Uptake of Radionuclides by Bryophytes in the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone

Schmidt, Brigitte; Kegler, Felix; Steinhauser, Georg; Chyzhevskyi, Ihor; Dubchak, Sergiy; Ivesic, Caroline; Koller-Peroutka, Marianne; Laarouchi, Aicha; Adlassnig, Wolfram

doi:10.3390/toxics11030218

Open AccessArticle

Uptake of Radionuclides by Bryophytes in the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone

by

Brigitte Schmidt

¹,

Felix Kegler

^2,3,

Georg Steinhauser

⁴,

Ihor Chyzhevskyi

⁵,

Sergiy Dubchak

³,

Caroline Ivesic

^1,6

,

Marianne Koller-Peroutka

^1,*

,

Aicha Laarouchi

¹ and

Wolfram Adlassnig

¹

Core Facility Cell Imaging and Ultrastructure Research, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Djerassiplatz 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria

²

Institute for Physics, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120 Halle, Germany

³

Institute of Radioecology and Radiation Protection, Leibniz University Hannover, Herrenhäuser Straße 2, Building 4113, 30419 Hannover, Germany

⁴

Chemistry & TRIGA Center Atominstitut, TU Wien, Getreidemarkt 9/163, 1060 Vienna, Austria

⁵

State Specialized Enterprise “Ecocentre” (SSE “Ecocentre”), 07270 Chornobyl, Ukraine

⁶

Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Djerassiplatz 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria

^*

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Toxics 2023, 11(3), 218; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11030218

Submission received: 3 January 2023 / Revised: 11 February 2023 / Accepted: 22 February 2023 / Published: 25 February 2023

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioaccumulation and Toxicokinetics of Organic and Inorganic Compounds in Aquatic and Soil Organisms)

Download

Browse Figures

Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

The “Chernobyl nuclear disaster” released huge amounts of radionuclides, which are still detectable in plants and sediments today. Bryophytes (mosses) are primitive land plants lacking roots and protective cuticles and therefore readily accumulate multiple contaminants, including metals and radionuclides. This study quantifies ¹³⁷Cs and ²⁴¹Am in moss samples from the cooling pond of the power plant, the surrounding woodland and the city of Prypiat. Activity concentrations of up to 297 Bq/g (¹³⁷Cs) and 0.43 Bq/g (²⁴¹Am) were found. ¹³⁷Cs contents were significantly higher at the cooling pond, where ²⁴¹Am was not detectable. Distance to the damaged reactor, amount of original fallout, presence of vascular tissue in the stem or taxonomy were of little importance. Mosses seem to absorb radionuclides rather indiscriminately, if available. More than 30 years after the disaster, ¹³⁷Cs was washed out from the very top layer of the soil, where it is no more accessible for rootless mosses but possibly for higher plants. On the other hand, ¹³⁷Cs still remains solved and accessible in the cooling pond. However, ²⁴¹Am remained adsorbed to the topsoil, thus accessible to terrestrial mosses, but precipitated in the sapropel of the cooling pond.

Keywords:

americium; cesium; strontium; fallout; bryophytes; mosses; radioactivity

1. Introduction

The explosion of the RBMK-1000 reactor in Unit 4 of the Chornobyl nuclear power station on April 26, 1986 is regarded as the worst nuclear accident in history, the “Chernobyl nuclear disaster”. A significant part of the inventory of the reactor was released, including 8.5 × 10¹⁶ Bq ¹³⁷Cs with a half-life (T_1/2) of 30.1 years, corresponding to approximately 33% of the inventory, 1.0 × 10¹⁶ Bq ⁹⁰Sr with a T_1/2 of 28.8 years, corresponding to approximately 4.3% of the inventory, and 4.2 × 10¹² Bq ²⁴¹Am with a T_1/2 of 432.3 years. However, the amount of ²⁴¹Am exceeds the comparatively small amount originally released, as its environmental concentrations have been increasing since the disaster, as ²⁴¹Am is constantly produced by the decay of ²⁴¹Pu. An amount of 6.0 × 10¹⁵ Bq ²⁴¹Pu with a T_1/2 of 14.3 years was set free, corresponding to approximately 3.3% of the inventory. In addition to these isotopes, numerous other radionuclides were released, most of which were rather short-lived [1]. Thus, the total activity decreased rapidly, but not in a linear manner, with <1% remaining in the global environment after ten years and <0.1% after 100 years [1]. A significant proportion of the radioactivity was released in small particles, which were predominantly deposited within 30 km of the reactor, mainly north and west of the reactor. Within this 30 km zone, deposition of ⁹⁰Sr varied from 20 kBq/m² to 20,000 kBq/m², with even higher values at certain spots [1].

In the affected areas, plants were exposed to radioactivity by two distinct pathways:

(1): Immediately after the incident, deposition of contaminated dust or precipitation led to the exposure of parts above the ground. Thereby, exposure rates were high enough to kill coniferous trees in the particularly affected “Red Forest” [2] and to cause pathologic leaf-fall and morphological abnormalities in deciduous trees [3].
(2): After approximately one year, most radioisotopes mitigated to the soil. Subsequently, plants may have absorbed radioisotopes via their root systems, especially if the chemical properties of the radioisotopes were similar to essential nutrients, as in the case of ¹³⁷Cs and potassium. This uptake was more pronounced on the sandy podzol soils in the close vicinity to the plants due to their weaker ion-binding capacity [1].

Bryophytes (mosses/Bryopsida and liverworts/Marchantiopsida and Jungermanniopsida) are known to be more resistant to radioactivity compared to “higher”, i.e., vascular plants [3,4], and tend to absorb much higher amounts of radionuclides [4,5]. Due to the wide geographical distribution of some species, mosses have even been used to map deposition of radioisotopes [6]. However, compared to fungi [7], conifers [8] and edible berries [2], wild-growing mosses in the Chornobyl exclusion zone have received comparatively little attention so far.

The high accumulation of radioisotopes by mosses is predominantly caused by two factors: mosses are usually small, with leaflets consisting only of a single cell layer. Thus, they have a very high ratio of surface to volume. Furthermore, the gametophyte, i.e., the green moss plant, lacks the impermeable cuticle present in vascular plants. The sporophyte, i.e., the spore capsule and its stalk, may possess a cuticle but contribute little to the total biomass of the plant. Mosses therefore absorb water and nutrients throughout their whole surface. On the other hand, mosses lack roots and are therefore not capable of extracting nutrients from deeper soil layers. Instead, mosses possess rhizoids, which predominantly fix the plant on its substrate and may also contribute to absorption, but only from the very surface of the substrate. The possibility of transport of absorbed elements within the moss plant, from rhizoids to leaflets, depends on the presence of vascular tissue. Some primitive Bryopsida (Polytrichaceae) exhibit vascular tissue similar to higher plants, but have a lower transport capacity. In more advanced Bryopsida, the vascular tissue is reduced and probably not functional anymore. In liverworts, no vascular tissue exists.

Thus, uptake of radioisotopes from the environment in mosses differs significantly from higher plants, both in quantitative and in qualitative terms. Furthermore, it can be expected that mosses will exhibit highly diverse patterns of uptake, depending both on their anatomy and the availability of radioisotopes at the very surface layer of the substrate (mainly soil, rock or tree bark, but also including exotic substrates such as animal corpses or hairballs) and possibly also in dust deposition. A study on ¹³⁷Cs in Turkish Bryophytes found pronounced differences between samples but no conclusive evidence for differences between taxa [9]. Overall, both dry and wet deposition and contamination of the soil have been shown to contribute to radionuclides in Bryophytes [10]

This pilot study aims to obtain an overview of the uptake of three selected isotopes, ¹³⁷Cs, ⁹⁰Sr and ²⁴¹Am, in mosses from the Chornobyl exclusion zone. All three isotopes are regarded as radionuclides of primary radiological concern [1]. Thereby, it was aimed to include mosses of all major taxonomic groups and from various substrates.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Identification of Bryophytes

Bryophyte species were selected in order to cover the greatest possible diversity with regard to taxonomic groups, substrates and growth forms. Samples were collected in paper bags, rinsed with tap water in order to remove soil and dust particles and air-dried. Samples were determined to the species level by morphological and anatomical features [11,12,13]. Macrophotography of mosses was performed with Nikon SMZ 1500, in combination with a Nikon Ds-Ri2 camera. Mosses were partly hydrated, and black velvet was used as a background.

A total of 25 moss samples were collected inside the Chornobyl exclusion zone in October 2018. Sampling focused on the surroundings of the former cooling pond, covering both sediment that has become dry only in recent years [14] and the surrounding woods, at a distance of 3.1–7.5 km from the reactor. Further samples were taken in the abandoned city of Prypiat (Пpип’ять, approximately 3.1–4.2 km from the reactor), and at an open meadow approximately 4.9 km from the reactor, which was also used for radionuclide uptake experiments in the fungus Schizophyllum commune [15]. Figure 1 indicates all the sampling locations. Pictures at the sampling locations were taken with an Olympus E3 camera.

2.2. γ-Ray Spectroscopy of ¹³⁷Cs and ²⁴¹Am

Both ¹³⁷Cs (T_1/2 = 30.08 a) and ²⁴¹Am (T_1/2 = 432.6 a) are γ-ray emitting radionuclides that can be identified and quantified by gamma spectrometry. In this study, a 151 cm³ high-purity germanium (HPGe) with a relative efficiency of 35% and a resolution of 1.78 keV (FWHM) at the 1332 keV peak of ⁶⁰Co was used. The software used was Genie 2000. Geometries were calibrated by using QCY48^TM solutions for quality assurance. Decay corrections were performed to the date of sampling. Counting time depended on the actual activity of the measured sample but averaged at 99 × 10³ s. Uncertainty was calculated via propagation of uncertainty, with one factor taking inhomogeneous distribution of sample material into account. Detection limits were calculated for each sample and nuclide according to DIN 11929.

2.3. Quantification of ⁹⁰Sr

Pure β-emitter ⁹⁰Sr (T_1/2 = 28.91 a) and its decay product ⁹⁰Y (T_1/2 = 64.05 h) cannot be determined using gamma spectrometry. Their β^- radiation was analyzed using liquid scintillation counting (LSC) after chemical isolation of the strontium content of the sample. The entire procedure has been well-described previously [17] and is briefly summarized here: For the microwave-assisted digestion, about 0.2 g of sample material was spiked with 1.2 mg of stable Sr and a known activity of ⁸⁵Sr (for quantification of the extraction yield) and mixed with 5 mL of 8 M HNO₃. The PTFE vial was closed with a lid and slowly (20 min) heated to 160 °C in a microwave oven. This temperature was held for 30 min. After cooling, the organic components of the sample were entirely dissolved. The sample was filtrated through a Schleicher & Schuell paper filter. The solution was taken up in 3 mL of 8 M HNO₃ and loaded onto a cartridge that held Eichrom strontium-specific SR-resin. After loading, the resin was rinsed using a solution of 3 M HNO₃ + 0.05 M oxalic acid. For elution, 10 mL of 0.025 M HNO₃ was used [18]. For a better miscibility with the LSC cocktail (Ultima Gold AB^TM), the sample was evaporated to almost dryness and then diluted with 1 mL H₂O. This procedure was repeated 9 times, which yielded an almost pH-neutral product. After the final evaporation, the sample was transferred to an LSC vial, the flask was rinsed, and the rinse solution also transferred (total volume of sample and rinse solution about 2 mL) and mixed with 18 mL of LSC cocktail. Measurement was performed for 4 × 5 h with the HIDEX 300 SL counter with software Mikrowin 5.58 as described previously [19].

After 14 days, ingrowth of ⁹⁰Y was assumed to have reached secular equilibrium with its mother nuclide. For quality control, the LSC vials were measured again to check if the initial count rate (⁹⁰Sr) had doubled (⁹⁰Sr + ⁹⁰Y).

For quantification, a ⁹⁰Sr standard solution with known activity was used. Decay corrections were performed to the date of sampling.

The detection limit according to DIN 32,645 in each sample was 0.0071 Bq, and the limit to quantify ⁹⁰Sr was 0.0365 Bq.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Stata^® 14.2 was used for all analyses. The isotope content measurements were subdivided by taxonomic groups (acrocarpous mosses, pleurocarpous mosses and liverworts) and substrate (asphalt, construction waste, concrete, hortisol with pebbles, podzol, Dreissena sp. shells, swamp soil, robinia bark, sand, sandy podzol, sandy mud and gravel). Descriptive statistics comprised arithmetic mean (μ), standard deviation (SD), quartiles (Q1–Q3) and sample size (n). For comparison of subgroups, Kruskal–Wallis Test (with adjustment for ties, KW) with the post hoc Dunn Test (DT) were applied.

The relationship between isotope content and numeric parameters (anatomical features—vascular tissue present, reduced or lacking; distance to Unit 4, fallout from 1986) (200–2000 kBq ⁹⁰Sr/m², 2000–20,000 kBq ⁹⁰Sr/m² and >20,000 kBq ⁹⁰Sr/m²) was assessed by linear regressions (LR). Furthermore, regression analyses were also used to confirm the results of the Kruskal–Wallis Test (Supplement Table S1), and to assess the influence of co-founders. In case of activity below the detection limit, 0 was imputed; p < 0.05 was regarded as significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Moss Diversity in the Study Area

A total of 25 moss samples (17 species) were collected. Two species were Polytrichaceae with functioning vascular systems, ten were more advanced acrocarpous Bryopspidae with sporangia at the apex of the stem and reduced vascular systems, and four were pleurocarpous mosses with lateral sporangia and usually without vascular systems. One species was a thallose liverwort, also without a vascular system. Five species belonged to the genus Bryum (Bryaceae). Table 1 shows the main characteristics of the samples and their respective sampling locations. Figure 2 illustrates the diversity of mosses that were collected. Further morphological images are to be found in Supplementary Figure S1.

Five samples were taken from the sandbanks of the cooling pond, which were formed since 2014 when the pumps maintaining the water level were stopped [14]. Due to constant resuspension of Cs-rich sediments by invertebrates and other mixing processes, especially in shallow water, a comparatively high bioavailability of Cs can be assumed [20]. Three of the moss samples from the pond (Bryum imbricatum, B. argenteum and B. badium, Bryaceae) were collected from low-lying wetlands (54% of the drained bottom area in 2017). The surrounding vegetation consisted of Populus tremula (Salicaceae), Salix sp. (Salicaceae), Typha sp. (Typhaceae), and Epilobium sp. (Brassicaceae) (Figure 3f,f’). Two samples (B. × intermedium and Marchantia polymorpha, Marchantiaceae) originated from sandy sites covered with shells (26% of the drained area) (Figure 3c). The mosses were growing directly on Dreissena sp. shells under a very loose vegetation of young Populus, Salix and Epilobium.

Eight samples were collected in the woodland west of the cooling pond, dominated by Robinia pseudacacia (Fabaceae), Populus tremula (Salicaceae), Quercus sp. (Fagaceae) and occasional stands of Pinus sylvestris (Pinaceae). Substrates included tree bark (Orthotrichum speciosum, Orthotrichaceae), construction waste (Ceratodon purpureus, Dicranaceae; Homalothecium philippeanum, Brachytheciaceae; and Plagiomnium cuspidatum, Mniaceae), banquettes (Brachythecium glaveosum, Brachiteciaceae), forest floor under P. sylvestris (Dicranum polysetum, Dicranaceae and Pleurozium schreberi, Hypnaceae) and boggy areas (Amblystegium serpens, Amblystegiaceae). On the forest floor under deciduous trees, growth of mosses was inhibited by littering.

Eight samples were taken from open habitats, including an oligotrophic meadow (C. purpureus, Polytrichum juniperinum and P. piliferum, Polytrichaceae) (Figure 3b), a sand road on a dike within the cooling pond (P. piliferum and B. caespiticium) and a former parking space now overgrown by mosses.

Four samples were found in the abandoned city of Prypiat, one in a former garden (P. juniperinum) and two growing on concrete (T. calcicolens and D. polysetum) (Figure 3d), where extensive layers of mosses covered a significant part of the total area. The last sample, A. serpens, was growing within an abandoned factory (Figure 3e), where rainwater penetrated the roof, enabling extensive growth of mosses. Furthermore, a cushion of Climacium dendroides, Climaciaceae, was found at a road banquette in Prypiat, which could not be sampled due to its extreme activity (dose rate of more than 3 mSv/h at a distance of a few cm), suggesting adsorption of one or more so-called “hot particles” (highly radioactive fuel particles, rich in uranium and fission products [21]).

All collected moss species were typical for their respective habitats [11]. The habitats of 23 samples were exposed to 200–2000 kBq ⁹⁰Sr/m², and two spots in the southern part of Prypiat were contaminated with 2000–20,000 kBq ⁹⁰Sr/m² [1]. No impoverishment of moss diversity due to radiation or other factors was recognizable. Rather, mosses were highly abundant on concrete surfaces, both within Prypiat and throughout the exclusion zone, since weathering does not allow for the growth of vascular plants yet.

3.2. ¹³⁷Cesium

¹³⁷Cs was detectable in all moss samples but activities differed widely. Table 2 includes all measured radioisotopes values from 25 sampling sites. An amount of 157–297 Bq/g was found of M. polymorpha and B. intermedium on Dreissena shells, and B. imbricatum and B. badium on the sand banks of the cooling pond (Figure 3a). B. argenteum and B. caespiticium exhibited activities > 5 Bq/g, and <1 Bq/g was found exclusively in moss samples growing without direct contact to the substrate, i.e., in epiphytic O. speciosum, in mosses growing on construction rubble, and, remarkably, in D. polysetum growing on a bollard in the highly contaminated city of Prypiat. These surfaces may not have been exposed to the environment at the time point of the disaster, or ¹³⁷Cs has been washed out over time. A. serpens <1 Bq/g was also found growing on the factory floor which was protected against fallout until the roof caved in and rainwater was able to penetrate. Some specimens of the same species (A. serpens, D. polysetum and C. purpureus) were also collected on soil, where they exhibited > 1 Bq/g. Members of the genus Bryum generally exhibited a higher activity (KW: p = 0.001) compared to the other mosses, in good accordance with the tendency of Bryum to accumulate heavy metals as well [22]. No significant difference was found between acrocarpous and pleurocarpous mosses and liverworts, or between mosses with and without vascular tissue. ¹³⁷Cs content differed significantly between the substrates (KW: p = 0.029). Shells and sand at the pond were correlated with high ¹³⁷Cs, whereas other substrates were without significant correlations. Deposition in 1986 (LR: ≤2000 vs. >2000 kBq ⁹⁰Sr/m²) did not result in a significant difference (KW: p = 0.423). Distance to the reactor at Unit 4 was positively correlated with ¹³⁷Cs (LR: F < 0.001; p < 0.001; R² = 0.45), however, this is probably an artifact caused by the high ¹³⁷Cs activity at the cooling pond, which was further away from Unit 4 than the other sampling sites.

Except for the high ¹³⁷Cs uptake in Bryum, activity seemed to be determined predominantly by the substrate. A previous study in Serbia [23] found substrate to moss ratios of 0.27 to 0.92, but did not identify parameters controlling Cs availability. In the Chornobyl area, pond sediments in shallow waters exhibited the highest ¹³⁷Cs concentrations at the very surface [14], and the very same situation can be assumed for sediments, which have become dry only recently. Furthermore, Cs is strongly adsorbed only to clay minerals, which are virtually absent on the sandy banks of the cooling pond. Thus, it appears plausible that mosses may absorb ¹³⁷Cs from the sediments via their rhizoids, in spite of their very limited capacity for uptake from soil solutions. In terrestrial habitats, ¹³⁷Cs may be less bioavailable, though the sandy podzol soil in the exclusion zone binds Cs only poorly [1]. Furthermore, Cs slowly penetrates into deeper layers of soil and may already be depleted in the very top layer, where it would be accessible for moss rhizoids [21].

3.3. ²⁴¹Americium

²⁴¹Am was detectable in 11 of 25 samples, including the specimens collected in the dry meadow (P. juniperinum, P. piliferum and C. purpureus), dike of the cooling pond (P. piliferum and B. caespiticium), an abandoned parking space (B. argenteum and C. purpureus) and in the city of Prypiat (A. serpens, T. calcicolens and D. polysetum). ²⁴¹Am was missing from wet habitats and in mosses growing on tree bark or construction waste. Three species exhibited presence or lack of ²⁴¹Am depending on their sampling site (A. serpens, C. purpureus and D. polysetum). No significant influence of fallout in 1986 or distance to Unit 4 was detected, nor was ²⁴¹Am content significantly affected by taxonomic features. KW showed a borderline insignificant (p = 0.066) influence of vascular tissues on ²⁴¹Am content. LR, however, indicated increased ²⁴¹Am uptake in species with more developed vascular tissue (F = 0.033; p = 0.030; R² = 0.18).

Modeling of ²⁴¹Am accumulation was impeded, since its predecessor ²⁴¹Pu was released in 1986 and continues to decay to ²⁴¹Am, which will achieve its maximum concentration in 2059 [1]. Thus, detection of ²⁴¹Am may indicate availability and uptake of either ²⁴¹Pu or ²⁴¹Am. In contrast to ¹³⁷Cs, ²⁴¹Am uptake is obviously rather independent of the moss species but may involve vascular tissue. In contrast to Cs uptake by potassium carriers, uptake of both Pu and Am by nutrient carriers is very unlikely, since no biological function of actinoids is known. However, metal ions are easily absorbed by a wide variety of biological matrices, e.g., negatively charged cell walls or reduced sulfur [24,25]. Since the whole organism of the moss plant is accessible to Am or Pu due to the lack of an impermeable cuticle, it can be assumed that ²⁴¹Am concentrations reflect the bioavailability of ²⁴¹Am and ²⁴¹Pu in the environment.

In the frame of the disaster, Pu was predominantly dispersed as hot particles and gradually released by weathering; subsequently, soluble metal species may have been relocated by water. In the sediments of the cooling pond, no weathering of hot particles took place, due to reducing, anoxic conditions [26], explaining the lack of ²⁴¹Am content from the moss samples collected at the banks of the cooling pond. ²⁴¹Am is also lacking on substrates that did not exist in 1986, such as tree bark. In soil or on concrete, however, bioavailable ²⁴¹Am is obviously still present in the very top layer, where it is accessible to the rhizoids of mosses. In the case of A. serpens, growing within a former factory, hot particles were obviously deposited on the roof. Whereas ¹³⁷Cs was quickly washed out by rain, ²⁴¹Pu/²⁴¹Am seemed to be released continuously until the roof caved in and water released the isotopes unto the factory floor.

3.4. ⁹⁰Strontium

⁹⁰Sr was not determined in seven samples. Of these, four exhibited detectable contents (D. polysetum, C. purpureus, B. × intermedium and B. argenteum), and three did not (M. polymorpha, B. imbricatum and B. cf. badium). As only limited statistical testing was possible in such a small sample, KW did not indicate significant differences (p = 0.206). LR, on the other hand, explained ⁹⁰Sr concentration almost completely (LR: R² = 0.99, p < 0.001), with significantly higher ⁹⁰Sr on podzol compared to sand or shells. No influence of ⁹⁰Sr fallout in 1986, vascular tissue or taxonomic features was found.

The uptake behavior of ⁹⁰Sr is counterintuitive. Most of the cooling pond received 200–2000 kBq ⁹⁰Sr/m² in 1986, of which approximately 46% was still present after 32 years. As analog for calcium, Sr would be expected to be incorporated into Dreissena shells [3], even to such an extent that malformations of the shells have been observed [27]. In 1998, mollusk shells from the cooling pond contained 2500 Bq/kg [28]. However, ⁹⁰Sr uptake may be impeded by the low trophic level of Dreissena in the food chain [29]. The ⁹⁰Sr content of the Dreissena shells is unknown, but the very low ⁹⁰Sr concentrations in mosses growing directly on the shells suggest that mosses lack acidic exudates as in higher plants, thus no mobilization of ions from the shells occurs, though exudates in general are produced [30]. In podzol, on the other hand, ⁹⁰Sr may also be reversibly bound to Fe and Mn oxides [31,32] and therefore be accessible to moss rhizoids.

4. Conclusions

In the Chornobyl exclusion zone, a diverse flora of mosses can be found, with the highest abundance on abandoned streets and on newly formed banks of the drying cooling pond.
¹³⁷Cs is generally accumulated by mosses, especially by the genus Bryum (Bryaceaea), which is known to accumulate heavy metals. Furthermore, ¹³⁷Cs has been washed out from the very top layer of the soil, where it would be accessible for moss rhizoids. In the newly formed banks of the cooling pond, ¹³⁷Cs is still available for mosses.
²⁴¹Am uptake seems to be controlled predominantly by bioavailability, which is higher in podzol than in the cooling pond, where little degradation of hot particles takes place.
⁹⁰Sr is taken up by mosses from soil but virtually not from mussel shells, in spite of its similarity to Ca.
The presence or lack of functional or reduced vascular tissue in mosses does not seem to influence the uptake of any of the investigated radionuclides.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics11030218/s1, Table S1: Results of Kruskal-Wallis tests and regression analyses. Correlation coefficients are only shown if the regression model contains one co-founder. Figure S1: Additional figure of sampled mosses.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.A. and G.S.; sampling, I.C., S.D. and W.A.; determination of mosses, B.S.; radioanalytics, G.S. and F.K.; statistics, W.A. and C.I.; visualization, C.I. and A.L.; writing, C.I., M.K.-P., B.S., G.S. and W.A.; resources, G.S., I.C., S.D. and M.K.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Joachim Lenz Foundation directly to Georg Steinhauser and Sergiy Dubchak. Open Access Funding by the University of Vienna.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their gratitude to the authorities of the Chornobyl exclusion zone, who made research in the restricted area possible. Thanks are due to Dorian Zok, Tobias Blenke and Felix Stäger for assistance in the radiometric measurements. Thanks are due to the Core Facility Cell Imaging and Ultrastructure Research, University of Vienna—member of the Vienna Life-Science Instruments (VLSI).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Smith, J.T.; Beresford, N.A. Introduction. In Chernobyl: Catastrophe and Consequences, 1st ed.; Smith, J.T., Beresford, N.A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2005; pp. 1–34. [Google Scholar]
Smith, J.T.; Beresford, N.A.; Shaw, G.; Moberg, L. Radioactivity in Terrestrial Ecosystems. In Chernobyl: Catastrophe and Consequences, 1st ed.; Smith, J.T., Beresford, N.A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2005; pp. 81–137. [Google Scholar]
Kryshev, I.I.; Sazykina, T.; Beresford, N.A. Effects on Wildlife. In Chernobyl: Catastrophe and Consequences, 1st ed.; Smith, J.T., Beresford, N.A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2005; pp. 267–287. [Google Scholar]
Frahm, J.-P. Moose Als Bioindikatoren; Quelle & Meyer: Wiesbaden, Germany, 1998; 187p. [Google Scholar]
Papastefanou, C.; Manolopoulou, M.; Sawidis, T. Lichens and mosses: Biological monitors of radioactive fallout from the Chernobyl reactor accident. J. Environ. Radioact. 1989, 9, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Smidt, S.; Bauer, H.; Fürst, A.; Jandl, R.; Mutsch, F.; Seidel, C.; Zechmeister, H. Schwermetalle und Radionuklide in Österreichischen Waldökosystemen. Austrian J. For. Sci. 2011, 28, 251–278. [Google Scholar]
Zarubina, N. The influence of biotic and abiotic factors on ¹³⁷Cs accumulation in higher fungi after the accident at Chernobyl NPP. J. Environ. Radioact. 2016, 161, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zarubina, N.E. ¹³⁷Cs and ⁴⁰K in the needles and branches of scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) on the territory of chornobyl exclusion zone. Nucl. Phys. At. Energy 2019, 20, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Çevik, U.; Çelik, N. Ecological half-life of Cs-137 in mosses and lichens in the Ordu province, Turkey. J. Environ. Radioact. 2008, 100, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ren, X.; Wang, J.; Zhong, Q.; Bi, Q.; Zhu, R.; Du, J. Radionuclide and trace metal accumulation in a variety of mosses used as bioindicators for atmospheric deposition. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 797, 149224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Frahm, J.-P.; Frey, W. Moosflora, 4th ed.; UTB: Stuttgart, Germany, 2004; 538p. [Google Scholar]
Ahrens, M.; Nebel, M. Die Moose Baden-Württembergs: Band 1; Eugen Ulmer: Stuttgart, Germany, 2000; Volume 1, 512p. [Google Scholar]
Ahrens, M.; Nebel, M. Die Moose Baden-Württembergs: Band 2; Eugen Ulmer: Stuttgart, Germany, 2001; Volume 2, 529p. [Google Scholar]
International Agency for Atomic Energy. Environmental Impact Assessment of the Drawdown of the Chernobyl NPP Cooling Pond as a Basis for Its Decommissioning and Remediation; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Traxler, L.; Wollenberg, A.; Steinhauser, G.; Chyzhevskyi, I.; Dubchak, S.; Großmann, S.; Günther, A.; Gupta, D.K.; Iwannek, K.-H.; Kirieiev, S.; et al. Survival of the Basidiomycete Schizophyllum commune in soil under hostile environmental conditions in the Chernobyl exclusion zone. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 403, 124002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Google Inc. Google Earth Pro 2018, V9.0; Google Inc.: Mountain View, CA, USA, 2018.
Rosenberg, B.L.; Ball, J.E.; Shozugawa, K.; Korschinek, G.; Hori, M.; Nanba, K.; Johnson, T.E.; Brandl, A.; Steinhauser, G. Radionuclide pollution inside the Fukushima Daiichi exclusion zone, Part 1: Depth profiles of Radiocesium and Strontium-90 in soil. Appl. Geochem. 2017, 85, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kocadag, M.; Musilek, A.; Steinhauser, G. On the interference of ²¹⁰Pb in the determination of ⁹⁰Sr using a strontium specific resin. Nucl. Technol. Radiat. Prot. 2013, 28, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Weller, A.; Hori, M.; Shozugawa, K.; Steinhauser, G. Rapid ultra-trace determination of Fukushima-derived radionuclides in food. Food Control 2018, 85, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Meili, M.; Braf, L.; Konitzer, K. Sediment resuspension as a long-term secondary source of Chernobyl ¹³⁷Cs in lake ecosystems: The example of Blacksåstjärn (Sweden). In Freshwater and Estuarine Radioecology (Studies in Environmental Science); Desmet, G., Blust, R.J., Comans, R.N.J., Fernandez, J.A., Hilton, J., de Bettencourt, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997; Volume 68, pp. 225–233. [Google Scholar]
Smith, J.T.; Beresford, N.A. Radioactive fallout and environmental transfers. In Chernobyl: Catastrophe and Consequences, 1st ed.; Smith, J.T., Beresford, N.A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2005; pp. 35–80. [Google Scholar]
Adlassnig, W.; Lichtscheidl, I.; Sassmann, S.; Lendl, T.; Wernitznig, S.; Hallberg, K.B.; Hofhansl, F.; Lang, I. Heavy metal household of the former mining site Schwarzwand (Salzburg, Austria): Spontaneous self cleaning by plants and biofilms. Appl. Geochem. 2013, 35, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cuculovic, A.; Cuculovic, R.; Cvetic-Antic, T.; Veselinovic, D. Mosses as biomonitors for radioactivity following the Chernobyl Accident. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2011, 63, 1117–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Schopfer, P.; Brennicke, A. Pflanzenphysiologie, 7th ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010; 702p. [Google Scholar]
Marschner, H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: San Diago, CA, USA, 1995; 898p. [Google Scholar]
Steinhauser, G. Anthropogenic radioactive particles in the environment. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2018, 318, 1629–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Yavnyuk, A.A.; Efremova, N.N.; Protsenko, O.N.; Gudkov, D.I.; Nazarov, A.B. Fluctuating asymmetry of Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha Pall.) and floating pondweed (Potamogeton natans L.) in water bodies within the Chernobyl accident exclusion zone. Radioprotection 2009, 44, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Gudkov, D.I.; Kuzmenko, M.I.; Kireev, S.I.; Nazarov, A.B.; Klenus, V.G.; Kaglyan, A.E.; Kulachinsky, A.V.; Zub, L.N. Radionuclides in components of aquatic ecosystems of the Chernobyl accident restriction zone. In 20 Years after the Chernobyl Accident: Past, Present and Future; Nova Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 265–284. [Google Scholar]
Kinney, R.M.; Manos, C.G.; Mills, E.L.; Mellina, E.; Lisk, D.J. Zebra Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) as a biomonitoring tool for Sr90 contamination. Chemosphere 1994, 28, 729–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Martínez-Cortés, T.; Pomar, F.; Merino, F.; Novo-Uzal, E. A Proteomic approach to Physcomitrella patens rhizoid exudates. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 1671–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jeske-Kaczanowska, A. Mobility and distribution of barium and strontium in profiles of podzolic soils. Soil Sci. Annu. 2013, 64, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mishra, S.; Arae, H.; Zamostyan, P.; Ishikawa, T.; Yonehara, H.; Sahoo, S. Sorption-desorption characteristics of uranium, cesium and strontium in typical podzol soils from Ukraine. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2012, 152, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Figure 1. Map of the sampling area. Red pins indicate the sample collection points. In the cooling pond bright blue coloration indicates areas that have recently become dry and dark blue areas were still submerged in 2018. Hatches indicate deposition of 200–2000 kBq ⁹⁰Sr/m², more pronounced, darker hatches 2000–20,000 kBq ⁹⁰Sr/m² and multiple hatches >20,000 kBq ⁹⁰Sr/m². Redrawn after [1,16].

Figure 2. Figure of some of the sampled mosses; # indicates the sampling location, described in detail in Figure 1. (a) Tortula calcicolens (#24), (b) Dicranum polysetum (#19), (c) Plagiomnium cuspidatum (#9), (d) Homalothecium philippeanum (#8), (e) Orthotrichum speciosum (#21), (f) Marchantia polymorpha (#16), (g) Polytrichum piliferum (#4), (h) Bryum cf. badium (#6), (i) Bryum × intermedium (#17), (j) Bryum argenteum (#13). Scale bar = 5 mm.

Figure 3. Selected sample sites. (a) Cooling pond with unfinished cooling tower, (b) dry meadow (#1–3), (c) bank of the cooling pond (#16,17), (d) Prypiat, moss cushions (#24), (e) decaying factory building in Prypiat with Amblystegium serpens covering concrete floor (#23), (f) Bryum moss cushion (#10–12), (f’) detail of Bryum. Mosses indicated by white arrows.

Table 1. Principal characteristics of the Bryophytes used in this study: # indicates the sampling location as described in Figure 1.

ID	Species	Family ¹	Vascicel ²	Position ³		Habitat and Substrate
#01	Polytrichum juniperinum	Polytrichaceae (acrocarpous)	+	51°20′54.5″ N	30°07′40.9″ E	Open, sandy patches in a meadow, on podzol
#02	Polytrichum piliferum	Polytrichaceae (acrocarpous)	+	51°20′54.5″ N	30°07′40.9″ E	Open, sandy patches in a meadow, on podzol
#03	Ceratodon purpureus	Dicranaceae (acrocarpous)	±	51°20′54.5″ N	30°07′40.9″ E	Open, sandy patches in a meadow, on podzol
#04	Polytrichum piliferum	Polytrichaceae (acrocarpous)	+	51°22′24.9″ N	30°08′36.3″ E	Sandy road on the main dam of the cooling pond
#05	Polytrichum piliferum	Polytrichaceae (acrocarpous)	+	51°22′24.3″ N	30°08′36.3″ E	Sandy road on the main dam of the cooling pond
#06	Bryum caespiticium	Bryaceae (acrocarpous)	±	51°22′23.4″ N	30°08′37.7″ E	Sandy road on the main dam of the cooling pond
#07	Ceratodon purpureus	Dicranaceae (acrocarpous)	±	51°22′28.0″ N	30°08′26.5″ E	Deciduous forest ⁴, on waste material (wood and plastic)
#08	Homalothecium philippeanum	Brachytheciaceae (pleurocarpous)	−	51°22′28.0″ N	30°08′26.5″ E	Deciduous forest ⁴, on waste material (wood and plastic)
#09	Plagiomnium cuspidatum	Mniaceae (acrocarpous)	±	51°22′28.0″ N	30°08′26.5″ E	Deciduous forest ⁴, on waste material (wood and plastic)
#10	Bryum imbricatum	Bryaceae (acrocarpous)	±	51°22′11.5″ N	30°08′26.5″ E	Shrubbery ⁵ on a newly formed island of the cooling pond, on sandy mud
#11	Bryum argenteum	Bryaceae (acrocarpous)	±	51°22′11.5″ N	30°08′37.5″ E	Shrubbery ⁵ on a newly formed island of the cooling pond, on sandy mud
#12	Bryum cf. badium	Bryaceae (acrocarpous)	±	51°22′11.5″ N	30°08′37.5″ E	Shrubbery ⁵ on a newly formed island of the cooling pond, on sandy mud
#13	Bryum argenteum	Bryaceae (acrocarpous)	±	51°22′25.1″ N	30°08′19.3″ E	Asphalt parking space, no vegetation besides mosses
#14	Ceratodon purpureus	Dicranaceae (acrocarpous)	±	51°22′25.1″ N	30°08′19.3″ E	Asphalt parking space, no vegetation besides mosses
#15	Brachythecium glaveosum	Brachytheciaceae (pleurocarpous)	−	51°22′26.0″ N	30°08′19.3″ E	Road side in a deciduous forest ⁴, on gravel
#16	Marchantia polymorpha	Marchantiaceae (thallose liverworts)	−	51°20′12.1″ N	30°09′08.1″ E	Shrubbery ⁵ on the newly formed shore of the cooling pond, on shells (Unio sp., Unionidae)
#17	Bryum × intermedium	Bryaceae (acrocarpous)	±	51°20′12.1″ N	30°09′57.8″ E	Shrubbery ⁵ on the newly formed shore of the cooling pond, on shells (Unio sp., Unionidae)
#18	Pleurozium schreberi	Hypnaceae (pleurocarpous)	−	51°22′06.9″ N	30°08′05.7″ E	Open forest dominated by Pinus sylvestris (Pinaceae), on raw humus
#19	Dicranum polysetum	Dicranaceae (acrocarpous)	±	51°22′06.9″ N	30°08′05.7″ E	Open forest dominated by Pinus sylvestris (Pinaceae), on raw humus
#20	Amblystegium serpens	Amblystegiaceae (pleurocarpous)	−	51°22′07.2″ N	30°08′05.7″ E	Swampy meadow, between grasses
#21	Orthotrichum speciosum	Orthotrichaceae (acrocarpous)	−	51°22′27.0″ N	30°08′05.3″ E	Deciduous forest ⁴, on the bark of Robinia pseudacacia (Fabaceae), 2 m above the ground
#22	Polytrichum juniperinum	Polytrichaceae (acrocarpous)	+	51°24′16.9″ N	30°03′13.2″ E	Former garden of a housing complex in Prypiat, on gravel and garden soil
#23	Amblystegium serpens	Amblystegiaceae (pleurocarpous)	−	51°24′08.0″ N	30°03′13.2″ E	Concrete floor of a decaying factory building in Prypiat
#24	Tortula calcicolens	Pottiaceae (acrocarpous)	±	51°24′27.4″ N	30°02′31.6″ E	Asphalt parking space in Prypiat, no vegetation besides mosses
#25	Dicranum polysetum	Dicranaceae (acrocarpous)	±	51°24′26.7″ N	30°03′53.8″ E	Concrete bollard in Prypiat

¹ Families are itemized to thallose liverworts (no leafy liverworts were found), primitive acrocarpous mosses with sporangia at the apex of the stem and an existing but not necessarily functioning vascular system, and more advanced pleurocarpous mosses with lateral sporangia and usually without a vascular system. ² Vascular system: + present and functional; ± reduced; − missing. ³ Altitude was virtually constant, between 96 and 120 m.a.s.l. ⁴ The deciduous forests at the cooling pond are dominated by Robinia pseudacacia (Fabaceae) and Populus tremula (Salicaceae) with some intermixed Quercus petraea (Fagaceae). ⁵ The shrubbery at the cooling pond is dominated by Populus tremula (Salicaceae), Salix sp. (Salicaceae), Typha sp. (Typhaceae) and Epilobium sp. (Brassicaceae).

Table 2. Concentration of selected radionuclide in bryophytes [Bq/g]; # indicates the sampling location as described in Figure 1.

ID	Species	¹³⁷Cs		²⁴¹Am		⁹⁰Sr (Uncertainty)
ID	Species	Radionuclides (Uncertainty)	Detection Limit	Radionuclides (Uncertainty)	Detection Limit	⁹⁰Sr (Uncertainty)
#01	Polytrichum juniperinum	6.0 (5.9–8.4)	0.402	0.24 (0.23–0.34)	0.035	Not determined
#02	Polytrichum piliferum	3.6 (2.9–4.2)	0.208	0.14 (0.12–0.17)	0.04	Not determined
#03	Ceratodon purpureus	5.5 (4.9–6.9)	0.309	0.22 (0.19–0.29)	0.044	Not determined
#04	Polytrichum piliferum	3.1 (2.7–3.4)	0.450	0.08 < A < 0.17 ¹	0.171	Not determined
#05	Polytrichum piliferum	6.5 (5.6–6.9)	0.758	0.31 (0.25–0.35)	0.127	Not determined
#06	Bryum caespiticium	10.9 (9.6–11.5)	0.325	0.43 (0.37–0.46)	0.066	Not determined
#07	Ceratodon purpureus	0.6 (0.5–0.7)	0.053	<0.001 ²	4.36 × 10⁻⁴	Not determined
#08	Homalothecium philippeanum	0.9 (0.9–1.2)	0.126	<0.001 ²	8.86 × 10⁻⁴	Not determined
#09	Plagiomnium cuspidatum	0.6 (0.6–0.8)	0.107	<0.001 ²	5.12 × 10⁻⁴	Not determined
#10	Bryum imbricatum	248 (219–261)	6.49	<0.011 ²	0.021	<0.45 ²
#11	Bryum argenteum	37.1 (30.8–43.4)	1.20	<0.003 ²	4.32 × 10⁻³	0.64 (0.63–0.65)
#12	Bryum cf. badium	157 (136.4–166.1)	3.63	<0.006 ²	0.011	<0.38 ²
#13	Bryum argenteum	8.4 (6.9–9.9)	0.278	0.28 (0.23–0.34)	0.067	2.54 (2.53–2.55)
#14	Ceratodon purpureus	3.2 (2.8–3.4)	0.138	0.06 (0–0.08)	0.039	Not determined
#15	Brachythecium glaveosum	2.3 (2.1–2.9)	0.247	<0.022 ²	0.077	Not determined
#16	Marchantia polymorpha	185 (154–216)	5.90	<0.011 ²	0.021	<0.47 ²
#17	Bryum × intermedium	297 (259–317)	9.04	<0.017 ²	0.034	0.76 (0.75–0.77)
#18	Pleurozium schreberi	3.0 (2.7–3.9)	0.289	<0.001 ²	7.53 × 10⁻⁴	Not determined
#19	Dicranum polysetum	15.9 (13.3–18.5)	1.22	<0.004 ²	8.00 × 10⁻³	12.14 (12.13–12.15)
#20	Amblystegium serpens	2.9 (2.4–3.4)	0.244	<0.002 ²	2.11 × 10⁻³	Not determined
#21	Orthotrichum speciosum	0.8 (0.8–1)	0.069	<0.001 ²	3.60 × 10⁻⁴	Not determined
#22	Polytrichum juniperinum	3.0 (2.4–3.6)	0.276	<0.001 ²	1.57 × 10⁻³	Not determined
#23	Amblystegium serpens	0.9 (0.8–1.2)	0.109	0.04 (0.03–0.05)	0.026	Not determined
#24	Tortula calcicolens	4.8 (4.1–5)	0.627	0.32 (0.27–0.36)	0.107	Not determined
#25	Dicranum polysetum	0.8 (0.8–1.1)	0.068	0.015 (0.01–0.02)	0.013	Not determined

¹ Detectable but not quantifiable. ² Below detection limit.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schmidt, B.; Kegler, F.; Steinhauser, G.; Chyzhevskyi, I.; Dubchak, S.; Ivesic, C.; Koller-Peroutka, M.; Laarouchi, A.; Adlassnig, W. Uptake of Radionuclides by Bryophytes in the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone. Toxics 2023, 11, 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11030218

AMA Style

Schmidt B, Kegler F, Steinhauser G, Chyzhevskyi I, Dubchak S, Ivesic C, Koller-Peroutka M, Laarouchi A, Adlassnig W. Uptake of Radionuclides by Bryophytes in the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone. Toxics. 2023; 11(3):218. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11030218

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schmidt, Brigitte, Felix Kegler, Georg Steinhauser, Ihor Chyzhevskyi, Sergiy Dubchak, Caroline Ivesic, Marianne Koller-Peroutka, Aicha Laarouchi, and Wolfram Adlassnig. 2023. "Uptake of Radionuclides by Bryophytes in the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone" Toxics 11, no. 3: 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11030218

APA Style

Schmidt, B., Kegler, F., Steinhauser, G., Chyzhevskyi, I., Dubchak, S., Ivesic, C., Koller-Peroutka, M., Laarouchi, A., & Adlassnig, W. (2023). Uptake of Radionuclides by Bryophytes in the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone. Toxics, 11(3), 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11030218

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Menu

Uptake of Radionuclides by Bryophytes in the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone

Abstract

1. Introduction