Next Article in Journal
Chestnut Cultivar Identification through the Data Fusion of Sensory Quality and FT-NIR Spectral Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Emerging Risks in Food: Probiotic Enterococci Pose a Threat to Public Health through the Food Chain
Previous Article in Journal
Antihypertensive Peptides from Ultrafiltration and Fermentation of the Ricotta Cheese Exhausted Whey: Design and Characterization of a Functional Ricotta Cheese
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of the Impact on Human Health of the Presence of Norovirus in Bivalve Molluscs: What Data Do We Miss?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hazard Identification Related to the Presence of Vibrio spp., Biogenic Amines, and Indole-Producing Bacteria in a Non-Filter Feeding Marine Gastropod (Tritia mutabilis) Commercialized on the Italian Market

Department of Veterinary Medical Science, University of Bologna, Viale A. Vespucci 2, 47042 Cesenatico, FC, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(11), 2574; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112574
Submission received: 14 September 2021 / Revised: 13 October 2021 / Accepted: 21 October 2021 / Published: 25 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbiological Risk Assessment in Foods)

Abstract

:
Tritia mutabilis is a carrion-feeder edible marine gastropod with an open circulatory system. Therefore, biological, and chemical contaminants associated with the feed can reach all body tissues. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possible association of these characteristics with some food safety hazards. Vibrio spp. load, and the prevalence of pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, and V. cholerae, were investigated. Moreover, biogenic amines (BAs) and indole-producing bacteria (IPB), markers of seafood decomposition, were quantified for the first time in an edible carrion-feeder. Overall, 49 batches were analyzed (38 from retail, and 11 from primary production). The Vibrio spp. load resulted of 5.64 ± 0.69 log10 CFU g−1 at retail, and 5.27 ± 0.74 at harvest but all batches resulted negative for pathogenic Vibrio. Histamine, putrescine, cadaverine, and tyramine were detected both at harvest and at the retail level. Their sum (BAs Index) showed a mean value of 50.45 and 65.83 mg Kg−1 in batches at harvest and at retail, respectively. IPB were detected at harvest and upon refrigeration for three days (T1–T3). The mean load resulted in 2.52 ± 0.85 log10 MPN g−1 at T0, 3.31 ± 1.23 at T3 in batches immediately refrigerated, and 3.22 ± 1.18 at T3 in batches previously immersed in clean seawater. Our results contribute to identifying food-borne hazards for T. mutabilis that may be related to the retention of biogenic amines and indole-producing bacteria due to carrion feeding.

1. Introduction

Fishing of marine gastropod Tritia mutabilis is by far the most important activity carried out by artisanal fisheries in the Central and Northern Adriatic Sea, yielding from 2000 to 3000 tons of landings each year [1,2].
According to diet, gastropods can be herbivorous, carnivorous, and omnivorous, and their feeding strategies are also very diversified including grazing, suspension-feeding, predation, and even parasitism [3]. T. mutabilis is a scavenger gastropod, feeding on carrion in the adult stage [2,4].
Gastropods, together with bivalve mollusks, possess an open circulatory system, characterized by irregular spaces or sinuses within the tissues between the distributing and collecting blood vessels [5]. The system is considered open because the blood (hemolymph) empties from a contractile heart and major supply vessels into the body cavity (hemocoel), where it directly bathes the organs [6]. Therefore, contaminants including bacteria, viruses, and chemicals circulating after feeding can easily reach all body tissues.
The genus Vibrio comprises the major culturable bacteria in marine and estuarine environments [7], and with 130 confirmed species, it represents one of the most diverse marine bacterial genera, geographically spread all over the world, but more commonly occurring in warmer waters [8]. The genus Vibrio includes several food-borne pathogens that cause a spectrum of clinical conditions, that can be grouped into three major syndromes: gastroenteritis, wound infection and septicemia [9]. Pathogenic vibrios have emerged as new threats since the 1970s [10], causing an increased incidence of human infections worldwide [11,12,13], and the consumption of raw or undercooked bivalve mollusks is considered the primary source particularly oyster, clam, and mussels, because of their filter-feeding habit that allows concentrating particles associated with various contaminants from the surrounding waters [14,15,16]. Unfortunately, marine gastropods, unlike bivalves, are poorly investigated in terms of food safety.
Besides the so-called “big four”, namely V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, and V. alginolyticus, other Vibrio species have been associated with food-borne illness, including V. fluvialis, V. mimicus, Grimontia (Vibrio) hollisae, and V. metschnikovii [8].
Nevertheless, the European Union (EU) legislation does not include pathogenic vibrios, biogenic amines and other products of the decomposition among the safety criteria for gastropods, regarded as equivalent to bivalve mollusks, echinoderms, and tunicates [17]. To our best knowledge, no outbreaks of food poisoning caused by T. mutabilis have ever been reported.
Appropriate cooking treatment is effective to inactivate microorganisms associated with seafood, but it is considered little or nothing effective on their toxic products, as documented for many marine biotoxins [18,19], biogenic amines (BAs) [20], and indole, whose production is fostered by high pH and temperature [21].
BAs are organic bases with aliphatic, aromatic, and heterocyclic structures produced mainly by bacteria [20]. During the decomposition of seafood, various amounts of BAs are usually produced, in particular, the Gram-negative bacteria are considered the predominant amine-forming bacteria in fish, cephalopods, and shellfish [22], including Vibrio spp. [23]. BAs are formed mainly by decarboxylation of specific free amino acids or by amination and transamination of ketones and aldehydes [23,24]. Decarboxylation of histidine, lysine, ornithine, and tyrosine results in the production of histamine, cadaverine, putrescine, and tyramine respectively [25], which are commonly used as chemical indicators of fish decomposition [22]. BAs in food constitutes a potential public health concern due to their physiological and toxicological effects, such as histamine intoxication, migraine, and food intolerance crises [26]. Except for histamine in fishery products no threshold is established for these biomolecules in EU legislation. On the other hand, despite a widely reported association between histamine and scombroid food poisoning, histamine alone appears to be insufficient to cause food toxicity, as other BAs, i.e., putrescine and cadaverine, may potentiate histamine toxicity [27].
Indole is widespread in nature because various species of bacteria can produce a considerable amount of this heterocyclic aromatic amine [28], via the action of the enzyme tryptophanase, expressed in many Gram-negative, as well as Gram-positive bacteria [29]. It should be noted that members of the genus Vibrio are nearly all indole positive [30]. Indole may serve as a chemical indicator for the evaluation of incipient spoilage of crustaceans and other seafood products [31] and has long been regarded as a typical N-heterocyclic aromatic pollutant due to its toxicity and potential mutagenicity causing animal hemolysis, hemoglobinuria nephrosis, temporary skin irritation and tumor formation [21]. Normally, indole is metabolized to indoxyl sulfate in the liver and then excreted into the urine, but if the dietary intake exceeds the renal clearance, the serum levels of indoxyl sulfate increase with toxicological effects [2].
Official controls on non-filter feeding marine gastropods harvested from non-classified production areas are considered not yet fully implemented by the EU Member States [32], in any case, several food-borne hazards are not considered by the Legislation in force. Among them, pathogenic vibrios, BAS and indole.
The aim of the present study was to ascertain possible food-borne hazards related to the accumulation of bacteria and chemical products of the decomposition in T. mutabilis from Emilia-Romagna Region, Northern Italy. Batches at harvest and retail were considered under different conditions for viability of the batches, Vibrio spp. load, and the prevalence of pathogenic species, namely V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. vulnificus. To ascertain the possible accumulation of toxic catabolites assumed from the carrion, Biogenic Amines (BAs) and Biogenic Amines Index (BAI) were investigated at harvest and retail, whereas Indole Producing Bacteria (IPB) load was investigated at harvest and under refrigerated storage.

2. Materials and Methods

The study area is part of the FAO zone 37.2.1, GSA (Geographical Subarea) 17, along the Emilia-Romagna coastline, Adriatic Sea, Northern Italy (Figure 1).
T. mutabilis is not available year-round, because the fishing season is from the early autumn to the late spring. Therefore, the study required several surveys carried out between October 2017 and February 2021.
The research program was divided into three Work Packages (WPs): (WP1) evaluation of batches viability, Vibrio spp. load and the prevalence of pathogenic vibrios at retail; (WP2) evaluation of batches viability, Vibrio spp. load, and the prevalence of pathogenic vibrios and BAs content at retail and at harvest; (WP3) evaluation of batches viability, Vibrio spp. load, prevalence of pathogenic vibrios and IPB load at harvest and during refrigeration at 4 °C with and without prior treatment of immersion in clean seawater in a Recirculating Aquaculture System (RAS). The treatment is normally intended for bivalve mollusks depuration (to reduce E. coli contamination) and conditioning (to remove sand, mud or slime, to improve organoleptic qualities and to ensure good vitality).
The batches from primary production were obtained directly from a fisherman (at landing), and those at retail from different fish shops. All batches were transported immediately to the laboratory in isothermal boxes, stored at 6–8 °C to avoid Vibrio spp. entering a viable but non-culturable state, and processed within 24 h.

2.1. Viability of the Batches (WPs 1, 2, and 3)

According to the EU legislation [17], “fresh” marine gastropods must be sold alive as bivalve mollusks, to which they are assimilated. They must show characteristics of freshness and viability, must be responsive to the touch by closing their open valves, and must contain normal amounts of intravalvular liquid. This approach is tailored to the specific features of bivalves, and obviously, it is unsuitable for gastropods, because they lack two valves and obviously, intravalvular liquid. The viability of the batches of T. mutabilis was ascertained following an internal protocol, by spreading table salt on the animals, as NaCl results in an aversive stimulus promoting extroflexion of the foot and mucus production in viable animals [33]. For each batch, the viability was expressed as the percentage of living animals on the whole batch.

2.2. Abundance of Vibrio spp. and Pathogenic Vibrios (WPs 1, 2, and 3)

The abundance of Vibrio spp. was checked on thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose (TCBS) agar (Oxoid, Milan, Italy) NaCl 3% (final) by the spread plate method at 20 °C for 3–5 days, following an internal protocol [34].
The sample units (10–20 individuals) were prepared according to a slight modification of the ISO 6887-3:2017/Amd.1:2020 method. Briefly, gastropods were rinsed with sterilized seawater, then their shells were cut aseptically to obtain 10 g of the whole body. Each unit was added to 90 mL of saline solution NaCl 3% and homogenized utilizing a rotary blender at medium speed. From this first dilution, further ten-fold serial dilutions were prepared with saline solution NaCl 3%.
From each homogenate and its ten-fold serial dilutions, 100 µL were spread plated on the agar plates and incubated at 20 °C. The results were expressed as log10 Colony Forming Units (CFU) g−1.
V. parahaemolyticus, V. cholerae and V. vulnificus were investigated utilizing the homogenate of each sample unit, from which 100 µL were spread plated on agar plate of CHROMagar™ Vibrio (CAV) (PBI International, Milan, Italy), then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Suspected colonies (V. parahaemolyticus mauve, V. vulnificus/V. cholerae green-blue to turquoise blue, V. alginolyticus colorless) were submitted to biochemical screening and genotyped by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Briefly, after a biochemical screening to ascertain the characteristics of the genus (pleomorphic Gram-negative rods, oxidase-positive, able to reduce nitrate, glucose-fermenting, sensitive to the vibriostatic O129/150 μg), suspected strains were genotyped by PCR as previously described [35] to test their respective species-specific and pathogenic gene markers. For V. parahaemolyticus toxR, tdh and trh; for V. cholerae toxR, ctx and stn/sto; for V. vulnificus only the species-specific gene marker vvhA, because, according to the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization [36], all V. vulnificus strains may be prudently considered virulent. The oligonucleotide primers and the PCR conditions are reported in Supplementary Materials Table S1.

2.3. Biogenic Amines (WP2)

BAs were quantified by an HPLC method employing a UV detector after derivatization by Dansyl chloride. Analyses were performed by an external service (FoodMicroTeam s.r.l., Academic Spin-off of the University of Florence, Italy), and samples were supplied frozen (−20 °C). Considering the results for each batch, the sum of histamine, putrescine, cadaverine, and tyramine quantities were calculated and expressed as BAI (Biogenic Amines Index) according to Veciana-Nogués et al. [37].

2.4. Abundance of IPB (WP3)

IPB load was determined in T. mutabilis by Most Probable Number procedure, indicated by Leitão and Rios [38] as the most reliable approach for the quantitative evaluation of the indole positive microflora. Three series of three tubes containing 5 mL of tryptone broth 1% were prepared. One series was inoculated with 0.5 mL of the homogenate (dilution 1:10), and the remaining two with 0.5 mL of two further ten-fold serial dilutions each. After incubation at 20 °C for 3–5 days, Kovac’s reagent was added to each tube. The reagent builds with indole a cherry-red complex, allowing to confirm the enzymatic activity of tryptophanases and the positivity for IPB.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed on Vibrio spp. load, BAs, BAI, and IPB content of the batches of T. mutabilis. According to the EU legislation [17], bivalve mollusks and gastropods placed on the market must be alive, but a mortality ≤10% is almost always accepted. For this reason, batches were divided into two groups based on the percentage of viability: high viability (≥90%) and low viability (<90%). The one-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) test was performed to assess data distribution. According to K–S test results, either non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test (M–W U) or Student’s t-test were used to establish possible differences in Vibrio spp. load, BAs, BAI, and IPB content between the two viability groups or between treatment groups (with or without immersion). Paired samples t-test was used to compare viability, Vibrio spp. load and IPB content between T0 and T3 within treatment groups.
Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using the software SPSS 26.0.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

Overall, forty-nine batches of T. mutabilis were processed. Results are reported below for each of the three WPs. All batches were negative for V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, and V. cholerae.

3.1. Viability of the Batches and Vibrio spp. Load at Retail (WP1)

The twenty-four batches of T. mutabilis from retail showed different values of viability (Table 1). Only 20.8% (5/24) of the batches showed 90–100% of viability, whereas 16.7% (4/24) of the batches had 70–80% of viability, 41.7% (10/24) had 19–50%, and 20.8% (5/24) had 0%. Vibrio spp. load resulted in a variable within 4.07 and 7.69 log10 CFU g−1 with a mean value of 5.70 ± 0.75 log10 CFU g−1. No statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) of Vibrio spp. load was observed between the group with viability ≥ 90% (5.27 log10 CFU g−1) and the group with viability < 90% (5.81 log10 CFU g−1).

3.2. Viability of the Batches, Vibrio spp. Load and BAs Content at RETAIL and at Harvest (WP2)

Overall, 18 batches of T. mutabilis were analyzed (Table 2). The four batches from primary production showed viability of 100%. Two of the fourteen batches from retail had a viability of 90%, ten < 90% and two 0%. Vibrio spp. mean load resulted in 5.60 ± 0.61 log10 CFU g−1 in the batches from retail, and 5.30 ± 0.85 log10 CFU g−1 in the batches at harvest. Histamine, putrescine, cadaverine, and tyramine were detected in all samples and each BAI (their sum) was calculated. All BAI value resulted >15 mg Kg−1, and 50% (9 out of 18) resulted >50 mg Kg−1 (min-max: 23.2–225.1 mg Kg−1). The mean value resulted in 50.45 ± 21.27 Kg−1 in the four batches from the primary production, and 65.83 ± 48.36 mg Kg−1 in the fourteen batches from retail.
No statistically significant difference of Vibrio spp. load, histamine, putrescine, cadaverine, tyramine, and BAI quantity were observed between batches from the primary production or from retail.

3.3. Viability of the Batches, Vibrio spp. and IPB Load at Harvest and during Refrigeration (WP3)

Seven batches at harvest were utilized to verify any influence of the refrigerated storage at 4 °C for three days (T1, T2, T3) on the viability of the batches, Vibrio spp. load and IPB load. Three batches were immediately refrigerated, while four batches were partly immediately refrigerated and partly refrigerated after 18–24 of immersion in clean seawater in a RAS. Results are reported in Table 3.
Overall, at harvest (T0) the mean value of viability resulted in 98.63 ± 3.63% (six batches 100% and one batch 90.4%). The mean value of viability at T3 resulted in 62.43 ± 26.95% in the samples immediately refrigerated and 94.25 ± 7.59% in the samples previously immersed in clean seawater. The mean load of Vibrio spp. resulted in 5.08 ± 0.82 log10 CFU g−1 at T0, 5.10 ± 0.62 at T3 without immersion, and 5.46 ± 0.12 at T3 with previous immersion.
IPB load resulted in 2.52 ± 0.85 log10 MPN g−1 at T0, 3.31 ± 1.23 and 3.22 ± 1.18 at T3 without and with previous immersion, respectively.
In batches refrigerated after 18–24 of immersion in clean seawater in a RAS, no significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in viability, Vibrio spp. load and IPB content between T0 and T3. Similarly, in batches refrigerated without immersion, no significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in Vibrio spp. load and IPB content between T0 and T3. However, viability at T3 (62.4%) was significantly lower (paired-t: 3.94; p = 0.008) than that observed at T0 (98.6%).

4. Discussion

The EU legislation assimilates the marine gastropods to the bivalve mollusks in terms of safety criteria for human consumption but allows the harvesting of gastropods that are not filter-feeders in non-classified areas [39,40]. This provision relies on earlier statements expressed in Regulation UE 558/2010 [41]: the risk of accumulation of microorganisms related to fecal contamination may be considered remote in animals that are not filter-feeders; no epidemiological information was reported to link the provisions for classification of production areas with risks for public health associated with marine gastropods which are not filter feeders.
Bivalve mollusks and gastropods have both an open circulatory system [5], and therefore bacteria and other contaminants can be expected in all organs and tissues, independently of the different feeding habits. Despite this biological evidence, the microbiology of marine gastropods has been poorly investigated, except few studies concerning disease outbreaks of Abalone, reporting high bacterial contamination of tissues also in healthy animals [42], and the study of Cheng et al. [43] reporting high contamination of the gastropod Niotha clathrata muscle by Vibrio spp. (6–8 log10 CFU g−1).
A recent study evidenced a Vibrio spp. mean load exceeding 5 log10 CFU g−1 in the tissues of T. mutabilis and 5.79 log10 CFU g−1 in Bolinus brandaris, another carnivorous gastropod fished, commonly by-catch, in the Adriatic Sea [33].
Accordingly, in the present study Vibrio spp. mean load resulted in >5 log10 CFU g−1 in all the three WPs. In WP1 resulted in 5.70 ± 0.75 log10 CFU g−1 in batches from retail (Table 1). In WP2 resulted in 5.60 ± 0.61 log10 CFU g−1 in the batches from retail, and 5.30 ± 0.85 log10 CFU g−1 in the batches from primary production (Table 2). In WP3 resulted in 5.08 ± 0.82 log10 CFU g−1 in the batches from primary production (T0 = before refrigeration), 5.10 ± 0.62 log10 CFU g−1 after refrigeration (T3) without previous treatment of immersion, and 5.46 ± 0.12 log10 CFU g−1 after refrigeration (T3) with previous treatment of immersion (Table 3). It should be noted that these values result higher than those ascertained in R. philippinarum in the same area, showing a mean load of 4.69 ± 0.65 log10 CFU g−1 in a multi-year retrospective study [44], and 4.82 ± 0.71 log10 CFU g−1 in a concurrent project (unpublished data).
Notwithstanding the high Vibrio spp. load, all batches of T. mutabilis resulted negative for pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus and V. cholerae, whereas batches of R. philippinarum showed 62% of positivity for at least one of the targets in a concurrent project (unpublished data), as proof of their circulation in the area. The discrepancy between the two species is difficult to explain and needs further investigation. It can only be assumed that the microbial environment and the chemical characteristics of the carrion on which T. mutabilis feed could result in an unsuitable environment for V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus and V. cholerae.
The fishing of T. mutabilis is practiced within three miles of the coastline by dedicated traps with dead fishes as baits, predominantly bluefish. These gastropods use their sense of smell to find carrion, therefore spoiled fish is preferred by some fishermen. Other fishermen prefer thawed white fish of acceptable quality to prevent the bitterness of gastropod flesh.
Given the feeding habit of T. mutabilis, chemical products of the decomposition should be considered of concern, particularly BAs and indole. However, to our best knowledge, this is the first study conducted on a marine scavenger gastropod and comparative data are lacking. Histamine, putrescine, cadaverine, and tyramine, were always detected (Table 2), including 14 batches of T. mutabilis from retail and four batches from primary production. Considering the BAI limit of acceptability suggested for tuna (<50 mg Kg−1) and for anchovy, (<15–16 mg Kg−1) [25], the BAI values registered in T. mutabilis may be considered unquestionably high. All samples had a value >15 mg Kg−1, and 50% (9 out of 18) had a value >50 mg Kg−1 (minimum 23.2 mg Kg−1, maximum 225.1 mg Kg−1). While not differing significantly, the BAI mean value resulted higher in the batches from retail (65.83 mg Kg−1) than in the batches from the primary production (50.45 mg Kg−1) suggesting that, after the harvesting, endogenous production of BAs may occur over time, increasing the total amount of these substances in T. mutabilis tissues.
Indole may serve as a chemical indicator for the evaluation of incipient spoilage of crustaceans and other seafood products [31]. A limit of 250 μg Kg−1 was established by the US Food and Drug Administration, and in several countries, to identify shrimps in the first stage of decomposition, but it was demonstrated that also shrimps with a level of 44.6 μg Kg−1 show the rejection conditions [45]. Almost all species of Vibrio spp. can produce indole via tryptophanase activity [30,46], and the activity of tryptophanase may result increased 21-fold at pH 8–9 [47]. Marine carrion is rich medium in a strongly alkaline environment (pH > 8), and it may be expected to contain a significant amount of this substance. As shown in Table 3, IPB were always detected in T. mutabilis batches at harvest (mean load 2.52 ± 0.85 log10 MPN g−1), and with increasing value after three days of refrigeration (3.31 ± 1.23 and 3.22 ± 1.18 log10 MPN g−1 without and with immersion respectively) suggesting that IPB are predominantly represented by psychrophilic bacteria metabolically active at chilling temperature (4 °C). Considering that fish meat is naturally rich in tryptophan [48] this IPB load in a carrion-feeder is certainly potentially able to produce a high level of indole.
The immersion in clean seawater is provided by EU legislation for bivalve mollusks [17], but not for marine gastropods. Conversely, our results suggest that this treatment may ensure higher viability to T. mutabilis at retail, as the batches immersed in clean seawater after landing showed higher viability after three days of refrigeration (mean value 94.25%) than those immediately refrigerated (mean value 62.43%). It can be assumed that the low percentage of viability registered for 24 batches at retail (only 20.8% with 90–100% of viability) could be due to the lack of treatment of immersion after landing.

5. Conclusions

The feeding habit of T. mutabilis and its open circulatory system allows a high accumulation of bacteria (Vibrio spp.) and products of the decomposition associated with the carrion on which the animal feed, i.e., BAs and IPB. Notwithstanding the circulation of pathogenic vibrios in the area, namely V. parahaemolyticus, V vulnificus, and V. cholerae (high percentage of positivity in R. philippinarum) all samples resulted negative. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to address various issues of food safety involving T. mutabilis. For this species, the undiscovered safety issues seem to rely on the retention of biogenic amines and indole-producing bacteria because of the feeding on carrion. Obviously, the utilization of spoiled fish as bait should be discouraged, to prevent an excessive intake of products of the decomposition in T. mutabilis. Moreover, the lack of immersion in clean seawater after landing could be at the origin of the low viability of the batches at retail, with possible endogenous production of BAs.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods10112574/s1, Table S1: Target genes and oligonucleotide primers utilized in the study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.S.; methodology, P.S.; software, F.O.; formal analysis, G.B. and L.L.; data curation, F.O.; writing—original draft preparation, P.S.; writing—review and editing, F.O.; project administration, P.S.; funding acquisition, P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Emilia-Romagna Region, Operative Program PO FEAMP 2014–2020 CUPE21F19000270009 and by the Department of Veterinary Medical Science, University of Bologna, Italy.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, since invertebrate, with the exception of cephalopods, are not included in Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament which regulates this field in the European Union.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Silvia Mangani and FoodMicroTeam s.r.l., Academic Spin-off of the University of Florence, for agreeing to perform biogenic amines analyses for the first time on a marine gastropod. The authors thank the fisherman Alekos Riccardi for the cooperation and the free supply of T. mutabilis batches at harvest.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Polidori, P.; Grati, F.; Bolognini, L.; Domenichetti, F.; Scarcella, G.; Fabi, G. Towards a better management of Nassarius mutabilis (Linnaeus, 1758): Biometric and biological integrative study. Acta Adriat. 2015, 56, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Niwa, T. Iindoxyl Sulfate, A Tryptophan Metabolite, Induces Nephro-Vascular Toxicity. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2012, 26, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Lobo-da-Cunha, A. Structure and function of the digestive system in molluscs. Cell Tissue Res. 2019, 377, 475–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Felici, A.; Bilandzic, N.; Magi, G.E.; Iaffaldano, N.; Fiordelmondo, E.; Doti, G.; Roncarati, A. Evaluation of Long Sea Snail Hinia reticulata (Gastropod) from the Middle Adriatic Sea as a Possible Alternative for Human Consumption. Foods 2020, 9, 905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Narain, A.S. A review of the structure of the heart of molluscs, particularly bivalves, in relation to cardiac function. J. Molluscan Stud. 1976, 42, 46–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Monahan-Earley, R.; Dvorak, A.M.; Aird, W.C. Evolutionary origins of the blood vascular system and endothelium. J. Thromb. Haemost 2013, 11 (Suppl. S1), 46–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Thompson, F.L.; Iida, T.; Swings, J. Biodiversity of vibrios. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2004, 68, 403–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ceccarelli, D.; Amaro, C.; Romalde, J.L.; Suffredini, E.; Vezzulli, L. Vibrio Species. In Food Microbiology: Fundamentals and Frontiers, 5th ed.; Doyle, M.P., Diez-Gonzalez, F., Hill, C., Eds.; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2019; pp. 347–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hoffmann, M.; Brown, E.W.; Feng, P.C.H.; Keys, C.E.; Fischer, M.; Monday, S.R. PCR-based method for targeting 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer regions among Vibrio species. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. DePaola, A.; Lee, R.; Mahoney, D.; Rivera, I.; Tamplin, M. Case Study: Vibrio Vulnificus in Oysters. Background Paper for the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Development of Practical Risk Management Strategies based on Microbiological Risk Assessment Outputs. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/au626e/au626e.pdf (accessed on 3 June 2021).
  11. Kim, J.Y.; Lee, J.L. Correlation of Total Bacterial and Vibrio spp. Populations between Fish and Water in the Aquaculture System. Front. Mar. Sci. 2017, 4, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Tack, D.M.; Ray, L.; Griffin, P.M.; Cieslak, P.R.; Dunn, J.; Rissman, T.; Jervis, R.; Lathrop, S.; Muse, A.; Duwell, M.; et al. Preliminary Incidence and Trends of Infections with Pathogens Transmitted Commonly Through Food—Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 U.S. Sites, 2016–2019. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 2020, 69, 509–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Song, X.; Zang, J.; Yu, W.; Shi, X.; Wu, Y. Occurrence and Identification of Pathogenic Vibrio Contaminants in Common Seafood Available in a Chinese Traditional Market in Qingdao, Shandong Province. Front Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Galaviz-Silva, L.; Goméz-Anduro, G.; Molina-Garza, Z.J.; Ascencio-Valle, F. Food safety issues and the microbiology of fish and shellfish. In Microbiologically Safe Foods; Heredia, N., Wesley, I., García, S., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 227–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Potasman, I.; Paz, A.; Odeh, M. Infectious outbreaks associated with bivalve shellfish consumption: A worldwide perspective. Clin. Infect Dis. 2002, 35, 921–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Froelich, B.A.; Phippen, B.; Fowler, P.; Noble, R.T.; Oliver, J.D. Differences in Abundances of Total Vibrio spp., V. vulnificus, and V. parahaemolyticus in Clams and Oysters in North Carolina. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e02265-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. European Parliament. Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for on the hygiene of foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union 2004, 47, 139–206. [Google Scholar]
  18. Food and Drug Amministration. Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/80637/download (accessed on 3 July 2021).
  19. Paredes, I.; Rietjens, I.M.; Vieites, J.M.; Cabado, A.G. Update of risk assessments of main marine biotoxins in the European Union. Toxicon 2011, 58, 336–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Naila, A.; Flint, S.; Fletcher, G.; Bremer, P.; Meerdink, G. Control of biogenic amines in food—Existing and emerging approaches. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75, R139–R150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Ma, Q.; Zhang, X.; Qu, Y. Biodegradation and Biotransformation of Indole: Advances and Perspectives. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Prester, L.; Orct, T.; Macan, J.; Vukusic, J.; Kipcic, D. Determination of biogenic amines and endotoxin in squid, musky octopus, Norway lobster, and mussel stored at room temperature. Arh. Za Hig. Rada I Toksikol. 2010, 61, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Biji, K.B.; Ravishankar, C.N.; Venkateswarlu, R.; Mohan, C.O.; Gopal, T.K. Biogenic amines in seafood: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 2210–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Weremfo, A.; Eduafo, M.K.; Gyimah, H.A.; Oppong, S.A. Monitoring the levels of biogenic amines in canned fish products marketed in Ghana. J. Food Qual. 2020, 2020, 2684235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Prester, L. Biogenic amines in fish, fish products and shellfish: A review. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal Control. Expo Risk Assess 2011, 28, 1547–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Baixas-Nogueras, S.; Bover-Cid, S.; Veciana-Nogues, M.T.; Marine-Font, A.; Vidal-Carou, M.C. Biogenic amine index for freshness evaluation in iced Mediterranean hake (Merluccius merluccius). J. Food Prot. 2005, 68, 2433–2438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Al Bulushi, I.; Poole, S.; Deeth, H.C.; Dykes, G.A. Biogenic amines in fish: Roles in intoxication, spoilage, and nitrosamine formation—A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 49, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lee, J.H.; Lee, J. Indole as an intercellular signal in microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 34, 426–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Roager, H.M.; Licht, T.R. Microbial tryptophan catabolites in health and disease. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chart, H. Vibrio, mobiluncus, gardnerella and spirillum: Cholera; vaginosis; rat bite fever. In Medical Microbiology, 18th ed.; Greenwood, D., Barer, M., Slack, R., Irving, W., Eds.; Churchill Livingstone Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 314–323. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mendes, R.; Gonçalves, A.; Pestana, J.; Pestana, C. Indole production and deepwater pink shrimp (Parapenaeus longirostris) decomposition. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2005, 221, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. European Commission DG Health and Food Safety. Overview Report Bivalve Molluscs. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/8b3b3ca8-1028-11e6-ba9a-01aa75ed71a1/language-en (accessed on 30 August 2021).
  33. Serratore, P.; Zavatta, E.; Bignami, G.; Lorito, L. Preliminary investigation on the microbiological quality of edible marine gastropods of the Adriatic Sea, Italy. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2019, 8, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Serratore, P.; Turtura, G.C.; Rinaldini, E.; Milandri, S.; Presepi, D. Phenotypic characterization of some bacterial populations belonging to the genus Vibrio. Ann. Microbiol. Ed. Enzimol. 1999, 49, 89–99. [Google Scholar]
  35. Passalacqua, P.L.; Zavatta, E.; Bignami, G.; Serraino, A.; Serratore, P. Occurrence of Vibrio Parahaemolyticus, Vibrio Cholerae and Vibrio Vulnificus in the Clam Ruditapes Philippinarum (Adams & Reeve, 1850) from Emilia Romagna and Sardinia, Italy. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2016, 5, 5709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Risk Assessment of Vibrio Vulnificus in Raw Oysters. Interpretative Summary and Technical Report. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43365 (accessed on 22 August 2021).
  37. Veciana-Nogues, M.T.; Marine-Font, A.; Vidal-Carou, M.C. Biogenic Amines as Hygienic Quality Indicators of Tuna. Relationships with Microbial Counts, ATP-Related Compounds, Volatile Amines, and Organoleptic Changes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 2036–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Leitão, M.F.F.; Rios, D.P.A. Microbiological and chemical changes in freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosembergii) stored under refrigeration. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2000, 31, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. European Parliament. Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on official controls and other official activities performed to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products, amending Regulations (EC) No 999/2001, (EC) No 396/2005, (EC) No 1069/2009, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EU) No 1151/2012, (EU) No 652/2014, (EU) 2016/429 and (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulations (EC) No 1/2005 and (EC) No 1099/2009 and Council Directives 98/58/EC, 1999/74/EC, 2007/43/EC, 2008/119/EC and 2008/120/EC, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 854/2004 and (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 89/608/EEC, 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 96/23/EC, 96/93/EC and 97/78/EC and Council Decision 92/438/EEC (Official Controls Regulation). Off. J. Eur. Union 2017, 60, 1–142. [Google Scholar]
  40. European Parliament. Commision Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/624 of 8 February 2019 concerning specific rules for the performance of official controls on the production of meat and for production and relaying areas of live bivalve molluscs in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Off. J. Eur. Union 2019, 62, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  41. European Parliament. Regulation (EU) No 558/2010 of 24 June 2010 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin. Off. J. Eur. Union 2010, 53, 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  42. Shi, L.Y.; Liang, S.; Luo, X.; Ke, C.H.; Zhao, J. Microbial community of Pacific abalone (Haliotis discus hannai) juveniles during a disease outbreak in South China. Aquac. Res. 2017, 48, 1080–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cheng, C.A.; Hwang, D.F.; Tsai, Y.H.; Chen, H.C.; Jeng, S.S.; Noguchi, T.; Ohwada, K.; Hasimoto, K. Microflora and tetrodotoxin-producing bacteria in a gastropod, Niotha clathrata. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1995, 33, 929–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Serratore, P.; Ostanello, F.; Passalacqua, P.L.; Zavatta, E.; Bignami, G.; Serraino, A.; Giacometti, F. First Multi-Year Retrospective Study on Vibrio Parhaemolyticus and Vibrio Vulnificus Prevalence in Ruditapes Philippinarum Harvested in Sacca Di Goro, Italy. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2016, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Mendes, R.; Huidobro, A.; Caballero, L. Indole levels in deepwater pink shrimp (Parapenaeus longirostris) from the Portuguese coast. Effects of temperature abuse. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2014, 214, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Mueller, R.S.; Beyhan, S.; Saini, S.G.; Yildiz, F.H.; Bartlett, D.H. Indole acts as an extracellular cue regulating gene expression in Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 3504–3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Kim, D.H.; Lee, J.H.; Bae, E.A.; Han, M.J. Induction and inhibition of indole production of intestinal bacteria. Arch. Pharmacal. Res. 1995, 18, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Palego, L.; Betti, L.; Rossi, A.; Giannaccini, G. Tryptophan Biochemistry: Structural, Nutritional, Metabolic, and Medical Aspects in Humans. J. Amino Acids 2016, 2016, 8952520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Sampling area along the Emilia-Romagna region coast, Northern Italy (red) Adriatic Sea (blue), FAO zone 37.2.1, GSA 17 (light blue).
Figure 1. Sampling area along the Emilia-Romagna region coast, Northern Italy (red) Adriatic Sea (blue), FAO zone 37.2.1, GSA 17 (light blue).
Foods 10 02574 g001
Table 1. Viability of the Tritia mutabilis batches at retail and Vibrio spp. load.
Table 1. Viability of the Tritia mutabilis batches at retail and Vibrio spp. load.
Viability ClassBatch id.
(Date of Collection or Purchase)
Viability (%)Vibrio spp.
(log10 CFU g−1)
<90%1379(10 October 2017)07.69
1442(26 February 2019)06.16
1446(7 March 2019)05.48
1448(18 March 2019)06.26
1453(9 April 2019)05.66
1384(25 October 2017)196.42
1407(18 April 2018)205.26
1433(15 January 2019)204.34
1447(12 March 2019)205.29
1443(28 February 2019)255.18
1452(3 April 2019)255.76
1434(17 January 2019)305.92
1438(5 February 2019)306.26
1435(22 January 2019)406.29
1440(13 February 2019)505.71
1406(21 March 2018)706.32
1439(13 February 2019)705.73
1450(21 March 2019)705.79
1449(19 March 2019)804.88
mean- 29.955.81
std. deviation- 26.640.71
std. error of mean- 6.110.16
≥90%1436(29 January 2019)905.03
1437(31 January 2019)906.07
1378(4 October 2017)1006.00
1382(18 October 2017)1005.20
1451(25 March 2019)1004.07
mean- 96.05.27
std. deviation- 5.480.82
std. error of mean- 2.450.37
all viability classes
mean- 43.715.70
std. deviation- 36.210.75
std. error of mean- 7.390.15
Table 2. Viability of the batches of Tritia mutabilis, Vibrio spp. load, single BAs content, and BAI (Histamine + Putrescine + Cadaverine + Tyramine) at harvest and at retail.
Table 2. Viability of the batches of Tritia mutabilis, Vibrio spp. load, single BAs content, and BAI (Histamine + Putrescine + Cadaverine + Tyramine) at harvest and at retail.
Batch OriginBatch id.
(Date of Collection or Purchase)
Viability (%)Vibrio spp.
(log10 CFU g−1)
Histamine
(mg Kg−1)
Putrescine
(mg Kg−1)
Cadaverine
(mg Kg−1)
Tyramine
(mg Kg−1)
BAI
(mg Kg−1)
Harvest1389 (21 November 2017)1005.9215.6038.3013.306.5073.70
1470 (12 February 2020)1005.5319.005.1017.105.5046.70
1471 (19 February 2020)1005.73.8015.8033.505.1058.20
1472 (24 February 2020)1004.043.906.308.704.3023.20
mean100 5.3010.5816.3818.155.3550.45
std. deviation0.000.857.8915.3810.790.9121.27
std. error of mean0.000.433.947.695.400.4610.64
Retail1406 (21 March 2018)706.326.0014.5015.905.7042.10
1433 (15 January 2019)204.342.009.6019.103.3034.00
1434 (17 January 2019)305.925.4016.9021.104.6048.00
1435 (22 January 2019)406.297.002.9643.606.7060.26
1436 (29 January 2019)905.034.0012.6027.905.4049.90
1437 (31 January 2019)906.072.3016.0027.904.6050.80
1438 (5 February 2019)305.482.50172.0024.9025.70225.10
1439 (13 February 2019)705.734.6019.7019.302.5046.10
1442 (26 February 2019)06.1616.9024.1036.5013.2090.70
1443 (28 February 2019)255.181.708.0012.608.5030.80
1446 (7 March 2019)05.485.9018.2026.409.6060.10
1447 (12 March 2019)205.295.008.2016.307.8037.30
1448 (18 March 2019)06.264.2020.7027.4010.9063.20
1449 (19 March 2019)804.8839.008.1028.507.7083.30
mean40.365.607.6125.1124.818.3065.83
std. deviation33.310.619.7842.698.365.8248.36
std. error of mean8.900.162.6111.412.241.5513.09
Totalmean53.615.538.2723.1723.337.6462.41
std. deviation38.720.659.2638.079.075.2544.23
std. error of mean9.130.152.188.972.141.2410.43
Table 3. Viability of the batches of Tritia mutabilis, Vibrio spp. load, and IPB load. Batches at harvest (T0) and refrigeration at 4 °C. T1–T3 = day of refrigeration with and without immersion.
Table 3. Viability of the batches of Tritia mutabilis, Vibrio spp. load, and IPB load. Batches at harvest (T0) and refrigeration at 4 °C. T1–T3 = day of refrigeration with and without immersion.
Batch id.TimeVibrio spp.
(log10 CFU g−1)
Viability of the Batches (%)IPB
(log10 MPN g−1)
(Date of Collection or Purchase) Without ImmersionWith ImmersionWithout ImmersionWith ImmersionWithout ImmersionWith Immersion
1470
(12 February 2020)
05.53-100-1.66-
14.74-74.0-2.58-
25.71-32.0-5.04-
34.00-73.0-4.63-
1471
(19 February 2020)
05.70-100-3.04-
15.49-86.0-4.04-
26.12-44.0-4.18-
35.08-54.0-5.18-
1472
(24 February 2020)
04.04-100-2.18-
14.41-73.0-3.18-
24.67-69.0-3.63-
35.38-59.0-3.20-
1486
(19 October 2020)
06.23(6.03) a100(100)4.04(3.30)
14.635.791001002.882.92
25.254.6494.01004.182.63
35.885.5384.093.02.863.38
14893
(November 2020)
04.98(6.08)90.4(99.0)2.81(3.66)
14.004.7680.084.02.041.36
25.645.3635.084.04.182.63
34.605.4316.084.01.561.56
1492
(18 January 2021)
04.99(4.92)100(100)1.63(1.63)
15.095.231001001.362.97
25.755.8697.01003.043.15
35.455.5851.01002.543.63
1495
(22 February 2021)
04.09(4.91)100(100)2.30(3.66)
13.815.481001003.811.88
24.865.871001002.882.81
35.305.311001003.184.32
Totalmean at T05.08(5.48)98.63(99.75)2.52(3.06)
std. deviation at T00.820.663.630.500.850.97
std. error of mean at T00.310.331.370.250.320.48
mean at T35.105.4662.4394.253.313.22
std. deviation at T30.620.1226.957.591.231.18
std. error of mean at T30.230.0610.193.790.470.59
a Values registered after immersion are reported in brackets.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Serratore, P.; Bignami, G.; Ostanello, F.; Lorito, L. Hazard Identification Related to the Presence of Vibrio spp., Biogenic Amines, and Indole-Producing Bacteria in a Non-Filter Feeding Marine Gastropod (Tritia mutabilis) Commercialized on the Italian Market. Foods 2021, 10, 2574. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112574

AMA Style

Serratore P, Bignami G, Ostanello F, Lorito L. Hazard Identification Related to the Presence of Vibrio spp., Biogenic Amines, and Indole-Producing Bacteria in a Non-Filter Feeding Marine Gastropod (Tritia mutabilis) Commercialized on the Italian Market. Foods. 2021; 10(11):2574. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112574

Chicago/Turabian Style

Serratore, Patrizia, Giorgia Bignami, Fabio Ostanello, and Luna Lorito. 2021. "Hazard Identification Related to the Presence of Vibrio spp., Biogenic Amines, and Indole-Producing Bacteria in a Non-Filter Feeding Marine Gastropod (Tritia mutabilis) Commercialized on the Italian Market" Foods 10, no. 11: 2574. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112574

APA Style

Serratore, P., Bignami, G., Ostanello, F., & Lorito, L. (2021). Hazard Identification Related to the Presence of Vibrio spp., Biogenic Amines, and Indole-Producing Bacteria in a Non-Filter Feeding Marine Gastropod (Tritia mutabilis) Commercialized on the Italian Market. Foods, 10(11), 2574. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112574

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop