Next Article in Journal
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy in the Determination of the Dielectric Properties of Tau-441 Protein for Dielectrophoresis Response Prediction
Next Article in Special Issue
The Utility of Indocyanine Green Angiography in Breast Reconstruction to Detect Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis and Free Flap Perfusion: An Umbrella Review
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Internal and External Foot Rotation on Peak Knee Adduction Moments and Ankle Moments during Gait in Individuals with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Conceptualizing Scaffold Guided Breast Tissue Regeneration in a Preclinical Large Animal Model
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Bioengineering
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/bioengineering11070697
bioengineering-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Adipose Tissue Derivatives in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration after Transection: A Systematic Review

by
Rafael Silva de Araújo
1,*,
Matheus Galvão Valadares Bertolini Mussalem
1,
Gabriel Sant’Ana Carrijo
2,
João Victor de Figueiredo Bani
1 and
Lydia Masako Ferreira
1
1
Federal University of São Paulo, Department of Plastic Surgery, São Paulo 04038-001, Brazil
2
FMABC University Center, Faculty of Medicine, Santo André 09060-870, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2024, 11(7), 697; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11070697
Submission received: 26 April 2024 / Revised: 8 June 2024 / Accepted: 28 June 2024 / Published: 10 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Microsurgery, Breast Reconstruction & Tissue Engineering)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Introduction: Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is increasingly prevalent and challenging to treat despite advances in microsurgical techniques. In this context, adipose tissue derivatives, such as adipose-derived stem cells, nanofat, and stromal vascular fraction have been gaining attention as potential allies in peripheral nerve regeneration. Objectives: This study aims to explore the use of adipose tissue derivatives in nerve regeneration following peripheral nerve transection in murine models. Thus, we assess and synthesize the key techniques and methods used for evaluating the obtained nerve regeneration to guide future experimental research and clinical interventions. Methodology: A systematic review was conducted in February 2024, adhering to the Cochrane and PRISMA 2020 guidelines, using the PubMed, SciELO, and LILACS databases. The focus was on experimental studies involving adipose tissue derivatives in nerve regeneration in animal models post-transection. Only experimental trials reporting nerve regeneration outcomes were included; studies lacking a comparator group or evaluation methods were excluded. Results: Out of 273 studies initially identified from MEDLINE, 19 were selected for detailed analysis. The average study included 32.5 subjects, with about 10.2 subjects per intervention subgroup. The predominant model was the sciatic nerve injury with a 10 mm gap. The most common intervention involved unprocessed adipose-derived stem cells, utilized in 14 articles. Conclusions: This review underscores the significant potential of current methodologies in peripheral nerve regeneration, particularly highlighting the use of murine models and thorough evaluation techniques.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) has been garnering increased attention due to its rising prevalence alongside rapid societal developments [1]. The main causes of PNI are related to damage to nervous structures, such as traumatic injuries, which can present in diverse clinical manifestations. The reviews of the literature indicate a prevalence of 8% for non-traumatic cases [2] and 5% for traumatic instances [3]. Despite advancements in microsurgical techniques, patients with PNI still face unsatisfactory recovery prognosis [4].
Injuries are categorized into neuropraxia, axonotmesis, and neurotmesis, each with distinct implications for treatment and functional recovery [5,6]. This scenario underscores the need for innovative therapeutic approaches that could offer more promising outcomes.
In this context, adipose stem cells (ASCs) emerge as a promising source for regenerative therapies due to their ability to differentiate into various cell types, such as Schwann-like cells, and to release regenerative factors through paracrine mechanisms [7,8].
The scientific literature highlights the potential of these cells in treating peripheral nerve injuries in animal models, with evidence of their role in promoting regeneration and improving nerve function. Experimental studies have been primarily conducted in rodent models, as their nerves share similar size, fascicular organization, and morphology to humans [9]. Regarding the use of ASCs in treatment, the potential to contribute to the recovery of damaged nerves makes them promising candidates for future clinical applications [10].
Additionally, complementary techniques such as the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and nanofat are explored to optimize the regenerative potential of ASCs with paracrine and immunomodulatory actions to induce tissue regeneration. These approaches combine the cellular richness of the SVF with the benefits of the extracellular matrix and paracrine signals provided by nanofat, enabling the development of more effective treatments against nerve injuries [11,12].
In this context, this systematic review aims to present the state of the art in the current literature regarding the use of murine models subjected to transection injuries in the peripheral nerves and that have utilized adipose tissue derivatives to promote nerve regeneration. Subsequently, it intends to synthesize the main methods of analyzing nerve regeneration and their respective results in the selected articles.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Information

This is a systematic search study following the Cochrane standards, and this manuscript was completed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines [13], with data research conducted in February 2024. As this is a systematic literature review, this study was exempt from institutional review board approval and did not utilize external funding sources. The databases PubMed, Scielo, and LILACS were used to search for articles addressing peripheral nerve regeneration in animals subjected to nerve transection. The following keywords were used in PubMed: (“rat” [All Fields] OR “mice” [All Fields] OR “rabbits” [All Fields] OR “macaca” [All Fields] OR “swine” [All Fields] OR “muridae” [All Fields]) AND (“peripheral nerve injuries” [All Fields] OR “denervation” [All Fields]) AND (“microsurgery” [All Fields] OR “neurosurgery” [All Fields] OR “mesenchymal stem cells” [All Fields] OR “adipose tissue” [All Fields]) AND “nerve regeneration” [All Fields]. The same terms were used in SciELO and LILACS with necessary modifications according to the rules of those databases.
The search for articles on the topic was conducted to encompass the largest number of studies, aiming to portray the current state of the art regarding this type of experimental assay. This allows for the evaluation of the variation in academic production on this subject in a historical panorama. Articles from January 1969 to December 2023 were selected.

2.2. Data Selection and Extraction

Following data research, article selection was conducted by three independent reviewers in two stages: analysis of article titles and abstracts, followed by full-text review. Any conflicts were resolved by a third author. The literature was restricted to articles in English, Portuguese, and Spanish without date limitations. Inclusion criteria were limited to articles assessing peripheral nerve regeneration as the primary outcome and considering the section of the peripheral nerve studied. Moreover, only experimental trials were included since they are the primary studies with the highest impact, thus providing more reliability for the data the authors aimed to analyze. The exclusion criteria were defined as follows: articles that did not address the presence of a comparator group among the studied subgroups; those that did not include methods for the evaluation of the studied nerve regeneration; and those that did not use adipose derivatives in at least one subgroup. In the present study, adipose tissue derivatives were considered, including fat graft, ASCs, and raw materials obtained mechanically (nanofat and microfat) and chemically (stromal vascular fraction). After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the studies were included for full-text analysis. It is important to note that the choice of inclusion and exclusion criteria was made a priori.
Regarding data extraction, it was performed by three independent reviewers who collected the following information from the articles: author, publication year, intervention, objective, conclusion, study location, animal follow-up, population, number of animals per subgroup, breed of animal, functional analyses, histological analyses, and other parameters assessing nerve regeneration. Data on funding sources were also collected.

3. Results

The literature search yielded 273 records, mainly from the MEDLINE database. Abstract screening removed the majority of the articles. The main causes for removal were wrong study design and studies that did not use adipose tissue byproducts. More details can be found in Figure 1.
The country in which the institution of the first author is located was considered as the country of origin of the article. The country that produced the most results was China (n = 4), followed by Switzerland (n = 3). A complete breakdown of the countries can be found in Figure 2.
Despite including several animal species in our search terms, we only located studies conducted in muridae. The most commonly used species was the Sprague Dawley rat, followed by Wistar and Lewis rats. FVB rats and mice were used in a single study each. The average number of subjects was 32.5 (SD = 17.9), being the average number of subjects per intervention group 9.2 (SD = 5.2)
Most articles performed their intervention immediately after neurotmesis, and then observed the rat for a mean number of 11.26 (SD = 5.4) weeks.
The sciatic nerve injury with a gap of 10 mm was the overall most commonly utilized model by a distinct margin (n = 11). Other gaps were utilized in smaller nerves or animals. One study utilized a chronic denervation model by severing the peroneal nerve and suturing the ends away from each other. Figure 3 presents a breakdown of all models.
A total of 38.8%. of control groups utilized empty conduits. All articles utilized a control group in accordance with the intervention.
ASCs with no further processing were the most common intervention, utilized in a total of 14 articles and 122 nerves. A total of 68.4% of the articles utilized conduits to bridge the nerve gaps. Aside from ASCs, other adipose tissue byproducts utilized were SVF and fat grafts. A breakdown of all results can be seen in Table 1.

4. Discussion

Based on the current research, tissue bioengineering and microsurgery emerge as some of the fundamental pillars of regenerative medicine. As intervention studies on vital structures progress, the techniques described increasingly approach practical applicability.

4.1. General Aspects

Among the selected studies, China contributed the highest number (n = 4), followed by Switzerland (n = 3). This find is compatible with the recent advances that China has been making in the academic publishing scene [33]. Remarkably, Chinese articles had the second-highest average journal impact factor, surpassed only by Korea. This indicates that China has had an increase not only in the quantity, but also in the quality of their publications.

4.2. Adipose Tissue Derivatives

In accordance with our inclusion criteria, all articles involved ASC-based interventions in at least one group, totaling 269 nerves undergoing sectioning and ASC interventions. The use of ASCs has been gaining popularity within the literature since its discovery as a potential material for tissue regeneration [34]. A search on PubMed for ‘Adipose-derived stem cells’ shows an increasing trend, indicating the growing interest in this topic. Several uses of ASCs are currently under investigation, with the main ones including wound healing, bone healing, immunomodulation, and nerve regeneration [35]. ASCs have gained special attention in the field of stem cell research because they are widely accessible throughout the body, easy to process, and lack the ethical controversies associated with other stem cell sources [36].
The first article proposing the use of ASCs for neuronal regeneration was published in 2005, followed by numerous animal and human research models exploring its therapeutic potential [37]. Their applications across various specialties, including ophthalmology (optic nerve regeneration), urology (treatment of nerve-induced erectile dysfunction), and reconstructive plastic surgery, have been extensively studied [38,39,40].

4.3. Trauma Mechanism

The studies on ASCs in nerve regeneration remain predominantly confined to animal models, notably involving the sciatic nerve neurotmesis with a 10 mm gap. Among the analyzed articles, 11 studies employed this specific model, while others explored neurotmesis involving different gaps or other nerves, such as the brachial plexus and the facial nerve. Additionally, several studies investigated crush injury models [41], although they were not included in this review.
The selected studies exhibited a broad spectrum of methodologies and approaches, leading to considerable variability in the types of functional and histological analyses performed. This diversity hindered the feasibility of conducting a meta-analysis, which generally demands a more standardized approach to data synthesis and analysis [42]. Consequently, we adopted a systematic review methodology to provide a comprehensive and interpretive synthesis of the existing literature.

4.4. Functional Analysis

In this review, eight articles [16,19,20,21,22,25,26,31] utilized the “Sciatic Functional Index” (SFI) for evaluating nerve function. Based on Medicaneli et al. (1982) [43], the method is reliable for assessing the muscle strength index and tissue electrophysiology, thus evaluating the performance of nerve function in the injured lower limb. For instance, the regeneration of the sciatic nerve was assessed by Dai et al. (2013) [19] with recovery rates ranging from 20.4% to 23.4% over a three-month period. Similarly, Orbay et al. (2012) [44] reported a functional recovery rate of 24.9% within two months in mice that received the intervention, demonstrating the method’s effectiveness in analyzing this variable [45,46,47,48]. Conversely, other studies also used alternative scales. Mohammadi et al. (2015) [22], in addition to the SFI, employed the “Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan for limb motor function” (BBB) and “Static Sciatic Index” (SSI) for assessing the same parameter. Although less used in the reviewed articles, both have validation in the scientific literature for their use [49,50]. Only one article used the “Peroneal Functional Index” (PFI), although the literature equally validates its use compared to the SFI [51].
Regarding methods of nerve electrostimulation, the parameter compound muscle action potential (CMAP) was used in five articles [15,17,18,28,30], compound nerve action potential (CNAP) in one article [25], and nerve conduction velocity (NCV) in four articles [16,19,20,25].
The CMAP is intended to measure the sum of the action potential of the concerned muscle fibers, focusing on the response of the innervated muscle [52]. Notably, the experiment by Di Summa et al. (2011) [15] assessed nerve regeneration through significant increases in axonal diameter and CMAP using either autograft or fibrin seeded with ASCs on the PNI. The validation of this method is also present in the literature [53].
The use of CNAP also proved to be a satisfactory parameter in the study of He et al. (2016) [25], being effective in comparing the proposed regeneration between two groups that used ASCs obtained from different sources. This suggests its potential in differentiating the quality of nerve regeneration even with interventions of a similar nature.
The measurement of nerve conduction velocity is also an important factor for evaluating innervation of the site, and depends on factors such as axon diameter, myelin sheath thickness, and the length of the “internodes” [54,55]. According to Raisi et al. (2014) [20], NCV was effective in ascertaining poorer performance in nerve regeneration in the pro-inflammatory MSC group, with a lower conduction velocity rate (72%). This aspect was crucial in questioning which factors were triggering, such as smaller diameter of regenerating axons, thinner myelin sheaths, or even an immaturity of myelinated nerve fibers in that group.
Regarding the muscle weight ratio (MWR), nine articles used this method [17,19,21,22,23,25,26,29,31]. This parameter appears to be used due to the ease of its application in studies, often being the only type of functional evaluation performed [23,29]. In the experimental trial conducted by Wang et al. (2023) [41], the method proved effective in comparing nerve regeneration in the transection versus crushing of the peripheral nerve group.

4.5. Histological Analysis

The use of optical microscopy alongside software for image analysis was highlighted in all selected articles. Based on Kappos et al. (2015) [21], this combined method was crucial for measuring axonal diameter and fiber diameter. Thus, the thickness of myelin and other important average parameters for evaluating local tissue regeneration can be calculated and compared across groups [56].
The light microscope method was enhanced by complementary analyses in several studies. Notably, the use of toluidine blue in five articles [22,23,25,27,29] emphasized its role in staining myelinated structures that facilitate neuronal visualization [57,58,59]. According to Ozkan et al. (2016) [27], this method proved effective for verifying regular myelinated pre-neuronal bodies with an increased diameter in the study group, demonstrating better organization of nerve tissue regeneration.
Previous articles have successfully utilized immunofluorescence methods for analyzing the regeneration of Schwann cells and peripheral remyelination [60,61]. In agreement, Kastamoni et al. (2023) [32] found that the expression of EphA4 was associated with a negative effect on the axonal repair of the sciatic nerve, consistent with previous studies [62,63,64].
Despite its requirement for considerable time and specialized training, transmission electron microscopy is widely mentioned in the literature as a method for obtaining detailed, high-quality images of nervous structures [65,66,67,68]. In this regard, several studies have used this method to obtain highly specific images of structures [16,18,20,25,28,29,30].

4.6. Other Analysis

Tremp et al. (2015) [24] identified a correlation between axonal length measured by MRI and axonal length measured by immunohistochemistry, reaffirming the nerve damage between the sciatic nerve of the intervention versus control. Thus, it is understood that the use of this method can add comparative value between the analyses performed.
Flow cytometry is an effective tool in the studies of axonal nerve regeneration, due to its ability to quantitatively analyze individual cells in large populations [69,70,71]. One study used this method to evaluate specific cellular groups and their tissue behavior in regeneration [29].
RNL is a prospective method for evaluating nerve regeneration that compares neuronal expansion through its connections [72,73,74]. Di Summa et al. (2011) [15], using this method and electrostimulation, evaluated that the autograft group and the ASCs group showed greater motoneuron regeneration compared to the control, which is in concurrence with the current literature [75,76,77].

4.7. Strengths and Limitations

This review fulfills its role of assessing the current state of the scientific literature regarding the use of murine models for the experimentation of peripheral nerve regeneration, as well as elucidating and analyzing the main functional assessment models used in such experimental trials. Another point analyzed was the global distribution of scientific production for these article models, with an emphasis on comparing the use of different adipose tissue derivatives, such as ADSCs, SVF, and nanofat. However, although there are well-defined study populations and outcomes, the breadth of types of peripheral nerve injury makes the execution of a meta-analysis unfeasible, due to the heterogeneity of the selected articles concerning the type of intervention proposed in each study. Lastly, the heterogeneity of the subgroups and evaluation methods complicates a more sophisticated biostatistical analysis.

5. Conclusions

The techniques and procedures described in this review hold significant potential for future practical application in peripheral nerve regeneration, as further studies continue to advance the field. Thus, this work serves its purpose by elucidating the current evidence on the topic, evaluating the principal models and formats of experimental studies that permeate the literature. Additionally, it enhances the clarity of the main types of adipose tissue derivatives and the methods for evaluating nerve regeneration in the most methodologically rigorous articles reviewed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.S.d.A.; methodology, R.S.d.A. and M.G.V.B.M.; formal analysis, G.S.C.; data curation, M.G.V.B.M., J.V.d.F.B. and G.S.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.G.V.B.M., G.S.C. and J.V.d.F.B.; writing—review and editing, R.S.d.A.; visualization, G.S.C. and M.G.V.B.M.; supervision, L.M.F.; project administration, R.S.d.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. England, J.D.; Asbury, A.K. Peripheral neuropathy. Lancet 2004, 363, 2151–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Martyn, C.N.; Hughes, R.A. Epidemiology of peripheral neuropathy. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1997, 62, 310–318. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1074084/pdf/jnnpsyc00004-0006.pdf (accessed on 25 April 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Robinson, L.R. Traumatic injury to peripheral nerves. Muscle Nerve 2022, 66, 661–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Scholz, T.D.; Krichevsky, A.; Sumarto, A.; Jaffurs, D.; Wirth, G.A.; Paydar, K.Z.; Evans, G.R.D. Peripheral Nerve Injuries: An International Survey of Current Treatments and Future Perspectives. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2009, 25, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Neurapraxia; Axonotmesis; Neurotmesis. Nerve Injury: Classification, Clinical Assessment, Investigation, and Management. Semant. Sch. 2018. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Nerve-injury%3A-Classification%2C-clinical-assessment%2C-Neurapraxia-Axonotmesis/fa2de78f0c685fa0d79b1f04632fc6f3524d3917 (accessed on 25 April 2024).
  6. Robinson, L.R. Electrodiagnosis and Rehabilitation of Peripheral Nerve Injuries. Jpn. J. Rehabil. Med. 2004, 41, S71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Walsh, S.; Midha, R. Practical considerations concerning the use of stem cells for peripheral nerve repair. Neurosurg. Focus 2009, 26, E2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Leberfinger, A.N.; Ravnic, D.J.; Payne, R.; Rizk, E.; Koduru, S.V.; Hazard, S.W. Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. Curr. Surg. Rep. 2017, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nichols, C.M.; Myckatyn, T.M.; Rickman, S.R.; Fox, I.K.; Hadlock, T.; Mackinnon, S.E. Choosing the correct functional assay: A comprehensive assessment of functional tests in the rat. Behav. Brain Res. 2005, 163, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Erba, P.; Mantovani, C.; Kalbermatten, D.F.; Pierer, G.; Terenghi, G.; Kingham, P.J. Regeneration potential and survival of transplanted undifferentiated adipose tissue-derived stem cells in peripheral nerve conduits. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2010, 63, e811–e817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gentile, P.; Calabrese, C.; De Angelis, B.; Pizzicannella, J.; Kothari, A.; Garcovich, S. Impact of the Different Preparation Methods to Obtain Human Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction Cells (AD-SVFs) and Human Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (AD-MSCs): Enzymatic Digestion Versus Mechanical Centrifugation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Verpaele, A.; Tonnard, P. Discussion: Nanofat Cell Aggregates: A Nearly Constitutive Stromal Cell Inoculum for Regenerative Site-Specific Therapies. Plast. Reconstr. Surg./PSEF CD J. 2019, 144, 1089–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. A Declaração PRISMA 2020: Diretriz Atualizada para Relatar Revisões Sistemáticas. Rev. Panam. De Salud Pública 2022, 46, 1. Available online: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/56882/v46e1122022.pdf?sequence=5 (accessed on 25 April 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Reid, A.J.; Sun, M.; Wiberg, M.; Downes, S.; Terenghi, G.; Kingham, P.J. Nerve repair with adipose-derived stem cells protects dorsal root ganglia neurons from apoptosis. Neuroscience 2011, 199, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Summa, P.G.; Kalbermatten, D.F.; Pralong, E.; Raffoul, W.; Kingham, P.J.; Terenghi, G. Long-term in vivo regeneration of peripheral nerves through bioengineered nerve grafts. Neuroscience 2011, 181, 278–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, G.; Cheng, Y.; Guo, S.; Feng, Y.; Li, Q.; Jia, H.; Wang, Y.; Tong, L.; Tong, X. Transplantation of adipose-derived stem cells for peripheral nerve repair. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2011, 28, 565–572. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tomita, K.; Madura, T.; Mantovani, C.; Terenghi, G. Differentiated adipose-derived stem cells promote myelination and enhance functional recovery in a rat model of chronic denervation. J. Neurosci. Res. 2012, 90, 1392–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hea Gu, J.; Hwa Ji, Y.; Dhong, E.S.; Hwee Kim, D.; Yoon, E.S. Transplantation of Adipose Derived Stem Cells for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration in Sciatic Nerve Defects of the Rat. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2012, 7, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dai, L.G.; Huang, G.S.; Hsu, S.H. Sciatic Nerve Regeneration by Cocultured Schwann Cells and Stem Cells on Microporous Nerve Conduits. Cell Transplant. 2013, 22, 2029–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Raisi, A.; Azizi, S.; Delirezh, N.; Heshmatian, B.; Farshid, A.A.; Amini, K. The mesenchymal stem cell–derived microvesicles enhance sciatic nerve regeneration in rat. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014, 76, 991–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kappos, E.A.; Engels, P.E.; Tremp, M.; Meyer zu Schwabedissen, M.; di Summa, P.; Fischmann, A.; von Felten, S.; Scherberich, A.; Schaefer, D.J.; Kalbermatten, D.F. Peripheral Nerve Repair: Multimodal Comparison of the Long-Term Regenerative Potential of Adipose Tissue-Derived Cells in a Biodegradable Conduit. Stem Cells Dev. 2015, 24, 2127–2141. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26134465/ (accessed on 22 April 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mohammadi, R.; Mehrtash, M.; Mehrtash, M.; Sajjadi, S.S. Nonexpanded Adipose Stromal Vascular Fraction Local Therapy on Peripheral Nerve Regeneration Using Allografts. J. Investig. Surg. 2015, 29, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Reichenberger, M.A.; Mueller, W.; Hartmann, J.; Diehm, Y.; Lass, U.; Koellensperger, E.; Leimer, U.; Germann, G.; Fischer, S. ADSCs in a fibrin matrix enhance nerve regeneration after epineural suturing in a rat model. Microsurgery 2015, 36, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tremp, M.; Meyer Zu Schwabedissen, M.; Kappos, E.A.; Engels, P.E.; Fischmann, A.; Scherberich, A.; Schaefer, D.J.; Kalbermatten, D.F. The Regeneration Potential after Human and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in a Rat Sciatic Nerve Injury Model Can Be Monitored by MRI. Cell Transplant. 2015, 24, 203–211. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24380629/ (accessed on 22 April 2024). [CrossRef]
  25. He, X.; Ao, Q.; Wei, Y.; Song, J. Transplantation of miRNA-34a Overexpressing Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Enhances Rat Nerve Regeneration. Wound Repair Regen. Off. Publ. Wound Heal. Soc. Eur. Tissue Repair Soc. 2016, 24, 542–550. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26899299/ (accessed on 22 April 2024). [CrossRef]
  26. Sowa, Y.; Kishida, T.; Imura, T.; Numajiri, T.; Nishino, K.; Tabata, Y.; Mazda, O.M. Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Promote Peripheral Nerve Regeneration In Vivo without Differentiation into Schwann-like Lineage. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2016, 137, 318e–330e. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26818322/ (accessed on 22 April 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Özkan, H.S.; Silistreli, Ö.K.; Ergür, B.; İrkören, S. Repairing peripheral nerve defects by vein grafts filled with adipose tissue derived stromal vascular fraction: An experimental study in rats. Turk. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2016, 22, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  28. Shimizu, M.; Matsumine, H.; Osaki, H.; Ueta, Y.; Tsunoda, S.; Kamei, W.; Hashimoto, K.; Niimi, Y.; Watanabe, Y.; Miyata, M.; et al. Adipose-derived stem cells and the stromal vascular fraction in polyglycolic acid-collagen nerve conduits promote rat facial nerve regeneration. Wound Repair Regen. 2018, 26, 446–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, J.; Ren, S.; Duscher, D.; Kang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, C.; Yuan, M.; Guo, G.; Xiong, H.; Zhan, P.; et al. Exosomes from human adipose-derived stem cells promote sciatic nerve regeneration via optimizing Schwann cell function. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 23097–23110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Durço, D.F.P.A.; Pestana, F.M.; Oliveira, J.T.; Ramalho, B.d.S.; Souza, L.M.; Cardoso, F.S.; da Silva, I.C.; Marques, S.A.; Domingues, R.C.; Pereira, C.C.; et al. Grafts of human adipose-derived stem cells into a biodegradable poly (acid lactic) conduit enhances sciatic nerve regeneration. Brain Res. 2020, 1747, 147026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schilling, B.K.; Baker, J.S.; Komatsu, C.; Turer, D.M.; Bengur, F.B.; Nerone, W.V.; Qin, F.; Cottrill, A.R.; Kokai, L.E.; Rubin, J.P.; et al. Intramuscular Nanofat Injection Promotes Inflammation-Induced Gastrocnemius Regeneration in a Syngeneic Rat Sciatic Nerve Injury Model. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2023, 151, 947e–958e. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36728782/ (accessed on 22 April 2024). [CrossRef]
  32. Kastamoni, M.; Yavaş, S.E.; Ozgenel, G.Y.; Ersoy, S. The effects of fat graft and platelet-rich fibrin combination after epineurectomy in rats. Rev. Da Assoc. Médica Bras. 2023, 69, 272–278. Available online: https://www.scielo.br/j/ramb/a/qJvqDHfjC6vzNg3xKZryQNS/?lang=en# (accessed on 16 April 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Woolston, C. What China’s Leading Position in Natural Sciences Means for Global Research. Nature 2023, 620, S2–S5. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02159-7#:~:text=China%20is%20already%20one%20of (accessed on 13 September 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zuk, P.A.; Zhu, M.; Ashjian, P.; De Ugarte, D.A.; Huang, J.I.; Mizuno, H.; Alfonso, Z.C.; Fraser, J.K.; Benhaim, P.; Hedrick, M.H. Human Adipose Tissue Is a Source of Multipotent Stem Cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2002, 13, 4279–4295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Si, Z.; Wang, X.; Sun, C.; Kang, Y.; Xu, J.; Wang, X.; Hui, Y. Adipose-derived stem cells: Sources, potency, and implications for regenerative therapies. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 114, 108765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bacakova, L.; Zarubova, J.; Travnickova, M.; Musilkova, J.; Pajorova, J.; Slepicka, P.; Kasalkova, N.S.; Svorcik, V.; Kolska, Z.; Motarjem, H.I.; et al. Stem cells: Their source, potency and use in regenerative therapies with focus on adipose-derived stem cells—A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 1111–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kokai, L.E.; Rubin, J.P.; Marra, K.G. The Potential of Adipose-Derived Adult Stem Cells as a Source of Neuronal Progenitor Cells. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2005, 116, 1453–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, X.; Zhao, S.; Wang, L. Therapeutic effect of adipose-derived stem cell transplantation on optic nerve injury in rats. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 17, 2529–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gokce, A.; Peak, T.C.; Abdel-Mageed, A.B.; Hellstrom, W.J. Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction. Curr. Urol. Rep. 2016, 17, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, Y.J.; Jeong, J.H. Clinical Application of Adipose Stem Cells in Plastic Surgery. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2014, 29, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, B.B.; Guo, C.; Sun, S.Q.; Zhang, X.N.; Li, Z.; Li, W.J.; Li, Z.D.; Schumacher, M.; Liu, S. Comparison of the Nerve Regeneration Capacity and Characteristics between Sciatic Nerve Crush and Transection Injury Models in Rats. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2023, 36, 160–173. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Martins, R.S.; Siqueira, M.G.; da Silva, C.F.; Plese, J.P.P. Correlation between parameters of electrophysiological, histomorphometric and sciatic functional index evaluations after rat sciatic nerve repair. Arq. De Neuro-Psiquiatr. 2006, 64, 750–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. de Medinaceli, L.; Freed, W.J.; Wyatt, R.J. An index of the functional condition of rat sciatic nerve based on measurements made from walking tracks. Exp. Neurol. 1982, 77, 634–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Orbay, H.; Uysal, A.C.; Hyakusoku, H.; Mizuno, H. Differentiated and Undifferentiated Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Improve Function in Rats with Peripheral Nerve Gaps. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2012, 65, 657–664. Available online: https://www.jprasurg.com/article/S1748-6815(11)00652-8/fulltext (accessed on 23 August 2022). [CrossRef]
  45. Shen, N.; Zhu, J. Application of sciatic functional index in nerve functional assessment. Microsurgery 1995, 16, 552–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shenaq, J.M.; Shenaq, S.M.; Spira, M. Reliability of sciatic function index in assessing nerve regeneration across a 1 cm gap. Microsurgery 1989, 10, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Moattari, M.; Kouchesfehani, H.M.; Kaka, G.; Sadraie, S.H.; Naghdi, M.; Mansouri, K. Chitosan-film associated with mesenchymal stem cells enhanced regeneration of peripheral nerves: A rat sciatic nerve model. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 2018, 88, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Guo, Q.; Liu, C.; Hai, B.; Ma, T.; Zhang, W.; Tan, J.; Fu, X.; Wang, H.; Xu, Y.; Song, C. Chitosan conduits filled with simvastatin/Pluronic F-127 hydrogel promote peripheral nerve regeneration in rats. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2017, 106, 787–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Basso, D.M.; Beattie, M.S.; Bresnahan, J.C. A Sensitive and Reliable Locomotor Rating Scale for Open Field Testing in Rats. J. Neurotrauma 1995, 12, 1–21. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7783230/ (accessed on 25 April 2024). [CrossRef]
  50. Bervar, M. An Alternative Video Footprint Analysis to Assess Functional Loss Following Injury to the Rat Sciatic Nerve. Acta Chir. Plast. 2002, 44, 86–89. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12514995/ (accessed on 22 April 2024). [CrossRef]
  51. Bain, J.R.; Mackinnon, S.E.; Hunter, D.A. Functional Evaluation of Complete Sciatic, Peroneal, and Posterior Tibial Nerve Lesions in the Rat. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1989, 83, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Pollari, E.; Prior, R.; Robberecht, W.; Van Damme, P.; Van Den Bosch, L. In Vivo Electrophysiological Measurement of Compound Muscle Action Potential from the Forelimbs in Mouse Models of Motor Neuron Degeneration. J. Vis. Exp. 2018, 136, e57741. [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Mi, D.; Gu, X.; Hu, W. Periodical assessment of electrophysiological recovery following sciatic nerve crush via surface stimulation in rats. Neurological Sciences 2015, 36, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ao, Q.; Fung, C.-K.; Tsui, A.Y.-P.; Cai, S.; Zuo, H.-C.; Chan, Y.-S.; Shum, D.K.-Y. The regeneration of transected sciatic nerves of adult rats using chitosan nerve conduits seeded with bone marrow stromal cell-derived Schwann cells. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 787–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Matsumoto, K.; Ohnishi, K.; Kiyotani, T.; Sekine, T.; Ueda, H.; Nakamura, T.; Endo, K.; Shimizu, Y. Peripheral nerve regeneration across an 80-mm gap bridged by a polyglycolic acid (PGA)–collagen tube filled with laminin-coated collagen fibers: A histological and electrophysiological evaluation of regenerated nerves. Brain Res. 2000, 868, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, G.; Lu, G.; Ao, Q.; Gong, Y.; Zhang, X. Preparation of Cross-Linked Carboxymethyl Chitosan for Repairing Sciatic Nerve Injury in Rats. Biotechnol. Lett. 2010, 32, 59–66. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19760120/ (accessed on 22 April 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ghnenis, A.B.; Czaikowski, R.E.; Zhang, Z.J.; Bushman, J.S. Toluidine Blue Staining of Resin-Embedded Sections for Evaluation of Peripheral Nerve Morphology. J. Vis. Exp. 2018, 137, e58031. [Google Scholar]
  58. Sridharan, G.; Shankar, A. Toluidine Blue: A Review of Its Chemistry and Clinical Utility. J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 2012, 16, 251. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3424943/ (accessed on 25 April 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Scipio, F.D.; Raimondo, S.; Tos, P.; Geuna, S. A simple protocol for paraffin-embedded myelin sheath staining with osmium tetroxide for light microscope observation. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2008, 71, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jessen, K.R.; Mirsky, R. The Origin and Development of Glial Cells in Peripheral Nerves. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 6, 671–682. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/nrn1746 (accessed on 25 April 2024). [CrossRef]
  61. Jessen, K.R.; Mirsky, R. The Success and Failure of the Schwann Cell Response to Nerve Injury. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 33. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6378273/ (accessed on 26 September 2019). [CrossRef]
  62. Harboe, M.; Torvund-Jensen, J.; Kjaer-Sorensen, K.; Laursen, L.S. Ephrin-A1-EphA4 signaling negatively regulates myelination in the central nervous system. Glia 2018, 66, 934–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wang, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Hu, D. Inhibition of EphA4 expression promotes Schwann cell migration and peripheral nerve regeneration. Neurosci. Lett. 2013, 548, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chen, R.; Yang, X.; Zhang, B.; Wang, S.; Bao, S.; Gu, Y.; Li, S. EphA4 Negatively Regulates Myelination by Inhibiting Schwann Cell Differentiation in the Peripheral Nervous System. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Wang, Y.; Sun, B.; Shibata, B.; Guo, F. Transmission electron microscopic analysis of myelination in the murine central nervous system. STAR Protoc. 2022, 3, 101304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Nam, Y.H.; Park, S.; Yum, Y.; Jeong, S.; Park, H.E.; Kim, H.J.; Lim, J.; Choi, B.-O.; Jung, S.-C. Preclinical Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Regeneration by Schwann Cell-like Cells Differentiated from Human Tonsil-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in C22 Mice. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Rui, B.; Guo, S.; Zeng, B.; Wang, J.; Chen, X. An implantable electrical stimulator used for peripheral nerve rehabilitation in rats. Exp. Ther. Med. 2013, 6, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ge, J.; Zhu, S.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Hu, X.; Huang, L.; Quan, X.; Wang, M.; Huang, J.; Li, Y.; et al. Experimental Immunological Demyelination Enhances Regeneration in Autograft-Repaired Long Peripheral Nerve Gaps. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39828. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep39828 (accessed on 22 April 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sulong, A.; Hassan, N.; Hwei, N.; Lokanathan, Y.; Naicker, A.; Abdullah, S.; Yusof, M.; Htwe, O.; Idrus, R.; Haflah, N. Collagen-coated Polylactic-Glycolic Acid (PLGA) Seeded with Neural-Differentiated Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells as a Potential Nerve Conduit. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. Off. Organ Wroc. Med. Univ. 2014, 23, 353–362. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24979505/ (accessed on 22 April 2024). [CrossRef]
  70. Nadeau, S.; Filali, M.; Zhang, J.; Kerr, B.J.; Rivest, S.; Soulet, D.; Iwakura, Y.; Vaccari, J.P.d.R.; Keane, R.W.; Lacroix, S. Functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury is dependent on the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNF: Implications for neuropathic pain. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 12533–12542. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21880915 (accessed on 15 June 2020). [CrossRef]
  71. McKinnon, K.M. Flow Cytometry: An Overview. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 2018, 120, 5.1.1–5.1.11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Hayashi, A.; Moradzadeh, A.; Hunter, D.A.; Kawamura, D.H.; Puppala, V.K.; Tung, T.H.H.; Mackinnon, S.E.; Myckatyn, T.M. Retrograde Labeling in Peripheral Nerve Research: It Is Not All Black and White. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2007, 23, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Catapano, J.; Willand, M.P.; Zhang, J.J.; Scholl, D.; Gordon, T.; Borschel, G.H. Retrograde labeling of regenerating motor and sensory neurons using silicone caps. J. Neurosci. Methods 2016, 259, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Chen, L.; Leng, C.; Ru, Q.; Xiong, Q.; Zhou, M.; Wu, Y. Retrograde Labeling of Different Distribution Features of DRG P2X2 and P2X3 Receptors in a Neuropathic Pain Rat Model. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 9861459. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7396081/ (accessed on 25 April 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Pettersson, J.; Kalbermatten, D.F.; McGrath, A.; Novikova, L.N. Biodegradable fibrin conduit promotes long-term regeneration after peripheral nerve injury in adult rats. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2010, 63, 1893–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Rodrίguez, F.J.; Verdú, E.; Ceballos, D.; Navarro, X. Nerve Guides Seeded with Autologous Schwann Cells Improve Nerve Regeneration. Exp. Neurol. 2000, 161, 571–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Vleggeert-Lankamp, C.L.A.M. The role of evaluation methods in the assessment of peripheral nerve regeneration through synthetic conduits: A systematic review. J. Neurosurg. 2007, 107, 1168–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bioengineering 11 00697 g001
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram representing the review selection process.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram representing the review selection process.
Bioengineering 11 00697 g001
Bioengineering 11 00697 g002
Figure 2. Analytical view of publishing countries.
Figure 2. Analytical view of publishing countries.
Bioengineering 11 00697 g002
Bioengineering 11 00697 g003
Figure 3. Nerve injury models utilized.
Figure 3. Nerve injury models utilized.
Bioengineering 11 00697 g003
Table 1. Table containing breakdown of the characteristics of each study.
Table 1. Table containing breakdown of the characteristics of each study.
Author and YearSampleStudy GroupsFunctional AnalysisHistological AnalysisOther Analyses
Reid et al. (2011) [14]12Artificial CD; CD + ASCs; CD + SCs-LM; IAS; and ImmunofluorescencePCR; Western Blot; and ELISA
di Summa et al. (2011) [15]25Fibrin CD; Fibrin CD + ASCs; Fibrin CD + SC; Fibrin CD + BMSC; AutograftCMAPLM; IAS; and ImmunofluorescenceRNL
Liu et al. (2011) [16]30Acellular nerve graft + DMEM; Acellular nerve graft + ASCs; AutograftSFI and NCVLM; IAS; TEM; and ImmunofluorescencePCR
Tomita et al. (2012) [17]18Vehicle; ASCs; SCsPFI; CMAP; and MWRLM; IAS; and Immunofluorescence-
Gu et al. (2012) [18]30Silicone CD + fibrin glue; CD + Undifferentiated ASCs; CD + neurally differentiated ASCsCMAPLM; IAS; TEM; and ImmunofluorescenceWestern Blot
Dai et al. (2013) [19]30CD; CD + ASCs; CD + SCs; CD + DPSC; CD + ASCs + SCs; CD + DPSC + SCsSFI; NCV; and MWRLM and IASPCR
Raisi et al. (2014) [20]90CD; ASCs undifferentiated; ASCs microvesicles; ASCs Microvesicles + Pro-inflammatory; ASCs Microvesicles + anti-inflammatorySFI and NCVLM; IAS; and TEM-
Kappos et al. (2015) [21]49CD + ASCs undifferentiated; CD + SCs; CD + autograft; CD + Human SVF; CD + Differentiated ASCs; CD + Human superficial ASCs; CD + Human Deep ASCsSFI and MWRLM and IASMRI scanning
Mohammadi et al. (2015) [22]30Sham; autograft; Allograft + SVFBBB; SFI; SSI and MWRLM; IAS; TBS; and ImmunofluorescenceBiomechanical Stretch Testing
Reichenberger et al. (2015) [23]50Fibrin glue; Fibrin glue + ASCsMWRLM; IAS; TBS; and Immunofluorescence-
Tremp et al. (2015) [24]49CD + DMEM; CD + ASCs; differentiated ASCs (SC-like); Human superficial ASCs; Human Deep ASCs; Human SVF; SCs-LM; IAS; and ImmunofluorescenceMRI scanning
He et al. (2016) [25]16ASCs; ASCs with transduced vector controlSFI; CNAP; NCV; and MWRLM; IAS; TBS; TEM; and ImmunofluorescencePCR
Sowa et al. (2016) [26]20CD; ASCs; SCs; ShamSFI and MWRLM; IAS; and Immunofluorescence-
Özkan et al. (2016) [27]30Vein graft; Vein graft + SVF; Autograft-LM; IAS; and TBS-
Shimizu et al. (2018) [28]24CD; CD + ASCs; CD + SVFCMAPLM; IAS; and TEMRNL
Chen et al. (2019) [29]28Vehicle; ASCsMWRLM; TEM; IAS; TBS and ImmunofluorescenceFC; PCR and Western Blot
Durço et al. (2020) [30]30CD + DMEM; CD + ASCsCMAPLM; TEM and IASPinprick Test and RNL
Schilling et al. (2023) [31]Unknown *Control; NanofatSFI; MWR and TCFLM and IASPCR; Cytokine Quantification
Kastamoni et al. (2023) [32]24Control: neurotomy of the left sciatic nerve; Intervention: fat graft at right nerve-LM; IAS; and Immunofluorescence-
Observations: All studies divided the sample equally between groups. * Article did not mention sample size. Abbreviations: CD, conduit; ASCs, adipose stem cells; SCs, Schwann cells; BMSC, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell; DMEM, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium; SVF, stromal vascular fraction IAS, image analysis system; LM, light microscope; SFI, Sciatic Functional Index; PFI, Peroneal Functional Index; MWR, Muscle Weight Ratio; NCV, nerve conduction velocity; CMAP, compound muscle action potential; CNAP, Compound nerve action potential; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; BBB, “Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan” for limb motor function; SSI, Static Sciatic Index; TCF, tetanic contraction force; TBS, toluidine blue staining; RNL, retrograde neuronal labelling; FC, flow cytometry; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Araújo, R.S.d.; Mussalem, M.G.V.B.; Carrijo, G.S.; Bani, J.V.d.F.; Ferreira, L.M. Adipose Tissue Derivatives in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration after Transection: A Systematic Review. Bioengineering 2024, 11, 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11070697

AMA Style

Araújo RSd, Mussalem MGVB, Carrijo GS, Bani JVdF, Ferreira LM. Adipose Tissue Derivatives in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration after Transection: A Systematic Review. Bioengineering. 2024; 11(7):697. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11070697

Chicago/Turabian Style

Araújo, Rafael Silva de, Matheus Galvão Valadares Bertolini Mussalem, Gabriel Sant’Ana Carrijo, João Victor de Figueiredo Bani, and Lydia Masako Ferreira. 2024. "Adipose Tissue Derivatives in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration after Transection: A Systematic Review" Bioengineering 11, no. 7: 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11070697

APA Style

Araújo, R. S. d., Mussalem, M. G. V. B., Carrijo, G. S., Bani, J. V. d. F., & Ferreira, L. M. (2024). Adipose Tissue Derivatives in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration after Transection: A Systematic Review. Bioengineering, 11(7), 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11070697

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop