1. Introduction
The optical beams in one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) array formats find numerous applications in emerging fields such as microscopy [
1,
2], photonics [
3,
4], nonlinear optics [
5,
6], optical trapping [
7], beam shaping [
8], laser fabrication [
9,
10], etc. For instance, Pushkarev et al. [
6] have demonstrated arrays of nonlinear stable beams, often referred to as filament, using optical array generators such as phase plate and Dammann grating. Dammann grating is a phase grating that produces multiple light spots of equal intensity [
11]. Such nonlinear arrayed beams are extremely useful for efficient THz generation and waveguiding [
5] in a gas medium. Similarly, Zhu et al. [
9] have demonstrated parallel fabrication capability using multifocal spots generated by a spatial light modulator (SLM) and a high numerical aperture (NA) objective lens. Ma et al. [
3] have demonstrated matrix multiplications of 50 pairs of 4 * 8 matrices using Dammann gratings involving digital micro-mirror arrays. The parallel multiphoton microscopy of microspheres and nanorods was also demonstrated by Gu et al. [
1], wherein they generated [2 × 2] multifocal arrays using an SLM. The importance of the applications mentioned above is further accelerated by the discovery of non-diffractive optical beams such as Bessel beams [
12,
13]. The remarkable properties of Bessel beams, such as their non-diffractive aspects, i.e., they resist diffraction, and self-healing, i.e., they recover the beam profile after encountering an obstacle, make the case for their being of prime importance in the fields of nonlinear optics, laser micro-fabrication, etc. [
14,
15]. Therefore, a range of novel applications may be envisaged by combining the concepts of optical beam array generation and non-diffractive beams with long propagation distances. A significant advancement has been made over the last decade towards realising Bessel beams in an array format.
García-Martínez et al. [
16] have generated a two-dimensional array [4 × 4] of diverging Bessel beams by applying Dammann grating and axicon lens phases with an SLM. In this case, the Bessel-beam array generation process can be understood as follows: the axicon lens produces single Bessel beam, which subsequently gets diffracted with multiple orders with the help of the Dammann grating. The phase g(r) of a classical linear axicon lens can be expressed as follows:
where
is the radial coordinate and r
0 is the parameter that defines the cone angle of Bessel beams. Values x and y are the Cartesian coordinates. The phase is further modified when axicon lens is associated with a one-dimensional grating of period P, which can be expressed as follows:
. This resulting phase g’(r) would eventually generate an array of Bessel beams [
16]. Nevertheless, the diverging half-angle (θ) of multiple Bessel beams in the array can be calculated as follows:
, where n is the order of diffraction, and λ is the light wavelength. Lutz et al. [
17] have generated a one-dimensional array [2 × 1] of 0.81-degree-diverging Bessel beams by applying the phase of a Dammann grating with an SLM combined with a 170-degree refractive axicon lens. Indeed, they have obtained arrayed zero-order Bessel beams of 7.6 µm full width half maxima (FWHM) central core and successfully drilled 5 µm diameter holes on aluminium foil using such beams. Using a spatial light modulator, Cheng et al. [
18] have exploited the superposition of high-order Bessel beams to obtain tightly packed foci, retaining the non-diffractive length of 1 mm, and resembling an array of zero-order Bessel beams. Schwarz et al. [
19] have generated an array of parallel zero-order Bessel beams using fused silica axicon lenslets in hexagonal arrangements by exploiting laser manufacturing techniques. In this case, 37 Bessel beams of FWHM central core sizes in the range of 9.4–10.3 µm and FWHM non-diffractive lengths in the range of 8–8.5 mm were obtained by Schwarz et al. using an axicon lenslet array. Chen et al. [
20] have generated Bessel-beam arrays [4 × 4] with a sub-wavelength size central core, i.e., 570 nm and non-diffractive length up to 60 um, using all-dielectric metasurfaces. In this case, the corresponding metasurfaces were created through the use of electron-beam lithography and lift-off processes. To summarise, Bessel beams in dense array format are typically generated by modulating the beam’s phase at the pupil plane of a high-NA objective lens involving an SLM. However, the poor resolution of the spatial light modulator limits the phase discretisation and hence limits the generation of high-cone-angle Bessel beams. In contrast, a high-cone-angle Bessel beam array can be generated directly using metasurfaces, but the fabrication of such elements needs very high-end lithography techniques. Therefore, a simple method for generating a Bessel beam array is of prime importance and hence becomes the subject of the current study. Our study realised the described Bessel beam array using passive optical elements such as an axicon lens, laser-fabricated Dammann gratings, and an optical magnification system.
2. Experimental Design and Methods
The experimental setup employed for the grating fabrication is shown in
Figure 1. The diode-pumped solid-state nanosecond pulsed laser source (Bright Solutions, Italy, Onda 1064 nm Model) emitted a radiation of wavelength 1064 nm, pulse durations in the range of 2–6 ns at a 100 kHz maximum rate of repetition, and 1 mJ of pulse energy. The laser beam was directed onto the samples (i.e., soda lime glass of 1 mm thickness) using an objective lens (Olympus Plan N 10X/0.25 NA). The glass samples were mounted on a motorized X(50 mm)-Y(50 mm)-Z(25 mm) translation stage assembly (Holmarc Opto-mechatronics Pvt. Ltd., India, MTS series). A delay generator (Lightigo s.r.o, Czech Republic, SyncRay Model) was employed to trigger both the laser source and translation stages; the pulse parameter selection and sample movement corresponding to a particular fabrication condition were controlled using a computer. To machine a Dammann grating on glass, the Gaussian laser focal point was adjusted with respect to the sample front surface by optimising the plasma intensity. Multiple pulse-based holes and single-pass-based trenches were machined on the sample surface prior to the Dammann grating fabrication experiments.
For instance, single-pass trenches were machined on a glass surface using the following parameters: 5 kHz laser repetition rate, laser power in the range of 1–3.3 watts, scanning speed of 1.5 mm/s, and focal spot size (1/e
2) of 14.6 μm. The laser power was measured near the laser source. The morphological characteristics of machined features were then studied using optical microscopy (using Olympus’s CX33 Optical Microscope) and 3D Profilometry (using Bruker‘s Contour GT-K 3D optical microscope) techniques.
Figure 2a,b show the optical micrograph and 3D profile of trenches machined using laser fluence levels in the range of 191–789 J/cm
2, respectively. Although material modification was evident for machining at a threshold fluence of 191 J/cm
2, i.e., peak intensity of 9.56 × 10
10 W/cm
2, the machining condition could not produce continuous line structures on glass. Nevertheless, the variation of trench width obtained from the optical micrograph with respect to the laser fluence is shown in
Figure 2c; the trench width evolves near-linearly (except for the threshold fluence), with increasing laser fluence levels. It was also observed that the trench depth nearly saturates at 40 μm when machined using laser fluence in the range of 239–789 J/cm
2. The trench machining strategy was eventually followed to realise large machined areas, which are an integral part of grating. In this case, the inter-line spacing, i.e., pitch, was maintained at 10 µm. The binary phase Dammann gratings were fabricated on glass to generate multiple orders of diffraction based on the number and position of transition points, i.e., the 0-π phase change point of the grating. Here, we have adopted the transition points determined through the cost function optimisation method by Zhou et al. [
21]. The transition point of grating for a one-dimensional (1D) two-spot (1 × 2) array is [0.5]. Similarly, the transition points for the five-spot (1 × 5) array are [0.03863, 0.39084, 0.65552]. In the case of two-dimensional (2D) beam array generation, the above transition points can be extended in a plane. In this study, we have fabricated gratings to generate both 1D and 2D arrays of optical Bessel beams.
The Bessel beam generation and characterisation setups were developed to evaluate the performance of fabricated gratings, as shown in
Figure 3a and b, respectively. The Gaussian CW laser beams of 532 nm wavelength were first expanded and incident on the fabricated grating, followed by a polymer linear–phase axicon lens of a 177-degree apex angle. This grating–axicon combination generates an array of zero-order Bessel beams. The generated Bessel beam array was further de-magnified using a telescopic arrangement involving a plano-convex lens (f = 150 mm) and an objective lens of 20X/0.4 NA to obtain a micro-Bessel beam array. To characterise the generated micro-Bessel beam array, an imaging setup (see
Figure 3b) comprising a CMOS camera in combination with a set of lenses (a plano-convex lens (f = 150 mm) and an objective lens of 20X/0.4 NA), resulting in a magnification of 32, was developed. A series of transverse Bessel beam profiles at every 5 microns along the beam propagation direction was recorded (using 0.5 ms camera exposure time) for further image processing. Note that in the absence of grating, the present setup generates single micro-Bessel beams.
Figure 3c,d show the typical longitudinal and radial cross-sectional profiles of Bessel beams of conical half-angles of 12 degrees generated in the experiment. In this case, the Bessel beam central core size (FWHM) and longitudinal extent (FWHM) were measured at 0.9 µm and 220 µm, respectively.
3. Experimental Results
The experimental results in connection with the fabricated one-dimensional (1D) gratings and the respective Bessel beam arrays are shown in
Figure 4. For every grating, we define the following parameters: Transparent zone (TZ) is defined as the portion of the width of the material which is not machined. The opaque zone (OZ) is defined as the width of the laser-machined trench on the surface of a material. Period (P) is defined as the sum of TZ and OZ. For instance, a few 1D gratings were machined using a laser fluence of 335 J/cm
2, with fixed P = 200 µm, but with varying TZs and OZs; the corresponding optical micrographs and 3D profiles are shown as insets of
Figure 4a–c. The depth profile, in particular that of the grating of TZ = 100 µm, OZ =100 µm, follows a U-shape. The depth of the gratings, as measured from 3D profile images, was approximately 40 μm. When such gratings were employed for Bessel beam array generation, it was observed that the number of Bessel beams increased from 3 to 7 by increasing the OZ from 20 to 100 µm of the grating. In contrast, the normal transmission of the gratings was decreased from 67 to 43% (with a measurement error of up to 2%) by increasing the OZ from 20 to 100 µm. It was also observed that the overall characteristics of the original isolated Bessel beam, i.e., one generated using the axicon alone, remain preserved in the array format. However, the Bessel beam longitudinal, i.e., axial, intensity is modulated with the increasing opaque-zone length of the grating. For instance, in the case of grating of TZ = 100 µm, OZ =100 µm, the average Bessel beam axial modulation distance was measured to be approximately 90 μm. This axial modulation can be attributed to the non-uniformity of laser-machined patches of grating. Also, we cannot rule out the Talbot effect, i.e., axial intensity modulation [
22,
23] which normally appears when light passes through a grating-like structure. In the present case, the Talbot distance (= 2P
2/λ) was calculated to be 540 μm. Therefore, the axial modulation can be due to a fractional Talbot effect, although this needs to be verified through experiments.
1D gratings were also fabricated by varying the laser fluence levels, keeping the grating parameter fixed at TZ = OZ = 100 µm.
Figure 4d–f depict the longitudinal cross-section images of Bessel beam arrays generated using gratings fabricated with laser fluence levels of 335, 478, and 645 J/cm
2, respectively. It is apparent from the figure that the number of Bessel beams in the array only increases from 7 to 9 by increasing the laser power for grating fabrication. However, the normal transmission of the gratings was severely decreased, changing from 46 to 23% (with a measurement error of up to 2%) with an increase in the laser fluence level for grating fabrication from 335 to 645 J/cm
2. The quality of the Bessel beam array in terms of uniformity is also poor when the gratings are machined with high laser power. In an attempt to enhance the transmission of the grating, etching (using 5% HF + 95% water solution, and 40 min of etching time) was performed on the fabricated grating. Indeed, the grating transmission was enhanced from 46% to 49%, 32% to 51%, and 23% to 43%, corresponding to the laser fluence levels of 335, 478, and 645 J/cm
2, respectively, as used for grating fabrication.
To study the influence of the “periods” of the gratings on the Bessel beam array generation, 1D gratings were fabricated, using a fixed laser fluence of 335 J/cm
2, with different grating periods. In all of the cases considered, the laser-machined trench width is half of the grating period size, i.e., TZ = OZ = P/2.
Figure 5a–d show the longitudinal cross-section images of Bessel beam arrays generated using the fabricated gratings with the following periods (P): 120, 200, 400 and 800 µm, respectively. It is apparent from the figure that the number of Bessel beams, along with their longitudinal extent in the array, decreases from 7 to 3 with an increase in the grating period size from 120 to 800 µm. It was also observed that the diverging half-angles such as θ1 (first-order), θ2 (second-order), and θ3 (third-order) of the Bessel beams vary with respect to the period of the gratings involved; diverging half-angles decrease with increased grating period. For instance, the diverging half-angles of the Bessel beam array generated using a 200 µm period grating (see
Figure 5b) are as follows: θ1 = 2.2°, θ2 = 4.5°, and θ3 = 6.7°. Interestingly, the diverging half-angle of the Bessel beam array, generated using an 800 µm period grating (see
Figure 5d), is sufficiently low, i.e., 0.4°. However, in this instance, an evolutionary phase of Bessel beams, extended over a considerable range, and spanning a few hundred microns was observed.
For better illustration, Bessel beam array generation using fabricated gratings with periods of 200 µm and 800 µm were given emphasis. In such cases, the transverse profiles of the Bessel beam arrays at different longitudinal distances, i.e., Z1 = 120 µm, Z2 = 240 µm, and Z3 = 430 µm, are shown in
Figure 5e–j. It is evident from the figure and insets that the strength of individual Bessel beams in the array varies from one to the other, i.e., there is maximum intensity in the zero-order and then gradually diminished intensities in the high-order. The occurrence of non-uniform beam strengths in the array may be due to the suboptimal grating depth profiles [
10,
24]. From a quantitative viewpoint, the radial distances between individual Bessel beams of an array with respect to the central Bessel beams were calculated considering the light wavelength, λ = 532 nm.
Figure 5k displays the tabulated values corresponding to respective gratings with periods of 200 µm and 800 µm. In case of the 200 µm period grating, it was observed that the three well-separated Bessel beams appear only beyond a longitudinal distance of 200 µm. The radial profile of Bessel beam arrays corresponding to a representative case, i.e., Z2 = 240 µm, is shown in
Figure 5f, wherein the zero-order and first-order Bessel beams are separated by a radial distance of 17 λ. Prior to this longitudinal distance, overlapping of adjacent Bessel rings occurs, as evident from
Figure 5e. Such features were earlier observed for both zero-order and high-order Bessel beams [
25,
26]; the authors observed that the complete radial separation between adjacent Bessel beams depends on the longitudinal distance of Bessel beams. Contrastingly, in case of the 800 µm period grating, it was observed that the three well-separated Bessel beams appear only beyond a longitudinal distance of 400 µm.
Figure 5l shows the decreasing trend of diverging half-angles of Bessel beams (only first-order) in an array with respect to the increasing grating period. Indeed, a Bessel beam array [1 × 3] of a diverging half-angle of 6 degrees was successfully generated using laser-fabricated gratings with a period of 80 µm.
The idea of Bessel beam array generation using laser-fabricated Dammann grating was also extended to 2D. To do so, two different grating fabrication strategies were developed. In the first case, transparent zones and opaque zones, i.e., laser-machined (using laser fluence of 335 J/cm
2) zones of nearly 100 µm each (corresponding to the grating period of 200 µm), were first fabricated in one axis, and the same patterns were created in the perpendicular axis of the same plane. Here, we refer to the machining strategy as the “line-scanning” strategy, as the laser continuously machines the sample surface along a line. As a result, square-size transparent zones were created at the corners in a square lattice, as shown in
Figure 6a. In the second case, laser machining was performed with another machining strategy, referred to as the “patch-scanning” strategy. In this case, the machining was performed in patches (corresponding to the grating period of 200 µm) at selective locations on the sample surface. As a result, square-sized transparent zones were created at the corners and the centre in a square lattice, as shown in
Figure 6b. The 3D profiles of both considered gratings are also shown as insets to
Figure 6. When such gratings were employed for generating a Bessel beam array in two dimensions, the Bessel beam configuration appeared to be very contrasting.
Figure 6c,d show the typical transverse profiles at a near-longitudinal-intensity maximum position of a Bessel beam (FWHM core size of 0.9 µm) array generated using gratings fabricated with line-scanning and patch-scanning strategies, respectively. It is apparent from the figures that a denser array of Bessel beams can be generated using gratings fabricated with the line-scanning strategy.
To generate Bessel beams of the desired array configuration, the grating transition points need to be fixed. For instance, the transition points corresponding to a five-spot [1 × 5] array are [0.03863, 0.39084, 0.65552]. In such cases, the opaque zones, i.e., laser-machined zones, were obtained on glass according to the transition points in a 1D plane.
Figure 7a shows the microscopic image of a 1D Dammann grating with non-uniform transparent zone spacing. In this case, when the fabricated 1D grating was employed for array generation, a [1 × 5] Bessel beam array was obtained;
Figure 7b–d show the transverse profiles of the Bessel beam array at Z = 190 µm, 295 µm, and 335 µm, respectively. It was observed that the well-separated Bessel beams in the array appear beyond the longitudinal distance of 330 µm.
Figure 7b,c show the radial profiles of Bessel beam array corresponding to the evolutionary phases of Bessel beams.
4. Discussion
Diffractive optical elements such as Dammann gratings are crucial components for generating optical beam arrays. Therefore, the key findings of the present study relate to the fabrication of Dammann-like gratings on glass surfaces and their respective roles in forming the Bessel beam array. In general, the phase profile of Dammann grating is governed by controlled depth patterns on a transparent dielectric material. From the fabrication viewpoint, reactive ion etching is the prevailing method, but obtaining a controlled depth on glass using this method is difficult. The state-of-the-art in this fabrication domain incorporates electron-beam pattern generators with nanometre-fabrication resolution. However, the adoption of such an instrument is limited by instrument cost and stringent machining conditions. In this respect, the laser machining technique offers a versatile solution. For instance, multifocal spot arrays up to [5 × 5] were realised using 2D Dammann gratings on sapphire plates machined using 400 nm wavelength femtosecond laser beams and wet etching [
27]. In contrast, we offer an economic Dammann grating machining method using nanosecond laser beams as demonstrated in the current investigation.
One of the interesting features of our Bessel beam array generation scheme is that it does not require Dammann grating of critical sub-micron depth profiles to obtain an array of zero-order Bessel beams with a sub-micron-size central core. Instead, Dammann gratings with periods in the range of hundreds of microns and depths in the range of tens of microns may be employed in combination with an axicon lens and an optical magnification system comprising a high-NA objective lens to generate a Bessel beam array (see
Figure 2). There are several advantages associated with our developed Bessel beam array generation methodology. (1) A high-NA objective lens ensures small core-size, i.e., high cone-angle Bessel beams [
28]. (2) The onset position of beam array lies at the focal point of the objective lens; this condition is advantageous for parallel micromachining and microscopy applications. For sake of comparison, when phase coded Dammann grating is employed to directly realize a Bessel beam array, the onset point lies right next to the grating, putting limitations on the above-mentioned applications. (3) Both Bessel beam characteristics and their array format can be controlled independently by choice of the axicon lens and grating, respectively. In contrast, a Dammann grating multiplexed with axicon phase can generate only a single type and configuration of Bessel beam array. Of course, a SLM-based Bessel beam array generation method can offer flexibility in getting the desired Bessel beam (low cone angle Bessel beams only) characteristics and their array format. However, because of the typically low laser-damage threshold of the SLM, such a scheme cannot be implemented for high-power applications such as those in plasma physics.
Gratings on glass were fabricated using standard machining techniques involving a few kHz repetition rate nanosecond pulsed laser beams [
29]. Grating periods were maintained by single-pass laser scanning across the sample surface. For the sake of consistency, we choose a laser fluence of 335 J/cm
2 for the fabrication of uniform grating structures. It is obvious that the laser machining would result in plenty of debris, hindering the grating transmittance. Therefore, prior to the application, gratings were rinsed with water after machining. Further etching of the grating additionally increased transmission, which reached a peak value of approximately 50%. This enhancement occurs because the half-period region becomes opaque as a result of the laser machining.
From the Bessel beam array generation capability viewpoint, the grating period plays a key role. For instance, by keeping the period same, one can vary the number of Bessel beams in an array by employing gratings of increased opaque-zone widths (see
Figure 4a–c). Grating depth seems not to be critical in deciding the number of Bessel beams in an array (see
Figure 4d–f). Indeed, [1 × 9] arrayed zero-order Bessel beams were produced using grating with a period 200 µm with a transition point of 0.5. Ideally, a grating of the transition point of 0.5 should generate an array of [1 × 2], as calculated by Zhou et al. [
21], with the condition that the grating depth is maintained to create π- phase shift. For example, for an incident light of 532 nm wavelength (λ) and glass refractive index (n) of 1.51, the ideal grating depth (d) corresponding to a phase delay (ø) of π can be estimated as follows: d = [ø/π][λ/2(n − 1)] = 522 nm. Indeed, earlier reports suggest that zero-order diffraction becomes prominent if the grating depth does not match the estimated one [
10,
24]. Since our grating depths were in the order of tens of microns, we excited not only zero-order diffraction but also high-order diffraction. We also observe that the spatial characteristics of zero-order Bessel beams in isolated form (i.e., those generated using only the axicon lens) remain preserved in the case of an array format (i.e., when generated using both an axicon lens and Dammann grating). The FWHM central core and non-diffracting length of zero-order Bessel beams in both isolated and array formats were 0.9 µm and 220 µm, respectively. There are several beam-array configurations reported in the literature [
17,
18,
19,
20]. The present study deals with the generation of diverging Bessel beam array configurations. It has been observed that the diverging angle of the Bessel beam array decreases with an increase in the grating period, as evident from
Figure 5a–d. For example, the diverging half-angle of the first-order Bessel beam in the array generated by grating of a period of 120 µm was measured to be 3.7 degrees, which corresponds to NA = 0.1. Similarly, the diverging half-angle of the third-order Bessel beam in the array was measured to be 11 degrees, which corresponds to NA = 0.29. In contrast, when grating of a period of 800 µm was employed, the diverging half-angle of the first-order Bessel beam (other orders are barely visible) in the array was measured at 0.4 degrees, quite analogous to a parallel Bessel beam array.
The above machining approach can be easily extended over two-dimensional space to obtain a 2D Dammann grating. Two primary laser machining approaches, i.e., line-scanning and patch-scanning, were explored. In the case of line scanning, the laser beam traverses first one axis, followed by the other axis, resulting in a unit cell consisting of four square pieces with transparent zones at the corners. In contrast, in the case of patch-scanning, laser machines glass surface in such a way that a unit cell consisting of four square pieces with transparent zones at the corners as well as in the centre forms. Interestingly, different configurations of the Bessel beam array were obtained when the 2D gratings used were machined with different strategies (see
Figure 6); a denser array can be obtained with grating machined using line-scanning strategy. An ideal 1D Dammann grating with unique transition points [
21] was thus obtained using the line-scanning machining strategy; a [1 × 5] array of zero-order Bessel beams was obtained using suitable gratings (see
Figure 7). We, therefore, anticipate here that the developed grating fabrication strategy involving an economic nanosecond-laser-pulse-based machining setup would be highly useful in the realisation of array of different classes of non-diffractive optical beams, with potential applications in emerging areas such as microscopy, nonlinear optics, and micro- and nanofabrication. As perspective for future work, various aspects of the Bessel beam array may be studied. For instance, controlling the axial intensity [
30] and polarization states [
31] of individual Bessel beams given an array of arbitrary configuration would be useful for the above-mentioned applications.