Next Article in Journal
Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs) and Male Reproductive Health: Challenging the Future with a Double-Edged Sword
Previous Article in Journal
Difenoconazole Exposure Induces Retinoic Acid Signaling Dysregulation and Testicular Injury in Mice Testes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic Constraints on the Ecobiochemical Status of Cultivated Soils along Transportation Routes

by
Elżbieta Zawierucha
1,*,
Marcin Zawierucha
2,
Barbara Futa
3 and
Agnieszka Mocek-Płóciniak
4
1
Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Emergency Medicine, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, IX Wieków Kielc 19A, 25-317 Kielce, Poland
2
Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, The Marshal Office of the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship, IX Wieków Kielc 3, 25-516 Kielce, Poland
3
Institute of Soil Science and Environment Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Leszczyńskiego St. 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland
4
Department of Soil Science and Microbiology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Szydłowska 50, 60-656 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2023, 11(4), 329; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040329
Submission received: 2 February 2023 / Revised: 12 March 2023 / Accepted: 14 March 2023 / Published: 30 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Ecotoxicology)

Abstract

:
There is a lack of studies on the impact of COVID-19-related population mobility and freight transport restrictions on the soil environment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of automotive pollution on selected parameters describing the quality and healthiness of crop soils based on results obtained before the pandemic (2017–2019) in relation to data from the pandemic period (2020–2021). The study included soils from six cultivated fields located in eastern Poland along national roads (DK No. 74 and 82) and provincial roads (DW No. 761 and 835). Soil samples were taken from distances of 5, 20, 50, and 100 m from the edge of the roadway. The following soil characteristics were determined: pHKCl, content of total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), and activity of the three enzymes dehydrogenases (ADh), neutral phosphatase (APh), and urease (AU). The degree of traffic-generated soil pollution was assessed by determining the samples’ total cadmium and lead levels (Cd and Pb) and total content of 14 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (Σ14PAHs). The monitoring of cultivated soils showed that the parameters of cultivated soils varied primarily according to the distance from the edge of the roadway. There was an increase in soil acidity and TOC and TN content and a decrease in Cd, Pb, and Σ14PAHs as one moved away from the edge of the roadway. The highest ADh and APh values were found in soils located 100 m from the edge of the road. AU at 5 m and 20 m from the edge of the pavement was significantly higher than at 100 m away. The reduction in vehicular traffic associated with the pandemic did not affect the changes in the reaction of the studied soils and their TOC, TN, and Pb contents. The lowest content of Σ14PAHs was found in 2020. In the case of the amount of Cd in soils, a downward effect was also observed in 2020. However, no significant differences were noted, except for the soils in Skorzeszyce and Łuszczów Kolonia. The reduced influx of xenobiotics into the soil environment stimulated ADh and APh. In the following year (2021), the amounts of tested xenobiotics and enzyme activities in the soils were at a similar level to those in 2019. The results indicate a positive but short-term effect of the pandemic on reducing the contamination of soils located along transportation routes.

1. Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a major upheaval that has triggered socio-political changes around the world. The first media reports of illness caused by a previously unknown type of coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, appeared early in December 2019 in the city of Wuhan in central China. In just 30 days, it spread from one city to all of China and then appeared in other countries. In the second half of February 2020, outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred in Europe (mainly in Italy), and as of 4 March 2020, infections were reported in Poland, eastern Europe [1,2,3]. On 30 January 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 outbreak caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus a public health emergency of international concern. On 11 March 2020, the WHO declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic [4]. In the spring of 2020, in order to counter the spread of infection, restrictions were imposed in most countries, including restrictions on movement; temporary total or partial quarantine; and the postponement or cancellation of a number of sports, religious, and cultural events. At the national and local levels, schools and universities were closed. Some countries closed borders or imposed restrictions on border traffic. The introduced restrictions resulted in a reduction in emissions from certain sectors of economic activity (including transportation and selected industries) and a potential increase in emissions from municipal and residential sources. This was due to the population remaining in quarantine in households, as well as widespread work and education from home using digital technologies [1,3,5]. In the lockdown period, traffic decreased by 50 to 70% and as much as 90% in some cases [6].
A number of publications have been published on the effects of COVID-19 restrictions on environmental pollutant concentrations, and the vast majority have focused on air quality [3,7,8]. However, there is a lack of studies describing parameter changes in soils [9]. Soils are the foundation on which all life on Earth rests, and their ecosystem functions are an indispensable part of the food-production process [10]. The ecochemical state of soils determines crop quality and human health [11,12]. However, between 60 and 70% of EU soils are unhealthy according to a report on a Horizon Europe mission on soil health and food [13]. According to the Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils (ITPS), the third most significant threat to soil function in Europe is pollution from anthropogenic activities [14]. Particularly noteworthy are cultivated soils located along transportation routes. Road transport and automobile communications are an important source of heavy metal and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) pollution of soils adjacent to transportation routes. Vehicle emissions, abrasion of vehicle tires and asphalt, wear and tear of the clutch and brake pads and discs, and leakage of operating fluids are important sources of these pollutants in the soils around roads [15,16,17]. Soils contaminated with heavy metals (HMs) and PAHs can pose a health risk to humans, livestock, and wildlife, as well as an ecotoxicological risk to the soil biome, soil functions, plants, the quality of air, and aquatic life [18,19].
Intensive development of motorization has generated certain threats to the quality of the soil environment, human health, and life. In this context, scientifically designed and continuous monitoring of agricultural land along roads is necessary. The protection and monitoring of these soils are in line with the environmental policy of EU member states, which aims to achieve the goals of the European Green Deal [20]. The determination of the content of xenobiotics (i.e., HMs or PAHs) in soils does not reflect the real ecotoxicological risk associated with their presence in the environment. Therefore, when assessing the quality of soils, what is important is the amount of contamination that can be tolerated and without causing negative effects on living organisms [21,22].
A reliable assessment of the ecochemical state of soil can be achieved by testing the activity of a number of enzymes, including dehydrogenases, urease, and neutral phosphatase. Soil enzymes are natural mediators and catalysts of many important soil processes [23] and participate in the formation and decomposition of organic matter in the soil. Enzymes in the soil also stimulate reactions that release nutrients from organic matter and make them available to plants. They have a significant effect on the rate of transformation and flow of carbon, nitrogen, and many other elements of the biochemical cycle and also stimulate the fixation of molecular nitrogen [24]. Enzymatic activity is a sensitive indicator of changes in the soil environment, including those caused by the presence of HMs and PAHs in the environment [22,25,26,27].
The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of population mobility and freight transport restrictions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and the distance from the edge of a roadway on the ecobiochemical status of soils in cultivated fields. The fields were located along transportation routes in the Świętokrzyskie and Lubelskie provinces of Poland. An analysis of the results obtained before the pandemic (2017–2019) in relation to data from during the pandemic period (2020–2021) allowed us to assess the impact of automotive pollution on selected parameters describing the quality and health of crop soils. The present study is a continuation of research previously conducted in the mentioned areas in 2017–2019 [28].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study included soils from six farm fields located in the eastern part of Poland along national roads (DK Nos. 74 and 82) and provincial roads (DW Nos. 761 and 835) in the Świętokrzyskie and Lubelskie provinces (Figure 1). The public roads in Poland are classified according to their function in the road network as national roads, which are transit routes, and provincial roads, which are connections between cities of importance in the province. With the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in Europe, restrictions on the mobility of the population and the transport of goods have been imposed since March 2020. The study was conducted in 2020–2021, and the results were compared with data from 2017–2019, which were the basis of a doctoral thesis [28] and article [29].
The soils in the studied area were classified as Cambisols and Luvisols and characterized by silt loam (SiL) and silt (Si) texture (Table 1) [30,31]. Field work was conducted during periods of stable weather, when the soil was in a state of dynamic equilibrium, which kept the course of biochemical processes within the limits of moderate intensity.

2.2. Sampling and Analyses

Soil samples were taken from selected agricultural fields in August of each research year (2017–2021) from the arable layer at depths of 0–20 cm and distances of 5, 20, 50, and 100 m from the edge of the roadway. Soil samples were taken in triplicate using a special cane with a diameter of 4 cm. Soil samples were collected for the biochemical analyses, sieved through a 2 mm sieve, and stored at 4 °C according to the principles specified in ISO 18400 [32]. Soil samples for physicochemical analyses were dried at room temperature and then ground in a soil mill. Each sample was assayed using three replications.
The physicochemical analyses consisted of the determination of the following parameters: pHKCl, content of total organic carbon (TOC), and total nitrogen (TN). To assess the degree of traffic-generated soil pollution, total cadmium and lead (Cd and Pb) and the total content of 14 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (Σ14PAHs) were determined in the collected samples. pHKCl was determined by the potentiometric method in a 1-mol·dm−3 KCl (1:2.5) solution [33]. TOC was determined by the Tiurin method [34] through the combustion of soil samples using a TOC-VCSH apparatus with an SSM-5000A module (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan). TN was determined by the modified Kjeldahl method using a Kjeltech TM 8100 distillation unit (Foss, Copenhagen, Denmark) [35]. The total content of HMs (Cd and Pb) was determined using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) on an optical emission spectrometer (PS 950 ICP-OES, Teledyne Leeman Labs, Hudson, NY, USA) after ashing the soil at 450 °C and digesting it in an aqua regia solution (HCl-HNO3 at a 3:1 ratio). Determination of Σ14PAHs was performed by an HLPC method on a liquid chromatograph (ThermoSeparation Product, Waltham, MA, USA) with UV detection (254 nm) [36].
Biochemical analyses were conducted to determine the activity of the following soil enzymes: dehydrogenases (EC 1.1), neutral phosphatase (EC 3.1.3), and urease (EC 3.5.1.5). These enzymes catalyze the carbon (dehydrogenases), nitrogen (urease), and phosphorus (neutral phosphatase) cycling processes in ecosystems. The methodology for determination of the soil enzymatic activity was based on a detailed study conducted by Schinner et al. [37] and Dick [38]. Table 2 shows the classification of the soil enzymes tested (EC); their acronyms, substrates, and products used in the assays; and the units used for analytical data.
The activity of dehydrogenases (ADh) was determined by Thalmann’s method [37] using a 1% solution of 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) as a substrate. The determination of neural phosphatase activity (APh) was performed according to Tabatabai and Bremner [37] using a 0.8% disodium p-nitrophenyl phosphate solution as a substrate in pH 6.5 buffer. Urease activity (AU) was determined using Zantua and Bremner’s method [37] and a 2.5% urea solution as a substrate. The activities of the enzymes were determined by the colorimetric method with a CECIL CE 2011 spectrophotometer (Cecil Instrumentation Ltd., Cambridge, UK) at the following wavelengths: λ = 485 nm for dehydrogenases, λ = 410 nm for urease, and λ = 410 nm for neutral phosphatase.

2.3. Statistics

A statistical analysis of the results was carried out using Microsoft Office Excel 2010 and the package Statistica 14.1 PL (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). Descriptive statistics included arithmetic means and standard deviation for individual parameters. A statistical evaluation of the variability of the results was performed using a two-factor analysis of variance. The significance of differences between mean values was verified using Tukey’s HSD post hoc test at a significance level of p ≤ 0.05. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess the normality of the data. The value of Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient (r) was calculated for selected parameters with a significance level of p < 0.05. A maximum of 5% scatter between measurements in the chemical analysis was assumed in the study. In addition, regression models were determined between the tested soil properties and (I) the distance from the road edge and (II) changes in the mobility of the population and the transport of goods in 2017–2021.

3. Results

3.1. Reaction of the Studied Soils

The pHKCl values of soils varied from 3.86 to 7.28, indicating a wide range of pH from very acidic to alkaline (Table 3). An increase in the acidity of soils was observed as one moved away from the edge of the roadway. In soils close to the road (5 and 20 m), pHKCl values were generally significantly higher than at a distance of 100 m (within the range of 0.52–2.64 units in 1 mol KCl dm−3). During the study period, there were no statistically significant differences in pHKCl values (Table 3).

3.2. Organic Carbon and Total Nitrogen Content

The analyzed sites varied in TOC and TN content. They contained from 6.38 to 10.28 gTOC kg−1 and 0.42 to 1.15 gTN kg−1. According to the criteria of the European Soil Bureau Network (ESBN), the tested soils were generally characterized by very low TOC content [39]. Soils located at a distance of 5 m from the edge of the road had the lowest TOC and TN contents. The values of these parameters increased (statistically significantly in general) with the distance from the bituminous pavement (Table 4 and Table 5). At a distance of 100 m from the edge of the roadway, TOC levels were about 14–42% higher and TN levels were about 25–86% higher than in the immediate vicinity of the bituminous pavement. As in the case of pHKCl, there was no statistically significant variation in the content of TOC and TN (Table 4 and Table 5) during the analyzed period.

3.3. Cadmium and Lead Content

Cd and Pb contents in the studied soils ranged from 0.25 to 0.63 mgCd kg−1 and from 13.8 to 34.9 mgPb kg−1 (Table 6 and Table 7). The factors significantly modifying cadmium and lead contents in the studied soils were the distance from the edge of the roadway. The highest Cd and Pb contents were recorded in soils at distances of 5 m and 20 m from the edge of the roadway. They decreased statistically significantly at 50 m and 100 m from the road.
There was a decrease in the amount of Cd content in 2020 (the year of major COVID-19 restrictions) and then an increase in 2021. However, the recorded differences were generally not statistically significant except for the soils in Skorzeszyce and Łuszczów Kolonia (Table 6). In the case of Pb, the highest content in soils was recorded in 2017, followed by a subsequent decrease, but the differences were not statistically significant (Table 7).

3.4. Content of PAHs

The contents of Σ14PAHs in the studied soils ranged from 349.4 to 1328.6 μgkg−1 (Table 8). The modifying factors of Σ14PAH contents in the studied soils were the distance from the edge of the roadway and years of study. The highest Σ14PAHs contents were recorded in soils at 5 m from the edge of the roadway (Table 8). In soils located 50 m and 100 m from the edge of road, Σ14PAHs levels were more than 50% lower than in soils in the immediate vicinity of asphalt roads (5 m and 20 m).
After analyzing changes in Σ14PAHs in the analyzed soils from 2017 to 2021, the lowest content of these xenobiotics was found in the year of the lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., 2020. This effect was most pronounced in the soils of the observation plots located at distances of 5 and 20 m from the edge of the roadway. For most sites, except Skorzeszyce and Albertów, these differences were statistically significant (Table 8). In 2021, the content of Σ14PAHs in the investigated soils increased and was at a similar level to 2019. The results indicate a short-term effect of the pandemic on the reduction of contamination by PAHs of soils located along traffic routes.

3.5. Enzymatic Activity

ADh, APh, and AU showed pandemic-related variations according to the type of enzyme, location, distance from the edge of the roadway, and years of study (Table 9, Table 10 and Table 11).
ADh ranged from 0.80 to 4.85 mg TPF kg−1 24 h−1 (Table 9). The distance from the edge of the roadway significantly affected the activity of these enzymes. The highest ADh values were determined in soils located 100 m from the road. In 2020, an increase in ADh was found compared to other years, with statistically significant differences noted for only the Piekoszów and Skorzeszyce sites (Table 9).
APh ranged from 5.64 to 14.56 mmol PNP kg−1 h−1 (Table 10). The distance from the edge of the roadway significantly affected the activity of these enzymes. The highest APh values were found in soils 100 m from the edge of the road. In the year of the outbreak of the pandemic in Europe (2020), there was a significant increase in APh compared to other years. Only the Marcinkowice site did not show statistically significant differences (Table 10).
AU ranged from 8.62 to 17.40 mg N-NH4+ kg−1 h−1 (Table 11). The distance from the edge of the roadway significantly affected the result. AU at 5 m and 20 m from the edge of the pavement was significantly higher than at 100 m away. Restrictions on vehicular transport associated with epidemic restrictions had a different effect on the direction and severity of changes in AU than ADh and APh. In 2020–2021 (under the conditions of reduced input of automotive pollutants into the soil environment), AU was lower than in 2017–2019 (Table 11). However, significant differences were observed only in the Marcinkowice and Skorzeszyce locations.

4. Discussion

Technological development and globalization are significantly influencing the expansion of transportation routes, and the rise in people’s standard of living has intensified transportation by passenger cars [40]. The negative impact of automobile transportation on soils, including agricultural soils, is associated with environmental pollution by HMs and PAHs, among others [22,41,42]. The protection and monitoring of agricultural soils, including agricultural land along roads, are related to the European Union’s broad environmental policy. Healthy agricultural soils and cleaner, more sustainable transportation are key elements to achieving the European Green Deal goals of climate neutrality, restoration of biodiversity, healthy and sustainable food systems, and a resilient environment [20].

4.1. Effect of Distance from Road Edge

The values of physicochemicals (pHKCl, TOC, and TN), biochemicals (ADh, AU, and APh), and Σ14PAHs, Cd, and Pb varied over a wide range and primarily according to the distance from the edge of the road (Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7, Table 8, Table 9, Table 10 and Table 11). This was confirmed by the multivariate regression analysis (Figure 2).
During the study period, an increase in soil acidity was observed as one moved away from the edge of the roadway. In soils close to it, pHKCl values were significantly higher than at 100 m from the road. A similar relationship was shown by other studies [43,44]. According to them, the alkalinization of soils near roads is related to alkaline dust precipitation and the use of slip-control agents in winter.
Werkenthin et al. [45] showed that the range of impact of alkalizing deposition on the soil environment from pavement abrasion and brake linings does not exceed 5–10 m. However, Cunningham et al. [43] noted elevated sodium contents as far as 150 m from paved surfaces. According to Green et al. [46] and Gavrichkova et al. [44], 20–90% of applied road salts enter the roadside environment through direct infiltration, surface runoff, spray or aerosol fallout, and flushing from vegetation. This causes changes in the saturation of the sorption complex with base cations, disrupting natural biogeochemical cycles, and consequently raising the pH of soils [44,46]. The accumulation of base cations depends primarily on the content of clay particles in the soil and their associated negative charges [43,47], and it has been observed that reduced infiltration is a common phenomenon in roadside soils [48].
TOC and TN contents in soils increased with distance from the edge of the road, and the change was statistically significant in general. The influx of automotive pollutants and increased salinity of the soil environment had a significant effect on the decrease in TOC and TN contents in soils near roads compared to sites 100 m from roads. The contaminants of roadside soils (mainly chloride salts, HMs, and PAHs) negatively affected the processes of carbon and nitrogen accumulation and their transformation in the soil environment. They reduced the abundance, diversity, and activity of soil microorganisms and stimulated the solubility of soil organic matter and thus its mineralization and potential gas or leaching losses [49,50]. The negative correlation demonstrated between pHKCl and TOC content (r = −0.61) and TN content (r = −0.49) indirectly confirms the presence of this mechanism.
The soil TOC reservoir had a decisive effect on the TN pool (r = 0.97) (Table 12). The decrease in soil organic matter undoubtedly also had an effect on the decrease in TN content in roadside soils [50]. Changes in pH due to soil salinity near roads in the long term may also affect the rate of key microbial N-transformation processes (ammonification and nitrification) by slowing or even inhibiting them [46,51]. The long-term effects of winter slip-control agents also exacerbate leaching of nitrate (V) and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) compounds from soils in the vicinity of roads [46,48].
The highest Cd and Pb contents in soils were found in the immediate vicinity of the roadway (5 m and 20 m). The amounts of HM in soils decreased significantly with increasing distance from the road. Other studies on soils subjected to vehicular transport pressure also observed a decrease in the amount of HM with the distance from transportation routes [22,29,45,52,53]. According to Krailertrattanachai et al. [53], a safe distance for agricultural production should be greater than 10 m from the edge of the road. In contrast, da Silva et al. [50] analyzed literature data and found that most metals are deposited up to 20 m from the edge of the roadway, with the possibility of dispersion up to 100–200 m away. This depends on the terrain, traffic volume, rainfall totals, and wind speed and direction [50,52,54].
Trace elements of the automotive origin are more mobile in the roadside zone, which is primarily due to their interaction with salts used for slush-slippage control and the activation of mechanisms related to the ion exchange, formation of complexes with chlorides, and dispersion of colloids [55]. Elevated salinity can also lead to the release of previously adsorbed HMs and enhance their transport to the surrounding area [56,57]. HMs accumulating in the roadside belt or moving into agroecosystems are extremely dangerous due to the possibility of their secondary activation and bioaccumulation in human, plant, and animal tissues [58,59]. At the same time, it should be emphasized that the determined contents of Cd and Pb did not exceed the lowest permissible contents, causing risks of particular importance for the protection of the Earth’s surface specified in the Regulation of the Minister of Environment of 1 September 2016 [60]. They can be used for all horticultural and agricultural crops in accordance with the principles of rational use of agricultural production space.
The highest Σ14PAH contents in soils were recorded at 5 m from the edge of the roadway, decreasing significantly with distance. Other studies also reported significantly higher PAH contents in soils directly influenced by transportation [22,61,62]. Futa et al. [22] and Yang et al. [63] noted that ΣPAH contents in agricultural soils decreased exponentially with increasing distance from transportation routes. On the other hand, Zhang et al. [62] showed that Σ16PAH contents in agricultural soils at 0 m and 20 m points from the edge of the roadway were similar to each other. From 20 m to 50 m, Σ16PAH amounts increased with distance, while from 50 m to 250 m, Σ16PAH concentrations gradually decreased with increasing distance, reaching a minimum value at 250 m. PAH concentrations at 0 m and 20 m were lower than those at 50 m, which was because the foliage of the roadside trees in spring hindered the diffusion of pollutants [62].
The highest concentration at 50 m is mainly due to the transfer of particulate matter and aerosols generated by vehicle exhaust and the impact of runoff after heavy rainfall [64,65]. The PAH concentrations in soils are not only related to their input from exogenous sources, but also to soil properties, including organic carbon content, nitrogen content, and pH. These factors affect the losses, including sorption and desorption, transport, leaching, volatilization, biological uptake, and decomposition [66]. However, our study showed no correlation between Σ14PAHs and pHKCl, TOC, and TN (Table 12). The highest amounts of Σ14PAHs, cadmium, and lead accumulated in the immediate vicinity of the edge of roadways, indicating the need to monitor and protect this area of agroecosystems from the potential negative impacts of traffic routes.
The distance from the edge of the roadway significantly affected soil enzyme activity, and the direction and intensity of changes depended on the type of enzyme. The highest values of ADh and APh were found in soils located 100 m from the edge of the road. The reason for the impaired activity of ADh and APh in soils located in the immediate vicinity of traffic routes was the increased influx of automotive pollutants and salt into the soil environment for de-icing roads. Salinity as well as HMs and PAHs contained in exhaust gases and road dust negatively affect the abundance and activity of microorganisms, disrupting their basic physiological functions and primary processes related to the decomposition and transformation of organic matter [67,68].
It is well known that soil microorganisms are mainly responsible for the biosynthesis of soil enzymes [69,70]. Data presented by many studies confirm the particular sensitivity of dehydrogenases and phosphatases to HM and PAH contamination of the soil environment [22,26]. Their activity can be used as an indicator of soil environment contamination with these xenobiotics [71,72,73].
In contrast, AU at 5 m and 20 m from the edge of the pavement was significantly higher than at 100 m away. The pHKCl of the soils developed in a similar way. According to previous research, urease activity is usually positively correlated with soil pH [74,75]. In this study, the correlation analysis performed did not show such a relationship.

4.2. Impact of Traffic Restrictions Caused by COVID-19 Pandemic

Traffic and automobile transport restrictions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly affect the pH, TOC, and TN (Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5). Under the conditions of cultivated fields, the factors modifying pH, TOC, and TN may have been agrotechnical treatments. The multivariate regression analysis did not show significant correlations between the soil parameters and the years of the study [76]. In addition, the multiple regression analysis carried out did not show any significant changes in the tested soil parameters during the research period (2017–2021).
Between 2017 and 2021, the lowest contents of Σ14PAHs were found in 2020, the year with the greatest COVID-19 restrictions. In the discussed year, a decrease (not statistically significant) in the amount of Cd in soils was also observed. This effect was most pronounced at 5 and 20 m from the edge of the roadway. In 2021, the contents of these xenobiotics increased and were at similar levels to those in 2019. The results indicate a short-term effect of the pandemic on the reduction of contamination by PAHs, and, to a lesser extent, the Cd of soils located along traffic routes.
The results are supported by data published by the Polish Organization of Petroleum Industry and Trade (POPiHN), which is associated with 56% of fuel stations in Poland [77,78]. These data show that in 2020, there was a slump in liquid fuel sales related to the COVID-19 pandemic, with a 35% drop in April 2020 compared to April 2019. For the whole year, the average decrease in the growth rate of fuel sales at stations was 8.4% (8% for diesel, 8% for gasoline, and 12% for autogas) [77]. In 2021, there was a recovery of the fuel market in Poland and worldwide. Sales of gasoline increased by 11% compared to the previous year, while diesel sales increased by 7%, and autogas sales increased by 2% [78]. However, there was a downward trend in the amount of Pb, which may have been related to a reduction in emissions of Pb compounds from exhaust gases. Industrial incineration processes, coal combustion, and petrol-powered vehicles are the main sources of the PAHs and Cd, while Pb mainly originates from historical accumulation and the use of Pb-enriched petrol [79]. The introduction of tetraethyl lead and tetramethyl lead as an agent to increase the acetate number and prevent engine knocking has made the commute routes the main source of these metals [80,81].
Despite the fact that lead fuels have been unavailable in Poland since 2005, the accumulation of the metal in earlier years was so high that even limiting its content in fuel did not result in a significant decrease in its concentration in the soil. This is due to the fact that lead is not very mobile in soils, and at pH > 6.5, it becomes immobilized [80]. The correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between Σ14PAHs and Cd (r = 0.75), and a negative one for Σ14PAHs with Pb (r= −0.47).
In the year of the outbreak in Europe (2020), there was an increase in ADh and Aph compared to other years. The greatest differences were noted near transportation routes. The reason was the reduced influx into the soil environment of PAHs contained in exhaust fumes and road dust, which inhibit the biosynthesis of enzymes by soil microorganisms. Our study showed a negative correlation between ADh and Σ14PAHs (r = −0.40). The significance of dehydrogenases as a pollution indicator is supported by their lack of ability to accumulate in the extracellular environment since they are found in only living intact cells [82]. In 2021, the activity of dehydrogenases and neutral phosphatase was at a similar level to that in 2017–2019. This was influenced by the increase in vehicles on the roads and the associated increased influx of PAHs into the soil environment. The obtained results show that the reduction in road pollution triggers an immediate, positive reaction of the soil environment.
Restrictions on automobile transport associated with epidemic restrictions had a different effect on the direction and severity of changes in AU compared to ADh and APh. In 2020–2021 (with reduced automotive pollutants), AU was lower than in 2017–2019. Our study showed a positive correlation between AU, Cd (r = 0.72), and Σ14PAHs (r = 0.40) (Table 12). Urease is resistant to external factors and an increase in its activity is observed even in extreme conditions [83]. The high resistance of urease to anthropogenic pollutants (HMs and PAHs) was also shown by other studies [22,26]. Based on AU, the degree of anthropogenization of the soil environment can be assessed [84].
The activity of soil enzymes is also influenced by the species composition of the plant cover [23]. According to many authors [85,86,87], root secretions are a good source of nutrients for microorganisms, mainly living in the rhizosphere. During growth, roots produce organic and inorganic compounds, as well as active substances, which foster the growth of many enzyme-producing microbes. By creating an artificial simplified rhizosphere, Renella et al. [86] demonstrated that root secretions, such as glucose, glutamic acid, citric acid, and oxalic acid have a significant effect on the activation of microbial development. Root secretions affect both the growth of soil microorganisms and their adaptation to the decomposition of contaminants, which is particularly important in areas transformed by man [87]. However, it should be remembered that the effect of higher plants on soil enzymes depends on the chemical composition of the plant, which, even in the case of root secretions alone, may be different in different types, species, and even varieties [23,88]. The research shows that the assessment of soil quality and health should include tests of enzymatic activity. Determining the content of xenobiotics in soil does not reflect the real ecotoxicological risk associated with their presence in the environment. However, soil enzymes reflect the level of environmental contamination that threatens living organisms without identifying multiple compounds [22,87,89].

5. Conclusions

This study monitored cultivated soils along transportation routes in eastern Poland in 2017–2021, and the results showed that the values of pHKCl, TOC, TN, ADh, AU, APh, Σ14PAHs, Cd, and Pb primarily varied with distance from the edge of the roadway. Soil acidification increased as one moved away from the edge of the roadway. The highest amounts of Cd, Pb, and Σ14PAHs accumulated at a distance of 5–20 m from the edge of the roadway, indicating the need to monitor and protect this area of agroecosystems from the potential negative impacts of traffic routes.
The analysis showed that the reduction in motorized transport did not affect changes in the studied soils or their organic carbon, total nitrogen, and lead content. The lowest content of Σ14PAHs, and, to a lesser extent, Cd was found in 2020. The reduced influx of xenobiotics into the soil environment inhibited the enzyme biosynthesis by soil microorganisms and stimulated ADh and APh. In the following year (2021), the amounts of xenobiotics and enzyme activities were similar to levels in 2019. The obtained results show that the reduction in road pollution triggers an immediate, positive reaction of the soil environment. The impact of the restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic on the chemical and enzymatic properties of soils is noteworthy, even if it was too short to bring measurable environmental effects. The conducted research points to the need to reduce pollution from the transport sector. This is extremely important because both healthy soils and sustainable transport are among the 17 Sustainable Development Goals in the 2030 Agenda.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.Z., M.Z. and B.F.; methodology, E.Z. and B.F.; software, M.Z.; formal analysis, E.Z.; resources, M.Z.; data curation, E.Z. and M.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, E.Z.; writing—review and editing, B.F.; visualization, A.M.-P.; supervision, A.M.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection. The Impact of Economic Constraints Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Level of Air Pollution Concentrations in 2020; Główny Inspektorat Ochrony Srodowiska: Warsaw, Poland, 2021. (In Polish)
  2. Vanelli, M.; Signorelli, C.; De Sanctis, V. Foreword: Research in times of pandemic COVID-19. Acta Biomed. 2020, 91, 11–12. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Filonchyk, M.; Hurynovich, V.; Yan, H. Impact of Covid-19 lockdown on air quality in the Poland, Eastern Europe. Environ. Res. 2021, 198, 110454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cucinotta, D.; Vanelli, M. WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020, 91, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Świtała, M.; Łukasiewicz, A. Road freight transport companies facing the COVID-19 pandemic. Mater. Econ. Logist. J. 2021, 5, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. PIARC. COVID-19: Key Lessons for the Road and Transport Community from the Latest PIARC Webinars; Economic Studies/Project Management/Road Network Operations/Freight Transport; PIARC: Paris, France, 2020; ISBN 978-2-84060-619-2. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, L.A.; Chien, L.C.; Li, Y.; Lin, G. Nonuniform impacts of COVID-19 lockdown on air quality over the United States. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 745, 141105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Baldasano, J.M. COVID-19 lockdown effects on air quality by NO2 in the cities of Barcelona and Madrid (Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 741, 140353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lal, R.; Brevik, E.C.; Dawson, L.; Field, D.; Glaser, B.; Hartemink, A.E.; Hatano, R.; Lascelles, B.; Monger, C.; Scholten, T.; et al. Managing Soils for Recovering from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Soil Syst. 2020, 4, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Panagos, P.; Montanarella, L.; Barbero, M.; Schneegans, A.; Aguglia, L.; Jones, A. Soil priorities in the European Union. Geoderma Region. 2022, 29, e00510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bünemann, E.K.; Bongiorno, G.; Bai, Z.; Creamer, R.E.; De Deyn, G.; de Goede, R.; Brussaard, L. Soil quality—A critical review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 120, 105–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Brevik, E.C.; Pereg, L.; Steffan, J.J.; Burgess, L.C. Soil ecosystem services and human health. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2018, 5, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Veerman, C.; Pinto Correia, T.; Bastioli, C. Caring for Soil Is Caring for Life: Ensure 75% of Soils Are Healthy by 2030 for Healthy Food. People, Nature and Climate: Interim Report of the Mission Board for Soil Health and Food; European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Publications Office: Brussels, Belgium, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  14. FAO. ITPS: Status of the World’s Soil Resources (SWSR)—Main Report; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils: Rome, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lima, A.L.C.; Farrington, J.W.; Reddy, C.M. Combustion-derived polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the environment. Environ. Forensics 2005, 6, 109–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pan, H.; Lu, X.; Lei, K. A comprehensive analysis of heavy metals in urban road dust of Xi’an. China: Contamination. Source apportionment and spatial distribution. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 609, 1361–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. She, W.; Guo, L.; Gao, J.; Zhang, C.; Wu, S.; Jiao, Y.; Zhu, G. Spatial Distribution of Soil Heavy Metals and Associated Environmental Risks near Major Roads in Southern Tibet. China Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jaiswal, A.; Verma, A.; Jaiswal, P. Detrimental Effects of Heavy Metals in Soil, Plants, and Aquatic Ecosystems and in Humans. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. Oncol. 2018, 37, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bandowe, B.A.M.; Shukurov, N.; Leimer, S. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils of an industrial area in semi-arid Uzbekistan: Spatial distribution. relationship with trace metals and risk assessment. Environ. Geochem. Health 2021, 43, 4847–4861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. The European Council. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament; The European Green Deal COM/2019/640 Final; The Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Brussels, Belgium, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  21. Oleszczuk, P.; Jośko, I.; Kuśmierz, M.; Futa, B.; Wielgosz, E.; Ligęza, S.; Pranagal, J. Microbiological, biochemical and ecotoxicological evaluation of soils in the area of biochar production in relation to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon content. Geoderma 2014, 213, 502–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Futa, B.; Bielińska, E.J.; Mocek-Płóciniak, A. The use of enzymatic tests to assess the quality of arable soils along main thoroughfares in Lublin. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 2016, 61, 94–97. [Google Scholar]
  23. Błońska, E.; Lasota, J.; Zwydak, M. The relationship between soil properties, enzyme activity and land use. For. Res. Pap. 2017, 78, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Burke, D.; Weintraub, M.; Hewins, C.; Kalisz, S. Relationship between soil enzyme activities. nutrient cycling and soil fungal communities in a northern hardwood forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 795–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, M.; Markert, B.; Shen, W. Microbial biomass carbon and enzyme activities of urban soils in Beijing. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2011, 18, 958–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bielińska, E.J.; Futa, B.; Ukalska-Jaruga, A.; Weber, J.; Chmielewski, S.; Wesołowska, S.; Mocek-Płóciniak, A.; Patkowski, K.; Mielnik, L. Mutual relations between PAHs derived from atmospheric deposition, enzymatic activity, and humic substances in soils of differently urbanized areas. J. Soils Sediments 2018, 18, 2682–2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aponte, H.; Meli, P.; Butler, B.; Paolini, J.; Matus, F.; Merino, C.; Cornejo, P.; Kuzyakov, Y. Meta-analysis of heavy metal effects on soil enzyme activities. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 737, 139744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zawierucha, E. Diversity of Chemical and Biological Properties of Cultivated Soils Located along the Communication Routes. Ph.D. Thesis, Lublin, Poland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zawierucha, E.; Skowrońska, M.; Zawierucha, M. Chemical and Biological Properties of Agricultural Soils Located along Communication Routes. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. Update 2015. In International Soil Classification System for 690 Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps; Report No. 106; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kabała, C.; Charzyński, P.; Chodorowski, J.; Drewnik, M.; Glina, B.; Greinert, A.; Hulisz, P.; Jankowski, M.; Jonczak, J.; Łabaz, B.; et al. Polish soil classification: Principles, classification scheme and correlations. Soil Sci. Annu. 2019, 70, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. ISO 18400; Soil Quality. In Sampling. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
  33. ISO 10390; Soil Quality. In Determination of pH. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
  34. ISO 14235; Soil Quality. In Determination of Organic Carbon by Sulfochromic Oxidation. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
  35. ISO 13878; Soil Quality. In Determination of Total Nitrogen Content by Dry Combustion. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
  36. Oleszczuk, P.; Baran, S. Degradation of individual polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil polluted with aircraft fuel. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2003, 12, 431–437. [Google Scholar]
  37. Schinner, F.; Öhlinger, R.; Kandeler, E.; Margesin, R. (Eds.) Methods in Soil Biology; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  38. Dick, R.P. Methods of Soil Enzymology; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; 26p. [Google Scholar]
  39. Rusco, E.; Jones, R.J.; Bidoglio, G. Organic Matter in the Soils of Europe: Present Status and Future Trends; Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Joint Research Centre, European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  40. Glazener., A.; Wylie., J.; van Waas, W.; Khreis, H. The Impacts of Car-Free Days and Events on the Environment and Human Health. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2022, 9, 165–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pîrlea, E.O.; Burlacu, A. The impact of road transport on the environment. Rev. Romana Ing. Civ. 2014, 5, 95. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sugier, P.; Sugier, D. Impact of road transport on soil physicochemical characteristics and heavy metal concentrations in the bark of purple willow (Salix purpurea L.). Acta Agrobot. 2018, 71, 1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cunningham, M.A.; Snyder, E.; Yonkin, D.; Ross, M.; Elsen, T. Accumulation of deicing salts in soils in an urban environment. Urban Ecosyst. 2008, 11, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gavrichkova, O.; Brykova, R.A.; Brugnoli, E.; Pallozzi, E.; Vasenev, V.I.; Calfapietra, C.; Cheng, Z.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Liberati, D.; Moscatelli, M.C. Secondary soil salinization in urban lawns: Microbial functioning, vegetation state, and implications for carbon balance. Land Degrad. Dev. 2020, 31, 2591–2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Werkenthin, M.; Kluge, B.; Wessolek, G. Metals in European roadside soils and soil solution—A review. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 189, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Green, S.M.; Machin, R.; Cresser, M.S. Effect of long-term changes in soil chemistry induced by road salt applications on N-transformations in roadside soils. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 152, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Barbier, L.; Suaire, R.; Durickovic, I.; Laurent, J.; Simonnot, M.O. Is a Road Stormwater Retention Pond Able to Intercept Deicing Salt? Water Air Soil Pollut. 2018, 229, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shannon, T.P.; Ahler, S.J.; Mathers, A.; Ziter, C.D.; Dugan, H.A. Road salt impact on soil electrical conductivity across an urban landscape. J. Urban Ecol. 2020, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. McGuire, K.M.; Judd, K.E. Road salt chloride retention in wetland soils and effects on dissolved organic carbon export. Chem. Ecol. 2020, 36, 342–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. De Silva, S.; Ball, A.S.; Indrapala, D.V.; Reichman, S.M. Review of the interactions between vehicular emitted potentially toxic elements, roadside soils, and associated biota. Chemosphere 2021, 263, 128135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Craig, S.; Zhu, W. Impacts of deicing salt and nitrogen addition on soil nitrogen and carbon cycling in a roadside ecosystem. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2018, 229, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, M.; Zhang, H. Accumulation of heavy metals in roadside soil in urban area and the related impacting factors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Krailertrattanachai, N.; Ketrot, D.; Wisawapipat, W. The Distribution of Trace Metals in Roadside Agricultural Soils, Thailand. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rolka, E.; Żołnowski, A.C.; Sadowska, M.M. Assessment of heavy metal content in soils adjacent to the DK16-Route in Olsztyn (North-Eastern Poland). Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2020, 29, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Schuler, M.S.; Relyea, R.A. A review of the combined threats of road salts and heavy metals to freshwater systems. BioScience 2018, 68, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Findlay, S.E.G.; Kelly, V.R. Emerging indirect and long-term road salt effects on ecosystems. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1223, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kostka, A.; Strzebońska, M.; Sobczyk, M.; Zakrzewska, M.; Bochenek, A. The effect of de-icing roads with salt on the environment in Krakow (Poland). Geol. Geophys. Environ. 2019, 45, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ciarkowska, K.; Konduracka, E.; Gambus, F. Primary Soil Contaminants and Their Risks, and Their Relationship to Myocardial Infarction Susceptibility in Urban Krakow (Poland). Expo Health 2022, 14, 515–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shammi, S.A.; Salam, A.; Khan, M.A.H. Assessment of heavy metal pollution in the agricultural soils, plants, and in the atmospheric particulate matter of a suburban industrial region in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 1, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 1 September 2016 on the Method of Assessing the Pollution of the Earth’s Surface; Wydawnictwo Sejmowe: Warsaw, Poland, 2016; Volume 1395.
  61. Kumar, V.; Kothiyal, N.C. Distribution behavior and carcinogenic level of some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in roadside soil at major traffic intercepts within a developing city of India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184, 6239–6252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, X.; Lu, W.; Xu, L.; Wu, W.; Sun, B.; Fan, W.; Zheng, H.; Huang, J. Environmental Risk Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Farmland Soils near Highways: A Case Study of Guangzhou. China Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yang, J.; Sun, P.; Zhang, X.; Wei, X.-Y.; Huang, Y.-P.; Du, W.-N.; Qadeer, A.; Liu, M.; Huang, Y. Source apportionment of PAHs in roadside agricultural soils of a megacity using positive matrix factorization receptor model and compound-specific carbon isotope analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 403, 123592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kibblewhite, M.G. Contamination of agricultural soil by urban and peri-urban highways: An overlooked priority? Environ. Pollut. 2018, 242, 1331–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Markiewicz, A.; Bjorklund, K.; Eriksson, E.; Kalmykova, Y.; Stromvall, A.M.; Siopi, A. Emissions of organic pollutants from traffic and roads: Priority pollutants selection and substance flow analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 580, 1162–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Klimkowicz-Pawlas, A.; Smreczak, B.; Ukalska-Jaruga, A. The impact of selected soil organic matter fractions on the PAH accumulation in the agricultural soils from areas of different anthropopressure. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 10955–10965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Hofman, J.; Trávníčková, E.; Anděl, P. Road salts effects on soil chemical and microbial properties at grass-land and forest site in protected natural areas. Plant Soil Environ. 2012, 58, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jaworska, H.; Lemanowicz, J. Heavy metal contents and enzymatic activity in soils exposed to the impact of road traffic. Sci. Rep. 2019, 27, 19981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Tabatabai, M.A.; Dick, W.A. Enzymes in Soil. In Enzymes in the Environment: Activity, Ecology and Applications; Burns, R.G., Dick, R.P., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002; pp. 567–596. [Google Scholar]
  70. Mencel, J.; Mocek-Płóciniak, A.; Kryszak, A. Soil Microbial Community and Enzymatic Activity of Grasslands under Different Use Practices: A Review. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kaczyńska, G.; Borowik, A.; Wyszkowska, J. Soil Dehydrogenases as an Indicator of Contamination of the Environment with Petroleum Products. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015, 226, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bierza, W.; Nadgórska-Socha, A.; Małkowska, E.; Ciepał, R. Evaluation of the Soil Enzymes Activity as an Indicator of the Impact of Anthropogenic Pollution on the Norway Spruce Ecosystems in the Silesian Beskid. Ecol. Chem. Eng. A 2012, 19, 699–717. [Google Scholar]
  73. Wiatrowska, K.; Komisarek, J.; Dłużewski, P. Effects of heavy metals on the activity of dehydrogenases. phosphatases and urease in naturally and artificially contaminated soils. J. Elem. 2015, 20, 743–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Fisher, K.A.; Yarwood, S.A.; James, B.R. Soil urease activity and bacterial ureC gene copy numbers: Effect of pH. Geoderma 2017, 285, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bueis, T.; Turrión, M.B.; Bravo, F. Factors determining enzyme activities in soils under Pinus halepensis and Pinus sylvestris plantations in Spain: A basis for establishing sustainable forest management strategies. Ann. For. Sci. 2018, 75, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Stankowski, S.; Jaroszewska, A.; Osińska, B.; Tomaszewicz, T.; Gibczyńska, M. Analysis of Long-Term Effect of Tillage Systems and Pre-Crop on Physicochemical Properties and Chemical Composition of Soil. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Oil Industry and Trade. Annual Report. 2020. Available online: https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/annual-report-2020-21 (accessed on 2 February 2023).
  78. Oil Industry and Trade. Annual Report. 2021. Available online: https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/annual-report-2020-21 (accessed on 2 February 2023).
  79. Ciarkowska, K.; de Carvalho, M.; Gambus, F. Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Sources and Vertical Distribution in Soils of the AgeDiverse Brownfields of Southern Poland Using Positive Matrix Factorisation and Data Mining Model. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dmochowska, A.; Majder-Lopatka, M.; Salamonowicz, Z.; Piechota-Polanczyk, A.; Polanczyk, A. Heavy Metal Emissions from Linear Sources and Polluted Soil in The Capital City of Poland. Annu. Set Environ. Prot. 2021, 23, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhao, L.; Hu, G.; Yan, Y.; Yu, R.; Yan, Y. Source apportionment of heavy metals in urban road dust in a continental city of eastern China: Using Pb and Sr isotopes combined with multivariate statistical analysis. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 201, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lipińska, A.; Kucharski, J.; Wyszkowska, J. The effect of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on the structure of organotrophic bacteria and dehydrogenase activity in soil. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 2014, 34, 35–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gianfreda, L.; Rao, A.M.; Piotrowska, A.; Palumbo, G.; Colombo, C. Soil enzyme activities as affected by anthropogenic alterations: Intensive agricultural practices and organic pollution. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 341, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Nannipieri, P.; Kandler, E.; Ruggiero, P. Enzyme Activities and Microbiological and Biochemical Processes in Soil. In Enzymes in the Environment: Activity, Ecology and Applications; Burns, R.G., Dick, R.P., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002; pp. 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  85. Bielińska, E.J.; Kołodziej, B. The effect of common dandelion (Terraxacum officinale Web.) rhizosphere on heavy metal content and enzymatic activity on soils. Acta Hortic. 2009, 826, 345–350. [Google Scholar]
  86. Renella, G.; Egamberiyeva, D.; Landi, L.; Mench, M.; Nannipieri, P. Microbial activity and hydrolase activities during decomposition of root exudates released by an artificial root surface in Cd-contaminated soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Skowrońska, M.; Bielińska, E.J.; Szymański, K.; Futa, B.; Antonkiewicz, J.; Kołodziej, B. An integrated assessment of the long-term impact of municipal sewage sludge on the chemical and biological properties of soil. Catena 2020, 189, 104484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sawicka, B.; Krochmal-Marczak, B.; Pszczółkowski, P.; Bielińska, E.J.; Wójcikowska-Kapusta, A.; Barbaś, P.; Skiba, D. Effect of Differentiated Nitrogen Fertilization on the Enzymatic Activity of the Soil for Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas L. [Lam.]) Cultivation. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Futa, B.; Bielińska, E.J.; Ligęza, S.; Chmielewski, S.; Wesołowska, S.; Patkowski, K.; Mocek-Płóciniak, A. Enzymatic activity and content of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils under low-stack emission in Lublin. Pol. J. Soil Sci. 2017, 50, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the study area [28,29].
Figure 1. Location of the study area [28,29].
Toxics 11 00329 g001
Figure 2. Regression analysis between studied soil parameters and distance from the road edge.
Figure 2. Regression analysis between studied soil parameters and distance from the road edge.
Toxics 11 00329 g002
Table 1. Area inventory, location, soil types, and species.
Table 1. Area inventory, location, soil types, and species.
SiteRoad No.Soil Type—Particle Size Group
PiekoszówDW 761Cambisols—silt loam (SiL)
MarcinkowiceDK 74Cambisols—silt loam (SiL)
SkorzeszyceDK 74Luvisols—silt (Si)
Giełczew IIDW 835Cambisols—silt loam (SiL)
Łuszczów KoloniaDK 82Cambisols—silt loam (SiL)
AlbertówDK 82Luvisols—silt (Si)
Explanations: DK—national road; DW—provincial road.
Table 2. Determination of the activity of soil enzymes.
Table 2. Determination of the activity of soil enzymes.
EnzymesECAcronymSubstrate NameProduct NameUnit Name
DehydrogenasesEC 1.1ADh2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC)triphenyl formazane
(TPF)
mg TPF kg−1 24 h−1
Neutral
phosphatase
EC 3.1.3APhp-nitrophenyl phosphate disodiump-nitrophenol (PNP)mmol PNP kg−1 h−1
UreaseEC 3.5.1.5AUUreaN-NH4+mg N-NH4 kg−1 h−1
Table 3. The pHKCl values in soils before the COVID-19 pandemic (2017–2019) [28] and during the pandemic (2020–2021).
Table 3. The pHKCl values in soils before the COVID-19 pandemic (2017–2019) [28] and during the pandemic (2020–2021).
SiteYearsDistance from the Road Edge [m]
52050100
Piekoszów
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.239
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20176.81 ± 0.06 a6.74 ± 0.5 ab6.52 ± 0.01 bc6.29 ± 0.03 cd
20187.06 ± 0.02 a6.82 ± 0.4 ab6.64 ± 0.02 bc6.27 ± 0.03 d
20196.98 ± 0.02 a6.92 ± 0.3 a6.55 ± 0.01 b6.23 ± 0.03 bc
20206.66 ± 0.03 a6.51 ± 0.1 a6.42 ± 0.02 a6.02 ± 0.02 b
20216.99 ± 0.04 a6.88 ± 0.2 a6.51 ± 0.02 b6.27 ± 0.03 bc
Marcinkowice
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.279
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20176.82 ± 0.03 a6.82 ± 0.2 a6.72 ± 0.02 b6.12 ± 0.01 b
20186.84 ± 0.04 a6.98 ± 0.1 ab6.67 ± 0.01 b6.26 ± 0.02 d
20196.91 ± 0.02 a7.13 ± 0.2 a6.23 ± 0.02 b6.14 ± 0.03 bc
20206.75 ± 0.02 a6.63 ± 0.2 ab6.40 ± 0.02 b6.01 ± 0.02 c
20216.92 ± 0.03 a6.86 ± 0.2 a6.32 ± 0.01 b6.19 ± 0.03 bc
Skorzeszyce
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.372
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20175.55 ± 0.05 a5.32 ± 0.3 a5.71 ± 0.03 b4.28 ± 0.02 c
20185.61 ± 0.03 a5.66 ± 0.2 a5.69 ± 0.03 a4.32 ± 0.03 b
20195.86 ± 0.05 a5.67 ± 0.3 ab5.31 ± 0.02 b4.46 ± 0.02 c
20205.47 ± 0.06 a5.21 ± 0.2 a5.09 ± 0.01 a4.12 ± 0.02 b
20215.77 ± 0.04 a5.54 ± 0.1 a5.16 ± 0.01 a4.37 ± 0.02 c
Giełczew II
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.243
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20175.35 ± 0.01 a4.49 ± 0.4 bc4.04 ± 0.01 c4.28 ± 0.02 c
20185.41 ± 0.02 a4.35 ± 0.3 b4.01 ± 0.02 c4.09 ± 0.02 c
20195.63 ± 0.02 a4.47 ± 0.1 b4.12 ± 0.02 cd4.26 ± 0.04 d
20205.25 ± 0.02 a4.20 ± 0.1 b4.14 ± 0.02 b3.99 ± 0.02 bc
20215.53 ± 0.02 a4.48 ± 0.2 b4.02 ± 0.01 c3.87 ± 0.03 c
Łuszczów Kolonia
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.258
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20177.01 ± 0.03 a5.71 ± 0.2 b5.29 ± 0.02 c4.62 ± 0.02 d
20187.06 ± 0.03 a5.65 ± 0.2 b5.35 ± 0.01 c4.94 ± 0.05 d
20197.16 ± 0.03 a5.53 ± 0.2 b5.47 ± 0.01 b4.84 ± 0.03 c
20206.88 ± 0.02 a5.95 ± 0.2 b5.17 ± 0.01 c4.63 ± 0.03 d
20217.28 ± 0.02 a5.63 ± 0.2 b5.27 ± 0.02 c4.64 ± 0.02 d
Albertów
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.207
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20175.81 ± 0.02 a5.60 ± 0.3 a4.62 ± 0.02 b3.99 ± 0.01 c
20186.13 ± 0.03 a5.38 ± 0.3 b4.74 ± 0.02 c3.86 ± 0.02 d
20195.95 ± 0.04 a5.56 ± 0.2 b4.86 ± 0.02 c3.95 ± 0.01 d
20205.97 ± 0.01 a5.44 ± 0.4 b4.58 ± 0.01 c4.03 ± 0.04 d
20216.09 ± 0.04 a5.72 ± 0.2 b4.60 ± 0.01 c3.91 ± 0.02 d
Explanation: a–d—different letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 (LDS for distance from the road edge); n.s.—not significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 4. Organic carbon content (TOC in g kg−1) in soils before the COVID-19 pandemic (2017–2019) [28] and during the pandemic (2020–2021).
Table 4. Organic carbon content (TOC in g kg−1) in soils before the COVID-19 pandemic (2017–2019) [28] and during the pandemic (2020–2021).
SiteYearsDistance from the Road Edge [m]
52050100
Piekoszów
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.195
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20176.41 ± 0.03 a6.90 ± 0.01 b6.96 ± 0.02 b7.26 c
20186.58 ± 0.01 a6.96 ± 0.01 b7.26 ± 0.01 c7.34 c
20196.62 ± 0.03 a6.70 ± 0.02 a7.34 ± 0.03 b7.43 b
20206.38 ± 0.02 a6.82 ± 0.02 b7.20 ± 0.01 c7.28 c
20216.51 ± 0.02 a6.78 ± 0.02 b7.12 ± 0.02 c7.30 c
Marcinkowice
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.274
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20177.10 ± 0.02 a7.68 ± 0.02 b9.47 ± 0.01 c9.78 d
20186.98 ± 0.02 a7.72 ± 0.01 b9.60 ± 0.00 c9.84 c
20197.12 ± 0.01 a7.34 ± 0.01 a9.82 ± 0.02 b9.86 b
20206.92 ± 0.02 a7.40 ± 0.01 b9.20 ± 0.02 c9.82 d
20217.08 ± 0.01 a7.65 ± 0.02 b9.44 ± 0.02 c9.90 d
Skorzeszyce
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.186
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20178.38 ± 0.02 a8.68 ± 0.02 b9.58 ± 0.02 c9.48 c
20188.45 ± 0.02 a8.80 ± 0.02 b9.52 ± 0.01 c9.58 c
20198.52 ± 0.02 a8.64 ± 0.00 a9.64 ± 0.01 b9.76 b
20208.29 ± 0.02 a8.52 ± 0.01 b9.41 ± 0.01 c9.52 c
20218.34 ± 0.02 a8.74 ± 0.01 b9.60 ± 0.03 c9.70 c
Giełczew II
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.236
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20178.10 ± 0.01 a8.28 ± 0.01 a9.20 ± 0.01 b9.24 b
20187.96 ± 0.02 a8.34 ± 0.02 b9.32 ± 0.00 c9.28 c
20197.98 ± 0.01 a8.04 ± 0.02 a8.92 ± 0.01 b8.94 b
20207.90 ± 0.01 a8.20 ± 0.00 b9.26 ± 0.02 c9.30 c
20217.95 ± 0.02 a8.26 ± 0.02 b9.04 ± 0.02 c9.12 c
Łuszczów Kolonia
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.337
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20177.76 ± 0.02 a8.37 ± 0.02 b9.40 ± 0.02 c9.86 d
20187.82 ± 0.02 a8.30 ± 0.01 b10.28 ± 0.02 c9.82 d
20197.91 ± 0.01 a8.36 ± 0.01 b9.96 ± 0.01 c9.97 c
20207.74 ± 0.02 a8.30 ± 0.01 b9.52 ± 0.02 c9.90 d
20217.80 ± 0.01 a8.24 ± 0.01 b9.96 ± 0.00 c9.88 c
Albertów
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.206
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20178.72 ± 0.02 a9.26 ± 0.02 b9.32 ± 0.03 b9.38 b
20188.74 ± 0.01 a8.91 ± 0.01 a9.50 ± 0.03 b9.32 b
20198.80 ± 0.01 a8.92 ± 0.02 a9.68 ± 0.01 b9.36 c
20208.68 ± 0.02 a8.84 ± 0.01 a9.45 ± 0.03 b9.40 b
20218.70 ± 0.01 a8.90 ± 0.00 a9.62 ± 0.01 b9.42 b
Explanation: a–d—different letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 (LDS for distance from the road edge); n.s.—not significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 5. Total nitrogen content (TN in g kg−1) in soils before the COVID-19 pandemic (2017–2019) [28] and during the pandemic (2020–2021).
Table 5. Total nitrogen content (TN in g kg−1) in soils before the COVID-19 pandemic (2017–2019) [28] and during the pandemic (2020–2021).
SiteYearsDistance from the Road Edge [m]
52050100
Piekoszów
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.033
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20170.43 ± 0.02 a0.49 ± 0.02 b0.74 ± 0.01 c0.75 ± 0.01 c
20180.42 ± 0.01 a0.51 ± 0.01 b0.76 ± 0.02 c0.78 ± 0.02 c
20190.44 ± 0.02 a0.52 ± 0.02 b0.78 ± 0.01 c0.80 ± 0.01 c
20200.45 ± 0.01 a0.52 ± 0.02 b0.78 ± 0.02 c0.80 ± 0.02 c
20210.42 ± 0.01 a0.49 ± 0.01 b0.74 ± 0.01 c0.76 ± 0.01 c
Marcinkowice
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.035
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20170.62 ± 0.02 a0.66 ± 0.02 b1.02 ± 0.02 c1.04 ± 0.02 c
20180.64 ± 0.01 a0.68 ± 0.02 b1.04 ± 0.01 c1.06 ± 0.02 c
20190.65 ± 0.02 a0.69 ± 0.01 b1.06 ± 0.01 c1.08 ± 0.02 c
20200.66 ± 0.02 a0.67 ± 0.02 a1.05 ± 0.01 b1.08 ± 0.02 b
20210.62 ± 0.02 a0.64 ± 0.01 a1.02 ± 0.01 b1.04 ± 0.01 b
Skorzeszyce
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.032
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20170.69 ± 0.01 a0.76 ± 0.01 b1.02 ± 0.02 c1.04 ± 0.01 c
20180.69 ± 0.01 a0.80 ± 0.01 b1.04 ± 0.02 c1.06 ± 0.01 c
20190.67 ± 0.01 a0.82 ± 0.02 b1.05 ± 0.02 c1.08 ± 0.01 c
20200.70 ± 0.01 a0.81 ± 0.01 b1.04 ± 0.00 c1.08 ± 0.02 c
20210.67 ± 0.01 a0.78 ± 0.01 b1.02 ± 0.02 c1.04 ± 0.00 c
Giełczew II
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.041
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20170.70 ± 0.02 a0.72 ± 0.00 a0.96 ± 0.01 b0.98 ± 0.01 b
20180.68 ± 0.01 a0.75 ± 0.02 b0.90 ± 0.01 c0.95 ± 0.01 d
20190.64 ± 0.02 a0.70 ± 0.00 b0.94 ± 0.00 c0.92 ± 0.02 c
20200.69 ± 0.03 a0.72 ± 0.03 a0.94 ± 0.02 b0.98 ± 0.00 b
20210.65 ± 0.02 a0.70 ± 0.02 b0.92 ± 0.02 c0.97 ± 0.02 c
Łuszczów Kolonia
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.046
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20170.64 ± 0.02 a0.69 ± 0.02 b1.04 ± 0.01 c1.08 ± 0.03 c
20180.67 ± 0.01 a0.72 ± 0.01 b1.05 ± 0.01 c1.10 ± 0.02 d
20190.68 ± 0.02 a0.70 ± 0.00 a1.12 ± 0.02 b1.15 ± 0.02 b
20200.66 ± 0.01 a0.69 ± 0.02 a1.06 ± 0.01 b1.12 ± 0.03 c
20210.64 ± 0.02 a0.68 ± 0.01 a1.04 ± 0.01 b1.08 ± 0.02 b
Albertów
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.045
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20170.76 ± 0.01 a0.80 ± 0.01 a0.96 ± 0.01 b0.98 ± 0.02 b
20180.74 ± 0.01 a0.76 ± 0.01 a0.98 ± 0.01 b0.99 ± 0.02 b
20190.70 ± 0.03 a0.74 ± 0.01 a0.98 ± 0.01 b0.98 ± 0.02 b
20200.78 ± 0.01 a0.82 ± 0.02 a0.98 ± 0.00 b0.98 ± 0.02 b
20210.72 ± 0.01 a0.74 ± 0.01 a0.96 ± 0.02 b0.98 ± 0.01 b
Explanation: a–d—different letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 (LDS for distance from the road edge); n.s.—not significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 6. Cadmium content (Cd in mgkg−1) in soils before the COVID-19 pandemic (2017–2019) [28,29] and during the pandemic (2020–2021).
Table 6. Cadmium content (Cd in mgkg−1) in soils before the COVID-19 pandemic (2017–2019) [28,29] and during the pandemic (2020–2021).
SiteYearsDistance from the Road Edge [m]
52050100
Piekoszów
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.042
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20170.45 ± 0.01 a0.38 ± 0.02 b0.31 ± 0.02 c0.30 ± 0.01 c
20180.46 ± 0.00 a0.39 ± 0.01 b0.34 ± 0.01 c0.29 ± 0.03 c
20190.50 ± 0.02 a0.41 ± 0.02 b0.37 ± 0.03 bc0.33 ± 0.01 c
20200.45 ± 0.02 a0.36 ± 0.03 b0.30 ± 0.01 c0.27 ± 0.01 c
20210.48 ± 0.01 a0.39 ± 0.01 b0.35 ± 0.00 bc0.32 ± 0.01 c
Marcinkowice
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.035
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20170.38 ± 0.03 a0.36 ± 0.01 a0.30 ± 0.01 b0.26 ± 0.03 c
20180.41 ± 0.01 a0.38 ± 0.02 a0.32 ± 0.01 b0.29 ± 0.02 b
20190.42 ± 0.01 a0.40 ± 0.00 a0.33 ± 0.02 b0.30 ± 0.01 b
20200.40 ± 0.01 a0.37 ± 0.01 a0.33 ± 0.02 b0.28 ± 0.00 c
20210.42 ± 0.02 a0.39 ± 0.01 ab0.36 ± 0.03 b0.32 ± 0.02 c
Skorzeszyce
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.049
LDS0.05 for years = 0.034
20170.34 ± 0.02 aAB0.31 ± 0.02 abA0.28 ± 0.02 bcA0.26 ± 0.00 cAB
20180.36 ± 0.04 aB0.33 ± 0.02 abAB0.30 ± 0.00 bcAB0.26 ± 0.02 cAB
20190.41 ± 0.01 aC0.35 ± 0.01 bB0.33 ± 0.01 bcB0.29 ± 0.02 cB
20200.31 ± 0.02 aA0.30 ± 0.02 aA0.28 ± 0.03 abA0.25 ± 0.01 cA
20210.39 ± 0.01 aBC0.36 ± 0.01 aB0.31 ± 0.00 bAB0.27 ± 0.02 cAB
Giełczew II
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.037
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20170.40 ± 0.02 a0.39 ± 0.03 a0.32 ± 0.02 b0.31 ± 0.01 b
20180.42 ± 0.01 a0.41 ± 0.01 a0.33 ± 0.03 b0.28 ± 0.01 c
20190.43 ± 0.02 a0.42 ± 0.00 a0.37 ± 0.00 b0.33 ± 0.02 c
20200.42 ± 0.01 a0.40 ± 0.01 a0.31 ± 0.00 b0.30 ± 0.01 b
20210.44 ± 0.01 a0.41 ± 0.00 ab0.38 ± 0.01 b0.32 ± 0.01 c
Łuszczów Kolonia
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.044
LDS0.05 for years = 0.028
20170.60 ± 0.03 aB0.58 ± 0.02 aA0.53 ± 0.02 bA0.52 ± 0.03 bA
20180.59 ± 0.02 aAB0.61 ± 0.02 aB0.54 ± 0.04 bA0.54 ± 0.02 bAB
20190.63 ± 0.02 aC0.62 ± 0.01 aB0.57 ± 0.02 bB0.56 ± 0.02 bB
20200.57 ± 0.01 aA0.55 ± 0.01 abC0.52 ± 0.02 bcA0.50 ± 0.01 cAC
20210.62 ± 0.02 aBC0.61 ± 0.01 aB0.56 ± 0.03 bC0.54 ± 0.02 cAB
Albertów
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.043
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20170.35 ± 0.01 a0.29 ± 0.01 b0.26 ± 0.02 bc0.24 ± 0.02 c
20180.37 ± 0.03 a0.33 ± 0.03 a0.28 ± 0.01 bc0.26 ± 0.02 c
20190.40 ± 0.01 a0.35 ± 0.03 b0.33 ± 0.02 b0.26 ± 0.00 c
20200.39 ± 0.00 a0.34 ± 0.02 ab0.30 ± 0.01 b0.25 ± 0.03 c
20210.42 ± 0.01 a0.36 ± 0.02 b0.29 ± 0.02 c0.27 ± 0.02 c
Explanation: a–c—different letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 (LDS for distance from the road edge); A–C—different letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 (LDS for years 2017–2021); n.s.—not significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 7. Lead content (Pb in mgkg−1) in soils before the COVID-19 pandemic (2017–2019) [28,29] and during the pandemic (2020–2021).
Table 7. Lead content (Pb in mgkg−1) in soils before the COVID-19 pandemic (2017–2019) [28,29] and during the pandemic (2020–2021).
SiteYearsDistance from the Road Edge [m]
52050100
Piekoszów
LDS0.05 for distance = 3.36
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
201724.3 ± 0.13 a23.9 ± 0.32 a19.4 ± 0.23 b18.6 ± 0.25 b
201823.9 ± 0.06 a20.5 ± 0.71 ab18.1 ± 0.10 ab17.6 ± 0.11 b
201924.1 ± 0.05 a19.1 ± 0.58 b17.6 ± 0.19 b16.5 ± 0.35 b
202022.8 ± 0.10 a18.6 ± 0.65 b17.5 ± 0.43 b16.3 ± 0.18 b
202121.5 ± 0.12 a18.9 ± 0.87 b17.2 ± 0.19 b16.0 ± 0.15 b
Marcinkowice
LDS0.05 for distance = 3.58
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
201734.1 ± 0.04 a31.9 ± 0.57 a16.9 ± 0.31 b16.4 ± 0.30 b
201830.4 ± 0.07 a29.3 ± 0.58 a15.8 ± 0.26 b16.2 ± 0.20 b
201928.2 ± 0.07 a26.4 ± 0.50 a15.1 ± 0.23 b14.9 ± 0.19 b
202028.1 ± 0.10 a25.9 ± 0.19 a15.0 ± 0.41 b16.4 ± 0.22 b
202127.7 ± 0.21 a25.4 ± 0.32 a15.2 ± 0.18 b16.3 ± 0.21 b
Skorzeszyce
LDS0.05 for distance = 3.58
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
201735.1 ± 0.22 a31.8 ± 0.48 a26.3 ± 0.23 b23.2 ± 0.18 b
201833.0 ± 0.15 a28.3 ± 0.56 b23.9 ± 0.48 c22.6 ± 0.10 c
201932.2 ± 0.24 a27.8 ± 0.59 b21.5 ± 0.40 c20.9 ± 0.45 c
202031.9 ± 0.45 a27.6 ± 0.53 b21.3 ± 0.34 c20.7 ± 0.66 c
202131.1 ± 0.26 a27.4 ± 0.37 a21.1 ± 0.25 b20.4 ± 0.23 b
Giełczew II
LDS0.05 for distance = 3.61
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
201724.2 ± 0.34 a23.9 ± 0.23 a16.1 ± 0.05 b15.4 ± 0.51 b
201822.9 ± 0.19 a23.1 ± 0.29 a14.2 ± 0.26 b14.7 ± 0.23 b
201921.8 ± 0.08 a22.0 ± 0.41 a14.5 ± 0.37 b13.8 ± 0.52 b
202021.6 ± 0.15 a21.2 ± 0.26 a14.4 ± 0.37 b14.1 ± 0.22 b
202121.5 ± 0.36 a21.3 ± 0.31 a14.5 ± 0.29 b13.9 ± 0.31 b
Łuszczów Kolonia
LDS0.05 for distance = 4.41
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
201732.9 ± 0.11 a23.2 ± 0.63 b20.6 ± 0.50 c20.3 ± 0.40 c
201830.5 ± 0.19 a21.6 ± 0.37 b17.2 ± 0.64 c15.4 ± 0.28 c
201929.2 ± 0.22 a20.9 ± 0.24 b16.1 ± 0.63 c14.8 ± 0.31 c
202028.3 ± 0.23 a20.2 ± 0.60 b15.9 ± 0.73 c14.6 ± 0.31 c
202128.1 ± 0.19 a20.3 ± 0.18 b15.8 ± 0.32 c14.5 ± 0.19 c
Albertów
LDS0.05 for distance = 4.00
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
201733.2 ± 0.19 a30.4 ± 0.29 a23.5 ± 0.20 b23.9 ± 0.30 b
201830.4 ± 0.27 a27.8 ± 0.63 a21.1 ± 0.25 b23.2 ± 0.38 b
201928.5 ± 0.22 a25.3 ± 0.26 a20.9 ± 0.44 b19.6 ± 0.21 b
202027.9 ± 0.05 a25.9 ± 0.52 a20.8 ± 0.10 b19.4 ± 0.30 b
202128.3 ± 0.22 a25.6 ± 0.59 a20.5 ± 0.23 b19.3 ± 0.33 b
Explanation: a–c—different letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 (LDS for distance from the road edge); n.s.—not significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 8. Σ14PAHs content (Σ14PAHs in (μgkg−1, μg∙kg−1) in soils before the pandemic (2017–2019) [28] and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021).
Table 8. Σ14PAHs content (Σ14PAHs in (μgkg−1, μg∙kg−1) in soils before the pandemic (2017–2019) [28] and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021).
SiteYearsDistance from the Road Edge [m]
52050100
Piekoszów
LDS0.05 for distance = 101.10
LDS0.05 for years = 113.68
20171107.1 ± 0.74 aAB1086.8 ± 1.29 aAB460.8 ± 1.09 bA438.6 ± 1.75 bA
20181163.1 ± 0.57 aB1128.9 ± 1.12 aB511.7 ± 0.82 bA482.9 ± 0.76 bA
20191195.9 ± 1.13 aB1155.1 ± 0.86 aB523.5 ± 0.81 bA495.1 ± 1.56 bA
20201029.9 ± 0.60 aA1001.6 ± 1.01 aA480.3 ± 0.94 bA422.4 ± 0.95 bA
20211203.1 ± 0.54 aB1192.0 ± 1.40 aB512.9 ± 1.37 bA469.3 ± 1.22 bA
Marcinkowice
LDS0.05 for distance = 121.34
LDS0.05 for years = 126.81
20171063.4 ± 0.97 aAB1044.6 ± 1.21 aA456.1 ± 0.58 bAB436.8 ± 0.79 bA
20181166.5 ± 0.73 aBC1116.7 ± 0.99 aA536.2 ± 0.71 bAB501.4 ± 1.12 bA
20191200.9 ± 0.59 aC1119.5 ± 1.01 aA535.5 ± 1.00 bAB489.8 ± 1.04 bA
20201005.2 ± 1.08 aA996.9 ± 1.06 aA411.4 ± 0.67 bA413.8 ± 0.93 bA
20211241.0 ± 0.57 aC1024.3 ± 0.77 bA552.1 ± 0.77 bB490.6 ± 0.85 bA
Skorzeszyce
LDS0.05 for distance = 70.82
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20171049.2 ± 0.63 aA1015.2 ± 0.97 aA440.9 ± 1.17 bA418.7 ± 1.04 bA
20181094.8 ± 0.50 aA1063.8 ± 0.65 aA489.0 ± 0.97 bA464.7 ± 0.75 bA
20191105.8 ± 0.47 aA1068.9 ± 0.75 aA478.9 ± 1.08 bA459.0 ± 1.18 bA
2020988.5 ± 0.51 aA971.6 ± 0.76 aA433.7 ± 0.53 bA419.5 ± 0.94 bA
20211112.3 ± 1.39 aA1092.3 ± 1.09 a460.9 ± 1.12 bA424.7 ± 0.65 bA
Giełczew II
LDS0.05 for distance = 130.11
LDS0.05 for years = 142.73
20171055.5 ± 0.79 aAB1020.6 ± 1.46 aAB436.7 ± 0.89 bA421.5 ± 1.02 bA
20181155.2 ± 0.24 aAB1130.0 ± 0.57 aAB525.5 ± 0.95 bA498.0 ± 0.61 bA
20191202.2 ± 0.99 aB1165.8 ± 1.18 aB490.7 ± 0.53 bA463.1 ± 1.18 bA
20201018.7 ± 0.46 aA1004.5 ± 0.93 aA422.8 ± 1.13 bA418.5 ± 1.13 bA
20211268.4 ± 1.51 aB1190.2 ± 0.56 aB486.1 ± 0.84 bA453.2 ± 1.05 bA
Łuszczów Kolonia
LDS0.05 for distance = 112.78
LDS0.05 for years = 127.41
20171161.2 ± 1.27 aAB1130.7 ± 0.76 aAB487.4 ± 0.78 bA464.8 ± 1.54 bA
20181265.8 ± 0.92 aAB1230.4 ± 1.25 aAB581.8 ± 0.77 bA563.7 ± 0.93 bA
20191301.5 ± 1.56 aB1253.6 ± 0.77 aB582.3 ± 0.99 bA540.4 ± 1.34 bA
20201154.7 ± 0.95 aA1120.5 ± 0.61 aA491.6 ± 1.06 bA455.2 ± 0.87 bA
20211328.6 ± 0.82 aB1249.8 ± 0.54 aB573.2 ± 1.00 bA528.9 ± 1.27 bA
Albertów
LDS0.05 for distance = 97.11
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20171001.6 ± 0.72 aA957.8 ± 1.08 aA402.9 ± 0.65 bA378.9 ± 1.33 bA
20181066.3 ± 0.83 aA1024.1 ± 1.11 aA485.0 ± 0.84 bA448.4 ± 0.98 bA
20191097.9 ± 0.62 aA1040.2 ± 0.90 aA489.5 ± 0.94 bA466.9 ± 0.61 bA
2020984.9 ± 0.77 aA922.1 ± 0.60 aA392.6 ± 0.82 bA349.4 ± 1.29 bA
20211106.2 ± 0.48 aA1054.8 ± 1.00 aA459.5 ± 1.00 bA472.3 ± 1.18 bA
Explanation: a,b—different letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 (LDS for distance from the road edge); A–C—different letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 (LDS for years 2017–2021); n.s.—not significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 9. Dehydrogenase activity (ADh in mg TPF kg−1 h−1) in soils before the COVID-19 pandemic (2017–2019) [28] and during the pandemic (2020–2021).
Table 9. Dehydrogenase activity (ADh in mg TPF kg−1 h−1) in soils before the COVID-19 pandemic (2017–2019) [28] and during the pandemic (2020–2021).
SiteYearsDistance from the Road Edge [m]
52050100
Piekoszów
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.337
LDS0.05 for years = 0.554
20170.99 ± 0.04 aA1.25 ± 0.01 aA2.41 ± 0.02 bB2.45 ± 0.03 bB
20180.93 ± 0.02 aA1.17 ± 0.02 aA2.20 ± 0.01 bAB2.28 ± 0.01 bAB
20190.88 ± 0.02 aA0.94 ± 0.03 aA1.84 ± 0.02 bA1.83 ± 0.02 bA
20201.58 ± 0.02 aB2.84 ± 0.02 bB3.11 ± 0.02 cC3.28 ± 0.02 cC
20210.92 ± 0.03 aA1.05 ± 0.03 aA1.97 ± 0.03 bAB2.03 ± 0.02 bAB
Marcinkowice
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.370
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20170.93 ± 0.02 a1.20 ± 0.06 b4.08 ± 0.01 c4.76 ± 0.03 d
20180.89 ± 0.01 a1.08 ± 0.01 a3.78 ± 0.02 b4.13 ± 0.02 c
20190.80 ± 0.02 a0.95 ± 0.02 a3.16 ± 0.02 b3.37 ± 0.02 b
1.411.62 ± 0.04 a3.46 ± 0.04 b4.79 ± 0.024.81 ± 0.01 c
0.900.98 ± 0.01 a2.52 ± 0.01 b4.54 ± 0.02 c4.70 ± 0.02 d
Skorzeszyce
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.335
LDS0.05 for years = 0.729
20171.90 ± 0.02 aAB1.96 ± 0.03 aB3.73 ± 0.02 bB3.78 ± 0.01 bB
20181.59 ± 0.01 aAB1.65 ± 0.02 aAB2.92 ± 0.01 bA3.15 ± 0.04 bAB
20191.35 ± 0.01 aA1.16 ± 0.02 aA2.60 ± 0.03 bA2.94 ± 0.02 cA
20202.17 ± 0.02 aB2.39 ± 0.08 bB3.65 ± 0.03 cB3.80 ± 0.02 cB
20211.20 ± 0.01 aA1.26 ± 0.03 aAB2.89 ± 0.02 bA2.97 ± 0.02 bA
Giełczew II
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.192
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20171.48 ± 0.02 a2.49 ± 0.02 b4.28 ± 0.02 c4.45 ± 0.03 c
20181.69 ± 0.02 a2.26 ± 0.02 b4.16 ± 0.01 c4.33 ± 0.02 c
20191.38 ± 0.01 a2.12 ± 0.02 b4.12 ± 0.03 c4.14 ± 0.01 c
20201.86 ± 0.01 a2.74 ± 0.02 b4.55 ± 0.03 c4.60 ± 0.02 c
20211.23 ± 0.02 a1.83 ± 0.01 b4.06 ± 0.02 c4.39 ± 0.02 d
Łuszczów Kolonia
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.230
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20171.05 ± 0.02 a1.76 ± 0.01 b4.05 ± 0.02 c4.76 ± 0.01 d
20180.99 ± 0.01 a1.52 ± 0.02 b4.10 ± 0.01 c4.52 ± 0.03 d
20190.94 ± 0.02 a1.43 ± 0.01 b3.74 ± 0.01 c4.05 ± 0.02 d
20201.64 ± 0.03 a2.18 ± 0.01 b4.30 ± 0.03 c4.85 ± 0.01 d
20211.03 ± 0.01 a1.26 ± 0.01 a4.01 ± 0.03 b4.29 ± 0.02 c
Albertów
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.224
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20171.92 ± 0.02 a2.01 ± 0.02 a3.87 ± 0.02 c4.56 ± 0.02 d
20181.82 ± 0.02 a1.88 ± 0.01 a3.65 ± 0.03 b4.38 ± 0.02 d
20191.47 ± 0.02 a1.70 ± 0.02 b3.22 ± 0.01 c4.30 ± 0.01 d
20202.09 ± 0.01 a2.54 ± 0.02 b3.92 ± 0.02 c4.67 ± 0.03 d
20211.62 ± 0.02 a1.78 ± 0.01 a3.06 ± 0.02 c4.41 ± 0.02 d
Explanation: a–d—different letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 (LDS for distance from the road edge); A–C—different letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 (LDS for years 2017–2021); n.s.—not significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 10. Neutral phosphatase activity (APh in mmol PNP kg−1 h−1) in soils before the COVID-19 pandemic (2017–2019) [28] and during the pandemic (2020–2021).
Table 10. Neutral phosphatase activity (APh in mmol PNP kg−1 h−1) in soils before the COVID-19 pandemic (2017–2019) [28] and during the pandemic (2020–2021).
SiteYearsDistance from the Road Edge [m]
52050100
Piekoszów
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.748
LDS0.05 for years = 1.598
20177.80 ± 0.03 aA7.94 ± 0.03 aA10.33 ± 0.03 bAB12.38 ± 0.04 cAB
20187.52 ± 0.01 aA7.68 ± 0.03 aA9.54 ± 0.04 bA12.57 ± 0.07 cB
20196.84 ± 0.04 aA7.05 ± 0.04 aA9.03 ± 0.04 bA9.81 ± 0.08 cA
20208.02 ± 0.02 aA8.34 ± 0.02 aA11.77 ± 0.06 bB12.39 ± 0.05 cAB
20216.71 ± 0.02 aA6.93 ± 0.02 aA9.26 ± 0.06 bA10.11 ± 0.02 cAB
Marcinkowice
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.612
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
20178.59 ± 0.02 a9.97 ± 0.04 b14.08 ± 0.06 c14.09 ± 0.05 c
20188.55 ± 0.02 a9.08 ± 0.04 a13.85 ± 0.07 b13.86 ± 0.04 b
20197.16 ± 0.02 a8.27 ± 0.01 b13.01 ± 0.02 c13.26 ± 0.03 c
20209.22 ± 0.03 a10.15 ± 0.03 b14.37 ± 0.03 c14.56 ± 0.04 c
20216.98 ± 0.03 a8.06 ± 0.02 b12.85 ± 0.03 c14.18 ± 0.05 d
Skorzeszyce
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.828
LDS0.05 for years = 1.505
20177.06 ± 0.02 aAB9.24 ± 0.03 bB11.45 ± 0.02 cAB11.99 ± 0.05 cB
20186.67 ± 0.01 aAB8.44 ± 0.04 bAB10.15 ± 0.03 cAB10.37 ± 0.04 cAB
20195.64 ± 0.02 aA8.18 ± 0.02 bAB9.24 ± 0.03 cA9.62 ± 0.03 cAB
20207.38 ± 0.02 aB9.71 ± 0.02 bB11.89 ± 0.03 cB12.04 ± 0.03 cB
20216.29 ± 0.01 aAB7.34 ± 0.03 bA9.05 ± 0.03 cA9.27 ± 0.04 cA
Giełczew II
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.605
LDS0.05 for years = 1.190
201710.24 ± 0.02 aB10.89 ± 0.03 bB12.79 ± 0.05 cA13.02 ± 0.04 cB
201810.11 ± 0.03 aAB10.58 ± 0.03 aB12.39 ± 0.05 bA12.67 ± 0.03 cAB
20199.20 ± 0.02 aAB9.69 ± 0.02 aAB12.15 ± 0.03 bA11.67 ± 0.04 bA
202011.35 ± 0.03 aC11.45 ± 0.02 aB12.88 ± 0.06 bA13.57 ± 0.05
20218.96 ± 0.03 aA9.08 ± 0.03 aA11.95 ± 0.01 bA13.21 ± 0.03 cB
Łuszczów Kolonia
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.724
LDS0.05 for years = 1.833
20177.26 ± 0.02 aA9.23 ± 0.02 bB11.33 ± 0.03 bA12.26 ± 0.03 cA
20187.18 ± 0.03 aA8.20 ± 0.03 bAB11.70 ± 0.02 cA11.82 ± 0.06 cA
20196.55 ± 0.02 aA6.78 ± 0.06 aA10.56 ± 0.05 bA11.15 ± 0.06 bA
20208.10 ± 0.02 aA9.87 ± 0.04 bB11.91 ± 0.03 bA12.35 ± 0.05 bA
20216.35 ± 0.02 aA6.42 ± 0.01 aA10.28 ± 0.06 bA11.16 ± 0.05 cA
Albertów
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.735
LDS0.05 for years = 1.712
20177.26 ± 0.00 aAB8.65 ± 0.04 bBC10.14 ± 0.04 bA11.72 ± 0.05 cA
20186.35 ± 0.02 aAB8.34 ± 0.02 bB9.65 ± 0.03 cA11.23 ± 0.04 dA
20196.22 ± 0.03 aAB6.43 ± 0.03 aA9.81 ± 0.03 bA10.83 ± 0.05 cA
20207.80 ± 0.00 aB9.15 ± 0.02 bC11.96 ± 0.03 cB11.95 ± 0.04 cA
20216.02 ± 0.02 aA6.22 ± 0.02 aA9.54 ± 0.03 bA10.73 ± 0.04 cA
Explanation: a–d—different letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 (LDS for distance from the road edge); A–C—different letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 (LDS for years 2017–2021); n.s.—not significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 11. Urease activity (AU in mg N-NH4+ kg−1 h−1) in soils before the COVID-19 pandemic (2017–2019) [28] and during the pandemic (2020–2021).
Table 11. Urease activity (AU in mg N-NH4+ kg−1 h−1) in soils before the COVID-19 pandemic (2017–2019) [28] and during the pandemic (2020–2021).
SiteYearsDistance from the Road Edge [m]
52050100
Piekoszów
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.318
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
201714.15 ± 0.03 a12.53 ± 0.01 b10.70 ± 0.06 c10.95 ± 0.06 c
201813.62 ± 0.02 a12.40 ± 0.03 b10.08 ± 0.01 c10.32 ± 0.04 c
201913.37 ± 0.02 a12.56 ± 0.02 b10.65 ± 0.01 c10.86 ± 0.01 c
202012.78 ± 0.01 a12.34 ± 0.02 b10.53 ± 0.02 c10.89 ± 0.02 d
202113.22 ± 0.02 a12.01 ± 0.01 b10.76 ± 0.03 c10.62 ± 0.02 c
Marcinkowice
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.698
LDS0.05 for years = 1.693
201715.53 ± 0.03 aB12.14 ± 0.02 bB10.39 ± 0.02 cB10.74 ± 0.01 cA
201814.61 ± 0.02 aAB10.59 ± 0.02 bA9.42 ± 0.01 cAB9.43 ± 0.02 cA
201913.95 ± 0.03 aAB9.62 ± 0.01 bA8.58 ± 0.01 cA8.40 ± 0.02 cA
202012.67 ± 0.02 aA11.86 ± 0.02 bB10.35 ± 0.02 cB10.61 ± 0.04 cA
202113.82 ± 0.02 aAB10.15 ± 0.02 bA9.20 ± 0.03 cAB9.86 ± 0.02 bcA
Skorzeszyce
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.645
LDS0.05 for years = 0.840
201712.42 ± 0.01 aB12.06 ± 0.02 abB11.54 ± 0.03 abB10.01 ± 0.03 cB
201811.68 ± 0.03 aAB11.05 ± 0.03 abA10.79 ± 0.04 bA9.63 ± 0.03 cAB
201911.25 ± 0.01 aA10.69 ± 0.01 abA10.44 ± 0.02 bA8.77 ± 0.02 cA
202012.46 ± 0.03 aB12.33 ± 0.03 abB12.09 ± 0.00 abB11.72 ± 0.02 bB
202112.27 ± 0.02 aB12.08 ± 0.01 aB11.38 ± 0.01 bB8.95 ± 0.03 cA
Giełczew II
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.439
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
201716.38 ± 0.03 a14.83 ± 0.04 b10.36 ± 0.02 c10.68 ± 0.02 c
201815.65 ± 0.03 a14.39 ± 0.04 b9.48 ± 0.01 c10.22 ± 0.02 c
201915.00 ± 0.01 a14.36 ± 0.02 b9.45 ± 0.02 c10.20 ± 0.02 c
202014.18 ± 0.02 a13.20 ± 0.02 b9.36 ± 0.03 c9.90 ± 0.02 d
202114.97 ± 0.03 a13.88 ± 0.01 b9.52 ± 0.01 c10.16 ± 0.01 d
Łuszczów Kolonia
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.467
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
201717.40 ± 0.01 a14.43 ± 0.04 b11.93 ± 0.01 c12.56 ± 0.03 d
201816.72 ± 0.02 a14.44 ± 0.03 b11.26 ± 0.02 c12.18 ± 0.01 d
201916.81 ± 0.02 a14.25 ± 0.00 b10.62 ± 0.01 c10.66 ± 0.01 c
202015.34 ± 0.03 a13.67 ± 0.02 b11.43 ± 0.02 c11.85 ± 0.02 c
202116.50 ± 0.02 a13.98 ± 0.02 b11.05 ± 0.02 c11.24 ± 0.02 c
Albertów
LDS0.05 for distance = 0.498
LDS0.05 for years = n.s.
201713.60 ± 0.02 a12.54 ± 0.01 b10.03 ± 0.02 c10.18 ± 0.02 c
201813.48 ± 0.02 a10.73 ± 0.04 b10.12 ± 0.01 c9.37 ± 0.02 d
201913.00 ± 0.02 a10.31 ± 0.02 b9.67 ± 0.03 c8.62 ± 0.02 d
202011.92 ± 0.01 a11.08 ± 0.02 b9.43 ± 0.02 c9.20 ± 0.04 c
202112.55 ± 0.02 a11.76 ± 0.04 b9.71 ± 0.02 c8.93 ± 0.01 d
Explanation: a–d—different letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 (LDS for distance from the road edge); A,B—different letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 (LDS for years 2017–2021); n.s.—not significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 12. Significant correlation coefficients between studied soil parameters (N = 30).
Table 12. Significant correlation coefficients between studied soil parameters (N = 30).
ParameterpHKClTOCTNCdPb14PAHsADhAPhAU
pHKCl-−0.61 ***−0.49 **n.s.n.s.n.s.−0.52 **n.s.n.s.
TOC -0.97 ***n.s.0.49 **n.s.0.60 ***n.s.n.s.
TN -n.s.0.48 **n.s.0.60 **n.s.n.s.
Cd -−0.41 *0.75 ***n.s.n.s.0.72 ***
Pb -−0.47 **n.s.n.s.n.s.
14PAHs -−0.40 *n.s.0.40 *
ADh -0.64 ***n.s.
APh -n.s.
AU -
Explanation: *** significant at α = 0.0001; ** significant at α = 0.001; * significant at α = 0.01; n.s.—not significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zawierucha, E.; Zawierucha, M.; Futa, B.; Mocek-Płóciniak, A. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic Constraints on the Ecobiochemical Status of Cultivated Soils along Transportation Routes. Toxics 2023, 11, 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040329

AMA Style

Zawierucha E, Zawierucha M, Futa B, Mocek-Płóciniak A. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic Constraints on the Ecobiochemical Status of Cultivated Soils along Transportation Routes. Toxics. 2023; 11(4):329. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040329

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zawierucha, Elżbieta, Marcin Zawierucha, Barbara Futa, and Agnieszka Mocek-Płóciniak. 2023. "Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic Constraints on the Ecobiochemical Status of Cultivated Soils along Transportation Routes" Toxics 11, no. 4: 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040329

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop