Next Article in Journal
Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Spent Coffee Grounds Using Ethanol and Acetone Aqueous Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
Structural Characterization and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Polysaccharides from Tremella fuciformis on Monosodium Urate-Stimulated RAW264.7 Macrophages
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Antioxidant Potential of Various Wheat Crusts Correlates with AGE Content Independently of Acrylamide

by
Kristin Wächter
1,*,
Carl Friedrich H. Longin
2,
Patrick R. Winterhalter
1,
Ute Bertsche
3,
Gábor Szabó
1 and
Andreas Simm
1,4
1
Department for Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
2
State Plant Breeding Institute, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
3
Core Facility Hohenheim, Mass Spectrometry Module, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
4
Center for Medical Basic Research, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(24), 4399; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12244399
Submission received: 3 November 2023 / Revised: 24 November 2023 / Accepted: 28 November 2023 / Published: 7 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Grain)

Abstract

:
Epidemiological studies have indicated that the consumption of whole-grain products is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular diseases, type II diabetes, and cancer. In the case of bread, high amounts of antioxidants and advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are formed during baking by the Maillard reaction in the bread crust; however, the formation of potentially harmful compounds such as acrylamide also occurs. This study investigated the antioxidant responses of different soluble extracts from whole-grain wheat bread crust extracts (WBCEs) in the context of the asparagine, AGE, and acrylamide content. For that, we analyzed nine bread wheat cultivars grown at three different locations in Germany (Hohenheim, Eckartsweier, and Oberer Lindenhof). We determined the asparagine content in the flour of the 27 wheat cultivars and the acrylamide content in the crust, and measured the antioxidant potential using the induced expression of the antioxidant genes GCLM and HMOX1 in HeLa cells. Our study uncovered, for the first time, that the wheat crust’s antioxidant potential correlates with the AGE content, but not with the acrylamide content. Mass spectrometric analyses of WBCEs for identifying AGE-modified proteins relevant to the antioxidant potential were unsuccessful. However, we did identify the wheat cultivars with a high antioxidant potential while forming less acrylamide, such as Glaucus and Lear. Our findings indicate that the security of BCEs with antioxidative and cardioprotective potential can be improved by choosing the right wheat variety.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The Maillard reaction, as a nonenzymatic browning reaction, takes place between protein amino groups and reducing sugars during heat processing, and results in the formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) as well as acrylamide [1,2,3]. While the health effects of AGEs have been controversially discussed from protective (antioxidant-active) to toxic [4], acrylamide is a clear carcinogenic compound [5]. On the one hand, AGE-rich bread crust extracts (BCEs) can induce NRF2 signaling and downstream targets such as HMOX1 and GCLM in endothelial cells, resulting in protection against oxidative stress [6]. In addition, BCEs have been shown to protect vascular grafts from in vitro ischemia/reperfusion injury [7]. Furthermore, feeding mice with rye bread crust induces antioxidant genes and suppresses the NF–κB pathway [8]. On the other hand, much research has been conducted to reduce the acrylamide formation in foods, especially in bread [9]. The common ways to mitigate acrylamide formation are heat reduction, fermentation prolongation, and additives [10]. For example, Hedegaard et al. reported that adding a 1% aqueous rosemary extract reduced the acrylamide content in wheat buns by 62% [11]. Furthermore, studies on a starch coating showed a significant reduction in the acrylamide content in bread crust [12]. Additionally, bread treated with a Tartary buckwheat sprout extract led to a 27.3% reduced acrylamide concentration [13]. During the baking process, asparagine is the responsible precursor for acrylamide formation [14,15]. Therefore, asparaginase can be added to inhibit acrylamide formation [10]. Another approach is plant breeding to reduce the asparagine content already in the raw material [16], combined with the genetic control of the grain amino acid composition [17]. Furthermore, in agricultural practice, a sulfur deficiency in the soil should be avoided, as it leads to increased asparagine levels in the grain [18]. Hence, the genetics of the wheat, the growing conditions, and the baking conditions can affect the products during baking. We therefore analyzed nine bread wheat cultivars, which were grown at three different locations, for asparagine content. Furthermore, the objective of this study was to determine the antioxidant potential and the acrylamide and AGE content of the wheat bread crust. We further analyzed the association between these parameters and found that the wheat crust’s antioxidant potential correlates with the AGE content independently of acrylamide.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The plant material consisted of nine different wheat cultivars originating from Germany. The field experiments were conducted at three different locations (Hohenheim—HOH, 48°43′07.3″ N 9°11′08.7″ E, altitude of 403 m, Germany; Oberer Lindenhof—OLI, 48°28′19.0″ N 9°18′29.3″ E, altitude of 700 m, Germany; and Eckartsweier—EWE 48°32′52.4″ N 7°52′32.5″ E, altitude of 140 m, Germany) in the 2018 season (Table 1). Cropping was performed similarly at all locations, with an intensive conventional farming practice and the application of about 200 kg of nitrogen per ha through the use of fertilizers, taking Nmin into account. According to best farming practices, the field plots were also treated with herbicides, growth regulators, and fungicides. All the field plots were machine-planted and -harvested. The harvested samples from each plot were cleaned with the haldrup seed cleaner LT-21 (HALDRUP GmbH, Ilshofen, Germany).

2.2. Bread Crust and Bread Crust Extracts

The wheat material was ground using a grain mill (Elsässer Getreidemühle, SAMAP ECOSYSTEME, Colmar, France). A dough was prepared from 1000 g of wheat flour, 600 mL of water, 5% baker’s yeast, and 2% NaCl using a dough-kneading machine (LEA25 2G, MANZ Backtechnik GmbH, Creglingen-Münster, Germany). The whole-grain wheat bread was baked (KornLiebchen, Halle (Saale), Germany; Table 2 shows the baking conditions) in a multideck oven (Friedrich Bäckerei Zubehör GmbH, Solingen, Germany). The crust was isolated from the bread using a four-edge grater (GEFU, Eslohe, Germany), ground in a mill at 8000 rpm (Retsch, ZM200, Verder Scientific, Birmingham, UK), and frozen at −20 °C.
Soluble wheat bread crust extracts (WBCEs) were generated as described in detail by Wächter et al. [6].

2.3. Cell Culture

HeLa cells (obtained from ATCC®CCL-2, passage No. 15–20; ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium; 4.5 g/L glucose (DMEM; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) containing 10% FCS and 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin in a 37 °C humidified incubator in the presence of 10% CO2. Cells (3 × 105 cells per well) were seeded on 6-well dishes and were incubated with 13% WBCE for 24 h.

2.4. RNA Extraction, Reverse-Transcription, and Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

The total RNA was isolated from cells by TRIzol extraction, reverse transcribed according to the protocol of iScript Advanced cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Feldkirchen, Germany), and qRT-PCR was performed as described in Wächter et al. [6]. The mRNA expression levels of the genes GCLM and HMOX1 were normalized by the levels of internal reference gene YBX1 (Y-box binding protein 1) and calculated according to the DDCt method (qRT-PCR primers are listed in Wächter et al. [6]). Data were analyzed from three and four independent experiments.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The data are presented as mean values with standard deviation, and n represents the number of independent experiments. For statistical analysis of the data, the 2-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test was applied. Results with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).

2.6. AGE-Fluorescence Measurements

The diluted WBCEs (1:50, in PBS) were excited at 360 nm and the AGE-associated fluorescence emission was detected at 440 nm in a 96-well microtiter plate (black, U-shape, Eppendorf, Germany) with the FLUOstar OPTIMA device (BMG LABTECH, Ortenberg, Germany). The data are presented as mean values with standard deviation from three independent measurements.

2.7. Determination of Asparagine Content

The asparagine content of the wheat flour was determined in mg/kg according to the European Commission Regulation (EC No 152/2009, Annex III, Method F) with moderate modifications as reported in Rapp et al. [16].

2.8. Determination of Acrylamide Content by LC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis

2.8.1. Sample Preparation for LC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis

One gram bread crust powder was spiked with 200 µL internal standard (d3-acrylamide, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 5 µg/mL in methanol) and extracted with 20 mL water using an ultrasonic bath (SONOREX Digitec DT, Bandelin, Berlin, Germany) for 12 min at 40 °C. Samples were centrifuged at 2500× g for 5 min and the supernatant was filtered through a filter paper (3HW, Sartorius AG, Goettingen, Germany). Proteins were precipitated by adding methanol to a ratio of methanol:water 80:20 (v/v) and incubation for 90 min at −20 °C. Then, samples were centrifuged at 2500× g and the supernatant was filtered through a filter paper (3HW, Sartorius AG, Goettingen, Germany). The filtrate was dried using an XcelVap concentrator (Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden). The samples were resuspended in 10 mL water and further purified by SPE cartridges (CHROMABOND ABC18, 45 µm, 6 mL/500 mg, Machery & Nagel, Düren, Germany). The SPE cartridges were activated with 10 mL methanol and then rinsed with 10 mL water. The samples (10 mL) were loaded on the SPE cartridges and the first two milliliters were discarded, while the rest of the flow through was collected and concentrated ten-fold using an XcelVap concentrator.

2.8.2. LC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis

Mass spectrometry analysis of the acrylamide content in bread crusts was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS/MS) using a 1290 Infinity HPLC system (Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) coupled to a 5500 QTRAP® mass spectrometer (SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA) equipped with a TurboV electrospray ion source. The QTRAP mass spectrometer was operated in positive electrospray ionization mode and the acrylamide was detected using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). MRM transitions m/z 72 > 55 (quantifier) and 72 > 27 were used for the identification and the quantification of the acrylamide, utilizing collision energies of 15 and 29 eV, respectively. The d3-acrylamide internal standard was monitored by MRM transitions m/z 75 > 75, 75 > 58 (quantifier), and 75 > 30, utilizing collision energies of 10, 22, and 35 eV, respectively. The dwell time for each MRM transition was 450 ms. The following general mass spectrometry settings were used: electrospray voltage 5500 V, curtain gas 35 (arbitrary units), Ion Source One and Two 70 and 30 (arbitrary units), and probe temperature 350 °C. HPLC separation was performed on a Luna Omega Polar C18, 150 mm × 2.1 mm column (particle size 1.6 µm, pore size 100 Å, Phenomenex, Germany) at a flow rate of 350 µL/min and a column temperature of 30 °C. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid (FA, solvent A) and methanol, 0.1% FA (solvent B). The following gradient conditions were used: 0 min 3% B, 0–1.5 min 5% B, 1.5–2 min 5% B, 2–4 min 20% B, 4–5 min 100% B, 5–8 min 100% B, 8–9 min 3% B, and re-equilibration at 3% B for 5 min. Total run time was 15 min. The data acquisition and quantification was performed using Analyst 1.7.2 software (SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA).

2.9. Mass Spectrometric Analyses of the Soluble WBCEs

2.9.1. Protein Extraction for Comparative Proteome Analysis

The soluble wheat bread crust extracts (WBCEs) were precipitated using chloroform-methanol precipitation [19]. The protein pellets were resuspended in 6 M urea in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5), and the protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford assay [20].

2.9.2. In-Solution Digest of Proteins and Peptide Purification

A total of 10 µg of the wheat protein extract in 60 µL 6 M urea, 50 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.5) was used for the in-solution digests. DTT was added to a final concentration of 10 mM for the reduction of cysteines. The samples were incubated for 30 min at 56 °C under shaking at 1000 rpm in an Eppendorf Thermomixer. Alkylation of cysteines was performed by adding 30 mM iodoacetamide and incubation for 45 min at room temperature in the dark. Alkylation was stopped by adding 50 mM DTT and samples were incubated for another 10 min at RT. Then, 500 ng LysC protease (Roche, Basel, Schweiz) in 50 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.5) was added and the samples were digested overnight at 30 °C. Next, the urea in the reaction mixture was diluted to 2 M by adding the appropriate amount of 50 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.5). One µg trypsin (Roche, Basel, Schweiz) in 50 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.5) was added and the digestion was continued for 4 h at 37 °C. The digest was stopped by adding 3 µL 10% TFA (trifluoroacetic acid). Next, the peptide mixtures were concentrated and desalted using C18 stage tips [21] and dried under vacuum. The dried samples were dissolved in 30 µL 0.1% TFA. Aliquots of 5 µL were subjected to nanoLC-MS/MS analysis.

2.9.3. Mass Spectrometry Analysis

The nanoLC-ESI-MS/MS experiments were performed on an UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled to a Q-Exactive HF-X mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using a Nanospray Flex ion source (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The tryptic digests were concentrated and desalted on a precolumn (300 µm × 5 mm, Acclaim PepMap100 C18, 5 µm particle size, 100 Å pore size) and separated on a nanoEase MZ HSS T3 analytical column (25 cm × 75 μm, 1.8 µm particle size, 100 Å pore size, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) operated at constant temperature of 35 °C. The peptides were separated at a flow rate of 300 nL/min using a 90 min gradient with the following profile: 2–55% solvent B in 90 min, 55–95% solvent B in 5 min, and maintained at 90% solvent B for 5 min (0.5% acetic acid (solvent A) and 0.5% acetic acid in acetonitrile/H2O (80/20, v/v, solvent B) were used as solvents).
The Q Exactive HF-X was operated under the control of XCalibur 4.3.73 software. MS spectra (m/z = 300–1800) were detected in the Orbitrap at a resolution of 60,000 (at m/z = 200) using a maximum injection time (MIT) of 100 ms and an automatic gain control (AGC) value of 1 × 106. The internal calibration of the Orbitrap analyzer was performed using lock-mass ions from ambient air, as described in Olsen et al. [22]. Data-dependent MS/MS spectra were generated for the 30 most abundant peptide precursors in the Orbitrap using higher-energy C-trap dissociation (HCD) fragmentation at a resolution of 15,000, a normalized collision energy of 27, and an intensity threshold of 1.6 × 105. Only ions with charge states from +2 to +5 were selected for fragmentation using an isolation width of 1.6 Da. For each MS/MS scan, the AGC was set at 2 × 105 and the MIT was 50 ms. Fragmented precursor ions were dynamically excluded for 30 s within a 5 ppm mass window to avoid repeated fragmentation.

2.9.4. Data Analysis

The MS data were analyzed by MaxQuant (version 1.6.17.0) [23] and Andromeda search engine [24] with standard settings except noted otherwise. The UniProt triticum aestivum-database was used (downloaded on 2 June 2022, unreviewed database entries: 130312). The carbamidomethylation of cysteine was set as a fixed modification. A maximum of two modifications per peptide were allowed. To identify interesting masses associated with AGEs that could be further analyzed by variable modification setup, the “Dependent peptide” search was activated. Variable modifications were set on lysine (K) or arginine (R): Hex (KR) 162.05282 Da, MG-H1/2/3 (R) 54.01056 Da, MGH-DH or CEA (R) 72.02113 Da, 3-DG or THP (R) 144.04226 Da. A minimal peptide length of seven amino acids and a maximum of three miscleavages (Trypsin/p) were allowed. The maximum protein, peptide, and site false discovery rates (FDR) were set to 0.01. “Re-quantify” and “Match between runs (2 min)” was activated. “Second peptides” and “Use .NET Core” was deactivated. The default values for label-free quantification (LFQ) were taken. For the first search, the reviewed database UniProt triticum aestivum-database was used (downloaded on 13 May 2022, entries: 361).
The automatic bioinformatics data analysis was carried out with Perseus (version 1.6.14.0) [25]. Only identified by site, reverse, and potential contaminant were rejected. For the modification analysis, the mod/base ratio of at least 5 of 27 samples was bigger than zero. For the protein analysis, only intensities of LFQ-proteins of all 27 samples were allowed. For each AGE modification, a ranking for all modified peptides was performed for the 27 samples (rank 27 for best mod/base ratio; rank 1 for not or least mod/base ratio) and the mean value of all modified peptide ranks was calculated for each sample).

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of Wheat Flour and Wheat Bread Crust Extracts (WBCEs)

3.1.1. AGE-Related Fluorescence

Nine wheat cultivars were grown at three different locations in Germany (Hohenheim, Eckartsweier, Oberer Lindenhof), i.e., 27 batches of flour were baked with the same recipe (Supplemental Figure S1). The soluble extracts were obtained from these bread crusts, and AGE-related fluorescence was measured (Figure 1). The AGE-related fluorescence acted as a measure for AGE formation during the baking process, and varied in the different cultivars. The wheat cultivar Julius, grown in Oberer Lindenhof, showed the strongest signal. In addition, the AGE-related fluorescence in one wheat cultivar was not the same at all locations. No significant differences between the wheat cultivars or the locations were observed for the AGE-related fluorescence (Supplemental Figure S2a,b).

3.1.2. Antioxidant Potential of Soluble WBCEs

In a previous study with soluble extracts from rye-wheat mixed bread crust (BCE), we showed an induction of the antioxidant gene expression in cells treated with BCE [6]. In order to analyze the antioxidant potential of the different soluble WBCEs, HeLa cells were stimulated for 24 h with WBCEs. Thereafter, RNA was isolated, and two genes encoding for antioxidant enzymes, namely, GCLM and HMOX1, were analyzed by qRT-PCR (Figure 2). The antioxidant potential of the various extracts was heterogeneous; however, both transcripts were uniformly regulated in their expression (Supplemental Figure S3). No significant differences between the wheat cultivars or the locations were observed for GCLM and HMOX1 (Supplemental Figures S4a,b and S5a,b).

3.1.3. Determination of Asparagine and Acrylamide

The asparagine amount, as an acrylamide precursor, was determined in the different wheat cultivars (Figure 3a). Upon baking, the acrylamide level were determined in the soluble WBCEs by mass spectrometry (Figure 3b). It is noteworthy that wheat cultivars grown in Oberer Lindenhof (OLI) had a significantly lower asparagine content in the flour compared to wheat cultivars grown in Hohenheim (Supplemental Figure S6a). Similarly, the acrylamide content was significantly lower in the bread crust of the wheat cultivars grown at Oberer Lindenhof compared to Hohenheim (Supplemental Figure S6b). Furthermore, the wheat cultivar Lear had a significantly lower asparagine level compared to the wheat cultivar Julius and Altigo (Supplemental Figure S7). Consistently, the wheat cultivar Lear had a significant lower acrylamide level compared to wheat cultivar Altigo (Supplemental Figure S8). Significantly lower acrylamide levels were also measured for the wheat cultivar Glaucus in comparison to the wheat cultivar Julius and Altigo, for the wheat cultivar Pionier in comparison to Altigo, and for the wheat cultivar Tengri in comparison to Julius and Altigo (Supplemental Figure S8).

3.2. Association between Different Parameters of Wheat Flour and WBCEs

To further explore the interplay of the determined parameters in the wheat flour and the WBCE, correlation analyses were performed. In line with other studies, we found a strong and significant correlation between the asparagine level in the flour and the acrylamide content in the WBCEs (Figure 4a). In contrast, no correlation was observed between the AGE-fluorescence and the asparagine level as well as the acrylamide level (Figure 4b,c). Furthermore, the correlation analysis between the antioxidant transcript GCLM and the asparagine as well as the acrylamide revealed no association (Figure 4d,e). However, the GCLM-transcript and the AGE-fluorescence indicated a strong significant dependency (Figure 4f). Consistently, no association was found for the HMOX1-transcript and the asparagine as well as the acrylamide (Figure 4g,h), whereas a strong significant correlation was observed between the HMOX1-transcript and the AGE-fluorescence (Figure 4i).

3.3. Mass Spectrometric Analyses of WBCEs

We further analyzed the soluble WBCEs by mass spectrometry. The abundance of the proteins found in all 27 samples is displayed in a heat map (Figure 5a). Very abundant proteins such as A0A3B6KUN7 are shown in red, while less abundant proteins such as A0A3B6MIQ1 are indicated in yellow. However, the correlation between the number of identified proteins and the AGE-fluorescence exhibited a negative relation (Figure 5b). This result indicates that the intensive baking leads to less protein identification. One reason could be that the AGE formation induces cross-linking and impedes the enzymatic digestion, thereby hampering the identification. Another reason for the weaker protein identification is the baking process itself, which promotes protein degradation.

3.3.1. Mass Spectrometric Analyses of Specific AGE Modifications in WBCEs

Since we observed a correlation between the AGE-related fluorescence and the antioxidant potential of WBCEs, we performed mass spectrometric analyses to identify specific AGE modifications in the WBCEs (Figure 6). We determined relative modification values by ranking from 1–27 (one stands for not or least abundant modifications (ratio modified to nonmodified), whereas 27 stands for high abundant modifications). The following modifications were validated: 3-deoxyglucosone (3-DG) or mass identical tetrahydropyrimidine (THP) (Figure 6a), several forms of the methylglyoxal-derived hydroimidazolone (MG-H1/2/3) (Figure 6b), the dihydroxyimidazolidine (MGH-DH) or mass identical carboxyethylarginine (CEA) (Figure 6c), and the hexose as a pre-stage of AGEs (Figure 6d). In a second step, the association between the GCLM-transcript and the ranking of the respective modification was determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient (rxy). There was no correlation of the analyzed AGE modifications to the GCLM-transcript found. Nevertheless, the mean of all ranked AGE modifications, including hexose, exhibited an increase in the wheat cultivars Tobak and Xerxes (Supplemental Figure S9).
Since the association between the mean ranking of all AGEs (mean value from all AGE ranks) and the number of identified proteins showed a good correlation (Figure 7), presumably the before-mentioned impeded enzymatic digestion by the AGE formation exists, leading to a decreased identification of the proteins as well as AGE modifications.

3.3.2. Mass Spectrometric Analyses of AGE Modifications at Specific Peptides

Among the abundant proteins identified in all WBCEs, we found MG-H1/2/3 modified peptides, which correlated to the antioxidant potential among all 27 WBCEs (Figure 8). For example in A0A3B6KUN7, the MG-H1/2/3 modified peptide DPTYGQYIR(1)SPHAR exhibited a dependence on the antioxidant potential (Figure 8a), whereas in Q5BHT9, the MG-H1/2/3 modified peptide R(1)SCEEVQNQCCQQLR showed an association with the antioxidant potential (Figure 8b). Noteworthily, these specific modifications were found to be particularly frequently in the Julius wheat cultivar grown in Oberer Lindenhof, which had the highest AGE-related fluorescence (Figure 1).

4. Discussion

The present study investigated the antioxidant responses of different soluble extracts from whole-grain wheat bread crust in the context of further properties like the asparagine, which was measured in the flour, as well as the AGEs and the acrylamide, which were measured in the soluble bread crust extracts. Both AGEs and acrylamide arise within the Maillard reaction [2,26,27]. The Maillard reaction is also the source of the flavor and the aroma of heated foods, which consumers expect. Hence, the browning reaction is like a double-edged sword. Acrylamide is considered as a neurotoxic substance [28,29] and is classified as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A carcinogen) by the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) [30]. In line with previous studies [31,32] we could show that the acrylamide levels in the WBCEs strongly depend on the asparagine content of the flour. However, the antioxidant potential represented by the activation of the NRF2 downstream targets GCLM and HMOX1 exhibited only a correlation on the AGE-fluorescence but not on the acrylamide content of the bread crust, nor on the asparagine content of the whole-grain flour. In addition, we found that the WBCEs of the wheat cultivars Glaucus and Lear have a high antioxidant potential and form less acrylamide.
One limitation of this study is that not all AGEs exhibit fluorescent properties; thus, the measured fluorescence represents only AGE-compounds like pentosidine as fluorescent glycoxidation marker for AGEs [33,34]. A study by Rapp and colleagues, with 149 bread wheat cultivars grown at three locations, revealed that a reduction of 64% in asparagine is achievable through the choice of the wheat cultivar [16]. For our studied nine wheat cultivars grown at three locations, we also found for the cultivar Lear a significantly lower asparagine and acrylamide level. Glaucus, Pionier, and Tengri also showed a significantly lower acrylamide content. These data suggest that varieties that form less acrylamide could be selected across environments. We also observed an influence of the mounting place. Some studies reported that environmental factors might affect the asparagine content [35]. For instance, a lack of sulfur leads to an increased asparagine content [18], and processing of flour derived from sulfate-deprived wheat results in a strong acrylamide formation [36]. Studies by Claus and colleagues indicated that the increased acrylamide levels could be caused by nitrogen fertilization [37].
Attempts to identify responsible AGE modifications within the soluble extracts were not successful. With the standard tryptic digestion methods, AGE modifications can be barely resolved. This was reflected in the negative correlation between identified proteins by mass spectrometry and the AGE-fluorescence (Figure 5b). Trypsin cleaves C-terminal to arginine or lysine residues, which are probably masked by the AGE modifications. Furthermore, an increased temperature might promote the AGE-mediated interprotein cross-linking, as described for the α-crystallin-client proteins [38]. Consequently, the digestion of the proteins is further impaired. Another reason for the weaker protein identification is the baking process itself, which promotes protein degradation. Therefore, identifying AGE-modified peptides and proteins in strongly heated food products is challenging. Future research is necessary to improve the digestion strategies of AGE-modified proteins and their quantification by mass spectrometry.
The antioxidant potential of the WBCEs might also be mediated by phenolic compounds like flavonoids and phenolic acids [39]. A role in the acrylamide reduction was postulated for plant extracts and their antioxidant activity [11]. No relation was found in the correlation analyses between the acrylamide content and the antioxidant activity of the WBCEs. This might be at least partly due to the relatively weak antioxidant activity of the WBCEs. In comparison, BCE (bread crust extract of rye-wheat mixed bread) showed a more potent induction of NRF2 downstream targets [6]. Therefore, future studies in which extracts with antioxidant activity are added to the wheat dough may also help to curb the acrylamide development. For instance, adding green tea extracts reduced the acrylamide levels in fried chicken [40], and for apple extracts, respectable inhibitory effects on the acrylamide formation in fried potatoes were observed [41]. One mechanism by which antioxidants mitigate the harmful effects of acrylamide might be the direct destruction of the acrylamide by their corresponding oxidation products [42]. Studies in potato crisps during frying exhibited a positive correlation between the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and the acrylamide formation, therefore the authors concluded that antioxidant compounds (like melanoidins) and acrylamide formed at similar stages of the Maillard reaction [43].
In summary, the present study showed that it is possible to develop antioxidant active WBCEs while containing less acrylamide. In addition, the reduction strategies for the acrylamide during baking should take into account risks and advantages, since the Maillard reaction is the essential source for taste and formation of antioxidant compounds. Whether the wheat bread crust with less acrylamide mediates antioxidant effects in vivo remains to be further investigated by animal feeding experiments and analyses of different tissues.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods12244399/s1, Figure S1: Bread baking. Figure S2: Wheat cultivar and location dependence of AGE-fluorescence. Figure S3: The association between GCLM- and HMOX1-transcript. Figure S4: Wheat cultivar and location dependence of GCLM induction. Figure S5: Wheat cultivar and location dependence of HMOX1 induction. Figure S6: Location dependence of asparagine and acrylamide. Figure S7: The mean asparagine value of each cultivar grown at three different places. Figure S8: The mean acrylamide value of each cultivar grown at three different places. Figure S9: The mean of all ranked AGE modifications and hexose.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S. and K.W.; methodology, K.W.; validation, K.W., P.R.W., and U.B.; investigation, K.W.; resources, K.W., C.F.H.L., P.R.W., U.B., G.S. and A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, K.W.; writing—review and editing, K.W., C.F.H.L., P.R.W., G.S. and A.S.; visualization, K.W.; supervision, A.S. and G.S.; project administration, A.S. and K.W.; funding acquisition, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research (ID: ZS/2018/12/96224) was funded by the European Union (ERDF-European Regional Development Fund), the State of Saxony-Anhalt, Germany (Autonomy in old Age (AiA)) and the German Research Foundation (RTG 2155 ProMoAge). The 5500 QTRAP and Exploris 480 mass spectrometers were funded in part by the German Research Foundation (DFG INST 36/152-1 FUGG and DFG-INST 36/171-1 FUGG).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jens Pfannstiel (Core Facility Hohenheim, Mass Spectrometry Unit, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany) for mass-spectrometry-related research. We thank Samiya Al-Robaiy for reading the manuscript. Sincere thanks are given to Anke-Kirsten Bodemann and Hans-Joachim Bodemann-Strache for baking the wheat breads.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, analyses or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

3-DG3-deoxyglucosone
AGEs advanced glycation end products
BCE bread crust extract
CEAcarboxyethylarginine
EWEEckartsweier
FAformic acid
FCS fetal calf serum
GCLM glutamate-cysteine ligase modifier subunit
HeLahuman cervical carcinoma
Hexhexose
HMOX1 heme oxygenase 1
HOHHohenheim
HPLChigh performance liquid chromatography
HPLC-ESI-MS/MShigh performance liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry
LFQlabel-free quantification
MG-H1/2/3methylglyoxal-derived hydroimidazolones
MGH-DHdihydroxyimidazolidine
Mod modified
MRMmultiple reaction monitoring
NRF2 nuclear factor E2-related factor 2
OLIOberer Lindenhof
PBS phosphate-buffered saline
qRT-PCRquantitative Real time-PCR
TFAtrifluoroacetic acid
THPtetrahydropyrimidine
WBCEsoluble extract from whole-grain wheat bread crust
YBX1Y-box binding protein 1

References

  1. Poulsen, M.W.; Hedegaard, R.V.; Andersen, J.M.; de Courten, B.; Bügel, S.; Nielsen, J.; Skibsted, L.H.; Dragsted, L.O. Advanced glycation endproducts in food and their effects on health. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 60, 10–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mottram, D.S.; Wedzicha, B.L.; Dodson, A.T. Acrylamide is formed in the Maillard reaction. Nature 2002, 419, 448–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dong, L.; Li, Y.; Chen, Q.; Liu, Y.; Qiao, Z.; Sang, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhan, S.; Wu, Z.; Liu, L. Research advances of advanced glycation end products in milk and dairy products: Formation, determination, control strategy and immunometabolism via gut microbiota. Food Chem. 2023, 417, 135861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, Y.; Peng, Y.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, L.; Yang, X. Dietary polyphenols: Regulate the advanced glycation end products-RAGE axis and the microbiota-gut-brain axis to prevent neurodegenerative diseases. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 9816–9842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rice, J.M. The carcinogenicity of acrylamide. Mutat Res. 2005, 580, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wächter, K.; Navarrete Santos, A.; Großkopf, A.; Baldensperger, T.; Glomb, M.A.; Szabó, G.; Simm, A. AGE-Rich Bread Crust Extract Boosts Oxidative Stress Interception via Stimulation of the NRF2 Pathway. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Korkmaz-Icöz, S.; Schwär, M.; Loganathan, S.; Wächter, K.; Georgevici, A.-I.; Kraft, P.; Mayer, T.; Simm, A.; Karck, M.; Szabó, G. Bread crust extract protects rats’ vascular grafts from in vitro ischemia/reperfusion injury. J. Funct. Foods 2022, 95, 105187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wächter, K.; Gohde, B.; Szabó, G.; Simm, A. Rye Bread Crust as an Inducer of Antioxidant Genes and Suppressor of NF-κB Pathway In Vivo. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sarion, C.; Codină, G.G.; Dabija, A. Acrylamide in Bakery Products: A Review on Health Risks, Legal Regulations and Strategies to Reduce Its Formation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Claus, A.; Carle, R.; Schieber, A. Acrylamide in cereal products: A review. J. Cereal Sci. 2008, 47, 118–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hedegaard, R.V.; Granby, K.; Frandsen, H.; Thygesen, J.; Skibsted, L.H. Acrylamide in bread. Effect of prooxidants and antioxidants. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2008, 227, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Man, Y.; Liu, Y. Reduction of acrylamide content in bread crust by starch coating. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 336–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jing, Y.; Li, X.; Hu, X.; Ma, Z.; Liu, L.; Ma, X. Effect of buckwheat extracts on acrylamide formation and the quality of bread. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 6482–6489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lingnert, H.; Grivas, S.; Jägerstad, M.; Skog, K.; Törnqvist, M.; Åman, P. Acrylamide in food: Mechanisms of formation and influencing factors during heating of foods. Scand. J. Nutr. 2002, 46, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Friedman, M. Chemistry, biochemistry, and safety of acrylamide. A review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 4504–4526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rapp, M.; Schwadorf, K.; Leiser, W.L.; Würschum, T.; Longin, C.F.H. Assessing the variation and genetic architecture of asparagine content in wheat: What can plant breeding contribute to a reduction in the acrylamide precursor? Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 2427–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Oddy, J.; Chhetry, M.; Awal, R.; Addy, J.; Wilkinson, M.; Smith, D.; King, R.; Hall, C.; Testa, R.; Murray, E.; et al. Genetic control of grain amino acid composition in a UK soft wheat mapping population. Plant Genome 2023, e20335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shewry, P.; Franklin, J.; Parmar, S.; Smith, S.; Miflin, B. The effects of sulphur starvation on the amino acid and protein compositions of barley grain. J. Cereal Sci. 1983, 1, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wessel, D.; Flugge, U.I. A method for the quantitative recovery of protein in dilute solution in the presence of detergents and lipids. Anal. Biochem. 1984, 138, 141–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rappsilber, J.; Ishihama, Y.; Mann, M. Stop and go extraction tips for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, nanoelectrospray, and LC/MS sample pretreatment in proteomics. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 663–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Olsen, J.V.; de Godoy, L.M.F.; Li, G.; Macek, B.; Mortensen, P.; Pesch, R.; Makarov, A.; Lange, O.; Horning, S.; Mann, M. Parts per million mass accuracy on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer via lock mass injection into a C-trap. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2005, 4, 2010–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cox, J.; Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 1367–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cox, J.; Neuhauser, N.; Michalski, A.; Scheltema, R.A.; Olsen, J.V.; Mann, M. Andromeda: A peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1794–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tyanova, S.; Temu, T.; Sinitcyn, P.; Carlson, A.; Hein, M.Y.; Geiger, T.; Mann, M.; Cox, J. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 731–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Stadler, R.H.; Blank, I.; Varga, N.; Robert, F.; Hau, J.; Guy, P.A.; Robert, M.-C.; Riediker, S. Acrylamide from Maillard reaction products. Nature 2002, 419, 449–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ulrich, P.; Cerami, A. Protein glycation, diabetes, and aging. Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 2001, 56, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. LoPachin, R.M., Jr.; Lehning, E.J. Acrylamide-induced distal axon degeneration: A proposed mechanism of action. Neurotoxicology 1994, 15, 247–259. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang, B.; Zhao, M.; Ji, X.; Xia, Q.; Jiang, L.; Zhao, L. Acrylamide induces neurotoxicity in zebrafish (Danio rerio) via NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 896, 165208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. IARC. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; Some Industrial Chemicals; IARC: Lyon, France, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  31. Surdyk, N.; Rosén, J.; Andersson, R.; Åman, P. Effects of asparagine, fructose, and baking conditions on acrylamide content in yeast-leavened wheat bread. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 2047–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zyzak, D.V.; Sanders, R.A.; Stojanovic, M.; Tallmadge, D.H.; Eberhart, B.L.; Ewald, D.K.; Gruber, D.C.; Morsch, T.R.; Strothers, M.A.; Rizzi, G.P.; et al. Acrylamide formation mechanism in heated foods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 4782–4787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Baynes, J.W. Role of Oxidative Stress in Development of Complications in Diabetes. Diabetes 1991, 40, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sell, D.R.; Monnier, V.M. Structure Elucidation of a Senescence Cross-Link from Human Extracellular Matrix: Implication of Pentoses in the Aging Process*. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 21597–21602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Corol, D.I.; Ravel, C.; Rakszegi, M.; Charmet, G.; Bedo, Z.; Beale, M.H.; Shewry, P.R.; Ward, J.L. (1)H-NMR screening for the high-throughput determination of genotype and environmental effects on the content of asparagine in wheat grain. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2016, 14, 128–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Muttucumaru, N.; Halford, N.G.; Elmore, J.S.; Dodson, A.T.; Parry, M.; Shewry, P.R.; Mottram, D.S. Formation of high levels of acrylamide during the processing of flour derived from sulfate-deprived wheat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 8951–8955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Claus, A.; Schreiter, P.; Weber, A.; Graeff, S.; Herrmann, W.; Claupein, W.; Schieber, A.; Carle, R. Influence of agronomic factors and extraction rate on the acrylamide contents in yeast-leavened breads. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 8968–8976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Nandi, S.K.; Rankenberg, J.; Glomb, M.A.; Nagaraj, R.H. Transient elevation of temperature promotes cross-linking of alpha-crystallin-client proteins through formation of advanced glycation endproducts: A potential role in presbyopia and cataracts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 533, 1352–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tian, W.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, D.; Tilley, M.; Zhang, G.; He, Z.; Li, Y. A comprehensive review of wheat phytochemicals: From farm to fork and beyond. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 2274–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Demirok, E.; Kolsarıcı, N. Effect of green tea extract and microwave pre-cooking on the formation of acrylamide in fried chicken drumsticks and chicken wings. Food Res. Int. 2014, 63, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Morales, G.; Jimenez, M.; Garcia, O.; Mendoza, M.R.; Beristain, C.I. Effect of natural extracts on the formation of acrylamide in fried potatoes. LWT -Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 58, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ou, S.; Shi, J.; Huang, C.; Zhang, G.; Teng, J.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, B. Effect of antioxidants on elimination and formation of acrylamide in model reaction systems. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 182, 863–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Serpen, A.; Gökmen, V. Evaluation of the Maillard reaction in potato crisps by acrylamide, antioxidant capacity and color. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2009, 22, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. AGE-related fluorescence measured for nine wheat cultivars grown at three different locations (HOH (Hohenheim), EWE (Eckartsweier), and OLI (Oberer Lindenhof)). The data are presented as mean values with standard deviation from three independent measurements (technical replicates).
Figure 1. AGE-related fluorescence measured for nine wheat cultivars grown at three different locations (HOH (Hohenheim), EWE (Eckartsweier), and OLI (Oberer Lindenhof)). The data are presented as mean values with standard deviation from three independent measurements (technical replicates).
Foods 12 04399 g001
Figure 2. The antioxidant potential of the soluble WBCEs. Upon incubation of HeLa cells with WBCEs, the mRNA abundance of the antioxidant gene GCLM (a) and HMOX1 (b) was measured by qRT-PCR and was normalized to reference gene YBX1. Data were analyzed from four (a) and three (b) independent experiments and were depicted as means with standard deviation. Mounting place is indicated by HOH (Hohenheim), EWE (Eckartsweier), and OLI (Oberer Lindenhof) together with the names of the nine wheat cultivars.
Figure 2. The antioxidant potential of the soluble WBCEs. Upon incubation of HeLa cells with WBCEs, the mRNA abundance of the antioxidant gene GCLM (a) and HMOX1 (b) was measured by qRT-PCR and was normalized to reference gene YBX1. Data were analyzed from four (a) and three (b) independent experiments and were depicted as means with standard deviation. Mounting place is indicated by HOH (Hohenheim), EWE (Eckartsweier), and OLI (Oberer Lindenhof) together with the names of the nine wheat cultivars.
Foods 12 04399 g002
Figure 3. Determination of asparagine and acrylamide. Asparagine content was determined in the flour in mg/kg (a). Acrylamide content was measured in water-soluble extracts of the 27 wheat crusts by mass spectrometry in µg/kg (b). Mounting place is indicated by HOH (Hohenheim), EWE (Eckartsweier), and OLI (Oberer Lindenhof) together with the names of the nine wheat cultivars.
Figure 3. Determination of asparagine and acrylamide. Asparagine content was determined in the flour in mg/kg (a). Acrylamide content was measured in water-soluble extracts of the 27 wheat crusts by mass spectrometry in µg/kg (b). Mounting place is indicated by HOH (Hohenheim), EWE (Eckartsweier), and OLI (Oberer Lindenhof) together with the names of the nine wheat cultivars.
Foods 12 04399 g003
Figure 4. Association between different parameters was determined by Pearson correlation coefficient (rxy), for acrylamide and asparagine (a), AGE-fluorescence and asparagine (b), AGE-fluorescence and acrylamide (c), asparagine and GCLM-transcript (d), acrylamide and GCLM-transcript (e), AGE-fluorescence and GCLM-transcript (f), asparagine and HMOX1-transcript (g), acrylamide and HMOX1-transcript (h), and AGE-fluorescence and HMOX1-transcript (i). * p < 0.0001.
Figure 4. Association between different parameters was determined by Pearson correlation coefficient (rxy), for acrylamide and asparagine (a), AGE-fluorescence and asparagine (b), AGE-fluorescence and acrylamide (c), asparagine and GCLM-transcript (d), acrylamide and GCLM-transcript (e), AGE-fluorescence and GCLM-transcript (f), asparagine and HMOX1-transcript (g), acrylamide and HMOX1-transcript (h), and AGE-fluorescence and HMOX1-transcript (i). * p < 0.0001.
Foods 12 04399 g004
Figure 5. Mass spectrometric analyses of the soluble WBCEs. The heat map (a) exhibits the proteins found in all 27 samples. Marked candidates with the asterisk (*) are representative for multiple homologous proteins. (b) The association between the AGE-fluorescence and the number of identified proteins is determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient (rxy).
Figure 5. Mass spectrometric analyses of the soluble WBCEs. The heat map (a) exhibits the proteins found in all 27 samples. Marked candidates with the asterisk (*) are representative for multiple homologous proteins. (b) The association between the AGE-fluorescence and the number of identified proteins is determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient (rxy).
Foods 12 04399 g005
Figure 6. Analysis of different AGE modifications by mass spectrometry. The relative values of modified versus unmodified peptides are exhibited by ranking from 1–27 (for not or least abundant modifications to highly abundant modifications) for the additional mass of 3-DG or THP (a), MG-H1/2/3 (b), MGH-DH or CEA (c), and hexose (d). The association between GCLM-transcript and the ranking of the respective modification is determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient (rxy). The mounting place is indicated by HOH (Hohenheim), EWE (Eckartsweier), and OLI (Oberer Lindenhof) together with the names of the nine wheat cultivars.
Figure 6. Analysis of different AGE modifications by mass spectrometry. The relative values of modified versus unmodified peptides are exhibited by ranking from 1–27 (for not or least abundant modifications to highly abundant modifications) for the additional mass of 3-DG or THP (a), MG-H1/2/3 (b), MGH-DH or CEA (c), and hexose (d). The association between GCLM-transcript and the ranking of the respective modification is determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient (rxy). The mounting place is indicated by HOH (Hohenheim), EWE (Eckartsweier), and OLI (Oberer Lindenhof) together with the names of the nine wheat cultivars.
Foods 12 04399 g006
Figure 7. Association between mean ranking of all AGEs (Figure 6) and the number of the identified proteins, determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient (rxy).
Figure 7. Association between mean ranking of all AGEs (Figure 6) and the number of the identified proteins, determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient (rxy).
Foods 12 04399 g007
Figure 8. Ratio of the MG-H1/2/3 modified peptides to the unmodified peptides of protein A0A3B6KUN7 (a) and Q5BHT9 (b) among all 27 WBCEs. Association between the GCLM-transcript and the ratio mod/base for the modification at the indicated peptide was determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient (rxy).
Figure 8. Ratio of the MG-H1/2/3 modified peptides to the unmodified peptides of protein A0A3B6KUN7 (a) and Q5BHT9 (b) among all 27 WBCEs. Association between the GCLM-transcript and the ratio mod/base for the modification at the indicated peptide was determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient (rxy).
Foods 12 04399 g008
Table 1. Wheat cultivars and their growth locations.
Table 1. Wheat cultivars and their growth locations.
Wheat CultivarGrowth Location
GlaucusHOH, EWE, OLI
AkteurHOH, EWE, OLI
TobakHOH, EWE, OLI
PionierHOH, EWE, OLI
XerxesHOH, EWE, OLI
LearHOH, EWE, OLI
JuliusHOH, EWE, OLI
TengriHOH, EWE, OLI
AltigoHOH, EWE, OLI
Table 2. Baking conditions.
Table 2. Baking conditions.
GrainDough RestingBaking TimeTop HeatBottom Heat
wheat30 min50–60 min250230
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wächter, K.; Longin, C.F.H.; Winterhalter, P.R.; Bertsche, U.; Szabó, G.; Simm, A. The Antioxidant Potential of Various Wheat Crusts Correlates with AGE Content Independently of Acrylamide. Foods 2023, 12, 4399. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12244399

AMA Style

Wächter K, Longin CFH, Winterhalter PR, Bertsche U, Szabó G, Simm A. The Antioxidant Potential of Various Wheat Crusts Correlates with AGE Content Independently of Acrylamide. Foods. 2023; 12(24):4399. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12244399

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wächter, Kristin, Carl Friedrich H. Longin, Patrick R. Winterhalter, Ute Bertsche, Gábor Szabó, and Andreas Simm. 2023. "The Antioxidant Potential of Various Wheat Crusts Correlates with AGE Content Independently of Acrylamide" Foods 12, no. 24: 4399. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12244399

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop