Simulated LCSLM with Inducible Diffractive Theory to Display Super-Gaussian Arrays Applying the Transport-of-Intensity Equation
, Bolivia Cuevas-Otahola 2,*, Jacobo Oliveros-Oliveros 1, MarÃa MorÃn-Castillo 3, Ygnacio MartÃnez-Laguna 4 and Lilia Cedillo-RamÃrez 4
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
1. The purpose of this study is not clear, please clarify.
2. nm in lines 84 and 159, and m in line 167 should be solid.
3. Please explain why a is 6 microns in line 86. please state if the SLM fill factor is involved.
4. Please check if equation 7 is correct. I think it is different from the supplement file. Also, I1,h should be written.
5. After equation 17, please state that r is omitted.
6. Please elaborate on how to get two intensities for the TIE. In addition, line 166 does not mention how to scan the camera in the z-direction.
7. In the experiment setup, there is a mention of RR, but it is not in Figure 3. Please elaborate on this.
8. It would be more helpful to explain the difference between Gaussian and Super Gaussian using gamma.
9. Is equation 19 one-dimensional? I think it should be two-dimensional.
10. You should explain why you set gamma to 80.
11. The paper does not state the need for RR. First, RR is unnecessary in the general TIE method, so an explanation is needed. Especially, the principle of ref. 25 should be written in the section of the explanation of the TIE.
12. The year of reference 25 is different. Please check.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
The changes made by the authors to the article completely suit me. But I still think that it is necessary to delete the 2x2, 3x3, 4x4 cases and Figure 2. After making these changes, I would recommend the article for publication in the journal.
Author Response
We thank the reviewer for the comments. We have removed the complete section 3 (which contained the 2x2, 3x3, and 4x4 cases). We included a short sub-section (2.1), with the same name as the previous section 3 (“LCD validation”). Following the reviewer's comment, we kept only the equations corresponding to the NxN case and referred to the Supplementary Material. We included a short text in subsection 2.1, only with relevant information, and we highlighted it in the revised version. We have also removed Figures 1 and 2.
Reviewer 2 Report
I will answer your comment.
In my opinion, I agree with another reviewer's opinion.
Author Response
We thank the reviewer for the comments. We have removed the complete section 3 (which contained the 2x2, 3x3, and 4x4 cases). We included a short sub-section (2.1), with the same name as the previous section 3 (“LCD validation”). Following the reviewer's comment, we kept only the equations corresponding to the NxN case and referred to the Supplementary Material. We included a short text in subsection 2.1, only with relevant information, and we highlighted it in the revised version. We have also removed Figures 1 and 2.
