Next Article in Journal
The Introduction of Allochthonous Olive Variety and Super High-Density System in the Abruzzo Region: A Study on Olive Oil Quality
Next Article in Special Issue
LC-MS/MS Method Minimizing Matrix Effect for the Analysis of Bifenthrin and Butachlor in Chinese Chives and Its Application for Residual Study
Previous Article in Journal
Accelerated Accumulation of γ-Aminobutyric Acid and Modifications on Its Metabolic Pathways in Black Rice Grains by Germination under Cold Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dissipation of Four Typical Insecticides on Strawberries and Effects of Different Household Washing Methods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fungicide Dissipation Kinetics and Dietary Exposure Risk Assessment in Squash Fruit and Leaf

1
Korea Conformity Laboratories, Bio Division, Incheon 21999, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Crop Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(6), 1291; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12061291
Submission received: 9 February 2023 / Revised: 13 March 2023 / Accepted: 15 March 2023 / Published: 17 March 2023

Abstract

:
The dissipation behavior and dietary exposure risk assessment of four fungicides (dimethomorph, mandipropamid, myclobutanil, and metalaxyl) was performed in fruits and leaves of squash grown under greenhouse conditions. Squash fruit and leaf samples were randomly collected at 0, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days after the last pesticide application. Analysis was performed using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). The quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) method was used for sample preparation. Recovery rates at two spiked levels (0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg) were found to be in the range of 76.4%–101.9% for the analyzed pesticides and their relative standard deviations were ≤4%. Pesticide half-lives were 2.1 and 4.9 days for dimethomorph, 4.6 and 8.1 days for mandipropamid, 4.7 and 8.2 days for myclobutanil, and 2.7 and 5 days for metalaxyl in squash fruit and leaf, respectively. Regarding the total surveyors, hazard quotient values for squash fruit and leaf were ≤1.03 × 10−3 and ≤2.39 × 10−3, respectively. These values in the case of true consumers were ≤3.14 × 10−3 and ≤3.91 × 10−1, respectively.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Food safety is receiving more attention worldwide than ever before [1], and pesticide residues are a major harmful factor affecting human health [2]. Regarding human toxicity, an earlier study investigating the residual pesticides indicated that the exposure route is primarily through the ingestion of contaminated food and that pesticide intake through this route is considerably higher than that via any other route, such as air and water [3]. Although pesticides pose a potential risk to human health, they effectively protect crops against both pests and diseases, consequently increasing crop yield [4].
Pesticide residue levels in food are typically regulated to reduce unnecessary consumer exposure [5]. In the Republic of Korea (ROK), a positive list system (PLS) has been enforced since 2019 [6]. PLS represents a legislative rule that states that the tolerance limit of a pesticide residue (0.01 mg/kg) must be applied to agricultural products that have no maximum residue limit (MRL). Consumers can intake agricultural products that are safe [7]. While this system is a strict standard for producers, establishing the MRL is significant for both producers and consumers. Because major crops have a high economic value, pesticide manufacturers prioritize setting MRLs for major crops over minor crops [8].
Squash, a minor crop in the Cucurbitaceae family, is primarily consumed as fruit, leaf, and seed in the ROK. In the Fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (5th KNHNES) [9], squash fruit was reported to be a major source of potassium and thiamine intake. Squash leaf is very often consumed in the ROK, and although the frequency of consumption is lower than that of squash fruit, it is known that its calcium content is approximately 6–45 times higher [10].
Dimethomorph and mandipropamid are carboxylic acid amide fungicides. According to microscopic and ultrastructural studies on mycelial cell endometrial structure, diemethomorph may disrupt the cell wall formation of pathogens [11]. Myclobutanil is a triazole fungicide that can interfere with the normal functions of male hormones and the CYP3A4 enzyme [12]. Metalaxyl has been found to stimulate the skin, accumulate in the liver, fat, and muscles, and induce thyroid tumors [13]. In the ROK, MRLs are currently established for several pesticides used for squash fruit and leaf [14]. However, in the European Union (EU), they are only established for squash fruit pesticides [15]. The MRL values for squash fruit in the EU and ROK are 0.5 and 1.5 mg/kg for dimethomorph, 0.3 mg/kg and undetermined for mandipropamid, 0.3 and 0.1 mg/kg for myclobutanil, and 0.01 and 0.2 mg/kg for metalaxyl, respectively. Previous studies have reported the dissipation pattern and exposure risk of chlorfenapyr [16], sulfoxaflor [17], tebuconazole, penconazole, myclobutnil, and triadimenol in squash fruit [18]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies to date have assessed the dissipation pattern or human exposure risk of any pesticide in squash leaf.
This study aimed to (1) develop and validate an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method using a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) sample preparation procedure to determine the residue levels of four pesticides—dimethomorph, mandipropamid, myclobutanil, and metalaxyl—in squash fruit and leaf (2), calculate the half-life of the four pesticides based on their dissipation patterns, and (3) estimate the health risk to a true consumer by assessing pesticide residues. Experiments were conducted under greenhouse conditions, following which the four pesticides present in harvested squash fruits and leaves were analyzed. The results will provide a reference towards proposing usage recommendations for the four pesticides in squash fruit and leaf.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals, Reagents, and Materials

Dimethomorph, mandipropamid, myclobutanil, and metalaxyl were purchased from Kemidas Co. (Suwon, Republic of Korea). The chemical structures and physicochemical properties of the four pesticides are presented in Supplementary Material Table S1. Formulations of dimethomorph (wettable powder (WP), 25%, Dongbang Agro Corporation, Seoul, Republic of Korea), mandipropamid (suspension concentrate, 22.59%, Syngenta Korea Ltd., Jeonbuk, Republic of Korea), myclobutanil (WP, 6%, Kyung Nong Corporation, Seoul, Republic of Korea), and metalaxyl (WP, 25%, Enbio Co., Ltd., Gunpo-si, Republic of Korea) used in greenhouse experiments were purchased from a local market (Seoul, the ROK). HPLC-grade acetonitrile was provided by J. T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). Formic acid (>98% purity) was obtained from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Membrane filters (0.2 µm) were purchased from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA). An EN-QuEChERS kit was purchased from Chiral Technology Korea (Daejeon, Republic of Korea).

2.2. Greenhouse Experiments

Squash plants were grown under greenhouse conditions. The greenhouse facility was located in Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, the ROK (36.675120° N, 127.317190° E). The experiments were conducted in accordance with the relevant institutional, national, and international Good Laboratory Practice guidelines and legislation [19]. Each pesticide treatment plot measured 45 m (length) × 1 m (width), divided into three replicates. A control plot was located in an area separated from the treated areas. Each experimental plot was treated with one of the four pesticides three times before harvest. The applications were performed per 7 days, and the first application was performed on 6 April 2021. According to the safe use standard of agricultural chemicals, dimethomorph, mandipropamid, myclobutanil, and metalaxyl formulations were diluted in water in ratios of 1:1000, 1:2000, 1:1000, and 1:1500, respectively, and were applied on squash fruit and leaf by spraying at recommended dosages of 45, 20.331, 7.2, and 45 g a.i./10a, respectively [10]. The total spraying volume was 27.5 L per plot (45 m2). Squash fruit samples (>2 kg) and squash leaf samples (>1 kg) were collected 0, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days (including the pre-harvest interval (PHI)) after the last pesticide application, randomly from each replicate. During cultivation, the greenhouse air temperature range and humidity were maintained at 13.7 °C–20.9 °C and 63.0%–90.9%, respectively (Supplementary Material Table S2), measured using an electric data logger (TandD, T&D, Matsumoto, Japan). After harvesting, all plant samples were immediately transferred to the laboratory. Squash fruit and leaf samples were homogenized in dry ice and subsequently stored at −20 °C in polyethylene bags.

2.3. Standard Solutions

Standard stock solutions of the four pesticides were prepared at a concentration of 1000 mg/L in acetonitrile. Working solutions at concentrations of 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.1, and 0.2 mg/L were prepared by the serial dilution of the stock solutions with acetonitrile. Each of the working solutions was mixed with the extract of squash fruit or squash leaf in a ratio of 1:1 to prepare the matrix-matched standard solutions of 0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, and 0.1 mg/L.

2.4. Sample Preparation and Extraction

An EN-QuEChERS kit [20] was used to extract the pesticides. Homogenized squash fruits or squash leaves (10 g) were weighed in 50 mL falcon tubes. Ten milliliters of acetonitrile were added to each tube. The EN-QuEChERS kit reagent (4 g MgSO4, 1 g NaCl, 1 g sodium citrate, and 0.5 g disodium citrate sesquihydrate) was added into the falcon tubes. The tubes were shaken at 1200 rpm for 1 min. After centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 5 min, 1 mL of the supernatant was filtered using a 0.2 μm PTFE syringe filter.

2.5. LC-MS/MS Analytical Conditions

All samples were analyzed using the Shimadzu LCMS-8045 device equipped with a UHPLC Nexera X2 system (Kyoto, Japan) coupled with a Kinetex C18 column (2.1 × 150 mm; 2.6 μm particle size; Phenomenex, California, USA). The column oven temperature was maintained at 40 °C and the injection volume was 5 μL (for metalaxyl) or 2 μL (for other pesticides). Mobile phases consisted of water with 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (B). The total mobile phase flow rate was 0.2 mL/min. The following gradient conditions were used (A:B): for dimethomorph—90:10 (0–0.5 min), 55:45 (1–5.5 min), 10:90 (6–6.5 min), and 90:10 (7–8 min); for other pesticides—90:10 (0–1 min), 90:10 (2–5 min), and 90:10 (6–7 min).
The following MS instrumental conditions with a positive ESI source were applied: an interface temperature of 350 °C, a heat block temperature of 400 °C, a nebulizing gas flow rate of 3 L/min, and a drying gas flow rate of 10 L/min. The four pesticides were analyzed in the multiple reaction monitoring mode using a triple quadrupole (QqQ) mass spectrometer (Shimadzu, Japan) (Table 1).

2.6. Method Validation

The method was validated in terms of the linearity of calibration curves and the recovery test through limits of quantitation (LOQs). Matrix-matched calibration was examined using prepared matrix-matched standard solutions of 0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, and 0.1 mg/L. Among the chromatograms that produced a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of >10, the lowest concentration was defined as the LOQ that could enable the quantitation of the target compound. To estimate the accuracy and precision through relative standard deviation (RSD) values, the recovery test was performed at two different concentrations: 0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg. Each test was performed in triplicate. Only the parent substance was evaluated, except for dimethomorph residues. The level of dimethomorph residue in the plants was calculated as the sum of (E)-dimethomorph and (Z)-dimethomorph, which are isomers of dimethomorph.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The dissipation patterns of the four pesticides in the squash fruit and leaf over time were expressed by the following first-order kinetics (Equation (1)), and the half-lives were calculated using Equation (2) [21]:
C t = C 0 × e k t
t 1 / 2 = ln × 2 / k ,
where C0 is the initial residue concentration of a pesticide (mg/kg), which represents the residue levels 2 h after the last treatment, Ct is the residue concentration (mg/kg), t represents days after the last spraying, and k is the constant rate of dissipation.

2.8. Dietary Risk Assessment

The human health risk related to pesticide residues present in squash fruit and leaf was estimated though the dietary intake rate compared to acceptable daily intake (ADI) [22,23]. Hazard quotient (HQ) based on estimated daily intake (EDI) and ADI was calculated following Equations (3) and (4):
E D I = C t × I R / B W
H Q = E D I / A D I ,
where EDI represents the estimated daily intake (mg/kg b.w./day), Ct is the residue concentration of a pesticide in squash fruit or leaf (mg/kg), and IR is the average squash fruit or leaf intake (kg/day) that was obtained from the Standardization Guidelines for Food Intake Calculation and Contamination Monitoring conducted in 2019 by the National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation on 43,602 individuals. The average consumption of squash fruit and leaf was 0.01042 kg and 0.0018 kg per day per person, respectively [24]. Among the total surveyors (n = 43,602), the true consumers of squash fruit were 14,013 individuals (32.14%). The average squash fruit intake of a true consumer (n = 14,013) was 0.03188 kg per day. With regard to squash leaf, the true consumer percentage among the total surveyors was 0.73% and the average squash leaf intake of a true consumer (n = 319) was 0.02946 kg per day. The body weight was obtained from 5thKNHNES [12], and the average weight of total surveyors was 59.44 kg. The ADI values of dimethomorph, mandipropamid, myclobutanil, and metalaxyl are 0.2, 0.05, 0.03, and 0.08 mg/kg b.w./day, respectively [14]. If a value of <1 indicates that a population is at no risk of exposure. All statistical data for the study were obtained from a publicly accessible database.

3. Results

3.1. Method Validation

Method validation was performed in terms of linearity, accuracy, and precision. The calibration curves of all pesticides were linear from 0.005 to 0.1 mg/L of standard solutions in both squash fruit and leaf (Table 2, Figure 1). MLOQ was 0.01 mg/kg for all pesticides. The accuracy and precision were determined using the recovery rate and RSD of recovery tests performed in triplicate at two different concentrations (0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg). The results presented in Table 3 show satisfactory recovery rates and RSD for two spiked levels in squash fruit and leaf for all pesticides. The range of recovery rates was 76.4%–101.9% at two different concentrations. The RSD values for all pesticides were less than 4% (Table 3).

3.2. Pesticides MRLs in the EU and ROK

3.2.1. MRL in Squash Fruit

MRL values in the EU and ROK for squash fruit are presented in Table 4. Table 4 also shows the pesticide residue levels at 0, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days after the last application. The residue levels of the dimethomorph on days 0 and 7 of application were 0.36 and 0.02 mg/kg, respectively, which are 24% and 1.3% of the national MRL (1.5 mg/kg) and 72% and 40% of the MRL set in the EU (0.5 mg/kg). The residue levels of mandipropamid on days 0 and 7 of application were 0.29 and 0.08 mg/kg, respectively, which are 97% and 27% of the MRL set in the EU (0.3 mg/kg). Regarding myclobutanil, the residue levels on days 0 and 7 of application were 0.06 and 0.01 mg/kg, respectively, which are 60% and 10% of the national MRL (0.1 mg/kg), and 20% and 33% of the MRL set in the EU (0.3 mg/kg). The residue levels of metalaxyl on days 0 and 7 of application were 0.33 and 0.05 mg/kg, respectively, which are 165% and 25% of the national MRL (0.2 mg/kg) and 3300% and 500% of the MRL set in the EU (0.01 mg/kg). In the ROK, the MRL of mandipropamid in squash has not yet been established. Hence, our residual level data for mandipropamid may be used as a basis for the establishment of a national MRL. Dimethomorph, myclobutanil, and metalaxyl MRLs in squash fruit differ between the ROK and EU. Pesticide residual levels can differ depending on plant growth conditions (air temperature and humidity), climate, and crop species [25,26,27].

3.2.2. MRL in Squash Leaf

Currently, in the ROK, MRL is only established for myclobutanil and metalaxyl for squash leaf [14], and in the EU, none of the pesticides have a defined MRL for squash leaf [15]. Therefore, the initial residue levels (mg/kg) of myclobutanil and metalaxyl were compared to the national MRLs. The initial residue level of myclobutanil was 11.65 mg/kg, which is 58% of the national MRL (20 mg/kg), and that of metalaxyl was 31.71 mg/kg, which is 106% of the national MRL (30 mg/kg). Regarding dimethomorph and mandipropamid, the initial residue levels were 69.88 and 39.41 mg/kg, respectively. While the residue levels of myclobutanil and metalaxyl on day 7 of the application were 6.07 (30%) and 8.09 mg/kg (27%), respectively, which are less than 20 and 30 mg/kg (the national MRL for each pesticide, respectively), the residue levels of the dimethomorph and mandipropamid on day 7 of application were 25.97 and 16.86 mg/kg, respectively. The obtained residual level data for these pesticides in squash leaf may be used as a basis for the establishment of their MRLs.

3.3. Residual Characteristics of Pesticides in Squash Fruit and Leaf

The residue dissipation patterns of the four pesticides applied in a greenhouse are shown in Figure 2. The data imply that the pesticide residue levels were closely related to the specific surface area and texture of the crop. Because squash fruit has a smaller specific surface area and a smoother texture than squash leaf, they show a large difference in initial residue levels, despite being sprayed under the same cultivation conditions. Specifically, the initial residue levels in squash fruit 2 h after the last treatment were 0.36, 0.29, 0.06, and 0.33 mg/kg for dimethomorph, mandipropamid, myclobutanil, and metalaxyl, respectively, while those in squash leaf were 69.88, 39.41, 11.65, and 31.71 mg/kg, respectively. By comparing the initial residual levels between the two organs, these values in squash leaf were found to be 193, 135, 180, and 95 times higher for dimethomorph, mandipropamid, myclobutanil, and metalaxyl, respectively.
The residual levels of all pesticides decreased as the harvest date after the last spraying was postponed, and the correlation coefficients of dissipation kinetics were in the range of 0.94–0.98 (Figure 2). Figure 2 show the regression curves and dissipation equations of the four pesticides evaluated by first-order kinetic analysis in squash fruit and leaf. The half-lives of all pesticides were shorter in fruit than in leaf. In this study, it is hypothesized that the significant difference observed between the pesticides’ half-life in squash fruit and leaf could be due to the effect of dilution during plant growth [28].
In squash fruit, the half-lives of dimethomorph, mandipropamid, myclobutanil, and metalaxyl were 2.1, 4.6, 4.7, and 2.7 days, respectively. In previous studies, the half-lives of various pesticides were reported: chlorfenapyr (3.05 days) [16], sulfoxaflor (6.13 days) [17], tebuconazole (2.30 days), triadimenol (2.81 days), and myclobutanil (2.98 days) [18]. In field experiments, increasing temperature accelerates numerous processes associated with pesticide dissipation [28,29,30,31]. Moreover, the higher the air humidity, the higher the pesticide adsorption affinity to the plant surface and the lower its volatilization [32,33]. In a previous study on myclobutanil residues in squash fruit [18], the average temperature and average humidity during field experiments were reported to be 13 °C and 60%, respectively. In this study, the average temperature of 18 °C and the average humidity of 71% were relatively high and likely contributed to the short half-life of the pesticide; however, various factors involved in its half-life (e.g., microbial activity, rainfall, and sunlight) appear to have been combined. The half-lives of dimethomorph, mandipropamid, myclobutanil, and metalaxyl in squash leaf were 4.9, 8.1, 8.2, and 5 days, respectively. Consequently, their half-lives were higher in squash leaf than in squash fruit. Unlike squash fruit, no studies have been reported on the half-lives of these pesticides in squash leaf.
Previous studies have shown that dimethomorph tends to decompose quickly in iceberg lettuce (0.86 days) [34] and pepper (3.2–3.8 days) [35], but slowly in potato (9.4 days) [36], grape (9–9.8 days) [37], and pak choi (6.2 days) [38]. Mandipropamid has been reported to have a short or a similar half-life in grape (2.2 days) [39], Korean cabbage (3.9–4 days) [40], and sesame leaf (5.1–5.4 days) [41]. A few studies on myclobutanil half-life showed similar trends, reporting 2.2–3.4 days for lychee [42], 2.5–4.5 days for wheat [43], and 4.9–6.8 days for green tobacco leaf [44]. Regarding the chemical classes, the dissipation half-lives of triazoles were reported to be in the range of 2–12.8 days [45], which is similar to our results and previous studies. The half-life of metalaxyl was reported to be 2.5 days in Chinese cabbage [46], 3–3.5 days in cucumber [47], 4.9 days in grape [37], and 16.5 days in durian leaf [48]. The decomposition behavior of pesticides is generally influenced by many factors such as their physicochemical characteristics, formulations, environmental conditions, crop species, and plant growth-based dilution factor [29,49,50].

3.4. Dietary Risk Assessment

The dietary risk assessment was performed by calculating the dietary intake rates compared to ADI. An HQ value of >1 indicates that a population is at risk of exposure. Table 5 shows the risk assessment results of four fungicides on days 0, 3, and 7 after the last treatment for total surveyors and true consumers associated with squash fruit and leaf consumption. Considering the total surveyors (n = 43,602), the HQ values of squash fruit on days 0, 3, and 7 of application were ≤1.03 × 10−e and those of squash leaf on days 0, 3, and 7 of the application were ≤2.39 × 10−3 (Table 5a). Because there was a large difference in squash intake between the actual consumers and non-consumers, additional risk assessments were performed in true consumers. The resulting HQ values of squash fruit on days 0, 3, and 7 of application were ≤3.14 × 10−3 and those of squash leaf on days 0, 3, and 7 of the application were ≤3.91 × 10−e (Table 5b). The PHI was 3, 7, and 7 days for dimethomorph, myclobutanil, and metalaxyl, respectively. During the PHI period, the HQ values of all three pesticides were <l. The PHI of mandipropamid in squash fruit and leaf has not been established in the ROK. The mandipropamid risk assessment results can help contribute toward the establishment of its PHI. Our findings imply that the exposure risk of true consumers of squash fruit and leaf to these pesticides was 3 times and 164 times higher, respectively, than that of all surveyors. According to the national nutrition statistics of the Korea Health Industry Development Institute [51], the intake of squash fruit and squash leaf increases after the age of 30, and it was found that the population of small/medium-sized cities and suburbs consumed 6 and 16.5 times more squash leaf than the population of large cities, respectively. When the average intake was examined according to the age and settlement type, it was found to be higher for individuals residing in the suburbs than for those residing in large cities as well as for older individuals. Considering the daily consumption of squash fruit and leaf, the exposure risk to pesticides is regarded as safe.

4. Conclusions

We studied the residual levels and dissipation patterns and performed the dietary risk assessment of four fungicides—dimethomorph, mandipropamid, myclobutanil, and metalaxyl—in squash fruit and leaf during greenhouse cultivation. To assess the pesticide residues, simple and rapid analytical methods based on a modified QuEChERS method were developed and validated using UHPLC-MS/MS. Based on the obtained HQ values, it can be concluded that the intake of pesticide residues from squash fruit and leaf does not pose a health risk to even a true consumer. Overall, it is expected that these results will help us understand the properties of dimethomorph, mandipropamid, myclobutanil, and metalaxyl residues as well as establish their domestic MRLs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods12061291/s1, Table S1: Chemical structures and physicochemical properties of the four pesticides.; Table S2: Greenhouse air temperature, humidity, and pesticide treatment date during cultivation of squash plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-H.L.; methodology, R.K. and J.K.; software, R.K. and D.A.; validation, R.K., K.L. and J.K.; formal analysis, R.K. and D.A.; investigation, R.K., D.A. and J.-H.L.; resources, J.-H.L.; data curation, D.A. and J.-H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, D.A. and J.-H.L.; writing—review and editing, J.-H.L.; visualization, D.A. and J.-H.L.; supervision, J.-H.L.; project administration, J.-H.L.; funding acquisition, J.-H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Rural Development Administration, grant number PJ01594905.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

ADIAcceptable daily intake
CVCoefficients of variation
EDIEstimated daily intake
HPLCHigh-performance liquid chromatography
HQHazard quotient
LC-MS/MSLiquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry
LOQLimit of quantitation
MLOQMethod limit of quantification
MRLMaximum residue limit
PHIPre-harvest interval

References

  1. Magkos, F.; Arvaniti, F.; Zampelas, A. Organic Food: Buying More Safety or Just Peace of Mind? A Critical Review of the Literature. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2006, 46, 23–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Torres, C.M.; Picó, Y.; Mañes, J. Determination of Pesticide Residues in Fruit and Vegetables. J. Chromatogr. A 1996, 754, 301–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Margni, M.; Rossier, D.; Crettaz, P.; Jolliet, O. Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Pesticides on Human Health and Ecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 93, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aguilera, A.; Valverde, A.; Camacho, F.; Boulaid, M.; García-Fuentes, L. Effect of Household Processing and Unit to Unit Variability of Azoxystrobin, Acrinathrin and Kresoxim Methyl Residues in Zucchini. Food Control 2012, 25, 594–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Na, T.W.; Rahman, M.M.; Park, J.-H.; Yang, A.; Park, K.H.; Abd El-Aty, A.M.; Shim, J.-H. Residual Pattern of Acequinocyl and Hydroxyacequinocyl in Perilla Leaf Grown under Greenhouse Conditions Using Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Photo Diode Array Detector with Tandem Mass Confirmation. J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2012, 55, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chang, H.-R.; You, J.-S.; Do, J.-A. Residue Dissipation Patterns of Neonicotinoid Acetamiprid and Thiamethoxam in Swiss Chard for the Harvest Periods under Greenhouse Conditions. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 2018, 37, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Yang, Y.S.; Gang, G.R.; Lee, S.M.; Kim, S.Y.; Lee, M.G.; Choi, E.A.; Seo, K.W.; Kim, E.S.; Kim, J.H. Survey on Pesticide Residues and Risk Assessment of Agricultural Products from Wholesale Market in Gwangju (2014~2016). Korean J. Pestic. Sci. 2017, 21, 341–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Walorczyk, S.; Drożdżyński, D.; Kierzek, R. Determination of Pesticide Residues in Samples of Green Minor Crops by Gas Chromatography and Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Tandem Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry. Talanta 2015, 132, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. KCDC. Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Available online: https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr/knhanes/main.do (accessed on 25 September 2019).
  10. RDA. 8th Revision Food Composition Table; National Academy of Agricultural Sciences: Suwon, Republic of Korea, 2011; pp. 1–636. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mitani, S.; Araki, S.; Yamaguchi, T.; Takii, Y.; Ohshima, T.; Matsuo, N. Antifungal Activity of the Novel Fungicide Cyazofamid Against Phytophthora Infestans and Other Plant Pathogenic Fungi In Vitro. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2001, 70, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. De Castro, V.L.S.S.; Maia, A.H. Prenatal Epoxiconazole Exposure Effects on Rat Postnatal Development. Birth Defects Res. Part B Dev. Reprod. Toxicol. 2012, 95, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Saab, J.; Bassil, G.; Abou Naccoul, R.; Stephan, J.; Mokbel, I.; Jose, J. Salting-out Phenomenon and 1-Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient of Metalaxyl Pesticide. Chemosphere 2011, 82, 929–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. MFDS. Pesticides and Veterinary Drugs Information. Available online: https://www.foodsafetykorea.go.kr/residue/main.do (accessed on 27 January 2022).
  15. European Commission. EU Pesticides Database. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/start/screen/mrls (accessed on 16 January 2023).
  16. Abdel Ghani, S.B.; Abdallah, O.I. Method Validation and Dissipation Dynamics of Chlorfenapyr in Squash and Okra. Food Chem. 2016, 194, 516–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abdallah, O.; Soliman, H.; El-Hefny, D.; Abd El-Hamid, R.; Malhat, F. Dissipation Profile of Sulfoxaflor on Squash under Egyptian Field Conditions: A Prelude to Risk Assessment. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2021, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abdallah, O.I.; Alrasheed, A.M.; Al-Mundarij, A.A.; Omar, A.F.; Alhewairini, S.S.; Al-Jamhan, K.A. Levels of Residues and Dietary Risk Assessment of the Fungicides Myclobutanil, Penconazole, Tebuconazole, and Triadimenol in Squash. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2021, 35, e5126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. RDA. Registration Standards for Pesticides and Raw Materials. Available online: https://psis.rda.go.kr/psis (accessed on 6 July 2022).
  20. Anastassiades, M.; Lehotay, S.J.; Štajnbaher, D.; Schenck, F.J. Fast and Easy Multiresidue Method Employing Acetonitrile Extraction/Partitioning and “Dispersive Solid-Phase Extraction” for the Determination of Pesticide Residues in Produce. J. AOAC Int. 2003, 86, 412–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Farha, W.; Abd El-Aty, A.M.; Rahman, M.M.; Kabir, M.H.; Chung, H.S.; Lee, H.S.; Jeon, J.-S.; Wang, J.; Chang, B.-J.; Shin, H.-C.; et al. Dynamic Residual Pattern of Azoxystrobin in Swiss Chard with Contribution to Safety Evaluation. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2018, 32, e4092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, P.; Chai, Y.; Liu, R.; Yuan, L. Dissipation, Residue, and Dietary Risk Assessment of Bifenthrin, Bifenazate, and Its Metabolite Bifenazate–Diazene in Apples Based on Deterministic and Probabilistic Methods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 14302–14310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chai, Y.; Liu, R.; Du, X.; Yuan, L. Dissipation and Residue of Metalaxyl-M and Azoxystrobin in Scallions and Cumulative Risk Assessment of Dietary Exposure to Hepatotoxicity. Molecules 2022, 27, 5822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. NIFDS. Guidelines for Calculating Food Intake and Standardizing Contamination Monitoring. Available online: https://www.mfds.go.kr/brd/m_1060/view.do?seq=14347&srchFr=&srchTo=&srchWord=&srchTp=&itm_seq_1=0&itm_seq_2=0&multi_itm_seq=0&company_cd=&company_nm=&page=54 (accessed on 15 May 2019).
  25. Poulsen, M.E.; Wenneker, M.; Withagen, J.; Christensen, H.B. Pesticide Residues in Individual Versus Composite Samples of Apples after Fine or Coarse Spray Quality Application. Crop Prot. 2012, 35, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, H.-S.; Park, Y.-W. Antioxidant Activity and Antibacterial Activities from Different Parts of Broccoli Extracts under High Temperature. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2005, 34, 759–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ghadiri, H.; Rose, C.W.; Connell, D.W. Degradation of Organochlorine Pesticides in Soils under Controlled Environment and Outdoor Conditions. J. Environ. Manag. 1995, 43, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fenoll, J.; Hellín, P.; del Mar Camacho, M.; López, J.; González, A.; Lacasa, A.; Flores, P. Dissipation Rates of Procymidone and Azoxystrobin in Greenhouse Grown Lettuce and under Cold Storage Conditions. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2008, 88, 737–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stenersen, J. Chemical Pesticides Mode of Action and Toxicology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004; ISBN 9781135731809. [Google Scholar]
  30. Willis, G.H.; McDowell, L.L. Pesticide Persistence on Foliage. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1987; pp. 23–73. [Google Scholar]
  31. Katagi, T. Photodegradation of Pesticides on Plant and Soil Surfaces. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 1–78. [Google Scholar]
  32. Karthika, C.; Muraleedharan, N.N. Residual Deposits in Green Tea Shoots and Black Tea after Individual and Combined Application of Propiconazole and Copper Oxychloride. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 1851–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sundaram, K.M.S. Influence of Dislodgeable and Penetrated Residues on Volatilization, Codistillation and Persistence of Mexacarbate in Balsam Fir Foliage. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 1997, 32, 213–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Horská, T.; Kocourek, F.; Stará, J.; Holý, K.; Mráz, P.; Krátký, F.; Kocourek, V.; Hajšlová, J. Evaluation of Pesticide Residue Dynamics in Lettuce, Onion, Leek, Carrot and Parsley. Foods 2020, 9, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liang, H.; Li, L.; Li, W.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, F. Dissipation and Residue of Dimethomorph in Pepper and Soil under Field Conditions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2011, 74, 1331–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, L.; Jia, C.; Li, F.; Jing, J.; Yu, P.; He, M.; Zhao, E. Dissipation and Residues of Fluazinam and Dimethomorph in Potatoes, Potato Plants, and Soil, Determined by QuEChERS Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 32783–32790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, C.; Wan, K.; Huang, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, F. Behavior of Mixed Formulation of Metalaxyl and Dimethomorph in Grape and Soil Under Field Conditions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2012, 84, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tang, H.; Ma, L.; Huang, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Meng, D.; Wen, G.; Dong, M.; Wang, W.; Zhao, L. Residue Behavior and Dietary Risk Assessment of Six Pesticides in Pak Choi Using QuEChERS Method Coupled with UPLC-MS/MS. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 213, 112022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Malhat, F.M.; Mahmoud, H.A. Dissipation and Residues of Mandipropamid in Grape Using QuEChERS Methodology and HPLC-DAD. Int. Sch. Res. Not. Anal. Chem. 2012, 2012, 267596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Choung, M.G.; Ahn, K.G.; Kim, G.P.; Hwang, Y.S.; Kwon, C.H.; Kang, I.K.; Lee, Y.D. Dissipation Pattern of a Fungicide Mandipropamid in Korean Cabbage at Different Harvest Times under Greenhouse Conditions. Korean J. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2016, 34, 644–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Farha, W.; Rahman, M.M.; Abd El-Aty, A.M.; Kim, S.-W.; Jung, D.-I.; Im, S.J.; Choi, J.-H.; Kabir, M.H.; Lee, K.-B.; Shin, H.-C.; et al. Analysis of Mandipropamid Residual Levels through Systematic Method Optimization against the Matrix Complexity of Sesame Leaves Using HPLC/UVD. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2016, 30, 990–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liu, Y.; Sun, H.; Liu, F.; Wang, S. Dissipation and Residue of Myclobutanil in Lychee. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2012, 88, 902–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, X.; Dong, F.; Wang, X.; Zheng, Y. The Dissipation Rates of Myclobutanil and Residue Analysis in Wheat and Soil Using Gas Chromatography-Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2009, 89, 957–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Xu, G.; Sun, H.; Xu, J.; Zheng, X.; Wang, F. Dissipation and Residues of Myclobutanil in Tobacco and Soil under Field Conditions. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2012, 88, 759–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fantke, P.; Juraske, R. Variability of Pesticide Dissipation Half-Lives in Plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 3548–3562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ripley, B.D.; Ritcey, G.M.; Harris, C.R.; Denommé, M.A.; Lissemore, L.I. Comparative Persistence of Pesticides on Selected Cultivars of Specialty Vegetables. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 1328–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rattan, G.S.; Sharma, N. Dissipation Kinetics of Metalaxyl in Cucumber. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2012, 88, 769–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Phetkhajone, S.; Pichakum, A.; Songnuan, W. The Study of the Kinetics of Metalaxyl Accumulation and Dissipation in Durian (Durio zibethinus L.) Leaf Using High-performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Technique. Plants 2021, 10, 708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nash, R.G. Comparative Volatilization and Dissipation Rates of Several Pesticides from Soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1983, 31, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zongmao, C.; Haibin, W. Factors Affecting Residues of Pesticides in Tea. Pestic. Sci. 1988, 23, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. KHIDI. National Nutrition Statistics. Available online: https://www.khidi.or.kr/kps/dhraStat/result1?menuId=MENU01652&year=2019 (accessed on 6 July 2022).
Figure 1. Representative chromatogram (0.1 mg/kg) of (a-1) dimethomorph (E), (a-2) dimethomorph (Z), (b) mandipropamid, (c) myclobutanil, (d) metalaxyl.
Figure 1. Representative chromatogram (0.1 mg/kg) of (a-1) dimethomorph (E), (a-2) dimethomorph (Z), (b) mandipropamid, (c) myclobutanil, (d) metalaxyl.
Foods 12 01291 g001
Figure 2. In squash fruit, dissipation patterns of (a-1) dimethomorph, (a-2) mandipropamid, (a-3) myclobutanil, (a-4) metalaxyl. In squash leaf, dissipation patterns of (b-1) dimethomorph, (b-2) mandipropamid, (b-3) myclobutanil, (b-4) metalaxyl.
Figure 2. In squash fruit, dissipation patterns of (a-1) dimethomorph, (a-2) mandipropamid, (a-3) myclobutanil, (a-4) metalaxyl. In squash leaf, dissipation patterns of (b-1) dimethomorph, (b-2) mandipropamid, (b-3) myclobutanil, (b-4) metalaxyl.
Foods 12 01291 g002aFoods 12 01291 g002b
Table 1. Multiple reaction monitoring conditions of the four analytes.
Table 1. Multiple reaction monitoring conditions of the four analytes.
AnalyteIonizationPrecursor Ion (m/z)Product Ion (m/z)Retention Time (min)
Quantitation (Collision Energy, eV)Qualification (Collision Energy, eV)
Dimethomorph[M + H]+388.1301.15 (21)165.1 (33)5.3; (E)-isomer
5.6; (Z)-isomer
Mandipropamid[M + H]+412.1328.2 (15)125.1 (35)3.5
Myclobutanil[M + H]+289.470.15 (18)125.05 (31)3.6
Metalaxyl[M + H]+280.1220.1 (14)248.1 (11)3.5
Table 2. Linear equation of the calibration curves for the quantification of the four pesticide residues in squash fruit and leaf.
Table 2. Linear equation of the calibration curves for the quantification of the four pesticide residues in squash fruit and leaf.
PesticideLinear Range (mg/L)Squash FruitSquash Leaf
Linear EquationR2Linear EquationR2
Dimethomorph0.005–0.1y = 31,386,895.5097 × 8396.13230.9993y = 27,666,075.9306 × 34,369.78110.9996
Mandipropamidy = 23,414,787.2168 × 8024.74600.9951y = 15,504,048.6650 × 9435.49880.9997
Myclobutanily = 8,773,295.1861 × 9848.44380.9965y = 7,088,559.9919 × 3798.83940.9923
Metalaxyly = 145,612,794.4175 × 276,181.31310.9987y = 61,474,433.9401 × 146,444.28840.9992
Table 3. Recovery tests in squash fruit and leaf.
Table 3. Recovery tests in squash fruit and leaf.
PesticideSquash FruitSquash Leaf
Added Concentration (mg/kg)Added Concentration (mg/kg)
0.01 mg/kg0.1 mg/kg0.01 mg/kg0.1 mg/kg
Recovery Mean (%)RSDRecovery Mean (%)RSDRecovery Mean (%)RSDRecovery Mean (%)RSD
Dimethomorph98.01.1100.01.792.31.098.80.3
Mandipropamid85.73.595.40.887.93.089.33.6
Myclobutanil99.91.596.71.788.54.589.81.7
Metalaxyl87.61.296.50.776.60.394.01.4
RSD, relative standard deviation.
Table 4. (a) Average residues of four pesticides in squash fruit. (b) Average residues of four pesticides in squash leaf.
Table 4. (a) Average residues of four pesticides in squash fruit. (b) Average residues of four pesticides in squash leaf.
(a)
PesticideDays after the Last TreatmentMean ± SD (mg/kg)EU MRL of Squash Fruit (mg/kg)National MRL of Squash Fruit (mg/kg)
Dimethomorph00.36 ± 0.000.51.5
30.19 ± 0.01
50.12 ± 0.02
70.02 ± 0.00
140.00 ± 0.00
Mandipropamid00.29 ± 0.040.3-
30.13 ± 0.02
50.10 ± 0.00
70.08 ± 0.00
140.03 ± 0.00
Myclobutanil00.06 ± 0.000.30.1
30.03 ± 0.00
50.03 ± 0.00
70.01 ± 0.00
140.01 ± 0.00
Metalaxyl00.33 ± 0.020.010.2
30.16 ± 0.03
50.05 ± 0.01
70.05 ± 0.01
140.01 ± 0.00
(b)
PesticideDays after the Last TreatmentMean ± SD (mg/kg)EU MRL of Squash Leaf (mg/kg)National MRL of Squash Leaf (mg/kg)
Dimethomorph069.88 ± 6.46--
356.71 ± 3.06
530.32 ± 1.57
725.97 ± 1.55
1410.18 ± 3.23
Mandipropamid039.41 ± 4.22--
327.49 ± 0.85
520.92 ± 4.09
716.86 ± 1.53
1411.69 ± 1.60
Myclobutanil011.65 ± 1.52-20
39.15 ± 0.65
56.99 ± 0.38
76.07 ± 0.93
143.57 ± 0.32
Metalaxyl031.71 ± 0.54-30
315.59 ± 0.77
511.64 ± 1.03
78.09 ± 1.38
144.22 ± 0.23
SD, standard deviation; EU, European Union; MRL, maximum residue limit.
Table 5. (a) HQ of four pesticides in total surveyors related to squash fruit and leaf consumption. (b) HQ of four pesticides in true consumers related to squash fruit and leaf consumption.
Table 5. (a) HQ of four pesticides in total surveyors related to squash fruit and leaf consumption. (b) HQ of four pesticides in true consumers related to squash fruit and leaf consumption.
(a)
PesticideResidue Value (mg/kg)ADIEDI (mg/kg b.w./day)HQ
DimethomorphDay 0Fruit0.360.26.31 × 10−53.16 × 10−4
Leaf69.882.12 × 10−41.06 × 10−3
Day 3Fruit0.193.33 × 10−51.67 × 10−4
Leaf56.711.72 × 10−48.59 × 10−4
Day 7Fruit0.023.51 × 10−61.75 × 10−5
Leaf25.977.86 × 10−53.93 × 10−4
MandipropamidDay 0Fruit0.290.055.08 × 10−51.02 × 10−3
Leaf39.411.19 × 10−42.39 × 10−3
Day 3Fruit0.132.28 × 10−54.56 × 10−4
Leaf27.498.32 × 10−51.66 × 10−3
Day 7Fruit0.081.40 × 10−52.80 × 10−4
Leaf16.865.11 × 10−51.02 × 10−3
MyclobutanilDay 0Fruit0.060.041.05 × 10−52.63 × 10−4
Leaf11.653.53 × 10−58.82 × 10−4
Day 3Fruit0.035.26 × 10−61.31 × 10−4
Leaf9.152.77 × 10−56.93 × 10−4
Day 7Fruit0.011.75 × 10−64.38 × 10−5
Leaf6.071.84 × 10−54.60 × 10−4
MetalaxylDay 0Fruit0.330.075.78 × 10−58.26 × 10−4
Leaf31.719.60 × 10−51.37 × 10−3
Day 3Fruit0.162.80 × 10−54.01 × 10−4
Leaf15.594.72 × 10−56.74 × 10−4
Day 7Fruit0.058.77 × 10−61.25 × 10−4
Leaf8.092.45 × 10−53.50 × 10−4
(b)
PesticideResidue Value (mg/kg)ADIEDI (mg/kg b.w./day)HQ
DimethomorphDay 0Fruit0.360.21.93 × 10−49.65 × 10−4
Leaf69.883.46 × 10−21.73 × 10−1
Day 3Fruit0.191.02 × 10−45.10 × 10−4
Leaf56.712.81 × 10−21.41 × 10−1
Day 7Fruit0.021.07 × 10−55.36 × 10−5
Leaf25.971.29 × 10−26.44 × 10−2
MandipropamidDay 0Fruit0.290.051.56 × 10−43.11 × 10−3
Leaf39.411.95 × 10−23.91 × 10−1
Day 3Fruit0.136.97 × 10−51.39 × 10−3
Leaf27.491.36 × 10−22.72 × 10−1
Day 7Fruit0.084.29 × 10−58.58 × 10−4
Leaf16.868.36 × 10−31.67 × 10−1
MyclobutanilDay 0Fruit0.060.043.22 × 10−58.05 × 10−4
Leaf11.655.77 × 10−31.44 × 10−1
Day 3Fruit0.031.61 × 10−54.02 × 10−4
Leaf9.154.53 × 10−31.13 × 10−1
Day 7Fruit0.015.36 × 10−61.34 × 10−4
Leaf6.073.01 × 10−37.52 × 10−2
MetalaxylDay 0Fruit0.330.071.77 × 10−42.53 × 10−3
Leaf31.711.57 × 10−22.25 × 10−1
Day 3Fruit0.168.58 × 10−51.23 × 10−3
Leaf15.597.73 × 10−31.10 × 10−1
Day 7Fruit0.052.68 × 10−53.83 × 10−4
Leaf8.094.01 × 10−35.73 × 10−2
ADI, acceptable daily intake; EDI, estimated daily intake; HQ, hazard quotient.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

An, D.; Ko, R.; Kim, J.; Lee, K.; Lee, J.-H. Fungicide Dissipation Kinetics and Dietary Exposure Risk Assessment in Squash Fruit and Leaf. Foods 2023, 12, 1291. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12061291

AMA Style

An D, Ko R, Kim J, Lee K, Lee J-H. Fungicide Dissipation Kinetics and Dietary Exposure Risk Assessment in Squash Fruit and Leaf. Foods. 2023; 12(6):1291. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12061291

Chicago/Turabian Style

An, Dai, Rakdo Ko, Jinchan Kim, Kwanghun Lee, and Ji-Ho Lee. 2023. "Fungicide Dissipation Kinetics and Dietary Exposure Risk Assessment in Squash Fruit and Leaf" Foods 12, no. 6: 1291. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12061291

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop