The Impact of Mood, Familiarity, Acceptability, Sensory Characteristics and Attitude on Consumers’ Emotional Responses to Chocolates †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background
2.1. Emotional Response
2.2. Measuring Emotional Response
2.3. Sensory Characteristics
2.4. Linking Emotions to Sensory Characteristics
2.5. Consumer Behaviour
2.6. Mood as a Consumer Variable
2.7. Familiarity as a Consumer Variable
2.8. Acceptability as a Consumer Variable
2.9. Attitude as a Consumer Variable
2.10. Sensory Properties and Emotional Response
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Selection of Sensory Characteristics and Chocolate Samples
3.2. Chocolate Sample Presentation
- (1)
- the three chocolate samples;
- (2)
- a 330 mL bottle of still mineral water;
- (3)
- three Carrs water biscuits (weighing 8 g per biscuit, thus 24 g of biscuits was provided), sealed in a zip-lock bag, one to be consumed before the first, second and third chocolate sample was assessed.
- (4)
- storage instructions (as to not compromise sample quality and integrity); and
- (5)
- a reminder of the questionnaire instructions (such as the use of palate cleansers and the request to complete the questionnaire in one sitting).
3.3. Questionnaire
3.4. Data Collection
3.5. Research Setting
3.6. Respondents
3.7. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Mean Scores
4.2. Factor Loadings, p-Values and Cronbach’s Alpha
4.3. Correlations
4.3.1. Mood
4.3.2. Familiarity
4.3.3. Acceptability
4.3.4. Attitude
4.4. Regression
5. Discussion
5.1. Value of the Study
5.2. Limitations and Recommendations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Questionnaire | ||
Section 1: Mood (0 = Not at all; 1 = Slightly; 2 = Moderately; 3 = Very; 4 = Extremely) Please complete the below questionnaire by ticking the appropriate box for each adjective, to give an indication of your mood at the moment. Please work quickly and do not think too long about the answer. | ||
Wide awake. Relaxed. Depressed. Friendly. Anxious. Clumsy. Cheerful. Drowsy. Aggressive. Clear-headed. Well-coordinated. Confused. | ||
Section 2: Familiarity (1 = Daily; 2 = Weekly; 3 = Monthly; 4 = Once a year/rarely; 5 = Never) Please indicate how often you consume the following types of chocolates. | ||
Segment Alfajores (Sandwich biscuit with chocolate centre or covered biscuits). Bagged selflines/softlines (Small identical items such as chocolate buttons). Standard boxed assortments (Bite size chocolates, often with fillings). Twist wrapped miniatures (Miniature versions of chocolate bars, wrapped). Chocolates with toys. Countlines (Chocolate bars). Seasonal chocolate. Filled tablets (slabs). (With a soft filling or hard pieces such as biscuits, nuts, mint). Plain dark tablets (slabs). Plain milk tablets (slabs). Plain white tablets (slabs). | Examples (Brand names not included due to ethical reasons) | |
Section 3: Acceptability (3 chocolate samples) Please indicate which below statement you agree with for each sample (select one). I would eat this chocolate every opportunity I had. I would eat this very often. I would frequently eat this. I like this and would eat it now and then. I would eat this if available but would not go out of my way. I do not like it but would eat it on occasion. I would hardly ever eat this. I would eat this only if there were no other food choices. I would eat this only if I were forced to. | ||
Section 4: Sensory characteristics (0 = Not at all; 1 = Slightly; 2 = Moderately; 3 = Very; 4 = Extremely) In the cooler bag you will find (three) samples of chocolate. Each sample is marked with a 3-digit code. Please ensure that the code on the sample matches the code on the survey when answering the questions. Please cleanse your palate before you start and in between each sample by drinking some of the water and eating one of the biscuits provided. Please taste sample xxx and then review below characteristics and definitions of the properties of the product you have just tasted. Please indicate how intensely you experienced each sensory property in the product. | ||
Descriptor | Definition | Reference |
Appearance | N/A | |
1. Gloss | The amount of light reflected from the surface | |
Aroma | Confectionary and sweets | |
2. Sweet | Aroma characteristic of sweet products | |
Flavour | ||
3. Bitter | Taste of aloe, caffeine and hop bitters | Coffee, aloe juice, tonic water |
4. Burnt | Flavour of overheated or scorched starch or sugar | Burnt sugar, burnt toast |
5. Cocoa powder | Brown, sweet often bitter flavour | Cocoa beans, cocoa powder |
6. Coffee | Flavour of coffee and coffee beans | Coffee power, coffee beans |
7. Milky | Flavour associated with milk and milk products | Milk and cultured dairy products |
8. Sweet | Taste delivered by sugar | Sucrose, fructose, artificial sweeteners |
9. Cocoa powder | Brown, sweet often bitter flavour | Cocoa beans, cocoa powder |
10. Vanilla | Flavour of vanilla | Vanilla pods, vanilla essence |
Mouthfeel | N/A | |
Adherence | The amount that sticks to tooth surfaces | |
11. Creaminess | Resembles the consistency of cream | N/A |
Melting | The length of time for it to melt in the mouth | N/A |
12. Mouthcoating | The amount of film or coating left on mouth surfaces | N/A |
13. Milky | Flavour associated with milk and milk products | N/A |
Aftertaste | ||
14. Bitter | Aftertaste delivered by substances such as quinine, caffeine and hop bitters | Coffee, aloe juice, tonic water |
Section 5: Emotional response (0 = Not at all; 1 = Slightly; 2 = Moderately; 3 = Very; 4 = Extremely Please taste sample xxx and then review below characteristics of how the product makes you feel. Please rate how intensely you experience these emotions when eating the product. | ||
Active. Adventurous. Aggressive. Bored. Calm. Disgusted. Enthusiastic. Free. Good. Good-natured. Guilty. Happy. Interested. Joyful. Loving. Mild. Nostalgic. Pleasant. Satisfied. Secure. Tame. Understanding. Warm. Wild. Worried. | ||
Section 6: Attitude (1 = Strongly agree; 2 = Agree; 3 = Neither agree nor disagree; 4 = Disagree; 5 = Strongly disagree) Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the below statements about chocolate in general. | ||
I eat chocolate to cheer me up when I am down. My desire for chocolate often seems overpowering. I feel unattractive after I have eaten chocolate. I often feel sick after eating chocolate. I eat chocolate as a reward when everything is going really well for me. I am often on one kind of diet or another. The thought of chocolate often distracts me from what I am doing (e.g., watching TV). I usually find myself wanting chocolate during the afternoon. I consider chocolate to be high in fat and of poor nutritional value. After eating chocolate I often wish I had not. I feel guilty after eating chocolate. I eat chocolate only when I am hungry. Chocolate often preys on my mind. I feel unhealthy after I have eaten chocolate. I always look at the kilojoule value of a chocolate snack before I eat it. If I resist the temptation to eat chocolate I feel more in control of my life. Nothing else but chocolate will satisfy my chocolate cravings. Even when I do not really want any more chocolate I will often carry on eating it. I eat chocolate to keep my energy levels up when I am doing physical exercise I eat more chocolate in the winter when it is colder. I often go into a shop for something else and end up buying chocolate. I feel depressed and dissatisfied with life after eating chocolate. I often eat chocolate when I am bored. I like to indulge in chocolate. |
Appendix B
Acceptability | Positive Emotions | Negative Emotions | |
---|---|---|---|
Chocolate 1 | 4.8 | 1.46 | 0.65 |
Chocolate 2 | 4.5 | 1.37 | 0.60 |
Chocolate 3 | 3.4 | 1.92 | 0.25 |
References
- Voora, V.; Bermúdez, S.; Larrea, C. Global Market Report: Cocoa. International Institute for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://www.iisd.org/publications/global-market-report-cocoa (accessed on 21 September 2021).
- Macht, M.; Dettmer, D. Everyday mood and emotions after eating a chocolate bar or an apple. Appetite 2006, 46, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rajeswari, P. Can chocolate be addictive. FASJ 2020, 1, 108–115. [Google Scholar]
- Macht, M.; Mueller, J. Immediate effects of chocolate on experimentally induced mood states. Appetite 2007, 49, 667–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, S.E.; Smith, L.; Firth, J.; Grabovac, I.; Soysal, P.; Koyanagi, A.; Hu, L.; Stubbs, B.; Demurtas, J.; Veronese, N.; et al. Is there a relationship between chocolate consumption and symptoms of depression? A cross-sectional survey of 13,626 US adults. Depress. Anxiety 2019, 36, 987–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Całkosiński, A.; Kostrzewska, P.; Majewski, M.; Mandera, A.; Pawlikowska, A.; Szuster, E.M. Impact of cocoa on the human health. J. Educ. Health Sport 2019, 9, 145–154. [Google Scholar]
- Maleki, S.; Amiri Aghdaie, S.F.; Shahin, A.; Ansari, A. Investigating the relationship among the Kansei-based design of chocolate packaging, consumer perception, and willingness to buy. J. Mark. Commun. 2020, 26, 836–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veronese, N.; Demurtas, C.S.; Caruso, M.G.; Maggi, S.; Bolzetta, F.; Firth, J.; Smith, L.; Schofield, P.; Koyanagi, A.; Yang, L.; et al. Is chocolate consumption associated with health outcomes? An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 38, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krittanawong, C.; Narasimhan, B.; Wang, Z.; Hahn, J.; Hassan Virk, H.U.; Farrell, A.M.; Zhang, H.; Wilson Tang, W.H. Association between chocolate consumption and risk of coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis show. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2020, 28, e33–e35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCabe, M.; De Waal Malefyt, T. Women and chocolate. In Women, Consumption and Paradox; De Waal Malefyt, T., McCabe, M., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2020; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
- Macht, M.; Gerer, J.; Ellgring, H. Emotions in overweight and normal-weight women immediately after eating foods differing in energy. Physiol. Behav. 2003, 80, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whitham, H.M. Measuring Chocolate Craving in Adults. Master’s Thesis, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Watt, A. Consumers Turn to Chocolate for Emotional Benefits. Candy Industry. Available online: https://www.candyindustry.com/articles/87186-report-consumers-turn-to-chocolate-for-emotional-benefits (accessed on 27 July 2021).
- Ries, B. The Emotions Evoked by Chocolates. Thermo Fisher Scientific. Available online: https://www.thermofisher.com/blog/food/the-emotions-evoked-by-chocolates/ (accessed on 27 July 2021).
- Thomson, D. Going beyond liking: Measuring emotional and conceptual profiles to make better new products. In Consumer-Driven Innovation in Food and Personal Care Products; Jaeger, S.R., MacFie, H., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2010; pp. 219–274. [Google Scholar]
- Rathore, A.K.; Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P. Pre- and post-launch emotions in new product development: Insights from twitter analytics of three products. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 50, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merlino, V.M.; Mota-Gutierrez, J.; Borra, D.; Brun, F.; Cocolin, L.; Blanc, S.; Massaglia, S. Chocolate culture: Preferences, emotional implications and awareness of Italian consumers. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2021, 25, 100374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaeger, S.R.; Spinelli, S.; Ares, G.; Monteleone, E. Linking product-elicited emotional associations and sensory perceptions through a circumplex model based on valence and arousal: Five consumer studies. Food Res. Int. 2018, 109, 626–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juodeikiene, G.; Zadeike, D.; Klupsaite, D.; Cernauskas, D.; Bartkiene, E.; Lele, V.; Steibliene, V.; Adomaitiene, V. Effects of Emotional Responses to Certain Foods on the Prediction of Consumer Acceptance. Food Res. Int. 2018, 112, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Agudelo, A.; Varela, P.; Fiszman, S. Methods for a deeper understanding of the sensory perception of fruit fillings. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 46, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moskowitz, H.; Hartmann, J. Consumer research: Creating a solid base for innovative strategies. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 19, 581–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ares, G.; Bruzzone, F.; Vidal, L.; Cadena, R.S.; Giménez, A.; Pineau, B.; Hunter, D.C.; Paisley, A.G.; Jaeger, S.R. Evaluation of a rating-based variant of check-all-that-apply questions: Rate-all-that-apply (RATA). Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 36, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Kleef, E.; Trijp, H.; Luning, P. Internal versus external preference analysis: An exploratory study on end-user evaluation. Food Qual. Prefer. 2006, 17, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Worch, T.; Lê, S.; Punter, P.; Pagès, J. Assessment of the consistency of ideal profiles according to non-ideal data for IPM. Food Qual. Prefer. 2012, 24, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaeger, S.R.; Vidal, L.; Kam, K.; Ares, G. Can emoji be used as a direct method to measure emotional associations to food names? Preliminary investigations with consumers in USA and China. Food Qual. Prefer. 2017, 56, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schouteten, J.J.; De Pelsmaeker, S.; Juvinal, J.; Lagast, S.; Dewettinck, K.; Gellynck, X. Influence of sensory attributes on consumers’ emotions and hedonic liking of chocolate. Br. Food J. 2018, 120, 1489–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunaratne, T.M.; Gonzalez Viejo, C.G.; Fuentes, S.; Torrico, D.D.; Gunaratne, N.M.; Ashman, H.; Dunshea, F.R. Development of emotion lexicons to describe chocolate using the Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) methodology across Asian and Western groups. Food Res. Int. 2019, 115, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- UWA. The Science of Emotion: Exploring the Basics of Emotional Psychology. Psychology and Counseling News. Available online: https://online.uwa.edu/news/emotional-psychology/ (accessed on 27 July 2021).
- Kropf, E.; Syan, S.K.; Minuzzi, L.; Frey, B.N. From anatomy to function: The role of the somatosensory cortex in emotional regulation. Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr. 2019, 41, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fanselow, M.S. Emotion, motivation and function. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2018, 19, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, S.C.; Meiselman, H.L. Development of a method to measure consumer emotions associated with foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 2010, 21, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prescott, J. Some considerations in the measurement of emotions in sensory and consumer research. Food Qual. Prefer. 2017, 62, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mojet, J.; Dürrschmid, K.; Danner, L.; Jöchl, M.; Heiniö, R.-L.; Holthuysen, N.; Köster, E. Are implicit emotion measurements evoked by food unrelated to liking? Food Res. Int. 2015, 76, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalenberg, J.; Gutjar, S.; ter Horst, G.; de Graaf, K.; Renken, R.; Friese, M. Evoked Emotions Predict Food Choice. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e115388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spinelli, S.; Monteleone, E. Emotional Responses to Products. In Methods in Consumer Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Desmet, P.M.; Schifferstein, H.N. Sources of positive and negative emotions in food experience. Appetite 2008, 50, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nestrud, M.A.; Meiselman, H.L.; King, S.C.; Lesher, L.L.; Cardello, A.V. Development of EsSense25, a shorter version of the EsSense Profile®. Food Qual. Prefer. 2016, 48, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaeger, S.R.; Swaney-Stueve, M.; Chheang, S.L.; Hunter, D.C.; Pineau, B.; Ares, G. An assessment of the CATA-variant of the EsSense Profile®. Food Qual. Prefer. 2018, 68, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lagast, S.; Gellynck, X.; Schouteten, J.; De Herdt, V.; De Steur, H. Consumers’ emotions elicited by food: A systematic review of explicit and implicit methods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 69, 172–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meiselman, H.L. A review of the current state of emotion research in product development. Food Res. Int. 2015, 76, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardello, A.V.; Meiselman, H.L.; Schutz, H.G.; Craig, C.; Given, Z.; Lesher, L.L.; Eicher, S. Measuring emotional responses to foods and food names using questionnaires. Food Qual. Prefer. 2012, 24, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaneko, D.; Toet, A.; Brouwer, A.-M.; Kallen, V.; van Erp Jan, B.F. Methods for Evaluating Emotions Evoked by Food Experiences: A Literature Review. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gutjar, S.; de Graaf, C.; Kooijman, V.; de Wijk, R.A.; Nys, A.; ter Horst, G.J.; Jager, G. The role of emotions in food choice and liking. Food Res. Int. 2015, 76, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.-T.; Lin, Y.-T. A study of the relationships among sensory experience, emotion, and buying behavior in coffeehouse chains. Serv. Bus. 2018, 12, 551–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spinelli, S.; Jaeger, S.R. What do we know about the sensory drivers of emotions in foods and beverages? Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2019, 27, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wardy, W.; Chonpracha, P.; Chokumnoyporn, N.; Sriwattana, S.; Prinyawiwatkul, W.; Jirangrat, W. Influence of package visual cues of sweeteners on the sensory-emotional profiles of their products. J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 500–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walsh, A.M.; Duncan, S.E.; Bell, M.A.; O’Keefe, S.; Gallagher, D.L. Integrating implicit and explicit emotional assessment of food quality and safety concerns. Food Qual. Prefer. 2017, 56, 212–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Varela, P.; Ares, G. Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization. Food Res. Int. 2012, 48, 893–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ventanas, S.; González-Mohino, A.; Estévez, M.; Carvalho, L. Innovation in sensory assessment of meat and meat products. In Meat Quality Analysis, Advanced Evaluation Methods, Techniques, and Technologies; Biswas, A.K., Mandal, P.K., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 393–418. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.K.; Sullivan, P. Emotional branding speaks to consumers’ heart: The case of fashion brands. Fash. Text. 2019, 6, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pishghadam, R.; Shayesteh, S. Emo-Sensory Expression at the Crossroads of Emotion, Sense, and Language: A Case of Color-Emotion Associations. IJSCL 2017, 5, 15–25. [Google Scholar]
- Kostyra, E.; Wasiak-Zys, G.; Rambuszek, M.; Waszkiewicz-Robak, B. Determining the sensory characteristics, associated emotions and degree of liking of the visual attributes of smoked ham. A multifaceted study. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 65, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sylvetsky, A.C.; Visek, A.J.; Halberg, S.; Rhee, D.K.; Ongaro, Z.; Essel, K.D.; Dietz, W.H.; Sacheck, J. Beyond taste and easy access: Physical, cognitive, interpersonal, and emotional reasons for sugary drink consumption among children and adolescents. Appetite 2020, 155, 104826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rankin, A.; Bunting, B.; Poínhos, R.; van der Lans, I.; Fischer, A.; Kuznesof, S.; Almeida, M.D.V.; Markovina, J.; Frewer, L.; Stewart-Knox, B. Food choice motives, attitude towards and intention to adopt personalised nutrition. Public Health Nutr. 2018, 21, 2606–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hartwell, H.J.; Shepherd, P.A.; Edwards, J.S.; Johns, N. What do patients value in the hospital meal experience? Appetite 2016, 96, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gibson, E.L. Emotional influences on food choice: Sensory, physiological and psychological pathways. Physiol. Behav. 2006, 89, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; King, J.M.; Prinyawiwatkul, W. A review of measurement and relationships between food, eating behavior and emotion. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 36, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerin, J.L.; Webb, H.J.; Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J. Intuitive, mindful, emotional, external and regulatory eating behaviours and beliefs: An investigation of the core components. Appetite 2019, 132, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.-Y.; Prescott, J.; Kim, K.-O. Emotional responses to sweet foods according to sweet liker status. Food Qual. Prefer. 2017, 59, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kontaris, I.; East, B.S.; Wilson, D.A. Behavioral and Neurobiological Convergence of Odor, Mood and Emotion: A Review. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spinelli, S.; Masi, C.; Zoboli, G.; Prescott, J.; Monteleone, E. Emotional responses to branded and unbranded foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 42, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byrne, D.V. Current Trends in Multidisciplinary Approaches to Understanding Consumer Preference and Acceptance of Food Products. Foods 2020, 9, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Samant, S.S.; Seo, H.-S. Using both emotional responses and sensory attribute intensities to predict consumer liking and preference toward vegetable juice products. Food Qual. Prefer. 2018, 73, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cancino-Montecinos, S.; Björklund, F.; Lindholm, T. Dissonance reduction as emotion regulation: Attitude change is related to positive emotions in the induced compliance paradigm. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0209012. [Google Scholar]
- De Pelsmaeker, S.; Gellynck, X.; Dewettinck, K.; Schouteten, J.J. Effect of tasting and flavour on chocolate-evoked emotions by consumers. Br. Food J. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ronquest-Ross, L.-C.; Vink, N.; Sigge, G.O. Food consumption changes in South Africa since 1994. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2015, 111, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taljaard, I. Exploring the Relationship between Selected Internal Consumer Behaviour Variables and the Emotional Response to the Sensory Properties of Chocolate. Ph.D. Thesis, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Jog, S.V.; Bagal, S.A.; Chogale, M.M.; Shanbhag, P. Sensorial analysis in cosmetics: An overview. HPC Today 2012, 7, 23–24. [Google Scholar]
- Woodruffe-Peacock, C.; Turnbull, G.; Johnson, M.; Elahi, N.; Preston, G. The quick mood scale: Development of a simple mood assessment scale for clinical pharmacology studies. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 1998, 13, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labadarios, D.; Steyn, N.; Maunder, E.; MacIntryre, U.; Gericke, G.; Swart, R.; Huskisson, J.; Dannhauser, A.; Vorster, H.; Nesmvuni, A. The national food consumption survey (NFCS): South Africa, 1999. Public Health Nutr. 2005, 8, 533–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schutz, H.G. Food action rating scale for measuring food acceptance. J. Food Sci. 1965, 30, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, S.Y.; Mattes, R. Appetitive, dietary and health effects of almonds consumed with meals or as snacks: A randomized, controlled trial. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 67, 1205–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Schouteten, J.J.; De Steur, H.; De Pelsmaeker, S.; Lagast, S.; De Bourdeaudhuij, I.; Gellynck, X. An integrated method for the emotional conceptualization and sensory characterization of food products: The EmoSensory® Wheel. Food Res. Int. 2015, 78, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ng, M.; Chaya, C.; Hort, J. Beyond liking: Comparing the measurement of emotional response using EsSense Profile and consumer defined check-all-that-apply methodologies. Food Qual. Prefer. 2013, 28, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benton, D.; Greenfield, K.; Morgan, M. The development of the attitudes to chocolate questionnaire. Personal. Individ. Differ. 1998, 24, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Posel, D.; Zeller, J. Language shift or increased bilingualism in South Africa: Evidence from census data. J. Multiling. Multicult. Dev. 2016, 37, 357–370. [Google Scholar]
- Casale, D.; Posel, D. English language proficiency and earnings in a developing country: The case of South Africa. J. Socio-Econ. 2011, 40, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bowling, A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J. Public Health 2005, 27, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Garcia-Losa, M.; Unda, M.; Badia, X.; Rodriguez-Alcantara, F.; Carballido, J.; Dal-Re, R.; Herdman, M. Effect of Mode of Administration on I–PSS Scores in a Large BPH Patient Population. Eur. Urol. 2001, 40, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swanborn, P. Case Study Research: What, Why and How, 1st ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2010; pp. 73–80. [Google Scholar]
- Boutrolle, I.; Arranz, D.; Rogeaux, M.; Delarue, J. Comparing central location test and home use test results: Application of a new criterion. Food Qual. Prefer. 2005, 16, 704–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meilgaard, M.C.; Carr, B.T.; Civille, G.V. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 4th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 20–35. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis; Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 35–36. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Evers, C.; Adriaanse, M.; de Ridder, D.T.D.; de Witt Huberts, J.C. Good mood food. Positive emotion as a neglected trigger for food intake. Appetite 2013, 68, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sester, C.; Dacremont, C.; Deroy, O.; Valentin, D. Investigating consumers’ representations of beers through a free association task: A comparison between packaging and blind conditions. Food Qual. Prefer. 2013, 28, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomson, D.M.; Crocker, C. Application of conceptual profiling in brand, packaging and product development. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 40, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaneko, D.; Brouwer, A.-M.; Hogervorst, M.; Toet, A.; Kallen, V.; Van Erp, J.B.F. Emotional State During Tasting Affects Emotional Experience Differently and Robustly for Novel and Familiar Foods. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leite, P.B.; Bispo, E.d.S.; Santana, L.R.R. Sensory profiles of chocolates produced from cocoa cultivars resistant to Moniliophtora Perniciosa. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2013, 35, 594–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Pelsmaeker, S.; Schouteten, J.J.; Lagast, S.; Dewettinck, K.; Gellynck, X. Is taste the key driver for consumer preference? A conjoint analysis study. Food Qual. Prefer. 2017, 62, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ammann, J.; Hartmann, C.; Siegrist, M. A bitter taste in the mouth: The role of 6-n-propylthiouracil taster status and sex in food disgust sensitivity. Physiol. Behav. 2019, 204, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Demographic Profile | Percentage of Respondents (%) | Number of Respondents (n) |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 26 | 38 |
Female | 74 | 111 |
Age in years | ||
18–29 | 23 | 34 |
30–39 | 37 | 55 |
40–49 | 26 | 38 |
50–59 | 9 | 14 |
>60 | 5 | 8 |
Highest level of education | ||
Grade 12 | 13 | 19 |
Diploma/Certificate | 33 | 49 |
Degree | 22 | 32 |
Post-graduate degree | 33 | 49 |
Construct | Item Description | Mean Score | Factor Loading | p-Value | α |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mood | Positive mood | 2.22 | 0.668 | ** | 0.717 |
Negative mood | 1.20 | 0.671 | ** | ||
Familiarity | Small chocolates | 1.38 | 0.644 | ** | 0.745 |
Large chocolates | 1.73 | 0.571 | ** | ||
Acceptability | Acceptability | 4.23 | 0.842 | ** | |
Attitude | Negative | 2.33 | 0.672 | ** | 0.748 |
Emotional | 3.01 | 0.690 | ** | ||
Functional | 2.20 | 0.679 | ** | ||
Obsession | 2.78 | 0.514 | ** | ||
Sensory characteristics | Sensory sweetness | 1.76 | 0.693 | ** | 0.730 |
Sensory bitterness | 0.95 | 0.532 | ** | ||
Emotional response | Positive emotion | 1.52 | 0.793 | ** | 0.774 |
Negative emotion | 0.49 | 0.589 | ** |
Chocolate 1 (Diabetic) | Chocolate 2 (Premium) | Chocolate 3 (Mainstream) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive Emotion | Negative Emotion | Guilty | Positive Emotion | Negative Emotion | Guilty | Positive Emotion | Negative Emotion | Guilty | |
Mood | |||||||||
Positive mood | 0.081 | −0.038 | 0.066 | 0.114 | −0.011 | −0.054 | 0.245 ** | −0.083 | 0.017 |
Negative mood | 0.044 | 0.082 | 0.123 | 0.038 | 0.138 | 0.335 ** | 0.106 | 0.114 | 0.218 * |
Familiarity | |||||||||
Small chocolate format | 0.041 | 0.029 | 0.091 | 0.209 * | −0.145 | 0.145 | 0.272 ** | −0.119 | 0.075 |
Large chocolate format | 0.135 | 0.032 | 0.028 | 0.232 ** | −0.103 | 0.062 | 0.231 ** | −0.095 | 0.058 |
Acceptability | 0.463 ** | −0.460 ** | 0.057 | 0.010 | 0.081 | 0.057 | 0.094 | −0.057 | −0.077 |
Attitudes | |||||||||
Emotional Attitude | 0.073 | 0.070 | 0.005 | 0.086 | 0.060 | 0.150 | 0.206 * | −0.018 | 0.103 |
Obsession Attitude | 0.119 | 0.163 | −0.020 | 0.132 | 0.091 | 0.050 | 0.214 * | −0.081 | 0.024 |
Negative Attitude | −0.199 | 0.036 | 0.230 ** | −0.258 | 0.278 | 0.299 ** | −0.092 | 0.136 | 0.309 ** |
Functional Attitude | 0.047 | 0.007 | −0.058 | 0.095 | −0.001 | 0.099 | 0.117 | −0.014 | −0.062 |
Dependent Variable | R2 | R2 adj. | Independent Variable | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sensory Sweetness | Sensory Bitterness | |||
Beta (β) Coefficient | Beta (β) Coefficient | |||
Chocolate 1 (Diabetic) | ||||
Positive emotion | 10.8% | 9.5% | 0.481 ** | −0.183 |
Negative emotion | 25.2% | 24.1% | −0.378 ** | 0.330 ** |
Chocolate 2 (Premium) | ||||
Positive emotion | 7.7% | 6.4% | 0.132 | 0.427 ** |
Negative emotion | 1.6% | 0.0% | 0.040 | 0.123 |
Chocolate 3 (Mainstream) | ||||
Positive emotion | 2.7% | 1.3% | 0.032 | 0.213 |
Negative emotion | 3.5% | 2.0% | 0.098 | 0.061 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mielmann, A.; Le Roux, N.; Taljaard, I. The Impact of Mood, Familiarity, Acceptability, Sensory Characteristics and Attitude on Consumers’ Emotional Responses to Chocolates. Foods 2022, 11, 1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11111621
Mielmann A, Le Roux N, Taljaard I. The Impact of Mood, Familiarity, Acceptability, Sensory Characteristics and Attitude on Consumers’ Emotional Responses to Chocolates. Foods. 2022; 11(11):1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11111621
Chicago/Turabian StyleMielmann, Annchen, Neoline Le Roux, and Innike Taljaard. 2022. "The Impact of Mood, Familiarity, Acceptability, Sensory Characteristics and Attitude on Consumers’ Emotional Responses to Chocolates" Foods 11, no. 11: 1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11111621
APA StyleMielmann, A., Le Roux, N., & Taljaard, I. (2022). The Impact of Mood, Familiarity, Acceptability, Sensory Characteristics and Attitude on Consumers’ Emotional Responses to Chocolates. Foods, 11(11), 1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11111621