Next Article in Journal
Fermentation of Whole-Wheat Using Different Combinations of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Yeast: Impact on In Vitro and Ex Vivo Antioxidant Activity
Previous Article in Journal
COI Metabarcoding as a Novel Approach for Assessing the Honey Bee Source of European Honey
Previous Article in Special Issue
Edible Coating Combining Liquid Smoke from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches and Turmeric Extract to Prolong the Shelf Life of Mackerel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Pulsed Electric Fields and Osmotic Dehydration on the Quality of Modified-Atmosphere-Packaged Fresh-Cut and Fried Potatoes

by
Efimia Dermesonlouoglou
*,
George Seretis
,
Maria Katsouli
,
Alexandros Katsimichas
,
Petros Taoukis
and
Maria Giannakourou
*
Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Technology, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), 9, Iroon Polytechniou Str, 15772 Zografou, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(3), 420; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030420
Submission received: 20 December 2024 / Revised: 15 January 2025 / Accepted: 22 January 2025 / Published: 27 January 2025

Abstract

:
The aim of this research was to study the effect of osmotic dehydration (OD) and/or pulsed electric field (PEF) on the quality of MAP-packed potatoes, both as raw materials and after deep frying. Fresh-cut potato strips (from Naxos island) were osmotically dehydrated using a solution of 20% glycerol, 5% sodium chloride, and 1% ascorbic acid (wt) at a 5:1 liquid-to-food ratio at 35 °C for 120 min. OD-treated and untreated samples were packaged at MAP (0.2% O2 + 12% CO2) and stored at 4, 8, and 12 °C. Color (Browning Index, BI), texture (hardness, Fmax), sensory characteristics (including total sensory quality), and microbial stability (total aerobic and anaerobic counts, Pseudomonas, Entrobacteriaceae, and yeasts/molds) were monitored during storage. After package opening, samples were deep-fried at 180 °C for up to 8 min, and the oil content of fried samples was quantified. Sensory evaluation of raw and fried samples was conducted. Untreated fresh-cut potatoes were characterized by detrimental color degradation starting from the third day of storage at 4 °C and presented microbial growth (total viable counts: 6 log (CFU)/g) on the sixth day, whereas pre-treated potato samples retained their color and microbiological stability after 15 and 18 days of cold storage, respectively. OD pre-treatment reduced the oil uptake during frying (up to 30%).

1. Introduction

Potatoes are highly popular due to their rich content of nutrients, minerals, and dietary fibers and their versatility in various food applications, such as potato fries [1,2,3]. However, during the fresh-cutting process, the mechanical damage to the tissue makes them susceptible to enzymatic browning and reduces their shelf life [4,5,6]. The browning of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables occurs when phenolic compounds undergo enzymatic oxidation, catalyzed by polyphenol oxidase, leading to the formation of quinones, which then condense into colored pigments [4,5]. Blanching (at 55–75 °C for a minimum of 10 min) is commonly used in the production of par-fried potatoes to deactivate polyphenol oxidase. However, blanching requires significant amounts of water and is not energy efficient [7]. Additionally, during blanching, a colorless complex may form between potato iron and chlorogenic acid. Upon oxidation, this complex can create ferri-chlorogenic acid, resulting in an undesirable dark color. To mitigate this, anti-browning agents, such as sulfites, are often added to the blanching solution [8]. Previous studies have also highlighted the positive effect of osmotic dehydration (as a single treatment or in combination with other technologies) in preserving the color (browning) of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].
Osmotic dehydration (OD) is a process where food is immersed in a hypertonic solution—containing carbohydrates, salts, and other specific ingredients such as antioxidants and antimicrobials—at mild temperatures. The key parameters of this process include temperature, time, food-to-osmotic solution ratio, and the osmotic solution formulation [9,10]. For each food product, the optimal processing conditions must be chosen to ensure efficient dehydration within a reasonable timeframe while preserving food quality. The influence of different parameters, particularly temperature, time duration, and the composition of the osmotic solution, on mass transfer during OD has been widely studied [10,12]. Osmotic dehydration has been extensively explored as a pre-treatment method, particularly before drying or freezing foods with a high water content. Studies have shown that OD pre-treatment can increase the quality and stability of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables [9,10,13,14,15,16,17]. Additionally, the impact of OD on frying kinetics and the quality of potato fries (French type) has been explored by Krokida et al. [18], Gupta et al. [19], and Kwaw et al. [20]. The studies found that pre-frying dehydration reduced oil absorption in potato fries while significantly enhancing their color and structural properties. Osmotic dehydration also helped prevent discoloration that occurred during subsequent frying.
Recently, there has been increasing interest in innovative technologies that offer significant potential for reducing energy consumption and shortening processing times [16,21,22]. Among these, pulsed electric field (PEF) has emerged as a promising process for various food applications owing to its low power requirements [16,21,22]. PEF is recognized as an effective pre-treatment for enhancing mass transfer processes, such as dehydration (air drying, freeze drying, and osmotic dehydration) and extraction [23,24,25,26,27]. The process involves the use of high-voltage pulses on semi-liquid or liquid foods placed between two electrodes. This electric field induces electroporation, which creates pores in the cell membranes and walls. As a result, cell permeability increases, allowing intracellular water to move into the extracellular matrix [23,28]. This movement of water accelerates dehydration but also leads to a loss of turgor pressure, causing tissue softening [23,24,29,30]. PEF technology is now used in the potato industry to reduce cutting forces [30,31]. Research has also explored the potential of PEF pre-treatment on potato tubers for French fries production [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. PEF treatment has been shown to enhance the permeability of potato cell membranes, reduce oil and acrylamide content in fried potatoes, and improve their texture [30,36,37]. However, studies on the combined use of PEF (as a pre-treatment for osmotic dehydration) and osmotic dehydration before frying are still relatively limited.
The objective of this study is twofold: (1) to assess and model the impact of pulsed electric field (PEF) pre-treatment conditions on the osmotic dehydration (OD) parameters (including mass transfer) and product quality characteristics (water activity, texture, and color) of fresh-cut potatoes and (2) to evaluate the quality and shelf-life stability (with regard to microbial growth) of potatoes treated with OD and PEF + OD and packaged under modified atmosphere during cold storage. The quality of OD-treated and PEF + OD-treated potatoes during/after frying was also determined (oil uptake during frying, texture/color, and sensory properties of the fried product). For this study, potatoes with protected geographical indication certifications from Naxos Island (Greece) were used. Preserving the unique qualities of “Naxos” potatoes at their freshest while extending their shelf life is essential from a quality standpoint. This will ensure that they can be successfully distributed to both domestic and foreign markets.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Potatoes (of the Spunta variety) were purchased from a local potato producer (SKLIRAKIS, J.,-JACOB GIAKOUMIS O.E., Naxos, Greece) at the maturity stage (based on crop physiology and the presence of a thick, firm skin) and stored at room temperature in the dark for 7 days (maximum). The potatoes with similar color, size, and maturity and no obvious disease, insect, and mechanical damage were peeled (1–2 mm) and cut along the longitudinal direction (in the middle of the potato) to obtain potato strips of weight 5 g and length 5 cm. The water content of the raw material was 0.874 ± 0.024 g water/g sample weight.

2.2. Pulsed Electric Field (PEF) Treatment of Potatoes

Potato strips were treated in water (tap, with an electrical conductivity of 800 μS/cm) at an electric field strength of 0.5 kV/cm for 200 pulses, resulting in a specific energy input equal to 0.02 kJ/kg [38]. The treatment was performed in a stainless-steel parallel plate batch electrode chamber with an electrode spacing of 8 cm and a total volume of 300 mL. Bipolar pulses of near-rectangular shape were delivered to the treatment chamber using an Elcrack-5 kW unit (DIL, Quackenbrück, Germany). In brief, approximately 80 g of potato strips were transferred to the treatment chamber for each PEF treatment and covered with tap water. The pulse width was set to 15 μs, the amplitude of electric pulses was 4 kV, and the pulse frequency was maintained at 20 Hz. The initial temperature of potato strips was approximately 25 °C, and the post-treatment temperature remained practically unchanged. Sample temperature was measured by a digital thermometer (General Tools & Instruments, Secaucus, NJ, USA) before and after each PEF treatment. After each treatment, selected quality parameters (texture/color) of the potatoes were evaluated.

2.3. Osmotic Dehydration (OD) of Untreated and PEF-Pre-Treated Potatoes

Potato strips (untreated and PEF-pre-treated) were first weighed and placed in cylindrical glass containers, which were then filled with preheated osmotic medium of 20% glycerol, 5% sodium chloride, and 1% ascorbic acid at 35 °C to achieve a food-to-liquid sample ratio of 1:5. The containers were immersed in a thermostatic water bath with continuous agitation at 240 rpm (Grant GL5400 Linear Shaking Water Bath, Royston, UK). Samples were taken at 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min, rinsed with water to remove excess solution, and gently blotted with absorbent paper [32]. Water loss (WL), solid gain (SG), water activity (aw), and the quality properties of texture (firmness) and color (browning) change were determined throughout the OD process.
Osmotic dehydration of potatoes for the shelf-life study was performed in pilot-scale equipment consisting of a cylindrical (Ø28 × 60 cm) stainless steel 100 L tank fitted with spigots, which allowed draining of the solution. Stirring was also mildly applied (set at a rotational speed of 120 rpm) through an electrical motor paddle-type stirrer, carefully submerged into the solution. A heating option was also provided, where required, with a complementary stainless steel helical tube, which could be heated via a continuous circulation of water from a 3 kW water bath. In our work, gentle heating was employed (temperature set at 35 °C, monitored with a thermocouple throughout the whole process) to ensure homogeneous dissolution of the osmotic medium constituents. The solution required for osmotic dehydration was prepared in situ within the stainless-steel tank by dosing the ingredients using a high-capacity electronic balance. Potatoes were manually loaded and unloaded in the tank (batch process). After OD treatment, the potatoes were rinsed with centrifugal household vegetable equipment and placed for 30 min on a perforated rack to drain off excess osmotic solution. The scaling-up of the OD process up to the 100 kg scale was deemed successful, and the measured parameters agreed with their counterparts obtained after experiments in the lab scale.

2.4. Quality Monitoring of Untreated and PEF-Pre-Treated OD Potatoes During Cold Storage

OD potato strips, untreated and PEF-treated, were packaged in PA (polyamide)/PE (polyethylene) bags (250 × 175 × 0.04 mm; ten potato strips from each repetition) in modified atmosphere (12.2% CO2-0.188% O2) (Boss NT42N, Bad Homburg, Germany) and stored in controlled temperature cabinets at 4, 8, and 12 °C (±0.2 °C) (Sanyo MIR 153, Sanyo Electric, Osaka, Japan). The temperature in the cabinets was continuously monitored using temperature data loggers (COX TRACER, Belmont, NC, USA). At predetermined sampling storage times, three bags per processing with one bag per repetition were selected for the shelf-life study. Quality (texture/color) and microbial stability of samples were measured. Gas headspace of packages was analyzed (CheckMate 9900 O2/CO2, PBI Dansensor, Ringsted, Denmark).
OD potato strips, untreated and PEF-treated, were fried in sunflower oil at 180 °C (±1 °C) for 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min (Tefal Visialis Deep Fryer, Groupe SEB, Paris, France). The fryer was filled with 2 L of oil in a potato strips-to-oil ratio of 1:50 w/v. Fried potato strips were drained for a few seconds on paper.

2.5. Analytical Protocols and Mathematical Modeling

2.5.1. Physicochemical Parameters

Water activity (aw) was determined by a water activity meter (Aqua lab 4TEV, Decagon Devices, Pullman, WA, USA). The water (moisture) content was measured by drying at 105 °C for 18 h (WTB BINDER 7200, Type C53, Tuttlingen, Germany) [39]. pH was measured using a pH meter (338, Amel Instruments, Milano, Italy). Ten grams of homogenized potato sample was diluted in 90 mL of sterilized Ringer solution [40].

Mass Transfer During Osmotic Dehydration

Water loss (WL) and solid gain (SG) values were calculated using Equations (1) and (2) [41], respectively.
W L = m 0 m 0 · D W w b m w e t m d r y m 0 · D W w b
S G = m d r y D W w b · m 0 D W w b · m 0
where m0 represents the initial wet weight of the sample prior to immersion in the osmotic solution, DWwb is the dry weight of the untreated sample (g of water/g of sample wet base), mwet is the wet weight of the treated sample (g), and mdry is the dry weight of the OD-pre-treated sample (g).
According to our kinetic approach, the penetration model was used to describe water loss and solid gain, where the ratio of WL/SG is proportional to the square root of the contact time, according to Equation (3) [41].
W L   o r   S G = k X · t O D
where WL is in g   w a t e r g   D W or SG is in g   s o l i d g   D W at time tOD; kX is the water loss constant (kWL) in g   w a t e r g   D W · s 1 2 or the solid gain constant (kSG) in g   s o l i d s g   D W · s 1 2 ; and t is the osmotic dehydration time in min.

2.5.2. Potato Product Composition

The glycerol content of the potato strip product was measured according to the assay proposed by Kuhn et al. [42] with minor modifications. The final measurement was executed in a microplate reader at 410 nm over a period of 25 min. The final glycerol content was calculated based on a glycerol standard curve and expressed as mg glycerol/g potato. The salt content of the potato strip product was measured titrimetrically by the Mohr method [39]. Vitamin C (mg L (ascorbic acid)/100 g potato) of the potato strip product was determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography method [43]. For all measurements, two replicates were used.

2.5.3. Potato Product Firmness

Potato strips were compressed to a deformation of 20% by a knife attached to a texture analyzer (TA-XT2i, Stable Micro Systems, Godalming, UK) (test speed of 1.00 mm/s; distance of 4.00 mm). The knife was used to cut the potatoes along the longitudinal direction in the middle of each potato sample. The firmness was recorded as the maximum compression force (Fmax, N) [11]. A minimum of five replicates were performed for each measurement.

2.5.4. Potato Product Color

An Xrite-i1 portable digital colorimeter (Gretag-Macbeth, Grand Rapids, MI, USA) was used to assess the objective color on the potato surface, expressed in the CIE-Lab color scale. At least five replicates were taken by measuring the color at three different evenly distributed locations on the surface of each potato. The degree of browning was quantified using the Browning Index (BI) calculated using Equation (4) [44]. In the present study, BI is used (as the most representative parameter) to indicate color changes in the processed potato strips during OD processing as well as during cold storage [1,2,3,45].
B I = 100 a   +   1.75   ×   L 5.645   ×   L   +   a     0.3012   ×   b 0.31 0.17
where L, a, and b represent the measured CIE-Lab color parameters.

2.5.5. Oil Content

Five grams of smashed potato strips were weighed and placed in a 250 mL beaker together with hexane at a 1:10 sample–solvent ratio. The mixture was allowed to stir with a magnetic stirrer for about 40 min, and the liquid solvent–oil phase was then placed in pre-weighed 100 mL round-bottom flasks by filtration. The vacuum evaporator (Heidolph G1, Germany) was then used to evaporate the hexane at a temperature of 40 °C, with gentle rotation of the flask. Finally, the spherical bottles were re-weighed, and the gross bottle-oil weight was measured, with the fat content calculated through the weight and the initial amount.
For the prediction of the oil uptake during the frying process, a first-order kinetic model proposed in the literature was used [32] (Equation (5)).
Y = Y e [ 1 exp k O I L × t f r ]
where Y is the oil content (kg/kg db), Ye is the equilibrium value of Y (kg/kg db), kOIL is the rate constant (min−1), and tfr is the frying time.

2.5.6. Sensory Analysis

The sensory evaluation was performed by eight to ten trained adult assessors [46]. Participation in the assessments was voluntary, and an informed written consent was obtained by all participants prior to the sensory evaluation study, which could be withdrawn at any point of the evaluation. The organizer of the sensory test provided a detailed description of the test to all participants to inform them about the food samples that would be assessed. A questionnaire was also distributed where they were obliged to report any indispositions or allergies, and if such was the case, the particular volunteer was excluded from the tests.
Sensory attributes of fried potato strips (including the appearance and odor of the raw samples) were assessed, with scores recorded on appropriate forms to reflect the organoleptic changes indicating quality deterioration (provided as a Supplementary Materials). The fried potato strips were described in terms of appearance (oil detection and color browning), odor, texture (crispiness, firmness, and gumminess), taste (overall, sweet taste, salty taste, and other), flavor, aftertaste, and total sensory quality. Each sensory parameter, as well as the total sensory quality, was scored separately on a 1–9 scale (where 9 represented high quality and 1 represented poor quality). A sensory score of 5 was considered the threshold for minimum acceptability.

2.5.7. Microbial Growth

The growth of key microorganisms associated with the spoilage of fresh-cut potatoes was monitored throughout storage. For microbiological analysis, a 10 g sample was transferred to a sterile stomacher bag containing 90 mL of sterilized Ringer solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and homogenized for 60 s using a Stomacher (Bag Mixer, Interscience, Saint Nom la Bretêche, France). Mold and yeast counts were performed using Rose Bengal Chloramphenicol (RBC, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) after incubation at 25 °C for 120 h. Total aerobic mesophiles were counted using the standard plate count method with plate count agar (PCA, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) incubated at 25 °C for 72 h. Total anaerobic bacteria were enumerated on sulfite-polymyxinsulfadiazin-A (SPS) agar, with plates incubated at 35 ± 0.5 °C for 24–36 h in anaerobic jars with an atmosphere generation system (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK). Pseudomonas spp. was measured on cetrimide agar (CFC, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) after incubation at 25 °C for 48 h. The pour plate method was used for Enterobacteriaceae enumeration using violet red bile glucose agar (VRBG, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) after incubation at 37 °C for 24–48 h. Two replicates from at least three appropriate dilutions were enumerated. Microbial counts were expressed as log CFU per gram of tissue. Microbial growth was modeled using the Baranyi growth model. The DMFit program (available at www.combase.cc accessed on 24 July 2024) was used for curve fitting and calculation of the kinetic parameters, lag phase (λ in d), and microbial growth rate (kmicr in d−1).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Analyses were conducted on at least three duplicate samples, and treatments were conducted at least twice. The mean value ± SD is used to report the results. The significance level for analyses of variance (ANOVA) was set at p < 0.05 using Statista 7.0 (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). As a post hoc analysis, Duncan’s multiple range test was used to separate means with significant differences.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. PEF and OD

3.1.1. Effect of PEF and OD on Mass Transfer and Water Activity of Potatoes

For both untreated and PEF-pre-treated potato strips, water loss increased and water activity rapidly decreased at the start of the OD process, reaching stable values after 120 min, as shown in Figure 1a,c. PEF pre-treatment significantly affected water loss up to 180 min of OD (p < 0.05). The increase in water loss after PEF processing was also noted by the increase in the water loss constant (kWL) (Equation (3); Table 1). The effect of PEF on solid gain values (under the applied processing conditions) was not significant (p > 0.05) (kSG) (Figure 1b; Table 1). Dimopoulos et al. (2024) reported that PEF pre-treatment of osmotically dehydrated spinach (glycerol concentration in the osmotic solution: 60%) led to a significant WL as well as SG increase [41]. Dermesonlouoglou et al. (2019) reported that the increase in glycerol concentration (from 40 to 60%) in the osmotic solution significantly affected both the water and the solids diffusion of OD peach fruit [47]. In this study, the glycerol concentration was kept low (at 20%), aiming at a minimum alteration of potato sensory attributes.
Pre-treatment of OD potatoes with PEF induced slight changes in the product water activity (aw,PEF/OD sample: 0.9375; aw,OD sample: 0.9406) (p > 0.05). Significantly different aw values for OD-treated and PEF + OD-treated potato strips were observed for osmotic dehydration times up to 60 min (p < 0.05). According to Katsouli et al. (2024) [38], although the mass transfer and water activity values are significantly lower at more intense process conditions (PEF application as a pre-osmotic dehydration step), the temporal evolution (rate of aw decrease) is not affected by PEF treatments. This observation suggests that electroporation leads to an immediate release of free water right after the treatment. A rapid immersion in the osmotic solution is adequate to eliminate this released free water and reduce water activity.

3.1.2. PEF and OD Effect on Color and Texture of Potato Strips

PEF pre-treatment influenced the quality of the product, specifically in terms of color degradation and texture firmness during osmotic dehydration (OD). The degradation of color in treated potatoes as a function of the duration of osmotic dehydration was quantified by the Browning Index (BI) (Figure 2a). The BI values for samples subjected to PEF pre-treatment were found to be higher compared to those of the OD-treated samples. Furthermore, the application of OD to PEF-treated samples resulted in a decrease in BI values. Throughout the OD process, BI values for both standard OD-treated and PEF + OD-treated samples exhibited a decline. It was observed that after 120 min of OD, the BI values approached 14.0. For OD times > 120 min and BI values < 14, the potato strips were characterized as «white-colorless». Katsouli et al. (2024) [38] similarly noted that the BI values of potato strips subjected to PEF treatment prior to osmotic dehydration (OD) were lower than those of untreated samples. The firmness of potatoes post-PEF treatment is a significant aspect, as it affects the sensory attributes of the final product. Figure 2b illustrates the variation in firmness of the samples in relation to the duration of osmotic dehydration. A softening effect was observed in the potatoes following both PEF and OD treatments, with firmness decreasing from approximately 8.15 N in the fresh-cut samples to 6.43 N and 5.74 N after PEF and PEF + OD treatments, respectively. This finding is consistent with the observations made by Katsouli et al. (2024) [38] regarding potato strips treated with PEF and OD. Conversely, during the osmotic dehydration process, an increase in firmness values was recorded. Specifically, a 120 min duration of OD resulted in firmness values that approached those of fresh-cut potatoes, i.e., approximately 9.00 N. The OD-treated and PEF + OD-treated potato product characteristics for OD time of 120 min (selected as the appropriate OD treatment time) are shown in Table 2. The PEF + OD-treated potato strips were characterized by significantly lower water activity and pH values compared to the values of the untreated potato strips. PEF + OD-treated potato strips presented different color and texture parameters. The OD-treated potato strips were positively evaluated during the sensory evaluation testing. Regarding the composition of the OD-modified and PEF + OD-modified potato tissue, glycerol, salt, and ascorbic acid (vitamin C) content were calculated by analytical methods.

3.2. Quality of OD-Treated and PEF + OD-Treated Potatoes After Frying

3.2.1. Oil Uptake During Frying of OD-Treated and PEF + OD-Treated Potato Strips

The oil content of potatoes during frying up to 10 min is presented in Figure 3. OD, as well as the combined PEF and OD application, significantly decreased the oil uptake during frying (p < 0.05). For all sample categories, the data for oil uptake showed an exponential increase in oil uptake with the increase in frying time. In Table 3, the oil content constants for different pre-treatments (OD, PEF, PEF + OD) are reported as calculated by Equation (5) after appropriate data fitting.
Pre-drying procedures lower the crust’s permeability, moisture content, and oil absorption of fried products. When potatoes are dried, a skin layer forms on their surface, which lowers porosity and lessens the amount of vapor that passes through the surface. There is less vacant space for oil to remain after frying when porosity decreases. Because the dry matter level of potatoes contributes to the undesirable mealy texture of fries, manufacturers try to increase the dry matter of potatoes by pre-drying them before frying. Chips made from tubers with a high dry matter content absorb less oil when fried. Oladejo et al. (2017) investigated the impact of osmotic dehydration on the quality attributes of French fries [48]. They found that samples that were pre-treated in osmotic solutions had much less oil and moisture compared to the untreated samples [48]. They reported that the increased moisture movement inside the food product’s structure during frying, which results in high vapor pressure within the food structure and reduces oil absorption, could be the cause of the reduced oil content of the osmotically pre-treated samples. Furthermore, a crust formed on the surface of the fried samples treated with OD, which may have stopped the oil from being absorbed during the cooling process. This outcome matches the findings of Krokida et al. (2001) [32], Karizaki et al. (2013) [33], Dehghannya et al. (2015) [49], and Barani et al. (2020) [50]. Krokida et al. (2001) reported that the oil content reduced as drying time increased [32].
The positive effects of electroporation were also highlighted by Liu et al. (2017, 2018) [51,52], who observed a reduction in oil absorption during the frying of potato discs. Their research found that PEF treatment was more effective than a blanching-induced gel layer in reducing oil uptake in French fries. Specifically, PEF-treated chips showed a 38.7% reduction in oil uptake, while blanching only resulted in a 3.8% decrease [51]. PEF treatment reduces oil absorption by promoting water diffusion from the potato core to the surface, which forms a thicker water vapor layer that minimizes both dehydration and oil absorption during frying. Additionally, the smoother surface of PEF-treated potatoes enhances oil drainage after frying. Regardless of the processing conditions, PEF treatments increase the moisture content and softens the potato cubes without altering their fresh appearance. More recently, it has been shown that combining PEF treatment with convective air drying significantly shortens frying times and reduces oil absorption in fried potatoes [52]. Furthermore, the efficiency of potato dehydration was notably improved when PEF treatment was combined with vacuum drying at sub-atmospheric pressure [53].

3.2.2. Quality of OD-Treated and PEF + OD-Treated Fried Potato Strips

The organoleptic quality of fried potato strips (frying time 10 min) can be described in terms of appearance (oil detection and color browning), odor, texture (crispiness, firmness, and gumminess), taste (overall, sweet taste, salty taste, and other), flavor, aftertaste, and total sensory quality. In Figure 4, average scores (scale 1–9) for the characteristics (axis 1–13) of untreated, OD-treated, and PEF + OD-treated potato strips are demonstrated.
Fresh-cut potatoes and/or minimally processed potatoes are convenient but highly perishable products. Unlike most fresh-cut vegetables, which are ready to eat, fresh-cut potatoes must be cooked before consumption. Therefore, in addition to the safety (chemical and microbiological), quality, and sensory characteristics of raw fresh-cut potatoes, the same requirements should be applied for cooked potatoes [54]. In the present study, the sensory evaluation was conducted on raw potatoes as well as fried potatoes. Sensory scores for the individual sensory/quality parameters as well as the overall sensory quality of these samples were presented and mathematically modeled. Score for overall sensory quality encompasses the panelists’ general opinion about the examined samples and is a good indicator of the evolution of a product’s quality.
From the sensory scores, the OD-treated fried potato strips received a high score for the total sensory quality (7.1/9.0 compared to 7.7/9 for the untreated fried potato sample). PEF pre-treatment negatively affected the sensory quality of the OD-treated fried samples. PEF + OD-treated fried potato strips received the lowest score for total sensory quality (6.0/9.0), mainly due to their increased firmness. PEF-pre-treated potato strips presented the value of 10 N for firmness compared to 8 N of the OD-treated sample and 5.5 N of the untreated sample. The water content of untreated, OD-treated, and PEF + OD-treated samples was calculated as 0.413, 0.249, and 0.298 g/g, respectively. All treated samples had a sticky texture due to glycerol content compared to the untreated sample.
French fries have two distinct textures: a “crispy” crust, similar in physical characteristics to potato chips (or crisps) [55], and a “firm-mealy” core, which shares some of the textural properties of boiled potatoes. The key structural parameters that influence the crispness of French fries include moisture content, oil absorption, and the starch content and distribution within the potato tissues. Other important parameters affecting crispness are related to the manufacturing process, such as pre-drying and par-frying conditions [56,57].
PEF-treated samples received lower scores for aroma, taste, and oil content. Both OD-treated and PEF + OD-treated samples were accepted in terms of appearance and presented improved sensory characteristics. Previous studies of Abedpour and Dehghannya (2016) [58] and da Costa Ribeiro et al. (2016) [59] on osmotic dehydration pre-treatment of potato preceding frying revealed that OD pre-treatment improved sensory characteristics of the fried potato.
The OD-treated and PEF + OD-treated samples exhibited a dark yellow color, in contrast to the light yellow color of the untreated sample (Scheme 1). Among these, the OD-treated samples were considered the most visually appealing. The golden yellow hue of the fried crust is an important factor in consumer preference, often influencing their choice even before tasting. This color results from the Maillard reaction, which leads to the caramelization of sugars when fried at high temperatures [37,59]. The intensity of the color is influenced by the presence of reducing sugars, amino acids, and proteins on the surface, as well as the frying temperature, edible coating, and pre-treatment method [19,28,60]. Zhang et al. (2018) reported that combining PEF treatment with blanching significantly enhanced the brightness of French fries, giving them a golden yellow appearance [61]. The discoloration observed during frying was primarily caused by the Maillard reaction, with the depth of color depending on the levels of reducing sugars, amino acids, or proteins on the surface of the potato strips, as well as frying temperature and duration [60]. Blanching likely resulted in the loss of reducing sugars and amino acids due to electrolyte leakage from the potato strips. As a result, the PEF–blanching combined pre-treatment slowed the Maillard reaction and significantly reduced browning during frying [61,62].

3.3. Shelf-Life Study of OD and PEF + OD Raw Potatoes

3.3.1. Texture and Color Change During Storage

The texture (firmness) and color (browning) of OD raw potato strips were retained during 18 days of storage. In Figure 5, the firmness change of OD-treated, PEF + OD-treated, and untreated potato strips during storage are presented. PEF-treated samples presented the highest firmness values compared to the untreated and OD-treated samples. During the 18 days of storage, the firmness of OD-treated and PEF + OD-treated samples increased, whereas the firmness of untreated samples remained stable during their shorter 5 days of storage. The firmness of OD-treated samples presented a 10%, 22%, and 31% increase at the end of their storage at 4, 8, and 12 °C, respectively. The firmness values of PEF + OD-treated samples significantly decreased at a storage temperature of 12 °C (12%). Firmness in potato tubers is influenced by three primary changes that occur due to chemical, physical, and structural transformations during the manufacturing process [63]. First, starch undergoes gelatinization; second, cell walls weaken, resulting in increased permeability; and third, the adhesion between adjacent cells diminishes [64]. The extent of these changes is determined by thermal conditions, including processing temperature and treatment duration.
Browning index values were significantly lower for OD-treated (66%) and PEF + OD-treated (71%) potato strips (at day 1 and throughout storage) compared to untreated ones, showing that OD pre-treatment protected potato color, which is a major problem of fresh-cut potatoes (p < 0.05). In Figure 6, the BI changes of OD-treated, PEF + OD-treated, and untreated potato strips during storage are presented. The BI values of untreated samples were 20.48 (day 1) and 23.89 (day 5 at 12 °C) compared to BI values of OD-treated and PEF + OD-treated samples, which were 6.81 and 5.76 (day 1) and 10.66 and 8.45 (day 5 at 12 °C), respectively. BI values of all samples slightly increased during storage. The same trend was observed by Katsouli et al. [38] for PEF + OD-treated and high-pressure (HP) + OD-treated potato strips, which presented lower BI values (and lighter color) compared to untreated potato strips. More specifically, HP and PEF reduced the BI by 12.5% and 27.9%, respectively, compared to the samples that had only been osmo-dehydrated.
The potato variety Spunta, commonly cultivated for the fresh market in southern Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa, is among the most susceptible to browning [65]. Therefore, for such delicate tissue, the milder color (PEF and OD) could be considered commercially significant. However, despite the stability of the BI value of the untreated sample during the 5 days of storage, untreated samples were rejected at day 3 by the sensory panelists. This could be due to the discolorations on the surface of the potato strips. Although color measurements were taken at three representative points of the potato tissue, the BI failed to accurately reflect the color differences. Therefore, visual inspection proves to be a more reliable method for monitoring processing. In a study on enzymatic browning in potatoes, Cantos et al. (2002) assessed color development using both the BI and organoleptic evaluation given the unique characteristics of the tissue and observed discrepancies between the two methods [65].

3.3.2. Evolution of Microbial Load During Storage

In the present study, the primary focus was on the quality changes incurred by spoilage, microbial growth, and/or enzymatic activity. The evolution of the total aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, and anaerobic microorganisms (no significant growth of other microorganisms was observed) of untreated, OD-treated, and PEF + OD-treated potato strips is shown in Figure 7. OD pre-treatment significantly increased the microbial stability of potato strips. The microbial counts of OD-treated and PEF + OD-treated potatoes presented an extended lag period before reaching about 104–105 CFU/g at 18 days of storage, as also reported by Dimopoulos et al. (2024) [41]. The microbial counts of untreated potatoes reached 105 (4 °C)–108 (12 °C) CFU/g (total anaerobic) after 5 days of storage. The initial total viable load (TVC) of untreated potato strips was 4 log(CFU)/g. The total viable counts for pre-treated with OD and PEF + OD were <6 log(CFU)/g for 18 days of chill storage. Enterobacteriaceae were at levels below the limit of detection (<10 CFU/g). In the case of the untreated sample, Enterobacteriaceae growth was observed after 5 days of storage. The kinetic parameters of the microbial growth model, microbial growth rate (k), and lag phase (λ) are presented in Table 4. The effect of OD treatment regarding microbial growth inhibition can be attributed to the difficulty of microorganism penetration into cellular spaces, which are filled with the concentrated osmotic solution [66]. Glycerol, chosen as the primary agent for reducing water activity in the osmotic medium, also demonstrates benefits as a microbial protectant. The combination of water activity levels, pH values, and packaging conditions in the developed osmo-dehydrated potatoes ensures their microbial stability.

3.3.3. Evolution of Sensory Quality Loss During Storage

The quality of fresh-cut potatoes (slices, strips, or cubes) is defined by their bright appearance, firm texture, slightly moist surface, and flesh color characteristic of the variety, free from signs of darkening or dehydration. To preserve these qualities, a combination of anti-browning agents, such as sodium bisulfite or organic acids, is commonly used alongside modified atmosphere packaging or vacuum packaging to maintain very low oxygen levels. Key parameters influencing quality include the potato cultivar, harvesting and handling practices, tuber maturity, and the peeling method employed. In the present study, the modified atmosphere of 12.2% CO2–87.6% N2 (0.188% O2) used for the package kept the microbial counts at low levels for 5 and 18 days of storage at 4 °C (untreated, OD-treated, and PEF + OD-treated samples, respectively). During storage, the O2 and CO2 concentration levels decreased for all temperatures studied. For example, the O2 and CO2 concentrations of untreated potatoes stored at 4 °C reduced from 0.188 and 12.2 to 0.139 and 9.0, respectively. The same was observed for OD-treated and PEF + OD-treated samples, to a lesser extent. The respective values for OD-treated and PEF + OD-treated samples were 0.122 and 10.9 (OD) and 0.121 and 11.4 (PEF + OD). Ma et al. (2010) demonstrated that potato slices could be preserved for 8 days at 5 °C under a controlled atmosphere of 12% CO2 and 3% O2, combined with a dip in 0.025% sodium bisulfite [67]. Similarly, a shelf life exceeding 7 days at 5 °C was achieved when bisulfite was replaced with citric and ascorbic acids and packed under a modified atmosphere of 20% CO2 and 80% N2 [68]. Angos et al. (2008) reported that a super-atmospheric oxygen composition of 80% O2 and 10–20% CO2 effectively controlled browning and suppressed the respiration rate compared to a controlled atmosphere with 2.5% O2 and 10% CO2 over 14 days of storage at 4 °C [69]. Additionally, an active modified atmosphere with initial O2 levels of 0.5–1.0% using a 35 μm thick polypropylene (PP) film preserved the appearance of fresh-cut potatoes for 10 days at 4 °C, though slight off-odors developed [70]. Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) with low oxygen levels (1–3%) at 0–5 °C can reduce cut surface browning but is insufficient to completely prevent it [71]. A shelf life of up to 3 weeks at 2 °C can be achieved by applying an active MAP with an initial nitrogen flush, resulting in a gas composition of 2–5% O2 and 3–5% CO2 during storage [72]. These gas levels do not impact microbial populations compared to storage in air [73]. Beltran et al. (2005) concluded that vacuum packaging was the most effective method for preserving the sensory quality of fresh-cut potatoes for up to 14 days at 4 °C. Under MAP conditions, browning was inhibited only with sodium sulfite, but this treatment led to the development of off-odors after 14 days at 4 °C [74].
In the present study, the OD-treated potato samples were rejected on day 15 due to off-odor development. The untreated fried potato samples were rejected on day 3 due to discoloration (based on sensory deterioration as well as microbial growth). As reported, (sole) MAP packaging could not maintain the color of fresh-cut potatoes [74]. The OD-treated and PEF + OD-treated fried potato strips were sensorially evaluated up to day 15 for the three temperatures studied. The average sensory scores for OD-treated potato fries were 6.5, 6.3, and 6.0 for the storage temperatures of 4, 8, and 12 °C, respectively, showing that the effect of temperature was not statistically significant. The same was observed for PEF + OD-treated samples. PEF + OD-treated samples received 6.5 (4 °C), 6.4 (8 °C), and 6.3 (12 °C) on storage day 15. The shelf life of OD-treated as well as PEF + OD-treated fried potato strips was limited to 15 days at 4–12 °C by the sensory rejection of (raw, after package opening) potato strips. Both OD-treated and PEF + OD-treated potato samples were microbially stable, as shown in Section 3.3.2.

4. Conclusions

The scope of this study was to explore the application of PEF and OD for effective treatment of potatoes with the aim of retaining or improving the quality and shelf life of modified-atmosphere-packaged raw potato strips as well as reducing oil uptake during subsequent frying. OD (35 °C, 120 min) with/without PEF (0.5 kV/cm, 200 pulses) pre-treatment was found to promote the retention of the overall quality (texture and color) and increase the shelf-life stability of the fresh-cut potato strips. Additionally, the OD-treated and PEF + OD-treated samples resulted in high-quality potato strips with reduced browning during chilled storage. Raw OD-pre-treated potatoes were microbiologically stable for 18 days at 4 °C; however, their shelf life was estimated at 15 days based on sensory acceptance. The untreated potato strips were rejected at 3 days (based on sensory deterioration as well as microbial growth). OD pre-treatment reduced the oil uptake during frying (up to 30%) and resulted in potato fries judged positively by sensory panelists. OD in combination with MAP can extend the shelf life and improve the commercial value of fresh-cut potatoes (especially concerning the “Naxos” variety, which has a special added value), while OD pre-treatment can be utilized as an alternative method of producing low-fat potato fries.
A point to consider regarding PEF and OD feasibility in the food industry is related to existing technical and economic challenges and scalability but also to the need for optimization of these emerging technologies. Taking also into account each technology’s limitations, their successful combined use may assist in delivering safer and environmentally friendly fresh-cut potato products with prolonged shelf life. More specifically, OD, while retaining sensory qualities, cannot provide the required microbial stability and consumes large volumes of osmotic solution, increasing operational costs and rendering scalability difficult. On the other hand, PEF, although energy efficient, is not yet fully explored regarding the optimization of processing parameters, and validation of results on a larger scale remains a point of investigation. Nonetheless, PEF has been extensively explored and recently implemented in various fresh-cut product treatments, which makes it a promising technology for broader commercial application in the fresh-cut potato industry. A strong competitive advantage of PEF is that it has already been used in the potato industry. In this context, future research should focus on addressing energy efficiency issues for smaller-scale operations and designing an appropriate optimization study to ensure consistency and scalability, especially in terms of texture and sensory quality. Future studies should also investigate the effect of these technologies on different potato cultivars and processing conditions to retain the initial superior quality of raw material and maximize the shelf life of the end product [16].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods14030420/s1, Table S1: Tested sensory characteristics for raw and fried potatoes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.T. and M.G.; methodology, E.D. and M.K.; validation, G.S., M.K. and A.K.; investigation, E.D. and M.K.; data curation, G.S. and A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, E.D. and G.S.; writing—review and editing, E.D., M.G. and P.T.; visualization, E.D.; supervision, M.K. and E.D.; project administration, M.G. and P.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the European Union-Next Generation EU in the framework of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (Greece 2.0) under call ID 16971 “RESEARCH-CREATE—INNOVATE” [project code T2EDK-03121—project acronym: Fresh4ever].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Institutional Review Board approval for human subject study (IRB) is not applicable in this case. Our Institution, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) is a Technical University in Athens, Greece. The Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Technology of the School of Chemical Engineering of NTUA consists of a chemical laboratory and a sensory laboratory. The chemical laboratory (well equipped with basic and specialized instruments for food analyses) facilities have a total area of 250 m2 and the sensory laboratory a total area of 50 m2. The sensory laboratory was accredited in 2010 according to the ISO 17025 standard. The preparation of food samples was conducted in the preparation area under hygienic conditions according to the principles of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) (suitably separated from the testing room, equipped for preparing and serving food samples), and the sensory testing was conducted in sensory booths by trained assessors. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations included in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) concerning sensory analysis.

Informed Consent Statement

Regarding the ethics statement during sensory testing, the following procedure was considered. Only adults participated in the recruitment to the sensory team. Participation in the tests and assessments was voluntary. Informed written consent was obtained from the participants in the sensory evaluation study. Each of them could withdraw their consent without providing any justification. Each participant also consented to the processing of their personal data in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons regarding the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). All participants obtained a detailed description of the test and were informed about the food samples that would be assessed. Each of the assessors was obliged to report any indispositions and allergies and if such was the case, the subject did not participate in the tests.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to project grant confidentiality restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dourado, C.; Pinto, C.; Barba, F.J.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Delgadillo, I.; Saraiva, J.A. Review Innovative non-thermal technologies affecting potato tuber and fried potato quality. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 88, 274–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Qiao, L.; Han, X.; Wang, H.; Gao, M.; Tian, J.; Lu, L.; Liu, X. Novel alternative for controlling enzymatic browning: Catalase and its application in fresh-cut potatoes. J. Food Sci. 2021, 86, 3529–3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tian, J.; Chen, J.; Ye, X.; Chen, X. Health benefits of the potato affected by domestic cooking: A review. Food Chem. 2016, 202, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, L.; Wu, M.; Zhao, M.; Guo, M.; Liu, H. Enzymatic properties on browning of fresh-cut potato. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 397, 012116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hou, Z.; Feng, Y.; Wei, S.; Wang, Q. Effects of curing treatment on the browning of fresh-cut potatoes. Am. J. Potato Res. 2014, 91, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, P.; Xu, N.; Liu, R.; Liu, J.; Peng, Y.; Wang, Q. Exogenous proline treatment inhibiting enzymatic browning of fresh-cut potatoes during cold storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2022, 184, 111754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bingol, G.; Wang, B.; Zhang, A.; Pan, Z.; McHugh, T.H. Comparison of water and infrared blanching methods for processing performance and final product quality of French fries. J. Food Eng. 2014, 121, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang-Pruski, G.; Nowak, J. Potato after-cooking darkening. Am. J. Potato Res. 2004, 81, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ahmed, I.; Qazi, I.M.; Jamal, S. Developments in osmotic dehydration technique for the preservation of fruits and vegetables. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016, 34, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yadav, A.K.; Singh, S.V. Osmotic dehydration of fruits and vegetables: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 1654–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Krokida, M.K.; Kiranoudis, C.T.; Maroulis, Z.B.; Marinos-Kouris, D. Effect of pretreatment on color of dehydrated products. Dry. Technol. 2000, 18, 1239–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Osae, R.; Adjonu, R.; Owusu-Ansah, P.; Apaliya, M.T.; Fauzia, A.S.; Engmann, F.N.; Otoo, G.S.; Alolga, R.N. Freeze-thawing and osmotic dehydration pretreatments on physicochemical properties and quality of orange-fleshed sweet potato slice during hot air drying. Food Chem. Adv. 2024, 5, 100843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Torreggiani, D.; Bertolo, G. Present and Future in Process Control and Optimization of Osmotic Dehydration: From Unit Operation to Innovative Combined Process: An Overview. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2004, 48, 173–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cheng, X.; Wang, S.; Iqbal, M.S.; Pan, L.; Hong, L. Effect of ultrasound-assisted osmotic dehydration on the drying kinetics, water state, and physicochemical properties of microwave vacuum-dried potato slices. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2023, 99, 106557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mari, A.; Andriotis, P.; Drosou, C.; Krokida, M. Enhancing Shelf-life Stability of Refrigerated Potatoes through Osmotic Dehydration and Ohmic Heating Optimization: A Strategy to Mitigate Enzymatic Browning. Eur. Potato J. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Drosou, C.; Sklirakis, I.; Polyzou, E.; Yakoumis, I.; Boukouvalas, C.J.; Krokida, M. Processing Fresh-Cut Potatoes Using Non-Thermal Technologies and Edible Coatings. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 11039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Akbarian, M.; Ghasemkhani, N.; Moayedi, F. Osmotic dehydration of fruits in food industrial: A review. Int. J. Biosci. 2013, 3, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  18. Krokida, M.K.; Oreopoulou, V.; Maroulis, Z.B.; Marinos-Kouris, D. Effect of osmotic dedydration pretreatment on quality of french fries. J. Food Eng. 2001, 49, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gupta, P.; Shivhare, U.S.; Bawa, A.S. Studies on frying kinetics and quality of French fries. Dry. Technol. 2000, 8, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kwaw, E.; Osae, R.; Apaliya, M.T.; Sackey, A.S.; Alolga, R.N.; Kaburi, S.A.; Hinson, M.; Bediako, G.; Botwe, A.K.; Pitcher, V.M. Effect of different pre-treatments on the physical properties, frying kinetics and organoleptic physiognomies of fried sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) chips. Food Human. 2024, 3, 100351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nowosad, K.; Sujka, M.; Pankiewicz, U.; Kowalski, R. The application of PEF technology in food processing and human nutrition. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 58, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tiwari, B.; O’Donell, C.; Cullen, P. New challenges in food science and technology: An industrial perspective. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 20, 180–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Donsì, F.; Ferrari, G.; Pataro, G. Applications of Pulsed Electric Field Treatments for the Enhancement of Mass Transfer from Vegetable Tissue. Food Eng. Rev. 2010, 2, 109–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. González Pérez, J.E.; Ramírez Corona, N.; López Malo, A. Mass Transfer During Osmotic Dehydration of Fruits and Vegetables: Process Factors and Non-Thermal Methods. Food Eng. Rev. 2021, 13, 344–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Soliva-Fortuny, R.; Balasa, A.; Knorr, D.; Martín-Belloso, O. Effects of pulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds in foods: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2009, 20, 544–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wiktor, A.; Lammerskitten, A.; Barba, G.; Michalski, M.; Toepfl, S.; Parniakov, O. Drying Processes Assisted by PEF for Plant-Based Materials. In Innovative Food Processing Technologies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wiktor, A.; Singh, A.P.; Parniakov, O.; Mykhailyk, V.; Mandal, R.; Witrowa-Rajchert, D. PEF as an alternative tool to prevent thermolabile compound degradation during dehydration processes. In Pulsed Electric Fields to Obtain Healthier and Sustainable Food for Tomorrow; Barba, F.J., Parniakov, O., Wiktor, A., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 155–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Barba, F.J.; Parniakov, O.; Pereira, S.A.; Wiktor, A.; Grimi, N.; Boussetta, N.; Saraiva, J.; Raso, J.; Martin-Belloso, O.; Witrowa-Rajchert, D.; et al. Current applications and new opportunities for the use of pulsed electric fields in food science and industry. Food Res. Int. 2015, 77, 773–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Boussetta, N.; Grimi, N.; Lebovka, N.I.; Vorobiev, E. “Cold” electroporation in potato tissue induced by pulsed electric field. J. Food Eng. 2013, 115, 232–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Janositz, A.; Noack, A.; Knorr, D. Pulsed electric fields and their impact on the diffusion characteristics of potato slices. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 1939–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Faustera, T.; Schlossnikl, D.; Ostermeier, R.R.; Teufel, F.; Toepfl, S.; Jaeger, H. Impact of pulsed electric field (PEF) pretreatment on process performance of industrial French fries production. J. Food Eng. 2018, 235, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Krokida, M.K.; Oreopoulou, V.; Maroulis, Z.B.; Marinos-Kouris, D. Effect of pre-treatment on viscoelastic behaviour of potato strips. J. Food Eng. 2001, 50, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Karizaki, V.M.; Sahin, S.; Sumnu, G.; Mosavian, M.T.H.; Luca, A. Effect of ultrasound-assisted osmotic dehydration as a pretreatment on deep fat frying of potatoes. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 3554–3563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, C.; Deng, H.; Lv, M.; Du, H.; Li, B.; Grimi, N.; Liu, Y.; Chen, W. Impact of pulsed electric fields and ultrasound on the frying characteristics of sweet potato chips. Food Bioprod. Process. 2025, 149, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Su, Y.; Zhang, M.; Chitrakar, B.; Zhang, W. Reduction of oil uptake with osmotic dehydration and coating pre-treatment in microwave-assisted vacuum fried potato chips. Food Biosci. 2021, 39, 100825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ostermeier, R.; Hill, K.; Dingis, A.; Töpfl, S.; Jäger, H. Influence of pulsed electric field (PEF) and ultrasound treatment on the frying behavior and quality of potato chips. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 67, 102553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Schouten, M.A.; Genovese, J.; Tappi, S.; Di Francesco, A.; Baraldi, E.; Cortese, M.; Capriolid, G.; Angelonid, S.; Vittori, S.; Rocculi, P.; et al. Effect of innovative pre-treatments on the mitigation of acrylamide formation in potato chips. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 64, 102397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Katsouli, M.; Dermesonlouoglou, E.; Dimopoulos, G.; Karafantalou, E.; Giannakourou, M.; Taoukis, P. Shelf-Life Enhancement Applying Pulsed Electric Field and High-Pressure Treatments Prior to Osmotic Dehydration of Fresh-Cut Potatoes. Foods 2024, 13, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Rockville, MD, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  40. Garcia, E.; Barrett, D.M. Preservative Treatments for Fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables. In Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables, 1st ed.; Lamikanra, O., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dimopoulos, G.; Katsimichas, A.; Balachtsis, K.; Dermesonlouoglou, E.; Taoukis, P. Effect of pulsed electric fields on the shelf stability and sensory acceptability of osmotically dehydrated spinach: A mathematical modeling approach. Foods 2024, 13, 1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kuhn, J.; Müller, H.; Salzig, D.; Czermak, P. A rapid method for an offline glycerol determination during microbial fermentation. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 18, 252–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Giannakourou, M.C.; Taoukis, P.S. Kinetic modelling of vitamin c loss in frozen green vegetables under variable storage conditions. Food Chem. 2003, 83, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Aguirre-Joya, J.A.; Ventura-Sobrevilla, J.; Martínez-Vazquez, G.; Ruelas-Chacón, X.; Rojas, R.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Aguilar, C.N. Effects of a natural bioactive coating on the quality and shelf life prolongation at different storage conditions of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) cv. Hass. Food Pack. Shelf Life 2017, 14, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wong, J.X.; Ramli, S.; Desa, S.; Chen, S.N. Use of Centella Asiatica Extract in Reducing Microbial Contamination and Browning. Effect in Fresh Cut Fruits and Vegetables during Storage: A Potential Alternative of Synthetic Preservatives. LWT 2021, 151, 112229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. ISO 8586-1; Sensory Analysis—General Guidance for the Selection, Training and Monitoring of Assessors, Part 1: Selected As-sessors. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1993.
  47. Dermesonlouoglou, E.K.; Giannakourou, M.C. Evaluation and modelling of osmotic pre-treatment of peach using alternative agents in a multiple-component solution. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 1240–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Oladejo, A.O.; Ma, H.; Qu, W.; Zhou, C.; Wu, B. Effects of ultrasound on mass transfer kinetics, structure, carotenoid and vitamin c content of osmodehydrated sweet potato (Ipomea batatas). Food Bioproc. Tech. 2017, 10, 1162–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dehghannya, J.; Gorbani, R.; Ghanbarzadeh, B. Effect of ultrasound-assisted osmotic dehydration pretreatment on drying kinetics and effective moisture diffusivity of mirabelle plum. J Food Proc. Preserv. 2015, 39, 2710–2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Barani, Y.H.; Zhang, M.; Wang, B.; Devahastin, S. Influences of four pretreatments on anthocyanins content, color and flavor characteristics of hot-air dried rose flower. Dry. Technol. 2020, 38, 1988–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, T.; Dodds, E.; Leong, S.Y.; Eyres, G.T.; Burritt, D.J.; Oey, I. Effect of pulsed electric fields on the structure and frying quality of “kumara” sweet potato tubers. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2017, 39, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, C.; Grimi, N.; Lebovka, N.; Vorobiev, E. Effects of pulsed electric fields treatment on vacuum drying of potato tissue. LWT 2018, 95, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, C.; Grimi, N.; Lebovka, N.; Vorobiev, E. Effects of preliminary treatment by pulsed electric fields and convective air-drying on characteristics of fried potato. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2018, 47, 454–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Levaj, Β.; Pelaic, Z.; Galic, K.; Hunjek, D.D.; Pedisic, S.; Kurek, M.; Šcetar, M.; Poljak, M.; Balbino, S.; Cošic, Z.; et al. Maintaining the Quality and Safety of Fresh-Cut Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum): Overview of Recent Findings and Approaches. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pedreschi, F.; Aguilera, J.; Pyle, L. Textural characterization and kinetics of potato strips during frying. J. Food Sci. 2002, 66, 314–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pedreschi, F.; Moyano, P.; Santis, N.; Pedreschi, R. Physical properties of pre-treated potato chips. J. Food Eng. 2007, 79, 1474–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kita, A. The influence of potato chemical composition on crisp texture. Food Chem. 2002, 76, 173e179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Abedpour, L.; Dehghannya, J. Investigation of oil uptake during potato strips deep-fat frying pretreated with ultrasound and osmotic dehydration. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 12, 79–94. [Google Scholar]
  59. Da Costa Ribeiro, A.S.; Aguiar-Oliveira, E.; Maldonado, R.R. Optimization of osmotic dehydration of pear followed by conventional drying and their sensory quality. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 72, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Graham-Acquaah, S.; Ayernor, G.S.; Bediako-Amoa, B.; Saalia, F.S.; Afoakwa, E.O.; Abbey, L. Effect of blanching and frying on textural profile and appearance of yam (Dioscorea rotundata) french fries. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2015, 39, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, Y.; Kahl, D.H.W.; Bizimungu, B.; Lu, Z.X. Effects of blanching treatments on acrylamide, asparagine, reducing sugars and colour in potato chips. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 4028–4041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, G.; Rei, K.; Lyu, X.; Yang, R. Effects of combined pulsed electric field and blanching pretreatment on the physiochemical properties of French fries. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 67, 102561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Thybo, A.K.; Christiansen, J.; Kaack, K.; Petersen, M.A. Effect of cultivars, wound healing and storage on sensory quality and chemical components in pre-peeled potatoes. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 39, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Van Marle, J.T.; Stolle-Smits, T.; Donkers, J.; van Dijk, C.; Voragen, A.G.J.; Recourt, K. Chemical and microscopic characterization of potato (solanum tuberosum l.) cell walls during cooking. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cantos, E.; Tudela, J.A.; Gil, M.I.; Espín, J.C. Phenolic compounds and related enzymes are not rate-limiting in browning development of fresh-cut potatoes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 3015–3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Castelló, M.L.; Fito, P.J.; Chiralt, A. Changes in respiration rate and physical properties of strawberries due to osmotic dehydration and storage. J. Food Eng. 2010, 97, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ma, Y.; Wang, Q.; Hong, G.; Cantwell, M. Reassessment of treatments to retard browning of fresh-cut Russet potato with emphasis on controlled atmospheres and low concentrations of bisulphite. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 1486–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Laurila, E.K.; Hurme, E.U.; Ahvenainen, R.T. Shelf life of sliced raw potatoes of various cultivar varieties—Substitution of bisulfites. J. Food Prot. 1998, 61, 1363–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Angos, I.; Virseda, P.; Fernandez, T. Control of respiration and color modification on minimally processed potatoes by means of low and high O2/CO2 atmospheres. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2008, 48, 422–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tudela, J.A.; Gil, M.I. Tubers: Fresh-cut potatoes Group on Quality and Safety. In Controlled and Modified Atmospheres for Fresh and Fresh-Cut Produce; Department of Food Science and Technology, CEBAS-CSIC: Murcia, Spain, 2020; Chapter 25.1; pp. 625–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gorny, J.R. A summary of CA and MA requirements and recommendations for fresh-cut (minimally processed) fruits and vegetables. Acta Hortic. 2003, 600, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gunes, G.; Lee, C.Y. Color of minimally processed potatoes as affected by modified atmosphere packaging and ant browning agents. J. Food Sci. 1997, 62, 572–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gunes, G.; Splittstoesser, D.F.; Lee, C.Y. Microbial quality of fresh potatoes: Effect of minimal processing. J. Food Prot. 1997, 60, 863–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Beltran, D.; Selma, M.V.; Tudela, J.A.; Gil, M. Effect of different sanitizers on microbial and sensory quality of fresh-cut potato strips stored under modified atmosphere or vacuum packaging. Postharv. Biol. Technol. 2005, 37, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mass transfer: (a) water loss (WL, g water/g d.m.), (b) solid gain (SG, g s./g d.m.), and (c) water activity (aw) during osmotic dehydration (OD) of OD-treated and PEF + OD-treated potato strips. (values: mean ± standard error).
Figure 1. Mass transfer: (a) water loss (WL, g water/g d.m.), (b) solid gain (SG, g s./g d.m.), and (c) water activity (aw) during osmotic dehydration (OD) of OD-treated and PEF + OD-treated potato strips. (values: mean ± standard error).
Foods 14 00420 g001
Figure 2. (a) Browning index (BI) and (b) firmness (Fmax, N) values of raw (untreated), OD-treated, PEF-treated, and PEF + OD-treated potato strips during osmotic dehydration (0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min) (values: mean ± standard error).
Figure 2. (a) Browning index (BI) and (b) firmness (Fmax, N) values of raw (untreated), OD-treated, PEF-treated, and PEF + OD-treated potato strips during osmotic dehydration (0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min) (values: mean ± standard error).
Foods 14 00420 g002
Figure 3. Oil content (kg/kg d.m.) during frying (values: mean ± standard error).
Figure 3. Oil content (kg/kg d.m.) during frying (values: mean ± standard error).
Foods 14 00420 g003
Figure 4. Average scores (scale 1–9) for sensory characteristics of untreated (Foods 14 00420 i001), OD-treated (Foods 14 00420 i002) and PEF + OD-treated (Foods 14 00420 i003) fried potato strips (180 °C, 10 min): oil detection, color browning, odor, crispiness, firmness, gumminess, taste overall, sweet taste, salty taste, other taste, flavor, aftertaste, and total sensory quality.
Figure 4. Average scores (scale 1–9) for sensory characteristics of untreated (Foods 14 00420 i001), OD-treated (Foods 14 00420 i002) and PEF + OD-treated (Foods 14 00420 i003) fried potato strips (180 °C, 10 min): oil detection, color browning, odor, crispiness, firmness, gumminess, taste overall, sweet taste, salty taste, other taste, flavor, aftertaste, and total sensory quality.
Foods 14 00420 g004
Scheme 1. Photos of (a) untreated, (b) OD-treated, and (c) PEF + OD-treated potato strips after deep frying at 180 °C for 10 min (day 0 of the storage).
Scheme 1. Photos of (a) untreated, (b) OD-treated, and (c) PEF + OD-treated potato strips after deep frying at 180 °C for 10 min (day 0 of the storage).
Foods 14 00420 sch001
Figure 5. Evolution of texture (firmness, N) of (a) OD-treated, (b) PEF + OD-treated, and (c) untreated potato strips during their storage at 4, 8, and 12 °C.
Figure 5. Evolution of texture (firmness, N) of (a) OD-treated, (b) PEF + OD-treated, and (c) untreated potato strips during their storage at 4, 8, and 12 °C.
Foods 14 00420 g005
Figure 6. Evolution of color (Browning Index, BI) of (a) OD-treated, (b) PEF + OD-treated, and (c) untreated potato strips during their storage at 4, 8, and 12 °C.
Figure 6. Evolution of color (Browning Index, BI) of (a) OD-treated, (b) PEF + OD-treated, and (c) untreated potato strips during their storage at 4, 8, and 12 °C.
Foods 14 00420 g006
Figure 7. Microbial growth: total viable counts (TVC) of (a) OD-treated, (b) PEF + OD-treated, and (c) untreated samples; total anaerobic count of (d) OD-treated, (e) PEF + OD-treated, and (f) untreated samples; and (g) Enterobacteriaceae of untreated potato strips. (a,d,g) Experimental values and (ac) experimental values and data fit to the Baranyi model. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 7. Microbial growth: total viable counts (TVC) of (a) OD-treated, (b) PEF + OD-treated, and (c) untreated samples; total anaerobic count of (d) OD-treated, (e) PEF + OD-treated, and (f) untreated samples; and (g) Enterobacteriaceae of untreated potato strips. (a,d,g) Experimental values and (ac) experimental values and data fit to the Baranyi model. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three replicates.
Foods 14 00420 g007
Table 1. Water loss (WL) and solid gain (SG) constants for osmotic dehydration and/or pulsed electric fields (OD and PEF + OD) (Equation (3)).
Table 1. Water loss (WL) and solid gain (SG) constants for osmotic dehydration and/or pulsed electric fields (OD and PEF + OD) (Equation (3)).
Water   Loss   Constant   k WL g   w a t e r g   D W · s 1 2 R2 Solid   Gain   Constant   k SG g   s o l i d s g   D W · s 1 2 R2
OD-treated0.1913 ± 0.0095 a0.98850.0893 ± 0.0088 a0.9948
PEF + OD-treated0.2320 ± 0.0151 b0.97080.0798 ± 0.0068 a0.9927
Different superscript letters indicate significant differences between means kWL and kSG ± standard deviation as calculated by Duncan’s multiple range test for a significance level of p = 0.05.
Table 2. Potato product characteristics (untreated, OD-treated, and PEF + OD-treated).
Table 2. Potato product characteristics (untreated, OD-treated, and PEF + OD-treated).
SampleWater
Content
awpHVitamin C
(g asc.acid/g)
Glycerol
(g /g)
Salt
(g NaCl/g)
Color
(L, a, b, BI)
Texture (Firmness, Fmax, N)Sensory Score
(1–9)
Untreated0.85720.99276.0360.0013_0.00453.77; −0.57; 20.485.767.9
OD-treated0.70140.94624.7980.0110.3720.05454.22; −0.98; 8.108.417.1
PEF + OD-treated0.68210.94574.4680.0100.3560.04952.99; −1.17; 7.889.555.7
Table 3. Oil uptake constant (kOIL) values for untreated, OD-treated, PEF-treated, and PEF + OD-treated potato strips as calculated by Equation (5) after fitting to the experimental data.
Table 3. Oil uptake constant (kOIL) values for untreated, OD-treated, PEF-treated, and PEF + OD-treated potato strips as calculated by Equation (5) after fitting to the experimental data.
Oil Uptake Constant kOIL m i n 1 R2
Untreated0.199 a0.9483
PEF-treated0.198 a0.9875
OD-treated0.162 b0.9302
PEF + OD-treated0.142 b0.8961
Different superscript letters indicate significant differences between means kOIL ± standard deviation as calculated by Duncan’s multiple range test for a significance level of p = 0.05.
Table 4. Baranyi model parameters for microbial growth (total viable counts (TVC), Enterobacteriaceae, and total anaerobic count) for untreated potato strips. The dependence of the rate constant μm on storage temperature was modeled with the Arrhenius equation.
Table 4. Baranyi model parameters for microbial growth (total viable counts (TVC), Enterobacteriaceae, and total anaerobic count) for untreated potato strips. The dependence of the rate constant μm on storage temperature was modeled with the Arrhenius equation.
Storage
Temperature (°C)
μ m ( d 1 ) l o g N o l o g C F U g l o g N o l o g C F U g R2 E a , μ m k J m o l μ m , r e f ( d 1 ) R2
Total Viable Count (TVC)
40.483 ± 0.143.977 ± 0.3180.801 ± 1.1590.839118.960.8390.9317
80.718 ± 0.0533.998 ± 0.0830.293 ± 0.2190.995
122.062 ± 0.3264.085 ± 0.1421.267 ± 0.2010.990
Enterobacteriaceae
40.734 ± 0.2063.508 ± 0.1572.611 ± 0.5590.87633.610.3350.9513
80.834 ± 0.1053.670 ± 0.1560.668 ± 0.3620.984
121.106 ± 0.0583.643 ± 0.111_0.994
Total Anaerobic Count
40.523 ± 0.1533.758 ± 0.309_0.858104.880.5180.9995
80.975 ± 0.2433.972 ± 0.3190.703 ± 0.6400.944
121.876 ± 0.1454.084 ± 0.1220.982 ± 0.1470.996
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dermesonlouoglou, E.; Seretis, G.; Katsouli, M.; Katsimichas, A.; Taoukis, P.; Giannakourou, M. Effect of Pulsed Electric Fields and Osmotic Dehydration on the Quality of Modified-Atmosphere-Packaged Fresh-Cut and Fried Potatoes. Foods 2025, 14, 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030420

AMA Style

Dermesonlouoglou E, Seretis G, Katsouli M, Katsimichas A, Taoukis P, Giannakourou M. Effect of Pulsed Electric Fields and Osmotic Dehydration on the Quality of Modified-Atmosphere-Packaged Fresh-Cut and Fried Potatoes. Foods. 2025; 14(3):420. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030420

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dermesonlouoglou, Efimia, George Seretis, Maria Katsouli, Alexandros Katsimichas, Petros Taoukis, and Maria Giannakourou. 2025. "Effect of Pulsed Electric Fields and Osmotic Dehydration on the Quality of Modified-Atmosphere-Packaged Fresh-Cut and Fried Potatoes" Foods 14, no. 3: 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030420

APA Style

Dermesonlouoglou, E., Seretis, G., Katsouli, M., Katsimichas, A., Taoukis, P., & Giannakourou, M. (2025). Effect of Pulsed Electric Fields and Osmotic Dehydration on the Quality of Modified-Atmosphere-Packaged Fresh-Cut and Fried Potatoes. Foods, 14(3), 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030420

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop