Next Article in Journal
An Improved Bald Eagle Search Algorithm for Parameter Estimation of Different Photovoltaic Models
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling, Control, and Optimization of Multi-Generation and Hybrid Energy Systems
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Processes
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/pr9071126
processes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Iron Based Chitin Composite Films for Efficient Solar Seawater Desalination

by
Rumeng Zhang
1,†,
Xin Li
1,†,
Haiquan Xie
1,*,
Lunguang Yao
1,* and
Liqun Ye
2,*
1
Engineering Technology Research Center of Henan Province for Solar Catalysis, School of Life Science and Agricultural Engineering, Nanyang Normal University, Nanyang 473061, China
2
Key Laboratory of Inorganic Nonmetallic Crystalline and Energy Conversion Films, College of Films and Chemical Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally.
Processes 2021, 9(7), 1126; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071126
Submission received: 2 June 2021 / Revised: 17 June 2021 / Accepted: 20 June 2021 / Published: 29 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental and Green Processes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Seawater desalination provides a convenient method for the sustainable production of fresh water. However, the preparation of low-cost, high-efficiency solar absorbers remains a huge challenge. To this end, our research group designed and produced a cheap absorber—a membrane made of natural polymer chitin with black FeS and Fe3O4, respectively. Due to the hierarchical pore structure, excellent photothermal performance and good hydrophilicity of the film, their water evaporation rates reached 1.47 kg/m2/h and 1.55 kg/m2/h under one sunlight, respectively. Under about 10 suns, the highest desalination efficiency of FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin are 90% and 74%, respectively, and their salinities are also in line with the World Health Organization drinking water standards. These results indicate the potential of chitin-based nanomaterials as high-efficiency solar absorbers to produce fresh water.

1. Introduction

Water is the source of life. With the rapid development of society and the overuse of freshwater resources, many countries and regions are facing the problem of freshwater shortage. More than 70% of the earth’s surface is ocean; therefore, the extraction of fresh water from the ocean is a valuable technological method [1,2,3]. Traditional seawater desalination technology, however, has the disadvantages of high energy consumption, serious pollution and low efficiency. For example, the traditional desalination method mainly includes distillation, reverse osmosis membrane and multi-stage flash method. These methods are either at the cost of energy consumption or demanding for pretreatment of seawater. The most abundant energy source of solar energy will be a substitute for traditional fossil fuels and a low-carbon energy source, which will not aggravate global warming like fossil fuels. Therefore, solar seawater desalination technology came into being, and solar desalination is expected to solve the freshwater shortage crisis [4,5,6]. The membrane distillation technology using solar energy has the advantages of green, environmental protection and no non-renewable energy. The key to the high efficiency of solar seawater desalination lies in the selection of photothermal materials.
In recent years, the use of photothermal materials that can absorb solar radiation and convert solar energy into thermal energy has attracted wide attention [7,8,9,10]. Based on this, many scientific researchers are trying to develop a new type of light-to-heat conversion technology; that is, solar membrane distillation technology. It has a broad application prospect in solving the global shortage of fresh water resources. Recently, Zhang et al. prepared multifunctional textiles composed of Ag3PO4-rGO nanocomposite coated on a cotton fabric substrate with the water evaporation rate of 1.31 kg/m2/h under sunlight [11]. Wang et al. reported a general method for constructing photothermal layers on different substrates, which enhanced the interfacial water evaporation to 1.55 kg/m2/h through polypyrrole (PPy) polymerization and silver nanoparticle (Ag NPs) deposition [12]. Jun et al. prepared a polydopamine/hydroxyapatite based nanowire bilayer, showing a rate of 0.89 kg/m2/h [13]. Peng et al. designed an independent MOF based membrane with excellent photothermal properties. Under one sun, its evaporation rate reached 1.53 kg/m2/h [14]. However, the application of iron-based nanoparticles loaded on natural polymer chitin for solar-driven interfacial water evaporation is rarely reported.
FeS and Fe3O4 nanoparticles are widely used because of their advantages of good infrared photothermal effect, low toxicity, biocompatibility, low cost, easy processing and hydrophilicity [15,16,17]. Chitin is a common natural polymer material, which has been applied in practice because of its wide source, environmental benignness, excellent chemical stability, biocompatibility, and low toxicity [18,19,20]. Chitin can be used as materials in the adsorbent, antibacterial, catalytic technology, Fenton reaction and other aspects of extensive research. Because of its good biocompatibility and being non-toxic, it can also serve as a biological material. In this work, we conducted solar desalination experiments by loading the well-absorbed FeS and Fe3O4 onto chitin, respectively. The composite films showed high desalination efficiency. Under about 10 suns, the highest desalination efficiency of FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin are 90% and 74%, and the water evaporation rates reached 1.47 kg/m2/h and 1.55 kg/m2/h under one sunlight, respectively, and their salinities are also in line with the World Health Organization drinking water standards. The preparation method is easy to operate and can be used as a universal and scalable method to construct different photothermal materials on chitin substrates, demonstrating the potential application in the field of photothermal evaporation.

2. Experimental Part

2.1. Experimental Materials

Sea salt (Shanghai Guangyu Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), chitin (Golden-Shell Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China), FeS, Fe3O4, sodium hydroxide, sulfuric acid, urea, are analytical pure.

2.2. Experimental Process

2.2.1. Chitin Purification

100 g chitin was dispersed in 400 g NaOH (5 wt%) solution, stirred for 10 h, washed with distilled water to neutral, and filtered. Afterwards, the product was stirred in HCl (7 wt%) aqueous solution for 36 h to remove excess protein, washed with distilled water to neutral, and filtered. Then the collected chitin was dispersed in 400 g NaOH (5 wt%) aqueous solution, stirred for 10 h, washed with distilled water to neutral, and filtered. The sample was then bleached in sodium acetate (0.3 M) buffer solution containing sodium chlorite (1.7 wt%) at 80 ℃ for 6 h to remove the residual pigment, washed with distilled water to neutral, and filtered. After being dried, the purified chitin was stored in a dryer.

2.2.2. Dissolution of Chitin and Its Composites

7 g of the purified chitin was dispersed in 11 wt% NaOH- 4 wt% urea- 85 wt% H2O solutions and stirred for 15 min. FeS and Fe3O4 of different proportions were then added to the dispersion, respectively, and stirred for 1 h. The dispersion was then frozen in the refrigerator overnight, stirred and thawed at room temperature. After repeating the freeze-thaw process twice, the black FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin aqueous solution were obtained.

2.2.3. Preparation of Fe-Based Chitin Composite Films

A 0.5 cm thick liquid film was obtained by casting. FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin composite films were obtained by regenerating the films in H2SO4 (5 wt%) solution at 0 °C. Then the composite films were dialyzed in distilled water for 3 d to remove the excess alkali and urea. After being stripped and dried, the bright FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin composite films were obtained. By changing the concentration of FeS and Fe3O4, it is proved that a Fe base mass of 30 wt% can achieve the best desalination effect.

2.2.4. Artificial Seawater Preparation

A certain amount of sea salt was added to the container containing ultrapure water, then ultrasonically stirred. The appropriate amount of solution with 3.5 wt% was then obtained using a salinity meter.

2.2.5. Desalination Performance of FeS/Chitin and Fe3O4/Chitin Films

The composite film was put onto a tripod and moved into a solar reactor connected with a condensing equipment. Then a certain amount of seawater was added. After irradiated under 300 W xenon light, the tripod was weighed and the desalination efficiency was calculated.

2.3. Measurement

The morphology was analyzed via a Sigma Zeiss Field sweep surface electron microscope (FESEM) and an energy dispersive X ray spectrometer (EDS) was used to analyze the sample composition. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images were obtained by JEOL JEM-2100F (UHR) field emission TEM. X diffraction patterns (XRD) were recorded by a D8 Advance powder X diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). The surface area and N2 adsorption-desorption curves were obtained by N2 analyzer. The particle size distribution was obtained using a BJH model. Infrared spectrum (IR) was obtained on Nicolet iS5 fourier IR instruments after compressed by KBr. UV-vis diffuse reflectance (DRS) was obtained through the UV-vis Spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA, Lambda 850, BaSO4 as a reference) in the range of 200–1400 nm. The X-photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data was obtained by X ray photoelectron spectrometer (Thermo Escalab 250XI, Waltham, MA, USA). Thermal imaging images and real-time temperature monitoring were measured by infrared thermal imager (Sweden, FLIR, A300).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphology and Structure of Materials

Figure 1 shows SEM images of FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin films. As shown in Figure 1, FeS and Fe3O4 nanoparticles were grown on the chitin nanofibers. Seen from Figure 1a,b, the structure of chitin didn’t change in the composite films. The average size of the FeS is between 10–30 nm. Figure 1c,d displayed that Fe3O4 is hexahedron with the average size of about 100 nm. Nanoparticles are attached to the surface or pores of chitin fibers. Therefore, a composite membrane composed of chitin nanofibers and nanoparticles was successfully constructed using a simple green method. The synthesis of nanoparticles on nanofiber chitin is an important step to promote its wide application. Figure 1e,f are scanned images of pure chitin.

3.2. Fixation and Size Distribution of Nanoparticles on Chitin

Figure 2 shows the nitrogen adsorption isotherms and pore size distribution of chitin, FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin films. According to the nitrogen adsorption isotherm and pore size distribution data, the area, pore volume and pore size data of chitin, FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin composite films are shown in Table 1. Chitin still maintains its nanoporous structure after the deposition of FeS and Fe3O4. The main pore sizes of the samples are in the range of 10–150 nm, while the reduction of chitin surface area and pore volume may be due to the aggregation of nanoparticles.
TEM Figure (Figure 3) showed that the size of the nanoparticles is consistent with the SEM, and also verified the successful loading of nanoparticles on chitin. Figure 3a,b showed that the lattice fringe spacing was 0.256 nm and corresponded to the (210) crystal plane of FeS. Known from Figure 3e,f, the crystal plane spacing of 0.2916 nm corresponded to (422) crystal plane of Fe3O4, proving its hexagonal lattice. Meanwhile, the corresponding mapping diagram also confirmed the existence of FeS and Fe3O4.
XRD data can also verified the FeS, Fe3O4 fixation on the chitin matrix. The XRD spectra of the composite films and chitin were shown in Figure 4a. There were five peaks at 9.3°, 12.7°, 20.9°, 23.6°, 26.4° in the XRD spectra of chitin, corresponding to (020), (021), (120), (130) and (013) planes, confirming the typical antiparallel structural of chitin [21,22]. In addition to the five characteristic peaks of the chitin peak, the composite film all showed their own characteristic peaks. For FeS/chitin film, four additional peaks at 30.2°, 33.9°, 43.5° and 53.4° corresponded to (110), (112), (114), and (300) planes of FeS, indicating the regular hexagonal lattice of FeS nanoparticles [23]. Besides chitin and FeS, there are no other peaks in the diffraction pattern, indicating the successful loading of FeS on chitin. Fe3O4/chitin film exhibited characteristic peaks of Fe3O4 at 30.1°, 35.4°, 43.1°, 53.4°, 56.9° and 62.5°, corresponding to the (220), (311), (400), (422), (511) and (440) crystal planes, implying the hexagonal crystal structure of Fe3O4 (JCPDS 19-0629) [24]. Meanwhile, after loading the nanoparticles, the crystal structure of chitin in the composite remains unchanged. The UV-Vis-NIR DRS of chitin and composite films were shown in Figure 4b. As seen from the diagram, chitin had absorbance only in the ultraviolet region, while FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin showed strong absorption throughout the spectrum, the absorption intensity of FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin in the visible-infrared region is obviously improved, indicating that the addition of nanoparticles was beneficial to improve the efficiency of solar light absorption.

3.3. Interaction between FeS, Fe3O4 and Chitin

As mentioned above, FeS and Fe3O4 nanoparticles were firmly immobilized on chitin nanofibers. FT-IR and XPS were conducted to characterize the possible interactions between FeS, Fe3O4 and chitin. The IR spectra of samples were shown in Figure 4c. The strong absorption peak at 3430 cm−1 corresponded to the hydrogen bond and hydroxyl stretching vibration of chitin matrix [25,26]. Two typical peaks at 1670 cm−1 and 1580 cm−1 corresponded to the acetamide type I and II stretching vibration, respectively [27]. The absorption peak at 1070 cm−1 corresponded to C-O-C. Compared with FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin, chitin showed decreased intensity for hydroxyl groups, acetamide bond and O-C-O, indicating that FeS and Fe3O4 were successfully loaded on chitin.
Figure 5 showed the XPS spectra of chitin, FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin films. There are Fe and S in addition to the C, N, O the spectra for FeS/chitin. Figure 5a clearly show strong Fe 2p 3/2 and Fe 2p 1/2 peaks at 711.2 eV and 724.5 eV, respectively. The weak signal between the two major peaks may be due to the presence of iron oxide(Fe2O3). The peak at 164.0 eV in Figure 5b is attributed to S2− according to the standard spectrum [28,29]. Because S2− can be oxidized in the air, the peak at 168.5eV assigned to the SO32− were also observed [30]. The Fe2p XPS spectra (Fe3O4 nanoparticles) show two prominent peaks. The two peaks correspond to the Fe 2p3/2 and the Fe 2p1/2, respectively. Two peaks at 710.2 eV and 724.5 eV corresponded to Fe2+ and the peaks at 712.0 eV and 725.1 eV belonged to Fe3+, which is consistent with the spectra of the Fe3O4 reported in the literature [31]. There were two peaks at 714.9 eV and 727.5 eV, indicating the existence of small amount of Fe2O3 [31,32]. The C 1s spectra at 284.64 eV, 286.15 eV and 287.76 eV corresponded to C-C/C-H, C-O/C-N and C=O/O-C-O groups, respectively (Figure 5d) [33,34]. After loading FeS, the corresponding binding energies were 284.57 eV, 286.17 eV and 287.91 eV, respectively, while after the load of Fe3O4, the corresponding binding energies were 284.62 eV, 286.22 eV and 287.87 eV, indicating that there is no interaction between C and FeS nor Fe3O4. Three peaks of O 1s are located at 531.11 eV, 532.50 eV and 535.25 eV, corresponding to N-C=O, C-O-C and O-C-O, respectively (Figure 5f) [35,36,37]. After loading FeS, the corresponding binding energies were reduced to 531.07 eV, 532.57 eV and 535.15 eV. When Fe3O4 was loaded, the binding energies were 529.50 eV, 532.64 eV, 535.22 eV, indicating the interaction between O and FeS or Fe3O4. The N1s peak at 399.55 eV corresponded to acetamide groups [38], which increased to 399.69 eV after loading FeS and increased to 399.74 eV after the load of Fe3O4, indicating that there is also interaction between N and FeS or Fe3O4.
XPS results also confirmed the successful loading of FeS, Fe3O4 on the chitin. FT-IR analysis results are in consistent with XPS results, indicating that FeS, Fe3O4 interact with N (N-C=O) and O (O=C-N) through coordination bonds. It is highly probable that FeS, Fe3O4 were immobilized on chitin nanofibers by coordination with acetamide groups. Hence, the firm immobilization of nanoparticles onto chitin nanofibers can be attributed to the strong interaction between FeS, Fe3O4 nanoparticles and chitin.

3.4. Desalination Performance of Composite Films

The narrow band gap semiconductors FeS and Fe3O4 showed strong infrared absorption ability and were good photothermal conversion materials. Figure 6 showed the desalination performance of FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin films with different particle proportions. As shown in Figure 6a, under nearly 10 sunlight (9.84 kW/m2), the desalination efficiency was basically positive correlation linear to the ratio of FeS and Fe3O4 and reached the maximum when the the load of FeS or Fe3O4 was in the range of 30~40%. In addition, we also tested the solar evaporation performance under the sun (1 kW/m2), as shown in Figure 6b and also randomly tested the desalinated water (Table 2), agreeing with the domestic water standard. Figure 7 showed the thermal imagings of FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin composites with different proportions. Seen from the diagram, the temperature reached the maximum when the load of FeS or Fe3O4 in the range of 30~50%. Chitin film had a maximum temperature of 47.4 °C, in contrast to 63.48 °C for FeS/chitin film and 63.07 °C for Fe3O4/chitin film, probably because FeS and Fe3O4 can absorb a lot of infrared light and convert it into heat, thus improving utilization efficiency of the infrared ray. On the other hand, the structures of FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin composites are stable after applications (Figure S1). Therefore, it is of guiding significance for other solar catalytic materials to study solar desalination.
Remarks: Hygienic standards for drinking water: chloride (250 mg/L), sulfate (250 mg/L), nitrate (as N, 10 mg/L). FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin films with 40% loading were chosen for salinity test after water desalination.

4. Conclusions

FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin composite films were prepared by a series of purification and dissolution processes. By changing the concentration of FeS and Fe3O4, it has been proven that a Fe base mass of 30wt% can achieve the best desalination effect. Due to the hierarchical pore structure of the film, excellent photothermal performance and good hydrophilicity, their water evaporation rates under one sun reach 1.47 kg/m2/h and 1.55 kg/m2/h, respectively. Under about 10 suns, the highest desalination efficiencies of FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin are respectively 90% and 74%, and their salinity also meets the World Health Organization drinking water standards. These results indicate the potential of chitin-based nanomaterials as high-efficiency solar absorbers to produce fresh water. This work provides a green synthetic route for the construction of a mixture of natural polymers and black water-absorbing materials, and demonstrates its application potential in industrial seawater desalination.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pr9071126/s1, Figure S1: SEM images of FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin films after applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Y. (Liqun Ye); methodology, R.Z.; formal analysis, X.L.; investigation, R.Z.; data curation, X.L.; writing—original draft preparation, X.L.; writing—review and editing, R.Z. and L.Y. (Lunguang Yao); supervision, H.X.; funding acquisition, L.Y. (Liqun Ye). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51872147), the 111 Project (D20015), and the Program for Innovative Research Team of Science and Technology in the University of Henan Province (19IRTSTHN025).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Zhou, J.Q.; Li, L.; Fu, C.; Wang, J.; Fu, P.; Kong, C.P.; Bai, F.Q.; Eglitis, R.I.; Zhang, H.X.; Jia, R. A novel T-C3N and seawater desalination. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 5055–5066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Andres-Manas, J.A.; Roca, L.; Ruiz-Aguirre, A.; Acien, F.G.; Gil, J.D.; Zaragoza, G. Application of solar energy to seawater desalination in a pilot system based on vacuum multi-effect membrane distillation. Appl. Energy 2020, 258, 114068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Wang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Wei, Q.; Li, W.; Chen, F. Enhanced Desalination Performance of a Flow-Electrode Capacitive Deionization System by Adding Vanadium Redox Couples and Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 1234–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, Q.; Zhao, X.; Li, L.; Hu, T.; Zhang, J. Facile preparation of polydimethylsiloxane/carbon nanotubes modified melamine solar evaporators for efficient steam generation and desalination. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 584, 602–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Elbar, A.R.A.; Hassan, H. Enhancement of hybrid solar desalination system composed of solar panel and solar still by using porous material and saline water preheating. Sol. Energy 2020, 204, 382–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Haddad, A.Z.; Menon, A.K.; Kang, H.; Urban, J.J.; Prasher, R.S.; Kostecki, R. Solar Desalination Using Thermally Responsive Ionic Liquids Regenerated with a Photonic Heater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 3260–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Du, X.; Qiu, J.; Deng, S.; Du, Z.; Cheng, X.; Wang, H. Flame-retardant and solid-solid phase change composites based on dopamine-decorated BP nanosheets/Polyurethane for efficient solar-to-thermal energy storage. Renew. Energ. 2021, 164, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xiong, F.; Yuan, K.; Aftab, W.; Jiang, H.; Zou, R. Copper Sulfide Nanodisk-Doped Solid–Solid Phase Change Materials for Full Spectrum Solar-Thermal Energy Harvesting and Storage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 1377–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Z.; Cai, W.; Wang, X.; Hu, Y.; Gui, Z. Self-floating black phosphorous nanosheets as a carry-on solar vapor generator. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 582, 196–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rafique, M.M.; Nathan, G.; Saw, W. A mathematical model to assess the influence of transients on a refractory-lined solar receiver. Renew. Energ. 2021, 167, 217–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Noureen, L.; Xie, Z.; Gao, Y.; Li, M.; Zhu, J. Multifunctional Ag3PO4-rGO Coated Textiles for Clean Water Production by Solar-Driven Evaporation, Photocatalysis, and Disinfection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 6343–6350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, Y.; Ma, J.X.; Han, Y.; Xu, H.B.; Wang, Y.; Qi, D.P.; Wang, W. A simple and universal strategy to deposit Ag/polypyrrole on various substrates for enhanced interfacial solar evaporation and antibacterial activity. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 384, 123379.1–123379.31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cao, S.S.; Wu, X.H.; Zhu, Y.G.; Gupta, R.; Tan, A.; Wang, Z.Y.; Jun, Y.S.; Singamaneni, S. Polydopamine/hydroxyapatite nanowire-based bilayered membrane for photothermal-driven membrane distillation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 5147–5156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ma, X.; Deng, Z.; Li, Z.Y.; Chen, D.K.; Wan, X.Y.; Peng, X.S. A photothermal and Fenton active MOF-based membrane for high-efficiency solar water evaporation and clean water production. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 22728–22735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Miao, X.; Li, H.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Lei, Z. Monodispersed FeS nanoparticles confined in 3D interconnected carbon nanosheets network as an anode for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 12139–12150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, M.; Zhang, S.; Sun, L.; Li, X.; Wang, Z. One-step synthesis of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole functionalized magnetic Fe3O4 and its application for the removal of heavy metals. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. E. 2020, 113, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bag, J.; Mukherjee, S.; Ghosh, S.K.; Das, A.; Mishra, M. Fe3O4 coated guargum nanoparticles as non-genotoxic materials for biological application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Khayrova, A.; Lopatin, S.; Varlamov, V. Obtaining chitin, chitosan and their melanin complexes from insects. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 167, 1319–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Jia, X.; Rajib, M.R.; Yin, H. Recognition Pattern, Functional Mechanism and Application of chitin and Chitosan Oligosaccharides in Sustainable Agriculture. Curr. Pharm. Design 2020, 26, 3508–3521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lizundia, E.; Nguyen, T.D.; Winnick, R.J.; Maclachlan, M.J. Biomimetic photonic materials derived from chitin and chitosan. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 796–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ding, F.Y.; Shi, X.W.; Jiang, Z.W.; Liu, L.; Cai, J.; Li, Z.Y.; Chen, S.; Du, Y.M. Electrochemically stimulated drug release from dual stimuli responsive chitin hydrogel. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 1729–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ifuku, S.; Morooka, S.; Morimoto, M.; Saimoto, H. Acetylation of chitin nanofibers and their transparent nanocomposite films. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 1326–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shangguan, E.; Li, F.; Li, J.; Chang, Z.; Li, Q.; Yuan, X.Z.; Wang, H. FeS/C composite as high-performance anode material for alkaline nickel-iron rechargeable batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 291, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Y.; Yang, P.; Li, Q.; Liu, Y.; Yin, J. Preparation of FeS@Fe3O4 core–shell magnetic nanoparticles and their application in uranyl ions removal from aqueous solution. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Ch. 2019, 321, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Franco, D.L.; Afonso, A.S.; Vieira, S.N.; Ferreira, L.F.; Gonqalves, R.A.; Brito-Madurro, A.G.; Madurro, J.M. Electropolymerization of 3-aminophenol on carbon graphite surface, Electric and morphologic properties. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2008, 107, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bottoni, U.; Tiriolo, R.; Pullano, S.A. Infrared Saliva Analysis of Psoriatic and Diabetic Patients, Similarities in Protein Components. IEEE T. Bio. Med. Eng. 2016, 63, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Guo, L.; Duan, B.; Zhang, L.N. Construction of controllable size silver nanoparticles immobilized on nanofibers of chitin microspheres via green pathway. Nano Res. 2016, 9, 2149–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pratt, A.R.; Muir, I.J.; Nesbitt, H.W. X-ray photoelectron and Auger electron spectroscopic studies of pyrrhotite and mechanism of air oxidation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1994, 58, 827–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Thomas, J.E.; Skinner, W.M.; Smart, R.S.T.C. A comparison of the dissolution behavior of troilite with other iron(II) sulfides; implications of structure. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2003, 67, 831–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Geng, H.; Zhu, L.; Li, W.; Liu, H.; Quan, L.; Xi, F.; Su, X. FeS/nickel foam as stable and efficient counter electrode material for quantum dot sensitized solar cells. J. Power Sources 2015, 281, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, W.; Tang, B.; Ju, B.; Gao, Z.; Xiu, J.; Zhang, S. Fe3O4-functionalized graphene nanosheet embedded phase change material composites, efficient magnetic- and sunlight-driven energy conversion and storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 958–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, W.P.; Chen, Y.Q.; Yao, L.; Ren, X.Z.; Li, Y.L.; Deng, L.B. Fe3O4 /PVDF-HFP photothermal membrane with in-situ heating for sustainable, stable and efficient pilot-scale solar-driven membrane distillation. Desalination 2020, 478, 114288.1–114288.10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kangwansupamonkon, W.; Tiewtrakoonwat, W.; Supaphol, P.; Kiatkamjornwong, S. Surface modification of electrospun chitosan nanofibrous mats for antibacterial activity. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 8558–8572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pradal, C.; Kithva, P.; Martin, D.; Trau, M.; Grndahl, L. Improvement of the wet tensile properties of nanostructured hydroxyapatite and chitosan biocomposite films through hydrophobic modification. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 2330–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Roy, P.S.; Samanta, A.; Mukherjee, M.; Roy, B.; Mukherjee, A. Designing Novel pH-Induced Chitosan–Gum Odina Complex Coacervates for Colon Targeting. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 15728–15745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zuo, X.J. Preparation and Evaluation of Novel Thiourea/Chitosan Composite Beads for Copper(II) Removal in Aqueous Solutions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 1249–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, W.; Wang, W.; Pan, B.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Lv, L. Facile fabrication of magnetic chitosan beads of fast kinetics and high capacity for copper removal. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 3421–3426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bratskaya, S.; Marinin, D.; Simon, F.; Synytska, A.; Zschoche, S.; Busscher, H.J.; Jager, D.; Van, d.M.H.C. Adhesion and viability of two enterococcal strains on covalently grafted chitosan and chitosan/kappa-carrageenan multilayers. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 2960–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Processes 09 01126 g001 550
Figure 1. SEM image of iron-based/chitin composite membrane material ((a,b), FeS/chitin; (c,d), Fe3O4/chitin; (e,f) pure chitin).
Figure 1. SEM image of iron-based/chitin composite membrane material ((a,b), FeS/chitin; (c,d), Fe3O4/chitin; (e,f) pure chitin).
Processes 09 01126 g001
Processes 09 01126 g002 550
Figure 2. Nitrogen adsorption−desorption isotherms (a) and pore distribution (b) of chitin and iron-based/chitin composite membranes.
Figure 2. Nitrogen adsorption−desorption isotherms (a) and pore distribution (b) of chitin and iron-based/chitin composite membranes.
Processes 09 01126 g002
Processes 09 01126 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) TEM and (b) HRTEM of FeS/chitin composite film; (c,d) FeS/chitin composite film mapping; (e) TEM and (f) HRTEM of Fe3O4/chitin composite film; (g,h) Fe3O4/chitin composite film mapping.
Figure 3. (a) TEM and (b) HRTEM of FeS/chitin composite film; (c,d) FeS/chitin composite film mapping; (e) TEM and (f) HRTEM of Fe3O4/chitin composite film; (g,h) Fe3O4/chitin composite film mapping.
Processes 09 01126 g003
Processes 09 01126 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) XRD, (b) UV−Vis−NIR DRS and (c) FT−IR spectra of chitin, FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin films.
Figure 4. (a) XRD, (b) UV−Vis−NIR DRS and (c) FT−IR spectra of chitin, FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin films.
Processes 09 01126 g004
Processes 09 01126 g005 550
Figure 5. Photoelectron spectra of chitin and Fe/chitin (a) Fe 2p; (b) S 2p; (c) Fe 2p; (d) C1s; (e) N1s; (f) O1s.
Figure 5. Photoelectron spectra of chitin and Fe/chitin (a) Fe 2p; (b) S 2p; (c) Fe 2p; (d) C1s; (e) N1s; (f) O1s.
Processes 09 01126 g005
Processes 09 01126 g006 550
Figure 6. The desalination efficiency of blank, chitin, FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin films (a) and a graph of evaporation performance under the sun (b).
Figure 6. The desalination efficiency of blank, chitin, FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin films (a) and a graph of evaporation performance under the sun (b).
Processes 09 01126 g006
Processes 09 01126 g007 550
Figure 7. Thermal imaging of chitin and FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin with different loading ratios: (a) maximum temperature of chitin, (b) FeS/chitin and (c) Fe3O4/chitin. Linear diagram of (d) FeS/chitin and (e) Fe3O4/chitin.
Figure 7. Thermal imaging of chitin and FeS/chitin and Fe3O4/chitin with different loading ratios: (a) maximum temperature of chitin, (b) FeS/chitin and (c) Fe3O4/chitin. Linear diagram of (d) FeS/chitin and (e) Fe3O4/chitin.
Processes 09 01126 g007
Table
Table 1. Surface properties of Chitin and Fe/Composite membrane.
Table 1. Surface properties of Chitin and Fe/Composite membrane.
SampleSurface Area
(m2·g−1)		Pore Volume
(cm3·g−1)		Pore Size (nm)
Chitin149.8601.30517.388
FeS/Chitin120.5600.95417.408
Fe3O4/Chitin80.3750.66817.442
Table
Table 2. Desalinated water salinity results.
Table 2. Desalinated water salinity results.
SampleClNO2/NO3SO4
Seawater144958194605
FeS/Chitin5.4604.060/1.904.153
Fe3O4/Chitin7.3294.097/0.1810.765
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, R.; Li, X.; Xie, H.; Yao, L.; Ye, L. Iron Based Chitin Composite Films for Efficient Solar Seawater Desalination. Processes 2021, 9, 1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071126

AMA Style

Zhang R, Li X, Xie H, Yao L, Ye L. Iron Based Chitin Composite Films for Efficient Solar Seawater Desalination. Processes. 2021; 9(7):1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071126

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Rumeng, Xin Li, Haiquan Xie, Lunguang Yao, and Liqun Ye. 2021. "Iron Based Chitin Composite Films for Efficient Solar Seawater Desalination" Processes 9, no. 7: 1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071126

APA Style

Zhang, R., Li, X., Xie, H., Yao, L., & Ye, L. (2021). Iron Based Chitin Composite Films for Efficient Solar Seawater Desalination. Processes, 9(7), 1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071126

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop