Next Article in Journal
Pulse Width Control Based on Blumlein Pulse Forming Line and SI-GaAs PCSS
Previous Article in Journal
Combined Optical Fiber Transmission System Based on QNSC and BER-LM
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Robust Pulse-Pumped Quadratic Soliton Assisted by Third-Order Nonlinearity

1
Key Laboratory of Weak-Light Nonlinear Photonics, School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
2
National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
3
Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2023, 10(2), 155; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10020155
Submission received: 24 December 2022 / Revised: 19 January 2023 / Accepted: 31 January 2023 / Published: 2 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fundamentals and Applications of Optical Frequency Combs)

Abstract

:
The generation of a quadratic soliton in a pulse-pumped microresonator has attracted significant interest in recent years. The strong second-order nonlinearity and high peak power of pumps offer a straightforward way to increase efficiency. In this case, the influence of the third-order nonlinearity effect becomes significant and cannot be ignored. In this paper, we study the quadratic soliton in a degenerate optical parametric oscillator driven synchronously by the pulse pump with third-order nonlinearity. Our simulations verify that the robustness of quadratic soliton generation is enhanced when the system experiences a perturbation from pump power, cavity detuning, and pump pulse width. These results represent a new way of manipulating frequency comb in resonant microphotonic structures.

1. Introduction

Optical frequency combs based on microresonators represent a fast-growing research field that has developed in the last decade, as they can ultimately reduce the size, weight, and power consumption of conventional frequency comb systems [1,2,3]. They are routinely used in a wide range of scientific and technological applications, such as high-speed optical communication [4,5], time-frequency metrology [6,7,8], astronomical spectral calibration [9,10], and spectrometry [11,12,13]. In the past decade, Kerr-based frequency combs where a χ ( 3 ) nonlinear resonator is coherently driven by a continuous-wave (cw) laser to excite temporal solitons has been extensively studied [14,15]. However, due to the relatively low strength of third-order nonlinearity, the generation of Kerr combs requires high pump power and the comb forms around the cw pump wavelength. In addition, the pump frequency must be close to the zero-dispersion point for the ideal phase-matching of effective four-wave mixing (FWM), which limits the wavelength range of the comb. These issues can be improved by operating with quadratic nonlinearity, which potentially offer lower pump power thresholds [16] and permit the direct generation of combs in spectral regions where the generation of conventional Kerr combs is difficult to achieve [17,18]. Another route to alleviate these issues is to use a pulse-pump driven arrangement [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The soliton can be generated by a periodic pulse pump instead of the continuous pump with higher pump-to-soliton conversion efficiency due to a significantly higher peak power [19,20,21,25,27,28]. Thus, soliton generation in the pulse-pumped quadratic nonlinear resonator is a viable route to realize highly efficient and widely tunable broadband frequency combs.
Recently, walk-off-induced temporal soliton in a degenerate optical parametric oscillator (DOPO) driven synchronously by the pulse pump with a temporal width of several picosecond based on pure quadratic nonlinearity has been demonstrated [26]. However, in general, quadratic nonlinear resonators also contain third-order nonlinearity. Compared with the second-order system, the participation of third-order nonlinearity can affect the comb-mode-locking behaviors by self and cross phase modulation (SPM and XPM), resulting in complex dynamics that are far from well-understood. In this paper, we numerically investigate the quadratic soliton generation in the DOPO driven synchronously by the pulse pump with the participation of the χ ( 3 ) nonlinear effect. Compared to the pure χ ( 2 ) system, the robustness of quadratic soliton generation is enhanced, benefiting from the χ ( 3 ) nonlinear effect when the system experiences a perturbation from pump power, cavity detuning and pump pulse width. Our results provide a new way to control the quadratic soliton.

2. Theory and Simulation Results

Figure 1 shows a schematic of the DOPO system, which is driven synchronously by a pulse with a temporal width of several picoseconds. The nonlinear parametric interactions between pump at fundamental frequency and signal at half-harmonic frequency take place in a periodically poled lithium niobite (PPLN) waveguide. The cavity is composed of polarization-maintaining fibers and free-space to ensure that the pump repetition rate is approximately close to multiples of the cavity free spectral range. We consider slowly varying electric field envelopes A and B with their carrier frequencies ω 0 and 2 ω 0 , respectively [29,30,31], which obey the coupled equations in the DOPO with both quadratic and cubic nonlinearity [32]:
A z = α s 2 i k s 2 2 τ 2 A + i κ B A * e i Δ k z + i γ 1 | A | 2 A + i 2 γ 12 | B | 2 A ,
B z = α p 2 Δ k τ i k p 2 2 τ 2 B + i κ A 2 e i Δ k z + i γ 2 | B | 2 B + i 2 γ 21 | A | 2 B .
The dynamics of the signal outside the waveguide are obtained as follows (the pump is non-resonant, no feedback contribution) [26]:
A m + 1 0 , τ = Γ 1 1 G 0 e i φ Γ A m L , τ ,
where A and B are the signal and pump field envelope, respectively, z is the longitudinal coordinate, α s , p is the propagation losses, Δ k is the wave–vector mismatch, Δ k is the group velocity mismatch, k s , p is the group-velocity dispersion (GVD) coefficient, τ is a fast time variable in a reference frame moving at the group velocity of the signal field frequency ω 0 , L is the length of the PPLN waveguide, m is an integer representing the mth roundtrip. ( 1 G 0 1 ) is the roundtrip cavity loss (including the out-coupling loss and propagation loss). The coupling phase shift is φ = Δ φ + l ω λ s / 2 c + φ 2 ω 2 / 2 , where Δ φ = π l is the cavity detuning, with parameter l changed in integers results in the cavity being detuned by λ s / 2 , φ 2 represents the cavity GVD contribution. Γ and Γ 1 represents= Fourier transform and inverse Fourier transform. γ 1 and γ 2 are the nonlinear coefficients of self-phase modulation, γ 12 and γ 21 are the cross-phase modulation coefficients and γ 1 = γ 12 = 2 π n 3 / λ s A e f f , γ 2 = γ 21 = 2 π n 3 / λ p A e f f , where n 3 is the nonlinear index, λ s , p is the wavelength of signal and pump field, A e f f is the effective mode area. The normalized second-order nonlinear coupling coefficient is κ = 2 ω 0 d e f f / ( A e f f c 3 n s 2 n p ϵ 0 ) , where d e f f is the effective second-order nonlinear coefficient, c is the speed of light, ϵ 0 is the vacuum permittivity and n s , p are the linear refractive indices. High-order dispersion and nonlinearity are neglected for simplicity and we assume there is a flat-top pump profile.
We solve the coupled-wave equations, Equations (1) and (2), by using the split-step Fourier method and fourth-order Runge-Kutta method with the following physical parameters: L = 40 mm, α s = 30 dB/m, α p = 30 dB/m, k s = 112 fs 2 /mm, k p = 406 fs 2 /mm, κ = 17 W 1 / 2 m 1 , Δ k = 329 ps/m, G 0 = 7.9, φ 2 = −21.6 fs 2 /mm, and the width of pump pulse t p = 14 ps. Our simulations, with noise, are iterated for two thousand roundtrips, until a stable soliton is formed, which is similar to the method commonly used for the excitation of cavity soliton in Kerr resonators [33]. For comparison, we first consider the case of pure χ ( 2 ) nonlinearity by setting γ 1 = γ 2 = γ 12 = γ 21 = 0 with the quasi-phase-matched condition Δ k = 0 . As the pump energy continues to enter the cavity, the OPO oscillation threshold occurs when the parametric gain overcomes the loss, and the quadratic soliton is formed. Figure 2a–c show the dynamics of the soliton generation under pure χ ( 2 ) nonlinear interaction for the different peak powers of the pump. Figure 2a shows the evolution of the intracavity power of signal field A and there is a stable state when the pump peak power is 14 W and 15 W. The temporal envelopes and frequency spectra of the last round of the intracavity signal field A are shown in Figure 2b and c, respectively. For the stable state, the corresponding temporal envelopes are single soliton and the spectra are smooth sech 2 profiles. The inner cavity power becomes unstable when the pump power increases to 16 W. The quadratic soliton with a pulse pump is formed under the condition of timing balance, which is determined by the collective interplay between linear cavity detuning, gain saturation and gain clipping. Higher pump power will induce increases temporal width of the gain-clipping region, which breaks this timing balance and results in an unstable state.
Then, we add third-order nonlinearity χ ( 3 ) by setting γ 1 = γ 12 = 0.66 W 1 m 1 , γ 2 = γ 21 = 1.32 W 1 m 1 to simulate the waveform inner cavity evolutionary processes using the same parameters mentioned. Figure 2d–f show the evolution of the inner cavity power and the corresponding time and frequency domain profiles, respectively. The phase modulation from χ ( 3 ) nonlinearity influences the χ ( 2 ) nonlinear conversion efficiency, which leads to a higher OPO threshold. The quadratic soliton is also formed for a higher pump peak power of 16 W because the gain saturation and clippings are alleviated and the timing balance is maintained. It is obvious that χ ( 3 ) nonlinearity can make the quadratic soliton more stable and enhance the robustness when it experience the pump power fluctuation, although the χ ( 3 ) effect reduces the OPO conversion efficiency.
Cavity detuning is an important factor affecting the generation of quadratic soliton, because it causes a timing mismatch from exact synchrony with the pump repetition rate. The drift induced by large detuning is counterbalanced by the combined effect of gain saturation and gain-clipping. Figure 3a shows the evolution of the intracavity power of the signal field A with pure χ ( 2 ) nonlinear interaction for different detuning parameter l. The larger cavity detuning is, the more unstable intracavity energy is. For l = 10 , the spectrum profile has two-peaks and the relative phases between comb lines are not a constant, which means the mode-locking state is not reached, as shown in Figure 3c. By setting γ 1 = γ 12 = 0.66 W 1 m 1 , γ 2 = γ 21 = 1.32 W 1 m 1 , the intracavity power becomes stable under the combined action of the χ ( 2 ) and χ ( 3 ) nonlinearity, even the cavity detuning l increases to 10 (Figure 3b). The spectrum also maintains a smooth sech 2 profile and the relative phases are constant, as shown in Figure 3d. This phenomenon shows that the χ ( 3 ) effect can not only modulate the relative phase of OPO comb lines, but also alleviate the drift caused by cavity detuning, which will benefit the timing balance situation. In practice, cavity detuning is easily interfered with by various factors; the χ ( 3 ) effect will help the system to maintain the stable pulse output in the case of large cavity detuning, which reduces the difficulty of experimental operation.
In addition, the generation of the quadratic soliton is sensitive to the pump pulse width due to the walk-off effect. If the pump pulse width is smaller, part of the crystal is not utilized and only provides dispersion. For the larger pulse width, multiple solitons will be generated. As shown in Figure 4a,b, a single soliton and a smooth sech 2 spectrum can be obtained for a pump pulse-width of 12 ps. The generated soliton broadens and the corresponding spectrum has sidebands with increased pump pulse width. However, by setting γ 1 = γ 12 = 0.66 W 1 m 1 , γ 2 = γ 21 = 1.32 W 1 m 1 , the single soliton and smooth sech 2 spectrum can be generated, even when the pump puls -width increases to 14 ps, as shown in Figure 4c,d. This indicates that the χ ( 3 ) effect alleviates the sensitivity to the pump pulse width of quadratic soliton, which reduces the requirement of experimental conditions.
To illustrate the role played by the value of χ ( 3 ) nonlinearity, we investigate the intracavity dynamics with varied χ ( 3 ) . Figure 5 shows the temporal and spectral profiles with χ ( 3 ) coefficient γ 1 increases from 0 to 0.5 W 1 m 1 for the pump pulse-width of 16 ps. As shown in Figure 5a, the output pulse changes from a two peaks profile to single soliton as the χ ( 3 ) increases. The corresponding frequency spectra (Figure 5b) exhibit variations from the two peaks profile to smooth the sech 2 profile. It is obvious that χ ( 3 ) nonlinearity helps to realize the mode-locking state compare to the pure χ ( 2 ) case.

3. Discussion and Summary

In this paper, we theoretically study quadratic soliton generation in DOPO, driven synchronously by the pulse pump with participation of the χ ( 3 ) nonlinear effect.For applications of the frequency comb, it is key to realize and maintain the mode locking between comb lines, namely single soliton generation. In our work, the strong second-order nonlinearity and high peak power of the pump offer a straightforward way to increase the efficiency of comb generation.In this case, the influence of the third-order nonlinearity effect becomes significant and cannot be ignored. In general, third-order nonlinearity is considered as a disadvantage factor to the quadratic soliton. We show for the first time that third-order nonlinearity can enhance the robustness of quadratic soliton generation when its synchronization experiences perturbations from pump energy, cavity detuning and pump pulse width.
Third-order nonlinearity can help in maintaining the stable single quadratic soliton, although it will affect the efficiency through phase matching. In practice, stability is essential for the comb system when it comes to application. The presence of third order nonlinearity can enhance the stability of this system and relax the fabrication requirements, paving the way to compact system integration. The microcomb will be used as a seed source and its output power can be increased by using the optical amplifier. We expect that our results will be useful for understanding the dynamics of nonlinear processes in pulse-pumped quadratic resonators and in the application of on-chip quadratic solitons integrated with the nanophotonic platform [34,35]. In addition, combined χ ( 2 ) and χ ( 3 ) effects provide a unique opportunity for quadratic soliton generation at the mid-infrared spectral range that may lead to the significant enhancement of the precision measurements and optical signal processing.

Author Contributions

K.W. performed the theoretical simulations and analyzed the data. K.W., Y.L. and H.W. wrote the manuscript. Y.L. and H.W. planned and supervised the project. All authors discussed the results. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported financially by the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFA0705000, 2019YFA0308700, 2020YFA0309500), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12234009, 12074197, 12074196, 11922406). The authors would like to thank the Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics for the support provided.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chang, L.; Liu, S.; Bowers, J.E. Integrated optical frequency comb technologies. Nat. Photonics 2022, 16, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gaeta, A.L.; Lipson, M.; Kippenberg, T.J. Photonic-chip-based frequency combs. Nat. Photonics 2019, 13, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kippenberg, T.J.; Gaeta, A.L.; Lipson, M.; Gorodetsky, M.L. Dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microresonators. Science 2018, 361, eaan8083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Marin-Palomo, P.; Kemal, J.N.; Karpov, M.; Kordts, A.; Pfeifle, J.; Pfeiffer, M.H.; Trocha, P.; Wolf, S.; Brasch, V.; Anderson, M.H.; et al. Microresonator-based solitons for massively parallel coherent optical communications. Nature 2017, 546, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pfeifle, J.; Brasch, V.; Lauermann, M.; Yu, Y.; Wegner, D.; Herr, T.; Hartinger, K.; Schindler, P.; Li, J.; Hillerkuss, D.; et al. Coherent terabit communications with microresonator Kerr frequency combs. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ye, J.; Schnatz, H.; Hollberg, L.W. Optical frequency combs: From frequency metrology to optical phase control. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2003, 9, 1041–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Collaboration, B.A.C.O.N.B. Frequency ratio measurements at 18-digit accuracy using an optical clock network. Nature 2021, 591, 564–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Papp, S.B.; Beha, K.; Del’Haye, P.; Quinlan, F.; Lee, H.; Vahala, K.J.; Diddams, S.A. Microresonator frequency comb optical clock. Optica 2014, 1, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Suh, M.G.; Yi, X.; Lai, Y.H.; Leifer, S.; Grudinin, I.S.; Vasisht, G.; Martin, E.C.; Fitzgerald, M.P.; Doppmann, G.; Wang, J.; et al. Searching for exoplanets using a microresonator astrocomb. Nat. Photonics 2019, 13, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Obrzud, E.; Rainer, M.; Harutyunyan, A.; Anderson, M.H.; Liu, J.; Geiselmann, M.; Chazelas, B.; Kundermann, S.; Lecomte, S.; Cecconi, M.; et al. A microphotonic astrocomb. Nat. Photonics 2019, 13, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Suh, M.G.; Yang, Q.F.; Yang, K.Y.; Yi, X.; Vahala, K.J. Microresonator soliton dual-comb spectroscopy. Science 2016, 354, 600–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Coddington, I.; Newbury, N.; Swann, W. Dual-comb spectroscopy. Optica 2016, 3, 414–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yu, M.; Okawachi, Y.; Griffith, A.G.; Picqué, N.; Lipson, M.; Gaeta, A.L. Silicon-chip-based mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Herr, T.; Hartinger, K.; Riemensberger, J.; Wang, C.; Gavartin, E.; Holzwarth, R.; Gorodetsky, M.; Kippenberg, T. Universal formation dynamics and noise of Kerr-frequency combs in microresonators. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 480–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Herr, T.; Brasch, V.; Jost, J.D.; Wang, C.Y.; Kondratiev, N.M.; Gorodetsky, M.L.; Kippenberg, T.J. Temporal solitons in optical microresonators. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Szabados, J.; Sturman, B.; Breunig, I. Frequency comb generation threshold via second-harmonic excitation in χ (2) optical microresonators. APL Photonics 2020, 5, 116102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Herr, S.J.; Brasch, V.; Szabados, J.; Obrzud, E.; Jia, Y.; Lecomte, S.; Buse, K.; Breunig, I.; Herr, T. Frequency comb up- and down-conversion in synchronously driven χ(2) optical microresonators. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 5745–5748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nie, M.; Huang, S.W. Quadratic Solitons in Singly Resonant Degenerate Optical Parametric Oscillators. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2020, 13, 044046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, J.; Bao, C.; Ji, Q.X.; Wang, H.; Wu, L.; Leifer, S.; Beichman, C.; Vahala, K. Efficiency of pulse pumped soliton microcombs. Optica 2022, 9, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Obrzud, E.; Lecomte, S.; Herr, T. Temporal solitons in microresonators driven by optical pulses. Nat. Photonics 2017, 11, 600–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Anderson, M.H.; Bouchand, R.; Liu, J.; Weng, W.; Obrzud, E.; Herr, T.; Kippenberg, T.J. Photonic chip-based resonant supercontinuum via pulse-driven Kerr microresonator solitons. Optica 2021, 8, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brasch, V.; Obrzud, E.; Lecomte, S.; Herr, T. Nonlinear filtering of an optical pulse train using dissipative Kerr solitons. Optica 2019, 6, 1386–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Weng, W.; Kaszubowska-Anandarajah, A.; He, J.; Lakshmijayasimha, P.D.; Lucas, E.; Liu, J.; Anandarajah, P.M.; Kippenberg, T.J. Gain-switched semiconductor laser driven soliton microcombs. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Nielsen, A.; Hendry, I.; Coen, S.; Erkintalo, M.; Ma, H.; Murdoch, S.G. Harmonic and rational harmonic driving of microresonator soliton frequency combs. Optica 2020, 7, 940–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Diddams, S.A.; Vahala, K.; Udem, T. Optical frequency combs: Coherently uniting the electromagnetic spectrum. Science 2020, 369, eaay3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Roy, A.; Nehra, R.; Jahani, S.; Ledezma, L.; Langrock, C.; Fejer, M.; Marandi, A. Temporal walk-off induced dissipative quadratic solitons. Nat. Photonics 2022, 16, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, X.; Huang, X.; Chen, E.; Zhou, Y.; Han, Y. Dissipative-soliton-resonance and evolution in an all-normal dispersion Er-doped fiber laser. Opt. Laser Technol. 2022, 156, 108592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, W.; Hu, X.; Gao, C.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Z.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; et al. Numerical investigation of soliton molecules with variable separation in passively mode-locked fiber lasers. Opt. Commun. 2012, 285, 1356–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hansson, T.; Leo, F.; Erkintalo, M.; Coen, S.; Ricciardi, I.; De Rosa, M.; Wabnitz, S. Singly resonant second-harmonic-generation frequency combs. Phys. Rev. A 2017, 95, 013805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Leo, F.; Hansson, T.; Ricciardi, I.; De Rosa, M.; Coen, S.; Wabnitz, S.; Erkintalo, M. Walk-Off-Induced Modulation Instability, Temporal Pattern Formation, and Frequency Comb Generation in Cavity-Enhanced Second-Harmonic Generation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 033901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Mosca, S.; Parisi, M.; Ricciardi, I.; Leo, F.; Hansson, T.; Erkintalo, M.; Maddaloni, P.; De Natale, P.; Wabnitz, S.; De Rosa, M. Modulation Instability Induced Frequency Comb Generation in a Continuously Pumped Optical Parametric Oscillator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 093903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, K.; Li, J.; Dai, F.; Wang, M.; Wang, C.; Wang, Q.; Tu, C.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.T. Kerr nonlinearity-assisted quadratic microcomb. Front. Phys. 2022, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, Y.; Huang, S.W.; Li, B.; Liu, H.; Yang, J.; Vinod, A.K.; Wang, K.; Yu, M.; Kwong, D.L.; Wang, H.T.; et al. Real-time transition dynamics and stability of chip-scale dispersion-managed frequency microcombs. Light. Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lu, J.; Al Sayem, A.; Gong, Z.; Surya, J.B.; Zou, C.L.; Tang, H.X. Ultralow-threshold thin-film lithium niobate optical parametric oscillator. Optica 2021, 8, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ledezma, L.; Sekine, R.; Guo, Q.; Nehra, R.; Jahani, S.; Marandi, A. Intense optical parametric amplification in dispersion-engineered nanophotonic lithium niobate waveguides. Optica 2022, 9, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of the synchronously pulse-pumped OPO with resonant signal and non-resonant pump.
Figure 1. Schematic of the synchronously pulse-pumped OPO with resonant signal and non-resonant pump.
Photonics 10 00155 g001
Figure 2. The evolution of the intracavity power of the signal field A (a) without ( γ 1 = γ 2 = γ 12 = γ 21 = 0 ) and (d) with ( γ 1 = γ 12 = 0.66 W 1 m 1 , γ 2 = γ 21 = 1.32 W 1 m 1 ) third-order nonlinearity for the peak power of pump P p increases from 14 W to 16 W. Temporal profile and corresponding spectrum [(b,c)] without and [(e,f)] with third-order nonlinearity for the peak power of pump P p increases from 14 W to 16 W.
Figure 2. The evolution of the intracavity power of the signal field A (a) without ( γ 1 = γ 2 = γ 12 = γ 21 = 0 ) and (d) with ( γ 1 = γ 12 = 0.66 W 1 m 1 , γ 2 = γ 21 = 1.32 W 1 m 1 ) third-order nonlinearity for the peak power of pump P p increases from 14 W to 16 W. Temporal profile and corresponding spectrum [(b,c)] without and [(e,f)] with third-order nonlinearity for the peak power of pump P p increases from 14 W to 16 W.
Photonics 10 00155 g002
Figure 3. The evolution of the intracavity power of the signal field A (a) without ( γ 1 = γ 2 = γ 12 = γ 21 = 0 ) and (b) with ( γ 1 = γ 12 = 0.66 W 1 m 1 , γ 2 = γ 21 = 1.32 W 1 m 1 ) third-order nonlinearity for the detuning l = 1 , 3 , 10 . The spectrum profile and relative phases between comb lines (c) without and (d) with third-order nonlinearity for l = 10 .
Figure 3. The evolution of the intracavity power of the signal field A (a) without ( γ 1 = γ 2 = γ 12 = γ 21 = 0 ) and (b) with ( γ 1 = γ 12 = 0.66 W 1 m 1 , γ 2 = γ 21 = 1.32 W 1 m 1 ) third-order nonlinearity for the detuning l = 1 , 3 , 10 . The spectrum profile and relative phases between comb lines (c) without and (d) with third-order nonlinearity for l = 10 .
Photonics 10 00155 g003
Figure 4. Temporal profile and the corresponding spectrum [(a,b)] without ( γ 1 = γ 2 = γ 12 = γ 21 = 0 ) and [(c,d)] with ( γ 1 = γ 12 = 0.66 W 1 m 1 , γ 2 = γ 21 = 1.32 W 1 m 1 ) third-order nonlinearity for the pump pulse width increases from 12 ps to 14 ps.
Figure 4. Temporal profile and the corresponding spectrum [(a,b)] without ( γ 1 = γ 2 = γ 12 = γ 21 = 0 ) and [(c,d)] with ( γ 1 = γ 12 = 0.66 W 1 m 1 , γ 2 = γ 21 = 1.32 W 1 m 1 ) third-order nonlinearity for the pump pulse width increases from 12 ps to 14 ps.
Photonics 10 00155 g004
Figure 5. Temporal profile (a) and the corresponding spectrum (b) with χ ( 3 ) coefficient γ 1 increases from 0 to 0.5 W 1 m 1 for the pump pulse width of 16 ps.
Figure 5. Temporal profile (a) and the corresponding spectrum (b) with χ ( 3 ) coefficient γ 1 increases from 0 to 0.5 W 1 m 1 for the pump pulse width of 16 ps.
Photonics 10 00155 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, K.; Li, J.; Dai, F.; Wang, M.; Wang, C.; Wang, Q.; Tu, C.; Li, Y.; Wang, H. Robust Pulse-Pumped Quadratic Soliton Assisted by Third-Order Nonlinearity. Photonics 2023, 10, 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10020155

AMA Style

Wang K, Li J, Dai F, Wang M, Wang C, Wang Q, Tu C, Li Y, Wang H. Robust Pulse-Pumped Quadratic Soliton Assisted by Third-Order Nonlinearity. Photonics. 2023; 10(2):155. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10020155

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Ke, Jing Li, Fan Dai, Mengshuai Wang, Chuanhang Wang, Qiang Wang, Chenghou Tu, Yongnan Li, and Huitian Wang. 2023. "Robust Pulse-Pumped Quadratic Soliton Assisted by Third-Order Nonlinearity" Photonics 10, no. 2: 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10020155

APA Style

Wang, K., Li, J., Dai, F., Wang, M., Wang, C., Wang, Q., Tu, C., Li, Y., & Wang, H. (2023). Robust Pulse-Pumped Quadratic Soliton Assisted by Third-Order Nonlinearity. Photonics, 10(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10020155

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop