Next Article in Journal
Urinary Malondialdehyde (MDA) and N-Acetyl-β-D-Glucosaminidase (NAG) Associated with Exposure to Trichloroethylene (TCE) in Underground Water
Previous Article in Journal
Adsorption of Pb(II) and Cr(VI) from Aqueous Solution by Synthetic Allophane Suspension: Isotherm, Kinetics, and Mechanisms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxics
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/toxics10060292
toxics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association of Urinary Phthalate and Phthalate Replacement Metabolite Concentrations with Serum Lipid Biomarker Levels among Pregnant Women Attending a Fertility Center

by
Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón
1,2,*,
Paige L. Williams
3,4,
Tamarra James-Todd
2,4,
Irene Souter
5,
Jennifer B. Ford
2,
Kathryn M. Rexrode
6,
Antonia M. Calafat
7,
Russ Hauser
2,4,8 and
Jorge E. Chavarro
1,4,9
1
Channing Division of Network Medicine, Harvard Medical School & Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
3
Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
4
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
5
Massachusetts General Hospital Fertility Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
6
Division of Women’s Health, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
7
National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
8
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
9
Departments of Nutrition and Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2022, 10(6), 292; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10060292
Submission received: 20 April 2022 / Revised: 21 May 2022 / Accepted: 22 May 2022 / Published: 28 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Human Toxicology and Epidemiology)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We examined whether urinary concentrations of phthalate and phthalate replacement metabolites were associated with lipid biomarker levels among pregnant women. This cross-sectional study included 175 women who enrolled in the Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study (2005–2017). We used linear regression models to assess the relationship between urinary phthalates and lipid biomarkers [triglycerides, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL), non-HDL, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol] levels while adjusting for confounders. Pregnant women in the highest quartile of urinary mono(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (MECPP) had, overall, 14% [31 (95% CI = 6.56) mg/dL], 21% [33 (95% CI = 9.57) mg/dL] and 25% [30 (95% CI = 8.53) mg/dL] higher serum total, non-HDL and LDL cholesterol, respectively, compared to women in the lowest quartile of MECPP. Similar positive associations were found for urinary concentrations of other metabolites of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, and mono(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate. Pregnant women with urinary mono-n-butyl phthalate (MBP) in the highest quartile had higher triglycerides and non-HDL cholesterol compared to women with MBP in the lowest quartile. Women with detectable concentrations of two phthalate replacement metabolites had lower HDL cholesterol compared to women with non-detectable concentrations. Gestational urinary concentrations of certain phthalate and phthalate replacement metabolites were associated with lipid levels among these women.

1. Introduction

Women with impaired fertility are at higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. CVD is the leading cause of mortality in women as well as the leading cause of pregnancy-related mortality in the United States (US) [13]. Around 16% of the pregnancy-related deaths in the US between 2014 and 2017 were attributable to cardiovascular conditions. Dyslipidemia, characterized by high circulating levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), in addition to lower circulating levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, is a well-known CVD risk factor and reflects the global obesity epidemic [14]. Numerous factors have been related to the rising prevalence of these important conditions, including exposure to phthalates, which have been called “obesogens” and can alter the endocrine system [15]. The Obesogen Hypothesis proposes that obesogens may cause obesity by disrupting the adipocyte metabolism, which may lead to altered metabolic outcomes or by dysregulating appetite and satiety. Everyday consumer products including food packaging and diet confer daily exposure to endocrine-disrupting “obesogens” [15].
Phthalates, many of which are considered endocrine-disrupting chemicals, can be used in a multitude of consumer products, leading to widespread general population exposure [16,17,18,19,20]. Exposure to phthalates occurs through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal absorption [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. After entering the body, phthalates are quickly hydrolyzed to their respective monoester metabolites that are biologically active. For some phthalate diesters, secondary oxidative metabolites are also formed and comprise the greater proportion of measured metabolites. Although phthalates do not persist in the body and have relatively short biological half-lives (<24 h), exposure to phthalates is repeated, episodic, and chronic [29,30,31]. Urine is the optimal matrix for quantifying phthalates as a result of phthalates’ short half-lives and non-persistent nature, as well as for being a non-invasive and convenient medium for biological monitoring [32].
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is primarily added to plastics to make them flexible, and can be found in consumer products, flooring and wall coverings, food contact applications, and medical devices. Metabolites of DEHP include mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP), mono(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl phthalate (MEHHP), mono(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MEOHP), and mono(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (MECPP). Parent compounds of other phthalate metabolites, such as mono-n-butyl phthalate (MnBP), mono-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP), and mono-benzyl phthalate (MBzP) can be found in personal care products and other consumer products [18,33]. Di(isononyl)cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH), a non-phthalate plasticizer, was introduced commercially in 2002 as a safer alternative to ortho-phthalate esters (e.g., DEHP) because of its more favorable toxicological profile [34]. The use of DINCH was approved by the European Food Safety Authority in 2006. DINCH, a replacement of DEHP in vinyl plastics, is used in many U.S. polyvinyl chloride (PVC) products, particularly in food packaging and in the manufacturing of toys, building materials and medical devices.
Among reproductive-aged women participating in the 2001–2010 NHANES, urinary concentrations of the DEHP metabolites were strongly associated with an increased risk in metabolic syndrome, including higher triglycerides and lower HDL [35]. Pregnant women represent a vulnerable study population to endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure, including phthalates, with potential consequences not only for maternal health but also to offspring health [36]. Yet, to the best of our knowledge, only one study has examined the association between urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites and circulating lipid biomarker levels in pregnant women from the general population [37]. This study showed that concentrations of some phthalate metabolites were positively associated with circulating tryglicerides and total cholesterol during pregnancy. Due to the scarcity of available literature on the topic and the importance of studying cardiovascular risk factors among subfertile women, we investigated whether urinary concentrations of phthalates and phthalate replacements are associated with serum lipids measured in serum among pregnant women attending a fertility center.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

We evaluated women enrolled in the Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study, a prospective cohort established to assess environmental and dietary determinants of fertility at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Fertility Center [38]. Women between 18 and 45 years old, using their own gametes for fertility treatment at the MGH Fertility Center, were eligible to participate; approximately 60% of those contacted by the research staff enrolled. For this specific analysis, we included 175 women participating in EARTH with data on both urinary metabolites of phthalates and phthalate replacements, in addition to serum lipid biomarker levels during pregnancy. Compared to excluded women also participating in the EARTH Study, included participants in this analysis were most likely to undergo IVF fertility treatments (compared to IUI and also non-medically pregnancies), and have a female factor infertility diagnosis (compared to male factor and unexplained fertility). Participants’ dates of birth were collected at entry, and weight and height were measured by trained study staff. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (in kilograms) divided by height (in meters) squared at enrollment. At this same time point, research staff administered sociodemographic, lifestyle and medical history questionnaires to participants, which self-reported important covariate information. Study participants also completed a comprehensive questionnaire on family, medical, reproductive, and occupational history; consumer products use, smoking history, and physical activity. Women were specifically asked about physical activity, frequency of tobacco, alcohol and illicit substance use, personal care and household product use, parental comorbidities, maternal smoking during pregnancy, and medical diagnoses of comorbidities, among others. Infertility diagnosis was assigned by physicians using the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology definitions (SART). Pregnancy covariates were abstracted from electronic medical records. The study was approved by the Human Subject Committees of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, MGH, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Participants each signed an informed consent document after the study procedures were explained by trained research study staff, and after all the participants’ questions were answered.

2.2. Exposure Assessment

During pregnancy, each woman collected up to three spot urine samples (one per trimester) in a sterile polypropylene specimen cup. For this analysis, we included one urine sample per woman—the one that was collected the same day as the blood sample, in order to measure lipid biomarkers in serum. Specific gravity (SG) was measured at room temperature using a handheld refractometer (National Instrument Company, Inc., Baltimore, MD, USA) calibrated with deionized water before each measurement. As a result of the potential for bias, rather than correcting by SG, we instead used the unadjusted urinary metabolite concentrations and adjusted for SG by including this as a covariate in the statistical models [39,40]. The urine was stored at −80 °C, and samples were shipped on dry ice overnight to the CDC for analysis. Following strict quality control/quality assurance practices, as previously described [41,42], we used online solid-phase extraction coupled with isotope dilution-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in order to quantify the urinary concentrations of eight phthalate metabolites (monoethyl phthalate (MEP), MBP, MiBP, MBzP, MEHP, MEHHP, MEOHP, MECPP), and two metabolites of DINCH, a phthalate replacement [cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid monohydroxy isononyl ester (MHiNCH) and cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid monocarboxyisooctyl ester (MCOCH)]. Limits of detection (LOD) ranged from 0.1 to 1.2 µg/L.

2.3. Outcome Assessment

Women participating in the study provided up to three blood samples (5 mL) during pregnancy. Serum samples were aliquoted, frozen, and stored at −80 °C until transfer to the Clinical and Epidemiologic (CER) Laboratory at the Boston Children’s Hospital (Boston, MA, USA). In one serum sample per female participant randomly selected, we simultaneously analyzed three different lipid biomarkers, including triglycerides [43], total cholesterol [44], and HDL cholesterol levels (mg/dL), with the Roche Cobas 6000 system, using reagents and calibrators from Roche Diagnostics (Indianapolis, IN, USA). These assays are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for clinical use. The CERLab is certified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Lipid Standardization Program. We calculated non-HDL as the difference between total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol. We calculated LDL cholesterol following the Friedewald formula: LDL cholesterol = (total cholesterol) − (HDL cholesterol) − (triglycerides/5) [45]. Triglycerides are determined with day-to-day reproducibilities of 1.8% and 1.7%. The coefficients of variation (CVs) for total cholesterol concentrations are 1.7% and 1.6%. HDL-Cs are determined with day-to-day reproducibilities of 3.3% and 1.7%.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

We presented demographic and reproductive characteristics as well as serum lipid biomarker levels using median ± interquartile ranges (IQRs) or percentages. All phthalate and DINCH metabolite concentrations below the LOD were assigned a value equal to the LOD divided by the square root of 2. We calculated the molar sum of DEHP metabolites (∑DEHP) by dividing each DEHP metabolite concentration by its molecular weight (g/mol), and then summing ([MEHP × (1/278.34)] + [MEHHP × (1/294.34)] + [MEOHP × (1/292.33)] + [MECPP × (1/308.33)]). We also reported distribution of urinary concentrations of phthalate and phthalate replacement metabolites using percentiles and means ± standard deviations (SDs). We divided the urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations in quartiles, and we used them as categorical exposure variables, with the lowest group considered as the reference group. Urinary MHiNCH and MCOCH were divided into two groups (detectable vs. non-detectable), since these metabolites have lower detection rates and smaller sample sizes than the other phthalate metabolites examined. Of note, for MEHP, we included all the values <LOD in the lowest category (31%), and we divided the remaining urinary concentrations into three groups based on their distribution. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test results documented that the serum lipid biomarker levels did not deviate substantially from a normal distribution. We used Spearman correlation coefficients (except for DINCH metabolites because of their relatively low detection rate) to assess correlations between the measured urinary metabolite concentrations as continuous variables. We used linear regression models to estimate the association between urinary phthalate and phthalate replacement metabolites, as categorical variables, and circulating lipid biomarker levels. In order to allow for better interpretation of the results, we presented population marginal means [46], adjusting for all the covariates in the model (at the mean level for continuous variables and for categorical variables at a value weighted according to their frequencies), and also translated each to a percentage increase or decrease for ease of interpretation.
Confounding was assessed using both prior knowledge regarding biological relevance, and descriptive statistics from our study population using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). The variables considered as potential confounders included factors previously demonstrated to be related to phthalates or serum lipids, and factors associated with both urinary metabolites and serum lipid levels in this study [47,48]. We adjusted models for age at pregnancy (years), pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m2), education (graduate degree vs. other), infertility diagnosis (female factor vs. other), cycle type (without medical treatment vs. other), number of babies (singleton vs. twins/triplets), trimester (first vs. second vs. third), and specific gravity. In order to evaluate the robustness of the findings, we conducted a sensitivity analysis that excluded pre-pregnancy BMI, as it could be a mediator of the phthalates on lipid measures; moreover, we stratified the main associations by trimester since lipid levels change across trimester during pregnancy. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Study Population Characteristics

The 175 women included in this analysis had a median (IQR) BMI of 22.3 (21.3, 25.9) kg/m2 at enrollment and age of 35 (33, 39) years during pregnancy when they provided the urine and serum samples included in this study (Table 1).
Subjects were predominantly white (88%), highly educated (60% had a graduate degree), and only 29% had ever smoked. The majority of the women became pregnant using fertility treatments (83% IUI+IVF), and 82% had singleton pregnancies. Both urine and blood samples were collected during the first, second, and third trimesters for 61 (35%), 47 (27%), and 67 (38%) women, respectively. Median (IQR) gestational ages (all in weeks) for women with samples collected in the first, second, and third trimesters were 8 (7, 9), 23 (20, 26), and 34 (33, 36), respectively. Median (IQR) triglycerides, total, HDL, and LDL cholesterol (all in mg/dL) were 181 (111, 251), 229 (189, 280), 68.0 (58.0, 79.0), and 120 (92.0, 158), respectively (Table 1).

3.2. Urinary Phthalate and Phthalate Replacement Measures

Detection frequencies for the urinary phthalate and phthalate replacement metabolites among women in this study were similar to those reported in U.S. adult females from the general population, with urine samples collected in similar years [20] (Table 2).
Detection frequency for urinary MEHP was moderate (69%), and for MHiNCH and MCOCH was relatively low (23% and 13%, respectively), whereas high detection frequency (>90%) was observed for the other phthalate metabolites. Urinary concentrations of phthalate and phthalate replacement metabolites measured in pregnancy samples among these women were comparable to those found in preconception samples among women in the same cohort study [49]. As expected, urinary concentrations of the DEHP metabolites (MEHP, MEHHP, MEOHP and MECPP) were highly correlated with each other (Spearman r ≥ 0.92) (Table S1). Urinary concentrations of other phthalate metabolites were weakly correlated with each other.

3.3. Main Results

In adjusted models, we observed associations between some urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and pregnancy serum lipid levels, in terms of differences between women with metabolite concentrations in the highest compared to the lowest quartile (Table 3). Specifically, pregnant women in the highest quartile of MECPP had, overall, 14% [31 (95% CI = 6.56) mg/dL], 21% [33 (95% CI = 9.57) mg/dL] and 25% [30 (95% CI = 8.53) mg/dL] higher serum total, non-HDL, and LDL cholesterol, respectively, compared to women with MECPP concentrations in the lowest quartile. Similar positive associations were found for urinary concentrations of other DEHP metabolites such as MEHP and MEOHP. Pregnant women with urinary MBP concentrations in the highest quartile had higher serum triglycerides and non-HDL cholesterol than women with urinary MBP concentrations in the lowest quartile (adjusted means for Q4 vs. Q1 = 212 vs. 181 and 183 vs. 162 mg/dL, respectively). Despite the relatively small sample size and the low detection frequency for the two examined urinary DINCH metabolites, we observed that women with detectable urinary concentrations of each of the phthalate replacement metabolites, MHiNCH and MCOCH, had lower HDL cholesterol compared to women with non-detectable urinary concentrations (adjusted means for detectable vs. non-detectable = 67.1 vs. 74.6, and 66.2 vs. 77.6 mg/dL, respectively). No other clear patterns were observed (Table 3). After excluding pre-pregnancy BMI as a covariate, the model results were almost identical (data not shown).

3.4. Trimester-Specific Associations

Since lipid metabolism changes across trimester during pregnancy, we then conducted the analyses stratified by trimester (Table 4). We found that the observed associations were primarily observed for samples collected during the second trimester (median = 23 weeks of gestation), except for the two DINCH metabolites where the associations were mainly observed for samples obtained in the third trimester (median = 34 weeks). Associations for urinary MBP and non-HDL cholesterol, as well as MEHP and LDL-cholesterol, were also observed in samples collected during the first trimester (median = 8 weeks of gestation).

4. Discussion

In this cross-sectional analysis among women attending a fertility center, we found that women with higher urinary concentrations of some DEHP metabolites had higher serum total, non-HDL, and LDL cholesterol levels measured during pregnancy. We also observed positive associations of urinary MBP with serum triglycerides and non-HDL cholesterol levels, as well as inverse associations between the two examined urinary DINCH metabolites and serum HDL cholesterol. Associations remained after excluding BMI as a covariate, and were overall found in samples collected during the second trimester. These results suggest that pregnancy exposure to certain phthalates and phthalate replacements may be associated with dyslipidemia (characterized by high circulating levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL, in addition to lower circulating levels of HDL cholesterol) during pregnancy among women participating in this cohort study. Among pregnant women from the same study cohort, we previously reported that urinary concentrations of MEP and MiBP were associated with higher pregnancy glucose, suggesting that exposure to certain phthalates may be a potentially modifiable risk factor of glucose dysregulation [50].
To the best of our acknowledge, only one epidemiologic study has assessed the relationship between urinary phthalate metabolites and circulating lipid biomarker levels during pregnancy [37]. In a cross-sectional analysis in which both urine and blood samples were collected at approximately 16 weeks of gestation, Vuong et al. reported that urinary MBzP was negatively associated with total cholesterol levels, and it was also an important contributor in the mixture models examining circulating triglycerides among 388 pregnant women participating in the Health Outcomes and Measures of the Environment (HOME) Study [37]. In a different study on pregnancy exposures in relation to post-natal lipids, Wu et al. prospectively investigated pregnancy urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations in relation to 4–8 years post-delivery lipid biomarker levels in 618 Mexican women [51]. The authors reported that the phthalate mixture was associated with lower HDL cholesterol and higher triglyceride levels. They also observed that the phthalate mixture was not associated with total and LDL cholesterol, however, urinary concentrations of MEP and the sum of metabolites of dibutyl phthalate (∑DBP) were both associated with lower and higher total cholesterol, respectively, and mono(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) terephthalate and ∑DBP were associated with lower LDL cholesterol. Among pregnant women in our study, however, we found that some urinary phthalates and phthalate replacement metabolites were associated with higher overall dyslipidemia as measured by higher triglycerides, total, and LDL cholesterol, in addition to lower HDL cholesterol. Discrepancies in results among Wu et al. and our study may be due to differences in study population, number of urine samples collected, urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations (being much lower in our study), and timing for lipid assessment. While the epidemiologic literature on pregnancy exposure to phthalates and lipid profiles is still scarce, there is growing evidence that exposure to certain phthalates may affect circulating levels of some lipid biomarkers in women. Clearly, further epidemiologic studies including other study populations are warranted in order to clarify the directions of these associations.
Some phthalates [52,53,54] are known agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs)-alpha, which also are key regulators of lipid metabolism [55]. Specifically, PPARs are involved in interpretation of fatty acid signals derived from dietary lipids, pathogenic lipoproteins, or essential fatty acid metabolites. Animal models have shown that exposure to DEHP can alter lipid levels by regulating hepatic energy metabolism through signaling of PPARs-alpha [56,57,58]. PPAR-alpha expression has been shown to be required for the toxicity of DEHP that results in altered plasma triglyceride levels. Other phthalate replacement biomarkers, such as MHiNCH, one of the metabolites of DINCH, are also capable of binding to PPARs, resulting in endocrine disruption and adipocyte cellular differentiation [59]. Epidemiologic studies have also demonstrated that exposure to phthalates can affect human health, observed as diminished reproductive function and higher pregnancy complications, increased risk of respiratory diseases, allergies, cardiometabolic diseases, and neurobehavioral disorders [60,61]. Variability in an individual’s exposure to phthalates can result from changes in the use of personal care products, diet, or daily activities, and exposure may vary over time [18]. Moreover, exposure to ortho-phthalates has declined over time, partially because their use has been restricted in many countries. Emerging plasticizers are replacing legacy phthalates in consumer products, and exposure to these replacements is expected to increase. Thus, additional studies in both animals and humans that explore the potential effects of these phthalate replacements on circulating lipid levels are also needed.
Limitations of this study include limited generalizability of these results to pregnant women in the general population, since this study includes subfertile women attending a fertility center. However, this study population is of public health importance, as women with impaired fertility are at higher risk of cardiovascular disease than other women [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Also, we did not exclude women with obesity and pregnancy complications, which may influence lipid metabolism in pregnant women. Secondly, the cross-sectional nature of this analysis does not allow us to establish that exposures occurred before the outcomes. Reverse causation is also possible, given the lipophilic nature of some phthalates [62]. Thirdly, as in any observational study, residual confounding by other chemical exposures, lifestyle, and reproductive factors is still possible. Particular interest for future studies should consider unmeasured confounding from diet and food packaging on the DEHP/replacement phthalate metabolite associations [62]. Fourthly, misclassification of the exposure is possible, especially for high molecular weight phthalates, given their short half-lives [18] and episodic nature of exposures to them. Fifthly, not all the collected blood samples were fasting, and this may impact the observed results. Sixthly, the observed results for MHiNCH and MCOCH, the two DINCH metabolites, should be taken cautiously given the relatively low detection frequency of these biomarkers in urine samples from pregnant women in this study. Despite these limitations, there are several strengths. Firstly, we evaluated two phthalate replacement metabolites, in addition to several phthalate metabolites. Secondly, we evaluated this research question using a well-established cohort of subfertile women at high risk of cardiovascular disease [6]. Evaluating exposures to prevalent EDCs as they relate to lipid levels in this subfertile population may provide key information that could aid in formulating recommendations for improving cardiometabolic health in this high-risk group.

5. Conclusions

To conclude, we observed positive associations between some DEHP metabolites and MBP and serum total, non-HDL, and LDL cholesterol levels measured among pregnant women seeking fertility care. We also observed negative associations between two metabolites of DINCH, a phthalate replacement, and serum HDL cholesterol. These results suggest that exposure to certain phthalates and phthalate replacements may be associated with dyslipidemia, a leading cause of cardiovascular and metabolic disease. Considering the scarce literature on the topic, further epidemiologic studies, including larger sample sizes, are warranted in order to explore phthalate mixtures as well as trimester-specific windows of exposure.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics10060292/s1, Table S1: Spearman correlations of urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites among pregnant women in the Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.M.-A., R.H. and J.E.C.; methodology, L.M.-A., R.H. and J.E.C.; software, L.M.-A. and P.L.W.; formal analysis, L.M.-A.; investigation, I.S. and J.B.F.; resources, I.S. and K.M.R.; data curation, A.M.C. and J.B.F.; writing—original draft preparation, L.M.-A.; writing—review and editing, L.M.-A., P.L.W., T.J.-T., I.S., J.B.F., K.M.R., A.M.C., R.H. and J.E.C.; visualization, R.H. and J.E.C.; supervision, R.H. and J.E.C.; project administration, J.B.F.; funding acquisition, R.H. and J.E.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), grant numbers: R01ES022955, R01ES009718, P30ES000002, and R01ES024381.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by Human Subject Committees of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (MGH), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (protocol code: 1999P008167 and date of approval: 29 January 2014).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data are not publicly available due to privacy and confidentiality reasons.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge all members of the EARTH study team, specifically the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health research staff Myra Keller, Ramace Dadd, and Alex Azevedo, physicians and staff at Massachusetts General Hospital Fertility Center, as well as CERLab and CDC personnel. A special thank you to all of the study participants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors, and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of trade name is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the CDC, the Public Health Service, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

References

  1. Tobias, D.K.; Gaskins, A.J.; Missmer, S.A.; Hu, F.B.; Manson, J.E.; Louis, G.M.B.; Zhang, C.; Chavarro, J.E. History of infertility and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study. Diabetologia 2015, 58, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Solomon, C.G.; Hu, F.B.; Dunaif, A.; Rich-Edwards, J.E.; Stampfer, M.J.; Willett, W.C.; Speizer, F.E.; Manson, J.E. Menstrual cycle irregularity and risk for future cardiovascular disease. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 2013–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Solomon, C.G.; Hu, F.B.; Dunaif, A.; Rich-Edwards, J.; Willett, W.C.; Hunter, D.J.; Colditz, G.A.; Speizer, F.E.; Manson, J.E. Long or highly irregular menstrual cycles as a marker for risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Jama 2001, 286, 2421–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Wang, E.T.; Cirillo, P.M.; Vittinghoff, E.; Bibbins-Domingo, K.; Cohn, B.A.; Cedars, M.I. Menstrual irregularity and cardiovascular mortality. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, E114–E118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Rubin, K.H.; Glintborg, D.; Nybo, M.; Abrahamsen, B.; Andersen, M. Development and risk factors of type 2 diabetes in a nationwide population of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 102, 3848–3857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Mahalingaiah, S.; Sun, F.; Cheng, J.J.; Chow, E.T.; Lunetta, K.L.; Murabito, J.M. Cardiovascular risk factors among women with self-reported infertility. Fertil. Res. Pract. 2017, 3, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Parikh, N.I.; Cnattingius, S.; Mittleman, M.A.; Ludvigsson, J.F.; Ingelsson, E. Subfertility and risk of later life maternal cardiovascular disease. Hum. Reprod. 2012, 27, 568–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kurabayashi, T.; Mizunuma, H.; Kubota, T.; Hayashi, K. Ovarian infertility is associated with cardiovascular disease risk factors in later life: A Japanese cross-sectional study. Maturitas 2016, 83, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cassar, S.; Misso, M.L.; Hopkins, W.G.; Shaw, C.S.; Teede, H.J.; Stepto, N.K. Insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp studies. Hum. Reprod. 2016, 31, 2619–2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Escobar-Morreale, H.F.; Luque-Ramirez, M.; Gonzalez, F. Circulating inflammatory markers in polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 95, 1048–1058.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Liu, M.; Gao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, P.; Wang, H.; Ren, X.; Li, C. Serum levels of TSP-1, NF-kappaB and TGF-beta1 in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients in northern China suggest PCOS is associated with chronic inflammation. Clin. Endocrinol. 2015, 83, 913–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Daan, N.M.; Louwers, Y.V.; Koster, M.P.; Eijkemans, M.J.; de Rijke, Y.B.; Lentjes, E.W.; Fauser, B.C.; Laven, J.S. Cardiovascular and metabolic profiles amongst different polycystic ovary syndrome phenotypes: Who is really at risk? Fertil. Steril. 2014, 102, 1444–1451.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. CDC; Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention. Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System. 2020. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternal-mortality/pregnancy-mortality-surveillance-system.htm?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Freproductivehealth%2Fmaternalinfanthealth%2Fpregnancy-mortality-surveillance-system.htm (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  14. Virani, S.S.; Alonso, A.; Aparicio, H.J.; Benjamin, E.J.; Bittencourt, M.S.; Callaway, C.W.; Carson, A.P.; Chamberlain, A.M.; Cheng, S.; Delling, F.N.; et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2021, 143, e254–e743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Heindel, J.J.; Blumberg, B. Environmental Obesogens: Mechanisms and Controversies. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2019, 59, 89–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Silva, M.J.; Barr, D.B.; Reidy, J.A.; Malek, N.A.; Hodge, C.C.; Caudill, S.P.; Brock, J.W.; Needham, L.L.; Calafat, A.M. Urinary levels of seven phthalate metabolites in the U.S. population from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2000. Environ. Health Perspect. 2004, 112, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zota, A.R.; Calafat, A.M.; Woodruff, T.J. Temporal trends in phthalate exposures: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2010. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Hauser, R.; Calafat, A.M. Phthalates and human health. Occup. Environ. Med. 2005, 62, 806–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Koch, H.M.; Rüther, M.; Schütze, A.; Conrad, A.; Pälmke, C.; Apel, P.; Brüning, T.; Kolossa-Gehring, M. Phthalate metabolites in 24-h urine samples of the German Environmental Specimen Bank (ESB) from 1988 to 2015 and a comparison with US NHANES data from 1999 to 2012. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2017, 220 (Pt A), 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. CDC; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals (March 2022); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2022. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/ (accessed on 13 April 2022).
  21. Rudel, R.A.; Gray, J.M.; Engel, C.L.; Rawsthorne, T.W.; Dodson, R.E.; Ackerman, J.M.; Rizzo, J.; Nudelman, J.L.; Brody, J.G. Food packaging and bisphenol A and bis(2-ethyhexyl) phthalate exposure: Findings from a dietary intervention. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 914–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cirillo, T.; Fasano, E.; Esposito, F.; del Prete, E.; Cocchieri, R.A. Study on the influence of temperature, storage time and packaging type on di-n-butylphthalate and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate release into packed meals. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2013, 30, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Duty, S.M.; Ackerman, R.M.; Calafat, A.M.; Hauser, R. Personal care product use predicts urinary concentrations of some phthalate monoesters. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 1530–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Just, A.C.; Adibi, J.J.; Rundle, A.G.; Calafat, A.M.; Camann, D.E.; Hauser, R.; Silva, M.J.; Whyatt, R.M. Urinary and air phthalate concentrations and self-reported use of personal care products among minority pregnant women in New York city. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2010, 20, 625–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wormuth, M.; Scheringer, M.; Vollenweider, M.; Hungerbuhler, K. What are the sources of exposure to eight frequently used phthalic acid esters in Europeans? Risk Anal. 2006, 26, 803–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wilson, N.K.; Chuang, J.C.; Lyu, C.; Menton, R.; Morgan, M.K. Aggregate exposures of nine preschool children to persistent organic pollutants at day care and at home. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2003, 13, 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Rudel, R.A.; Camann, D.E.; Spengler, J.D.; Korn, L.R.; Brody, J.G. Phthalates, alkylphenols, pesticides, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and other endocrine-disrupting compounds in indoor air and dust. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 4543–4553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Langer, S.; Beko, G.; Weschler, C.J.; Brive, L.M.; Toftum, J.; Callesen, M.; Clausen, G. Phthalate metabolites in urine samples from Danish children and correlations with phthalates in dust samples from their homes and daycare centers. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2014, 217, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Koch, H.M.; Preuss, R.; Angerer, J. Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP): Human metabolism and internal exposure—An update and latest results. Int. J. Androl. 2006, 29, 155–165; discussion 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Koch, H.M.; Christensen, K.L.; Harth, V.; Lorber, M.; Bruning, T. Di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP) and diisobutyl phthalate (DiBP) metabolism in a human volunteer after single oral doses. Arch. Toxicol. 2012, 86, 1829–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kao, M.L.; Ruoff, B.; Bower, N.; Aoki, T.; Smart, C.; Mannens, G. Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and excretion of 14C-monoethyl phthalate (MEP) and 14C-diethyl phthalate (DEP) after single oral and IV administration in the juvenile dog. Xenobiotica 2012, 42, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Calafat, A.M.; Longnecker, M.P.; Koch, H.M.; Swan, S.H.; Hauser, R.; Goldman, L.R.; Lanphear, B.P.; Rudel, R.A.; Engel, S.M.; Teitelbaum, S.L.; et al. Optimal Exposure Biomarkers for Nonpersistent Chemicals in Environmental Epidemiology. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123, A166–A168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Braun, J.M.; Just, A.C.; Williams, P.L.; Smith, K.W.; Calafat, A.M.; Hauser, R. Personal care product use and urinary phthalate metabolite and paraben concentrations during pregnancy among women from a fertility clinic. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2014, 24, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. EFSA. European Food Safety Authority. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food (AFC) Related to the 12th List of Substances for Food Contact Materials. 2006. Available online: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/395 (accessed on 22 September 2021).
  35. James-Todd, T.M.; Huang, T.; Seely, E.W.; Saxena, A.R. The association between phthalates and metabolic syndrome: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001–2010. Environ. Health 2016, 15, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Woodruff, T.J.; Zota, A.R.; Schwartz, J.M. Environmental chemicals in pregnant women in the United States: NHANES 2003–2004. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 878–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Vuong, A.M.; Braun, J.M.; Sjödin, A.; Calafat, A.M.; Yolton, K.; Lanphear, B.P.; Chen, A. Exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and cardiometabolic indices during pregnancy: The HOME Study. Environ. Int. 2021, 156, 106747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Minguez-Alarcon, L.; Gaskins, A.J.; Chiu, Y.H.; Souter, I.; Williams, P.L.; Calafat, A.M.; Hauser, R.; Chavarro, J.E. Dietary folate intake and modification of the association of urinary bisphenol A concentrations with in vitro fertilization outcomes among women from a fertility clinic. Reprod. Toxicol. 2016, 65, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Barr, D.B.; Wilder, L.C.; Caudill, S.P.; Gonzalez, A.J.; Needham, L.L.; Pirkle, J.L. Urinary creatinine concentrations in the U.S. population: Implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Schisterman, E.F.; Whitcomb, B.W.; Louis, G.M.; Louis, T.A. Lipid adjustment in the analysis of environmental contaminants and human health risks. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 853–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Silva, M.J.; Samandar, E.; Preau, J.L., Jr.; Reidy, J.A.; Needham, L.L.; Calafat, A.M. Quantification of 22 phthalate metabolites in human urine. J. Chromatogr. B 2007, 860, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Silva, M.J.; Jia, T.; Samandar, E.; Preau, J.L., Jr.; Calafat, A.M. Environmental exposure to the plasticizer 1,2-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid, diisononyl ester (DINCH) in U.S. adults (2000–2012). Environ. Res. 2013, 126, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Stinshoff, K.; Weisshaar, D.; Staehler, F.; Hesse, D.; Gruber, W.; Steier, E. Relation between concentrations of free glycerol and triglycerides in human sera. Clin. Chem. 1977, 23, 1029–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Allain, C.C.; Poon, L.S.; Chan, C.S.; Richmond, W.; Fu, P.C. Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol. Clin. Chem. 1974, 20, 470–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Roberts, W.C. The Friedewald-Levy-Fredrickson formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the basis for lipid-lowering therapy. Am. J. Cardiol. 1988, 62, 345–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Searle, S.R.; Speed, F.M.; Milliken, G.A. Population marginal means in the linear model: An alternative to leasts quare means. Am. Stat. 1980, 34, 216–221. [Google Scholar]
  47. Rooney, K.L.; Domar, A.D. The impact of lifestyle behaviors on infertility treatment outcome. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 26, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Sharma, R.; Biedenharn, K.R.; Fedor, J.M.; Agarwal, A. Lifestyle factors and reproductive health: Taking control of your fertility. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2013, 11, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Souter, I.; Bellavia, A.; Williams, P.L.; Korevaar, T.I.M.; Meeker, J.D.; Braun, J.M.; de Poortere, R.A.; Broeren, M.A.; Ford, J.B.; Calafat, A.M.; et al. Urinary Concentrations of Phthalate Metabolite Mixtures in Relation to Serum Biomarkers of Thyroid Function and Autoimmunity among Women from a Fertility Center. Environ. Health Perspect. 2020, 128, 67007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. James-Todd, T.M.; Chiu, Y.H.; Messerlian, C.; Minguez-Alarcon, L.; Ford, J.B.; Keller, M.; Petrozza, J.; Williams, P.L.; Ye, X.; Calafat, A.M.; et al. Trimester-specific phthalate concentrations and glucose levels among women from a fertility clinic. Environ. Health 2018, 17, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Wu, H.; Just, A.C.; Colicino, E.; Calafat, A.M.; Oken, E.; Braun, J.M.; McRae, N.; Cantoral, A.; Pantic, I.; Pizano-Zárate, M.L.; et al. The associations of phthalate biomarkers during pregnancy with later glycemia and lipid profiles. Environ. Int. 2021, 155, 106612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Venkata, N.G.; Robinson, J.A.; Cabot, P.J.; Davis, B.; Monteith, G.R.; Roberts-Thomson, S.J. Mono(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and mono-n-butyl phthalate activation of peroxisome proliferator activated-receptors alpha and gamma in breast. Toxicol. Lett. 2006, 163, 224–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lapinskas, P.J.; Brown, S.; Leesnitzer, L.M.; Blanchard, S.; Swanson, C.; Cattley, R.C.; Corton, J.C. Role of PPARalpha in mediating the effects of phthalates and metabolites in the liver. Toxicology 2005, 207, 149–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Desvergne, B.; Feige, J.N.; Casals-Casas, C. PPAR-mediated activity of phthalates: A link to the obesity epidemic? Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2009, 304, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Varga, T.; Czimmerer, Z.; Nagy, L. PPARs are a unique set of fatty acid regulated transcription factors controlling both lipid metabolism and inflammation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1812, 1007–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Feige, J.N.; Gerber, A.; Casals-Casas, C.; Yang, Q.; Winkler, C.; Bedu, E.; Bueno, M.; Gelman, L.; Auwerx, J.; Gonzalez, F.J.; et al. The pollutant diethylhexyl phthalate regulates hepatic energy metabolism via species-specific PPARalpha-dependent mechanisms. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hayashi, Y.; Ito, Y.; Yamagishi, N.; Yanagiba, Y.; Tamada, H.; Wang, D.; Ramdhan, D.H.; Naito, H.; Harada, Y.; Kamijima, M.; et al. Hepatic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α may have an important role in the toxic effects of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate on offspring of mice. Toxicology 2011, 289, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ding, S.; Qi, W.; Xu, Q.; Zhao, T.; Li, X.; Yin, J.; Zhang, R.; Huo, C.; Zhou, L.; Ye, L. Relationships between di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate exposure and lipid metabolism in adolescents: Human data and experimental rat model analyses. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 286, 117570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Campioli, E.; Duong, T.B.; Deschamps, F.; Papadopoulos, V. Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid diisononyl ester and metabolite effects on rat epididymal stromal vascular fraction differentiation of adipose tissue. Environ. Res. 2015, 140, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Eales, J.; Bethel, A.; Galloway, T.; Hopkinson, P.; Morrissey, K.; Short, R.E.; Garside, R. Human health impacts of exposure to phthalate plasticizers: An overview of reviews. Environ. Int. 2022, 158, 106903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kahn, L.G.; Philippat, C.; Nakayama, S.F.; Slama, R.; Trasande, L. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Implications for human health. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020, 8, 703–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Schettler, T. Human exposure to phthalates via consumer products. Int. J. Androl. 2006, 29, 134–139; discussion 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Demographic and reproductive characteristics as well as serum lipid biomarker levels [median (IQR) or N (%)] among 175 pregnant women in the Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study.
Table 1. Demographic and reproductive characteristics as well as serum lipid biomarker levels [median (IQR) or N (%)] among 175 pregnant women in the Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study.
Enrollment
Age, years35.0 (32.0, 37.0)
Race, N (%)
White154 (88)
Black5 (2)
Asian8 (5)
Other8 (5)
Body Mass Index, kg/m222.3 (21.2, 25.7)
Ever smoked, N (%)50 (29)
Graduate degree, N (%)105 (60)
Primary Infertility diagnosis, N (%)
Male factor58 (33)
Female factor59 (33)
Unexplained 58 (33)
Pregnancy
Age, years35.0 (32.0, 38.0)
Cycle type, N (%)
Without medical treatment29 (17)
IUI45 (26)
IVF101 (57)
Number of babies, N (%)
Singleton (1)144 (82)
Twins (2)28 (16)
Triplet (3) 3 (2)
Trimester of sample collection, N (%)
1st61 (35)
2nd47 (27)
3rd67 (38)
Triglycerides, mg/dL181 (111, 251)
Total cholesterol, mg/dL229 (189, 280)
HDL cholesterol, mg/dL68.0 (58.0, 79.0)
Non-HDL cholesterol, mg/dL161 (120, 206)
LDL cholesterol, mg/dL120 (92.0, 158)
Table
Table 2. Distribution of urinary phthalate and phthalate replacement metabolite concentrations (μg/L) among pregnant women in the Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study.
Table 2. Distribution of urinary phthalate and phthalate replacement metabolite concentrations (μg/L) among pregnant women in the Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study.
NDetection Frequency %Maximum LOD (μg/L)Mean (SD)10th25th50th75th95th
Mono-n-butyl phthalate (MBP)175970.617.8 (31.6)1.703.809.2019.046.7
Mono-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP)175980.89.85 (15.4)1.202.406.0112.331.7
Monoethyl phthalate (MEP)1751001.2200 (544)5.5411.631.31091500
Monobenzyl phthalate (MBzP)175930.37.54 (76.7)0.400.902.505.8024.9
Mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP)175691.210.5 (50.0)<LOD<LOD1.804.8027.4
Mono(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (MEHHP)175990.748.6 (239)1.402.907.0018.3115
Mono(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MEOHP)175980.731.5 (145)1.102.505.6014.056.5
Mono(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (MECPP)1751000.459.1 (254)2.805.5011.728.2104
Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid monohydroxy isononyl ester (MHiNCH)111230.40.97 (4.57)<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD1.40
Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid monocarboxyisooctyl ester (MCOCH)83130.50.68 (1.92)<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD1.10
Limit of detection (LOD); Standard deviation (SD).
Table
Table 3. Adjusteda serum levels of lipid biomarkers by groups of urinary phthalate and phthalate replacement metabolite concentrations among 175 pregnant women in the Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study.
Table 3. Adjusteda serum levels of lipid biomarkers by groups of urinary phthalate and phthalate replacement metabolite concentrations among 175 pregnant women in the Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study.
Triglycerides,
mg/dL		Total Cholesterol,
mg/dL		HDL Cholesterol,
mg/dL		Non-HDL Cholesterol,
mg/dL		LDL Cholesterol,
mg/dL
MBP
Q1181 (157, 206)234 (218, 250)71.6 (66.6, 76.7)162 (146, 178)126 (112, 141)
Q2211 (191, 231)ǂ236 (222, 250)69.6 (65.3, 73.9)166 (153, 180)124 (112, 137)
Q3178 (157, 199)228 (214, 242)71.0 (66.6, 75.5)157 (143, 171)122 (109, 134)
Q4212 (190, 234)ǂ250 (235, 264)66.3 (61.7, 70.9)183 (169, 198)ǂ141 (128, 154)
MiBP
Q1198 (174, 223)246 (230, 262)73.1 (68.0, 78.1)174 (158, 189)134 (120, 149)
Q2214 (193, 235)238 (225, 252)69.1 (64.8, 73.4)170 (156, 183)127 (114, 140)
Q3186 (164, 207)238 (224, 252)67.7 (63.3, 72.1)171 (157, 185)134 (121, 147)
Q4185 (162, 209)223 (208, 239)ǂ68.6 (63.8, 73.5)155 (140, 170)118 (104, 132)
MEP
Q1207 (185, 230)235 (220, 250)66.5 (61.9, 71.1)169 (154, 183)127 (114, 140)
Q2206 (185, 227)251 (238, 265)69.9 (65.6, 74.2)182 (168, 195)140 (128, 153)
Q3188 (167, 209)232 (218, 245)69.9 (65.6, 74.1)162 (149, 175)124 (112, 136)
Q4183 (160, 205)230 (216, 244)72.2 (67.7, 76.7)158 (144, 172)121 (108, 134)
MBzP
Q1185 (161, 209)236 (220, 252)73.5 (68.4, 78.4)162 (147, 178)125 (111, 140)
Q2217 (196, 237)230 (216, 243)65.0 (60.8, 69.1) *165 (152, 178)122 (109, 134)
Q3193 (172, 215)245 (231, 260)71.0 (66.5, 75.3)174 (160, 189)136 (123, 149)
Q4186 (165, 209)237 (223, 252)69.7 (65.2, 74.2)168 (153, 182)130 (117, 144)
MEHP
G1190 (170, 211)227 (214, 240)68.1 (63.9, 72.3)159 (146, 171)121 (109, 133)
G2200 (176, 224)232 (217, 246)71.3 (66.4, 76.3)160 (146, 176)121 (107, 135)
G3182 (159, 206)230 (215, 246)70.2 (65.4, 75.1)160 (145, 175)124 (110, 138)
G4209 (187, 230)256 (242, 270)*69.7 (65.2, 74.2)186 (172, 200) *145 (132, 157) *
MEHHP
Q1196 (172, 220)238 (222, 254)70.9 (65.9, 75.9)167 (152, 183)128 (114, 142)
Q2183 (163, 204)228 (215, 241)70.3 (66.1, 74.6)158 (145, 171)122 (109, 133)
Q3202 (181, 224)228 (215, 242)68.7 (64.3, 73.1)160 (146, 173)119 (107, 132)
Q4202 (179, 225)253 (238, 268)68.6 (63.9, 73.3)185 (170, 199)144 (131, 158)
MEOHP
Q1184 (160, 207)232 (216, 247)69.6 (64.7, 74.4)162 (147, 177)126 (112, 140)
Q2189 (168, 210)229 (216, 243)72.8 (68.5, 77.2)157 (143, 170)119 (107, 131)
Q3201 (180, 222)230 (217, 244)67.1 (62.8, 71.3)163 (150, 176)123 (111, 135)
Q4210 (186, 233)255 (240, 270)ǂ69.2 (64.3, 74.0)186 (171, 201) *144 (130, 158) ǂ
MECPP
Q1191 (166, 215)225 (210, 241)69.4 (64.3, 74.5)156 (141, 172)118 (104, 132)
Q2193 (171, 214)239 (225, 252)72.2 (67.8, 76.6)167 (153, 180)128 (116, 140)
Q3196 (175, 217)226 (213, 240)69.7 (65.4, 74.0)157 (144, 170)118 (106, 130)
Q4204 (180, 228)256 (240, 271) *67.2 (62.3, 72.1)189 (174, 205) *148 (134, 162) *
∑DEHP
Q1129 (112, 147)233 (217, 249)71.4 (66.5, 76.4)161 (146, 177)125 (110, 139)
Q2125 (110, 140)236 (221, 249)71.3 (66.9, 75.6)164 (151, 177)124 (111, 137)
Q3125 (110, 141)229 (215, 243)67.5 (63.2, 71.9)161 (148, 175)123 (110, 135)
Q4133 (115, 150)250 (235, 266)68.3 (63.5, 73.2)182 (167, 197)ǂ141 (127, 155)
MHiNCH
G1 non-detectable171 (143, 199)220 (204, 236)74.6 (69.3, 80.0)145 (129, 161)111 (96.1, 125)
G2 detectable187 (172, 202)223 (214, 231)67.1 (64.2, 70.0) *156 (147, 164)118 (111, 126)
MCOCH
G1 non-detectable144 (109, 179)223 (203, 244)77.6 (70.7, 84.4)146 (126, 165)117 (98.5, 135)
G2 detectable174 (161, 188)216 (208, 224)66.2 (63.6, 68.9) *150 (142, 157)115 (108, 122)
a Data are presented as predicted marginal means (95% CI) unless otherwise noted, adjusted for age at pregnancy, pre-pregnancy BMI, education, infertility diagnosis, cycle type, number of babies, trimester, and specific gravity. * p-value < 0.05 when comparing that group with the lowest group. ǂ p-value < 0.10 when comparing that group with the lowest group. Mono-n-butyl phthalate (MBP); mono-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP); monoethyl phthalate (MEP); monobenzyl phthalate (MBzP); mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP); mono(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (MEHHP); mono(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MEOHP); mono(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (MECPP); cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid monohydroxy isononyl ester (MHiNCH); cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid monocarboxyisooctyl ester (MCOCH). ∑DEHP = MEHP, MEHHP, MEOHP and MECPP.
Table
Table 4. Adjusted a trimester-specific associations of urinary phthalate and phthalate replacement metabolite concentrations with serum levels of lipid biomarkers among 175 pregnant women in the Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study.
Table 4. Adjusted a trimester-specific associations of urinary phthalate and phthalate replacement metabolite concentrations with serum levels of lipid biomarkers among 175 pregnant women in the Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study.
Trimester 1
Median 8 Weeks
(N = 61)		Trimester 2
Median 23 Weeks
(N = 47)		Trimester 3
Median 34 Weeks
(N = 67)
MBPTriglycerides, mg/dL
Q188.7 (61.5, 116)159 (121, 1970)262 (221, 304)
Q2120 (91.2, 148)183 (158, 209)323 (288, 358)
Q3116 (93.6, 139)182 (154, 209)231 (185, 277)
Q4116 (96.5, 136)208 (182, 235) ‡306 (250, 360)
Non-HDL cholesterol, mg/dL
Q1101 (87.8, 114)132 (104, 161)216 (188, 244)
Q2113 (98.8, 127)171 (152, 190) *211 (187, 235)
Q3120 (108, 131) *173 (152, 194) *190 (159, 222)
Q4117 (107, 127) ǂ196 (176, 217) *244 (207, 282)
MEHPTotal cholesterol, mg/dL
G1184 (170, 199)221 (198, 244)271 (249, 293)
G2192 (173, 209)228 (202, 255)288 (261, 314)
G3168 (152, 183)246 (229, 264) *271 (233, 311)
G4173 (162, 184)277 (259, 296) *325 (286, 364)*
Non-HDL cholesterol, mg/dL
G1121 (109, 134)144 (120, 167)201 (179, 223)
G2118 (103, 134)159 (132, 1860214 (188, 240)
G3103 (89.5, 116) ǂ171 (153, 188) *198 (160, 237)
G4111 (102, 121)197 (179, 217) *262 (224, 300) *
LDL cholesterol, mg/dL
G1103 (91.1, 114)112 (92.2, 132)145 (125, 166)
G2100 (85.9, 114)124 (101, 146)157 (132, 181)
G378.5 (66.5, 90.5) *131 (116, 146)154 (118, 190)
G487.1 (78.3, 95.9) ǂ160 (144, 176) *196 (161, 233)
MEOHPTotal cholesterol, mg/dL
Q1181 (166, 197)213 (189, 237)286 (258, 316)
Q2179 (165, 193)244 (220, 268) ‡270 (245, 2940
Q3168 (153, 182)242 (224, 261) ‡276 (248, 303)
Q4178 (166, 191)287 (265, 309) *320 (281, 359)
Non-HDL cholesterol, mg/dL
Q1115 (102, 128)139 (116, 163)218 (189, 247)
Q2109 (97.2, 121)167 (143, 191) ‡196 (172, 221)
Q3108 (95.5, 119)165 (147, 184) ‡207 (180, 235)
Q4118 (108, 129)210 (189, 231) *248 (209, 287)
LDL cholesterol, mg/dL
Q1100 (87.9, 112)104 (84.1, 124)164 (138, 190)
Q291.6 (80.5, 103)132 (112, 153) *139 (116, 161)
Q380.8 (69.7, 91.9) *129 (113, 145) ǂ151 (126, 176)
Q491.7 (82.1, 101)170 (151, 188) *192 (157, 228)
MECPPTotal cholesterol, mg/dL
Q1177 (163, 191)213 (186, 240)272 (240, 305)
Q2185 (171, 200)237 (213, 261)285 (261, 308)
Q3174 (160, 188)240 (220, 260)272 (244, 299)
Q4175 (162, 187)286 (263, 308) *323 (284, 363)
Non-HDL cholesterol, mg/dL
Q1112 (99.5, 124)139 (112, 165)203 (170, 235)
Q2116 (104, 128)163 (140, 186)211 (187, 235)
Q3110 (97.5, 122)158 (140, 177)204 (176, 232)
Q4116 (105, 127)211 (190, 233) *255 (216, 294) ǂ
LDL cholesterol, mg/dL
Q192.4 (81.0, 104)106 (82.9, 128)148 (118, 177)
Q294.1 (82.3, 106)126 (106, 146)157 (135, 179)
Q386.6 (75.2, 98.0)124 (108, 141)145 (120, 171)
Q491.5 (81.2, 102)170 (151, 188) *197 (161, 233) ǂ
Non-HDL cholesterol, mg/dL
MHiNCH
G1 non-detectable103 (92.4, 114)140 (114, 165)176 (117, 234)
G2 detectable114 (106, 121)160 (146, 174)199 (183, 215)
Non-HDL cholesterol, mg/dL
MCOCH
G1 non-detectable109 (93.4, 124)163 (152, 174)149 (107, 189)
G2 detectable110 (104, 116)195 (134, 256)196 (182, 211) *
a Data are presented as predicted marginal means (95% CI) unless otherwise noted, adjusted for age at pregnancy, pre-pregnancy BMI, education, infertility diagnosis, cycle type, number of babies, and specific gravity. * p-value < 0.05 when comparing that group with the lowest group. ‡ p-value < 0.10 when comparing that group with the lowest group. Mono-n-butyl phthalate (MBP); mono-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP); monoethyl phthalate (MEP); monobenzyl phthalate (MBzP); mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP); mono(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (MEHHP); mono(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MEOHP); mono(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (MECPP); cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid monohydroxy isononyl ester (MHiNCH); cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid monocarboxyisooctyl ester (MCOCH).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mínguez-Alarcón, L.; Williams, P.L.; James-Todd, T.; Souter, I.; Ford, J.B.; Rexrode, K.M.; Calafat, A.M.; Hauser, R.; Chavarro, J.E. Association of Urinary Phthalate and Phthalate Replacement Metabolite Concentrations with Serum Lipid Biomarker Levels among Pregnant Women Attending a Fertility Center. Toxics 2022, 10, 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10060292

AMA Style

Mínguez-Alarcón L, Williams PL, James-Todd T, Souter I, Ford JB, Rexrode KM, Calafat AM, Hauser R, Chavarro JE. Association of Urinary Phthalate and Phthalate Replacement Metabolite Concentrations with Serum Lipid Biomarker Levels among Pregnant Women Attending a Fertility Center. Toxics. 2022; 10(6):292. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10060292

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mínguez-Alarcón, Lidia, Paige L. Williams, Tamarra James-Todd, Irene Souter, Jennifer B. Ford, Kathryn M. Rexrode, Antonia M. Calafat, Russ Hauser, and Jorge E. Chavarro. 2022. "Association of Urinary Phthalate and Phthalate Replacement Metabolite Concentrations with Serum Lipid Biomarker Levels among Pregnant Women Attending a Fertility Center" Toxics 10, no. 6: 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10060292

APA Style

Mínguez-Alarcón, L., Williams, P. L., James-Todd, T., Souter, I., Ford, J. B., Rexrode, K. M., Calafat, A. M., Hauser, R., & Chavarro, J. E. (2022). Association of Urinary Phthalate and Phthalate Replacement Metabolite Concentrations with Serum Lipid Biomarker Levels among Pregnant Women Attending a Fertility Center. Toxics, 10(6), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10060292

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop