Next Article in Journal
Salmonella in Wild Boar Meat: Prevalence and Risk Assessment in Central Italy (Umbria and Marche Region)
Previous Article in Journal
Composition and Functional Properties of the Edible Spear and By-Products from Asparagus officinalis L. and Their Potential Prebiotic Effect
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Milk and Dairy Products in Croatia: A Health Risk Assessment

1
Laboratory for Residue Control, Department of Veterinary Public Health, Croatian Veterinary Institute, Savska cesta 143, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Veterinary and Food Safety Directorate, Ministry of Agriculture of Republic of Croatia, Planinska 2a, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2024, 13(8), 1155; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13081155
Submission received: 7 March 2024 / Revised: 3 April 2024 / Accepted: 5 April 2024 / Published: 10 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Contaminants and Human Health)

Abstract

:
The aim of this study was to evaluate contamination levels and the frequency of detection of organochlorine (OCPs) and organophosphate pesticides (OPPs), pyrethroids, carbamates and polychlorinated biphenyls (seven PCB congeners) in a total of 534 samples of cow’s, sheep’s and goat’s milk and dairy products from Croatia. Concentrations above the limit of quantification (LOQ) were measured for fourteen OCPs, nine OPPs, six pyrethroids, one carbamate and PCBs with a total of 172 results, and no concentrations exceeded the maximal residue levels defined by the European Union. The mean concentrations of pesticides and the sum of seven PCBs were determined in the ranges 0.92–17.4 μg/kg and 1.38–2.74 μg/kg. Pesticides were quantified in 27% of samples, and seven PCBs were quantified in 5.23% of samples. Among the three pesticide groups, the highest numbers of quantified results were found for OCPs (12.1–20.8%). The highest frequencies of detection were found for the sum of 4,4’-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane and its isomers (DDTs), hexachlorobenzene and seven PCBs. The sum of seven PCBs was quantified within the range of 3.3–6.67% of samples per milk type and dairy products. Among the OPPs, the highest frequency of detection was found for chlorpyrifos in cow’s milk. Based on the estimated daily intakes, chronic risk characterisation showed no risk for adults or ten-year-old children for the consumption of cow’s milk and dairy products.

1. Introduction

Milk is of great importance in human nutrition due to its important essential components. Therefore, ensuring its quality and monitoring its safety is of great importance worldwide. The presence of pesticide residues in food items is considered a major global health issue today. Pesticides most often reach milk and dairy products by feeding cows with contaminated animal feed, grass or corn silage and water, but also as a result of its direct usage in controlling insects and ectoparasites [1,2,3]. Pesticides are significant in resolving problems in agriculture caused by weeds and pests and, thus, ensure productivity and crop protection [4,5]. These chemicals are classified into more than a hundred classes, and the most used today are organochlorines (OCPs), organophosphates (OPPs), carbamates, pyrethroids, neonicophenoxy alkanes and glyphosate-based pesticides [6].
Due to their persistence and bioaccumulation, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are classified together with OCPs as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and, since 2001, have been banned worldwide by the Stockholm Convention [7]. Since they are very resistant to degradation in the environment, and given their widespread use in the past, they can still be found in almost all components of the environment and in animals, food and human tissues [8]. Due to their physical and chemical characteristics, PCBs are still used today in numerous industries and are part of numerous general-use items (plastics, rubber products, transformers, heat exchange fluids and others) [9,10]. Therefore, the environment, animals and humans are constantly exposed to these substances [11]. Also, these compounds are characterised by high resistance to and a very slow rate of degradation, causing them to persist in the environment and accumulate in the tissues of living organisms through the mechanisms of the food chain [12,13]. For example, one of the most persistent congeners of PCBs, PCB 153 (2,2′,4,4′,5,5′-hexachlorobiphenyl), has a half-life of 110 years in the environment and 12.4 years in the body [14].
Chronic exposure to pesticides causes negative effects on the endocrine, immune and neurological systems, including kidney and liver problems, respiratory complications and birth defects and is highly susceptible to several human cancers, including head, neck, lung, breast, cervix, prostate, thyroid, brain, colorectal, pancreatic, lung and leukaemia [4,6,15,16,17]. Similar to pesticides, many negative effects on human health have been recorded for PCBs, including reproduction disorders, immune system diseases, neurological disorders and cancers, such as malignant melanoma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and breast cancer [11,14,18]. Considering the established carcinogenic effects, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) categorises these compounds as carcinogenic to humans (group 1: PCBs and lindane), as probably carcinogenic to humans (group 2A: 4,4’-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and dieldrin) and possible human carcinogens (group 2B: chlordane, hexachlorobenzene (HCB), heptachlor and hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCH) [19].
Although OCP and PCB compounds, as already pointed out, have been banned for a number of years, their residues are constantly detected in food, especially food of animal origin, i.e., milk and related products. Numerous studies have shown their residues in milk above the quantification limits of the applied methods and, in some cases, in very high concentrations [2,3,4]. Therefore, the control of pesticides in milk and milk products is important for public health, especially because milk and milk products are consumed to the greatest extent by infants and children and also by the adult population. The acute toxic exposure to pesticides in humans can be well recognised. However, exposure to low doses for a long time by food is not easily observable and is difficult to identify and quantify. Therefore, it is important to carry out the determination of its exposure and assessment of the risk arising from the continuous ingestion of these contaminants in food [4].
The objective of this research was to evaluate the occurrence of pesticides and PCBs in the milk of cows, sheep and goats and dairy products during the period 2015–2022 in Croatia. A second goal was to estimate daily intakes of different age groups of the population and obtain the risk characterisation as to the extent to which consumption contributes to the toxicological reference values.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

A total of 534 samples of milk and dairy products were collected and analysed during the period 2015–2022. Raw milk samples of cows (n = 337), goats (n = 60) and sheep (n = 46) were collected as a part of the National Residue Monitoring Control Plan from dairy farms in the Republic of Croatia. A total of 91 dairy products (cheeses, yoghurts) were collected from retail stores in different Croatian cities. All samples were placed in the freezer at −18 °C until analysis.

2.2. Chemicals

Analytical standards of organochlorine (n = 23), organophosphorous (n = 25), pyrethroids (n = 12), carbamates (n = 4), pesticides and seven congeners of PCBs (purity 94–99%) were purchased from Dr. Ehrenstorfer LGC Standards (Augsburg, Germany), Toronto Research Chemicals (Toronto, ON, Canada) and Sigma Aldrich (Seelze, Germany). For all pesticides and seven PCBs, the internal standard used was tributyl phosphate, which was provided by Sigma-Aldrich, Seelze, Germany (≥99% purity). Cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, fenvalerate, fluvalinate, tau-, lamda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and resmethrin were reported as the sum of isomers, while deltamethrin was reported as cis-deltamethrin. Acetonitrile (ACN) ULC/MS-CC/SFC purity was obtained from Biosolve Chimie (Dieuze, France), acetone (for HPLC, ≥99.8%) and ethyl acetate (for HPLC, ≥99.7%) were supplied from CHROMASOLVTM (Honeywell Speciality Chemicals Seelze GmbH, Seelze, Germany) and cyclohexane (for HPLC, ≥99.7%) from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH® (Steinheim, Germany). Dimethylformamide, sodium sulphate (anhydrous) and sodium chloride were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Bellefonte, PA, USA). Ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ/cm) was obtained from the Milli-Q system (Millipore®, Bedford, MA, USA), and nitrogen (N2) (5.0 and 5.5 purity was supplied from SOL S.p.A® (Monza, Italy).

2.3. Sample Preparation

For the analysis using GC-MS/MS, 50 g of milk or dairy products was measured and placed in a centrifuge bottle. Subsequently, 75 mL of acetone was added and mixed for one minute. An additional 50 mL of the hexane/acetone extraction solvent was then added, and the mixture was blended using a vortex blender for approximately one minute, with the blender blades rinsed with 3 mL of the extraction solvent. The extract was centrifuged at 2500–3500× rpm for 2 to 3 min, and the supernatant was poured through a sodium sulphate column into a tube. Another 50 mL of hexane/acetone extraction solvent was added to the bottom layer, and the process was repeated. The column was rinsed with 20 mL of the hexane/acetone extraction solvent. The eluted fractions were concentrated to 2 mL using a gentle stream of nitrogen at a pressure of 12 ± 2 psi and a temperature of 35 ± 5 °C. The concentrated extract was then transferred to a labelled graduated test tube and adjusted to a volume of 10 mL with a GPC solvent (a mixture of cyclohexane and ethyl acetate in a 1:1 ratio, v/v).
The cleaning of the test tube was performed using a gel permeation chromatograph (GPC, LC-20 Prominence, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) on the EnviroSep™-ABC preparative (350 × 21 mm) and guard column (60 × 21.2 mm) by Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA). The GPC was operated under the following conditions: the mobile phase consisted of cyclohexane and ethyl acetate in a 1:1 ratio (v/v), with a flow rate of 3 mL/min, detection wavelength set at 254 nm, injection volume of 2 mL, and a collection time ranging from 26 to 47 min. The eluted fractions between 26 and 47 min were collected in a fraction collection tube and concentrated to 1 mL in a concentrator using nitrogen gas at a pressure of 12 ± 2 psi and a temperature of 35 ± 5 °C.
Subsequently, 1 mL of the extract was transferred to a Chem Elut cartridge (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and washed twice with 1 mL of the hexane/acetone solvent, followed by a minimum standing time of 60 min. The Chem Elute cartridge was then positioned above silica and C-18 cartridges, which had been conditioned with 7 mL of hexane-saturated acetonitrile. The sample was eluted from the Chem Elute cartridge using three portions of 6 mL each of hexane-saturated acetonitrile. The eluate was concentrated to 1 mL using nitrogen gas at a pressure of 12 ± 2 psi and a temperature of 35 ± 5 °C. Prior to injection into the GC-MS/MS system, the internal standard was added to every sample and pesticide standard were added to the sample for calibration purposes, employing a matrix-matched calibration approach.

2.4. Instrumental Analysis

After sample preparation, the analysis of the pesticide and seven PCBs was performed on an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph coupled to an Agilent 7000B triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). An HP-5 ms ultra inert capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm film thickness) containing (5%-phenyl)-methylpolysiloxane (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used as the chromatographic column.
Chromatographic separation and other operating conditions are presented in a recent study [17]. Briefly, chromatographic conditions were as follows: the injection volume was 2 μL, the inlet temperature was 80 °C until 0.01 min, and then 720 °C min−1 to 280 °C; the carrier gas was He at 0.9 mL min−1, and the oven temperature program was 70 °C for the first minute, followed by a 25 °C min−1 to 150 °C; this then increased from 150 °C to 200 °C for 5 min and finally rose to 280 °C for 13 min. The MS transfer line was at 280 °C, and the ion source was 300 °C. Electron ionisation (EI) at −70 eV was used in MS/MS after 4 min solvent delay. Quadrupole temperatures were 150 °C, collision gas (nitrogen) was 1.5 mL/min and quench (helium) was 2.25 mL/min.
Two or three multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions were selected for each analyte, and the method was divided into 9-time segments with “wide” MS resolutions for all transitions. MassHunter software version number B.07.05.2479 was used for instrument control and data acquisition and processing. The GC-MS/MS optimised parameters for each MRM transition for the 71 compounds are presented in Table 1.

2.5. Method Validation

The method’s validation was conducted in compliance with the guidelines outlined in SANTE guidance documents [20,21]. Various analytical parameters were assessed, including linearity, recovery, repeatability, intra-day and inter-day precision, and uncertainty. Linearity was determined by matrix-matched calibration curves in raw milk samples, with eight calibration levels ranging from 0.5 to 200 μg/kg.
Recoveries and repeatability were evaluated at five calibration levels by spiking milk matrix blanks at concentrations of 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 10 μg/kg. The maximum residue levels (MRL) for milk were set at very low levels, making it important and challenging to achieve a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.5 μg/kg. Intra-day precision was assessed by analysing spiked samples over five different days, while inter-day precision was determined by calculating relative standard deviations (RSDs) from the recovery checks of five spiked samples within the same day. Additionally, the uncertainty of the overall procedure was quantified based on the validation data.

2.6. Daily Dietary Exposure and Risk Characterisation

The estimation of daily intakes (EDI, μg/kg bw/day) for the pesticide compounds and the sum of seven PCBs in milk and dairy products was conducted using Equation (1):
EDI = C × MS/BW,
where C is the mean concentration of pesticides or PCBs (μg/kg, ww), MS is the meal size (daily consumption of milk or dairy products, gram per day), and BW is the body weight (kg) of adult and child consumers. The EDI was calculated for pesticide and PCB compounds quantified above the LOQ values in more than one sample. The EDI was calculated for cow’s milk as the most commonly consumed type of milk and also for dairy products. The chronic consumption of cow’s milk and dairy products for adult consumers in Croatia was 149.39 g/day, and the average body mass of adult consumers was 76.18 kg [22]. Data on the average consumption of milk in children and adolescents have not yet been published in Croatia. The consumption of milk for ten-year-olds was calculated based on the available literature. Based on the frequency of the consumption of milk and milk products by ten-year-olds in the fourth grade of primary school [23], a daily consumption of 270 g was calculated. The average body weight of a ten-year-old child in Croatia was calculated at 42.28 kg [24].
The chronic risk assessment posed by the pesticides and seven PCBs quantified in milk was assessed by calculating the hazard quotient (HQ) using Equation (2):
HQ = EDI/HBGV,
where HBGV is the health-based guidance value (the toxicological reference values’ acceptable daily intake (ADI), tolerable daily intake (TDI) or reference dose) of the pesticides and seven PCBs used for chronic risk assessment set by the Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues [25], the United States Environmental Protection Agency [26] and EFSA [27]. Estimations of HQ < 1 indicate there is no negative effect on consumer health, while HQ > 1 indicates a significant concern for adverse chronic health effects.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical processing of the results was carried out by Statistica 10 (StatSoft® Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA) and Excel (Microsoft Excel, 2010). The concentrations of analysed contaminants in different milk samples and dairy products were calculated as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and range (minimum and maximum). Statistical processing of the results was performed only for results above the LOQ values. When all results were below the LOQ, <LOQ was indicated.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Method Validation

The parameters of validation for pesticides and seven PCB congeners are shown in Table 2. Chromatograms for all optimised analytes in the real sample, blank milk sample and standard milk sample spiked at the LOQ level are presented in Figure 1.
For the linearity testing of the method, five levels were used. The deviation of the back-calculated concentration from the true concentration was ≤20%. The limits of quantification (LOQ) were determined in accordance with the criteria defined by DG SANTE [20,21], that is, as the lowest spike level at which acceptance criteria were met.
The LOQ values ranged from 0.5 to 10 μg/kg. Recovery and precision at five calibration levels ranged from 82.6 to 118.4%, with an RSD from 7.19 to 19.5%. The obtained results indicated good accuracy and precision.

3.2. Occurrence of Pesticide and PCB Residues

Table 3 presents the mean concentrations of OCP and OPP pesticides, pyrethroids and carbamates and seven PCB congeners in the samples of the raw milk of cows, goats, sheep and dairy products collected in Croatia over a period of eight years. The table of results contains only pesticides quantified above the LOQ value. Other pesticides not listed in the table were not quantified (<LOQ). Of the 172 results above the LOQs, none exceeded the maximal residue levels (MRLs) defined by Regulation 396/2005/EC [28]. The mean concentrations of detected pesticides ranged from 0.92 (HCB) to 17.4 μg/kg (carbaryl). Concentrations higher than the LOQ were found out for fourteen OCPs, nine OPPs, six pyrethroids and one carbamate. PCBs are expressed as the sum of seven PCBs, and the sum of the congener numbers are as follows: PCB-28, PCB-52, PCB-101, PCB-118, PCB-138, PCB-153 and PCB-180. Congener PCB-118 was not quantified above the LOQ value in any sample. Pesticides were quantified in 27% of the samples, and seven PCBs were quantified in 5.23% of the samples. The highest frequency of quantified results among the pesticide groups analysed was determined for OCPs, ranging between 12.1% for dairy products and 20.8% for cow’s milk. For HCB and DDTs, the highest detection frequency of 32.4% and 25.5% in the total number of OCP-quantified compounds were found. The mean values for HCB and DDTs were in the ranges of 0.92–1.70 μg/kg and 1.70–3.17 μg/kg.
Concentrations of quantified OCPs in cow’s milk ranged from 1.0 to 3.9 μg/kg with mean values from 0.92 μg/kg (HCB) to 1.78 μg/kg (methoxychlor). Furthermore, the highest percentages of detected OCP results within cow’s milk samples were found for HCB (32.9%), followed by the sum of DDT (DDTs, 30.0%).
Although the usage of OCPs (DDTs, HCB and HCH) has been banned for many years, they are still of great concern because they continue to be present in the environment. DDT can persist in soil for up to three decades [29]. HCB in soil undergoes slow anaerobic and aerobic biodegradation with a half-life of 10.6–22.9 and 2.7–5.7 years [30]. These compounds can accumulate in organisms and be biomagnified through food chains and eventually contaminate food, especially food of animal origin, ultimately reaching the human organism [2,12]. Due to lipolytic properties, OCPs and PCBs accumulate in tissues or food rich in fat [31]. Therefore, food of animal origin and milk and milk products are the main sources of human exposure to these compounds [32].
Numerous studies on DDTs, as the oldest used OCPs, show significant differences in milk concentrations with regard to regions or the level of development of individual countries [2]. Even today, OCPs above the MRL values can be determined in intensive milk production countries and according to the type of agricultural activity. The analysis of milk from dairy farms in Punjab, India, showed three milk samples that exceeded the MRL for DDT [33]. However, mean values for DDT were below 1 μg/kg. In another study conducted on milk produced in five urban areas in different parts of India, the low mean values of HCHs, DDTs, Endosulfan and methoxychlor of 0.09–0.79 μg/kg, 0.24–1.60 μg/kg, 1.21–1.24 μg/kg and 0.24 μg/kg, respectively, were determined, with concentrations above the MRL in the ranges of 18–85 μg/kg, 13.4–170 μg/kg, 86–130 μg/kg and 40 μg/kg, respectively [4]. However, in Ethiopian cow’s milk, DDT concentrations up to 10 times higher than the prescribed MRL values were measured (269–477 μg/kg, [34]; 243–420.80 μg/kg, [35]). Also, significantly higher concentrations of DDTs (113.40–218 μg/kg) compared to the MRL were determined in cow’s milk from urban areas in Romania with varying intensity of agriculture activities [36].
Research in Poland showed concentrations of DDTs, HCHs and heptachlor in the ranges 1.72–3.75 μg/kg, 0.72–4.031 μg/kg and 0.086–2.854 μg/kg, respectively [37]. Within the Total Diet Study (TDS) conducted in Hong Kong, low concentrations of DDTs and HCB (0.7 and 0.0 ug/kg) were measured in dairy products [38]. Also, very low concentrations of HCB (0.015 μg/kg) were determined in Catalonia, Spain [39]. DDTs and HCH concentrations found in milk from Nanjing, China, were below the maximum residue limits (MRLs) with mean levels of 2.25 μg/kg and 0.6 μg/kg, respectively [12]. A recent study from northern China showed low levels of HCHs (0.07 μg/kg) and DDTs (0.1 μg/kg) in cow’s milk [40]. However, analysis conducted at the national level in China and based on published studies showed mean values of 6.1 μg/kg and 5.3 μg/kg for DDTs and HCHs in dairy products [41].
In 97.4% of milk samples from the Greek market, at least one DDT isomer was detected, while DDE was the most frequently detected in 94.9% of samples, though all concentrations were below 1 μg/kg [42]. Studies from Pakistan showed high values exceeding the MRLs for α-endosulphan and β-endosulphan (112.69 and 107.16 ug/kg; [43]), and the sum of endosulfan was 118.9 ug/kg in cow’s milk [44]. In contrast, concentrations of total endosulfan in a recent study in China were below the measurable limits [40].
In the present study, sheep’s and goat’s milk had the highest frequency of detected compounds above the LOQ value (41.3 and 36.7%), and OCPs were detected in 20 and 19.7% of the total sheep’s and goat’s milk samples. The mean values of OCPs in sheep’s and goat’s milk ranged from 1.03 to 2.30 μg/kg. Few studies are available with the results of pesticide determination in these two types of milk. Unlike this study, in the milk of sheep and goats from Greece, no OCP or OPP residues were measured [45]. Also, analyses of OCPs (DDT, heptachlor, endosulfan, etc.) in organic and conventional goat’s milk from Indonesia [46] and goat’s milk from Nigeria [47] showed concentrations below the limits of detection. However, a study from Turkey showed high levels of OCPs in sheep’s milk with concentrations of 122.98 μg/L for beta-HCH, 4.49 μg/L for HCB, 16.34 μg/L for 4,4′-DDT and 26.09 μg/L for methoxychlor [48].
Today, insecticides make up about 20% of the world’s pesticide market, while OPPs are the most widely used insecticides [49]. Although they are neurotoxic like OCPs, they are considered a more favourable alternative because their levels of bioaccumulation in organisms are much lower compared to OCPs. They are characterised by a wide spectrum of action against pests due to their rapid action, i.e., immediate neurotoxicity against a large number of target organisms [50]. Another advantage of their use in agriculture is their cost efficiency [51]. Commonly used OPP insecticides in agriculture are diazinon, chlorpyrifos, chlorpyrifos-methyl, dichlorvos, fenithrotion, parathion, methyl-parathion, malathion, azinphos-methyl, phosmet and tetrachlorvinphos [50].
In this study, the frequent quantification of OPPs in the total number of quantified results in the raw milk of cows, goats, sheep and dairy products ranged between 3.3 and 10%. The mean values of OPP compounds ranged from 1.25 μg/kg for bromophos-ethyl determined in goat’s milk to 3.65 μg/kg of diazinon in sheep’s milk. The highest percentage of detected results of an individual compound was found for chlorpyrifos (47.4% among OPPs) in cow’s milk.
A study from Brazil showed chlorpyrifos detected in the range of 0.06–5.85 μg/L in cow’s milk [52]. Concentrations above the MRL, the maximal level of 45.4 μg/kg and mean of 2.58 μg/kg for chlorpyrifos, were determined in the milk from dairy farms in Punjab, India [33]. On the other hand, ethion levels of 0.92 μg/kg were measured, and the mean values of chlorpyrifos and ethion of 0.76–1.71 μg/kg and 0.68–1.46 μg/kg were obtained in a study of milk from an area adjacent to five cities in India [4]. Within the TDS on pesticide residues in France, primiphos-methyl was measured at maximal levels of 30 and 10 μg/kg in dairy-based yoghurt and ultra-fresh dairy-based desserts [53]. High concentrations of chlorpyrifos were determined in goat’s (0.76 mg/L) and sheep’s milk (0.69 mg/L) from Pakistan [54]. In a recent study from China, no OPPs were quantified in cow’s or sheep’s milk [55].
Pyrethroids are widely applied today and may be found in many commercial insecticide formulations used for insect control on food crops (maize, rice, sunflower, sweet corn and others) to prevent insect infestation in empty grain containers or on cereals before storage in breeding tanks, but also during livestock breeding for insect control on farms [56,57].
In the present study, pyrethroids and carbamates were measured in a range of 1.2 (bifenthrin in cow’s milk) to 27.9 μg/kg (carbaryl in sheep’s milk) but were not detected in dairy products. A recent study in Serbia showed that only 11.4% of analysed milk samples had pesticide residues above the LOQ, and among them, bifenthrin was measured at concentrations of 23 and 19 μg/kg [5]. A study from Brazil showed the presence of cypermethrin, deltamethrin and bifenthrin in the range of 0.02 to 1.61 μg/L [52]. A second study in Brazil also found low mean pyrethroid concentrations (0.02–0.08 μg/L) [56]. A study of dietary pyrethroid exposures in adults from North Carolina found bifenthrin (7.33 μg/kg), esfenvalerate (16.7 μg/kg) and cis-permethin (0.33 μg/kg) in yoghurt [57]. Permethrin and cypermethrin were measured in milk from areas near five cities in India, with a mean range of 0.39–1.74 μg/kg and 0.30–28.17 μg/kg, respectively, and maximum levels (exceeding the MRL) of 340 μg/kg and 1840 μg/kg, respectively [4].
Regarding pyrethroids and carbamates in sheep’s and goat’s milk, the highest mean value of 17.4 μg/kg was determined for carbaryl in sheep’s milk. A study on goat’s and sheep’s milk from Pakistan showed maximal concentrations of bifenthin at 0.71 and 0.72 mg/L and deltamethrin at 0.71 and 0.80 mg/L, respectively [54].
Although most studies have shown exposure to PCBs through fish consumption, dairy products also contribute to exposure to PCBs because they are more often used in food [10,58]. Studies have shown that almost 99% of PCBs are introduced to lactating cows through feed, with negligible contamination by air and water. According to the efficiency of absorption of PCBs after the intake of these contaminants, the highest value of PCBs that transfer from the gastrointestinal tract to milk occurs after 2–3 days [8].
In the present study, a frequency detection of seven PCBs from 3.3% (dairy products) to 5.63% (cow’s milk) was determined. Seven PCBs were calculated in the range from 1 to 25.6 μg/kg (highest in cow’s milk). Mean concentrations in milk samples of cows, sheep, goats and dairy products ranged from 1.38 to 2.85 μg/kg (highest in dairy products). The mean concentration for the sum of seven PCBs of 2.74 μg/kg was largely contributed to by the maximum determined value of 25.6 μg/kg.
According to the database for PCB levels in milk from different European countries, a mean PCB value of 10.7 μg/kg was calculated [32,59]. The evaluation of data on concentrations of PCBs sampled in the period 1995–2010 from 24 European Union countries, including Norway and Iceland, showed a trend of decreasing levels of PCBs in the food group “raw milk and milk products” [60]. In recent studies from Italy, the results of a reduction in PCB levels in milk over the observed years were found [61,62]. Since the values for PCBs in this research are expressed based on fresh weight and not on a lipid basis, a comparison was made with studies on PCB concentrations expressed in the same way. It should be emphasised that a lack of determination of the percentage of fat in the samples is a limitation of this research, especially because milk and milk products are eminently fatty matrices, and a good part of the compounds analysed are of a lipophilic nature.
PCBs determined in cow’s milk in France within the Total Dietary Study (TDS) showed levels below 1 μg/kg (44 ng/kg) [58]. In cow’s milk from California, congeners PCB-101, PCB-118 and PCB-138 were detected at low concentrations, below 0.03 μg/L [63]. The concentration of PCBs below 1 μg/kg was measured in milk from northern China [40] but also within the national analysis of data for PCBs available at the national level for China [41]. The content of seven PCB congeners in milk collected from three different areas of Slovakia was found to be less than the LOQ values [64]. However, significantly higher PCB concentrations (9.48 μg/kg) were determined in a recent study from southern Italy [65]. In cow’s milk from Bangladesh, the mean values of PCB congeners were measured in the range from 0.52 to 3.35 μg/kg [10].
In conclusion, according to the results determined in this paper, a similar trend between Croatia and other EU countries can be observed [32,37,39,58,59]. This is to be expected, considering that the production and use of the vast majority of OCPs are banned in Europe. Also, the use of these contaminants is significantly reduced throughout the world, but in some countries, such as India, the use of significant amounts of DDTs is permitted for the control of malaria [4,42]. The world map of pesticide use for significant agricultural problems in weed and pest control shows great differences [6]. Environmental burdens of pesticides vary, and thus, their residues in different food items, such as milk and dairy products, also vary in different regions of the world, as shown through the comparison of this study’s results with results from other countries.

3.3. Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment

Table 4 presents the dietary exposure and potential chronic health risk to pesticides and seven PCBs associated with the consumption of milk and dairy products for adults and children (ten-year-olds) in Croatia. Risk assessments were carried out for cow’s milk and dairy products, mostly consumed in Croatia, while goat’s and sheep’s milk are not often consumed. This was confirmed by the fact that Croatia produced 405,525 t of cow’s milk in 2022, and only 2231 t of sheep’s and 3556 t of goat’s milk [66].
Daily intakes (EDIs) of OCPs calculated for the consumption of cow’s milk for adults varied in the range of 1.80–3.49 ng/kg bw/day, while for children, this was 5.88–11.4 ng/kg bw/day. For dairy products, the highest EDI values were calculated for DDTs, 6.21 ng/kg bw/day for adults and 20.3 ng/kg bw/day for children. For OPPs, pyrethroids and carbamates, EDI values in milk and dairy products were determined in the ranges of 2.55–4.45 ng/kg bw/day for adults and 8.31–14.5 ng/kg bw/day for children. Similar EDI values for cow’s milk and dairy products were determined for PCBs for both adults (5.37 and 5.59 ng/kg bw/day) and children (17.5 and 18.2 ng/kg bw/day, respectively).
Higher dietary exposure to DDTs, endosulfan HCB and HCH via milk consumption compared to the results in this study was found in studies from Hong Kong and China [12,38]. Significantly higher values of dietary exposure by milk consumption for DDTs and HCH were measured for adults (29.13 and 12.62 ng/kg bw/day) and children (69.52 and 30.45 ng/kg bw/day) in Nanjing, China [12]. High EDI values of 23.8 and 39.9 ng/kg bw/day for DDTs and 8.5 and 16.6 ng/kg bw/day for endosulfan were found for the average population of Hong Kong [38].
A study from Turkey showed lower EDI values for DDTs for age groups of adults and children (2.59 and 6.75 ng/kg bw/day), the sum of endosulfan (1.86 and 4.83 ng/kg bw/day) and metocychlor (0.43 and 1.13 ng/kg bw/day), but higher values for HCHs (4.78 and 12.44 ng/kg bw/day) [67] than those determined in this study. A similar EDI for HCB was found (2.03 ng/day) through the consumption of milk determined in this study in Catalonia, Spain [39].
The determined values of EDIs for seven PCBs in this study are in line with the mean exposure to the sum of PCBs (six NDL-PCB indicators) found in EU countries between 4.3 and 25.7 ng/kg bw/day [60]. Very low EDIs were determined for PCBs within the TDS conducted in France, with 0.046 ng/kg bw/day for adults and 0.225 ng/kg bw/day for children [58]. The study also showed that milk and dairy products contribute only 5.9 and 5.8% to the total exposure of children to PCBs compared to other types of food (for example, meat contributes 7.9% and fish contributes 47.9%). The comparison of PCB exposure by different food types with previous research in France from 2007 shows that the contribution of meat has decreased while the dairy product contribution has remained stable [58]. Estimated dietary exposure to PCBs in Austria was 3.37 ng/kg bw/day for children and 2.64–3.19 ng/kg bw/day for adults. Within that study, milk and dairy products were the food groups contributing most (50–55%) to the total dietary intake of PCBs in adults and children [68]. Lower EDI values for PCBs in adults and children (1.14 and 2.97 ng/kg bw/day) were determined in milk from Turkey [67]. In the scope of the TDS in Australia, EDI values for adults and children in the age group between 2 and 17 years were calculated within the ranges of 0.015–2.3 ng/kg bw/day and 0.0032–3.9 ng/kg bw/day [69].
Table 4. The estimation of daily intake and risk characterisation of pesticides and seven PCBs in cow’s milk and dairy products.
Table 4. The estimation of daily intake and risk characterisation of pesticides and seven PCBs in cow’s milk and dairy products.
Active SubstancesHBGV
(ng/kg bw/day)
Cow’s MilkDairy Products
EDI (ng/kg bw/day)HQEDI (ng/kg bw/day)HQ
AdultsChildren fAdultsChildren fAdultsChildren fAdultsChildren f
OCPs
Chlorobenzilate20,000 a2.558.311.27 × 10−4 4.15 × 10−4
∑DDT 10,000 b3.3310.93.33 × 10−41.09 × 10−36.2120.36.21 × 10−42.02 × 10−3
∑endosulfan 6000 a3.3010.75.49 × 10−41.79 × 10−33.8212.56.37 × 10−42.08 × 10−3
∑HCH2000 d2.046.651.02 × 10−33.32 × 10−3
Heptachlor100 b 2.167.030.0220.070
Hexachlorobenzene170 c1.805.880.0110.0352.518.180.0150.048
Methoxychlor5000 e3.4911.46.98 × 10−42.27 × 10−3
OPPs
Bromophos-ethyl3000 b2.658.638.82 × 10−42.87 × 10−34.4514.51.48 × 10−34.84 × 10−3
Chlorfenvinphos500 b2.558.315.10 × 10−30.017
Chlorpyrifos1000 a2.929.522.92 × 10−39.52 × 10−3
Ethion2000 b4.3214.12.16 × 10−37.03 × 10−3
Pirimiphos-methyl4000 a2.748.956.86 × 10−42.23 × 10−3
P&C
Bifenthrin 15,000 a2.748.956.86 × 10−42.23 × 10−3
PCBs
∑PCB20 d5.3717.50.270.885.5918.20.280.91
HBGV—Health-based guidance values. EDI—Estimated daily intake (ng/kg bw/day). HQ—Hazard quotient. a Acceptable daily intake, ADI [27]. b Acceptable daily intake, ADI and provisional tolerable daily intake, PTDI [25]. c Tolerable daily intake, TDI [30]. d Reference dose [26]. e Tolerable daily intake, TDI [70]. f Ten-year-old children.
For chronic risk assessments in this study, HQs were determined for adults and children by the ratio of EDI values to the corresponding health-based guidance values (HBGV) defined by safety agencies and European or international bodies (Table 4). For all analysed compounds, an HQ < 1, which is lower than the HGBV, was determined. Furthermore, for all OCPs, OPPs and bifenthrin, the calculated values were significantly lower than 0.02. In the case of the sum of seven PCBs, similar HQs were calculated for both cow’s milk and dairy products for adults (0.27 and 0.28) and children (0.88 and 0.91, respectively). Based on this risk evaluation, possible negative and adverse effects on the health of adults and children regarding the use of cow’s milk and dairy products in the diet can be excluded.
Examples of different HQ values and, accordingly, different concerns for the chronic toxic effects of certain pesticides were determined in a study in Turkey [67], where HQs < 1 for adults and children were found for DDTs, endosulfan and methoxychlor, but HQ > 1 was found for heptachlor and PCBs. Extremely high HQs of 16 and 41.46 were found for HCHs.
A limiting factor of this study is the disadvantage of comprehensive data from the literature on the dietary intakes of milk and dairy products by the Croatian population for infants (up to 12 months old), toddlers (13–36 months old), children (37 months–9 years old) and adolescents (up to 10 years old). An additional limitation is the unavailability of data concerning the distribution of body weight in those age groups. Therefore, this study could not evaluate the exposure that the most sensitive population groups (infants and children up to 10 years old) have to these compounds who consume the largest amounts of milk and could be identified as having an increased risk of exposure with potentially long-term toxic effects.

4. Conclusions

In this study, residues of OCPs, OPPs, pyrethroids, carbamates and PCBs were determined in the milk of cows, sheep, goats and dairy products over a period of eight years. Pesticides were quantified in 27% and seven PCBs in 5.23% of samples. The quantification of 71 compounds in the milk of cows, sheep and goats and dairy products revealed levels above the LOQ values for fourteen OCPs, nine OPPs, six pyrethroids, one carbamate and the sum of seven PCBs, and no concentrations exceeded the MRL values defined by the EU legislation. The highest frequency of determination was found for OCP compounds. Among the total quantified compounds of OCPs, the highest frequencies of detected results were found for HCB and DDTs. Among OPPs, the highest percentage of detected results was found for chlorpyrifos in cow’s milk.
Based on the quantified concentrations of pesticides and seven PCBs in cow’s milk and dairy products, the estimated daily intakes of these compounds were calculated for ten-year-old children and adults in the Croatian population. Considering that the contaminant levels in samples are lower than the EU limits and risk characterisation shows results below HBGV, it can be concluded that dietary exposure to these compounds may not pose a risk to consumers’ health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, N.B.; methodology, M.Đ. and M.S.; software, T.N. and M.Đ.; validation, T.N. and M.Đ.; formal analysis, T.N., M.Đ., B.Č. and I.V. (Ines Varga); investigation, D.V. and N.B.; data curation, B.S.K., D.V. and B.Č.; writing—original draft preparation, N.B.; writing—review and editing, N.B. and M.Đ.; visualisation, I.V. (Ivana Varenina), M.Đ. and N.B.; supervision, N.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Croatia.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Goulart, S.M.; de Queiroz, M.E.L.R.; Neves, A.A.; de Queiroz, J.H. Low-temperature clean-up method for the determination of pyrethroids in milk using gas chromatography with electron capture detection. Talanta 2008, 75, 1320–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Boudebbouz, A.; Boudalia, S.; Boussadia, M.I.; Gueroui, J.; Habila, S.; Bousbia, A.; Symeon, G.K. Pesticide residues levels in raw cow’s milk and health risk assessment across the globe: A systematic review. Environ. Adv. 2022, 9, 100266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jia, Q.; Qiu, J.; Zhang, L.; Liao, G.; Jia, Y.; Qian, Y. Multiclass comparative analysis of veterinary drugs, mycotoxins, and pesticides in bovine milk by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography–hybrid quadrupole–linear ion trap mass spectrometry. Foods 2022, 11, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gill, J.; Bedi, J.; Singh, R.; Fairoze, M.N.; Hazarika, R.; Gaurav, A.; Satpathy, S.K.; Chauhan, A.S.; Lindahl, J.; Grace, D. Pesticide residues in peri-urban bovine milk from India and risk assessment: A multicenter study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ćosić, M.; Špirović Trifunović, B.; Petrović, A.; Tasić, S.; Puvača, N.; Đurić, S.; Vuković, G.; Konstantinović, B.; Marinković, D.; Bursić, V. Pesticide residues in cow’s milk. Mljekarstvo 2021, 71, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Armenova, N.; Tsigoriyna, L.; Arsov, A.; Petrov, K.; Petrova, P. Microbial Detoxification of Residual Pesticides in Fermented Foods: Current Status and Prospects. Foods 2023, 12, 1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. UNEP. Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Compounds; United Nations Environment Programme. 2004. Available online: http://chm.pops.int/theconvention/overview/textoftheconvention/tabid/2232/default.aspx (accessed on 9 May 2023).
  8. Tremolada, P.; Guazzoni, N.; Parolini, M.; Rossaro, B.; Bignazzi, M.M.; Binelli, A. Predicting PCB concentrations in cow milk: Validation of a fugacity model in high-mountain pasture conditions. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 487, 471–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tompson, L.; Wageh, S.D. Environmental chemical contaminants in food: Review of a global problem. J. Toxicol. 2019, 2019, 2345283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hasan, G.M.M.A.; Shaikh, M.A.A.; Satter, M.A.; Hossain, M.S. Detection of indicator polychlorinated biphenyls (I-PCBs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in cow milk from selected areas of Dhaka, Bangladesh and potential human health risks assessment. Toxicol. Rep. 2022, 9, 1514–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Polybrominated Biphenyls. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2016; Volume 107. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, Q.Q.; Xia, Z.H.; Wu, M.M.; Wang, L.P.; Yang, H. Human health risk assessment of DDTs and HCHs through dietary exposure in Nanjing, China. Chemosphere 2017, 177, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Herceg Romanić, S.; Vuković, G.; Klinčić, D.; Sarić, M.M.; Župan, I.; Antanasijević, D.; Popović, A. Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in Cyprinidae fish: Towards hints of their arrangements using advanced classification methods. Environ. Res. 2018, 165, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Miletić, M.; Murati, T.; Šimić, B.; Bilandžić, N.; Brozović, A.; Kmetič, I. Ortho-substituted PCB 153: Effects in CHO-K1 cells. Arh. Hig. Rada Toksikol. 2021, 72, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Serdar, B.; LeBlanc, W.G.; Norris, J.M.; Dickinson, L.M. Potential effects of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and selected organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) on immune cells and blood biochemistry measures: A cross-sectional assessment of the NHANES 2003–2004 data. Environ. Health 2014, 13, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Soderlund, D.M.; Clark, J.M.; Sheets, L.P.; Mullin, L.S.; Piccirillo, V.J.; Sargent, D.; Stevens, J.T.; Weiner, M.L. Mechanisms of pyrethroid neurotoxicity: Implications for cumulative risk assessment. Toxicology 2022, 171, 3–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Đokić, M.; Nekić, T.; Varenina, I.; Varga, I.; Solomun Kolanović, B.; Sedak, M.; Čalopek, B.; Kmetič, I.; Murati, T.; Vratarić, D.; et al. Distribution of pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in food of animal origin in Croatia. Foods 2024, 13, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Carpenter, D.O. Exposure to and health effects of volatile PCBs. Rev. Environ. Health 2015, 30, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). Agents classified by the IARC Monographs, 2024, Volumes 1–135. Available online: https://monographs.iarc.fr/list-of-classifications (accessed on 25 January 2024).
  20. SANCO/12571/2013; Guidance Document on Analytical Quality Control and Validation Procedures for Pesticide Residues Analysis in Food and Feed, DG SANTE. European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2013.
  21. SANTE/11945/2015; Guidance Document on Analytical Quality Control and Method Validation Procedures for Pesticides Residues Analysis in Food and Feed, DG SANTE. European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2015.
  22. CFA. National Survey on Eating Habits 2011–2012; Croatian Food Agency: Osijek, Croatia, 2011.
  23. Ministry of Agriculture Republic of Croatia. National Strategy for the Implementation of School Schemes of Fruit and Vegetables and Milk and Dairy Products for the Period from the School Year 2023/2024 until the School Year 2028/2029. 2023. Available online: https://www.apprrr.hr/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Nacionalna-strategija-skolska-shema-2023-2029-v-final.pdf (accessed on 12 February 2024).
  24. Vidranski, T. Pouzdanost i orijentacijske vrijednosti CROFIT testova u razrednoj nastavi. Napredak 2020, 161, 185–202. [Google Scholar]
  25. World Health Organization (WHO). Inventory of Evaluations Performed by the Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR). Available online: https://apps.who.int/pesticide-residues-jmpr-database/Home/Search (accessed on 22 November 2023).
  26. USEPA. Aroclor 1254; CASRN 11097-69-1. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), Chemical Assessment Summary. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment, USA, 1994. Available online: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris2/chemicalLanding.cfm?substance_nmbr=389 (accessed on 24 November 2023).
  27. European Commission. European Union Pesticide Database. Current MRLs Values. Active Substances, Safeners and Synergists. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/start/screen/active-substances (accessed on 11 November 2023).
  28. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of 23 February 2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC. Off. J. Europ. Union 2005, 70, 1. [Google Scholar]
  29. Dimond, J.B.; Owen, R.B. Long-term residue of DDT compounds in forest soils in Maine. Environ. Pollut. 1996, 92, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. WHO/IPCS. Hexachlorobenzene. In Environmental Health Criteria 195; World Health Organization/International Programme on ChemicalSafety: Geneva, Switzerland, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  31. Moenning, J.-L.; Numata, J.; Bloch, D.; Jahnke, A.; Schafft, H.A.; Spolders, M.; Lüth, A.; Lahrssen-Wiederholt, M.; Schulz, K. Transfer and toxicokinetic modeling of non-dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (ndl-PCBs) into accidentally exposed dairy cattle and their calves—A case report. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2023, 99, 104106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. EFSA. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on contaminants in the food chain [CONTAM] related to the presence of non dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) in feed and food. EFSA J. 2005, 3, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bedi, J.S.; Gill, J.P.S.; Kaur, P.; Aulakh, R.S. Pesticide residues in milk and their relationship with pesticide contamination of feedstuffs supplied to dairy cattle in Punjab (India). J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2018, 27, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gebremichael, S.; Birhanu, T.; Tessema, D.A. Analysis of organochlorine pesticide residues in human and cow’s milk in the towns of Asendabo, Serbo and Jimma in South-Western Ethiopia. Chemosphere 2013, 90, 1652–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Deti, H.; Hymete, A.; Bekhit, A.A.; Mohamed, A.M.I.; Bekhit, A.E.-D.A. Persistent organochlorine pesticides residues in cow and goat milks collected from different regions of Ethiopia. Chemosphere 2014, 106, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Năstăsescu, V.; Mititelu, M.; Goumenou, M.; Docea, A.O.; Renieri, E.; Udeanu, D.I.; Oprea, E.; Arsene, A.L.; Dinu-Pîrvu, C.E.; Ghica, M. Heavy metal and pesticide levels in dairy products: Evaluation of human health risk. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 146, 111844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Witczak, A.; Mituniewicz-Małek, A.; Dmytrów, I. Assessment of daily intake of organochlorine pesticides from milk in different regions of Poland. J. Environ. Sci. Health 2013, 48, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, M.Y.Y.; Wong, W.W.K.; Chen, B.L.S.; Lam, C.H.; Chung, S.W.C.; Ho, Y.Y.; Xiao, Y. Dietary exposure to organochlorine pesticide residues of the Hong Kong adult population from a total diet study. Food Addit. Contam. A 2015, 32, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Perelló, G.; Gómez-Catalán, J.; Castell, V.; Llobet, J.M.; Domingo, J.L. Estimation of the daily intake of hexachlorobenzene from food consumption by the population of Catalonia, Spain: Health risks. Food Control 2012, 23, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, X.; Gao, M.; Wang, B.; Tan, Y.; Guo, Y.; Li, Q.; Ge, S.; Lan, C.; Chen, J.; Jiangtulu, B.; et al. Risk of dietary intake of organochlorine pesticides among the childbearing-age women: A multiple follow-up study in North China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 224, 112607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fan, X.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Fan, W.; Dong, Z. Estimating the dietary exposure and risk of persistent organic pollutants in China: A national analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 288, 117764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tsakiris, I.N.; Goumenou, M.; Tzatzarakis, M.N.; Alegakis, A.K.; Tsitsimpikou, C.; Ozcagli, E.; Vynias, D.; Tsatsakis, A.M. Risk assessment for children exposed to DDT residues in various milk types from the Greek market. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015, 75, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ishaq, Z.; Nawaz, M. Analysis of contaminated milk with organochlorine pesticide residues using gas chromatography. Int. J. Food Prop. 2018, 21, 879–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Arif, A.M.; Javed, I.; Ayaz, M.; Abdullah, M.; Imran, M.; Shahbaz, M.; Gondal, T.A.; Ali, M.; Iqbal, Z.; Iqbal, Z. Organochlorine pesticide residues in raw milk samples collected from dairy farms and urban areas of Lahore district, Pakistan. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tsiplakou, E.; Anagnostopoulos, C.J.; Liapis, K.; Haroutounian, S.A.; Zervas, G. Pesticides residues in milks and feedstuff of farm animals drawn from Greece. Chemosphere 2010, 80, 504–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wanniatie, V.; Sudarwanto, M.B.; Purnawarman, T.; Jayanegara, A. Chemical compositions, contaminants, and residues of organic and conventional goat milk in Bogor District, Indonesia. Vet. World 2019, 12, 1218–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Aliyu, A.O.; Faruruwa, M.D.; Abdu, A.H. Seasonal Evaluation of Mineral Elements, Heavy Metals, Essential Amino Acids, Proximate Compositions and Pesticides in Goat Milk. World J. Anal. Chem. 2014, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bulut, S.; Akkaya, L.; Gök, V.; Konuk, M. Organochlorine pesticide (OCP) residues in cow’s, buffalo’s, and sheep’s milk from Afyonkarahisar region, Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 181, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Velki, M.; Di Paolo, C.; Nelles, J.; Seiler, T.B.; Hollert, H. Diuron and diazinon alter the behavior of zebrafish embryos and larvae in the absence of acute toxicity. Chemosphere 2017, 180, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Neylon, J.; Fuller, J.N.; van der Poel, C.; Church, J.E.; Dworkin, S. Organophosphate Insecticide Toxicity in Neural Development, Cognition, Behaviour and Degeneration: Insights from Zebrafish. J. Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pamanji, R.; Bethu, M.S.; Yashwanth, B.; Leelavathi, S.; Venkateswara Rao, J. Developmental toxic effects of monocrotophos, an organophosphorous pesticide, on zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. Int. 2015, 22, 7744–7753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dallegrave, A.; Pizzolato, T.M.; Barreto, F.; Eljarrat, F.; Barceló, D. Methodology for trace analysis of 17 pyrethroids and chlorpyrifos in foodstuff by gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 7689–7697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Nougadère, A.; Sirot, V.; Kadar, A.; Fastier, A.; Truchot, E.; Vergnet, C.; Hommet, F.; Baylé, J.; Gros, P.; Leblanc, J.-C. Total diet study on pesticide residues in France: Levels in food as consumed and chronic dietary risk to consumers. Environ. Int. 2012, 45, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Shahzadi, N.; Imran, M.; Sarwar, M.; Hashmi, A.S.; Wasim, M. Identification of pesticides residues in different samples of milk. J. Agroaliment. Process. Technol. 2013, 19, 167–172. [Google Scholar]
  55. Liu, P.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, X.; Jia, L.; Wang, L.; Wu, G.; Zhao, Y.; Fan, S.; Zhao, R. Determination of organophosphorus pesticide residues in milk of cows and sheep by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography- tandem mass spectrometry combined with passing type purification method. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu 2022, 51, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Dallegrave, A.; Pizzolato, T.M.; Barreto, F.; Bicab, V.C.; Eljarratc, E.; Barceló, D. Residue of insecticides in foodstuff and dietary exposure assessment of Brazilian citizens. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 115, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Morgan, M.K. Dietary pyrethroid exposures and intake doses for 188 duplicate-single solid food items consumed by North Carolina adults. Toxics 2020, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sirot, V.; Tard, A.; Venisseau, A.; Brosseaud, A.; Marchand, P.; Le Bizec, B.; Leblanc, J.-C. Dietary exposure to polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans and polychlorinated biphenyls of the French population: Results of the second French total diet study. Chemosphere 2012, 88, 492–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fattore, E.; Fanelli, R.; Dellatte, E.; Turrini, A.; di Domenico, A. Assessment of the dietary exposure to non-dioxin-like PCBs of the Italian general population. Chemosphere 2008, 73, S278–S283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. EFSA. Update of the monitoring of levels of dioxins and PCBs in food and feed. EFSA J. 2012, 10, 2832. [Google Scholar]
  61. Giannico, O.V.; Fragnelli, G.R.; Baldacci, S.; Desiante, F.; Pellegrino, A.; Basile, F.C.; Franco, E.; Diletti, G.; Conversano, M. Dioxins and PCBs contamination in milk and dairy products from Province of Taranto (Puglia Region, Southern Italy): A six years spatio-temporal monitoring study. Ann. Ist. Super Sanita 2021, 57, 233–238. [Google Scholar]
  62. Varrà, M.O.; Lorenzi, V.; Zanardi, E.; Menotta, S.; Fedrizzi, G.; Angelone, B.; Gasparini, M.; Fusi, F.; Foschini, S.; Padovani, A.; et al. Safety Evaluation and Probabilistic Health Risk Assessment of Cow Milk Produced in Northern Italy According to Dioxins and PCBs Contamination Levels. Foods 2023, 12, 1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, X.; Lin, Y.; Dang, K.; Puschner, B. Quantification of polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in commercial cows’ milk from California by gas chromatography–triple quadruple mass spectrometry. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Toman, R.; Pšenkova, M.; Tačcin, V. Polychlorinated biphenyls in cow’s milk, feed and soil in selected areas of Slovakia. Acta Fytotechn. Zootechn. 2020, 23, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Barone, G.; Storelli, A.; Garofalo, R.; Storelli, M.M. Update of Indicator PCB Levels in food in Southern Italy: Assessment of the dietary exposure for adult and elderly population. J. Food Qual. 2022, 2022, 1233977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Croatian Bureau for Statistics. Production of Milk and Dairy Products in 2022. Croatian Bureau for Statistics, Announcement, POLJ-2023-3-6. Available online: https://podaci.dzs.hr/2023/hr/58417 (accessed on 21 February 2024).
  67. Aydin, S.; Aydin, M.E.; Beduk, F.; Ulvi, A. Organohalogenated pollutants in raw and UHT cow’s milk from Turkey: A risk assessment of dietary intake. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 12788–12797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Mihats, D.; Moche, W.; Prean, M.; Rauscher-Gabernig, E. Dietary exposure to non-dioxin-like PCBs of different population groups in Austria. Chemosphere 2015, 126, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Food Standards Australia New Zealand. 26th Australian Total Diet Study. 2020. Available online: https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-11/26th-ATDS.pdf (accessed on 26 February 2024).
  70. ATSDR. Toxicological Profile for Methoxychlor. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2002. Available online: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp.asp?id=778&tid=151 (accessed on 27 February 2024).
Figure 1. Chromatograms for all optimised analytes in real milk sample (A), blank milk sample (B) and standard milk sample spiked at LOQ level (C).
Figure 1. Chromatograms for all optimised analytes in real milk sample (A), blank milk sample (B) and standard milk sample spiked at LOQ level (C).
Foods 13 01155 g001
Table 1. GC-MS/MS optimised parameters.
Table 1. GC-MS/MS optimised parameters.
CompoundRT
(min)
Ion Precursor; Ion Product 1
(m/z)
CE *
(eV)
Ion Precursor; Ion Product 2
(m/z)
CE *
(eV)
Ion Precursor; Ion Product 3
(m/z)
CE *
(eV)
Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs)
Aldrin23.22262.8; 193.140262.8; 191.140
Chlordane, cis-26.68374.7; 266.027374.7; 302.910
Chlordane, trans-26.09374.8; 266.030374.8; 26822
Chlorobenzilate12.20139.1; 111.016139.1; 75.122
p,p′-DDD 28.95234.8; 165.127234.8; 199.120
p,p′-DDE27.51246.0; 175.240246; 176.110
o,p′-DDT 29.06234.9; 165.027234.9; 199.117
p,p′-DDT 30.13234.9; 165.125234.9; 19920
Dieldrin27.55262.7; 192.937262.7; 19135
alpha-endosulfan26.58240.9; 206.115240.9; 17130
beta-endosulfan28.66241.0; 206.015238.8; 20415195; 1595
endosulfansulfate30.03271.9; 236.910271.9; 116.940
Endrin28.33262.7; 193.135262.7; 191.135
alpha-HCH15.78218.9; 183.07218.9; 1817
beta-HCH17.12218.9; 183.06218.9; 180.86
gamma-HCH/Lindan17.46218.9; 183.05218.9; 181.05
Heptachlor21.35271.6; 237.015273.7; 23915
Heptachlorepoxid, egzo-25.10352.8; 263.020352.8; 281.920
Heptachlorepoxid, endo-25.29252.8; 183.140252.8; 181.240
Hexachlorobenzene16.17283.9; 213.932283.9; 248.932
Methoxychlor14.07227.0; 141.110227.0; 169.112
Pentachloroaniline19.94264.7; 194.028264.7; 20328
Quintozene17.72236.9; 118.930236.9; 142.730
Organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs)
Azinphos-ethyl33.85160.0; 132.00132.; 104.04159.9; 104.912
Bromophos-ethyl26.26358.8; 303.015358.8; 330.95
Carbophenothion29.78156.9; 74.940156.9; 121.125
Chlorfenvinphos25.54266.9; 159.015266.9; 8130
Chlorpyrifos23.68314.0; 258.17314; 286.15
Chlorpyrifos-methyl21.00285.7; 93.020287.7; 93.020
Diazinon18.43199.0; 92.918199; 135,110
Dichlorvos7.37109.0; 78.75184.9; 9310
Ethion29.12230.8; 128.925230.8, 17510
Fenchlorphos21.83284.7; 269.815284.7; 9330
Fenithrotion22.57276.8; 260.05277; 125.120277; 109.120
Fenthion19.30278.0; 109.120278.0; 124.920
Malaoxon17.23127.0; 98.820127.0; 82.920
Malathion23.17173.0; 98.815173.0; 117.210158.0; 125.08
Methidathion26.18145.0; 85.05145; 58.115302; 8516
Mevinphos9.80127.0; 109.111192; 12711
Paraoxon-metyl14.69230.0; 200.15230.0; 136.15
Parathion-ethyl23.70291.0; 109.010291.0; 81.025
Parathion-methyl21.00262.8; 109.09263; 2462262.8; 79.130
Pirimiphos-methyl18.45290.0; 124.925290.0; 151.020
Profenofos27.39208.0; 63.144338.9; 269.012
Propetamphos17.77138.2; 109.95138.2; 64.215
Pyrazophos33.70220.9; 193.110220.9; 149.110
Tetrachlorvinphos26.59330.8; 109.020330.8; 79.027
Triazophos29.54161.0; 134.05161.0; 106.010257.0; 162.05
Pyrethroids
Allethrin25.60123.0; 81.27123; 79.122
Bifenthrin31.68180.9; 166.112180.9; 165.230
Cyfluthrin35.89162.9; 91.115162.9; 127.15
Cypermethrin36.64180.9; 152.128180.9; 127.130
Deltamethrin41.89180.9; 152.225253.0; 93.020
Fenpropathrin31.87180.9; 152.127181.1; 127.135
Fluvalinate, tau34.98250; 20040250.0; 55.040
lambda-Cyhalothrin30.24181.1; 15225197.0; 161.05209.0; 111.015
Fenvalerate39.24166.9; 125.110125.1; 89.125
Permethrin34.89183.1; 168.115183.1; 153.115183; 115.225
Resmethrin28.05123.0; 81.410123.0; 95.010
Tetramethrin31.67164.0; 107.312164; 135.110
Carbamates
Carbaryl21.21143.9; 115.128143.9; 116.213
Carbofuran13.15164.0; 103.025164.0; 149.110
Furathiocarb32.49163.0; 107.010163; 7730164; 149.210
Pirimicarb19.83238.0; 166.27166.2; 95.915
Seven PCB congeners
PCB 2820.52255.8, 186.128257.8; 18628
PCB 5222.48291.9; 222.030291.9; 22030
PCB 10126.42325.8; 256.139325.8; 29112
PCB 11828.67325.7; 256.030325.7; 25427
PCB 13830.27359.7; 289.930359.7; 324.915
PCB 15329.40359.7; 289.930359.7; 287.930
PCB 18032.23395.6; 325.930395.6; 360.915
* CE—collision energy.
Table 2. Validation parameters of the method.
Table 2. Validation parameters of the method.
CompoundLOQ a (μg/kg)Recovery (%)RSD b (%)Linearity Ranger2
Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs)
Aldrin183.711.21–2000.9967
Chlordane, cis-194.313.51–2000.9960
Chlordane, trans-196.89.431–2000.9983
Chlorobenzilate185.47.191–2000.9946
p,p′-DDD1104.217.41–2000.9945
p,p′-DDE1107.311.11–2000.9972
o,p′-DDT1104.716.51–2000.9943
p,p′-DDT1101.38.411–2000.9947
Dieldrin192.216.21–2000.9981
alpha-endosulfan184.217.61–2000.9954
beta-endosulfan180.615.41–2000.9975
endosulfansulfate185.714.41–2000.9969
Endrin0.587.415.40.5–2000.9948
alpha-HCH0.599.311.60.5–2000.9971
beta-HCH0.598.69.770.5–2000.9920
gamma-HCH/Lindan0.597.410.40.5–2000.9973
Heptachlor194.615.11–2000.9946
Heptachlorepoxid, egzo-196.613.61–2000.9947
Heptachlorepoxid, endo-197.411.41–2000.9978
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)0.591.316.70.5–2000.9989
Methoxychlor1105.416.61–2000.9930
Pentachloroaniline1106.914.51–2000.9961
Quintozene191.29.551–2000.9926
Organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs)
Azinphos-ethyl287.311.22–2000.9962
Bromophos-ethyl1101.418.31–2000.9941
Carbophenothion592.113.15–2000.9929
Chlorfenvinphos189.712.31–2000.9983
Chlorpyrifos187.911.61–2000.9940
Chlorpyrifos-methyl196.316.31–2000.9950
Diazinon194.715.61–2000.9986
Dichlorvos193.316.61–2000.9975
Ethion183.721.41–2000.9905
Fenchlorphos182.611.61–2000.9943
Fenithrotion188.08.871–2000.9926
Fenthion195.314.41–2000.9940
Malaoxon192.713.61–2000.9945
Malathion192.612.51–2000.9930
Methidathion196.915.41–2000.9913
Mevinphos1107.714.71–2000.9986
Paraoxon-metyl5118.413.35–2000.9924
Parathion-ethyl2105.610.72–2000.9908
Parathion-methyl2104.29.512–2000.9981
Pirimiphos-methyl186.413.91–2000.9938
Profenofos187.617.71–2000.9947
Propetamphos196.016.21–2000.9951
Pyrazophos1105.712.21–2000.9971
Tetrachlorvinphos1104.413.61–2000.9920
Triazophos188.715.31–2000.9921
Pyrethroids
Allethrin298.67.512–2000.9985
Bifenthrin1105.216.31–2000.9963
Cyfluthrin593.618.75–2000.9918
Cypermethrin10105.711.610–2000.9942
Deltamethrin1098.711.710–2000.9954
Fenpropathrin596.415.55–2000.9926
Fenvalerate596.412.45–2000.9957
Fluvalinate, tau597.29.225–2000.9963
lambda-Cyhalothrin590.715.45–2000.9978
Permethrin1107.316.31–2000.9974
Resmethrin596.612.65–2000.9906
Tetramethrin197.916.21–2000.9958
Carbamates
Carbaryl584.119.55–2000.9911
Carbofuran186.118.41–2000.9923
Furathiocarb198.68.551–2000.9902
Pirimicarb189.68.341–2000.9952
Polychlorobiphenyls
(Seven PCBs)
PCB 280.5102.48.430.5–2000.9961
PCB 520.5104.316.10.5–2000.9983
PCB 1010.594.610.40.5–2000.9973
PCB 1180.595.38.320.5–2000.9965
PCB 138197.810.61–2000.9978
PCB 1530.586.47.630.5–2000.9964
PCB 180184.310.31–2000.9970
a LOQ—limit of quantification; b RSD—precision in case of repeatability.
Table 3. Mean concentrations and minimum–maximum range (μg/kg, fresh weight) of pesticides and 7 PCB congeners in cow’s, goat and sheep’s milk and dairy products collected in Croatia within the period 2015–2022 (other pesticides not listed in the table were not quantified above the LOQ (<LOQ).
Table 3. Mean concentrations and minimum–maximum range (μg/kg, fresh weight) of pesticides and 7 PCB congeners in cow’s, goat and sheep’s milk and dairy products collected in Croatia within the period 2015–2022 (other pesticides not listed in the table were not quantified above the LOQ (<LOQ).
CompoundMean ± SD (Number of Results above the LOQ)
Minimum–Maximum
Cow’s Milk
n = 337
Goat’s Milk
n = 60
Sheep’s Milk
n = 46
Dairy Products
n = 91
Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs)
Chlorobenzilate1.30 ± 0.17 (4)
1.2–1.6
1.25 ± 0.05 (2)
1.2–1.3
<LOQ<LOQ
Chlordane, trans-1.2<LOQ<LOQ<LOQ
∑DDT a1.70 ± 0.82 (21)
1.0–3.9
2.30 ± 0.40 (2)
1.9–2.7
1.33.17 ± 2.15 (3)
1.0–6.1
Dieldrin1.1<LOQ<LOQ<LOQ
∑endosulfan b1.68 ± 0.43 (4)
1.0–2.2
1.72.21.95 ± 0.05 (2)
1.9–2.0
Endrin1.0<LOQ<LOQ<LOQ
∑HCH c1.04 ± 0.34 (9)
0.7–1.5
1.07 ± 0.05 (3)
1.0–1.1
0.5<LOQ
Heptachlor<LOQ<LOQ<LOQ1.1 ± 0.1 (2)
1.0–1.2
Hexachlorobenzene0.92 ± 0.22 (23)
0.2–1.2
1.70 ± 0.6 (2)
1.1–2.3
1.03 ± 0.19 (4)
0.8–1.1
1.28 ± 0.28 (4)
0.8–1.5
Methoxychlor1.78 ± 0.35 (6)
1.1–2.2
1.11.1<LOQ
Pentachloroaniline<LOQ<LOQ1.1<LOQ
Quintozene<LOQ1.9<LOQ<LOQ
Organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs)
Bromophos-ethyl1.35 ± 0.05 (2)
1.3–1.4
1.25 ± 0.05 (2)
1.2–1.3
<LOQ2.27 ± 0.05 (3)
2.2–2.3
Chlorfenvinphos1.3 ± 0.3 (2)
1.0–1.6
<LOQ<LOQ<LOQ
Chlorpyrifos1.49 ± 0.18 (9)
1.3–1.8
1.21.8<LOQ
Chlorpyrifos-methyl<LOQ<LOQ<LOQ<LOQ
Diazinon<LOQ<LOQ3.65 ± 1.95 (2)
1.7–5.6
<LOQ
Ethion2.2 ± 0.3 (2)
1.9–2.5
<LOQ<LOQ<LOQ
Pirimiphos-methyl1.4 ± 0.37 (3)
1.0–1.9
1.65 ± 0.35 (2)
1.3–2.0
<LOQ<LOQ
Pyrazophos1.0<LOQ<LOQ<LOQ
Triazophos<LOQ1.6<LOQ<LOQ
Pyrethroids and carbamates (P&C)
Allethrin<LOQ3.3<LOQ<LOQ
Bifenthrin 1.4 ± 0.2 (2)
1.2–1.6
<LOQ<LOQ<LOQ
Carbaryl17.4<LOQ17.4 ± 7.40 (3)
12.0–27.9
<LOQ
Primicarb1.5<LOQ<LOQ<LOQ
Permethrin 1.4<LOQ<LOQ<LOQ
Resmethrin <LOQ7.6<LOQ<LOQ
Tetramethrin1.5<LOQ<LOQ<LOQ
Polychlorobiphenyls
(Seven PCBs)
∑PCBs d2.74 ± 5.42 (19)
1.0–25.6
1.93 ± 0.18 (2)
1.75–2.1
1.38 ± 0.48 (4)
1.0–2.2
2.85 ± 0.61 (3)
2.4–3.9
Total no. of results above LOQ
Total no. of OCP (%)70 (20.8)12 (20.0)9 (19.7)11 (12.1)
Total no. of OPP (%)19 (5.64)6 (10.0)3 (6.52)3 (3.30)
Total no. of P&C (%)6 (1.78)2 (3.33)3 (6.52)0
Total no. of PCBs (%)19 (5.63)2 (3.33)4 (6.67)3 (3.30)
Total114 (33.8)22 (36.7)19 (41.3)17 (18.7)
a ∑DDT: sum of pp′-DDD, pp′-DDE, op′-DDT and pp′-DDT. b ∑endosulfan: alpha-endosulfan, beta-endosulfan and endosulfansulfate. c ∑HCH: sum of the alpha, beta and gamma isomers. d ∑PCBs: sum of PCB 28, PCB 52, PCB 101, PCB 118, PCB 138, PCB 153 and PCB 180.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Đokić, M.; Nekić, T.; Varenina, I.; Varga, I.; Solomun Kolanović, B.; Sedak, M.; Čalopek, B.; Vratarić, D.; Bilandžić, N. Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Milk and Dairy Products in Croatia: A Health Risk Assessment. Foods 2024, 13, 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13081155

AMA Style

Đokić M, Nekić T, Varenina I, Varga I, Solomun Kolanović B, Sedak M, Čalopek B, Vratarić D, Bilandžić N. Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Milk and Dairy Products in Croatia: A Health Risk Assessment. Foods. 2024; 13(8):1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13081155

Chicago/Turabian Style

Đokić, Maja, Tamara Nekić, Ivana Varenina, Ines Varga, Božica Solomun Kolanović, Marija Sedak, Bruno Čalopek, Darija Vratarić, and Nina Bilandžić. 2024. "Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Milk and Dairy Products in Croatia: A Health Risk Assessment" Foods 13, no. 8: 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13081155

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop