Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Indigenous Yeasts Screened from Chinese Vineyards as Potential Starters for Improving Wine Aroma
Previous Article in Journal
Fusarium Mycotoxins and OTA in Beer from Shanghai, the Largest Megacity in China: Occurrence and Dietary Risk Assessment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complexes and Their Application in Food Safety Analysis: Recent Developments and Future Prospects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effectiveness of Ultra-High Irradiance Blue Light-Emitting Diodes in Inactivating Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Dry Stainless Steel and Cast-Iron Surfaces

1
Department of Family & Consumer Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA
2
Center of Excellence in Sustainable Food and Agricultural Systems, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(16), 3072; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12163072
Submission received: 1 August 2023 / Revised: 9 August 2023 / Accepted: 13 August 2023 / Published: 16 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Emerging Technologies for Food Safety)

Abstract

:
The use of blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs) is emerging as a promising dry decontamination method. In the present study, LEDs emitting ultra-high irradiance (UHI) density at 405 nm (842 mW/cm2) and 460 nm (615 mW/cm2) were used to deliver high-intensity photoinactivation treatments ranging from 221 to 1107 J/cm2. The efficacy of these treatments to inactivate E. coli O157:H7 dry cells was evaluated on clean and soiled stainless steel and cast-iron surfaces. On clean metal surfaces, the 405 and 460 nm LED treatment with a 221 J/cm2 dose resulted in E. coli reductions ranging from 2.0 to 4.1 log CFU/cm2. Increasing the treatment energy dose to 665 J/cm2 caused further significant reductions (>8 log CFU/cm2) in the E. coli population. LED treatments triggered a significant production of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) in E. coli cells, as well as a significant temperature increase on metal surfaces. In the presence of organic matter, intracellular ROS generation in E. coli cells dropped significantly, and treatments with higher energy doses (>700 J/cm2) were required to uphold antimicrobial effectiveness. The mechanism of the bactericidal effect of UHI blue LED treatments is likely to be a combination of photothermal and photochemical effects. This study showed that LEDs emitting monochromatic blue light at UHI levels may serve as a viable and time-effective method for surface decontamination in dry food processing environments.

1. Introduction

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infection in humans is not only associated with severe gastroenteritis but also with life-threatening extraintestinal complications, such as progressive kidney failure [1]. STEC virulence attributes are linked to the production of cytotoxins known as Shiga toxins (Stx1, Stx2) or to their ability to adhere to the intestinal epithelium causing distinctive histological lesions [2]. STEC is a heterogeneous group of E. coli in which O157 serotypes are most commonly implicated in foodborne disease outbreaks [3].
The presence of STECs in the food supply chain continues to be a major concern for food manufacturers, consumers, and public health authorities. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that the STEC group is responsible for at least 265,000 infections every year in the United States, of which 36% are attributed to O157 serotypes, with the remaining 64% to non-O157 STECs [4]. Epidemiological data collected from 1982 to 2002 in the U.S. suggest that animal-based products (e.g., ground beef) and raw produce are the predominant vectors of STEC O157 infections [5]. However, in recent years, E. coli contamination has emerged in previously unrecognized food vehicles, such as low-moisture foods (LMFs) [6,7]. Although microbial growth is inhibited by low aw, the long-term survival of this enteric pathogen has been demonstrated in LMFs and their processing environments [8,9]. One of the most significant risk factors for microbial contamination in dry operations is the presence of water; therefore, the use of conventional wet cleaning and sanitation procedures are restricted [10].
Outbreaks caused by LMFs not only underscore the difficulty of eradicating pathogenic bacteria from dry processing environments but also highlight the need to evaluate and incorporate innovative antimicrobial interventions. Several dry disinfection methods have been previously investigated with varying degrees of success, including ultraviolet light [11], alcohol-based sanitizers [12], gaseous ozone, and dry heat [13,14]. Over the last decade, photodynamic inactivation using visible (blue) light has emerged as an innovative and safer disinfection alternative to the aforementioned methods. Several studies have shown that blue light (405 to 470 nm) is bioactive against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogenic microorganisms in low moisture settings [15,16,17,18,19]. The mechanism by which blue light causes bacterial inactivation is mainly attributed to a combination of photochemical and photothermal effects. For instance, the photoexcitation of intracellular flavins and porphyrin molecules trigger the production of cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) (e.g., singlet oxygen, hydrogen peroxide) [20,21,22], which may cause irreversible cellular oxidative processes that lead to cell death [23,24]. On the other hand, radiation heat transfer from the light source to microbial cells and the surrounding environment may occur, resulting in a lethal increase in temperature during the treatment [19].
The germicidal efficiency of blue light photodynamic treatments has generally been evaluated using low irradiance levels (<100 mW/cm2), which requires long exposure times (several hours) to be effective [22]. Extended treatment times may preclude this technology from being deployed in high-throughput food processing environments. In addition, the effectiveness of blue light in reducing microbial contamination in dry food processing environments remains largely uninvestigated. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to (i) evaluate the effectiveness of ultra-high irradiance blue light treatments at 405 and 460 nm to inactivate E. coli O157:H7 sessile cells in dry stainless steel and cast-iron surfaces and (ii) examine the impact of a soil layer, using wheat flour as a model food soil system, on the antimicrobial efficacy of these treatments. The production of intracellular ROS in E. coli cells triggered by blue light treatments was also investigated in this study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Inoculum Preparation

Five strains of Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 (ATCC: 35150, 43895, 43889, 51658, 43894) isolated from the feces of patients with hemorrhagic colitis were used in this study. Frozen stock cultures were re-activated individually by scraping the frozen broth with a sterile loop (10 μL) and transferring it into 9 mL Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB; BD Difco™ Bacto™, Sparks, MD, USA), followed by incubation at 37 °C for 22 ± 2 h. A bacterial lawn was created for each strain by spread plating 0.1 mL of overnight broth culture onto Tryptic Soy Agar plates supplemented with 0.6% (w/w) Yeast Extract (TSA-YE; CRITERION™, Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA, USA) and incubated for 22 ± 2 h at 37 °C. The lawns were then harvested by adding 6 mL of 0.1% buffered peptone water (BPW; Difco™) to each agar plate and scraping the bacterial cells using an L-shaped spreader. Equal amounts of cell suspensions were transferred to a 50-mL sterile conical tube to create a five-strain cocktail of E. coli O157:H7. Bacterial cells were then harvested by centrifugation (4000× g/4 °C for 8 min); the resulting pellet was washed twice with 10 mL 0.1% BPW and, finally, resuspended in 4 mL of sterile distilled water.

2.2. Preparation and Inoculation of Metal Surfaces

Stainless steel (type 304) and cast-iron disc coupons (1.27 cm diameter, 0.38 cm depth) were used in this study. Prior to inoculation, coupons were washed thoroughly with 1% laboratory detergent solution (7X™, MP Biomedicals™, Solon, OH, USA), wrapped in aluminum foil, and subsequently sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 15 min. Four sterile coupons, two of each material, were placed in sterile aluminum pans (diameter: 10 cm; Fisherbrand™, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA), and the surface spot was inoculated with 70 µL of the bacterial cocktail to achieve an approximate concentration of 9.0 log CFU/cm2. In addition, to evaluate the impact of organic matter on the antimicrobial effectiveness of blue light treatments, the E. coli cocktail was mixed with all-purpose wheat flour to emulate the presence of organic soiling at a concentration of 0.25 g/mL (0.025%). To prepare the flour slurry, 4 g of flour was placed in a 50 mL sterile conical tube and mixed with 14 mL of sterile distilled water and 2 mL of the bacterial inoculum. Seventy µL of the inoculated flour slurry was then applied to surface coupons to achieve an approximate concentration of 8.0 log CFU/cm2. All inoculated coupons were allowed to air-dry inside a biosafety cabinet for 3 h, with the fan running, to allow for moisture evaporation and the transition of cells from the planktonic to the sessile state.

2.3. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) System

The LED system (Honle® LED Cube 100 IC; Panacol-USA, Inc., Torrington, CT, USA) consisted of (i) an electronic power controller, (ii) an irradiation chamber with a reflective interior wall structure (18 × 18 × 18 cm3), and (iii) the LED heads emitting light at 405 nm and 460 nm wavelengths. LED lamps were mounted on top of the irradiation chamber and connected to the power controller with the LED power level set to 100%, as shown in Figure 1. Both the chamber and light heads were equipped with fans to avoid overheating during treatments. The irradiance (mW/cm2) of each LED head was measured using a hand-held UV meter (Honle®) connected to a LED spectrum surface sensor (FS LED D2; Honle®) positioned 5 cm from the LED head.

2.4. Ultra-High Irradiance (UHI) Monochromatic Blue Light Treatments

Dry, inoculated metal coupons were subjected to various ultra-high irradiance (UHI) monochromatic blue light (405 and 460 nm) treatments under equivalent energy dosages, achieved by varying the treatment times at 100% power level (Table 1). The application of equivalent energy doses allowed the comparison and determination of potential differences in antimicrobial effect between the two light wavelengths.
The aluminum pan carrying the inoculated coupons was placed inside the irradiation chamber, leaving a 5 cm gap between the LED head and coupon surfaces. The irradiance level received by metal coupons was 842 and 615 mW/cm2 when using the 405 nm and 460 nm LEDs, respectively. The total energy dose delivered by a given light treatment was calculated according to Prasad and Roopesh [17] using the following equation:
E = I × t
where E is the energy dose (J/cm2), I denotes the irradiance of the emitted light at a particular wavelength (W/cm2), and t represents the treatment time (seconds).
The surface temperature of the metal coupons was captured before and immediately after UHI light treatments with a thermographic camera (FLIR ONE Pro; Teledyne FLIR, Wilsonville, OR, USA), and the temperature differential (ΔT) between the two measuring points was calculated. Coupons without light treatment were used as controls. Two technical replicates (i.e., coupons) were used for each surface material and treatment, and triple-independent experiments were conducted for each treatment combination.

2.5. Microbiological Analysis

2.5.1. Determination of Viable E. coli O157:H7 Cells

To enumerate the surviving E. coli population after UHI blue light treatments, treated coupons were aseptically transferred into 50-mL sterile conical tubes containing 10 mL of full-strength BPW and ~2 g of glass beads (2 mm diameter; BioSpec Products, Inc., Bartlesville, OK, USA). Tubes were then vortexed at high speed (3000 rpm) for 2 min to assure complete detachment of bacterial cells. This method had been previously validated in our laboratory to maximize cell recovery from coupon surfaces. The resulting bacterial suspension was then serially diluted with 0.1% BPW and appropriate dilutions enumerated by spread plating on TSA-YE plates followed by incubation at 37 °C for 24 ± 2 h. The final cell counts were expressed in Log CFU/cm2.

2.5.2. Molecular Detection and Confirmation of E. coli O157:H7 Cells

For those coupons with plate counts below the limit of detection (<1 Log CFU/cm2), a molecular PCR-based pathogen detection system (GENE-UP®; bioMérieux, Inc.; Salt Lake City, UT, USA) was used to corroborate the absence of E. coli O157:H7. To this purpose, after serial dilution, the conical tubes containing the remaining detached bacterial suspensions in full-strength BPW were placed in an incubator at 41 °C for 24 ± 2 h. Tubes with turbid broth were pulled from the incubator, and the GENE-UP® E. coli O157:H7 2 (ECO 2) assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s direction. In addition, the broth in these tubes was sub-cultured on Cefixime Tellurite Sorbitol MacConkey (CT-SMAC; CRITERION™, Hardy Diagnostics) agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 ± 2 h for confirmation of E. coli O157:H7 presence based on typical colony morphology.

2.6. Determination of Oxidative Stress in E. coli O157:H7 Cells

The quantification of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) in E. coli cells was performed using a general oxidative stress indicator (5(6)-carboxy-2′,7′-dichlorodihydroflourescein diacetate (Carboxy-H2DCFDA) (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA), according to a procedure described by Prasad et al. [25], with minimal modifications. Briefly, LED-treated E. coli cells were detached from unsoiled metal coupons as previously described using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4; Gibco, Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA). Coupons were aseptically removed and rinsed with 1 mL PBS above the 50 mL conical tube to recover the remaining bacterial cells. Cells were then harvested by centrifugation (4000× g/4 °C for 8 min), and the resulting pellet was washed once with 5 mL PBS. The clean pellet was then resuspended in 1 mL PBS containing 10 µM of carboxy-H2DCFDA dye and incubated in the dark at 37 °C for 30 min to facilitate the staining of cells. The stained cell suspension was centrifuged, and the resultant pellet was resuspended in 1 mL PBS. Two hundred microliters (200 µL) of the cell suspension were loaded in 0.5 mL thin-walled PCR tubes (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and two tubes were loaded for each coupon. E. coli cells removed from untreated coupons were used as baseline controls, while cells treated with 200 mM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 30 min at 22 °C served as positive controls. Exposure to H2O2 is widely used to induce oxidative damage/stress in microbial cells. Fluorescence values were measured using a fluorometer (Quantus; Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) with excitation and emission wavelengths of 495 nm and 525 nm, respectively. The intracellular concentration of ROS was expressed as relative fluorescence intensity in arbitrary units (AU).

2.7. Data Analysis

Triplicate data were analyzed with statistical package software SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Wake County, NC, USA), using a two- and three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the changes in pathogen load on coupon surfaces in response to light wavelength, energy dose, and metal type. Significant differences between treatment means were determined using two- and three-way ANOVAs with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (p ≤ 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Inactivation of E. coli O157:H7 on Unsoiled Metal Surfaces by UHI Blue Light Treatments

The E. coli O157:H7 sessile population on clean (no added soil) stainless steel and cast-iron coupons before UHI blue light treatments was 9.2 ± 0.2 and 8.4 ± 0.3 log CFU/cm2, respectively. The initial E. coli counts were significantly reduced by all light treatments (Figure 2). A significant effect of the treatment energy dose on E. coli reduction was observed for both light wavelengths (p < 0.05). For instance, increasing the energy dose of 405 and 460 nm light treatments from 221 to 665 J/cm2 further reduced the E. coli population by 7.2 and 5.3 log CFU/cm2, respectively, on stainless steel surfaces (Figure 2A). The type of wavelength also had a significant effect on E. coli inactivation (p < 0.05). At an equal energy dosage of 221 J/cm2, for example, the 460 nm light (3.6 log CFU/cm2 reduction) was more effective than the 405 nm (2.0 log CFU/cm2 reduction) at reducing the number of E. coli cells on stainless steel surfaces (Figure 2A).
Similar inactivation trends were observed on cast-iron surfaces to those obtained on stainless steel. The E. coli population on cast-iron coupons was reduced from 8.4 log CFU/cm2 to below detectable levels after UHI blue treatments with both 405 and 460 nm LEDs at 443 or 665 J/cm2 energy dose (Figure 2B). Nevertheless, the molecular pathogen detection system (GENE-UP®) revealed that viable E. coli cells were still present on cast-iron surfaces. This result was later confirmed by morphological analysis of isolated colonies on CT-SMAC selective agar plates. In general, the type of metal did not have a significant effect on the reduction in E. coli counts (p > 0.05).

3.2. Effect of Organic Soil on the Antimicrobial Effectiveness of UHI Blue Light Treatments

LED-based treatment is a surface decontamination approach with limited penetration capacity, which might restrict its antimicrobial effect on soiled surfaces. To understand the possible shading effect of organic matter, metal coupons were soiled with a wheat flour/bacteria mixture before the application of light treatments. The mean E. coli O157:H7 sessile population on soiled stainless steel coupons before treatments was 8.1 ± 0.2 log CFU/cm2, while the population attached to soiled cast-iron coupons was 7.3 ± 0.3 log CFU/cm2.
UHI blue light treatments at 405 and 460 nm reduced E. coli O157:H7 counts on soiled metal surfaces significantly, as illustrated in Figure 3. However, higher energy doses were required to achieve comparable microbial reduction to those obtained on unsoiled metal surfaces. For example, light treatments at 665 J/cm2 energy dose, regardless of wavelength, were able to achieve >8.5 log reduction on clean surfaces (Figure 2), while the same treatment dose caused <5.5 log reduction on soiled surfaces (Figure 3). Increasing the energy dose to 738 J/cm2 further reduced E. coli counts by 3.3 and 1.8 log CFU/cm2 on flour-coated stainless steel and cast-iron surfaces, respectively. Regardless of the metal type, light treatments with the highest energy dose (1107 J/cm2) caused the E. coli population to decline to levels below the limit of detection of the plating method (Figure 3A,B). However, after incubation in enrichment broth, viable cells of E. coli were detected on metal coupons through a real-time PCR molecular detection system (GENE-UP®) and confirmed via morphological analysis of isolated colonies on CT-SMAC agar plates. Overall, the wavelength of light did not have a significant effect on E. coli reduction levels on soiled surfaces (p > 0.05); rather, log reductions were driven by the magnitude of light energy applied (p < 0.0001).

3.3. Intracellular ROS Generation in E. coli O157:H7

One of the proposed mechanisms of microbial inactivation using blue light is the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that triggers a cascade of oxidative reactions inside microbial cells. In this study, UHI blue light treatments with 405 and 460 nm light resulted in significant intracellular ROS production in E. coli cells (Figure 4). In general, the generation of ROS was not influenced by the light wavelength (p > 0.05) but rather by the dose of energy (p < 0.05) and the presence of organic matter (p < 0.001). On clean metal surfaces, an increment in the fluorescence intensity was observed, with an increase in fluence from 221 to 443 J/cm2, followed by a significant decline at higher fluences of 1107 J/cm2 (Figure 4B). The presence of organic matter (i.e., wheat flour) on metal surfaces significantly reduced (p < 0.001) the generation of ROS in E. coli cells, as shown in Figure 4A. The average fluorescence intensity remained relatively unchanged on soiled metal surfaces, despite increases in energy dose. No significant differences in fluorescence intensity were observed between 1107 J/cm2 treatments and negative controls (p > 0.05).

3.4. Temperature Changes on Metal Surfaces during UHI Blue Light Treatments

Depending on treatment conditions, light-based antimicrobial interventions may increase the temperature of target surfaces, thereby inducing photothermal stress in microbial cells. In the present study, substantial increases in the surface temperature of stainless steel and cast-iron coupons were observed due to UHI treatments (Figure 5). In clean metal coupons (no soil added), the change in surface temperature (ΔT) increased linearly with the treatment energy dose, regardless of the metal type. Depending on the energy dose applied, the temperature on the surface of stainless steel metal coupons increased from room temperature (22 ± 1 °C) to 78 ± 4 or 94 ± 5 °C (ΔT: 57 ± 4 to 72 ± 5 °C) during 405 nm light treatments, while the exposure to 460 nm light caused surface temperatures to reach 79 ± 8 to 88 ± 3 °C (ΔT: 58 ± 6 to 68 ± 2 °C) (Figure 5A). Higher surface temperature increases were observed in cast-iron coupons. For example, the surface of cast-iron coupons reached 107 ± 4 and 103 ± 3 °C (ΔT: 86 ± 4 to 83 ± 3 °C) during the application of 665 J/cm2 energy dose with 405 or 460 nm light, respectively. In general, increasing the treatment energy dose resulted in incremental gains in temperature on metal surfaces.
The addition of organic matter (i.e., wheat flour) to the metal coupons resulted in sharper changes in surface temperatures, with less pronounced temperature differences between treatment dose and metal types (Figure 5B). For instance, a dose of 369 J/cm2 with 405 or 460 nm light increased the surface temperature from 22 ± 1 to 101 ± 1 °C (ΔT: 79 ± 1 °C), regardless of the metal type. When a 1107 J/cm2 dose treatment was applied, the temperature of soiled stainless steel coupons reached 106 ± 5 to 109 ± 4 °C (ΔT: 84 ± 4 to 87 ± 5 °C), and 111 ± 5 to 112 ± 6 °C (ΔT: 89 ± 5 to 90 ± 6 °C) in soiled cast-iron. Previous studies have suggested that temperature increase due to LED treatments is wavelength-dependent [19]. In the present study, differences in the surface temperature of metals were observed between 405 and 460 nm treatments at the same energy dose; however, these differences were small and may not be relevant for microbial inactivation.

4. Discussion

In recent years, LEDs emitting blue light have emerged as a safer antimicrobial alternative to other dry sanitizing methods due to their potential to inactivate microbial cells via a combination of photochemical and photothermal effects. The results obtained in this study suggest that high-irradiance 405 and 460 nm LED treatments could serve as a viable and time-effective intervention to reduce the risk of microbial contamination in dry food processing environments. The Food Code from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommends that at least a 5-log microbial reduction should be achieved by an effective sanitization method [26]. In the present study, the microbial inactivation achieved by UHI blue light treatments effectively surpassed FDA-recommended levels, as >7 log reduction in E. coli O157:H7 counts were obtained on clean and soiled metal surfaces.
The bactericidal activity of LEDs emitting violet/blue light is primarily attributed to the intracellular generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) due to the excitation of endogenous photosensitizing molecules (e.g., flavins and porphyrins), resulting in oxidative stress and irreversible damage to cellular components such as lipids, proteins, and enzymes [27,28]. In this study, carboxy-H2DCFDA was used as a fluorogenic probe for the detection of oxidative stress in E. coli cells to understand the role of ROS production in the inactivation efficacy of UHI blue light treatments. The 405 and 460 nm blue light treatments produced significant intracellular ROS generation in E. coli cells (Figure 4B). These results are in line with the findings of a previous study by Prasad, Gänzle, and Roopesh [25], who also reported significant ROS regeneration in dehydrated Salmonella Typhimurium cells when exposed to 455 nm LEDs. In the presence of organic matter, however, intracellular ROS generation in E. coli cells declined significantly (Figure 4A). In fact, fluorescence intensities between non-treated E. coli cells and those treated with 405 nm LED at 1107 J/cm2 did not differ significantly. This finding confirms those of a previous study by Ziuzina et al. [29], suggesting that organic matter exerts a protective effect against the antimicrobial action of reactive species generated during blue light treatments.
In addition to oxidative stress, blue LEDs have the potential to increase the temperature of target surfaces, which may have a synergistic or additive effect on microbial inactivation [30,31]. In fact, the photothermal effects of violet/blue LED (395–470 nm) treatments have not only been associated with the drying of food matrices but also with increased microbial reductions [18,19,32,33,34]. The UHI blue light treatments applied in this study led to substantial changes in the surface temperature of stainless steel and cast-iron coupons, with clear differences between both metal types. For example, clean cast-iron surfaces (ΔT: 86 ± 4 °C) registered higher temperature changes when compared to clean stainless steel (ΔT: 72 ± 5 °C) after the application of a 665 J/cm2 treatment with 405 nm LED (Figure 5A). These temperature differences could be due to the specific heat capacity (cp) of each metal. This thermal property refers to the amount of heat (energy) required to raise the temperature of a given type of matter [35]. The cp of many pure and alloyed metals, including cast iron (0.420 kJ/kg °C) and stainless steel (0.461 kJ/kg °C), is well established [35]. The metal coupons used in this study had the same mass (4 g each) and were exposed to equal amounts of radiant energy doses. In this context, due to its lower cp value, cast iron needed to absorb less energy to raise its temperature and to experience the largest temperature change. Slightly higher microbial inactivation rates were observed on cast-iron surfaces, which could be linked to its thermal properties (Figure 2B and Figure 3B). The increase in temperature generates an additional layer of stress on microbial cells, providing an additive effect to the generation of ROS that may enhance their inactivation rates. These findings are consistent with those of Lang, Thery, Peltier, Colliau, Adamuz, Grangeteau, Dupont, and Beney [31], who found that the thermal properties of food contact surface materials played an important role in the inactivation rates of S. cerevisiae using ultra-high intensity 405 nm LED treatments.
On the other hand, flour-coated coupons displayed comparable temperature changes on their surfaces, regardless of the type of metal (Figure 5B). The cp of wheat flour (1.66 kJ/kg °C) is four times higher than that of cast iron and stainless steel [36], thus requiring elevated energy doses to increase its temperature. It is also worth noting that materials with higher cp values tend to retain heat for a longer period of time [35], which may result in greater microbial reductions over time. LED illumination has limitations, such as low penetration in soiled and opaque surfaces. This limitation was evident when UHI blue light treatments were applied to flour-coated surfaces since longer exposure times (i.e., higher energy doses) were needed to increase effectiveness and achieve substantial microbial reduction levels. In general, our findings suggest that at high energy density (>665 J/cm2), blue light mainly produces a photothermal effect, whereas a lower energy density tends (<443 J/cm2) to produce both photochemical and photothermal effects. However, in the presence of organic matter, the mechanism of the bactericidal effect is more likely to be photothermal rather than photochemical.
A variety of dry sanitation methods, such as cold plasma, dry heat, UV light, and pulsed-light technology, have been the subject of research in recent years [37]. Although promising, these technological interventions have several limitations, including low penetration levels and long treatment times, and a number of safety concerns for large-scale deployment. For instance, McKelvey and Bodnaruk [38] evaluated the effectiveness of dry heat at 80 and 100 °C against S. enteritidis PT30 on stainless steel carriers. The investigators observed a decline in the Salmonella population of 1.6 log CFU/carrier after a 4 h dry heat exposure at 80 °C, while at 100 °C, a 4.4 log reduction was noted after 2 h. More recently, Harada and Nascimento [13,14] reported reductions in Listeria monocytogenes (~2.2 log CFU/cm2) and Bacillus cereus (~1.8 log CFU/cm2) sessile cells on stainless steel coupons after a 30 min exposure to UV-C radiation at 6.5 mW/cm2. UV-based antimicrobial interventions, especially those with lower wavelengths (<315 nm [UV-B and UV-C]), are hazardous to end-users, as exposure is associated with skin cancer and other cell mutations [39]. The microbial inactivation levels obtained in this study were markedly higher, and achieved in a shorter period of time, than those reported in the above-cited research studies using other dry sanitation methods. Accumulating evidence indicates that, unlike conventional ultraviolet radiation, blue light is innocuous on the skin; however, prolonged exposure to blue light may damage human corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells [40]. Therefore, widespread implementation of antimicrobial blue light in food processing environments requires robust safety standards and the use of appropriate personal protective equipment, such as safety glasses.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we observed that LEDs emitting 405 and 460 nm light at ultra-high irradiance (UHI) levels significantly reduced E. coli O157:H7 contamination on dry metal surfaces, with and without the presence of organic matter. On clean metal surfaces, the 460 nm light was more effective than the 405 nm in reducing the number of E. coli cells., while no differences were observed between wavelengths on soiled surfaces. Pathogenic E. coli counts declined by >7 log CFU/cm2 when 665 and 1107 J/cm2 treatments were applied, regardless of the light wavelength. This research demonstrates that bacterial cell inactivation induced by UHI blue light exposure is accompanied by reactive oxygen species production, as detected by the generation of fluorescence from Carboxy-H2DCFDA and an increase in temperature due to radiation heat transfer from the light source. Significant surface temperature increases were observed in UHI LED-treated coupons, which may have synergistically or additively contributed to microbial inactivation. This study also highlights the importance of removing soil from food contact surfaces before the application of light treatments since a shading/shielding effect on microbial cells may occur, thus limiting the antimicrobial effectiveness of these treatments. When applied at UHI levels, blue LEDs could overcome the need for prolonged treatment times and the use of exogenous photosensitizers, which are two major obstacles to viable implementation in the food industry. Overall, this study provided insight into the potential application of LEDs emitting monochromatic blue light at UHI levels for the control of microbial contamination in dry food processing environments. Future studies are warranted to assess the effects of UHI blue light on spore-forming microorganisms, spore germination, and other types of food contact surfaces, such as plastics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.S.; Methodology, L.S. and M.M.; Validation, L.S. and M.M.; Formal analysis, L.S. and M.M.; Data curation, M.M.; Writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; Writing—review and editing, L.S.; Supervision, L.S.; Project administration, L.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support from NMSU’s Agricultural Experiment Station. The authors would like to thank Laura Muñoz for providing technical support in the microbiological analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known conflict of interest, competing financial interests, or personal relationships that could have influenced the work and findings reported in this paper.

References

  1. Kim, J.-S.; Lee, M.-S.; Kim, J.H. Recent updates on outbreaks of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and its potential reservoirs. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Karmali, M.A. Infection by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli: An overview. Mol. Biotechnol. 2004, 26, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pennington, H. Escherichia coli O157. Lancet 2010, 376, 1428–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Scallan, E.; Hoekstra, R.M.; Angulo, F.J.; Tauxe, R.V.; Widdowson, M.-A.; Roy, S.L.; Jones, J.L.; Griffin, P.M. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—Major pathogens. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rangel, J.M.; Sparling, P.H.; Crowe, C.; Griffin, P.M.; Swerdlow, D.L. Epidemiology of Escherichia coli O157: H7 outbreaks, united states, 1982–2002. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 603–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Harris, J.; Yada, S. Flour and cereal grain products: Foodborne illness outbreaks and product recalls. In Flour & Cereal Grains—Outbreaks and Recalls; UC Davis: Davis, CA, USA, 2023; Available online: https://ucfoodsafety.ucdavis.edu/low-moisture-foods/lmf-information-uc (accessed on 2 July 2023).
  7. Harris, J.; Yada, S. Publications on the microbial safety of nuts and sesame seeds (version 2). In Nuts & Nut Products—Outbreaks and Recalls; UC Davis: Davis, CA, USA, 2023; Available online: https://ucfoodsafety.ucdavis.edu/low-moisture-foods/nuts-and-nut-pastes (accessed on 2 July 2023).
  8. Gill, A.T.; McMahon, F.D.; Petronella, N. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli survives storage in wheat flour for two years. Food Microbiol. 2020, 87, 103380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Beuchat, L.; Komitopoulou, E.; Betts, R.; Beckers, H.; Bourdichon, F.; Joosten, H.; Fanning, S.; Ter Kuile, B. Persistence and Survival of Pathogens in Dry Foods and Dry Food Processing Environments; ILSI Europe Report Series; International Life Sciences Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; pp. 1–48. Available online: https://ilsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2016/06/Persistence-and-survival-report.pdf (accessed on 8 August 2023).
  10. Beuchat, L.R.; Komitopoulou, E.; Beckers, H.; Betts, R.P.; Bourdichon, F.; Fanning, S.; Joosten, H.M.; Ter Kuile, B.H. Low–Water Activity Foods: Increased Concern as Vehicles of Foodborne Pathogens. J. Food Prot. 2013, 76, 150–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bae, Y.M.; Lee, S.Y. Inhibitory effects of UV treatment and a combination of UV and dry heat against pathogens on stainless steel and polypropylene surfaces. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, M61–M64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Du, W.X.; Danyluk, M.D.; Harris, L.J. Efficacy of aqueous and alcohol-based quaternary ammonium sanitizers for reducing Salmonella in dusts generated in almond hulling and shelling facilities. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75, M7–M13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Harada, A.M.M.; Nascimento, M.S. Efficacy of dry sanitizing methods on Listeria monocytogenes biofilms. Food Control 2021, 124, 107897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Harada, A.M.M.; Nascimento, M.S. Effect of dry sanitizing methods on Bacillus cereus biofilm. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2021, 52, 919–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bache, S.E.; Maclean, M.; MacGregor, S.J.; Anderson, J.G.; Gettinby, G.; Coia, J.E.; Taggart, I. Clinical studies of the High-Intensity Narrow-Spectrum light Environmental Decontamination System (HINS-light EDS), for continuous disinfection in the burn unit inpatient and outpatient settings. Burns 2012, 38, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Maclean, M.; MacGregor, S.; Anderson, J.; Woolsey, G.; Coia, J.; Hamilton, K.; Taggart, I.; Watson, S.; Thakker, B.; Gettinby, G. Environmental decontamination of a hospital isolation room using high-intensity narrow-spectrum light. J. Hosp. Infect. 2010, 76, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Prasad, A.; Roopesh, M. Bacterial biofilm reduction by 275 and 455 nm light pulses emitted from light emitting diodes. J. Food Saf. 2023, 43, e13049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Subedi, S.; Du, L.; Prasad, A.; Yadav, B.; Roopesh, M. Inactivation of Salmonella and quality changes in wheat flour after pulsed light-emitting diode (LED) treatments. Food Bioprod. Process. 2020, 121, 166–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Prasad, A.; Gänzle, M.; Roopesh, M. Antimicrobial activity and drying potential of high intensity blue light pulses (455 nm) emitted from LEDs. Food Res. Int. 2021, 148, 110601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Cossu, M.; Ledda, L.; Cossu, A. Emerging trends in the photodynamic inactivation (PDI) applied to the food decontamination. Food Res. Int. 2021, 144, 110358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Murray, C.K.; Hamblin, M.R.; Hooper, D.C.; Dai, T. Antimicrobial blue light inactivation of pathogenic microbes: State of the art. Drug Resist. Updates 2017, 33, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hessling, M.; Spellerberg, B.; Hoenes, K. Photoinactivation of bacteria by endogenous photosensitizers and exposure to visible light of different wavelengths–a review on existing data. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2017, 364, fnw270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Luksienė, Z.; Zukauskas, A. Prospects of photosensitization in control of pathogenic and harmful micro-organisms. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 107, 1415–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. D’Souza, C.; Yuk, H.G.; Khoo, G.H.; Zhou, W. Application of light-emitting diodes in food production, postharvest preservation, and microbiological food safety. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2015, 14, 719–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Prasad, A.; Gänzle, M.; Roopesh, M. Understanding the Salmonella inactivation mechanisms of 365, 395 and 455 nm light pulses emitted from light-emitting diodes. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Food Code; U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2017; pp. 21, 130.
  27. Hyun, J.-E.; Lee, S.-Y. Blue light-emitting diodes as eco-friendly non-thermal technology in food preservation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 105, 284–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ramakrishnan, P.; Maclean, M.; MacGregor, S.J.; Anderson, J.G.; Grant, M.H. Cytotoxic responses to 405 nm light exposure in mammalian and bacterial cells: Involvement of reactive oxygen species. Toxicol. In Vitro 2016, 33, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ziuzina, D.; Han, L.; Cullen, P.J.; Bourke, P. Cold plasma inactivation of internalized bacteria and biofilms for Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 210, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mandal, R.; Mohammadi, X.; Wiktor, A.; Singh, A.; Pratap Singh, A. Applications of pulsed light decontamination technology in food processing: An overview. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lang, E.; Thery, T.; Peltier, C.; Colliau, F.; Adamuz, J.; Grangeteau, C.; Dupont, S.; Beney, L. Ultra-high irradiance (UHI) blue light: Highlighting the potential of a novel LED-based device for short antifungal treatments of food contact surfaces. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Subedi, S.; Roopesh, M. Simultaneous drying of pet food pellets and Salmonella inactivation by 395 nm light pulses in an LED reactor. J. Food Eng. 2020, 286, 110110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Prasad, A.; Gänzle, M.; Roopesh, M. Inactivation of Escherichia coli and Salmonella using 365 and 395 nm high intensity pulsed light emitting diodes. Foods 2019, 8, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Du, L.; Prasad, A.J.; Gänzle, M.; Roopesh, M. Inactivation of Salmonella spp. in wheat flour by 395 nm pulsed light emitting diode (LED) treatment and the related functional and structural changes of gluten. Food Res. Int. 2020, 127, 108716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kreith, F.; Manglik, R.M.; Bohn, M.S. Principles of Heat Transfer, 7th ed.; Cengage Learning: Stamford, CT, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim, Y.S.; Flores, R.A.; Chung, O.K.; Bechtel, D.B. Physical, chemical, and thermal characterization of wheat flour milling coproducts. J. Food Process. Eng. 2003, 26, 469–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Alonso, V.P.P.; Gonçalves, M.P.M.; de Brito, F.A.E.; Barboza, G.R.; Rocha, L.d.O.; Silva, N.C.C. Dry surface biofilms in the food processing industry: An overview on surface characteristics, adhesion and biofilm formation, detection of biofilms, and dry sanitization methods. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2023, 22, 688–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. McKelvey, P.J.; Bodnaruk, P.W. Survival of Salmonella species on stainless steel exposed to dry heat. Int. J. Food Saf. 2013, 15, 88–92. [Google Scholar]
  39. De Gruijl, F.R. Photocarcinogenesis: UVA vs. UVB radiation. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 2002, 15, 316–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hadi, J.; Wu, S.; Brightwell, G. Antimicrobial blue light versus pathogenic bacteria: Mechanism, application in the food industry, hurdle technologies and potential resistance. Foods 2020, 9, 1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic view of experimental set-up for UHI blue light treatments.
Figure 1. Schematic view of experimental set-up for UHI blue light treatments.
Foods 12 03072 g001
Figure 2. Reduction of E. coli O157:H7 counts in unsoiled stainless steel (A) and cast-iron (B) coupons after ultra-high irradiance blue light treatments using 405 and 460 nm LEDs. Samples were treated at a 5 cm distance from the LED head. Results are shown as mean ± standard deviation of triplicate independent experiments. Log reduction values within the same figure panel that share the same letter are not significantly different from one another (p > 0.05).
Figure 2. Reduction of E. coli O157:H7 counts in unsoiled stainless steel (A) and cast-iron (B) coupons after ultra-high irradiance blue light treatments using 405 and 460 nm LEDs. Samples were treated at a 5 cm distance from the LED head. Results are shown as mean ± standard deviation of triplicate independent experiments. Log reduction values within the same figure panel that share the same letter are not significantly different from one another (p > 0.05).
Foods 12 03072 g002
Figure 3. Reduction of E. coli O157:H7 counts in soiled (flour-coated) stainless steel (A) and cast-iron (B) coupons after ultra-high irradiance blue light treatments using 405 and 460 nm LEDs. Samples were treated at a 5 cm distance from the LED head. Results are shown as mean ± standard deviation of triplicate independent experiments. Log reduction values within the same figure panel that share the same letter are not significantly different from one another (p > 0.05).
Figure 3. Reduction of E. coli O157:H7 counts in soiled (flour-coated) stainless steel (A) and cast-iron (B) coupons after ultra-high irradiance blue light treatments using 405 and 460 nm LEDs. Samples were treated at a 5 cm distance from the LED head. Results are shown as mean ± standard deviation of triplicate independent experiments. Log reduction values within the same figure panel that share the same letter are not significantly different from one another (p > 0.05).
Foods 12 03072 g003
Figure 4. Quantification of oxidative stress in E. coli O157:H7 cells after the application of ultra-high irradiance blue light treatments (405 and 460 nm LEDs) on dry stainless steel and cast-iron surfaces with (A) and without (B) the presence of organic matter. Results are shown as mean ± standard deviation of triplicate independent experiments. Fluorescence intensity values within the same figure panel that share the same letter are not significantly different from one another (p > 0.05). Negative control (−): Untreated E. coli cells; Positive control (+): E. coli cells treated with 200 mM H2O2.
Figure 4. Quantification of oxidative stress in E. coli O157:H7 cells after the application of ultra-high irradiance blue light treatments (405 and 460 nm LEDs) on dry stainless steel and cast-iron surfaces with (A) and without (B) the presence of organic matter. Results are shown as mean ± standard deviation of triplicate independent experiments. Fluorescence intensity values within the same figure panel that share the same letter are not significantly different from one another (p > 0.05). Negative control (−): Untreated E. coli cells; Positive control (+): E. coli cells treated with 200 mM H2O2.
Foods 12 03072 g004
Figure 5. Effect of ultra-high irradiance blue light treatments on the surface temperature of unsoiled (A) and soiled/flour-coated (B) metal surfaces. Legend: SS, Stainless Steel 304; CC, Cast-Iron; Light Wavelength, 405 and 460 nm. Temperature Difference (ΔT) = Final Temperature (Tf) − Initial Temperature (Ti). Dotted lines denote trendlines.
Figure 5. Effect of ultra-high irradiance blue light treatments on the surface temperature of unsoiled (A) and soiled/flour-coated (B) metal surfaces. Legend: SS, Stainless Steel 304; CC, Cast-Iron; Light Wavelength, 405 and 460 nm. Temperature Difference (ΔT) = Final Temperature (Tf) − Initial Temperature (Ti). Dotted lines denote trendlines.
Foods 12 03072 g005
Table 1. Ultra-high irradiance treatments applied to clean and soiled stainless steel and cast-iron surfaces using 405 and 460 nm LEDs.
Table 1. Ultra-high irradiance treatments applied to clean and soiled stainless steel and cast-iron surfaces using 405 and 460 nm LEDs.
Organic
Soiling a
Light
Wavelength
Treatment Intensity
Power Level
(%)
Irradiance
(mW/cm2) b
Treatment Time
(s)
Energy Dose
(J/cm2)
None405 nm100842263221.3
526442.7
790664.9
460 nm100615360221.4
720442.7
1080664.1
All-Purpose Wheat Flour405 nm100842438368.6
790664.9
877738.1
13151106.7
460 nm100615600368.9
1080664.1
1200737.9
18001106.8
a None: No soil added to metal surfaces; All-purpose wheat flour: Used to emulate the presence of organic soiling on metal surfaces. b Irradiance of LEDs as determined using a UV-meter/LED spectrum surface sensor at a distance of 5 cm from the light-emitting head.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Minor, M.; Sabillón, L. Effectiveness of Ultra-High Irradiance Blue Light-Emitting Diodes in Inactivating Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Dry Stainless Steel and Cast-Iron Surfaces. Foods 2023, 12, 3072. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12163072

AMA Style

Minor M, Sabillón L. Effectiveness of Ultra-High Irradiance Blue Light-Emitting Diodes in Inactivating Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Dry Stainless Steel and Cast-Iron Surfaces. Foods. 2023; 12(16):3072. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12163072

Chicago/Turabian Style

Minor, Martha, and Luis Sabillón. 2023. "Effectiveness of Ultra-High Irradiance Blue Light-Emitting Diodes in Inactivating Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Dry Stainless Steel and Cast-Iron Surfaces" Foods 12, no. 16: 3072. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12163072

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop