Next Article in Journal
An 11-Year Analysis of Bacterial Foodborne Disease Outbreaks in Zhejiang Province, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Physicochemical Characteristics of Soluble Dietary Fiber Obtained from Grapefruit Peel Insoluble Dietary Fiber and Its Effects on Blueberry Jam
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Guava Pulp Microencapsulated in Mucilage of Aloe Vera and Opuntia ficus-indica as a Natural Dye for Yogurt: Functional Characterization and Color Stability
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Sulfated Polysaccharide from Red Algae (Gelidium crinale) to Suppress Cells Metastasis and MMP-9 Expression of HT1080 Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 11
Issue 15
10.3390/foods11152381
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Two Ascophyllum nodosum Fucoidans with Different Molecular Weights Inhibit Inflammation via Blocking of TLR/NF-κB Signaling Pathway Discriminately

by
Lilong Wang
1,
Linlin Wang
1,
Chunhong Yan
1,
Chunqing Ai
1,
Chengrong Wen
1,
Xiaoming Guo
2 and
Shuang Song
1,*
1
National Engineering Research Center of Seafood, School of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China
2
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Health, Institute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(15), 2381; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11152381
Submission received: 26 June 2022 / Revised: 27 July 2022 / Accepted: 4 August 2022 / Published: 8 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Dietary Fiber and Polysaccharide: Preparation, Structure and Health Benefits)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The present study aimed to clarify the potential mechanism of fucoidans found in Ascophyllum nodosum on anti-inflammation and to further explore the relationship between their structures and anti-inflammation. Two novel fucoidans named ANP-6 and ANP-7 and found in A. nodosum, were separated and purified and their structures were elucidated by HPGPC, HPLC, GC-MS, FT-IR, NMR, and by the Congo red test. They both possessed a backbone constructed of →2)-α-L-Fucp4S-(1→, →3)-α-L-Fucp2S4S-(1→, →6)-β-D-Galp-(1→, and →3,6)-β-D-Galp4S-(1→ with branches of →2)-α-L-Fucp4S-(1→ and →3)-β-D-Galp-(1→. Moreover, ANP-6 and ANP-7 could prevent the inflammation of the LPS-stimulated macrophages by suppressing the NO production and by regulating the expressions of iNOS, COX-2, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10. Their inhibitory effects on the TLR-2 and TLR-4 levels suggest that they inhibit the inflammation process via the blocking of the TLR/NF-κB signal transduction. In addition, ANP-6, with a molecular weight (63.2 kDa), exhibited stronger anti-inflammatory capabilities than ANP-7 (124.5 kDa), thereby indicating that the molecular weight has an influence on the anti-inflammatory effects of fucoidans.

1. Introduction

As a host immune system defense mechanism, inflammation restores cells to their normal condition after the pathogen invades the tissue structure and its function [1]. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are conserved groups of host transmembrane recognition receptors that are found in viral and bacterial products, as well as in other pathogens [2]. Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and gram-negative bacterial endotoxins are mainly sensed by Toll-like receptors-4 (TLR-4). Many researchers have reported that LPS are associated with the nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) and by activating the TLR-4, they promote the excessive production of inflammatory cytokines [3]. TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 are considered inflammation biomarkers, which play critical functions in some chronic inflammatory diseases [1]. Clinically, TLRs, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and cyclooxygenase enzymes are also crucial pharmacological targets for anti-inflammatory drugs [4]. However, most current anti-inflammatory drugs are not entirely operative for chronic inflammation and may have adverse side effects [4]. Hence, more efforts are needed in order to explore anti-inflammatory drugs with no or lower side effects.
As critical biological macromolecules, sulfated polysaccharides are isolated from marine animals, brown algae, and microorganisms [5]. In addition, sulfated polysaccharides have been proven to have anti-inflammatory [1] and anti-oxidation applications [6]. Fucoidan is a water-soluble, sulfate polysaccharide that is found in brown algae, and that mainly contains a large amount of α-(1→3)-linked L-fucose and sulfate groups [7]. Fucoidan from Saccharina japonica alleviates the NO production and inflammatory cytokine levels [8]. Furthermore, fucoidan from Padina commersonii can inhibit the nitric oxide (NO) production and that of inflammatory cytokines and suppress the inflammatory effects through the down-regulating of the NF-κB pathways [3]. A low molecular weight (8.1 kDa) of the fucoidan from Laminaria japonica and consisting of fucose and galactose, is known to alleviate the inflammatory factors in mice lung tissue [9]. These studies shed light on the positive impact of fucoidan in order to prevent inflammation. Given that the anti-inflammatory properties of fucoidans significantly depend on their structures [7], it is essential to analyze the structure of fucoidan found in brown algae. The molecular weight is a kind of structural factor, that can affect fucoidan bioactivities. A previous study demonstrated that a high molecular weight (386.1 kDa) of the sulfated polysaccharides from Sargassum cristaefolium showed a greater NO inhibitory activity [10]. However, the low-molecular-weight (5-30 kDa) of fucoidan from Macrocystis pyrifera showed stronger anti-inflammatory properties [11]. The relationship between molecular weight and anti-inflammation is still unclear [7] and more efforts are needed in order to obtain a reliable explanation.
East Asian countries, specifically Korea, China, and Japan, extensively use seaweeds (fucoidan-rich substance) as part of their diet [12]. Ascophyllum nodosum is one of the most critically economic brown algae, and it is one of the materials used in alginate production [13,14]. Our previous report showed that fucoidan from A. nodosum showed several differences in the structural features and reduced the incidence of antibiotic-induced colitis in vivo [14]. However, the relationship between the structure and the anti-inflammatory effects has not been fully elucidated. Therefore, the detailed structural information of two fucoidans isolated from A. nodosum was elucidated in the current study as well as their anti-inflammatory effects in the LPS-activated RAW 264.7 cells. In addition, the relative molecular weight and anti-inflammatory effects were also discussed. The present work aims to enlarge the knowledge of the structure-activity of fucoidan and to promote the application of the potential for new functional products using A. nodosum.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Chemicals

The brown seaweed A. nodosum was provided by Qingdao Brightmoon Seaweed Group Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China). The standard monosaccharides were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (MO, USA). Papain, pectinase, cellulase, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT), 1-phenyl-3-methyl-5-pyrazolone (PMP), and LPS were obtained from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All other chemicals of analytical reagent grade were supplied by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

2.2. Fucoidan from the A. nodosum Preparation

The fucoidan was isolated from A. nodosum by following the reported method [14,15]. Briefly, the brown algae A. nodosum was pulverized and then defatted three times. The residue was extracted with an enzyme mixture containing pectinase, cellulase, and papain in order to obtain the A. nodosum polysaccharide (ANP).
The ANP (0.5 g) was loaded into the DEAE-52 cellulose anion-exchange column (4.6 cm × 73 cm), and eluted by a 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, and 1.5 mol/L NaCl solution. The eight separated fractions ANP-1, ANP-2, ANP-3, ANP-4, ANP-5, ANP-6, ANP-7, and ANP-8 were collected and further purified through an ultrafiltration tube (30 kDa and 100 kDa). The polysaccharides were collected, dialyzed (molecular weight cut-off 3.5 × 103 Da), and lyophilized. The yields of ANP-6 and ANP-7 were higher than those of other fractions. Thus, ANP-6 and ANP-7 were used for further analysis.

2.3. Chemical Analysis

The contents of uronic acid [16], protein [17], total sugar [18], total polyphenols [19], and sulfate ester [20] were determined as described previously.
The purity and molecular weight distribution of ANP-6 and ANP-7 were examined using a Shimadzu HPLC (Shimadzu Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) system connected with the evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD) 6000 and TSK-gel G4000 column with 0.1 M ammonium acetate at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min [14]. The temperature and airflow rates in the drift tube of the ELSD were 85 °C and 2.5 L/min, respectively.

2.4. Monosaccharide Composition Analysis

The monosaccharide compositions of ANP-6 and ANP-7 were assessed by HPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Basel, Switzerland) [21]. Briefly, ANP-6 and ANP-7 were hydrolyzed at 121 °C for 3 h and derivatized at 70 °C for 0.5 h with PMP. The PMP residues were detected with an HPLC system equipped with a PAD detector at 249 nm. The 20 mM ammonium acetate (83%) and acetonitrile (17%) were used as the mobile phase at 1.0 mL/min.

2.5. Fourier-Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopic Analysis of ANP-6 and ANP-7

Each sample (1 mg) was dispersed in a KBr powder (100 mg). The spectra used an FT-IR Spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) in the range of 4000–400 cm−1 at 25 °C.

2.6. Congo Red Test of ANP-6 and ANP-7

The conformational structures of ANP-6 and ANP-7 were measured by the Congo red test method [22]. Each 1 mL sample solution (0 as control and 2 mg/mL) was mixed with 1 mL Congo red solution. Next, the NaOH solution (1 M) was added in order to obtain the mixtures of different gradient concentrations. Finally, the maximum absorption wavelength of the samples in a range of 400–600 nm was recorded with an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.7. Desulfation, Methylation, and GC-MS Analysis

The desulfation of ANP-6 and ANP-7 was carried out using the DMSO-methanol method [23]. Next, the desulfation residues were methylated according to the reported method [23,24]. Once the methylated products were hydrolyzed and reduced, the monosaccharides were transformed into the alditol acetates. Following the vortexing, the derivatives were analyzed with a 7980A/5979C GC-MS (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) using an HP-5MS column.

2.8. NMR Spectroscopy Analysis

The NMR measurements of ANP-6 (35 mg) and ANP-7 (35 mg), once individually dispersed in 500 μL of D2O (99.9%), were conducted using a 400 MHz NMR spectrometer (Bruker Corp., Rheinstetten, Germany) at 25 °C.

2.9. Cell Culture

The macrophage RAW 264.7 cells were supplied by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). The cells were maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 media from Gibco (Grand Island, NY, USA) and contained 10% heat-inactivated FBS, and were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2.

2.10. Cell Viability Assay

The cytotoxicity induced by ANP-6 and ANP-7 was analyzed using the MTT method [8]. The macrophages were seeded to 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well. Following cell growth for 24 h, the cells were cultured with a 100 μL serum-free medium sterilized using a 0.22 μm sterile filter that contained ANP-6 or ANP-7 at different concentrations. Twenty-four hours later, 20 μL MTT of the solution (5 mg/mL) was discarded. Following a further 4 h incubation, 150 μL of DMSO was added in order to dissolve the formazan crystals that had formed and the absorbance was measured at 490 nm.

2.11. Nitric Oxide (NO) Production Determination

The NO production was performed following the previous report [8] with minor modifications. The macrophages (1 × 104 cells/well) were plated in 96-well plates and then cultured for 24 h. Next, the different concentrations of ANP-6 (0 to 100 μg/mL) and ANP-7 (0 to 200 μg/mL) in the serum-free medium were added to the different wells for 2 h, and then the LPS was added in order to achieve the final concentration of 1 μg/mL. The LPS (1 μg/mL) was used as a positive control, and an equal volume of the serum-free RPIM 1640 medium was used as a blank control. Once cultured for 24 h, the nitrite levels were measured using a NO assay kit according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

2.12. Real-Time PCR Analysis

The suspended cells (6 × 104 cells/well) were added to 12-well plates and cultured for 24 h. The culture media of each well was then removed using a pipettor and the cells were then washed three times with the sterilized PBS. Next, 1 mL Trizol Reagent (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was added to each well and the cells were then removed and placed into a 1.5 EP tube (Sterile and DNase/RNase-Free) using a cell lifter and pipettor, according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The total mRNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using a Fast Quant RT Kit (Takara Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China). Furthermore, the quantitative RT-PCR reactions using the cDNA templates were performed using SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Takara Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) on a qTOWER detection system and calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. The primers are shown in Table S1 in Supplementary Materials.

2.13. Statistical Analysis

The data are presented as the mean ± SD. The Student’s t-test or Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was performed for the statistical differences between the groups. The value of p less than 0.05 was indicated as extremely significant.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Physicochemical Properties and the Monosaccharide Composition of ANP-6 and ANP-7

The crude fucoidan was isolated from A. nodosum through an enzymolysis treatment yielding 1.3% of dried materials. The ANP was classified by anion-exchange chromatography in order to afford the main fractions of ANP-6 and ANP-7 with a yield of 24.61% and 19.23% from the crude fucoidan, respectively (Figure 1A). Next, the purity and the molecular weight of ANP-6 and ANP-7 were determined using HPGPC. The single and symmetrical peaks are shown in Figure 1B, implying that ANP-6 and ANP-7 are homogeneous fucoidan. Furthermore, the average molecular weights of ANP-6 and ANP-7 were 63.2 kDa and 124.5 kDa, respectively. These results were lower than the previously reported fucoidan from A. nodosum, namely, 361.4 kDa and 1330.0 kDa [25,26]. The chemical contents are shown in Table 1. Following the analysis using the Student’s t-test, the contents of total sugar, uronic acid, sulfate, protein, and total polyphenols were not significantly different between the ANP-6 and ANP-7 fractions.
Following the acid hydrolysis and derivatization with PMP, the derivatives of the standard monosaccharides, ANP-6, and ANP-7 were analyzed using HPLC-photo-diode array (PDA) detectors at 249 nm. As is shown in Figure 1C, ANP-6 and ANP-7 were mainly composed of Man: Gal: Fuc, within a ratio of 1.0: 7.8: 31.2 and 1.0: 9.8: 49.2, respectively. In previous reports, fucoidan from A. nodosum were usually combined with GlcA, Xyl, Glc, and Man [6,22,23]. Thus, the ANP-6 and ANP-7 isolated from A. nodosum may have a different structure, compared with fucoidan from the same species.

3.2. FT-IR Spectroscopy Analysis of ANP-6 and ANP-7

The structural information of ANP−6 and ANP−7 was further confirmed by the FT-IR spectra recorded in the region of 4000–400 cm−1. In the FT-IR spectra (Figure 1D), the peaks at 3454 cm−1 and 2945 cm−1 were assigned to the stretching vibration of -OH bonds and C-H bonds [27]. The band at 1648 cm−1 corresponded to the water scissoring vibration [28]. The intense band at 1043 cm−1 was associated with the stretching vibration of the glycosidic linkage C-O [29]. In particular, the signal at 1238 cm−1 in ANP-6 and ANP-7 represented the asymmetrical S=O stretching vibration [30]. The peak at 845 cm−1 was caused by the stretching vibration of the symmetrical C-O-S in an axial position and that in the band at 592 cm−1 was assigned to the S-O stretching vibration [30,31]. Following desulfation, the bands of dS-ANP-6 and dS-ANP-7 at 1238 cm−1 and 845 cm−1 disappear, indicating that the sulfate groups were successfully removed. The results confirmed that ANP-6 and ANP-7 contained sulfate, which was consistent with the results of the chemical composition.

3.3. The Helix-Coil Transition of ANP-6 and ANP-7

The conformational structure of polysaccharides may also be attributed to their bioactivities [22], therefore the helix-coil transition of ANP−6 and ANP−7 were analyzed using the Congo red test. The analysis results for ANP−6 and ANP−7 are illustrated in Figure 1E. With the increased concentrations of NaOH, the maximum absorption wavelength of the Congo red-fucoidan complexes increased rapidly, indicating that ANP−6 and ANP−7 both have a triple-helix conformation [22]. The fucoidan from Sargassum fusiforme also displayed the triple helix structure which was damaged by the 0.2 M NaOH solution [32]. However, when the NaOH concentration reached 0.50 M, the triple helix structures of ANP−6 and ANP−7 were not destroyed. Those results suggest that ANP−6 and ANP−7 adopt a highly ordered conformation even under strongly alkaline conditions.

3.4. Methylation Analysis of dS-ANP-6 and dS-ANP-7

The existence of sulfate groups in acidic polysaccharides could affect their dissolution in a methylation solvent, so desulfation was used to simplify the methylation analysis [33]. The methylation analysis results of dS-ANP-6 and dS-ANP-7 are shown in Table 2. The primary type of methylated alditol acetates was attributed to 2,4-di-O-methylfucitol in dS-ANP-6 and dS-ANP-7, suggesting that their backbone was mainly composed of →3)-Fucp-(1→ residue. The position information of the sulfate groups and the branch chains were further analyzed and combined with the NMR results.

3.5. NMR Spectroscopy Analysis of ANP-6 and ANP-7

The NMR spectroscopy analysis can provide detailed structural information, including sequences, linkage formations, and the type of sugar residues [27]. Five signals mainly appeared in the range of 4.40–5.50 ppm and are observed in Figure 2A,B, suggesting that ANP-6 and ANP-7 have α- and β-configuration glycosidic bonds. Additionally, the anomeric proton of 5.34 ppm, 5.20 ppm, 4.68 ppm, 4.48 ppm, and 4.42 ppm are assigned to H-1 of B, A, C, D, and E. Five signal peaks of 98.5 ppm, 100.1 ppm, 102.7 ppm, 103.3 ppm, and 103.8 ppm correspond to the C-1 residues of B, A, C, D, and E (Figure 2C,D), respectively.
The spin correlated spectroscopy (COSY) experiment reflects the correlation between the adjacent protons of a sugar residue and the heteronuclear single-quantum correlated spectroscopy (HSQC) reflects the correlations between the protons and the adjacent carbons [34]. According to the report’s data of the fucoidan isolated from the seaweed [35,36,37], the cross-peaks in COSY (Figure 3A,B), and the HSQC spectra signals (Figure 3C,D) of ANP-6 and ANP-7 are assigned and summarized in Table 3. The total correlated signals were further assigned based on the interpretation of the TOCSY spectroscopy (Figure 4A,B), which could be assigned as →2)-α-L-Fucp-(1→ (A), →3)-α-L-Fucp-(1→ (B), →3,6)-β-D-Galp-(1→ (C), →6)-β-D-Galp-(1→ (D), and →3)-β-D-Galp-(1→ (E), which were in agreement with the methylation results. The sulfate groups of the fucoidan are usually located at the C-2 or C-4 positions of fucose residues [38]. Compared with previous reports [39], the chemical shifts of C4 signals of residue A significantly varied downfield at 81.0 ppm compared with no sulfated fucose residue with C4 at 71.0–73.0 ppm. The O-sulfate group could affect the adjacent carbon chemical shift (+6–10 ppm) [34]. The FT-IR results were also shown bands around 845 cm-1, indicating the majority of sulfates were at the equatorial C-4 positions [36] in ANP-6 and ANP-7. Thus, combining the analysis results of NMR and FT-IR, residue A was deduced to be a →2)-α-L-Fucp4S-(1→. Using the same methodology, residue B with C2 at 78.2 ppm and C4 at 80.3 ppm and residue C with C4 at 77.3 ppm were deduced to be →3)-α-L-Fucp2S4S-(1→ and →3,6)-β-D-Galp4S-(1→ residues, respectively, which correspond with the findings of the fucoidan extracted from brown algae [40,41].
In the NOESY spectra (Figure 4C,D), the inter-residual contacts of H1A-H2A, H1A-H6C, H1B-H3B, H1B-H3C, H1C-H3B, H1B-H6D, H1D-H6C, H3C-H1E, and H1C-H2A were observed, indicating the existence of A-(1→2)-A, A-(1→6)-C, B-(1→3)-B, B-(1→3)-C, C-(1→3)-B, B-(1→6)-D, D-(1→6)-C, C-(3→1)-E, and C-(1→2)-A linkages. Based on the methylation and the NMR spectrometry data, it could be inferred that ANP-6 and ANP-7 own the same repeating fragment and only differ in their polymerization degree. As shown in Figure 5, their structure is constructed with alternating →3)-α-L-Fucp2S4S-(1→, →2)-α-L-Fucp4S-(1→, →6)-β-D-Galp-(1→ and 3,6)-β-D-Galp4S-(1→, and branched with →2)-α-L-Fucp4S-(1→ and →3)-β-D-Galp-(1→ residues. These structural results are different from the reported sulfated polysaccharide from A. nodosum, which has a backbone of →2)-α-D-GlcpA-(1→2)-α-D-GlcpA-(1→6)-α-D-Galp-(1→2)-α-D-GlcpA-(1→ with a branch chain of T-α-D-Glcp-(1→4)-β-D-Xylp-(→3)-α-L-Fucp4S-(1→ at the O-3 of 3,6)-α-D-Galp-(1→ residue [42]. Some researchers recently reported that the fucoidan isolated from A. nodosum has a backbone of →3)-α-L-Fucp2S-(1→4)-α-L-Fucp2S3S-(1→ [36,43], which was different in the present study. Those differences may be owing to the different extraction methods [7]. In addition, ANP-6 and ANP-7 had relatively lower molecular weights, which could be an advantage for their applications for anti-inflammation [7].

3.6. Effects of ANP-6 and ANP-7 on Cell Viability and NO Production

Prior to assessing the anti-inflammatory properties of ANP-6 and ANP-7, the toxic impact of ANP-6 and ANP-7 was checked using the MTT viability assay. As shown in Figure 6A,B, both ANP-6 and ANP-7 exhibited no toxic effect on RAW264.7 cells at concentrations up to 100 μg/mL and 200 μg/mL, respectively. On the basis of these results, ANP-6 (0–100 μg/mL) and ANP-7 (0–200 μg/mL) were selected for the following analysis.
The NO production of the RAW 264.7 cells is one of the critical mediators for assessing the anti-inflammatory activity because NO, as a vital participant in inflammatory reactions, could induce pathological complications throughout the progress of cancer [44]. Thus, the effects of ANP-6 and ANP-7 on the NO inhibition of RAW 264.7 cells were analyzed. As shown in Figure 6C, LPS remarkably enhanced the NO production. However, the NO levels were dose-dependently reversed by ANP-6 (IC50 = 41.44 μg/mL) and ANP-7 (IC50 = 44.66 μg/mL), which were much more effective than the unpurified sulfated polysaccharide from A. nodosum [45]. A previous study suggested that polysaccharides with triple-helix configurations showed a stronger inhibitory effect on NO production [46]. Furthermore, both ANP-6 and ANP-7 could reduce the LPS-induced toxicity (Figure 6D), similar to the fucoidan from P. commersonii [3]. Therefore, ANP-6 and ANP-7 exhibited excellent inhibitory effects on NO production with no toxicity.

3.7. Effects of ANP-6 and ANP-7 on iNOS and COX-2 mRNA Expressions

The production of NO was associated with the levels of iNOS, and the high production of iNOS was often accompanied by upregulated COX-2 in the inflammatory process [3]. The gene transcription properties of iNOS and COX-2 were significantly secreted in the LPS group (Figure 7A,B). However, the up-regulated expression of iNOS and COX-2 could be dose-dependently reversed by ANP-6 and ANP-7. Pretreatment with 100 μg/mL ANP-6 and ANP-7 could decrease the expression of iNOS by 72.22% and 54.17%, respectively. Furthermore, the COX-2 production was significantly reduced by 74.84% and 46.93%, respectively. These results were similar to the fucoidan from S. japonica which significantly decreased the mRNA expressions of iNOS and COX-2 in the LPS-induced cells model [44].

3.8. Effects of ANP-6 and ANP-7 on the Inflammatory Cytokine mRNA Expression

The abundance of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) played a remarkable role in the process of inflammation [1,14]. As illustrated in Figure 7C–E, the mRNA transcription properties of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 were increased by 2.85-fold, 8.15-fold, and 6.85-fold by the LPS stimulation, respectively. Moreover, ANP-6 and ANP-7 could significantly decrease the TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels in a dose-dependent manner. Herein, the IL-6 expression was inhibited to 19.8% by ANP-6 and 37.08% by ANP-7 at 100 μg/mL. However, no obvious difference was observed in the TNF-α level and the IL-1β level between the ANP-6 treatment and the ANP-7 treatment at 100 μg/mL. As shown in Figure 7F, the ANP-6 and ANP-7 fractions could up-regulate the IL-10 level, a critical factor in preventing inflammation. Further analysis of the ratios of pro/anti-inflammatory cytokines (Figure 7G–I) showed that the proportions of TNF-α/IL-10, IL-1β/IL-10, and IL-6/IL-10 could be significantly decreased by ANP-6 and ANP-7 at 50 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL. The ANP-6 treatment significantly decreased the IL-1β/IL-10 ratio and IL-6/IL-10 ratio compared with the ANP-7 treatment at 100 μg/mL. The fucoidan from other brown seaweed could also decrease the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines and their half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of pro-inflammatory cytokines expression was reported to be 200 μg/mL [44] and more than 1 mg/mL [47], which was much higher than that of ANP-6 and ANP-7 of 50 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL, respectively. In addition, the IC50 value of the fucoidan from P. commersonii was 50 μg/mL [3], which was consistent with ANP-6. These results suggested that ANP-6 showed a better reduction of the IL-6 expression and up-regulation of the IL-10 expression, which suggested its superior anti-inflammatory effect.

3.9. Effects of ANP-6 and ANP-7 on the TLR-2 and TLR-4 mRNA Expression

Recently, many research studies indicated that LPS activated the inflammatory response by the TLR-2 or TLR-4 mediated NF-κB signal transduction [1,8]. To reveal the anti-inflammatory mechanism of ANP-6 and ANP-7, the expressions of TLR-2 and TLR-4 were evaluated. The activation with LPS significantly enhanced the expressions of TLR-2 and TLR-4. Both ANP-6 and ANP-7 showed down-regulated gene expressions of TLR-2 and TLR-4 (Figure 7J,K). At a concentration of 100 μg/mL, ANP-6 showed a stronger down-regulation in the expression of TLR-2 and TLR-4, which is consistent with the inhibition of inflammatory cytokines expression.
Previous studies have demonstrated that LPS could induce a macrophage differentiation into the M1-type phenotype by the TLR4-mediated NF-κB signaling pathway, which could lead to the over-production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [1,44]. Some fucoidan extracted from seaweed could protect against the LPS-induced macrophage by inhibiting the TLR/NF-κB signal transduction [1,3,8]. In the present study, the LPS-induced expression increases of TLR-2, TLR-4, TNF-α, IL-1β, iNOS, COX-2, and IL-6 related to the NF-κB pathway, were all down-regulated by the ANP-6 and ANP-7. Therefore, ANP-6 and ANP-7 may regulate the LPS-induced inflammation by blocking the TLR/NF-κB signal transduction and the possible signaling pathway that is proposed in Figure 7L. Some evidence indicates that polysaccharides with a higher fucose content, β-(1→3, 1→6) linkages, and triple-helix configurations show more remarkable anti-inflammatory capabilities [1,44,46]. So, the high fucose contents, →6)-β-D-Galp-(1→ and →3)-β-D-Galp-(1→ and triple-helix configurations of ANP-6 and ANP-7 may contribute to their potential anti-inflammatory activity. It could be noted that ANP-6 showed stronger inhibitory effects than ANP-7 at the same concentration. As observed in the in vivo models, a high-molecular-weight fucoidan could increase the infiltration of inflammatory cells in the tissue, while the fucoidan with low-molecular-weight could alleviate the phenomenon [9,47]. Based on the above results, ANP-6 showed a stronger capability, which could be attributed to its lower molecular weight compared with ANP-7.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, two fucoidans, ANP-6 and ANP-7, were obtained from A. nodosum. ANP-6 and ANP-7 have a remarkable similarity in the saccharide chain structure but only differ in molecular weight. Their backbones are both constructed with alternating →2)-α-L-Fucp4S-(1→, →3)-α-L-Fucp2S4S-(1→, →6)-β-D-Galp-(1→, and →3,6)-β-D-Galp4S-(1→, and branched with →2)-α-L-Fucp4S-(1→ and →3)-β-D-Galp-(1→ residues. Furthermore, The Congo red test shows that ANP-6 and ANP-7 both have a triple helix stereo configuration. Both ANP-6 and ANP-7 can regulate NO production and the mRNA expressions of iNOS, COX-2, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10 in the LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells. In addition, they inhibit inflammation by suppressing the TLR-2 and TLR-4 levels, suggesting the anti-inflammatory properties of ANP-6 and ANP-7 are associated with TLR/NF-κB signaling pathway. Of note, ANP-6, with a lower molecular weight, showed stronger anti-inflammatory effects, providing evidence for the important role of the molecular weight in the anti-inflammatory capabilities of the fucoidan. The findings from the current study indicate the potential application of fucoidan from A. nodosum as an anti-inflammatory agent.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods11152381/s1, Table S1. Primer sequences are used for quantitative RT-PCR reactions.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation: L.W. (Lilong Wang); data curation: L.W. (Lilong Wang) and L.W. (Linlin Wang); conceptualization: C.Y.; methodology: C.A.; validation: C.W. and X.G.; project administration: S.S.; supervision: S.S.; writing—review and editing: S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (NO. 2019YFD0902005).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

All of the participants in the study were provided with information about the experiment and agreed voluntarily.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jayawardena, T.U.; Sanjeewa, K.K.A.; Nagahawatta, D.P.; Lee, H.G.; Lu, Y.A.; Vaas, A.; Abeytunga, D.T.U.; Nanayakkara, C.M.; Lee, D.S.; Jeon, Y.J. Anti-inflammatory effects of sulfated polysaccharide from Sargassum swartzii in macrophages via blocking TLR/NF-Kappa b signal transduction. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Janssens, S.; Beyaert, R. Role of Toll-like receptors in pathogen recognition. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 16, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Sanjeewa, K.K.A.; Jayawardena, T.U.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, S.Y.; Fernando, I.P.S.; Wang, L.; Abetunga, D.T.U.; Kim, W.S.; Lee, D.S.; Jeon, Y.J. Fucoidan isolated from Padina commersonii inhibit LPS-induced inflammation in macrophages blocking TLR/NF-kappa B signal pathway. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 224, 115195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Terzi, M.; Altun, G.; Sen, S.; Kocaman, A.; Kaplan, A.A.; Yurt, K.K.; Kaplan, S. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs diseases. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 2018, 87, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kang, J.; Jia, X.; Wang, N.; Xiao, M.; Song, S.; Wu, S.; Li, Z.; Wang, S.; Cui, S.W.; Guo, Q. Insights into the structure-bioactivity relationships of marine sulfated polysaccharides: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 123, 107049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yuan, Y.; Macquarrie, D. Microwave assisted extraction of sulfated polysaccharides (fucoidan) from Ascophyllum nodosum and its antioxidant activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 129, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Apostolova, E.; Lukova, P.; Baldzhieva, A.; Katsarov, P.; Nikolova, M.; Iliev, I.; Peychev, L.; Trica, B.; Oancea, F.; Delattre, C.; et al. Immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects of fucoidan: A review. Polymers 2020, 12, 2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ni, L.Y.; Wang, L.; Fu, X.T.; Duan, D.L.; Jeon, Y.J.; Xu, J.C.; Gao, X. In vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory activities of a fucose-rich fucoidan isolated from Saccharina japonica. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 156, 717–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, N.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Geng, L.; Yue, Y.; Deng, Z.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Q. Low molecular weight fucoidan attenuating pulmonary fibrosis by relieving inflammatory reaction and progression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 273, 118567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, G.J.; Shiu, S.M.; Hsieh, M.C.; Tsai, G.J. Anti-inflammatory activity of a sulfated polysaccharide from the brown alga Sargassum cristaefolium. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 53, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ahmad, T.; Eapen, M.S.; Ishaq, M.; Park, A.Y.; Karpiniec, S.S.; Stringer, D.N.; Sohal, S.S.; Fitton, J.H.; Guven, N.; Caruso, V.; et al. Anti-inflammatory activity of fucoidan extracts in vitro. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Phull, A.R.; Kim, S.J. Fucoidan as bio-functional molecule: Insights into the anti-inflammatory potential and associated molecular mechanisms. J. Funct. Food. 2017, 38, 415–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yuan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Fan, J.; Clark, J.; Shen, P.; Li, Y.; Zhang, C. Microwave assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from four economic brown macroalgae species and evaluation of their antioxidant activities and inhibitory effects on alpha-amylase, alpha-glucosidase, pancreatic lipase and tyrosinase. Food Res. Int. 2018, 113, 288–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, L.; Ai, C.; Wen, C.; Qin, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, L.; Gong, Y.; Su, C.; Wang, Z.; Song, S. Fucoidan isolated from Ascophyllum nodosum alleviates gut microbiota dysbiosis and colonic inflammation in antibiotic-treated mice. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 5595–5606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, T.; Wu, S.; Ai, C.; Wen, C.; Liu, Z.; Wang, L.; Jiang, L.; Shen, P.; Zhang, G.; Song, S. Galactofucan from Laminaria japonica is not degraded by the human digestive system but inhibits pancreatic lipase and modifies the intestinal microbiota. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 166, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Filisetticozzi, T.; Carpita, N.C. Measurement of uronic-acids without interference from neutral sugars. Anal. Biochem. 1991, 197, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bradford, M.M. Rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utillizing principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dubois, M.; Gilles, K.A.; Hamilton, J.K.; Rebers, P.A.; Smith, F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Imbs, T.I.; Skriptsova, A.V.; Zvyagintseva, T.N. Antioxidant activity of fucose-containing sulfated polysaccharides obtained from Fucus evanescens by different extraction methods. J. Appl. Phycol. 2015, 27, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dodgson, K.S.; Price, R.G. A note on determination of ester sulphate content of sulphated polysaccharides. Biochem. J. 1962, 84, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wang, H.; Zhao, J.; Li, D.; Wen, C.; Liu, H.; Song, S.; Zhu, B. Comparison of polysaccharides of Haliotis discus hannai and Volutharpa ampullacea perryi by PMP-HPLC-MSn analysis upon acid hydrolysis. Carbohydr. Res. 2015, 415, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhao, T.; Mao, G.; Feng, W.; Mao, R.; Gu, X.; Li, T.; Li, Q.; Bao, Y.; Yang, L.; Wu, X. Isolation, characterization and antioxidant activity of polysaccharide from Schisandra sphenanthera. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 105, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Song, S.; Zhang, B.; Wu, S.F.; Huang, L.; Ai, C.Q.; Pan, J.F.; Su, Y.C.; Wang, Z.F.; Wen, C.R. Structural characterization and osteogenic bioactivity of a sulfated polysaccharide from pacific abalone (Haliotis discus hannai Ino). Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 182, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Needs, P.W.; Selvendran, R.R. Avoiding oxidative-degradation during sodium-hydroxide methyl iodide-mediated carbohydrate methylation in dimethyl sulfoxide. Carbohydr. Res. 1993, 245, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yin, J.Y.; Wang, J.; Li, F.H.; Yang, Z.X.; Yang, X.Q.; Sun, W.L.; Xia, B.; Li, T.; Song, W.G.; Guo, S.D. The fucoidan from the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum ameliorates atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 5124–5139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shang, Q.; Shan, X.; Cai, C.; Hao, J.; Li, G.; Yu, G. Dietary fucoidan modulates the gut microbiota in mice by increasing the abundance of Lactobacillus and Ruminococcaceae. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 3224–3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arab, K.; Ghanbarzadeh, B.; Ayaseh, A.; Jahanbin, K. Extraction, purification, physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity of a new polysaccharide from Ocimum album L. seed. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 180, 643–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, Y.; Mao, W.; Gao, Y.; Teng, X.; Zhu, W.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, C.; Li, N.; Wang, C.; Yan, M.; et al. Structural elucidation of an extracellular polysaccharide produced by the marine fungus Aspergillus versicolor. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 93, 478–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, G.J.; Bai, Y.X.; Zeng, Z.Q.; Peng, Y.J.; Zhou, W.T.; Shen, W.B.; Zeng, X.X.; Liu, Z.H. Structural characterization and immunostimulatory activity of heteropolysaccharides from fuzhuan brick tea. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 1368–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, X.M.; Li, S.N.; Liu, J.; Lin, L.S.; Sun, H.F.; Yang, W.J.; Cai, Y.; Gao, N.; Zhou, L.T.; Qin, H.B.; et al. A regular fucan sulfate from Stichopus herrmanni and its peroxide depolymerization: Structure and anticoagulant activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 256, 117513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gao, J.; Lin, L.Z.; Sun, B.G.; Zhao, M.M. Comparison study on polysaccharide fractions from Laminaria japonica: Structural characterization and bile acid binding capacity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 9790–9798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Liu, J.; Wu, S.Y.; Chen, L.; Li, Q.J.; Shen, Y.Z.; Jin, L.; Zhang, X.; Chen, P.C.; Wu, M.J.; Choi, J.I.; et al. Different extraction methods bring about distinct physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities of Sargassum fusiforme fucoidans. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 155, 1385–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yamazaki, K.; Inukai, K.; Suzuki, M.; Kuga, H.; Korenaga, H. Structural studies on a sulfated polysaccharide from an Arthrobacter sp. by NMR spectroscopy and methylation analysis. Carbohydr. Res. 1997, 305, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cheng, H.N.; Neiss, T.G. Solution, NMR spectroscopy of food polysaccharides. Polym. Rev. 2012, 52, 81–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zou, P.; Yang, X.; Yuan, Y.; Jing, C.L.; Cao, J.M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C.S.; Li, Y.Q. Purification and characterization of a fucoidan from the brown algae Macrocystis pyrifera and the activity of enhancing salt-stress tolerance of wheat seedlings. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 180, 547–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chevolot, L.; Foucault, A.; Chaubet, F.; Kervarec, N.; Sinquin, C.; Fisher, A.M.; Boisson-Vidal, C. Further data on the structure of brown seaweed fucans: Relationships with anticoagulant activity. Carbohydr. Res. 1999, 319, 154–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, Y.; Jiang, X.; Xie, H.; Li, X.; Shi, L. Structural characterization and antitumor activity of a polysaccharide from ramulus mori. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 190, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, Y.; Hu, T.; Li, J.; Xin, M.; Zhao, X. Structural characterization and effect on leukopenia of fucoidan from Durvillaea antarctica. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 256, 117529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bilan, M.I.; Ustyuzhanina, N.E.; Shashkov, A.S.; Thanh, T.T.T.; Bui, M.L.; Tran, T.T.; Bui, V.; Nifantiev, N.E.; Usov, A.I. A sulfated galactofucan from the brown alga Hormophysa cuneiformis (Fucales, Sargassaceae). Carbohydr. Res. 2018, 469, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Synytsya, A.; Kim, W.J.; Kim, S.M.; Pohl, R.; Synytsya, A.; Kvasnicka, F.; Copikova, J.; Park, Y.I. Structure and antitumour activity of fucoidan isolated from sporophyll of Korean brown seaweed Undaria pinnatifida. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 81, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rasin, A.B.; Silchenko, A.S.; Kusaykin, M.I.; Malyarenko, O.S.; Zueva, A.O.; Kalinovsky, A.I.; Jia, A.R.; Surits, V.V.; Ermakova, S.P. Enzymatic transformation and anti-tumor activity of Sargassum horneri fucoidan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 246, 116635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Jiang, Z.D.; Yu, G.; Bao, Q.Y.; Xu, X.; Zhu, Y.B.; Ni, H.; Li, Q.B.; Oda, T. Macrophage-stimulating activities of a novel low molecular weight saccharide fragment prepared from ascophyllan with alginate lyase. J. Funct. Food. 2020, 67, 103839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Foley, S.A.; Mulloy, B.; Tuohy, M.G. An unfractionated fucoidan from Ascophyllum nodosum: Extraction, characterization, and apoptotic effects in vitro. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 1851–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ye, J.; Chen, D.; Ye, Z.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, N.; Lui, E.M.K.; Xue, C.; Xiao, M. Fucoidan isolated from Saccharina japonica inhibits LPS-induced inflammation in macrophages via blocking NF-κB, MAPK and JAK-STAT pathways. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liang, Y.; Zha, S.; Tentaku, M.; Okimura, T.; Jiang, Z.; Ueno, M.; Hirasaka, K.; Yamaguchi, K.; Oda, T. Suppressive effects of sulfated polysaccharide ascophyllan isolated from Ascophyllum nodosum on the production of NO and ROS in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. Biosci. Biotech. Bioch. 2021, 85, 882–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jen, C.I.; Su, C.H.; Lai, M.N.; Ng, L.T. Comparative anti-inflammatory characterization of selected fungal and plant water soluble polysaccharides. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2021, 27, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Park, S.B.; Chun, K.R.; Kim, J.K.; Suk, K.; Jung, Y.M.; Lee, W.-H. The differential effect of high and low molecular weight fucoidans on the severity of collagen-induced arthritis in mice. Phytother. Res. 2010, 24, 1384–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Foods 11 02381 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical characteristics of the fucoidan from A. nodosum. Stepwise elution curve of the crude ANP on a DEAE−52 column (A), HPGPC profiles of ANP-6 and ANP-7 (B), FT−IR spectra of ANP-6, dS-ANP-6, ANP-7, and dS-ANP-7 (C), HPLC profiles of monosaccharide standards, ANP-6, and ANP-7 (D), and the Congo red experiment of ANP-6 and ANP-7 (E).
Figure 1. Chemical characteristics of the fucoidan from A. nodosum. Stepwise elution curve of the crude ANP on a DEAE−52 column (A), HPGPC profiles of ANP-6 and ANP-7 (B), FT−IR spectra of ANP-6, dS-ANP-6, ANP-7, and dS-ANP-7 (C), HPLC profiles of monosaccharide standards, ANP-6, and ANP-7 (D), and the Congo red experiment of ANP-6 and ANP-7 (E).
Foods 11 02381 g001
Foods 11 02381 g002 550
Figure 2. 1H NMR spectra of ANP-6 (A) and ANP-7 (B) and 13C NMR spectra of ANP-6 (C) and ANP-7 (D).
Figure 2. 1H NMR spectra of ANP-6 (A) and ANP-7 (B) and 13C NMR spectra of ANP-6 (C) and ANP-7 (D).
Foods 11 02381 g002
Foods 11 02381 g003 550
Figure 3. COSY spectra of ANP-6 (A) and ANP-7 (B) and HSQC spectra of ANP-6 (C) and ANP-7 (D).
Figure 3. COSY spectra of ANP-6 (A) and ANP-7 (B) and HSQC spectra of ANP-6 (C) and ANP-7 (D).
Foods 11 02381 g003
Foods 11 02381 g004 550
Figure 4. TOCSY spectra of ANP-6 (A) and ANP-7 (B) and NOESY spectra of ANP-6 (C) and ANP-7 (D).
Figure 4. TOCSY spectra of ANP-6 (A) and ANP-7 (B) and NOESY spectra of ANP-6 (C) and ANP-7 (D).
Foods 11 02381 g004
Foods 11 02381 g005 550
Figure 5. Hypothetical structures of ANP-6 and ANP-7.
Figure 5. Hypothetical structures of ANP-6 and ANP-7.
Foods 11 02381 g005
Foods 11 02381 g006 550
Figure 6. Effects of ANP-6 (A) and ANP-7 (B) on cell viability and NO production (C) and against LPS-induced toxicity (D). The results were expressed as means ± SD (n = 6). Values are significantly different from the LPS group at # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, and ### p < 0.001. Or * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 against the control group.
Figure 6. Effects of ANP-6 (A) and ANP-7 (B) on cell viability and NO production (C) and against LPS-induced toxicity (D). The results were expressed as means ± SD (n = 6). Values are significantly different from the LPS group at # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, and ### p < 0.001. Or * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 against the control group.
Foods 11 02381 g006
Foods 11 02381 g007 550
Figure 7. Effects of ANP-6 and ANP-7 on mRNA levels of iNOS (A), COX-2 (B), TNF-α (C), IL-1β (D), IL-6 (E), IL-10 (F), TNF-α/IL-10 ratio (G), IL-1β/IL-10 ratio (H), IL-6/IL-10 ratio (I), TLR-2 (J), TLR-4 (K) and the possible signaling pathways of ANP-6 and ANP-7 (L). Results were indicated as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Values are significantly different from the LPS treated or control group at * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. ns, not significant.
Figure 7. Effects of ANP-6 and ANP-7 on mRNA levels of iNOS (A), COX-2 (B), TNF-α (C), IL-1β (D), IL-6 (E), IL-10 (F), TNF-α/IL-10 ratio (G), IL-1β/IL-10 ratio (H), IL-6/IL-10 ratio (I), TLR-2 (J), TLR-4 (K) and the possible signaling pathways of ANP-6 and ANP-7 (L). Results were indicated as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Values are significantly different from the LPS treated or control group at * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. ns, not significant.
Foods 11 02381 g007
Table
Table 1. Chemical compositions of ANP-6 and ANP-7.
Table 1. Chemical compositions of ANP-6 and ANP-7.
SampleTotal Sugar
Content (%)		Uronic Acid
Content (%)		Sulfate Content
(%)		Protein Content (%)Total Polyphenols
Content (%)
ANP-661.67 ± 1.343.39 ± 0.2939.88 ± 1.610.01 ± 0.0050.01 ± 0.002
ANP-760.88 ± 1.362.70 ± 0.3742.06 ± 1.480.01 ± 0.0060.01 ± 0.003
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Data are the result of a statistical analysis using the Student’s t-test.
Table
Table 2. Methylation analysis and mode of linkage of dS-ANP-6 and dS-ANP-7.
Table 2. Methylation analysis and mode of linkage of dS-ANP-6 and dS-ANP-7.
SampleMethylated DerivativeDeduced LinkageCharacteristic
Fragments (m/z)		Molar Ratio
dS-ANP-62,3,4-Me3-FucpFucp-(1→43, 57, 71, 89, 101, 117, 129, 142, 161, 1891.1
2,3,4,6-Me4-GalpGalp-(1→43, 57, 71, 87, 101, 117, 129, 143, 161, 2052.4
2,4-Me2-Fucp→3)-Fucp-(1→43, 58, 85, 89, 101, 117, 131, 159, 173, 189, 201, 23312.6
3,4-Me2-Fucp→2)-Fucp-(1→43, 87, 99, 129, 143, 159, 189, 2012.6
2,4,6-Me3-Galp→3)-Galp-(1→43, 71, 87, 99, 101, 117, 129, 161, 173, 2331.6
2,3,4-Me3-Galp→6)-Galp-(1→43, 71, 87, 99, 101, 117, 129, 143, 161, 173, 189, 2331.0
2,4-Me2-Galp→3,6)-Galp-(1→43, 58, 87, 99, 101, 117, 129, 142, 161, 189, 2013.0
2,4,6-Me3-Manp→3)-Manp-(1→43, 59, 87, 101, 115, 129, 145, 173, 189, 2150.2
dS-ANP-72,3,4-Me3-FucpFucp-(1→43, 57, 71, 89, 101, 117, 129, 142, 161, 1891.2
2,3,4,6-Me4-GalpGalp-(1→43, 57, 71, 87, 101, 117, 129, 143, 161, 2052.3
2,4-Me2-Fucp→3)-Fucp-(1→43, 58, 85, 89, 101, 117, 131, 159, 173, 189, 201, 23313.6
3,4-Me2-Fucp→2)-Fucp-(1→43, 87, 99, 129, 143, 159, 189, 2012.4
2,4,6-Me3-Galp→3)-Galp-(1→43,71,87,99,101,117,129,161,173,2331.6
2,3,4-Me3-Galp→6)-Galp-(1→43, 71, 87, 99, 101, 117, 129, 143, 161, 173, 189, 2331.0
2,4-Me2-Galp→3,6)-Galp-(1→43, 58, 87, 99, 101, 117, 129, 142, 161, 189, 2012.9
2,4,6-Me3-Manp→3)-Manp-(1→43, 59, 87, 101, 115, 129, 145, 173, 189, 2150.2
Table
Table 3. Chemical shift assignments of ANP-6 and ANP-7.
Table 3. Chemical shift assignments of ANP-6 and ANP-7.
SampleSugar ResidueChemical Shift (ppm)
H1/C1H2/C2H3/C3H4/C4H5/C5H6/C6
ANP-6A→2)-α-L-Fucp4S-(1→5.20/100.13.71/74.64.02/68.94.50/81.03.86/67.91.16/15.6
B→3)-α-L-Fucp2S4S-(1→5.34/98.94.50/78.24.42/74.84.30/80.34.28/67.51.23/16.3
C→3,6)-β-D-Galp4S-(1→4.68/102.73.64/71.44.81/78.54.60/77.33.90/73.73.84/66.8
D→6)-β-D-Galp-(1→4.47/103.33.58/69.44.26/74.54.07/70.13.86/76.24.08/67.1
E→3)-β-D-Galp-(1→4.42/103.93.42/71.24.25/80.33.69/69.13.62/73.33.65/61.1
ANP-7A→2)-α-L-Fucp4S-(1→5.20/100.13.71/74.54.02/68.94.50/80.93.86/67.91.16/15.5
B→3)-α-L-Fucp2S4S-(1→5.33/98.74.50/78.34.43/75.04.31/80.34.28/67.51.27/16.4
C→3,6)-β-D-Galp4S-(1→4.68/102.93.64/71.54.82/78.34.60/77.33.89/73.53.84/66.8
D→6)-β-D-Galp-(1→4.48/103.23.58/69.34.28/74.54.08/70.13.85/76.34.07/67.1
E→3)-β-D-Galp-(1→4.40/103.83.42/71.24.25/80.43.70/69.13.62/73.23.65/61.1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, L.; Wang, L.; Yan, C.; Ai, C.; Wen, C.; Guo, X.; Song, S. Two Ascophyllum nodosum Fucoidans with Different Molecular Weights Inhibit Inflammation via Blocking of TLR/NF-κB Signaling Pathway Discriminately. Foods 2022, 11, 2381. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11152381

AMA Style

Wang L, Wang L, Yan C, Ai C, Wen C, Guo X, Song S. Two Ascophyllum nodosum Fucoidans with Different Molecular Weights Inhibit Inflammation via Blocking of TLR/NF-κB Signaling Pathway Discriminately. Foods. 2022; 11(15):2381. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11152381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Lilong, Linlin Wang, Chunhong Yan, Chunqing Ai, Chengrong Wen, Xiaoming Guo, and Shuang Song. 2022. "Two Ascophyllum nodosum Fucoidans with Different Molecular Weights Inhibit Inflammation via Blocking of TLR/NF-κB Signaling Pathway Discriminately" Foods 11, no. 15: 2381. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11152381

APA Style

Wang, L., Wang, L., Yan, C., Ai, C., Wen, C., Guo, X., & Song, S. (2022). Two Ascophyllum nodosum Fucoidans with Different Molecular Weights Inhibit Inflammation via Blocking of TLR/NF-κB Signaling Pathway Discriminately. Foods, 11(15), 2381. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11152381

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop