Next Article in Journal
Effect of High Hydrostatic Pressure Intensity on Structural Modifications in Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) Proteins
Next Article in Special Issue
Dynamics of Changes in pH and the Contents of Free Sugars, Organic Acids and LAB in Button Mushrooms during Controlled Lactic Fermentation
Previous Article in Journal
Maturation of Moristel in Different Vineyards: Amino Acid and Aroma Composition of Mistelles and Wines with Particular Emphasis in Strecker Aldehydes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Limosilactobacillus fermentum ING8, a Potential Multifunctional Non-Starter Strain with Relevant Technological Properties and Antimicrobial Activity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bacteriocin-Producing Strain Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP17L/1 Isolated from Traditional Stored Ewe’s Milk Cheese and Its Beneficial Potential

by
Andrea Lauková
1,*,
Martin Tomáška
2,
Maria Joao Fraqueza
3,
Renáta Szabóová
1,
Eva Bino
1,
Jana Ščerbová
1,
Monika Pogány Simonová
1 and
Emília Dvorožňáková
4
1
Centre of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4–6, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia
2
Dairy Research Institute, a.s., Dlhá 95, 010 01 Žilina, Slovakia
3
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Avenida da Universidade Tecnica, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal
4
Parasitological Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Hlinkova 3, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(7), 959; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11070959
Submission received: 1 March 2022 / Revised: 21 March 2022 / Accepted: 24 March 2022 / Published: 25 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Fermented Foods)

Abstract

:
Stored ewe’s milk lump cheese is a local product that can be a source of autochthonous beneficial microbiota, especially lactic acid bacteria. The aim of this study was to show the antimicrobial potential of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP17L/1 isolated from stored ewe’s milk lump cheese. Lpb. plantarum LP17L/1 is a non-hemolytic, non-biofilm-forming strain, susceptible to antibiotics. It contains genes for 10 bacteriocins—plantaricins and exerted active bacteriocin with in vitro anti-staphylococcal and anti-listerial effect. It does not produce damaging enzymes, but it produces β-galactosidase. It also sufficiently survives in Balb/c mice without side effects which indicate its safety. Moreover, a reduction in coliforms in mice jejunum was noted. LP17L/1 is supposed to be a promising additive for Slovak local dairy products.

1. Introduction

Ewe’s milk and products made from ewe’s milk remain irreplaceable in human nutrition [1]. In Slovakia, ewe’s milk products are very popular because sheep breeding has a long tradition. Sheep are mostly grazed on mountainous pastures, so ewe’s milk can be supposed as a biofood. Ewe’s milk contains more protein, vitamins, and trace elements compared with cow milk [1]. Many traditional products made from ewe’s milk such as ”Slovenská parenica“, “Slovenská bryndza“, and “Slovenský oštiepok“ have been designed as protected geographical products (PGI), meaning with protected geographical indication since 2008. Ewe’s milk lump cheese received a traditional specialty guaranteed (TSG) label [2]. This indication designated by the European Union Commission was decided because of the special traditional manufacturing of ewe’s milk lump cheese. Moreover, stored ewe’s milk lump cheese belongs to these products. These products can be a source of autochthonous beneficial microbiota especially lactic acid bacteria, mostly from the phylum Firmicutes such as lactobacilli, lactococci, streptococci, and/or pediococci [3,4]. Besides this, stored ewe’s milk lump cheese is a base component for bryndza production [1]. Ewe’s milk lump cheese is processed as formerly described by Lauková et al. [5] but cheese for stored cheese processing has to be pressed for longer, then it is minced and salted (to have a salt concentration of around 4–6%) in special wood barrels which are lined with wood veneer. Barrels are filled, closed, and placed in a cellar for two months for ripening at temperatures from 2–6 °C.
The species Lactobacillus plantarum (now Lactiplantibacillus plantarum) [6] has been reported several times as a probiotic additive [7,8] which can also produce bacteriocin [9]. Bacteriocins are low molecular, thermo-stable, antimicrobial, and ribosomal active peptides which are synthesized by many species of bacteria including lactic acid bacteria (LAB). They show antimicrobial activities against food pathogens [10,11]. Many lactobacilli with probiotic characteristics are described as functional additives for dairy products [12,13]. Molecular studies reveal that bacteriocin determinants are mostly grouped in operons-regulons [11]. Structural genes for bacteriocin production can be found on plasmids, transposons, or mobile genetic elements inside the bacterial chromosome [14]. Bacteriocins produced by different food-originated LAB of many species have been reported up to now [11]. Their benefit is not only as an additive to beneficially influence the product itself but they can be beneficial for consumers via products such as, e.g., cholesterol-reducing functional bacteria [12]. Bacteriocin-producing bacteria are used as the main starter or adjunct culture for making cheese or fermented dairy products to prevent spoilage bacteria [11]. Strains of the species Lactococcus lactis and/or Lactobacillus casei are mostly used in the dairy industry [11]. This study focused on the antimicrobial potential of Lpb. plantarum strain LP17L/1 originating from stored ewe’s milk lump cheese for its further application possibility in Slovak local dairy products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation and Identification of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (Lactobacillus plantarum) LP17L/1

Stored sheep cheeses were supplied by different dairy plants (34) located in central Slovakia. The standard dilution microbiological method (International Organization for Standardization, ISO) was used to treat samples as follows: sample (10 g) was mixed with 90 mL of peptone water (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using a Stomacher–Masticator homogenizer (IUL Instruments, Barcelona, Spain). Then, samples were diluted in Ringer solution (pH 7.0, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The dilutions were plated on MRS medium (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and cultivated at 37 °C for 48 h. Randomly picked colonies were checked for purity on MRS medium enriched with 5% of sheep blood. Then, pure colonies were submitted for taxonomical identification by the MALDI-TOF identification system (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) based on the analysis of the bacterial proteins [15]. This was performed using a Microflex MALDI-TOF mass spectrophotometer as also described by Lauková et al. [5]. Lysates of bacterial cells were prepared according to the producer’s recommendation (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA). Results were evaluated using the MALDI Biotyper 3.0 (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) identification database. Taxonomic allocation of strains was evaluated on the basis of highly probable species identification (score 2.300–3.000), secure probable species identification/probable species identification (2.000–2.299), and probable genus identification (1.700–1.999). The L. plantarum DSM 20633T DSM strain involved in the identification system database was a positive control. The identified Lpb. plantarum LP17L/1 strain was stored using the Microbank system (Pro-Lab Diagnostic, Richmond, Canada) for further analyses. Genotypization of Lpb. plantarum was performed according to an amplification protocol [16] with the following primers: 5′-ATGAGGTATTCAACTTATG-3′ and 5′-GCTGGATCACCTCCTTTC-3′ according to the following program: amplification consisted of 30 cycles 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 53 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C. The first cycle was preceded by incubation for 5 min at 94 °C. Visualization was performed by agarose electrophoresis (0.8% agarose, Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Schnelldorf, Germany). The control strain was L. plantarum CCM 4000 (Dr. Nemcová, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Slovakia).
Phenotypization was provided using the commercial kit BBL Anaerobe (Becton and Dickinson, Cockeysville, MD, USA), and compared with a reference strain according to de Vos et al. [17] following the fermentation of carbohydrates (arabinose, cellobiose, mannitol, melibiose, raffinose, fructose, ribose, sucrose, xylose), esculin hydrolysis, and others such as L-serine AMC, L-isoleucine-AMC, L-methionine-AMC, p-n-p-phosphate, L-phenylalanine-AMC, or 4MU-β-D-xyloside.
Based on technological properties such as the acidify ability test, coagulate formation during the growth in raw milk, non-production of biogenic amines (2-fenyletylamine, putrescin, cadaverin, histamine, tyramine, spermidine, spermin) as well as non-CO2 production, the LP17L/1 strain was selected for additional study [18].

2.2. Hemolysis, Antibiotic Phenotype Profile, Biofilm-Forming Ability, and Enzyme Production of Lpb. plantarum LP17L/1

MRS agar (Difco, Sparks, MD, USA) supplemented with 5% of defibrinated sheep blood was inoculated by tested strain to check hemolysis. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h under semi-anaerobic conditions. The presence of clearing zones around the colonies was interpreted as β, α-hemolysis. The absence of zones was evaluated as a negative result, ᵧ-hemolysis, respectively [19].
The antibiotic phenotype was tested using antibiotic strips [20] with minimal inhibition concentration (MIC in µg) on Mueller-Hinton agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The control strain was Lpb. plantarum CCM 4000 (kindly supplied by Dr. Nemcová, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Slovakia). Evaluating was performed according to the manufacturer`s instructions. The following strips and concentrations (with established breakpoints) supplied by Oxoid (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) were used: ampicillin (0.015–256 µg/mL), penicillin (0.002–32 µg/mL), tetracycline (0.015–256 µg/mL), erythromycin (0.015–256 µg/mL), vancomycin (0.015–256 µg/mL), oxacillin, and gentamicin (0.064–1024 µg/mL).
Biofilm-forming ability in the LP17L/1 strain was analyzed using the quantitative plate assay by Chaieb et al. [21] and Slížová et al. [22]. One colony of the LP17L/1 strain grown on MRS (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) overnight at 37 °C was transferred into 5 mL of Ringer solution (pH 7.0, 0.75% w/v) to obtain a suspension corresponding to 1 × 108 CFU/mL. This dilution (100 µL volume) was transferred into 10 mL of MRS broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The volume (200 µL) of dilution in MRS was inoculated into polystyrene microtiter plate wells (Greiner ELISA 12 Well Strips, 350 µL, flat bottom, Frickenhausen GmbH, Germany). The microtiter plate was incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The biofilm formed in the microtiter plate wells was washed twice with 200 µL of deionized water and dried at 25 °C for 40 min. The attached bacteria were stained at 25 °C for 30 min with 200 µL of 0.1% (m/v) crystal violet in deionized water. After the dye solution was aspirated away, the wells were washed twice with 200 µL of deionized water. The plate was dried at 25 °C for 30 min. The dye bound to the adherent biofilm was extracted with 200 µL of 95% ethanol. A 150 µL volume was transferred from each well into a new microplate well for absorbance (A) measurement at 570 nm. An Apollo 11 Absorbance Microplate reader LB 913 (Apollo, Berthold Technologies, Oak Ridge, TN, USA) was used. Each strain and condition were tested in two independent runs with 12 replicates. A sterile MRS was included in each analysis as a negative control. Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus CCM 7316 was used as a positive control (kindly provided by Dr. Eva Styková, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Slovakia). Biofilm-forming ability was classified as highly positive (A570 ≥ 1.0), low-grade positive (0.1 ≤ A570 <1.0), or negative (A570 < 0.1) [21,22].
The following enzymes were tested: alkalic phosphatase, esterase, esterase lipase (C8), lipase (C14), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, acidic phosphatase, naphthol-AS-Bi-phosphohydrolase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase. They are involved in the API-ZYM system kit (BioMérieux, Marcy l`Etoile, France). Enzyme activities were evaluated according to the manufacturer`s instructions (after 4 h of incubation at 37 °C). Color intensity values from 0 to 5 and relevant values in nanomoles (nmoL) were assigned for each reaction according to the color chart supplied with the kit as previously described by Lauková et al. [23].

2.3. Tolerance to Oxgall/Bile, Low pH and Growth in Skim Milk (Biofermentor Biosan)

The tolerance of the LP17L/1 strain in a bile environment was tested in MRS broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) enriched with 1% oxgall/bile (Difco, Sparks, MD, USA) according to Gilliland and Walker [24]. An overnight culture of the LP17L/1 strain was inoculated (0.1%) into MRS broth without and with oxgall/bile and incubated at 37 °C for 180 min. Viable cells of the tested strain (in medium with and without oxgall/bile) were counted at time zero (0), at 90 min, and 180 min. Appropriate dilutions (in Ringer solution, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were plated on MRS (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Surviving cells of LP17L/1 grown on MRS agar at time zero (0), at 90 min, and at 180 min were expressed in CFU/mL.
Tolerance to pH 2.5 was tested in simulated gastric juice (SGJ) containing pepsin and also not containing pepsin (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Schnelldorf, Germany) according to Arboleya et al. [25]. Tubes containing SGJ with and without pepsin were inoculated with a 0.1% overnight culture of the LP17L/1 strain. Surviving cells were counted on MRS agar at time zero (0), and at 90 min and 180 min as formerly mentioned and expressed in CFU/mL.
Skim milk (Difco, Sparks, MD, USA) in a tube was inoculated with 0.1% pre-inoculum (overnight culture of the LPa17L/1 strain—9.0 × 109 CFU/mL) and cultivated at 37 °C in the Biofermentor Biosan RTB-1C (Laboserv Company, Brno, Czech Republic). The growth of the strain (absorbance, A600) was measured every 30 min from time 0 (before cultivation) for 24 h. After 24 h, the cell count was calculated by spreading an appropriate dilution on MRS agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and the cells count was expressed in CFU/mL.

2.4. Structural Plantaricin Genes Analysis and Bacteriocin Activity of LP17L/1

The genes for 10 plantaricins were analyzed. The plantaricin (pln) A, B, C, N, and K genes were amplified through a PCR multiplex adapted from Remiger et al. [26] and Sáenz et al. [27] in a thermocycler VWR Dopio (VRW International, Leuven, Belgium). PCR amplification of other gene sequences involved in plantaricin production was carried out using the primers and conditions specified in Table 1. Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC BAA793TM was used as a positive control.
Firstly, the bacteriocin activity of LP17L/1 was tested using the qualitative method according to Skalka et al. [28]. Briefly, an MRS agar plate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) inoculated with the tested strain was incubated at 37 °C overnight. After that, the plate was overlaid with 4 mL of soft agar (0.7%) and seeded with 200 µL of indicator bacteria (overnight culture-absorbance measured at 600 nm-A600 up to 0.8 which corresponds to 106–109 CFU/mL based on the type/species of indicator strain). The plates were incubated overnight and widths of the clear inhibitory zones were measured in mm. In this testing, the most susceptible indicator -Enterococcus avium EA5 (fecal isolate of our laboratory) was used, followed by listeriae; Listeria monocytogenes CCM4699-clinical strain, the strains of L. monocytogenes P2024, P7223, P7562-isolated from various meat products (State Veterinary and Food Institute in Olomouc, Czech Republic), L. innocua LMG13568 (University Brussel, Belgium), Staphylococcus aureus SA5 (isolated from mastitis milk), S. aureus SABok1, and S. aureus SASedl4 (from ewe’s milk lump cheeses). These species were selected as the most frequent contaminants in raw milk. To obtain a more concentrated bacteriocin substance, the supernatant of the LP17L/1 strain was concentrated using Concentrator plus (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany). Briefly, the LP17L/1 strain (0.1% pre-inoculum) was inoculated in MRS broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Then, the culture was centrifuged for 30 min at 10,000× g (at laboratory temperature). The supernatant was concentrated 20 × fold to achieve a volume of 4 mL. The inhibitory activity was tested using the method according to De Vuyst et al. [29] against E. avium EA5, 12 strains of L. monocytogenes from various food products, L. monocytogenes CCM4699 (clinical strain, Czech Culture Collection, Brno, Czech Republic), L. innocua LMG13568 (University Brussel, Belgium), and 10 strains of S. aureus (from mastitis milk-1, from the feces of rabbits, and intestines of trout). Bacteriocin activity was expressed in arbitrary units per mL, indicating the highest dilution of concentrated bacteriocin substance which can inhibit the growth of the indicator strain.
Table 1. The primers used for plantaricin genes detection.
Table 1. The primers used for plantaricin genes detection.
Target PCR PrimersAmplicons (pb)Temperature of AnnealingReferences
pln A F-GTACAGTACTAATGGGAG
R-CTTACGCCATCTATACG45053.5 [26,27]
pln B F-GCTTCTTATTTAAGTAGAGGATTTCTG
R-GCCACGATTACTACCCTTAG92753.5
pln C F-AGCAGATGAAATTCGGCAG
R-ATAATCCAACGGTGCAATCC10853.5
pln D F-TGAGGACAAACAGACTGGAC
R-GCATCGGAAAAATTGCGGATAC41454
pln KF-CTGTAAGCATTGCTAACCAATC
R-ACTGCTGACGCTGAAAAG24653.5
pln J F-TAACGACGGATTGCTCTG
R-AATCAAGGAATTATCACATTAGTC 47553.5
pln L F-ACGGCGTCTGAGATCCAATG
R-GTTCTGGAAGTCACTGCGATTG41356.5
pln M F-AAGCGGTATATTAAAAGCGTAGAG
R-CATTTCCTCCTTAAAGCATTCAAC44454
pln N F-ATTGCCGGGTTAGGTATCG
R-CCTAAACCATGCCATGCAC4635.5
pln R F-CCCAGCAGTCCCATCACTAA
R-TTACGGAGCGGCATCTATGTC23656.5

2.5. To Confirm Proteinaceous Character of Bacteriocin Substance

MRS broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was inoculated with Lpb. plantarum LP17L/1 and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Then, it was centrifuged at 10,000× g for 30 min (at laboratory temperature). The supernatant was taken away and the cells (109 CFU/mL) were dissolved in Ringer solution. The surface of the 1.5% agar plate was overlaid with BHI soft agar (v/w, 0.7%) containing 200 µL of indicator strain. After drying, 5 µL of LP 17L/1 cells was dropped on the agar plate surface. To each drop was added 2–3 µL of the enzyme protease K (10 mg/mL). Plates were incubated at 37 °C overnight. When a clear halfmoon-formed zone appeared, it indicated the proteinaceous character of the substance. The protease-treated substance was then checked against indicator bacteria such as S. aureus from chondritis (R. Nemcová, UVMP in Košice) and trout (our isolates) as well as against S. aureus SA5, S. aureus SABok1, SASedl4, Kek2, and L. monocytogens P 7223. Indicator bacteria used were overnight culture-absorbance measured at 600 nm-A600 up to 0.8 which again corresponds to 106–109 CFU/m based on the type/species of the indicator strain.

2.6. In Vivo Safety Control and Effect against Coliform Bacteria

To test the in vivo safety of the LP17L/1 strain and its inhibitory effect against coliforms, aged eight weeks, pathogen-free male Balb/c mice (VELAZ Prague, Czech Republic) were used with weight ranging from 18 g to 20 g. Mice were kept under a 12 h light/dark regimen at a temperature of 22–24 °C with a humidity of 56%. They were placed on a commercial diet and water was available without restriction [30]. Animals were divided randomly into 2 groups: control (n = 15) and experimental group (n = 17). To differentiate the LP17L/1 strain from other LAB, its variant marked by rifampicin was prepared [31]. LP17L/1 was administered per os daily at a total dose of 100 µL (109 CFU/mL). Its count, as well as the count of other LAB, was enumerated after the standard microbiological dilution of feces and jejunum (jejunum was homogenized using the Stomacher–Masticator, Spain) and then plated on MRS agar enriched with rifampicin (100 µg) and MRS agar-rifampicin free. Moreover, coliform bacteria were counted to test the in vivo inhibitory activity due to the LP17L/1 strain. The bacterial count was expressed in CFU/g ± SD. The sampling of feces and jejunum was performed at the start of the experiment (n = 20), at day 7 (mixture samples, n = 5), and at day 30 (mixture samples n = 5.) For the jejunum, mixture sampling was also provided (n = 3).

3. Results

3.1. Identification, Hemolysis, Antibiotic Phenotype Profile, Biofilm-Forming Ability, and Enzyme Production of Lpb. plantarum LP17L/1

Evaluation of the MALDI-TOF system score (2. 387) allotted the identified strain to the species Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (previously Lactobacillus plantarum, Zheng et al. [6]). A high score was associated with highly probable species identification (2.300–3.000) which was also confirmed by the PCR result and by phenotypization as indicated by Zheng et al. [6]. Genotypization using PCR confirmed the species allocation compared with the L. plantarum-positive control strain.
Lpb. plantarum LP17L/1 was hemolysis negative (ᵧ-hemolysis) and susceptible to antibiotics (P-2 µg/mL, Amp-ampicillin 25 µg, Tc-tetracycline 12 µg, Gn-gentamicin 16 µg, Ox-oxacillin 4 µg, E-erythromycin, Van-vancomycin 4 µg/mL. Lpb. plantarum LP17L/1 does not form a biofilm (0.096 ± 0.002). The values measured for the individual enzyme in the API ZYM test reached zero (no enzyme production) for alkalic phosphatase, esterase, esterase lipase (C8), lipase (C14), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, and cystine arylamidase; no production was also evaluated for the enzyme trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, acidic phosphatase, and naphthol-AS-Bi-phosphohydrolase. A value of 10 nmoL was measured for β-galactosidase, and β-glucosidase. LP17L/1 did not produce β-glucuronidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase, α-fucosidase, and α-galactosidase. In α-glucosidase, 5 nmoL was measured.

3.2. Tolerance to Oxgall/Bile, Low pH and Growth in Skim Milk (Biofermentor Biosan), Enzyme Analysis

LP17/1 sufficiently tolerated 1% of oxgall/bile, when after 90 min cultivation, the difference in cell count between the sample with and without oxgall/bile was in the order of 5.6 × 106: 9.0 × 107 CFU/mL and after 180 min cultivation of the cell count of the LP17/1 strain reached 4.0 × 105 in comparison to the control tube (2.0 × 106, Table 2), still one order difference. Initial counting in this analysis was 3.0 × 109 CFU/mL. In the case of the gastric environment, when its count in gastric juice-simulating medium reached 2.7 × 104 CFU/mL after 180 min incubation in comparison with the control (2.0 × 108 CFU/mL), it did not produce damaging enzymes such as trypsin, α- chymotrypsin or β- glucuronidase. In contrast, it produced 10 nmoL of β- galactosidase.
In Biofermentor Biosan, the LP17L/1 strain showed sufficient growth to achieve 7.2 × 108 CFU/mL in skim milk compared to the same time in MRS (9.0 × 109 CFU/mL) for 24 h in MRS.

3.3. Structural Plantaricin Genes Analysis, Bacteriocin Activity of LP17L/1 and Proteinaceous Character of Substance

Ten pln genes in LP17L/1 strain were confirmed: pln A (450 bp), pln B (475 bp), pln C (108 bp), pln D/414 bp), pln J, pln K, pln L, pln M, pln N (146 bp), and pln R.
Using the qualitative method, LP17L/1 showed inhibitory activity against two listeriae, L. monocytogenes CCM4699 and L. innocua LMG13568 (inhibitory zone 6 mm), out of 8 different indicators such as E. avium EA5, S. aureus SA5, SABok1, SASedl4, L. monocytogenes CCM4699, L. monocytogenes P2024, L. monocytogenes, L. monocytogenes P7223, and L. monocytogenes P7562. Therefore, the substance from the LP17L/1 strain was concentrated using Concentrator plus (Spain) to obtain a more concentrated bacteriocin substance. The inhibitory activity was checked using the quantitative method against 31 indicators (Table 3) [29]. The concentrated substance showed inhibition against 9 out of 14 L. monocytogenes strains (Table 3) with inhibitory activity ranging from 100 to 3 200 AU/mL. The growth of L. monocytogenes CC4699, L. innocua LMG13568, L. monocytogenes P7562, P6301, P2116, P2024 was not inhibited using concentrated substance LP17L/1 as well as the growth of S. aureus SA5, K1/2, and E. avium EA5. However, the growth of 14 out of 16 S. aureus strains was inhibited (Table 3). The most susceptible was L. monocytogenes P7223. This means that 23 out of 31 indicators (74.2%) were inhibited using the concentrated substance.
After treatment with protease K, half-moon inhibitory zones were evaluated with 15 indicator strains confirming the proteinaceous character of the substance and eliminating inhibition due to other effects (e.g., acid production or other organic substance). The growth of these indicators was inhibited: L. monocytogenes P7223, S. aureus SA5 (mastitis milk), SABok1, SASedl4 (cheese), SAKek/2, SA31/9, 31/8, 31/4, 31/3, 31/6 (feces of rabbits), and S. aureus SA5/3, SA3/1, SA6/1, SA3/4, SA 2/1 (trouts).

3.4. In Vivo Control of Safety and Activity of LP17L/1

The LP17L/1 strain sufficiently colonized mice intestines. At day 7, its count in the feces reached 3.63 ± 1.83 CFU/g log 10 (Table 4). Counts of LAB were high (6.48 ± 2.54 CFU/g log 10) and well balanced compared to day 0/1 (Table 4). At day 30, counts of the LP17L/1 strain decreased; however, the total LAB count was increased (7.38 ± 2.71 CFU/g). The decrease in the LP17L/1 strain can be explained by competitive interaction with other LAB flora. In the jejunum, its sufficient count was also noted (2.07 ± 1.43 CFU/g log 10) and similarly as in the feces at day 30, also in the jejunum, a decrease in the LP17L/1 strain was noted. The total LAB in the jejunum was still sufficient and similarly as in the feces at day 30; they were increased also in the jejunum, while the LP17L/1 count decreased at the same time. However, no mortality or symptoms were noted in mice. Coliforms control in the feces showed no influence, but in the jejunum at day 7, a difference of 2.71 log cycle was found compared to sampling at day 0/1 and it was almost the same at day 30.

4. Discussion

The species Lactiplantibacillus plantarum is a bacterium from the genus Lactiplantibacillus, family Lactobacillacae, order Lactobacillales, class Bacilli, and phylum Firmicutes. Because of the progressive genomic sequencing method, the lactobacilli description of 23 novel genera was evaluated by Zheng et al. [6]. The accession number for type strain Lpb. plantarum is AZFR00000000. The identity of our strain was also confirmed by next-generation sequencing showing similarity with the same species strains in the general database up to 91.4% (data not shown, personal communication, Dr. Marián Maďar, UVMP, Košice). The species Lactiplantibacillus plantarum can be frequently detected in dairy products. This is also the case with our strain. It is a lactic acid-producing (data not shown) strain, but also a bacteriocin-producing strain. Its sufficient growth in skim milk and tolerance to oxgall/bile and low pH was confirmed in this study. If the strain is tested for its further probiotic use in products for human consumption, it is required to work/function under gastrointestinal (GIT) conditions; this is because the strain can grow sufficiently under those GIT conditions and can better function there [32]. Listeriae are frequent contaminants of dairy products. Because listeriae can also grow at refrigeration temperatures, they can survive easily in the product [33]. Staphylococci can be also often detected in milk and dairy products [33]. One approach to reducing the prevalence of those contaminants is the use of bacteriocins with a broad antimicrobial spectrum [34]. The in situ effects of enterocins (bacteriocins mostly produced by representatives of the genus Enterococcus) have been already published, e.g., in skimmed milk or yogurt [34]. A decrease of 8 log cycles in viable cells of S. aureus SA1 in skimmed milk was reported by Lauková et al. [35] during 24 h. Using enterocin CCM 4231 was also demonstrated in yogurt (a decrease of 3 log cycles CFU/g). Although in this study non-purified plantaricin was mentioned, the strain Lpb. plantarum 17L/1 possessed 10 pln genes (plantaricins). Plantaricin MG produced by L. plantarum and isolated from Jiaoke, a traditional fermented cream from China, was active against L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, E. coli, and S. Typhimurium [36]. Cukrowska et al. [37] also described lactobacilli with antagonistic activity against listeriae, S. aureus ATCC25923 and salmonellae which sufficiently tolerate low pH and oxgall/bile. A mixture of those strains applied in Balb/c mice affected the cytokine TH1/TH2 balance toward a non-allergic TH1 response. Moreover, the best protective effect against Trichinella spiralis infection associated with the increased oxidative metabolism of peritoneal macrophages was exhibited by the LP17L/1 strain which activated the metabolic activity of macrophages during the migration of newborn larvae (from day 5 to 25 post infection) [30]. This means the model experiment using Balb/c mice showed that the beneficial strain has the ability to decrease the intensity of parasitic infection by affecting important components of the innate immune system such as phagocytosis [38]. The LP17L/1 strain showed impact as an effective mediator to regulate macrophages’ oxidative metabolism in T. spiralis infection, which is promising in trichinellosis treatment or prevention. After an in vitro fecundity test, it was also observed that the LP17L/1 strain revealed a direct inhibitory impact on female fecundity (about 80%) [39]. In this study, the LP17L/1 strain did not cause mortality when applied in Balb/c mice. In addition, in the jejunum, coliform bacteria were decreased. The antimicrobial effect of the beneficial strain can be also increased due to the co-interaction of bacteriocin and lactic acid. Lpb. plantarum L7L/1 also produces β- galactosidase which is the enzyme used in the dairy industry for the production of lactose-free milk intended for lactose-intolerant consumers [40]. Lpb. plantarum 17L/1 was involved in the utility model (PÚV 50094-2021) which is processed at the Industrial Property Office of the Slovak Republic and deposited in the Czech Culture Collection in Brno, Czech Republic (CCM 9208).

5. Conclusions

Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP17L/1 is a non-hemolytic and non-biofilm-forming strain, susceptible to commercial antibiotics, which contains genes for 10 plantaricins and exerted active antimicrobial substances of proteinaceous character—bacteriocin showing in vitro anti-staphylococcal and anti-listerial effects. It does not produce damaging enzymes; however, it produces β- galactosidase. It sufficiently survives in the mouse gastrointestinal tract without side effects which confirms its safety. Moreover, its application in Balb/c mice for one month reduced the count of coliform bacteria in the jejunum. Additional tests are in progress; however, LP17L/1 is a promising additive for Slovak local dairy products.

Author Contributions

A.L. conceptualization, investigation, methodology, data curation, writing, project administration; M.T. resources, methodology; M.J.F. methodology; R.S. methodology; E.B. methodology; J.Š. methodology; M.P.S. methodology; E.D. methodology. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under contract no. APVV-17-0028 and by bilateral project SK-PT-18-0005.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Slovak ethical rules for animal handling. It was approved by the Animal Care Committee of Parasitological Institute SAS (Košice, Slovakia) and the State Veterinary and Food Administration of the Slovak Republic (Ro-3184-221).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under contract no. APVV-17-0028 and by bilateral project SK-PT-18-0005. We are grateful Margita Bodnárová and Dana Melišová for their skillful laboratory work. We also thank Vladimír Kmeť for help with MALDI-TOF evaluation. We are also grateful for Viola Strompfová performing analysis of LP17L/1 strain surviving in oxgall/bile environment. Preliminary results were presented at the conference Hygiena Alimentorum XXXIV (Lauková et al., 2013), pp. 122–125. ISBN 978-80-8077-334-2 and In Mlékarské Listy (Milk Letters No. 144, 2014, Lauková et al. Species of lactobacilli detected in ewe’s milk and lump cheese from region of central Slovakia. Renáta Szabóová is now in position at University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice; however, at time of analysis performing was a Philosophy student and later employed at our institute.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Herian, M. Benefit of sheep milk products to human health. Milk Lett. (Mlékářské listy) 2014, 143, 1–6. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  2. The Slovak Spectator. Available online: https://spectator.sme.sk (accessed on 6 August 2011).
  3. Medveďová, A.; Valík, Ľ.; Liptáková, D. Study of the Fresco culture inhibitory effect against Staphylococcus aureus in milk and in lump cheese. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2011, 50, 193–198. [Google Scholar]
  4. Klapáčová, L.; Greif, G.; Greifová, M.; Tomáška, M.; Hanuš, O.; Dudríková, E. Antimicrobially active lactobacilli from goat’s milk that do not produce biogenic amines. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2015, 54, 270–274. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lauková, A.; Pogány Simonová, M.; Focková, V.; Kološta, M.; Tomáška, M.; Dvrožňáková, E. Susceptibility to bacteriocins in biofilm-forming, variable staphylococci isolated from local Slovak ewe`s milk lump cheese. Foods 2020, 9, 1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zheng, J.; Wittouck, S.; Salvetti, E.; Frany, C.M.A.P.; Harris, H.M.B.; Mattaralli, P.; O’Toole, P.W.; Pot, B.; Vandamme, P.; Walter, J.; et al. Taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillacae and Leuconostocacae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 2782–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tosukhowong, A.; Visessanguan, W.; Pumpuang, L.; Tepkasikul, P.; Panya, A.; Valyasevi, R. Biogenic amine formation in Nham, a Thai fermented sausage, and the reduction by commercial starter culture, Lactobacillus plantarum BCC9546. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 846–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arena, M.P.; Silvian, A.; Normanno, G.; Grieco, F.; Drider, D.; Spano, G. Use of Lactobacillus plantarum strains as a bio-control strategy against food-borne pathogenic microorganisms. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Barbosa, J.; Albano, H.; Silva, B.; Almeida, M.H.; Noguiera, T.; Teixeira, P. Characterization of a Lactiplantibacillus plantarum R23 isolated from Arugula by whole-genome sequencing and its bacteriocin production ability. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, C.; Chen, X.; Jiang, M.; Rui, X.; Li, W.; Dong, M. A newly discovered bacteriocin from Weisella hellenica 1501 associated with Chinese Dong fermented meat (Nanx Wudl). Food Control 2014, 42, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Verma, K.D.; Thakur, M.; Singh, A.; Tripathy, S.; Gupta, K.A.; Baranwal, D.; Patel, A.R.; Shah, N.; Utama, G.L.; Niamah, A.K.; et al. Bacteriocins as antimicrobial and preservative agents in food:Biosynthesis, separation and application. Food Biosci. 2022, 46, 101594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bujňáková, D.; Kmeť, V. Functional properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from dairy products. Folia Microbiol. 2012, 57, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Thakkar, P.; Modi, H.; Dabhi, B.; Prajapati, J. Bile tolerance, bile deconjugation and cholesterol reducing properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated form traditional fermented foods. Int. J. Ferm. Foods 2014, 3, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tajbakhsh, M.; Karimi, A.; Fallah, F.; Akhavan, M.M. Overview of ribosomal and non-ribosomal antimicrobial peptides produced by gram-positive bacteria. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2017, 63, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Alatoom, A.A.; Cunningham, S.A.; Ihde, S.; Mandrekar, J.; Patel, R. Comparison of direct colony method versus extraction method for identification of Gram-positive cocci by use of Bruker Biotyper matrix-assissted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 2868–2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Bertier, F.; Ehrlich, S. Rapid species identification with the two groups of closely related lactobacilli using PCR that target the 16S/23S rRNA spece region. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1998, 23229783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. De Vos, P.; Garrity, G.M.; Jones, D.; Krieg, N.R.; Ludwig, W.; Rainey, F.A.; Schelifer, K.H.; Whitman, W.P. The Firmicutes. In Bergey`s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, genus Lactobacillus, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  18. Drončovský, M.; Lauková, A.; Tomáška, M.; Kološta, M. Selected properties of lactic acid bacteria, isolated from goats milk. In Proceedings of the Hygiena a technologie potravin XLIX. Lenfeldovy a Höklovy dny, Brno, Czech Republic, 16–17 October 2019; pp. 122–125. (In Slovak). [Google Scholar]
  19. Semedo-Lemsadek, T.; Santos, M.A.; Martins, P.; Lopes, M.F.S.; Marques, J.F.; Tenreiro, R.; Crespo, M.T.B. Comparative study using type strains and clinical and food isolates to examine hemolytic activity and occurrence of the cyl operon in enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 2569–2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. CLSI. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Guideline. In Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing M100S, 26th ed.; Electronic: Wayne, PA, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-1-68440-067-6. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chaieb, K.; Chehab, O.; Ymantar, T.; Rouabhia, M.; Mahdouani, K.; Bakhrouf, A. In vitro effect of pH and ethanol on biofilm formation by clinical ica-positive Staphylococcus epidermidis strains. Ann. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Slížová, M.; Nemcová, R.; Maďar, M.; Hadryová, J.; Gancarčíková, S.; Popper, M.; Pistl, J. Analysis of biofilm formation by intestinal lactobacilli. Can. J. Microbiol. 2015, 61, 437–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lauková, A.; Focková, V.; Pogány Simonová, M. Enterococcus mundtii isolated from Slovak raw goat milk and its bacteriocinogenic potential. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. Health 2020, 17, 9504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gilliland, S.E.; Walker, K. Factors to consider when selecting a culture of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a dierat adjunct to produce a hypocholesterolemic effect in humans. J. Dairy Sci. 1990, 73, 905–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Arboleya, S.; Ruas-Madiedo, P.; Margolles, A.; Solis, G.; Salminen, S.; de los Rezes-Gavilán, C.; Gueimonde, M. Characteriyation and in vitro properties of potentially Bifidobacterium strains isolated from breast-milk. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 149, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Remiger, A.; Matthias, A.; Ehrmann, M.A.; Vogel, R.F. Identification of bacteriocin encoding genes in lactobacilli by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1996, 19, 28–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sáenz, C.; Tapia, S.; Chavey, J.; Pay, R. Microencapsulation by spray drying of bioactive compounds from cactus Opuntia ficus-indica. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Skalka, B.; Pillich, J.; Pospíšil, L. Further observation on Corynebacterium renale as an indicator organism in the detection of exfoliation-positive strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Zentralbl. Bacteriol. Hyg. 1983, A256, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De Vuyst, L.; Callaewart, B.; Pot, B. Characterization of antagonistic activity of Lactobacillus amylovorus DCE471 and large-scale isolation of its bacteriocin amylovorin L471. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1996, 19, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vargová, M.; Hurníková, Z.; Revajová, V.; Lauková, A.; Dvorožňáková, E. Probiotic bacteria can modulate murine macrophage`s superoxide production in Trichinella spiralis infection. Helminthologia 2020, 57, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Strompfová, V.; Lauková, A.; Mudroňová, D. Effect of bacteriocin-like substance produced by Enterococcus faecium EF55 on the composition of avian gastrointestinal microflora. Acta Vet. Brno 2003, 72, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Giraffa, G. Enterococci from foods. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 26, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dudríková, E.; Naas, H.T.; Pilipčinec, E.; Burdová, O. Staphylococci as environment contaminants in raw cow’s milk production. In Procedeengs of the 4th International Conference Ecology and Veterinary Medicine, Košice, Slovakia, 13–16 May 1998; pp. 265–271. (In Slovak). [Google Scholar]
  34. Lauková, A.; Czikková, S.; Burdová, O. Anti-staphylococcal effect of enterocin in Sunar and yoghurt. Folia Microbiol. 1999, 44, 707–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lauková, A.; Czikková, S.; Dobránsky, T.; Burdová, O. Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus by enterocin CCM 4231 in milk products. Food Microbiol. 1999, 16, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gong, H.S.; Meng, X.C.; Wang, H. Plantaricin MG, active against Gram-negative bacteria produced by Lactobacillus plantarum KLDS1.0391 isolated from “Jiaok”, a traditional fermented cream from China. Food Control 2010, 21, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cukrowska, B.; Motyl, I.; Kozáková, H.; Schwarzer, M.; Górecki, R.K.; Klewicka, E.; Slizewska, K.; Libudzisz, Z. Probiotic Lactobacillus strains:in vitro and in vivo studies. Folia Microbiol. 2009, 54, 533–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Dvorožňáková, E.; Bucková, B.; Hurníková, Z.; Revajová, V.; Lauková, A. Effect of probiotic bacteria on phagocytosis and respiratory burst activity of blood polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMNL) in mice infected with Trichinella spiralis. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 231, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bucková, B.; Hurníková, Z.; Lauková, A.; Revajová, V.; Dvorožňáková, E. The anti-parasitic effect of probiotic bacteria via limiting the fecundicity of Trichinella spiralis female adults. Helmithologia 2018, 55, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Zeinat, K.; Nawal Magdy, M.; Farahat, M.G. Optimization of culture conditions for production of β-galactosidase by Bacillus megaterium NM56 isolated from rae milk. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. 2016, 7, 366–376. [Google Scholar]
Table 2. Survival of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP17/1 in oxgall/bile as well as at low pH expressed in colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL).
Table 2. Survival of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP17/1 in oxgall/bile as well as at low pH expressed in colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL).
Time of Cultivation
90 min 180 min
LP17/1Ox5.6 × 1064.0 × 105
Control 9.0 × 107 2.0 × 106
LP17/1pH4.5 ×105 2.7 × 104
Control 3.8 × 1082.0 × 108
Initial count of LP17L/1 strain at start 0 h of analysis to survive in oxgall/bile was 3.0 × 109 CFU/mL and in case of pH (2.5) study it was 9.2 × 108 CFU/mL.
Table 3. Inhibitory activity of concentrated substance LP17L/1 expressed in arbitrary units per mL AU/mL.
Table 3. Inhibitory activity of concentrated substance LP17L/1 expressed in arbitrary units per mL AU/mL.
IndicatorsInhibitory Activity
Listeria monocytogenes
P3300100
P5258200
P6501100
P72233 200
P7395100
P7401 100
Ve40100
P10811100
P7395100
S. aureus
Kek2800
Nip/1100
Rum/1100
Bel/1100
31/5400
31/6400
33/4400
39/9100
39/10400
SA5/3ch100
Sa3/1ch200
SA6/1ch800
SA3/4ch200
SA2/1100
Listeria monocytogenes P3300-97395, clinical strains, L. monocytogenes CCM4699 (CCM, Brno, CZ), L. innocua LMG13568 (Belgium) were not inhibited. E. avium EA5 not inhibited, SA5-mastitis milk not inhibited, Staphylococcus aureus SA31/5-39/10-trouts, Kek/2-Bel/1- feces of rabbits. The rest of the strains were not inhibited.
Table 4. In vivo safety and activity of LP17L/1 strain in model experiment with Balb/c mice. Counts are expressed in CFU/g (log 10).
Table 4. In vivo safety and activity of LP17L/1 strain in model experiment with Balb/c mice. Counts are expressed in CFU/g (log 10).
Feces LP17L/1LAB Coliforms
Sampling I
n = 10
day 0/1
nt 6.96 ± 2.603.24 ± 1.84
Sampling II
n = 5
day 7
3.63 ± 1.836.48 ± 2.543.60 ± 1.89
Sampling III
n = 5
day 30
1.21 ± 0.107.38 ± 2.713. 60 ± 1.89
Jejunum
Sampling I
n = 3
day 0/1
nt4.98 ± 2.204.21 ± 2.05
Sampling I
n = 5
day 7
2.07 ± 1.434.19 ± 2.041.50 ± 0.22
Sampling I
n = 5
day 30
<1.05.23 ± 2.281.15 ± 0.07
NS, only mathematical difference, not significant/statistical difference; coliforms, day 0/1 to day 7 and 30; LAB, lactic acid bacteria; nt-not tested;
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lauková, A.; Tomáška, M.; Fraqueza, M.J.; Szabóová, R.; Bino, E.; Ščerbová, J.; Pogány Simonová, M.; Dvorožňáková, E. Bacteriocin-Producing Strain Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP17L/1 Isolated from Traditional Stored Ewe’s Milk Cheese and Its Beneficial Potential. Foods 2022, 11, 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11070959

AMA Style

Lauková A, Tomáška M, Fraqueza MJ, Szabóová R, Bino E, Ščerbová J, Pogány Simonová M, Dvorožňáková E. Bacteriocin-Producing Strain Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP17L/1 Isolated from Traditional Stored Ewe’s Milk Cheese and Its Beneficial Potential. Foods. 2022; 11(7):959. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11070959

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lauková, Andrea, Martin Tomáška, Maria Joao Fraqueza, Renáta Szabóová, Eva Bino, Jana Ščerbová, Monika Pogány Simonová, and Emília Dvorožňáková. 2022. "Bacteriocin-Producing Strain Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP17L/1 Isolated from Traditional Stored Ewe’s Milk Cheese and Its Beneficial Potential" Foods 11, no. 7: 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11070959

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop