Next Article in Journal
Glyphosate and Glufosinate Residues in Honey and Other Hive Products
Next Article in Special Issue
Low-Level Clostridial Spores’ Milk to Limit the Onset of Late Blowing Defect in Lysozyme-Free, Grana-Type Cheese
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Metabolomic Analysis of the Nutritional Aspects from Ten Cultivars of the Strawberry Fruit
Previous Article in Special Issue
Growth and Biocontrol of Listeria monocytogenes in Greek Anthotyros Whey Cheese without or with a Crude Enterocin A-B-P Extract: Interactive Effects of the Native Spoilage Microbiota during Vacuum-Packed Storage at 4 °C
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/foods12061154
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Technological Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains for Potential Use in Cheese Manufacture

by
Fabrizio Domenico Nicosia
1,
Alessandra Pino
1,2,3,
Guilherme Lembi Ramalho Maciel
4,
Rosamaria Roberta Sanfilippo
2,
Cinzia Caggia
1,2,3,
Antonio Fernandes de Carvalho
4 and
Cinzia Lucia Randazzo
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
2
ProBioEtna SRL, Spin off of the University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 100, 95123 Catania, Italy
3
CERNUT, Interdepartmental Research Centre in Nutraceuticals and Health Products University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
4
InovaLeite—Laboratório de Pesquisa em Leite e Derivados, Departamento de Tecnologia de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa 36570900, MG, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(6), 1154; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12061154
Submission received: 19 January 2023 / Revised: 10 February 2023 / Accepted: 6 March 2023 / Published: 9 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbes in Cheese: Isolation, Molecular Detection and Characterization)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A total of 26 lactic acid bacteria isolates from both Italian and Brazilian cheeses were tested for their use in cheesemaking. Isolates were screened for salt tolerance, exopolysaccharide and diacetyl production, lipolytic, acidifying, and proteolytic activities. In addition, the aminopeptidase (Pep N and Pep X) activities, were evaluated. Most of the strains demonstrated salt tolerance to 6% of NaCl, while only two L. delbruekii (P14, P38), one L. rhamnosus (P50) and one L. plantarum (Q3C4) were able to grow in the presence of 10% (w/v) of NaCl. Except for 2 L. plantarum (Q1C6 and Q3C4), all strains showed low or medium acidifying activity and good proteolytic features. Furthermore, lipolytic activity was revealed in none of the strains, while the production of EPS and diacetyl was widespread and variable among the tested strains. Finally, regarding aminopeptidase activities, 1 L. delbrueckii (P10), 1 L. rhamnosus (P50), and 1 L. lactis (Q5C6) were considered as the better performing, showing high values of both Pep N and Pep X. Based on data presented here, the aforementioned strains could be suggested as promising adjunct cultures in cheesemaking.

1. Introduction

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB), normally present in milk, utensils, and surfaces of dairy farms, play an important role in cheesemaking, both in the early stages of milk fermentation and during cheese ripening [1,2]. In particular, the starter LAB (SLAB), rapidly fermenting the lactose, produces high concentrations of lactic acid whereas the non-starter LAB (NSLAB) is mainly involved during the ripening process in the definition of the sensory profile of the final product [3]. The NSLAB carefully selected based on particular metabolic features and intentionally added as “adjunct cultures”, can improve the taste, flavor, and texture of cheese [4]. Three primary LAB metabolic pathways, including lactate and free fatty acid release metabolisms as well as proteolysis (with subsequent peptides and amino acid catabolism), are mainly involved in the definition of the sensory profile of the final product [5]. In addition, by fermenting citrate, glucose, lactose, and other carbon sources, the produced diacetyl and acetoin confers desirable sensory features to ripened cheeses [6,7]. In particular, diacetyl plays a key role in the flavor development of Dutch-style cheeses, cottage cheese, quark, and many other fermented dairy products [8]. Moreover, different studies demonstrated that some LAB provides an important contribution to the development of the texture of cheeses through, for example, the production of exopolysaccharides (EPS) [9,10]. As stabilizers, EPS can improve the firmness of the casein network by binding water and interacting with other milk components, such as whey proteins and casein micelles, along with promoting antimicrobial and antioxidant activities in dairy products [11]. Furthermore, LAB possesses a complex enzymatic system that includes proteinases and peptidases. Peptidases are able to hydrolyze small peptides starting from long peptide chains, which in turn are freed from milk caseins by the action of coagulating enzymes and microbial proteinases themselves [12]. The accumulation of peptides with the presence of hydrophobic amino acids (lysine, leucine, and proline), in the peptide side chains, is generally associated with the development of a bitter taste in cheese [13]. Some enzymes, produced by LAB, are able to selectively hydrolyze these peptides reducing the bitter taste. From this perspective, aminopeptidase N (Pep N) is one of the most significant peptidases able to hydrolyze peptides with hydrophobic N-terminal amino acids (e.g., Leu and Lys). Moreover, X-prolyl-dipeptidyl aminopeptidase (PepX) is an additional peptidase with the ability to hydrolyze proline in specific peptide sites mitigating the bitter taste of the cheese [14]. All these properties are important for the selection of an adjunct culture able to improve both the taste and texture of cheeses. All the technological properties mentioned above contribute to flavor development and quality of the cheese, which are strongly determined by the complex dynamics and interaction among cheese indigenous LAB [15]. In particular, the indigenous LAB population arising from milk and dairy environment, usually consisting of streptococci, enterococci, and lactobacilli, is considered a source of enzymatic activity involved in flavor formation, especially in traditional cheeses [15].
The aim of this work was to characterize the technological features of LAB strains, isolated from different traditional cheeses, in order to set up an adjunct culture for cheesemaking. In particular, indigenous strains were isolated from Pecorino Siciliano and from Ragusano cheeses which are traditional Italian hard cheeses manufactured from raw ewe’s and cow’s milk, respectively, without any starter cultures, using ancient manufacturing processes and ripened at least for 4–6 months or longer [2,16]. Brazilian strains were isolated from Marajó cheese, a traditional Brazilian cheese produced in the Marajó island, made from raw buffalo milk, in accordance with the region’s cultural traditions by spontaneous coagulation, and characterized by a complex flavor mainly generated by autochthonous LAB. This cheese has been produced for more than a century and is the socioeconomic foundation of tiny farmers on the island [17]. All strains were tested for the ability to exert lipolytic and proteolytic activities, produce exopolysaccharides and diacetyl, and tolerate different NaCl concentrations. In addition, the presence of specific aminopeptidases (Pep N and Pep X), able to hydrolyze bitter peptides, was in-depth evaluated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

A total of 26 LAB strains were used in this work: 11 belonging to the collection of InovaLeite (Laboratory of Milk and Dairy Products, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Brazil) were isolated from Marajó and Pará cheeses using M17 agar medium (Difco laboratories, Ditroit, MI, USA) and MRS agar medium (Difco laboratories, Ditroit, MI, USA), and 15, belonging to the collection of the Laboratory of Microbiology (Department of Agricultural, Food, and Environment, Di3A, University of Catania, Italy), were isolated from Pecorino and Ragusano cheeses using Rogosa agar medium (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) and MRS agar medium (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK). The strains were previously identified at species level through molecular methods as follows: 4 Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (Q1C6, Q3C4, Q5C9, and Q6C4), 6 Pediococcus acidilactici (Q1C8, Q3C1, Q3C3, Q6C1, Q6C5, and Q22C2), 1 Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis (Q5C6), 14 Lactobacillus delbrueckii (P7, P9, P10, P11, P12, P13, P14, P15, P33, P36, P37, P38, P39, and P40) and 1 Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (P50). The strains were stored in de Man Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) broth (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) with 20% (v/v) glycerol and kept at −20 °C till further use.

2.2. Bacterial Growth and Cell Suspension Standardization

LAB isolates were cultured in MRS broth (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, England) and incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. After growth, cells were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 2 min at 4 °C and the obtained pellet was suspended in NaCl (0.9% w/v) to a turbidity equivalent to the 1 McFarland (about 3 × 108 CFU/mL). The standardized cell suspension was used to test proteolytic, lipolytic, and acidifying activities, diacetyl and exopolysaccharides production as well as salt tolerance.

2.3. Proteolytic and Lipolytic Activities

The extracellular proteolytic activity was evaluated following the protocol described by Randazzo and co-workers (2021) [18] and Franciosi and co-workers (2009) [19]. In detail, 2 µL of cells, standardized as previously described, were spotted on the surface of petri dishes containing Plate Count Agar (PCA, HiMedia, Mumbai, MH, India) supplemented with skim milk (10% w/v, Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK). After incubation at 30 °C for four days, plates were checked for the presence of a clear zone surrounding the colonies.
The lipolytic activity was tested by spotting 2 µL of standardized cells (about 3 × 108 CFU/mL) on the lipolytic medium composed of peptone, 2.5 g/L; casein peptone, 2.5 g/L; yeast extract, 3 g/L; Agar, 12 g/L; and 1% of tributyrin. After incubation at 30 °C for 72 h, the presence of a halo around the bacterial spot revealed lipolytic activity [20].
Each test was performed in triplicate.

2.4. Diacetyl and Exopolysaccharide Production

In order to measure the diacetyl production, 0.1 mL aliquots of standardized cell suspension were added to 10 mL of sterile reconstituted skim milk (10% w/v, Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK), and the mixture was incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. Then, an aliquot of 1 mL was transferred to a sterile tube and supplemented with 0.5 mL of α-naphthol (1% w/v) and KOH (16% w/v), then the mixture was incubated at 30 °C for 10 min. Diacetyl production was indicated by the formation of a pink ring and classified as weak (+), medium (++), or strong (+++) according to the color intensity.
The feature relative to the synthesis of exopolysaccharide (EPS) was assessed using the methodology described by Dal Bello et al. (2012) [21]. In detail, 0.1 mL aliquot of the standardized cell suspension was inoculated into 10 mL of sterile reconstituted skim milk (10% v/v, Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) and the mixture was incubated at 30 °C for 48 h. The presence of stringiness was used to evaluate the EPS production.
Each test was performed in triplicate.

2.5. Salt Tolerance

The ability of the tested isolates to grow at different salt concentrations was evaluated as described by Ferrari et al. (2016) [22]. MRS broth medium (Oxoid, Milan, Italy) containing bromocresol purple (0.04% w/v) and different NaCl concentrations (2, 6, 10% w/v) was transferred into sterile tube and inoculated with 1% of standardized cell suspension. After incubation at 37 °C for one week, the change of color from purple to yellow was considered as positive growth.
The test was performed in triplicate.

2.6. Acidifying Activity

Acidifying activity was determined by inoculating the standardized cell suspension (2% v/v) into reconstituted skim milk (10% w/v, Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK). The pH changes (∆pH) were determined after 6 h and 8 h of incubation at 37 °C using a pH meter (MettlerDL25, Mettler-Toledo International Inc., Columbus, OH, USA).
The test was performed in triplicate.

2.7. Aminopeptidase Activity

2.7.1. Cell Free Extract Preparation

LAB strains were grown at 37 °C in MRS broth medium (Oxoid, Milan, Italy) until reaching the late exponential phase. After centrifugation (10.000 g, 10 min, 4 °C), cells were washed twice with sodium phosphate buffer (0.05 M, pH 7.0), then standardized to 109 CFU/mL in the same buffer (0.05 M, pH 7.0). To obtain the cell free extract (CFE), cell lysis was carried out through the bead-beating method, in the Precellys apparatus (Bertin technologies, Düsseldorf, Germany), using zirconium beads with a diameter of 0.1 mm. The treatment at 6000 rpm for 40 s was repeated twice. Samples were placed on ice (for 4 min) between each cycle. At the end of the treatment, the samples were placed on ice for 10 min. CFE was obtained after removing zirconium beads, cell debris, and unbroken cells by centrifugation (10.000 g, 10 min, 4 °C). The protein concentration was determined by using the Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.7.2. Aminopeptidase N Activity

Aminopeptidase activity of the CFE was determined as described by Requena et al. (1993) [23]. Then, 100 μL of CFE were added to 80 μL of phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0) and 20 μL of a reaction buffer containing the substrate Lys-p-nitroanilide dihydrobromide (20 mM in methanol) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After incubation at 37 °C for 30 min (or until the mixture reaches a strong yellow color) the reaction was stopped by adding 500 μL of glacial acetic acid (10% v/v, Panreac, Barcelona, Spain). Optical density (OD) at 410 nm was measured using iMark™ Microplate Absorbance Reader (Biorad, Milan, Italy). The test was performed in triplicate, using the “white test” (20 μL of the reaction buffer containing the substrate Lys-p-nitroanilide dihydrobromide with 180 μL of phosphate buffer) as blank. The aminopeptidase N (Pep N) activity was expressed as U/mg of protein. One U was defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 μmol of p-NA per minute under the assay conditions.

2.7.3. Aminopeptidase X Activity

For the evaluation of aminopeptidase X (Pep X), 50 μL of CFE were added to 600 μL of phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.2) and 50 μL of a reaction buffer containing the substrate H-Ala-Pro-p-nitroanilide HCl (20 mM in methanol) (ChemCruz Biochemicals, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). After incubation at 37 °C for 30 min (or until the mixture reaches a strong yellow color), the reaction was stopped by adding 500 μL of glacial acetic acid (10% v/v, Panreac, Barcelona, Spain). Optical density (OD) at 410 nm was measured using iMark™ Microplate Absorbance Reader (Biorad, Milan, Italy). The test was performed in triplicate, using the “white test” (50 μL of a reaction buffer containing the substrate H-Ala-Pro-p-nitroanilide HCl with 150 μL of phosphate buffer) as blank. Specific activity was expressed as U/mg of protein. One U was defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 μmol of p-NA per minute under the assay conditions.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Pep N and Pep X data were subjected to One-way ANOVA analysis with Tukey’s post hoc test using the Statistica software (TIBCO Software, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. In order to correlate acidifying and aminopeptidase activities, data were subjected to principal component analysis (PCA) using the XLSTAT (2023.1.1.1397) software.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Proteolytic and Lipolytic Activities, Diacetyl and Exopolysaccharide Production

Results of proteolytic and lipolytic activities as well as diacetyl and exopolysaccharide production are shown in Table 1. Overall, all the tested strains, with the exception of two L. plantarum strains (Q1C6 and Q3C4), showed proteolytic activity. It is well known that LAB possesses an efficient proteolytic system, with complex combinations of proteinases and peptidases, which allow them to obtain organic nitrogen from complex proteins like casein [24]. Proteases hydrolyze caseins forming peptides which, crossing the cell membrane through specific transport proteins, are further degraded into amino acids by intracellular peptidases [25]. The amino acids, through specific catabolic pathways, are transformed into volatile and non-volatile compounds, which play a key role in the definition of the sensory properties of cheese [26].
Concerning lipolytic activity, as reported in Table 1, none of the strains exhibited this feature. Identical results were reported by Meng et al. (2018) [27] and Monfredini et al. (2012) [28]. In fact, none of the tested LAB strains showed lipolytic activity through tributyrin agar, while Silva et al. (2020) [29] found lipolytic activity only in 5 strains of LAB out of 37 tested. The inability of LAB strains to break down milk fat during ripening makes them suitable as adjunct cultures. In fact, it is well known that NSLAB should not possess lipolytic activity since this is associated with the development of rancid flavor [30,31,32]. Differently, one important feature of adjunct cultures is related to diacetyl production. Out of the 26 strains, 20 showed diacetyl production (Table 1); the strains isolated from Pecorino cheese were classified as medium diacetyl producers whereas LAB strains from Ragusano, Marajó, and Pará cheeses showed variable ability to produce diacetyl (Table 1). In detail, 4 L. delbrueckii (P11, P12, P13, and P39) and one P. acidilactici (Q3C1) strains displayed strong production, 4 L. delbrueckii (P7, P9, P10, and P36) 2 L. plantarum (Q5C9 and Q6C4), and one L. lactis (Q5C6) had medium production, 3 P. acidilactici (Q1C8, Q6C5 and Q22C2), 2 L. plantarum (Q1C6 and Q3C4), one L. delbrueckii (P38), and one L. rhamnosus (P50) strains showed weak production, while 4 L. delbrueckii (P14, P15, P33, and P40) and 2 P. acidilactici (Q3C3 and Q6C1) strains had no production. This wide variability in diacetyl production was previously observed in L. rhamnosus strains isolated from semihard goat cheese [27], and in L. rhamnosus and L. dellbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus strains isolated from hard raw cow’s milk cheese [28]. This evidence is in accordance with previously reported data, suggesting that diacetyl production is a strain-dependent feature [19,33]. The production of this compound represents a very important variable in the choice of a strain for the formulation of an adjunct culture; in fact, the diacetyl, produced by LAB using citrate, glucose, lactose, and other carbon sources as substrates, confers a buttery taste to dairy products [34,35]. Furthermore, diacetyl was shown to have inhibitory activity against foodborne pathogens, especially when combined with bacteriocin such as nisin [36].
Concerning EPS production, three L. delbrueckii strains (P10, P14, and P38) isolated from Pecorino and Ragusano cheeses showed the ability to produce these compounds (Table 1). The results are in agreement with those previously reported by Christianah et al. (2008) [37] and Khubaib et al. (2018) [38], showing that strains belonging to L. delbrueckii and L. delbrueckii subps. bulgaricus were able to produce EPS and among them, L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus is a well-known EPS producer [39]. In detail, L. delbrueckii subps. bulgaricus exhibit many intraspecific biosynthetic pathways producing different EPS structures, consisting of units of repeated monomers such as glucose, galactose, rhamnose, and sometimes fructose [40]. L. delbrueckii subps. bulgaricus EPS producers have been used for many years in classical yogurt, drinking yogurt, fresh cheeses, cultured cream, or milk-based desserts, thanks to their ability to increase viscosity, prevent syneresis and improve sensory and nutritional characteristics of dairy products [41,42]. In the work of Ahmed et al. (2005) [43], the employment of an EPS-producing culture, during the manufacture of the Karish cheese, strongly influenced the textural properties of the final product. The resulting cheese exhibited lower hardness, consistency, chewiness, and adhesiveness compared to the cheese obtained using a strain unable to produce EPS. Furthermore, the panelists described the cheese made with the EPS-producing strain as smooth, creamy, moist, and soft, while the one with the EPS-nonproducing strain was described as dry and granular. In addition, several functional features were recently attributed to EPS produced by LAB, such as antitumorigenic, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities. In particular, EPS are able to counteract reactive oxygen species (ROS) hindering the development of many disorders including lung injury, atherosclerosis, inflammation, aging, and cancer [44].

3.2. Salt Tolerance and Acidifying Activity

As reported in Table 2, all tested strains were able to grow in presence of 2% (w/v) of NaCl. Moreover, 13 strains (7 L. delbruekii, 2 L. plantarum, 3 P. acidilactici and one L. lactis) demonstrated salt tolerance at the concentration of 6% (w/v), and a total of 4 strains (2 L. delbruekii (P14 and P38), 1 L. rhamnosus (P50) and 1 L. plantarum (Q3C4) grew in presence of 10% (w/v) of NaCl. The results agree with the data reported by Meng et al. (2018) [27], which demonstrated the ability of L. rhamnosus strains isolated from semihard goat cheese to grow in presence of high NaCl concentration (10% w/v). In addition, L. rhamnosus isolates from traditional Provola dei Nebrodi cheese showed high tolerance to the presence of NaCl (10% w/v) resulting in accordance with evidence reported in the present study [18]. Differently, the salt resistance feature is not widespread in L. plantarum strains; in fact, our data revealed that only 1 strain out of 4 L. plantarum strains demonstrated 10% (w/v) NaCl tolerance, confirming data reported by Karasu et al. (2010) [45] where only 2 out of 12 L. plantarum strains were able to grow at a salt concentration of 9% (w/v), suggesting the low tolerance of L. plantarum strains to high salt concentration. To tolerate high salt concentrations, LAB develops various strategies such as the uptake or the synthesis of a limited number of solutes [46]. The ability of NSLAB strains to grow in a wide range of salt concentrations is fundamental since they are often subjected to high concentrations of NaCl especially during brining and ripening of cheese production. In fact, NaCl is a common preservative for long-term storage cheeses and is crucial for managing cheese ripening [47].
Regarding the acidifying parameter generally, to be classified as a starter, a bacterial strain should be able to lower the pH of the milk to 5.3 after 6 h [48]. According to that, all strains are often classified into three groups in line with their rate of acidification: fast acidification (pH ˂ 5.3 after 6 h of fermentation), medium (pH < 5.3 after 8 h of fermentation), and slow (pH > 5.3 after 8 h of fermentation). As reported in Figure 1, the strains tested in the present study showed a ∆pH within 6 h ranging from 0.16 to 2.01, while the ∆pH within 8 h was from 0.22 to 2.08. According to that and as displayed by PCA plot (Supplementary Figure S1), 2 L. plantarum strains (Q1C6 and Q3C4) demonstrated fast acidifying activity, 5 L. delbruekii stains (P14, P15, P36, P37, and P38) medium behavior, while all the others showed low acidifying activity proving to be usable for an adjunct culture. Similar results were obtained by Hadef et al., (2022) [49] demonstrating the weak acidification among the 36% LAB strains tested. Moreover, lactobacilli strains isolated from Tenerife cheese by Pérez et al. (2003) [50] revealed low acidification activity. It is well known that LAB strains, selected as adjunct cultures, should have low acidifying activity; in fact, a high rate could generate sensory defects in cheese [51].

3.3. Aminopeptidase Activities

In the present study, the aminopeptidase activities Pep N and Pep X were tested using Lys-pNa and H-Ala-Pro-pNa substrates, respectively. In detail, as reported in Figure 2, the tested strains showed high activity against the substrate Lys-pNa, with values ranging from 265.47 to 2.15, of units per milligram of protein per minute (U/mg). In particular, according to the PCA plot (Supplementary Figure S1), the strain Q5C6 ascribed to the L. lactis species, as well as the L. delbrueckii P10 strain and the L. rhamnosus P50 strain were considered the best performers. Pep N data present in this study were higher to those obtained by Morea et al., (2007) [52] in fact, L. delbrueckii, L. gasseri and P. pentosaceus strains isolated from Caciocavallo Pugliese cheese showed values ranging from 45.3 to 10.01 U/mg. Further, González and co-workers (2010) [53] demonstrated low Pep N activity among LAB strains isolated from traditional Spanish cheese; in fact, except for few cases, the Pep N activity was generally low or even undetectable. Moreover, the L. rhamnosus P50 strain, tested in the present study, showed very high activity against the Lys-pNa substrate (254.56 U/mg) compared to L. rhamnsosus strain tested by Carafa et al. (2015) [31], which revealed an activity equal to 19 U/mg.
Overall, it is well known that aminopeptidase activity is crucial for the breakdown of peptides and the release of amino acids during the secondary proteolysis of the cheese. In particular, Pep N displays high selectivity for the basic amino acids Lys and Arg, followed by the hydrophobic/uncharged residues Leu and Ala [54]. It was previously isolated from strains ascribed to different species such as Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lactobacillus helveticus, and Streptococcus thermophilus suggesting that this activity is strain-dependent and not species-dependent.
Concerning Pep X, the tested strains showed values ranging from 36.55 to 1.18 U/mg (Figure 3). Higher Pep X activity was displayed by the strain Q5C6 (33.22 U/mg), ascribed to the L. lactis species, as well as by the L. delbrueckii P10 (25.86) strain and by the L. rhamnosus P50 (36.55 U/mg) strain. In agreement with our results, some L. rhamnosus strains, isolated from semihard artisanal goat cheeses, showed a marked activity for Pep X when tested through Arg-Pro-pNA and Gly-Pro-pNA substrates [27], confirming that L. rhamnosus possesses a complex proteolytic system, including the X-prolyl-dipeptidyl aminopeptidase [55]. Differently Psoni et al. (2007) [56], testing L. lactis strains isolated from Batzos cheese, revealed Pep X values lower than 5 U/mg. Similarly, Vlieg et al. [57], testing a collection of dairy and wild L. lactis strains, obtained values of Pep X activity lower than 1 µmol/mg min. Pep X was purified and characterized from strains ascribed to the L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. helveticus, L. lactis, and S. thermophilus species [54]. The synergistic effect between Pep N and Pep X is essential to obtain high levels of hydrolysis. In fact, Pep N releases amino acids from the N-terminal of peptides and the rate of hydrolysis is reduced in presence of proline residues [58]. To compensate for the proline inhibition, the Pep X is able to release Xaa-Pro dipeptides from the N-terminal side of peptides. It is advantageous to have strains that can hydrolyze proline-containing peptides, since hydrophobic peptides with at least one proline residue have been linked to the bitter flavor of cheese [59].

4. Conclusions

In the present study, a technological characterization of indigenous LAB, isolated from Italian and Brazilian cheeses was carried out. Based on salt resistance, low acidifying and lipolytic activities, ability to produce diacetyl and EPS as well as aminopeptidase activities, data allowed us to select the strains Q5C6, P10, and P50, ascribed to L. lactis, L. delbrueckii, and L. rhamnosus, respectively, as the most promising to be used as adjunct cultures. In particular, the high aminopeptidase N and X activities displayed by the strains could help to enhance the flavor properties of cheese, improving the overall quality of the final product. In addition, the synergistic effect of aminopeptidase N and X revealed by the selected strains could be useful for the reduction of bitter peptides, generated from milk-clotting enzymes during cheese manufacture and ripening.
Research efforts should be made to confirm the results of the present study. The potential flavor improvement of ewe’s and cow’s milk cheese prepared using the selected strains will be further investigated at both pilot and industrial scales.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods12061154/s1, Figure S1: Biplot of the principal components analysis (PCA) of LAB strains isolated from Brazilian and Italian cheeses in relation to aminopeptidase activities (Pep N and Pep X) and acidifying activity (∆pH 6h and ∆pH 8h).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F.d.C. and C.L.R.; methodology, A.P., C.C., A.F.d.C. and C.L.R.; formal analysis, F.D.N., G.L.R.M. and R.R.S.; resources, A.F.d.C. and C.L.R.; data curation, F.D.N. and A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, F.D.N.; writing—review and editing, A.P., A.F.d.C. and C.L.R.; supervision, A.F.d.C. and C.L.R.; project administration, C.L.R.; funding acquisition, C.L.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by the “Innovazioni tecnologiche di prodotto e di processo per lo sviluppo della filiera lattiero casearia Halal (Cheesehal)”, -cod. domanda: 94250045039, cod. CUP: G66D20000640009, sottomisura 16.1 del PSR-Sicilia 2014/2020.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

A.P., C.C. and C.L.R. declare that they are members of ProBioEtna, a spinoff of the University of Catania, Italy. In addition, the authors declare that they do not have any personal, financial, professional, political, or legal interests with a significant chance of interfering with the performance of their ethical or legal duties.

References

  1. Walther, B.; Schmid, A.; Sieber, R.; Wehrmüller, K. Cheese in Nutrition and Health. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2008, 88, 389–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Carpino, S.; Randazzo, C.L.; Pino, A.; Russo, N.; Rapisarda, T.; Belvedere, G.; Caggia, C. Influence of PDO Ragusano Cheese Biofilm Microbiota on Flavour Compounds Formation. Food Microbiol. 2017, 61, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guarcello, R.; Carpino, S.; Gaglio, R.; Pino, A.; Rapisarda, T.; Caggia, C.; Marino, G.; Randazzo, C.L.; Settanni, L.; Todaro, M. A Large Factory-Scale Application of Selected Autochthonous Lactic Acid Bacteria for PDO Pecorino Siciliano Cheese Production. Food Microbiol. 2016, 59, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. el Soda, M.; Madkor, S.A.; Tong, P.S. Adjunct Cultures: Recent Developments and Potential Significance to the Cheese Industry. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83, 609–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McSweeney, P.L.H.; Sousa, M.J. Biochemical Pathways for the Production of Flavour Compounds in Cheeses during Ripening: A Review. Lait 2000, 80, 293–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. McAuliffe, O.; Kilcawley, K.; Stefanovic, E. Symposium Review: Genomic Investigations of Flavor Formation by Dairy Microbiota. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 909–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pino, A.; Liotta, L.; Randazzo, C.L.; Todaro, A.; Mazzaglia, A.; de Nardo, F.; Chiofalo, V.; Caggia, C. Polyphasic Approach to Study Physico-Chemical, Microbiological and Sensorial Characteristics of Artisanal Nicastrese Goat’s Cheese. Food Microbiol. 2018, 70, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Fox, P.F.; Singh, T.K.; McSweeney, P.L.H. Biogenesis of Flavour Compounds in Cheese. In Chemistry of Structure-Function Relationships in Cheese; Malin, E.L., Tunick, M.H., Eds.; Plenum Publishing Corporation: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 59–98. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kumari, M.; Kumar, R.; Singh, D.; Bhatt, S.; Gupta, M. Physiological and Genomic Characterization of an Exopolysaccharide-Producing Weissella Cibaria CH2 from Cheese of the Western Himalayas. Food Biosci. 2020, 35, 100570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pino, A.; Russo, N.; van Hoorde, K.; de Angelis, M.; Sferrazzo, G.; Randazzo, C.L.; Caggia, C. Piacentinu Ennese PDO Cheese as Reservoir of Promising Probiotic Bacteria. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Korcz, E.; Varga, L. Exopolysaccharides from Lactic Acid Bacteria: Techno-Functional Application in the Food Industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 110, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kunji, E.R.S.; Mierau, I.; Hagting, A.; Poolman, B.; Konings, W.N. The Proteotytic Systems of Lactic Acid Bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1996, 70, 187–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lemieux, L.; Simard, R.E. Bitter Flavour in Dairy Products. I. A Review of the Factors Likely to Influence Its Development, Mainly in Cheese Manufacture. Lait 1991, 71, 599–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Nicosia, F.D.; Puglisi, I.; Pino, A.; Caggia, C.; Randazzo, C.L. Plant Milk-Clotting Enzymes for Cheesemaking. Foods 2022, 11, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Randazzo, C.L.; de Luca, S.; Todaro, A.; Restuccia, C.; Lanza, C.M.; Spagna, G.; Caggia, C. Preliminary Characterization of Wild Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Abilities to Produce Flavour Compounds in Ripened Model Cheese System. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 103, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Randazzo, C.L.; Pitino, I.; de Luca, S.; Scifò, G.O.; Caggia, C. Effect of Wild Strains Used as Starter Cultures and Adjunct Cultures on the Volatile Compounds of the Pecorino Siciliano Cheese. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 2008, 122, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kamimura, B.A.; Magnani, M.; Luciano, W.A.; Campagnollo, F.B.; Pimentel, T.C.; Alvarenga, V.O.; Pelegrino, B.O.; Cruz, A.G.; Sant’Ana, A.S. Brazilian Artisanal Cheeses: An Overview of Their Characteristics, Main Types and Regulatory Aspects. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 1636–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Randazzo, C.L.; Liotta, L.; de Angelis, M.; Celano, G.; Russo, N.; van Hoorde, K.; Chiofalo, V.; Pino, A.; Caggia, C. Adjunct Culture of Non-Starter Lactic Acid Bacteria for the Production of Provola Dei Nebrodi PDO Cheese: In Vitro Screening and Pilot-Scale Cheese-Making. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Franciosi, E.; Settanni, L.; Cavazza, A.; Poznanski, E. Biodiversity and Technological Potential of Wild Lactic Acid Bacteria from Raw Cows’ Milk. Int. Dairy J. 2009, 19, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hantsis-Zacharov, E.; Halpern, M. Culturable Psychrotrophic Bacterial Communities in Raw Milk and Their Proteolytic and Lipolytic Traits. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 7162–7168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Dal Bello, B.; Cocolin, L.; Zeppa, G.; Field, D.; Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C. Technological Characterization of Bacteriocin Producing Lactococcus Lactis Strains Employed to Control Listeria Monocytogenes in Cottage Cheese. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 2012, 153, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ferrari, I.d.S.; de Souza, J.V.; Ramos, C.L.; da Costa, M.M.; Schwan, R.F.; Dias, F.S. Selection of Autochthonous Lactic Acid Bacteria from Goat Dairies and Their Addition to Evaluate the Inhibition of Salmonella Typhi in Artisanal Cheese. Food Microbiol. 2016, 60, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Requena, T.; Pelaez, C.; Fox, P.F. Peptidase and Proteinase Activity of Lactococcus Lactis, Lactobacillus Casei and Lactobacillus Plantarum. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 1993, 196, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, M.; Bayjanov, J.R.; Renckens, B.; Nauta, A.; Siezen, R.J. The Proteolytic System of Lactic Acid Bacteria Revisited: A Genomic Comparison. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kieliszek, M.; Pobiega, K.; Piwowarek, K.; Kot, A.M. Characteristics of the Proteolytic Enzymes Produced by Lactic Acid Bacteria. Molecules 2021, 26, 1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lawlor, J.B.; Delahunty, C.M.; Wilkinson, M.G.; Sheehan, J. Relationships between the Gross, Non-Volatile and Volatile Compositions and the Sensory Attributes of Eight Hard-Type Cheeses. Int. Dairy J. 2002, 12, 493–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meng, Z.; Zhang, L.; Xin, L.; Lin, K.; Yi, H.; Han, X. Technological Characterization of Lactobacillus in Semihard Artisanal Goat Cheeses from Different Mediterranean Areas for Potential Use as Nonstarter Lactic Acid Bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 2887–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Monfredini, L.; Settanni, L.; Poznanski, E.; Cavazza, A.; Franciosi, E. The Spatial Distribution of Bacteria in Grana-Cheese during Ripening. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 35, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Silva, E.; Nespolo, C.R.; Sehn, C.P.; Pinheiro, F.C.; Stefani, L.M. Lactic Acid Bacteria with Antimicrobial, Proteolytic and Lipolytic Activities Isolated from Ovine Dairy Products. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 40, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Tsigkrimani, M.; Panagiotarea, K.; Paramithiotis, S.; Bosnea, L.; Pappa, E.; Drosinos, E.H.; Skandamis, P.N.; Mataragas, M. Microbial Ecology of Sheep Milk, Artisanal Feta, and Kefalograviera Cheeses. Part II: Technological, Safety, and Probiotic Attributes of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolates. Foods 2022, 11, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Carafa, I.; Nardin, T.; Larcher, R.; Viola, R.; Tuohy, K.; Franciosi, E. Identification and Characterization of Wild Lactobacilli and Pediococci from Spontaneously Fermented Mountain Cheese. Food Microbiol. 2015, 48, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Herrero, M.; Mayo, B.; González, B.; Suárez, J.E. Evaluation of Technologically Important Traits in Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Spontaneous Fermentations. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1996, 81, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Câmara, S.; Dapkevicius, A.; Riquelme, C.; Elias, R.; Silva, C.; Malcata, F.; Dapkevicius, M. Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Pico Cheese for Starter Culture Development. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2019, 25, 303–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Peralta, G.H.; Bergamini, C.V.; Audero, G.; Páez, R.; Wolf, I.V.; Perotti, M.C.; Hynes, E.R. Spray-Dried Adjunct Cultures of Autochthonous Non-Starter Lactic Acid Bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 255, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rincon-Delgadillo, M.I.; Lopez-Hernandez, A.; Wijaya, I.; Rankin, S.A. Diacetyl Levels and Volatile Profiles of Commercial Starter Distillates and Selected Dairy Foods. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 1128–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Thierry, A.; Valence, F.; Deutsch, S.-M.; Even, S.; Falentin, H.; le Loir, Y.; Jan, G.; Gagnaire, V. Strain-to-Strain Differences within Lactic and Propionic Acid Bacteria Species Strongly Impact the Properties of Cheese—A Review. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2015, 95, 895–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Christianah Adebayo-Tayo, B.; Onilude, A.; Adebayo-tayo, B.C.; Onilude, A.A. Screening of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains Isolated from Some Nigerian Fermented Foods for EPS Production Antmicrobial Activity of Biomolecules View Project Probiotic Pineapple Juice View Project Screening of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains Isolated from Some Nigerian Fermented Foods for EPS Production. World Appl. Sci. J. 2008, 4, 741–747. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ali, K.; Mehmood, M.H.; Iqbal, M.A.; Masud, T.; Qazalbash, M.; Saleem, S.; Ahmed, S.; Tariq, M.R.; Safdar, W.; Nasir, M.A.; et al. Isolation and Characterization of Exopolysaccharide-producing Strains of Lactobacillus Bulgaricus from Curd. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 1207–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zhu, Y.; Wang, X.; Pan, W.; Shen, X.; He, Y.; Yin, H.; Zhou, K.; Zou, L.; Chen, S.; Liu, S. Exopolysaccharides Produced by Yogurt-Texture Improving Lactobacillus Plantarum RS20D and the Immunoregulatory Activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 121, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Shene, C.; Bravo, S. Whey Fermentation by Lactobacillus Delbrueckii Subsp. Bulgaricus for Exopolysaccharide Production in Continuous Culture. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2007, 40, 1578–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bancalari, E.; Gatti, M.; Bottari, B.; Mora, D.; Arioli, S. Disclosing Lactobacillus Delbrueckii Subsp. Bulgaricus Intraspecific Diversity in Exopolysaccharides Production. Food Microbiol. 2022, 102, 103924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xu, Y.; Cui, Y.; Yue, F.; Liu, L.; Shan, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhou, Y.; Lü, X. Exopolysaccharides Produced by Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bifidobacteria: Structures, Physiochemical Functions and Applications in the Food Industry. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 94, 475–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ahmed, N.H.; el Soda, M.; Hassan, A.N.; Frank, J. Improving the Textural Properties of an Acid-Coagulated (Karish) Cheese Using Exopolysaccharide Producing Cultures. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 38, 843–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Saleem, M.; Malik, S.; Mehwish, H.M.; Ali, M.W.; Hussain, N.; Khurshid, M.; Rajoka, M.S.R.; Chen, Y. Isolation and Functional Characterization of Exopolysaccharide Produced by Lactobacillus Plantarum S123 Isolated from Traditional Chinese Cheese. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 3061–3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Karasu, N.; Şimşek, Ö.; Çon, A.H. Technological and Probiotic Characteristics of Lactobacillus Plantarum Strains Isolated from Traditionally Produced Fermented Vegetables. Ann. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Júnior, W.L.G.A.; Ferrari, I.S.; Souza, J.V.; Silva, C.D.A.; Costa, M.M.; Dias, F.S. Characterization and evaluation of lactic acid bacteria isolated from goat milk. Food Control 2015, 53, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Georgieva, R.; Iliev, I.; Haertlé, T.; Chobert, J.-M.; Ivanova, I.; Danova, S. Technological Properties of Candidate Probiotic Lactobacillus Plantarum Strains. Int. Dairy J. 2009, 19, 696–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Beresford, T.P.; Fitzsimons, N.A.; Brennan, N.L.; Cogan, T.M. Recent Advances in Cheese Microbiology. Int. Dairy J. 2001, 11, 259–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hadef, S.; Idoui, T.; Sifour, M.; Genay, M.; Dary-Mourot, A. Screening of Wild Lactic Acid Bacteria from Algerian Traditional Cheeses and Goat Butter to Develop a New Probiotic Starter Culture. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Perez, G.; Cardell, E.; Zarate, V. Technological Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Tenerife Cheese. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2003, 38, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Scatassa, M.L.; Gaglio, R.; Macaluso, G.; Francesca, N.; Randazzo, W.; Cardamone, C.; di Grigoli, A.; Moschetti, G.; Settanni, L. Transfer, Composition and Technological Characterization of the Lactic Acid Bacterial Populations of the Wooden Vats Used to Produce Traditional Stretched Cheeses. Food Microbiol. 2015, 52, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Morea, M.; Matarante, A.; di Cagno, R.; Baruzzi, F.; Minervini, F. Contribution of Autochthonous Non-Starter Lactobacilli to Proteolysis in Caciocavallo Pugliese Cheese. Int. Dairy J. 2007, 17, 525–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. González, L.; Sacristán, N.; Arenas, R.; Fresno, J.M.; Eugenia Tornadijo, M. Enzymatic Activity of Lactic Acid Bacteria (with Antimicrobial Properties) Isolated from a Traditional Spanish Cheese. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 592–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Christensen, J.E.; Dudley, E.G.; Pederson, J.A.; Steele, J.L. Peptidases and Amino Acid Catabolism in Lactic Acid Bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1999, 76, 217–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Moslehishad, M.; Ehsani, M.R.; Salami, M.; Mirdamadi, S.; Ezzatpanah, H.; Naslaji, A.N.; Moosavi-Movahedi, A.A. The Comparative Assessment of ACE-Inhibitory and Antioxidant Activities of Peptide Fractions Obtained from Fermented Camel and Bovine Milk by Lactobacillus Rhamnosus PTCC 1637. Int. Dairy J. 2013, 29, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Psoni, L.; Kotzamanidis, C.; Yiangou, M.; Tzanetakis, N.; Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E. Genotypic and Phenotypic Diversity of Lactococcus Lactis Isolates from Batzos, a Greek PDO Raw Goat Milk Cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 114, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Vlieg, J.E.T.; Dijkstra, A.; Smit, B.A.; Engels, W.J.M.; Rijnen, L.; Starrenburg, M.J.C.; Smit, G.; Wouters, J.A. Exploiting Natural Microbial Diversity for Development of Flavour Starters. Dev. Food Sci. 2006, 43, 61–64. [Google Scholar]
  58. Stressler, T.; Eisele, T.; Schlayer, M.; Lutz-Wahl, S.; Fischer, L. Characterization of the Recombinant Exopeptidases PepX and PepN from Lactobacillus Helveticus ATCC 12046 Important for Food Protein Hydrolysis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Habibi-Najafi, M.B.; Lee, B.H.; Law, B. Bitterness in Cheese: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1996, 36, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Foods 12 01154 g001 550
Figure 1. Acidifying activity of LAB strains. Results are expressed as ∆pH (6 h and 8 h) (starting from a pH of 6.7) and reported as mean and standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 1. Acidifying activity of LAB strains. Results are expressed as ∆pH (6 h and 8 h) (starting from a pH of 6.7) and reported as mean and standard deviation of three replicates.
Foods 12 01154 g001
Foods 12 01154 g002 550
Figure 2. Aminopeptidase N (Pep N) activity exhibited by the tested strains. Results are reported as mean and standard deviation of three replicates. Aminopeptidase activity was expressed as the number of activity units per milligram of protein per minute (U/mg). One unit of aminopeptidase activity was considered as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 μmol of p-NA per minute under the assay conditions. Different letters (a–g) indicate statistically significant differences as determined by the one-way ANOVA test, which is followed by the Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Aminopeptidase N (Pep N) activity exhibited by the tested strains. Results are reported as mean and standard deviation of three replicates. Aminopeptidase activity was expressed as the number of activity units per milligram of protein per minute (U/mg). One unit of aminopeptidase activity was considered as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 μmol of p-NA per minute under the assay conditions. Different letters (a–g) indicate statistically significant differences as determined by the one-way ANOVA test, which is followed by the Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
Foods 12 01154 g002
Foods 12 01154 g003 550
Figure 3. X-prolyl-dipeptidyl aminopeptidase (Pep X) activity exhibited by the tested strains. Results are reported as mean and standard deviation of three replicates. Aminopeptidase activity was expressed as the number of activity units per milligram of protein per minute (U/mg). One unit of aminopeptidase activity was considered as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 μmol of p-NA per minute under the assay conditions. Different letters (a–f) indicate statistically significant differences as determined by the one-way ANOVA test, which is followed by the Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. X-prolyl-dipeptidyl aminopeptidase (Pep X) activity exhibited by the tested strains. Results are reported as mean and standard deviation of three replicates. Aminopeptidase activity was expressed as the number of activity units per milligram of protein per minute (U/mg). One unit of aminopeptidase activity was considered as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 μmol of p-NA per minute under the assay conditions. Different letters (a–f) indicate statistically significant differences as determined by the one-way ANOVA test, which is followed by the Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
Foods 12 01154 g003
Table
Table 1. Identification and technological properties of strains isolated from Pecorino cheese, Ragusano cheese, Marajó cheese and Pará cheese.
Table 1. Identification and technological properties of strains isolated from Pecorino cheese, Ragusano cheese, Marajó cheese and Pará cheese.
IsolateIsolation SourceSpecies Attribution Proteolysis *Lipolysis *Diacetyl **EPS *
P7, P9Pecorino CheeseL. delbrueckii+-++-
P10Pecorino CheeseL. delbrueckii+-+++
P11, P12, P13, P39Ragusano CheeseL. delbrueckii+-+++-
P14Ragusano CheeseL. delbrueckii+--+
P15, P33, P40Ragusano CheeseL. delbrueckii+---
P37Ragusano CheeseL. delbrueckii+-+-
P36Ragusano CheeseL. delbrueckii+-++-
P38Ragusano CheeseL. delbrueckii+-++
P50Ragusano CheeseL. rhamnosus+-+-
Q5C9, Q6C4Marajó CheeseL. plantarum+-++-
Q1C6, Q3C4Marajó CheeseL. plantarum--+-
Q1C8, Q6C5, Q22C2Marajó CheeseP. acidilactici+-+-
Q3C1Marajó CheeseP. acidilactici+-+++-
Q3C3, Q6C1Marajó CheeseP. acidilactici+---
Q5C6Pará CheeseL. lactis+-++-
* (+), positive; (-), negative. ** (+++), strong production; (++), medium production; (+), weak production; (-), no production.
Table
Table 2. Salt tolerance of LAB strains.
Table 2. Salt tolerance of LAB strains.
Isolates2%6%10%
P14, P38, P50, Q3C4+++
P9, P10, P11, P13, P36, P37, P39, Q1C6, Q1C8, Q3C1, Q6C4, Q6C5, Q5C6++-
P7, P12, P15, P33, P40, Q3C3, Q5C9, Q6C1, Q22C2+--
(+), positive; (-), negative.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nicosia, F.D.; Pino, A.; Maciel, G.L.R.; Sanfilippo, R.R.; Caggia, C.; de Carvalho, A.F.; Randazzo, C.L. Technological Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains for Potential Use in Cheese Manufacture. Foods 2023, 12, 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12061154

AMA Style

Nicosia FD, Pino A, Maciel GLR, Sanfilippo RR, Caggia C, de Carvalho AF, Randazzo CL. Technological Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains for Potential Use in Cheese Manufacture. Foods. 2023; 12(6):1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12061154

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nicosia, Fabrizio Domenico, Alessandra Pino, Guilherme Lembi Ramalho Maciel, Rosamaria Roberta Sanfilippo, Cinzia Caggia, Antonio Fernandes de Carvalho, and Cinzia Lucia Randazzo. 2023. "Technological Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains for Potential Use in Cheese Manufacture" Foods 12, no. 6: 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12061154

APA Style

Nicosia, F. D., Pino, A., Maciel, G. L. R., Sanfilippo, R. R., Caggia, C., de Carvalho, A. F., & Randazzo, C. L. (2023). Technological Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains for Potential Use in Cheese Manufacture. Foods, 12(6), 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12061154

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop