Consumer Preferences for Cured Meat Products from the Autochthonous Black Slavonian Pig
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
Survey Procedure and Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Sample Description
3.2. Consumer’s Preferences Concerning the Importance of Certain Attributes When Buying Cured Pork Products from the Black Slavonian Pig
3.3. Segmentation Analysis of Croatian Consumers
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Razmaitė, V.; Šiukščius, A.; Šveistienė, R.; Jatkauskienė, V. Present Conservation Status and Carcass and Meat Characteristics of Lithuanian Vištinės Goose Breed. Animals 2022, 12, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pugliese, M.; Previti, A.; De Pascale, A.; Alibrandi, A.; Zirilli, A.; Biondi, V.; Passantino, A.; Monti, S.; Giannetto, C.; Lanfranchi, M. Exploring Consumer Behavior and Preferences in Welfare-Friendly Pork Breeding: A Multivariate Analysis. Foods 2023, 12, 3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grunert, K.G.; Verbeke, W.; Kügler, J.O.; Saeed, F.; Scholderer, J. Use of consumer insight in the new product development process in the meat sector. Meat Sci. 2011, 89, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vitale, M.; Kallas, Z.; Rivera-Toapanta, E.; Karolyi, D.; Cerjak, M.; Lebret, B.; Lenoir, H.; Pugliese, C.; Aquilani, C.; Čandek-Potokar, M.; et al. Consumers’ expectations and liking of traditional and innovative pork products from European autochthonous pig breeds. Meat Sci. 2020, 168, 108179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos Silva, J.; Tirapicos Nunes, J.L. Inventory and characterisation of traditional Mediterranean pig production systems. Advantages and constraints towards its development. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on the Mediterranean Pig, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 10−12 October 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Lončarić, R.; Rebekić, A.; Zmaić, K.; Sudarić, T. Consumer oppinions and attitudes regarding Slavonia and Baranya traditional food products. In Proceedings of the 50th Croatian and 10th International Symposium on Agriculture, Opatija, Croatia, 16–20 February 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Hrasnica, F.; Ilančić, D.; Pavlović, S.; Rako, A.; Šmalcelj, I. Specijalno Stočarstvo; Poljoprivredni Nakladni Zavod: Zagreb, Croatia, 1958. [Google Scholar]
- HPA. Croatian Agricultural Agency, Annual Report for Pig Breeding 2017; Croatian Agricultural Agency, ZEBRA: Vinkovci, Croatia, 2018; pp. 1–74.
- Ministry of Agriculture. Annual Report for Pig Breeding in Republic of Croatia 2018; Ministry of Agriculture, ZEBRA: Vinkovci, Hrvatska, 2019; pp. 1–59.
- HAPIH. Croatian Agency for Agriculture and Food, Pig Breeding, Annual Report for 2020. Available online: https://www.hapih.hr/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Godisnje-izvjesce-Svinjogojstvo-2020-web.pdf (accessed on 12 June 2021).
- HAPIH. Croatian Agency for Agriculture and Food, Pig Breeding, Annual Report for 2021. Available online: https://www.hapih.hr/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Svinjogojstvo-Godisnje-izvjesce-2022.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2023).
- Djurkin Kušec, I.; Buha, I.; Margeta, V.; Gvozdanović, K.; Radišić, D.; Komlenić, M.; Kušec, G. Carcass Composition and Meat Quality of Crna Slavonska Pigs from Two Diff erent Housing Conditions. Agric. Conspec. Sci. 2017, 82, 221–225. [Google Scholar]
- Karolyi, D.; Luković, K.; Salajpal, K. Production traits of Black Slavonian pigs. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Mediterranean Pig, Messina, Italy, 11–13 October 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Uremović, M.; Uremović, Z.; Luković, Z. Stanje u autohtonoj Crnoj slavonskoj pasmini svinja. In Uremović Marija: Crna Slavonska Pasmina Svinja: Hrvatska Izvorna Pasmina; Vukovarskosrijemska županija: Vukovar, Croatia, 2004; pp. 107–115. [Google Scholar]
- Margeta, V. Perspektive uzgoja crne slavonske svinje u Hrvatskoj u kontekstu pristupanja Europskoj uniji. In Proceedings of the 48th Croatian & 8th International Symposium on Agriculture, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 17–22 February 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Salazar, E.; Cayuela, J.M.; Abellán, A.; Poto, A.; Peinado, B.; Tejada, L. A comparison of the quality of dry-cured loins obtained from the native pig breed (Chato Murciano) and from a modern crossbreed pig. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2013, 53, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kušec, G.; Komlenić, M.; Gvozdanović, K.; Sili, V.; Krvavica, M.; Radišić, Ž.; Kušec, I.D. Carcass Composition and Physicochemical Characteristics of Meat from Pork Chains Based on Native and Hybrid Pigs. Processes 2022, 10, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Budimir, K.; Margeta, V.; Kralik, G.; Margeta, P. Silvopastoral keeping of the Black Slavonian Pigs. Krmiva Časopis Hranidbi Zivotinj. Proizv. Tehnol. Krme 2013, 55, 151–157. [Google Scholar]
- Kralik, G.; Margeta, V.; Luković, Z.; Kralik, I. Situation and directions of pig breedding with special review to Eastern Croatia. Stočarstvo 2013, 67, 151–159. [Google Scholar]
- Senčić, Đ.; Samac, D. Preserving biodiversity of Black Slavonian pigs through production and evaluation of traditional meat products. Poljoprivreda 2017, 23, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Špička, J.; Náglová, Z. Consumer segmentation in the meat market—The case study of Czech Republic. Agric. Econ. 2022, 68, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chernukha, I.; Kotenkova, E.; Pchelkina, V.; Ilyin, N.; Utyanov, D.; Kasimova, T.; Surzhik, A.; Fedulova, L. Pork Fat and Meat: A Balance between Consumer Expectations and Nutrient Composition of Four Pig Breeds. Foods 2023, 12, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Olson, J.C.; Jacoby, J. Cue utilization in the quality perception process. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research Chicago: Association for Consumer Research, Chicago, IL, USA, 3–5 November 1972; pp. 167–179. [Google Scholar]
- Bernués, A.; Olaizola, A.; Corcoran, K. Extrinsic attributes of red meat as indicators of quality in Europe: An application for market segmentation. Food Qual. Prefer. 2003, 14, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dillman, D.; Smyth, J.; Christian, L.M. Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys, 4th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; Available online: https://www.perlego.com/book/997936/internet-phone-mail-and-mixedmode-surveys-the-tailored-design-method-pdf (accessed on 15 March 2021).
- Khachatryan, H.; Rihn, A.; Wei, X. Consumers’ Preferences for Eco-labels on Plants: The Influence of Trust and Consequentiality Perceptions. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 2021, 91, 101659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mariel, P.; Hoyos, D.; Meyerhoff, J.; Czajkowski, M.; Dekker, T.; Glenk, K.; Jacobsen, B.; Liebe, U.; Olsen, S.B.; Sagebiel, J.; et al. Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments, Guidance on Design, Implementation and Data Analysis; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marescotti, M.E.; Caputo, V.; Demartini, E.; Gaviglio, A. Consumer preferences for wild game cured meat label: Do attitudes towards animal welfare matter? Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 2020, 23, 599–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, R.; Kelly, B.; Yeatman, H.; Boyland, E. Food Marketing Influences Children’s Attitudes, Preferences and Consumption: A Systematic Critical Review. Nutrients 2019, 11, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pettigrew, S.; Jongenelis, M.; Quester, P.; Chapman, K.; Miller, C. Factors associated with parents’ attitudes to unhealthy foods and beverages: Parents’ attitudes to unhealthy foods. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2016, 52, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarabashkina, L.; Quester, P.; Crouch, R. Exploring the moderating effect of children’s nutritional knowledge on the relationship between product evaluations and food choice. Soc. Sci. Med. 2016, 149, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verbeke, W.; Pérez-Cueto, F.J.A.; de Barcellos, M.D.; Krystallis, A.; Grunert, K.G. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork. Meat Sci. 2010, 84, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Gudiño, J.; Blanco-Penedo, I.; Gispert, M.; Brun, A.; Perea, J.; Font-I-Furnols, M. Understanding consumers’ perceptions towards Iberian pig production and animal welfare. Meat Sci. 2021, 172, 108317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Realini, C.E.; Font i Furnols, M.; Sañudo, C.; Montossi, F.; Oliver, M.A.; Guerrero, L. Spanish, French and British consumers’ acceptability of Uruguayan beef, and consumers’ beef choice associated with country of origin, finishing diet and meat price. Meat Sci. 2013, 95, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Font-i-Furnols, M.; Guerrero, L. Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: An overview. Meat Sci. 2014, 98, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saeed, F.; Grunert, K.G.; Therkildsen, M. How product trial changes quality perception of four new processed beef products. Meat Sci. 2013, 93, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salnikova, E.; Grunert, K.G. The role of consumption orientation in consumer food preferences in emerging markets. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 112, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Török, Á.; Yeh, C.H.; Menozzi, D.; Balogh, P.; Czine, P. Consumers’ preferences for processed meat: A best–worst scaling approach in three European countries. Agric. Food Econ. 2023, 11, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cerjak, M.; Petrčić, M.; Karolyi, D. Effect of information about animal feeding on consumer acceptability of sausages from Turopolje pig breed. Agric. Conspec. Sci. 2017, 82, 151–154. [Google Scholar]
- Jelić Milković, S.; Lončarić, R.; Kralik, I.; Kristić, J.; Crnčan, A.; Djurkin Kušec, I.; Canavari, M. Consumers’ Preference for the Consumption of the Fresh Black Slavonian Pig’s Meat. Foods 2023, 12, 1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortega, D.L.; Wang, H.H.; Wu, L.; Olynk, N.J. Modeling heterogeneity in consumer preferences for select food safety attributes in China. Food Policy 2011, 36, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balogh, P.; Békési, D.; Gorton, M.; Popp, J.; Lengyel, P. Consumer willingness to pay for traditional food products. Food Policy 2016, 61, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, N.B.; Rodrigues Minim, V.P.; Nascimento, M.; Teixeira Ribeiro Vidigal, M.C.; Marques Ferreira, M.A.; Arruda Gonçalves, A.C.; Minim, A.L. A discriminant function for validation of the cluster analysis and behavioral prediction of the coffee market. Food Res. Int. 2015, 77, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aprile, M.C.; Caputo, V.; Nayga, R.M., Jr. Consumers’ Preferences and Attitudes Toward Local Food Products. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2016, 22, 19–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haas, R.; Canavari, M.; Imami, D.; Gjonbalaj, M.; Gjokaj, E.; Zvyagintsev, D. Attitudes and Preferences of Kosovar Consumer Segments Toward Quality Attributes of Milk and Dairy Products. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2016, 28, 407–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kallas, Z.; Vitale, M.; Gil, J.M. Health Innovation in Patty Products. The Role of Food Neophobia in Consumers’ Non-Hypothetical Willingness to Pay, Purchase Intention and Hedonic Evaluation. Nutrients 2019, 11, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pejman, N.; Kallas, Z.; Dalmau, A.; Velarde, A. Should Animal Welfare Regulations Be More Restrictive? A Case Study in Eight European Union Countries. Animals 2019, 9, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schütz, A.; Sonntag, W.I.; Spiller, A. Environmental Enrichment in Pig Husbandry: Consumer Comparative Assessment of Different Housing Elements Based on a Pictorial Survey; Diskussionsbeitrag, No. 1903; Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung (DARE): Göttingen, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Eldesouky, A.; Mesias, F.J.; Escribano, M. Consumer Assessment of Sustainability Traits in Meat Production. A Choice Experiment Study in Spain. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortiz, A.; Diaz-Caro, C.; Tejerina, D.; Escribano, M.; Crespo, E.; Gaspar, P. Consumption of fresh Iberian pork: Two-stage cluster for the identification of segments of consumers according to their habits and lifestyles. Meat Sci. 2021, 173, 108373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardona, M.; Gorriz, A.; Barat, J.M.; Fernández-Segovia, I. Perception of fat and other quality parameters in minced and burguer meat from Spanish consumer studies. Meat Sci. 2020, 166, 108138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felderhoff, C.; Lyford, C.; Malaga, J.; Polkinghorne, R.; Brooks, C.; Garmyn, A.; Miller, M. Beef quality preferences: Factors driving consumer satisfaction. Foods 2020, 9, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silvestri, C.; Aquilani, M.; Ruggieri, A. Beef traditional food: Consumer before purchase preferences based on quality. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2020, 32, 16–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tregear, A. From Stilton to Vimto: Using food history to re-think typical products in rural development. Sociol. Rural. 2003, 43, 91–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Török, Á.; Gorton, M.; Yeh, C.-H.; Czine, P.; Balogh, P. Understanding Consumers’ Preferences for Protected Geographical Indications: A Choice Experiment with Hungarian Sausage Consumers. Foods 2022, 11, 997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ministry of Agriculture, Protected Designation of Origin (PDO). The Control Plan for the Product “Black Slavonian Pig Meat”—PDO, According to which the Procedure for Confirming the Conformity of the Product with the Product Specification is Approved by the Ministry of Agriculture on 20 September 2021 (CLASS: 310-26/20-01/60, REGISTRATION NUMBER: 525-14/1268-21-4). Available online: https://poljoprivreda.gov.hr/istaknute-teme/hrana-111/oznake-kvalitete/zoi-zozp-zts-poljoprivrednih-i-prehrambenih-proizvoda/zasticena-oznaka-izvornosti-zoi/1206 (accessed on 15 April 2022).
- Garavaglia, C.; Mariani, P. How Much Do Consumers Value Protected Designation of Origin Certifications? Estimates of willingness to Pay for PDO Dry-Cured Ham in Italy. Agribusiness 2017, 33, 403–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Frequency | Percent (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 201 | 49.0 |
Female | 209 | 51.0 | |
Age | 18–24 | 55 | 13.4 |
25–34 | 84 | 20.5 | |
35–44 | 84 | 20.5 | |
45–54 | 77 | 18.8 | |
>55 | 110 | 26.8 | |
Region | Central Croatia | 102 | 24.9 |
North-western Croatia | 101 | 24.6 | |
Eastern Croatia | 88 | 21.5 | |
Northern Adriatic and Lika | 65 | 15.9 | |
Middle and South Adriatic | 54 | 13.2 | |
Labour situation | Student | 45 | 11.0 |
Unemployed | 33 | 8.0 | |
Employed part-time | 17 | 4.1 | |
Employed | 254 | 62.0 | |
Retired | 61 | 14.9 | |
Number of household members | 1 | 26 | 6.3 |
2–4 | 339 | 82.7 | |
5–8 | 45 | 11.0 | |
Number of children below 15 years in the household | 0 | 282 | 68.8 |
1 | 70 | 17.1 | |
≥2 | 58 | 14.1 | |
Household income group | Significantly below average | 12 | 2.9 |
Below average | 70 | 17.1 | |
Average | 241 | 58.8 | |
Above average | 87 | 21.2 | |
Usual place of purchase | Direct from producer | 30 | 7.3 |
Butcher shop | 197 | 48.0 | |
Hyper/supermarket | 183 | 44.6 | |
Knowledge about the breed of pig from which the meat originates | Yes | 73 | 17.8 |
No | 337 | 82.2 | |
Consumption frequency of fresh meat or cured products from Black Slavonian Pig | Never | 166 | 40.5 |
Yes, occasionally | 226 | 55.1 | |
Yes, frequently | 18 | 4.4 |
M | Me | Mo | SD | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Taste of the meat | 4.48 | 5 | 5 | 0.614 |
Odor of the meat | 4.44 | 5 | 5 | 0.673 |
Color of the meat | 4.16 | 4 | 4 | 0.690 |
Quality mark | 4.12 | 4 | 4 | 0.742 |
Origin (regions of the Republic of Croatia, autochthonous breed) | 4.07 | 4 | 4 | 0.788 |
Production method (domestic or industrial production) | 4.06 | 4 | 4 | 0.714 |
Visible fat content | 4.00 | 4 | 4 | 0.750 |
Percentage of salt | 3.93 | 4 | 4 | 0.836 |
Producer or brand | 3.75 | 4 | 4 | 0.828 |
Variables | Female | Male | t-Test | p | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | SD | M | SD | |||
Production method (domestic or industrial production) | 4.12 | 0.714 | 4.00 | 0.711 | −1.771 | 0.077 |
Producer or brand | 3.80 | 0.819 | 3.70 | 0.837 | −1.193 | 0.234 |
Quality mark | 4.22 | 0.659 | 4.01 | 0.806 | −2.960 | 0.003 ** |
Origin (regions of the Republic of Croatia, autochthonous breed) | 4.11 | 0.767 | 4.03 | 0.809 | −0.966 | 0.334 |
Color of the meat | 4.22 | 0.630 | 4.09 | 0.743 | −1.993 | 0.047 * |
Taste of the meat | 4.53 | 0.580 | 4.42 | 0.644 | −1.788 | 0.074 |
Odor of the meat | 4.51 | 0.644 | 4.37 | 0.696 | −2.101 | 0.036 * |
Visible fat content | 4.04 | 0.723 | 3.96 | 0.777 | −1.186 | 0.236 |
Percentage of salt | 4.01 | 0.743 | 3.85 | 0.917 | −2.040 | 0.042 * |
Variables | Yes | No | t-Test | p | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | SD | M | SD | |||
Production method (domestic or industrial production) | 4.21 | 0.763 | 4.03 | 0.700 | 1.946 | 0.052 |
Producer or brand | 3.92 | 0.909 | 3.72 | 0.807 | 1.901 | 0.058 |
Quality mark | 4.26 | 0.708 | 4.09 | 0.747 | 1.793 | 0.074 |
Origin (regions of the Republic of Croatia) | 4.36 | 0.653 | 4.01 | 0.802 | 3.430 | 0.001 ** |
Color of the meat | 4.36 | 0.632 | 4.12 | 0.695 | 2.720 | 0.007 ** |
Taste of the meat | 4.58 | 0.551 | 4.46 | 0.626 | 1.495 | 0.136 |
Odor of the meat | 4.60 | 0.571 | 4.40 | 0.688 | 2.306 | 0.022 * |
Visible fat content | 4.16 | 0.764 | 3.96 | 0.743 | 2.074 | 0.039 * |
Percentage of salt | 4.18 | 0.788 | 3.88 | 0.838 | 2.799 | 0.005 ** |
18–24 | 25–34 | 35–44 | 45–54 | >55 | p | ||||||
M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | ||
Percentage of salt | 3.67 | 0.862 | 3.85 | 0.703 | 3.89 | 0.905 | 3.90 | 0.912 | 4.18 | 0.756 | 0.002 ** |
Student | Unemployed | Employed part-time | Employed | Retired | p | ||||||
M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | ||
Percentage of salt | 3.71 | 0.869 | 3.91 | 0.947 | 3.82 | 0.728 | 3.91 | 0.831 | 4.23 | 0.739 | 0.022 * |
1 | 2–4 | 5–8 | p | ||||||||
M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | ||||||
Percentage of salt | 4.42 | 0.578 | 3.91 | 0.849 | 3.80 | 0.786 | 0.006 ** | ||||
0 | 1 | ≥2 | p | ||||||||
M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | ||||||
Producer or brand | 3.76 | 0.814 | 3.91 | 0.608 | 3.53 | 1.063 | 0.035 * | ||||
Quality mark | 4.14 | 0.700 | 4.23 | 0.685 | 3.90 | 0.949 | 0.031 * | ||||
Percentage of salt | 4.02 | 0.798 | 3.71 | 0.783 | 3.78 | 1.009 | 0.007 ** | ||||
Direct from producer | Butcher shop | Hyper/supermarket | p | ||||||||
M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | ||||||
Production method | 4.20 | 0.925 | 4.13 | 0.706 | 3.96 | 0.674 | 0.042 * | ||||
Producer or brand | 3.77 | 0.858 | 3.87 | 0.808 | 3.62 | 0.829 | 0.011 * | ||||
Quality mark | 4.27 | 0.868 | 4.23 | 0.680 | 3.98 | 0.763 | 0.002 ** | ||||
Origin | 4.27 | 0.907 | 4.19 | 0.758 | 3.91 | 0.772 | 0.001 ** | ||||
Never | Yes, occasionally | Yes, frequently | p | ||||||||
M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | ||||||
Origin | 3.96 | 0.781 | 4.13 | 0.792 | 4.44 | 0.616 | 0.013 * | ||||
Visible fat content | 3.92 | 0.742 | 4.02 | 0.751 | 4.50 | 0.618 | 0.006 ** |
F1 | F2 | |
---|---|---|
Odor of the meat | 0.857 | 0.143 |
Taste of the meat | 0.836 | 0.153 |
Color of the meat | 0.662 | 0.371 |
Visible fat content | 0.652 | 0.339 |
Percentage of salt | 0.546 | 0.380 |
Producer or brand | 0.077 | 0.806 |
Quality mark | 0.330 | 0.747 |
Origin (regions of the Republic of Croatia) | 0.316 | 0.733 |
Production method (domestic or industrial production) | 0.325 | 0.731 |
% Variance Explained | 50.270 | 12.351 |
Eigenvalues | 4.524 | 1.112 |
Cronbach’s Alpha | 0.822 | 0.818 |
Custer 1 (n = 123) Intrinsically Oriented Meat Consumers | Cluster 2 (n = 182) Extrinsically Oriented Meat Consumers | Cluster 3 (n = 105) Uninterested Meat Consumers | |
---|---|---|---|
Intrinsic quality | 0.91445 | −0.05907 | −0.96883 |
Extrinsic quality | −0.66815 | 0.81817 | −0.63547 |
Cluster (Consumers %) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | C2 | C3 | χ2 | p | ||
Gender | Male | 44.4 | 44.6 | 61.7 | 9.284 | 0.010 ** |
Female | 55.6 | 55.4 | 38.3 | |||
Age | 18–24 | 11.1 | 14.7 | 14.0 | 8.961 | 0.346 |
25–34 | 19.0 | 22.6 | 18.7 | |||
35–44 | 19.0 | 19.2 | 24.3 | |||
45–54 | 21.4 | 14.1 | 23.4 | |||
>55 | 29.4 | 29.4 | 19.6 | |||
Region | Central Croatia | 30.2 | 21.5 | 24.3 | 15.271 | 0.054 |
North-western Croatia | 31.0 | 20.3 | 24.3 | |||
Eastern Croatia | 14.3 | 23.7 | 26.2 | |||
Northern Adriatic and Lika | 15.9 | 16.9 | 14.0 | |||
Middle and South Adriatic | 8.7 | 17.5 | 11.2 | |||
Labour status | Student | 7.9 | 13.0 | 11.2 | ||
Unemployed | 11.1 | 4.5 | 10.3 | |||
Employed part-time | 4.0 | 3.4 | 5.6 | 10.628 | 0.224 | |
Employed | 64.3 | 60.5 | 61.7 | |||
Retired | 12.7 | 18.6 | 11.2 | |||
Number of household members | 1 | 7.1 | 6.8 | 4.7 | 3.781 | 0.436 |
2–4 | 85.7 | 79.7 | 84.1 | |||
5–8 | 7.1 | 13.6 | 11.2 | |||
Number of children in household (<15) | 0 | 75.4 | 68.4 | 61.7 | 7.999 | 0.092 |
1 | 12.7 | 19.8 | 17.8 | |||
≥2 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 20.6 | |||
Household income group | Significantly below average | 5.6 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 8.533 | 0.202 |
Below average | 14.3 | 16.4 | 21.5 | |||
Average | 55.6 | 59.9 | 60.7 | |||
Above average | 24.6 | 21.5 | 16.8 | |||
Usual place of purchase | Direct from producer | 4.8 | 10.2 | 5.6 | 7.139 | 0.129 |
Butcher shop | 44.4 | 51.4 | 46.7 | |||
Hyper/supermarket | 50.8 | 38.4 | 47.7 | |||
Knowledge about the breed of pig | Yes | 16.7 | 22.6 | 11.2 | 6.066 | 0.048 * |
No | 83.3 | 77.4 | 88.8 | |||
Consumption frequency of fresh meat or cured products from Black Slavonian Pig | Never | 41.3 | 38.4 | 43.0 | 4.714 | 0.318 |
Yes, occasionally | 54.0 | 55.4 | 56.1 | |||
Yes, frequently | 4.8 | 6.2 | 0.9 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jelić Milković, S.; Crnčan, A.; Kristić, J.; Kralik, I.; Djurkin Kušec, I.; Gvozdanović, K.; Kušec, G.; Kralik, Z.; Lončarić, R. Consumer Preferences for Cured Meat Products from the Autochthonous Black Slavonian Pig. Foods 2023, 12, 3666. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12193666
Jelić Milković S, Crnčan A, Kristić J, Kralik I, Djurkin Kušec I, Gvozdanović K, Kušec G, Kralik Z, Lončarić R. Consumer Preferences for Cured Meat Products from the Autochthonous Black Slavonian Pig. Foods. 2023; 12(19):3666. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12193666
Chicago/Turabian StyleJelić Milković, Sanja, Ana Crnčan, Jelena Kristić, Igor Kralik, Ivona Djurkin Kušec, Kristina Gvozdanović, Goran Kušec, Zlata Kralik, and Ružica Lončarić. 2023. "Consumer Preferences for Cured Meat Products from the Autochthonous Black Slavonian Pig" Foods 12, no. 19: 3666. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12193666
APA StyleJelić Milković, S., Crnčan, A., Kristić, J., Kralik, I., Djurkin Kušec, I., Gvozdanović, K., Kušec, G., Kralik, Z., & Lončarić, R. (2023). Consumer Preferences for Cured Meat Products from the Autochthonous Black Slavonian Pig. Foods, 12(19), 3666. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12193666