Next Article in Journal
Detect Cytochrome C Oxidase- and Glutathione-S-Transferase-Mediated Detoxification in a Permethrin-Resistant Population of Lygus lineolaris
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Gut Microbiota on Metabolism of Bisphenol A, a Major Component of Polycarbonate Plastics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lethal and Sublethal Toxicity of Beta-Carboline Alkaloids from Peganum harmala (L.) against Aedes albopictus Larvae (Diptera: Culicidae)

1
Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
2
School of Biology and Food Engineering, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2023, 11(4), 341; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040341
Submission received: 3 March 2023 / Revised: 22 March 2023 / Accepted: 29 March 2023 / Published: 3 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Agrochemicals and Food Toxicology)

Abstract

:
Plant-derived agents are powerful bio-pesticides for the eco-friendly control of mosquito vectors and other blood-sucking arthropods. The larval toxicity of beta-carboline alkaloids against the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Skuse) (Diptera: Culicidae), was investigated under laboratory conditions. The total alkaloid extracts (TAEs) and beta-carboline alkaloids (harmaline, harmine, harmalol, and harman) from Peganum harmala seeds were isolated and tested in this bioassay. All alkaloids were tested either individually or as binary mixtures, using the co-toxicity coefficient (CTC) and Abbott’s formula analysis. The results revealed considerable toxicity of the tested alkaloids against A. albopictus larvae. When all larval instars were exposed to the TAEs at 48 h post-treatment, the mortality of all larval instars varied in a concentration-dependent manner. The second-instar larvae were the most susceptible to different concentrations of TAEs, and the fourth-instar larvae were more tolerant to TAEs than the second-instar larvae. Especially, the third-instar larvae exposed to all alkaloids also showed that all doses resulted in an increased mortality of the third-instar larvae at 48 h post-treatment, and the toxicities of the tested alkaloids in a descending order were TAEs > harmaline > harmine > harmalol, with the LC50 values of 44.54 ± 2.56, 55.51 ± 3.01, 93.67 ± 4.53, and 117.87 ± 5.61 μg/mL at 48 h post-treatment, respectively. In addition, all compounds were also tested individually or in a 1:1 ratio (dose LC25/LC25) as binary mixtures to assess the synergistic toxicity of these binary combinations against the third-instar larvae at 24 and 48 h post-treatment, respectively. The results demonstrated that when tested as a binary mixture, all compounds (especially TAEs, harmaline, and harmine) showed their synergistic effects, exceeding the toxicity of each compound alone. Interestingly, the obtained data further revealed that the TAEs at sublethal doses (LC10 and LC25) could significantly delay the larval development and decrease the pupation and emergence rates of A. albopictus. This phenomenon could be helpful in order to develop more effective control strategies for different notorious vector mosquitoes.

1. Introduction

Aedes albopictus (Skuse) (Diptera: Culicidae), commonly known as the Asian tiger mosquito, is an aggressive daytime human-biting behavior and one of the most important nuisance mosquito species in the world [1]. A. albopictus has proven to be an infectious vector, which can transmit a spectrum of at least 23 human pathogens causing various diseases including dengue virus, West Nile virus, and chikungunya virus [2] (Manni et al., 2017). The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that there are 68,000 clinical cases each year, but more than 3 billion people in Asia are at risk of exposure [3,4]. It is well known that one way to reduce the mosquito populations is targeting mosquito larvae with chemical insecticides, such as pyrethroids, organophosphates, and insect growth regulators [5,6]. However, repeated use of these chemical insecticides can lead to the development of resistance in mosquitoes or affect human health, or to undesirable effects on non-target organisms [7]. For these reasons, there is an urgent need to develop new insecticides which are more environmentally safe and also biodegradable and are targeted specifically against vector mosquitoes. In fact, plant extracts and plant-derived compounds belonging to many families have been reported to possess larvicidal properties against Aedes, Culex, and Anopheles mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) [8,9].
Peganum harmala L. (Zygophyllaceae) is one of the most famous plants, the so-called Harmal, used in popular medicine. As a perennial herb, it is widely distributed in Europe, North Africa, Middle East, Central Asia, Northwest India, and Northwest China [10,11]. The full plant, aerial parts, seeds, and fruits have generally been reported to exhibit a traditional herbal medicine with various pharmacological activities, such as analgesic activity, antiproliferative, anti-parasitological, and antimicrobial activities, anticancer, and other activities [10,12]. The seeds of P. harmala have also been included in the Drug Standards of the Ministry of Public Health of the People’s Republic of China, and the therapeutic dose of them is 4~8 g [13]. Ulteriorly, the quality standards for the seeds and the total alkaloid extracts from the seeds of P. harmala have been formulated in previous studies [14]. The seeds of P. harmala contain about 2% and 6% (w/w) pharmacologically active alkaloids, which are mostly beta-carbolines such as harmaline, harmine, harmalol, and harmane. In particular, the total content of harmine and harmaline is more than 50% in the total alkaloid extracts (TAEs) of P. harmalala seeds [12,15]. Modern pharmacology has also revealed that P. harmala alkaloids can inhibit monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), and interact with γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and induce apoptosis and DNA damage [11,12,16,17].
There have been some reports about the pesticidal bioactivity of TAEs and beta-carboline alkaloids, indicating their lethal and sublethal effects on many pests. We previously evaluated the insecticidal activity of TAEs and its alkaloids against a variety of pests in laboratory and field conditions [18,19,20]. Several studies have also reported on the effectiveness of alkaloid extracts of P. harmala against many insects and parasites [21,22,23,24]. In addition to lethal effects, several studies have also revealed that P. harmala total alkaloids or its beta-carboline alkaloids could induce sublethal effects on insect development, reproduction, lifespan, and behavior, even at low-dose levels [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Therefore, these results demonstrated that TAEs and its beta-carboline alkaloids have a variety of unique insecticidal activities against pests, indicating that these alkaloids are potential plant-derived agents.
Synergistic effects between different chemical components in plants have been documented, with the toxicity or other bioactivity of one compound significantly increased in the presence of other compounds [9,30,31]. In fact, the optimal efficacy of a medicinal plant may not be due to one major active component, but to the combined effect of distinct compounds originally in the plant. For instance, the antibacterial and antifungal activities of beta-carboline alkaloids of P. harmala seeds were increased when tested as binary or total alkaloidal mixtures showing a kind of synergism among these alkaloids such as harmaline, harmine, harmane, and harmalol [32]. Another study also obtained similar results on the combined toxic effects of two alkaloids, harmine and ricinine, on beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) [33]. Because such responses are likely to occur affecting the total alkaloid extract of P. harmala seeds, it is important to evaluate an active synergistic mixture with the pesticide properties. Consequently, it could be concluded that P. harmala alkaloids have potential in the search for new and eco-friendly pesticidal agents for the control of the vector mosquitoes such as A. albopictus.
To the best of our knowledge, the insecticidal activity of harmala alkaloids against vector mosquitoes has not been reported. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the lethal and sublethal toxicity of beta-carboline alkaloids from P. harmala against A. albopictus larvae, explore the synergistic toxicity of binary mixtures of four isolated alkaloids at low-dose levels, and provide a reference for the further exploration and utilization of the plant as a botanical insecticide.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material, Standards, and Reagents

P. harmala L. fresh seeds were collected in August 2020 from ripened samples at Huan in County Northwest China and were dried to a constant weight at 60 °C. The raw material was identified by Prof. Xiaoqiang Guo, Life Science and Technology College of Longdong University, China. Harmaline, harman, harmalol, and harmine with high (>95%) label purities were purchased from Fluka Chemical Co. and used as reference materials. The molecular structural formulas of the four alkaloids are shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Total Alkaloid Extracts of P. harmala Seeds

The total alkaloid extracts of P. harmala seeds were extracted by the method we previously described [20]. Specifically, dried and powdered seeds (1 kg) were macerated four times with 1 L of methanol for 24 h. The extracts were combined and then the solvent was evaporated to dryness, using a rotary evaporator. The methanol extract of the seeds was successfully separated using hexane and dichloromethane in 10% NH4OH medium (pH 9–10). The obtained fractions were concentrated, yielding the total alkaloid extracts (TAEs) of P. harmala seeds [14]. Fractionation of the individual alkaloids was prepared according to the method of Kartal et al. (2003) [34]. Briefly, the TAEs were eluted on a silica gel column initially with pure CHCl3 and increasing amounts of CH3OH. All fractions obtained were tested on precoated TLC plates using CHCl3/CH3OH (9:1, v/v). Similar fractions were combined and washed sequentially in CHCl3 and CH3OH. The crystallized samples were compared by their retention times on high-performance liquid chromatography (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA, 1290 Infinity II) relative to authentic samples, and using electrospray mass spectrometry (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, Orbitrap Exploris™ 240) [15]. All fractions obtained were dried and stored in closed dried bottles for further bioassays.

2.3. Insect

A. albopictus, maintained for more than 100 generations without exposure to any known insecticide, was obtained from laboratory colonies in the State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing. According to the World Health Organization’s standards for larval susceptibility test methods [35], eggs for the study were obtained by feeding mated 15 generation females provided with a 10% sucrose solution for 12 h, and then provided with a rat placed in resting cages (25 × 25 × 35 cm) overnight for blood feeding to be carried by the females. All rats were maintained and used in accordance with the Guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Fuyang Normal University (license number 083/2021). Larvae were fed a diet of dog biscuits, milk powder, beef liver, and yeast powder in a ratio of 2:1:1:1, respectively. The insectary room was maintained at a photoperiod of 14:10 (L/D) h, temperature of 27 ± 1 °C, and relative humidity of 75–85%.

2.4. Evaluation of Bioefficacy

2.4.1. Individual Toxicity of the Tested Alkaloids

The larvicidal activity of TAEs and the four major compounds, namely harmaline, harmine, harmane, and harmalol, isolated from P. harmala seeds was evaluated according to the WHO protocol [35] (2005). Based on previous pre-experiments, each compound was tested at 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, and 120 μg/mL. Stock dilution (w/v) of each material was dissolved in 1 mL of methanol and then diluted in 249 mL of distilled water to obtain each of the required concentrations. The control was prepared using 1 mL methanol in 249 mLof distilled water. Thirty required larvae were introduced into each solution. Five biological replicates were then performed for each concentration, with 30 larvae per replicate (n = 150). Larval mortality was recorded at 24 h and 48 h post-treatment and corrected according to Abbott’s formula as Corrected mortality (%) = [(Treated mortality—Control mortality)]/(100-Control mortality)] × 100. The 25 and 50% lethal concentrations (LC25 and LC50, respectively) were evaluated by probit analysis [36].

2.4.2. Synergistic Toxicity of Binary Mixtures of Four Isolated Alkaloids

In this bioassay, four isolated alkaloids (harmaline, harmine, harmalol, and harman) were combined in a 1:1 ratio (doses LC25/LC25), binary combinations of the alkaloids were assessed for the third-instar larvae, and TAEs as the positive control group. Larval mortality was recorded at 48 h post-treatment and corrected using Abbott’s formula. The co-toxicity coefficient (CTC) of the mixtures was calculated according to Alonso-Amelot and Calcagno [37] (2000) as follows:
CTC = [(A + B)exper/(A + B)theor] × 100.
where
(A + B)exper = Sum of experimental (observed) mortalities of A + B.
(A + B)theor = Sum of experimental (expected) mortalities of A + B.

2.5. Sublethal Effects of the Tested Alkaloids on Larval Growth

In this experiment, TAEs were used to evaluate the sublethal effects. TheLC10 and LC25 values of the second-instar larvae determined by a bioassay at 48 h post-treatment were selected as the sublethal concentrations. The second-instar larvae were placed in a 250 mL glass beaker and exposed to the LC10 and LC25 doses for each test. More than 30 second-instar larvae were introduced into each concentration, and five biological replicates were performed for each concentration, with more than 30 larvae per replicate (n > 150) [35]; 48 h after treatment, dead larvae were counted and only alive larvae were transferred to glass beakers through a small filter, and larvae were provided with the larval food mixture at a concentration of 50 mg/L until pupation. Larval development was surveyed daily until all larvae had either pupated or died. Pupae from each treatment were removed daily and were transferred into a cup with distilled water until the adults emerged. The development of mosquito larvae, pupae, and adults emerging each day was recorded.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The data from the larval mortality tests were subjected to an analysis of variance (ANOVA of square root transformed percentages). Differences between the treatments were determined by Tukey’s multiple range tests to compare differences at p < 0.05 significance level. The sublethal and lethal dosages of each material to the tested larvae were calculated by using probit analysis. All data were analyzed using the SPSS Statistical Software Package version 16.0. The results with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Contents of the Isolated Alkaloids of P. harmala

According to the dry weight of seeds, the w/w extraction yield of the total alkaloid extracts (TAEs) of P. harmalala seeds, the TAE was 4.83% for hexane and dichloromethane. It was found that harmaline and harmine were the main alkaloids, with a content of 2.62% and 1.59% (w/w), respectively. And their contents were higher than that of the others (harmalol, 0.32% and harman, 0.15%). The chemical structures of these four major compounds are shown in Figure 1. Based on the literature, the total alkaloid content of P. harmala seeds varied between 2% and 6% [14,15], and the ratio of alkaloids in P. harmala may vary during different stages of growth.

3.2. Larvicidal Activity of the Tested Alkaloids

The total alkaloid extracts (TAEs) of P. harmala seeds exhibited a larvicidal effect against the second-instar larvae to fourth-instar larvae of A. albopictus at 48 h post-treatment, indicating that the mortality of all the larval instars varied in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 2a). The second-instar larvae were the most susceptible to different concentrations of TAEs, and the fourth-instar larvae were more tolerant to TAEs than the second-instar larvae (p < 0.05). For example, the mortality rate of the second-instar larvae was over 80% at a 60 μg/mL concentration, while the mortality rate of the fourth-instar larvae was only over 80% at a 100 μg/mL concentration (Figure 2a). In this study, the third-instar larvae were thus used as toxicity assays unless otherwise specified. Furthermore, the third-instar larvae exposed to all alkaloids tested (TAEs and four compounds) also showed that all doses resulted in an increased mortality of the third-instar larvae at 48 h post-treatment, although harmalol and harman showed relatively low larvicidal activity. The larvicidal activity of the tested alkaloids in a descending order was TAEs > harmaline > harmine > harmalol > harman (Figure 2b).

3.3. Comparison of the Lethal Concentration (LC50) of Third-Instar Larvae

To further study the toxicity of the tested alkaloids (TAEs, harmaline, harmine, harmalol, and harman) to the third-instar larvae of A. albopictus, a bioassay was performed by the probit analysis method. The obtained results revealed that the toxicity of the third-instar larvae increased with the increasing concentrations (ranging from 20 to 120 μg/mL) of the tested alkaloids at 48 h post-exposure, as shown in Figure 3. There was a good linear relationship between the logarithm of each compound concentration and the probit value of the mortality for 48 h post-treatment. According to the obtained formula, the LC50 value of each compound was calculated. The results revealed the significant larvicidal effects of the tested alkaloids including TAEs, harmaline, harmine, harmalol, and harman, with the LC50 values of 44.54 ± 2.56, 55.51 ± 3.01, 93.67 ± 4.53, and 117.87 ± 5.61 μg/mL, respectively, while the LC50 value of harman exceeded the highest concentration tested (120 μg/mL).

3.4. Synergistic Toxicity of Binary Mixtures

Four isolated alkaloids (harmaline, harmine, harmalol, and harman) were tested individually or in a 1:1 ratio (dose LC25/LC25) as binary mixtures to assess the synergistic toxicity of these binary combinations against the third-instar larvae at 24 and 48 h post-treatment, as shown in Table 1. The results revealed that a considerable synergistic effect between all combinations was significantly increased when examined as binary mixtures than when each compound was examined individually. A mixture of harmaline and harmine at their LC25 against the third-instar larvae of A. albopictus resulted in 59.2% and 79.3% mortality at 24 and 48 h post-treatment, respectively. In addition, the binary mixtures of harmane with harmine or harmalol showed weak synergistic effects, respectively. Notably, TAEs also showed excellent activity against the third-instar larvae at 24 and 48 h after treatment. Thus, the results revealed that the activity of the tested alkaloids was significantly increased when tested as binary or TAEs indicating a kind of synergism among these alkaloids.

3.5. Sublethal Effects of Total Alkaloid Extracts (TAEs) on Larval Development

For the newly emerged second-instar larvae exposure to sublethal concentrations of TAEs at 48 h post-treatment, the obtained results revealed that TAEs at LC10 and LC30 concentrations exhibited sublethal effects on larval development time, as well as pupation and emergence rate (Table 2). The developmental time of the larvae stage was 183.9 h and 201.3 h days significantly longer in the LC10 (p < 0.05) and LC30 (p < 0.01) treatments, respectively than in the control. The pupa time was also significantly prolonged at 67.2 h and 83.5 h in LC10 and LC30 treatments, respectively. Additionally, the pupation and emergence rates of LC30 treatment were more significantly decreased than the control (p < 0.05). The results indicated that sublethal concentrations of TAEs could delay the development of A. albopictus larvae and decrease the reproductive potential of A. albopictus individuals.

4. Discussion

With the increasing demand for more eco-friendly products for mosquito control, plants may be valuable sources for mosquito control products. Plants can produce a vast repository of secondary compounds with a wide range of biological activities such as insecticidal activity [8]. Plant-derived alkaloids, either as plant-derived insecticides or as pure compounds, provide unlimited opportunities for new and selective pesticide discoveries because of the varied insecticidal active targets and unmatched availability of chemical diversity [9]. In this study, total alkaloids and four isolated alkaloids of P. harmala exhibited considerable larvicidal activity against A. albopictus larvae in a dose-dependent manner. Especially, the TAEs exhibited strong larvicidal activity against all instar larvae of A. albopictus at 48 h post-treatment (Figure 1a). Comparing the achieved LC50values, the larvicidal activity of the tested alkaloids in a descending order was TAEs > harmaline > harmine > harmalol (Figure 1b). Similarly, Shang et al. [22] (2016) observed the acaricidal activity of the total alkaloids from P. harmala on Psoroptes cuniculi. The authors also found that extracts of three bioactive alkaloids exhibited excellent acaricidal activity, as confirmed by our previous study [18] as well as this one. The authors Miao et al. [24] (2020) and Abbassi et al. [21] (2003) also demonstrated some of our observations. For example, the authors observed a toxic effect in harmaline and the extract of P. harmala seeds on the mortality of Caenorhabditis elegans and Spodoptera exigua. Therefore, extensive bioassays on larvicidal properties of the alkaloid components are needed to reveal possible synergisms, especially in those cases where the total alkaloids are more active than their individual main components such as harmaline and harmine.
It is well known that secondary metabolites always exist in plants in the form of simple or complex mixtures; there are thus many hypotheses about the so-called phytochemical redundancy [38]. Accordingly, evaluating for the pesticidal activity of specific phytochemicals must be supplemented by the appropriate testing of relevant mixtures and the whole extracts [31,32,33]. In this study, doses matching the estimated LC25 were used to evaluate the biological activity of simple or complex mixtures of the tested alkaloids; results showed that the action of a single alkaloid usually resulted in evidently lower larval mortality than the expected 25%. Despite that, when included in binary mixtures, some combinations resulted in a larval mortality greater than 70% (Table 1). This phenomenon was observed in binary mixtures of harmaline/harmine or harmaline/harmalol, indicating a kind of synergism among these compounds. Rizwan-ul-Haq et al. [33] (2009) obtained similar results regarding the two alkaloids harmaline and ricinine from isolated the seeds of P. harmala and Ricinus communis, respectively. They found that the insecticidal activity of these alkaloids on Spodoptera exigua larvae was significant when treated alone, while a mixture of both alkaloids at the same dose was shown to be more effective. Another study also found that the antibacterial and antifungal activities of isolated alkaloids (i.e., harmine, harmaline, and harmalol or total alkaloids) was significantly increased, when tested as a binary or total alkaloidal mixture, indicating a kind of synergistic effect among these compounds [32]. Synergism between different chemical components in plants has been documented, in which the toxicity or other active effects of one compound are significantly increased in the presence of other compounds [31]. The optimal efficacy of a medicinal plant may not be due to one major active ingredient, but to the combined effect of different compounds in the plant [8] (Dinesh, et al., 2014). Due to such responses commonly occurring in the plant-derived extracts, it is thus important to select an active synergistic mixture with the insecticidal properties. Thus, it could be concluded that the total alkaloids or binary mixture from of P. harmala have the potential for new and selective insecticidal agents for mosquito vector control. However, the mechanism behind the synergism among these beta-carboline alkaloids is still to be further explored.
Recently, plant-derived biopesticides have been used against many insect pests, especially vector mosquitoes, because plant-derived compounds (e.g., alkaloids, essential oils, and terpenoids) are safer to use and have a wide range of sublethal effects such as biochemical metabolism abnormality, growth and/or reproduction inhibition, adult repellent, and oviposition deterrent [9]. In the present study, the TAEs could significantly delay the development of A. albopictus larvae and pupae, when treated with sublethal concentrations (LC10 and LC25). In addition, the pupation rate and emergence rate of the surviving individuals also decreased significantly under LC25 exposure dose (Table 2). Our previous research found that total alkaloids and harmalin from P. harmala could significantly inhibit the absorption of Na+, K+, and glucose by Sf9 cells, as well as the number of blood cells of S. frugiperda larvae when exposed to LC50 dose [20] (Li et al., 2016). Jbilou et al. (2008) [26] found that P. harmala extracts exhibited many sublethal effects on Tribolium castaneum, including α-amylase activity, larval development, and progeny production. Similarly, another two studies also observed sublethal effects of harmalin on Spodoptera exigua and Plodia interpunctella larvae, which involved nutrient metabolism, a-amylase activity, and larval growth [23,33], as confirmed by our previous study [19]. Further analysis concluded that sublethal effects on insect growth may result from disruptions in the development of neural tissues by P. harmala alkaloids, especially harmaline and harmine [39,40]. Another reason may be that energy intake is limited or energy is used for detoxification, which is not enough for growth and development, as confirmed by previous studies [29]. However, further studies need to be conducted on the synergistic mechanism and the long-term sublethal effects on generations.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the total alkaloid extracts (TAEs) and beta-carboline alkaloids (harmaline, harmine, harmalol, and harman) from Peganum harmala seeds were isolated and tested in this bioassay. The results revealed considerable toxicity of the TAEs and isolated beta-carboline alkaloids against A. albopictus larvae. Especially, all compounds (such as TAEs, harmaline, and harmine) showed their synergistic effects, exceeding the toxicity of each compound alone. Interestingly, the obtained data further showed that the TAEs at sublethal doses (LC10 and LC25) could significantly delay the larval development, and decrease the pupation and emergence rates of A. albopictus. This phenomenon could be helpful in order to develop more effective control strategies for different notorious vector mosquitoes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.J. and W.L.; methodology, N.J.; investigation, N.J. and J.L.; data curation, L.C. and J.L.; software, L.C.; formal analysis, J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, N.J.; writing—review and editing, S.J.; project administration, W.L.; funding acquisition, S.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91643113) and the Key Project of Natural Science Research of Anhui provincial Education Department (KJ2021ZD0072).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

TAEs, total alkaloid extracts of Peganum harmala seeds; CTC, co-toxicity coefficient; LC50, lethal concentration to 50% of the test population; LC25, lethal concentration to 25% of the test population; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography.

References

  1. Bhatt, S.; Gething, P.W.; Brady, O.J.; Messina, J.P.; Farlow, A.W.; Moyes, C.L.; Drake, J.M.; Brownstein, J.S.; Hoen, A.G.; Sankoh, O.; et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 2013, 496, 504–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Manni, M.; Guglielmino, C.R.; Scolari, F.; Vega, R.A.; Failloux, A.B.; Somboon, P.; Lisa, A.; Savini, G.; Bonizzoni, M.; Gomulski, L.M.; et al. Genetic evidence for a worldwide chaotic dispersion pattern of the arbovirus vector, Aedes albopictus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Jourdain, F.; Roiz, D.; de Valk, H.; Noël, H.; L’Ambert, G.; Franke, F.; Paty, M.-C.; Guinard, A.; Desenclos, J.-C.; Roche, B. From importation to autochthonous transmission: Drivers of chikungunya and dengue emergence in a temperate area. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mitchell, C.J. The role of Aedes albopictus as an arbovirus vector. Parassitologia 2020, 37, 108–113. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ishak, I.H.; Jaal, Z.; Ranson, H.; Wondji, C.S. Contrasting patterns of insecticide resistance andknockdown resistance (kdr) in the dengue vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from Malaysia. Parasites Vectors 2015, 8, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zhao, C.C.; Zhu, C.Y.; Jia, Q.C.; Yan, D.M.; Liu, G.J.; Wu, H.X.; Song, X.P.; Liu, Q.Y.; Wang, J.; Meng, F.X. Resistance of Aedes albopictus to commonly used insecticides in different areas of China, 2017–2018. Chin. J. Vector Biol. Control 2017, 31, 126–132. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, N. Insecticide resistance in mosquitoes: Impact, mechanisms, and research directions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2015, 60, 537–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dinesh, D.S.; Kumari, S.; Kumar, V.; Das, P. The potentiality of botanicals and their products as an alternative to chemical insecticides to sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae): A review. J. Vector Borne Dis. 2014, 51, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shaalan, E.A.; Canyon, D.; Younes, M.W.; Abdel-Wahab, H.; Mansour, A.H. A review of botanical phytochemicals with mosquitocidal potential. Environ. Int. 2005, 31, 1149–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, S.P.; Cheng, X.M.; Wang, C.H. A review on traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and toxicology of the genus Peganum. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 203, 127–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Mina, C.N.; Mohammad, H.F.; Gholamreza, A. Medicinal properties of Peganum harmala L. in traditional Iranian medicine and modern phytotherapy: A review. J. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2015, 35, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Moloudizargari, M.; Mikaili, P.; Aghajanshakeri, S.; Asghari, M.H.; Shayegh, J. Pharmacological and therapeutic effects of Peganum harmala and its main alkaloids. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2013, 7, 199–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Committee (CPC). Drug Standards of the Ministry of Public Health of the People’s 587 Republic of China (Uygur Pharmaceutical Section); Chinese Pharmacopoeia Committee: Beijing, China, 1998; p. 80.
  14. Liu, L.; Cheng, X.M.; Wang, C.H.; Wang, Z.T. Quality standard for alkaliod extract of Peganum harmala L. Chin. J. Pharm. 2010, 41, 420–423. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, C.H.; Liu, J.; Zheng, L.M. Analysis of harmine and harmaline of Peganum harmala in different parts and different localities. Chin. Pharm. J. 2002, 37, 211–215. [Google Scholar]
  16. Haarmann-Stemmann, T.; Sendker, J.; Götz, C.; Krug, N.; Bothe, H.; Fritsche, E.; Proksch, P.; Abel, J. Regulation of dioxin receptor function by different beta-carboline alkaloids. Arch. Toxicol. 2010, 84, 619–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khan, F.A.; Maalik, A.; Iqbal, Z.; Malik, I. Recent pharmacological developments in β-carboline alkaloid “harmaline”. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 721, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, G.L.; Jiang, S.L.; Xue, L.G. A preliminary report on the field control effect of the extract of Peganum harmala to phytophagy spider mites. J. Northwest Sci.-Tech. Univ. Agric. For. 1997, 25, 111–114. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiang, S.L.; Guo, X.Q.; Zhan, G.L.; Liu, B. A preliminary study on the resources of botanical insecticides in East Gansu province. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid Sin. 1999, 19, 209–211. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, J.M.; Mu, K.; Jiang, S.L.; Li, D.K.; Li, W.Y.; Ma, T.F.; Li, Y.M. Toxicity effects of total alkaloids of Peganum harmala against Spodoptera frugiperda larvae blood corpuscles and in vitro cultured Sf9 cells. J. Northwest A. F. Univ. 2016, 44, 127–133. [Google Scholar]
  21. Abbassi, K.; Atay-Kadiri, Z.; Ghaout, S. Biological effects of alkaloids extracted from three plants of Moroccan arid areas on the desert locust. Physiol. Entomol. 2003, 26, 232–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shang, X.; Xiao, H.; Guo, X.; Li, B.; Pan, H.; Zhang, J.; Miao, X. Microwave-assisted extraction of three bioactive alkaloids from Peganum harmala L. and their acaricidal activity against Psoroptes cuniculi in vitro. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 192, 350–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Moazeni, M.; Ardakani, Z.S.S.; Saharkhiz, M.J.; Jalaei, J.; Khademolhoseini, A.A.; Abad, S.S.E.; Alavi, A.M. In vitro ovicidal activity of Peganum harmala seeds extract on the eggs of Fasciola hepatica. J. Parasit. Dis. 2017, 41, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Miao, X.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, J.; Kang, N.; Liu, X.; Wu, J.; Liu, Y.; Tan, P. The toxicity assessment of extract of Peganum harmala L. seeds in Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Complement. Med. 2020, 20, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Weng, Q.F.; Zhong, G.L.; Hu, M.Y.; Luo, J.J.; Li, X.G. Bioactivities and physiological effects of extracts of Peganum harmala against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2005, 8, 2014–2022. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jbilou, R.; Amri, H.; Bouayad, N.; Ghailani, N.; Ennabili, A.; Sayah, F. Insecticidal effects of extracts of seven plant species on larval development, a-amylase activity and offspring production of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Insecta: Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 959–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Al-mazra’awi, M.S.; Ateyyat, M. Insecticidal and repellent activities of medicinal plant extracts against the sweet potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Hom.:Aleyrodidae) and its parasitoid Eretmocerus mundus (Hym.: Aphelinidae). J. Pest Sci. 2009, 82, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rharrabe, K.; Bakrim, A.; Ghailani, N.; Sayah, F. Bioinsecticidal effect of harmaline on Plodia interpunctella development (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 2007, 89, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Heinz, C.A.; Zangerl, A.R.; Berenbaum, M.R. Effects of natural and synthetic neuroactive substances on the growth and feeding of cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1996, 80, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Benjannet, H.; Skhiri, F.; Mighri, Z.; Simmonds, M.S.J.; Blaney, W.M. Antifeedant activity of plant extracts and of new natural diglyceride compounds isolated from Ajuga pseudoiva leaves against Spodoptera littoralis larvae. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2001, 4, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stermitz, F.; Lorenz, P.; Tawara, J.; Zenewicz, L.; Lewis, K. Synergy in a medicinal plant: Antimicrobial action of berberine potentiated by 50-methoxyhydnocarpin, a multidrug pump inhibitor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 1433–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Nenaah, G. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of (beta)-carboline alkaloids of Peganum harmala (L.) seeds and their combination effects. Fitoterapia 2010, 81, 779–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rizwan-ul-Haq, M.; Hu, Q.B.; Hu, M.Y.; Lin, Q.S.; Zhang, W.L. Biological impact of harmaline, ricinine and their combined effects with Bacillus thuringiensis on Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Pest Sci. 2009, 82, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kartal, M.; Altun, M.L.; Kurucu, S. HPLC method for the analysis of harmol, harmalol, harmine and harmaline in the seeds of Peganum harmala L. J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. 2003, 31, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for Laboratory and Field Testing of Mosquito Larvicides World Health Organization Communicable Disease Control, Prevention and Eradication; WHO Pesticide Evaluation Scheme (WHOPES): Geneva, Switzerland, 2005; pp. 1–41. [Google Scholar]
  36. Finney, D.J. Probit Analysis; Cambridge University Press: London, UK, 1971; pp. 68–72. [Google Scholar]
  37. Alonso-Amelot, M.; Calcagno, M. Modeling synergistic and antagonistic interactions in xenobiotic compounds. J. Chem. Ecol. 2000, 26, 513–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jones, C.; Firn, R. On the evolution of plant secondary chemical diversity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1991, 333, 273–280. [Google Scholar]
  39. O’Hearn, E.; Molliver, M.E. Degeneration of Purkinje cells in parasagittal zones of the cerebellar vermis after treatment with ibogaine or harmaline. Neuroscience 1993, 55, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wieczorek, H.; Putzenlechner, M.; Zeiske, W.; Klein, U. A vacuolartype proton pump energizes H+/K+ antiport in an animal plasma membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 15340–15347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Molecular structural formulas off our isolated alkaloids (harmaline, harmine, harmalol, and harman) from Peganum harmala seeds.
Figure 1. Molecular structural formulas off our isolated alkaloids (harmaline, harmine, harmalol, and harman) from Peganum harmala seeds.
Toxics 11 00341 g001
Figure 2. Individual toxicity of the tested alkaloids against Aedesalbopictus larvae. (A) Corrected mortality of the total alkaloids of P. harmala seeds (TAEs) against the second-, third- and fourth-instar larvae of A. albopictus at 48 h post-treatment. (B) Comparison of individual toxicity of pure alkaloids and TAEs against third-instar larvae of A. albopictus at 48 h post-treatment. Corrected mortality (±SE) followed by different letters in the same concentration in bars indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) according to Tukey’s test.
Figure 2. Individual toxicity of the tested alkaloids against Aedesalbopictus larvae. (A) Corrected mortality of the total alkaloids of P. harmala seeds (TAEs) against the second-, third- and fourth-instar larvae of A. albopictus at 48 h post-treatment. (B) Comparison of individual toxicity of pure alkaloids and TAEs against third-instar larvae of A. albopictus at 48 h post-treatment. Corrected mortality (±SE) followed by different letters in the same concentration in bars indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) according to Tukey’s test.
Toxics 11 00341 g002
Figure 3. Evaluation of the median lethal concentration (LC50) of the tested alkaloids against third- instar larvae. Linear regression analysis of the log value of alkaloid concentrations and probit value of larval mortalities at 48 h post-treatment. (A) TAEs, (B) harmaline, (C) harmine, and (D) harmalol, with the LC50 values of 44.54 ± 2.56, 55.51 ± 3.01, 93.67 ± 4.53, and 117.87 ± 5.61 μg/mL, respectively. The LC50 value was calculated from the average of three replicates.
Figure 3. Evaluation of the median lethal concentration (LC50) of the tested alkaloids against third- instar larvae. Linear regression analysis of the log value of alkaloid concentrations and probit value of larval mortalities at 48 h post-treatment. (A) TAEs, (B) harmaline, (C) harmine, and (D) harmalol, with the LC50 values of 44.54 ± 2.56, 55.51 ± 3.01, 93.67 ± 4.53, and 117.87 ± 5.61 μg/mL, respectively. The LC50 value was calculated from the average of three replicates.
Toxics 11 00341 g003
Table 1. Toxicity of total alkaloid extracts (TAEs) and isolated alkaloids from Peganum harmala seeds and their binary mixtures prepared as LC25 combinations against second-instar larvae of Aedes albopictus.
Table 1. Toxicity of total alkaloid extracts (TAEs) and isolated alkaloids from Peganum harmala seeds and their binary mixtures prepared as LC25 combinations against second-instar larvae of Aedes albopictus.
TreatmentsMean Mortality (%) ± SECo-Toxicity CoefficientType of Effect
24 h48 h24 h48 h24 h48 h
Harmaline (A)22.3 ± 1.1 d29.7 ± 1.3 d----
Harmine (B)19.8 ± 0.9 d23.6 ± 1.1 d----
Harmalol (C)18.6 ± 1.2 d22.3 ± 1.4 d----
Harmane (D)17.9 ± 1.3 d21.5 ± 1.2 d----
A + B59.2 ± 2.1 b79.3 ± 2.1 a+141+149SynergismSynergism
A + C56.1 ± 1.9 b72.5 ± 2.4 b+137+139SynergismSynergism
A + D55.6 ± 2.2 b69.5 ± 1.9 b+138+136SynergismSynergism
B + C52.3 ± 1.8 c60.2 ± 2.1 c+136+131SynergismSynergism
B + D50.4 ± 2.0 c54.9 ± 1.7 c+134+122SynergismSynergism
C + D48.3 ± 1.6 c51.9 ± 1.9 c+132+119SynergismSynergism
TAEs65.2 ± 2.4 a83.1 ± 2.6 a--SynergismSynergism
Co-toxicity coefficient (CTC) = [(A + B)exper/(A + B)theor] × 100 [37]. Each datum represents the mean of three replicates. In the same column, means followed by the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Table 2. Sublethal effects of total alkaloid extracts (TAEs) from Peganum harmala seeds on the second-instar larval development.
Table 2. Sublethal effects of total alkaloid extracts (TAEs) from Peganum harmala seeds on the second-instar larval development.
TreatmentNumber of Larvae TestedLarvae Grow Time/h(Mean ± SE)Pupa Time/h (Mean ± SE)Pupation Rate/% (Mean ± SE)Emergence Rate/% (Mean ± SE)
Control210156.8 ± 6.2 c55.3 ± 6.5 c96.8 ± 2.1 a94.1 ± 3.9 a
LC10210183.9 ± 8.2 b67.2 ± 7.3 b89.4 ± 5.6 a87.3 ± 6.3 a
LC30240201.3 ± 9.3 a83.5 ± 8.1 a74.5 ± 6.2 b65.4 ± 5.1 b
Each datum represents the mean of three replicates. Mean in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, N.; Chen, L.; Li, J.; Li, W.; Jiang, S. Lethal and Sublethal Toxicity of Beta-Carboline Alkaloids from Peganum harmala (L.) against Aedes albopictus Larvae (Diptera: Culicidae). Toxics 2023, 11, 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040341

AMA Style

Jiang N, Chen L, Li J, Li W, Jiang S. Lethal and Sublethal Toxicity of Beta-Carboline Alkaloids from Peganum harmala (L.) against Aedes albopictus Larvae (Diptera: Culicidae). Toxics. 2023; 11(4):341. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Nan, Li Chen, Jinmei Li, Wenyong Li, and Shuanglin Jiang. 2023. "Lethal and Sublethal Toxicity of Beta-Carboline Alkaloids from Peganum harmala (L.) against Aedes albopictus Larvae (Diptera: Culicidae)" Toxics 11, no. 4: 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040341

APA Style

Jiang, N., Chen, L., Li, J., Li, W., & Jiang, S. (2023). Lethal and Sublethal Toxicity of Beta-Carboline Alkaloids from Peganum harmala (L.) against Aedes albopictus Larvae (Diptera: Culicidae). Toxics, 11(4), 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop