Next Article in Journal
The Regulatory Effects and the Signaling Pathways of Natural Bioactive Compounds on Ferroptosis
Previous Article in Journal
Feasibility of Elder-Friendly Food Applications of Sacha Inchi According to Cooking Method: Focusing on Analysis of Antioxidative Activity and Brain Neuron Cell Viability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Paeonol Disrupts the Integrity of Aspergillus flavus Cell Walls via Releasing Surface Proteins, Inhibiting the Biosynthesis of β-1,3-Glucan and Promoting the Degradation of Chitin, and an Identification of Cell Surface Proteins

Henan Key Laboratory of Cereal and Oil Food Safety Inspection and Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(12), 2951; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10122951
Submission received: 21 October 2021 / Revised: 15 November 2021 / Accepted: 23 November 2021 / Published: 1 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Food Microbiology)

Abstract

:
Paeonol can effectively inhibit Aspergillus flavus (A. flavus) via damaging cell walls. In this work, paeonol treatment remarkably destroyed both the outer amorphous layer and the inner fibrous layer of cell walls. Furthermore, FT-IR and XPS characterization showed that OH functional groups were altered and proteins in the outer layer were released. According to proteomic analysis, 605 proteins have been identified and annotated. The activities of β-1,3-glucan synthase and chitinase were prohibited and promoted, respectively, by paeonol treatment, however, the activities of β-1,3-glucanase and chitin synthase were not influenced. QRT-PCR results suggested that FKSP, CHIIII, and CHIV genes might be the antifungal targets of paeonol. In addition, paeonol can effectively restrain the pathogenicity of A. flavus on peanut butter. This study provided a new elucidation on the mode of action of paeonol against cell walls of A. flavus, facilitating the application of paeonol in the preservation of agricultural products.

1. Introduction

Aspergillus flavus (A. flavus), a common filamentous fungus, is prone to contaminate peanuts, corns, and other food crops. A. flavus can cause aspergillosis in immunocompromised humans and animals [1]. In addition, the secondary metabolite aflatoxins (AFs) are severely carcinogenic, teratogenic and mutagenic, of which AFB1 is the most toxic and has been classified as a category I carcinogen by the cancer research organization of the World Health Organization (WHO) [2]. According to a recent report, about 25% of crops have been contaminated due to A. flavus infection [3]. The related economic loss across the world has reached up to hundreds of millions of dollars per year [4]. Therefore, how to effectively control the contamination of A. flavus is of great significance in ensuring the safety of grains of agricultural products and guaranteeing the health of humans and livestock.
The fungal cell wall is composed of various compounds, such as polysaccharides, proteins, fats, and ions, and is essential in maintaining cell homeostasis and protecting cells [5,6]. As a unique and dynamic structure, fungal cell wall has been extensively studied and considered as an attractive antimicrobial target [6,7,8]. Although there has been no report on the detailed components of A. flavus cell walls, in our previous study, they are assumed to be organized into two layers [9], similar to Aspergillus fumigatus (A. fumigatus). The outer amorphous layer contains N-glycosylated proteins and the fibrous inner layer contains mainly glucans and chitin [10,11]. In A. fumigatus mycelia, one carbohydrate part of this glycoprotein identified in the outer layer is galactosaminogalactan (GAG) that plays important roles in the primary pathogenicity to the host [12,13,14]. In addition, depending on the strains and growing state, surface proteins of A. flavus are diverse, therefore, identifying these proteins should be considered beneficial in understanding the infection of A. flavus on grains, as well as controlling its contamination.
Besides the commercial antifungal agents on the market, several plant-derived natural compounds have been reported to be capable of destroying cell walls to different extents, such as cinnamaldehyde [15], 2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde (HMB) [16], and o-vanillin [9]. In our previous study, we have screened a new natural antifungal compound-paeonol, which exerts a strong inhibitory effect against A. flavus via destroying cell surface and reducing the content of β-1,3-glucan and chitin [17]. All these proofs are directed to the assumption that paeonol can be developed as a substitute for commercial chemical fungicides (e.g., echinocandins [18] and nikkomycin [19]) against cell walls of A. flavus. However, the detailed mode of action of paeonol against cell walls is yet to be demonstrated.
In this study, we tried to reveal the antifungal effect of paeonol against A. flavus cell walls in three aspects: first, the ultrastructural changes of cell walls were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Subsequently, the functional groups and the elements in the outer surface of cell walls were examined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), respectively. Notably, proteins in the outer layer of cell walls were identified by proteomic analysis. To determine which enzymes and genes contribute to the metabolisms of β-1,3-glucan and chitin in the cell wall, the activities of enzymes participating in their biosynthesis and hydrolysis and/or degradation were quantified, and relative expressions of several key genes encoding these enzymes were also quantified by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (QRT-PCR). Finally, the antifungal efficacy of paeonol on peanut butter was also evaluated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Paeonol (purity: 99%, CAS: 552-41-0, Shanghai Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) was dissolved in ethanol absolute and stored at 4 °C in darkness. Chitin (CAS: 1398-61-4), N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc, CAS: 512-17-6), Uridine 5′-diphospho-N-acetylglucosamine disodium salt (UDP-GlcNAc, CAS: 91183-98-1) and Brij® 35 (CAS: 9002-92-0) were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Trypsin (CAS: 9002-07-7) and 3,3,5′,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB, CAS: 54827-17-7) were purchased from Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Wheat germ agglutinin (WGA, L3892, and WGA-HRP, L9640) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Trading Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Uridine 5′-diphosphoglucose disodium salt (UDP-Glc, CAS: 28053-08-9) was purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). GTP solution (R0461) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

2.2. Fungal Strain and Culture Conditions

A. flavus strain (CGMCC 3.6304, China General Microbial Culture Collection Center) was cultured on sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA: 4% glucose, 1% peptone, and 2% agar) at 28 ± 2 °C as described previously [20]. Mycelia were cultured in sabouraud dextrose broth (SDB: 4% glucose and 1% peptone).

2.3. Transmission Electron Microscopy

TEM characterization was performed according to Li et al. [9] with slight modifications. One hundred microliters of A. flavus spore suspension (5 × 105 /mL) were added into 20 mL SDB and cultured for 24 h. Then, paeonol dissolved in ethanol was added to the SDB to reach the final concentrations of 0 and MIC (0.625 mg/mL, previously tested in our lab [17]). After another 24 h culture, the fresh mycelia were collected and fixed with 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde and 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 4 °C for 4 h followed by a postfixation with 1% (w/v) osmium tetroxide at 4 °C for 2 h. Afterward, the samples were dehydrated with 25%, 50%, 75%, 85%, 95%, and 100% ethanol, successively. The samples were then embedded in Spurr’s resin (SPI Supplies, West Chester, PA, USA). Ultra-thin sections (approximately 50 nm) were obtained by an ultramicrotome (Leica EM-UC7, Leica Ltd., Weztlar, Germany). The sections were mounted on copper grids and stained with 2% saturated uranyl acetate and lead citrate each for 7 min. At last, the samples were visualized with a transmission electron microscope (JEM-1400, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

2.4. FT-IR Assay

Fresh mycelia were lyophilized and ground with KBr (1:100). Then, the mixture was pressed into tablets for the test. Whole spectra in the wavelength range of 400–4000 cm−1 were recorded in the reflectance mode using an FT-IR spectrophotometer (ALPHA, Bruker Corp., Karlsruhe, Germany). Pure KBr was used as the background.

2.5. XPS Assay

The surface atomic changes of each specimen were characterized by a K-Alpha XPS system (K-Alpha+, Thermo Fisher Scientific, East Grinstead, East Sussex County, UK). Peak decomposition and data analysis were conducted using XPS peak 4.0 software. The test parameters were set as follows: energy: 1486.8 ev, test spot area: 400 μm, tube voltage: 15 kV, tube current: 10 mA, background vacuum: 2 × 10−9 mbar, and binding energy: 0–1400 eV. The survey scans were collected for binding energy spanning from 1100 eV to 0 with an analyzer pass energy of 50 eV and a step of 1.00 eV.

2.6. Proteomic Analysis of Cell Surface Proteins

Surface proteins of A. flavus were obtained according to the method reported previously with slight modifications [21]. In brief, 1 g of fresh mycelia were washed several times with deionized water, suspended in 5 mL of 0.156 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and shaken for 3 h at room temperature. Supernatants were collected by centrifugation at 5000× g for 30 min and clarified by filtration with Whatman no. 2 paper and another centrifugation at 12,000× g for 3 min at 10 °C. Then, the content of surface protein in the collected supernatants was quantified by the Bradford assay [22]. Then, the proteins were separated by electrophoresis and trypsin hydrolysis. After desalination and lyophilization, samples were ready for analysis. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) identification and Gene Ontology (GO) analysis, eukaryotic orthologous groups (KOG) functional classification, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were conducted by the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI, Shenzhen, China). In brief, proteins were separated through LC (eksigent ultra 2D, SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA) and detected by Triple TOF 5600 (SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA). The MS/MS data were aligned with A. flavus 3357 proteome (NCBI database).

2.7. Determination of the Activity of β-1,3-Glucan Synthase

Microsomal membrane preparation was conducted as previously described [23] except that fresh mycelia were ground with liquid nitrogen. Then, the activity of β-1,3-glucan synthase was measured as described elsewhere [24].

2.8. Determination of the Activity of Chitin Synthase

Prior to the determination of the activity of chitin synthase, the microsomal membrane was prepared and the microtiter plate was coated as described previously [25] except for the initial ratio of fresh mycelia and TM buffer containing Tris-HCl and MgCl2. In the present study, 12 mg of grounded fresh mycelia were resuspended in 10 mL of TM buffer. Then, chitin synthase activity was measured as described by Belewa et al. [24].

2.9. Determination of the Activities of β-1,3-Glucanase and Chitinase

Fresh mycelia were ground with liquid nitrogen and homogenized with extraction buffer (0.1 M sodium acetate buffer, pH 4.8) at a ratio of 1:2. Then, the homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000× g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected as crude enzyme extract. The activities of β-1,3-glucanase and chitinase were determined as described previously [26].

2.10. Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (QRT-PCR)

The extraction of total RNA, reverse transcription, and real-time quantitative PCR were conducted with RC401 kit, P212 kit, and Q711 kit, respectively, following the instructions provided by the manufacturer (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). The primers were synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and the sequences are shown in Table S1. A relative quantification method (2−∆∆CT) was used to evaluate changes in expression among three replicates.

2.11. Antifungal Effect of Paeonol on Peanut Butter

Peanut butter (Shandong Yinger Foodstuffs Co., Ltd., Zaozhuang, China) in a sealed can was bought from a local supermarket. Two grams of peanut butter were spread on a Petridish (d = 3.5 cm) and irradiated under UV light for 30 min. Then, fresh spores (2 × 105 spores/Petridish) were mixed with paeonol at final concentrations of 0, 1/4 MIC, 1/2 MIC, and MIC. The growth of A. flavus was visualized every 24 h.

2.12. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed at least three times in triplicate. The results were presented as the mean ± SD. Significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA using Duncan’s multiple range test for enzyme activities determination and Student’s t-test was used for QRT-PCR test (p < 0.05). The statistical analyses were performed by SPSS 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Paeonol Destroyed Both the Outer and Inner Layer of Cell Walls

To understand the influence of paeonol on the ultrastructure of A. flavus mycelia, we conducted TEM characterization. As shown in Figure 1A,C, the cell walls of mycelia in the control group were clearly present with two layers, of which the outer layer is amorphous and the inner layer is fibrous. After paeonol treatment, both layers were thinner (Figure 1B,D). Quantification showed that the thicknesses of the inner layer were 199.17 ± 20.98 and 136.55 ± 10.92 nm for the control and the MIC treated group, respectively. As we determined previously, this reduction is attributed to the reduced content of β-1,3-glucan and chitin [17]. Therefore, paeonol treatment greatly damaged both the outer and the inner layer of A. flavus cell walls. Moreover, in the intact mycelia, some organelles such as mitochondria and vacuole are normal, while in the paeonol treated mycelia, the cytoplasm is in chaos. Plasmolysis can also be visualized in the paeonol treated mycelia. A similar mode of action was reported previously in o-vanillin treated mycelia, of which the chitin content was not changed remarkably [9].

3.2. Paeonol Changed OH Groups, Released Surface Proteins, and Increased Lipid Content

To determine the changes of functional groups in the surface of mycelia treated with paeonol, FT-IR characterization was conducted. As shown in Figure 2A, the peak around 3400 cm−1 (1) represents the O-H stretching vibration. Symmetric stretching vibration of CH3 group is present at 2925 cm−1 (2) [27,28]. The absorption band at 2360 cm−1 (3) was associated with stretching vibration of triple bond and cumulative double bond such as (-N=C=O, -N=C=O, etc.) [9]. The band at 1653 cm−1 (4) corresponds to the amide I band and amide II band, which are the characteristic infrared spectra of proteins [29]. The peak at the wavenumber of 1076 cm−1 (5) represents a symmetrical stretching vibration of C-O-C [30]. It can be observed that in the control group, the peak occurs at 3356 cm−1, and with the increase in the concentration of paeonol, the peak moved to higher wavenumbers, and at the highest concentration of paeonol (MIC), the wavenumber reached up to 3420 cm−1. For the other functional groups, no obvious changes can be detected. Therefore, paeonol altered the OH groups in the surface of A. flavus mycelia. Interestingly, o-vanillin also altered this group [9]. This is the first proof that, although belonging to different categories of plant-derived natural compounds based on chemical structure, paeonol and o-vanillin both altered OH groups.
The fact that OH groups are present in all three major compounds (polysaccharides, lipids, and proteins) in cell walls directed to further analysis. XPS is capable to determine the ratios of elements. Representative XPS survey spectra of A. flavus mycelia treated with paeonol at MIC and without are shown in Figure 2B. C, N, and O atoms occurred at about 532 eV, 400 eV, and 285 eV, respectively. The C1s peak is composed of three components containing carbon in C-(C, H) at 284.4 eV, C-(O, N) at 286.3 eV, and C=O bonds at 288.0 eV. There are two components: O=C bonds at 531.4 eV and O-C bonds at 532.7 eV in the O1s peak. The N1s peak is also composed of two components: amine or amide functionalities at 399.9 eV and protonated nitrogen at 401.4 eV (Supplementary Figure S1). Among the three elements, only the nitrogen intensity was remarkably decreased from 8266.67 (the control group) to 6085.63 (the MIC group) (Supplementary Figure S1B,E). The quantification result in Table 1 showed that the content of C increased slightly while the content of N and O decreased. C is present in polysaccharides (Ps), lipids (Lp), and proteins (Pr). We adopted the method reported by Dague et al. [31] and determined changes of the three main components in the mycelia treated with paeonol. It showed that the content of polysaccharides was almost stable, however, a decrease (8.45%) of the content of protein and an increase (13.66%) of lipids occurred. Based on the altered OH groups, it is probably that this alteration decreased the proteins’ potential for hydrogen bonding. Consequently, paeonol could effectively release some proteins from the cell wall of A. flavus mycelia, which was similar to another plant-derived natural compound (o-vanillin) studied in our lab previously [9]. However, to the best of our knowledge, the composition of the surface protein is still unknown.

3.3. Identification of the Composition of Surface Proteins

Although a previous study reported that a varied number of proteins in the surface of A. flavus mycelia were present based on different detection methods [21], the detailed information of these proteins are still lacking, therefore, we conducted a proteomic analysis to identify them. As the integrities of cell walls and cell membranes are injured by paeonol treatment, intracellular components would be inevitably released during the collection procedure, confounding the components of surface proteins in paeonol treated mycelia. Therefore, only the surface proteins of intact mycelia (control group) were analyzed. The concentration of extracted surface proteins was 0.5149 ± 0.02 mg/mL according to the Bradford method. Before identification, SDS-PAGE electrophoresis was conducted, and as shown in Figure 3, a large number of proteins falling in a wide molecular range can be visualized, and among them, intensive proteins are around 90, 55, and 30 kDa.
By proteomic analysis, in total 605 proteins and 3639 peptides have been identified in intact mycelia. After alignment, all of the proteins have been identified. Although they are uncharacterized, their functions can be annotated by the GO, KOG, and KEGG pathways. First of all, the distribution of the proteins based on their mass is shown in Figure 4A. One hundred proteins are falling in the mass range of 30–40 kDa, and 89 proteins are in the mass range of 40–50 and 50–60 kDa, respectively. More than 50 proteins are falling in the range of 20–30, 60–70, and higher than 100 kDa. For KOG analysis, as shown in Figure 4B, there are 72 proteins classified in “amino acid transport and metabolism” and 71 proteins in “posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones”. In Figure 4C, there are 590, 615, and 635 proteins classified in biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. To decipher the pathways the proteins participated in, we adopted KEGG analysis. According to the number of proteins in all categories, most of the proteins participated in the catalytic activity or metabolic process as these two biological functions rank the first in their respective category. As shown in Figure 4D, about 44% of proteins have been annotated in metabolic pathways, followed by biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and biosynthesis and antibiotics. These results indicated that A. flavus surface proteins are indeed involved in a myriad of biological functions.
Besides, we also annotated several interesting proteins involved in cell wall construction. As shown in Table 2, the proteins (XP_041141235.1, XP_041142920.1, XP_041147528.1) have been annotated as mannosyl-oligosaccharide α-1,2-mannosidase for the biosynthesis of GlcNAc, a precursor of N-glycan, in “various types of N-glycan biosynthesis”. The proteins (XP_041142920.1, XP_041146481.1, XP_041146483.1) have been annotated as mannosyl-oligosaccharide α-1,3-mannosidase and mannosyl-oligosaccharide α-1,2-mannosidase for N-glycan precursor trimming and biosynthesis. The proteins (XP_041141235.1, XP_041147528.1, XP_041151178.1) have been annotated as N-sulfoglucosamine sulfohydrolase and hexosaminidase in glycosaminoglycan degradation. The protein (XP_041148932.1) has been annotated as phosphatidylinositol N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase in glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor biosynthesis. Notably, three proteins (XP_041143468.1, XP_041147095.1, XP_041147899.1) have been annotated as versiconal hemiacetal acetate reductase in aflatoxin biosynthesis. They have been indicated to mediate the conversion between 1′-hydroxy-versicolorone and versicolorone, versiconal-hemiacetal acetate and versiconol acetate, as well as versiconal and versiconol. Although the functions of these proteins have been not revealed, this is the first report of the identification and annotation of them (also their sequences), as well, the direct link between surface proteins and their roles in biological processes, in particular cell wall construction and aflatoxin biosynthesis.

3.4. Paeonol Regulated the Activities of Enzymes Participating in β-1,3-Glucan and Chitin Metabolism

The decreased content of both β-1,3-glucan and chitin by peaonol treatment directed the hypothesis that the metabolism of them were regulated. In a variety of yeasts and filamentous fungi, the synthases catalyzing the biosynthesis of polysaccharides in cell walls are located across plasma membranes [32,33]. After the linear polysaccharide chains are formed, they have to be remodeled and cross-linked to construct a 3D structural network during the neosynthesized polysaccharides by the enzymes (e.g., hydrolases and glycosyltransferases) [33,34,35]. Excessive polysaccharides are degraded by enzymes, such as glucanase, chitinase, etc., [32,33,36].
To further understand the mode of action of paeonol on β-1,3-glucan and chitin in the inner layer of the cell wall, we quantified the amounts of β-1,3-glucan and chitin synthesized in vitro by β-1,3-glucan synthase and chitin synthase with nonradioactive methods, respectively, which can directly reflect the activities of β-1,3-glucanase and chitinase. As shown in Figure 5, except for the 1/4 MIC group, the content of neosynthesized β-1,3-glucan was significantly (p < 0.05) reduced by paeonol treatment in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 5A), indicating that the activity of β-1,3-glucan synthase was reduced. However, the activity of β-1,3-glucanase was relatively stable (Figure 5B). For chitin, the activity of chitin synthase was almost not changed as there were no significant (p > 0.05) differences in chitin production among the control and paeonol treatment groups (Figure 5C), and interestingly, in comparison with the control group, the activity of chitinase was promoted remarkably in mycelia with the exposure of paeonol at 1/2 MIC and MIC (Figure 5D). Therefore, we assume that paeonol could hinder the biosynthesis of β-1,3-glucan rather than enhance its degradation, as well, paeonol could promote the degradation of chitin rather than attenuate its biosynthesis. Our results are not fully consistent with previous reports. Belewa et al. claimed that extract from Tulbaghia violacea Harv. plant reduced the activities of both β-glucan synthase and chitin synthase, however, they did not determine the activities of glucanase and chitinase [24].
As β-1,3-glucan synthase and chitin synthase are inherent components of plasma membranes, their attenuated activities can also aggravate cell membrane damage. From this point of view, apart from the relative spatial position of cell walls and cell membranes, their functions are closely correlated with each other, providing some clues for further research in antifungal mechanisms.

3.5. Paeonol Regulated the Relative Expressions of Genes Encoding the Enzymes Participating in Β-1,3-Glucan and Chitin Metabolism

The above changes of activities of enzymes catalyzing β-1,3-glucan and chitin metabolism are indeed the comprehensive results of the expressions of several relevant genes participating in diverse functions, such as biosynthesis, reconstruction, and degradation. Therefore, quantifying changes of their relative expressions is of significance in revealing the antifungal effect of paeonol against A. flavus on the molecular level. Relative expressions of the genes are shown in Figure 6. A. flavus genome encodes only one β-1,3-glucan synthase, FKSP, and as expected, the relative expression of the FKSP gene decreased significantly with the treatment of paeonol at 1/2 MIC. We also quantified the expression level of the BGT1 gene, which is responsible for the elongation of the β-(1,3)-glucans [33], it was not changed by paeonol treatment, therefore, paeonol reduced the biosynthesis of β-1,3-glucan only by downregulating the expression of FKSP gene. In the degradation of A. flavus β-1,3-glucan, there exist three key genes: ENGL1, ENDO-1,3(4)-β-GLUCANASE, and EGLC. Among them, the relative expression of ENDO-1,3(4)-β-GLUCANASE gene was not changed remarkably, while ENGL1 gene and EGLC gene were downregulated by 0.71 fold and upregulated by 1.50 fold, respectively, probably leading to the unchanged activity of β-1,3-glucanase.
For chitin, in A. flavus, there are 7 genes mediating its biosynthesis: chitin synthase A, B, C, D, E, F, and G (CHSA, B, C, D, E, F, and G). Among them, the relative expressions of CHSC and CHSE were significantly upregulated, while CHSA and CHSB were remarkably downregulated by peaonol treatment, and CHSD and CHSF were not changed, probably resulting in an unchanged activity of chitin synthase. Although the impacts of CHSA, B, and C on chitin synthesis were limited in A. fumigatus [37], their actual functions in A. flavus have not been clarified. There are two classes of chitinase which are responsible for the degradation of chitin: class III (CHIIII) and class V (CHIV), the gene expressions of which were all upregulated remarkably by paeonol treatment, leading to the increased activity of chitinase. Therefore, we hypothesize that FKSP, class III, and class V genes might be the targets of paeonol in inhibiting the cell wall integrity of A. flavus. Although previous studies also reported plant-derived natural compounds in damaging cell wall integrity in conditional pathogens, the detailed mechanisms are not consistent. Hu et al. reported that Perilla frutescens essential oil downregulated α-1,3-glucan synthase AGS1 gene and four chitinase genes in A. flavus [38]. Cinnamaldehyde was capable to target β-1,3-glucan synthase and chitin synthase in Saccharomyces. Cerevisiae [39], as well as regulate glucanase, chitin synthase, and chitinase in Geotrichum citri-aurantii [15].

3.6. Paeonol Can Effectively Control the Pathogenicity of A. flavus on Peanut Butter

In our previous study, paeonol performed a strong inhibitory effect on peanuts and corn kernels [17]. In the present work, we continued the determination of agricultural products. Peanut butter was selected to evaluate the antifungal effect of paeonol. As shown in Figure 7, white mycelia can be visualized on peanut butter at 48 h for those not treated with paeonol, and almost the whole surface of peanut butter was covered with A. flavus for 72 h. For those treated with paeonol, the growth of A. flavus was restrained in a dose-dependent manner. In comparison with the control, fewer mycelia were covered on the surface of peanut butter treated with paeonol at 1/2 MIC for 72 h. Paeonol at MIC can fully suppress the growth of A. flavus in the tested period. Therefore, paeonol can also effectively control the contamination of A. flavus on peanut butter.

4. Conclusions

Paeonol can destroy both the outer and inner layers of A. flavus cell walls. The proteins identified in the outer layer were involved in many biological processes, interestingly, several of them participated in the construction of the inner layer as well as aflatoxin biosynthesis. The biosynthesis of β-1,3-glucan was damaged by paeonol treatment via attenuating β-1,3-glucan synthase encoded by FKSP gene, while the degradation of it was not changed. The activity of chitinase was reduced and it was mainly due to the downregulated expressions of class III and class V chitinase genes. In addition, paeonol performed strong inhibitory efficacy against A. flauvs on peanut butter. This study revealed a new mode of action of paeonol damaging cell walls of A. flavus, as well as providing a theoretical basis for the application of paeonol in the preservation of agricultural products.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods10122951/s1, Figure S1: XPS scan of C1s, N1s, O1s region of A. flavus surface treated with paeonol at 0 and MIC, Table S1: Primer sequences for QRT-PCR.

Author Contributions

Q.L. designed and coordinated the study. Y.Z. conducted experiments and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. Y.X. supervised the study. This manuscript has not been submitted to, nor is under review at, another journal or other publishing venue. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Innovative Funds Plan of Henan University of Technology, grant number 2020ZKCJ17, the Natural Science Research Projects of Education Department of Henan Province, grant number 21A550005, the Doctor Research Fund of Henan University of Technology, grant number 2019BS019, and the Zhengzhou Key Science and Technology Innovation Project, grant number 2020CXZX0077. The APC was funded by the Doctor Research Fund of Henan University of Technology.

Data Availability Statement

Raw data can be provided by the corresponding author on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Rudramurthy, S.M.; Paul, R.A.; Chakrabarti, A.; Mouton, J.W.; Meis, J.F. Invasive aspergillosis by Aspergillus flavus: Epidemiology, diagnosis, antifungal resistance, and management. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Xue, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, W.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Wan, F.; Kim, Y.; Liu, Y.; Kou, X. Recent advances in aflatoxin B1 detection based on nanotechnology and nanomaterials—A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1069, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Klingelhöfer, D.; Zhu, Y.; Braun, M.; Bendels, M.H.K.; Brüggmann, D.; Groneberg, D.A. Aflatoxin—publication analysis of a global health threat. Food Control 2018, 89, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yu, J.; Cleveland, T.E.; Bennett, J.W. Aspergillus flavus genomics: Gateway to human and animal health, food safety, and crop resistance to diseases. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2005, 22, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lima, S.L.; Colombo, A.L.; de Almeida Júnior, J.N. Fungal cell wall: Emerging antifungals and drug resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gow, N.A.R.; Latgé, J.P.; Munro, C.A. The fungal cell wall: Structure, biosynthesis, and function. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Hopke, A.; Brown, A.J.P.; Hall, R.A.; Wheeler, R.T. Dynamic Fungal Cell Wall Architecture in Stress Adaptation and Immune Evasion. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 284–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, W.; Yuan, L.; Wang, S.Z. Recent progress in the discovery of antifungal agents targeting the cell wall. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 12429–12459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Q.; Zhu, X.M.; Xie, Y.L.; Zhong, Y. o-Vanillin, a promising antifungal agent, inhibits Aspergillus flavus by disrupting the integrity of cell walls and cell membranes. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2021, 105, 5147–5158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xie, X.; Lipke, P.N. On the evolution of fungal and yeast cell walls. Yeast 2010, 27, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Latgé, J.P. Tasting the fungal cell wall. Cell. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 863–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gravelat, F.N.; Beauvais, A.; Liu, H.; Lee, M.J.; Snarr, B.D.; Chen, D.; Xu, W.; Kravtsov, I.; Hoareau, C.M.Q.; Vanier, G.; et al. Aspergillus galactosaminogalactan mediates adherence to host constituents and conceals hyphal beta-glucan from the immune system. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Rocio, G.R.; Haroldo, C.O.; Rivera, J.; Nuria, T.C. The fungal cell wall: Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus Species. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2993. [Google Scholar]
  14. Briard, B.; Muszkieta, L.; Latge, J.P.; Fontaine, T. Galactosaminogalactan of Aspergillus fumigatus, a bioactive fungal polymer. Mycologia 2016, 108, 572–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. OuYang, Q.L.; Duan, X.F.; Li, L.; Tao, N.G. Cinnamaldehyde Exerts Its Antifungal Activity by Disrupting the Cell Wall Integrity of Geotrichum citri-aurantii. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, Q.; Zhu, X.M.; Xie, Y.L.; Ren, S.L. 2-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde inhibits the growth of Aspergillus flavus via damaging cell wall, cell membrane, manipulating respiration thus creating a promising antifungal effect on corn kernels. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 56, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, X.M.; Xie, Y.L. Antifungal efficacy of paeonol on Aspergillus flavus and its mode of action on cell walls and cell membranes. LWT 2021, 149, 111985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, K.K.; Maccallum, D.M.; Jacobsen, M.D.; Walker, L.A.; Odds, F.C.; Gow, N.A.; Munro, C.A. Elevated cell wall chitin in Candida albicans confers echinocandin resistance in vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Chaudhary, P.M.; Tupe, S.G.; Deshpande, M.V. Chitin synthase inhibitors as antifungal agents. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 222–236. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Hu, L.L.; Ban, F.F.; Li, H.B.; Qian, P.P.; Shen, Q.S.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Mo, H.Z.; Zhou, X. Thymol induces conidial apoptosis in Aspergillus flavus via stimulating K+ eruption. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 8530–8536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ullah, A.H.J.; Neucere, J.N.; Cleveland, T.E. Surface proteins of two aflatoxin-producing isolates of Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus mycelia. 2. HPLC mapping by gel-permeation, ion-exchange, and reverse-phase chromatography. J. Agri. Food Chem. 1992, 40, 1613–1616. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Selvakumar, D.; Miyamoto, M.; Furuichi, Y.; Komiyama, T. Inhibition of fungal β-1,3-glucan synthase and cell growth by HM-1 killer toxin single-chain anti-idiotypic antibodies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 3090–3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Belewa, V.; Baijnath, H.; Frost, C.; Somai, B.M. Tulbaghia violacea Harv. plant extract affects cell wall synthesis in Aspergillus flavus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 122, 921–931. [Google Scholar]
  25. Magellan, H.; Boccara, M.; Drujon, T.; Soulie, M.C.; Guillou, C.; Dubois, J.; Becker, H.F. Discovery of two new inhibitors of Botrytis cinerea chitin synthase by a chemical library screening. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 4997–5003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zeng, R.; Zhang, A.; Chen, J.; Fu, Y. Postharvest quality and physiological responses of clove bud extract dip on ‘Newhall’ navel orange. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 138, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hua, K.C.; Feng, J.T.; Yang, X.G.; Wang, F.; Zhang, H.; Yang, L.; Zhang, H.R.; Xu, M.Y.; Li, J.K.; Qiao, R.Q.; et al. Assessment of the defatting efficacy of mechanical and chemical treatment for allograft cancellous bone and its effects on biomechanics properties of bone. Orthop. Surg. 2020, 12, 617–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, N.; Qiu, F.; Zhu, F.; Qi, L. Therapeutic potential of zinc oxide-loaded syringic acid against in vitro and in vivo model of lung cancer. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 8249–8260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Y.; Feng, K.W.; Yang, H.H.; Yuan, Y.H.; Yue, T.L. Antifungal mechanism of cinnamaldehyde and citral combination against Penicillium expansum based on FT-IR fingerprint, plasma membrane, oxidative stress and volatile profile. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 5806–5815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Serrano, L.; Egües, I.; Alriols, M.G.; Llano, P.R.; Labidi, J. Miscanthus sinensis fractionation by different reagents. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dague, E.; Delcorte, A.; Latgé, J.P.; Dufrêne, Y.F. Combined use of atomic force microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and secondary ion mass spectrometry for cell surface analysis. Langmuir 2008, 24, 2955–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Beauvais, A.; Latgé, J.P. Special issue: Fungal cell wall. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Latgé, J.P.; Beauvais, A.; Chamilos, G. The cell wall of the human fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus: Biosynthesis, organization, immune response, and virulence. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 71, 99–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mouyna, I.; Hartl, L.; Latgé, J.P. β-1,3-glucan modifying enzymes in Aspergillus fumigatus. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Zhao, W.; Li, C.; Liang, J.; Sun, S. The Aspergillus fumigatus β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase Gel7 plays a compensatory role in maintaining cell wall integrity under stress conditions. Glycobiology 2014, 24, 418–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Mouyna, I.; Aimanianda, V.; Hartl, L.; Prevost, M.C.; Sismeiro, O.; Dillies, M.A.; Jagla, B.; Legendre, R.; Coppee, J.Y.; Latgé, J.P. GH16 and GH81 family β-(1,3)-glucanases in Aspergillus fumigatus are essential for conidial cell wall morphogenesis. Cell. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 1285–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Gastebois, A.; Clavaud, C.; Aimanianda, V.; Latgé, J.P. Aspergillus fumigatus: Cell wall polysaccharides, their biosynthesis and organization. Future Microbiol. 2009, 4, 583–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hu, Z.; Yuan, K.; Zhou, Q.; Lu, C.; Du, L.; Liu, F. Mechanism of antifungal activity of Perilla frutescens essential oil against Aspergillus flavus by transcriptomic analysis. Food Control 2021, 123, 107703–107733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shreaz, S.; Wani, W.A.; Behbehani, J.M.; Raja, V.; Irshad, M.; Karched, M.; Ali, I.; Siddiqi, W.A.; Hun, L.T. Cinnamaldehyde and its derivatives, a novel class of antifungal agents. Fitoterapia 2016, 112, 116–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. TEM characterization of A. flavus treated with paeonol at 0 (A,C) and MIC (B,D). Scale bar: 1 μm.
Figure 1. TEM characterization of A. flavus treated with paeonol at 0 (A,C) and MIC (B,D). Scale bar: 1 μm.
Foods 10 02951 g001
Figure 2. Influence of paeonol on the cell walls of A. flavus. (A) FT-IR spectra of mycelia treated with paeonol at 0, 1/4 MIC, 1/2 MIC, and MIC. (B) XPS survey spectra of mycelia treated with paeonol at 0 and MIC.
Figure 2. Influence of paeonol on the cell walls of A. flavus. (A) FT-IR spectra of mycelia treated with paeonol at 0, 1/4 MIC, 1/2 MIC, and MIC. (B) XPS survey spectra of mycelia treated with paeonol at 0 and MIC.
Foods 10 02951 g002
Figure 3. SDS-PAGE electrophoresis of A. flavus surface proteins.
Figure 3. SDS-PAGE electrophoresis of A. flavus surface proteins.
Foods 10 02951 g003
Figure 4. Identification and annotation of A. flavus surface proteins. (A) Protein count. (B) KOG analysis. (C) GO analysis (D) KEGG annotation.
Figure 4. Identification and annotation of A. flavus surface proteins. (A) Protein count. (B) KOG analysis. (C) GO analysis (D) KEGG annotation.
Foods 10 02951 g004
Figure 5. Activities of enzymes in the metabolisms of β-1,3-glucan and chitin in A. flavus treated with paeonol at 0, 1/4 MIC, 1/2 MIC, and MIC. (A) Activity of β-1,3-glucan synthase. (B) Activity of β-1,3-glucanase. (C) Activity of chitin synthase. (D) Activity of chitinase. a–c significant difference (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 5. Activities of enzymes in the metabolisms of β-1,3-glucan and chitin in A. flavus treated with paeonol at 0, 1/4 MIC, 1/2 MIC, and MIC. (A) Activity of β-1,3-glucan synthase. (B) Activity of β-1,3-glucanase. (C) Activity of chitin synthase. (D) Activity of chitinase. a–c significant difference (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Foods 10 02951 g005
Figure 6. Relative gene expression of A. flavus treated with paeonol at 0 and 1/2 MIC. Student’s t-test, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001.
Figure 6. Relative gene expression of A. flavus treated with paeonol at 0 and 1/2 MIC. Student’s t-test, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001.
Foods 10 02951 g006
Figure 7. Antifungal effect of paeonol in vitro on peanut butter.
Figure 7. Antifungal effect of paeonol in vitro on peanut butter.
Foods 10 02951 g007
Table 1. Surface chemical composition measured by XPS of mycelia treated with paeonol at 0 and MIC.
Table 1. Surface chemical composition measured by XPS of mycelia treated with paeonol at 0 and MIC.
%C%N%ON/CO/CN/O%CPr%CPs%CLp
072.575.5721.860.080.300.2519.9618.4534.15
MIC77.723.2119.070.040.250.1711.5118.4047.81
Table 2. Proteins and the pathways involved in cell wall construction and aflatoxin biosynthesis.
Table 2. Proteins and the pathways involved in cell wall construction and aflatoxin biosynthesis.
PathwayProtein Name
Other glycan degradationXP_041140530.1;XP_041141235.1;XP_041141593.1;XP_041142346.1;XP_041144446.1;XP_041145896.1;XP_041147338.1;XP_041147528.1;XP_041148927.1;XP_041151327.1;XP_041151574.1
Various types of N-glycan biosynthesisXP_041141235.1;XP_041142920.1;XP_041147528.1
N-Glycan biosynthesisXP_041142920.1;XP_041146481.1;XP_041146483.1
Glycosaminoglycan degradation XP_041141235.1;XP_041147528.1;XP_041151178.1
Aflatoxin biosynthesisXP_041143468.1;XP_041147095.1;XP_041147899.1
Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor biosynthesisXP_041148932.1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Xie, Y. Paeonol Disrupts the Integrity of Aspergillus flavus Cell Walls via Releasing Surface Proteins, Inhibiting the Biosynthesis of β-1,3-Glucan and Promoting the Degradation of Chitin, and an Identification of Cell Surface Proteins. Foods 2021, 10, 2951. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10122951

AMA Style

Li Q, Zhao Y, Xie Y. Paeonol Disrupts the Integrity of Aspergillus flavus Cell Walls via Releasing Surface Proteins, Inhibiting the Biosynthesis of β-1,3-Glucan and Promoting the Degradation of Chitin, and an Identification of Cell Surface Proteins. Foods. 2021; 10(12):2951. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10122951

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Qian, Ying Zhao, and Yanli Xie. 2021. "Paeonol Disrupts the Integrity of Aspergillus flavus Cell Walls via Releasing Surface Proteins, Inhibiting the Biosynthesis of β-1,3-Glucan and Promoting the Degradation of Chitin, and an Identification of Cell Surface Proteins" Foods 10, no. 12: 2951. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10122951

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop