Next Article in Journal
Weak Value Amplification of Photons in Optical Nonlinear Medium, Opto-Mechanical, and Spin-Mechanical Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
High-Efficiency and Large-Angle Homo-Metagratings for the Near-Infrared Region
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Interference Effect in Double Optomechanically Induced Transparency System
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Theoretical Investigation of an Ultrawide S-, C- and L-Band-Tunable Random Fiber Laser Based on the Combination of Tellurite Fiber and Erbium-Doped Fiber
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Study on Speckle Noise Reduction in Laser Projection Displays

Photonics 2024, 11(4), 290; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11040290
by Hongyou Zhang 1,2,*, Yu Hu 2,3, Shuihai Peng 1,2 and Yong Liu 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Photonics 2024, 11(4), 290; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11040290
Submission received: 20 February 2024 / Revised: 18 March 2024 / Accepted: 21 March 2024 / Published: 22 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Lasers and Their Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

see attached reviewer report.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Quality of English Language is good in general.

Author Response

Dear Sir, 
We thanks for your detailed comments, which really benefit our manuscript. We have carefully considered all comments and accordingly revised our manuscript. The point by point responses to the reviewer’s comments are listed below, and our responses start with dashes “--” in the Word file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Please see the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

extensive editing of English language required

Author Response

Dear Sir, 
We thanks for your detailed comments, which really benefit our manuscript. We have carefully considered all comments and accordingly revised our manuscript. The point by point responses to the reviewer’s comments are listed below, and our responses start with dashes “--” in the Word file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors addressed the reviewer's comments well. 

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors have accorrdingly made corrections.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Back to TopTop