Next Article in Journal
The Impacts of Standardized Flaxseed Meal (XanFlax) on the Physicochemical, Textural, and Sensory Properties of Muffins
Next Article in Special Issue
Detection, Control, Risk Assessment, and Prevention of Foodborne Microorganisms
Previous Article in Journal
Safety Analysis of Korean Cottage Industries’ Doenjang, a Traditional Fermented Soybean Product: A Special Reference to Biogenic Amines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Use of Doehlert Matrix as a Tool for High-Throughput Screening of Organic Acids and Essential Oils on Miniaturized Pork Loins, Followed by Lab-Scale Validation That Confirmed Tested Compounds Do Not Show Synergistic Effects against Salmonella Typhimurium
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Variability in Physicochemical Parameters and Its Impact on Microbiological Quality and Occurrence of Foodborne Pathogens in Artisanal Italian Organic Salami

1
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
2
Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Cordoba, Agrifood Campus of International Excellence ceiA3, Campus Rabanales, 14014 Córdoba, Spain
3
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(22), 4086; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12224086
Submission received: 6 October 2023 / Revised: 29 October 2023 / Accepted: 6 November 2023 / Published: 10 November 2023

Abstract

:
Artisanal salami is produced in small-scale production plants, where the lack of full automation might result in higher variability in food intrinsic properties. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the inter- and intra-batch variability in physicochemical parameters and its impact on microbial quality and occurrence of foodborne pathogens on 480 samples collected from six batches of an artisanal Italian production of organic salami. Relatively high total bacterial counts (TBC) were found on the surface of the table in the stuffing room (4.29 ± 0.40 log cfu/cm2). High loads of Enterobacteriaceae in the meat mixture of batch 2 and TBC in batch 5 were associated with a higher occurrence of bacterial pathogens. During ripening, water activity (aw) and pH failed to reach values lower than 0.86 and 5.3, respectively. Six Staphylococcus aureus and four Listeria monocytogenes isolates were collected from the salami meat mixture during ripening and the processing environment. A total of 126 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae were characterized at a species level, with Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, and Citrobacter freundii isolated from the final products. Results suggest the relevance of first steps of production in terms of the hygiene of raw materials and handling during stuffing procedures, especially when the physicochemical parameters of the final products do not reach values that represent hurdles for foodborne pathogens.

1. Introduction

An increased demand for artisanal foods has been observed in the last decades. These products are generally elaborated locally in small-scale, family-based companies perceived as producing healthier and more ethical food [1,2]. Due to the large variety of local, small-scale productions, microbial data on each specific product are scarce. Moreover, in small-scale food productions, the reduced automation results in variability in physicochemical and microbiological parameters of the final product [3,4].
Italian salami falls within the category of dry fermented sausages with a ripening period longer than 4 weeks and a water activity lower than 0.90 [5]. In Italy, a wide variety of artisanal salami recipes exist with ripening times from 3 to 6 months [6,7]. In traditional salami, the addition of salt and nitrates inhibits Gram-negative spoilage bacteria and enhances coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) during fermentation and ripening [7]. CNS use oxygen contributing to a reduction in the redox potential, which in turn inhibits aerobic bacteria in favor of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Acidification due to LAB growth and the decrease in water activity during natural ripening represent the hurdles reducing the risk of bacterial pathogen growth in fermented sausages [8]. However, the size of these technological hurdles might vary in different productions. In particular, in organic productions, the absence of starter cultures and of nitrates might potentially impact the effective acidification of the food matrix and reduction in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial pathogens.
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) as well as Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., and Staphylococcus aureus were isolated from fermented productions [8,9,10]. L. monocytogenes was detected in a French plant producing dry sausages, its equipment, and in 10% of the final products [11]. Higher occurrences of 13–15%, 16%, 42%, and 60% were registered in Italy, Spain, Greece, and Portugal, respectively [2,12,13,14,15]. Salmonella was detected in Italy in three dry fermenting processing plants with a prevalence of 16.7% in food and 5.8% in the environment [10]. Additionally, S. aureus was detected in raw meat, casing, semifinished, and finished fermented sausages produced in both a nitrite and a nitrite-free production in Spain [9]. Although unusual, outbreaks associated with the consumption of contaminated fermented sausages have been described. E. coli O157:H7, O103:H25, and O26:H11 have been identified as etiologic agents in outbreaks involving fermented pork and beef meat salami as vehicles in United States in 1994, in Sweden in 2002, in Italy in 2004, in Norway in 2008, and in Denmark in 2018 [16,17,18,19,20]. Similarly, fermented sausages contaminated by Salmonella spp. were associated with outbreaks in Germany in 2001, Spain in 2011, and more recently in the United States in 2022, linked to salami sticks [21,22,23].
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the variability in physicochemical parameters and its impact on the microbiological quality and occurrence of foodborne pathogens in an Italian artisanal factory producing an organic pig-meat salami over a year of sampling. Based on results, potential routes of contamination are suggested.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

One artisanal Italian factory was sampled over 10 months (July 2020–May 2021). The factory produces an organic salami made of pig meat with no addition of nitrites/nitrates or starter cultures and with a ripening period of 6 months. Regarding processing, after the stuffing of a mixture of meat, spices, and salt into natural casing, salami were dried at 10 °C and RH 55–60% for 7–9 days and then stored in controlled environment for 5 weeks at 10 °C and RH 70% for maturation. Afterwards, salami were stored in a cellar up to 6 months (Figure 1). Raw materials were sampled, along with intermediate and final products, as well as the processing environment. A total of 420 samples were analyzed, namely, meat mixture (n = 30), salami from the drying room (n = 30), salami in the maturation room (n = 30), and salami after 10 (n = 30), 18 (n = 30), and 28 (n = 30) weeks of ripening in the storage room. Swabs from the surface of a table in the stuffing room (n = 30) as well as the walls (n = 90) and drains (n = 90) were also collected from the stuffing, drying, and maturation rooms. In addition, swabs from the stuffing machine (n = 30) were gathered. For environmental samples, sterile cotton swabs (Copan Italia, Brescia, Italy) were moistened in 10 mL of saline solution (0.9% NaCl) and then used to swab a 100 cm2 area. These samples were collected before disinfection and cleaning. Five sample units per matrix (food and environment) per batch were tested. Overall, six batches were analyzed: batch 1 (stuffing on the 1 July 2020), batch 2 (23 September 2020), batch 3 (7 October 2020), batch 4 (21 October 2020), batch 5 (4 November 2020), and batch 6 (18 November 2020).

2.2. Microbiological and Physicochemical Analyses

Total bacterial count (TBC) (ISO 4833-2), water activity (ISO 21807), pH (ISO 2917), and the occurrence of L. monocytogenes (ISO 11290-1), coagulase positive Staphylococci (ISO 6888-1), verotoxigenic E. coli (VTEC) (ISO 16649), and Salmonella (ISO 6579) were investigated in all 480 samples [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. In particular for VTEC, after the isolation of E. coli on Tryptone Bile X-GLUC Agar (TBX, Thermo Scientific, Milan, Italy), a PCR for the identification of Shiga toxin-encoding genes was applied as previously described [31]. Additionally, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) (ISO 15214) and Enterobacteriaceae (ISO 21528-2) were enumerated in raw materials and semifinished and finished products [32,33]. Moreover, to characterize Enterobacteriaceae at a species level, 25 g of food sample was diluted in 225 mL of Buffer Peptone Water (BPW, Thermo Scientific, Milan, Italy) and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. BPW pre-enriched cultures were then streaked on MacConkey agar (Thermo Scientific) and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Five colonies per plate (both lactose fermenting and non-lactose fermenting) were submitted to biochemical test (RapID ONE System and RapID STAPH PLUS System, Thermo Scientific) and PCR for confirmation [31,34,35,36]. One confirmed isolate per species per sample was retained.

2.3. Data Analysis and Modelling

Data analysis and modeling were carried out using R Studio v4.2.2. Statistical comparisons were made between microbial counts from various food batches and environmental samples through ANOVA (with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05). To identify homogeneous groups, we applied Tukey’s HSD test. Additionally, we created boxplots to visually represent the variation in microbial counts within and between batches of salami samples stored at different temperatures throughout their shelf life.
Longitudinal data sets, encompassing TBC and Enterobacteriaceae counts, collected from various sources such as environmental surfaces, food contact surfaces, meat mixture, and the finished salami within the drying room were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs). These models were adjusted using the R packages lme4 [37] and nlme to account for inter-batch variability, treating it as a random effect. Main effects considered the influence of the variables “Stage” (mixing, stuffing, drying, and ripening) according to the form:
Y i s b = β 0 + u b + S t a g e s + ε i s b ,
where Y i s b represents the count (in log cfu/g) of a specific microbial group (TBC and Enterobacteriaceae), determined within the processing stage denoted as s, belonging to the batch labeled as b; β0 is the model intercept which can undergo random shifts denoted as ub, associated with the specific batch b; S t a g e s represents a particular processing stage s; and ε i s b represents the error associated with the microbial count i determined within the processing stage s, belonging to batch b. Samples, including environmental and drain swabs, meat mixture, and finished salami collected from each processing stage, were integrated into another main effects model as follows:
Y i s b = β 0 + u b + S t a g e s E n v i r o n m e n t i + ε i s b ,
where S t a g e s E n v i r o n m e n t i represents a sample denoted as i, which was obtained from the processing stage s within a specific batch b. The variability between batches within a factory was quantified by assessing the squared standard deviation of the random effects, while it was assumed that errors also conformed to a normal distribution.

3. Results

3.1. Enumeration of Total Bacterial Count, Lactic Acid Bacteria, and Enterobacteriaceae

Regarding environmental swabs collected at the processing plant, manhole samples presented the highest loads of TBC compared to the other tested environmental sites (Figure 2). More specifically, manhole samples in the drying and ripening rooms (SWD and SWR) showed the highest TBC, with a mean value of 7.08 ± 0.29 log cfu/cm2 and 7.05 ± 0.61 log cfu/cm2, respectively. No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed for TBC between batches, also supported by the high intra-batch variability. Interestingly, the surface swab of the table in the stuffing room (STM) showed TBC 4.29 ± 0.40 log cfu/cm2 higher than those found in the other swabs of the same room, notably the stuffing machine swab (SM, 2.77 ± 0.99 log cfu/cm2) and the wall swab (SEM, 3.24 ± 1.32 log cfu/cm2) (Figure 2).
Regarding the meat mixture used to produce salami, high intra- and inter-batch variability for the different groups evaluated was observed, especially for Enterobacteriaceae (Figure 3). Higher Enterobacteriaceae counts were detected in meat mixture samples of batch 2 compared to the other batches, except for batch 1 (p ≤ 0.05). In addition, significantly higher LAB counts were registered in samples of batch 2. Higher TBC counts in the meat mixture samples of batch 5 were observed compared to the other batches, except for batch 2 (p ≤ 0.05).
Regarding salami samples, slight increases in TBC and LAB counts were associated with a decrease in Enterobacteriaceae load in all batches (Figure 4). Interestingly, the increase in TBC and LAB reached maximum levels in salami at 3 or 10 weeks of ripening (depending on the batch), after which a decrease was observed up to 28 weeks of ripening. The increase in TBC in batch 1, for example, started at 8.58 log cfu/g in minced meat mixture and reached 9.75 log cfu/g in salami after 10 weeks of ripening, and slightly decreased to 8.77 log cfu/g in the final product (28 weeks of ripening). Similarly, in batch 1, LAB loads increased from 8.53 to 9.34 log cfu/g (10 weeks of ripening) and reached 8.10 log cfu/g in the final product. Regarding Enterobacteriaceae, loads showed a decreasing trend all across the ripening process, starting from 4.56 and reaching 1.09 log cfu/g in the final product in batch 1 (Figure 4). No statistically significant differences were observed between batches in TBC and LAB loads in salami after 28 weeks of ripening (p > 0.05). In the final product of all batches, the load of Enterobacteriaceae was lower or close to the detection limit of 1 log cfu/g, suggesting that the ripening process was effective in reducing the risk for human health related to the potential occurrence of foodborne pathogens included in this bacterial family.

3.2. Physicochemical Parameters (pH and aw)

As expected, the pH decreased along with the increase in LAB up to 3–10 weeks of ripening, after which it increased along with a reduction in LAB (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Initial pH in the salami in the drying room ranged from 5.28 (batch 1) to 5.58 (batch 5). During ripening, the pH decreased up to 5.3 in all batches except batch 5. However, after 10 weeks of ripening, the pH increased in all batches, reaching values ranging from 5.87 (batch 4) to 6.25 (batch 3) in the final product (Figure 5).
Regarding water activity, a constant decrease was observed from values ranging from 0.953 (batch 6) to 0.982 (batch 3) in the salami in the drying room to values ranging from 0.842 (batch 3) to 0.884 (batch 5) in salami after 28 weeks of ripening (Figure 5).

3.3. Generalized Linear Mixed Models

Generalized linear mixed models were created to explore whether variations in the production stage and the environment could account for some of the differences observed between batches in TBC and Enterobacteriaceae counts throughout the salami production process. The outcomes of this investigation are presented in Table 1 and Table 2.
Results from GLMMs indicated that the TBC in the drying, stuffing, and ripening phases were significantly higher than the TBC found in the meat mixture (p ≤ 0.05). Specifically, the ripening step produced the largest increase (4.33 ± 0.27 log cfu/g), which can be partially attributed to the increase in LAB populations. During ripening, a positive effect was predicted for TBC counts in 18- and 28-week ripened salami (Table 1). Regarding Enterobacteriaceae counts, there was a significant negative effect after mixing, indicating the decrease in microbial counts during the drying, stuffing, and ripening phases. A significant decrease in Enterobacteriaceae populations was predicted during salami ripening (Table 2). Significant negative effects were found between most of the analyzed surfaces and TBC and Enterobacteriaceae counts in the salami samples in the drying room, thus indicating an increase in microbial populations in the finished salami samples. Nevertheless, TBC counts from the water drainages (ripening and drying rooms) were similar to the TBC levels in the salami samples in the drying room (p > 0.05, Table 1). Regarding the inter-batch variability, random effects indicate a higher inter-batch variability for TBC in comparison to Enterobacteriaceae.

3.4. Occurrence of Bacterial Pathogens

Regarding bacterial pathogens, none of the 480 samples collected were positive for VTEC or Salmonella spp. Four isolates were positive for L. monocytogenes and six for S. aureus, eight for S. warneri, one for S. capitis, and one for S. xilosus. Regarding Enterobacteriaceae, the following species were identified: Klebsiella oxytoca and K. pneumoniae (33), E. coli (30), Citrobacter freundii (26), Enterobacter cloacae (16), and Routella planticola (1) (Table S1).
Bacteria were collected from mixed meat and salami during and at the end of the ripening period, and environmental swabs were gathered during production. In particular, pathogens were mostly found in the meat mixture (22), the surface of the table in the stuffing room (15), and in the salami in the drying room (25) and after 3 weeks of ripening (19) (Table S2). Following ripening, the number of pathogens decreased from 25 in salami in the drying room to 5 and 12 in salami at 18 and 28 weeks of ripening, respectively (Table S2). One Enterobacter cloacae strain, six E. coli, two Citrobacter freundii, and two K. pneumoniae were found in the finished product, suggesting that although the ripening process was effective in reducing the risk associated with the presence of bacterial pathogens, it was not enough to guarantee the lack of bacterial pathogens in the final food product. Although the water activity in the final product was lower than 0.90, data on the increased pH suggest the need to better control this parameter, for example, by considering the possibility of shortening the ripening period from 28 to 18 weeks.

4. Discussion

In the present study, the effect of pH and water activity on the number of bacterial indicators of the process’s hygiene and the occurrence of foodborne pathogens was assessed in an artisanal Italian production of organic salami.
pH is an essential parameter in fermented meat products. The acid hurdle is crucial for the control of the safety of the product [38,39]. pH values below 5.3 are essential to inhibit the growth of Gram-positive bacteria such as S. aureus. The pH of the majority of Mediterranean-style fermented sausages is approximately 4.5/5.4, which has several beneficial effects on both the shelf life and the manufacturing process [39,40]. However, the final pH can rise up to 6.0/6.7 in some low-acid fermented sausages (e.g., Soudjouk, Fuet).
In the present study, the pH decreased below 5.3 after 10 weeks of ripening, after which an increase to values higher than 6 in the final products was achieved. These results might be associated with the lack of standardized starter cultures and the different growth rates of autochthonous LAB groups in each batch. In salami prepared with starter cultures of dairy origin, pH 5.3 was reached after 3 weeks of ripening [41]. Neutral values of pH in the final product might reduce the acid hurdles and thus enhance the growth of bacteria. In the present study, although the number of Enterobacteriaceae was lower than the detection limit in most final products, bacterial pathogens were detected.
Water activity values lower than 0.90 and 0.86 are essential to control the growth of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial pathogens, respectively [5,42]. In the final product of the present study, all batches showed a water activity value lower than 0.90, but only one (batch 3) fell under the 0.86 limit (batch 3, 0.842), suggesting a potential hurdle for S. aureus control. Although not found in the final product, S. aureus was found in raw materials, salami in the drying room, and salami after 3 weeks of ripening. This finding suggests the relevance of a high microbiological quality of raw materials, especially when pH and water activity hurdles cannot be fully maintained.
Besides bacterial pathogens being found in the final product, the detection of pathogens in the processing environment is of concern since potential events of cross-contamination might occur involving both workers and the food product before commercialization.
The ability of L. monocytogenes to survive on several environmental stress conditions boost the likelihood of detecting this foodborne pathogen in contaminated ready-to-eat products of meat, fish, and dairy-origin products [43,44]. Recently, several L. monocytogenes outbreaks were associated with ready-to-eat meat product contamination from Italy and worldwide [45,46,47], among which a recent US outbreak involved Italian-type salami, mortadella, and prosciutto [48]. Despite L. monocytogenes not being detected in the final products, it was found in the processing environment of batch 2 (manhole of the drying room). Therefore, a more intensive control of the contamination routes in the salami processing plant might be necessary. Likewise, S. aureus is able to tolerate a wide range of environmental conditions, including pH ranges from 4.5 to 9.0 and NaCl concentrations up to 9%. Many strains have been recently recovered from dry-cured meat processing facilities and related products [49,50]. The finding of six S. aureus strains from all batches but the first one, as well as from different sources (including meat mixture, processing surfaces, and in salami of the drying and ripening rooms), suggests that different strains have been introduced in the food processing chain through raw materials, hygiene failures, or food handlers.
Enterobacteriaceae represented the predominant family recovered across the salami facility, resulting in 6 species and 106 strains confirmed overall (84% prevalence). Among Enterobacteriaceae, E. coli corresponded to the dominant species, exhibiting a remarkable predominance in the meat mixture and associated environment up to the drying and ripening of the product. Moreover, it represented the bacterial species isolated in the highest proportion from the final product (n = 6 strains). Additionally, K. oxytoca and K. pneumoniae as well as C. freundii and E. cloacae were recovered from five to six batches; these were associated with the environment and food matrices of the meat mixture and the drying room, then persisting in the salami throughout the ripening up to the final products, where few strains were detected. Though strains belonging to enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) have been attributed to foodborne outbreaks associated with fermented sausage consumption [51], the persistence of commensal Escherichia spp. strains has been already pointed out in spontaneously fermented sausages of the Mediterranean area [52]. Correspondingly, Klebsiella spp. were detected from minced pork meat during fermentation and raw pork sausages before ripening in Belgium and Spain [53,54], as well as E. cloacae and Citrobacter spp. during the ripening of traditional fermented sausages [53,55]. Considering that these bacteria have already been involved in nosocomial infections [56,57,58], further investigations should be addressed to verify their potential role as contributors to food-related infections.
Whether introduced from raw materials or environmental contamination due to poor hygienic conditions, enhanced hurdle technologies, disinfection measures, and training should be properly adopted to control the growth of potentially pathogenic or undesirable bacteria along the whole food chain. In the present study, the meat mixture and the surface of the table in the stuffing room were spotted as principal potential sources of contamination. The meat mixture might have been contaminated at the first steps of the production during the cutting and addition of spices, or before that, during the primary production. Unfortunately, no samples from pig carcasses were collected; therefore, no speculations can be formulated about carcass hygiene. However, since the same person owns both the primary production of the organic pig and the food production of organic salami, cross-contamination cannot be ruled out.
The adoption of tailor-made biosecurity plans including the hygiene of farms and workers has been described as an effective measure to reduce the risk of occurrence of foodborne pathogens in pig farms and the dissemination of those bacteria to humans through direct contact [59]. In addition, special attention should be paid to hygiene procedures for surfaces in direct contact with food [60]. The sampling of surfaces in direct contact with food should be prioritized, and results obtained from different batches should be compared in order to identify deviations and take corrective actions [60]. Besides the implementation of hygiene procedures, food safety training has been described as particularly effective in small-scale facilities. In particular, food safety training programs, which incorporate both knowledge and behavior-based training, were described as the most effective in commercial food services [61].

5. Conclusions

High inter-batch variability was detected in the physicochemical and microbiological parameters of organic salami produced in an artisanal factory, confirming process standardization to be a challenge in small-scale, not fully automized, production facilities. Higher TBC in the meat mixture and on the surface of the table in the stuffing room were associated with a higher occurrence of bacterial pathogens, suggesting TBC to be a good predictor of the microbial quality of the final product. This predictor might be of particular relevance, especially when the protocol of production cannot guarantee the acid and desiccation hurdles essential for biohazard control. In these conditions, enhanced hygiene measures and training could be effective control measures against the growth of potentially pathogenic or undesirable bacteria along the whole food chain.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods12224086/s1, Table S1: Results of the species identification of bacterial food-borne pathogens and pathogens of clinical importance from the 126 isolates in the six tested batches (B1–B6); Table S2: Results of the species identification of bacterial food-borne pathogens and pathogens of clinical importance from the 126 isolates in relation to the type of sample.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: F.P.; Methodology: F.P., C.C., L.G. and A.L.; Software: A.V. and A.P.; Validation: F.P., C.C., L.G. and A.L.; Formal Analysis: F.P., A.V., A.P., G.M. and A.D.C.; Investigation: C.C., L.G. and A.L.; Resources: F.P., G.M. and A.D.C.; Data curation: F.P., C.C., L.G. and A.L.; Writing—Original Draft: F.P. and A.V.; Writing—Review and Editing: A.P., G.M. and A.D.C.; Visualization: F.P., A.V. and A.P.; Supervision: A.D.C.; Project administration: F.P. and A.D.C.; Funding acquisition; F.P., G.M. and A.D.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by EU H2020 PRIMA ARTISANEFOOD project “Innovative Bio-interventions and Risk Modeling Approaches for Ensuring Microbial Safety and Quality of Mediterranean Artisanal Fermented Foods” and project PID2019-108420RB-C31-ASEQURA financed by the Spanish Government (Ministry of Science and Innovation, research).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Almli, V.L.; Verbeke, W.; Vanhonacker, F.; Næs, T.; Hersleth, M. General image and attribute perceptions of traditional food in six European countries. Food Qual. Prefer. 2011, 22, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cirne, C.T.; Tunick, M.H.; Trout, R.E. The chemical and attitudinal differences between commercial and artisanal products. NPJ Sci. Food 2019, 3, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Roccato, A.; Uyttendaele, M.; Barrucci, F.; Cibin, V.; Favretti, M.; Cereser, A.; Cin, M.D.; Pezzuto, A.; Piovesana, A.; Longo, A.; et al. Artisanal Italian salami and soppresse: Identification of control strategies to manage microbiological hazards. Food Microbiol. 2017, 61, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jaramillo-Bedoya, E.; Trujillo-Alzate, Y.A.; Ocampo-Ibáñez, I.D. Surveillance of Fresh Artisanal Cheeses Revealed High Levels of Listeria monocytogenes Contamination in the Department of Quindío, Colombia. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lücke, F.K. Fermented sausages. In The Microbiology of Fermented Foods, 2nd ed.; Wood, B.J.B., Ed.; Blackie Academic and Profession: Glasgow, UK, 1998; Chapter 14; Volume 2, pp. 441–483. [Google Scholar]
  6. Comi, G.; Urso, R.; Iacumin, L.; Rantsiou, K.; Cattaneo, P.; Cantoni, C.; Cocolin, L. Characterisation of naturally fermented sausages produced in the North East of Italy. Meat Sci. 2005, 69, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Halagarda, M.; Wójciak, K.M. Health and safety aspects of traditional European meat products. A review. Meat Sci. 2022, 184, 108623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Meloni, D. Presence of Listeria monocytogenes in Mediterranean-Style Dry Fermented Sausages. Foods 2015, 4, 34–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gonzales-Barron, U.; Cadavez, V.; Pereira, A.P.; Gomes, A.; Araújo, J.P.; Saavedra, M.J.; Estevinho, L.; Butler, F.; Pires, P.; Dias, T. Relating physicochemical and microbiological safety indicators during processing of linguiça, a Portuguese traditional dry-fermented sausage. Food Res. Int. 2015, 78, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Piras, F.; Spanu, C.; Mocci, A.M.; Demontis, M.; Santis, E.P.L.; Scarano, C. Occurrence and traceability of Salmonella spp. in five Sardinian fermented sausage facilities. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2019, 8, 8011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thévenot, D.; Delignette-Muller, M.L.; Christieans, S.; Vernozy-Rozand, C. Fate of Listeria monocytogenes in experimentally contaminated French sausages. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 101, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. De Cesare, A.; Mioni, R.; Manfreda, G. Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh and fermented Italian sausages and ribotyping of contaminating strains. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 120, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Martin, B.; Garriga, M.; Aymerich, T. Prevalence of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes at small-scale Spanish factories producing traditional fermented sausages. J. Food Prot. 2011, 74, 812–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gounadaki, A.S.; Skandamis, P.N.; Drosinos, E.H.; Nychas, G.J. Microbial ecology of food contact surfaces and products of small-scale facilities producing traditional sausages. Food Microbiol. 2008, 25, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ferreira, V.; Barbosa, J.; Silva, J.; Felício, M.T.; Mena, C.; Hogg, T.; Gibbs, P.; Teixeira, P. Characterisation of alheiras, traditional sausages produced in the North of Portugal, with respect to their microbiological safety. Food Control 2007, 18, 436–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alexander, E.R.; Boase, J.; Davis, M.; Kirchner, L.; Osaki, C.; Tanino, T.; Samadpour, M.; Tarr, P.; Goldoft, M.; Lankford, S.; et al. Escherichia-coli O157/H7 linked to commercially distributed dry-cured salami–Washington and California, 1994. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1995, 273, 985–986. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sartz, L.; De Jong, B.; Hjertqvist, M.; Plym-Forshell, L.; Alsterlund, R.; Löfdahl, S.; Osterman, B.; Ståhl, A.; Eriksson, E.; Hansson, H.B.; et al. An outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection in southern Sweden associated with consumption of fermented sausage; aspects of sausage production that increase the risk of contamination. Epidemiol. Infect. 2008, 136, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Conedera, G.; Mattiazzi, E.; Russo, F.; Chiesa, E.; Scorzato, I.; Grandesso, S.; Bessegato, A.; Fioravanti, A.; Caprioli, A. A family outbreak of Escherichia coli O157 haemorrhagic colitis caused by pork meat salami. Epidemiol. Infect. 2007, 135, 311–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schimmer, B.; Nygard, K.; Eriksen, H.M.; Lassen, J.; Lindstedt, B.A.; Brandal, L.T.; Kapperud, G.; Aavitsland, P. Outbreak of haemolytic uraemic syndrome in Norway caused by stx2-positive Escherichia coli O103:H25 traced to cured mutton sausages. BMC Infect. Dis. 2008, 8, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ethelberg, S.; Smith, B.; Torpdahl, M.; Lisby, M.; Boel, J.; Jensen, T.; Nielsen, E.M.; Mølbak, K. Outbreak of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection from consumption of beef sausage. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 48, e78–e81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bremer, V.; Leitmeyer, K.; Jensen, E.; Metzel, U.; Meczulat, H.; Weise, E.; Werber, D.; Tschaepe, H.; Kreienbrock, L.; Glaser, S.; et al. Outbreak of Salmonella Goldcoast infections linked to consumption of fermented sausage, Germany 2001. Epidemiol. Infect. 2004, 132, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Arnedo-Pena, A.; Sabater-Vidal, S.; Herrera-León, S.; Bellido-Blasco, J.B.; Silvestre-Silvestre, E.; Meseguer-Ferrer, N.; Yague-Muñoz, A.; Gil-Fortuño, M.; Romeu-García, A.; Moreno-Muñoz, R. An outbreak of monophasic and biphasic Salmonella Typhimurium, and Salmonella Derby associated with the consumption of dried pork sausage in Castellon (Spain). Enfermedades Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2016, 34, 544–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Salmonella Outbreak Linked to Salami Sticks. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/i45-10-21/index.html (accessed on 26 September 2023).
  24. 4833–2:2013; Microbiology of the Food Chain. Horizontal Method for the Enumeration of Microorganisms—Part 2: Colony Count at 30 °C by the Surface Plating Technique. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
  25. 21807:2004; Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs. Determination of Water Activity. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
  26. 2917:1999; International Standards Meat and Meat Products. Measurement of the pH (Reference Method). ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1999.
  27. 11290–11291:2017; Microbiology of the Food Chain. Horizontal Method for the Detection and Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes and of Listeria spp.—Part 1: Detection Method. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
  28. ISO 6888-1/A1:2004; Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs. Horizontal Method for the Enumeration of Coagulase-Positive Staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus and other species)—Part 1: Technique using Baird-Parker agar medium. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
  29. 16649:2001; Microbiology of the Food Chain—Horizontal Method for the Enumeration of Beta-Glucuronidase-Positive Escherichia coli—Part 2: Colony-Count Technique at 44 Degrees C Using 5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl beta-D-glucuronide. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.
  30. 6579–1:2017; Microbiology of the Food Chain. Horizontal Method for the Detection, Enumeration and Serotyping of Salmonella—Part 1: Detection of Salmonella spp. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
  31. Perelle, S.; Dilasser, F.; Grout, J.; Fach, P. Detection by 5’-nuclease PCR of Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli O26, O55, O91, O103, O111, O113, O145 and O157:H7, associated with the world’s most frequent clinical cases. Mol. Cell Probes 2004, 18, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. 15214:1998; Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs. Horizontal Method for the Numeration of Mesophilic Lactic Acid Bacteria—Colony-Count Technique at 30 Degrees C. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
  33. 21528–2:2017; Microbiology of the Food Chain. Horizontal Method for the Detection and Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae—Part 2: Colony-Count Technique. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
  34. Wesley, I.V.; Harmon, K.M.; Dickson, J.S.; Schwartz, A.R. Application of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for the simultaneous confirmation of Listeria monocytogenes and other Listeria species in turkey sample surveillance. J. Food Prot. 2002, 65, 780–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chander, Y.; Ramakrishnan, M.A.; Jindal, N.; Hanson, K.; Goyal, S.M. Differentiation of Klebsiella pneumoniae and K. oxytoca by multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Int. J. Appl. Res. Vet. M. 2011, 9, 138. [Google Scholar]
  36. Saraiva, M.M.; De Leon, C.M.; Santos, S.C.; Stipp, D.T.; Souza, M.M.; Santos Filho, L.; Gebreyes, W.A.; Oliveira, C.J. Accuracy of PCR targeting different markers for Staphylococcus aureus identification: A comparative study using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry as the gold standard. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2018, 30, 252–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bates, D.; Mächler, M.; Bolker, B.; Walker, S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4. J. Stat. Soft. 2015, 67, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ordóñez, J.A.; de la Hoz, L. Mediterranean products. In Handbook of Fermented Meat and Poultry; Toldrà, F., Ed.; Blackwell Publishing: Ames, IA, USA, 2007; pp. 333–347. [Google Scholar]
  39. Jofré, A.; Aymerich, T.; Garriga, M. Improvement of the food safety of low acid fermented sausages by enterocins A and B and high pressure. Food Control 2009, 20, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Greco, M.; Mazzette, R.; De Santis, E.P.; Corona, A.; Cosseddu, A.M. Evolution and identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated during the ripening of Sardinian sausages. Meat Sci. 2005, 69, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cenci-Goga, B.T.; Ranucci, D.; Miraglia, D.; Cioffi, A. Use of starter cultures of dairy origin in the production of Salame nostrano, an Italian dry-cured sausage. Meat Sci. 2008, 78, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ewald, S.; Notermans, S. Effect of water activity on growth and enterotoxin D production of Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1988, 6, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Osek, J.; Lachtara, B.; Wieczorek, K. Listeria monocytogenes—How This Pathogen Survives in Food Production Environments. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 866462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pasquali, F.; Palma, F.; Guillier, L.; Lucchi, A.; De Cesare, A.; Manfreda, G. Listeria monocytogenes Sequence Types 121 and 14 Repeatedly Isolated within One Year of Sampling in a Rabbit Meat Processing Plant: Persistence and Ecophysiology. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Althaus, D.; Jermini, M.; Giannini, P.; Martinetti, G.; Reinholz, D.; Nüesch-Inderbinen, M.; Lehner, A.; Stephan, R. Local Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes Serotype 4b Sequence Type 6 Due to Contaminated Meat Pâté. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2017, 14, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Duranti, A.; Sabbatucci, M.; Blasi, G.; Acciari, V.A.; Ancora, M.; Bella, A.; Busani, L.; Centorame, P.; Cammà, C.; Conti, F.; et al. A severe outbreak of listeriosis in central Italy with a rare pulsotype associated with processed pork products. J. Med. Microbiol. 2018, 67, 1351–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gelbíčová, T.; Zobaníková, M.; Tomáštíková, Z.; Van Walle, I.; Ruppitsch, W.; Karpíšková, R. An outbreak of listeriosis linked to turkey meat products in the Czech Republic, 2012–2016. Epidemiol. Infect. 2018, 146, 1407–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Outbreak of Listeria Infections Linked to Deli Meats. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/listeria/outbreaks/delimeat-10-20/index.html (accessed on 26 September 2023).
  49. Pérez-Boto, D.; D’Arrigo, M.; García-Lafuente, A.; Bravo, D.; Pérez-Baltar, A.; Gaya, P.; Medina, M.; Arqués, J.L. Staphylococcus aureus in the Processing Environment of Cured Meat Products. Foods 2023, 12, 2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gelbíčová, T.; Brodíková, K.; Karpíšková, R. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Czech retailed ready-to-eat meat products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2022, 374, 109727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Holck, A.L.; Axelsson, L.; Rode, T.M.; Høy, M.; Måge, I.; Alvseike, O.; L’abée-Lund, T.M.; Omer, M.K.; Granum, P.E.; Heir, E. Reduction of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli in production of fermented sausages. Meat Sci. 2011, 89, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Barbieri, F.; Tabanelli, G.; Montanari, C.; Dall’Osso, N.; Šimat, V.; Smole Možina, S.; Baños, A.; Özogul, F.; Bassi, D.; Fontana, C.; et al. Mediterranean Spontaneously Fermented Sausages: Spotlight on Microbiological and Quality Features to Exploit Their Bacterial Biodiversity. Foods 2021, 10, 2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Charmpi, C.; Van Reckem, E.; Sameli, N.; Van der Veken, D.; De Vuyst, L.; Leroy, F. The Use of Less Conventional Meats or Meat with High pH Can Lead to the Growth of Undesirable Microorganisms during Natural Meat Fermentation. Foods 2020, 9, 1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Roig-Sagues, A.X.; Hernandez-Herrero, M.; Lopez-Sabater, E.I.; Rodriguez-Jerez, J.J.; Mora-Ventura, M.T. Histidine Decarboxylase Activity of Bacteria Isolated from Raw and Ripened Salchichón, a Spanish Cured Sausage. J. Food Prot. 1996, 59, 516–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bogdanović, S.; Stanković, S.; Berić, T.; Tomasevic, I.; Heinz, V.; Terjung, N.; Dimkić, I. Bacteriobiota and Chemical Changes during the Ripening of Traditional Fermented “Pirot ‘Ironed’ Sausage”. Foods 2023, 12, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Davin-Regli, A.; Pagès, J.M. Enterobacter aerogenes and Enterobacter cloacae; versatile bacterial pathogens confronting antibiotic treatment. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Chang, D.; Sharma, L.; Dela Cruz, C.S.; Zhang, D. Clinical Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Control Strategies of Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 750662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Rezaei, M.; Akya, A.; Elahi, A.; Ghadiri, K.; Jafari, S. The clonal relationship among the Citrobacter freundii isolated from the main hospital in Kermanshah, west of Iran. Iran. J. Microbiol. 2016, 8, 175–180. [Google Scholar]
  59. Scollo, A.; Perrucci, A.; Stella, M.C.; Ferrari, P.; Robino, P.; Nebbia, P. Biosecurity and hygiene procedures in pig farms: Effects of a tailor-made approach as monitored by environmental samples. Animals 2023, 13, 1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Agüeria, D.A.; Libonatti, C.; Civit, D. Cleaning and disinfection programmes in food establishments: A literature review on verification procedures. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 131, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. McFarland, P.; Checinska Sielaff, A.; Rasco, B.; Smith, S. Efficacy of food safety training in commercial food service. J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 1239–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Production flowchart of the Italian organic salami. Sampling spots in the processing environment are indicated in round circles.
Figure 1. Production flowchart of the Italian organic salami. Sampling spots in the processing environment are indicated in round circles.
Foods 12 04086 g001
Figure 2. Total bacterial count (TBC) (log cfu/cm2) on environmental samples collected at the processing plant. SWD: manhole swab—drying room; SWR: manhole swab—ripening room; SWM: manhole swab—stuffing room; SER: wall swab—ripening room; STM: surface swab—stuffing room; SED: wall swab—drying room; SEM: wall swab—stuffing room; SM: minced-meat machine swab—stuffing room (mean ± standard deviation of 6 batches).
Figure 2. Total bacterial count (TBC) (log cfu/cm2) on environmental samples collected at the processing plant. SWD: manhole swab—drying room; SWR: manhole swab—ripening room; SWM: manhole swab—stuffing room; SER: wall swab—ripening room; STM: surface swab—stuffing room; SED: wall swab—drying room; SEM: wall swab—stuffing room; SM: minced-meat machine swab—stuffing room (mean ± standard deviation of 6 batches).
Foods 12 04086 g002
Figure 3. Enterobacteriaceae, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), and total bacteria counts (TBC) of meat mixture samples (n = 5) belonging to six different batches.
Figure 3. Enterobacteriaceae, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), and total bacteria counts (TBC) of meat mixture samples (n = 5) belonging to six different batches.
Foods 12 04086 g003
Figure 4. Enterobacteriaceae, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), and total bacterial counts (TBC) of salami samples analyzed over the production process: drying room (time = 0) and ripening (3 to 28 weeks) for the six batches evaluated (n = 5 for each batch).
Figure 4. Enterobacteriaceae, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), and total bacterial counts (TBC) of salami samples analyzed over the production process: drying room (time = 0) and ripening (3 to 28 weeks) for the six batches evaluated (n = 5 for each batch).
Foods 12 04086 g004
Figure 5. Water activity (aw) and pH of salami samples analyzed over the production process: drying room (time = 0) and ripening (3 to 28 weeks) for the six batches evaluated (n = 5 for each batch).
Figure 5. Water activity (aw) and pH of salami samples analyzed over the production process: drying room (time = 0) and ripening (3 to 28 weeks) for the six batches evaluated (n = 5 for each batch).
Foods 12 04086 g005
Table 1. Estimations of model parameters in linear mixed models with random effects, investigating the influence of “Stage” and “Sample” variables on total bacteria counts (TBC) in Italian salami, alongside assessments of between-batch variability.
Table 1. Estimations of model parameters in linear mixed models with random effects, investigating the influence of “Stage” and “Sample” variables on total bacteria counts (TBC) in Italian salami, alongside assessments of between-batch variability.
ModelParametersEstimate (SE)t-ValuePr > |t|
Main effects: Stage 1Random effects (σ)
Batch in factory0.504--
Residual1.827--
Fixed effects
Intercept3.153 (0.313)10.085<0.001
Drying2.941 (0.304)9.674<0.001
Stuffing0.845 (0.304)2.7800.005
Ripening4.327 (0.272)15.916<0.001
Main effects: Sample 2Random effects (σ)
Batch in factory0.503--
Residual1.390--
Fixed effects
Intercept7.256 (0.335)21.615<0.001
Sample: MB−3.783 (0.367)−10.318<0.001
Sample: SBR_281.148 (0.367)3.1300.002
Sample: SBR_181.117 (0.367)3.0470.002
Sample: SBR_100.092 (0.367)0.2510.801
Sample: SBR_30.992 (0.367)2.7050.007
Sample: SEM−4.421 (0.367)−12.058<0.001
Sample: SED−3.311 (0.367)−9.031<0.001
Sample: SER−1.796 (0.367)−4.899<0.001
Sample: SM−4.574 (0.367)−12.473<0.001
Sample: STM−3.681 (0.367)−10.039<0.001
Sample: SWD−0.173 (0.367)−0.4720.637
Sample: SWM−1.517 (0.367)−4.136<0.001
Sample: SWR−0.202 (0.367)−0.5500.583
1 TBC in mixing stage was set as reference category. 2 TBC in salami samples of drying room was set as reference category. MB: meat mixture; SEM: wall swab (stuffing room); SED: wall swab (drying room); SER: wall swab (ripening room); SM: minced-meat machine swab (stuffing room); STM: surface swab (stuffing room); SWD: water drainage swab (drying room); SWM: water drainage swab (stuffing room); SWR: water drainage swab (ripening room); SBR: ripened salami (3, 10, 18, and 28 weeks).
Table 2. Estimations of model parameters in linear mixed models with random effects, evaluating the impact of “Stage” and “Sample” variables on Enterobacteriaceae in Italian salami, and including assessments of between-batch variability.
Table 2. Estimations of model parameters in linear mixed models with random effects, evaluating the impact of “Stage” and “Sample” variables on Enterobacteriaceae in Italian salami, and including assessments of between-batch variability.
ModelParametersEstimate (SE)t-ValuePr > |t|
Main effects: Stage 1Random effects (σ)
Batch in factory0.193--
Residual1.654--
Fixed effects
Intercept1.952 (0.228)8.576<0.001
Drying−0.588 (0.275)−2.1320.034
Stuffing−1.337 (0.275)−4.849<0.001
Ripening−0.658 (0.246)−2.6700.008
Main effects: Sample 2Random effects (σ)
Batch in factory0.503--
Residual1.390--
Fixed effects
Intercept4.095 (0.171)24.010<0.001
Sample: MB−0.190 (0.188)−1.0110.313
Sample: SBR_28−3.096 (0.188)−16.506<0.001
Sample: SBR_18−3.045 (0.188)−16.233<0.001
Sample: SBR_10−1.926 (0.188)−10.267<0.001
Sample: SBR_3−0.547 (0.188)−2.9090.004
Sample: SEM−4.095 (0.188)−21.830<0.001
Sample: SED−4.095 (0.188)−21.830<0.001
Sample: SER−4.095 (0.188)−21.830<0.001
Sample: SM−4.095 (0.188)−21.830<0.001
Sample: STM−2.247 (0.188)−11.978<0.001
Sample: SWD−4.095 (0.188)−21.830<0.001
Sample: SWM−4.095 (0.188)−21.830<0.001
Sample: SWR−4.095 (0.188)−21.830<0.001
1 Enterobacteriaceae in mixing stage was set as reference category. 2 Enterobacteriaceae in salami samples in the drying room was set as reference category. MB: meat mixture; SEM: wall swab (stuffing room); SED: wall swab (drying room); SER: wall swab (ripening room); SM: minced-meat machine swab (stuffing room); STM: surface swab (stuffing room); SWD: water drainage swab (drying room); SWM: water drainage swab (stuffing room); SWR: water drainage swab (ripening room); SBR: ripened salami (3, 10, 18, and 28 weeks).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pasquali, F.; Valero, A.; Possas, A.; Lucchi, A.; Crippa, C.; Gambi, L.; Manfreda, G.; De Cesare, A. Variability in Physicochemical Parameters and Its Impact on Microbiological Quality and Occurrence of Foodborne Pathogens in Artisanal Italian Organic Salami. Foods 2023, 12, 4086. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12224086

AMA Style

Pasquali F, Valero A, Possas A, Lucchi A, Crippa C, Gambi L, Manfreda G, De Cesare A. Variability in Physicochemical Parameters and Its Impact on Microbiological Quality and Occurrence of Foodborne Pathogens in Artisanal Italian Organic Salami. Foods. 2023; 12(22):4086. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12224086

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pasquali, Frédérique, Antonio Valero, Arícia Possas, Alex Lucchi, Cecilia Crippa, Lucia Gambi, Gerardo Manfreda, and Alessandra De Cesare. 2023. "Variability in Physicochemical Parameters and Its Impact on Microbiological Quality and Occurrence of Foodborne Pathogens in Artisanal Italian Organic Salami" Foods 12, no. 22: 4086. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12224086

APA Style

Pasquali, F., Valero, A., Possas, A., Lucchi, A., Crippa, C., Gambi, L., Manfreda, G., & De Cesare, A. (2023). Variability in Physicochemical Parameters and Its Impact on Microbiological Quality and Occurrence of Foodborne Pathogens in Artisanal Italian Organic Salami. Foods, 12(22), 4086. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12224086

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop