Next Article in Journal
Phytochemical and Flavor Characteristics of Mulberry Juice Fermented with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum BXM2
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparative Study of LC-MS and FIA-(ESI)MS for Quantitation of S-Allyl-L-Cysteine in Aged Garlic Supplements
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Total Quality Management in the Pharmaceutical, Food, and Nutritional Supplement Sectors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Salt-Reduced Fish Sauce Produced under Pressurized Carbon Dioxide Treatment Using Sardinops melanostictus, Trachurus japonicus, Konosirus punctatus, Odontamblyopus lacepedii, Their Collective Mixture, and Unused Fish Mixture

1
Graduate School of Agriculture, Saga University, Saga 840-8502, Japan
2
Faculty of Agriculture, College of Natural Sciences, Institute of Education and Research, Saga University, Saga 840-8502, Japan
3
The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima 890-0065, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2024, 13(17), 2646; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13172646 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 28 June 2024 / Revised: 30 July 2024 / Accepted: 14 August 2024 / Published: 23 August 2024

Abstract

:
Fish sauce is produced at high salt concentrations (>20%) to inhibit the growth of harmful microorganisms. The salt-reduced fish sauce (10% salt) was prepared under pressurized CO2 (pCO2) conditions at 30 °C and 5 MPa for 3 months ( F S C O 2 ), from Sardinops melanostictus, Odontamblyopus lacepedii, Trachurus japonicus, Konosirus punctatus, and their collective mixture, as well as unused fish mixture obtained from the Ariake Sea in Japan. F S C O 2 exhibited significantly better microbial quality and free amino acid content, lighter color, standardized odor (dashi-like odor), and umami richness qualities compared to fish sauces prepared using the conventional method ( F S c o n ) (20% salt), as previously demonstrated, after a fermentation period of 2 months. Bacterial flora analysis implied that the standardization of odor and umami richness may not be the result of specific microbial metabolism. Even when using previously unused fish, it was possible to produce F S C O 2 equivalent to that produced by conventional sardines and other fish. These results indicate that the quality of fish sauce can be improved. The flavor of F S C O 2 became similar regardless of the type of fish and fermentation period using pCO2 during fermentation, leading to the effective utilization of unutilized fish as a resource for high-quality salt-reduced fish sauce.

1. Introduction

Fish sauce is a liquid seasoning made by marinating fish in a high salt concentration and allowing it to digest. It is produced through protein hydrolysis by the action of endogenous proteases in the fish body and the metabolism of contaminating bacteria, which contribute to the formation of a unique flavor during the fermentation process [1]. High salt concentration is essential to inhibit the growth of spoilage bacteria that produce unfavorable flavors and amines in fish sauce [2]. However, consumer demand for salt reduction is increasing, and high salt content hinders the decomposition of fish meat. Salt reduction has been attempted through electrodialysis and the addition of acetic acid [3,4]. However, these methods do not address the retarded decomposition rate of fish meat, despite meeting consumer demand.
We attempted to reduce salt concentration by applying pressurized CO2 (pCO2) during fermentation. Both acidic and anaerobic conditions can be created under pCO2 treatment, which is expected to inhibit the growth of aerobic mesophilic bacteria and prevent the oxidation of fish sauce components. The use of pCO2 eliminates the need for CO2 removal after fermentation because the CO2 dissolved in fish sauce is naturally released after depressurization. Noma et al. [5] demonstrated that reduced-salt (10% of the final salt concentration) sardine fish sauce could be prepared under pCO2 treatment (30 °C and 1–5 MPa for 6 months). The resulting fish sauce had improved qualities, including increased free amino acid content, brightened color, and suppressed characteristic mustiness, compared to the conventional production method under atmospheric pressure with 20% NaCl concentration. Furthermore, Tagawa et al. [6] prepared a fish sauce from Sardinops melanostictus, Odontamblyopus lacepedii, Trachurus japonicus, Konosirus punctatus, and their collective mixture under pCO2 at 30 °C and 5 MPa for 2 months. The quality of the fish sauces ( F S C O 2 ) similarly improved, regardless of the fish species used as the raw material. Interestingly, the flavors (odor and taste) of F S C O 2 tended to be similar to each other. These findings suggest that fish sauce with a standardized flavor can be prepared from unused marine resources. It is unclear whether the advantages of fermentation under CO2 and similarity of flavor among various kinds of fish can also be ensured using a fermentation period longer than 2 months. Therefore, as a continuation of previous experiments, the improvement in fish sauce quality that we observed at 2 months was tested using a longer fermentation period of 3 months. In addition, we have not yet determined whether bacteria produce common flavors in F S C O 2 .
Sardines are the main raw material used in fish sauces worldwide. However, reliance on a specific species of sardine as a raw material may lead to its depletion. In addition, a non-negligible amount of catch is wasted at sea immediately after harvesting, which increases fishing costs. If fish sauce of similar quality to sardines can be produced even if the raw material is a mixture of unused fish, fishery resources can be conserved and fishing costs reduced using these fish as a raw material for fish sauce without having to sort them by species after harvesting. Many fish species have been identified in the Ariake Sea in Japan; however, many remain underutilized because of their low visibility. Therefore, these fish species can be used as raw materials for fish sauce production.
Therefore, to further develop the study of F S C O 2 [6], F S C O 2 was prepared from Sardinops melanostictus, Odontamblyopus lacepedii, Trachurus japonicus, Konosirus punctatus, their collective mixture for a prolonged fermentation period of three months, and its quality was analyzed. In addition, we prepared F S C O 2 from unused fish caught in the Ariake Sea, Japan, and compared its quality with that of sardine F S C O 2 to explore the possibility of using unused fish as raw material for F S C O 2 in terms of stable quality and flavor. The results obtained in the present study will provide an opportunity to valorize underutilized fish as high-quality fish sauce.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Fish Sauces

Sardinops melanostictus, Odontamblyopus lacepedii, Trachurus japonicus, and Konosirus punctatus used in this study were purchased from a local supermarket or fresh fish store on the day the fish sauce preparation was started (Thursday, 4 March 2021), and brought back to the laboratory while being kept on ice. In another set of experiments, fish species that are unused and/or rarely used because of their low commercial value, caught in the Ariake Sea (unused fish), were acquired from a fisherman on the day of fish sauce production (Wednesday, 13 July 2022). S. melanostictus was repurchased on the same day to prepare fish sauce for comparison with the unused fish sauce. The weights and lengths of the fish used in this study are listed in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. Fish sauce was produced according to the method described by Tagawa et al. [5]. Fish sauce using the unused fish was prepared by mixing each fish species according to their composition ratio at the time of fishing in the Ariake Sea (Pennahia argentata:Cynoglossus abbreviatus:Pampus puntatissimus:O. lacepedii = 5:2:2:1 by weight). The fish mixture prepared in the experiment started on 4 March 2021, and 13 July 2022, and was referred to as “collective mixture” and “unused fish mixture”, respectively.

2.2. Fish Sauce Characterization

The degree of fish meat decomposition in the fish sauce mashes was visually observed, and the odor impression was evaluated.

2.3. Viable Mesophilic Bacteria Count

The fish sauce moromi was coarsely filtered through a drainage net and centrifuged (1000× g, 15 min, 4 °C). A volume of 100 μL of fish sauce sample was serially diluted in 0.85% NaCl solution, plated on Tryptic Soy agar (TSA; Difco, Detroit, MI, USA), and incubated at 30 °C for 2 days. Colonies formed on the plate (10–1000 colonies/plate) were counted, and viable counts were expressed as colony-forming units (CFU/mL).

2.4. Biogenic Amine Content

The proteins and fats contained in the fish sauces were removed according to the method described by Noma et al. [5] after rough filtration and centrifugation. The biogenic amine contents of the resulting fish sauces were analyzed using a pre-column derivatization method with dansyl chloride. Briefly, amines in the fish sauce samples and standard amines derivatized with dansyl chloride (Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) were separated by isocratic elution using 75% acetonitrile (Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC, St. Louis, MO, USA) as the mobile phase on an Intersil ODS-SP column (GL-science Inc, Tokyo, Japan) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and a temperature of 40 °C, and detected using a UV detector at a wavelength of 254 nm. The concentration of each amine in the fish sauce samples was determined by comparing the areas of the peaks with retention times matching those of the standard sample. The analysis was performed with an HPLC system, an L-6200 intelligent pump, an L-5090 degasser, and an L-2400 UV detector (Hitachi High-Technologies Co., Tokyo, Japan).

2.5. Free Amino Acid Content

The free amino acid composition of fish sauces without proteins and fats was analyzed using the method described by Noma et al. [5]. Briefly, free amino acids in fish sauces and standard amino acid mixture (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Japan) were derivatized using phenylisothiocyanate (PTC, FUJIFILM Wako, Osaka, Japan) and analyzed using the HPLC system with Wakopak® Wakosil-PTC (4.0 mm × 250 mm, FUJIFILM Wako) under a gradient condition from 0% (0 min) to 70% (15 min) of solvent B at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min at 40 °C, and detection was performed at 254 nm. Eluents A and B were specifically designed for analysis using a column (FUJIFILM Wako). The concentration of free amino acids was determined by comparing the peak areas in fish sauces with a standard amino acid mixture.

2.6. Organic Acid Analysis

After defatting and deproteinizing the fish sauce, 25 µL of the fish sauce samples were analyzed with the Nexera XR organic acid analysis system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The concentration of each organic acid in the fish sauce samples was calculated by comparing the peak areas with those of a standard organic acid mixture.

2.7. Sensory Evaluation

The odor of the fish sauce was evaluated using a two-point test. Ten non-trained panelists (four males and six females, ages 21–24) participated in the test. The test was conducted to confirm whether an untrained panel representing typical consumers could distinguish between F S c o n and F S C O 2 . Two milliliters of the fish sauce sample was placed in a test tube and covered with aluminum foil so that the type of sample could not be determined visually from its appearance. Each test tube containing a fish sauce sample was randomly assigned a three-digit number, and the samples were allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 min before sensory testing. The panels were asked to select the one fish sauce with stronger putrefactive odor, fishy smell, rancid odor, shore scent, soup stock-like scent, and preferable odor when comparing between F S C O 2 and F S c o n prepared from each fish species. A binomial distribution with p = 1/2 was used for the significant difference test.

2.8. Analysis of Volatile Compounds

Volatile compounds in the fish sauce were analyzed by solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (SPME-GC-MS) according to Tagawa et al. (2022) [6]. In brief, fish sauce samples in glass sample bottles were absorbed at 37 °C for 40 min on SPME fiber (divinylbenzene dispersion/dimethylsiloxane, SUPELCO, MilliporeSigma, Darmstadt, Germany) and desorbed at 210 °C for 10 min within the GC-MS (GC-MS-QP2010, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) for analysis. DB-WAX (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 µm film thickness) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used for the separation of the volatiles. After GC-MS, a similarity score was calculated for the detected peaks (peak area > 100,000) according to the following formula, where nFS and mFS represent the number of peaks in each fish sauce and the number of fish sauces containing the compound (mFS takes the value 1–5), respectively:
S i m i l a r i t y   s c o r e = ( n F S × m F S ) n F S   a t   m F S

2.9. Taste Evaluation Using a Taste Sensor

The taste of each fish sauce was evaluated using a TS-5000Z system (Intelligent Sensor Technology, Inc., Kanagawa, Japan).

2.10. Bacterial Flora Analysis by Next-Generation Sequencing

Total DNA was extracted from the fish sauce using an extraction kit (DNA Suisui-E without skim milk, RIZO Inc., Ibaraki, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. 16S rRNA (V4) amplicon metagenomic sequencing and determination of operational taxonomic units as relative abundances were performed by Novogen Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).

2.11. Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed as averages of the triplicate measurements ± standard deviation. Principal component analysis (PCA) of free amino acid content and taste was performed using JMP Pro 17.0.0 (JMP Statistical Discovery LLC, Cary, NC, USA). Significant differences in viable count, amine content, and organic acid content were determined using Student’s t-test and/or Tukey–Kramer’s method at p < 0.05, using Bell Curve for Excel 3.21 (Social Survey Research Information Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

3. Results and Discussion

In this study, fish sauces were prepared from various fish under pCO2 conditions for three months. For F S C O 2 , mesophilic bacteria were not detected. The brighter color and more similar and less distinctive flavor, regardless of the raw material, were characteristics of the F S C O 2 . These improved qualities were equal to or greater than those of 2-month F S C O 2 [6], suggesting that extending the fermentation period was favorable for improving the quality of F S C O 2 . Interestingly, the quality of F S C O 2 prepared from the unused fish mixture was comparable to that of sardines, the most popular raw material for fish sauce.

3.1. Characterization of F S C O 2

3.1.1. Appearance, Odor Impressions, and Color

The appearance and odor impressions of F S C O 2 and F S c o n mashes are summarized in Table 3. The fish sauce mash was not subjected to the conventional residue separation procedures used in the preparation of fish sauce, such as filtration, and thus exhibited pronounced turbidity. This observation suggests that the fish may still be undergoing decomposition. Fish meat decomposition was better in F S C O 2 mash than in F S c o n mash. F S C O 2 mash commonly had a soup stock-like odor, although F S C O 2 prepared from O. lacepedi has a characteristic odor. However, the characteristic fishy and pungent odor impressions of each raw material were observed in F S c o n mashes. The odor tended to be more average in both the F S c o n and the F S c o n mashes when the collective mixture was used as the raw material. As shown in Figure 1, the color of F S C O 2 was lighter than F S c o n regardless of fish species. Color formation during fish sauce fermentation can be attributed to the Maillard reaction. The Maillard reaction is initiated by the formation of a Schiff base by the reaction between amino and carbonyl compounds and produces melanoidin at the end of the reaction series, resulting in browning. F S C O 2 was prepared under CO2-generated anaerobic conditions that suppressed aldehyde formation via lipid oxidation. Horikawa [7] reported that in the middle stage of the Maillard reaction, the Amadori rearrangement proceeds relatively close to neutral. pCO2 caused the acidification of the fish sauce, which retarded the progress of the reactions after the middle stage.

3.1.2. Microbial Quality

Lopetchant et al. [8] reported that a salinity of more than 20% inhibited the growth of bacteria to an extent that did not adversely affect the quality of fish sauce. Figure 2 shows the viable mesophilic bacterial counts in each fish sauce. The counts in F S c o n prepared from O. lacepedii, T. japonicus, or their collective mixtures exceeded 106 CFU/mL. In an experiment comparing S. melanostictus and unused fish mixture, mesophilic bacteria were detected in both F S c o n . Therefore, 20% salinity was insufficient to inhibit mesophilic bacterial growth. Wang et al. [9] reported that the microbial flora in fish sauce changed dramatically during each fermentation period. In addition, bacterial flora and fish vary greatly with the season [10,11]. The growth inhibition effect of 20% salinity was not consistent with that observed in our previous report, with a shorter fermentation period (2 months) and the season at the start of fermentation [6].
F S C O 2 did not contain any detectable mesophilic bacteria, despite 10% salinity. The difference in viable counts between F S c o n and F S C O 2 was significant for O. lacepedii, T. japonicus, and their mixture. Mesophilic bacteria in F S C O 2 may be inactivated under acidic pH, anaerobicity, and high pressure caused by pCO2 [12]. Higher CO2 pressure increases the permeability and fluidity of bacterial membranes, causing a decrease in phosphoglycerides relative to phosphatidylethanolamine, which may be essential for microbial growth, and its reduction may lead to microbial inactivation. Changes in the charge balance on the membrane surface owing to a decrease in the pH of the membrane may also cause inactivation. Furthermore, pCO2 causes destruction of cell surface or cellular tissue [13,14,15] and inactivation of microbial enzymes [16]. Anaerobic conditions were generated during the F S C O 2 fermentation process as CO2 was dissolved in the salt solution with fish and filled the pressure-resistant vessel. As many mesophilic bacteria grow aerobically, anaerobic conditions under pCO2 conditions may inhibit their growth. Mesophilic bacteria were not detected regardless of the fish species in F S C O 2 . This result is in agreement with Tagawa et al. [6], indicating that factors such as the length of the fermentation period and fishing season have no effect on the suppression of mesophilic bacteria in F S C O 2 , and the pCO2 condition is suitable for producing fish sauce with more stable quality.
Biogenic amines are commonly present in fermented foods [17,18]. According to the Codex standards [19], the concentration of histamine should not exceed 400 ppm, as it has the greatest effects on the human body, including nausea and headache among the amines [20,21]. Histamine production in fish is primarily attributed to histidine decarboxylase enzymes of histamine-producing bacteria [22]. High concentrations of tyramine cause headaches and other physiological effects at high concentrations [22,23,24]. Putrescine, cadaverine, and spermidine do not have physiological effects by themselves, but they enhance the physiological effects of histamine and tyramine or inhibit enzymes that decompose histamine [25,26]. Table 4 presents the biogenic amine content of each fish sauce sample. The average contents of putrescine and cadaverine in F S c o n and F S C O 2 were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those of the other three amines. The mean putrescine and cadaverine levels were also higher in F S C O 2 than in F S c o n Histamine was detected at levels below the Codex specification (40 mg/mL) in both F S c o n and F S C O 2 . Uehara et al. [27] reported that histamine production was higher when fish with internal organs underwent fermentation. Noma et al. (2020) reported that histamine was not detected in F S c o n and F S C O 2 after 6 months of fermentation of sardines with the removal of internal organs under pCO2 [5].

3.2. Flavor Quality of F S C O 2

3.2.1. Odor

The volatile compounds in each fish sauce were analyzed using GC-MS, and the obtained peaks with areas larger than 100,000 were compared. For F S c o n , the numbers of S. melanostictus, O. lacepedii, T. japonicus, K. punctatus, and their collective mixture were 63, 55, 44, 57, and 63, respectively. For F S C O 2 , the numbers of peaks were 42, 37, 43, 35, and 37 for S. melanostictus, O. lacepedii, T. japonicus, K. punctatus, and their collective mixture, respectively. The numbers of peaks commonly observed for each fish sauce are shown in Figure 3. For example, 16 peaks observed in F S c o n prepared from S. melanostictus were also detected in the three types of F S c o n . For F S c o n prepared from S, O, T, and M, the number of volatile compounds contained in the sample was greater than 17. The peaks common to all F S C O 2 were not specific to F S C O 2 , and were also common to all or some of the F S c o n . The ratio of the number of peaks specific to one fish species or common to two fish species was 47.5% in F S c o n , which was higher than that in F S C O 2 (35.0%). The ratio of the peaks specific to F S c o n was calculated as 66.3%. Therefore, the results suggest that F S c o n contains fish-specific odor components, while F S C O 2 enables the production of fish sauce with a reduced fish-specific odor.
The peak similarity score, which indicates how many fish species the volatile compounds present in each F S C O 2 and F S c o n were common to on average, was calculated. Fish sauces with higher scores indicated higher similarity in volatile compounds among fish sauces. The score for F S C O 2 was 3.27 and that for F S c o n was 2.77. Thus, the fish sauce preparation methods with higher scores indicated a higher similarity of volatile compounds among the fish sauces, indicating that the volatile compound profiles of F S C O 2 were more similar than those of F S c o n . This result was consistent with the observation that the unique odor of the fish species was suppressed, and the common odor of fish sauce was a soup stock-like odor in F S C O 2 (Table 3). A 16% increase in the percentage of peaks commonly present in F S C O 2 was observed in the unused fish mixture, indicating that the types of volatile compounds tended to be similar. The odor characteristic of F S C O 2 showed a decreased fish-specific odor and an increased soup stock-like odor. This result is consistent with those observed in the sensory analysis in this study.
Table 5 shows the odor attributes with significant differences (p < 0.05) and significant trends (p < 0.11) in F S C O 2 by sensory evaluation. The quantification of the odor impressions is shown in Table 3. In F S C O 2 , putrefactive and rancid odors were reduced, preferred odors were enhanced regardless of the fish species, and the soup stock-like scent tended to be enhanced. In addition, when comparing the S. melanosticus and the unused fish mixtures, similar differences were observed. These trends were in agreement with those of some 2-month fish sauces [6], and the longer fermentation period of 3 months in the present study tended to improve the odor of F S C O 2 . This suggests that a fermentation period of 3 months or longer is preferable for the production of F S C O 2 in terms of odor. Furthermore, all panelists distinguished between F S C O 2 and F S c o n prepared from S. melanostictus and an unused fish mixture. However, more than half of the panelists could not distinguish between F S C O 2 prepared from a mixture of S. melanostictus and the unused fish mixture. The results of both GC-MS and sensory analyses demonstrated that the F S C O 2 exhibited a comparable odor profile, suggesting that pCO₂ can be employed to generate fish sauces with a similar odor profile, even when utilizing unspecified fish as the raw material.

3.2.2. Taste

The taste analyzers recognized three types of first tastes (salty, umami, bitterness and miscellaneous), and two types of aftertastes (bitter and umami). Figure 4 shows a radar plot comparing the tastes detected in F S C O 2 and F S c o n . The radar shape varied with F S c o n , and the bitterness of miscellaneous tastes commonly decreased in F S C O 2 .This tendency was more pronounced in 3-month fish sauce compared than in 2-month fish sauce [6]. Figure 4 shows the PCA of the tastes detected in F S C O 2 and F S c o n . The distribution of F S c o n is scattered, whereas that of F S C O 2 is similar. These results suggest that the taste of F S c o n reflects the characteristics of each raw fish, whereas in F S C O 2 , regardless of the raw fish, the tastes converged to the same family, characterized by enhanced umami richness and reduced bitterness.
Table 6 shows the amount of free amino acids in each fish sauce sample. The total amounts of free amino acids in F S C O 2 prepared from S. melanostictus, O. lacepedii, T. japonicus, K. punctatus, and their collective mixture, respectively, were 1.9, 2.2, 1.3, 1.7, and 1.4 times and significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those in F S c o n . Furthermore, a significant (p < 0.05) increase in total free amino acid content was observed in the F S C O 2 prepared from the unused fish mixture. Free amino acids are produced by endogenous proteases and the contaminating bacteria [1]. Endogenous acid proteases can effectively hydrolyze fish proteins in a pCO2 environment because the number of contaminating bacteria may be reduced under such conditions.
Therefore, the enrichment of total free amino acid content is a universal phenomenon in F S C O 2 regardless of fish type. Figure 5 shows the principal component analysis of the proportions of free amino acids in each fish sauce. The free amino acid composition appeared to be divided into two groups, depending on PC1 between F S C O 2 and F S c o n . Glutamic acid, a typical umami amino acid, does not always constitute this group. The PCA results indicate that the free amino acid composition did not provide sufficient evidence for enhanced umami taste and umami richness. Imai et al. [28] reported that the bitter taste was not caused mainly by free amino acids but by peptides such as carnosine and glutathione. Kuroda et al. [29] reported that a tripeptide, glutamylvalylglycine, detected in fermented foods such as fish sauce, has umami richness.
Jung et al. [30] and Ohshima et al. [1] reported that microbial metabolism during fermentation plays an important role in flavor formation in fermented fish-based foods. Wang et al. [31] reported that the peptides in fish sauce are formed by the hydrolysis of fish proteins by microbial proteases. Therefore, the bacterial flora of each fish sauce was analyzed using 16S rRNA amplicon analysis and presented as relative ratios of the bacterial flora (Figure 6). In all raw fish, the bacterial flora changed with the different methods of fish sauce preparation. However, the dominant species in both the F S C O 2 and F S c o n collective mixture were staphylococci. The diversity of microflora appeared to increase in CO2 fish sauces. The bacterial flora in fish sauce could not be clearly characterized by F S C O 2 and F S c o n . It is difficult to infer which bacteria contribute to the common flavor observed in F S C O 2 . The bacterial flora in fish sauce changes during fermentation [8]. The fermented foods contained dead cells, which were also detected using 16S rRNA amplicon analysis. In addition, 16S rRNA amplicon analysis could not quantify the absolute number of viable cells. Therefore, it is necessary to examine viable cells quantitatively and over time to identify the bacterial species that have a significant impact on flavor similarity.
The organic acid composition was similar for all types of F S C O 2 , and a high lactic acid content was commonly observed in F S C O 2 (Table 7). The types of organic acids used varied depending on the raw material used in F S c o n . The average lactic acid content of F S C O 2 tended to be higher (p = 0.07) than that of F S c o n . Lactic acid has a peculiar soft acidity and a low-acid smell. Acidity was not detected in F S C O 2 (Table 3 and Figure 4), suggesting that the organic acids had no significant effect on the flavor of F S C O 2 . Lactic acid in fish sauce is produced by lactic acid bacteria or rigorous mortis [32,33]. However, positive evidence that lactic acid bacteria accumulated lactic acid at high concentrations was not obtained from the microflora analysis (Figure 6). In addition, production via the rigor mortis process provides a clear explanation for the difference in lactic acid content between F S C O 2 and F S c o n prepared from O. lacepedii and T. japonicus.

4. Conclusions

The present study revealed that pCO2 treatment during the fermentation of fish sauces caused significant species-independent quality improvement and flavor similarity, suggesting that a fermentation period of three months or longer is suitable for achieving stable quality improvement compared with two months. However, bacterial flora analyses of fish sauces after preparation could not predict which bacteria were responsible for the similarity in flavor. Further analysis of the microbial flora over time is needed to link microorganisms and flavor formation, leading to a more stable production of F S C O 2 . In addition, the use of an unused fish mixture in the present study produced a flavor similar to that produced by sardines. These results fully support our future vision for the use of CO2 in fish sauce production, as described in our previous paper. Although this study was conducted using unutilized fish harvested in Japan, the problem of unutilized fish is not limited to this country. Therefore, similar experiments using a variety of underutilized fish harvested from more diverse regions are desirable in the future. Furthermore, small-quantity use-up packs, as seen in many kinds of salt-reduced foods, are one solution to ensure the microbial safety of F S C O 2 for practical use.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.T. and S.N.; methodology, J.T., M.D. and S.N.; validation, J.T.; investigation, J.T.; resources, S.N.; data curation, J.T.; writing—original draft preparation, J.T.; writing—review and editing, M.D. and S.N.; visualization, S.N.; supervision, S.N.; project administration, S.N.; funding acquisition, S.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (grant number 20K02406) and the 2017 Preliminary Research Subsidy Project related to functional research of agriculture, forestry, and fishery products, foods, etc., by the Foundation of the Saga Prefecture Regional Industry Support Center.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review of sensory testing in this study was waived by Ethics Review Committee, Saga University Faculty of Medicine.

Informed Consent Statement

Ethical review of sensory testing in this study was waived by Ethics Review Committee, Saga University Faculty of Medicine. However, for ethical considerations, the information related to the experiment was fully explained to the panelists who might participate in the experiment before the start of the experiment, and only those who agreed to participate in the sensory testing were allowed to do so.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support by the Analytical Research Center for Experimental Sciences, Saga University, and the support by the ‘Project for Promoting Public Utilization of Advanced Research Infrastructure’ for the taste sensor analysis and SPME-GC-MS analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ohshima, C.; Takahashi, H.; Insang, S.; Phraephaisarn, C.; Techaruvichit, P.; Khumthong, R.; Haraguchi, H.; Lopetcharat, K.; Keeratipibul, S. Next-generation sequencing reveals predominant bacterial communities during fermentation of Thai fish sauce in large manufacturing plants. LWT 2019, 114, 108375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mohamed, H.N.; Man, Y.C.; Mustafa, S.; Manap, Y.A. Tentative identification of volatile flavor compounds in commercial Budu, a Malaysian fish sauce, using GC-MS. Molecules 2012, 17, 5062–5080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Raksakulthal, N.; Harrd, N.F. Correlation between the con centration of peptides and amino acids and the flavour of fish sauce. ASEAN Food J. 1992, 7, 86–90. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gildberg, A.; Hermes, J.E.; Orejana, F.M. Acceleration of autolysis during fish sauce fermentation by adding acid and reducing the salt content. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1984, 35, 1363–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Noma, S.; Koyanagi, L.; Kawano, S.; Hayashi, N. Application of pressurized carbon dioxide during salt-reduced sardine fish sauce production. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2020, 26, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tagawa, J.; Noma, S.; Demura, M.; Hayashi, N. Comparison of reduced-salt fish sauces produced under pressurized carbon dioxide treatment from Sardinops melanostictus, Trachurus japonicus, Konosirus punctatus, Odontamblyopus lacepedii, and their mixture. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2023, 16, 434–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Horikawa, H. Glycation of protein: Primarily on the Maillard reaction. J. Tokyo Women’s Med. Univ. 2004, 74, 667–672. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  8. Lopetcharat, K.; Choi, Y.J.; Park, J.W.; Daeschel, M. Fish sauce products and manufacturing: A review. Food Rev. Int. 2001, 17, 65–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Zhao, Y.; Li, L.; Yang, X.; Wu, Y.; Chen, S.; Cen, J.; Yang, S.; Yang, D. Novel insight into the formation mechanism of volatile flavor in Chinese fish sauce (Yu-lu) based on molecular sensory and metagenomics analysis. Food Chem. 2020, 323, 126839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gilbert, J.A.; Steele, J.A.; Caporaso, J.G.; Steinbrück, L.; Temperton, J.R.B.; Huse, S.; McHardy, A.C.; Knight, R.; Joint, I.; Somerfield, P.; et al. Defining seasonal marine microbial community dynamics. ISME J. 2012, 6, 298–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pereira, C.; Salvador, S.; Arrojado, C.; Silva, Y.; Santos, A.L.; Cunha, Â.; Gomesa, N.; Almeida, A. Evaluating seasonal dynamics of bacterial communities in marine fish aquaculture: A preliminary study before applying phage therapy. J. Environ. Monit. 2011, 13, 1053–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Okubo, A.; Kuniyoshi, N.; Noma, S.; Demura, M.; Hayashi, N. Effective bacterial control during fish sauce production under pressurized CO2. Food Preserv. Sci. 2022, 48, 157–164. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Yu, T.; Niu, L.; Iwahashi, H. High-pressure carbon dioxide used for pasteurization in food industry. Food Eng. Rev. 2020, 12, 364–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liao, H.; Zhang, F.; Liao, X.; Hu, X.; Chen, Y.; Deng, L. Analysis of Escherichia coli cell damage induced by HPCD using microscopies and fluorescent staining. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 144, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Niu, L.Y.; Nomura, K.; Iwahashi, H.; Matsuoka, H.; Kawachi, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Tamura, K. Petit-high pressure carbon dioxide stress increases synthesis of S-adenosylmethionine and phosphatidylcholine in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biophys. Chem. 2017, 231, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, F.; Feng, X.; Sui, X.; Lin, X.; Lin, H.; Han, Y. Inactivation mechanism of Vibrio parahaemolyticus via supercritical carbon dioxide treatment. Food Res. Int. 2017, 100, 232–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Arulkumar, A.; Paramithiotis, S.; Paramasivam, S. Biogenic amines in fresh fish and fishery products and emerging control. Aquac. Fish. 2023, 8, 431–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ma, X.; Sang, X.; Yan, C.; Zhang, Y.; Bi, J.; Zhang, G.; Hao, H.; Hou, H. Dynamics of bacterial composition and association with quality formation and biogenic amines accumulation during fish sauce spontaneous fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 88, e00690-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. DeBeer, J.; Bell, J.W.; Nolte, F.; Arcieri, J.; Correa, G. Histamine limits by country: A survey and review. J. Food Prot. 2021, 84, 1610–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Taylor, S.L.; Keefe, T.J.; Windham, E.S.; Howell, J.F. Outbreak of histamine poisoning associated with consumption of Swiss cheese. J. Food Prot. 1982, 45, 455–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jarisch, R.; Wantke, F. Wine and headache. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 1996, 110, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Arnold, S.H.; Brown, W.D. Histamine (?) toxicity from fish products. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 1978, 24, 113–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rice, S.L.; Koehler, P.E. Tyrosine and histidine decarboxylase activities of Pediococcus cerevisiae and Lactobacillus species and the production of tyramine in fermented sausages. J. Food Protect. 1976, 39, 166–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. VanDenBerg, C.M.; Blob, L.F.; Kemper, E.M.; Azzaro, A.J. Tyramine pharmacokinetics and reduced bioavailability with food. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2013, 43, 604–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bulushi, I.A.; Poole, S.; Deeth, H.C.; Dykes, G.A. Biogenic amines in fish: Roles in intoxication, spoilage, and nitrosamine formation—A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 49, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Stratton, J.E.; Hutkins, W.R.; Taylor, S.L. Biogenic amines in cheese and other fermented foods. A review. J. Food Prot. 1991, 54, 460–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Uehara, N.; Yasuda, A.; Maeda, T.; Noguchi, T. Effect of temperature control on histamine producing bacteria in fresh fish. Ann. Rep. Miyazaki Pref. Inst. Public Health Environ. 2017, 32, 69–71. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  28. Imai, Y.; Ito, E.; Higuchi, S. Evaluation of enhancement of tastes by the combination dashi using the taste sensor and amino acid analysis. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Japanese Association for the Study of Taste and Smell, Saitama, Japan, 29–31 October 2018; pp. 91–94. (In Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuroda, M.; Kato, Y.; Yamazaki, J.; Kai, Y.; Mizukoshi, T.; Miyano, H.; Eto, Y. Determination and quantification of γ-glutamyl-valyl-glycine in commercial fish sauces. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 7291–7296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jung, M.Y.; Kim, T.W.; Lee, C.; Kim, J.Y.; Song, H.S.; Kim, Y.B.; Ahn, S.W.; Kim, J.S.; Roh, S.W.; Lee, S.H. Role of jeotgal, a Korean traditional fermented fish sauce, in microbial dynamics and metabolite profiles during kimchi fermentation. Food Chem. 2018, 265, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Li, C.; Zhao, Y.; Xiang, H.; Li, L.; Yang, X.; Chen, S.; Sun, L.; Qi, B. Genome-resolved metaproteomic analysis of microbiota and metabolic pathways involved in taste formation during Chinese traditional fish sauce (Yu-lu) fermentation. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 851895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. König, K.; Fröhlich, J. Lactic Acid Bacteria. In Biology of Microorganisms on Grapes, in Must and in Wine, 2nd ed.; König, H., Unden, G., Fröhlich, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 3–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nazir, D.J.; Magar, N.G. Biochemical changes in fish muscle during rigor mortis. J. Food Sci. 1963, 28, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Appearances of fish sauce mashes. S, S. melanostictus; O, O. lacepedii; T, T. japonicus; K, K. punctatus; M, collective mixture; S*, S. melanostictus; U*, unused fish mixture. * The set of experiments comparing F S C O 2 prepared from S. melanostictus and an unused fish mixture.
Figure 1. Appearances of fish sauce mashes. S, S. melanostictus; O, O. lacepedii; T, T. japonicus; K, K. punctatus; M, collective mixture; S*, S. melanostictus; U*, unused fish mixture. * The set of experiments comparing F S C O 2 prepared from S. melanostictus and an unused fish mixture.
Foods 13 02646 g001
Figure 2. Viable mesophilic counts of each fish sauce. S, S. melanostictus; O, O. lacepedii; T, T. japonicus; K, K. punctatus; M, collective mixture; S*, S. melanostictus; U*, unused fish mixture. Gray bars indicate F S c o n . *1 Not detected. * Set of experiments comparing F S C O 2 prepared from S. melanostictus (S*) and an unused fish mixture (U*).
Figure 2. Viable mesophilic counts of each fish sauce. S, S. melanostictus; O, O. lacepedii; T, T. japonicus; K, K. punctatus; M, collective mixture; S*, S. melanostictus; U*, unused fish mixture. Gray bars indicate F S c o n . *1 Not detected. * Set of experiments comparing F S C O 2 prepared from S. melanostictus (S*) and an unused fish mixture (U*).
Foods 13 02646 g002
Figure 3. The numbers of peaks commonly observed in each fish sauce. S, S. melanostictus; O, O. lacepedii; T, T. japonicus; K, K. punctatus; M, collective mixture.
Figure 3. The numbers of peaks commonly observed in each fish sauce. S, S. melanostictus; O, O. lacepedii; T, T. japonicus; K, K. punctatus; M, collective mixture.
Foods 13 02646 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of tastes detected in F S C O 2 and F S c o n with radar charts and their PCA. Blue and red lines/dots in the graphs indicate F S C O 2 and F S c o n , respectively. Blue and red dots on PCA graphs show F S C O 2 and F S c o n , respectively. S, S. melanostictus; O, O. lacepedii; T, T. japonicus; K, K. punctatus; M, collective mixture; S*, S. melanostictus; U*, unused fish mixture. * The set of experiments comparing F S C O 2 prepared from S. melanostictus (S*) and an unused fish mixture (U*).
Figure 4. Comparison of tastes detected in F S C O 2 and F S c o n with radar charts and their PCA. Blue and red lines/dots in the graphs indicate F S C O 2 and F S c o n , respectively. Blue and red dots on PCA graphs show F S C O 2 and F S c o n , respectively. S, S. melanostictus; O, O. lacepedii; T, T. japonicus; K, K. punctatus; M, collective mixture; S*, S. melanostictus; U*, unused fish mixture. * The set of experiments comparing F S C O 2 prepared from S. melanostictus (S*) and an unused fish mixture (U*).
Foods 13 02646 g004
Figure 5. PCA analysis of free amino acid relative composition of fish sauces. Blue and red dots in the graphs indicate F S C O 2 and F S c o n , respectively. S, S. melanostictus; O, O. lacepedii; T, T. japonicus; K, K. punctatus; M, collective mixture.
Figure 5. PCA analysis of free amino acid relative composition of fish sauces. Blue and red dots in the graphs indicate F S C O 2 and F S c o n , respectively. S, S. melanostictus; O, O. lacepedii; T, T. japonicus; K, K. punctatus; M, collective mixture.
Foods 13 02646 g005
Figure 6. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing analysis and presented as relative ratios of microbiota. S, S. melanostictus; O, O. lacepedii; T, T. japonicus; K, K. punctatus; M, collective mixture.
Figure 6. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing analysis and presented as relative ratios of microbiota. S, S. melanostictus; O, O. lacepedii; T, T. japonicus; K, K. punctatus; M, collective mixture.
Foods 13 02646 g006
Table 1. Average weights and lengths of fishes used for fish sauce production.
Table 1. Average weights and lengths of fishes used for fish sauce production.
Single UseCollective Mixture
Weight (g)Length (cm)Weight (g)Length (cm)
S. melanostictus982310924
O. lacepedii30264029
T. japonicus2102818927
K. punctatus1732516425
Table 2. Weights and lengths of fishes (S. melanosticus and unused fish mixture) used for each fish sauce preparation.
Table 2. Weights and lengths of fishes (S. melanosticus and unused fish mixture) used for each fish sauce preparation.
Single Use Unused Fish Mixture
Weight (g)Length (cm) Weight (g)Length (cm)
S. melanosticus101.222P. argentata5.128.6
C. abbreviatus6.797.1
P. punctatissimus8.6412.8
O. lacepedii15.6520.7
Table 3. Appearances and odor impressions of F S C O 2 and F S c o n mashes.
Table 3. Appearances and odor impressions of F S C O 2 and F S c o n mashes.
Raw MaterialsFSDecomposition Degree of Fish MeatOdor
S. melanostictus F S c o n Almost completelythick
F S C O 2 Completelya little savory, soup stock-like, and stronger than the F S c o n
O. lacepedii F S c o n Incompletefishy, soup stock-like, and characteristic smell of O. lacepedii
F S C O 2 More than the F S c o n a little savory, soup stock-like, and light
T. japonicus F S c o n Completelyfishy, a little soup stock-like, and pungent
F S C O 2 Almost completelysavory, soup stock-like, stronger than the F S c o n
K. punctatus F S c o n Almost completely F S c o n of S. melanostictus-like, a little savory, and characteristic smell of K. punctatus
F S C O 2 Almost completelya little savory, stronger than the F S c o n , and light
Collective mixture F S c o n Almost completelymixed odor of the 4 kinds of fishes
F S C O 2 Almost completelymixed odor of the 4 kinds of fishes, light, savoy, a little soup stock-like
* S. melanostictus F S c o n soup stock-like
F S C O 2 Almostsoup stock-like
* Unused fish
mixture
F S c o n sour and pungent
F S C O 2 Almost completelysoup stock-like, shore-like, and a little rancid
* The descriptions below the double lines are for the set of experiments comparing F S C O 2 prepared from S. melanostictus and an unused fish mixture.
Table 4. Biogenic amine content (mg/100 mL) of each fish sauce.
Table 4. Biogenic amine content (mg/100 mL) of each fish sauce.
F S c o n F S C O 2 F S c o n F S C O 2
SOTKMSOTKMS*U*S*U*
Putrescine433537424357767359621141009790
Cadaverine191214127393860375731265244
Histamine126200405570000
Tyramine42200224111000
Spermidine870003273410101414
S, S. melanostictus; O, O. lacepedii; T, T. japonicus; K, K. punctatus; M, collective mixture; S*, S. melanostictus; U*, an unused fish mixture. * The set of experiments comparing F S C O 2 prepared from S. melanostictus (S*) and an unused fish mixture (U*).
Table 5. Odor attributes for which a significant difference or significant tendency was observed in F S C O 2 .
Table 5. Odor attributes for which a significant difference or significant tendency was observed in F S C O 2 .
ReducedEnhanced
Odor AttributePutrefactiveFishyRancidShores ScentSoup Stock-LikePreferred
p < 0.05S, O, T, K, MMS, T, K, M-O, T, K, MS, O, T, K, M
p < 0.11--OS, O, T, KS-
p < 0.05S*, U*U*U*-S*, U*U*
p < 0.11-S*S*--S*
S, S. melanostictus; O, O. lacepedii; T, T. japonicus; K, K. punctatus; M, collective mixture; S*, S. melanostictus; U*, unused fish mixture. * The set of experiments comparing F S C O 2 prepared from S. melanostictus (S*) and an unused fish mixture (U*).
Table 6. Free amino acid content (mg/100 mL) of each fish sauce.
Table 6. Free amino acid content (mg/100 mL) of each fish sauce.
F S c o n F S C O 2 F S c o n F S C O 2
SOTKMSOTKMS*U*S*U*
Gly6732130444922415318313315001118078
Ala200116374131150425351430329338312265286222
Val116107160126148200162208163175231196225159
Leu227165305230306380385470336363275253363263
Ile13391192149189233193285211246196174270158
Ser86075718141137881008900116125
Thr807113182100150153167118151163172174171
Cys32779497372463673516901510
Met22621673072132137176145191126111151110
Phe8526835425611655183137144175147
Tyr99758876848116310986100163639090
Trp8177163109146197182247179220- **---
Pro58008176160118186174222870209116
Asn7600740173001220----
Asp402877407410113070116911181339090
Glu6842594163145159797310571118175140
Lys5623916526121154189164137129447214215165
Arg3051873433074373313233133552290200228201
His96672061271541561322981782882840170211
Total18501418278218282292351131243574307932212679215431682446
S, S. melanostictus; O, O. lacepedii; T, T. japonicus; K, K. punctatus; M, collective mixture; S*, S. melanostictus; U*, unused fish mixture. * The set of experiments comparing F S C O 2 prepared from S. melanostictus (S*) and an unused fish mixture (U*). ** Not determined.
Table 7. Organic acid content (mg/100 mL) of each fish sauce.
Table 7. Organic acid content (mg/100 mL) of each fish sauce.
F S c o n F S C O 2
SOTKMSOTKM
Citric3.312.91.36.92.65.61.73.612.210.9
Pyruvic4.03.012.96.91.31.70.04.00.00.0
Malic6.61.00.07.35.68.33.02.69.212.5
Succinic4.63.00.03.330.76.93.63.62.019.5
Lactic3442.63.353546.2345172738541865
Formic18.20.00.014.91.71.71.32.63.32.3
Acetic11.22591.715.83526.94.315.85.636.6
Butyric0.00.30.00.30.00.00.00.00.00.0
Isovaleric14.521.130.028.445.90.00.00.00.00.0
S, S. melanostictus; O, O. lacepedii; T, T. japonicus; K, K. punctatus; M, collective mixture.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tagawa, J.; Demura, M.; Noma, S. Salt-Reduced Fish Sauce Produced under Pressurized Carbon Dioxide Treatment Using Sardinops melanostictus, Trachurus japonicus, Konosirus punctatus, Odontamblyopus lacepedii, Their Collective Mixture, and Unused Fish Mixture. Foods 2024, 13, 2646. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13172646

AMA Style

Tagawa J, Demura M, Noma S. Salt-Reduced Fish Sauce Produced under Pressurized Carbon Dioxide Treatment Using Sardinops melanostictus, Trachurus japonicus, Konosirus punctatus, Odontamblyopus lacepedii, Their Collective Mixture, and Unused Fish Mixture. Foods. 2024; 13(17):2646. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13172646

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tagawa, Johma, Mikihide Demura, and Seiji Noma. 2024. "Salt-Reduced Fish Sauce Produced under Pressurized Carbon Dioxide Treatment Using Sardinops melanostictus, Trachurus japonicus, Konosirus punctatus, Odontamblyopus lacepedii, Their Collective Mixture, and Unused Fish Mixture" Foods 13, no. 17: 2646. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13172646

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop