Scope for Sustainable Development of Small Holder Farmers in the Palm Oil Supply Chain—A Systematic Literature Review and Thematic Scientific Mapping
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- What are the challenges faced by the small holder farmers in the palm oil supply chain?
- (2)
- What are the factors influencing the scope for sustainability for small holder farmers in the palm oil supply chain?
2. Literature Study
2.1. Small Holder Sustainability in Palm Oil Sector
2.2. Certification and Related Challenges
2.3. Market Governance
2.4. Problem faced by Independent Small Holder Farmer (ISHF)
3. Methodology
4. Results
5. SHF Sustainability and Livelihood—Insights from Table 4
6. Bibliometric/Thematic Scientific Mapping
6.1. Research Linkage on Small Holders
6.2. Bibliographic Coupling (Documents and Sources)
6.3. Sources
7. Discussion
7.1. Best Practices for Yield and Financial Challenges
7.2. Role of Certification Bodies and Challenges
7.3. Environmental Governance, Consumer and Stakeholder Perception
7.4. Water, Soil, Pest, and Waste Management towards Environmental Sustainability
7.5. Bioenergy, Biodiesel and Biomass
7.6. Land Use
8. Recent Research Work
9. Conceptual Framework for Sustainability and Livelihood of ISHF
10. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Teoh, C.H. Key Sustainability Issues in the Palm Oil Sector; International Finance Corporation, World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Padfield, R.; Hansen, S.; Davies, Z.G.; Ehrensperger, A.; Slade, E.M.; Evers, S.; Papargyropoulou, E.; Bessou, C.; Abdullah, N.; Page, S.; et al. Co-producing a Research Agenda for Sustainable Palm Oil. Front. For. Glob. Change 2019, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Burgos, D.; Ivanov, D. Food retail supply chain resilience and the COVID-19 pandemic: A digital twin-based impact analysis and improvement directions. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2021, 152, 102412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van der Vorst, J.G.A.J. Effective Food Supply Chains: Generating, Modelling and Evaluating Supply Chain Scenarios; Wageningen University and Research ProQuest Dissertations Publishing: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Khatun, R.; Reza, M.I.H.; Moniruzzaman, M.; Yaakob, Z. Sustainable oil palm industry: The possibilities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 76, 608–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, C.I.; Biswas, W. Sustainability assessment for crude palm oil production in Malaysia using the palm oil sustainability assessment framework. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 27, 253–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gatti, R.C.; Liang, J.; Velichevskaya, A.; Zhou, M. Sustainable palm oil may not be so sustainable. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 652, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dolorosa, N.E.; Suryadi, U.E. Farmers’ Organizations Model of Independent Smallholders in Sustainable Palm Oil Certification. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2019, 27, 1843–1863. [Google Scholar]
- Parvathi, E.P.; Waibel, H. Adoption of Sustainable Palm Oil Practices by Indonesian Smallholder Farmers. J. Southeast Asian Econ. 2016, 33, 291–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rist, L.; Feintrenie, L.; Levang, P. The livelihood impacts of oil palm: Smallholders in Indonesia. Biodivers Conserv. 2010, 19, 1009–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oosterveer, P. Promoting sustainable palm oil: Viewed from a global networks and flows perspective. J. Clean Prod. 2015, 107, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chand, R.; Prasanna, P.A.L.; Singh, A. Farm size and productivity: Understanding the strengths of smallholders and improving their livelihoods. Econ. Polit. Wkly 2011, 46, 5–11. [Google Scholar]
- Brandi, C.; Cabani, T.; Hosang, C.; Schirmbeck, S.; Westermann, L.; Wiese, H. Sustainability standards for palm oil: Challenges for smallholder certification under the RSPO. J. Environ. Dev. 2015, 24, 292–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glasbergen, P. Smallholders do not Eat Certificates. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 147, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgans, C.L.; Meijaard, E.; Santika, T.; Law, E.; Budiharta, S.; Ancrenaz, M.; Wilson, K.A. Evaluating the effectiveness of palm oil certification in delivering multiple sustainability objectives. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 064032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oosterveer, P.; Adjei, B.E.; Vellema, S.; Slingerland, M. Global sustainability standards and food security: Exploring unintended effects of voluntary certification in palm oil. Glob. Food Secur.-Agric. Policy Econ. Environ. 2014, 3, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlson, K.M.; Heilmayr, R.; Gibbs, H.K.; Noojipady, P.; Burns, D.N.; Morton, D.C.; Walker, N.F.; Paoli, G.D.; Kremen, C. Effect of oil palm sustainability certification on deforestation and fire in Indonesia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E842–E843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Garrett, R.D.; Carlson, K.M.; Rueda, X.; Noojipady, P. Assessing the potential additionality of certification by the Round table on Responsible Soybeans and the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. Environ. Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 045003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brandi, C.; Cabani, T.; Hosang, C.; Schirmbeck, S.; Westermann, L.; Wiese, H. Sustainability Certification in the Indonesian Palm Oil Sector: Benefits and Challenges for Smallholders. 2013. Available online: https://www.idos-research.de/uploads/media/Studies_74.pdf (accessed on 8 December 2022).
- Saadun, N.; Lim, E.A.L.; Esa, S.M.; Ngu, F.; Awang, F.; Gimin, A.; Johari, I.H.; Firdaus, M.A.; Wagimin, N.I.; Azhar, B. Socio-ecological perspectives of engaging smallholders in environmental-friendly palm oil certification schemes. Land Use Policy 2018, 72, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rival, A.; Montet, D.; Pioch, D. Certification, labelling and traceability of palm oil: Can we build confidence from trustworthy standards? Oilseeds Fats Crops Lipids 2016, 23, D609. [Google Scholar]
- Fischer, E.; Qaim, M. Linking smallholders to markets: Determinants and impacts of farmer collective action in Kenya. World Dev. 2012, 40, 1255–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vamuloh, V.V.; Kozak, R.A.; Panwar, R. Voices unheard: Barriers to and opportunities for small farmers’ participation in oil palm contract farming. J. Clean Prod. 2020, 275, 121955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Futemma, C.; De Castro, F.; Brondizio, E.S. Farmers and social innovations in rural development: Collaborative arrangements in eastern Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy 2020, 99, 104999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruml, A.; Qaim, M. Effects of marketing contracts and resource-providing contracts in the African small farm sector: Insights from oil palm production in Ghana. World Dev. 2019, 136, 105110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apriani, E.; Kim, Y.-S.; Fisher, L.A.; Baral, H. Non-state certification of smallholders for sustainable palm oil in Sumatra, Indonesia. Land Use Policy 2020, 99, 105112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brandi, C.A. Sustainability standards and sustainable development–synergies and trade-offs of transnational governance. Sustain. Dev. 2017, 25, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Apriyanti, I.; Ramadhani, J. Palm Oil Marketing Model through Performance Analysis Approach in Simalungun Regency. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 697, 12004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, S.; Rieple, A.; Chang, J.; Boniface, B.; Ahmed, A. Small farmers and sustainability: Institutional barriers to investment and innovation in the Malaysian palm oil industry in Sabah. J. Rural Stud. 2015, 40, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lim, C.I.; Biswas, W.; Samyudia, Y. Review of Existing Sustainability Assessment Methods for Malaysian Palm Oil Production. Procedia CIRP 2015, 26, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chalil, D. Assessment of Smallholders’ Barriers to Adopt Sustainable Practices: Case Study on Oil Palm (Elaeis Guineensis) Smallholders’ Certification in North Sumatra, Indonesia. In Cases on the Diffusion and Adoption of Sustainable Development Practices; IGI GLOBAL: Hershey, PA, USA, 2013; pp. 439–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hidayat, N.K.; Glasbergen, P.; Offermans, A. Sustainability Certification and Palm Oil Smallholders’ Livelihood: A Comparison between Scheme Smallholders and Independent Smallholders in Indonesia. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 2015, 18, 25–48. [Google Scholar]
- Bissonnette, J.-F. Is oil palm agribusiness a sustainable development option for Indonesia? A review of issues and options. Can. J. Dev. Stud.-Rev. Can. Etudes Dev. 2016, 37, 446–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shukla, M.; Tiwari, M.K. Big-data analytics framework for incorporating smallholders in sustainable palm oil production. Prod. Plan. Control. 2017, 28, 1365–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Choy, E.A.; Albanya, A.B. Economic sustainability of palm oil plantations among smallholders in lahad datu, sabah. J. Fundam. Appl. Sci. 2017, 9, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jelsma, I.; Slingerland, M.; Giller, K.E.; Bijman, J. Collective action in a smallholder oil palm production system in Indonesia: The key to sustainable and inclusive smallholder palm oil? J. Rural Stud. 2017, 54, 198–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, A.; Ravikumar, A.; McDermott, C.L.; Malhi, Y. Smallholder Oil Palm Production in the Peruvian Amazon: Rethinking the Promise of Associations and Partnerships for Economically Sustainable Livelihoods. Front. For. Glob. Change 2019, 2, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senawi, R.; Rahman, N.K.; Mansor, N.; Kuntom, A. transformation of oil palm independent smallholders through malaysian sustainable palm oil. J. Oil Palm Res. 2019, 31, 496–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martens, K.; Kunz, Y.; Rosyani, I.; Faust, H. Environmental Governance Meets Reality: A Micro-Scale Perspective on Sustainability Certification Schemes for Oil Palm Smallholders in Jambi, Sumatra. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2020, 33, 634–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khatun, K.; Maguire-Rajpaul, V.A.; Asante, E.A.; McDermott, C.L. From Agroforestry to Agroindustry: Smallholder Access to Benefits from Oil Palm in Ghana and the Implications for Sustainability Certification. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Parvathi, E.P.; Waibel, H. Will teaching sustainability standards to oil palm smallholders in Indonesia pay off? Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2020, 18, 196–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodthong, W.; Kuwornu, J.K.M.; Datta, A.; Anal, A.K.; Tsusaka, T.W. Factors Influencing the Intensity of Adoption of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil Practices by Smallholder Farmers in Thailand. Environ. Manage 2020, 66, 377–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falagas, M.E.; Pitsouni, E.I.; Malietzis, G.A.; Pappas, G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008, 22, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chapman, K.; Ellinger, A.E. An evaluation of Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar citations in operations management. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2019, 30, 1039–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snyder, H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus Res. 2019, 104, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Worthington, H.; Esposito, M.; Nieri, M.; Glenny, A.-M. What is a systematic review? Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2003, 1, 174–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abideen, A.Z.; Mohamad, F.B.; Fernando, Y. Lean simulations in production and operations management—A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. J. Model. Manag. 2020, 16, 623–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shuit, S.H.; Tan, K.T.; Lee, K.T.; Kamaruddin, A.H. Oil palm biomass as a sustainable energy source: A Malaysian case study. Energy 2009, 34, 1225–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tan, K.T.; Lee, K.T.; Mohamed, A.R.; Bhatia, S. Palm oil: Addressing issues and towards sustainable development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 420–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lam, M.K.; Tan, K.T.; Lee, K.T.; Mohamed, A.R. Malaysian palm oil: Surviving the food versus fuel dispute for a sustainable future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 1456–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laurance, W.F.; Koh, L.P.; Butler, R.; Sodhi, N.S.; Bradshaw, C.J.; Neidel, J.D.; Consunji, H.; Vega, J.M. Improving the Performance of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil for Nature Conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2010, 24, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukherjee, I.; Sovacool, B.K. Palm oil-based biofuels and sustainability in southeast Asia: A review of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 37, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R.P.; Ibrahim, M.H.; Esa, N.; Iliyana, M.S. Composting of waste from palm oil mill: A sustainable waste management practice. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 331–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schouten, G.; Leroy, P.; Glasbergen, P. On the deliberative capacity of private multi-stakeholder governance: The Roundtables on Responsible Soy and Sustainable Palm Oil. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 83, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- von Geibler, J. Market-based governance for sustainability in value chains: Conditions for successful standard setting in the palm oil sector. J. Clean Prod. 2013, 56, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruysschaert, D.; Salles, D. Towards global voluntary standards: Questioning the effectiveness in attaining conservation goals The case of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). Ecol. Econ. 2014, 107, 438–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gatti, R.C.; Velichevskaya, A. Certified “sustainable” palm oil took the place of endangered Bornean and Sumatran large mammals habitat and tropical forests in the last 30 years. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 742, 140712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fleiss, S.; Waddell, E.H.; Ola, B.B.; Banin, L.F.; Benedick, S.; Sailim, A.B.; Chapman, D.S.; Jelling, A.; King, H.; McClean, C.J.; et al. Conservation set-asides improve carbon storage and support associated plant diversity in certified sustainable oil palm plantations. Biol. Conserv. 2020, 248, 108631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tengku Hamzah, T.A.A.; Zainuddin, Z.; Mohd Yusoff, M.; Osman, S.; Abdullah, A.; Md Saini, K.; Sisun, A. The Conundrum of Carbon Trading Projects towards Sustainable Development: A Review from the Palm Oil Industry in Malaysia. Energies 2019, 12, 3530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lestari, F.; Ompusunggu, J.; Diniaty, D.; Silvia. Evaluation of Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil Certification Using Green SCOR. In Vision 2025: Education Excellence and Management of Innovations through Sustainable Economic Competitive Advantage; Int Business Information Management ASSOC-IBIMA: Norristown, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 5101–5109. [Google Scholar]
- Munasinghe, M.; Jayasinghe, P.; Deraniyagala, Y.; Matlaba, V.J.; dos Santos, J.F.; Maneschy, M.C.; Mota, J.A. Value–Supply Chain Analysis (VSCA) of crude palm oil production in Brazil, focusing on economic, environmental and social sustainability. Sustain Prod. Consum. 2019, 17, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papilo, P.; Hambali, M.E.; Sitanggang, I.S. Sustainability index assessment of palm oil-based bioenergy in Indonesia. J. Clean Prod. 2018, 196, 808–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, C.I.; Biswas, W.K. Development of triple bottom line indicators for sustainability assessment framework of Malaysian palm oil industry. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2018, 20, 539–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silalertruksa, T.; Gheewala, S.H.; Pongpat, P.; Kaenchan, P.; Permpool, N.; Lecksiwilai, N.; Mungkung, R. Environmental sustainability of oil palm cultivation in different regions of Thailand: Greenhouse gases and water use impact. J. Clean Prod. 2017, 167, 1009–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hospes, O.; Kroeze, C.; Oosterveer, P.; Schouten, G.; Slingerland, M. New generation of knowledge: Towards an inter- and transdisciplinary framework for sustainable pathways of palm oil production. NJAS-Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2017, 80, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, C.I.; Biswas, W. An Evaluation of Holistic Sustainability Assessment Framework for Palm Oil Production in Malaysia. Sustainability 2015, 7, 16561–16587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Choong, C.G.; McKay, A. Sustainability in the Malaysian palm oil industry. J. Clean Prod. 2014, 85, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonzalez-Redin, J.; Polhill, J.G.; Dawson, T.P.; Hill, R.; Gordon, I.J. Exploring sustainable scenarios in debt-based social-ecological systems: The case for palm oil production in Indonesia. Ambio 2020, 49, 1530–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tey, Y.S.; Brindal, M.; Darham, S.; Sidique, S.F.A.; Djama, M. Early mover advantage in Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil certification: A panel evidence of plantation companies. J. Clean Prod. 2020, 252, 119775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higgins, V.; Richards, C. Framing sustainability: Alternative standards schemes for sustainable palm oil and South-South trade. J. Rural Stud. 2019, 65, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kadarusman, Y.B.; Herabadi, A.G. Improving Sustainable Development within Indonesian Palm Oil: The Importance of the Reward System. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 26, 422–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, A. The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil’s national interpretation process in Ecuador: ‘Fitting’ global standards into local contexts. J. Rural. Stud. 2019, 71, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacheco, P.; Schoneveld, G.; Dermawan, A.; Komarudin, H.; Djama, M. Governing sustainable palm oil supply: Disconnects, complementarities, and antagonisms between state regulations and private standards. Regul. Gov. 2020, 14, 568–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borrello, M.; Annunziata, A.; Vecchio, R. Sustainability of Palm Oil: Drivers of Consumers’ Preferences. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ching, J.Y.L.; Yaman, I.C.; Khoon, K.L.; Hong, C.K.; Melayong, G. A case study into the sustainability journey and biodiversity conservation projects in sarawak by sarawak oil palms berhad. J. Oil Palm Res. 2019, 31, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hidayat, N.K.; Offermans, A.; Glasbergen, P. Sustainable palm oil as a public responsibility? On the governance capacity of Indonesian Standard for Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO). Agric Hum. Values 2018, 35, 223–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dahliani, L.; Maharani, M.D.D. Palm Oil Sustainable Management Using MDS Model from Social Dimension. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Community Development (AMCA 2018), Quezon City, Philippines, 19–20 July 2018; Volume 231, pp. 50–53. [Google Scholar]
- Offerrnans, A.; Glasbergen, P. Boundary work in sustainability partnerships: An exploration of the Round Table on Sustainable Palm Oil. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 50, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Antone, S.; Robert, S. Organising for sustainable palm oil consumption: A market-based approach. Consum. Mark. Cult. 2015, 18, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kohne, M. Multi-stakeholder initiative governance as assemblage: Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil as a political resource in land conflicts related to oil palm plantations. Agric. Hum. Values 2014, 31, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahputra, M.A.; Zen, Z. Positive and Negative Impacts of Oil Palm Expansion in Indonesia and the Prospect to Achieve Sustainable Palm Oil. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 122, 012008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noor, F.M.M.; Gassner, A.; Terheggen, A.; Dobie, P. Beyond sustainability criteria and principles in palm oil production: Addressing consumer concerns through insetting. Ecol. Soc. 2017, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2009, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L.; Dekker, R.; Van Den Berg, J. A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2010, 61, 2405–2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Murphy, D.J. Oil palm: Future prospects for yield and quality improvements. Lipid Technol. 2009, 21, 257–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Euler, M.; Hoffmann, M.P.; Fathoni, Z.; Schwarze, S. Exploring yield gaps in smallholder oil palm production systems in eastern Sumatra, Indonesia. Agric Syst. 2016, 146, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagazonzya, H.; Safdar, Z.; Sen, S. Broadening Smallholders’ Access to Financial Services through ICT; International Finance Corporation, World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Tey, Y.S.; Brindal, M.; Darham, S.; Djama, M.; Sidique, S.F.A. Financial performance of certified palm oil companies in Malaysia. Oil Palm Ind. Econ. J. 2019, 19, 57–66. [Google Scholar]
- Nurfatriani, F.; Sari, G.K.; Komarudin, H. Optimization of Crude Palm Oil Fund to Support Smallholder Oil Palm Replanting in Reducing Deforestation in Indonesia. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hutabarat, S.; Slingerland, M.; Rietberg, P.; Dries, L. Costs and benefits of certification of independent oil palm smallholders in Indonesia. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 2018, 21, 681–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richardson, B. Making a Market for Sustainability: The Commodification of Certified Palm Oil. New Political Econ. 2015, 20, 545–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pye, O. Commodifying sustainability: Development, nature and politics in the palm oil industry. World Dev. 2019, 121, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meemken, E.-M. Do smallholder farmers benefit from sustainability standards? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob. Food Sec. 2020, 26, 100373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morley, D. RSPO, the global standard for sustainable palm oil. Agro Food Ind. Hi-Tech 2015, 26, 29–30. [Google Scholar]
- Marin-Burgos, V.; Clancy, J.S.; Lovett, J.C. Contesting legitimacy of voluntary sustainability certification schemes: Valuation languages and power asymmetries in the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil in Colombia. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 117, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- 96. Lazaroiu, G.; Valaskova, K.; Nica, E.; Durana, P.; Kral, P.; Bartoš, P.; Maroušková, A. Techno-Economic Assessment: Food Emulsion Waste Management. Energies 2020, 13, 4922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazaroiu, G.; Andronie, M.; Uţă, C.; Hurloiu, I. Trust management in organic agriculture: Sustainable consumption behavior, environmentally conscious purchase intention, and healthy food choices. Front. Public Health 2019, 7, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ostfeld, R.; Howarth, D.; Reiner, D.; Krasny, P. Peeling back the label-exploring sustainable palm oil ecolabelling and consumption in the United Kingdom. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 014001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gassler, B.; Spiller, A. Is it all in the MIX? Consumer preferences for segregated and mass balance certified sustainable palm oil. J. Clean Prod. 2018, 195, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno-Penaranda, R.; Gasparatos, A.; Stromberg, P.; Suwa, A.; Pandyaswargo, A.H.; de Oliveira, J.A. Sustainable production and consumption of palm oil in Indonesia: What can stakeholder perceptions offer to the debate? Sustain Prod. Consum. 2015, 4, 16–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nesadurai, H.E.S. Food security, the palm oil-land conflict nexus, and sustainability: A governance role for a private multi-stakeholder regime like the RSPO? Pac. Rev. 2013, 26, 505–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safitri, L.; Hermantoro, H.; Purboseno, S.; Kautsar, V.; Saptomo, S.K.; Kurniawan, A. Water Footprint and Crop Water Usage of Oil Palm (Eleasis guineensis) in Central Kalimantan: Environmental Sustainability Indicators for Different Crop Age and Soil Conditions. Water 2019, 11, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sundram, S.; Angel, L.P.L.; Sirajuddin, S.A. Integrated balanced fertiliser management in soil health rejuvenation for a sustainable oil palm cultivation: A review. J. Oil Palm Res. 2019, 31, 348–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, L.G.; Abd Wahid, S.A.; Tamilarasan, P.; Siang, C.S. Enhancing sustainable oil palm cultivation using compost. J. Oil Palm Res. 2019, 31, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamarudin, N.; Abu Seman, I.; Masri, M.M.M. prospects in sustainable control of oil palm pests and diseases through the enhancement of ecosystem services-the way forward. J. Oil Palm Res. 2019, 31, 381–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Y.D.; Lim, J.S. Feasibility of palm oil mill effluent elimination towards sustainable Malaysian palm oil industry. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 111, 507–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choy, Y.K. Can palm oil waste be a solution to fossil fuel scarcity and environmental sustainability? A Malaysian case study provides the answer. Waste Manag. Environ. VIII 2016, 202, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boons, F.; Mendoza, A. Constructing sustainable palm oil: How actors define sustainability. J. Clean Prod. 2010, 18, 1686–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, W.S.; Khor, C.S.; Hashim, H.; Lim, J.S.; Ashina, S.; Herran, D.S. Optimal operation of a distributed energy generation system for a sustainable palm oil-based eco-community. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2015, 17, 1597–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umar, M.S.; Jennings, P.; Urmee, T. Sustainable electricity generation from oil palm biomass wastes in Malaysia: An industry survey. Energy 2014, 67, 496–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tan, S.T.; Hashim, H.; Rashid, A.H.A.; Lim, J.S.; Ho, W.S.; Jaafar, A.B. Economic and spatial planning for sustainable oil palm biomass resources to mitigate transboundary haze issue. Energy 2018, 146, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ludin, N.A.; Bakri, M.A.M.; Kamaruddin, N.; Sopian, K.; Deraman, M.S.; Hamid, N.H.; Asim, N.; Othman, M.Y. Malaysian oil palm plantation sector: Exploiting renewable energy toward sustainability production. J. Clean Prod. 2014, 65, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kottusch, C.; Schaffartzik, A. Sustainable Palm Oil? Insights from Material Flow and Land Use Analysis in Brazil’s Production Hotspot. Gaia-Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 2017, 26, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Austin, K.G.; Lee, M.E.; Clark, C.; Forester, B.R.; Urban, D.L.; White, L.; Kasibhatla, P.S.; Poulsen, J.R. An assessment of high carbon stock and high conservation value approaches to sustainable oil palm cultivation in Gabon. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 014005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cattau, M.E.; Marlier, M.E.; DeFries. Effectiveness of Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) for reducing fires on oil palm concessions in Indonesia from 2012 to 2015. Environ. Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 105007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, F.A.; Edwards, D.P.; Sloan, S.; Hamer, K.C. Sustainable Management in Crop Monocultures: The Impact of Retaining Forest on Oil Palm Yield. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smit, H.H.; Meijaard, E.; van der Laan, C.; Mantel, S.; Budiman, A.; Verweij, P. Breaking the Link between Environmental Degradation and Oil Palm Expansion: A Method for Enabling Sustainable Oil Palm Expansion. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bessou, C.; Chase, L.D.; Henson, I.E.; Abdul-Manan, A.F.; I Canals, L.M.; Agus, F.; Sharma, M.; Chin, M. Pilot application of PalmGHG, the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil greenhouse gas calculator for oil palm products. J. Clean Prod. 2014, 73, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rahmat, S.R.; Yasin, S.M.; Mad’Atari, M.F.; Tayeb, A. Seeking for sustainability: Actor’s perspective on the Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil Certification Scheme (MSPO). Geogr.-Malays. J. Soc. Space 2021, 17, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogahara, Z.; Jespersen, K.; Theilade, I.; Nielsen, M.R. Review of smallholder palm oil sustainability reveals limited positive impacts and identifies key implementation and knowledge gaps. Land Use Policy 2022, 120, 106258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y. Smallholder agriculture, sustainability and the Syngenta Foundation. Syngenta Found. Sustain. Agric. 2010, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Ruysschaert, D.; Carter, C.; Cheyns, E. Territorializing effects of global standards: What is at stake in the case of `sustainable’ palm oil? Geoforum 2019, 104, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamaruddin, H.; Wahab, H.A.; Anuar, H.M. Legal and non-legal agricultural practices: Toward a sustainable future in malaysia’s palm oil industry. Indones. Law Rev. 2018, 8, 316–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saswattecha, K.; Kroeze, C.; Jawjit, W.; Hein, L. Improving environmental sustainability of Thai palm oil production in 2050. J. Clean Prod. 2017, 147, 572–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romero Leon, A.; Agustin, A.; Luis Sulvaran, J. The Myth Behind Sustainable African Palm Crop. Socio-Environmental Impacts of Palm Oil in Chiapas, Mexico. Int. J. Ecol. Dev. 2017, 32, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Herath, G. Free Trade and Sustainable Development: Progress and Challenges in the Oil Palm Sector. In Proceedings of the Usm-Aut International Conference 2012 Sustainable Economic development: Policies and Strategies, Penang, Malaysia, 17–18 November 2012; pp. 51–62. [Google Scholar]
- Hadiguna, R.A.; Tjahjono, B. A framework for managing sustainable palm oil supply chain operations: A case of Indonesia. Prod. Plan. Control 2017, 28, 1093–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
S.No | Author | Research Work/Inference | Publication Source | Theme Focused |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | [31] | Complications with RSPO certification for small holders were addressed. The primary impediments were determined to be a lack of information, the expense of adoption, and incompatibility with the stage of farm growth, societal values, and farming conditions, insufficient managerial skills, and profitability. | Cases on the Diffusion and Adoption of Sustainable Development Practices | Certification |
2 | [32] | Formulated an improved livelihood framework for Indonesian small holders who engage in the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) to address both the ethical and financial aspects of certification while increasing small holder profitability. | International Food and Agribusiness Management Review | Small holder livelihood |
3 | [33] | Developed methods to improve the governance and regulatory framework for small holders, wage laborers in plantations, and the biophysical environment in Indonesia’s oil palm agribusiness, as well as to address related challenges to improving the governance and regulatory framework for small holders. | Canadian Journal of Development Studies-Revue Canadienne D Etudes Du Development | Socio economic sustainability of small holders |
4 | [9] | In Merangin district, Jambi province, researchers investigated the extension plan for ISPO-based oil palm techniques among small holder farmers. Household characteristics, economic shocks, and farmers’ perceptions of the risk of declining oil palm yield are all factors to consider. | Journal of Southeast Asian Economies | Good Agricultural Practices |
5 | [34] | Proposed a framework for big data analysis that would allow the incorporation of small farmers in the RSPO certification process through cutting-edge technologies. | Production Planning & Control | Technology assisted certification |
6 | [35] | Reviewed economic sustainability metrics in Lahad Datu, Sabah, for oil palm farmers. The results showed that a majority of small holder farmers had revenues above poverty level to enable sustainable farming. | Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences | Livelihood |
7 | [36] | It has been demonstrated that, with a robust institutional arrangement, small holder oil palm growers can engage in supply chains on favorable terms and significantly boost production, thereby contributing to both rural development and land sparing. | Journal of Rural Studies | Supply chain sustainability |
8 | [37] | In the Peruvian Amazon’s main oil palm producing region, Ucayali, diverse socio-economic typologies of different small holder ways of production have arisen. Small holders praised a variety of production tactics, including independent production, business partnerships, and government aid programs. | Frontiers in Forests and Global Change | Overall sustainability |
9 | [8] | Framed the main relationships amongst small holders’ organizations to achieve a sustainable certification program. | Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities | Certification |
10 | [38] | The antecedents for independent small holders’ activities were formulated based on a modified conceptual change model, produced and examined by an independent small holders’ independent audit findings on trust–sustainability aspects. | Journal of Oil Palm Research | Overall sustainability |
11 | [39] | Designed mixed-method multi-stakeholder cost reduction technique, which reflects the effect of the Small holder Benchmark as advocated by the RSPO, for a better institutional environment of independently owned oil palm small holders in rural Sumatra. | Society & Natural Resources | Multi-stakeholder & Certification |
12 | [40] | The “Access theory” (2003) of Ribot and Peluso has been applied to evaluate hurdles and possibilities for small holder oil palm growers and to what extent RSPO initiatives in small-scale Ghanaian holdings address them. Market contracts with fairer reach are good at many local to international levels. | Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems | |
13 | [41] | A cost-benefit analysis of introduction of sustainability standards in the province of Jambi, Sumatra, Indonesia, and investment by Indonesian government, according to the ISPO criteria, has been presented. | International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability | Certification & Livelihood |
14 | [42] | The elements impacting decision making by small holder farmers and the degree of adoption in Southern Thailand have been evaluated. The overall agricultural work, the scale of farm work, the number of training sessions attended, availability to information, extension services, support, and perceived ease of practice have had a favorable effect on their intensity of adoption. | Environmental Management | Good Agriculural Practices (GAP) |
S.No | Publication Source | Number of Papers |
---|---|---|
1 | Journal of Cleaner Production | 18 |
2 | Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews | 8 |
3 | Sustainability | 7 |
4 | Journal of Oil Palm Research | 6 |
5 | Environmental Research Letter | 6 |
6 | Journal of Rural Studies | 4 |
7 | Ecological Economics | 4 |
8 | Achieving Sustainable Consumption of Oil Palm—Diseases, Pest, Quality and Sustainability, Frontiers in Forest and Global Change, Sustainable Production and Consumption, Agriculture and Human Values, Sustainable Development, Energy, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies | 3 |
9 | Plos One, Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, Environment Development and Sustainability, International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, Achieving Sustainable Cultivation of Oil Palm, Vol 1: Introduction, Breeding and Cultivation Techniques, International Conference on Agriculture, Environment, And Food Security, Production Planning & Control, Science of The Total Environment, Geoforum, Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, World Development, Food Australia, International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, Renewable Energy, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy | 2 |
S.No | Author Reference | Research Theme | Citation Score |
---|---|---|---|
1 | [48] | Oil palm biomass usage as sustainable energy source | 278 |
2 | [49] | Overall palm oil sustainability issues and solutions | 177 |
3 | [50] | Palm oil as food and fuel for sustainability | 152 |
4 | [51] | Roundtable for conservation of forest | 105 |
5 | [52] | Palm oil in biofuel application | 102 |
6 | [53] | Waste management and environmental sustainability | 84 |
7 | [54] | Roundtable on multi-stakeholder governance for sustainable palm oil production | 81 |
8 | [55] | Market-based governance strategies for palm oil sustainability | 75 |
9 | [17] | Certification on deforestation | 64 |
10 | [56] | Roundtable on global forest conservation standards in the palm oil industry | 61 |
Sustainability Factor | Reference | Research Work | Inference |
---|---|---|---|
Environmental Sustainability | [57] | Remotely sensed time-series and imagery analysis (1984–2020) | Estates of licensed farmers can be found in vast animal communities in Sumatra and Borneo, which were once tropical forests. |
[58] | Case study on biodiversity conservation by planting for enrichment and preserving the above-ground carbon content. | Quality enrichment in plantation without clearing land for cultivation is strongly encouraged and aids in the conservation of forest-dependent biodiversity. | |
[42] | Decisions on small holder farming and the intensity of adoption using binary logit and two-limit Tobit regressions | The strength of adoption was positively influenced by total farm labor, farm size, the number of training sessions attended, access to information, extension resources, support services, and the perceived ease of adopting the good practices. | |
[59] | Addressed and analyzed how the carbon trading projects’ targets in Malaysia can be achieved. | Carbon trading is being implemented in Malaysia in accordance with the goals and principles of sustainable development for economic growth. | |
[60] | Evaluated the implementation of environmental management based on the ISPO certification criteria. | To achieve a full evaluation of the application of production operations, numerous environmental management certifications are always applied utilizing green SCOR. | |
[61] | Evidenced-based analysis of sustainability (based on carbon, energy, blue-water, labor, and economic footprints) of crude palm oil (CPO) production in Para, Brazil. | Based on carbon and energy footprints, many sustainability hotspots were discovered. | |
[62] | Assessed the sustainability index of Indonesian palm oil-based bioenergy development through the multi-dimensional scaling analysis. | The sustainability score is believed to be effective in establishing the optimal strategy for future bioenergy development in Indonesia. | |
[63] | Developed performance measures for triple bottom line assessment in the Malaysian palm oil industry. | Using a structured approach, presented the final list of performance measures, key performance indicators, and higher performance indicators, and introduced weighting factors to the indicators to reflect differences in perceived relevance. | |
[64] | Assessed the life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water use, and water scarcity footprint of oil palm cultivation in the different regions of Thailand. | The promotion of oil palm production should be land and climate appropriateness, as well as good productivity-increasing strategies. | |
[65] | Developed an interdisciplinary framework conceptualizing the palm oil sector as consisting of systems, flows, and networks. | Instead of the production and expansion of palm oil, considered switchers as critical actors for shaping sustainable pathways, both in the palm oil sector and at the science–policy interface. | |
[66] | Proposed a holistic sustainability assessment framework for palm oil production with the aim to address the weaknesses of existing palm oil sustainability assessment methods. | The sustainability evaluation framework proved to be a comprehensive tool for determining the sustainability of the source of biofuel. | |
[67] | Addressed the need to improve understanding of having clear information requirements based on the different impacts in the Malaysian palm oil industry supply network tiers. | In the course of similar experiments, these information requirements and links across the Malaysian palm oil supply network were subsequently analyzed. | |
Economic Sustainability | [68] | Sustainable scenarios in debt-based social-ecological systems in Palm Oil production | The responsibility of the state to safeguard the environment is strengthened, showing that debt based economic factors can partially stimulate environmental protection. |
[69] | Assessed profitability and impact on return on invested capital (ROIC) and (RSPO) adoption for sustainability standard. | Increased plantation enterprises’ acceptance of international palm oil standards proves to be a cornerstone for small holders. | |
[70] | Developed alternative sustainability standards schemes and the framing of sustainability in the context of South–South trade relationship through Indonesian and Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil schemes (ISPO and MSPO). | Sustainability plans aimed at markets in the Global South should be scrutinized more closely in terms of how they redefine sustainability to satisfy existing and growing market requirements. | |
[71] | Equitable governance system enables the introduction of the reward system on the CSPO transaction. | As a result, influential stakeholders can exert absolute control over other stakeholders, even when their interests are at odds with the RSPO’s goal. | |
Social Sustainability | [72] | National Interpretation (NI) processes and relations with palm-oil production with RSPO certification | This integration is crucial for the local validation and implementation of global standards, as it allows local actors to bring value to the norms while also assisting in the development of the standards’ transformative ability. |
[73] | Explored disconnects, complementarities, and antagonisms between public regulations and private standards, looking at the global, national, and subnational policy domains shaping chain actors’ conduct. | The complex battle for regulation initiatives within the emerging policies system is to resolve sectorally wide structural issues: widespread land disputes, differences in yield between enterprises and small-scale holders, and carbon emissions from deforestation and conversion of peatlands, particularly at the subnational level. | |
[74] | Consumers’ perception of food products carrying a “palm oil-free” label on their packaging. | In general, customers prefer palm-oil-free products, which they see as healthier or more eco-friendly, and the low level of information about this ingredient emphasized the need for public information and media campaigns in order to stress that there is no scientifically proven negative effect on the health of palm oil. | |
[75] | Focused on the sustainability initiatives and outcomes by Sarawak Oil Palms Berhad (SOPB), a Sarawakian oil palms plantation company incorporated in Malaysia. | Sustainability accreditation systems such as Malaysian sustainable palm oil (MSPO) and ISCC and SOPB combined support for biodiversity conservation initiatives while balancing people, planet, and profit with opposing goals. | |
[76] | Studied sustainability roles of government and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Indonesia palm oil production. | The key problem of governance is the combination of a more authentic ISPO implementing mechanism with a strong balance between the sector’s sustainable and economic interests. | |
[77] | Determined the status of sustainability of palm oil management using multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) model. | The absorption of palm oil in intervention, access to local communication, synchronizing politics, and social rules are needed to sustain palm oil management. | |
[78] | Developed an analytical framework, based on attributes of the nature of knowledge, i.e., the process of knowledge production. | The deployment of the paradigm to the sample case of the RSPO reveals that science and scientific knowledge are not necessarily of the utmost importance in a frontier organization of this kind. | |
[79] | Explored how sustainable-oriented changes in food consumption are intertwined in dispersed movements of material and immaterial entities in both markets and society. | The focus on diverse market players’ attempts to configure and reconfigure a sustainable form of (non-) palm oil consumption. | |
[80] | Examined how actors use MSI regulation regarding land conflicts with a focus on the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). | MSI’s enactions and therefore governance are determined by how access to an MSI is divided among the contending players. The unfair sharing of RSPO access means that corporations are governed by communities. |
Criteria | Value |
---|---|
Type of Analysis | Co-Occurrence of All Keywords Full Counting Clustering |
Total Keywords | 896 |
Minimum number of occurrences of Keyword | 3 |
Final Keyword Set | 106 |
S.No | Keyword | Number of Occurrences | Link Strength |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Palm Oil | 75 | 355 |
2 | Sustainability | 52 | 254 |
3 | Indonesia | 25 | 171 |
4 | Biodiversity | 28 | 160 |
5 | Expansion | 24 | 158 |
6 | Certification | 22 | 146 |
7 | Roundtable | 17 | 133 |
8 | Governance | 23 | 129 |
9 | Deforestation | 17 | 123 |
10 | Small Holders | 17 | 116 |
11 | Standards | 16 | 116 |
12 | Plantation | 16 | 105 |
13 | RSPO | 15 | 93 |
14 | Oil Palm | 19 | 92 |
15 | Agriculture | 13 | 88 |
16 | Malaysia | 15 | 88 |
17 | Conservation | 12 | 81 |
18 | Forest | 10 | 80 |
19 | Multi-Stakeholder Governance | 12 | 73 |
20 | Conversion | 10 | 68 |
Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 5 | Cluster 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Framework | Certification | Amazon | Agriculture | Economic | Challenges |
Biodiesel | Consumption | Biofuels | Biodiversity | Environment | Stakeholder Perceptions |
Biomass | Emergence | Conservation | Conversion | Future | |
Business | Global Value Chain | Deforestation | Ecosystem Services | Malaysia | |
Empty Fruit Bunch | Human Rights | Emissions | Elaeis-guineensis | Management | |
Energy | Indonesia | Environmental Governance | Expansion | Oil Palm | |
Environmental Sustainability | Information | Food | Forest | Production | |
Framework | Ispo | Forests | Land | Small Holders | |
Fresh Fruit Bunch | Legitimacy | Governance | Land Use Change | Social | |
Fuel | Multi-Stakeholder Governance | Impact | Power | Sustainability | |
Green House Gas Emission | Palm Oil | Land Use | Sumatra | ||
Impact | Partnership | Market | Sustainable Agriculture | ||
Indicators | Policy | Plantations | Tropical Forest | ||
Industry | Politics | Round-Table on Sustainable Palm Oil | |||
Life Cycle Assessment | Private Governance | South-east Asia | |||
Mill Effluent | Products | Soy | |||
Networks | Rise | Trade | |||
Optimization | Round Table | ||||
Palm Oil Mill | RSPO | ||||
Performance | Sector | ||||
Pome | Standards | ||||
Quality | State | ||||
Renewable Energy | Strategies | ||||
Sustainable Assessment | Sustainability Standards | ||||
Sustainable Development | Transnational Governance | ||||
Sustainable Production | Value Chain | ||||
Systems | Voluntary Standards | ||||
Technology | |||||
Thailand |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Abideen, A.Z.; Sundram, V.P.K.; Sorooshian, S. Scope for Sustainable Development of Small Holder Farmers in the Palm Oil Supply Chain—A Systematic Literature Review and Thematic Scientific Mapping. Logistics 2023, 7, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics7010006
Abideen AZ, Sundram VPK, Sorooshian S. Scope for Sustainable Development of Small Holder Farmers in the Palm Oil Supply Chain—A Systematic Literature Review and Thematic Scientific Mapping. Logistics. 2023; 7(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics7010006
Chicago/Turabian StyleAbideen, Ahmed Zainul, Veera Pandiyan Kaliani Sundram, and Shahryar Sorooshian. 2023. "Scope for Sustainable Development of Small Holder Farmers in the Palm Oil Supply Chain—A Systematic Literature Review and Thematic Scientific Mapping" Logistics 7, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics7010006