Next Article in Journal
Functionality of Cordia and Ziziphus Gums with Respect to the Dough Properties and Baking Performance of Stored Pan Bread and Sponge Cakes
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a 3D Printer for the Manufacture of Functional Food Protein Gels
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/foods11030459
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microbial Ecology of Sheep Milk, Artisanal Feta, and Kefalograviera Cheeses. Part II: Technological, Safety, and Probiotic Attributes of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolates

by
Markella Tsigkrimani
1,
Konstantina Panagiotarea
1,
Spiros Paramithiotis
1,
Loulouda Bosnea
2,
Eleni Pappa
2,
Eleftherios H. Drosinos
1,
Panagiotis N. Skandamis
1 and
Marios Mataragas
2,*
1
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos St., 11855 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Dairy Research, Institute of Technology of Agricultural Products, Hellenic Agricultural Organization “DIMITRA”, 3 Ethnikis Antistaseos St., 45221 Ioannina, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(3), 459; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030459
Submission received: 16 December 2021 / Revised: 21 January 2022 / Accepted: 25 January 2022 / Published: 3 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Dairy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of the present study was to examine 189 LAB strains belonging to the species Enterococcus faecium, E. faecalis, Lactococcus lactis, Pediococcus pentosaceus, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Lactiplantibacillus pentosus, Latilactobacillus curvatus, Lp. plantarum, Levilactobacillus brevis, and Weissella paramesenteroides isolated form sheep milk, Feta and Kefalograviera cheeses at different ripening stages, for their technological compatibility with dairy products manufacturing, their activities that may compromise safety of the dairy products as well as their capacity to survive in the human gastrointestinal tract. For that purpose, milk acidification and coagulation capacity, caseinolytic, lipolytic, hemolytic, gelatinolytic, and bile salt hydrolase activity, production of exopolysaccharides, antimicrobial compounds, and biogenic amines, as well as acid and bile salt tolerance and antibiotic susceptibility were examined. The faster acidifying strains were Lc. lactis DRD 2658 and P. pentosaceus DRD 2657 that reduced the pH value of skim milk, within 6 h to 5.97 and 5.92, respectively. Strains able to perform weak caseinolysis were detected in all species assessed. On the contrary, lipolytic activity, production of exopolysaccharides, amino acid decarboxylation, hemolytic, gelatinase, and bile salt hydrolase activity were not detected. Variable susceptibility to the antibiotics examined was detected among LAB strains. However, in the majority of the cases, resistance was evident. None of the strains assessed, managed to survive to exposure at pH value 1. On the contrary, 25.9 and 88.9% of the strains survived after exposure at pH values 2 and 3, respectively; the reduction of the population was larger in the first case. The strains survived well after exposure to bile salts. The strain-dependent character of the properties examined was verified. Many strains, belonging to different species, have presented very interesting properties; however, further examination is needed before their potential use as starter or adjunct cultures.

1. Introduction

The microbiota that drives spontaneous fermentations has been in the epicenter of intensive research for decades. The primary aim was to depict the microecosystem composition, as well as the role, symbiotic patterns, and dynamics of the key players. Product standardization essentially requires the development of starter cultures that provide the necessary metabolic capacities to carry out the desired biotransformations. However, the former are usually accompanied by undesired activities that may compromise the safety of the product. This is also the case of dairy products. The criteria used for the selection of proper starter cultures may be divided into technological, safety, and probiotic-related attributes.
The most important technological properties include milk acidification, proteolytic and lipolytic activities, as well as production of exopolysaccharides. Milk acidification is very important as it affects microbial stability and enhances clotting and whey expulsion [1]. The proteolytic activities of dairy lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have been extensively studied [2,3]. These affect the organoleptic quality of the final products as well as their functional potential. Indeed, casein hydrolysis may liberate branched-chain, aromatic and sulfur-containing amino acids that through the subsequent transamination and elimination routes may produce several flavor compounds [4]. In addition, the decryption of short peptides with a variety of biological roles, including angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory, immunomodulatory, antihypertensive, and antithrombotic activities, has also been extensively studied [5]. Free short- and intermediate-chain fatty acids that are liberated from their triglycerides through the activity of lipolytic enzymes are also very important. They may contribute directly to flavor development or serve as precursors for the production of other flavor components such as alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, acids, γ and δ lactones [6]. Exopolysaccharides (EPS) produced by LAB may effectively modify the rheological properties and concomitantly the mouthfeel of the products [7]. In addition, health promoting activity has been claimed for some of them [8,9,10].
Several metabolic activities of dairy microbiota may improve or compromise safety of the final product; these include production of antimicrobial compounds, hemolytic, gelatinase, and amino acid decarboxylase activities, as well as antibiotic susceptibility. The latter is very useful as it may indicate presence of antibiotic resistance genes. Indeed, LAB are considered as a pool of transferable antibiotic resistance genes, the spread of which has been recognized as a major problem for public health [11,12]. Production of antimicrobial compounds is a useful trait that may assist in controlling of foodborne pathogens occurrence and proliferation. Indeed, the capability of LAB to produce an extended variety of antimicrobial compounds is well established. Among them, production and application of proteinaceous antimicrobial compounds in food biopreservation have drawn specific attention over the last decades [13,14]. Hemolytic and gelatinase activities contribute to virulence of enterococci. In both cases, assessment of the phenotype is necessary since predictive accuracy of genetic determinants is still low [15,16]. Decarboxylation of amino acids to their respective amines is an attempt to cytosol deacidification, which results from growth under acidic conditions [17]. Accumulation of biogenic amines is not desired since their consumption has been correlated with a series of adverse effects, including headache, skin irritation, etc. [18].
The probiotic-related properties are constantly updated, mostly with ones related to the functional potential of the cultures. However, survival in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and production of bile salt hydrolase are among the key characteristics that a potential probiotic strain may possess [19].
The aim of the present study was to assess the technological, safety, and probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolates from milk and dairy products. More specifically, 189 isolates belonging to the different genera, i.e., Enterococcus, Lactococcus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, Lactiplantibacillus, Latilactobacillus, Levilactobacillus, and Weissella were examined for their milk acidification and coagulation capacity, caseinolytic, lipolytic, hemolytic, gelatinolytic, and bile salt hydrolase activity, production of exopolysaccharides, antimicrobial compounds, and biogenic amines, as well as acid and bile salt tolerance and antibiotic susceptibility.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microbial Strains and Culture Conditions

A total of 189 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains of the collection of Dairy Research Department (DRD) of Hellenic Agricultural Organization “DIMITRA” (ELGO-DIMITRA), isolated from sheep milk and artisanal Feta and Kefalograviera cheeses [20], belonging to the species Enterococcus faecium (46 strains), E. faecalis (3 strains), Lactococcus lactis (7 strains), Pediococcus pentosaceus (29 strains), Leuconostoc mesenteroides (6 strains), Lactiplantibacillus pentosus (2 strains), Latilactobacillus curvatus (6 strains), Lp. plantarum (29 strains), Levilactobacillus brevis (29 strains), and Weissella paramesenteroides (32 strains) were included in the present study (Table S1). All strains were stored at −20 °C, in Nutrient Broth (LAB M, Lancashire, UK) supplemented with 30% glycerol (Applichem, Darmstadt, Germany). Before experimental use, strains were subcultured twice in de Mann, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) broth (LAB M) at 37 °C for enterococci and 30 °C for the rest LAB, for 24 h. Purity was examined after streaking in MRS agar. Before inoculation, the bacterial cultures were washed twice with sterile saline and resuspended in the same diluent at the initial culture volume, unless otherwise stated.

2.2. Technological Properties

2.2.1. Milk Acidification and Coagulation

Milk acidification and coagulation was examined in 74 LAB representative strains, which were selected based on their different isolation source or separate genotypic cluster [20], namely E. faecium (strains DRD 2579, 2581, 2585, 2587, 2588, 2600, 2602, 2667, 2670, 2686, 2691, 2695, 2711, 2720, 2723, 2724), Lv. brevis (strains DRD 2596, 2624, 2664, 2665, 2688, 2757, 2760, 2763), Lp. plantarum (strains DRD 2584, 2608, 2612, 2645, 2648, 2653, 2656, 2668), E. faecalis (strains DRD 2602, 2651, 2722), Lp. pentosus (strain DRD 2662, 2693), Lc. lactis (strain DRD 2646, 2658, 2692, 2699), Lt. curvatus (strains DRD 2708, 2709, 2716, 2728), W. paramesenteroides (strains DRD 2613, 2701, 2714, 2719, 2726, 2743, 2751, 2755, 2756), Ln. mesenteroides (strains DRD 2576, 2604, 2703, 2705, 2706), and P. pentosaceus (strains DRD 2616, 2634, 2635, 2652, 2655, 2657, 2676, 2681, 2689, 2694, 2748, 2749, 2752, 2753, 2761). Overnight bacterial cultures of the representative strains were used to inoculate (1% inoculum) 10 mL skim milk (LAB M). Incubation took place at 37 °C for enterococci and 30 °C for the rest LAB, for 24 h. The pH value was measured immediately upon inoculation and for every 3 h until 24 h. After each measurement, the respective test tube was discarded. The ΔpH values presented were calculated by subtracting the pH value after the given incubation time at 30 °C (37 °C for enterococci) from the respective of uninoculated skim milk incubated for the same time at the same temperature.
Milk coagulation was performed according to Bancalari et al. [21]. In brief, overnight cultures of the aforementioned strains were inoculated (2% inoculum) into 10 mL skim milk (LAB M) and incubated at 37 °C for enterococci and 30 °C for the rest of the LAB, for up to 7 days. Milk coagulation was optically evaluated at 6, 12, 24 h, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 days. The time in which coagulation was visibly observed in presented.

2.2.2. Caseinolytic and Lipolytic Capacity

The caseinolytic and lipolytic capacity of all strains were assessed through agar well diffusion assays. In the first case, wells were aseptically punched in freshly prepared lawns of a medium consisting of 0.5% tryptone (LAB M), 0.25% yeast extract (LAB M), 0.1% glucose (Applichem), 1% casein (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 1.5% bacteriological agar (LAB M), pH 6.9. Overnight bacterial cultures were centrifuged (12,000× g; 15 min; 4 °C) and 25 μL of each cell-free supernatant was added in each well. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 5 days. The plates were then stained with 0.05% (w/v) Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 (Applichem). Presence of a clarification halo around each well was perceived as an indication of caseinolytic activity. The latter was characterized as weak, if the clarification zone extended for less than 0.5 cm around the wells, and strong if the clarification zone extended for more than 0.5 cm. For the assessment of the lipolytic capacity, wells were aseptically punched in freshly prepared lawns of a medium consisting of 0.5% peptone (LAB M), 0.3% meat extract (LAB M), 0.5% lecithin (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany), 1% tributyrin (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), 3% meat extract (Merch), and 1.5% bacteriological agar (LAB M), with the addition of 2.5 mM CaCl2 (Applichem) and 5 mM MgSO4 (Applichem) [22]. Overnight bacterial cultures were centrifuged (12,000× g; 15 min; 4 °C) and 25 μL of each cell-free supernatant was added in each well. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 10 days. Presence of a clarification halo around each well was perceived as an indication of lipolytic activity. As in the case of proteolytic activity, it was characterized as weak, if the clarification zone extended for less than 0.5 cm around the wells, and strong if the clarification zone extended for more than 0.5 cm.

2.2.3. Production of Exopolysaccharides (EPS)

The capacity of all strains to produce exopolysaccharides was assessed according to Smitinont et al. [23]. In brief, overnight bacterial cultures were streaked on the surface of MRS agar (LAB M) containing 2% glucose, galactose, or lactose (Applichem). Occurrence of slimy phenotype after incubation at 37 °C for enterococci and 30 °C for the rest LAB for 3 days was indicative of EPS production.

2.3. Safety Properties

2.3.1. Production of Antimicrobial Compounds

Production of antibacterial compounds against a mixture of five strains from each of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 pathogen was assessed through agar well diffusion assay. More accurately, wells were aseptically punched in freshly prepared BHI agar (LAB M) lawns inoculated with the mixture of the pathogens. Overnight bacterial cultures of all strains were centrifuged (12,000× g; 15 min; 4 °C), each cell-free supernatant was neutralized and treated with catalase (Sigma-Aldrich) and 25 μL of each was added in each well. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Growth inhibition of the pathogenic bacteria strain mixture used as indicator around the wells was indicative of the presence of antibacterial compounds in the respective cell-free supernatant. The protein nature of the antibacterial compounds was verified by treatment with proteinase (Sigma-Aldrich) and trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich), according to Syrokou et al. [24].

2.3.2. Biogenic Amine Production

The capacity of all bacterial strains to decarboxylate lysine (Serva), tyrosine (Serva), ornithine (Applichem), and histidine (Applichem) was assessed by using the substrate described by Bover-Cid and Holzapfel [25]. Overnight bacterial cultures were used to inoculate the aforementioned substrate supplemented with each amino acid. Incubation took place at 37 °C for enterococci and 30 °C for the rest of the LAB for 48 h; occurrence of color change around the colonies was indicative of the respective amino acid decarboxylation.

2.3.3. Hemolytic Activity

Hemolytic activity was assessed with the use of Columbia blood agar (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) supplemented with 5% defibrinized horse blood (TCS Biosciences, Buckingham, UK). Overnight bacterial cultures of all strains were used to inoculate the aforementioned substrate. Examination of the plates for α-hemolysis (green discoloration around the colonies), β-hemolysis (clarification around the colonies), or γ-hemolysis (no discoloration or clarification) took place after incubation at 37 °C for enterococci and 30 °C for the rest LAB, for 48 h.

2.3.4. Antibiotic Susceptibility

The resistance of all strains to eight antibiotics, namely ampicillin (Applichem), bacitracin (Sigma), chloramphenicol (Applichem), erythromycin (Sigma), novobiocin (Sigma), streptomycin (Applichem), tetracycline (Applichem), and vancomycin (Applichem) was estimated using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test [26]. In brief, 6-mm filter paper disks were impregnated with known concentration of the aforementioned antibiotics (0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 mg/mL) and placed on the surface of an MRS agar plate, on the surface of which 100 μL of 107 colony forming units per mL (CFU/mL) dilution of each strain included in the present study, was spread. Growth of the strains around the disks was indicative of their resistance to the respective concentration.

2.3.5. Gelatinase Activity

Gelatinase activity was assessed by the nutrient gelatin stab method and the nutrient gelatin plate method according to Cruz and Torres [27]. In brief, overnight bacterial cultures of all strains were used to inoculate both substrates. Incubation took place at 25 °C for 1 week in the first case and at 35 °C for 24 h in the latter. After incubation, the substrates were examined for liquefaction in the first case and clear zones around the colonies in the latter.

2.4. Probiotic-Related Activities

2.4.1. Acid and Bile Salt Tolerance

Acid and bile salt tolerance of all strains was assessed according to Paramithiotis et al. [28]. More accurately, overnight bacterial cultures were washed twice with sterile saline. Acid tolerance was assessed after resuspension of the biomass in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer adjusted to pH 1, 2, or 3 with HCl and incubation at 37 °C for 3 h. Bile salt tolerance was assessed after resuspension of the biomass in PBS buffer, pH 8, containing 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0% (w/v) bile bovine (Sigma) and incubation at 37 °C for 4 h. In both cases, the viable cell counts enumerated immediately upon inoculation and after the incubation period were used to estimate acid and bile salt tolerance. If the surviving population was below the enumeration limit (10 CFU/mL), the latter was used for calculating purposes.

2.4.2. Bile Salt Hydrolase Activity

Bile salt hydrolase activity was performed according to Paramithiotis et al. [28]. In brief, overnight bacterial cultures of all strains were streaked on MRS agar, supplemented with 0.5% (w/v) bile bovine, and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. Bile bovine hydrolysis was indicated by precipitation zones around the colonies and altered colony morphology.

3. Results

3.1. Technological Properties

3.1.1. Milk Acidification and Coagulation

In Table 1, skim milk acidification (in ΔpH) and coagulation capacity of representative strains of the LAB included in the present study, is presented. In general, skim milk acidification and coagulation seemed to be a strain- rather than a species-dependent property. Strains with variable acidification and coagulation capacity were included in all species. Enterococcus faecalis was an exception, since coagulation was achieved after 24 h, by all strains. The strains that achieved faster acidification were Lc. lactis DRD 2658 and P. pentosaceus DRD 2657. In both cases, coagulation of skim milk was observed after 6 h. Fast acidification and coagulation (after 6 h) was also achieved by Lc. lactis DRD 2692, Lp. pentosus DRD 2662, P. pentosaceus DRD 2655, and Lv. brevis DRD 2664.

3.1.2. Caseinolytic and Lipolytic Capacity

Weak caseinolytic activity was observed for 64 LAB strains belonging to E. faecium (9 strains; DRD 2577, 2581, 2582, 2586, 2588, 2636, 2718, 2721, and 2725), Ln. mesenteroides (5 strains; DRD 2576, 2604, 2703, 2704, and 2705), Lp. plantarum (15 strains; DRD 2606, 2607, 2608, 2609, 2610, 2611, 2612, 2614, 2615, 2617, 2618, 2619, 2637, 2640, and 2646), P. pentosaceus (11 strains; DRD 2616, 2621, 2622, 2623, 2683, 2696, 2748, 2749, 2752, 2753, and 2761), W. paramesenteroides (16 strains; DRD 2613, 2712, 2713, 2714, 2719, 2740, 2741, 2742, 2743, 2744, 2745, 2746, 2747, 2750, 2755, and 2756), Lv. brevis (3 strains; DRD 2684, 2685, and 2759), Lc. lactis (1 strain; DRD 2697), Lt. curvatus (2 strains; DRD 2708 and 2716), Lp. pentosus (1 strain; DRD 2693) and E. faecalis (1 strain; DRD 2722). Since the caseinolytic activity was weak, no further assessment with SDS-PAGE took place. As far as lipolytic activity was concerned, this was not observed by the strains under study.

3.1.3. Production of Exopolysaccharides (EPS)

None of the strains under study presented the slimy phenotype when glucose, galactose, or lactose were supplied as carbon sources.

3.2. Safety Properties

3.2.1. Production of Antimicrobial Compounds

A total of 14 strains produced antimicrobial compounds against the L. monocytogenes strain mixture that was employed as indicator. These belonged to E. faecium (10 strains; strains DRD 2577, 2579, 2580, 2581, 2582, 2585, 2588, 2686, 2721, and 2723), Lp. plantarum (1 strain; DRD 2650), Lv. brevis (1 strain; DRD 2629), and Ln. mesenteroides (2 strains; DRD 2576 and 2705). The protein nature of these compounds was verified after treatment with proteolytic enzymes; in all cases the antilisterial activity was abolished. None of the strains produced antimicrobial compounds against E. coli O157:H7 or S. enterica strain mixtures.

3.2.2. Biogenic Amine Production

None of the strains under study presented with the necessary color change that was indicative of decarboxylation of lysine, tyrosine, ornithine, or histidine that were provided in the growth medium.

3.2.3. Hemolytic Activity

None of the strains under study presented hemolytic activity and thus can be classified as non-hemolytic or γ-hemolytic.

3.2.4. Antibiotic Susceptibility

The antibiotic susceptibility of the strains under study is presented in Figure 1A–J. A variable degree of susceptibility to the antibiotics examined was observed, with the exception of streptomycin and bacitracin, the concentration of which required to inhibit growth of the majority of the strains under study was above 128 mg/mL. Tetracycline and erythromycin were also relatively ineffective since the concentration required to inhibit growth of the majority of the strains under study was equal or above 64 mg/mL, with the exception of Lc. lactis and Lp. pentosus. In the first case, growth of the majority of the strains was inhibited by 32 mg/mL tetracycline, whereas growth of half of the Lp. pentosus was inhibited by 32 mg/mL and the other half by more than 128 mg/mL erythromycin. Regarding novobiocin, growth of the majority of the strains belonging to E. faecalis, Lp. pentosus, Lt. curvatus, E. faecium, P. pentosaceus, and Lv. brevis was inhibited by concentration equal or above 64 mg/mL. On the contrary, the strains belonging to Lc. lactis, Ln. mesenteroides, Lp. plantarum, and W. paramesenteroides seemed to be more susceptible to novobiocin since a concentration equal or less than 32 mg/mL was required to inhibit growth of the majority of them. As far as vancomycin was concerned, growth of the majority of the strains belonging to E. faecalis, Lt. curvatus, P. pentosaceus, Ln. mesenteroides, Lp. plantarum, Lv. brevis, and W. paramesenteroides was inhibited by concentration equal or above 64 mg/mL. On the contrary, half of the Lp. pentosus strains were inhibited by 8 mg/mL and the other half by more than 128 mg/mL, whereas growth of the majority of Lc. lactis and E. faecium strains was inhibited by concentration equal or less than 16 and 32 mg/mL, respectively. Finally, ampicillin seemed to be the most effective among the antibiotics examined. Growth of the majority of Lt. curvatus and Lv. brevis strains was inhibited by concentration equal or less than 32 mg/mL, Lp. pentosus, P. pentosaceus and Ln. mesenteroides equal or less than 16 mg/mL, E. faecalis, E. faecium, Lp. plantarum and W. paramesenteroides equal or less than 8 mb/mL and Lc. lactis equal or less than 4 mg/mL.

3.2.5. Gelatinase Activity

None of the strains under study presented gelatinase activity, by any of the methods employed.

3.3. Probiotic-Related Activities

3.3.1. Acid and Bile Salt Tolerance

In Figure S1, the microbial survival after exposure of the strains to PBS buffer adjusted at pH values 2 and 3 and incubation at 37 °C for 3 h, is presented. A box and whisker plot, summarizing the survival of the strains, at species level, is shown in Figure 2. After exposure to PBS buffer adjusted at pH value 1 and incubation at 37 °C for 3 h, no surviving population was enumerated; therefore, these results were not included in Figure 2 and Figure S1. Exposure to PBS buffer adjusted at pH values 2 and 3 and incubation at 37 °C for 3 h resulted in reduction of the population of all strains. In the former case, the reduction of the population was larger (p < 0.05) in all strains, with the exception of the ones in which no surviving population was detected in both pH values.
The median values of the microbial survival after exposure to pH 2 ranged from −6.56 log N/N0 in Lv. brevis to −4.38 log N/N0 in Lt. curvatus and after exposure to pH 3 from −4.24 log N/N0 in Ln. mesenteroides to −0.81 log N/N0 in Lc. lactis.
Bile tolerance of the strains included in the present study is presented in Figure S2. A box and whisker plot, summarizing the survival of the strains after incubation, at species level, is shown in Figure 3. The lowest survival at 0.5 and 1.0% referred to P. pentosaceus strain DRD 2761, while at 2% bile bovine concentration to Ln. mesenteroides strain DRD 2604. Growth was also observed in many cases; it reached 0.66, 1.13, and 1.10 log N/N0 at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0% bile bovine, respectively. In the first case, such a growth was observed in the case of Lv. brevis strain DRD 2632, in the second case in E. faecium strain DRD 2723 and in the third case in E. faecium strain 2667. The median values of the microbial survival ranged from −0.17 to 0.03, from −0.22 to 0.23, and from −0.37 to 0.06 log N/N0 at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0% bile bovine, respectively. The lowest median values were observed for Lp. plantarum at 0.5% bile bovine, for Lc. lactis at 1.0%, and for Lp. pentosus at 2.0% bile bovine. On the other hand, the highest median values were observed in all cases for E. faecalis.

3.3.2. Bile Salt Hydrolase Activity

None of the strains under study presented with the necessary precipitation zones around the colonies or the altered colony morphology, when grown on the surface of MRS agar, which was indicative of bile salt hydrolase activity.

4. Discussion

In recent years, consumer awareness regarding food safety and nutritional status is increasing. In addition, the demand for functional food, i.e., food that may provide more than just nutritional elements [29] is also increasing. Dairy industry is addressing these demands through the selection of microorganisms that may serve as starter or adjunct cultures that apart from the product-dependent sensorial and technological characteristics, may provide with additional benefits. In the present study, the technological, safety and probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from sheep milk and during ripening of Feta and Kefalograviera cheeses are assessed. To our knowledge, there is a knowledge gap, especially regarding the properties of Kefalograviera wild microbiota.
Milk acidification and coagulation, caseinolytic and lipolytic activity, as well as production of exopolysaccharides are among the critical technological properties for LAB that are evaluated as starter or adjunct cultures in cheesemaking. The rapid pH reduction contributes to safety, shaping of appropriate environment for lipolytic, and proteolytic enzymes and it is essential for milk coagulation [30,31]. Caseinolytic and lipolytic activity as well as EPS production play a major role in aroma, flavor, and texture development of final products [32,33].
Rapid milk acidification is one of the most important properties of LAB that are used as starter cultures, but it is not desirable in the adjunct cultures, since it could negatively affect the quality of the final products [34]. Therefore, strains with poor acidifying activity but with interesting technological or functional properties, can be used as adjunct cultures and combined with more acidifying strains, in mixed starter cultures [30,35]. According to Beresford et al. [36], the starter bacteria should reduce the pH value of milk to 5.3 within 6 h at 30–37 °C. In the present study, the faster acidifying strains were Lc. lactis DRD 2658 and P. pentosaceus DRD 2657, which reduced the pH value of skim milk, within 6 h, to 5.97 and 5.92, respectively, failing to meet this criterion. The results obtained in the present study highlighted the strain-dependent character of this property. Indeed, in all species, faster and slower acidifying strains were included, concurring with the results presented in the literature [30,31,32,33,34,37,38,39]. The only exception was E. faecalis, in which a uniformity was observed in the acidifying capacity, which may be assigned to the small number of strains assessed. Milk coagulation is encouraged by acid production from LAB strains, as well as coagulant enzymes activity [36,38]. This property is also strain-dependent and strains able to coagulate skim milk within 24 h were detected in all species included in the present study. Similar results were also presented by Fusieger et al. [37], Teixeira et al. [39], and Picon et al. [40].
Proteolytic LAB strains, through the activity of cell wall-associated proteinases and intracellular peptidases, degrade casein leading to the development of aroma, texture, and flavor [37,41,42]. Therefore, caseinolysis is of great importance for starter or adjunct LAB. Nevertheless, extensive caseinolysis could result in organoleptic and structural defects [37,43]. In the present study, weak caseinolytic strains were detected in all species assessed. Interestingly, the majority of them were isolated from the same source, namely Feta cheese in early ripening stage [20]. Caseinolysis does not seem to be a property shared among the majority of dairy LAB; in addition, the extend of proteolytic activity is strain-dependent [30,32,34,37,38,39,44,45,46,47,48].
Lipolytic activity is another important trait that may affect cheese texture, aroma, and flavor [30,49,50]. In the present study, no lipolytic strains were detected, supporting the conclusion that lipolysis is rather uncommon among dairy LAB [30,31,32,33,38,43,46,48,49,50,51].
Exopolysaccharides production by LAB used in cheese-making is important from both a technological and functional perspective. More specifically, these molecules may function as thickeners and stabilizers, improving texture and structure of products. Moreover, EPS may have a positive effect on consumer health [48,50,52]. In the present study, no EPS producing strain was detected, concurring with Camara et al. [46], who characterized this property as rare among dairy LAB. However, EPS producing strains have been isolated from milk and dairy products [35,48,50,52,53].
Regarding the safety traits that were assessed in the present study, none of the isolates exhibited amino acid decarboxylation, hemolytic and gelatinase activity, while their response to antibiotic varied widely; finally, 14 out of 189 strains were found to produce antibacterial compounds able to inhibit growth of the L. monocytogenes strain mixture that was used as indicator.
LAB may decarboxylate amino acids and produce biogenic amines during the production and storage of fermented products. The consumption of biogenic amines may lead to series of adverse health effects [18]. Biogenic amines production seems to be a rather common property among dairy LAB [40,46,48,50,53]. However, in the present study no such strains were detected. This could be attributed to the method used for their detection and should be verified by analytical techniques with improved limit of detection, such as High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC).
Hemolytic and gelatinase activities are also very important; strains possessing such activities constitute a hazard to consumers health [45,52,54,55]. In general, no such activities have been reported for dairy LAB with the exception of enterococci, in which occurrence of hemolytic and gelatinolytic strains has been reported [33,48,52,56,57]. No such strains were detected in the present study.
The bacterial antibiotic resistance is a matter of great concern for the food industry. The phenotypical assessment of LAB antibiotic susceptibility is the first step to evaluate the presence of antibiotic resistance genes [32]. The majority of the strains included in the present study, exhibited resistance to the antibiotics examined. According to the cut-off values recommended by EFSA [58], all isolates, with only a few exceptions, seemed to be resistant to chloramphenicol, erythromycin, streptomycin, and tetracycline. Similar was the case of ampicillin, but more strains could be characterized as sensitive. Regarding vancomycin, all E. faecalis, E. faecium, Lc. lactis, and W. paramesenteroides strains, can be characterized as resistant. For the remaining species, no cut-off values have been proposed for vancomycin.
According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [59,60], all E. faecium, E. faecalis, Lt. curvatus, Lp. pentosus, Lp. plantarum, Lc. lactis, and Lv. brevis strains can be characterized as resistant to erythromycin. Similarly, all Enterococcus spp. and Lc. lactis strains to tetracycline. Moreover, none of the Enterococcus spp., Ln. mesenteroides, and P. pentosaceus strains appeared to be sensitive to chloramphenicol, except one E. faecium isolate (DRD 2724). Regarding ampicillin, the results varied between species and strains; the higher rate of ampicillin susceptible strains was observed for Lp. plantarum (82.8%), followed by E. faecalis (66.7%) and E. faecium (65.2%), while none of Lt. curvatus as well as Lc. lactis seemed to be ampicillin sensitive. Enterococcus faecalis, Lt. curvatus, Lc. lactis, one out of two Lp. pentosus, as well as the majority of E. faecium, Lp. plantarum, and Lv. brevis strains seemed to be resistant to vancomycin. Regarding novobiocin, strains belonging to Ln. mesenteroides, Lc. lactis, Lp. plantarum, and W. paramesenteroides seemed to be more susceptible than E. faecium, E. faecalis, Lt. curvatus, Lp. pentosus, Lv. brevis, and P. pentosaceus.
In general, Enterococcus spp. exhibit natural resistance to many antibiotics, such as ampicillin, streptomycin, tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, and vancomycin [33,42], while Lactococcus spp. and Pediococcus spp. present intrinsic resistance to vancomycin and tetracycline [61]. However, in many studies, susceptibility of dairy LAB has been exhibited [32,47,56,62,63].
In recent years, the capacity of LAB as natural biopreservatives, especially in fermented foods, has been exhibited. This capacity is attributed to the production of various metabolites with antimicrobial activity, such as organic acids (lactic, acetic, propionic, and formic acids), hydrogen peroxide, diacetyl, carbon dioxide, ethanol, and bacteriocins. The latter are ribosomally synthesized proteinaceous molecules that target mainly the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane [33,39,52]. L. monocytogenes, E. coli, and Salmonella are among the most frequent foodborne pathogens and the antimicrobial potential of LAB against them has been extensively assessed. In the present study, 14 strains exhibited such activity against the L. monocytogenes strains mixture. Noticeably, ten of those strains belonged to the genetically closely related E. faecium, which explains this activity [64]. In line with present data, Albayrak and Duran [32] reported that the majority of Enterococcus spp. isolated from a ripened white cheese sample, inhibited growth of L. monocytogenes. In addition, Ispirli et al. [65] reported that 12 Enterococcus spp., isolated from Turkish white cheese, produced bacteriocins against Gram-negative bacteria, such as S. Typhimurium and E. coli. In the present study, one Lp. plantarum, one Lv. brevis, and two Ln. mesenteroides strains also exhibited antilisterial activity. Such activity from strains belonging to these species is commonly reported in literature [33,52,56].
Regarding the probiotic potential of LAB isolates, acid and bile tolerance, as well as bile salt hydrolase (BSH) activity were tested since resistance to gastric acidity and bile salts is essential for the survival of microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The capacity of LAB to survive acidic conditions is essential, since in the stomach, they may confront pH values less than 3.0 [47]. In the present study, none of the 189 LAB strains assessed, managed to survive to exposure at pH value 1. On the contrary, 25.9 and 88.9% of the strains survived after exposure at pH values 2 and 3, respectively. The population reduction was greater in the first case. Similarly, tolerance to exposure at pH 3.0, but population reduction greater than 2 log CFU/mL of 116 LAB strains isolated from Serpa cheese was reported by Ruiz-Moyano et al. [63]. Zoumpopoulou et al. [56] reported that 32 isolates belong to 14 different species, isolated from Kalathaki and Melichloro cheeses presented with population reduction larger than 2 log CFU/mL after exposure to pH 2.5 for 2 h. Survival rates ranging from 70–90% were reported by Islam et al. [48] when 11 strains belonging to different species were exposed to pH 2 for 3 h.
The transit time of LAB in human GIT is estimated from 4 to 6h, and the bile concentration from 0.3 to 0.5% w/v, depending on the person [32,49]. In the present study, the maximum population reduction observed was 1.5 log CFU/mL, in any bile salt concentration studied. In some cases, growth enhancement was observed. Similarly, Albayrak and Duran [32] observed enhancement of Enterococcus spp. growth, the population increase of which, in some cases exceeded 1 log CFU/mL. In general, good survival of dairy LAB is reported [47,56], with just a few exceptions [34].
Bile salts are antimicrobial agents that interact with the cell membrane, proteins, DNA, and chelate iron and calcium. The deconjugation of bile salts from BSH enzyme contribute to bacterial survival in the GIT and has an important role in intestinal homeostasis and in the reduction of serum cholesterol levels. Therefore, BSH activity is a desirable property. In the present study, no such strains were detected. This concurs with the conclusion that such a property is rather uncommon among dairy LAB [38,66].
Overviewing the results obtained in the present study, many strains, belonging to different species presented very interesting properties. However, these properties were scattered among the strains and no strain would present more than one. More specifically, the strains able to produce antilisterial compounds were poor acidifiers and among the least susceptible to antibiotics. Therefore, selection could only be based on fast acidification capacity among the strains that were more susceptible to antibiotics; these strains were Lc. lactis DRD 2692 and P. pentosaceus DRD 2655.

5. Conclusions

The properties assessed in the present study are strain- rather than species-dependent. It was further supported that proteolysis, lipolysis, EPS and bacteriocin production, amino acid decarboxylation, and hemolytic and gelatinase activity are rather uncommon traits among dairy LAB. However, resistance to antibiotics seems very common. Many strains, belonging to different species, have presented very interesting properties, which deserve further assessment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods11030459/s1, Figure S1: Microbial survival (in log N/N0) after exposure of E. faecalis (A), E. faecium (B), Lc. lactis (C), Ln. mesenteroides (D), Lp. pentosus (E), Lp. plantarum (F), Lt. curvatus (G), Lv. brevis (H), P. pentosaceus (I) and W. paramesenteroides (J) strains included in the present study to PBS buffer adjusted to pH 2 (blue) or 3 (green) with HCl and incubation at 37 °C for 3 h. N: microbial population after incubation; N0: initial microbial population. Figure S2: Microbial survival (in log N/N0) after exposure of E. faecalis (A), E. faecium (B), Lc. lactis (C), Ln. mesenteroides (D), Lp. pentosus (E), Lp. plantarum (F), Lt. curvatus (G), Lv. brevis (H), P. pentosaceus (I) and W. paramesenteroides (J) strains included in the present study to PBS buffer, pH 8, containing 0.5% (blue), 1.0% (green) or 2.0% (yellow) (w/v) bile bovine and incubation at 37 °C for 4 h. N: microbial population after incubation; N0: initial microbial population. Table S1: Origin of the strains included in the present study.

Author Contributions

Investigation, M.T., K.P., S.P., L.B., E.P. and M.M.; Supervision, writing—review and editing, M.T., S.P., E.H.D., P.N.S., L.B. and M.M.; Conceptualization, S.P. and M.M.; Data curation, M.T., S.P. and M.M.; Formal analysis, M.T., S.P. and M.M.; Funding acquisition, S.P., E.H.D., P.N.S. and M.M.; Methodology, M.T., S.P. and M.M.; Project administration, M.M.; Resources, S.P. and M.M.; Software, M.M.; Writing—original draft preparation, M.T., S.P. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been co-financed by the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH—CREATE—INNOVATE (T1EDK-02087).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fox, P.F.; Guinee, T.P.; Cogan, T.M.; McSweeney, P.L.H. Fundamentals of Cheese Science; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 333–390. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kunji, E.R.S.; Mierau, I.; Hagting, A.; Poolman, B.; Konings, W.N. The proteolytic systems of lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 1996, 70, 187–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, M.; Bayjanov, J.R.; Renckens, B.; Nauta, A.; Siezen, R.J. The proteolytic system of lactic acid bacteria revisited: A genomic comparison. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Liu, M.; Nauta, A.; Francke, C.; Siezen, R.J. Comparative genomics of enzymes in flavor-forming pathways from amino acids in lactic acid bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 4590–4600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Park, Y.W.; Nam, M.S. Bioactive peptides in milk and dairy products: A review. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2015, 35, 831–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. McSweeney, P.; Sousa, M. Biochemical pathways for the production of flavour compounds in cheeses during ripening: A review. Lait 2000, 80, 293–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ruas-Madiedo, P.; Reyes-Gavilan, C.G. Invited review: Methods for the screening, isolation, and characterization of exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 843–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Chabot, S.; Yu, H.L.; De Leseleuc, L.; Cloutier, D.; van Calsteren, M.R.; Lessard, M.; Roy, D.; Lacroix, M.; Oth, D. Exopolysaccharide from Lactobacillus rhamnosus RW-9595M stimulate TNF, IL6 and IL-12 in human and mouse cultured immunocompetent cells, and IFN-g in mouse splenocytes. Lait 2001, 81, 683–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hu, S.-M.; Zhou, J.-M.; Zhou, Q.-Q.; Li, P.; Xie, Y.-Y.; Zhou, T.; Gu, Q. Purification, characterization and biological activities of exopolysaccharides from Lactobacillus rhamnosus ZFM231 isolated from milk. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 147, 111561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, J.; Li, Q.; Gao, N.; Wang, Z.; Li, F.; Lia, J.; Shan, A. Exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG alleviate hydrogen peroxide-induced intestinal oxidative damage and apoptosis through the Keap1/Nrf2 and Bax/Bcl-2 pathways in vitro. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 9632–9641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. von Wintersdorff, C.J.H.; Penders, J.; van Niekerk, J.M.; Mills, N.D.; Majumder, S.; van Alphen, L.B.; Savelkoul, P.H.M.; Wolffs, P.F.G. Dissemination of antimicrobial resistance in microbial ecosystems through horizontal gene transfer. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Stefanska, I.; Kwiecien, E.; Józwiak-Piasecka, K.; Garbowska, M.; Binek, M.; Rzewuska, M. Antimicrobial susceptibility of lactic acid bacteria strains of potential use as feed additives—The basic safety and usefulness criterion. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 687071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Perez-Ramos, A.; Madi-Moussa, D.; Coucheney, F.; Drider, D. Current knowledge of the mode of action and immunity mechanisms of LAB-bacteriocins. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Soltani, S.; Hammami, R.; Cotter, P.D.; Rebuffat, S.; Said, L.B.; Gaudreau, H.; Bedard, F.; Biron, E.; Drider, D.; Fliss, I. Bacteriocins as a new generation of antimicrobials: Toxicity aspects and regulations. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2021, 45, fuaa039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lopes, M.F.S.; Simões, A.P.; Tenreiro, R.; Marques, J.J.F.; Crespo, M.T.B. Activity and expression of a virulence factor, gelatinase, in dairy enterococci. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 112, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Semedo-Lemsaddek, T.; Cota, J.B.; Ribeiro, T.; Pimentel, A.; Tavares, L.; Bernando, F.; Oliveira, M. Resistance and virulence distribution in enterococci isolated from broilers reared in two farming systems. Ir. Vet. J. 2021, 74, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Molenaar, D.; Bosscher, J.S.; Ten Brink, B.; Driessen, A.J.M.; Konings, W.N. Generation of a proton motive force by histidine decarboxylation and electrogenic histidine/histamine antiport in Lactobacillus buchneri. J. Bacteriol. 1993, 175, 2864–2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ladero, V.; Calles-Enriquez, M.; Fernandez, M.; Alvarez, M. Toxicological effects of dietary biogenic amines. Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. 2010, 6, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Reale, A.; Di Renzo, T.; Rossi, F.; Zotta, T.; Iacumin, L.; Preziuso, M.; Parente, E.; Sorrentino, E.; Coppola, R. Tolerance of Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus paracasei and Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains to stress factors encountered in food processing and in the gastro-intestinal tract. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 60, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tsigkrimani, M.; Bakogianni, M.; Paramithiotis, S.; Bosnea, L.; Pappa, E.; Kondyli, E.; Drosinos, E.H.; Skandamis, P.Ν.; Mataragas, M. Microbial ecology of artisanal Feta and Kefalograviera cheeses. Part I: Bacterial community and its functional characteristics with focus on lactic acid bacteria as determined by culture-dependent methods and phenotype microarrays. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bancalari, E.; Sardaro, M.L.S.; Levante, A.; Marseglia, A.; Caligiani, A.; Lazzi, C.; Neviani, E.; Gatti, M. An integrated strategy to discover Lactobacillus casei group strains for their potential use as aromatic starters. Food Res. Int. 2017, 100, 682–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carrazco-Palafox, J.; Rivera-Chavira, B.E.; Ramírez-Baca, N.; Manzanares-Papayanopoulos, L.I.; Nevárez-Moorillón, G.V. Improved method for qualitative screening of lipolytic bacterial strains. MethodsX 2018, 5, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Smitinont, T.; Tansakul, C.; Tanasupawat, S.; Keeratipibul, S.; Navarini, L.; Bosco, M.; Cescutti, P. Exopolysaccharide-producing lactic acid bacteria strains from traditional thai fermented foods: Isolation, identification and exopolysaccharide characterization. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1991, 51, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Syrokou, M.K.; Tziompra, S.; Psychogiou, E.-E.; Mpisti, S.-D.; Paramithiotis, S.; Bosnea, L.; Mataragas, M.; Skandamis, P.N.; Drosinos, E.H. Technological and safety attributes of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts isolated from spontaneously fermented Greek wheat sourdoughs. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bover-Cid, S.; Holzapfel, W.H. Improved screening procedure for biogenic amine production by lactic acid bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999, 53, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hudzicki, J. Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Test Protocol. Available online: https://asm.org/Protocols/Kirby-Bauer-Disk-Diffusion-Susceptibility-Test-Pro (accessed on 13 September 2020).
  27. Cruz, T.E.E.; Torres, J.M.O. Gelatin Hydrolysis Test Protocol. 2012. Available online: https://asm.org/Protocols/Gelatin-Hydrolysis-Test-Protocol (accessed on 13 September 2020).
  28. Paramithiotis, S.; Melissari, Ι.; Drosinos, Ε.H. In vitro assessment of properties associated with the survival through the gastrointestinal tract of staphylococci isolated from traditional sausage fermentation. Food Microbiol. 2006, 23, 663–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Roberfroid, M.B. What is beneficial for health? The concept of functional food. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1999, 37, 1039–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Araújo-Rodrigues, H.; dos Santos, M.T.P.G.; Ruiz-Moyano, S.; Tavaria, F.K.; Martins, A.P.L.; Alvarenga, N.; Pintado, M.E. Technological and protective performance of LAB isolated from Serpa PDO cheese: Towards selection and development of an autochthonous starter culture. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 150, 112079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Londoño-Zapata, A.F.; Durango-Zuleta, M.M.; Sepúlveda-Valencia, J.U.; Moreno Herrera, C.X. Characterization of lactic acid bacterial communities associated with a traditional Colombian cheese: Double cream cheese. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 82, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Albayrak, Ç.B.; Duran, M. Isolation and characterization of aroma producing lactic acid bacteria from artisanal white cheese for multifunctional properties. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 150, 112053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ribeiro, S.C. Technological properties of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria isolated from Pico cheese an artisanal cow’s milk cheese. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 116, 573–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kask, S.; Adamberg, K.; Orłowski, A.; Vogensen, F.K.; Møller, P.L.; Ardö, Y.; Paalme, T. Physiological properties of Lactobacillus paracasei, L. danicus and L. curvatus strains isolated from Estonian semi-hard cheese. Food Res. Int. 2003, 36, 1037–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ayad, E.H.E.; Nashat, S.; El-Sadek, N.; Metwaly, H.; El-Soda, M. Selection of wild lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional Egyptian dairy products according to production and technological criteria. Food Microbiol. 2004, 21, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Beresford, T.P.; Fitzsimons, N.A.; Brennan, N.L.; Cogan, T.M. Recent advances in cheese microbiology. Int. Dairy J. 2001, 11, 259–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fusieger, A.; Martins, M.C.F.; Freitas, R.; Nero, L.A.; Carvalho, A.F. Technological properties of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis bv. diacetylactis obtained from dairy and non-dairy niches. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2020, 51, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Carafa, I.; Nardin, T.; Larcher, R.; Viola, R.; Tuohy, K.; Franciosi, E. Identification and characterization of wild lactobacilli and pediococci from spontaneously fermented Mountain Cheese. Food Microbiol. 2015, 48, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Teixeira, C.G.; Fusieger, A.; Martins, E.; Freitas, R.; Vakarelova, M.; Nero, L.A.; Carvalho, A.F. Biodiversity and technological features of Weissella isolates obtained from Brazilian artisanal cheese-producing regions. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 147, 111474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Picon, A.; Garde, S.; Ávila, M.; Nuñez, M. Microbiota dynamics and lactic acid bacteria biodiversity in raw goat milk cheeses. Int. Dairy J. 2016, 58, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, C.L.; Zhang, L.W.; Yi, H.X.; Du, M.; Han, X.; Zhang, L.L.; Feng, Z.; Zhang, Y.C.; Li, Q. Technological characterization of lactococci isolated from traditional Chinese fermented milks. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 1691–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Sarantinopoulos, P.; Andrighetto, C.; Georgalaki, M.D.; Rea, M.C.; Lombardi, A.; Cogan, T.M.; Kalantzopoulos, G.; Tsakalidou, E. Biochemical properties of enterococci relevant to their technological performance. Int. Dairy J. 2001, 11, 621–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nieto-Arribas, P.; Poveda, J.M.; Seseña, S.; Palop, L.; Cabezas, L. Technological characterization of Lactobacillus isolates from traditional Manchego cheese for potential use as adjunct starter cultures. Food Control 2009, 20, 1092–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. González, L.; Sacristán, N.; Arenas, R.; Fresno, J.M.; Tornadijo, M.E. Enzymatic activity of lactic acid bacteria (with antimicrobial properties) isolated from a traditional Spanish cheese. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 592–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Domingos-Lopes, M.F.P.; Stanton, C.; Ross, P.R.; Dapkevicius, M.L.E.; Silva, C.C.G. Genetic diversity, safety and technological characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from artisanal Pico cheese. Food Microbiol. 2017, 63, 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Camara, S.P.; Dapkevicius, A.; Riquelme, C.; Elias, R.B.; Silva, C.C.G.; Malcata, F.X.; Dapkevicius, M.L.N.E. Potential of lactic acid bacteria from Pico cheese for starter culture development. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2019, 25, 303–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mohammed, S.; Çon, A.H. Isolation and characterization of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria from traditional cheese. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 152, 112319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Islam, M.Z.; Uddin, M.E.; Rahman, M.T.; Islam, M.A.; Harun-ur-Rashid, M. Isolation and characterization of dominant lactic acid bacteria from raw goat milk: Assessment of probiotic potential and technological properties. Small Rumin. Res. 2021, 205, 106532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yerlikaya, O. Probiotic potential and biochemical and technological properties of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis strains isolated from raw milk and kefir grains. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 124–134. [Google Scholar]
  50. Nezhad, S.J.E.; Dovom, M.R.E.; Najafi, M.B.H.; Yavarmanesh, M.; Mayo, B. Technological characteristics of Lactobacillus spp. isolated from Iranian raw milk Motal cheese. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 133, 110070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Asteri, I.A.; Robertson, N.; Kagkli, D.M.; Andrewes, P.; Nychas, G.; Coolbear, T.; Holland, R.; Crow, V.; Tsakalidou, E. Technological and flavour potential of cultures isolated from traditional Greek cheeses—A pool of novel species and starters. Int. Dairy J. 2009, 19, 595–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Margalho, L.P.; Feliciano, M.E.; Silva, C.E.; Abreu, J.S.; Piran, M.V.F.; Sant’Ana, A.S. Brazilian artisanal cheeses are rich and diverse sources of nonstarter lactic acid bacteria regarding technological, biopreservative, and safety properties—Insights through multivariate analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 7908–7926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Franciosi, E.; Settanni, L.; Cavazza, A.; Poznanski, E. Biodiversity and technological potential of wild lactic acid bacteria from raw cows’ milk. Int. Dairy J. 2009, 19, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chajęcka-Wierzchowska, W.; Zadernowska, A.; Łaniewska-Trokenheim, Ł. Virulence factors of Enterococcus spp. presented in food. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 75, 670–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Landeta, G.; Curiel, J.A.; Carrascosa, A.V.; Muñoz, R.; De las Rivas, B. Technological and safety properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Spanish dry-cured sausages. Meat Sci. 2013, 95, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Zoumpopoulou, G.; Papadimitriou, K.; Alexandraki, V.; Mavrogonatou, E.; Alexopoulou, K.; Anastasiou, R.; Georgalaki, M.; Kletsas, D.; Tsakalidou, E.; Giaouris, E. The microbiota of Kalathaki and Melichloro Greek artisanal cheeses comprises functional lactic acid bacteria. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 130, 109570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Popovic, N.; Dinic, M.; Tolinacki, M.; Mihajlovic, S.; Terzic-Vidojevic, A.; Bojic, S.; Djokic, J.; Golic, N.; Veljovic, K. New insight into biofilm formation ability, the presence of virulence genes and probiotic potential of Enterococcus sp. dairy isolates. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP). Guidance on the assessment of bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobials of human and veterinary importance. EFSA J. 2012, 10, 2740. [Google Scholar]
  59. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). M45 Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria, 3rd ed.; CLSI Document M45-A; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2006; ISBN 1-56238-607-7. [Google Scholar]
  60. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 27th ed.; CLSI Supplement M100; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sohanang, F.S.N.; Coton, M.; Debaets, S.; Coton, E.; Tatsadjieu, L.N.; Mohammadou, B.A. Bacterial diversity of traditional fermented milks from Cameroon and safety and antifungal activity assessment for selected lactic acid bacteria. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 138, 110635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Caro, I.; Quinto, E.J.; Fuentes, L.; Alessandria, V.; Cocolin, L.S.; Redondo-del-Río, M.P.; Mayo, B.; Flórez, A.B.; Mateo, J. Characterization of Lactococcus strains isolated from artisanal Oaxaca cheese. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 122, 109041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ruiz-Moyano, S.; Gonçalves dos Santos, M.T.P.; Galván, A.I.; Merchán, A.V.; González, E.; Córdoba, M.G.; Benito, M.J. Screening of autochthonous lactic acid bacteria strains from artisanal soft cheese: Probiotic characteristics and prebiotic metabolism. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 114, 108388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mokoena, M.P. Lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins: Classification, biosynthesis and applications against uropathogens: A mini-review. Molecules 2017, 22, 1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. İspirli, H.; Demirbaş, F.; Dertli, E. Characterization of functional properties of Enterococcus spp. isolated from Turkish white cheese. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 75, 358–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zoumpopoulou, G.; Tzouvanou, A.; Mavrogonatou, E.; Alexandraki, V.; Georgalaki, M.; Anastasiou, R.; Papadelli, M.; Manolopoulou, E.; Kazou, M.; Kletsas, D.; et al. Probiotic features of lactic acid bacteria isolated from a diverse pool of traditional Greek dairy products regarding specific strain–host interactions. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2018, 10, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Foods 11 00459 g001 550
Figure 1. Antibiotic susceptibility of E. faecalis (A), Lc. lactis (B), Lp. pentosus (C), Lt. curvatus (D), E. faecium (E), P. pentosaceus (F), Ln. mesenteroides (G), Lp. plantarum (H), Lv. brevis (I), and W. paramesenteroides (J). The concentration of each antibiotic that was necessary to inhibit growth of the strains of each species included in the present study (in mg/mL), indicated in colors.
Figure 1. Antibiotic susceptibility of E. faecalis (A), Lc. lactis (B), Lp. pentosus (C), Lt. curvatus (D), E. faecium (E), P. pentosaceus (F), Ln. mesenteroides (G), Lp. plantarum (H), Lv. brevis (I), and W. paramesenteroides (J). The concentration of each antibiotic that was necessary to inhibit growth of the strains of each species included in the present study (in mg/mL), indicated in colors.
Foods 11 00459 g001
Foods 11 00459 g002 550
Figure 2. Box and whisker plot, summarizing the microbial survival (in log N/N0) of the strains included in the present study, at species level after exposure to PBS buffer adjusted to pH 2 (upper) or 3 (lower) with HCl and incubation at 37 °C for 3 h. N: microbial population after incubation; N0: initial microbial population; solid circle symbol: outliers.
Figure 2. Box and whisker plot, summarizing the microbial survival (in log N/N0) of the strains included in the present study, at species level after exposure to PBS buffer adjusted to pH 2 (upper) or 3 (lower) with HCl and incubation at 37 °C for 3 h. N: microbial population after incubation; N0: initial microbial population; solid circle symbol: outliers.
Foods 11 00459 g002
Foods 11 00459 g003 550
Figure 3. Box and whisker plot, summarizing the microbial survival (in log N/N0) of the strains included in the present study, at species level after exposure to PBS buffer, pH 8, containing 0.5% (A), 1.0% (B), or 2.0% (C) (w/v) bile bovine and incubation at 37 °C for 4 h. N: microbial population after incubation; N0: initial microbial population; solid circle symbol: outliers.
Figure 3. Box and whisker plot, summarizing the microbial survival (in log N/N0) of the strains included in the present study, at species level after exposure to PBS buffer, pH 8, containing 0.5% (A), 1.0% (B), or 2.0% (C) (w/v) bile bovine and incubation at 37 °C for 4 h. N: microbial population after incubation; N0: initial microbial population; solid circle symbol: outliers.
Foods 11 00459 g003
Table
Table 1. Skim milk acidification (in ΔpH 1) and coagulation capacity of representative strains of the LAB included in the present study.
Table 1. Skim milk acidification (in ΔpH 1) and coagulation capacity of representative strains of the LAB included in the present study.
Strain (DRD)Incubation Time (h)Coagulation 2
3691215182124
E. faecalis
26020.08 (0.017)0.21 (0.011)0.38 (0.020)0.50 (0.010)0.57 (0.036)0.66 (0.034)0.74 (0.066)0.76 (0.047)24 h
26510.06 (0.005)0.27 (0.026)0.38 (0.025)0.54 (0.061)0.99 (0.065)1.10 (0.050)0.94 (0.615)1.37 (0.028)24 h
27220.08 (0.043)0.31 (0.057)0.50 (0.029)0.64 (0.015)0.80 (0.025)0.88 (0.032)0.95 (0.053)0.98 (0.040)24 h
Lc. lactis
26490.05 (0.076)0.28 (0.096)0.20 (0.049) 1.74 (0.021)1.92 (0.032)2.17 (0.006)2.16 (0.036)2.13 (0.025)12 h
26580.07 (0.070)0.61 (0.095)1.81 (0.025)2.05 (0.030)2.22 (0.015)2.23 (0.006)2.16 (0.140)2.27 (0.035)6 h
26920.08 (0.031)0.47 (0.146)1.35 (0.311)1.91 (0.066)2.11 (0.036)2.13 (0.043)2.17 (0.026)2.18 (0.030)6 h
26990.08 (0.040)0.12 (0.050)0.16 (0.032)0.17 (0.032)0.11 (0.049)0.19 (0.01)0.19 (0.038)0.21 (0.041)NC
Lp. pentosus
26620.10 (0.043)0.53 (0.217)1.38 (0.361)1.94 (0.085)2.16 (0.057)2.16 (0.063)2.20 (0.028)2.18 (0.066)6 h
26930.09 (0.034)0.10 (0.045)0.14 (0.025)0.16 (0.030)0.15 (0.066)0.19 (0.02)0.19 (0.023)0.18 (0.020)NC
Lt. curvatus
27080.03 (0.005)0.10 (0.015)0.24 (0.040)0.31 (0.020)0.45 (0.010)0.50 (0.011)0.54 (0.010)0.59 (0.023)24 h
27090.05 (0.020)0.19 (0.026)0.33 (0.051)0.48 (0.034)0.73 (0.055)0.78 (0.049)0.85 (0.041)0.89 (0.050)3 d
27160.03 (0.015)0.13 (0.020)0.25 (0.020)0.34 (0.035)0.64 (0.058)0.74 (0.035)0.89 (0.015)0.96 (0.030)2 d
27280.04 (0.025)0.10 (0.025)0.16 (0.035)0.20 (0.041)0.24 (0.017)0.23 (0.020)0.24 (0.015)0.23 (0.047)NC
E. faecium
25790.08 (0.02)0.24 (0.03)0.36 (0.037)0.40 (0.045)0.50 (0.065)0.52 (0.070)0.55 (0.075)0.58 (0.089)4 d
25810.07 (0.020)0.19 (0.030)0.29 (0.036)0.32 (0.035)0.39 (0.047)0.40 (0.020)0.40 (0.015)0.43 (0.015)NC
25850.06 (0.023)0.17 (0.028)0.29 (0.030)0.33 (0.045)0.35 (0.015)0.47 (0.015)0.46 (0.020)0.43 (0.055)NC
25880.07 (0.028)0.15 (0.030)0.30 (0.026)0.34 (0.035)0.39 (0.052)0.51 (0.017)0.48 (0.055)0.46 (0.061)4 d
26670.05 (0.045)0.22 (0.025)0.58 (0.085)0.91 (0.005)1.21 (0.023)1.37 (0.011)1.46 (0.01)1.52 (0.026)12 h
26700.07 (0.036)0.22 (0.036)0.60 (0.020)0.85 (0.045)1.10 (0.025)1.29 (0.023)1.37 (0.02)1.39 (0.026)24 h
25870.05 (0.026)0.07 (0.037)0.07 (0.011)0.07 (0.005)0.08 (0.030)0.13 (0.02)0.12 (0.02)0.11 (0.075)NC
26000.08 (0.017)0.24 (0.037)0.46 (0.025)0.59 (0.020)0.64 (0.015)0.70 (0.015)0.72 (0.037)0.72 (0.015)3 d
26950.04 (0.083)0.08 (0.115)0.12 (0.110)0.21 (0.173)0.21 (0.023)0.26 (0.025)0.42 (0.191)0.42 (0.026)3 d
27110.04 (0.032)0.12 (0.045)0.25 (0.055)0.33 (0.100)0.53 (0.040)0.72 (0.03)0.81 (0.030)0.83 (0.126)3 d
27200.07 (0.030)0.19 (0.025)0.36 (0.026)0.38 (0.030)0.49 (0.015)0.56 (0.017)0.56 (0.030)0.55 (0.126)5 d
27230.05 (0.005)0.21 (0.025)0.30 (0.026)0.32 (0.030)0.44 (0.015)0.43 (0.017)0.45 (0.030)0.51 (0.126)NC
26910.07 (0.030)0.16 (0.076)0.49 (0.080)0.75 (0.076)1.00 (0.017)1.23 (0.030)1.35 (0.005)1.39 (0.02)24 h
26860.05 (0.001)0.19 (0.003)0.27 (0.020)0.31 (0.015)0.39 (0.030)0.36 (0.030)0.40 (0.030)0.41 (0.052)NC
27240.07 (0.036)0.19 (0.010)0.35 (0.020)0.44 (0.040)0.54 (0.037)0.63 (0.005)0.68 (0.035)0.78 (0.181)6 d
P. pentosaceus
26160.1 (0.032)0.15 (0.005)0.23 (0.020)0.29 (0.026)0.30 (0.02)0.32 (0.051)0.38 (0.040)0.41 (0.040)NC
26350.11 (0.025)0.20 (0.040)0.32 (0.026)0.39 (0.005)0.48 (0.041)0.52 (0.023)0.53 (0.025)0.54 (0.021)NC
26810.07 (0.066)0.11 (0.055)0.21 (0.010)0.42 (0.051)0.50 (0.032)0.77 (0.121)1.00 (0.115)1.13 (0.085)3 d
26890.06 (0.02)0.14 (0.049)0.32 (0.047)0.71 (0.060)1.08 (0.041)1.30 (0.005)1.44 (0.041)1.47 (0.026)24 h
26940.01 (0.017)0.03 (0.036)0.06 (0.07)0.13 (0.090)0.73 (0.936)0.83 (0.990)0.87 (1.013)0.88 (0.962)3 d
27530.09 (0.062)0.16 (0.130)0.21 (0.225)0.23 (0.239)0.15 (0.015)0.18 (0.023)0.24 (0.032)0.31 (0.106)NC
26340.08 (0.034)0.12 (0.045)0.16 (0.025)0.17 (0.011)0.15 (0.068)0.22 (0.02)0.22 (0.025)0.23 (0.001)NC
26520.10 (0.040)0.30 (0.045)0.50 (0.055)0.73 (0.051)1.10 (0.015)1.30 (0.001)1.44 (0.011)1.49 (0.023)12 h
26550.11 (0.025)0.58 (0.050)1.12 (0.015)1.53 (0.025)1.78 (0.050)1.86 (0.025)1.92 (0.005)1.96 (0.069)6 h
26570.11 (0.026)0.66 (0.070)1.85 (0.020)2.00 (0.037)2.21 (0.011)2.22 (0.020)2.23 (0.015)2.22 (0.064)6 h
27610.08 (0.011)0.18 (0.036)0.26 (0.043)0.35 (0.030)0.42 (0.005)0.48 (0.001)0.58 (0.020)0.65 (0.005)2 d
26790.01 (0.023)0.06 (0.032)0.33 (0.020)0.44 (0.023)0.01 (0.034)0.01 (0.017)0.13 (0.199)0.18 (0.238)NC
26760.07 (0.061)0.12 (0.086)0.22 (0.097)0.33 (0.070)0.45 (0.011)0.63 (0.075)0.66 (0.126)0.65 (0.188)4 d
27480.10 (0.015)0.24 (0.028)0.34 (0.036)0.42 (0.020)0.54 (0.020)0.60 (0.028)0.67 (0.02)0.72 (0.043)24 h
27490.08 (0.005)0.21 (0.02)0.29 (0.032)0.4 (0.043)0.52 (0.028)0.58 (0.036)0.72 (0.005)0.89 (0.026)2 d
27520.09 (0.011)0.18 (0.020)0.25 (0.030)0.30 (0.010)0.31 (0.011)0.31 (0.015)0.36 (0.026)0.42 (0.030)6 d
Ln. mesenteroides
25760.09 (0.020)0.22 (0.011)0.32 (0.015)0.36 (0.020)0.40 (0.011)0.42 (0.005)0.39 (0.030)0.38 (0.01)NC
26040.12 (0.02)0.43 (0.026)0.93 (0.026)1.29 (0.055)1.50 (0.075)1.65 (0.060)1.72 (0.034)1.74 (0.060)12 h
27030.06 (0.080)0.18 (0.189)0.56 (0.258)0.88 (0.150)1.08 (0.085)1.33 (0.086)1.42 (0.075)1.44 (0.051)NC
27050.07 (0.055)0.12 (0.160)0.32 (0.149)0.39 (0.112)0.47 (0.041)0.60 (0.030)0.62 (0.040)0.66 (0.092)4 d
27060.01 (0.017)0.02 (0.051)0.03 (0.058)0.10 (0.159)0.32 (0.375)0.51 (0.540)0.74 (0.564)0.64 (0.242)24 h
Lp. plantarum
25840.07 (0.032)0.19 (0.041)0.34 (0.015)0.42 (0.032)0.55 (0.02)0.64 (0.015)0.66 (0.005)0.66 (0.02)3 d
26080.14 (0.005)0.30 (0.032)0.51 (0.051)0.64 (0.025)0.85 (0.130)0.91 (0.145)0.99 (0.137)1.05 (0.151)2 d
26530.10 (0.028)0.30 (0.026)0.50 (0.026)0.78 (0.017)1.05 (0.101)1.25 (0.092)1.39 (0.083)1.48 (0.085)12 h
26680.07 (0.043)0.06 (0.050)0.07 (0.032)0.37 (0.589)0.60 (0.335)1.32 (0.526)2.00 (0.104)2.05 (0.068)24 h
26120.10 (0.020)0.23 (0.055)0.37 (0.098)0.50 (0.134)0.61 (0.185)0.67 (0.189)0.73 (0.172)0.77 (0.163)2 d
26450.05 (0.005)0.18 (0.037)0.29 (0.028)0.31 (0.015)0.44 (0.025)0.44 (0.025)0.46 (0.026)0.47 (0.025)4 d
26480.06 (0.032)0.14 (0.045)0.24 (0.05)0.43 (0.060)0.90 (0.066)1.19 (0.040)1.31 (0.041)1.36 (0.051)24 h
26560.08 (0.015)0.23 (0.005)0.41 (0.020)0.52 (0.126)0.42 (0.040)0.47 (0.030)0.47 (0.040)0.51 (0.037)3 d
Lv. brevis
25960.05 (0.015)0.11 (0.017)0.24 (0.01)0.33 (0.047)0.67 (0.075)0.77 (0.051)0.88 (0.026)0.95 (0.015)2 d
26240.07 (0.005)0.12 (0.005)0.16 (0.005)0.19 (0.015)0.15 (0.047)0.21 (0.069)0.21 (0.005)0.56 (0.597)NC
26640.05 (0.047)0.12 (0.205)0.30 (0.090)1.63 (0.272)1.98 (0.165)2.14 (0.120)2.20 (0.075)2.16 (0.066)6 h
26650.06 (0.055)0.22 (0.015)0.39 (0.052)0.44 (0.015)0.45 (0.015)0.46 (0.037)0.48 (0.017)0.56 (0.085)3 d
27570.09 (0.040)0.20 (0.020)0.23 (0.005)0.28 (0.005)0.28 (0.03)0.29 (0.017)0.31 (0.032)0.35 (0.017)NC
27600.06 (0.005)0.12 (0.005)0.15 (0.005)0.18 (0.015)0.15 (0.005)0.17 (0.005)0.23 (0.011)0.25 (0.015)NC
27630.06 (0.01)0.12 (0.01)0.14 (0.01)0.19 (0.015)0.13 (0.015)0.15 (0.015)0.21 (0.023)0.24 (0.040)NC
26880.1 (0.02)0.13 (0.051)0.16 (0.036)0.18 (0.040)0.09 (0.058)0.25 (0.046)0.26 (0.017)0.26 (0.034)NC
W. paramesenteroides
26130.11 (0.028)0.20 (0.010)0.36 (0.010)0.43 (0.015)0.51 (0.020)0.53 (0.005)0.60 (0.075)0.61 (0.062)NC
27010.10 (0.040)0.13 (0.055)0.17 (0.041)0.19 (0.041)0.14 (0.050)0.18 (0.052)0.21 (0.020)0.21 (0.026)NC
27140.10 (0.030)0.19 (0.01)0.19 (0.107)0.36 (0.028)0.50 (0.017)0.56 (0.020)0.54 (0.028)0.55 (0.010)NC
27190.03 (0.010)0.10 (0.011)0.25 (0.047)0.57 (0.118)1.09 (0.049)1.19 (0.035)1.33 (0.026)1.40 (0.035)24 h
27510.07 (0.005)0.19 (0.010)0.29 (0.010)0.37 (0.017)0.55 (0.020)0.57 (0.025)0.61 (0.038)0.62 (0.040)4 d
27260.09 (0.032)0.20 (0.040)0.32 (0.015)0.42 (0.011)0.52 (0.020)0.54 (0.025)0.57 (0.025)0.64 (0.023)4 d
27430.08 (0.041)0.24 (0.037)0.66 (0.036)0.90 (0.049)1.06 (0.050)1.19 (0.005)1.26 (0.020)1.33 (0.005)24 h
27550.10 (0.023)0.20 (0.020)0.30 (0.011)0.39 (0.034)0.53 (0.026)0.53 (0.020)0.55 (0.015)0.56 (0.025)NC
27560.07 (0.026)0.25 (0.025)0.39 (0.005)0.48 (0.015)0.61 (0.011)0.62 (0.015)0.65 (0.036)0.66 (0.015)3 d
1 The ΔpH values were calculated by subtracting the pH value after the given incubation time at 30 °C (37 °C for enterococci) from the respective of uninoculated skim milk incubated for the same time at the same temperature. 2 The time in which coagulation was visibly observed in presented. NC: no coagulation after 7 days incubation at 37 °C for enterococci and 30 °C for the rest LAB.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsigkrimani, M.; Panagiotarea, K.; Paramithiotis, S.; Bosnea, L.; Pappa, E.; Drosinos, E.H.; Skandamis, P.N.; Mataragas, M. Microbial Ecology of Sheep Milk, Artisanal Feta, and Kefalograviera Cheeses. Part II: Technological, Safety, and Probiotic Attributes of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolates. Foods 2022, 11, 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030459

AMA Style

Tsigkrimani M, Panagiotarea K, Paramithiotis S, Bosnea L, Pappa E, Drosinos EH, Skandamis PN, Mataragas M. Microbial Ecology of Sheep Milk, Artisanal Feta, and Kefalograviera Cheeses. Part II: Technological, Safety, and Probiotic Attributes of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolates. Foods. 2022; 11(3):459. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030459

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsigkrimani, Markella, Konstantina Panagiotarea, Spiros Paramithiotis, Loulouda Bosnea, Eleni Pappa, Eleftherios H. Drosinos, Panagiotis N. Skandamis, and Marios Mataragas. 2022. "Microbial Ecology of Sheep Milk, Artisanal Feta, and Kefalograviera Cheeses. Part II: Technological, Safety, and Probiotic Attributes of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolates" Foods 11, no. 3: 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030459

APA Style

Tsigkrimani, M., Panagiotarea, K., Paramithiotis, S., Bosnea, L., Pappa, E., Drosinos, E. H., Skandamis, P. N., & Mataragas, M. (2022). Microbial Ecology of Sheep Milk, Artisanal Feta, and Kefalograviera Cheeses. Part II: Technological, Safety, and Probiotic Attributes of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolates. Foods, 11(3), 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030459

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop