Next Article in Journal
Food Banks against Climate Change, a Solution That Works: A Case Study in Navarra, Spain
Next Article in Special Issue
Insights into Protective Effects of Different Synbiotic Microcapsules on the Survival of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum by Electrospraying
Previous Article in Journal
The Motivations for Consumption of Edible Insects: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pulsed Light Application for Campylobacter Control on Poultry Meat and Its Effect on Colour and Volatile Profile
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Purification of Camellia Oil by Inorganic Ceramic Membrane

Foods 2022, 11(22), 3644; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11223644
by Danyu Cao 1,2,3, Lili Gai 1,2,3, Debao Niu 1,2,3,*, Yarong Li 1,2,3, Jianbin Li 1,2,3, Run Tian 1,2,3 and Kai Li 1,2,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Foods 2022, 11(22), 3644; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11223644
Submission received: 22 September 2022 / Revised: 31 October 2022 / Accepted: 7 November 2022 / Published: 15 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Emerging Nonthermal Technologies in the Food Industry)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The subject investigated is of interest to the readers. The manuscript is very well written, however, minor amendments are required to improve the overall quality. 

A complete report on the manuscript is attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

 

Manuscript n. “foods-1956948-peer-review”

 Comments:

 The manuscript is a report of the results obtained in the purification of camellia virgin oil by inorganic ceramic membranes.

Membrane performances in the degumming process are reported and the quality of the purified oil is documented, included viscosity measurements. As a whole, the manuscript is interesting.

The “materials and methods” section is clear and well detailed with reference to all the analytical techniques. However, there is a total lack of information about the characteristics of the membranes/modules used. None of the experiments can be reproduced by the reader.

The detailed information must be provided on the membranes and modules used.

 Detailed comments

 Abstract: please revise English.

 Materials and methods.: 1) membrane characteristics should be provided: material, number of layers, porosity and thickness of each layer; 2) module characteristics: shape (flat disc or tubular), geometry( disc diameter, or inner and outer diameter of the tube and the tube length), membrane area. 3) membrane performances: nominal rejection or MWCO and water flux.  And so on.

Figure 2.  Please check the y-axis title of (a) and (b): what does “aperture” represent?

The clear definition of “degumming” should be provided.

What is the definition of “degumming rate” ?

 Table 1: please specify in the title if the samples are of retentate or of permeate.  Symbols used of fatty acids is certainly usual, however the addition of the name would be very appreciated.

 Figure 4.  Please, clarify the caption. “..viscosity of different ceramic membranes…” does not make sense.  

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

accept

Back to TopTop