Next Article in Journal
Integrated Biomarker Response Emphasizing Neuronal Oxidative Stress and Genotoxicity Induced by Oxamyl in Sprague Dawley Rats: Ameliorative Effect of Ginseng as a Neuroprotective Agent
Previous Article in Journal
Plant Root Secretion Alleviates Carbamate-Induced Molecular Alterations of Dissolved Organic Matter
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Plant Defense Mechanisms against Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Contamination: Insights into the Role of Extracellular Vesicles

1
Department of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
2
Department of Craniofacial Diagnostics and Biosciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2024, 12(9), 653; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12090653
Submission received: 25 July 2024 / Revised: 22 August 2024 / Accepted: 4 September 2024 / Published: 5 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Toxicity Reduction and Environmental Remediation)

Abstract

:
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are persistent organic pollutants that pose significant environmental and health risks. These compounds originate from both natural phenomena, such as volcanic activity and wildfires, and anthropogenic sources, including vehicular emissions, industrial processes, and fossil fuel combustion. Their classification as carcinogenic, mutagenic, and teratogenic substances link them to various cancers and health disorders. PAHs are categorized into low-molecular-weight (LMW) and high-molecular-weight (HMW) groups, with HMW PAHs exhibiting greater resistance to degradation and a tendency to accumulate in sediments and biological tissues. Soil serves as a primary reservoir for PAHs, particularly in areas of high emissions, creating substantial risks through ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation. Coastal and aquatic ecosystems are especially vulnerable due to concentrated human activities, with PAH persistence disrupting microbial communities, inhibiting plant growth, and altering ecosystem functions, potentially leading to biodiversity loss. In plants, PAH contamination manifests as a form of abiotic stress, inducing oxidative stress, cellular damage, and growth inhibition. Plants respond by activating antioxidant defenses and stress-related pathways. A notable aspect of plant defense mechanisms involves plant-derived extracellular vesicles (PDEVs), which are membrane-bound nanoparticles released by plant cells. These PDEVs play a crucial role in enhancing plant resistance to PAHs by facilitating intercellular communication and coordinating defense responses. The interaction between PAHs and PDEVs, while not fully elucidated, suggests a complex interplay of cellular defense mechanisms. PDEVs may contribute to PAH detoxification through pollutant sequestration or by delivering enzymes capable of PAH degradation. Studying PDEVs provides valuable insights into plant stress resilience mechanisms and offers potential new strategies for mitigating PAH-induced stress in plants and ecosystems.

1. Introduction

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are persistent organic pollutants with significant carcinogenic, mutagenic, and teratogenic effects, originating from both natural and anthropogenic sources [1]. The persistence of PAHs in soils is a critical issue; their complex structures and low volatility lead to a prolonged environmental presence and accumulation in soil matrices [2]. For instance, compounds like benzo[a]pyrene, a common PAH, are highly resistant to degradation and can remain in soils for decades. The behavior of PAHs in soil systems is complex. They tend to adsorb on to soil particles and organic matter, reducing their mobility but increasing their potential for bioaccumulation in plants and animals [3]. This bioaccumulation can lead to significant health risks as PAHs move up the food chain, ultimately impacting human health through dietary exposure [4]. Studies have shown that chronic exposure to PAHs can result in serious conditions such as cancer, respiratory disorders, and developmental issues. For example, elevated levels of PAHs in agricultural soils have been linked to increased incidence of cancer in populations consuming contaminated crops [5]. PAHs pose long-term environmental risks, leading to bioaccumulation in the food chain and adverse effects on plants, animals, and humans, including reproductive issues, immune suppression, cancer, and neurotoxicity [6]. Given these concerns, understanding the fate and transport of PAHs in soils, as well as their potential environmental and health impacts, is essential for developing effective mitigation strategies.
Plant-derived extracellular vesicles (PDEVs) are nano-sized membrane-bound particles secreted by plant cells into the extracellular space. These vesicles, which include exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies, play crucial roles in intercellular communication and the transfer of molecular cargo such as proteins, lipids, RNA, and metabolites. PDEVs offer a novel approach for PAH remediation. These EVs can facilitate the biodegradation and detoxification of PAHs, enhance the bioavailability of detoxifying compounds, and aid in the adsorption and sequestration of PAHs in soil and water.
The aim of this review article is to evaluate the potential of PDEVs for the remediation of PAHs. It seeks to explore how these EVs can enhance PAH degradation, improve detoxification, and facilitate the adsorption and sequestration of PAHs in contaminated soils, while also comparing their effectiveness with traditional remediation methods and identifying future research directions. The hypothesis of this review article is that PDEVs can significantly enhance the bioremediation of PAHs in contaminated soils. This hypothesis is based on the premise that PDEVs possess enzymatic and bioactive molecules capable of degrading PAHs into less harmful forms, improving the bioavailability of detoxification compounds, and facilitating the adsorption and sequestration of PAHs, thereby aiding in the remediation of PAH contamination. The review is structured to first provide an overview of PAHs, including their sources, classification, and characteristics. It then discusses the analytical techniques used to detect and measure PAHs, highlighting advancements in technology for improved sensitivity and accuracy. Following this, the review examines the environmental and health impacts of PAHs, focusing on their persistence in soil, their bioaccumulation in the food chain, and the associated risks to ecosystems and human health. The discussion extends to the specific challenges faced in coastal and Arctic regions due to PAH pollution. Finally, the review concludes with a summary of current regulatory measures and the need for ongoing monitoring to address the persistent threats posed by PAHs.

2. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)

PAHs are persistent organic pollutants known for their colorless, white, or pale-yellow appearance. PAHs are released into the environment both from natural and anthropogenic sources, including volcanic eruptions, forest fires, vehicle emissions, industrial processes, and the burning of fossil fuels and biomass [1]. These compounds are garnering significant attention due to their classification as carcinogenic, mutagenic, and teratogenic substances. Studies have reported that exposure to PAHs has been linked to a range of health problems, including lung cancer, melanoma, and bladder cancer [2]. PAHs can be categorized into two groups: low-molecular-weight (LMW) PAHs, which contain 2–3 rings, and high-molecular-weight (HMW) PAHs, which consist of 4–7 rings [3,4,5,6]. A total of 200 different kinds of PAHs exists and, as the number of benzene rings in PAHs grows, their chemical and physical characteristics exhibit anticipated alterations [4]. These bigger PAHs have lower volatility, decreasing their ability to evaporate into the atmosphere. Additionally, their solubility in water decreases, causing them to have a higher likelihood of gathering in sediments and biological tissues such as plants instead of dissolving in water [7]. Moreover, the greater structural complexity of these larger PAHs causes them to be more resilient to degradation by natural processes or biological systems. At the same time, their increased ability to dissolve in fats also makes them more likely to stick to particles, such as soil, dust, and organic material in water systems [3,7]. Together, these characteristics enhance the likelihood of larger PAHs persisting and accumulating in the environment.
Some of the common PAHs are naphthalene, acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, fluorene, phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene, benzo[a]anthracene, chrysene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[a]pyrene, indeno [1,2,3-cd]pyrene, dibenz[a,h]anthracene, and benzo[g,h,i]perylene [4]. Due to their toxicity and environmental persistence, all these 16 PAHs have been prioritized for monitoring by the European Union and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Their persistence in the environment coupled with their ability to bioaccumulate makes them pose significant risks to human health—such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)—as well as ecosystems, thus making them subject to environmental monitoring as well regulatory measures [8,9,10].
High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography (GC) are powerful tools for analyzing PAHs [3]. HPLC, often paired with fluorescence or ultraviolet detectors (HPLC-FL/UV), excels in PAH detection. GC, particularly when coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS), boasts even higher sensitivity. Recent advancements, such as LC-MS/MS (tandem mass spectrometry) and GCxGC (comprehensive two-dimensional GC), have further enhanced PAH analysis in complex environmental samples like soil, sediment, and biota [11]. These advancements have achieved even lower detection limits and improved accuracy [9].

3. Soil as a Critical Reservoir

PAHs are transported long distances to remote ecosystems like high mountains, the Arctic, and Antarctic. Biological sources also contribute to soil PAH levels. Soil plays a crucial role as a major environmental storage site for PAHs, making up more than 90% of their content in ecosystems [12], especially in countries that are still developing, such as China, which saw a total of 35,289 tons of PAH emissions in 2020 [13]. Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) emerged as the most significant contributor to the total health risks associated with the 16 PAHs analyzed [14]. A study has found that the BaP content in the green parts of Hordeum sativum increased from 0.3 µg/kg in control soil to 2.6 µg/kg and 16.8 µg/kg under BaP concentrations of 20 and 400 ng/g, respectively. Similarly, in the roots, BaP concentrations increased from 0.9 µg/kg in control soil to 7.7 µg/kg and 42.8 µg/kg under the same conditions [15]. Meanwhile, a BaP concentration threshold of 0.24 mg/kg was calculated, which is over 10 times higher than the limit established in Spain [16]. An exceedance of BaP standards in soils and road dust indicates a hazardous environmental situation in Alushta, Yalta, and Sebastopol, with PM10 particles being particularly dangerous due to their potential for forming anomalies with extreme levels of BaP contamination [17]. Meanwhile, BaP concentrations in municipal soils in Cleveland, USA have been reported between 0.28 and 5.50 mg/kg, indicating significant pollution levels in this urban environment [18]. Historical data from 1993 to 1994 show BaP concentrations ranging from <0.0001 to 3.030 mg/kg, with higher levels associated with motor vehicles and residential furnaces in Poland. A later study in Bialystok reported BaP levels from 0.3 to 0.9 mg/kg in soils [19]. In Turkey (Antalya Aksu region), BaP levels in soils from greenhouse crops were lower, with a mean value of 2.31 µg/kg [20]. Urban soils had the highest average concentration (169.59 ng/g, range 41.29–295.90), agricultural soils had a lower average (119.48 ng/g) but a wider range (8.23–955.05 ng/g), and montane soils had the lowest levels (mean 33.63 ng/g, range 13.32–79.74), likely due to distance from pollution sources [21]. Similarly, BaP concentration in the surface soil horizons (0–10 cm) was found to be 409 ng/g. This level is significantly elevated, being 83 times higher than the local background value and 20 times above the maximum permissible concentration (MPC) accepted in Russia [22]. In Bursa, Turkey, BaP deposition in soil samples from the same region was analyzed and the study reported total PAH concentrations ranging from 13 to 189.4 ng/g dry matter (DM). The study also noted that PAH concentrations were elevated during the colder months, indicating a seasonal influence on contamination levels [23]. In Zhiwu Park during the summer, the concentration of BaP was recorded at 0.944 mg/kg. This level significantly exceeds the screening value of 0.55 mg/kg, indicating a potential environmental concern and highlighting elevated pollution in this area [24]. In urban areas, the median concentration of pyrene in surface soils varies greatly, highlighting the impact of population density and industrial activities on contamination levels. Pyrene concentrations are notably low in Tallinn (117 w g/kg) and Vilnius (127 w g/kg), moderately higher in Helsinki (539 w g/kg), but are significantly elevated in Chicago (3263 w g/kg) and London (1728 w g/kg). This substantial variation underscores how larger and more industrialized cities, such as Chicago and London, experience higher pyrene contamination, likely due to increased industrial emissions and vehicular activity [25]. During the summer, dibenz[a,h]anthracene levels in Zhiwu Park at 1.469 mg/kg and Toutunhe Park at 0.615 mg/kg exceed the 0.55 mg/kg screening value, suggesting contamination with potential environmental and health risks [24]. A study analyzed PAH contamination in soils across 35 locations, measuring 16 PAHs. The total PAH concentrations ranged from 0.36 to 11.49 mg/kg, with an average of 1.99 mg/kg, surpassing the permissible limit of 1 mg/kg. Among the PAHs, pyrene had the highest mean concentration at 0.28 mg/kg, followed by naphthalene and acenaphthylene, while phenanthrene had the lowest at 0.06 mg/kg [26]. Research on PAH contamination in agricultural soils of the Pearl River Delta Region, China, indicates that the most prevalent PAHs are five-ring compounds especially benzo[b]fluoranthene with maximum detection at 843 ng/g, followed by four-ring, six-ring, three-ring, and two-ring PAHs. This hierarchy highlights the predominance of higher-ring PAHs in the soil, which often correlates with sources like combustion processes and industrial activities [27]. A study conducted in Shandong Province, China found that three-ring PAHs were the most dominant, with phenanthrene, acenaphthene, and fluorene being the major compounds, contributing 16.3%, 13.1%, and 10.5% to the total PAH concentration, respectively [28]. In Cluj-Napoca, the primary PAH contaminants identified in the soil were naphthalene, benzo(a)anthracene, and benzo(b)fluoranthene. The average concentrations of these PAHs were as follows: naphthalene at 1.23 μg/kg, benzo(a)anthracene at 1.38 μg/kg, and benzo(b)fluoranthene at 1.71 μg/kg. The total PAH content in the soil averaged 7.03 μg/kg [26]. The distribution of PAHs in Taiyuan soil in Northern China reveals that Nap is the most widespread contaminant at 28.39%, while BgP is the least at 0.65%. BbF makes up 28.19% of carcinogenic PAHs, with DBA representing only 0.46%. High-ring PAHs account for 53.51% of total PAHs, low-ring PAHs for 23.99%, and medium-ring PAHs are the least prevalent [27]. Another study conducted in Taiyuan has found that anthracene rose 5.36-fold while in 2016, and acenaphthylene increased 3.37-fold. This increase was more pronounced for pyrogenic PAHs due to continuous fossil fuel emissions and elevated CO2 levels. Phenanthrene had the highest concentration, ranging from 43.30 μg kg−1 in 2015 to 46.27 μg kg−1 in 2016 [21]. A typical chemical industrial park in Chongqing has demonstrated detection rates of phenanthrene (94.44%), fluoranthene (83.33%), and pyrene (83.33%). The primary sources of PAHs in the study area are likely coal combustion and transportation emissions, based on the high percentages of four-ring and five-ring PAHs [29]. A study has also reported that four-ring PAHs such as Kingtom (KT) (698–1750 ng g−1 dw) are the most concentrated, followed by five-ring and two-ring PAHs. KT was higher in some urban and rural areas globally, but lower in other high-PAH regions like Beijing and London [30]. On the other hand, in soils of an industrial area in semi-arid Uzbekistan [31], an average concentration of 21.53 ng/g was reported in top-layer soil, where phenanthrene was the most prevalent PAH, contributing 4.25–41.03% of the total PAHs, followed by chrysene at 3.4–24.1%; however PAH concentrations decreased progressively from the surface to deeper soil layers, likely due to atmospheric sedimentation affecting the topsoil more directly. Meanwhile, PAH profiles of agricultural soils of Hamedan County, in the west of Iran indicate that PAHs with four or more rings account for 78% of the total mass of the 16 PAHs that were predominant [32]. Interestingly, a study has found the presence of three-ring PAHs, with phenanthrene (PHE) and 9-fluorenone (9-FO) being the most abundant individual PAH and OPAH, respectively, in soil and vegetation samples from the Antarctic, Arctic, and Tibetan Plateau. Antarctic samples showed higher ratios of PAH derivatives such as oxygenated-PAHs (OPAHs) and nitrated-PAHs (NPAHs) to parent PAHs suggesting increased secondary OPAH and NPAH formation in the region [33]. Increased amounts of PAHs were identified in soil samples from Al-Ahdab oil field in the Waset Region, Iraq, in which fluorene and phenanthrene ranged from 19 to 855 μg/kg dry weight, with a mean concentration of 320 μg/kg [34]. The top three PAHs identified in the soil surrounding the Nam Son landfill area are naphthalene with an average concentration of 10.33 ng/g (range: nd–26.16 ng/g), phenanthrene with an average concentration of 8.43 ng/g (range: 3.16–14.53 ng/g), and benzo[b]fluoranthene with an average concentration of 6.63 ng/g (range: 0.60–30.94 ng/g). The PAHs in this area were primarily attributed to biomass burning (such as straw, grass, and trees) and partially to the combustion of fossil fuels due to agricultural machinery and vehicles [35]. Table 1 provides a summary of the top PAHs and their concentrations from various studies.
PAHs in soil pose significant risks to human health through various exposure routes, including ingestion, dermal contact, inhalation, and bioaccumulation in the food chain. Soil, as a major reservoir of PAHs, presents a more substantial exposure risk than air or water. When PAHs are present in soil, they can enter the human body through direct contact with contaminated soil, consumption of food grown in such soil, or inhalation of soil particles that may contain PAHs [11,12,13]. Over time, PAHs can accumulate in the body, leading to chronic health issues such as cancer, respiratory problems, and reproductive effects. The higher potential for human exposure through soil underscores the critical need for public health interventions to address soil contamination [36]. On the other hand, coastal regions with heavy maritime traffic are especially at risk of PAH pollution because of heavy human activities like industrialization, tourism, and inadequate waste disposal which lead to higher atmospheric PAH levels due to ship emissions and harbor activities. PAHs are released into the air and can settle on water and soil, leading to localized contamination. These PAHs deposited from the atmosphere can accumulate in coastal sediments and aquatic organisms, affecting marine life and potentially entering the food chain. This is particularly relevant in harbors and coastal areas, where pollution sources are concentrated [37,38]. These actions lead to a high level of PAH pollution in estuarine and coastal ecosystems (ECEs), where pollutants move from rivers to bays, worsening contamination in calm areas [39]. The transfer of PAHs from rivers to coastal areas and bays, acting as secondary sources, may result in sediment build up, forming possible contamination zones. Various pathways, such as wastewater discharge, atmospheric deposition, surface runoff, and crude oil leakage, can introduce pollutants into the marine environment [18]. A study has reported that the Arctic Ocean is no longer pristine, and that this is because of climate change, which contributes to the transport of pollutants, making the Arctic a final sink and potential secondary source [40]. Elevated levels of PAHs in soil can have notable effects on ecosystem health by changing soil microbial communities, impacting plant growth and nutrient cycling, and potentially disturbing ecosystem functions and biodiversity. Previous studies have focused on single pollutants’ impacts on microbial communities, with findings showing that PAHs can affect microbial abundance, diversity, and metabolic functions [41,42,43].

4. Impact of PAHs on Animals, Humans and Environment

Since these PAHs are hydrophobic in nature, they tend to stick strongly to soil organic matter and black carbon. This characteristic causes soil to be a major storage area for these pollutants [44,45]. The hydrophobicity of PAHs makes them less likely to dissolve in water, leading them to associate with non-polar substances like organic matter present in the soil [46]. Meanwhile, soil’s complex structure and composition, which includes organic matter and clay particles, also plays a significant role in the adsorption and retention of PAHs [47]. Organic matter in soil, such as decomposed plant and animal residues, provides numerous binding sites for PAHs, enhancing their retention. Similarly, clay particles, with their high surface area and charge properties, can adsorb PAH molecules effectively [48]. This high retention capacity results in prolonged environmental persistence of PAHs in soil. The strong binding between PAHs and soil components makes it difficult for these pollutants to be removed or degraded, leading to their accumulation over time [49]. Furthermore, PAHs can be gradually released from the soil into the environment through processes such as leaching, volatilization, or bioturbation [50]. This slow release can lead to continuous exposure of the ecosystem to PAHs, posing long-term environmental, food chain, animal, and health risks [51,52].
PAHs enter the food chain through multiple pathways, beginning with their absorption by primary producers such as plants and phytoplankton in aquatic environments. These organisms accumulate PAHs from contaminated soil or water, initiating their transfer into terrestrial and aquatic food webs [53]. Additionally, many animals ingest PAHs inadvertently while consuming soil or sediment, further facilitating their entry into the food chain; for instance, following an explosion at the Baghjan-5 well in May 2020, a long-lasting fire broke out and led to the discharge of natural gas, condensate, and harmful chemicals into the nearby region. This incident severely affected nearby wildlife sanctuaries and rivers [54]. Predation then allows PAHs to move up the trophic levels as contaminated organisms are consumed by predators. Biomagnification of PAHs within food chains exacerbates their environmental impact. This phenomenon results from slow metabolism and excretion rates in many animals, particularly those higher up the food chain. Top predators such as birds of prey, large fish, and marine mammals consequently accumulate higher concentrations of PAHs compared to their prey species [54,55]. Marine animals take in PAHs mainly through their gills or by eating food that contains soluble and particulate fractions, with absorption rates influenced by factors like bioavailability and physiological condition. However, vertebrates typically metabolize and eliminate PAHs more effectively than invertebrates, which lowers the potential for bioaccumulation and biomagnification in marine food chains [56]. Studies have shown that PAHs bioaccumulate in avian tissues, with detectable concentrations found in organs such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, brain, eggs, muscle tissue, blood, and even feces across various bird species [57].
PAHs in animals decrease immune function, making the animals more vulnerable to illnesses and parasites [58]. The long-term exposure of animals to PAHs can lead to a range of health issues such as cancer, particularly in the lungs, liver, and skin. Chronic exposure can also lead to respiratory problems such as bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), as well as liver and kidney damage, manifesting as jaundice and impaired organ function. Additionally, PAHs can cause dermatological issues, and reproductive and developmental toxicity, potentially leading to reduced fertility and developmental delays in offspring [59,60]. PAHs present a substantial health hazard to animals and humans through different avenues of exposure. PAHs are associated with a wide range of health issues due to their toxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic properties. Naphthalene, one of the most common PAHs, is particularly hazardous, leading to hemolysis (the breakdown of red blood cells) when inhaled or ingested in significant amounts [61]. Additionally, PAHs like benzo[a]pyrene are metabolized into reactive intermediates that bind to DNA, causing mutations that can initiate and promote cancer development [62]. Benzo[a]pyrene is recognized as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), highlighting its strong association with various cancers, particularly lung, breast, childhood cancers, cervical, and bladder cancers. Other PAHs, like dibenzo[al]pyrene, show higher genotoxicity in experimental settings but are less studied in humans, thus classified in Group 2A (probably carcinogenic) [63].
PAHs cause DNA damage primarily by forming DNA adducts. This process begins with the metabolic activation of PAHs, a critical step mediated by cytochrome P450 enzymes, particularly CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1. The activation involves the conversion of PAHs into reactive intermediates that can covalently bind to DNA, forming adducts that can lead to mutations and initiate carcinogenesis. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) plays a crucial role in regulating the expression of these cytochrome P450 enzymes, thereby influencing the extent of PAH-induced DNA damage [64,65]. PAH metabolism can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to oxidative stress and damage to cellular components, including DNA, proteins, and lipids, which may contribute to carcinogenesis [66,67]. PAHs can also induce epigenetic changes, such as DNA methylation and histone modification, which can alter gene expression and contribute to the development and progression of cancer [68]. Inhalation of PAHs is linked to respiratory issues, including bronchitis, asthma, and COPD, as well as an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases due to the oxidative stress and inflammation they cause [69]. Both male and female reproductive systems can be affected by PAH exposure, leading to decreased fertility, hormonal imbalances, and complications during pregnancy [70]. Emerging evidence suggests that PAHs may have neurotoxic effects, contributing to cognitive impairments and neurodegenerative diseases. Furthermore, they can suppress the immune system, increasing susceptibility to infections and exacerbating cancer risk [71]. Vulnerable populations, such as children, the elderly, and those with preexisting conditions, are particularly at risk from PAH exposure. The diverse health effects such as impacts on immune, genetic, developmental, respiratory, and neurological systems emphasize the urgent need to reduce PAH exposure from environmental sources and contaminated food, stressing the importance of thorough approaches in managing air quality, controlling industrial emissions, and ensuring food safety [72,73].
Overall, PAH contamination has profound ecological impacts across various environments. These pollutants persist in soil, adversely affecting soil microorganisms, reducing fertility, and inhibiting plant growth and community structures. In aquatic ecosystems, PAHs harm fish, invertebrates, and algae, accumulating in sediments and posing long-term contamination risks [74]. As PAHs bioaccumulate up the food chain, they disproportionately impact predator species, potentially disrupting ecosystem balance and biodiversity [75]. In marine environments, PAHs threaten sensitive ecosystems like coral reefs where herbivory and predation play a crucial role in PAH accumulation in corals, with longer food chains leading to higher bioaccumulation. Despite significant accumulation, PAH exposure does not appear to affect coral symbionts’ photosynthetic efficiency, suggesting that short-term phenanthrene accumulation may not have immediate toxic effects on coral health [76]. Overall, PAH contamination extends beyond direct human health concerns, exerting far-reaching ecological consequences that affect ecosystem stability and biodiversity. Effective management strategies, including long-term monitoring and remediation plans, are crucial to mitigate the ongoing impact of PAH contamination on both environmental and human health scales.

5. Pathways of PAH Entry into Plants

Soil contamination by PAHs can significantly impact plants by PAHs being absorbed and transported within the plant system [77,78]. Plants can absorb PAHs from soil via root uptake, stomatal uptake, cuticular penetration, and hydroponic uptake. Root uptake involves the diffusion of PAH molecules through the soil solution into root cells, where they may undergo transformations or be transported within the plant [79,80]. Stomatal uptake occurs when gaseous PAH molecules diffuse through stomatal openings on leaves and into internal leaf tissues [81]. Cuticular penetration involves PAHs diffusing through the waxy cuticle covering plant aerial parts and accumulating in leaf tissues. In hydroponic uptake, plants in controlled environments can absorb PAHs dissolved in water directly from hydroponic solutions [82]. Some studies indicate higher PAH levels in vegetables grown in polluted soil. However, research shows that PAH transport from roots to shoots has minimal impact on shoot PAH accumulation [77]. Instead, gaseous PAHs in the atmosphere are a major source of PAHs in vegetable leaves, suggesting that vegetables from heavily polluted environments may have higher PAH levels [79,80,81,82].
The uptake and translocation of PAHs within plants depend significantly on their hydrophobicity, often quantified by the octanol–water partition coefficient (log Kow). PAHs with lower log Kow values (<4) are relatively more hydrophilic and can be translocated more readily within the plant, potentially reaching aerial parts like leaves and stems. These compounds can volatilize from contaminated soil or air and be absorbed through the plant cuticle or stomata. In contrast, PAHs with higher log Kow values (>4) tend to remain bound in the root epidermis or outer root tissues, with limited translocation to aerial plant parts [82,83,84]. The uptake of PAHs by plants is influenced by factors such as PAH properties, soil characteristics, plant species, and environmental conditions [85]. Understanding these pathways is crucial for assessing and mitigating PAH contamination in plants and their impact on ecosystems and human health. Table 2 displays the different uptake pathways of PAHs by plants. Figure 1 shows uptake and translocation of PAHs within a plant.

6. Impact of PAHs in Plants

PAH pollution is seen as a type of abiotic stress on plants, characterized as a non-living element in the environment that hinders plant growth and progress. PAH stress, unlike natural abiotic stressors such as drought or temperature changes, is usually caused by human activities like industrial operations, urban runoff, or oil spills. This stress can cause different physiological effects like oxidative stress by increasing the generation of ROS, overpowering the plant’s antioxidant mechanisms. PAHs can have various adverse effects, for instance leading to stunting of growth or chlorosis (yellowing of leaves) and necrosis (tissue death) and reduced biomass production [86]. The generation of excessive ROS by PAHs within plant cells can lead to lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and DNA damage [87]. Specifically, during times of stress conditions, mitochondria produce ROS through the electron transport chain. Peroxisomes play a role in generating ROS during photorespiration and the breakdown of fatty acids through β-oxidation [88]. Moreover, NADPH oxidases located on the plasma membrane have the ability to produce superoxide when exposed to different types of stress. Overall, oxidative stress impairs cell functionality and compromises plant growth and development [89]. A study has reported elevated superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and increased transcript levels of catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) in barley leaves upon exposure to biochar, indicating ROS-induced stress. In spite of plants’ antioxidant defense mechanisms, these defenses can be overwhelmed in cases of prolonged exposure to PAHs, hence causing extreme stress and damage [90,91].
The interaction between PAHs with plant DNA may create conditions under which mutations in the DNA occur or chromosomal aberrations emerge as well as other genotoxic impacts on plants [92]. Hu et al. have reported that PAHs disrupted rice biomass by affecting light and dark reactions in photosynthesis. Photon absorption and transfer were hindered, and chlorophyll metabolism was disrupted, leading to decreased biosynthesis and increased degradation in roots and leaves. The primary mechanism was the inhibition of chlorophyll a synthesis [93]. Zhang et al. further confirmed that rice plants grown in soil spiked with PAHs (phenanthrene, pyrene, benzo[a]pyrene) exhibited inhibition carboxylation and oxygenation due to the down-regulation of the Rubisco coding gene (OsRBCS2) [94]. In another study involving rice, three pollutants (4′-OH-CB 61, TRI, and BDE 47) also potentially competed with CO2 for binding to Rubisco’s active sites, leading to reduction of CO2 capture efficiency and a decreased biomass yield [95]. PAH compounds can also dysregulate plant hormonal signaling pathways, leading to abnormal development and physiology. This interference with growth hormones and responses to environmental stresses can disrupt metabolic pathways, affecting the synthesis of secondary metabolites, hormones, and signaling molecules [96]. Genotoxic PAHs can damage DNA, causing mutations or chromosomal aberrations with long-term consequences. Plants can accumulate PAHs from polluted soil, aiding in the bioaccumulation of PAHs through food chains [97]. For instance, distribution and accumulation of PAHs has been observed in winter wheat near a coal-fired power plant where PAH levels were higher in rhizosphere soil, roots, stems, and leaves at the regreening stage compared to the maturity stage. Specifically, root concentration factors (RCF) for three- and four-ring PAHs increased over time, while five-ring PAHs decreased. In stems, three- and four-ring PAHs showed a decreasing trend, while five- and six-ring PAHs initially decreased before stabilizing. This indicates dynamic changes in PAH accumulation and distribution throughout the growth cycle of winter wheat [98]. Leaves act as sensitive air samplers, showing higher concentrations of particle-bound PAHs (H-PAH) concentrations, while lower molecular weight PAHs (L-PAHs) decrease. Vegetation may effectively remove H-PAHs due to their lipophilicity. Pine needles accumulate both L-PAHs and H-PAHs. PAH concentrations are generally higher in pine needles, reflecting their greater surface area. Equilibrium processes govern PAH partitioning between the atmosphere and plants [99]. Table 3 summarizes the various stress responses induced by PAHs in plants.

7. Plant Derived Extracellular Vesicles (PDEVs)

Plant derived extracellular vesicles (PDEVs) have shown potential in enhancing plant resilience to PAHs by transporting antioxidants, signaling proteins, and stress-related molecules through facilitating intercellular communication within plants [100]. PDEVs are also integral to plant defense mechanisms. Recent studies have demonstrated the therapeutic potential of PDEVs beyond plant health [101]. PDEVs have shown promising effects in combating inflammation, cancer, bacterial infections, and aging in other biological systems [102]. However, research on PDEVs is growing, with studies exploring their biogenesis, composition, and functions in various plant species. PDEVs have become popular because they are easily accessible, cheap, have low immunogenicity, and are relatively safe in comparison to mammalian-derived exosomes [101]. Research on PDEVs has grown since their discovery in plant cell walls in 1967 [103], as well as the extraction of exosome-like nanoparticles from sunflower seeds in 2009 [104]. PDEVs have been extracted from a range of plant sources, such as fruits, vegetables, seeds, rhizomes, leaves, flowers, bark, tea, and nuts [101].
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from plants consist of a variety of vesicles that come from different parts of cells, such as multivesicular bodies (MVBs), autophagosomes, vacuoles, and exocyst-positive organelles (EXPOs) [100]. Similar to mammalian EVs, PDEVs originating from MVBs fuse with the plasma membrane to release EVs outside of the cell wall. EXPO structures, characterized by spherical double membranes, fuse with the plasma membrane to release membrane vesicles. This pathway is unique to plants. Meanwhile, the central vacuole fuses with the plasma membrane, releasing vacuolar proteins and hydrolases into the extracellular compartment to combat extracellular bacterial pathogens. This pathway is also considered a potential source of PDEVs. PDEVs can range from 30 nm to 500 nm, which encompasses the typical sizes of exosomes (around 50–150 nm) and the larger EXPO-derived EVs (200–500 nm) [105]. PDEVs from certain plants like carrots can reach up to 1500 nm in size. This highlights the incredible diversity and variability in the dimensions of these vesicles across different plant species [106]. However, large EVs, in the range of 1–1.5 μm, would likely not fall under the conventional categories of exosomes or microvesicles, which are typically smaller than 1 micrometer [107]. The larger PDEVs may signify unique subtypes or arise from biogenesis pathways that are not fully elucidated [108].
The characterization of PDEVs includes assessing particle size distribution, zeta potential, and morphology. PDEVs typically have a zeta potential ranging from −70 mV to neutral [109]. Biochemical analysis has revealed that PDEVs contain bioactive molecules that mediate metabolic and signaling pathways in target cells [110]. However, PDEVs lack established surface protein markers like CD63, CD9, and CD81. Instead, they are enriched in proteins such as aquaporins, heat shock proteins, metabolic enzymes, and annexins [109]. Biomarkers like PENETRATION1 and tetraspanins (such as tetraspanin 8 and tetraspanin 9) have been discovered in EVs from plants, assisting in their identification and monitoring [110]. The lipid makeup of EV membranes from plants, which consists mainly of phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylcholine, digalactosyl diacylglycerol, monogalactosyldiacylglycerol, and phytosterols, is essential for stability, vesicle release, cell-to-cell signaling, and membrane fusion processes [111]. PDEVs contain small RNAs, such as ty RNA, lncRNA, circRNA, and sRNA, which regulate different biological functions and aid in inter-kingdom communication [112].

8. Role of Plant EVs in PAH-Induced Stress Response

The stress responses induced by PAHs in plants, as mentioned earlier, are closely related to the potential effects on PDEVs [113,114]. Although research in this specific area is still limited, several potential links between PAH-induced stress and alterations in plant EVs can be identified. The production and release of EVs are closely linked to cellular stress responses. Oxidative stress, membrane damage, and signaling disruptions caused by PAHs could potentially affect the biogenesis and release mechanisms of EVs in plant cells [115]. The cargo (proteins, lipids, nucleic acids) packaged into EVs can reflect the cellular stress state [116]. PAH-induced stress responses, such as the upregulation of antioxidant enzymes, changes in protein synthesis, and alterations in signaling pathways, may lead to changes in the composition of EVs released by plants [117]. Plant cells may utilize EVs as a means of intercellular communication and stress response by selectively loading them with stress-related molecules, such as antioxidants, signaling proteins, or small RNAs [118]. These EVs could potentially be involved in mediating defense mechanisms against PAH-induced stress. EVs have been proposed to play a role in the transport and detoxification of xenobiotic compounds, including PAHs. Plant cells may package and secrete PAHs or their metabolites into EVs as a defense mechanism to remove these toxic substances from the cells [119]. PAHs can disrupt plant cell membranes, potentially affecting the lipid composition and membrane properties of EVs derived from these cells [120]. Changes in EV membrane composition could impact their stability, targeting, and interactions with recipient cells. EVs are involved in intercellular communication and can transfer signals between cells [121]. PAH-induced stress responses may lead to alterations in the signaling cargo or the release and uptake mechanisms of EVs, potentially disrupting their role in stress-related signaling pathways [122,123,124]. While the exact ways PAHs and plant EVs interact are being studied, it is clear that EVs are vital in plant stress responses and may be important for protecting against PAH-related harm. Comprehending these links could offer understanding of plant stress resilience mechanisms and result in the creation of new methods for observing and reducing PAH-triggered stress in plants. Table 4 displays the potential links between PAH-induced stress and alterations in PDEVs.

9. Mitigation Strategies and Practical Applications

Plants use a diverse range of methods to reduce the harmful impacts of PAHs by utilizing different biochemical, physiological, and molecular mechanisms such as cuticle formation, unsaturated fatty acids, scavenging reactive species, molecular chaperones, and compatible solutes [122,123,124,125,126,127]. Exposure to PAHs causes plants to prioritize defense and stress management over growth by reallocating energy towards producing defensive compounds and upregulating stress-response proteins (late embryogenesis abundant proteins and their subgroup, dehydrins). This trade-off aids in coping with immediate stress but can lead to stunted growth, reduced root development, and metabolic adjustments to support the production of defense compounds and stress-related proteins [128].
The cuticle serves as a barrier that may restrict the absorption of PAHs from the soil into plant tissues. Moreover, the build-up of wax on the outer layer of the plant has been linked to its ability to handle stress, potentially reducing the negative impacts of exposure to PAHs [125]. Moreover, exposure to PAHs may alter the function of unsaturated fatty acids by disrupting membrane fluidity. Plants have the ability to modify their membrane composition in order to preserve integrity and functionality when faced with PAH stress, just like they do in response to other non-living environmental stresses [126]. Proteins like heat shock proteins (HSPs) serve as molecular chaperones and are essential for maintaining protein folding and stability during stressful conditions [129]. Exposure to PAHs may lead to protein damage, while molecular chaperones could help preserve protein integrity and cellular function. Compatible solutes such as sugars, amino acids (proline and glutamate), and polyols (inositol and mannitol) have the ability to stabilize proteins and membranes when facing stressful conditions. They might also be involved in detoxification or protective functions against stress caused by PAHs in plants [130]. In order to fight against the oxidative stress caused by PAHs, plants boost their antioxidant defense systems by elevating the levels of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, CAT, and glutathione peroxidase, as well as non-enzymatic antioxidants like glutathione, ascorbate, and carotenoids that eliminate ROS [131,132]. Moreover, plants have the ability to isolate and store PAHs, either by trapping them in vacuoles or by attaching them to lignin in cell walls, which lowers their harmful effects [133]. In terms of metabolism, plants increase the activity of detoxification pathways which include cytochrome P450 enzymes, glutathione S-transferases, and UDP-glucosyltransferases to improve the degradation and binding of PAHs [134,135]. This also leads to an increase in the synthesis of secondary metabolites such as flavonoids and phenolics for added protection [136].
In addition, phytoremediation is a promising method of cleaning up the environment that uses plants and their microbiomes to gather, break down, store, or fix PAHs. Rhizoremediation, a specific form of phytoremediation, involves the breakdown of PAHs in the rhizosphere through interactions between plant roots, their exudates, and soil microorganisms [137]. The success of phytoremediation depends on factors like plant selection, environmental parameters (e.g., nutrient status, contaminant concentration, and bioavailability), soil pH, and the composition and activity of plant-associated microbiomes. Plant root exudates stimulate PAH-degrading microbes, enhancing contaminant degradation. Simultaneously, mycorrhizal fungi form symbiotic relationships with plant roots, improving nutrient absorption and increasing plant resistance to PAH stress [138]. Some of the mycorrhizal fungi can also directly degrade or sequester PAHs, such as Bjerkandera sp., Coriolopsis rigida, Irpex lacteus, Phanerochaete chrysosporium, P. sordida, Pleurotus ostreatus, P. pulmonarius, and Trametes versicolor. The synergistic interaction between plants and their associated microorganisms (both bacteria and fungi) in the rhizosphere creates a powerful system for PAH degradation. Other strategies include phytoextraction, phytostabilization, and phytovolatilization. For PAHs, rhizoremediation is often the most effective approach due to limited PAH uptake and translocation within most plants. This holistic strategy, leveraging both plant and microbial activities, forms the cornerstone of phytoremediation efforts in PAH-contaminated soils [139,140].
Genetic and epigenetic changes in plants help them adapt to PAH stress by increasing stress-responsive gene expression and modifying DNA methylation and histone patterns [141]. This enables plants to effectively combat the adverse effects of PAHs, such as oxidative stress and metabolic disruptions [142]. Exposure to PAHs triggers upregulation of genes encoding for protective molecules like antioxidant enzymes. Additionally, changes in DNA methylation and histone modifications regulate gene expression, enhancing stress responses [143]. These mechanisms collectively boost plant resilience to PAH stress, ensuring their health and productivity in polluted environments. Both genetic and epigenetic factors are crucial for plant stress tolerance and adaptation to PAH pollutants [144]. Figure 2 outlines the key aspects of PAH–plant interactions, from sources and entry pathways to plant responses and potential mitigation strategies, including the role of PDEVs.

10. Conclusions

To sum up, PAHs pose significant environmental and health risks due to their persistence and toxicity. Their widespread presence in soil, water, and air ecosystems underscores the urgent need for effective management and remediation strategies. PAHs induce various stress responses in plants, including oxidative stress, disruption of photosynthesis, and alterations in gene expression and metabolism. These effects can significantly impact plant growth, development, and overall ecosystem health. PDEVs have emerged as a promising area of research in the context of PAH-induced stress. These nanoparticles play crucial roles in intercellular communication and stress response, potentially enhancing plant resilience to PAH contamination. The interaction between PAHs and PDEVs, while not fully understood, suggests complex cellular defense mechanisms that may contribute to PAH detoxification and stress mitigation. Phytoremediation, particularly rhizoremediation, offers a sustainable approach to PAH contamination management. This strategy leverages the synergistic interactions between plants, their root exudates, and associated microorganisms to degrade PAHs in the rhizosphere. The success of phytoremediation depends on various factors, including plant selection, environmental parameters, and the composition of plant-associated microbiomes. Future research should focus on elucidating the specific molecular mechanisms of PAH-induced stress in plants and the role of PDEVs in stress resilience. Additionally, developing innovative remediation strategies that integrate plant-based approaches with advanced biotechnological tools could enhance our ability to manage PAH contamination effectively. These efforts are crucial for mitigating the ecological and human health impacts associated with PAH pollution, particularly in vulnerable ecosystems and populations exposed to high levels of these contaminants.

Author Contributions

M.B., S.L.N., Y.L., M.H.N. and J.X.L.: conception and design, collection and/or assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by research grants from the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (DIP-2023-011) and Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (FF-2024-115/1).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The funder had no role in the manuscript submission and publication.

References

  1. Patel, A.B.; Shaikh, S.; Jain, K.R.; Desai, C.; Madamwar, D. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Sources, Toxicity, and Remediation Approaches. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 562813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Venkatraman, G.; Giribabu, N.; Mohan, P.S.; Muttiah, B.; Govindarajan, V.K.; Alagiri, M.; Abdul Rahman, P.S.; Karsani, S.A. Environmental impact and human health effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and remedial strategies: A detailed review. Chemosphere 2024, 351, 141227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sampaio, G.R.; Guizellini, G.M.; da Silva, S.A.; de Almeida, A.P.; Pinaffi-Langley, A.C.C.; Rogero, M.M.; de Camargo, A.C.; Torres, E.A.F.S. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Foods: Biological Effects, Legislation, Occurrence, Analytical Methods, and Strategies to Reduce Their Formation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bukowska, B.; Mokra, K.; Michałowicz, J. Benzo[a]pyrene-Environmental Occurrence, Human Exposure, and Mechanisms of Toxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Al-Nasir, F.; Hijazin, T.J.; Al-Alawi, M.M.; Jiries, A.; Mayyas, A.; Al-Dalain, S.A.; Al-Dmour, R.; Alahmad, A.; Al-Madanat, O.Y.; Batarseh, M.I. Accumulation, Source Identification, and Cancer Risk Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Different Jordanian Vegetables. Toxics 2022, 10, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pathak, V.M.; Verma, V.K.; Rawat, B.S.; Kaur, B.; Babu, N.; Sharma, A.; Dewali, S.; Yadav, M.; Kumari, R.; Singh, S.; et al. Current status of pesticide effects on environment, human health and it’s eco-friendly management as bioremediation: A comprehensive review. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 962619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Souza, R.H.Z.; Cardoso, M.D.G.; Machado, A.M.R.; Santiago, W.D.; Pedroso, M.P.; Brandão, R.M.; Oliveira, R.E.S.; Barbosa, R.B.; Alvarenga, G.F.; Caetano, A.R.S.; et al. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cachaças packed in bottles of polyethylene terephthalate. J. Food Sci. 2022, 87, 1906–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Samburova, V.; Zielinska, B.; Khlystov, A. Do 16 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Represent PAH Air Toxicity? Toxics 2017, 5, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Starski, A.; Kukielska, A.; Postupolski, J. Occurrence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in human diet—Exposure and risk assessment to consumer health. Rocz. Panstw. Zakl. Hig. 2021, 72, 253–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Bai, P.; Hayakawa, K.; Zhang, L.; Tang, N. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Emitted from Open Burning and Stove Burning of Biomass: A Brief Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vistnes, H.; Sossalla, N.A.; Røsvik, A.; Gonzalez, S.V.; Zhang, J.; Meyn, T.; Asimakopoulos, A.G. The Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) with HPLC-DAD-FLD and GC-MS Techniques in the Dissolved and Particulate Phase of Road-Tunnel Wash Water: A Case Study for Cross-Array Comparisons and Applications. Toxics 2022, 10, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ailijiang, N.; Zhong, N.; Zhou, X.; Mamat, A.; Chang, J.; Cao, S.; Hua, Z.; Li, N. Levels, sources, and risk assessment of PAHs residues in soil and plants in urban parks of Northwest China. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 21448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, M.; Chen, W.; Chuan, X.; Guo, X.; Shen, X.; Zhang, H.; Wu, F.; Hu, J.; Wu, Z.; Wang, X. Remediation of heavily PAHs-contaminated soil with high mineral content from a coking plant using surfactant-enhanced soil washing. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 909, 168499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sun, H.; Jia, X.; Wu, Z.; Yu, P.; Zhang, L.; Wang, S.; Xia, T. Contamination and source-specific health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil from a mega iron and steel site in China. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 340 Pt 2, 122851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fedorenko, A.G.; Chernikova, N.; Minkina, T.; Sushkova, S.; Dudnikova, T.; Antonenko, E.; Fedorenko, G.; Bauer, T.; Mandzhieva, S.; Barbashev, A. Effects of benzo[a]pyrene toxicity on morphology and ultrastructure of Hordeum sativum. Environ. Geochem. Health 2021, 43, 1551–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Boente, C.; Baragaño, D.; Gallego, J.R. Benzo[a]pyrene sourcing and abundance in a coal region in transition reveals historical pollution, rendering soil screening levels impractical. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 266 Pt 1, 115341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bezberdaya, L.; Kosheleva, N.; Chernitsova, O.; Lychagin, M.; Kasimov, N. Pollution Level, Partition and Spatial Distribution of Benzo(a)pyrene in Urban Soils, Road Dust and Their PM10 Fraction of Health-Resorts (Alushta, Yalta) and Industrial (Sebastopol) Cities of Crimea. Water 2022, 14, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Obrycki, J.F.; Basta, N.T.; Culman, S.W. Management Options for Contaminated Urban Soils to Reduce Public Exposure and Maintain Soil Health. J. Environ. Qual. 2017, 46, 420–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Twardowska, I.; Kolodziejczyk, A.M. Benzo[a]Pyrene in Soils and Ground Water: Occurrence, Sources, Distribution, Interrelation. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 1998, 66, 127–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Olgun, B.; Doğan, G. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations in soils of greenhouses located in Aksu Antalya, Turkey. Water Sci. Technol. A J. Int. Assoc. Water Pollut. Res. 2020, 81, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, R.; Cheng, M.; Cui, Y.; He, Q.; Guo, X.; Chen, L.; Wang, X. Distribution of the Soil PAHs and Health Risk Influenced by Coal Usage Processes in Taiyuan City, Northern China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kasimov, N.S.; Kosheleva, N.E.; Nikiforova, E.M.; Vlasov, D.V. Benzo[a]pyrene in urban environments of eastern Moscow: Pollution levels and critical loads. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 17, 2217–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sanli, G.; Celik, S.; Joubi, V.; Tasdemir, Y. Concentrations, phase exchanges and source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) In Bursa-Turkey. Environ. Res. 2023, 232, 116344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jiao, S.; Zhang, H.; Cai, Y.; Jin, C.; Shen, S. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) evidence for frequent combustion events on land during the Permian–Triassic transition in Northwest China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2024, 642, 112152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ilić, P.; Nišić, T.; Farooqi, Z.U.R. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons contamination of soil in an industrial zone and evaluation of pollution sources. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2021, 30, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brukstiene, D.; Ruzgyte, A. Contamination of soil by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in some urban areas. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 2001, 2001, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cai, H.; Yao, S.; Huang, J.; Zheng, X.; Sun, J.; Tao, X.; Lu, G. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Pollution Characteristics in Agricultural Soils of the Pearl River Delta Region, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chai, C.; Cheng, Q.; Wu, J.; Zeng, L.; Chen, Q.; Zhu, X.; Ma, D.; Ge, W. Contamination, source identification, and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the soils of vegetable greenhouses in Shandong, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 142, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Guo, D.; Dang, J. Characteristics and Risk Assessment of PAH Pollution in Soil of a Retired Coking Wastewater Treatment Plant in Taiyuan, Northern China. Toxics 2023, 11, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Muntean, N.; Muntean, E.; Duda, M.M. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil. ProEnvironment 2015, 8, 285–289. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bandowe, B.A.M.; Shukurov, N.; Leimer, S.; Kersten, M.; Steinberger, Y.; Wilcke, W. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils of an industrial area in semi-arid Uzbekistan: Spatial distribution, relationship with trace metals and risk assessment. Environ. Geochem. Health 2021, 43, 4847–4861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rabieimesbah, A.; Sobhanardakani, S.; Cheraghi, M.; Lorestani, B. Concentrations, Source Identification and Potential Ecological and Human Health Risks Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Agricultural Soils of Hamedan County, West of Iran. Soil Sediment Contam. Int. J. 2023, 33, 482–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wei, L.; Lv, J.; Zuo, P.; Li, Y.; Yang, R.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, G. The occurrence and sources of PAHs, oxygenated PAHs (OPAHs), and nitrated PAHs (NPAHs) in soil and vegetation from the Antarctic, Arctic, and Tibetan Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 169394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Alawi, M.A.; Azeez, A.L. Study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil samples from Al-Ahdab oil field in Waset Region, Iraq. Toxin Rev. 2016, 35, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ngoc, N.T.; Kim, T.T.; Quynh, N.T.; Vi, P.T.; Viet, P.H.; Anh, D.H. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in paddy soil around Nam Son landfill area, Ha Noi, Viet Nam. Vietnam J. Sci. Technol. 2023, 61, 875–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhao, X.; Gao, J.; Zhai, L.; Yu, X.; Xiao, Y. Recent Evidence on Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Exposure. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dai, C.; Han, Y.; Duan, Y.; Lai, X.; Fu, R.; Liu, S.; Leong, K.H.; Tu, Y.; Zhou, L. Review on the contamination and remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in coastal soil and sediments. Environ. Res. 2022, 205, 112423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gregoris, E.; Barbaro, E.; Morabito, E.; Toscano, G.; Donateo, A.; Cesari, D.; Contini, D.; Gambaro, A. Impact of maritime traffic on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, metals and particulate matter in Venice air. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2016, 23, 6951–6959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lin, X.; Lin, L.; Liao, Z.; Wu, P.; Yang, C. Occurrence and distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in marine organisms from Shenzhen coastal waters and human health risk assessment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2023, 195, 115498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, F.; Lin, Y.; Cai, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Kuang, W.; Liu, L.; Huang, P.; Ke, H. Occurrence and Risk Assessment of PAHs in Surface Sediments from Western Arctic and Subarctic Oceans. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shen, Q.; Fu, W.; Chen, B.; Zhang, X.; Xing, S.; Ji, C.; Zhang, X. Community response of soil microorganisms to combined contamination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and potentially toxic elements in a typical coking plant. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1143742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Duan, L.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Dong, L. Deep relationships between bacterial community and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil profiles near typical coking plants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 64486–64498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Geng, S.; Xu, G.; Cao, W.; You, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Ding, A.; Fan, F.; Dou, J. Occurrence of polycyclic aromatic compounds and potentially toxic elements contamination and corresponding interdomain microbial community assembly in soil of an abandoned gas station. Environ. Res. 2022, 212 Pt E, 113618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ai, F.; Eisenhauer, N.; Xie, Y.; Zhu, J.; Jousset, A.; Du, W.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ji, R.; Guo, H. Elevated CO2 accelerates polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon accumulation in a paddy soil grown with rice. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0196439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Janneh, M.; Qu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Xing, X.; Nkwazema, O.; Nyihirani, F.; Qi, S. Distribution, sources, and ecological risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in agricultural and dumpsite soils in Sierra Leone. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 7102–7116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tarigholizadeh, S.; Sushkova, S.; Rajput, V.D.; Ranjan, A.; Arora, J.; Dudnikova, T.; Barbashev, A.; Mandzhieva, S.; Minkina, T.; Wong, M.H. Transfer and Degradation of PAHs in the Soil-Plant System: A Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 46–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ukalska-Jaruga, A.; Smreczak, B. The Impact of Organic Matter on Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) Availability and Persistence in Soils. Molecules 2020, 25, 2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Petruzzelli, L.; Celi, L.; Cignetti, A.; Marsan, F.A. Influence of soil organic matter on the leaching of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B Pestic. Food Contam. Agric. Wastes 2002, 37, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kuśmierz, M.; Oleszczuk, P.; Kraska, P.; Pałys, E.; Andruszczak, S. Persistence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in biochar-amended soil. Chemosphere 2016, 146, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, D.; Ma, J.; Li, H.; Zhang, X. Concentration and Potential Ecological Risk of PAHs in Different Layers of Soil in the Petroleum-Contaminated Areas of the Loess Plateau, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, J.; Odinga, E.S.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, X.; Yang, B.; Waigi, M.G.; Gao, Y. Polyaromatic hydrocarbons in biochars and human health risks of food crops grown in biochar-amended soils: A synthesis study. Environ. Int. 2019, 130, 104899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sethi, S.S.; Ambade, B.; Mohammad, F.; Al-Lohedan, H.A.; Soleiman, A.A. Accumulation and Toxicity of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Long-Term Soil Irrigated with Treated Wastewater. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sui, Q.; Yang, X.; Sun, X.; Zhu, L.; Zhao, X.; Feng, Z.; Xia, B.; Qu, K. Bioaccumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their human health risks depend on the characteristics of microplastics in marine organisms of Sanggou Bay, China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 473, 134622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Honda, M.; Suzuki, N. Toxicities of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons for Aquatic Animals. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Meng, Y.; Liu, X.; Lu, S.; Zhang, T.; Jin, B.; Wang, Q.; Tang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Guo, X.; Zhou, J.; et al. A review on occurrence and risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in lakes of China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651 Pt 2, 2497–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lourenço, R.A.; Taniguchi, S.; da Silva, J.; Gallotta, F.D.C.; Bícego, M.C. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in marine mammals: A review and synthesis. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 171, 112699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Power, A.; White, P.; McHugh, B.; Berrow, S.; McKeown, A.; Crowley, D.; Newton, S.; McGovern, E.; Murphy, S.; O’Connor, I. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in seabird eggs in Ireland. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 170, 112636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sun, K.; Song, Y.; He, F.; Jing, M.; Tang, J.; Liu, R. A review of human and animals exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Health risk and adverse effects, photo-induced toxicity and regulating effect of microplastics. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 773, 145403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xie, W.; Wang, G.; Yu, E.; Xie, J.; Gong, W.; Li, Z.; Zhang, K.; Xia, Y.; Tian, J.; Li, H. Residue character of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in river aquatic organisms coupled with geographic distribution, feeding behavior, and human edible risk. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 895, 164814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gregoris, E.; Argiriadis, E.; Vecchiato, M.; Zambon, S.; De Pieri, S.; Donateo, A.; Contini, D.; Piazza, R.; Barbante, C.; Gambaro, A. Gas-particle distributions, sources and health effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCNs) in Venice aerosols. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 476–477, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yost, E.E.; Galizia, A.; Kapraun, D.F.; Persad, A.S.; Vulimiri, S.V.; Angrish, M.; Lee, J.S.; Druwe, I.L. Health Effects of Naphthalene Exposure: A Systematic Evidence Map and Analysis of Potential Considerations for Dose-Response Evaluation. Environ. Health Perspect. 2021, 129, 76002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ewa, B.; Danuta, M.Š. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and PAH-related DNA adducts. J. Appl. Genet. 2017, 58, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Smith, J.N.; Gaither, K.A.; Pande, P. Competitive Metabolism of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): An Assessment Using In Vitro Metabolism and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Stoddard, E.G.; Nag, S.; Martin, J.; Tyrrell, K.J.; Gibbins, T.; Anderson, K.A.; Shukla, A.K.; Corley, R.; Wright, A.T.; Smith, J.N. Exposure to an Environmental Mixture of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Induces Hepatic Cytochrome P450 Enzymes in Mice. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2021, 34, 2145–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Šulc, M.; Indra, R.; Moserová, M.; Schmeiser, H.H.; Frei, E.; Arlt, V.M.; Stiborová, M. The impact of individual cytochrome P450 enzymes on oxidative metabolism of benzo[a]pyrene in human livers. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2016, 57, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Indra, R.; Moserova, M.; Sulc, M.; Frei, E.; Stiborova, M. Oxidation of carcinogenic benzo[a]pyrene by human and rat cytochrome P450 1A1 and its influencing by cytochrome b5—A comparative study. Neuro Endocrinol. Lett. 2013, 34 (Suppl. S2), 55–63. [Google Scholar]
  67. Pietrogrande, M.C.; Bacco, D.; Demaria, G.; Russo, M.; Scotto, F.; Trentini, A. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their oxygenated derivatives in urban aerosol: Levels, chemical profiles, and contribution to PM2.5 oxidative potential. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 54391–54406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zuo, J.; Brewer, D.S.; Arlt, V.M.; Cooper, C.S.; Phillips, D.H. Benzo pyrene-induced DNA adducts and gene expression profiles in target and non-target organs for carcinogenesis in mice. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rafiee, A.; Hoseini, M.; Akbari, S.; Mahabee-Gittens, E.M. Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and adverse reproductive outcomes in women: Current status and future perspectives. Rev. Environ. Health 2023, 39, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jo, Y.S.; Ko, H.S.; Kim, A.Y.; Jo, H.G.; Kim, W.J.; Choi, S.K. Effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on the proliferation and differentiation of placental cells. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2022, 20, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yu, Y.Y.; Jin, H.; Lu, Q. Effect of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on immunity. J. Transl. Autoimmun. 2022, 5, 100177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Humphreys, J.; Valdés Hernández, M.D.C. Impact of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure on cognitive function and neurodegeneration in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Neurol. 2023, 13, 1052333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Moubarz, G.; Saad-Hussein, A.; Shahy, E.M.; Mahdy-Abdallah, H.; Mohammed, A.M.F.; Saleh, I.A.; Abo-Zeid, M.A.M.; Abo-Elfadl, M.T. Lung cancer risk in workers occupationally exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with emphasis on the role of DNA repair gene. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2023, 96, 313–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Olayinka, O.O.; Adewusi, A.A.; Olujimi, O.O.; Aladesida, A.A. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Sediment and Health Risk of Fish, Crab and Shrimp Around Atlas Cove, Nigeria. J. Health Pollut. 2019, 9, 191204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y. Analytical chemistry, formation, mitigation, and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: From food processing to in vivo metabolic transformation. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 1422–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Ashok, A.; Høj, L.; Brinkman, D.L.; Negri, A.P.; Agusti, S. Food-chain length determines the level of phenanthrene bioaccumulation in corals. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 297, 118789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pullagurala, V.L.R.; Rawat, S.; Adisa, I.O.; Hernandez-Viezcas, J.A.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. Plant uptake and translocation of contaminants of emerging concern in soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 636, 1585–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Paris, A.; Ledauphin, J.; Poinot, P.; Gaillard, J.L. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in fruits and vegetables: Origin, analysis, and occurrence. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 234, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jia, J.; Bi, C.; Jin, X.; Zeng, Y.; Deng, L.; Wang, X.; Chen, Z. Uptake, translocation, and risk assessment of PAHs in con-taminated soil-air-vegetable systems based on a field simulation experiment. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 271, 116361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wu, X.; Zhu, L. Prediction of organic contaminant uptake by plants: Modified partition-limited model based on a sequential ultrasonic extraction procedure. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 246, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fatma, M.; Asgher, M.; Iqbal, N.; Rasheed, F.; Sehar, Z.; Sofo, A.; Khan, N.A. Ethylene Signaling under Stressful Environments: Analyzing Collaborative Knowledge. Plants 2022, 11, 2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Yu, Z.; Xu, X.; Guo, L.; Jin, R.; Lu, Y. Uptake and transport of micro/nanoplastics in terrestrial plants: Detection, mechanisms, and influencing factors. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 907, 168155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhang, H.; Zeng, N.; Feng, Q.; Xu, S.; Cheng, J.; Wang, J.; Zhan, X. New mechanistic insights into PAHs transport across wheat root cell membrane: Evidence for ABC transporter mediation. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 859 Pt 1, 160251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhang, S.; Yao, H.; Lu, Y.; Yu, X.; Wang, J.; Sun, S.; Liu, M.; Li, D.; Li, Y.F.; Zhang, D. Uptake and translocation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heavy metals by maize from soil irrigated with wastewater. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Mackiewicz-Walec, E.; Krzebietke, S.J.; Sienkiewicz, S. The Influence of Crops on the Content of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil Fertilized with Manure and Mineral Fertilizers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Molina, L.; Segura, A. Biochemical and Metabolic Plant Responses toward Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Heavy Metals Present in Atmospheric Pollution. Plants 2021, 10, 2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Choudhary, A.; Kumar, A.; Kaur, N. ROS and oxidative burst: Roots in plant development. Plant Divers. 2019, 42, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zandi, P.; Schnug, E. Reactive Oxygen Species, Antioxidant Responses and Implications from a Microbial Modulation Perspective. Biology 2022, 11, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sagi, M.; Fluhr, R. Production of reactive oxygen species by plant NADPH oxidases. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Krzyszczak, A.; Dybowski, M.; Jośko, I.; Kusiak, M.; Sikora, M.; Czech, B. The antioxidant defense responses of Hordeum vulgare L. to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their derivatives in biochar-amended soil. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 294, 118664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Paková, V.; Hilscherová, K.; Feldmannová, M.; Bláha, L. Toxic effects and oxidative stress in higher plants exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their N-heterocyclic derivatives. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2006, 25, 3238–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. And Jajoo, A.; Mekala, N.R.; Tomar, R.S.; Grieco, M.; Tikkanen, M.; Aro, E.M. Inhibitory effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) on photosynthetic performance are not related to their aromaticity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2014, 137, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Hu, J.; Chen, J.; Wang, W.; Zhu, L. Mechanism of growth inhibition mediated by disorder of chlorophyll metabolism in rice (Oryza sativa) under the stress of three polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Chemosphere 2023, 329, 138554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Zhang, Z.; Rengel, Z.; Meney, K.; Pantelic, L.; Tomanovic, R. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) mediate cadmium toxicity to an emergent wetland species. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 189, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lin, F.; Sun, J.; Liu, N.; Zhu, L. Phytotoxicity and metabolic responses induced by tetrachlorobiphenyl and its hydroxylated and methoxylated derivatives in rice (Oryza sative L.). Environ. Int. 2020, 139, 105695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Weisman, D.; Alkio, M.; Colón-Carmona, A. Transcriptional responses to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-induced stress in Arabidopsis thaliana reveal the involvement of hormone and defense signaling pathways. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Liu, H.; Weisman, D.; Tang, L.; Tan, L.; Zhang, W.K.; Wang, Z.H.; Huang, Y.H.; Lin, W.X.; Liu, X.M.; Colón-Carmona, A. Stress signaling in response to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure in Arabidopsis thaliana involves a nucleoside diphosphate kinase, NDPK-3. Planta 2015, 241, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Bao, H.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Xing, W.; Hong, H.; Wu, F. Dynamic distribution and accumulation of PAHs in winter wheat during whole plant growth: Field investigation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 202, 110886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhang, A.; Ye, X.; Yang, X.; Li, J.; Zhu, H.; Xu, H.; Meng, J.; Xu, T.; Sun, J. Elevated urbanization-driven plant accumulation and human intake risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in crops of peri-urban farmlands. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022, 29, 68143–68151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lian, M.Q.; Chng, W.H.; Liang, J.; Yeo, H.Q.; Lee, C.K.; Belaid, M.; Tollemeto, M.; Wacker, M.G.; Czarny, B.; Pastorin, G. Plant-derived extracellular vesicles: Recent advancements and current challenges on their use for biomedical applications. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2022, 11, e12283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sall, I.M.; Flaviu, T.A. Plant and mammalian-derived extracellular vesicles: A new therapeutic approach for the future. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1215650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Yang, L.Y.; Li, C.Q.; Zhang, Y.L.; Ma, M.W.; Cheng, W.; Zhang, G.J. Emerging Drug Delivery Vectors: Engineering of Plant-Derived Nanovesicles and Their Applications in Biomedicine. Int. J. Nanomed. 2024, 19, 2591–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. An, Q.; van Bel, A.J.; Hückelhoven, R. Do plant cells secrete exosomes derived from multivesicular bodies? Plant Signal. Behav. 2007, 2, 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Regente, M.; Corti-Monzón, G.; Maldonado, A.M.; Pinedo, M.; Jorrín, J.; de la Canal, L. Vesicular fractions of sunflower apoplastic fluids are associated with potential exosome marker proteins. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 3363–3366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bai, C.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Qin, Q.; Song, H.; Yuan, C.; Huang, Z. Research status and challenges of plant-derived exosome-like nanoparticles. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2024, 174, 116543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Mu, N.; Li, J.; Zeng, L.; You, J.; Li, R.; Qin, A.; Liu, X.; Yan, F.; Zhou, Z. Plant-Derived Exosome-Like Nanovesicles: Current Progress and Prospects. Int. J. Nanomed. 2023, 18, 4987–5009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Nemati, M.; Singh, B.; Mir, R.A.; Nemati, M.; Babaei, A.; Ahmadi, M.; Rasmi, Y.; Golezani, A.G.; Rezaie, J. Plant-derived extracellular vesicles: A novel nanomedicine approach with advantages and challenges. Cell Commun. Signal. CCS 2022, 20, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Johnson, S.M.; Banyard, A.; Smith, C.; Mironov, A.; McCabe, M.G. Large Extracellular Vesicles Can be Characterised by Multiplex Labelling Using Imaging Flow Cytometry. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Jeppesen, D.K.; Zhang, Q.; Franklin, J.L.; Coffey, R.J. Extracellular vesicles and nanoparticles: Emerging complexities. Trends Cell Biol. 2023, 33, 667–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Alzahrani, F.A.; Khan, M.I.; Kameli, N.; Alsahafi, E.; Riza, Y.M. Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles and Their Exciting Potential as the Future of Next-Generation Drug Delivery. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Liu, N.; Hou, L.; Chen, X.; Bao, J.; Chen, F.; Cai, W.; Zhu, H.; Wang, L.; Chen, X. Arabidopsis TETRASPANIN8 mediates exosome secretion and glycosyl inositol phosphoceramide sorting and trafficking. Plant Cell 2024, 36, 626–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Latella, R.; Calzoni, E.; Urbanelli, L.; Cerrotti, G.; Porcellati, S.; Emiliani, C.; Buratta, S.; Tancini, B. Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles from Agri-Food Wastes: A Novel Perspective in the Valorization of Agri-Food Wastes and By-Products. Foods 2024, 13, 1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Baldrich, P.; Rutter, B.D.; Karimi, H.Z.; Podicheti, R.; Meyers, B.C.; Innes, R.W. Plant Extracellular Vesicles Contain Diverse Small RNA Species and Are Enriched in 10- to 17-Nucleotide “Tiny” RNAs. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Rutter, B.D.; Innes, R.W. Extracellular Vesicles Isolated from the Leaf Apoplast Carry Stress-Response Proteins. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 728–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Kim, M.; Jang, H.; Kim, W.; Kim, D.; Park, J.H. Therapeutic Applications of Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as Antioxidants for Oxidative Stress-Related Diseases. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Lo, K.J.; Wang, M.H.; Ho, C.T.; Pan, M.H. Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: A New Revolutionization of Modern Healthy Diets and Biomedical Applications. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 2853–2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ambrosone, A.; Barbulova, A.; Cappetta, E.; Cillo, F.; De Palma, M.; Ruocco, M.; Pocsfalvi, G. Plant Extracellular Vesicles: Current Landscape and Future Directions. Plants 2023, 12, 4141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Shen, Y.; Li, J.; Gu, R.; Yue, L.; Wang, H.; Zhan, X.; Xing, B. Carotenoid and superoxide dismutase are the most effective antioxidants participating in ROS scavenging in phenanthrene accumulated wheat leaf. Chemosphere 2018, 197, 513–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hao, S.; Yang, H.; Hu, J.; Luo, L.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, L. Bioactive compounds and biological functions of medicinal plant-derived extracellular vesicles. Pharmacol. Res. 2024, 200, 107062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kumar, M.; Bolan, N.S.; Hoang, S.A.; Sawarkar, A.D.; Jasemizad, T.; Gao, B.; Keerthanan, S.; Padhye, L.P.; Singh, L.; Kumar, S.; et al. Remediation of soils and sediments polluted with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: To immobilize, mobilize, or degrade? J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 420, 126534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Liu, S.; Liu, N.; Lu, H.; Zhu, L. Disturbed phospholipid metabolism by three polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Oryza sativa. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 283, 117073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Skotland, T.; Sagini, K.; Sandvig, K.; Llorente, A. An emerging focus on lipids in extracellular vesicles. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020, 159, 308–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Alkio, M.; Tabuchi, T.M.; Wang, X.; Colón-Carmona, A. Stress responses to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Arabidopsis include growth inhibition and hypersensitive response-like symptoms. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 2983–2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zhao, Z.; He, W.; Wu, R.; Xu, F. Distribution and Relationships of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Soils and Plants near Major Lakes in Eastern China. Toxics 2022, 10, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Wang, X.; Chang, C. Exploring and exploiting cuticle biosynthesis for abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in wheat and barley. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1064390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. He, M.; Ding, N.Z. Plant Unsaturated Fatty Acids: Multiple Roles in Stress Response. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 562785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. You, J.; Chan, Z. ROS Regulation During Abiotic Stress Responses in Crop Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhou, P.; Graether, S.P.; Hu, L.; Zhang, W. Editorial: The role of stress proteins in plants under abiotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1193542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ul Haq, S.; Khan, A.; Ali, M.; Khattak, A.M.; Gai, W.X.; Zhang, H.X.; Wei, A.M.; Gong, Z.H. Heat Shock Proteins: Dynamic Biomolecules to Counter Plant Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Li, R.; Ge, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, R. Plants’ Response to Abiotic Stress: Mechanisms and Strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Rajput, V.D.; Harish; Singh, R.K.; Verma, K.K.; Sharma, L.; Quiroz-Figueroa, F.R.; Meena, M.; Gour, V.S.; Minkina, T.; Sushkova, S.; et al. Recent Developments in Enzymatic Antioxidant Defence Mechanism in Plants with Special Reference to Abiotic Stress. Biology 2021, 10, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Anee, T.I.; Parvin, K.; Nahar, K.; Mahmud, J.A.; Fujita, M. Regulation of Ascorbate-Glutathione Pathway in Mitigating Oxidative Damage in Plants under Abiotic Stress. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Alagić, S.Č.; Maluckov, B.S.; Radojičić, V.B. How can plants manage polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons? May these effects represent a useful tool for an effective soil remediation? A review. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2015, 17, 597–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Hodges, R.E.; Minich, D.M. Modulation of Metabolic Detoxification Pathways Using Foods and Food-Derived Components: A Scientific Review with Clinical Application. J. Nutr. Metab. 2015, 2015, 760689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Fenton, T.R.; Armour, B.; Thirsk, J. Comment on “Modulation of Metabolic Detoxification Pathways Using Foods and Food-Derived Components: A Scientific Review with Clinical Application”. J. Nutr. Metab. 2015, 2015, 934070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Hussain, O.A.; Abdel Rahim, E.A.; Badr, A.N.; Hathout, A.S.; Rashed, M.M.; Fouzy, A.S.M. Total phenolics, flavonoids, and antioxidant activity of agricultural wastes, and their ability to remove some pesticide residues. Toxicol. Rep. 2022, 9, 628–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Correa-García, S.; Pande, P.; Séguin, A.; St-Arnaud, M.; Yergeau, E. Rhizoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons: A model system for plant microbiome manipulation. Microb. Biotechnol. 2018, 11, 819–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. García-Sánchez, M.; Košnář, Z.; Mercl, F.; Aranda, E.; Tlustoš, P. A comparative study to evaluate natural attenuation, mycoaugmentation, phytoremediation, and microbial-assisted phytoremediation strategies for the bioremediation of an aged PAH-polluted soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 147, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kadri, T.; Rouissi, T.; Kaur Brar, S.; Cledon, M.; Sarma, S.; Verma, M. Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by fungal enzymes: A review. J. Environ. Sci. 2017, 51, 52–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Sun, Y.; Li, Y.; Liang, H.; Li, M.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Lai, W.; Tang, T.; Diao, Y.; Bai, Y.; et al. Distinct laccase expression and activity profiles of Trametes versicolor facilitate degradation of benzo[a]pyrene. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1264135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Kakoulidou, I.; Avramidou, E.V.; Baránek, M.; Brunel-Muguet, S.; Farrona, S.; Johannes, F.; Kaiserli, E.; Lieberman-Lazarovich, M.; Martinelli, F.; Mladenov, V.; et al. Epigenetics for Crop Improvement in Times of Global Change. Biology 2021, 10, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Liu, G.; Kang, G.; Wang, S.; Huang, Y.; Cai, Q. Extracellular Vesicles: Emerging Players in Plant Defense Against Pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 757925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Subha, D.; AnuKiruthika, R.; Sreeraj, H.; Tamilselvi, K.S. Plant exosomes: Nano conveyors of pathogen resistance. Discov. Nano 2023, 18, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Sun, M.; Yang, Z.; Liu, L.; Duan, L. DNA Methylation in Plant Responses and Adaption to Abiotic Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Illustration depicting the uptake and translocation of PAHs within a plant system. The image visualizes the various pathways of PAH absorption and their movement within the plant based on their hydrophobicity.
Figure 1. Illustration depicting the uptake and translocation of PAHs within a plant system. The image visualizes the various pathways of PAH absorption and their movement within the plant based on their hydrophobicity.
Toxics 12 00653 g001
Figure 2. Sources and entry pathways to plant responses and mitigation strategies, and potential role of PDEVs.
Figure 2. Sources and entry pathways to plant responses and mitigation strategies, and potential role of PDEVs.
Toxics 12 00653 g002
Table 1. The top three PAHs and their concentrations for each study location.
Table 1. The top three PAHs and their concentrations for each study location.
Study LocationTop 3 PAHsAverage ConcentrationRange
Nam Son Landfill AreaNaphthalene (Nap)10.33 ng/gnd–26.16 ng/g
Phenanthrene (Phe)8.43 ng/g3.16–14.53 ng/g
Benzo[b]fluoranthene (BbF)6.63 ng/g0.60–30.94 ng/g
Shandong Province, ChinaPhenanthrene (Phe)16.3% of total PAH concentration-
Acenaphthene (Ace)13.1% of total PAH concentration-
Fluorene (Fl)10.5% of total PAH concentration-
Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaNaphthalene (Nap)1.23 μg/kg-
Benzo[a]anthracene (BaA)1.38 μg/kg-
Benzo[b]fluoranthene (BbF)1.71 μg/kg-
Taiyuan, Northern ChinaNaphthalene (Nap)28.39% of total PAH concentration-
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene (BgP)0.65% of total PAH concentration-
Benzo[b]fluoranthene (BbF)28.19% of total carcinogenic PAHs-
Zhiwu Park, ChinaDibenz[a,h]anthracene (DahN)1.469 mg/kg-
Bursa, TurkeyBenzo[a]pyrene (BaP)-13–189.4 ng/g dry matter
Antalya Aksu Region, TurkeyBenzo[a]pyrene (BaP)2.31 μg/kg-
Uzbekistan (Industrial Area)Phenanthrene (Phe)21.53 ng/g4.25–41.03% of total PAHs
Chrysene (Chr)-3.4–24.1% of total PAHs
Hamedan County, IranPAHs with four or more rings78% of total PAH mass-
Antarctic, Arctic,
Tibetan Plateau
Phenanthrene (Phe)Most abundant PAH-
Table 2. The uptake pathways of PAHs by plants.
Table 2. The uptake pathways of PAHs by plants.
Uptake PathwayDescriptionKey PointsReferences
Root UptakeDiffusion of PAH molecules through the soil solution into root cells.PAHs may undergo transformations or be transported within the plant.[77,78,79,80]
Stomatal UptakeDiffusion of gaseous PAH molecules through stomatal openings on leaves into internal leaf tissues.Major source of PAHs in vegetable leaves in polluted environments.[81]
Cuticular PenetrationDiffusion of PAHs through the waxy cuticle covering plant aerial parts, accumulating in leaf tissues.Significant for aerial parts of plants in contact with PAH-contaminated environments.[81]
Hydroponic UptakeAbsorption of PAHs dissolved in water directly from hydroponic solutions in controlled environments.Used in studies to evaluate PAH uptake in controlled conditions.[82]
Table 3. Summary of the various stress responses induced by PAHs in plants.
Table 3. Summary of the various stress responses induced by PAHs in plants.
Effect of PAHs on PlantsMechanismConsequenceReferences
Oxidative StressROS-induced lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and DNA damageImpaired cell functionality, compromised growth[89,90,91]
Antioxidant ResponseElevated SOD, CAT, and APX activityEnhanced defense against oxidative stress[92,93]
GenotoxicityInteraction with plant DNAMutations, chromosomal aberrations[94,99]
Photosynthesis DisruptionInhibition of chlorophyll synthesis, Rubisco down-regulationReduced photosynthetic efficiency and biomass yield[95,96,97]
Hormonal DysregulationInterference with hormonal signaling pathwaysAbnormal development, disrupted
metabolism
[98]
Table 4. Summary of potential effects of PAH-induced stress on PDEVs.
Table 4. Summary of potential effects of PAH-induced stress on PDEVs.
AspectPotential Effects
Cellular Stress ResponsesPAH-induced oxidative stress, membrane damage, and signaling disruptions could affect the production and release mechanisms of plant EVs.
Cargo CompositionPAH-induced stress responses may lead to changes in the composition of EVs, altering the packaging of proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids.
Intercellular CommunicationEVs could serve as carriers of stress-related molecules, such as antioxidants, signaling proteins, or small RNAs, facilitating intercellular communication and stress response mediation.
Detoxification MechanismsEVs may participate in the detoxification of PAHs by transporting and secreting these compounds or their metabolites as a defense mechanism to remove toxic substances.
Membrane PropertiesPAHs can disrupt plant cell membranes, potentially affecting the lipid composition and properties of EV membranes, influencing their stability and interactions with recipient cells.
Role in Signaling PathwaysPAH-induced stress responses might disrupt the release and uptake mechanisms of EVs involved in stress-related signaling pathways, impacting plant stress resilience.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barathan, M.; Ng, S.L.; Lokanathan, Y.; Ng, M.H.; Law, J.X. Plant Defense Mechanisms against Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Contamination: Insights into the Role of Extracellular Vesicles. Toxics 2024, 12, 653. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12090653

AMA Style

Barathan M, Ng SL, Lokanathan Y, Ng MH, Law JX. Plant Defense Mechanisms against Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Contamination: Insights into the Role of Extracellular Vesicles. Toxics. 2024; 12(9):653. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12090653

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barathan, Muttiah, Sook Luan Ng, Yogeswaran Lokanathan, Min Hwei Ng, and Jia Xian Law. 2024. "Plant Defense Mechanisms against Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Contamination: Insights into the Role of Extracellular Vesicles" Toxics 12, no. 9: 653. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12090653

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop