Next Article in Journal
Combined Toxicities of Di-Butyl Phthalate and Polyethylene Terephthalate to Zebrafish Embryos
Next Article in Special Issue
Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): Do They Matter to Aquatic Ecosystems?
Previous Article in Journal
Feasibility Study on the Application of Biodegradable Plastic Film in Farmland Soil in Southern Xinjiang, China—Planting Tomatoes as an Example
Previous Article in Special Issue
Using Blood Gas Analysis and Capnography to Determine Oxygenation Status in Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) Following the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Sensitive Response Index Selection for Rapid Assessment of Heavy Metals Toxicity to the Photosynthesis of Chlorella pyrenoidosa Based on Rapid Chlorophyll Fluorescence Induction Kinetics

1
Key Laboratory of Environmental Optics and Technology, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
2
Science Island Branch of Graduate School, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
3
Key Laboratory of Optical Monitoring Technology for Environment of Anhui Province, Hefei 230031, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2023, 11(5), 468; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11050468
Submission received: 17 March 2023 / Revised: 11 May 2023 / Accepted: 17 May 2023 / Published: 19 May 2023

Abstract

:
Heavy metals as toxic pollutants have important impacts on the photosynthesis of microalgae, thus seriously threatening the normal material circulation and energy flow of the aquatic ecosystem. In order to rapidly and sensitively detect the toxicity of heavy metals to microalgal photosynthesis, in this study, the effects of four typical toxic heavy metals, chromium (Cr(VI)), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and copper (Cu), on nine photosynthetic fluorescence parameters (φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo, φRo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm) derived from the chlorophyll fluorescence rise kinetics (OJIP) curve of microalga Chlorella pyrenoidosa, were investigated based on the chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics technique. By analyzing the change trends of each parameter with the concentrations of the four heavy metals, we found that compared with other parameters, φPo (maximum photochemical quantum yield of photosystem II), FV/FO (photochemical parameter of photosystem II), PIABS (photosynthetic performance index), and Sm (normalized area of the OJIP curve) demonstrated the same monotonic change characteristics with an increase in concentration of each heavy metal, indicating that these four parameters could be used as response indexes to quantitatively detect the toxicity of heavy metals. By further comparing the response performances of φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm to Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu, the results indicated that whether it was analyzed from the lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC), the influence degree by equal concentration of heavy metal, the 10% effective concentration (EC10), or the median effective concentration (EC50), the response sensitivities of PIABS to each heavy metal were all significantly superior to those of φRo, FV/FO, and Sm. Thus, PIABS was the most suitable response index for sensitive detection of heavy metals toxicity. Using PIABS as a response index to compare the toxicity of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu to C. pyrenoidosa photosynthesis within 4 h by EC50 values, the results indicated that Hg was the most toxic, while Cr(VI) toxicity was the lowest. This study provides a sensitive response index for rapidly detecting the toxicity of heavy metals to microalgae based on the chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics technique.

1. Introduction

As the source of life, water is an indispensable part of nature and human life. However, with the rapid development of socioeconomic events, industry, and agriculture, large quantities of heavy metals from anthropogenic activities, such as industrial emissions involving smelting and mining, extensive application of chemical fertilizers in agricultural production, automobile exhaust emissions, and garbage dumps in daily life, are discharged into the environment, resulting in serious heavy metal pollution problems in the aquatic environment [1,2,3]. Because heavy metals have the characteristics of non-degradability, bioaccumulation, and toxicity [4,5], the toxic effects of heavy metals on aquatic organisms in the aquatic environment have always been concerning.
In aquatic ecosystems, compared with other aquatic organisms, microalgae as kinds of planktonic photosynthetic organisms, are at the bottom of the aquatic food chain and are the main primary producers and energy converters [5,6]. As an important link in the material cycle and energy flow of aquatic ecosystems, microalgae play an important role in maintaining the normal structure and function of aquatic ecosystems [7]. Moreover, as a vital physiological process of microalgae, photosynthesis has important functions for aquatic ecosystems, which can provide material and energy sources for other organisms. As a result, microalgal photosynthesis is crucial for the normal primary production of the aquatic ecosystem [8]. However, many studies have reported that heavy metals have toxic effects on the photosynthesis of microalgae [1,8,9,10,11,12,13] by inhibiting the absorption of light energy, the transmission of photosynthetic electrons, and the conversion of photosynthetic energy [14,15,16], which will seriously affect the primary productivity of aquatic ecosystems and pose potential risks to the aquatic environment in severe cases. Therefore, rapid and sensitive detection of the toxicity of the heavy metals in water to the photosynthesis of microalgae is of great significance for evaluating the impacts of heavy metals on aquatic ecosystems and predicting their potential environmental risks.
The photosynthesis of plants is accompanied by the emission of chlorophyll fluorescence, and chlorophyll fluorescence is closely related to the photosynthesis state of plants [17,18]. Thus, the change in the photosynthesis state of plants can be determined by non-destructive measurement of chlorophyll fluorescence signals [19]. Based on this, the non-invasive and in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics technique has become a simple, rapid, reliable, and effective tool for analyzing the photosynthetic state [11,20,21,22] and photosystem II (PSII) behavior [1,16,20] of plants by conveniently and rapidly obtaining fluorescence information, including the chlorophyll fluorescence rise kinetics (OJIP) curve and diverse photosynthetic fluorescence parameters. In this way, the chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics technique has also become a favorable tool for rapid and on-site determination of pollutant toxicity to microalgal photosynthesis [23,24].
At present, although there are many photosynthetic fluorescence parameters derived from the OJIP curve, and some parameters have been widely used to evaluate the toxicity of heavy metals to microalgal photosynthesis based on the chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics technique, such as the maximum photochemical quantum yield of PSII (FV/FM) [12,20,21,25]. However, the response characteristics of different photosynthetic fluorescence parameters to heavy metals toxicity are not clear, and which parameter has the optimal response performance to the toxicity of heavy metals is still unknown. In this way, the use of an inappropriate response index will reduce the accuracy and sensitivity of fluorescence kinetics methods in detecting heavy metal toxicity. Therefore, it is extremely important to find an optimal response index to improve the accuracy and sensitivity of heavy metals toxicity detection based on the chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics technique.
In freshwater environments, the green alga Chlorella pyrenoidosa is a common unicellular freshwater microalga. Because of its wide distribution and vulnerability to toxic substances, C. pyrenoidosa has become an important indicative organism for detecting the toxicity of pollutants and evaluating the quality of the aquatic environment [15,21,26]. In this study, in order to rapidly and sensitively detect the toxicity of heavy metals to the photosynthesis of C. pyrenoidosa, the chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics technique was adopted to investigate the effects of four typical toxic heavy metals including chromium (Cr(VI)), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and copper (Cu) on the nine photosynthetic fluorescence parameters φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo, φRo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm derived from the OJIP curve. According to the change trends of each parameter with the concentrations of the four heavy metals, the parameters that could be used to quantitatively detect heavy metals toxicity were selected. Then by comparing their response performances to the toxicity of the four heavy metals, the most sensitive response index for detecting heavy metals toxicity was confirmed. On this basis, the optimal response index was used to compare the toxicity of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu to the photosynthesis of C. pyrenoidosa at different exposure times during short-term stress within 4 h. This study will be helpful for the development of rapid and accurate detection methods for the toxicity of pollutants based on the chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics technique.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Algal Culture

The freshwater microalga C. pyrenoidosa used in this study was obtained from the Freshwater Algae Species Bank of the Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Wuhan, China). After being autoclaved at 121 °C for 30 min, BG11 medium and 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks were used to inoculate and culture C. pyrenoidosa [15,27]. C. pyrenoidosa was aseptically inoculated in 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing sterile BG11 medium in a SW-CJ-1D ultra-clean workbench (Shangyu Aike Instrument Equipment Co., Ltd., Shaoxing, China). Then the inoculated algae samples were cultured in a MQD-B3G constant temperature incubator (Shanghai Minquan Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) with white cold fluorescent tubes as the light source. The culture conditions were as follows: light intensity was 120 μmol m−2 s−1; light and dark cycle was 12 h:12 h; and culture temperature was (25 ± 1) °C [27]. The cell density of the algal culture was counted daily by an ECLIPSE Ni-U biological fluorescence microscope (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). After being cultured for 3–4 days to enter the exponential growth phase, C. pyrenoidosa was used to carry out the exposure experiments of heavy metals.

2.2. Heavy Metals Exposure Experiments

Potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7, CAS: 7778-50-9, purity ≥ 99.8%), cadmium chloride hemi (pentahydrate) (CdCl2·2.5H2O, CAS: 7790-78-5, purity ≥ 99.0%), mercury chloride (HgCl2, CAS: 7487-94-7, purity ≥ 99.5%), and copper sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO4·5H2O, CAS: 7758-99-8, purity ≥ 99.0%) were used as the sources of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu for the heavy metals exposure experiments with C. pyrenoidosa, respectively. K2Cr2O7, CdCl2·2.5H2O, HgCl2, and CuSO4·5H2O were all of analytical grade and were all purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
First, according to the preliminary experimental results, 0.2 M of Cr(VI) stock solution and 0.05 M of Cd, Hg, and Cu stock solutions were prepared by dissolving K2Cr2O7, CdCl2·2.5H2O, HgCl2, and CuSO4·5H2O in sterile BG11 medium, respectively. Then the stock solution of each heavy metal was further diluted with sterile BG11 medium to obtain a series of working solutions of each heavy metal with different concentrations. An iCAP PQ inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) was employed to further measure the accurate concentration of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg or Cu in each working solution, and the concentrations of heavy metals measured by ICP-MS were as follows: Cr(VI) concentrations in a series of Cr(VI) working solutions were 0.510, 0.969, 1.938, 3.927, 7.854, 15.708, 31.365, 62.781 and 125.562 mM; Cd concentrations in a series of Cd working solutions were 0.102, 0.204, 0.459, 0.918, 1.836, 3.621, 7.242, 14.535 and 29.070 mM; Hg concentrations in a series of Hg working solutions were 0.102, 0.255, 0.510, 0.765, 1.020, 1.275, 1.530, 1.785 and 2.040 mM; and Cu concentrations in a series of Cu working solutions were 0.204, 0.612, 0.816, 1.020, 1.224, 1.428, 1.632, 2.397, 3.213 and 6.426 mM.
Exposure experiments were performed according to standard OECD Guideline 201 [28] with minor modification. Prior to exposure to heavy metals, the C. pyrenoidosa culture was diluted with sterile BG11 medium to obtain an algal suspension with the expected cellular concentration (1 × 105 cells mL−1). Then 1 mL of each heavy metal working solutions was added into aliquots of 50 mL of algal suspension; after that, each mixture was thoroughly shaken by hand to obtain a series of treatments of each heavy metal. The initial heavy metal concentrations of the treatments of each heavy metal were as follows: initial Cr(VI) concentrations of the Cr(VI) treatments were in the range of 0.010 to 2.462 mM; initial Cd concentrations of the Cd treatments ranged from 0.002 to 0.570 mM; initial Hg concentrations of the Hg treatments were in the range of 0.002 to 0.040 mM; and initial Cu concentrations of the Cu treatments ranged from 0.004 to 0.063 mM. Moreover, controls were prepared by adding 1 mL of sterile BG11 medium to aliquots of 50 mL of algal suspensions. Three replicates were performed for each treatment and the control. Then all the controls and treatments were placed in the incubator and cultured under the same culture conditions as described above. When the exposure times reached 1, 2, 3 and 4 h, the OJIP curve of each test alga sample was measured.

2.3. OJIP Curve Measurement

The chlorophyll fluorescence rise kinetics OJIP curve of each test alga sample was measured at room temperature according to Chen et al. (2016) [29] by an AquaPen AP110/C Handheld Algae Fluorescence Meter (Photon Systems Instruments, Czech Republic) with a blue light source of 455 nm. The saturation light pulse intensity was set as 1800 μmol (photons) m−2 s−1, and the measuring light pulse intensity was set as 0.027 μmol (photons) m−2 s−1. Prior to measurement, all the test algae samples were dark-adapted for 15 min to allow the PSII reaction centers (RCs) to open (re-oxidize) and the electron transport chain to be fully oxidized [14]. Fluorescence intensity data in a time span from 20 μs to 2 s were recorded with a varying sampling rate: from 20 to 610 μs, data were recorded per 10 μs; from 1 to 13.9 ms, data were recorded per 100 μs; from 15 to 89 ms, data were recorded per 1 ms; and from 90 ms to 2 s, data were recorded per 10 ms. The recorded 360 fluorescence intensity data before 1000 ms were used to draw the OJIP curve of each test alga sample.

2.4. Photosynthetic Fluorescence Parameters Acquisition

The following fluorescence data obtained from the original measured OJIP curves were used to calculate different photosynthetic fluorescence parameters: FO is the initial fluorescence level of the OJIP curve, corresponding to the fluorescence intensity of O-step at 20 μs and representing the minimal fluorescence yield of the system; FJ is the fluorescence level of J-step, corresponding to the fluorescence intensity at about 2 ms; FI is the fluorescence level of I-step, corresponding to the fluorescence intensity at about 20 ms; and FM is defined as the maximal fluorescence intensity of the OJIP curve, which is equal to the fluorescence level of P-step [20]. Then the variable fluorescence FV was calculated based on the above basic fluorescence intensity data according to Equation (1), which refers to the variation in fluorescence intensity between P-step and O-step of the OJIP curve.
FV = FM − FO
In addition, photosynthetic fluorescence parameters, including VJ, VI, Mo, Area, φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo, φRo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm, were calculated and obtained by the JIP-test based on FO, FJ, FI, FM, and FV values of the OJIP curve. The calculation equations and definitions of different parameters are shown in Table 1. Among them, φPo (also known as FV/FM) was the most frequently used parameter in detecting the toxicity of pollutants and diagnosing the photosynthetic state of plants under stress [25]. The K-S normality test was used to check the normality of the above parameters, and all data passed the normality test. Then φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo, φRo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm were used to analyze the impacts of heavy metals Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu on them, and φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm were further used as response indexes to detect the toxicity of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu to the photosynthesis of C. pyrenoidosa, respectively.

2.5. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses of data were carried out using SPSS 19.0 software. The statistically significant differences between the control group and each treatment group were determined by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Tukey post-hoc multiple test. For the results, 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05 was marked with an asterisk (*) to indicate that the treatment group was significantly different from the control group, and p < 0.01 was marked with two asterisks (**) to indicate that there was a highly significant difference between the control group and the treatment group. In order to detect the toxicity of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu to C. pyrenoidosa photosynthesis, when the response index of exposed C. pyrenoidosa was inhibited, the percentage inhibitions of the response index at different exposure times were calculated according to Equation (2):
It (%) = [(Pc−t − Pt−t)/Pc−t] × 100%
where Pc−t is the response index of control at the exposure time of t; Pt−t is the response index of treatment at the exposure time of t; and It (%) is the percentage inhibition of response index at the exposure time of t. When the response index of exposed C. pyrenoidosa was promoted, the percentage promotions of the response index at different exposure times were calculated according to Equation (3):
Ft (%) = [(Pt−t − Pc−t)/Pc−t] × 100%
where Ft (%) is the percentage promotion of response index at the exposure time of t.
For different response indexes of C. pyrenoidosa, the lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC) values of each heavy metal at different exposure times were determined by the lowest concentration of the heavy metal at which there was a significant difference between the treatment and the control [29]. All the concentration–response relationships between the response indexes of C. pyrenoidosa and each heavy metal were fitted using the logistic curve model [31], and the 10% effective concentration (EC10) values and median effective concentration (EC50) values of each heavy metal at different exposure times were calculated according to the fitted concentration–response curves [32].

3. Results

3.1. Influences of Four Heavy Metals on the OJIP Curve

For the C. pyrenoidosa treated with Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu during a short-term exposure of 1–4 h, there was no further considerable change in the calculated inhibitions of photosynthetic activity comparing the 3 h long exposures to the 4 h long ones, so the 3 h long exposures are presented in this paper for detailed analyses. In order to accurately analyze the influences of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu on the OJIP curve of C. pyrenoidosa and avoid the interferences of other factors, the directly measured OJIP curves of each treatment and control were first normalized with FO. When the exposure time was 3 h, the normalized OJIP curves (0.02–100 ms) of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to different concentrations of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu are shown in Figure 1. As seen from Figure 1, for the normalized OJIP curve of unexposed C. pyrenoidosa, the fluorescence yield increased to a great extent from O-step (about 0.02 ms) to P-step (about 100 ms). In addition, there were also two obvious inflections between O-step and P-step, corresponding to J-step (about 2 ms) and I-step (about 20 ms), respectively. Because of the toxic effects of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu on the photosynthesis of C. pyrenoidosa, the exposures to those four heavy metals induced significant changes in the normalized OJIP curve of C. pyrenoidosa compared with the control. That is, with an increase in heavy metal concentration, the fluorescence yield of the normalized OJIP curve gradually decreased, and the J-step and I-step in the normalized OJIP curve became less pronounced. Moreover, as the concentrations of heavy metals gradually increased, the fluorescence yield of P-step gradually approximated that of O-step, so that the photosynthetic fluorescence parameter FV/FO gradually decreased. When C. pyrenoidosa was exposed to Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu for 1, 2, and 4 h, the normalized OJIP curve had the same change characteristics as those of the 3 h exposures.

3.2. Changes of Different Parameters with Heavy Metals Concentrations

In order to select suitable response indexes for detecting heavy metals toxicity based on the chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics technique, we analyzed the changes in nine photosynthetic fluorescence parameters, φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo, φRo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm, derived from the OJIP curve of C. pyrenoidosa with the concentrations of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu. At the exposure time of 3 h, the values of φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo, φRo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to different concentrations of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu are shown in Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5. It can be seen that as the concentration of each heavy metal gradually increased, the values of φPo, FV/FO, and PIABS monotonically decreased, and the value of Sm monotonically increased. However, the changes in the other five parameters with the concentrations of the four heavy metals were different from those of φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm. For example, although the parameters φEo and φRo gradually decreased with an increase in Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu concentrations, when the Hg concentration was greater than 0.020 mM, the values of φEo and φRo slightly increased instead. Moreover, as the concentrations of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu increased, both δRo and ΨRo showed a trend of gradually decreasing first and then slowly increasing. In addition, although the parameter ΨEo gradually decreased with the increase in Cr(VI) and Cd concentrations, there was little change in ΨEo within the lower concentration ranges of Hg and Cu (Hg ≤ 0.020 mM and Cu ≤ 0.047 mM); then, when the concentration of Hg was greater than 0.02 mM and the concentration of Cu was greater than 0.047 mM, ΨEo demonstrated a gradually increasing trend. When C. pyrenoidosa was exposed to Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu for 1, 2, and 4 h, the change characteristics of each parameter with four heavy metal concentrations were the same as those of the 3 h exposures. These results indicated that when the heavy metals were different, the change trends of ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo, and φRo with heavy metal concentration may be inconsistent. In contrast, all the parameters φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm showed monotonic changes with heavy metal concentration, indicating that these four parameters were suitable for quantitative detection of the toxicity of heavy metals.

3.3. Comparison of Response Performances of φPo, FV/FO, PIABS and Sm to Four Heavy Metals Toxicity

In view of the fact that all four heavy metals Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu had important impacts on the φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm values of C. pyrenoidosa, and all four parameters had monotonic concentration-dependences with each heavy metal, in order to select a suitable response index for rapid and sensitive detection of the toxicity of heavy metals to the photosynthesis of C. pyrenoidosa, the response performances of φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm to the four heavy metals’ toxicity were compared.
First, the response sensitivities of φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm to low concentrations of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu were compared. At the exposure time of 3 h, the significant differences in φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm between the low concentration of heavy metal treatments and the control are shown in Figure 6. It can be seen that when the concentration of Cr(VI) reached 0.019 mM, there was a significant difference in FV/FO (p = 0.012) and a highly significant difference in PIABS (p = 0.008) between the treatment and the control, while the φPo and Sm parameters of the treatment had no significant differences from those of the control. For 0.020 mM Cd treatment, compared with the control, PIABS showed a highly significant difference (p = 0.009), while FV/FO, φPo and Sm only showed significant differences (p = 0.012, 0.042, and 0.046, respectively). Similarly, when the concentrations of Hg and Cu were as low as 0.002 and 0.004 mM, respectively, the FV/FO and PIABS of the treatments were significantly different from those of the control (for the Hg treatment, p = 0.032 (FV/FO) and 0.045 (PIABS); for the Cu treatment, p = 0.036 (FV/FO) and 0.041 (PIABS)), while there were no significant differences in φPo and Sm between the treatments and the control. These results indicated that when PIABS and FV/FO were used as test endpoints, the LOEC values of the four heavy metals were significantly lower than the values determined using φPo and Sm as test endpoints. Moreover, compared with FV/FO, PIABS of the same low-concentration heavy metal treatment showed a more significant difference from that of the control. When the exposure times were 1, 2, and 4 h, the comparison results of the different parameters in response to low concentrations of the heavy metal were similar to those of the 3 h exposures. Thus, the response sensitivity of PIABS to low concentrations of heavy metals was significantly higher than that of FV/FO, φPo, and Sm.
Second, for each treatment exposed for the same time, the influence degrees of φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm of C. pyrenoidosa by the same concentration of heavy metal were also compared, and the results at the exposure time of 3 h are shown in Figure 7. We can see that regardless of whether C. pyrenoidosa was exposed to Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, or Cu, when the heavy metal concentration was the same, all the percentage changes of PIABS were significantly greater than those of φPo, FV/FO and Sm. For example, when the concentration of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu increased from 0.010 to 2.462 mM, from 0.002 to 0.570 mM, from 0.002 to 0.040 mM, and from 0.004 to 0.063 mM, respectively, the percentage inhibition of PIABS increased correspondingly from 1.45% to 90.09%, from 10.05% to 96.44%, from 5.57% to 99.49%, and from 4.35% to 92.7%, respectively; and the corresponding percentage inhibition of FV/FO increased from 0.92% to 80.06%, from 7.75% to 85.91%, from 3.33% to 96.80%, and from 3.65% to 89.30%, respectively; while the corresponding percentage inhibition of φPo only increased from 0.26% to 53.86%, from 2.46% to 64.72%, from 0.99% to 89.86%, and from 1.03% to 69.76%, respectively. In the concentration ranges of heavy metals used in this study, the percentage inhibitions of φPo induced by Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu were 40–92%, 33–78%, 6–82%, and 25–83% lower than those of PIABS, with average reductions of 72%, 57%, 36% and 59%, respectively; and the percentage inhibitions of FV/FO caused by Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu decreased by averages of 39%, 16%, 9% and 18% compared with those of PIABS, respectively. Thus, the influence degrees of PIABS for equal concentrations of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu were significantly higher than those of FV/FO and φPo. For the same heavy metal treatment, although the percentage changes of Sm were significantly higher than the percentage inhibitions of PIABS within the range of higher concentrations of heavy metals (such as Cr(VI) ≥ 1.231 mM, Cd ≥ 0.285 mM, Hg ≥ 0.020 mM, and Cu ≥ 0.031 mM), when the concentrations of heavy metals were lower, the percentage changes of Sm were also lower than the percentage inhibitions of PIABS. When the exposure times were 1, 2, and 4 h, the comparison results of the influence degrees of φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm for the same concentrations of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu were the same as those of the 3 h exposures. Therefore, the response sensitivity of PIABS to the same concentration of heavy metal was significantly better than those of φPo, FV/FO, and Sm.
In addition, the EC10 and EC50 values of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu calculated according to φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm were further compared when C. pyrenoidosa was exposed for the same time, and when the exposure time was 3 h, the results are shown in Table 2. It can be seen that when PIABS was used as the test endpoint of C. pyrenoidosa to detect the toxicity of heavy metals, the EC50 values of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu were 0.054, 0.023, 0.013 and 0.022 mM, respectively, which were significantly lower than the EC50 values of these four heavy metals calculated based on φPo, FV/FO, and Sm. For Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu, compared to the EC50 values calculated according to PIABS, the EC50 values calculated according to φPo were 33.95, 6.98, 1.25, and 1.78 times those values; the EC50 values calculated according to FV/FO were 5.04, 1.36, 1.04, and 1.14 times those values; and the EC50 values calculated according to Sm were 7.45, 3.84, 1.09,and 1.31 times those values, respectively. Similarly, the EC10 values of each heavy metal calculated according to φPo, FV/FO, and Sm were also significantly higher than those values calculated according to PIABS. When the exposure time was 1, 2, and 4 h, the comparison results of the EC10 and EC50 values of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu calculated according to φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm were similar to those of the 3 h exposures. So compared with φPo, FV/FO, and Sm, PIABS could be used as a response index to more sensitively detect the toxicity of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu to the photosynthesis of C. pyrenoidosa.
Consequently, for C. pyrenoidosa exposed to Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu, whether it was analyzed from the LOEC values, the influence degrees by equal concentrations of the heavy metal, the EC10 or EC50 values, and the response sensitivities of PIABS to the toxicity of each heavy metal were all significantly superior to those of φPo, FV/FO, and Sm. So PIABS was a more suitable response index for rapidly and sensitively detecting the toxicity of heavy metals to the photosynthesis of C. pyrenoidosa.

3.4. Comparison of the Toxicity of Four Heavy Metals to the Photosynthesis of C. pyrenoidosa during Short-Term Stress within 4 h by PIABS

Among the four parameters φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm, PIABS, which had the most sensitive response performance, was used as a test endpoint to evaluate and compare the toxicity of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu to the photosynthesis of C. pyrenoidosa during short-term stress within 4 h, and the EC50 values of the four heavy metals at the exposure times of 1, 2, 3, and 4 h are shown in Figure 8. As can be seen from Figure 8, within 4 h, the EC50 values of all four heavy metals decreased with an increase in exposure time. This result indicated that the toxic effects of the four heavy metals on the photosynthesis of C. pyrenoidosa were time-dependent during short-term stress. Although the EC50 values of the four heavy metals changed with the exposure time within 4 h, when the exposure time was the same, all the orders of EC50 values of the four heavy metals followed Hg < Cu < Cd < Cr(VI). Thus, during the short-term stress within 4 h, the toxicity order of the four heavy metals to C. pyrenoidosa photosynthesis was Hg > Cu > Cd > Cr(VI). Those results demonstrated that in a freshwater environment, among the four heavy metals, the photosynthesis of C. pyrenoidosa was most vulnerable to the toxicity of Hg, while the toxicity of Cr(VI) had a weaker impact on the photosynthesis of C. pyrenoidosa.

4. Discussion

In the present study, by analyzing the change characteristics of the normalized OJIP curve of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to heavy metals Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu compared with the control, we found that all four heavy metals had important effects on the normalized OJIP curve of C. pyrenoidosa, resulting in a reduction in fluorescence yield of the entire curve, which was consistent with the results of previous reports that heavy metals could decrease the fluorescence yields of the OJIP curves of Chlorella valgaris [16], Scenedesmus incrassatululus [18], Scenedesmus obliquus [33], and Spirodela polyrhiza [1].
Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu induced changes in the OJIP curve of C. pyrenoidosa because Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu, as toxic heavy metal pollutants, inhibited the photosynthetic activity of C. pyrenoidosa. The OJIP curve contained abundant information about the photochemical reaction of PSII, thus reflecting the changes in the photosynthetic state of C. pyrenoidosa. According to previous reports, PSII was the major target site of toxic heavy metals Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu [16,34,35]. When algal cells were exposed to Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, or Cu, these four heavy metals might reduce the light-capturing performance of light-harvesting antenna complexes (LHCs) and inhibit the electron transport of PSII via QA, QB, and the plastoquinone pool, thereby causing a reduction in the active PSII RCs and a decrease in the quantum yield of PSII [5,14,16,18,36]. Moreover, the nine photosynthetic fluorescence parameters φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo, φRo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm were all calculated based on the fluorescence information from the OJIP curve. Although these nine parameters were all affected by Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu, because they had different photosynthetic physiological meanings and represented the information of different photosynthetic stages, their response characteristics to heavy metals toxicity were inconsistent. If a parameter could be used as a response index for quantitative detection of heavy metals toxicity, for different heavy metals, it should have the same monotonic change characteristics with the change in heavy metal concentration. In this study, the parameters φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo, φRo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm were all affected by Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu. However, for different heavy metals, only φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm showed the same monotonic change trend with the increase in each heavy metal concentration, while the change trends of ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo, and φRo with an increase in each heavy metal concentration were neither monotonic nor completely consistent. Therefore, parameters φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm could be used as test endpoints to quantitatively detect heavy metals toxicity, while parameters ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo and φRo were not applicable.
In order to select an optimal response index for rapidly and sensitively detecting the toxicity of heavy metals to the photosynthesis of C. pyrenoidosa, the response sensitivities of φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm to the toxicity of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu were compared. We found that among the four photosynthetic activity parameters, no matter whether compared in terms of the LOEC values, the influence degrees for equal concentrations of heavy metal, the EC10 values, or the EC50 values, the response sensitivities of PIABS to the toxicity of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu were all better than those of φPo, FV/FO, and Sm. Among them, parameter φPo (also known as FV/FM) represented the maximum photochemical quantum yield of PSII and is a frequently and widely used photosynthetic fluorescence parameter in the assessment of various pollutants’ toxicity. By comparison, we verified that φPo did not have very good sensitivity in response to the toxicity of heavy metal. If φPo is used to evaluate the toxic effects of heavy metals on the photosynthesis of microalgae, the degrees of toxic effect will be underestimated. The photosynthetic activity parameter PIABS had a more sensitive response performance to heavy metals, which was a more appropriate response index for quantitatively detecting the toxicity of heavy metals to C. pyrenoidosa using the chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics technique. The studies of Xin et al. (2020) [37] and Hu et al. (2018) [38] also indicated that PIABS (the performance index for energy conservation from photons absorbed by PSII to the reduction of intersystem electron acceptors) was more sensitive than φPo (also known as FV/FM) and FV/FO in reflecting the impact of the heavy metal Cd and temperature on the photosynthesis of aquatic macrophyte Pontederia cordata and cotton seedlings. Therefore, the result of our study was in good agreement with the reports of Xin et al. (2020) and Hu et al. (2018). However, it is currently uncertain whether the response sensitivities of PIABS to other types of toxic pollutants are also superior to those of φPo, FV/FO, and other photosynthetic fluorescence parameters. Therefore, we will conduct detailed research on the response characteristics of different photosynthetic fluorescence parameters to other toxic pollutants in the future.
In addition, we used PIABS as a test endpoint to compare the toxicity of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu to the photosynthesis of C. pyrenoidosa during short-term stress within 4 h. We found that among the four heavy metals, Hg was the most toxic to C. pyrenoidosa, followed by Cu and Cd, while the toxicity of Cr(VI) was the lowest. Rocchetta et al. (2009) reported that treatment with Cu led to clearer and stronger effects on the photochemistry of Euglena gracilis than the treatment with Cr(VI) [39]. Eom et al. (2021) assessed and compared the toxicity of different heavy metals to Chlorella vulgaris by oxygen evolution, and the results indicated that the toxicity of Hg was higher than Cd according to 18 h EC50 values [40]. Liu et al. (2011) compared the toxicity of Cu and Cd on the motility of the two marine microalgae Isochrysis galbana and Tetraselmis chui, and their results demonstrated that the toxic effect of Cu on the motility of the two species was greater than that of Cd [41]. Tonon et al. (2018) analyzed the tolerance of Gracilaria tenuistipitata to Cd and Cu by observing photosynthesis, and they found that the toxicity of Cu was also higher than Cd toxicity to Gracilaria tenuistipitata according to 6 days EC50 [42]. Although the test organisms, toxicity test endpoints, and exposure times used in these previous studies were different from the present study, the toxicity ranking of the four heavy metals to the test organisms was in good agreement with our results. In the present study, Cr(VI) demonstrated the weakest toxicity compared with Cd, Hg, and Cu, which may be due to the fact that the PSII is not the main site where this metal exerts its action.
Moreover, we also found that although the response sensitivities of PIABS to Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu were better than those of φPo, FV/FO, and Sm, the EC50 values of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu determined based on PIABS were still not very low during the short-term stress within 4 h. For example, Reis et al. (2021) [8] and Rocha et al. (2021) [9] reported that the 96 h EC50 value of Cd inhibiting the growth of Raphidocelis subcapitata was 0.67 μM, and the 72 h EC50 value of Cu inhibiting the growth of Selenastrum gracile was 0.06 μM. Because the toxicity of heavy metals is time-dependent, the short exposure time (within 4 h) in this study may be the reason why the EC50 values of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu obtained based on PIABS were not very low. The low toxicity determined by PIABS in the hour time-scale may hide stronger effects (such as genotoxicity and growth toxicity) after longer exposures. Therefore, in practical application, during short-term exposure at an hour time scale, PIABS may be more suitable for the detection and evaluation of the toxicity of industrial wastewater and other polluted water containing higher concentrations of pollutants. Furthermore, algal population is a key indicator to evaluate the aquatic ecological environment. At present, although using the biomass or growth rate of algal population as a test endpoint to detect the toxicity of pollutants is a commonly used toxicity test method, these response indicators usually require longer exposure time. Because these test endpoints have difficulty in achieving rapid detection of the toxicity of pollutants or contaminated water, they have certain limitations in terms of the monitoring and management of the water environment and the emergency detection of sudden water pollution events. In contrast, the photosynthetic activity parameter PIABS selected in this study has a rapid response characteristic to heavy metals. Thus, establishing the relationship between PIABS and algal biomass or the growth rate of the algal population is of great significance for improving the practical application performance of PIABS. Therefore, in our follow-up work, we plan to carry out detailed and systemic research on the relationship between the inhibition degree of PIABS by heavy metals after short-term exposure and the inhibition degree of algal biomass or growth rate by heavy metals after long-term exposure and try to construct their relationship models in order to infer the long-term impacts of heavy metals on the algae population based on the monitoring of PIABS over a short time. We hope that our subsequent works will provide methods with more practical application value for the evaluation of aquatic environment quality and the prediction of aquatic environmental risk.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the toxic effects of heavy metals Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu on the photosynthesis of C. pyrenoidosa induced significant changes in the OJIP curves of C. pyrenoidosa. As a result, Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu had significant impacts on photosynthetic fluorescence parameters φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo, φRo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm derived from the OJIP curve. Among the nine parameters, φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm showed the same monotonic change trends with the increase in each heavy metal concentration and were suitable for quantitatively detecting the toxicity of heavy metals. On the contrary, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo, and φRo were not suitable for assessment of heavy metals toxicity because their change trends with the concentration of each heavy metal were not completely consistent or not monotonic. Among the four parameters φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm, the response sensitivities of PIABS to the four heavy metals were all better than those of φPo, FV/FO, and Sm, verifying that PIABS was a more sensitive response index than φPo, FV/FO, and Sm in quantitatively detecting the toxicity of heavy metals. During short-term stress within 4 h, using PIABS as a response index to compare the toxicity of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu to the photosynthesis of C. pyrenoidosa, the toxicity order of the four heavy metals was Hg > Cu > Cd > Cr(VI). This study provides an important basis and a sensitive response index for rapidly detecting heavy metals toxicity in water based on the chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics technique.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.G. and G.Y.; methodology, T.G. and G.Y.; software, T.G.; validation, T.G., N.Z. and G.Y.; formal analysis, T.G., X.T. and Y.W.; investigation, T.G. and X.T.; data collation, T.G.; writing—original draft preparation, T.G.; writing—review and editing, N.Z. and G.Y.; visualization, T.G.; supervision, N.Z.; project administration, N.Z.; funding acquisition, N.Z., G.Y. and T.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program (grant number 2021YFC3200100, 2022YFC3103901); Anhui Province Science and Technology Major Special Project (grant number 202003a07020007, 202203a07020002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this article and data for 1, 2 and 4 h exposures are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Appenroth, K.J.; Stöckel, J.; Srivastava, A.; Strasser, R.J. Multiple effects of chromate on the photosynthetic apparatus of Spirodela polyrhiza as probed by OJIP chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements. Environ. Pollut. 2001, 115, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vörösmarty, C.J.; McIntyre, P.B.; Gessner, M.O.; Dudgeon, D.; Prusevich, A.; Green, P.; Glidden, S.; Bunn, S.E.; Sullivan, C.A.; Liermann, C.R.; et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 2010, 467, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Samadani, M.; Perreault, F.; Oukarroum, A.; Dewez, D. Effect of cadmium accumulation on green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and acid-tolerant Chlamydomonas CPCC 121. Chemosphere 2018, 191, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chowdhury, S.; Mazumder, M.A.J.; Al-Attas, O.; Husain, T. Heavy metals in drinking water: Occurrences, implications, and future needs in developing countries. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 569, 476–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gao, C.; Gao, L.; Duan, P.; Wu, H.; Li, M. Evaluating combined toxicity of binary heavy metals to the cyanobacterium Microcystis: A theoretical non-linear combined toxicity assessment method. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 187, 109809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sun, C.; Xu, Y.; Hu, N.; Ma, J.; Sun, S.; Cao, W.; Klobučar, G.; Hu, C.; Zhao, Y. To evaluate the toxicity of atrazine on the freshwater microalgae Chlorella sp. using sensitive indices indicated by photosynthetic parameters. Chemosphere 2020, 244, 125514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Martins, P.L.G.; Marques, L.G.; Colepicolo, P. Antioxidant enzymes are induced by phenol in the marine microalga Lingulodinium polyedrum. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 116, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dos Reis, L.L.; Alho, L.D.O.G.; de Abreu, C.B.; Melao, M.D.G.G. Using multiple endpoints to assess the toxicity of cadmium and cobalt for chlorophycean Raphidocelis subcapitata. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rocha, G.S.; Parrish, C.C.; Espíndola, E.L.G. Effects of copper on photosynthetic and physiological parameters of a freshwater microalga (Chlorophyceae). Algal Res. 2021, 54, 102223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rocha, G.S.; Lombardi, A.T.; Espíndola, E.L.G. Combination of P-limitation and cadmium in photosynthetic responses of the freshwater microalga Ankistrodesmus densus (Chlorophyceae). Environ. Pollut. 2021, 275, 116673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aksmann, A.; Pokora, W.; Baścik-Remisiewicz, A.; Dettlaff-Pokora, A.; Wielgomas, B.; Dziadziuszko, M.; Tukaj, Z. Time-dependent changes in antioxidative enzyme expression and photosynthetic activity of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cells under acute exposure to cadmium and anthracene. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 110, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, B.; Duan, G.; Fang, Y.; Deng, X.; Yin, Y.; Huang, K. Selenium(IV) alleviates chromium(VI)-induced toxicity in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 272, 116407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Didur, O.; Dewez, D.; Popovic, R. Alteration of chromium effect on photosystem II activity in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cultures under different synchronized state of the cell cycle. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20, 1870–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Da Costa, C.H.; Perreault, F.; Oukarroum, A.; Melegari, S.P.; Popovic, R.; Matias, W.G. Effect of chromium oxide (III) nanoparticles on the production of reactive oxygen species and photosystem II activity in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 565, 951–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, S.; Wufuer, R.; Duo, J.; Li, W.; Pan, X. Cadmium caused different toxicity to photosystem I and photosystem II of freshwater unicellular algae Chlorella pyrenoidosa (Chlorophyta). Toxics 2022, 10, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Oukarroum, A.; Perreault, F.; Popovic, R. Interactive effects of temperature and copper on photosystem II photochemistry in Chlorella vulgaris. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2012, 110, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kumar, K.S.; Dahms, H.-U.; Lee, J.-S.; Kim, H.C.; Lee, W.C.; Shin, K.-H. Algal photosynthetic responses to toxic metals and herbicides assessed by chlorophyll a fluorescence. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 104, 51–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Perales-Vela, H.V.; González-Moreno, S.; Montes-Horcasitas, C.; Canizares-Villanueva, R.O. Growth, photosynthetic and respiratory responses to sub-lethal copper concentrations in Scenedesmus incrassatulus (Chlorophyceae). Chemosphere 2007, 67, 2274–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, C.; Li, W.; Xu, Y.; Hu, N.; Ma, J.; Cao, W.; Sun, S.; Hu, C.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, Q. Effects of carbon nanotubes on the toxicities of copper, cadmium and zinc toward the freshwater microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus. Aquat. Toxicol. 2020, 224, 105504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dao, L.H.T.; Beardall, J. Effects of lead on two green microalgae Chlorella and Scenedesmus: Photosystem II activity and heterogeneity. Algal Res. 2016, 16, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shivagangaiah, C.P.; Sanyal, D.; Dasgupta, S.; Banik, A. Phycoremediation and photosynthetic toxicity assessment of lead by two freshwater microalgae Scenedesmus acutus and Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 173, 246–258. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kalaji, H.M.; Jajoo, A.; Oukarroum, A.; Brestic, M.; Zivcak, M.; Samborsk, I.A.; Cetner, M.D.; Łukasik, I.; Goltsev, V.; Ladle, R.J. Chlorophyll a fluorescence as a tool to monitor physiological status of plants under abiotic stress conditions. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2016, 38, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Durrieu, C.; Tran-Minh, C.; Chovelon, J.M.; Barthet, L.; Chouteau, C.; Védrine, C. Algal biosensors for aquatic ecosystems monitoring. Eur. Phys. J.—Appl. Phys. 2006, 36, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Belaïdi, F.S.; Farouil, L.; Salvagnac, L.; Temple-Boyer, P.; Séguy, I.; Heully, J.L.; Alary, F.; Bedel-Pereira, E.; Launay, J. Towards integrated multi-sensor platform using dual electrochemical and optical detection for on-site pollutant detection in water. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 132, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Connan, S.; Stengel, D.B. Impacts of ambient salinity and copper on brown algae: 1. Interactive effects on photosynthesis, growth, and copper accumulation. Aquat. Toxicol. 2011, 104, 94–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mo, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, D.; Qin, L.; Yuan, B.; Liang, N. Time-dependent toxicity and health effects mechanism of cadmium to three green algae. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chen, M.; Yin, G.; Zhao, N.; Gan, T.; Feng, C.; Gu, M.; Qi, P.; Ding, Z. Rapid and sensitive detection of water toxicity based on photosynthetic inhibition effect. Toxics 2021, 9, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. OECD. Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. 2006. Available online: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/test-no-201-alga-growth-inhibition-test_9789264069923-en (accessed on 23 March 2006).
  29. Chen, S.; Yang, J.; Zhang, M.; Strasser, R.J.; Qiang, S. Classification and characteristics of heat tolerance in Ageratina adenophora populations using fast chlorophyll a fluorescence rise O-J-I-P. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 122, 126–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Stirbet, A.; Govindjee. On the relation between the Kautsky effect (chlorophyll a fluorescence induction and Photosystem II: Basics and applications of the OJIP fluorescence transient). J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2011, 104, 236–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, L.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Jiao, N. Environmental risk assessment of triazine herbicides in the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea and their toxicity to phytoplankton at environmental concentrations. Environ. Int. 2019, 133, 105175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Z.; Sun, X.; Ru, S.; Wang, J.; Xiong, J.; Yang, L.; Hao, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X. Effects of co-exposure of the triazine herbicides atrazine, prometryn and terbutryn on Phaeodactylum tricornutum photosynthesis and nutritional value. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 807, 150609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dewez, D.; Geoffroy, L.; Vernet, G.; Popovic, R. Determination of photosynthetic and enzymatic biomarkers sensitivity used to evaluate toxic effects of copper and fludioxonil in alga Scenedesmus obliquus. Aquat. Toxicol. 2005, 74, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mallick, N.; Mohn, F.H. Use of chlorophyll fluorescence in metal-stress research: A case study with the green microalga Scenedesmus. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2003, 55, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Deng, C.; Pan, X.; Wang, S.; Zhang, D. Cu2+ inhibits photosystem II activities but enhances photosystem I quantum yield of Microcystis aeruginosa. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2014, 160, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Janeczko, A.; Koscielniak, J.; Pilipowicz, M.; Szarek-Lukaszewska, G.; Skoczowski, A. Protection of winter rape photosystem 2 by 24-epibrassinolide under cadmium stress. Photosynthetica 2005, 43, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xin, J.; Ma, S.; Li, Y.; Zhao, C.; Tian, R. Pontederia cordata, an ornamental aquatic macrophyte with great potential in phytoremediation of heavy-metal-contaminated wetlands. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 203, 111024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hu, W.; Snider, J.L.; Chastain, D.R.; Slaton, W.; Tishchenko, V. Sub-optimal emergence temperature alters thermotolerance of thylakoid component processes in cotton seedlings. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 155, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rocchetta, I.; Küpper, H. Chromium- and copper-induced inhibition of photosynthesis in Euglena gracilis analysed on the single-cell level by fluorescence kinetic microscopy. New Phytol. 2009, 181, 405–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Eom, H.; Park, M.; Jang, A.; Kim, S.; Oh, S.-E. A simple and rapid algal assay kit to assess toxicity of heavy metal-contaminated water. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 269, 116135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Liu, G.; Chai, X.; Shao, Y.; Hu, L.; Xie, Q.; Wu, H. Toxicity of copper, lead, and cadmium on the motility of two marine microalgae Isochrysis galbana and Tetraselmis chui. J. Environ. Sci. 2011, 23, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tonon, A.P.; Zaini, P.A.; Falcão, V.D.R.; Oliveira, M.C.; Collén, J.; Boyen, C.; Colepicolo, P. Gracilaria tenuistipitata (Rhodophyta) tolerance to cadmium and copper exposure observed through gene expression and photosynthesis analyses. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 2129–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Normalized OJIP curves of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to different concentrations of heavy metals for 3 h: (A) Cr(VI), (B) Cd, (C) Hg, (D) Cu.
Figure 1. Normalized OJIP curves of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to different concentrations of heavy metals for 3 h: (A) Cr(VI), (B) Cd, (C) Hg, (D) Cu.
Toxics 11 00468 g001aToxics 11 00468 g001b
Figure 2. Parameter values of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to different concentrations of Cr(VI) for 3 h: (A) φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo and φRo; (B) FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm. Symbols and error bars represent the average values and standard deviations of triplicates, respectively.
Figure 2. Parameter values of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to different concentrations of Cr(VI) for 3 h: (A) φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo and φRo; (B) FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm. Symbols and error bars represent the average values and standard deviations of triplicates, respectively.
Toxics 11 00468 g002
Figure 3. Parameter values of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to different concentrations of Cd for 3 h: (A) φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo and φRo; (B) FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm. Symbols and error bars represent the average values and standard deviations of triplicates, respectively.
Figure 3. Parameter values of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to different concentrations of Cd for 3 h: (A) φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo and φRo; (B) FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm. Symbols and error bars represent the average values and standard deviations of triplicates, respectively.
Toxics 11 00468 g003
Figure 4. Parameter values of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to different concentrations of Hg for 3 h: (A) φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo and φRo; (B) FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm. Symbols and error bars represent the average values and standard deviations of triplicates, respectively.
Figure 4. Parameter values of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to different concentrations of Hg for 3 h: (A) φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo and φRo; (B) FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm. Symbols and error bars represent the average values and standard deviations of triplicates, respectively.
Toxics 11 00468 g004
Figure 5. Parameter values of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to different concentrations of Cu for 3 h: (A) φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo and φRo; (B) FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm. Symbols and error bars represent the average values and standard deviations of triplicates, respectively.
Figure 5. Parameter values of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to different concentrations of Cu for 3 h: (A) φPo, ΨEo, φEo, δRo, ΨRo and φRo; (B) FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm. Symbols and error bars represent the average values and standard deviations of triplicates, respectively.
Toxics 11 00468 g005
Figure 6. Significant differences in φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm for C. pyrenoidosa exposed to a low concentration of heavy metal for 3 h and the control: (A) Cr(VI), (B) Cd, (C) Hg, (D) Cu. An asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference between the treatment group and the control group at 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05; and two asterisks (**) indicate a highly significant difference between the treatment group and the control group at p < 0.01. “NS” indicates that there is no significant difference between the treatment group and the control group. Columns and error bars represent the average values and standard deviations of triplicates, respectively.
Figure 6. Significant differences in φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm for C. pyrenoidosa exposed to a low concentration of heavy metal for 3 h and the control: (A) Cr(VI), (B) Cd, (C) Hg, (D) Cu. An asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference between the treatment group and the control group at 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05; and two asterisks (**) indicate a highly significant difference between the treatment group and the control group at p < 0.01. “NS” indicates that there is no significant difference between the treatment group and the control group. Columns and error bars represent the average values and standard deviations of triplicates, respectively.
Toxics 11 00468 g006aToxics 11 00468 g006b
Figure 7. Percentage changes of φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to different concentrations of heavy metal for 3 h: (A) Cr(VI), (B) Cd, (C) Hg, (D) Cu.
Figure 7. Percentage changes of φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm of C. pyrenoidosa exposed to different concentrations of heavy metal for 3 h: (A) Cr(VI), (B) Cd, (C) Hg, (D) Cu.
Toxics 11 00468 g007aToxics 11 00468 g007b
Figure 8. EC50 values of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu at exposure times of 1, 2, 3 and 4 h using PIABS as the response index. The upper and lower borders of the red dashed boxes represent the 95% confidence interval of the EC50 value.
Figure 8. EC50 values of Cr(VI), Cd, Hg, and Cu at exposure times of 1, 2, 3 and 4 h using PIABS as the response index. The upper and lower borders of the red dashed boxes represent the 95% confidence interval of the EC50 value.
Toxics 11 00468 g008
Table 1. Calculations and definitions of different photosynthetic fluorescence parameters [30].
Table 1. Calculations and definitions of different photosynthetic fluorescence parameters [30].
Parameter and EquationDefinition
VJ = (FJ − FO)/(FM − FO)Relative variable fluorescence at J-step
VI = (FI − FO)/(FM − FO)Relative variable fluorescence at I-step
MO = 4·(F300μs − FO)/(FM − FO)Approximate value of the initial slope of the relative variable fluorescence curve
AreaArea between the OJIP curve and the line F = FM
FV/FOPSII photochemical parameter
Sm = Area/FVNormalized area of the OJIP curve
φPo = 1 − FO/FM = FV/FMMaximum quantum yield of primary PSII photochemistry
φEo = φPo·(1-VJ) = 1 − FJ/FMQuantum yield of the electron transport flux from QA to QB
φRo = φPo·(1-VI) = 1 − FI/FMQuantum yield of the electron transport flux until the PSI electron acceptors
ΨEo = 1 − VJEfficiency with which a PSII trapped electron is transferred from QA to QB
ΨRo = 1 − VIEfficiency with which a PSII trapped electron is transferred until PSI acceptors
δRo = (1 − VI)/(1-VJ)Efficiency with which an electron from QB is transferred until PSI acceptors
PIABS = [γRC/(1 − γRC)]·[φPo/(1 − φPo)]·[ΨEo/(1 − ΨEo)]Performance index for energy conservation from photons absorbed by PSII antenna to the reduction of QB
Table 2. Three-hour EC10 and EC50 values and their confidence intervals (95%) of four heavy metals with φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm as response indexes.
Table 2. Three-hour EC10 and EC50 values and their confidence intervals (95%) of four heavy metals with φPo, FV/FO, PIABS, and Sm as response indexes.
Heavy Metal3 h EC10 (mM)3 h EC50 (mM)
φPoFV/FOPIABSSmφPoFV/FOPIABSSm
Cr(VI)0.086
(0.064–0.116)
0.024
(0.019–0.030)
0.014
(0.013–0.015)
0.043
(0.042–0.044)
1.835
(1.548–2.309)
0.272
(0.223–0.336)
0.054
(0.049–0.059)
0.403
(0.322–0.491)
Cd0.010
(0.008–0.015)
0.003
(0.002–0.004)
0.002
(0.002–0.003)
0.004
(0.003–0.005)
0.164
(0.127–0.212)
0.032
(0.025–0.041)
0.023
(0.020–0.027)
0.090
(0.089–0.091)
Hg0.013
(0.011–0.014)
0.007
(0.006–0.008)
0.005
(0.004–0.006)
0.010
(0.009–0.011)
0.016
(0.016–0.017)
0.013
(0.013–0.014)
0.013
(0.012–0.014)
0.014
(0.011–0.017)
Cu0.019
(0.015–0.023)
0.015
(0.011–0.017)
0.013
(0.010–0.014)
0.019
(0.017–0.022)
0.039
(0.034–0.046)
0.025
(0.024–0.027)
0.022
(0.021–0.023)
0.029
(0.027–0.031)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gan, T.; Yin, G.; Zhao, N.; Tan, X.; Wang, Y. A Sensitive Response Index Selection for Rapid Assessment of Heavy Metals Toxicity to the Photosynthesis of Chlorella pyrenoidosa Based on Rapid Chlorophyll Fluorescence Induction Kinetics. Toxics 2023, 11, 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11050468

AMA Style

Gan T, Yin G, Zhao N, Tan X, Wang Y. A Sensitive Response Index Selection for Rapid Assessment of Heavy Metals Toxicity to the Photosynthesis of Chlorella pyrenoidosa Based on Rapid Chlorophyll Fluorescence Induction Kinetics. Toxics. 2023; 11(5):468. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11050468

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gan, Tingting, Gaofang Yin, Nanjing Zhao, Xiaoxuan Tan, and Ying Wang. 2023. "A Sensitive Response Index Selection for Rapid Assessment of Heavy Metals Toxicity to the Photosynthesis of Chlorella pyrenoidosa Based on Rapid Chlorophyll Fluorescence Induction Kinetics" Toxics 11, no. 5: 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11050468

APA Style

Gan, T., Yin, G., Zhao, N., Tan, X., & Wang, Y. (2023). A Sensitive Response Index Selection for Rapid Assessment of Heavy Metals Toxicity to the Photosynthesis of Chlorella pyrenoidosa Based on Rapid Chlorophyll Fluorescence Induction Kinetics. Toxics, 11(5), 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11050468

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop