Next Article in Journal
Consumer Behaviour and Food Waste: Understanding and Mitigating Waste with a Technology Probe
Previous Article in Journal
Cross-Cultural Differences in the Perception of Lamb between New Zealand and Chinese Consumers in New Zealand
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Dietary Energy Density in a Fermented Total Mixed Ration Formulated with Different Ratios of Rice Straw and Cassava Pulp on 2- or 14-Day-Aged Meat Quality, Collagen, Fatty Acids, and Ribonucleotides of Native Thai Cattle Longissimus Muscle

by
Chanporn Chaosap
1,*,
Achara Lukkananukool
2,
Sineenart Polyorach
2,
Kritapon Sommart
3,
Panneepa Sivapirunthep
1 and
Rutcharin Limsupavanich
2
1
Department of Agricultural Education, School of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
2
Department of Animal Production Technology and Fishery, School of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
3
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(14), 2046; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142046
Submission received: 6 June 2022 / Revised: 1 July 2022 / Accepted: 7 July 2022 / Published: 11 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Meat)

Abstract

:
This study investigated the effects of dietary energy density in rice straw and cassava pulp fermented total mixed ration on pH, cooking loss, Warner–Bratzler shear force (WBSF), and collagen content of 2- or 14-d-aged native Thai cattle (NTC) Longissimus thoracic (LT) muscles and fatty acids and ribonucleotides of 2-d-aged LT. Eighteen yearling NTC (Bos indicus) were randomly divided into three dietary treatments (T1 = 8.9, T2 = 9.7, and T3 = 10.5 MJ ME/kg), with six bulls per treatment. The results showed that T1 had the highest WBSF (p < 0.05). However, T2 had similar WBSF to T3 (p > 0.05). With aging, cooking loss increased (p < 0.01), while WBSF decreased (p < 0.01). Insoluble and total collagen decreased with aging (p < 0.05). Dietary energy density had no effect (p > 0.05) on collagen content, ribonucleotides and most fatty acids. However, T1 had more (p < 0.05) decanoic (C10:0), vaccenic (C18:1n9t), trans-linolelaidic (C18:2n6t), eicosatrienoic (C20:3n6), and docosadienoic (C22:2) acids than T2 and T3. In terms of lowest feed cost with comparable tenderness to T2 and highest energy density, T3 may be well suited for feeding NTC. Aging for 14 days improves LT tenderness, but its cooking loss may affect yield and juiciness.

1. Introduction

Beef consumption in Thailand is increasing, while the production is insufficient to meet the demand. Therefore, beef and beef-product-imported values of the country increased by 34% in 2021 compared to 2020 [1]. In 2020, 6.23 million cattle were raised in Thailand, of which 3.50 million or 56% were native Thai cattle (NTC) [2]. NTC, classified as Bos indicus, were formerly used as draught cattle in Thailand before being considered for meat production [3,4]. Despite their small size and slow growth, NTC are well adapted to the harsh and humid climate and resistant to ticks, parasites, and diseases [3,5]. They can utilize agricultural by-products or low-quality ingredients as feed and have high fecundity and maternal characteristics [3,5]. Farmers generally let them graze freely on low-quality local grasses and weeds without supplementation, except for some rice straw in the dry season. Depending on natural grazing alone results in low growth performance and low productivity [6]. Previous studies [6,7] suggested that NTC longissimus muscle offers health benefits due to its lower fat (<1.0%) and cholesterol content, but more polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), conjugated linoleic acid (CLA C18:2), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, C20:5n3), and docosapentaenoic acid (DHA, C22:5n3) than those of Bos taurus crosses. However, the meat from NTC was less tender with Warner–Bratzler shear force (WBSF) values of 10.47 kg [6] and 15.78 kg [4], which may be a limitation from an eating quality standpoint.
As consumers demand not only more quantity of meat, but also on a better quality, especially for eating quality, there is a need for NTC meat quality improvement. The feeding strategy is a tool to improve cattle performance, productivity, and meat quality. For example, concentrate-fed beef had more monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) in intramuscular fat, less connective tissue, and better palatability than grass-fed beef [8]. The high intramuscular fat content in concentrated-fed beef may improve the flavor, juiciness, and tenderness of the meat [8]. Fermented total mixed ration (FTMR) is a complete feed combination of concentrate and roughage, formulated to meet a specific nutrient requirement of cattle and fermented to provide better nutrient availability, feed intake, digestibility, and aerobic storability [9,10,11,12,13]. In Thailand, cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is one of the most important agro-industrial crops with a production of about 31.6 million tons in 2021 [14]. It is mainly used as a raw material for the starch industry, producing a surplus of cassava pulp. Cassava pulp is composed of highly digestible starch and fiber, making it suitable as an alternative energy source for cattle feed [15,16,17], especially when compared to rice straw [17,18]. A study by [13] showed that inclusion of cassava pulp in TMR silage improved preserved nutritional value, feed storage ability, rumen fermentation, digestibility, and enteric methane mitigation in NTC. Higher growth performance of NTC fed with higher energy density by using more cassava pulp instead of rice straw in FTMR has been reported [12,17].
Post-mortem aging in a vacuum package or wet aging are known to be methods for improving meat palatability [19]. It is well recognized that post-mortem proteolysis of myofibrilla proteins is responsible for improving tenderness during aging [20,21,22]. With extended aging, proteolytic enzymes degrade and dissociate the intramuscular connective tissue structure (IMCT) of muscles with high connective tissue toughness, resulting in collagen solubilization [23]. The higher collagen content with lower collagen solubility causes meat toughness [24,25,26]. It has been known that both fatty acid composition and ribonucleotide content in meat contribute to meat flavor [27,28,29]. In addition, fatty acid composition in meat plays an important role in terms of the health aspect. MUFA are better for health, while saturated fatty acids (SFA) may cause health problems [30]. However, different SFAs have various biological effects, making their roles in heart disease complex [31].
This study was a continuation of the study of [32], which investigated the growth performance, carcass quality, and production cost of NTC fed with different energy densities and ratios of rice straw and cassava pulp FTMR. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to further investigate the effects of energy density in FTMR with different ratios of rice straw and cassava pulp on (1) meat quality, including pH, cooking loss, WBSF, and collagen solubility of 2- or 14-d post-mortem aged LT muscles of NTC and (2) fatty acid composition and ribonucleotide content of 2-d aged LT muscles of NTC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Ethics

The LT muscle samples used in this study were collected from 18 NTC bulls that were part of a government project supported by the Thailand Research Fund (project code RDG5820025). The cattle were raised at the Khon Kaen University Farm Research Station, Khon Kaen Province, Thailand. All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the animal welfare standards of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Department of Livestock Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Royal Thai Government.

2.2. Experimental Cattle and Muscle Collection

Eighteen NTC bulls with an average age of 16.8 months and an average body weight of 96.1 ± 5.2 kg (mean ± SD) were randomly assigned to three treatment groups with different densities of metabolizable energy (ME) in FTMR: Treatment 1 (T1: 8.9 MJ ME/kg DM), Treatment 2 (T2: 9.7 MJ ME/kg DM), and Treatment 3 (T3: 10.5 MJ ME/kg DM), with six bulls per treatment. The experimental diet was formulated to meet the nutritional requirements of beef cattle [33] and to produce a total mixed ration (TMR) silage [17] using ingredients such as rice straw, cassava pulp, cassava chips, palm meal, soybean meal, rice bran, urea, and minerals. The ingredients and analyzed chemical composition of the FTMR formulation with different ratios of rice straw and cassava pulps are shown in Table 1 [32]. The diets were offered ad libitum as FTMRs to all cattle twice per day at 08:30 and 16:30. The experimental animals were randomly assigned to one of six blocks according to their initial body weight using a completely randomized block design. Within each block, animals were randomly allocated to one of the three dietary treatments and were fattened for 450 days. Animals were transported for approximately eight h to a commercial slaughterhouse where they were stalled for 12 h and had access to water prior to slaughter. The animals were weighed, stunned, bled, skinned, eviscerated, and washed according to commercial practices. Carcasses were split lengthwise and stored at 2 ± 2 °C for 24 h before transfer to the Meat Science and Technology Laboratory at King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand. At 2 days postmortem, the carcasses were fabricated. Then, LT muscle sample was taken from the left side of each carcass. All visible fat was removed from the samples, which was then divided into one 1.5 cm thick and two 5 cm thick portions. The 1.5 cm thick portion was vacuum packaged and stored at −80 °C for further analysis of ribonucleotide content and fatty acid composition. Each of the 5 cm thick portions was individually vacuum packaged in a barrier bag and stored at 1 °C for 2- or 14-day-aged meat quality analysis. For meat quality analysis, at each post mortem aging time, each 5 cm thick muscle portion was removed from a barrier bag and pH was measured. The muscle was then cut into 2 and 3 cm thick steaks, vacuum packaged individually in a barrier bag, and kept frozen at −20 °C. Each 2 cm thick steak was used for collagen content determination, while the 3 cm thick steak was used for cooking loss and WBSF measurements.

2.3. Meat Quality Analysis

2.3.1. pH Measurement

At 2 and 14 days postmortem, duplicate measurements of muscle pH were obtained using a pH meter equipped with a spear tip glass electrode (SevenGo, Mettler-Toledo International Inc., Greifensee, ZH, Switzerland).

2.3.2. Cooking Loss and Shear Force Measurement

At each post-mortem aging time, the frozen vacuum packaged 3 cm thick steak was thawed overnight, removed from the bag, and weighed before being placed in a high-density polyethylene bag, heat sealed, and cooked in a water bath (80 °C) until the internal temperature reached 70 °C. The cooked samples were removed from the bag and allowed to cool to room temperature before being reweighed. The difference in weight between cooking was used to quantify cooking loss and expressed as a percentage of the weight before cooking. For WBSF measurements, each cooked sample was cut transversely and along the muscle fiber orientation into eight pieces of 1.3 × 1.3 × 3 cm3 cubes. Each cube was sheared perpendicular to the muscle fibers using the texture analyzer (EZ-SX, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a 50 kg load cell and a crosshead speed of 50 mm/min. The WBSF value of each muscle sample was calculated by averaging the values of eight cubes’ cuts.

2.3.3. Collagen Measurement

According to [34], with slight modification, the 2 cm thick steak was homogenized with Ringer’s solution at 77 °C for 70 min and then centrifuged at 2500× g for 10 min. Soluble and insoluble collagen were measured by hydrolysis of the supernatant and sediment solutions in 12 N HCl and 6 N HCl at 110 °C for 20 h, respectively. Hydroxyproline concentration was determined by measuring the absorbance of the hydrolysate at 550 nm and comparing with a standard curve as described by [35]. Collagen content was determined by multiplying the hydroxyproline content by 7.25.

2.3.4. Ribonucleotide Measurement

The muscle sample obtained from the 1.5 cm thick 2-day-aged muscle portion was homogenized in 0.6 M perchloric acid as described by [36]. The homogenate was neutralized, pH adjusted to 7.0 with 0.8 M KOH and KH2PO4 buffer, and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. Inosine monophosphate (IMP), guanosine monophosphate (GMP), inosine, and hypoxanthine were determined in the supernatant. The stationary phase was a TSK gel Amide-80 column (Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) and the eluent was a 70:30 acetonitrile:KH2PO4 buffer. Ribonucleotide content was determined using an external standard curve.

2.3.5. Fatty Acid Composition Measurement

Fatty acid composition was analyzed according to [37] using a muscle sample obtained from the 1.5 cm thick 2-day-aged muscle portion. Chloroform was used for the extraction of lipids according to the method of [38]. Methyl nonadecanoate was used as an internal standard during extraction. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were analyzed by gas chromatography (7890B, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), using a fused silica capillary column (100 m × 0.25 mm × 0.2 μm film thickness, SPTM-2560, Supelco, Bellfonte, PA, USA). The peaks of FAMEs were detected and quantified by comparing the retention times with the standard of FAME C4–C24 components. The percentage of each fatty acid was calculated relative to the total fatty acid content.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed with a general linear model using Proc GLM. Least-squares means were separated using the PDIFF option. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. For pH, cooking loss, shear force value, and collagen content, the experimental model included terms for dietary treatment and aging period according to the following equation: Yijk = µ + bi + Tj + Ak+ Tj*Ak + €ijk, where Yijk was the dependent variable, µ was the overall mean, bi was the block effect of initial body weight (i = 1,......, 6), Tj was the fixed effect of dietary energy density (j = 1, 2, 3), Ak was the fixed effect of the aging period (k = 1, 2), and Tj * Ak was interaction and €ijk was the residual error. For ribonucleotides and fatty acid composition, the experimental model included a dietary treatment term according to the following equation: Yij = µ + bi + Tj + €ij, where Yij was the dependent variable, µ was the overall mean, bi was the block effect of initial body weight (i = 1,......, 6), Tj was the fixed effect of dietary energy density (j = 1, 2, 3), and €ij was the residual error.

3. Results

3.1. Meat Quality

The effects of different dietary energy densities in FTMR and aging time on meat quality of LT muscle of NTC are shown in Table 2. There was no interaction (p > 0.05) between dietary energy density and aging time on muscle pH, cooking loss, and WBSF. The highest dietary-energy-density treatments, T3, tended to have a higher percentage of cooking loss than others (p = 0.051). The dietary energy density affected the WBSF value, as the high dietary energy density, 9.7 MJ ME/kg (T2), and 10.5 MJ ME/kg (T3), had a lower WBSF value (p < 0.05) than the low dietary energy density, 8.9 MJ ME/kg (T1). The longer aging of 14 days had a higher percentage of cooking losses but a lower WBSF value (p < 0.01) than the aging of 2 days.
Muscle pH influences many meat quality characteristics, including water-holding capacity, color lightness, tenderness, and shelf life [39]. After slaughter, muscle pH decreases in relation to the increase in lactic acid accumulation due to anaerobic glycolysis [40]. Table 2 shows that neither dietary energy density nor aging time affected muscle pH (p > 0.05). In contrast to our study, [41] reported lower ultimate muscle pH in F1 Angus × Chinese Xiangxi Yellow cattle fed a high-energy diet than in cattle fed a low-energy diet. The authors of [41] stated that the lower pH in their study was due to higher glycogen availability because of feeding a high-energy diet. The difference between our results and their report could be due to differences in cattle breed, age, or diet. Previous investigation in the same group of experimental cattle as in this study showed that growth parameters, especially average daily gain (ADG), did not differ at different energy densities [32]. At the final phase of fattening, NTC might reach a mature body weight resulting in no further weight gained [32]. The limited nutrient utilization of NTC might lead to similar muscle glycogen levels; therefore, muscle pH did not differ in the current study. However, [42] stated that muscle glycogen in an animal before slaughter is generally less affected by nutrition, compared to stress or muscle energy requirement before slaughter. According to [43], the pH values of LT muscles in NTC fattened at all dietary energy densities in this study were in the normal range, indicating optimal pre-slaughter handlings and meat quality.
The cooking loss of meat is the loss of water during a cooking process. It reflects the ability of meat to retain water during cooking at high temperature and correlates negatively with meat juiciness [44]. For the meat processing industry, high cooking loss means lower meat yield, affects the appearance of the meat, and is, therefore, an important economic indicator [45]. Table 2 shows that percent cooking loss tends to be affected (p = 0.051) by the dietary energy density of FTMR. The LT muscles of NTC fed the highest energy density (T3) tended to have (p = 0.051) higher cooking loss percentage than the others. However, in the study of [41], the dietary energy density showed no effect on cooking loss. They reported that the average cooking loss was 31.5%, which was higher than the present study.
Aging time had an effect (p < 0.05, Table 2) on the percentage of cooking losses. LT muscles that were aged longer (14 days) had a higher (p < 0.05) percentage of cooking losses than muscles that were aged for only 2 days. The authors of [46] reported that 14-day-aged muscles had a 3% higher cooking loss than non-aged muscles. In contrast, [47] found that aging for 2 and 14 days had no effect on cooking loss and the average was 21.8%. The authors of [44] reported that cooking losses were lower for beef aged on day 0 than on day 7 (p < 0.05), with averages of 25.8% and 30.7%, respectively. The higher cooking loss during aging may be due to the denaturation of muscle protein and degradation of certain muscle proteins, such as desmin and troponin T, by postmortem proteolysis, resulting in a decrease in water-holding capacity in aged beef [20,48]. In addition, it has been shown that in aged beef, water tends to shift from the intracellular to the extracellular compartment, making it easier to remove during cooking [46,49].
WBSF assessment is an objective measurement of a force required to cut through muscle fiber bundles simulating a biting process. A higher WBSF indicates less tenderness. Meat was defined as “tender” when it had a shear force value of less than 6 kg [50]. Results showed that both dietary energy density in FTMR and aging time influenced WBSF values (p < 0.05, Table 2). The LT muscles of NTC in the high-dietary-energy-density treatments (T2, 9.7 MJ/kg and T3, 10.5 MJ/kg) resulted in a lower WBSF value (p < 0.05) than in the lowest-dietary-energy-density treatment (T1, 8.9 MJ/kg). The result of the present study is consistent with [41,51]. A study by [51] showed that the lower shear force value was associated with a higher muscle fragmentation index in cattle fed high-energy diets than in cattle fed low-energy diets. The possible explanation for the lower WBSF value in the high-energy FTMR (T3) in the current study could be due to slightly more (p < 0.05) marbling accumulation in T3, as reported in the study by [32], which conducted a study on the same group of experimental cattle as this study. In addition, [32] reported the fat percentages of the LT muscles as 6.1, 6.2, 6.7 for T1, T2, and T3, respectively (p > 0.05). According to [52], in Holstein-Friesian bulls, increased dietary energy, with less structural carbohydrate, resulted in an increase in ruminal amylolytic bacteria, but decreasing cellulolytic bacteria. This further increased propionate, but reduced acetate concentration, influencing blood glucose and allowing more carbon source as a substrate for intramuscular lipogenesis [52,53]. As shown in Table 1, T3 has the highest proportion of cassava pulp, but the least neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF). However, [32] found no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the marbling score (MS) of T1 and T2. Thus, MS may not be the only factor responsible for the tenderness of the LT muscle in this study. As expected, LT exhibited lower WBSF at 14 days of aging (p < 0.01) than at 2 days of aging.

3.2. Collagen Content

Collagen is a major component in the connective tissue of meat. The higher the collagen content, the lower the solubility of collagen, or the stronger its structural cross-linking, resulting in higher toughness in meat [24,25,26]. Table 3 shows the effects of dietary energy density in FTMR and aging time on collagen parameters in LT muscles of NTC. There was no combined effect (p > 0.05, Table 3) of dietary energy density and aging time on any collagen parameters. There was a trend (p < 0.1) toward higher insoluble and total collagen content in the medium energy FTMR (T2; rice straw 30: cassava pulp 30) than in the others. However, there was no effect of energy density on soluble collagen and percent collagen solubility. In contrast, higher collagen solubility was found in the muscles of cattle fed a high-energy-density diet than in cattle fed a low-energy-density diet [51]. In another study, soluble collagen concentration was higher in cattle fed high-energy diets (p < 0.084), whereas dietary energy density had no effect on total collagen content [28]. The authors of [54] noted that collagen solubility increased in the longissimus muscle of grain-fed cattle, which was probably due to an increase in collagen biosynthesis rate or a decrease in collagen cross-linking rate after the animals were fed a higher-dietary-energy-density diet. The explanation for the nonsignificant differences in collagen solubility between treatments in the current study may be related to the limited nutrient utilization of NTC, as indicated by the nonvariation in ADG at different dietary energy densities, as mentioned in the report of [32]. However, the higher proportion of insoluble collagen and total collagen in the treatment, which contained a similar proportion of rice straw and cassava pulp, may require further investigation.
Table 3 shows that post-mortem aging time had an effect (p < 0.05) on insoluble collagen content and total collagen content in LT muscles. The 14-day-aged LT muscle had less (p < 0.05) insoluble and total collagen than that aged after 2 days. The decrease in these two collagen parameters may indicate post-mortem degradation of collagen structure, which could be a contributing factor to the observed lower 14-day-aged WBSF value. However, soluble collagen and collagen solubility percentage were not affected by aging time (p > 0.05, Table 3). The effect of aging on collagen solubility is controversial, as [44] found that post-mortem aging does not affect collagen content, while [55] reported that collagen is damaged and partially solubilized during aging.

3.3. Fatty Acid Composition

Fatty acid deposition in beef muscle is dependent, but not proportionately, on dietary fatty acid composition and rumen microbial dehydrogenation activity, which transforms UFA to SFA [56]. In general, MUFAs and PUFAs are considered better for health, while the image of SFAs is unhealthy for consumers [30]. However, high content of PUFAs in muscle foods can lead to oxidative rancidity, affecting meat flavor, storage ability, and overall meat quality [57]. Table 4 shows the effect of dietary energy density in FTMR with different ratios of rice straw and cassava pulp on fatty acid composition of LT muscle of NTC at 2-day aging. For most fatty acid compositions in LT muscle, the dietary energy density of FTMR showed similar effects (p > 0.05). However, dietary energy density affected (p < 0.05) decanoic acid (C10:0), vaccenic acid (C18:1n9t), trans-linolelaidic acid (C18:2n6t), eicosatrienoic acid (C20:3n6), and docosadienoic acid (C22:2) content in LT muscle. NTC fed the lowest-energy-density diet (T1, 8.9 MJ ME/kg) had higher (p < 0.05) levels of decanoic acid (C10:0), vaccenic acid (C18:1n9t), trans-linolelaidic acid (C18:2n6t), eicosatrienoic acid (C20:3n6), and docosadienoic acid (C22:2), and tended to have (p = 0.082) more linoleic acid (C18:2n6c), an essential fatty acid, than T2 (9.7 MJ ME/kg) and T3 (10.5 MJ ME/kg). However, fatty acid composition in T2 was similar to T3 (p > 0.05). This could be due to the influence of different ruminal fibrolytic bacterial communities predominated in T1, compared to T2 and T3 [17]. T1 contained a higher proportion of rice straw (50) to cassava pulp (10) ratio, which resulted in more dietary fiber in NDF and ADF (Table 1). According to [17,58], rumen microbial community was mainly affected by dietary forage to concentrate ratio, rather than dietary energy level, provided the energy level difference was at 8%. The three dietary-energy-density treatments, however, showed similar results (p > 0.05, Table 4) for SFA, MUFA, PUFA, and UFA (unsaturated fatty acids) content, as well as for UFA: SFA and PUFA:SFA ratios. It should be noted that MUFA was the most abundant fatty acid (65.74%), followed by SFA (31.33%) and PUFA (2.93%).
The three most abundant fatty acids found in LT muscle examined in this study were oleic acid (C18:1n9c; 58.28–61.75%), palmitic acid (C16:0; 18.35–20.08%), and stearic acid (C18:0; 6.41–7.95%), respectively. These results agree with other studies [59,60,61]. Oleic acid, a MUFA, is abundant in grain-fed beef, which could be considered an important dietary source of MUFAs for humans [62]. Higher amounts of oleic acid in beef may be beneficial because it can increase blood HDL cholesterol levels and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) [30]. Consumption of trans fatty acids (TFA) has been associated with a number of health harms, particularly coronary heart disease (CHD), CVD, and related conditions [63]. The main sources of TFA are products from industrially produced hydrogenated vegetable oils, such as margarine and deep-fried foods, and a small amount of TFA may occur naturally in animal fat synthesized by anaerobic bacteria in the rumen [64]. In the present study, the highest amount of TFA (vaccenic acid 0.52% and trans-linolelaidic acid 0.49%) was found in T1, which accounted for only 1.01% of the total fatty acid (0.04 g/100 g), suggesting that the TFA in LT muscle from NTC in the present study contained less TFA than the recommended threshold of 5 g per 100 g serving, which is the threshold for increased CHD risk [64]. In ruminants, however, vaccenic acid is a substrate for the formation of CLA (C18:2 cis-9 tran-11) in muscle tissues [65,66]. In addition, a study in an animal model indicated that vaccenic acid-rich butter could prevent atherosclerosis development [67]. The authors [68] reported that medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) with 6–12 carbons have a unique transport system and are rapidly metabolized in the body. MCFAs not only serve as an energy source, but also regulate glucose and lipid metabolism. MCFAs have been found to enhance immune response and insulin secretion and may increase apoptosis in cancer cells. Therefore, the higher proportion of MCFA decanoic acid (C10:0) in T1 may contribute to some health benefits.

3.4. Ribonucleotides

Post-mortem degradation of nucleotide triphosphates, such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and guanosine triphosphate (GTP), results in flavor-related compounds, such as IMP and GMP [27,29]. IMP is reported to be responsible for umami flavor, while hypoxanthine is associated with a bitter taste, but inosine is tasteless [27,29]. From Table 5, dietary energy density in FTMR had no effect (p > 0.05) on the levels of hypoxanthine, inosine, IMP, and GMP in 2-day-aged LT muscles from NTC. This indicated that the three dietary energy densities of FTMR formulated by replacing rice straw with cassava pulp in this study resulted in similar ribonucleotide contents in 2-day-aged LT muscles of NTC. IMP was present in the highest amount, followed by inosine, hypoxanthine, and GMP, which ranged from 211.29–219.04, 19.85–21.41, 4.21–5.31, and 2.78–3.04 mg/100g, respectively (Table 5).
The fact that dietary energy density did not affect ribonucleotide content in the current study could also be related to the limitation in nutrient utilization of NTC [32], as mentioned earlier. Our study is in agreement with [69], who investigated the effects of carbohydrate sources (corn silage, corn grain, and barley grain) on meat quality of Xiangxi yellow cattle. They found that despite the lower ME in the corn silage group, the content of IMP and GMP was not affected compared to the higher ME corn grain and barley grain groups. However, [59] found that starch source affected IMP content, as pineapple stem starch had higher levels of IMP than ground corn and cassava starch in the LT muscle of Holstein steers.

4. Conclusions

The three dietary-energy-density treatments did not affect pH, collagen, ribonucleotides, and most fatty acid parameters in LT muscles. The high-energy FTMR (rice straw 10: cassava pulp 50) can be considered for feeding NTC because it is the most economical diet, while it provides similarly tender LT as that of T2. Vacuum aging for 14 days, with careful handlings to prevent cooking loss, can be practiced for tenderness improvement. Further sensory quality study could provide more information on quality and consumer acceptance. Rumen microbial structure investigation in the low-energy-density FTMR (rice straw 50: cassava pulp 10) fed NTC may provide more understanding on its muscle fatty acid composition, some of which might have health benefits. It should be noted, however, that the most abundant fatty acid obtained in this study was MUFA, especially oleic acid (18:1n-9c).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.C., A.L., S.P. and K.S.; Methodology, C.C. and A.L.; Validation, C.C., R.L. and K.S.; Formal analysis, C.C.; Investigation, C.C.; Resources, C.C.; Data curation, C.C.; Writing—original draft preparation, C.C., R.L. and P.S.; Writing—review and editing, C.C. and R.L.; Visualization, C.C. and K.S.; Supervision, C.C.; Project administration, C.C.; Funding acquisition, C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Thailand research fund (TRF), grant number RDG 6020023.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the research project was initiated in 2015, prior to the ANIMALS FOR SCIENTIFIC PURPOSES ACT became effective in Thailand on 1 January 2017.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the author C.C. on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Phimook Thiwaratkoon at King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang for ribonucleotide analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Department of Trade Negotiations. Available online: https://api.dtn.go.th/files/v3/60fa587cef41404be4216b7f/download (accessed on 11 March 2022).
  2. Department of Livestock Development. Available online: http://docimage.dld.go.th/FILEROOM/CABDLD_BOOKSHELF2/DRAWER26/GENERAL/DATA0000/00000082.PDF (accessed on 1 March 2022).
  3. Saithong, S.; Chatchawan, T.; Boonyanuwat, K. Thai Indigenous Cattle Production Provide a Sustainable Alternative for the Benefit of Smallscale Farmers, Healthy Food, and the Environment. BAHGI E-J. 2011, 1, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sethakul, J.; Opatpatanakit, Y.; Sivapirunthep, P.; Intrapornudom, P. Beef quality under production systems in Thailand: Preliminary Remarks. In Proceedings of the 13th AAAP Animal Science Congress, Hanoi, Vietnam, 22–26 September 2008. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kahi, A.K.; Graser, H.U. Indigenous Thai Beef Cattle Breeding Scheme Incorporating Indirect Measures of Adaptation: Sensitivity to Changes in Heritabilities of and Genetic Correlations between Adaptation Traits. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 17, 1039–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Duanyai, S.; Duanyai, S.; Tanasunthonsut, W.; Suwannee, P. Natural Beef Production; Research Report Project Code RDG5120012; Thailand Research Fund (TRF): Bangkok, Thailand, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  7. Somboonpanyakul, P. Nutritional value of beef (in Thai). In Value of Thai Beef; Sethakul, J., Sivapirunthep, P., Eds.; Amarin Printing: Bangkok, Thailand, 2009; pp. 35–44. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hwang, Y.-H.; Joo, S.-T. Fatty Acid Profiles, Meat Quality, and Sensory Palatability of Grain-fed and Grass-fed Beef from Hanwoo, American, and Australian Crossbred Cattle. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2017, 37, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Nishino, N.; Harada, H.; Sakaguchi, E. Evaluation of fermentation and aerobic stability of wet brewers’ grains ensiled alone or in combination with various feeds as a total mixed ration. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2003, 83, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Subepang, S.; Suzuki, T.; Phonbumrung, T.; Sommart, K. Enteric methane emissions, energy partitioning, and energetic efficiency of zebu beef cattle fed total mixed ration silage. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 32, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, Y.; Wang, F.; Nishino, N. Lactic acid bacteria in total mixed ration silage containing soybean curd residue: Their isolation, identification and ability to inhibit aerobic deterioration. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 29, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Gunha, T.; Kongphitee, K.; Sommart, K. Feed intake, digestibility, growth performances and eating behavior of native Thai beef cattle fed diets differing in energy density using cassava pulp with rice straw. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tropical Animal Science and Production, Bangkok, Thailand, 26–29 July 2016; pp. 112–115. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kongphitee, K.; Sommart, K. Ensilage quality, digestibility and enteric methane emission of the fermented total mixed ration in Thai native beef cattle. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tropical Animal Science and Production, Bangkok, Thailand, 26–29 July 2016; pp. 116–120. [Google Scholar]
  14. Centre for Agricultural Information. Available online: https://api.dtn.go.th/files/v3/5e871694ef4140f16b21b86a/download (accessed on 11 March 2022).
  15. Keaokliang, O.; Kawashima, T.; Angthong, W.; Suzuki, T.; Narmseelee, R. Chemical composition and nutritive values of cassava pulp for cattle. Anim. Sci. J. 2018, 89, 1120–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sriroth, K.; Chollakup, R.; Chotineeranat, S.; Piyachomkwan, K.; Oates, C.G. Processing of cassava waste for improved biomass utilization. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 71, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kongphitee, K.; Sommart, K.; Phonbumrung, T.; Gunha, T.; Suzuki, T. Feed intake, digestibility and energy partitioning in beef cattle fed diets with cassava pulp instead of rice straw. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 31, 1431–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sommart, K.; Parker, D.S.; Rowlinson, P.; Wanapat, M. Fermentation Characteristics and Microbial Protein Synthesis in an In Vitro System Using Cassava, Rice Straw and Dried Ruzi Grass as Substrates. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 13, 1084–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, M.; Choe, J.; Lee, H.J.; Yoon, Y.; Yoon, S.; Jo, C. Effects of Aging and Aging Method on Physicochemical and Sensory Traits of Different Beef Cuts. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2019, 39, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ho, C.Y.; Stromer, M.H.; Robson, R.M. Identification of the 30 kDa polypeptide in post mortem skeletal muscle as a degradation product of troponin-T. Biochimie 1994, 76, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Koohmaraie, M.; Geesink, G. Contribution of postmortem muscle biochemistry to the delivery of consistent meat quality with particular focus on the calpain system. Meat Sci. 2006, 74, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Bhat, Z.; Morton, J.D.; Mason, S.L.; Bekhit, A.E.-D.A. Role of calpain system in meat tenderness: A review. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2018, 7, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nishimura, T. Role of extracellular matrix in development of skeletal muscle and postmortem aging of meat. Meat Sci. 2015, 109, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Light, N.; Champion, A.E.; Voyle, C.; Bailey, A.J. The role of epimysial, perimysial and endomysial collagen in determining texture in six bovine muscles. Meat Sci. 1985, 13, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Modzelewska-Kapituła, M.; Nogalski, Z.; Kwiatkowska, A. The influence of crossbreeding on collagen solubility and tenderness of Infraspinatus and Semimembranosus muscles of semi-intensively reared young bulls. Anim. Sci. J. 2016, 87, 1312–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Purslow, P.P. New developments on the role of intramuscular connective tissue in meat toughness. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 5, 133–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tikk, M.; Tikk, K.; Tørngren, M.; Meinert, L.; Aaslyng, M.; Karlsson, A.; Andersen, H. Development of Inosine Monophosphate and Its Degradation Products during Aging of Pork of Different Qualities in Relation to Basic Taste and Retronasal Flavor Perception of the Meat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 7769–7777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mandell, I.B.; Gullett, E.A.; Wilton, J.W.; Kemp, R.A.; Allen, O.B. Effects of gender and breed on carcass traits, chemical composition, and palatability attributes in Hereford and Simmental bulls and steers. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1997, 49, 235–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Muroya, S.; Oe, M.; Ojima, K.; Watanabe, A. Metabolomic approach to key metabolites characterizing postmortem aged loin muscle of Japanese Black (Wagyu) cattle. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 32, 1172–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Gilmore, L.A.; Walzem, R.L.; Crouse, S.F.; Smith, D.R.; Adams, T.H.; Vaidyanathan, V.; Cao, X.; Smith, S.B. Consumption of high-oleic acid ground beef increases HDL-cholesterol concentration but both high- and low-oleic acid ground beef decrease HDL particle diameter in normocholesterolemic men. J. Nutr. 2011, 141, 1188–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Mukhopadhyay, S.; Goswami, S.; Mondal, S.A.; Dutta, D. Dietary fat, salt, and sugar: A clinical perspective of the social catastrophe. In Dietary Sugar, Salt and Fat in Human Health; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 67–91. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sommart, K.; Tangjitwattanachai, N.; Nitipot, P.; Tumdee, A.; Chokcharoen, S. Feed Innovation and Feeding for High Quality Beef Cattle; Research report project code RDG5820025; Thailand Research Fund (TRF): Bangkok, Thailand, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  33. The Working Committee of Thai Feeding Standard for Ruminant. Nutrient Requirement of Beef Cattle in Indochinese Peninsula; Klungnanavithaya Press: Khon Kaen, Thailand, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hill, F. The solubility of intramuscular collagen in meat animals of various ages. J. Food Sci. 1966, 31, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chaosap, C.; Sivapirunthep, P.; Sitthigripong, R.; Tavitchasri, P.; Maduae, S.; Kusee, T.; Setakul, J.; Adeyemi, K. Meat quality, post-mortem proteolytic enzymes, and myosin heavy chain isoforms of different Thai native cattle muscles. Anim. Biosci. 2021, 34, 1514–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chaosap, C.; Sivapirunthep, P.; Takeungwongtrakul, S.; Zulkifli, R.B.M.; Sazili, A.Q. Effects of Zn-L-Selenomethionine on Carcass Composition, Meat Characteristics, Fatty Acid Composition, Glutathione Peroxidase Activity, and Ribonucleotide Content in Broiler Chickens. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2020, 40, 338–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Raes, K.; De Smet, S.; Demeyer, D. Effect of double-muscling in Belgian Blue young bulls on the intramuscular fatty acid composition with emphasis on conjugated linoleic acid and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Anim. Sci. 2001, 73, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Folch, J.; Lees, M.; Stanley, G.S. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1957, 226, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mir, N.A.; Rafiq, A.; Kumar, F.; Singh, V.; Shukla, V. Determinants of broiler chicken meat quality and factors affecting them: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 54, 2997–3009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Immonen, K.; Ruusunen, M.; Hissa, K.; Puolanne, E. Bovine muscle glycogen concentration in relation to finishing diet, slaughter and ultimate pH. Meat Sci. 2000, 55, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, L.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, X.; He, Y.; Cao, B. Effects of different dietary energy and protein levels and sex on growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of F1 Angus × Chinese Xiangxi yellow cattle. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 5, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Behan, A.A.; Akhtar, M.T.; Loh, T.C.; Fakurazi, S.; Kaka, U.; Muhamad, A.; Samsudin, A.A. Meat quality, fatty acid content and NMR metabolic profile of dorper sheep supplemented with bypass fats. Foods 2021, 10, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Silva, J.A.; Patarata, L.; Martins, C. Influence of ultimate pH on bovine meat tenderness during ageing. Meat Sci. 1999, 52, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fan, Y.; Han, Z.; Arbab, A.A.I.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Z. Effect of Aging Time on Meat Quality of Longissimus Dorsi from Yunling Cattle: A New Hybrid Beef Cattle. Animals 2020, 10, 1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Schönfeldt, H.C.; Strydom, P.E. Effect of age and cut on cooking loss, juiciness and flavour of South African beef. Meat Sci. 2011, 87, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Vaskoska, R.; Ha, M.; Naqvi, Z.B.; White, J.D.; Warner, R.D. Muscle, ageing and temperature influence the changes in texture, cooking loss and shrinkage of cooked beef. Foods 2020, 9, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vieira, C.; Cerdeño, A.; Serrano, E.; Lavín, P.; Mantecón, A. Breed and ageing extent on carcass and meat quality of beef from adult steers (oxen). Livest. Sci. 2007, 107, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jayasooriya, S.D.; Torley, P.J.; D’Arcy, B.R.; Bhandari, B.R. Effect of high power ultrasound and ageing on the physical properties of bovine Semitendinosus and Longissimus muscles. Meat Sci. 2007, 75, 628–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kristensen, L.; Purslow, P.P. The effect of ageing on the water-holding capacity of pork: Role of cytoskeletal proteins. Meat Sci. 2001, 58, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shackelford, S.D.; Wheeler, T.L.; Koohmaraie, M. Tenderness classification of beef: I. Evaluation of beef longissimus shear force at 1 or 2 days postmortem as a predictor of aged beef tenderness. J. Anim. Sci. 1997, 75, 2417–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Aberle, E.; Reeves, E.; Judge, M.; Hunsley, R.; Perry, T. Palatability and muscle characteristics of cattle with controlled weight gain: Time on a high energy diet. J. Anim. Sci. 1981, 52, 757–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, H.; Li, H.; Wu, F.; Qiu, X.; Yu, Z.; Niu, W.; He, Y.; Su, H.; Cao, B. Effects of dietary energy on growth performance, rumen fermentation and bacterial community, and meat quality of Holstein-Friesians bulls slaughtered at different ages. Animals 2019, 9, 1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Smith, S.B.; Crouse, J.D. Relative contributions of acetate, lactate and glucose to lipogenesis in bovine intramuscular and subcutaneous adipose tissue. J. Nutr. 1984, 114, 792–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wu, J.J.; Kastner, C.L.; Hunt, M.C.; Kropf, D.H.; Allen, D.M. Nutritional Effects on Beef Collagen Characteristics and Palatability. J. Anim. Sci. 1981, 53, 1256–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mikołajczak, B.; Iwańska, E.; Spychaj, A.; Danyluk, B.; Montowska, M.; Grześ, B.; Banach, J.K.; Żywica, R.; Pospiech, E. An analysis of the influence of various tenderising treatments on the tenderness of meat from Polish Holstein-Friesian bulls and the course of changes in collagen. Meat Sci. 2019, 158, 107906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, B.; Wang, Y.; Zuo, S.; Peng, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, H. Untargeted and Targeted Metabolomics Profiling of Muscle Reveals Enhanced Meat Quality in Artificial Pasture Grazing Tan Lambs via Rescheduling the Rumen Bacterial Community. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 846–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wood, J.D.; Enser, M.; Fisher, A.V.; Nute, G.R.; Sheard, P.R.; Richardson, R.I.; Hughes, S.I.; Whittington, F.M. Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: A review. Meat Sci. 2008, 78, 343–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bi, Y.; Zeng, S.; Zhang, R.; Diao, Q.; Tu, Y. Effects of dietary energy levels on rumen bacterial community composition in Holstein heifers under the same forage to concentrate ratio condition. BMC Microbiol. 2018, 18, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chaosap, C.; Sahatsanon, K.; Sitthigripong, R.; Sawanon, S.; Setakul, J. The Effects of Using Pineapple Stem Starch as an Alternative Starch Source and Ageing Period on Meat Quality, Texture Profile, Ribonucleotide Content, and Fatty Acid Composition of Longissimus Thoracis of Fattening Dairy Steers. Foods 2021, 10, 2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jaturasitha, S.; Norkeaw, R.; Vearasilp, T.; Wicke, M.; Kreuzer, M. Carcass and meat quality of Thai native cattle fattened on Guinea grass (Panicum maxima) or Guinea grass-legume (Stylosanthes guianensis) pastures. Meat Sci. 2009, 81, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chaiwang, N.; Jaturasitha, S.; Sringam, K.; Wicke, M.; Kreuzer, M. Comparison of the fatty acid profiles of the meat of crossbreds with 75 percent Charolais blood proportion and Thai indigenous upland cattle. Chiang Mai Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 2015, 14, 119–205. [Google Scholar]
  62. Nogoy, K.M.C.; Sun, B.; Shin, S.; Lee, Y.; Li, X.Z.; Choi, S.H.; Park, S. Fatty Acid Composition of Grain-and Grass-Fed Beef and Their Nutritional Value and Health Implication. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2022, 42, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. EFSA. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition, and Allergies (NDA); Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for fats, including saturated fatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, trans fatty acids, and cholesterol. EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1461. [Google Scholar]
  64. Wagner, K.-H.; Plasser, E.; Proell, C.; Kanzler, S. Comprehensive studies on the trans fatty acid content of Austrian foods: Convenience products, fast food and fats. Food Chem. 2008, 108, 1054–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lourenço, M.; Ramos-Morales, E.; Wallace, R. The role of microbes in rumen lipolysis and biohydrogenation and their manipulation. Animal 2010, 4, 1008–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Griinari, J.; Corl, B.; Lacy, S.; Chouinard, P.; Nurmela, K.; Bauman, D. Conjugated linoleic acid is synthesized endogenously in lactating dairy cows by Δ9-desaturase. J. Nutr. 2000, 130, 2285–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bassett, C.M.; Edel, A.L.; Patenaude, A.F.; McCullough, R.S.; Blackwood, D.P.; Chouinard, P.Y.; Paquin, P.; Lamarche, B.; Pierce, G.N. Dietary vaccenic acid has antiatherogenic effects in LDLr−/− mice. J. Nutr. 2010, 140, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Roopashree, P.; Shetty, S.S.; Kumari, N.S. Effect of medium chain fatty acid in human health and disease. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 87, 104724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Su, M.; Chen, D.; Zhou, J.; Shen, Q. Effects of Different Dietary Carbohydrate Sources on the Meat Quality and Flavor Substances of Xiangxi Yellow Cattle. Animals 2022, 12, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Ingredients and chemical composition of dietary-energy-density treatment in native Thai cattle diet [32].
Table 1. Ingredients and chemical composition of dietary-energy-density treatment in native Thai cattle diet [32].
ItemDietary Treatment 1Cassava PulpRice Straw
T1T2T3
Ingredients, %DM
   Rice straw503010
   Cassava pulp103050
   Cassava chip777
   Palm meal121212
   Soybean meal141414
   Rice bran555
   Urea0.70.70.7
   Mineral 20.80.80.8
   Limestone0.50.50.5
Total100100100
Analyzed chemical composition, %DM
   Dry matter46.241.133.223.892.8
   Organic matter88.490.893.698.288.0
   Crude protein13.814.315.02.22.7
   Ether extract3.53.33.40.80.9
   Neutral detergent fiber51.144.338.132.877.0
   Acid detergent fiber36.834.025.420.051.6
Energy density, MJ/kg DM
   Gross energy17.017.417.616.416.2
   Metabolizable energy (calculated)8.99.710.59.66.5
Cost, Baht/kg FM4.964.743.950.422.31
Cost, Baht/kg DM13.1912.6110.511.742.49
1 T1 = 8.9, T2 = 9.7, T3 = 10.5 MJ ME/kg DM, ME = Metabolizable energy density. 2 Chemical compositions were calcium = 164.00 g, cobalt = 0.04 g, copper = 1.00 g, iodine = 0.04 g, iron = 2.00 g, magnesium = 2.89 g, manganese = 11.00 g, phosphorus = 80.00 g, selenium = 0.03 g, sodium = 136.60 g, sulfur =19.20 g and carrier = 1000.00 g.
Table 2. Effect of dietary-energy-density treatment (T) 1 and aging time (A) on pH, cooking loss, and Warner–Bratzler shear force (WBSF) of Longissimus thoracis muscles of native Thai cattle.
Table 2. Effect of dietary-energy-density treatment (T) 1 and aging time (A) on pH, cooking loss, and Warner–Bratzler shear force (WBSF) of Longissimus thoracis muscles of native Thai cattle.
TraitTreatment (T) 1Aging (A)RMSE 2p-Value
T1T2T32 Days14 DaysTAT*As
pH5.655.565.595.565.630.180.5430.3490.969
Cooking loss (%)20.8120.7823.8719.95 b23.68 a2.910.0510.0020.066
WBSF (kg)8.91 a7.26 b7.74 b9.40 a6.34 b1.420.024<0.00010.802
a,b LS means having different superscripts within the same main effect are different (p < 0.05). 1 T1 = 8.9 MJ ME/kg, T2 = 9.7 MJ ME/kg, T3 = 10.5 MJ ME/kg; 2 root mean square error.
Table 3. Effect of dietary-energy-density treatment (T) 1 and aging time (A) on soluble, insoluble, and total collagen contents (mg/g wet weight) and collagen solubility (%) in Longissimus thoracis muscle of native Thai cattle.
Table 3. Effect of dietary-energy-density treatment (T) 1 and aging time (A) on soluble, insoluble, and total collagen contents (mg/g wet weight) and collagen solubility (%) in Longissimus thoracis muscle of native Thai cattle.
CollagenTreatment (T) 1Aging TimeRMSE 2p-Value
T1T2T32 Days14 DaysTAT*A
Soluble0.170.200.180.180.190.060.5370.3720.574
Insoluble2.583.002.762.96 a2.61 b0.420.0950.0230.468
Total2.753.202.953.14 a2.80 b0.430.0770.0370.462
% solubility6.326.346.325.686.972.190.9990.1100.585
a,b LS means with different superscripts within the same main effect are different (p < 0.05). 1 T1 = 8.9 MJ ME/kg, T2 = 9.7 MJ ME/kg, T3 = 10.5 MJ ME/kg; 2 root mean square error.
Table 4. Effect of dietary-energy-density treatment (T) 1 on fatty acid composition of Longissimus thoracis muscle of native Thai cattle aged for 2 days.
Table 4. Effect of dietary-energy-density treatment (T) 1 on fatty acid composition of Longissimus thoracis muscle of native Thai cattle aged for 2 days.
TraitTreatment 1RMSE 2p-Value
T1T2T3
Fatty acid compositiong/100 g total fatty acids (mg/100 g fresh meat)
 Decanoic acid (C10:0)0.33 a (14.82)0.12 b (7.79)0.14 b (5.46)0.110.024
 Lauric acid (C12:0)0.11 (5.01)0.11 (5.99)0.08 (3.26)0.050.549
 Tridecanoic acid (C13:0)0.07 (2.77)0.06 (3.69)0.06 (2.53)0.030.987
 Myristic acid (C14:0)2.73 (116.90) 3.02 (174.41)2.52 (107.25)0.760.636
 Myristoleic acid (C14:1)0.89 (38.82)1.10 (62.70)1.18 (49.60)0.360.449
 Pentadecanoic acid (C15:0)0.26 (10.71)0.19 (10.86)0.20 (8.45)0.060.162
 Ginkgolic acid (C15:1)0.12 (5.60)0.10 (6.21)0.13 (5.13)0.030.510
 Palmitic acid (C16:0)20.08 (836.20)20.67 (1209.13)18.35 (789.84)1.830.201
 Palmitoleic acid (C16:1)3.31 (140.01)3.73 (215.27)3.98 (169.45)0.520.160
 Margaric acid (C17:0)0.69 (29.99)0.70 (39.99)0.69 (29.90)0.100.998
 Heptadecenoic acid (C17:1)0.51 (21.97)0.51 (29.23)0.62 (26.37)0.080.139
 Stearic acid (C18:0)7.95 (328.81)7.21 (424.02)6.41 (275.35)1.500.310
 Vaccenic acid (C18:1n9t)0.52 a (21.75)0.15 b (8.82)0.24 b (10.18)0.120.003
 Oleic acid (C18:1n9c)58.28 (2444.18)59.27 (3443.02)61.75 (2710.62)4.580.498
 Trans-Linolelaidic acid (C18:2n6t)0.49 a (20.50)0.20 b (11.49)0.20 b (8.09)0.150.022
 Linoleic acid (C18:2n6c)1.44 (57.41)0.80 (46.81)0.92 (37.25)0.430.082
 γ-Linolenic acid (C18:3n6)0.14 (6.01)0.66 (40.80)0.75 (27.58)0.490.148
 ∝-Linolenic acid (C18:3n3)0.03 (1.61)0.04 (2.24)0.04 (1.64)0.010.947
 Arachidic (C20:0)0.19 (8.07)0.17 (10.24)0.17 (7.64)0.040.498
 Erucic acid (C20:1n9)0.18 (7.37)0.15 (8.69)0.17 (7.06)0.030.502
 Heneicosanoic Acid (C21:0)0.12 (4.87)0.14 (8.52)0.17 (8.06)0.040.116
 Eicosatrienoic acid (C20:3n6)0.31 a (13.09)0.09 b (5.23)0.18 b (6.63)0.100.022
 Docosanoic Acid (C22:0)0.10 (3.96)0.06 (4.06)0.09 (3.47)0.050.623
 Eicosatrienoic acid (C20:3n3) + Arachidonic acid (C20:4n6)0.55 (22.16)0.31 (18.61)0.41 (15.52)0.230.295
 Docosadienoic acid (C22:2)0.07 a (2.97)0.03 b (1.87)0.04 b (1.30)0.020.044
 Nervonic acid (C24:1)0.13 (5.52)0.08 (4.70)0.09 (3.48)0.050.176
 Docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6n3)0.37 (15.77)0.30 (18.22)0.41 (17.35)0.090.274
Total fatty acid (g/100 g)4.195.824.341.380.188
SFA (saturated fatty acid)32.6332.4628.903.770.282
MUFA (monounsaturated fatty acid)63.9665.1168.154.490.359
PUFA (polyunsaturated fatty acid)3.412.432.951.060.369
UFA (unsaturated fatty acid)78.7377.1780.453.770.282
UFA:SFA2.122.112.460.370.326
PUFA:SFA0.100.070.100.030.274
a,b LS means having different superscripts in the same row are different (p < 0.05).; 1 T1 = 8.9 MJ ME/kg, T2 = 9.7 MJ ME/kg, T3 = 10.5 MJ ME/kg; 2 root mean square error; SFA= C10:0 + C12:0 + C13:0 + C14:0 + C15:0 + C16:0 + C17:0 + C18:0 + C20:0 + C21:0 + C22:0; MUFA = C14:1 + C15:1 + C16:1 + C17:1 + C18:1n9t + C18:1n9c + 20:1n9 + C24:1; PUFA = C18:2n6t + C18:2n6c + C18:3n6 + C18:3n3 + C20:3n6 + (C20:3n3+C20:4n6) + C22:2 + C22:6n3; UFA = MUFA + PUFA.
Table 5. Effect of dietary-energy-density treatment (T) 1 on ribonucleotide content of Longissimus thoracis muscle of native Thai cattle aged for 2 days.
Table 5. Effect of dietary-energy-density treatment (T) 1 on ribonucleotide content of Longissimus thoracis muscle of native Thai cattle aged for 2 days.
Ribonucleotides (mg/100 g)Treatment 1RMSE 2p-Value
T1T2T3
Hypoxanthine5.044.215.311.170.424
Inosine19.8521.0821.416.690.927
Inosine monophosphate219.04211.29213.9515.070.707
Guanosine monophosphate2.862.783.040.200.277
1 T1 = 8.9 MJ ME/kg, T2 = 9.7 MJ ME/kg, T3 = 10.5 MJ ME/kg; 2 root mean square error.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chaosap, C.; Lukkananukool, A.; Polyorach, S.; Sommart, K.; Sivapirunthep, P.; Limsupavanich, R. Effects of Dietary Energy Density in a Fermented Total Mixed Ration Formulated with Different Ratios of Rice Straw and Cassava Pulp on 2- or 14-Day-Aged Meat Quality, Collagen, Fatty Acids, and Ribonucleotides of Native Thai Cattle Longissimus Muscle. Foods 2022, 11, 2046. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142046

AMA Style

Chaosap C, Lukkananukool A, Polyorach S, Sommart K, Sivapirunthep P, Limsupavanich R. Effects of Dietary Energy Density in a Fermented Total Mixed Ration Formulated with Different Ratios of Rice Straw and Cassava Pulp on 2- or 14-Day-Aged Meat Quality, Collagen, Fatty Acids, and Ribonucleotides of Native Thai Cattle Longissimus Muscle. Foods. 2022; 11(14):2046. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142046

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chaosap, Chanporn, Achara Lukkananukool, Sineenart Polyorach, Kritapon Sommart, Panneepa Sivapirunthep, and Rutcharin Limsupavanich. 2022. "Effects of Dietary Energy Density in a Fermented Total Mixed Ration Formulated with Different Ratios of Rice Straw and Cassava Pulp on 2- or 14-Day-Aged Meat Quality, Collagen, Fatty Acids, and Ribonucleotides of Native Thai Cattle Longissimus Muscle" Foods 11, no. 14: 2046. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142046

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop