Next Article in Journal
Europium-Doped Y2O3-Coated Diatomite Nanomaterials: Hydrothermal Synthesis, Characterization, Optical Study with Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Functionalized Tris(anilido)triazacyclononanes as Hexadentate Ligands for the Encapsulation of U(III), U(IV) and La(III) Cations
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

PbS1−xSex-Quantum-Dot@MWCNT/P3HT Nanocomposites with Tunable Photoelectric Conversion Performance

Inorganics 2021, 9(12), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics9120087
by He Zhu 1,2, Huilin Hu 1, Minheng Ye 1,2, Jinhua Ye 1,2,3 and Defa Wang 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Inorganics 2021, 9(12), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics9120087
Submission received: 2 November 2021 / Revised: 1 December 2021 / Accepted: 7 December 2021 / Published: 10 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Inorganic Materials)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript by Zhu et. al. represents the tunable photoelectric conversion properties of QD-embedded nanocomposites. The paper is written very clearly and claims are supported by the appropriate experimental data. I would like to recommend to publish in its present form. after clarification of following comments which authors should look into for the improvement of the manuscript :

(1) Size of QDs from TEM data as hitogrammed in the supplementary should be fitted. Also, the bin widths are not same for all the histogram plots.

(2) In Fig. 1(f), XRD peaks are shifted to the lower angle with higher X values.  Can authors explain this in the manuscript?

(3) In Fig. 3(d), which excitation wavelength is used to the fluorescence decay measurements? I would also like to plot the decay curve as semi-log plot i.e. plot y-axis in log scale and x-axis as it is.

(4) Is there any specific reason to measure photocurrent at 480 s with different x-values? The maxima for x = 0.25, is it remain same with if one measure at different time (lets say 360 s, 600 s etc.)?

Author Response

Re: Manuscript ID: inorganics-1469661

Dear Referee,

Thank you very much for your precious time and valuable suggestions on our manuscript.

With respect, we have carefully considered your constructive comments, and made corresponding modifications in the revised manuscript. The revisions made to the manuscript have been marked up using the “Track Changes” function for your convenient reference.

The “point-by-point” response to your questions/comments is enclosed separately.

We hope that the revised manuscript would be qualified for publishing in Inorganics.

Thank you very much again.

Sincerely yours,

Defa Wang, Prof., Dr.

TJU-NIMS International Collaboration Laboratory

School of Materials Science and Engineering

Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

E-mail: [email protected]

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Editor, thank you for the trust and the opportunity to provide a review of the work "PbS1xSex-Quantum-Dot@MWCNT/P3HT Nanocomposites with Tunable Photoelectric Conversion Performance" He Zhu, Huilin Hu, Minheng Ye, Jinhua Ye, Defa Wang.

 

The paper report about a nanocomposite light absorber based on  PbS1xSex quantum dots, electron-conducting multi-walled carbon nanotubes and hole-conducting poly-3-hexylthiophene. Engineering of the band gap by solid solution PbS1xSex QDs (x = 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1) was proposed. It should be noted what obtained nanocomposite can be used for the development of high efficiency photoelectric conversion devices.

The manuscript is well structured, nicely written and I consider it is suitable for the publication in present form.

Author Response

Re: Manuscript ID: inorganics-1469661

Dear Referee,

Thank you very much for your precious time in evaluating our manuscript, and your encouragement is highly appreciated.

Sincerely yours,

Defa Wang, Prof., Dr.

TJU-NIMS International Collaboration Laboratory

School of Materials Science and Engineering

Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

E-mail: [email protected]

Back to TopTop