Next Article in Journal
How to Predict the Efficacy of Free-Product DNAPL Pool Extraction Using 3D High-Precision Numerical Simulations: An Interdisciplinary Test Study in South-Western Sicily (Italy)
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Overview of Flood Modeling Approaches: A Review of Recent Advances
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Warm Rain Analysis from Remote Sensing Data in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona for 2015–2022

Hydrology 2023, 10(7), 142; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10070142
by Tomeu Rigo
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Hydrology 2023, 10(7), 142; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10070142
Submission received: 30 April 2023 / Revised: 3 July 2023 / Accepted: 3 July 2023 / Published: 6 July 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. Why authors are using model output for freezing height? Radiosonde data will be better.

2. The authors must have to include ground based observations over other part of the globe.

3. Why Echo Top of 12 dBZ is important? What is the sensitivity of the radar used here?

4. Can you compare the results here with the GPM Pass also?

5. Figure 2 and 3 is not clear.

6. How did you define the warm and cold rain? Not clear.

7. Results : Include the references also with past references.

8. Line 263: higher not higgher.

9. What is the physical meaning of Fig. 10.

No comments

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,
 
Thank you very much for your comments. I have made most of the suggested changes and answered in the attached doc. I hope the new version satisfies the conditions for being acceptable in Atmosphere.
 
All the best
The author

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

My comments are included in the document itself.  I had only a couple of science suggestions, which the authors should find.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

The author's command of written English is inadequate, much like my command of written or oral Spanish (which is non-existent).  This is not an insult, nor is it meant to be, and I hope the author is not offended.  The majority of the comments/suggestions I made were to improve the manuscript's readability.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,
 
Thank you very much for your in deep review. I have made all the suggested changes and answered directly to your document. I hope the new version satisfies the conditions for being acceptable in Atmosphere.
 
All the best
The author

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop