Next Article in Journal
Controlling the Interaction between Starchy Polyelectrolyte Layers for Adjusting Protein Release from Nanocapsules in a Simulated Gastrointestinal Tract
Next Article in Special Issue
Food Applications and Potential Health Benefits of Hawthorn
Previous Article in Journal
PCR Mediated Nucleic Acid Molecular Recognition Technology for Detection of Viable and Dead Foodborne Pathogens
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Attenuates Neuroinflammation Involved in Neurodegenerative Diseases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Memory-Enhancing Effect of 8-Week Consumption of the Quercetin-Enriched Culinary Herbs-Derived Functional Ingredients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

by
Jintanaporn Wattanathorn
1,*,
Woraluck Somboonporn
2,
Wipawee Thukham-Mee
1 and
Sudarat Sungkamnee
1
1
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Research Institute of High Human Performance and Health Promotion, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(17), 2678; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11172678
Submission received: 15 July 2022 / Revised: 22 August 2022 / Accepted: 27 August 2022 / Published: 2 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Foods Applied to Human Health Protection)

Abstract

:
Due to great demand for memory enhancers, the memory-enhancing effects and the possible underlying mechanisms of the functional ingredients derived from the combined extract of Polygonum odoratum and Morus alba were investigated. A total of 45 participants randomly received either a placebo or the developed herbal supplement at a dose of 50 or 1500 mg/day. The consumption was done once daily for 8 weeks. Working memory was assessed via both an event-related potential and computerized battery tests at baseline and at the end of the 8-week study period. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and monoamine oxidase type A and type B (MAO-A, MAO-B) levels were also measured at the end of the study. The subjects who consumed the supplement containing a developed functional ingredient at a dose of 1500 mg/day showed reduced latencies but increased amplitudes of N100 and P300. An improvement in working memory and the suppression of AChE, MAO-A, and MAO-B activities were also observed. Therefore, this study clearly demonstrates the cognitive enhancing effect of the developed herbal congee, which may be associated with the suppressions of AChE and both types of MAO.

1. Introduction

Currently, the demand for functional food ingredients or substances that provide health benefits beyond basic nutrition is growing fast due to an increase in the elderly population, health awareness of the consumer, and a paradigm shift in health to prevention medicine. It has been reported that functional food ingredients have gained much attention from the food and beverage industry [1]. Due to the growing popularity of food and beverage supplements aimed at memory enhancement, functional ingredients that can enhance and maintain memory are in great demand [2].
Memory, especially working memory, or the ability to maintain and manipulate information over a period [3], is necessary for daily life skills such as reading, comprehension, and problem-solving [4]. This capacity declines as age advances [5]. Normal age-related memory decline is modest, but severe memory decline causes memory impairment. Currently, we can monitor working memory by using event-related potential (ERP), a measurement of brain activity or neuronal biomarkers related to brain events, including working memory [6,7,8,9,10,11]. It is regarded as a good index for measuring cognitive function by providing the time course of information processing, including expectancy, attention, cognition search, decision making, and memorization [12,13]. The N100 component is a negative deflection of brain activity that occurs between 65 and 135 ms after the onset of an auditory stimulus and is largely distributed over the fronto-central regions of the brain, whereas the P300 component is a positive deflection of brain activity that can be observed between 280 and 350 ms after the onset of stimulus and is primarily distributed over the central–parietal region of the brain [14,15]. It has been reported that N100 reflects attention activation [14,16], whereas P300 reflects information processing [17]. The latency of a brain wave indicates neural speed or brain efficiency, whereas the amplitude of the wave indicates neural power or cognitive resources [18]. In addition to ERP, cognitive function, including working memory, can also be measured by standardized neuropsychological test batteries [19,20,21].
Memory impairment is recognized as one of the important problems in menopause [22], especially during the transition period. Around 49% of menopausal women are subjected to cognitive changes [23]. It has been demonstrated that subjective complaints are associated with working memory and attention performance as well as depression, anxiety, somatic complaints, and sleep disturbance [22]. These symptoms are reported to be associated with the level of estrogen [24,25]. In addition, several studies reveal that estrogen replacement therapy can improve the function of the frontal lobe and working memory [26] by modulating the functions of the cholinergic [27] and monoaminergic [25] systems. However, long-term treatment with estrogen replacement therapy can impair frontal lobe functions [28,29]. In addition, it is also associated with increased risks of breast cancer, stroke, coronary heart disease, pulmonary embolism, and uterine bleeding [30,31,32,33]. Therefore, a novel strategy to prevent cognitive impairment in menopausal women is still required.
Multiple lines of evidence have demonstrated that polyphenol substances enhance cognitive function in healthy adults [34]. Polyphenol-rich extracts of culinary herbs such as phak phai or Vietnamese coriander (Polygonum odoratum) and mohn or Morus alba also show neuroprotective and cognition-enhancing effects [35,36,37]. In addition, it has been revealed that the polyherbal recipe can provide benefits via synergistic interactions, leading to an increase in efficiency, a reduction in undesirable effects, an increase in stability or bioavailability, and a reduction of therapeutic dose [38]. Our previous study clearly demonstrated that the functional ingredient derived from the combined extract of P. odoratum and M. alba is safe to consume, without toxicity and side effects [39]. Owing to the memory-enhancing effects of both culinary herbs mentioned earlier and the synergistic interaction concept, it was hypothesized that functional ingredients containing the combined extract of P. odoratum and M. alba should enhance the cognitive function of peri- and postmenopausal women. Due to a lack of supporting evidence in clinical trial studies, this study was carried out to elucidate this issue. The possible underlying mechanisms were also further explored.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of the Culinary Herbs-Derived Functional Ingredients (MP)

The functional ingredient used in this study was prepared from the combined extract of phak phai or phak prew, or Polygonum odoratum, and mohn or Morus alba, two culinary herbs consumed widely in Thai cuisine, particularly in the north-east region of Thailand. The details have been mentioned elsewhere [39,40]. In brief, aerial parts of P. odoratum and leaves of Morus alba from Khon Kaen province were authenticated and prepared as a water extract by using the decoction method. Then, they were mixed with an appropriate ratio (petty patent number 9314, Department of Intellectual Property, Thailand). The final functional ingredient contained quercetin at a concentration of 22.846 mg quercetin equivalent (QE)/100 mg [39].
In this study, the developed functional ingredient was added to a congee-based formula at doses of 50 and 1500 mg/serving, which provided around 95.50 and 97.25 Kcal of energy, respectively. The placebo was also prepared using the same formulas, but no functional ingredient was added. The energy provided by each serving of placebo was 94.24 Kcal. The ingredients were described in detail by Wattanathorn et al., 2018 [39], and the fingerprint chromatogram was previously shown elsewhere [39].

2.2. Study Design

This study was performed as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. It was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT02563374) and was conducted in accordance with the International Conference of Harmonization (ICH) for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its further amendments. All protocols were reviewed and approved by the Khon Kaen University Ethical Committee on Human Research (HE571373).
The study is an 8-week intervention period consisting of 2 visits: a baseline visit (prior to an intervention) and an 8-week consumption period of a supplement containing the functional ingredient derived from the combined extract of M. alba and P. odoratum. A total of 75 Thai perimenopausal and postmenopausal women aged between 45 and 60 years old (<5 years of menstruation cessation) who lived in northeastern Thailand were enrolled to participate in this study. The recruitment procedures were performed through advertisements at the menopause clinic at Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand [39]. All participants in this study were women aged between 45 and 60 years old. They were free from serious physical illness such as diabetes, hypertension, allergies, and disorders of the heart, liver, kidney, lung, and mind. Within 3 months of participating in this study, they did not consume any medicines or hormones that affect the function of the nervous system. It was ensured that all subjects did not have alcohol addiction or drug abuse history and did not smoke more than 10 pieces/day. Participants were excluded on the basis of the following criteria: athletes, serious illness, smoking, and alcohol addiction. In addition, subjects who simultaneously participated in other intervention trials were also excluded. In total, 75 subjects were enrolled to participate in this study. Thirty subjects who did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded, and 45 participants who met all inclusion criteria were subjected to an interview through a semi-structured questionnaire and a physical examination. Written consent was obtained prior to participation in this study.
Using stratified randomization, all participants were allocated to the placebo group, the D1-treated group (functional ingredient 50 mg), or the D2-treated group (functional ingredient 1500 mg). To avoid confounding errors, it was ensured that tea, coffee, and alcoholic beverages were not consumed at least 12 h before the appointment on the experimental days. For 8 weeks, each intervention group was instructed to consume the assigned substance once daily in the morning before breakfast. Prior to the administration of the assigned substances, all subjects had their demographic data measured to ensure that there were no significant differences in any factors that can produce the confounding errors. In addition, the memory condition, attention, and functions of cholinergic and monoamine systems were evaluated by measuring parameters such as event-related potential (ERP), working memory, the activities of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and both monoamine oxidase type A and type B (MAO-A, MAO-B), and collected as baseline data. Then, at the end of the 8-week study period, all parameters mentioned earlier except demographic data and total phenolic compounds concentrations in serum were monitored. The sequences of all assessment tests were kept constant for all the volunteers. The schematic diagram illustrating the experimental protocol is shown in Figure 1. The instructions for the tests were explained to the volunteers before conducting the study. All volunteers were kept in the dark about whether they were taking D1 (MP 50 mg/serving), D2 (MP 1500 mg/serving), or placebo. The code numbers and the group allocation were revealed only after the assessment of the last subject. All volunteers were instructed to call the study center in case of any adverse effects during the study. The volunteers had the option to withdraw from the study at any time. However, throughout the study period, no subject withdrew. All volunteers were contacted at definite intervals to ensure that they consumed the assigned substance regularly.

2.3. Outcome Measurements

2.3.1. Event-Related Potential

Due to the high validity and low bias of the objective data [41], we used objective data such as ERP, a validated factor indicating working memory [13], as the primary outcome. Brain activity was measured using Ag-AgCl disk electrodes on the scalp, according to the international 10/20 system, with reference to linked earlobes using a 40-channel electrode cap (Neuroscan, Inc., Sterling, FL, USA). The detailed procedures are mentioned elsewhere [42]. In brief, the subjects must differentiate between two tones of auditory stimuli (650 Hz and 1 kHz) that served as targeted and non-targeted stimuli delivered at 60 dB via a headphone with a 1250 msec interstimulus interval. The non-targeted tone was provided 85% of total stimuli, whereas the targeted tone was provided 15% of total stimuli. The participants were informed to respond to each tone by pressing the response button in front of them. Using Scan 4.3 analysis software (Neuroscan, Inc., Sterling, FL, USA), the analysis was performed based on changes in latency and peak amplitude of N100 and P300 at Cz locations, which showed the optimum peak patterns [39]. The epochs were extracted from the EEG-free artifact beginning with a 100 msec pre-stimulus and ending with a 500 msec post-stimulus. The baseline correction was applied to each epoch, and voltage changes below 0.1 μV or above 50 μV were excluded from the analysis. N100 was defined as a negative peak that appeared between 65 and 135 msec, whereas P300 was defined as a positive peak that appeared between 280 and 350 msec.

2.3.2. Working Memory Assessment

In this study, four domains of working memory, consisting of power of attention, continuity of attention, quality of memory, and speed of memory, were assessed using a computerized battery test as described elsewhere [16,43,44]. The test-retest reliability in each domain of working memory varied between 0.72 and 0.82 (power of attention = 0.75, continuity of attention = 0.78, quality of working memory = 0.82, and speed of memory = 0.72). A selection of computer-controlled tasks from the system was administered, and the tasks were presented on VGA color monitors for 20 min. All responses were recorded via two-button (YES/NO) response boxes. The computerized battery test was administered to all subjects in the following order.

Word Presentation

The subjects were given a 15-word test that was matched for frequency and concreteness via a monitor with a stimulus duration and an interstimulus interval of 1 s. They had to recall each sequence in the correct order.

Picture Presentation

The participants were shown a set of 20 photographic images. They were displayed on the monitor at a rate of 1 every 3 s, with a stimulus duration of 1 s. They had to recall the presentation.

Simple Reaction Time

In this test, the subjects were exposed to a set of 15 stimuli with an interstimulus interval that varied randomly between 1 and 3.5 s. They were instructed to press the “yes” response button as quickly as possible every time the word “yes” was displayed on the monitor, and their reaction time was recorded.

Digit Vigilance Task

During the vigilance test, a target digit was randomly selected and constantly displayed to the right of the monitor screen. A series of digits were displayed in the center of the screen at a rate of 80 /min, and the participant had to press the “yes” button as quickly as possible every time the digit in the series matched the target digit. Both accuracy (%) and reaction time (milliseconds) were recorded.

Choice Reaction Time

The subjects were shown the word “no” or “yes” on a monitor, and they had to press the corresponding button as quickly as possible. Both a reaction time (millisecond) and accuracy (%) were recorded. In this test, there were 50 trials, in which the stimulus word was chosen randomly with equal probability, with a randomly varying interstimulus interval of 1 to 3.5 s.

Spatial Working Memory

On a motor screen, the participants were shown a picture of a house with four of its nine windows lit. They had to recall the position of the illuminated windows and match it to a subsequent presentation of 36 pictures of the house. They had to respond by pressing the “yes” or “no” response button as quickly as possible. Both reaction time and accuracy were recorded.

Numeric Working Memory

The subjects were instructed to memorize a 5-digit stimuli from the presentation and to match them with the new set of 30 probe digits. The response must be given by pressing the “yes” or “no” response button as quickly as possible. This process was repeated two times with different stimuli and probe digits. The mean of both reaction times and the accuracy of responses were recorded.
According to the aforementioned tasks, power of attention was derived from the response time of simple reaction time, choice reaction time, and digit vigilance, whereas continuity of attention was derived from the accurate responses of choice reaction time and digit vigilance tasks as indices. Quality of memory was obtained from the accurate responses of spatial working memory, numeric working memory, word recognition, picture recognition, and spatial memory, while the speed of memory was derived from response times of numeric and spatial working memory as well as word and picture recognition tasks.

2.4. Biochemical Assessments

2.4.1. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) Activity Assessment

The AChE activity of the supplement was determined using a modified Ellman’s method [45]. In brief, the reaction mixture containing 25 µL of 15 mM ATCI, 75 µL of 3 mM DTNB, and 50 µL of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) was put into a 96-well microplate and mixed with an aliquot of the tested substance at a volume of 25 µL. Then, the mixture was subjected to a 5 min incubation period. At the end of the incubation period, absorbance was measured at 415 nm (iMark™ Microplate Absorbance Reader). Then, 10 µL of acetylcholine thiochloride (ACTI) was added and incubated for 3 min. The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 415 nm and activity was calculated according to the equation below and expressed as mmol/min.g protein:
AChE activity = (rA/1.36 × 104) × 1/(20/230)C
(Ra = difference in absorbance/minute, C = protein concentration of brain homogenate).

2.4.2. Monoamine Oxidase (MAO) Assessment

Both monoamine oxidase type A and type B (MAO-A, and MAO-B) were measured based on the principle that an amino substrate is converted by MAO into aldehyde, amine, and hydrogen peroxide, which then oxidize 4-aminoantipyrine in the presence of peroxidase. The oxidized 4-aminoantipyrine is condensed with vanillic acid to give a red quinoneimine dye, which can be measured at 498 nm. For the assessment of MAO-A, 50 µL of the sample and 50 µL of 500 nM pargyline were mixed and incubated for 30 min. Then, 200 µL of P-tyramine 500 µM was added, and the absorbance was measured at 490 nm. In order to assess MAO-B activity, all procedures were performed, with the exception of 50 µL of 500 nM chogyline being replaced with 500 nM pargyline [46,47].

2.5. Determination of Total Phenolic Compounds

The serum phenolic compound was assessed using the Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method, which has been described elsewhere [48]. In brief, an aliquot of 20 µL of the tested sample was mixed with 0.2 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and 2 mL of distilled water. Then, the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 5 min. At the end of the incubation period, 1 mL of 20% sodium carbonate was added and incubated at room temperature for 2 h. The total polyphenolic compounds were determined using a spectrophotometer to measure the absorbance at 765 nm. Gallic acid was used as a standard and the total phenolics were expressed as gallic acid equivalents (mg/L GAE/mg extract). All measurements were made in triplicate.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Sample size calculations were performed to test the difference between each experimental group and placebo. An evaluable sample size of 15 subjects per group was expected to provide 80% power (two-sided, a = 0.05) based on the ability to detect a 10% difference in brain wave activity, which was used as a primary outcome.
All data were expressed as mean ± SD. An intent-to-treat analysis was performed. Differences in all data were analyzed via analysis of variance. A non-parametric test was used for the analysis of data that failed to show normal distribution. In all statistical comparisons, differences with p-value < 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Data of Subjects

The baseline data of all participants are shown in Table 1. No significant differences were observed among different intervention groups.

3.2. Changes in Event-Related Potential

The effects of various doses of the supplement containing the combined extract of M. alba leaves and P. odoratum (MP) on the late component of ERP are shown in Figure 2 and Table 2. It was found that after 8 weeks of consumption, the volunteers who consumed the supplement with the functional ingredient (MP) at a dose of 1500 mg per day showed a reduction in N100 and P300 latencies as well as an increase in the amplitudes of both waves (p-value < 0.01 all; p-value < 0.001 all; compared to the placebo-treated group).

3.3. Working Memory Changes

Table 3 shows that the subjects who consumed the supplement containing the functional ingredient (MP) at a dose of 1500 mg per day significantly increased their % response accuracy in the delayed word recognition test, picture recognition test, and spatial memory test (p-value < 0.05 all; compared to the placebo group). The volunteers who consumed the supplement containing the functional ingredient at a dose of 1500 mg (p-value < 0.05 all; compared to the placebo group) showed a decrease in response time in the delayed word recognition test, simple reaction time test, digit vigilance test, numeric recognition test, picture recognition test, and spatial memory test. Furthermore, the subjects who consumed MP at a dose of 50 mg per day also showed a significant reduction in reaction time in delayed word recognition and simple reaction time test but an increase in % response accuracy of the picture recognition test at the end of the study period (p-value < 0.05 all; compared to the placebo group).

3.4. Changes in Cholinergic and Monoaminergic Functions

The possible underlying mechanisms for the positive modulation effect of the developed herbal congee were also investigated. The serum activities of AChE and both types of MAO, the indirect indicators of the cholinergic and monoaminergic functions, were determined. The data are shown in Figure 3. It was found that prior to the interventions, no significant differences were observed in the activities of AChE, MAO-A, and MAO-B in serum of the placebo and both intervention groups. However, the subjects who consumed the supplement containing the combined extract of P. odorontum and M. alba (MP) at a dose of 1500 mg per day showed a significant reduction in the activities of AChE, MAO-A, and MAO-B in serum (p-value < 0.01 all; compared to the placebo-treated group).

3.5. Serum Level of Total Phenolic Compounds

Figure 4 shows the serum levels of total phenolic compounds of the subjects in all intervention groups. It was shown that the serum level of the total phenolic compounds in the subjects who consumed the supplement containing P. odoratum and M. alba at a dose of 1500 mg per day was significantly higher than that of the placebo group (p-value < 0.001; compared to the placebo-treated group). No significant difference in this parameter was observed in the subjects who consumed a low dose (50 mg) of the supplement containing the combined extract of P. odoratum and M. alba.

4. Discussion

The current study clearly demonstrates that the developed supplement containing the combined extract of P. odoratum and M. alba at a dose of 1500 mg per day exhibits a cognition-enhancing effect by increasing the amplitudes of both N100 and P300 but decreasing the N100 latency. The subjects in this group also have an increased percentage of accuracy response in the word recognition test, picture recognition test, and spatial memory test. In addition, the subjects in this group also show an increase in the percentage of accuracy response and a decrease in reaction time in the digit vigilance test. Moreover, they also have decreased activities of AChE, MAO-A, and MAO-B in serum.
The current study clearly demonstrates that subjects who consumed the supplement with the functional ingredient at a dose of 1500 mg per day show an increase in accuracy response in delayed word recognition, picture recognition, and spatial memory tests, the tests commonly used for motoring recognition working memory [49,50]. According to the tests mentioned, the volunteers must hold and retrieve stored information. Thus, these data indicate that this group of volunteers show an improvement in the quality of working memory [51], which in turn reflects an improvement in cognitive abilities [52]. Furthermore, our data also reveal an accuracy response elevation and response time reduction in the digit vigilance task, a validity test for assessing attention [53,54,55,56]. Therefore, these data point out that the supplement containing the functional ingredient at a dose of 1500 mg per day can enhance attention and working memory, which in turn indirectly indicates an improvement in cognitive processing abilities.
To ensure the positive modulation effect of the supplement containing the functional ingredient in this study, we also monitored both attention and cognitive processing. It has been revealed that P300 is a sensitive tool for measuring cognitive deterioration [57,58]. Due to the correlation between cognitive impairment and modification in P300, it can be used to measure the efficacy of various treatments on cognitive function [13,59,60]. N100 in ERP is also used to reflect attention [61,62,63,64]. It indicates the initial extraction of information from the sensory analysis of stimulus, which involves attention [65,66]. Our data demonstrate that the volunteers who consumed the supplement containing the functional ingredient at a dose of 1500 mg per day showed a decrease in latency but an increase in the amplitudes of N100 and P300. These findings reflect the improvement in attention and cognitive processing induced by the investigated substance. Furthermore, the findings observed in event-related potential also correspond with the changes obtained from computerized battery tests. Therefore, our data clearly demonstrate that the supplement containing the functional ingredient at a dose of 1500 mg can improve attention to stimuli and cognitive processing, which in turn improve working memory.
To explore the possible underlying mechanism of the developed product, we also determined the effect of the product consumption on the alterations of the cholinergic and monoaminergic systems, which play crucial roles in memory processes [44,67,68,69,70,71], indirectly via the suppression of AChE, MAO-A, and MAO-B, the enzymes that play crucial roles in the inactivation of cholinergic and monoaminergic neurotransmitters [72,73]. It was shown that there is a reduction in AChE, MAO-A, and MAO-B in the volunteers who consumed the supplement containing the functional ingredient at a dose of 1500 mg per day. These findings suggest an increase in cholinergic and monoaminergic functions. Owing to the pivotal roles of both cholinergic and monoaminergic transmitters on memory, particularly attention and cognitive processing, as mentioned earlier, we suggest that the memory enhancement observed in this study may be associated partly with an increase in the functions of the cholinergic system and the monoaminergic system such as serotonin and dopamine due to the suppression of the inactivation processes of acetylcholine and monoamine transmitters, leading to an improvement in synaptic transmission and synchronization of neuronal populations in attention and cognitive processing circuits, resulting in an improvement in working memory [44,70,74,75]. These changes are manifested by the improvement in recognition tests such as word recognition, picture recognition, and spatial memory tests, as well as a reduction in the latencies but an increase in the amplitudes of N100 and P300 brain waves.
Our data correspond to a previous study that shows the cognition-enhancing effect of polyphenol-rich substances in young and middle-aged adults [76] and the cognition-enhancing effect of quercetin-enriched onion [77]. The current data reveal that the total polyphenolic compound content in the serum of volunteers of other groups fail to show a significant change at the end of the study, whereas the subjects in the high dose treatment group show a significant elevation in serum. Therefore, the positive modulation effect on memory observed in this study may possibly relate to the polyphenolic compound content, such as quercetin, present in the supplement containing the functional ingredient derived from the combined extract of M. alba and P. odoratum.
The major strength of our study is its randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design. Compliance with the consumption of the developed product was 100% in all groups. In addition, we use the brain wave, validated objective data, together with a battery of computerized psychometric tests. This study provides a validated and sensitive tool for assessing the working memory of Thai menopausal and elderly women to ensure the positive modulation effect of the developed functional ingredient. The possible mechanism of the developed product is also explored in parallel with the cognitive function assessment in order to avoid other confounding errors such as the effect of different environments and emotions. However, a limitation of this study is the difference in lifestyles, environment, physical activity, mood of subject, level of social and cultural interaction, and diet, all of which can modulate the epigenetic mechanism. However, we minimized the influence of polyphenol-enriched food consumption and physical activity by measuring both amount and types of food intake and physical activity per week, and no significant changes were observed.

5. Conclusions

This study clearly demonstrates that the functional ingredient developed from the combined extract of M. alba and P. odoratum significantly increases working memory in menopausal women. The underlying mechanism may occur through an increase in the function of both cholinergic and monoaminergic systems, the neurotransmitters that play a crucial role in the memory process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.W. and W.S.; methodology, J.W. and W.S.; formal analysis, J.W., S.S. and W.S.; investigation, S.S.; resources, J.W., W.T.-M. and W.S.; Methodology, J.W. and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.W. and W.T.-M.; writing—review and editing, J.W. and W.T.-M.; supervision, J.W. and W.S.; project administration, J.W.; funding acquisition, J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Research Institute for High Human Performance and Health Promotion, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Khon Kaen University (HE 571373, approval date 17 December 2014).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by an Integrative Complementary Alternative Medicine Research and Development Center in the Research Institute for Human High Performance and Health Promotion, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand. The authors also would like to express sincere thanks to all participants in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wensing, S. Market Research of Advanced Materials: Understanding the World of Functional Ingredients. In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology; John-Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  2. McDougall, G.J., Jr.; Austin-Wells, V.; Zimmerman, T. Utility of nutraceutical products marketed for cognitive and memory enhancement. J. Holist. Nurs. 2005, 23, 415–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Constantinidis, C.; Klingberg, T. The neuroscience of working memory capacity and training. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2016, 17, 438–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dziemian, S.; Appenzeller, S.; von Bastian, C.C.; Jäncke, L.; Langer, N. Working Memory Training Effects on White Matter Integrity in Young and Older Adults. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 605213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pliatsikas, C.; Veríssimo, J.; Babcock, L.; Pullman, M.Y.; Glei, D.A.; Weinstein, M.; Goldman, N.; Ullman, M.T. Working memory in older adults declines with age, but is modulated by sex and education. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2019, 72, 1308–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Drew, T.W.; McCollough, A.W.; Vogel, E.K. Event-related potential measures of visual working memory. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 2006, 37, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Leiser, S.C.; Dunlop, J.; Bowlby, M.R.; Devilbiss, D.M. Aligning strategies for using EEG as a surrogate biomarker: A review of preclinical and clinical research. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011, 81, 1408–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sakkalis, V. Applied strategies towards EEG/MEG biomarker identification in clinical and cognitive research. Biomark. Med. 2011, 5, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Al-Qazzaz, N.K.; Ali, S.H.B.M.; Ahmad, S.A.; Chellappan, K.; Islam, M.S.; Escudero, J. Role of EEG as Biomarker in the Early Detection and Classification of Dementia. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, e906038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fraga, F.J.; Mamani, G.Q.; Johns, E.; Tavares, G.; Falk, T.H.; Phillips, N.A. Early diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s with event-related potentials and event-related desynchronization in N-back working memory tasks. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 2018, 164, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Assecondi, S.; Villa-Sánchez, B.; Shapiro, K. Event-related potentials as markers of efficacy for combined working memory training and transcranial direct current stimulation regimens: A proof-of-concept study. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 837979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tandon, O.P.; Mahajan, A. Averaged evoked potentials: Event related potentials (ERPs) and their applications. Indian J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1999, 43, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Thakur, L.; Ray, K.; Anand, J.P.; Panjwani, U. Event related potential (ERP) P300 after 6 months residence at 4115 meter. Indian J. Med. Res. 2011, 134, 113–117. [Google Scholar]
  14. Thornton, A.R.; Harmer, M.; Lavoie, B.A. Selective attention increases the temporal precision of the auditory N100 event-related potential. Hear. Res. 2007, 230, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pratt, N.; Willoughby, A.; Swick, D. Effects of working memory load on visual selective attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2011, 5, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Saenghong, N.; Wattanathorn, J.; Muchimapura, S.; Tongun, T.; Piyavhatkul, N.; Banchonglikitkul, C.; Kajsongkram, T. Zingiber officinale improves cognitive function of the middle-aged healthy women. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2012, 2012, 383062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nagaraj, N.K.; Atcherson, S.R. Investigation the association between working memory, speech identification in noise, and P300 in adults with hearing impairment. J. Hear. Sci 2017, 7, 41–46. [Google Scholar]
  18. Van Dinteren, R.; Arns, M.; Jongsma, M.L.; Kessels, R.P. P300 development across the lifespan: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87347. [Google Scholar]
  19. Foti, M.; Lo Buono, V.; Corallo, F.; Palmeri, R.; Bramanti, P.; Marino, S. Neuropsychological assessment in migraine patients: A descriptive review on cognitive implications. Neurol. Sci. 2017, 38, 553–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vives, M.; López-Navarro, E.; García-Campayo, J.; Gili, M. Cognitive impairments and depression: A critical review. Actas Esp. Psiquiatr. 2015, 43, 187–193. [Google Scholar]
  21. Moss, M.; Hewitt, S.; Moss, L.; Wesnes, K. Modulation of cognitive performance and mood by aromas of peppermint and ylang-ylang. Int. J. Neurosci. 2008, 118, 59–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Weber, M.; Mapstone, M.; Staskiewicz, J.; Maki, P.M. Reconciling subjective memory complaints with objective memory per-formance in the menopausal transition. Menopause 2012, 19, 735–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bromberger, J.T.; Kravitz, H.M.; Chang, Y.-F.; Cyranowski, J.M.; Brown, C.; Matthews, K.A. Major depression during and after the menopausal transition: Study of women’s health across the Nation (SWAN). Psychol. Med. 2011, 41, 1879–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hampson, E.; Morley, E.E. Estradiol concentrations and working memory performance in women of reproductive age. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013, 38, 2897–2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Epperson, C.N.; Amin, Z.; Ruparel, K.; Gur, R.; Loughead, J. Interactive effects of estrogen and serotonin on brain activation during working memory and affective processing in menopausal women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2012, 37, 372–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Duff, S.J.; Hampson, E. A beneficial effect of estrogen on working memory in postmenopausal women taking hormone replacement therapy. Horm. Behav. 2000, 38, 262–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Smith, Y.R.; Bowen, L.; Love, T.M.; Berent-Spillson, A.; Frey, K.A.; Persad, C.C.; Reame, N.K.; Koeppe, R.A.; Zubieta, J.-K. Early initiation of hormone therapy I menopausal women is associated with increased hippocampal and posterior cingulate cholinergic activity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, E1761–E1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fluck, E.; File, S.E.; Rymer, J. Cognitive effects of ten years of hormone-replacement therapy with tibolone. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2002, 22, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. File, S.E.; Heard, J.E.; Rymer, J. Trough oestradiol levels associated with cognitive impairment in post-menopausal women after 10 years of oestradiol implants. Psychopharmacology 2002, 161, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rossouw, J.E.; Anderson, G.L.; Prentice, R.L.; LaCroix, A.Z.; Kooperberg, C.; Stefanick, M.L.; Jackson, R.D.; Beresford, S.A.A.; Howard, B.V.; Johnson, K.C.; et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy post-menopausal women: Principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002, 288, 321–333. [Google Scholar]
  31. Barentsen, R. The climacteric in the Netherlands: A review of Dutch studies on epidemiology, attitudes and use of hormone replacement therapy. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1996, 64, S7–S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Breckwoldt, M.; Keck, C.; Karck, U. Benefits and risks of hormone replacement therapy. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1995, 53, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Beral, V. Million Study Collaborators. Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet 2003, 362, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ammar, A.; Trabelsi, K.; Müller, P.; Bouaziz, B.; Boukhris, O.; Glenn, J.M.; Bott, N.; Driss, T.; Chtourou, H.; Müller, N.; et al. The effect of (poly)phenol-rich interventions on cognitive functions and neuroprotective measures in healthy aging adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nicolakakis, N.; Aboulkassim, T.; Ongali, B.; Lecrux, C.; Fernandes, P.; Rosa-Neto, P.; Tong, X.-K.; Hamel, E. Complete rescue of cerebrovascular function in aged Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mice by antioxidants and pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonist. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 9287–9296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Niidome, T.; Takahashi, K.; Goto, S.; Goh, Y.M.; Tanaka, N.; Kamei, K. Mulberry leaf extract prevents amyloid beta-peptide fibril formation and neurotoxicity. NeuroReport 2007, 18, 813–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Srichaikul, B. The study of pharmacological efficacy in dry mulberry Burirum 60 in mild stage of Alzheimer’s disease. Adv. Nat. Sci. 2012, 5, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  38. Aiyegoro, O.A.; Okoh, A.I. Use of bioactive plant products in combination with standard antibiotics: Implications in antimicrobial chemotherapy. J. Med. Plants Res. 2009, 3, 1147–1152. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wattanathorn, J.; Somboonporn, W.; Sungkamanee, S.; Thukummee, W.; Muchimapura, S. A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial evaluating the effect of polyphenol-rich herbal congee on bone turnover markers of the perimenopausal and menopausal Women. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 2091872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sungkamanee, S.; Wattanathorn, J.; Muchimapura, S.; Thukham-mee, W. Antiosteoporotic effect of combined extract of Morus alba and Polygonum odoratum. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2014, 2014, 579305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tempelaar, D.; Rienties, B.; Nguyen, Q. Subjective data, objective data and the role of bias in predictive modelling: Lessons from a dispositional learning analytics application. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0233977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Thukham-mee, W.; Wattanathorn, J.; Kirisattayakul, W.; Wannanon, P. Effect of single administration of mulberry milk on the cognitive function of 6–12-year-old children: Results from a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 6123759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wattanathorn, J.; Mator, L.; Muchimapura, S.; Tongun, T.; Pasuriwong, O.; Piyawatkul, N.; Yimtae, K.; Sripanidkulchai, B.; Singkhoraard, J. Positive modulation of cognition and mood in the healthy elderly volunteer following the administration of Centella asiatica. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 116, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Peth-Nui, T.; Wattanathorn, J.; Muchimapura, S.; Tong-Un, T.; Piyavhatkul, N.; Rangseekajee, P.; Ingkaninan, K.; Vittaya-Areekul, S. Effects of 12-week Bacopa monnieri consumption on attention, cognitive processing, working memory, and functions of both cholinergic and monoaminergic systems in healthy elderly volunteers. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 2012, 606424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Elmann, G.L.; Courtney, K.D.; Andres, V., Jr.; Featherstone, R.M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1961, 7, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Holt, A.; Sharman, D.F.; Baker, G.B.; Palcic, M.M. A continuous spectrophotometric assay for monoamine oxidase and related enzymes in tissue homogenates. Anal. Biochem. 1997, 244, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Stafford, G.I.; Pederson, P.D.; Jäger, A.K.; Van Staden, J. Monoamine oxidase inhibition by southern African traditional medicinal plants. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2007, 73, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Quettier-Deleu, C.; Gressier, B.; Vasseur, J.; Dine, T.; Brunet, C.; Luyckx, M.; Cazin, M.; Cazin, J.-C.; Bailleul, F.; Trotin, F. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) hulls and flour. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 72, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Baddeley, A.D.; Allen, R.J.; Hitch, G.J. Binding in visual working memory: The role of the episodic buffer. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49, 1393–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ally, B.A. Using pictures and words to understand recognition memory deterioration in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: A review. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2012, 12, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Satler, C.; Belham, F.S.; Garcia, A.; Tomaz, C.; Tavares, M.C. Computerized spatial delayed recognition span task: A specific tool to assess visuospatial working memory. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2015, 24, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wesnes, K.A.; Ward, T.; McGinty, A.; Petrini, O. The memory enhancing effects of a Ginkgo biloba/Panax ginseng combination in healthy middle-aged volunteers. Psychopharmacology 2000, 152, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hahn, L.A.; Rose, J. Working memory as an indicator for comparative cognition—Detecting qualitative and quantitative differences. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kelland, D.Z.; Lewis, R.F. The Digit Vigilance Test: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to diazepam. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 1996, 11, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, C.; Lin, G.; Chen, M.; Hsueh, I.-P.; Hsieh, C.-L. Development of a computerized digit vigilance test and validation in patients with stroke. J. Rehabil. Med. 2015, 47, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lin, G.H.; Wu, C.T.; Huang, Y.J.; Lin, P.; Chou, C.Y.; Lee, S.C.; Hsieh, C.L. A reliable and valid assessment of sustained attention for patients with schizophrenia: The computerized digit vigilance test. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2018, 33, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jiang, S.; Qu, C.; Wang, F.; Liu, Y.; Qiao, Z.; Qiu, X.; Yang, X.; Yang, Y. Using event-related potential P300 as an electrophysiological marker for differential diagnosis and to predict the progression of mild cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis. Neurol. Sci. 2015, 36, 1105–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tsolaki, A.; Kosmidou, V.; Hadjileontiadis, L.; Kompatsiaris, I.; Tsolaki, M. Brain source localization of MMN, P300 and N400: Aging and gender differences. Brain Res. 2015, 1603, 32–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Picton, T.W. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1992, 9, 456–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Salisbury, D.F.; Rutherford, B.; Shenton, M.E.; McCarley, R.W. Button-pressing affects P300 amplitude and scalp topography. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 112, 1676–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hillyard, S.A.; Hink, R.F.; Schwent, V.L.; Picton, T.W. Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science 1973, 182, 177–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Näätänen, R. Attention and Brain Function; Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  63. Coull, J.T. Neural correlates of attention and arousal: Insights from electrophysiology, functional neuroimaging and psychopharmacology. Prog. Neurobiol. 1998, 55, 343–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Golob, E.J.; Starr, A. Serial position effects in auditory event-related potentials during working memory retrieval. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2004, 16, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hansen, J.C.; Hillyard, S.A. Temporal dynamics of human auditory selective attention. Psychophysiology 1988, 25, 316–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pratte, M.S.; Ling, S.; Swisher, J.D.; Tong, F. How attention extracts objects from noise. J. Neurophysiol. 2013, 110, 1346–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Clark, C.R.; Geffen, G.M.; Geffen, L.B. Role of monoamine pathways in attention and effort: Effects of clonidine and methylphenidate in normal adult humans. Psychopharmacology 1986, 90, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pekkonen, E.; Jääskeläinen, I.P.; Kaakkola, S.; Ahveninen, J. Cholinergic modulation of preattentive auditory processing in aging. NeuroImage 2005, 27, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Newman, E.L.; Gupta, K.; Climer, J.R.; Monaghan, C.K.; Hasselmo, M.E. Cholinergic modulation of cognitive processing: Insights drawn from computational models. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2012, 6, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Logue, S.F.; Gould, T.J. The neural and genetic basis of executive function: Attention, cognitive flexibility, and response inhibition. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2014, 123, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Takano, H. Cognitive function and monoamine neurotransmission in schizophrenia: Evidence from positron emission tomography studies. Front. Psychiatry 2018, 9, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bortolato, M.; Chen, K.; Shih, J.C. Monoamine oxidase inactivation: From pathophysiology to therapeutics. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1527–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Guo, L.; Suarez, A.I.; Thompson, C.M. Inactivation of acetylcholinesterase by various fluorophores. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2010, 25, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ragozzino, M. The contribution of cholinergic and dopaminergic afferents in the rat prefrontal cortex to learning, memory, and attention. Psychobiology 2000, 28, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kuo, H.I.; Qi, F.X.; Paulus, W.; Kuo, M.F.; Nitsche, M. A noradrenergic enhancement of motor learning, attention, and working memory in humans. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021, 24, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ammar, A.; Trabelsi, K.; Boukhris, O.; Bouaziz, B.; Müller, P.; Glenn, J.M.; Bott, N.T.; Müller, N.; Chtourou, H.; Driss, T. Effects of polyphenol-rich interventions on cognition and brain health in healthy young and middle-aged adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 90, 1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nishihira, J.; Nishimura, M.; Kurimoto, M.; Kagami-Katsuyama, H.; Hattori, H.; Nakagawa, T.; Muro, T.; Kobori, M. The effect of 24-week continuous intake of quercetin-rich onion on age-related cognitive decline in healthy elderly people: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group comparative clinical trial. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 2021, 69, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram illustrating experimental protocol.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram illustrating experimental protocol.
Foods 11 02678 g001
Figure 2. Representative image of event-related potential (ERP) at Cz location showing the latency and amplitude of N100 and P300 waves of the subjects who received the placebo and MP at the doses of 50 and 1500 mg/day.
Figure 2. Representative image of event-related potential (ERP) at Cz location showing the latency and amplitude of N100 and P300 waves of the subjects who received the placebo and MP at the doses of 50 and 1500 mg/day.
Foods 11 02678 g002
Figure 3. The effect of various doses of the developed supplement containing the combined extract of Polygonum odoratum and Morus alba leaves on the activities of the neurotransmitter inactivation enzymes in the subjects who consumed the assigned substances at the end of the 8-week study period. (A) Acetylcholinesterase (AChE). (B) Monoamine oxidase type A (MAO-A). (C) Monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) (N = 15/group). Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Data are analyzed using ANOVA. ** p-value < 0.01; compared to the placebo group.
Figure 3. The effect of various doses of the developed supplement containing the combined extract of Polygonum odoratum and Morus alba leaves on the activities of the neurotransmitter inactivation enzymes in the subjects who consumed the assigned substances at the end of the 8-week study period. (A) Acetylcholinesterase (AChE). (B) Monoamine oxidase type A (MAO-A). (C) Monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) (N = 15/group). Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Data are analyzed using ANOVA. ** p-value < 0.01; compared to the placebo group.
Foods 11 02678 g003
Figure 4. Serum level of the total phenolic compounds in the subjects who consumed the assigned substances at the end of the 8-week study period. (N = 15/group). Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Data are analyzed using ANOVA. *** p-value < 0.001; compared to the placebo group.
Figure 4. Serum level of the total phenolic compounds in the subjects who consumed the assigned substances at the end of the 8-week study period. (N = 15/group). Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Data are analyzed using ANOVA. *** p-value < 0.001; compared to the placebo group.
Foods 11 02678 g004
Table 1. The demographic data of subjects.
Table 1. The demographic data of subjects.
ParametersPlaceboMP 50 mg/DayMP 1500 mg/Day
Age (years)51.41 ± 4.2150.47 ± 3.20
F(1,28) = 0.536
P = 0.470
50.47 ± 3.64
F(1,28) = 0.484
P = 0.492
Education (years)7.73 ± 4.897.73 ± 4.13
F(1,28) = 0.000
P = 1.000
7.47 ± 4.50
F(1,28) = 0.024
P = 0.878
Body mass index24.27 ± 2.9125.23 ± 3.52
F(1,28) = 0.652
P = 0.426
24.91 ± 3.81
F(1,28) = 0.269
P = 0.608
Blood sugar87.33 ± 13.5084.67 ± 6.89
F(1,28) = 0.464
P = 0.501
88.93 ± 15.04
F(1,28) = 0.094
P = 0.761
Uric acid5.34 ± 0.775.05 ± 0.76
F(1,28) = 1.097
P = 0.304
5.43 ± 0.92
F(1,28) = 0.078
P = 0.782
Heart rate77.00 ± 12.8673.20 ± 9.20
F(1,28) = 1.269
P = 0.269
74.27 ± 8.66
F(1,28) = 0.779
P = 0.385
Respiratory rate19.80 ± 2.4018.00 ± 1.98
F(1,28) = 1.063
P = 0.332
18.80 ± 1.82
F(1,28) = 1.656
P = 0.209
Systolic blood
pressure (mmHg)
115.80 ± 11.48118.67 ± 13.84
F(1,28) = 0.381
P = 0.542
119.13 ± 13.06
F(1,28) = 0.551
P = 0.464
Diastolic blood
pressure (mmHg)
75.87 ± 8.9378.00 ± 9.38
F(1,28) = 0.407
P = 0.529
76.33 ± 8.47
F(1,28) = 0.022
P = 0.884
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation. (N = 15/group).
Table 2. The effect of various doses of the developed supplement containing the combined extract of Polygonum odoratum and Morus alba leaves on event-related potential (ERP).
Table 2. The effect of various doses of the developed supplement containing the combined extract of Polygonum odoratum and Morus alba leaves on event-related potential (ERP).
Brain WaveGroupBaseline8 Weeks
N100
amplitude (μV)
Placebo12.85 ± 7.8613.59 ± 4.52
MP 50 mg/day9.93 ± 6.77
F(1,28) = 1.601
P = 0.206
14.35 ± 5.24
F(1,28) = 0.589
P = 0.443
MP 1500 mg/day9.38 ± 6.76
F(1,28) = 2.201
P = 0.333
20.06 ± 6.43 **
F(1,28) = 10.808
P = 0.004
N100
latency (msec)
Placebo111.47 ± 23.26102.47 ± 13.26
MP 50 mg/day110.07 ± 25.59
F(1,28) = 0.025
P = 0.877
98.73 ± 18.35
F(1,28) = 0.408
P = 0.528
MP 1500 mg/day108.00 ± 22.65
F(1,28) = 0.171
P = 0.682
75.40 ± 6.78 ***
F(1,28) = 49.575
P < 0.001
P300 amplitude (UV)Placebo17.54 ± 10.3116.94 ±7.20
MP 50 mg/day16.69 ± 5.74
F(1,28) = 1.708
P = 0.191
20.14 ± 7.56
F(1,28) = 3.806
P = 0.051
MP 1500 mg/day14.65 ± 7.40
F(1,28) = 2.235
P = 0.327
26.28 ± 6.15 ***
F(1,28) = 23.847
P < 0.001
P300 latency (msec)Placebo317.87 ± 32.54323.20 ± 23.12
MP 50 mg/day328.87 ± 16.47
F(1,28) = 0.190
P = 0.663
307.47 ± 14.66
F(1,28) = 1.447
P = 0.229
MP 1500 mg/day330.93 ± 32.08
F(1,28) = 0.379
P = 0.827
280.40 ± 11.82 **
F(1,28) = 11.248
P = 0.004
Values are expressed as mean ± SD (N = 15/group). Data are analyzed using ANOVA. **, *** p-value < 0.01, 0.001, respectively, compared to the placebo group.
Table 3. The effect of various doses of the developed supplement containing the combined extract of Polygonum odoratum and Morus alba leaves on working memory assessed using computerized battery tests.
Table 3. The effect of various doses of the developed supplement containing the combined extract of Polygonum odoratum and Morus alba leaves on working memory assessed using computerized battery tests.
ParametersGroupsBaseline8 Weeks
(1) Delayed word
recognition
(% accuracy)
Group 1: Placebo
Group 2: MP 50 mg/day
Group 3: MP 1500 mg/day
81.56 ± 9.33
82.44 ± 14.10
78.89 ± 11.25
84.44 ± 9.65
84.89 ± 9.50
90.66 ± 5.37 *
(2) Delayed word recognition reaction time (msec)Group 1: Placebo
Group 2: MP 50 mg/day
Group 3: MP 1500 mg/day
1911.15 ± 474.01
1936.77 ± 627.23
1958.92 ± 721.37
1632.90 ± 650.36
1229.69 ± 239.25 *
1276.61 ± 285.61 *
(3) Simple reaction time (msec)Group 1: Placebo
Group 2: MP 50 mg/day
Group 3: MP 1500 mg/day
769.44 ± 206.93
690.37 ± 173.31
761.06 ± 193.27
738.08 ± 246.57
611.36 ± 112.72 *
585.41 ± 60.23 **
(4) Digit vigilance
(% accuracy)
Group 1: Placebo
Group 2: MP 50 mg/day
Group 3: MP 1500 mg/day
55.56 ± 25.66
53.33 ± 24.82
62.22 ± 25.78
66.70 ± 18.86
74.00 ± 14.27
86.81 ± 8.02 ***
(5) Digit vigilance reaction time (msec)Group 1: Placebo
Group 2: MP 50 mg/day
Group 3: MP 1500 mg/day
657.91 ± 71.39
666.77± 42.22
647.59± 60.11
641.63 ± 39.38
656.10 ± 61.20
583.35 ± 84.79 *
(6) Choice reaction time (%accuracy)Group 1: Placebo
Group 2: MP 50 mg/day
Group 3: MP 1500 mg/day
96.93 ± 6.13
97.60 ± 8.95
97.47 ± 2.56
98.80 ± 1.66
98.67 ± 1.63
98.27 ± 1.49
(7) Choice reaction time response (msec)Group 1: Placebo
Group 2: MP 50 mg/day
Group 3: MP 1500 mg/day
888.53 ± 122.17
946.71 ± 139.12
985.10 ± 122.45
875.51 ± 159.11
871.84 ± 112.36
828.72 ± 110.44
(8) Numeric working memory (% accuracy)Group 1: Placebo
Group 2: MP 50 mg/day
Group 3: MP 1500 mg/day
90.00 ± 9.76
91.78 ± 10.30
83.53 ± 16.20
91.96 ± 10.51
93.33 ± 8.07
91.11 ± 9.14
(9) Numeric working memory reaction time (msec)Group 1: Placebo
Group 2: MP 50 mg/day
Group 3: MP 1500 mg/day
1332.83 ± 296.88
1402.40 ± 333.81
1327.19 ± 318.30
1384.53 ± 558.66
1171.37 ± 320.52
1095.34 ± 129.58 *
(10) Picture recognition (% accuracy)Group 1: Placebo
Group 2: MP 50 mg/day
Group 3: MP 1500 mg/day
79.33 ± 7.04
83.00 ± 9.22
78.00 ± 9.41
83.00 ± 10.14
90.67 ± 9.42 *
89.67 ± 5.50 *
(11) Picture recognition reaction time (msec)Group 1: Placebo
Group 2: MP 50 mg/day
Group 3: MP 1500 mg/day
2044.87 ± 677.74
1963.24 ± 668.95
1759.14 ± 482.52
1565.55 ± 377.62
1348.75 ± 256.59
1300.18 ± 380.14 *
(12) Spatial working memory (% accuracy)Group 1: Placebo
Group 2: MP 50 mg/day
Group 3: MP 1500 mg/day
78.85 ± 19.89
79.81 ± 17.52
72.05 ± 22.64
82.37 ± 14.84
86.21 ± 9.78
92.59 ± 5.00 *
(13) Spatial working memory reaction time (msec)Group 1: Placebo
Group 2: MP 50 mg/day
Group 3: MP 1500 mg/day
2052.41 ± 802.14
2037.64 ± 709.31
1659.07 ± 402.16
1778.10 ± 525.19
1570.62 ± 346.19
1411.81 ± 241.06 *
Values are expressed as mean ± SD (N = 15/group). Data are analyzed using ANOVA. *, **, *** p-value < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively, compared to the placebo group.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wattanathorn, J.; Somboonporn, W.; Thukham-Mee, W.; Sungkamnee, S. Memory-Enhancing Effect of 8-Week Consumption of the Quercetin-Enriched Culinary Herbs-Derived Functional Ingredients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Foods 2022, 11, 2678. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11172678

AMA Style

Wattanathorn J, Somboonporn W, Thukham-Mee W, Sungkamnee S. Memory-Enhancing Effect of 8-Week Consumption of the Quercetin-Enriched Culinary Herbs-Derived Functional Ingredients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Foods. 2022; 11(17):2678. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11172678

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wattanathorn, Jintanaporn, Woraluck Somboonporn, Wipawee Thukham-Mee, and Sudarat Sungkamnee. 2022. "Memory-Enhancing Effect of 8-Week Consumption of the Quercetin-Enriched Culinary Herbs-Derived Functional Ingredients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial" Foods 11, no. 17: 2678. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11172678

APA Style

Wattanathorn, J., Somboonporn, W., Thukham-Mee, W., & Sungkamnee, S. (2022). Memory-Enhancing Effect of 8-Week Consumption of the Quercetin-Enriched Culinary Herbs-Derived Functional Ingredients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Foods, 11(17), 2678. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11172678

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop