An Analysis of Different Techniques Used to Seal Post-Extractive Sites—A Preliminary Report
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lombardi, T.; Bernardello, F.; Berton, F.; Porrelli, D.; Rapani, A.; Piloni, A.C.; Fiorillo, L.; Di Lenarda, R.; Stacchi, C. Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Maxillary Molar Extraction in Reducing Crestal Bone Resorption and Sinus Pneumatization: A Multicenter Prospective Case-Control Study. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 9352130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Schropp, L.; Wenzel, A.; Kostopoulos, L.; Karring, T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2003, 23, 313–323. [Google Scholar]
- Li, B.; Wang, Y. Contour changes in human alveolar bone following tooth extraction of the maxillary central incisor. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2014, 15, 1064–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Araujo, M.G.; Lindhe, J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2005, 32, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Niederman, R.; Ferguson, M.; Urdaneta, R.; Badovinac, R.; Christie, D.; Tantraphol, M.; Rasool, F. Evidence-based esthetic dentistry. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 1998, 10, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cosyn, J.; Thoma, D.S.; Hammerle, C.H.; De Bruyn, H. Esthetic assessments in implant dentistry: Objective and subjective criteria for clinicians and patients. Periodontol. 2000 2017, 73, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Raes, F.; Cosyn, J.; De Bruyn, H. Clinical, aesthetic, and patient-related outcome of immediately loaded single implants in the anterior maxilla: A prospective study in extraction sockets, healed ridges, and grafted sites. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2013, 15, 819–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cehreli, M.C.; Uysal, S.; Akca, K. Marginal bone level changes and prosthetic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 2 implants: A 5-year randomized clinical trial. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2010, 12, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gulati, M.; Govila, V.; Anand, V.; Anand, B. Implant Maintenance: A Clinical Update. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2014, 2014, 908534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menini, M.; Setti, P.; Pera, P.; Pera, F.; Pesce, P. Peri-implant Tissue Health and Bone Resorption in Patients with Immediately Loaded, Implant-Supported, Full-Arch Prostheses. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2018, 31, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Risi, V.; Clementini, M.; Vittorini, G.; Mannocci, A.; De Sanctis, M. Alveolar ridge preservation techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis of histological and histomorphometrical data. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2015, 26, 50–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Darby, I.; Chen, S.T.; Buser, D. Ridge preservation techniques for implant therapy. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2009, 24, 260–271. [Google Scholar]
- Pesce, P.; Menini, M.; Canullo, L.; Khijmatgar, S.; Modenese, L.; Gallifante, G.; Del Fabbro, M. Radiographic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Biomaterials Used for Lateral Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review on the Effect of Residual Bone Height and Vertical Graft Size on New Bone Formation and Graft Shrinkage. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Canullo, L.; Rossi-Fedele, G.; Camodeca, F.; Menini, M.; Pesce, P. A Pilot Retrospective Study on the Effect of Bone Grafting after Wisdom Teeth Extraction. Materials 2021, 14, 2844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baldi, D.; Menini, M.; Pera, F.; Ravera, G.; Pera, P. Sinus floor elevation using osteotomes or piezoelectric surgery. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2011, 40, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barootchi, S.; Wang, H.L.; Ravida, A.; Amor, F.B.; Riccitiello, F.; Rengo, C.; Paz, A.; Laino, L.; Marenzi, G.; Gasparro, R.; et al. Ridge preservation techniques to avoid invasive bone reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Naples Consensus Report Working Group C. Int. J. Oral Implantol. 2019, 12, 399–416. [Google Scholar]
- Horvath, A.; Mardas, N.; Mezzomo, L.A.; Needleman, I.G.; Donos, N. Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review. Clin. Oral Investig. 2013, 17, 341–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baldi, D.; Pesce, P.; Musante, B.; Pera, F.; Fulcheri, E.; Romano, F.; Menini, M. Radiological and Histomorphometric Outcomes of Homologous Bone Graft in Postextractive Implant Sites: A 6-Year Retrospective Analysis. Implant. Dent. 2019, 28, 472–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tischler, M.; Misch, C.E. Extraction site bone grafting in general dentistry. Review of applications and principles. Dent. Today 2004, 23, 108–113. [Google Scholar]
- Ketonis, C.; Barr, S.; Adams, C.S.; Hickok, N.J.; Parvizi, J. Bacterial colonization of bone allografts: Establishment and effects of antibiotics. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010, 468, 2113–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wong, R.W.; Rabie, A.B. Effect of bio-oss collagen and collagen matrix on bone formation. Open Biomed. Eng. J. 2010, 4, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Schou, S.; Holmstrup, P.; Jorgensen, T.; Stoltze, K.; Hjorting-Hansen, E.; Wenzel, A. Autogenous bone graft and ePTFE membrane in the treatment of peri-implantitis. I. Clinical and radiographic observations in cynomolgus monkeys. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2003, 14, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tehemar, S.; Hanes, P.; Sharawy, M. Enhancement of osseointegration of implants placed into extraction sockets of healthy and periodontally diseased teeth by using graft material, an ePTFE membrane, or a combination. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2003, 5, 193–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aimetti, M.; Ferrarotti, F.; Mariani, G.M.; Romano, F. A novel flapless approach versus minimally invasive surgery in periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative proteins: A 24-month randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin. Oral Investig. 2017, 21, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pippi, R. Post-Surgical Clinical Monitoring of Soft Tissue Wound Healing in Periodontal and Implant Surgery. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2017, 14, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sun, X.L.; Mudalal, M.; Qi, M.L.; Sun, Y.; Du, L.Y.; Wang, Z.Q.; Zhou, Y.M. Flapless immediate implant placement into fresh molar extraction socket using platelet-rich fibrin: A case report. World J. Clin. Cases 2019, 7, 3153–3159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Santis, D.; Cucchi, A.; de Gemmis, A.; Pier, F.N. New collagen matrix to avoid the reduction of keratinized tissue during guided bone regeneration in postextraction sites. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2012, 23, e186–e189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Natto, Z.; Parashis, A.; Jeong, Y.N. Soft Tissue changes after using Collagen Matrix Seal or Collagen Sponge with Allograft in Ridge Preservation:A Randomized Controlled Volumetric Study. J. Oral Implantol. 2020, 46, 588–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papi, P.; Di Murro, B.; Tromba, M.; Passarelli, P.C.; D’Addona, A.; Pompa, G. The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rosenquist, B. A comparison of various methods of soft tissue management following the immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 1997, 12, 43–51. [Google Scholar]
- Tal, H.; Bichacho, N.; Imber, S.; Kornowski, Y.; Nemcovsky, C.E. Rotated palatal flaps: A functional and aesthetic solution in endentulous sites. Pract. Proced. Aesthet. Dent. 2004, 16, 599–606. [Google Scholar]
- Landsberg, C.J.; Bichacho, N. A modified surgical/prosthetic approach for optimal single implant supported crown. Part I—The socket seal surgery. Pract. Periodontics Aesthet. Dent. 1994, 6, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Bichacho, N.; Landsberg, C.J. A modified surgical/prosthetic approach for an optimal single implant-supported crown. Part II. The cervical contouring concept. Pract. Periodontics Aesthet. Dent. 1994, 6, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Nemcovsky, C.E.; Artzi, Z.; Moses, O. Rotated split palatal flap for soft tissue primary coverage over extraction sites with immediate implant placement. Description of the surgical procedure and clinical results. J. Periodontol. 1999, 70, 926–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nemcovsky, C.E.; Artzi, Z.; Moses, O. Rotated palatal flap in immediate implant procedures. Clinical evaluation of 26 consecutive cases. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2000, 11, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mardinger, O.; Chaushu, G.; Ghelfan, O.; Nissan, J. Intrasocket reactive soft tissue for primary closure after augmentation of extraction sites with severe bone loss before implant placement. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009, 67, 1294–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canullo, L.; Rossi-Fedele, G.; Camodeca, F.; Marucchella, G.; Dogramaci, E.J.; Scarano, A. Comparative Histopathologic Analysis of Granulomatous Tissue of Endodontic and Periodontal Origin. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2020, 35, 585–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elian, N.; Cho, S.C.; Froum, S.; Smith, R.B.; Tarnow, D.P. A simplified socket classification and repair technique. Pract. Proced. Aesthet. Dent. 2007, 19, 99–104. [Google Scholar]
- Caiazzo, A.; Canullo, L.; Meeting, G.C.; Pesce, P. Consensus Report by the Italian Academy of Osseointegration on the Use of Antibiotics and Antiseptic Agents in Implant Surgery. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2021, 36, 103–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canullo, L.; Troiano, G.; Sbricoli, L.; Guazzo, R.; Laino, L.; Caiazzo, A.; Pesce, P. The Use of Antibiotics in Implant Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis on Early Implant Failure. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2020, 35, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meloni, S.M.; Tallarico, M.; Lolli, F.M.; Deledda, A.; Pisano, M.; Jovanovic, S.A. Postextraction socket preservation using epithelial connective tissue graft vs porcine collagen matrix. 1-year results of a randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2015, 8, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Guarnieri, R.; Stefanelli, L.; De Angelis, F.; Mencio, F.; Pompa, G.; Di Carlo, S. Extraction Socket Preservation Using Porcine-Derived Collagen Membrane Alone or Associated with Porcine-Derived Bone. Clinical Results of Randomized Controlled Study. J. Oral Maxillofac. Res. 2017, 8, e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Okamoto, T.; Okamoto, R.; Alves Rezende, M.C.; Gabrielli, M.F. Interference of the blood clot on granulation tissue formation after tooth extraction. Histomorphological study in rats. Braz. Dent. J. 1994, 5, 85–92. [Google Scholar]
- Nishikawa, I.; Kawazoe, S.; Hata, G.I.; Fujita, A.; Toda, T.; Weine, F.S. Changes in cell proliferative activity in granulation tissue invading the root canal. J. Osaka Dent. Univ. 1993, 27, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- An, Y.Z.; Kim, Y.K.; Lim, S.M.; Heo, Y.K.; Kwon, M.K.; Cha, J.K.; Lee, J.S.; Jung, U.W.; Choi, S.H. Physiochemical properties and resorption progress of porcine skin-derived collagen membranes: In vitro and in vivo analysis. Dent. Mater. J. 2018, 37, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bonine, F.L. Effect of chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of dry socket in impacted mandibular third molar extraction sites. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol. 1995, 79, 154–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gangwani, K.D.; Shetty, L.; Kulkarni, D.; Seshagiri, R.; Chopra, R. Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Method Alveoloplasty. Ann. Maxillofac. Surg. 2018, 8, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yap, B.W.; Sim, C.H. Comparisons of various types of normality tests. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 2011, 81, 2141–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McHugh, M.L. Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem. Med. 2012, 22, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landis, J.R.; Koch, G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Irinakis, T. Rationale for socket preservation after extraction of a single-rooted tooth when planning for future implant placement. J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 2006, 72, 917–922. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Agarwal, G.; Thomas, R.; Mehta, D. Postextraction maintenance of the alveolar ridge: Rationale and review. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2012, 33, 320–324, 326. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Lyu, C.; Shao, Z.; Zou, D.; Lu, J. Ridge Alterations following Socket Preservation Using a Collagen Membrane in Dogs. Biomed. Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 1487681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Canullo, L.; Del Fabbro, M.; Khijmatgar, S.; Panda, S.; Ravidà, A.; Tommasato, G.; Sculean, T.; Pesce, P. Dimensional and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Biomaterials used for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis Clin. Oral Investig. 2021, 26, 141–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Canellas, J.; Ritto, F.G.; Figueredo, C.; Fischer, R.G.; de Oliveira, G.P.; Thole, A.A.; Medeiros, P.J.D. Histomorphometric evaluation of different grafting materials used for alveolar ridge preservation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2020, 49, 797–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moraschini, V.; Barboza, E.S. Effect of autologous platelet concentrates for alveolar socket preservation: A systematic review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2015, 44, 632–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faria-Almeida, R.; Astramskaite-Januseviciene, I.; Puisys, A.; Correia, F. Extraction Socket Preservation with or without Membranes, Soft Tissue Influence on Post Extraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Systematic Review. J. Oral Maxillofac. Res. 2019, 10, e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Del Fabbro, M.; Tommasato, G.; Pesce, P.; Ravidà, A.; Khijmatgar, S.; Sculean, A.; Galli, M.; Antonacci, D.; Canullo, L. Sealing materials for post-extraction site: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Investig. 2021, 26, 1137–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Sousa Gomes, P.; Daugela, P.; Poskevicius, L.; Mariano, L.; Fernandes, M.H. Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Socket Healing in the Absence and Presence of Graft Materials and Autologous Platelet Concentrates: A Focused Review. J. Oral Maxillofac. Res. 2019, 10, e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araujo, M.G.; Silva, C.O.; Misawa, M.; Sukekava, F. Alveolar socket healing: What can we learn? Periodontol. 2000 2015, 68, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vieira, A.E.; Repeke, C.E.; Ferreira Junior Sde, B.; Colavite, P.M.; Biguetti, C.C.; Oliveira, R.C.; Assis, G.F.; Taga, R.; Trombone, A.P.; Garlet, G.P. Intramembranous bone healing process subsequent to tooth extraction in mice: Micro-computed tomography, histomorphometric and molecular characterization. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0128021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Farina, R.; Trombelli, L. Wound healing of extraction sockets. Endod. Top. 2013, 25, 16–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sculean, A.; Gruber, R.; Bosshardt, D.D. Soft tissue wound healing around teeth and dental implants. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2014, 41, S6–S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Barone, A.; Borgia, V.; Covani, U.; Ricci, M.; Piattelli, A.; Iezzi, G. Flap versus flapless procedure for ridge preservation in alveolar extraction sockets: A histological evaluation in a randomized clinical trial. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2015, 26, 806–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cardaropoli, D.; Cardaropoli, G. Preservation of the postextraction alveolar ridge: A clinical and histologic study. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2008, 28, 469–477. [Google Scholar]
- Oh, T.J.; Meraw, S.J.; Lee, E.J.; Giannobile, W.V.; Wang, H.L. Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2003, 14, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carmagnola, D.; Adriaens, P.; Berglundh, T. Healing of human extraction sockets filled with Bio-Oss. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2003, 14, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elgali, I.; Omar, O.; Dahlin, C.; Thomsen, P. Guided bone regeneration: Materials and biological mechanisms revisited. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2017, 125, 315–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kunert-Keil, C.; Gredes, T.; Heinemann, F.; Dominiak, M.; Botzenhart, U.; Gedrange, T. Socket augmentation using a commercial collagen-based product—An animal study in pigs. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 46, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caballe-Serrano, J.; Munar-Frau, A.; Delgado, L.; Perez, R.; Hernandez-Alfaro, F. Physicochemical characterization of barrier membranes for bone regeneration. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2019, 97, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pesce, P.; Menini, M.; Ugo, G.; Bagnasco, F.; Dioguardi, M.; Troiano, G. Evaluation of periodontal indices among non-smokers, tobacco, and e-cigarette smokers: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Investig. 2022, 26, 4701–4714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Clinic-Pathological Characteristics | COLL (tot. 10) | PC (tot. 10) | UD (tot. 10) | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean Age ± S.D. | 51.80 ± 8 | 48.40 ± 14.5 | 58 ± 6 | 0.051 | |
Sex | Male | 4 | 5 | 7 | 0.392 |
Female | 6 | 5 | 3 | ||
Reason for extraction | Prosthetic failure | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0.303 |
Vertical fracture | 3 | 2 | 5 | ||
Periodontal disease | 3 | 0 | 2 | ||
Caries | 2 | 4 | 1 | ||
Smoking status | Yes | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0.149 |
No | 5 | 7 | 9 | ||
Mean Time of surgery ± S.D. (minutes) | 38.50 ± 5 | 80.00 ± 21 | 52 ± 16 | <0.001 |
Healing Index | COLL (Tot. 10) | PC (Tot. 10) | UD (Tot. 10) | One-Way ANOVA p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± S.D. at 2 weeks | 1.90 ± 1 | 1.90 ± 0.3 | 2.00 ± 1.2 | 0.963 |
Mean ± S.D. at 12 weeks | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 1.2 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 0.006 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pesce, P.; Mijiritsky, E.; Canullo, L.; Menini, M.; Caponio, V.C.A.; Grassi, A.; Gobbato, L.; Baldi, D. An Analysis of Different Techniques Used to Seal Post-Extractive Sites—A Preliminary Report. Dent. J. 2022, 10, 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10100189
Pesce P, Mijiritsky E, Canullo L, Menini M, Caponio VCA, Grassi A, Gobbato L, Baldi D. An Analysis of Different Techniques Used to Seal Post-Extractive Sites—A Preliminary Report. Dentistry Journal. 2022; 10(10):189. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10100189
Chicago/Turabian StylePesce, Paolo, Eitan Mijiritsky, Luigi Canullo, Maria Menini, Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio, Andrea Grassi, Luca Gobbato, and Domenico Baldi. 2022. "An Analysis of Different Techniques Used to Seal Post-Extractive Sites—A Preliminary Report" Dentistry Journal 10, no. 10: 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10100189