Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Aromatic Profile and Functionality of Cheese Whey Beverages by Incorporation of Probiotic Cells Immobilized on Pistacia terebinthus Resin
Previous Article in Journal
High Fibre Gluten-Free Fresh Pasta with Tiger Nut, Chickpea and Fenugreek: Technofunctional, Sensory and Nutritional Properties
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 9
Issue 1
10.3390/foods9010012
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Food Safety Challenges and Barriers in Southern United States Farmers Markets

by
Zahra H. Mohammad
1,
Heyao Yu
2,
Jack A. Neal
1,
Kristen E. Gibson
3 and
Sujata A. Sirsat
1,*
1
Conrad N. Hilton College of Hotel and Restaurant Management, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-3028, USA
2
School of Hospitality Management, Pennsylvania State University, 230 Mateer Building University Park, PA 16802, USA
3
Department of Food Science, Center for Food Safety, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2020, 9(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9010012
Submission received: 26 November 2019 / Revised: 11 December 2019 / Accepted: 19 December 2019 / Published: 21 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Food Quality and Safety)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Purchasing fresh and local produce at farmers markets has seen an increasing trend over the past decade. However, with this rise in popularity food safety challenges need to be recognized and addressed. Farmers market managers play a significant role in ensuring that vendors implement food safety practices at the market. Thus, this study investigated the food safety perceptions of farmers markets managers and vendors in Texas and Arkansas. A total of 123 participants were surveyed, including 38 managers and 85 vendors. The survey included a series of questions to determine gaps in vendor and manager food safety knowledge as well as the barriers and factors that prevent the implementation of relevant food safety practices. The results indicate that a lack of facilities, equipment, and resources containing food safety guidelines specific to farmers markets were the major barriers to the implementation of food safety practices. In addition, only 36.7% of participants had formal food safety training (e.g., ServSafe) and approximately 50% of the market managers provided food safety materials to their vendors. Overall, these data suggest that the development of farmers market-specific training programs to enhance food safety behaviors and practices in farmers markets would be beneficial to stakeholders.

1. Introduction

The number of farmers markets have increased by 300% in the United States (U.S.) from 2863 markets reported in 2000 to 8720 farmers markets in 2017 [1]. In 2014, Texas and Arkansas were among the top ten states with the largest increases in the number of farmers markets [2], and by 2018, Texas and Arkansas had 226 and 111 farmers markets, respectively [1]. Ready-to-eat food products, primarily fresh fruit and vegetables, usually dominate the available goods at these markets across the country [3,4,5,6]. With the growing number of farmers markets, consumers’ demand for locally grown fresh fruit and vegetables has also increased [7]. This rise in fresh produce consumption may be attributed to an increased awareness about nutrition and enhancing healthy eating habits [8]. Studies have shown that consumers have positive assumptions about the quality and safety of food sold at farmers markets [9,10,11]. A previous survey-based study reported that approximately 60% of the respondents agreed that locally grown produce are safer than conventional produce [10]. From a socioeconomic perspective, farmer’s markets enhance economic growth in the United States through selling locally grown foods and increasing job opportunities. In addition, since both governmental policies and media support local food, farmers’ markets promote economic development for rural and urban communities [12]. However, microbial studies have found that the quality and safety of food products sold at farmers markets are not always better than food at retail stores, and in some cases, the microbial levels in produce from farmers markets were higher than retail establishments [13,14,15,16]. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), foodborne illness outbreaks cause an estimated 48 million illnesses, 128,000 hospitalizations, and 3000 deaths in the United States annually [17,18,19]. Fresh fruits and vegetables-responsible for 46% of the foodborne illnesses [20,21]—cause the largest number of illnesses compared to any other food category, as these foods typically receive no additional kill step such as heat treatment during processing [6,22,23,24,25]. While there are few outbreaks associated with foods sold at farmers markets, it is important to recognize that a majority of foodborne illness outbreaks go unreported [6]. Moreover, there is limited traceability on produce and other food items sold at farmers markets [26].
Products sold at farmers markets have been associated with at least ten foodborne illness outbreaks in the U.S. [27]. For instance, an outbreak of Campylobacter jejuni was linked to the consumption of raw peas at a farmers market in south-central Alaska in 2011 [28]. An E. coli O157:H7 outbreak was linked to the consumption of strawberries sold at the farmers market and roadside stands in Oregon in 2011 [29], and one case of salmonellosis was linked to consumption of tomatoes purchased from a farmers market [30]. In addition, multiple outbreaks of foodborne illness have been associated with non-produce products sold at farmers markets in the United States and Canada [31,32,33]. Of these, outbreaks of salmonellosis, E. coli O157:H7 hemorrhagic colitis, and listeriosis were implicated with different kinds of cheese sold at farmers markets [32,33].
Major food safety risk factors at farmers markets include improper handling, temperature abuse, contaminated equipment, and poor personal hygiene [34,35]. Some of the risks can be linked to the nature of operations at farmers markets. More specifically, markets are typically located outdoors in temporary locations which lack the necessary equipment and facilities (e.g., refrigeration and handwashing stations) to implement basic risk management practices and are usually exempt from state or local food safety regulations [6,34,36]. Therefore, it is critical to equip farmers market managers and employees with science-based strategies to enhance food safety. In addition, farmers markets managers’ knowledge and beliefs about food safety are essential for proper handling and implementation of food safety practices by the vendors [37,38,39].
Training and educational programs along with good manufacturing practices (GMP) and good handling practices (GHP) are critical to reduce the risk of foodborne illness [40]. Manager behavior and willingness to offer appropriate resources and food safety training to the vendors is important [37]. In the case of farmers markets, the manager may not have formal food safety training, and nearly all farmers market vendors are exempt from compliance with the Produce Safety Rule within the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) based on the $25,000 annual produce sales cut-off [3,41]. Food safety related perceptions, attitudes, and practices of farmers markets managers, vendors, and customers have been documented across the U.S. and other countries [11,34,36,38,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Behnke, Seo, and Miller [34] assessed the food safety practices at farmers market and reported that managers and vendors did exhibit knowledge of food safety. However, the results revealed that some vendors were not able to implement food safety practices because of a lack of resources such as handwashing stations [34].
To date, there is no published research on the knowledge and perceptions of food safety at farmers markets in Texas and Arkansas nor on the barriers to implementation of best practices at farmers markets in these states. Thus, the primary objectives of this study are to (1) investigate the food safety perceptions of farmers markets managers and vendors in Texas and Arkansas; (2) characterize current food safety content accessible to them; (3) determine the challenges and barriers to implementation of food safety practices; and (4) identify the critical gaps that need to be addressed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants and Data Collection

A survey instrument was designed to characterize farmers market manager and vendor food safety perceptions. Questions were screened and approved by the University of Houston’s Human Subjects Review Board as well as the University of Arkansas’s Institutional Review Board. The surveys were disseminated at farmers market meetings in TX and AR. The participants included 38 managers and 85 vendors. The survey was disseminated by investigators at farmers market conferences across TX and AR. The sample size was determined based on the margin of error from the confidence interval based on population distributions in the areas where the survey was conducted.

2.2. Measures

Farmers markets managers and vendors received different versions of the questionnaire. Both manager and vendor questionnaires included four sections to obtain similar information. The questions in the Section 1 of both surveys assessed participants’ food safety knowledge and self-reported food safety practices. Both constructs were measured by a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). General food safety knowledge was measured using four items adopted from a previous study by Yu et al. [11]. An example question was “I think unsafe food can make people really sick.” Food safety practices were measured using four items also adopted from Yu et al. [11]. An example of food safety practice items was “I can clean and sanitize equipment and utensils properly.”
The questions included in the Section 2 of both surveys were designed to examine the barriers for market vendors and managers to implement proper food safety handling procedures at farmers markets. These barriers were adopted from a previous study by Yapp and Fairman [51] and included: (1) lack of infrastructure; (2) lack of benefits to the vendors and managers to implementing food safety practices; (3) high costs; and (4) lack of specific food safety guidelines for farmers markets to follow. All of the items were measured using a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). An example question was “I feel that practicing safe food handling procedures at markets is too costly.”
The Section 3 of the vendor survey contained questions about current food safety training at farmers markets to obtain the information on the following: (1) whether managers provide food safety training material; (2) food safety policies (e.g., glove usage, providing samples, etc.) at their markets; and (3) vendors’ perception of current food safety materials. All the items were measured using a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). The Section 3 of the manager survey included questions related to (1) whether managers provided food safety materials to their vendors; (2) content included in current food safety training and policies; (3) managers’ perception of current food safety materials; and (4) whether managers have a designated food safety manager at their markets.
The final section on both surveys included questions to obtain demographic information of participants. Participants were requested to report general socio-demographic questions including gender, age, and education level and specific questions related to their work position such as their job titles, tenure, and the number of markets they attended as vendors/managers.

2.3. Data Analysis

Separate descriptive analyses were used to acknowledge current food safety training programs at farmers markets and the barriers to implementing proper food safety handling procedures using JMP (Version 14, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The descriptive analysis was used to calculate mean and standard deviation for each variable including manager and vendors responses to food safety training programs and the mean of responses versus barriers to implementing food safety practices. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted, and a 95% confidence level (α < 0.05) was used for statistical significance to compare whether vendors and managers perceived these barriers differently. In addition, hierarchical multiple regression was conducted to examine factors influencing participants’ self-reported food safety practices. IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 for Windows (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was used to analyze the data.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Demographic Analysis

Table 1 outlines the socio-demographic factors of the survey respondents (N = 123). The respondents included 38 farmers markets managers (18% male and 82% female) and 85 vendors (38% male and 62% female). In terms of generation, the majority of the participants were baby boomers (64%), while only 21.1% and 26.8% of the participants were millennials and generation X, respectively. More than 35% of the respondents had a bachelor’s degree, and approximately 30% of the participants had graduate or post-graduate degrees. In terms of the products that participating vendors sell at farmers’ markets, 82% of vendors sold fresh produce while 6% of the vendors sold fresh meat. Therefore, produce was represented as the majority of products sold at surveyed farmers markets. Majority of farmers markets had a U-shaped layout.

3.2. Current Food Safety Training and Policies at Farmers Markets

Questions related to individual food safety training and policies at farmers markets were included in the survey. Data related to food safety training and policies at farmers markets are presented in Table 2. Only 37.6% of market vendors reported that the managers require glove usage while handling ready-to-eat foods, and 43.5% of the vendors reported that the managers required them to provide utensils or toothpicks for food samples. The Food Code is a model for each state to adopt; however, states are not required to follow these recommendations. According to the FDA 2017 Food Code, a food handler should never handle ready-to-eat foods with bare hands and should wash hands thoroughly before putting on gloves and when changing to a new pair [52]. Meanwhile, 50.0% of the market managers reported that they required their vendors to use disposable gloves and provide utensils for food items, respectively.
In terms of food safety training at farmers markets, the data indicate that only 45 respondents (36.7%) including 15 managers and 30 vendors had received formal food safety training (e.g., Servsafe® Food handler course, general food safety training including handwashing procedure and time/ temperature abuse, and GAP training), previously. When asked whether food safety guidelines or training were provided for their farmers markets vendors, 50% of the markets’ managers indicated that they provide guidelines or training to their vendors, and 50.6% of the vendors reported that they had received food safety training from their market managers in the past. The consistent results from vendor and manager surveys indicated that approximately half of the farmers markets managers provided some type of food safety training material.
Among the managers who provided guidelines or outreach information to their vendors, 17 managers (89.4 %) provided handwashing training, and 8 managers (42.1%) provided training on standard operating procedures (SOPs) for facilities and equipment such as handwashing stations and refrigeration or cooling units. Among those vendors who reported that managers provided training materials, 37 (82.2%) indicated that managers provided training materials about handwashing, while only 12 (28.0%) vendors indicated that the training materials related to SOPs of facilities and equipment were provided by their managers.
In terms of the evaluation of current food safety training material at farmers markets, only 18 (42.0%) out of the 43 vendors who received food safety training material from managers before indicated that they had received high-quality training materials and the contents of the training material were comprehensive (Table 2). In addition, among the managers who reported that they provided food safety guidelines for their vendors, only 9 (47.4%) out of 19 managers believed that they provided high-quality materials, and 7 (36.8%) reported that the content of the training material was comprehensive.
According to these results, the majority of market managers and vendors never received any formal food safety training, and approximately 50% of the market managers provide food safety guidelines or training materials to their vendors. A majority of the managers surveyed do not require vendors to use disposable gloves and do not provide SOP for facilities and equipment. These findings are similar to those reported by Harrison et al. [44], who surveyed food safety practices on small and medium-sized farms and farmers markets in Georgia, Virginia, and South Carolina. The researchers reported that more than 42% of managers did not have specific food safety standards for their farmers markets. Both Harrison et al. [44] and the current study highlight gaps in farmers markets food safety standards and guidelines that may lead to an increase in potential contamination of food products sold at these markets and thus pose a risk to consumers.

3.3. Food Safety Knowledge of Farmers Market Managers and Vendors

In terms of food safety knowledge of farmers markets managers and vendors, the means of 83 respondents included 38 managers and 45 vendors (Table 3) indicate that 92% managers (mean = 4.58), and 89% vendors (mean = 4.44) agreed that foodborne illness could be life-threatening. Approximately half of the managers and vendors agreed that the probability of developing a foodborne illness is minimal, and some think that food is always safe to eat. Additionally, 91.6% of farmers markets managers (mean = 4.47) and 89% of vendors (mean = 4.44) believe that proper food safety practices reduce both food poisoning and bacterial growth. In addition, when farmers markets manager and vendors asked about how they feel confident about what they are doing at farmers markets, 42% of managers (mean = 4.29) and 44% of vendors (mean = 4.33) reported that they feel confident in their ability to store or transport food at a safe temperature. Furthermore, 55% of managers (mean = 4.38) and 49% of vendors (mean = 4.4) reported that they feel confident in their ability to clean and sanitize equipment and utensils properly. Finally, according to the data, 70% of managers (mean = 4.63) and 60% of vendors (mean = 4.56) exhibited confidence in their ability to learn proper food safety practices. Although there was some variation in responses from farmer markets managers and vendors, no significant differences were found between managers and vendors responses in terms of their knowledge of food safety.
Based on the results of the current study, farmers markets managers and vendors possess general food safety knowledge. However, there has been evidence of poor safety practices in farmers markets. Norwood et al. [53] conducted food safety observations among 300 vendors in farmers markets and reported multiple high-risk practices such as pets defecating around booths, vendors reusing cardboard produce boxes, live farm animals (goats) present, and no access to restroom facilities for vendors and patrons [53]. Behnke, Seo, and Miller [34] assessed food safety behavior at farmers markets and reported that although managers and vendors demonstrated some food safety knowledge, there was a gap in implementing food safety practices. According to Worsfold, Worsfold, and Griffith [41], who surveyed farmers markets vendors in the U.K., about 25% of vendors lacked food safety knowledge, and almost 84% of them believed that their products are safe and do not cause foodborne illness. Hence, farmers market vendors and managers may benefit from standardized formal training in order to increase their awareness about food safety.
These studies highlight the need for training and awareness about the importance of food safety practices.

3.4. Barriers to Implementing Proper Food Safety Handling Practices

Managers and vendors were specifically asked about the role of four barriers in their ability to implement safe food handling practices at farmers markets including (1) lack of proper facilities and equipment; (2) lack of specific food safety guidelines for farmers markets; (3) cost of implementation; and (4) lack of benefit to their business, for example increasing the amount of sales or attracting more customers.
A two-way ANOVA with four barriers and job positions (i.e., vendor and manager) as independent variables was conducted to compare participants’ perceptions about the barriers with the implementation of food safety handling procedures at farmers markets. The results of the two-way ANOVA indicate that there were significant differences among participants’ perceptions of four barriers (F (3, 383) = 7.21, p < 0.01) (Table 4). However, there was no significant difference between managers and vendors in terms of the perception of the four barriers (F (1, 385) = 1.64, p > 0.05). In addition, the interaction effect of barriers and job position was also insignificant (F (3, 383) = 1.10, p > 0.05). According to the Tamhane post hoc test for the four categories, the majority of participants agreed that the lack of proper facilities and equipment is the greatest barrier, while lack of specific food safety guidelines for farmers markets was the second most significant barrier. The participants believed that both the cost and lack of benefit to the market or their business was a less significant obstacle to the implementation of food safety practices (Figure 1). The independent sample t-test indicated that there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between market managers and vendors in terms of their perceptions about these barriers.
Farmers market vendors may not undergo formal inspection unless by choice or required by a buyer, though they could have GAP training and certification. Based on this, there are potential gaps in food safety practices along with a possible increased risk for contamination within farmer markets [26,34]. Most farmers markets do not have proper handwashing facilities, refrigeration, and restrooms because these venues are usually sited in transient locations or in a municipality’s green area where it can be a challenge to provide these resources [37]. Regardless, these resources should be a priority for both farmers market managers and market boards, if applicable, in order to support the implementation of effective food safety practices. A previous study has investigated the relationship between the growing number of farmers markets and the number of cases of foodborne illness in the United States and found a positive correlation between this increase and norovirus-related outbreaks [54]. This may be due to the lack of handwashing stations and refrigerators accessible at farmers markets. Behnke, Seo, and Miller [34] examined farmers markets in Indiana and indicated that only 9 out of 18 (50%) vendors had access to functional handwashing stations. Recent studies conducted in North Carolina and Virginia farmers markets reported that about 27% and 40%, respectively, of observed markets did not have handwashing facilities and about 87% of those that had handwashing facilities did not have illustrations for proper handwashing [47,55]. The CDC [56] has recognized that poor personal hygiene and sanitation by food handlers is one of the most critical risk factors that increase the likelihood of foodborne illness.
Lack of specific food safety guidelines for farmers markets to follow was found to be the second major barrier to implementing food safety practices at farmers markets. The food safety guidelines and best practices available for food handlers and food safety purposes are usually general, which include information and standards that are not applicable to farmers markets vendors and managers. Therefore, it may be beneficial for state cooperative extension and regulatory bodies to work together to facilitate uniformed and effective facilities and equipment as well as high-quality training designed specifically for farmers markets managers and vendors.

3.5. Factors Influencing Self-Reported Food Safety Handling Practices

Factors influencing market managers and vendors’ food safety handling practices were examined by hierarchical linear regression using ordinal least square (OLS). In the regression model, the dependent variable was self-reported food safety handling practices rated on a five-point Likert scale. Two demographic factors, age and gender were included in the first regression model as control variables. In addition, participants’ job position (i.e., manager and vendor), food safety training (coded as 1 = received training, 2 = never received training), and participants’ food safety perceptions were included in the second regression model after controlling for age and gender. The results are shown in Table 5. The first regression model was not significant overall (F (1, 121) = 0.80, p > 0.05). Both gender (B = −0.03, p > 0.05) and age (B = 0.01, p > 0.05) were not significantly related to respondents’ reported food safety practices. The second model included three independent variables (i.e., job position, food safety knowledge, and food safety training) and the model was significant overall (F (5, 117) = 5.57, p < 0.01) and the determination coefficient (R2) was 0.28, indicating acceptable model fit. The results of model 2 revealed that participants’ food safety perception was significantly related to their reported food safety practices (B = 0.34, p < 0.01). This indicates that the participants with high food safety perception tended to report performing proper food handling practices. Additionally, managers’ food safety practices were significantly higher than vendors’ level (B = 0.48, p < 0.05). However, whether or not participants completed formal food safety training did not influence their reported food safety practices (B = 0.10, p > 0.05). This may indicate that general food safety training programs (e.g., ServSafe) may be ineffective for farmers market vendors and managers. These results are in agreement with those reported by Worsfold, Worsfold, and Griffith, [41] who conducted a study at a single farmers markets in the United Kingdom and found most of the vendors had food safety training previously, but less than 50% of these vendors did not consider their products could be contaminated. Although studies have demonstrated that training may increase food safety knowledge, this does not always translate to positive food safety behavior and attitudes unless the perception is changed [40,57]. Enhancing food safety behaviors should not be limited to farmers market managers and vendors alone. Consumer’s behavior also plays a significant role in increasing the risk of foodborne illness. Studies have shown that enhanced consumer food safety practices may lead to a decrease in the risk of foodborne illness at farmers markets [10]. Wolf, Spittler, and Ahem [58] investigated consumers’ perception and the reasons they shop at farmers markets. The authors found that quality and value held the most important attributes for consumers to purchase at farmers markets. Consumers perceive that the produce sold at farmers markets look fresher, are higher-quality, and a better value or reasonably priced, but they do not necessarily consider safety of the products. Multiple studies have found that there is a strong relationship between food safety perception and practices [44,49,59,60]. To this end, changing the perception and attitude of farmers markets managers and vendors through specific and high-quality training should be a priority for reducing the potential risk of foodborne illness from these markets [61]. Choi and Almanza [62] suggested that training for farmers markets operators should be different from that provided for foodservice employees and focused on the products sold at these markets as well as personal hygiene, proper handling, and food safety practices. Ultimately, food safety at farmers markets is achieved by translating behavior into food safety culture [63]. This culture should include farmers market managers, vendors, and consumers.

4. Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that there are deficiencies in information and practices as reported by both managers and vendors. Overall, the data indicated that farmers markets managers and vendors are in need of improvement in terms of training or outreach programs to increase their perception of food safety risks at the market and facilitate the implementation of best practices. The present study also found that barriers perceived by farmers market managers and vendors to be obstacles to the implementation of food safety practices include a lack of facilities and equipment and lack of specific food safety guidelines for farmers markets to follow. These reported barriers should be addressed to encourage the implementation of food safety practices at farmers markets in Texas and Arkansas. Our findings support that there is a need for further food safety training and educational outreach tailored for farmers markets to enhance the safety of foods sold and to positively impact food safety behaviors of farmers markets vendors and managers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A.S., K.E.G., and J.A.N.; methodology, K.E.G., H.Y., and S.A.S.; analysis, H.Y. and Z.H.M.; data curation, H.Y.; writing-original draft preparation, Z.H.M. and H.Y.; writing-review and editing, Z.H.M.; S.A.S.; K.E.G.; supervision, S.A.S.; project administration, S.A.S.; funding acquisition, S.A.S. K.E.G., and J.A.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) under award number 2013-68003-21288. This work was also supported in part by the NIFA, USDA Hatch Act funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in the publication of this article.

References

  1. USDA. Farmers Markets and Direct-To Consumer Marketing; Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. Available online: https://www.ams.usda.gov/services/local-regional/farmers-markets-and-direct-consumer-marketing (accessed on 26 November 2019).
  2. USDA. New Data Reflects the Continued Demand for Farmers Markets; Communications, U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 2014. Available online: https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2014/08/04/new-data-reflects-continued-demand-farmers-markets (accessed on 26 November 2019).
  3. Boyer, R.R.; Pollard, S. Food Safety Considerations for Fruit and Vegetable Vendors. In Food Safety for Farmers Markets: A Guide to Enhancing Safety of Local Foods; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 39–55. [Google Scholar]
  4. Critzer, F.J. Food Safety Considerations for All Other Foods Sold at Farmers Markets. In Food Safety for Farmers Markets: A Guide to Enhancing Safety of Local Foods; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 67–74. [Google Scholar]
  5. Low, S.A.; Vogel, S.J. Direct and Intermediated Marketing of Local Foods in the United States; RR-128; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
  6. Sirsat, S.A.; Gibson, K.E.; Neal, J.A. Food safety at farmers’ markets: Fact or fiction? In Food Safety; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 319–329. [Google Scholar]
  7. Topè, A.M.; Rogers, P.F.; Hitter, A.C. Evaluation of good agricultural practices (GAP) compliance by small farmers in Kentucky: Assessing microbial quality of produce. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2014, 3, 29–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Pollack, S.L. Consumer demand for fruit and vegetables: The US example. In Changing Structure of Global Food Consumption and Trade; BiblioGov: Washington, DC, USA, 2001; Volume 6, pp. 49–54. [Google Scholar]
  9. Harrison, J.A.; Critzer, F.J.; Harrison, M.A. Regulatory and food safety knowledge gaps associated with small and very small food businesses as identified by regulators and food safety educators-implications for food safety training. Food Prot. Trends 2016, 36, 420–427. [Google Scholar]
  10. Onozaka, Y.; Nurse, G.; McFadden, D.T. Local food consumers: How motivations and perceptions translate to buying behavior. Choices 2010, 25, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yu, H.; Gibson, K.E.; Wright, K.G.; Neal, J.A.; Sirsat, S.A. Food safety and food quality perceptions of farmers’ market consumers in the United States. Food Control. 2017, 79, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Malone, T.; Whitacre, B. How rural is our local food policy? The Daily Yonder. 17 September 2012. Available online: https://www.dailyyonder.com/local-food-policy-it-it-truly-focussed-rural/2012/09/17/ (accessed on 6 December 2019).
  13. Levy, D.J.; Beck, N.K.; Kossik, A.L.; Patti, T.; Meschke, J.S.; Calicchia, M.; Hellberg, R.S. Microbial safety and quality of fresh herbs from Los Angeles, Orange County and Seattle farmers’ markets. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 95, 2641–2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Scheinberg, J.; Doores, S.; Cutter, C.N. A microbiological comparison of poultry products obtained from farmers markets and supermarkets in Pennsylvania. J. Food Saf. 2013, 33, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sirsat, S.A.; Neal, J.A. Microbial profile of soil-free versus in-soil grown lettuce and intervention methodologies to combat pathogen surrogates and spoilage microorganisms on lettuce. Foods 2013, 2, 488–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Soendjojo, E. Is local produce safer? Microbiological quality of fresh lettuce and spinach from grocery stores and farmers’ markets. J. Purdue Undergrad. Res. 2012, 2, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Estimates of Foodborne Illness in the United States; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Atlanta, GA, USA, 2011.
  18. Scallan, E.; Hoekstra, R.M.; Angulo, F.J.; Tauxe, R.V.; Widdowson, M.A.; Roy, S.L.; Jones, J.L.; Griffin, P.M. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States-major pathogens. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Scharff, R.L. Economic burden from health losses due to foodborne illness in the United States. J. Food Prot. 2012, 75, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Painter, J.A.; Hoekstra, R.M.; Ayers, T.; Tauxe, R.V.; Braden, C.R.; Angulo, F.J.; Griffin, P.M. Attribution of foodborne illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths to food commodities by using outbreak data, United States, 1998–2008. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Currie, D. Many foodborne illnesses linked to produce, handling problems. Nation’s Health 2013, 43, 8. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fischer, N.; Bourne, A.; Plunkett, D. Outbreak Alert! 2015-A Review of Foodborne Illness in the US from 2004–2013; Center for Science in the Public Interest: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  23. James, J. Microbial Hazard Identification in Fresh Fruits and Vegetables; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; p. 116. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lynch, M.; Tauxe, R.; Hedberg, C. The growing burden of foodborne outbreaks due to contaminated fresh produce: Risks and opportunities. Epidemiol. Infect. 2009, 137, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Park, C.E.; Sanders, G.W. Occurrence of thermotolerant campylobacters in fresh vegetables sold at farmers’ outdoor markets and supermarkets. Can. J. Microbiol. 1992, 38, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Beyranevand, L.J. Balancing Food Safety and Burdens on Small Farms. Nat. Resour. Environ. 2013, 28, 17. [Google Scholar]
  27. Young, I.; Thaivalappil, A.; Reimer, D.; Greig, J. Food safety at farmers’ markets: A knowledge synthesis of published research. J. Food Prot. 2017, 80, 2033–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gardner, T.J.; Fitzgerald, C.; Xavier, C.; Klein, R.; Pruckler, J.; Stroika, S.; McLaughlin, J.B. Outbreak of campylobacteriosis associated with consumption of raw peas. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 53, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Laidler, M.R.; Tourdjman, M.; Buser, G.L.; Hostetler, T.; Repp, K.K.; Leman, R.; Samadpour, M.; Keene, W.E. Escherichia coli O157: H7 infections associated with consumption of locally grown strawberries contaminated by deer. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 57, 1129–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Douglass, E.; Mondy, K.; Huth, R.G. Salmonella epidural abscess in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab. Infect. Dis. Clin. Pract. 2016, 24, e7–e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Trichinellosis surveillance-United States, 2002–2007. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2009, 58, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  32. Honish, L.; Predy, G.; Hislop, N.; Chui, L.; Kowalewska-Grochowska, K.; Trottier, L.; Kreplin, C.; Zazulak, I. An outbreak of E. coli O157: H7 hemorrhagic colitis associated with unpasteurized gouda cheese. Can. J. Public Health 2005, 96, 182–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. McIntyre, L.; Wilcott, L.; Naus, M. Listeriosis outbreaks in British Columbia, Canada, caused by soft ripened cheese contaminated from environmental sources. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 131623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Behnke, C.; Seo, S.; Miller, K. Assessing food safety practices in farmers’ markets. Food Prot. Trends 2012, 32, 232–239. [Google Scholar]
  35. Greig, J.D.; Todd, E.C.; Bartleson, C.A.; Michaels, B.S. Outbreaks where food workers have been implicated in the spread of foodborne disease. Part 1. Description of the problem, methods, and agents involved. J. Food Prot. 2007, 70, 1752–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. McIntyre, L.; Karden, L.; Shyng, S.; Allen, K. Survey of observed vendor food-handling practices at farmers’ markets in British Columbia, Canada. Food Prot. Trends 2014, 34, 397–408. [Google Scholar]
  37. Boyer, R.R.; Yang, L.L. Establishing a Food Safe Market: Considerations for Vendors at the Farmers Market. In Food Safety for Farmers Markets: A Guide to Enhancing Safety of Local Foods; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 145–166. [Google Scholar]
  38. Green, L.R.; Selman, C. Factors impacting food workers’ and managers’ safe food preparation practices: A qualitative study. Food Prot. Trends 2005, 25, 981–990. [Google Scholar]
  39. Jackson, C.; Archer, D.; Goodrich-Schnieder, R.; Gravani, R.; Bihn, E.; Schnieder, K. Determining the effect of good agricultural practices awareness of implementation: A survey. Food Prot. Trends 2007, 27, 684–693. [Google Scholar]
  40. Howes, M.; McEwen, S.; Griffiths, M.; Harris, L. Food handler certification by home study: Measuring changes in knowledge and behavior. Dairy Food Environ. Sanit. 1996, 16, 737–744. [Google Scholar]
  41. Worsfold, D.; Worsfold, P.M.; Griffith, C.J. An assessment of food hygiene and safety at farmers’ markets. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2004, 14, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Arendt, S.W.; Paez, P.; Strohbehn, C. Food safety practices and managers’ perceptions: A qualitative study in hospitality. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2013, 25, 124–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Clayton, D.A.; Griffith, C.J.; Price, P.; Peters, A.C. Food handlers’ beliefs and self-reported practices. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2002, 2, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Harrison, J.A.; Gaskin, J.W.; Harrison, M.A.; Cannon, J.L.; Boyer, R.R.; Zehnder, G.W. Survey of food safety practices on small to medium-sized farms and in farmers markets. J. Food Prot. 2013, 76, 1989–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hertzman, J.; Barrash, D. An assessment of food safety knowledge and practices of catering employees. Br. Food J. 2007, 109, 562–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ivey, M.L.L.; LeJeune, J.T.; Miller, S.A. Vegetable producers’ perceptions of food safety hazards in the Midwestern USA. Food Control. 2012, 26, 453–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pollard, S.; Boyer, R.; Chapman, B.; di Stefano, J.; Archibald, T.; Ponder, M.A.; Rideout, S. Identification of risky food safety practices at southwest Virginia farmers’ markets. Food Prot. Trends 2016, 36, 168–175. [Google Scholar]
  48. Rheinländer, T.; Olsen, M.; Bakang, J.A.; Takyi, H.; Konradsen, F.; Samuelsen, H. Keeping up appearances: Perceptions of street food safety in urban Kumasi, Ghana. J. Urban Health 2008, 85, 952–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Scheinberg, J.; Radhakrishna, R.; Cutter, C.N. Food safety knowledge, behavior, and attitudes of vendors of poultry products sold at Pennsylvania farmers’ markets. J. Ext. 2013, 51, 6FEA4. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sinkel, D.; Khouryieh, H.; Daday, J.K.; Stone, M.; Shen, C. Knowledge and Implementation of Good Agricultural Practices among Kentucky Fresh Produce Farmers. Food Prot. Trends 2018, 38, 111–121. [Google Scholar]
  51. Yapp, C.; Fairman, R. Factors affecting food safety compliance within small and medium-sized enterprises: Implications for regulatory and enforcement strategies. Food Control. 2006, 17, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. FDA Food Code 2017, Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/guidanceregulation/retailfoodprotection/foodcode/ucm595139.htm (accessed on 26 November 2019).
  53. Norwood, H.E.; Neal, J.A.; Sirsat, S.A. Food Safety Resources for Managers and Vendors of Farmers Markets in Texas. J. Environ. Health 2019, 82, 2. [Google Scholar]
  54. Bellemare, M.F.; Nguyen, N. Farmers markets and food-borne illness. Am. J Agric. Econ. 2018, 100, 676–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Smathers, S.A. Evaluation, development, and implementation of an education curriculum to enhance food safety practices at North Carolina farmers’ markets. Master’s Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA, 2012. Available online: http://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/bitstream/1840.16/8094/1/etd.pdf (accessed on 15 November 2019).
  56. CDC (Centers for Disease Control & Prevention). Guideline for Hand Hygiene in HealthCare Settings: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2002, 51, 1–44. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5116a1.htm (accessed on 26 November 2019).
  57. Powell, S.C.; Attwell, R.W.; Massey, S.J. The impact of training on knowledge and standards of food hygiene Eth a pilot study. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 1997, 7, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wolf, M.M.; Spittler, A.; Ahern, J. A profile of farmers’ market consumers and the perceived advantages of produce sold at farmers’ markets. J. Food Distrib. Res. 2005, 36, 192–201. [Google Scholar]
  59. Akabanda, F.; Hlortsi, E.H.; Owusu-Kwarteng, J. Food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices of institutional food-handlers in Ghana. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Vandeputte, E.G.; Pivarnik, L.F.; Scheinberg, J.; Machado, R.; Cutter, C.N.; Lofgren, I.E. An assessment of food safety handling practices at farmers’ markets in Rhode Island using a Smartphone application. Food Prot. Trends 2015, 35, 428–439. [Google Scholar]
  61. Powell, D.A.; Jacob, C.J.; Chapman, B.J. Enhancing food safety culture to reduce rates of foodborne illness. Food Control 2011, 22, 817–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Choi, J.K.; Almanza, B. An assessment of food safety risk at fairs and festivals: A comparison of health inspection violations between fairs and festivals and restaurants. Event Manag. 2012, 16, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Baur, P.; Getz, C.; Sowerwine, J. Contradictions, consequences and the human toll of food safety culture. Agric. Hum. Values 2017, 34, 713–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Foods 09 00012 g001 550
Figure 1. Barriers to implementation of safe food handling practices at farmers markets. Strongly disagree = 1, strongly agree = 5, the error bar denoted the range of 95% confidential interval. Error bars represent the ± standard deviation of average of responses of manager or vendor to each question.
Figure 1. Barriers to implementation of safe food handling practices at farmers markets. Strongly disagree = 1, strongly agree = 5, the error bar denoted the range of 95% confidential interval. Error bars represent the ± standard deviation of average of responses of manager or vendor to each question.
Foods 09 00012 g001
Table
Table 1. Demographic profile of the respondents (N = 123).
Table 1. Demographic profile of the respondents (N = 123).
CharacteristicsN (Frequency %)
Gender
Male40 (32.0)
Female83 (68.0)
Generation
Baby boomers (52 years above)64 (52.1)
Generation X (37 years to 51 years)33 (26.8)
Millennial (18 years to 36 years)26 (21.1)
Education Level
High school degree28 (22.1)
Associate degree16 (13.1)
Bachelor’s degree43 (35.2)
Graduate degree30 (24.6)
Post-graduate degree6 (4.9)
Food Safety Training
Yes45 (36.9)
No78 (63.4)
Position
Manager38 (4.9)
Vendor85 (62.9)
Vendors’ Primary Product
Fresh meat5 (5.9)
Produce70 (82.4)
Ready-to-eat food2 (2.4)
Other8 (9.5)
Table
Table 2. Current food safety training and policies at farmers markets.
Table 2. Current food safety training and policies at farmers markets.
Manager (Frequency %)Vendor (Frequency %)
Food safety course15 (39.5)30 (35.3)
Disposable gloves19 (50.0)32 (37.6)
Utensils for food sample19 (50.0)37 (43.5)
Food safety materials19 (50.0)43 (50.6)
a SOPs8 (42.1%)12 (28.0)
Handwashing17 (89.4%)37 (82.22)
b Good quality9 (47.4%)18 (42.0%)
c Comprehensive7 (36.8%)18 (42.0%)
a This refers to a question of whether the manager provided guidelines such as standard operating procedures (SOPs) for facilities and equipment such as handwashing stations and refrigeration or cooling units. b Refers to a question of whether the manager provided high-quality food safety outreach training. c Refers to a question of whether the manager provided the training material with comprehensive food safety content.
Table
Table 3. Mean of responses of self-assessment of food safety knowledge at farmers markets.
Table 3. Mean of responses of self-assessment of food safety knowledge at farmers markets.
StatementsManager a (Response)SD bVendor a (Response)SD b
Foodborne illness can be life threatening4.58 c0.84.441.0
A foodborne illness could be dangerous4.710.64.491.0
I think unsafe food can make people really sick4.570.84.401.0
The odds of developing a foodborne illness are very small2.631.12.471.1
I think food is always safe to eat1.870.81.710.9
Proper food safety practices reduce food poisoning4.480.64.360.8
Proper food safety practices reduce bacteria growth4.460.74.440.6
I feel confident in my ability to store/transport food at safe temperatures4.290.74.330.7
I feel confident in my ability to clean and sanitize equipment and utensils properly4.380.84.400.7
I feel confident I can learn proper food safety practices4.630.64.560.6
a Response refers to the average responses of agreement with respect to each question. b SD refers to a standard deviation for manager or vendors’ responses. c No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between manager and vendors responses to all of food safety knowledge questions.
Table
Table 4. Results of two-way ANOVA on identified four barriers of implementing proper food handling practices.
Table 4. Results of two-way ANOVA on identified four barriers of implementing proper food handling practices.
SourceSum of SquaresdfF-Valuep-Value
Barriers21.8937.210.00
Job position1.6711.640.20
a Barriers position3.3531.100.35
a this indicates that there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in perceptions of each of identified barrier between managers and vendors.
Table
Table 5. The hierarchical linear regression on food safety practices.
Table 5. The hierarchical linear regression on food safety practices.
PredictorFood Safety Practices
Model 1CoefficientS.E.
Gender−0.030.22
Age0.010.01
R20.05
Model 2
Gender−0.110.21
Age0.010.01
Job position0.48 *0.21
Food safety knowledge0.34 **0.11
Food safety training0.100.14
R20.28 **
ΔR20.23 **
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohammad, Z.H.; Yu, H.; Neal, J.A.; Gibson, K.E.; Sirsat, S.A. Food Safety Challenges and Barriers in Southern United States Farmers Markets. Foods 2020, 9, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9010012

AMA Style

Mohammad ZH, Yu H, Neal JA, Gibson KE, Sirsat SA. Food Safety Challenges and Barriers in Southern United States Farmers Markets. Foods. 2020; 9(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9010012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohammad, Zahra H., Heyao Yu, Jack A. Neal, Kristen E. Gibson, and Sujata A. Sirsat. 2020. "Food Safety Challenges and Barriers in Southern United States Farmers Markets" Foods 9, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9010012

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop