Next Article in Journal
Supramolecular Assemblies and Anticancer Activities of Aminopyidine-Based Polynuclear and Mononuclear Co(II) Benzoates: Experimental and Theoretical Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances and Challenges in Hybrid Supercapacitors Based on Metal Oxides and Carbons
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficient Sequestration of Heavy Metal Cations by [Mo2S12]2− Intercalated Cobalt Aluminum-Layered Double Hydroxide

by
Subrata Chandra Roy
1,
Carrie L. Donley
2 and
Saiful M. Islam
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Physics, and Atmospheric Sciences, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS 39217, USA
2
Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2025, 13(2), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13020050
Submission received: 20 December 2024 / Revised: 7 January 2025 / Accepted: 1 February 2025 / Published: 10 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crystalline Porous Materials for Environment and Sensing)

Abstract

:
Heavy metal cations such as Ag+, Pb2+, and Hg2+ can accumulate in living organisms, posing severe risks to biological systems, including humans. Therefore, removing heavy metal cations from wastewater is crucial before discharging them to the environment. However, trace levels and high-capacity removal of the heavy metals remain a critical challenge. This work demonstrates the synthesis and characterization of [Mo2S12]2− intercalated cobalt aluminum-layered double hydroxide, CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH (CoAl―Mo2S12), and its remarkable sorption properties for heavy metals. This material shows high efficiency for removing over 99.9% of Ag+, Cu2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ from 10 ppm aqueous solutions with a distribution constant, Kd, as high as 107 mL/g. The selectivity order for removing these ions, determined from the mixed ion state experiment, was Pb2+ < Cu2+ ≪ Hg2+ < Ag+. This study also suggests that CoAl―Mo2S12 is not selective for Ni2+, Cd2+, and Zn2+ cations. CoAl―Mo2S12 is an efficient sorbent for Ag+, Cu2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ ions at pH~12, with the removal performance of both Ag+ and Hg2+ cations retaining > 99.7% across the pH range of ~2 to 12. Our study also shows that the CoAl―Mo2S12 is a highly competent silver cation adsorbent exhibiting removal capacity (qm) as high as ~918 mg/g compared with the reported data. A detailed mechanistic analysis of the post-treated solid samples with Ag+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ reveals the formation of Ag2S, HgS, and PbMoO4, respectively, suggesting the precipitation reaction mechanism.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Heavy metal contamination in water resources poses a significant threat to environmental and human health due to the toxicity, persistence, and bioaccumulation of these pollutants [1]. Contaminated water with heavy metals destroys the main metabolic process of humans by producing reactive oxygen species and free radicals, which cause high morbidity and mortality worldwide [2]. Not only humans but also the entire ecosystems are at serious risk for the contamination of water bodies by heavy metals [1]. As industrial activities continue to expand globally, the need for efficient and cost-effective methods to remove heavy metals from water has become increasingly urgent [3]. Among various remediation techniques, adsorption using engineered nanomaterials has emerged as a promising approach due to its high efficiency and simplicity [4].
Layered double hydroxides (LDHs) have garnered considerable attention as adsorbents for heavy metal removal owing to their unique layered structure, high anion exchange capacity, and tunable composition [5,6,7]. These materials comprise positively charged metal hydroxide layers with intercalated anions and water molecules in the interlayer spaces [8]. Modifying the interlayer anions offers opportunities to enhance the adsorption capacity and selectivity of LDHs for specific contaminants [9]. Recent studies have shown that the intercalation of sulfur-containing anions into LDHs can significantly improve their performance in heavy metal removal [6,8,10,11,12,13]. These findings highlight the importance of functionalizing chemically diverse LDHs with various metal sulfide anions. In particular, incorporating sulfur-rich anions provides abundant binding sites and enables potential redox interactions, significantly enhancing the overall removal efficiency.
Building upon these findings, our study focuses on the development of a novel adsorbent material: [Mo2S12]2− intercalated cobalt aluminum-layered double hydroxide (CoAl―Mo2S12). The [Mo2S12]2− anion, a sulfur-rich molybdenum complex, is expected to provide numerous binding sites for heavy metal cations through strong metal–sulfur interactions [14] and particularly for soft heavy metal cations through hard and soft acid-base principles where sulfide ions act as a soft base [15]. It is important to note that MogAl-Mo3S13, a previously reported material, offers impressive sorption properties for heavy metals. This work reports the synthesis and characterization of CoAl-Mo2S12-LDH [6]. Importantly, the host–guest interactions depend on numerous factors, including the unique chemical properties of the layered cations and the guest anions. The layered composition varies from Mg2⁺ to Co2⁺, resulting in deviations in interlayer spacing and M-O bonding strength within the layered MoO6 octahedra. Furthermore, Mo3S13 and Mo2S12 ions exhibit distinct differences, including but not limited to the following: (i) Mo3S13 ions contain a trinuclear cluster with Mo-Mo bonds in a quasi-spherical structure, whereas [Mo2S12] ions comprise a dinuclear Mo-Mo cluster with a linear structure, (ii) molybdenum atoms in Mo2S12 anions have a pentavalent oxidation state, while those in Mo3S13 anions are tetravalent, and (iii) variations in charge density and ionic sizes further differentiate their chemical and physical behaviors. These features create remarkable distinctions in the host-guest interactions, significantly influencing the physicochemical properties of the resulting materials. Therefore, further investigation is necessary to understand these interactions fully.
In this manuscript, we report the synthesis, characterization, and efficiency of [Mo2S12]2− intercalated CoAl―LDH for the sequestration of various heavy metal cations from aqueous solutions. We explore the adsorption mechanisms, kinetics, and sorption capacity to elucidate the underlying processes governing the removal of these contaminants. Additionally, we examine the material’s selectivity under different environmental conditions to assess its practical applicability in water treatment scenarios. By combining the advantageous properties of CoAl―LDH with the metal-binding capabilities of [Mo2S12]2−, we developed a highly efficient and versatile adsorbent for heavy metal removal. This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on functionalized LDHs for environmental remediation and provides insights into the design principles for next-generation adsorbent materials targeting specific water pollutants.

2. Results and Discussions

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization

[Mo2S12]2− intercalated CoAl-layered double hydroxide (CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH) was synthesized at ambient conditions using the anion exchange method via the substitution of NO3 with [Mo2S12]2− anions into the positively charged gallery of the host CoAl─NO3─LDH. The XRD patterns of CoAl―CO3―LDH, CoAl―NO3―LDH, and CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH show the characteristics of Brag’s diffraction peaks of 003 and 006, belonging to the hydrotalcite structure type layered double hydroxide (Figure 1A). The corresponding d003 values for CoAl―CO3, CoAl―NO3, and CoAl―Mo2S12 are obtained at 0.75 nm, 0.89 nm, and 1.08 nm, respectively (Figure 1A). The gradual increase in the interplanar d003 distances from CoAl―CO3 → CoAl―NO3 → CoAl―Mo2S12 are attributed to the larger ionic sizes of intercalated anions having a trend of CO32− < NO3 < Mo2S122−.
Infrared spectroscopy revealed the C-O stretching and bending modes of CO32− were confirmed by the sharp band at 1355 cm−1 and a strong band at 787 cm−1, demonstrating the formation of CoAl―CO3―LDH (Figure 1B) [16]. Furthermore, a doublet of N-O stretching modes of micro-hydrated NO3 observed at 1355 and 1407 cm−1 confirm the exchange of CO32− by NO3 (Figure 1B) in the gallery of CoAl―LDH [16,17]. The appearance of a very low intensity of NO3 peak at the FTIR spectrum of CoAl―Mo2S12 reveals the almost disappearance of the NO3 group (Figure 1B). The steric hindrance of the disulfide-rich large [Mo2S12]2− might inhibit its complete exchange with NO3 ions [18]. A similar finding was also reported for other bulky metal–sulfide interaction LDH [19]. Therefore, the FTIR spectrum indicates the formation of CoAl―CO3 → CoAl―NO3 → CoAl―Mo2S12 through the ion-exchange method, which is also corroborated by XRD analysis.
We also analyzed the pristine CoAl―Mo2S12 by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to determine the oxidation states of cobalt, molybdenum, and sulfur ions. The high-resolution XPS spectrum of CoAl―Mo2S12 shows 3 doublets for Mo 3d with binding energies (BEs) of 229.17 and 232.37 eV, ∆BE = 3.20 eV; 231.15 and 234.35 eV, ∆BE = 3.20 eV; 232.32 and 235.52 eV, ∆BE = 3.20 eV corresponding to the 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 of Mo4+, Mo5+, and Mo6+, respectively [8,20,21]. Similarly, 3 doublets for S 2p orbitals (Figure 1D) at 161.76 and 162.94; 163.06 and 164.24; 168.02 and 169.20 eV with ∆ = 1.18 eV identified its three different oxidation states as −2, −1, and +6, respectively [8,21,22]. The deviation of the Mo and S oxidation states may suggest a change in the structure of the redox-active Mo2S12 anions during the intercalation process, which is yet to be understood. This kind of phenomenon was also observed for MgAl-MoO2S2 [23]. Additionally, XPS also revealed peaks at 781.25 and 797.56 eV, corresponding to Co 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 energy, respectively [8]. Hence, the distance between the main and satellite peaks of Co 2p3/2 orbitals is 5.5 eV, which indicates the bivalency of Co ions in the CoAl―Mo2S12 (Figure S1) [24].
The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) shows an initial loss of about 8 and 6.7 weight percentages up to 160 °C for CoAl―NO3 and CoAl―Mo2S12, respectively (Figure S2A). This weight loss is due to the removal of surface and interlayer water molecules. The thermal decomposition of the CoAl―NO3 structure is observed around 250 °C by the loss of OH and NO3 groups and, subsequently, led to the formation of CoAl2O4 (Figure S2A) [25]. However, the TGA of CoAl―Mo2S12 showed a continuous loss of weight that reached ~34% before it became stable at about 550 °C. Such a gradual loss is related to losing water, nitrate, and sulfide species. After TGA, the X-ray powder diffraction pattern of the CoAl―Mo2S12 shows low-intensity hump-like features of few diffraction peaks at 2Ɵ = 14.7, 26.2, 30.5, 46.9, and 53.9° which are related to CoMoS2.17O1.12 (PDF-2 Entry # 00-016-0438) (Figure S2B) [26].
The SEM image shows a random orientation of the aggregated plate-like crystallites of CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH (Figure 2A). The energy-dispersive X-ray spectrum of CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH confirms the presence of Mo and S besides Co and Al (Figure 2B). The atomic abundance of Co-Al is 0.61:0.39. Considering the amount of trivalent Al3+ ion, the maximum 0.195 moles of [Mo2S12]2− can be inserted into the CoAl―LDH layers, and, therefore, the molecular formula of CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH would be Co0.61Al0.39(OH)2(Mo2S12)0.195·H2O. However, bearing in mind the molar ratios of (Mo + S)/Co and (Mo + S)/Al which are 3.08 and 4.78, respectively, the molecular formula of the synthesized CoAl―Mo2S12 would be Co0.61Al0.39(OH)2(Mo2S12)0.134(NO3)x(CO3)0.06−x/2·H2O (where x = 0.0 to 0.12) instead of Co0.58Al0.42(OH)2(Mo2S12)0.21·H2O. Such a mix of anionic intercalation can agree with the IR spectrum (Figure 1B). The TEM image of the LDHs reveals the transparent hexagonal morphology, which demonstrates the ultrathin nature of the platelike crystallites (Figure 2C).

2.2. Sorption of Individual Heavy Metal Cations

We investigated the interactions of CoAl―Mo2S12 with various heavy metal cations: Cu2+, Hg2+, Ag+, Pb2+, Cd2+, Ni2+, and Zn2+ (Figure 3, Table S2). Among them, CoAl―Mo2S12 was remarkably effective in capturing Ag+, Cu2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ from aqueous solutions. This finding revealed that CoAl―Mo2S12 could remove over 99.9% of Ag+, Cu2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ from 10 ppm (mg/L) spiked solutions of each cation from the individual cationic states. Such a highly efficient removal of Ag+, Cu2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ led to the final concentrations of ~0.5, 22.0, 26.0, and 3.0 ppb, respectively, with their corresponding distribution constants of 2.0 × 107, 4.5 × 105, 3.8 × 105, and 9.9 × 106 mL/g. The distribution constant, Kd, represents the affinity of sorbent to a sorbate, and any value of ≥104 mL/g is deemed exceptional [27,28]. Hence, CoAl―Mo2S12, with such an excellent removal performance and unprecedented selectivity toward a large number of toxic heavy metal cations, including Ag+, Cu2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+, and an outstanding Kd value, places this material among the top candidates for the sorption of heavy metals ions from aqueous solutions.

2.3. Sorption of Mixed Heavy Metal Cations

To investigate the selective affinity and competitive sorption of different heavy metal cations, CoAl―Mo2S12 sorbents were suspended in a solution containing Mn+ = Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Ag+, Cd2+, Pb2+, and Hg2+, which we refer to as mixed-ion states (Figure 4A, Table S3). The sorption experiment was carried out in aqueous solutions with 10 ppm concentrations of each cation at pH~7 for contact times of 6, 24, and 48 h. Importantly, a solution with 10 ppm of each of the seven cations yields a total concentration of 70 ppm in the mixed-ion state. This experiment showed that even in the presence of competing cations, the removal performance for the Ag+ and Hg2+ cations remains over 99.5%. However, our results show in the mixed-ion state, the removal efficiency of Cu2+ ions dropped from ~70% (Kd~2.3 × 103) to ~20% (2.4 × 102 mL/g), whereas it increased from 7 (Kd~0.8 ×102) to 33% (Kd~4.9 × 102) for Pb2+ ions with a duration of 6 h to 48 h. Additionally, other harder cations, such as Ni2+, Cd2+, and Zn2+, are not selective for the CoAl―Mo2S12. The selectivity order for these ions was Pb2+ < Cu2+ ≪ Hg2+ < Ag+ (Table S3). Hence, such a high selectivity for Ag+ and Hg2+ can be attributed to their higher chemical softness and polarizability, which drive high affinity to bind with chemically soft and polarizable Lewis basic sulfide anions of the CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH, following Pearson’s hard-soft Lewis acid-base principle [15].
The sorption rates and mechanisms can be analyzed by pseudo-first and pseudo-second-order rate equations, as described in Equations (1) and (2), respectively [29].
Pseudo - first - order :   ln q e q t = l n q e k 1 t
Pseudo - second - order :   t q t = 1 k 2 q e 2 + t q e
where qe (mg/g) is the amount of adsorbed element per unit mass of adsorbent at equilibrium and qt (mg/g) is the adsorbed amount at time t, while k1 (min−1) and k2 (g/mg·min−1) are equilibrium rate constants of pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order adsorption interactions, respectively [30]. Fitting of the experimental data led to a decent linear relationship for the ‘t/qt’ versus ‘t plot (Figure 4B), demonstrating the sorption of Ag+ and Hg2+ follow the pseudo-second-order rate equations where the rate constant, k2, for Ag+ and Hg2+ is ~4.86×10−2 and 1.00×10−1 g/mg·min−1, respectively, and the correlation coefficients (R2) were nearly equal to unity. Overall, a combination of such remarkable sorption efficiencies establishes CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH as a highly promising adsorbent for the removal of heavy metals from complex samples and wastewater treatment.

2.4. pH-Dependent Sorption Studies

A pH-dependent sorption experiment of CoAl―Mo2S12 for heavy metal cations was conducted in an aqueous solution at neutral, acidic, and alkaline conditions. A detailed sorption analysis of mixed heavy metal cations shows that CoAl―Mo2S12 is the most efficient sorbent for Ag+, Cu2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ ions at pH~12 (Figure 5 and Table S5). At this pH, it achieves over ≥ 99.9% removal of Ag+ and Hg2+ cations with Kd values of >108 and 106 mL/g, respectively. Remarkably, the removal rate for both Ag+ and Hg2+ cations remains > 99.7 and 98.9%, respectively, over the pH range of ~2 to 12. For Cu2+ and Pb2+, the removal efficiency increases as the pH of the solution increases. Hence, the higher removal of Cu2+ and Pb2+ in alkaline conditions could be attributed to the cooperative effect of adsorption and metal hydroxide precipitation. This high removal performance, along with such high distribution constants, highlights CoAl―Mo2S12 as a unique sorbent for heavy metal cations.

2.5. The Sorption Capacity of CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH

Sorption experiments were conducted with 20.0 mg of the CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH for Ag+ and Pb2+ using their individual solution prepared by spiking a range of concentrations up to 3000 ppm. To understand the sorbent and sorbate interactions, the experimental data were fitted by the Langmuir isotherms model for heterogeneous surfaces (Equation (3)). This model predicts that the sorbate undergoes single-layer type exposure on the surface of the sorbent materials. It also predicts that once an adsorption site is covered, no further adsorption can take place at the same site [30].
Langmuir   isotherm :   q = q m b C e 1 + b C e
where Ce (mg/L) is the concentration at equilibrium, q (mg/g) is the equilibrium sorption capacity of the sorbed Ag+, qm (mg/g) is the theoretical maximum sorption capacity, b (L·mg−1) is the Langmuir constant that is related to the interaction energy of CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH and Ag+, and Ce (µg/mL) is the equilibrium concentration.
The sorption performance of the CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH towards Ag+ and Pb2+ increases with the initial concentrations up to 3.0 ×103 ppm. Our study shows that the CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH is a highly competent silver cation sorbent exhibiting removal capacity (qm) as high as ~918 mg/g (Figure 6A, Tables S6 and S7), placing this material among the topmost sulfide-based sorbent known to date (Table 1). The high sorption of Ag⁺ can be attributed to the strong affinity of Ag⁺ ions toward the Lewis-basic sulfide anions. However, the contribution of the topotactic ion exchange between the layered cations and Ag⁺ cannot be entirely ruled out. In contrast, CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH offers a moderate sorption capacity of ~202 mg/g for Pb2+ cations (Figure 6B). This value of sorption capacity for Pb2+ ions is comparable with Mg2Al-LS-LDH (123 mg/g) [31], CTS/PAM gel (138 mg/g) [32], EDTA-LDH (180 mg/g) [33], cellulose-based chalcogel (240 mg/g) [34], and MoS4-LDH (290 mg/g) [7].

2.6. Application Potential of CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH

To assess the potential in the application of CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH towards heavy metal removal from wastewater, we performed the sorption experiments in the presence of highly competitive ions in naturally contaminated water, e.g., Mississippi River water (MRW water, from Louisiana) and Tap water (TAP), which were contaminated with various types of inorganic ions, e.g., Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, CO32−, HCO3, SO42−, PO43−, and Cl and other organic pollutants. A total of 20.0 mL water from different sources was spiked with a mixed solution of Ag+, Hg2+, Pb2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, and Cd2+, containing 10 ppm of each metal cation resulting in a total concentration of 70 ppm for seven metal ions. CoAl―Mo2S12 can efficiently remove Ag+ and Hg2+ from those water samples even if they contain a variety of chemically diverse species, such as large quantities of cations, anions, and organic species. In particular, Ag+ and Hg2+ are removed from MRW and TAP with a removal performance of above 99% (Table 2). This finding implies that CoAl―Mo2S12 has exceptional potential for the selective extraction of Ag+ and Hg2+ from wastewater and for the selective separation of these elements from contaminated waterways.

2.7. Post-Sorbed Analysis of Solid Sorbent

After the sorption experiments, the solid adsorbent was collected, air-dried at ambient temperature, and analyzed using XRD, TEM, and XPS. The XRD pattern of the 100 ppm Ag+ interacted samples showed disruption of the LDH structure, which was significant in 3000 ppm Ag+ interacted sorbent and showed humps with very weak peaks at 2Θ~25.5, 31.4, and 43.0°, identified as Ag2S (Figure S3A) [43]. Furthermore, TEM analysis revealed the secondary phase (Figure S3B,C), suggesting a precipitation mechanism. Likewise, XRD patterns of 100 ppm Hg2+ and Pb2+ treated samples showed retention of the LDH structure with the formation of insoluble HgS and PbMoO4, respectively, indicative of precipitation mechanisms (Figure 7A). TEM images of post-treated samples clearly show the formation of secondary phases (HgS and PbMoO4) along with the hexagonal nanosheet of pristine sorbent (Figure 7B,C).
We also investigated the post-interacted solids after treating 100 ppm of Ag+, Hg2+, Pb2+, and Cu2+ using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The bands observed at 374.41 and 368.40 eV (∆ = 6.01eV, Figure 8A), 105.18 and 101.10 eV (∆ = 4.08 eV, Figure 8B), 139.51 and 144.33 eV (∆ = 4.08 eV, Figure 8C), and 933.29 and 953.04 eV (∆ = 19.75 eV, Figure 8D) correspond to binding energy for Ag (3d3/2; 3d5/2) [21], Hg (4f5/2; 4f7/2) [8,21], Pb (4f5/2; 4f7/2) [21], and Cu (2p1/2; 2p3/2) [44], respectively. These findings further suggest the precipitations of the lead, silver, and mercury cations occur through the interactions of the CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Material Synthesis

Cobalt aluminum nitrate-layered double hydroxides (CoAl―NO3―LDH) were synthesized using the ion-exchange method from cobalt aluminum carbonate-layered double hydroxides (CoAl―CO3―LDH), which were synthesized by hydrothermal method from their corresponding nitrate precursor using hexamethyl-tetramine at 140 °C according to literature reported by the author [11].
The sulfur-rich ammonium thiomolybdate (NH4)2Mo2(S2)6·2H2O was prepared according to the method summarized by Draganjac et al. [45]. In detail, freshly prepared 30 mL of dark red (NH4)2Sx solution was added to the reddish-brown aqueous solution (30 mL) containing 2.0 g of ammonium paramolybdate, (NH4)6Mo7O24.4H2O, and 1.5 g of hydroxylamine hydrochloride (NH2OH·HCl). The resulting reddish-brown solution was warmed at 50 °C and 90 °C for 1 and 4 h, respectively, with cooling and filtering in each step. A total of 10 mL of (NH4)2Sx solution was also added to the resulting reddish-brown solution before being kept in the Argon atmosphere overnight. Finally, dark-black crystals were filtered, washed with ice-cold water, 2-propanol, carbon disulfide, and diethyl ether a couple of times, and dried at room temperature (Figure 9A).
CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH layered double hydroxides (LDH―Mo2S12) were synthesized at room temperature by intercalating [Mo2S12]2− anions into the positively charged gallery of the host CoAl―NO3―LDH using the anion exchange method [11,12]. In detail, 600 mg of CoAl―NO3―LDH and 600 mg of (NH4)2(Mo2S12) were stirred in 15.0 mL of formamide separately for 1h, and then dispersed solution of (NH4)2(Mo2S12) was added dropwise to the CoAl―NO3 solution followed by stirring for 24 h at RT. The black solid was then centrifuged, washed with water, and dried under a vacuum at 70 °C (Figure 9B).

3.2. Characterization

X-ray powder diffraction: A Rigaku MiniFlex 600 diffractometer equipped with a D/teX Ultra detector was used to collect the high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) of CoAl―CO3, CoAl―NO3, and CoAl―Mo2S12 using Cu Kα1 (λ = 1.540593 Å) radiation generated from a sealed-tube X-ray source at 40 kV and 15 mA. The diffraction intensity data were collected from 5 to 80° 2θ at a scan rate of 3.5° min−1 (0.02° resolution).
Energy dispersive spectroscopy and electron microscopy: Elemental analysis was conducted using the ESED―II environmental secondary electron detector. The powdered samples were subsequently placed on a carbon-taped metal stub for imaging of the surface morphology of the samples. The samples were then analyzed using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and the experiment was performed in at least four different spots, with the average measured composition reported throughout. High-resolution Lyra3―Tescan scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for imaging and elemental analysis of the samples. The theoretical resolution of the instrument is 1.2 nm at 30 keV. An accelerating voltage of 20 kV and 120 s of accumulation time were maintained during data collection. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging was conducted using JEOL 1011 at 100 KV.
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy: Infrared spectra of the grounded polycrystalline powders of CoAl―CO3, CoAl―NO3, and CoAl―Mo2S12 and post-sorbed solid were collected using the PerkinElmer FTIR Spectrometer in the range of 400 to 4000 cm−1.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: Finely ground powder samples were pressed onto indium metal foil for data acquisition. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were carried out using a Kratos Supra+ spectrometer with an Al-Kα X-ray source running at 150 W. The analysis spot size was 300 × 700 µm, and an electron flood gun was applied to minimize sample charging. Survey scans were recorded at pass energy of 80 eV, with high-resolution scans taken at 20 eV. All spectra were referenced to the C 1s peak at 284.6 eV for calibration.
Thermogravimetric analysis: The stability of the powdered samples of the CoAl―NO3―LDH, CoAl―MoS4―LDH was studied by Shimadzu DTG-60 from RT to 600 °C using Al crucible under N2 atmosphere (30 mL/min).
Sorption experiments: The batch approach was used to evaluate the uptake of heavy metal ions, Mn+ = Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Ag+, Cd2+, Pb2+, and Hg2+, under ambient conditions. To assess the affinity of CoAl―Mo2S12 for Mn+ cations, 20.0 mg of sorbent material was suspended in Mn+ solutions of various concentrations and pHs and interacted for varying amounts of time. Subsequently, the solutions were centrifuged at 13,000 RMP for 30 min to precipitate the adsorbents from the heavy metal-contaminated aqueous solutions. The remaining metal ion concentrations in the supernatant solutions were determined using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). The post-interacted solid dried samples were also analyzed by XRD, TEM, and XPS.
The sorption efficiency was calculated from the difference in pre- and post-sorbed Mn+ ion concentrations. The affinity of CoAl―Mo2S12 to the heavy metal cations was determined by the distribution coefficient, Kd, which is defined by the equation, Kd = (V[(C0 − Cf)/Cf])/m; where V is the volume of the solution, C0 and Cf are the initial and final concentration of Mn+ ions in ppm, m is the mass of the functionalized sorbent. The removal rate of Mn+ was determined using the equation [C0 − Cf)/C0] × 100. The removal capacity, qm (mg/g), was obtained by the expression of qm = {(C0 − Cf)V/m} × 10−3.

4. Conclusions

The hexagonal ultrathin nanosheet of [Mo2S12]2− intercalated cobalt aluminum-layered double hydroxide, CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH, was synthesized by subsequent exchange of CO32− and NO3 ions. The formation of CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH was characterized using XRD, FTIR, SEM/EDX, XPS, and TEM analysis. The synthesized material exhibits exceptional sorption performance for Ag+, Cu2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ from 10 ppm aqueous solutions in individual tests. The CoAl―Mo2S12 demonstrated awe-inspiring performance as a silver cation adsorbent, with a maximum adsorption capacity of 918 mg/g, placing it among the topmost Ag sorbent known to date. XRD, XPS, and TEM analysis of Ag+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ sorbed solid samples revealed the formation of Ag2S, HgS, and PbMoO4, respectively, which reveal the precipitation sorption mechanism. Competitive sorption experiments revealed a selectivity order of Pb2+ ≪ Cu2+ ≪ Hg2+ < Ag+; however, the limited affinity for harder cations such as Ni2+, Cd2+, and Zn2+ following the HSAB rule as sulfur is a soft base.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/inorganics13020050/s1, Figure S1: High-resolution XP spectra of Co 2p orbitals (A) and Al 2p orbitals (B) of CoAl―Mo2S12; Figure S2: Comparison of DTG curve (A) and their corresponding XRD patterns after DTG analysis (B) of CoAl―NO3 and CoAl―Mo2S12; Figure S3: Comparison of XRD patterns of a solid sorbent, CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH treated with different concentrations of Ag+; Table S1: Assignment of XPS peaks of pristine CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH; Table S2: Sorption studies of CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH toward seven individual heavy metal cations (initial concentration: 10.00 ppm) in 20.0 mL DIW, m = 20.0 mg; Table S3: Sorption studies of CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH toward seven mixed heavy metal cations (initial concentration: 10 ppm of each, total 70 ppm) in 20.0 mL DIW, m = 20.0 mg; Table S4: Kinetic parameters obtained using the pseudo-second-order rate equation for Ag+, and Hg2+; Table S5: Sorption studies of CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH toward eight mixed heavy metal cations at different pH (initial concentration: 10 ppm of each, total 70 ppm) in 20.0 mL DIW, m = 20.0 mg; Table S6: Individual sorption capacity of Ag+ and Pb2+cations by CoAl―Mo2S12 in 20.0 mL DIW, adsorbent m = 20.0 mg; List of calculated data fitted with Langmuir Sorption isotherm of Ag+ and Pb2+ by CoAl―Mo2S12; Table S7: List of calculated data fitted with Langmuir Sorption isotherm of Ag+ and Pb2+ by CoAl―Mo2S12; Table S8: Assignment of XPS peaks of 100 ppm Ag+, Hg2+, Pb2+, and Cu2+ treated CoAl―Mo2S12 sorbents.

Author Contributions

Supervision, project administration, funding acquisition: S.M.I.; Conceptualization, methodology, software, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing: S.M.I. and S.C.R.; validation, resources, data curation: S.M.I., S.C.R. and C.L.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), Division of Chemistry, NSF-2100790; ECCS-2025064 as part of the National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure, NNCI, and US Department of Energy, office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (DE-SC0021173).

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

For TEM images, we acknowledge X. Zhu from JSU and A. Kumbhar from UNC. We are also thankful to the Chapel Hill Analytical and Nanofabrication laboratory, CHANL, a member of the North Carolina Research Triangle Nanotechnology Network, RTNN, and Center for Hybrid Approached in Solar Energy to Liquid Fuels (CHASE), an Energy Innovation Hub, for the XPS instrumental support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Tchounwou, P.B.; Yedjou, C.G.; Patlolla, A.K.; Sutton, D.J. Heavy Metal Toxicity and the Environment. In Molecular, Clinical and Environmental Toxicology; Experientia Supplementum; Luch, A., Ed.; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2012; Volume 101, pp. 133–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fu, Z.; Xi, S. The effects of heavy metals on human metabolism. Toxicol. Mech. Methods 2020, 30, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Järup, L. Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br. Med. Bull. 2003, 68, 167–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fu, F.; Wang, Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liang, J.; Ma, R.; Iyi, N.; Ebina, Y.; Takada, K.; Sasaki, T. Topochemical Synthesis, Anion Exchange, and Exfoliation of Co−Ni Layered Double Hydroxides: A Route to Positively Charged Co−Ni Hydroxide Nanosheets with Tunable Composition. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, L.; Xie, L.; Chu, M.; Wang, H.; Yuan, M.; Yu, Z.; Wang, C.; Yao, H.; Islam, S.M.; Shi, K.; et al. Mo3S132− Intercalated Layered Double Hydroxide: Highly Selective Removal of Heavy Metals and Simultaneous Reduction of Ag + Ions to Metallic Ag 0 Ribbons. Angew Chem Int Ed 2022, 61, e202112511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ma, L.; Wang, Q.; Islam, S.M.; Liu, Y.; Ma, S.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Highly Selective and Efficient Removal of Heavy Metals by Layered Double Hydroxide Intercalated with the MoS42− Ion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 2858–2866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Roy, S.C.; Asaduzzaman, A.; May, B.; Beals, A.M.; Chen, X.; Zhu, X.; Islam, S.M. Oxidative Immobilization of Gaseous Mercury by [Mo3S(S2)6]2−-Functionalized Layered Double Hydroxide. Chem. Mater. 2024, 36, 5826–5835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Q.; O’Hare, D. Recent Advances in the Synthesis and Application of Layered Double Hydroxide (LDH) Nanosheets. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 4124–4155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rohit, R.C.; Roy, S.C.; Alam, R.; Islam, S.M. Metal-sulfide/polysulfide functionalized layered double hydroxides—Recent progress in the removal of heavy metal ions and oxoanionic species from aqueous solutions. Dalton Trans. 2024, 53, 10037–10049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Roy, S.C.; Rahman, M.A.; Celik, A.; Wilson, S.; Azmy, A.; Bieber, J.; Spanopoulos, I.; Islam, R.; Zhu, X.; Han, F.X.; et al. Efficient removal of chromium(VI) ions by hexagonal nanosheets of CoAl-MoS4 layered double hydroxide. J. Coord. Chem. 2022, 75, 1581–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Celik, A.; Li, D.; Quintero, M.A.; Taylor-Pashow, K.M.L.; Zhu, X.; Shakouri, M.; Roy, S.C.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Arslan, Z.; Blanton, A.; et al. Removal of CrO42−, a Nonradioactive Surrogate of 99TcO4, Using LDH–Mo3S13 Nanosheets. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 8590–8598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Celik, A.; Baker, D.R.; Arslan, Z.; Zhu, X.; Blanton, A.; Nie, J.; Yang, S.; Ma, S.; Han, F.X.; Islam, S.M. Highly efficient, rapid, and concurrent removal of toxic heavy metals by the novel 2D hybrid LDH–[Sn2S6]. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 426, 131696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Müller, G. Die Schwermetallbelastung der sedimente des Neckars und seiner Nebenflusse: Eine Bestandsaufnahme. Chem. Ztg. 1981, 105, 157–164. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pearson, R.G. Hard and Soft Acids and Bases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 3533–3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, L.; Sun, B.; Wang, X.; Qiao, F.; Ai, S. 2D ultrathin nanosheets of Co–Al layered double hydroxides prepared in l-asparagine solution: Enhanced peroxidase-like activity and colorimetric detection of glucose. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Goebbert, D.J.; Garand, E.; Wende, T.; Bergmann, R.; Meijer, G.; Asmis, K.R.; Neumark, D.M. Infrared Spectroscopy of the Microhydrated Nitrate Ions NO3(H2O)1−6. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 7584–7592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, W.; Yang, C.; Du, T.; Yue, T.; Zhu, M.; Wang, J. Demand-oriented construction of Mo3S13LDH: A versatile scavenger for highly selective and efficient removal of toxic Ag(I), Hg(II), As(III), and Cr(VI) from water. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 820, 153334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yuan, M.; Yao, H.; Xie, L.; Liu, X.; Wang, H.; Islam, S.M.; Shi, K.; Yu, Z.; Sun, G.; Li, H.; et al. Polypyrrole–Mo3S13: An Efficient Sorbent for the Capture of Hg2+ and Highly Selective Extraction of Ag+ over Cu2+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 1574–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Biesinger, M. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Reference Pages of Molybdenym. Available online: http://www.xpsfitting.com/search/label/Molybdenum (accessed on 20 December 2024).
  21. Moulder, J.F.; Stickle, W.F.; Sobol, P.E.; Bomben, K.D. Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy; Perkin-Elmer Corporation: Waltham, MA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  22. Biesinger, M. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Reference Pages of Sulphur. [Online]. Available online: http://www.xpsfitting.com/search/label/Sulphur (accessed on 20 December 2024).
  23. Alam, R.; Roy, S.C.; Islam, T.; Feng, R.; Zhu, X.; Donley, C.L.; Islam, S.M. Molybdenum-Oxysulfide-Functionalized MgAl-Layered Double Hydroxides—A Sorbent for Selenium Oxoanions. Inorg. Chem. 2024, 63, 10997–11005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cherkashinin, G.; Nikolowski, K.; Ehrenberg, H.; Jacke, S.; Dimesso, L.; Jaegermann, W. The stability of the SEI layer, surface composition and the oxidation state of transition metals at the electrolyte–cathode interface impacted by the electrochemical cycling: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy investigation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 12321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhao, X.; Zhang, L.; Xiong, P.; Ma, W.; Qian, N.; Lu, W. A novel method for synthesis of Co–Al layered double hydroxides and their conversions to mesoporous CoAl2O4 nanostructures for applications in adsorption removal of fluoride ions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2015, 201, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kabekkodu, S.N.; Dosen, A.; Blanton, T.N. PDF-5+: A comprehensive Powder Diffraction FileTM for materials characterization. Powder Diffr. 2024, 39, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cosano, D.; Esquivel, D.; Romero-Salguero, F.J.; Jiménez-Sanchidrián, C.; Ruiz, J.R. Use of Raman spectroscopy to assess nitrate uptake by calcined LDH phases. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2020, 602, 125066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sarma, D.; Malliakas, C.D.; Subrahmanyam, K.S.; Islam, S.M.; Kanatzidis, M.G. K2xSn4−xS8−x (x = 0.65–1): A new metal sulfide for rapid and selective removal of Cs+, Sr2+ and UO22+ ions. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 1121–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Freundlich, H. Über die Adsorption in Lösungen. Z. Phys. Chem. 1907, 57U, 385–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Langmuir, I. The Adsorption of Gases on Plane Surfaces of Glass, Mica, and Platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1918, 40, 1361–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, G.; Wang, D.; Ma, S.; Chen, J.; Jiang, L.; Wang, P. A new, low-cost adsorbent: Preparation, characterization, and adsorption behavior of Pb(II) and Cu(II). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 445, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ma, J.; Zhou, G.; Chu, L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, C.; Luo, S.; Wei, Y. Efficient Removal of Heavy Metal Ions with An EDTA Functionalized Chitosan/Polyacrylamide Double Network Hydrogel. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 843–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ogawa, M.; Saito, F. Easily Oxidizable Polysulfide Anion Occluded in the Interlayer Space of Mg/Al Layered Double Hydroxide. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 1030–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alatalo, S.-M.; Pileidis, F.; Mäkilä, E.; Sevilla, M.; Repo, E.; Salonen, J.; Sillanpää, M.; Titirici, M.-M. Versatile Cellulose-Based Carbon Aerogel for the Removal of Both Cationic and Anionic Metal Contaminants from Water. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 25875–25883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nie, J.; Chandra Roy, S.; Dhami, S.; Islam, T.; Amin, R.; Zhu, X.; Taylor-Pashow, K.; Han, F.X.; Islam, S.M. K–Co–Mo–Sx chalcogel: High-capacity removal of Pb2+ and Ag+ and the underlying mechanisms. J. Mater. Chem. A 2024, 12, 30063–30072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, J.-R.; Wang, X.; Yuan, B.; Fu, M.-L. Layered chalcogenide for Cu2+ removal by ion-exchange from wastewater. J. Mol. Liq. 2014, 200, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rathee, G.; Kohli, S.; Awasthi, A.; Singh, N.; Chandra, R. MoS42− intercalated NiFeTi LDH as an efficient and selective adsorbent for elimination of heavy metals. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 19371–19381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ali, J.; Wang, H.; Ifthikar, J.; Khan, A.; Wang, T.; Zhan, K.; Shahzad, A.; Chen, Z.; Chen, Z. Efficient, stable and selective adsorption of heavy metals by thio-functionalized layered double hydroxide in diverse types of water. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 332, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xie, L.; Yu, Z.; Islam, S.M.; Shi, K.; Cheng, Y.; Yuan, M.; Zhao, J.; Sun, G.; Li, H.; Ma, S.; et al. Remarkable Acid Stability of Polypyrrole-MoS4: A Highly Selective and Efficient Scavenger of Heavy Metals Over a Wide pH Range. Adv Funct Mater. 2018, 28, 1800502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ma, S.; Chen, Q.; Li, H.; Wang, P.; Islam, S.M.; Gu, Q.; Yang, X.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Highly selective and efficient heavy metal capture with polysulfide intercalated layered double hydroxides. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 10280–10289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hassanzadeh Fard, Z.; Malliakas, C.D.; Mertz, J.L.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Direct Extraction of Ag+ and Hg2+ from Cyanide Complexes and Mode of Binding by the Layered K2 MgSn2 S6 (KMS-2). Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 1925–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jawad, A.; Liao, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Khan, A.; Wang, T.; Ifthikar, J.; Shahzad, A.; Chen, Z.; Chen, Z. Fe-MoS4: An Effective and Stable LDH-Based Adsorbent for Selective Removal of Heavy Metals. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 28451–28463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Swanson, H.; Cook, M.; Evans, E.H.; deGroot, J.H. Standard X-Ray Diffraction Powder Patterns; National Bureau of Standards Circular 539; US Department of Commerce: Washington, DC, USA, 1960; Volume 10.
  44. Biesinger, M.C.; Lau, L.W.M.; Gerson, A.R.; Smart, R.S.C. Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Sc, Ti, V, Cu and Zn. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 257, 887–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Draganjac, M.; Simhon, E.; Chan, L.T.; Kanatzidis, M.; Baenziger, N.C.; Coucouvanis, D. Synthesis, interconversions, and structural characterization of the molybdenum sulfide anions, [(S4)2MoS]2−x, [(S4)2MoO]2−x, (Mo2S10)2−x and (Mo2S12)2−x. Inorg. Chem. 1982, 21, 3321–3332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Comparison of powder XRD patterns (A) showing the gradual increase in ‘d’ values with increasing the intercalated anions, and FTIR spectra (B) of CoAl―CO3 → CoAl―NO3 → CoAl―Mo2S12, XPS spectra of Mo 3d (C) and S 2p orbital spectra of pristine CoAl―Mo2S12 (D).
Figure 1. Comparison of powder XRD patterns (A) showing the gradual increase in ‘d’ values with increasing the intercalated anions, and FTIR spectra (B) of CoAl―CO3 → CoAl―NO3 → CoAl―Mo2S12, XPS spectra of Mo 3d (C) and S 2p orbital spectra of pristine CoAl―Mo2S12 (D).
Inorganics 13 00050 g001
Figure 2. SEM image (A), EDS spectra and atomic abundance (B), TEM image showing hexagonal ultrathin nanocrystalline sized morphology (C), and elemental mapping (DG) showing the homogeneous distribution of Co, Al, Mo, S in CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH.
Figure 2. SEM image (A), EDS spectra and atomic abundance (B), TEM image showing hexagonal ultrathin nanocrystalline sized morphology (C), and elemental mapping (DG) showing the homogeneous distribution of Co, Al, Mo, S in CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH.
Inorganics 13 00050 g002
Figure 3. Sorption of individual heavy metal cations by CoAl―Mo2S12 showing almost similar removal performance of Ag+, Cu2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ at 24 and 48 h.
Figure 3. Sorption of individual heavy metal cations by CoAl―Mo2S12 showing almost similar removal performance of Ag+, Cu2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ at 24 and 48 h.
Inorganics 13 00050 g003
Figure 4. The removal performance of heavy metal cations in mixed states by CoAl―Mo2S12 shows higher removal performance for Ag+ and Hg2+ (A) and linear fit of the pseudo-second-order kinetic plots (B).
Figure 4. The removal performance of heavy metal cations in mixed states by CoAl―Mo2S12 shows higher removal performance for Ag+ and Hg2+ (A) and linear fit of the pseudo-second-order kinetic plots (B).
Inorganics 13 00050 g004
Figure 5. pH-dependent sorption analysis mixed ion state by CoAl―Mo2S12.
Figure 5. pH-dependent sorption analysis mixed ion state by CoAl―Mo2S12.
Inorganics 13 00050 g005
Figure 6. Sorption isotherms of Ag+ (A) and Pb2+ (B) cations by CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH at pH~7, derived from the experimental data fitted with the Langmuir model at equilibrium concentrations (Ce) and adsorption capacity (qe).
Figure 6. Sorption isotherms of Ag+ (A) and Pb2+ (B) cations by CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH at pH~7, derived from the experimental data fitted with the Langmuir model at equilibrium concentrations (Ce) and adsorption capacity (qe).
Inorganics 13 00050 g006
Figure 7. Comparison of XRD patterns of 100 ppm Ag+, Hg2+, Pb2+, and Cu2+ treated CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH sorbents (A) and TEM images of 100 ppm post-Pb2+ (B) and Hg2+ (C) treated solid sorbent, CoAl―Mo2S12 showing the formation of secondary phases PbMoO4 and HgS, respectively.
Figure 7. Comparison of XRD patterns of 100 ppm Ag+, Hg2+, Pb2+, and Cu2+ treated CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH sorbents (A) and TEM images of 100 ppm post-Pb2+ (B) and Hg2+ (C) treated solid sorbent, CoAl―Mo2S12 showing the formation of secondary phases PbMoO4 and HgS, respectively.
Inorganics 13 00050 g007
Figure 8. High-resolution XPS spectra of 100 ppm Pb2+ (A), Hg2+ (B), Ag+ (C), and Cu2+ (D) treated CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH sorbents.
Figure 8. High-resolution XPS spectra of 100 ppm Pb2+ (A), Hg2+ (B), Ag+ (C), and Cu2+ (D) treated CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH sorbents.
Inorganics 13 00050 g008
Figure 9. Schematic representation for the synthesis of (A) (NH4)2[Mo2(S2)6], and (B) CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH.
Figure 9. Schematic representation for the synthesis of (A) (NH4)2[Mo2(S2)6], and (B) CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH.
Inorganics 13 00050 g009
Table 1. Comparison of sorption capacities for Ag+ ions with the known high-performing sorbents.
Table 1. Comparison of sorption capacities for Ag+ ions with the known high-performing sorbents.
CationAdsorbentqm (mg/g)Ref.
CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH918This work
KCMS chalcogel1378[35]
KMS―1156[36]
LDH―Sn2S6978[13]
Mo3S13―ppy408[19]
Ag+Ni/Fe/Ti―MoS4―LDH856[37]
Mn―MoS4564[38]
MoS4―ppy480[39]
MoS4―LDH450[7]
Sx―LDH383[40]
KMS―2408[41]
Fe―MoS4565[42]
MgAl-Mo3S131073[6]
Table 2. Sorption results of CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH in potable Tap water and Mississippi River water containing seven metal ions of 10 ppm for each (70 ppm total), Ci = initial (pre-sorption) concentration, Cf = final (post-adsorption) concentration.
Table 2. Sorption results of CoAl―Mo2S12―LDH in potable Tap water and Mississippi River water containing seven metal ions of 10 ppm for each (70 ppm total), Ci = initial (pre-sorption) concentration, Cf = final (post-adsorption) concentration.
Mixed-IonsCi
(ppm)
Cf
(ppm)
SDRemoval (%)Kd
(mL/g)
qm
(mg/g)
Cf
(ppm)
SDRemoval (%)Kd
(mL/g)
qm
(mg/g)
MRW Tap Water
Cu2+10.05.66370.05243.36765.64.3367.4980.01925.02333.62.501
Hg2+10.00.04200.00499.782.37 × 1059.9580.0410.00499.592.41 × 1059.958
Ag+10.00.02230.00299.794.47 × 1059.9770.0310.00199.683.14 × 1059.968
Pb2+10.09.31990.0636.8073.00.6809.4560.1015.4357.50.543
Cd2+10.010.0-0.00.00.010.0-0.00.00.0
Ni2+10.010.0-0.00.00.010.0-0.00.00.0
Zn2+10.010.0-0.00.00.010.0-0.00.00.0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Roy, S.C.; Donley, C.L.; Islam, S.M. Efficient Sequestration of Heavy Metal Cations by [Mo2S12]2− Intercalated Cobalt Aluminum-Layered Double Hydroxide. Inorganics 2025, 13, 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13020050

AMA Style

Roy SC, Donley CL, Islam SM. Efficient Sequestration of Heavy Metal Cations by [Mo2S12]2− Intercalated Cobalt Aluminum-Layered Double Hydroxide. Inorganics. 2025; 13(2):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13020050

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roy, Subrata Chandra, Carrie L. Donley, and Saiful M. Islam. 2025. "Efficient Sequestration of Heavy Metal Cations by [Mo2S12]2− Intercalated Cobalt Aluminum-Layered Double Hydroxide" Inorganics 13, no. 2: 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13020050

APA Style

Roy, S. C., Donley, C. L., & Islam, S. M. (2025). Efficient Sequestration of Heavy Metal Cations by [Mo2S12]2− Intercalated Cobalt Aluminum-Layered Double Hydroxide. Inorganics, 13(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13020050

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop