Next Article in Journal
First-Principles Calculations to Investigate Structural, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Properties of Pyrochlore Oxides Eu2Tm2O7 (Tm = Hf, Sn, Zr) for Energy Applications
Previous Article in Journal
X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy of Phosphine-Capped Au Clusters
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Inorganics
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/inorganics11050192
inorganics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Zn(II) Three-Dimensional Metal-Organic Frameworks Based on 2,5-Diiodoterephthalate and N,N Linkers: Structures and Features of Sorption Behavior

by
Alexander S. Zaguzin
1,2,
Taisiya Sukhikh
1,
Maxim N. Sokolov
1,
Vladimir P. Fedin
1 and
Sergey A. Adonin
1,2,3,*
1
Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
2
South Ural State University, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia
3
Favorsky Irkutsk Institute of Chemistry SB RAS, 664033 Irkutsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2023, 11(5), 192; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11050192
Submission received: 23 March 2023 / Revised: 17 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 28 April 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Two new coordination polymers based on Zn(II) and 2,5-diiodoterephthalate—{[Zn(2,5-I-bdc)bpe}] (1) and {[Zn(2,5-I-bdc)bpen}] (2)—were synthesized and characterized. Polymers 1 and 2 feature halogen bonding between the I atoms of MOF and DMF guest molecules, which plays a crucial role in structure stabilization. Selectivity of sorption towards different organic substrates was examined.

1. Introduction

Metal-organic frameworks (commonly abbreviated as MOFs) are coordination compounds consisting of mono- or polynuclear metal fragments (including clusters) which assemble into polymeric structures via organic ligands (so-called “linkers”) [1]. Nowadays, this area preserves its high importance and attracts a great attention of researchers from around the globe [2,3,4], which is also reflected by growing number or relevant publications. There are numerous application areas which make MOFs especially attractive for further in-depth studies. Those include (but are not limited to) separation of diverse organic substrates [5], including industrially important ones (in particular, cyclohexane/benzene) [6,7,8,9], catalysis (including photocatalysis) [10,11,12,13,14,15], sensor systems [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25], removal or important inorganic pollutants [26,27,28,29,30,31], etc. Most of these features are due to the ability of MOF to act as sorbents: those having 3D structure can absorb various substrates into the pores.
The latter remark explains why sorption ability and selectivity of MOFs extremely strongly depends not only on the size of the pores/channels and, therefore, the free volume, but also on the features of supramolecular contacts between the organic ligands and guest molecules. Those can be very diverse. Most commonly, hydrogen bond (HB) plays the most important role [32], but there are also other types of non-covalent interactions, such as aromatic·aromatic contacts [33,34,35], halogen (XB) [36,37], chalcogen (ChB) [38,39], pnictogen or tetrel bonds which can also provide a very important contribution to the guest molecule binding [40,41,42]. In our opinion, this topic is well worth being investigated further and deeper.
Recently, we focused our attention on iodine-substituted aromatic polycarboxylic acids which, in our opinion, contain several important advantages from the perspective of MOF design. On the one hand, those can serve [43,44,45] as MOF linkers in the same manner that their non-substituted relatives do (there are literally thousands of structurally characterized dicarboxylate-based MOFs with different metals, so we cannot provide an in-depth analysis within this article; however, we can mention several comprehensive reviews by Yahgi et al. and other leading groups in this field [46,47,48,49]). On the other hand, as shown before [50], those can form halogen bonds. Finally, some of those are easily available—for example, 2-iodoterephtalic acid (2-I-bdc), which can be prepared from corresponding amino derivative via diazotization [51]. Our recent works with 2-I-bdc-based MOFs demonstrated [52] that those indeed can reveal sorption selectivity, as well as I2 uptake, quite different to MOFs based on corresponding halogen-free ligands. Continuing these studies, we decided to focus on a more iodine-rich ligand—2,5-iodoterephthalic acid (2,5-I-bdc). Herein, we present two new 3D metal-organic frameworks based thereupon—{[Zn(2,5-I-bdc)bpe]} (bpe = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane (1) and {[Zn(2,5-I-bdc)bpen]} (bpen = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene (2). The compounds were characterized using single crystal and powder X-ray diffraction, as well as by other physical methods (such as thermogravimetric analysis). We also examined their selectivity of sorption towards different mixtures of organic substrates.

2. Results and Discussion

Complexes 1 and 2 were prepared using the solvothermal method which is widely applied in chemistry of metal-organic frameworks [53,54]. In all cases, it yielded single crystals suitable for X-ray diffractometry. As follows from powder X-ray diffractometry data (see Supplementary, Figures S1 and S2), both compounds are formed as single phases.
Interestingly, removal of guest DMF molecule from the pure samples of 1 and 2 (so-called “activation” procedure via presence in acetone for 48 h followed by drying in vacuo; such procedure was successfully used by us before [52]) results in collapse of initial structure and formation of other crystalline phases. However, prolonged keeping of “collapsed” samples in DMF results in regeneration of initial phases of 1 and 2, as follows from powder X-ray diffraction data (Figure 1 and Figure 2), so these MOFs can be regarded as “breathing” ones (similar effects were described for other coordination polymers earlier). Considering the presence of prominent XB between the guest DMF molecules and I atoms of 2,5-bdc (see details below), it can be suggested that this factor plays the key role in structure stabilization. Unfortunately, despite numerous attempts being undertaken, we could not obtain the crystals of “collapsed” phases (neither in the case of 1 nor for 2) suitable for X-ray diffractometry since the “collapse” does not occur via the single crystal-to-single crystal route.
The isostructural 1 and 2 comprise {Zn(I2-bdc)2L2} SBUs (Figure 3, left) that connect with each other in a 3D diamond-like framework (Figure 3, right). The whole structure represents four-fold interpenetration of the frameworks (Figure 4), keeping voids decorated by I atoms. Two crystallographically independent DMF molecules are localized, completely filling the voids; free volume in the absence of the DMF molecules is estimated to be ca. 25%. Structures 1 and 2 reveal shortened contacts I···O (2.98–3.10 Å) between the DMF and I2-bdc; these values are less than the sum of corresponding Bondi’s van der Waals radii (3.50 Å). Via these contacts, each DMF molecule binds with two I atoms. These interactions can be regarded as halogen bonding (XB), and it becomes evident that they are responsible for ordering of guest molecules within the pores. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first cases of such ordering or organic molecule achieved due to XB [55,56]. In addition, as mentioned above, it is very likely that these interactions play an important role in overall stabilization of both these MOFs.
To examine the sorption selectivity, we used the approach successfully applied by us earlier [52]: the samples of 1 and 2 were treated to remove the guest solvent molecules and then kept in vapors of bicomponent mixture of organic substrates. After that, the absorbed substrates were extracted by organic solvent and their quantities were measured via comparison of corresponding intensities in 1H NMR spectra [52]. Results are summarized in Table 1 and compared with sorption properties for 2-iodobenzoate-based MOFs reported by us earlier [52]. Unfortunately, in all cases, the selectivity for 1 and 2 is lower. The difference between 1 and 2 is especially intriguing considering their high structural similarity; currently, there is no obvious explanation for this phenomenon. Especially discouraging is the low selectivity towards 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) which is especially interesting in terms of its removal from mixtures and which was expected by us to appear due to possible XB formation.
Results of the TGA experiments for 1 and 2 are presented in SI. In both cases, the first step of decomposition corresponds to the elimination of guest DMF molecules; these processes occur at >120 °C, agreeing well with the literature data. The mass loss matches well with the calculated one. Further heating expectedly results in total decomposition of MOF frameworks.

3. Experimental Part

The reagents were purchased from commercial sources and used without additional purification. 2,5-diiodoterephthalic acid was prepared from p-xylene via the method described earlier [57].

3.1. Synthesis of 1

A total of 50 mg (0.16 mmol) of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, 70 mg (0.16 mmol) of 2,5-I-bdcH2, 30 mg (0.16 mmol) of bpe and 8 mL of DMF were placed into the glass ampoule which was sealed, placed into ultrasonic bath (10 min) and kept at 120 °C for 48 h. Slow cooling resulted in formation of the crystals of 1 on the internal surface of the ampoule. Yield was at 73%.

3.2. Synthesis of 2

The procedure was the same as for 1, using bpen instead of bpe, as well as 7 mL of DMF. Yield was at 79%.

3.3. X-ray Diffractometry

Crystallographic data and refinement details for 1 and 2 are provided in Table 2. Single crystal XRD data for the compounds were collected with a Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer equipped with a CMOS PHOTON III detector and IµS 3.0 source (Montel mirror optics, λ(MoKα) = 0.71073 Å). Additionally, the cell parameters were checked on a Rigaku XtaLAB Synergy-S (Agilent Technologies) diffractometer with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54184). Absorption corrections were applied with the use of the SADABS program. The crystal structures were solved using SHELXT [58] and were refined using SHELXL [59] with OLEX2 GUI [60]. Atomic displacement parameters for non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. CCDC 2217437 and 2217438 contain the supplementary data for this paper. These data can be obtained online, free of charge.

3.4. Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD)

XRD analysis of polycrystals was performed on Shimadzu XRD-7000 diffractometer (CuK-alpha radiation, Ni filter, linear One Sight detector, 0.0143° 2θ step, 2 s per step). Plotting of PXRD patterns and data treatment was performed using X’Pert Plus software (see supplementary Materials).

3.5. Sorption of Organic Substrates

The sorption experiments were conducted according to the procedure reported earlier (interaction of MOF samples with vapors of organic substrates [52]).

3.6. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Thermogravimetric analyses were carried out on a TG 209 F1 Iris thermobalance (NETZSCH, Germany). The measurements were conducted in a helium flow using the heating rate of 10 °C min−1, the gas flow rate of 60 mL min−1, and open Al crucibles.

4. Conclusions

To conclude, we have demonstrated that 2,5-diiodoterephthalate is a suitable building block for design of porous 3D Zn(II)-based metal-organic frameworks which are porous and reveal sorption properties towards different organic substrates. XRD data confirm that halogen bonding can play the key role in stabilization of the MOF structures; moreover, reversible removal of guests likely results in breathing of the whole framework (this effect deserves further investigation). We believe that the use of a wide range of iodine-substituted arenecarboxylic acids has a great potential in design of metal-organic frameworks. Corresponding experiments are underway in our team.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/inorganics11050192/s1. Figure S1. PXRD data for 1 (as-synthesized). 2 theta = degrees; Figure S2. PXRD data for 2 (as-synthesized). 2 theta = degrees; Figure S3. TGA data for 1 (as-synthesized); Figure S4. TGA data for 2 (as-synthesized); Figure S5. 1H NMR spectrum of the sample 1 after vapor adsorption from 1:1 1,2-dichloroethane:benzene mixture (see article for details); Figure S6. 1H NMR spectrum of the sample 1 after vapor adsorption from 1:1 Benzene:chloroform mixture (see article for details); Figure S7. 1H NMR spectrum of the sample 1 after vapor adsorption from 1:1 Benzene:cyclohexane mixture (see article for details); Figure S8. 1H NMR spectrum of the sample 1 after vapor adsorption from 1:1 Benzene:1,2-dibromoethane mixture (see article for details); Figure S9. 1H NMR spectrum of the sample 1 after vapor adsorption from 1:1 dibromoethane:cyclohexane mixture (see article for details); Figure S10. 1H NMR spectrum of the sample 1 after vapor adsorption from 1:1 dibromoethane: hexane mixture (see article for details); Figure S11. 1H NMR spectrum of the sample 1 after vapor adsorption from 1:1 Bromobenzene:toluene mixture (see article for details); Figure S12. 1H NMR spectrum of the sample 2 after vapor adsorption from 1:1 1,2-dichloroethane:benzene mixture (see article for details); Figure S13. 1H NMR spectrum of the sample 2 after vapor adsorption from 1:1 Benzene:chloroform mixture (see article for details); Figure S14. 1H NMR spectrum of the sample 2 after vapor adsorption from 1:1 Benzene:cyclohexane mixture (see article for details); Figure S15. 1H NMR spectrum of the sample 2 after vapor adsorption from 1:1 Benzene:1,2-dibromoethane mixture (see article for details); Figure S16. 1H NMR spectrum of the sample 2 after vapor adsorption from 1:1 dibromoethane:cyclohexane mixture (see article for details); Figure S17. 1H NMR spectrum of the sample 2 after vapor adsorption from 1:1 dibromoethane: hexane mixture (see article for details); Figure S18. 1H NMR spectrum of the sample 2 after vapor adsorption from 1:1 Bromobenzene:toluene mixture (see article for details).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A.A. and V.P.F.; methodology, S.A.A.; validation, T.S. and S.A.A.; formal analysis, S.A.A., T.S. and M.N.S.; investigation, A.S.Z. and T.S.; resources, S.A.A.; data curation, T.S., M.N.S. and A.S.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, S.A.A., T.S., M.N.S. and A.S.Z.; writing—review and editing, M.N.S.; visualization, T.S., A.S.Z. and S.A.A.; supervision, V.P.F. and S.A.A.; project administration, S.A.A.; funding acquisition, S.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Russian Science Foundation, Grant No. 21-73-20019, and partially supported by Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (examination of the sorption properties of the samples, 121031700313-8).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Resource center of Saint Petersburg State University for assistance in XRD experiments, Ilya V. Korolkov and Pavel E. Plyusnin (NIIC SB RAS) for assistance with PXRD and TGA experiments, respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gorbunova, Y.G.; Fedin, V.P.; Blatov, V.A. Metal-organic frameworks as the basis for new-generation functional materials. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2022, 91, RCR5050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rubtsova, I.K.; Melnikov, S.N.; Shmelev, M.A.; Nikolaevskii, S.A.; Yakushev, I.A.; Voronina, J.K.; Barabanova, E.D.; Kiskin, M.A.; Sidorov, A.A.; Eremenko, I.L. Facile synthesis and structure elucidation of metal-organic frameworks with {ZnCa} and {Zn2Ca} metal cores. Mendeleev Commun. 2020, 30, 722–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sidorov, A.A.; Gogoleva, N.V.; Bazhina, E.S.; Nikolaevskii, S.A.; Shmelev, M.A.; Zorina-Tikhonova, E.N.; Starikov, A.G.; Kiskin, M.A.; Eremenko, I.L. Some aspects of the formation and structural features of low nuclearity heterometallic carboxylates. Pure Appl. Chem. 2020, 92, 1093–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kovalenko, K.A.; Potapov, A.S.; Fedin, V.P. Micro-and mesoporous metal-organic frameworks for hydrocarbon separation. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2022, 91, RCR5026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mahmoud, M.E.; Elsayed, S.M.; Mahmoud, S.E.M.E.; Nabil, G.M.; Salam, M.A. Recent progress of metal organic frameworks-derived composites in adsorptive removal of pharmaceuticals. Polyhedron 2022, 226, 116082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sapianik, A.A.; Kovalenko, K.A.; Samsonenko, D.G.; Barsukova, M.O.; Dybtsev, D.N.; Fedin, V.P. Exceptionally effective benzene/cyclohexane separation using a nitro-decorated metal-organic framework. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 8241–8244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, J.; Han, X.; Kang, X.; Chen, Y.; Xu, S.; Smith, G.L.; Tillotson, E.; Cheng, Y.; McCormick McPherson, L.J.; Teat, S.J.; et al. Purification of Propylene and Ethylene by a Robust Metal–Organic Framework Mediated by Host–Guest Interactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 15541–15547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhan, C.-H.; Huang, D.-P.; Wang, Y.; Mao, W.-T.; Wang, X.-J.; Jiang, Z.-G.; Feng, Y.-L. Four anionic Ln-MOFs for remarkable separation of C2H2-CH4/CO2-CH4 and highly sensitive sensing of nitrobenzene. CrystEngComm 2021, 23, 2788–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ye, C.-R.; Wang, W.-J.; Chen, W.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, H.-F.; Dai, B.-L.; Chen, S.-H.; Wu, X.-D.; Li, M.; Huang, X.-C. Harnessing Shape Complementarity for Upgraded Cyclohexane Purification through Adaptive Bottlenecked Pores in an Imidazole-Containing MOF. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 23590–23595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dey, G.; Shadab; Aijaz, A. Metal-Organic Framework Derived Nanostructured Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting. ChemElectroChem 2021, 8, 3782–3803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, X.; Zou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Marchetti, B.; Liu, Y.; Yi, J.; Zhou, X.-D.; Zhang, J. Tin-based metal organic framework catalysts for high-efficiency electrocatalytic CO2 conversion into formate. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 626, 836–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sharma, A.; Verma, K.; Kaushal, S.; Badru, R. A novel 2-D accordion like Al-BPED MOF as reusable and selective catalyst for N-alkylation of amines with dialkylcarbonates. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2022, 36, e6814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zheng, L.; Gu, Y.; Hua, B.; Fu, J.; Li, F. Hierarchical porous melamine sponge@MIL-101-Fe-NH2 composite as Fenton-like catalyst for efficient and rapid tetracycline hydrochloride removal. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 135728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Diyali, N.; Rasaily, S.; Biswas, B. Metal–Organic Framework: An Emergent Catalyst in C–N Cross-Coupling Reactions. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 469, 214667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mulik, N.; Bokade, V. Immobilization of HPW on UiO-66-NH2 MOF as efficient catalyst for synthesis of furfuryl ether and alkyl levulinate as biofuel. Mol. Catal. 2022, 531, 112689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fan, Y.; Guan, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, W.; Liu, C.; Li, X.; Zhou, J.; Ruan, S. Synthesis and gas sensing properties of β-Fe2O3 derived from Fe/Ga bimetallic organic framework. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 921, 166193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mullaney, B.R.; Thompson, A.L.; Beer, P.D. An All-Halogen Bonding Rotaxane for Selective Sensing of Halides in Aqueous Media. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 11458–11462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Miao, Q.; Hakimifar, A.; Akbar Razavi, S.A.; Abbasi, H.; Tehrani, A.A.; Chen, J.-Q.; Hu, M.-L.; Morsali, A.; Retailleau, P. Multi-functionalization strategy for environmental monitoring: A metal-organic framework for high capacity Mercury(II) removal and exceptionally sensitive detection of nitroaromatics. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 376, 134301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Saedi, Z.; Roushani, M.; Khaleghian-Moghadam, R.; Darabi, A. Selective and sensitive Detection of Cu2+ in aqueous solution based on cation exchange by Metal−Organic framework TMU-16 as a fluorescent sensor. J. Lumin. 2022, 251, 119165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mousavi, S.; Zeinali, S. VOC s detection using resistive gas nanosensor based on MIL-101(Cr) as a metal organic framework. Sensors Actuators A Phys. 2022, 346, 113810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khoshbin, Z.; Davoodian, N.; Taghdisi, S.M.; Abnous, K. Metal organic frameworks as advanced functional materials for aptasensor design. Spectrochim. Acta—Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2022, 276, 121251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. He, H.; Sun, F.; Zhao, N.; Yuan, R.; Zhu, G. Three novel zinc(ii) metal-organic frameworks based on three tetrazolate ligands: Synthesis, structures and photoluminescence. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 21535–21540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qu, X.; Yan, B. Zn(ii)/Cd(ii)-based metal-organic frameworks: Crystal structures, Ln(iii)-functionalized luminescence and chemical sensing of dichloroaniline as a pesticide biomarker. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 9427–9439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, X.-L.; Liu, G.-Z.; Xin, L.-Y.; Wang, L.-Y. Three Zn(II) metal-organic frameworks assembled from a versatile tecton 5-ethyl-pyridine-2,3-dicarboxylate and dipyridyl-type coligand. CrystEngComm 2012, 14, 1729–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, H.; Wang, Z.-X.; Luo, Y.-H.; Chen, F.-Y.; Jia, C.-Y.; Tan, X.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Zhang, D.-E. Co2+ and nitrobenzene sensing using indium-based metal-organic framework. Polyhedron 2022, 224, 116016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mansoorianfar, M.; Nabipour, H.; Pahlevani, F.; Zhao, Y.; Hussain, Z.; Hojjati-Najafabadi, A.; Hoang, H.Y.; Pei, R. Recent progress on adsorption of cadmium ions from water systems using metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as an efficient class of porous materials. Environ. Res. 2022, 214, 114113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, K.-G.; Bigdeli, F.; Sharifzadeh, Z.; Gholizadeh, S.; Morsali, A. Role of metal-organic framework composites in removal of inorganic toxic contaminants. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 404, 136709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ma, S.-Q.; Yu, B.; Yi, X.-H.; Wang, C.-C. Two new Zn-based coordination polymers constructed from a light responsive organic ligand: Efficient clean-up of Cr(VI) and organic pollutants. Polyhedron 2020, 188, 114701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maponya, T.C.; Makgopa, K.; Somo, T.R.; Tshwane, D.M.; Modibane, K.D. Highly adsorptive removal of palladium and platinum ions from wastewater using novel ethylenediamine-glutaraldehyde-grafted metal organic framework. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2023, 20, 100805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Maponya, T.C.; Modibane, K.D.; Somo, T.R.; Makgopa, K. Selective adsorption of palladium ions from wastewater by ion-imprinted MIL-101(Cr) derived from waste polyethylene terephthalate: Isotherms and kinetics. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 307, 122767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Quintero-Álvarez, F.G.; Mendoza-Castillo, D.I.; Rojas-Mayorga, C.K.; García-Hernández, E.; Aguayo-Villarreal, I.A.; Bonilla-Petriciolet, A. Mechanism, interfacial interactions and thermodynamics of the monolayer adsorption of trace geogenic pollutants from water using mil metal-organic frameworks: Fluorides and arsenates. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 380, 121665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Colorado-Peralta, R.; María Rivera-Villanueva, J.; Manuel Mora-Hernández, J.; Morales-Morales, D.; Ángel Alfonso-Herrera, L. An overview of the role of supramolecular interactions in gas storage using MOFs. Polyhedron 2022, 224, 115995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Torresi, S.; Famulari, A.; Martí-Rujas, J. Kinetically Controlled Fast Crystallization of M12L8Poly-[n]-catenanes Using the 2,4,6-Tris(4-pyridyl)benzene Ligand and ZnCl2in an Aromatic Environment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 9537–9543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Martí-Rujas, J.; Elli, S.; Famulari, A. Kinetic trapping of 2,4,6-tris(4-pyridyl)benzene and ZnI2 into M12L8 poly-[n]-catenanes using solution and solid-state processes. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 5605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sawada, T.; Inomata, Y.; Shimokawa, K.; Fujita, M. A metal-peptide capsule by multiple ring threading. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cavallo, G.; Metrangolo, P.; Milani, R.; Pilati, T.; Priimagi, A.; Resnati, G.; Terraneo, G. The Halogen Bond. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 2478–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Soldatova, N.S.; Postnikov, P.S.; Suslonov, V.V.; Kissler, T.Y.; Ivanov, D.M.; Yusubov, M.S.; Galmés, B.; Frontera, A.; Kukushkin, V.Y. Diaryliodonium as a double s-hole donor: The dichotomy of thiocyanate halogen bonding provides divergent solid state arylation by diaryliodonium cations. Org. Chem. Front. 2020, 7, 2230–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Esrafili, M.D.; Asadollahi, S.; Dadban Shahamat, Y. Competition between chalcogen bond and halogen bond interactions in YOX4:NH3 (Y = S, Se; X = F, Cl, Br) complexes: An ab initio investigation. Struct. Chem. 2016, 27, 1439–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mikherdov, A.S.; Novikov, A.S.; Kinzhalov, M.A.; Boyarskiy, V.P.; Starova, G.L.; Ivanov, A.Y.; Kukushkin, V.Y. Halides Held by Bifurcated Chalcogen–Hydrogen Bonds. Effect of μ (S,N–H) Cl Contacts on Dimerization of Cl(carbene)Pd II Species. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 3420–3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Norouzi, F.; Khavasi, H.R. Iodine decorated-UiO-67 MOF as a fluorescent sensor for the detection of halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 8937–8943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kalaj, M.; Momeni, M.R.; Bentz, K.C.; Barcus, K.S.; Palomba, J.M.; Paesani, F.; Cohen, S.M. Halogen bonding in UiO-66 frameworks promotes superior chemical warfare agent simulant degradation. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 3481–3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bertani, R.; Sgarbossa, P.; Venzo, A.; Lelj, F.; Amati, M.; Resnati, G.; Pilati, T.; Metrangolo, P.; Terraneo, G. Halogen bonding in metal-organic–supramolecular networks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010, 254, 677–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, L.; Chen, S.-C.; Zhang, Z.-H.; Sun, F.-A.; Cui, A.-J.; Gao, H.-B.; Hea, M.-Y.; Chen, Q. A Zinc(II) Coordination Polymer with Tetraiodoterephthalate: Synthesis, Crystal Structure, and Luminescence. Z. Naturforsch. B 2012, 67, 843–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, S.-C.; Hu, M.; Zhang, Z.-H.; Sun, F.-A.; Wang, L.; Zhou, W.-Y.; He, M.-Y.; Chen, Q. Syntheses, structures, and properties of zinc(II), cadmium(II), cobalt(II), and manganese(II) coordination polymers with tetraiodoterephthalate. Transit. Met. Chem. 2012, 37, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. deKrafft, K.; Xie, Z.; Cao, G.; Tran, S.; Ma, L.; Zhou, O.; Lin, W. Iodinated Nanoscale Coordination Polymers as Potential Contrast Agents for Computed Tomography. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9901–9904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Furukawa, H.; Cordova, K.E.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 2013, 341, 1230444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Schoedel, A.; Li, M.; Li, D.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Structures of Metal-Organic Frameworks with Rod Secondary Building Units. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 12466–12535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yaghi, O.M.; O’Keeffe, M.; Ockwig, N.W.; Chae, H.K.; Eddaoudi, M.; Kim, J. Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials. Nature 2003, 423, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schubert, U. Clusters with a Zr6O8 core. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 469, 214686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chernysheva, M.V.; Bulatova, M.; Ding, X.; Haukka, M. Influence of Substituents in the Aromatic Ring on the Strength of Halogen Bonding in Iodobenzene Derivatives. Cryst. Growth Des. 2020, 20, 7197–7210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Christine, T.; Tabey, A.; Cornilleau, T.; Fouquet, E.; Hermange, P. Syntheses of o-iodobenzyl alcohols—BODIPY structures as potential precursors of bimodal tags for positron emission tomography and optical imaging. Tetrahedron 2019, 75, 13076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zaguzin, A.S.; Sukhikh, T.S.; Kolesov, B.A.; Sokolov, M.N.; Fedin, V.P.; Adonin, S.A. Iodinated vs non-iodinated: Comparison of sorption selectivity by [Zn2(bdc)2dabco]n and superstructural 2-iodoterephtalate-based metal-organic framework. Polyhedron 2021, 212, 115587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cherezova, S.V.; Barsukova, M.O.; Samsonenko, D.G.; Fedin, V.P. Crystal structure of dense metal-organic frameworks based on sc(III) and two types of ligands. J. Struct. Chem. 2021, 62, 897–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sapianik, A.A.; Kiskin, M.A.; Samsonenko, D.G.; Ryadun, A.A.; Dybtsev, D.N.; Fedin, V.P. Luminescent detection by coordination polymers derived from a pre-organized heterometallic carboxylic building unit. Polyhedron 2018, 145, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Martí-Rujas, J.; Islam, N.; Hashizume, D.; Izumi, F.; Fujita, M.; Kawano, M. Dramatic structural rearrangements in porous coordination networks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 5853–5860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Martí-Rujas, J.; Bonafede, S.; Tushi, D.; Cametti, M. Multiple single-crystal-to-single-crystal guest exchange in a dynamic 1D coordination polymer. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 12357–12360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Perry, R.J.; Wilson, B.D.; Turner, S.R.; Blevins, R.W. Synthesis of Polyimides via the Palladium-Catalyzed Carbonylation of Bis(o-iodo esters) and Diamines. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 3509–3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT—Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Adv. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Struct. Chem. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Inorganics 11 00192 g001 550
Figure 1. PXRD data for 1.
Figure 1. PXRD data for 1.
Inorganics 11 00192 g001
Inorganics 11 00192 g002 550
Figure 2. PXRD data for 2.
Figure 2. PXRD data for 2.
Inorganics 11 00192 g002
Inorganics 11 00192 g003 550
Figure 3. Left: Secondary building unit {Zn(2,5-I-bdc)2L2} (L = bpe, bpen) in compounds 1 and 2, with the latter as example. Hydrogen atoms are not shown. Shortened intermolecular contacts I·O are highlighted by orange dashed lines. Right: A fragment of diamond-like structures 1 and 2, with the latter as example. Zinc atoms connected via bridging ligands are linked by bold blue lines.
Figure 3. Left: Secondary building unit {Zn(2,5-I-bdc)2L2} (L = bpe, bpen) in compounds 1 and 2, with the latter as example. Hydrogen atoms are not shown. Shortened intermolecular contacts I·O are highlighted by orange dashed lines. Right: A fragment of diamond-like structures 1 and 2, with the latter as example. Zinc atoms connected via bridging ligands are linked by bold blue lines.
Inorganics 11 00192 g003
Inorganics 11 00192 g004 550
Figure 4. Fragments of crystal packing in compounds 1 and 2, with the latter as example. Hydrogen atoms are not shown. Interpenetrated frameworks are highlighted by different colours; solvate DMF molecules are shown as grey spheres.
Figure 4. Fragments of crystal packing in compounds 1 and 2, with the latter as example. Hydrogen atoms are not shown. Interpenetrated frameworks are highlighted by different colours; solvate DMF molecules are shown as grey spheres.
Inorganics 11 00192 g004
Table
Table 1. Selectivity of vapor adsorption by 1, 2, {[Zn2(2-I-bdc)2bpe]} (3) and {[Zn2(2-I-bdc)2dabco]} (4) from equimolar mixtures of different organic substrates.
Table 1. Selectivity of vapor adsorption by 1, 2, {[Zn2(2-I-bdc)2bpe]} (3) and {[Zn2(2-I-bdc)2dabco]} (4) from equimolar mixtures of different organic substrates.
No.Substrates1234
11,2-dichloroethane:benzene1:11:11.2:12.54:1
2Benzene:chloroform1:2.151:1.51:1.31:3.3
3Benzene:cyclohexane6:110.6:125:143.8:1
4Benzene:1,2-dibromoethane1:1.31:2n/a1:8.3
51,2-dibromoethane:cyclohexane25.7:18.1:1116:1n/a
61,2-dibromoethane: hexane103:194:1176:1n/a
7Bromobenzene:toluene0.9:11.1:11.8:1n/a
Table
Table 2. Crystal data and structure refinement for 1 and 2.
Table 2. Crystal data and structure refinement for 1 and 2.
1·DMF2·DMF
Empirical FormulaC23H21I2N3O5ZnC23H19I2N3O5Zn
Crystal SystemOrthorombicOrthorombic
Formula weight738.60736.58
Temperature/K150 (2)150 (2)
Space groupFdd2Fdd2
a/Å28.7667 (10)28.6666 (11)
b/Å31.0967 (11)31.2803 (15)
c/Å22.7773 (8)22.6871 (11)
α/°9090
β/°9090
γ/°9090
Volume/Å320,375.4 (12)20,343.5 (16)
Z3232
ρcalcg/cm31.9261.924
μ/mm−13.4273.432
F (000)11,392.011,328.0
Crystal size/mm30.07 × 0.04 × 0.040.06 × 0.04 × 0.04
RadiationMoKα (λ = 0.71073)MoKα (λ = 0.71073)
2Θ range for data collection/°2.63 to 51.373.854 to 51.364
Index ranges−35 ≤ h ≤ 35, −37 ≤ k ≤ 35, −27 ≤ l ≤ 27−34 ≤ h ≤ 34, −38 ≤ k ≤ 38, −27 ≤ l ≤ 27
Reflections collected53,78248,728
Independent reflections9670 (Rint = 0.0825, Rsigma = 0.0641)9651 (Rint = 0.0606, Rsigma = 0.0486)
Data/restraints/parameters9670/153/5939651/56/604
Goodness-of-fit on F21.0311.047
Final R indexes (I > =2σ (I))R1 = 0.0615, wR2 = 0.1406R1 = 0.0449, wR2 = 0.0951
Final R indexes (all data)R1 = 0.0862, wR2 = 0.1565R1 = 0.0543, wR2 = 0.0999
Largest diff. peak/hole / e Å−31.85/−1.231.67/−0.97
Flack parameter0.50 (5)0.45 (3)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zaguzin, A.S.; Sukhikh, T.; Sokolov, M.N.; Fedin, V.P.; Adonin, S.A. Zn(II) Three-Dimensional Metal-Organic Frameworks Based on 2,5-Diiodoterephthalate and N,N Linkers: Structures and Features of Sorption Behavior. Inorganics 2023, 11, 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11050192

AMA Style

Zaguzin AS, Sukhikh T, Sokolov MN, Fedin VP, Adonin SA. Zn(II) Three-Dimensional Metal-Organic Frameworks Based on 2,5-Diiodoterephthalate and N,N Linkers: Structures and Features of Sorption Behavior. Inorganics. 2023; 11(5):192. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11050192

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zaguzin, Alexander S., Taisiya Sukhikh, Maxim N. Sokolov, Vladimir P. Fedin, and Sergey A. Adonin. 2023. "Zn(II) Three-Dimensional Metal-Organic Frameworks Based on 2,5-Diiodoterephthalate and N,N Linkers: Structures and Features of Sorption Behavior" Inorganics 11, no. 5: 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11050192

APA Style

Zaguzin, A. S., Sukhikh, T., Sokolov, M. N., Fedin, V. P., & Adonin, S. A. (2023). Zn(II) Three-Dimensional Metal-Organic Frameworks Based on 2,5-Diiodoterephthalate and N,N Linkers: Structures and Features of Sorption Behavior. Inorganics, 11(5), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11050192

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop