Next Article in Journal
Detection of Orange Essential Oil, Isopropyl Myristate, and Benzyl Alcohol in Lemon Essential Oil by FTIR Spectroscopy Combined with Chemometrics
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Potentialities of Photoinduced Glycation to Steer Protein Functionalities: The Study Case of Freeze-Dried Egg White Proteins/Carbohydrates Mixtures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interaction of Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells with Ara h 2 from Raw and Roasted Peanuts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of Immunohistochemical Methods for Casein Detection in Meat Products

by
Ludmila Kalčáková
1,
Matej Pospiech
1,
Bohuslava Tremlová
1,
Zdeňka Javůrková
1,* and
Irina Chernukha
2
1
Department of Plant Origin Foodstuffs Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, 612 24 Brno, Czech Republic
2
The V.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences, Talalikhina ul. 26, 109316 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(1), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010028
Submission received: 23 November 2020 / Revised: 19 December 2020 / Accepted: 22 December 2020 / Published: 24 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Approach Food Allergy)

Abstract

To increase production efficiency of meat products, milk protein additives are often used. Despite a number of advantages, use of dairy ingredients involves a certain risk, namely the allergenic potential of milk proteins. A number of methods have been developed to detect milk-origin raw materials in foodstuffs, including immunological reference methods. This study presents newly developed immunohistochemical (IHC) methods for casein detection in meat products. Casein was successfully detected directly in meat products where sensitivity was determined at 1.21 and specificity at 0.28. The results obtained from the IHC were compared with the Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay (ELISA) and there was no statistically significant difference between the IHC and ELISA methods (p > 0.05). The correspondence between the methods was 72% in total. The highest correspondence was reached in frankfurters (90%), the lowest in canned pâté (44%).
Keywords: milk; immunoreactivity; sausages; allergy; ELISA; food microscopy milk; immunoreactivity; sausages; allergy; ELISA; food microscopy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kalčáková, L.; Pospiech, M.; Tremlová, B.; Javůrková, Z.; Chernukha, I. Development of Immunohistochemical Methods for Casein Detection in Meat Products. Foods 2021, 10, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010028

AMA Style

Kalčáková L, Pospiech M, Tremlová B, Javůrková Z, Chernukha I. Development of Immunohistochemical Methods for Casein Detection in Meat Products. Foods. 2021; 10(1):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010028

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kalčáková, Ludmila, Matej Pospiech, Bohuslava Tremlová, Zdeňka Javůrková, and Irina Chernukha. 2021. "Development of Immunohistochemical Methods for Casein Detection in Meat Products" Foods 10, no. 1: 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010028

APA Style

Kalčáková, L., Pospiech, M., Tremlová, B., Javůrková, Z., & Chernukha, I. (2021). Development of Immunohistochemical Methods for Casein Detection in Meat Products. Foods, 10(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010028

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop