1. Introduction
Future smart factories in Industry 4.0 will require fast and reliable wireless connectivity to provide automation and real-time control of equipment [
1]. Optical wireless communication (OWC) is a promising technology for enabling such industrial transformation [
2,
3] since it offers a huge amount of unregulated bandwidth, high security, low latency, and immunity to electromagnetic interference. However, OWC links are based on line-of-sight (LOS) signal reception, and therefore the blockage of direct transmission by shadowing or obstacles is its main disadvantage. Current OWC solutions utilize multiple-input multiple-out (MIMO) schemes where several transmitters and receivers are employed [
4,
5].
Among the OWC approaches, visible light communication (VLC) is an attractive choice for indoor networks because of its capability to combine lighting and communications while using low-cost narrow bandwidth light-emitting diodes (LEDs), also known as light-fidelity (Li-Fi) [
6]. Recent works have demonstrated the feasibility of OFDM transmission with data rates of 15.7 Gbps, employing off-the-shelf LEDs [
7]; allowing multiuser access, interference mitigation, and mobility support [
8,
9]; and enabling 100 Gbps LiFi access network [
10] when laser-based lighting or micro-LEDs are considered.
Furthermore, recent works demonstrated the interest in heterogeneous networks based on hybrid polymer optical fiber (POF)/VLC links as a converged solution to integrate fiber backbone and in-building networks [
11,
12] where large core diameter and small bending radius of POFs lead to low cost and easy installation. These systems include a photodiode (PD) to provide opto-electrical conversion of the signal transmitted over the POF before supplying the recovered electrical signal to the VLC optical source, i.e., an LED as an illuminating source or a laser diode (LDs) if larger bandwidths and collimated beams are required.
Among different types of POFs, the 1-mm core size poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) step-index (SI)-POF is the most popular for indoor communications, whose major drawback is a low transmission bandwidth due to intermodal dispersion. However, in [
13] a transmission rate of 14.77 Gb/s was demonstrated by using wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) signals emitted by several LDs. Moreover, bandwidth efficient advanced modulation formats, i.e., multilevel pulsed amplitude modulation (M-PAM) signals modulating a micro-LED, with larger bandwidth than conventional LEDs, allowed 5 Gb/s transmission over 10 m [
14].
As an attractive simple high capacity indoor communication system, Correa et al. have recently proposed using large core optical fibers acting as the light source in a luminaire-free scheme for VLC transmission; 2 Gb/s was achieved using two WDM LDs over 1.6 m [
15].
In this paper, we propose, for the first time to the authors’ knowledge, the use of low-cost centralized LEDs to feed the fiber network with no further opto-electrical conversions after the fiber section to wirelessly connect the user equipment. Hence, no light source is required for the VLC link; in this way, an optical network industrial infrastructure can be significantly simplified.
The paper is organized as follows:
Section 2 describes the VLC solution over POF.
Section 3 reports the experimental results of the single LED hybrid POF/VLC link. Finally, conclusions are presented in
Section 4.
2. Description of a Single LED Hybrid POF/VLC Link
Figure 1 shows the proposal for Li-Fi wireless communication between a factory network and fixed arms of robots, i.e., users, where both uplink and downlink could employ VLC technology with POF cabling providing multiple signal access points. The network wireless infrastructure may consist of multiple distributed access points with no overlapping coverage despite the proximity between users. As a result, interference is avoided, and the spectrum can be reused efficiently. Moreover, MIMO techniques with diversity receiver designs [
16] can be employed in advanced implementations in order to prevent link blockage.
Therefore, a new hybrid POF/VLC link based on a single LED for indoor communications is proposed, as shown in
Figure 2a. In this paper, we describe the implementation of a POF link as a front-haul downlink solution for feeding the LiFi system. The passive optical front-end at the ceiling only includes an optical lens with no optical-to-electric converter (O/E), i.e., optical source.
The transmitter consists of a low-cost commercial LED emitting light in the visible spectral range with directly modulated intensity. The output light is launched into the 1 mm diameter POF whose fiber-output is attached to a collimating lens to create the wireless interface. A lens is attached to the receiver input to focus the light onto a Ø1 mm photodetector. Then, a trans-impedance amplifier (TIA) is used as an amplification stage.
Collimators are often used to modify the divergent light emission from an optical fiber into a parallel light beam. Most commercial fiber optic collimators are designed for 125 μm diameter silica fibers with low numerical aperture (NA). However, an appropriate collimation system is essential to maximize the received optical power and ensure system operation. Moreover, a smaller collimator optic is preferred as it is cheaper to manufacture and requires less space for installation.
Figure 2b shows the schematic of the free-space optics (FSO) link, including the geometrical optics and ray tracing, which are based on two lenses for proper light collimation as described below.
The purpose is to have efficient coupling (i.e., reduced insertion losses) and small collimator optics that minimizes cost. The numerical aperture provides the angle of acceptance of light from an optical system, i.e., the POF:
where
is the refractive index of the propagation medium and
is the angle of light emission from the optical element.
The fiber core size has a significant effect on the divergence angle of the collimated output beam,
. Consider a nonpoint light source placed at the focal point of the lens,
, where the fiber diameter gives the size of the optical source,
. Using the paraxial approximation, the divergence angle of the output beam at lens #1 can be calculated as follows:
and the resulting beam radius at the exit of lens #1 corresponds to:
In general, POFs have a relatively large core size to be considered as a point source. Therefore, the collimated beam will not be of constant diameter but will expand slightly as it propagates according to a beam divergence given by . To reduce this divergence, lenses with a longer focal length are required while maintaining the numerical aperture condition, , since lenses with smaller numerical aperture than the fiber would imply coupling losses. No matter which lens is used, for a given optical source, the smaller beam that is desired, the greater divergence that is obtained.
We investigated the use of different lens combinations at both transmitter and receiver sides. Available commercial solutions, such as Prizmatix (Prizmatix Ltd. Azrieli Center. Building B, 7th Floor 26 Harokmim St. Holon 5885849, Israel) [
17], offer 1/2′ and 1′ diameter POF collimators. Concretely, FCM1-05 offers the smallest divergence when using a 1 mm diameter and 0.5 NA POF, which has a full emission cone of 0.05 rad (2.86 deg).
We aim to reduce the beam divergence by optimizing the beam collimation in our system. According to Equation (2), a reduction down to α = 0.035 rad (2 deg) leads to a focal length of the collimating lens
larger than 28.5 mm for
. It is also necessary to satisfy the condition of
NA > 0.5. Our analysis is limited to low-cost commercial lenses, aiming to find the smallest lens with the lowest divergence while maintaining the lens numerical aperture condition.
Table 1 summarizes the optical characteristics of three commercial lenses and one Prizmatix solution that were selected to evaluate their performance.
In an optical system only composed of lenses; the optical invariant, also called Lagrange invariant, states that the product of the object height and the marginal ray angle is constant [
18]. From
Figure 2b, the following expression can be obtained:
since the product
is invariant, the beam radius at the PD input is given by:
Replacing Equations (3) and (4) in (5), we obtain
and the spot size
is expressed as:
where the focal distance of Lens #2 is
and the PD is located at the focal point. Therefore, the minimum spot size is limited by the fiber diameter and the focal lengths of both lenses in the system. A shorter focal length in the receiver is required to reduce the spot size at photodetection. An aberration-free optical system is assumed. Aberrations introduced by the optical elements of the system may cause exceptions to these simple rules.
An optimized design of the FSO link requires the simulation of the system optical components. In this work, Zemax software (Zemax, LLC 10230 NE Points Drive, Suite 500 Kirkland, Washington 98033)
USA is employed to simulate nine different setups, which are summarized in
Table 2. The simulator workspace is configured by placing the LED at the fiber input and the fiber-output at the focal distance of the collimating lens, ensuring proper face orientation, as depicted in
Figure 2b. The distance between the collimating lens and the receiver lens is set from 0.25 m to 2 m, and the lenses are fully aligned. The optical power of the LED is set to –5.5 dBm according to the manufacturer parameters and experimental measurements.
According to the simulation, with specific lenses at the fiber-output and at the photodetector input, signal losses can be obtained as a distance function.
Figure 3a compares the optical losses as a function of distance using different lenses in the transmitter, whereas no lens is employed at the detector (setups A, B, and C). As expected from the theoretical predictions, the lens with the longest focal length produces the least beam divergence and therefore the divergence losses over the distance will be lower (setup B).
Figure 3b shows the simulated optical losses as a function of distance by using the optimal lens for collimation (LA1951-A) and different lenses at the detector input (setups D, E and F). The aspheric lens ACL25416U-A (setup D) better concentrates the input beam on the photodetector due to the size of the focusing point (0.62 mm), small enough for the photodetector to capture it without power reduction. Besides, an aspheric lens introduces less loss in the detection system than a spherical lens due to the correction of the aberrations inherent to the geometry of spherical lenses. Lastly, the Prizmatix FCM05-05 collimator is tested at the fiber-output and different lenses are used at the detector input (G, H, and I setups), as shown in
Figure 3c. In all cases, lower optical power is collected than in setups D, E, and F. Note that G setup leads to higher received optical power, although setup I shows the smallest spot size (1 mm), but higher losses are introduced due to the reduced lens size (1/2′).
Experimental measurements were done by using Thorlabs (Thorlabs Inc. Newton, New Jersey, USA) S130C photodiode power sensor and the PM100D power meter console under several setups for the sake of validation of simulation results. As shown in
Figure 3, there is good agreement between theoretical results and experimental measurements in spite of differences between simulated models and real components. Therefore, setup D has been proved to be as the best option for the transmission system employed in this work.
Moreover, irradiance distribution is evaluated by nonsequential ray tracing in ZEMAX. The irradiance distribution variation can be shown as incoherent irradiance as a function of spatial position on the detector, as shown in
Figure 4. The cross section corresponds to the photodetector (Ø1 mm). Three different cases are shown for the sake of comparison. First, no optics are used in the FSO link; second, only one collimating lens at the fiber-output is evaluated and no lens is employed at the receiver-end (setup B); finally, lens LA1951-A is employed at the fiber-output and lens ACL25416U-A at the receiver-end (setup D).
As shown in
Figure 4a, the lack of an optical element at the fiber-output produces a highly divergent beam. The optical power incident on the photodiode over the distance is inadequate to establish communication. However, adding an optical element at the fiber-output to collimate the beam and homogenize the ray trajectories, as shown in
Figure 4b, increases the incident power on the surface of the photodiode. Finally, by incorporating an optical element at the photodetector input, the collimated beam is concentrated (see
Figure 4c) and thus the performance of the system is improved, as will be shown in the next section.