Next Article in Journal
Multi-Source Fusion Deformation-Monitoring Accuracy Calibration Method Based on a Normal Distribution Transform–Convolutional Neural Network–Self Attention Network
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental State Observer of the Population Inversion of a Multistable Erbium-Doped Fiber Laser
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design and Simulation of a High-Responsivity Dielectric Metasurface Si-Based InGaAs Photodetector
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Silicon Optical Phased Array Hybrid Integrated with III–V Laser for Grating Lobe-Free Beam Steering

1
Center for Optical and Electromagnetic Research, College of Optical Science and Engineering, International Research Center for Advanced Photonics, Ningbo Innovation Center, Zhejiang University, Ningbo 315100, China
2
School of Physics, Xi’dian University, Xi’an 710071, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2024, 11(10), 952; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11100952 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 11 September 2024 / Revised: 26 September 2024 / Accepted: 8 October 2024 / Published: 10 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Group IV Photonics: Advances and Applications)

Abstract

:
A silicon photonics-based optical phased array (OPA) is promising for realizing solid-state and miniature beam steering. In our work, a 1 × 16 silicon optical phased array (OPA) hybrid integrated with a III–V laser is proposed and demonstrated. The III–V laser chip is vertically coupled with a silicon OPA chip based on a chirped grating coupler with a large bandwidth. The coupling efficiency reaches up to 90% through utilizing the metal reflector underneath the silicon oxide layer. The one-dimensional antenna array comprising silicon waveguides with half-wavelength spacing enables beam steering with none high-order grating lobes in a 180° field of view. The measured beam steering angle of the hybrid integrated OPA chip is ±25°, without grating lobes, and the suppression ratio of the side-lobes is larger than 9.8 dB with phase calibration.

1. Introduction

Microwave phased arrays have been widely used in conventional radar systems. Due to the rapid development of laser detection and ranging (LADAR) and free-space optical communication (FSO), the optical phased array (OPA) is the most significant component of solid-state systems [1]. Silicon photonic platforms, which are CMOS compatible, low-cost and energy-efficient, enable the integration of OPA on one chip.
In the OPA chip, the antenna and laser source are the key components. The optical antenna, with the large separation to avoid crosstalk, will cause high-order grating lobes in the far-field [2,3]. The method of sparse aperiodic array arrangement can be used to suppress the far-field side-lobe of a large array spacing arrangement, and the simulation results show that a very small side mode rejection ratio can be obtained within the scanning angle of 180° [4]. However, the far-field energy of this scheme cannot be concentrated on the main lobe. If the half-wavelength interval method is adopted, the problem of grating lobes can be solved and the optical power can be more concentrated on the main lobe. Arrays with non-uniform waveguide spacing [5,6] and apodized amplitude [7] have been proposed to compress the grating lobes, but the suppression ratios are still low. The one-dimensional silicon-based optical phased array with an interval of 775 nm was demonstrated. The beam steering angle of 60° in one dimension was measured [8]. Using a half-wavelength interval waveguide to realize one-dimensional scanning has also been proposed in our previous work, and the scanning angle was measured to be 40° [9]. The curved waveguide array is also utilized to reduce the crosstalk of one-dimensional array elements [10,11]. However, these grating lobe-free OPAs based on the silicon-on-insulator (SOI) platform are found to have a lack of integrated lasers. The III–V platform has the capability of realizing the monolithically heterogeneous integration of the laser and modulators [12,13,14]. However, the integration process has a high requirement of state-of-the-art process and has a high cost.
In this paper, a 1 × 16 one-dimensional OPA chip hybrid integrated with a III–V laser is proposed and demonstrated. The III–V distributed feedback (DFB) laser chip is vertically coupled with a silicon OPA chip based on a chirped grating coupler of a large bandwidth. The coupling efficiency can also be increased by utilizing the metal reflector underneath the silicon oxide layer. To overcome the limitation of grating lobes, the waveguide array of a half-wavelength interval and a non-uniform width is utilized as the antenna array. Based on this design, the beam steering system based on OPA can have a wide field of view and a compact size.

2. Design and Analysis

The schematic diagram of the proposed integrated chip for beam steering is shown in Figure 1a. The III–V DFB laser is hybrid integrated with the OPA chip. The grating lobe-free 1 × 16 integrated OPA is shown in Figure 1b. The OPA chip consists of grating coupler, optical beam splitters, a phase modulator array and optical antennas. The power of the laser source is uniformly distributed to the phase modulators via the beam splitter tree. The optical wavefront is controlled using the phase modulator array. The far-field intensity distribution of an optical phased array can be calculated using the principle of multi-beam interference superposition, as shown in Figure 1c. The SOI platform with a 220 nm-thick silicon layer is considered for OPA chip in this work. The proposed OPA operates at a 1550 nm wavelength and TE polarization.
Conventionally, the optical modes of III–V waveguide and silicon waveguide are integrated with large mode mismatch. It is difficult to realize a low insertion loss. Here, the chirped grating coupler is utilized to couple the broadband light vertically from the III–V laser to the silicon OPA chip, as shown in Figure 2a. The height of the silicon waveguide h is 220 nm and the etch depth he of the grating is 70 nm. Due to the high computational cost of optimizing a full three-dimensional (3D) grating coupler, a two-dimensional (2D) finite difference time domain (FDTD) method combined with an inverse design method is used for parameter optimization, as shown in our previous work [15]. The inverse design method based on a gradient will not rely on parameter scanning or random perturbation and will save simulation time compared with the genetic algorithm or particle swarm optimization. The figure of merit (FOM) is defined as follows:
FOM = C E λ 1 + C E λ 2 + + C E λ n n
where CEλn is the coupling efficiency of the n-th wavelength λn. The coupling efficiency is the transmission of the laser mode coupled to the single mode of the silicon waveguide. The FOM is the maximum of the average coupling efficiencies over a wavelength range. The grating coupler is optimized at the center wavelength of 1550 nm and with the 3 dB bandwidth of 100 nm as optimal target values. The calculated insertion loss is larger than 4 dB without the reflector, as shown in Figure 2b. To further improve the coupling efficiency, a metal reflector is set underneath the chirped grating coupler, of which the spacing t is 900 nm. The optimized results are verified by using the 3D-FDTD method, and the parameters of the grating coupler are shown in Table 1. The coupling efficiency can be up to 0.45 dB (90%) and the 3 dB bandwidth is about 90 nm with the metal reflector underneath the silicon oxide layer, which has a higher performance than the conventional grating coupler.
The input power is equally divided into 16 channel phase shifters by utilizing cascaded 3 dB couplers, which is based on a multimode interference (MMI) coupler. Then, the light is modulated by 16 independent phase shifters, which are realized via the thermo-optic effect of silicon. Finally, the light with a specific phase is emitted from the butt-coupled waveguide array. The optical antennas with small spacing (d) are utilized to suppress these high-order (m) grating lobes [9]. The grating lobe angle (θm) is defined according to the following formula:
2 π λ d sin θ m Δ φ = ± m × 2 π
where λ is the optical wavelength and Δφ is the phase difference between antennas. When the spacing satisfies dλ/2, non-grating lobes will exist. Thus, the spacing of the waveguide is chosen to be 750 nm and is smaller than half of the wavelength 1550 nm. Furthermore, the beam steering angle can be up to ±90°, with a phase difference in ±π between phase shifters. Considering the phase mismatch condition to suppress the crosstalk of the antennas [16], the widths of the adjacent waveguide pair are chosen to be 450 nm, 550 nm, 400 nm and 600 nm as an example. The optical crosstalk is below −30 dB among 20 μm-long waveguide arrays.
The far-field beam angle is controlled using the phase modulator array of OPA. The phase shifter is based on the thermo-optic effect of silicon material. The thermo-optic coefficient is about 1.86 × 10−4/K. We use the HEAT Solver in DEVICE Solutions to simulate the thermal field distribution of the heater. To calculate the change in the effective refractive index, the thermal field distribution is imported to MODE Solutions. The relationship between the phase difference Δφ and beam steering angle θ is deduced to the following equation:
θ = arcsin Δ φ λ 2 π d
Figure 3 shows the calculated optical far-field distribution of the proposed OPA with half-wavelength spacing. The special design can fully eliminate the high-order grating lobes in a 180°-wide field of view (FOV). As shown in Figure 4, there is no grating lobe in the FOV and the side-lobe suppression ratio is about 13.3 dB.

3. Results and Discussion

The OPA chip is fabricated on the SOI platform with a top silicon layer of 220 nm thickness and a buried oxide layer of 2 μm thickness. The main fabrication flow is shown in Figure 5. Firstly, the electron beam lithography (Raith150 II) is used to define the patterns on the photoresist layer. The device patterns are then transferred onto the silicon layer using inductively coupled plasma reactive-ion etching (ICP-RIE) with a gas mixture. The silica top cladding layer is 900 nm thick, which is consistent with the high coupling efficiency of the grating coupler, and is deposited via plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). The gold/titanium of 5 nm/100 nm thickness that are utilized as thermal heaters, and the gold utilized as pads for wire bonding, are developed using electron beam evaporation. Then, the SOI chip is flip bonded with the quartz substrate and the upper silicon substrate is removed and polished with the chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) method. Finally, the lithography and ICP are used to etch the silicon oxide, which can open the windows above these metal pads.
Figure 6a shows the optical microscope image of the fabricated 16-channel OPA. The phase shifters are based on thermo-optic effect. The metal pads are wire-bonded to the external printed circuit board (PCB) connected to the multi-channel voltage controller. The commercial III–V DFB laser chip coupled and packaged with the silicon OPA chip, as shown in Figure 6b.
We also characterize the key components of the OPA chip. To characterize the coupling efficiency of the chirped grating coupler, the III–V DFB laser at a 1550 nm wavelength and with an output power of 4 dBm is utilized as the source. The photodetector connected with the single mode fiber is used to read out the transmissions. The normalized coupling efficiency of the chirped grating coupler is about 3.3 dB at a 1550 nm wavelength, which is mainly dependent on the thickness of the silicon oxide layer and the etching depth/width of the grating. The insertion loss of the OPA chip is about 5.3 dB. To characterize the phase modulation effect of the thermo-optic modulator, a Mach–Zehnder interferometer with one arm modulated using the electronic heater is fabricated on the same chip. For the π phase shift, the measured electric power is about 1.6 mW under a voltage of 1.8 V, which is compatible with most transistor–transistor logic circuits. The low power consumption is mainly due to the small spacing of the heater and waveguide and the removed silicon substrate. The response time of the phase shifter can be dramatically decreased with electro-optic effect.
The near-infrared charge coupled device (CCD) with a Fourier imaging system is utilized to capture the steering beam in the far-field, as shown in Figure 7. The far-field optical beam distribution is imaged with a 4f system, including the objective lens (OL), two lenses (Lens1, Lens2) with focal lengths of 20 cm and the infrared CCD.
Different optical waveguide widths and fabrication errors of waveguides result in an optical phase mismatch among the antennas; thus, the field distribution is random without external voltage applied. The hybrid-integrated OPA is placed in the center of the FOV of the imaging system. To compensate the stochastic phase error induced in the waveguide array due to fabrication error, the stochastic parallel gradient descent (SPGD) algorithm is used to optimize the drive voltages for phase calibration and beam steering. After fine compensation for the phase mismatch with applied voltage, the beam is calibrated well, as shown in Figure 8a. Figure 8b shows the normalized intensity of the far-field beam distribution after phase compensation. The side-lobe suppression ratio is about 9.8 dB, slightly different with the simulated ones, which may be caused by the background noise and the precision of the voltage.
The measured beam intensities at different steering angles in the far-field are shown in Figure 9. The maximum steering angle is measured to be ±25°, which is limited to the integrated laser power and the detection limitation of the optical detection system. A more accurate control algorithm and a higher precision in the voltage should be used to steer the beam towards large angles with lower side-lobe noise in the future.
The results show that the proposed hybrid-integrated strategy can efficiently integrate the III–V-based DFB laser source and the silicon-based OPA chip. Compared with the monolithically heterogeneous integration of laser and modulators [12,13,14], the hybrid integration process has a large tolerance and is cost-effective. The measured results of the beam steering show that there is a good coupling efficiency in the grating coupler and that there is only single main beam in the far-field, which is grating lobe-free. The integrated chip enables the LiDAR to move towards miniaturization, an all solid-state and a low-cost [17]. In the future, the source power could be further improved or amplified using an erbium-doped waveguide [18]. It is essential that the insertion loss of the on-chip OPA should be decreased for low-loss beam steering (including the loss of the grating coupler, power splitter and optical antenna). The measured coupling loss of the grating coupler for the integration of OPA and the laser chip could be improved with higher fabrication precision. The butt coupling-based antenna could be further improved using the tapered waveguide, which can reduce the reflection of the end face and increase the optical transmission. For 2D beam steering, the antenna array could also be arranged with a 2D nano-antenna array [19,20].

4. Conclusions

In summary, the one-dimensional OPA hybrid integrated with a III–V laser chip on a silicon platform is demonstrated experimentally. The III–sV laser chip is vertically coupled with a silicon OPA chip based on a chirped grating coupler, with a large bandwidth of about 90 nm. The coupling efficiency is also increased by utilizing the metal reflector underneath the silicon oxide layer. The hybrid integration solution can also be further used for the silicon nitride or lithium niobite platform. The unequally wide waveguide antenna of OPA is characterized to eliminate high-order lobes in a wide steering angle and could be extended to two-dimensional beam steering. The integrated laser could also utilize pulse modulation through an external circuit for distance detection or communication in mid- and long-range. Thus, we believe that the CMOS-compatible and hybrid-integrated OPA chip for beam steering has the potential to be applied in future solid-state LADAR and FSO systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C. and Y.S.; methodology, J.C. and S.Z.; software, S.Z. and W.L.; validation, J.C., S.Z., W.L. and X.W.; formal analysis, S.Z. and W.L.; investigation, J.C. and X.W.; resources, Y.S. and X.H.; data curation, J.C., S.Z., W.L. and X.W.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.S.; visualization, J.C.; supervision, Y.S.; project administration, Y.S.; funding acquisition, J.C. and Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (62105286, 61922070).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Aflatouni, F.; Abiri, B.; Rekhi, A.; Hajimiri, A. Nanophotonic coherent imager. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 5117–5125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Van Acoleyen, K.; Bogaerts, W.; Jágerská, J.; Thomas, N.L.; Houdré, R.; Baet, R. Off-chip beam steering with a one-dimensional optical phased array on silicon-on-insulator. Opt. Lett. 2009, 34, 1477–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Doylend, J.K.; Heck, M.J.R.; Bovington, J.T.; Peters, J.D.; Coldren, L.A.; Bowers, J.E. Two-dimensional free-space beam steering with an optical phased array on silicon-on-insulator. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 21595–21604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Komljenovic, T.; Helkey, R.; Coldren, L.; Bowers, J.E. Sparse aperiodic arrays for optical beam forming and LIDAR. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 2511–2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kwong, D.; Hosseini, A.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, R.T. 1 × 12 Unequally spaced waveguide array for actively tuned optical phased array on a silicon nanomembrane. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 051104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hutchison, D.N.; Sun, J.; Doylend, J.K.; Kumar, R.; Heck, J.; Kim, W.; Phare, C.T.; Feshali, A.; Rong, H. High-resolution aliasing-free optical beam steering. Optica 2016, 3, 887–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sun, J.; Hosseini, E.S.; Yaacobi, A.; Cole, D.B.; Leake, G.; Coolbaugh, D.; Watts, M.R. Two-dimensional apodized silicon photonic phased arrays. Opt. Lett. 2014, 39, 367–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Phare, C.T.; Shin, M.C.; Sharma, J.; Ahasan, S.; Krishnaswamy, H.; Lipson, M. Silicon Optical Phased Array with Grating Lobe-Free Beam Formation Over 180 Degree Field of View. In Proceedings of the CLEO: Science and Innovations, San Jose, CA, USA, 13–18 May 2018; Optical Society of America: Washington, DC, USA, 2018; p. SM3I.2. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, J.; Sun, Y.; Wei, S.; Han, X.; Shi, Y. Optical phased array based on silicon waveguides with non-uniform widths. In Proceedings of the 23rd Opto-Electronics and Communications Conference (OECC), Jeju Island, Republic of Korea, 2–6 July 2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. Xu, W.; Zhou, L.; Lu, L.; Chen, J. Aliasing-free optical phased array beam-steering with a plateau envelope. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 3354–3368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Liang, D.; Li, W.; Wang, X.; Zhao, X.; Guo, Z.; Han, X.; Chen, J.; Dai, D.; Shi, Y. Grating lobe-free silicon optical phased array with periodically bending modulation of dense antennas. Opt. Express 2023, 31, 11423–11430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Xie, W.; Komljenovic, T.; Huang, J.; Tran, M.; Davenport, M.; Torres, A.; Pintus, P.; Bowers, J. Heterogeneous silicon photonics sensing for autonomous cars. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 3642–3663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Doylend, J.; Heck, M.; Bovington, J.; Peters, J.; Davenport, M.; Coldren, L.A.; Bowers, J. Hybrid III/V silicon photonic source with integrated 1D free-space beam steering. Opt. Lett. 2012, 37, 4257–4259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hulme, J.; Doylend, J.; Heck, M.; Peters, J.; Davenport, M.; Bovington, J.; Coldren, L.; Bowers, J. Fully integrated hybrid silicon two dimensional beam scanner. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 5861–5874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. He, X.; Sun, D.; Chen, J.; Shi, Y. Inverse Designed Grating Coupler with Low Loss and High Bandwidth on LNOI Platform. IEEE Photonics J. 2024, 16, 6600305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Song, W.; Gatdula, R.; Abbaslou, S.; Lu, M.; Stein, A.; Lai, W.; Provine, J.; Pease, R.; Christodoulides, D.; Jiang, W. High-density waveguide superlattices with low crosstalk. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yi, Y.; Wu, D.; Kakdarvishi, V.; Yu, B.; Zhuang, Y.; Khalilian, A. Photonic Integrated Circuits for an Optical Phased Array. Photonics 2024, 11, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Y.; Qiu, Z.; Ji, X.; Bancora, A.; Lihachev, G.; Riemensberger, J.; Wang, R.; Voloshin, A.; Kippenberg, J. A fully hybrid integrated erbium-based laser. Nat. Photonics 2024, 18, 829–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, J.; Timurdogan, E.; Yaacobi, A.; Hosseini, E.; Watts, M. Large-scale nanophotonic phased array. Nature 2013, 493, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Fatemi, R.; Khachaturian, A.; Hajimiri, A. A nonuniform sparse 2-D large-FOV optical phased array with a low-power PWM drive. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuit 2019, 54, 1200–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Side view of the OPA with a hybrid-integrated laser. (b) Schematic diagrams of the proposed grating lobe-free beam steering chip. (c) Modeling of the far-field beam steering.
Figure 1. (a) Side view of the OPA with a hybrid-integrated laser. (b) Schematic diagrams of the proposed grating lobe-free beam steering chip. (c) Modeling of the far-field beam steering.
Photonics 11 00952 g001
Figure 2. (a) Schematic of the grating coupler. (b) Calculated insertion loss of the chirped grating coupler with or without metal reflector.
Figure 2. (a) Schematic of the grating coupler. (b) Calculated insertion loss of the chirped grating coupler with or without metal reflector.
Photonics 11 00952 g002
Figure 3. The calculated optical far-field distribution varies with the phase difference in the proposed OPA.
Figure 3. The calculated optical far-field distribution varies with the phase difference in the proposed OPA.
Photonics 11 00952 g003
Figure 4. The normalized optical far-field distribution without phase difference.
Figure 4. The normalized optical far-field distribution without phase difference.
Photonics 11 00952 g004
Figure 5. Schematic flow of the fabrication process.
Figure 5. Schematic flow of the fabrication process.
Photonics 11 00952 g005
Figure 6. (a) Optical microscope image of the specific part of the fabricated device. (b) The image of the OPA chip hybrid integrated with the laser.
Figure 6. (a) Optical microscope image of the specific part of the fabricated device. (b) The image of the OPA chip hybrid integrated with the laser.
Photonics 11 00952 g006
Figure 7. The measurement system for far-field beam characterization.
Figure 7. The measurement system for far-field beam characterization.
Photonics 11 00952 g007
Figure 8. Measured optical far-field distribution after phase calibration: (a) image in the CCD and (b) the normalized intensity.
Figure 8. Measured optical far-field distribution after phase calibration: (a) image in the CCD and (b) the normalized intensity.
Photonics 11 00952 g008
Figure 9. Measured optical far-field distributions of the different steering angles of the OPA hybrid integrated with a laser chip.
Figure 9. Measured optical far-field distributions of the different steering angles of the OPA hybrid integrated with a laser chip.
Photonics 11 00952 g009
Table 1. The optimized parameters of the grating coupler for vertical coupling.
Table 1. The optimized parameters of the grating coupler for vertical coupling.
Sectiona (nm)B (nm)Periodic Number
S128814420
S26003665
S32881442
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, J.; Zhao, S.; Li, W.; Wang, X.; Han, X.; Shi, Y. Silicon Optical Phased Array Hybrid Integrated with III–V Laser for Grating Lobe-Free Beam Steering. Photonics 2024, 11, 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11100952

AMA Style

Chen J, Zhao S, Li W, Wang X, Han X, Shi Y. Silicon Optical Phased Array Hybrid Integrated with III–V Laser for Grating Lobe-Free Beam Steering. Photonics. 2024; 11(10):952. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11100952

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Jingye, Shi Zhao, Wenlei Li, Xiaobin Wang, Xiang’e Han, and Yaocheng Shi. 2024. "Silicon Optical Phased Array Hybrid Integrated with III–V Laser for Grating Lobe-Free Beam Steering" Photonics 11, no. 10: 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11100952

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop