Next Article in Journal
Toward Fully Automated Personalized Orthopedic Treatments: Innovations and Interdisciplinary Gaps
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Validation of a PLC-Controlled Morbidostat for Investigating Bacterial Drug Resistance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficient 2D Neck Model for Simulation of the Whiplash Injury Mechanism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advancements in Biomedical and Bioengineering Technologies in Sports Monitoring and Healthcare

1
Department of Radiology, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo 315211, China
2
Faculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
3
Auckland Bioengineering Institute, Bioengineering Institute, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2024, 11(8), 816; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11080816 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 August 2024 / Accepted: 7 August 2024 / Published: 12 August 2024
The intersection of biomedical and bioengineering technologies with sports monitoring and healthcare has recently emerged as a key area of innovation and research. The integration of these technologies promises to address long-term challenges in the fields of sports monitoring and healthcare. In the past, traditional sports monitoring approaches have struggled to meet their individualized demand; generalized training plans may reduce training effectiveness and increased injury risk [1]. Similarly, the healthcare sector faces significant challenges, including managing chronic diseases, the need for continuous patient monitoring, and the limitations of conventional diagnostics [2].
In modern times, wearable devices equipped with sensors can track various physiological parameters, such as heart rate, oxygen levels, and muscle activity [3,4,5]. These data can be used to customize training programs and tailor them to an individual’s needs, optimizing performance and significantly reducing the risk of injury. In healthcare, these current technologies are leading to significant improvements in patient care. Particularly, telemedicine platforms break down geographical barriers, providing access to healthcare services for remote and underserved populations [6,7]. Additionally, smart prosthetics and advanced rehabilitation devices enhance the quality of life of patients with physical disabilities [8,9]. These applications highlight the immense potential of biomedical and bioengineering technologies to provide innovative solutions to challenges in the field of sports monitoring and healthcare.
This Special Issue showcases the latest research and advances in the application of biomedical and bioengineering technologies in sports monitoring and healthcare. It seeks to explore how to use these innovative technologies to address challenges in sports monitoring and healthcare and create more personalized, efficient, and effective solutions.
Data mining is a critical method in biomedical and bioengineering technology, allowing the extraction of meaningful patterns and trends from large datasets, enhancing the effectiveness of sports monitoring and healthcare [10,11]. In this Special Issue, Jiang et al. [12] explores the biomechanical differences between novice and experienced runners following a 5 km run. Their study used principal component analysis to highlight that novice runners show greater changes in joint angles, joint moments, and ground reaction forces, which could be linked to a higher risk of lower-limb injuries. These findings are crucial for distinguishing runner levels and monitoring performance and injury risk. Additionally, advanced imaging and motion analysis technologies in sports science can help to deepen our understanding of mechanisms affecting running performance and injury risk, thus improving performance and preventing injuries [13,14]. Li et al. [15] use an ultrasonography system, revealing that long-term running with a forefoot strike pattern significantly affects the muscle fascicle length and pennation angle of the medial gastrocnemius, indicating that this strike pattern could lead to a longer fascicle length and a smaller pennation angle, which may protect the medial gastrocnemius from strain under repetitive high loads. Liu et al. [16] examined how different running velocities and shoe stiffness levels affect joint kinematics and asymmetry, which is critical for understanding running biomechanics and informing the design of smarter sports equipment. Cen et al. [17] compared foot–ankle temporal kinematics during planned and unplanned gait termination in subjects with different arch stiffnesses using statistical nonparametric mapping, providing insights into the compensatory adjustments of lower-limb joints during gait termination.
Biomechanical modeling and simulation, including finite element analysis (FEA) and musculoskeletal modeling, offer essential insights into the mechanical behavior of biological tissues. These technologies aid in designing medical devices, prosthetics, and injury prevention strategies, enhancing human movement understanding and rehabilitation program effectiveness. In this Special Issue, Henriques et al. [18] presented the Efficient Neck Model—2D (ENM-2D), a computationally efficient model designed to simulate a whiplash injury mechanism. Wang et al. [19]. focused on a detailed three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) model of the head–neck complex (C0–C7) to analyze its kinematics under rear-end impact conditions. These two studies offer theoretical support and practical tools for predicting and preventing whiplash injuries, advancing vehicle safety technology. Pan et al. [20] used FEA to evaluate the biomechanical effects of three different pedicle screw fixation methods (bilateral, unilateral, and lateral) combined with oblique lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Their study reveals that the total deformation and endplate stress of a unilateral pedicle screw fixation are comparable to bilateral fixation, offering spine surgeons a viable alternative that may reduce surgery time. Musculoskeletal modeling integrates anatomical and physiological data to simulate human movement mechanics, facilitating the understanding of movement disorders and the development of rehabilitation protocols. Cassiolas et al. [21] created a multibody musculoskeletal model with a customizable frontal knee alignment capable of estimating tibiofemoral contact forces during the execution of highly dynamic movements. However, improving the accuracy of musculoskeletal modeling to bring the simulation increasingly closer to a real-life scenario is something that researchers have been pursuing recently. Nasseri et al. [22] investigated the consequences of limiting electromyography and ground reaction force (GRF) data on model-estimated ACL force. They found that simplifying muscle activation patterns and reducing 3D GRF to vertical GRF results in spurious model estimates, underscoring the need for comprehensive data assessing ACL loading during dynamic tasks.
Advanced materials and wearable devices also significantly contribute to this research field. Jayathilaka et al. [23] found that a flexible and wearable graphene heating device has the potential to accelerate fatigue recovery, this device positively impacts fatigue recovery and muscle function, suggesting its potential in sports and rehabilitation settings. The Intelligent Internet of Medical Things (IIoMT) offers significant advantages in tracking treatment outcomes by providing real-time, continuous monitoring of patient health data. In their study, Pal et al. [24] rely on cardiac signals, which follow an integrated detection–estimation–reduction framework for anxiety using the Intelligent Internet of Medical Things and Mano Shakti Yoga, the latter of which the study suggests as an evidence-based exercise modality. The advent of advanced wearable devices and sensor technologies is transforming sports monitoring by providing real-time, personalized feedback, optimizing training regimens, enhancing athletic performance, and minimizing injury risk. Biomedical engineering approaches are an important part of addressing healthcare challenges. Innovations such as wearable health monitors, telemedicine solutions, and smart prosthetics are revolutionizing patient care. These technologies enable continuous health monitoring, early disease detection, and timely intervention, ultimately improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.
This Special Issue highlights the potential of biomedical and bioengineering technologies in the fields of sports monitoring and healthcare. As these fields continue to advance, we can look forward to achieving more sophisticated and integrated solutions that will further enhance personalized care, improve sports performance, and reduce the risk of injury. Future developments may include more advanced wearable technologies, smarter prosthetics, and innovative rehabilitation programs, all driven by data and tailored to individual needs. By embracing these innovations, we will move towards a future where healthcare and sports performance are not only optimized, but also more accessible and effective for everyone.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. West, S.W.; Clubb, J.; Torres-Ronda, L.; Howells, D.; Leng, E.; Vescovi, J.D.; Carmody, S.; Posthumus, M.; Dalen-Lorentsen, T.; Windt, J. More than a Metric: How Training Load is Used in Elite Sport for Athlete Management. Int. J. Sports Med. 2021, 42, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, P.; Lee, G.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Kwon, S.Y.; Kim, H.R.; Park, S. From Diagnosis to Treatment: Recent Advances in Patient-Friendly Biosensors and Implantable Devices. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 1960–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Galli, A.; Montree, R.J.H.; Que, S.; Peri, E.; Vullings, R. An Overview of the Sensors for Heart Rate Monitoring Used in Extramural Applications. Sensors 2022, 22, 4035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chen, S.; Qi, J.; Fan, S.; Qiao, Z.; Yeo, J.C.; Lim, C.T. Flexible Wearable Sensors for Cardiovascular Health Monitoring. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, e2100116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yamane, T.; Kimura, M.; Morita, M. Application of nine-axis accelerometer-based recognition of daily activities in clinical examination. Phys. Act. Health 2024, 8, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, M.; Zhang, C.; Shi, Q.; Zeng, S.; Balezentis, T. Operationalizing the telemedicine platforms through the social network knowledge: An MCDM model based on the CIPFOHW operator. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 174, 121303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vaghasiya, J.V.; Mayorga-Martinez, C.C.; Pumera, M. Telemedicine platform for health assessment remotely by an integrated nanoarchitectonics FePS3/rGO and Ti3C2-based wearable device. npj Flex. Electron. 2022, 6, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sumner, J.; Lim, H.W.; Chong, L.S.; Bundele, A.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Kayambu, G. Artificial intelligence in physical rehabilitation: A systematic review. Artif. Intell. Med. 2023, 146, 102693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Khoshmanesh, F.; Thurgood, P.; Pirogova, E.; Nahavandi, S.; Baratchi, S. Wearable sensors: At the frontier of personalised health monitoring, smart prosthetics and assistive technologies. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 176, 112946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Paganelli, A.I.; Mondéjar, A.G.; da Silva, A.C.; Silva-Calpa, G.; Teixeira, M.F.; Carvalho, F.; Raposo, A.; Endler, M. Real-time data analysis in health monitoring systems: A comprehensive systematic literature review. J. Biomed. Inform. 2022, 127, 104009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dorris, H.; Oh, J.; Jacobson, N. Wearable movement data as a potential digital biomarker for chronic pain: An investigation using deep learning. Phys. Act. Health 2024, 8, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiang, X.; Xu, D.; Fang, Y.; Bíró, I.; Baker, J.S.; Gu, Y. PCA of Running Biomechanics after 5 km between Novice and Experienced Runners. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Franchi, M.V.; Fitze, D.P.; Hanimann, J.; Sarto, F.; Spörri, J. Panoramic ultrasound vs. MRI for the assessment of hamstrings cross-sectional area and volume in a large athletic cohort. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sarto, F.; Spörri, J.; Fitze, D.P.; Quinlan, J.I.; Narici, M.V.; Franchi, M.V. Implementing Ultrasound Imaging for the Assessment of Muscle and Tendon Properties in Elite Sports: Practical Aspects, Methodological Considerations and Future Directions. Sports Med. 2021, 51, 1151–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, L.; Wu, K.; Deng, L.; Liu, C.; Fu, W. The Effects of Habitual Foot Strike Patterns on the Morphology and Mechanical Function of the Medial Gastrocnemius-Achilles Tendon Unit. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Q.; Chen, H.; Song, Y.; Alla, N.; Fekete, G.; Li, J.; Gu, Y. Running Velocity and Longitudinal Bending Stiffness Influence the Asymmetry of Kinematic Variables of the Lower Limb Joints. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cen, X.; Yu, P.; Song, Y.; Sárosi, J.; Mao, Z.; Bíró, I.; Gu, Y. The Effect of Arch Stiffness on the Foot-Ankle Temporal Kinematics during Gait Termination: A Statistical Nonparametric Mapping Study. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Henriques, D.; Martins, A.P.; Carvalho, M.S. Efficient 2D Neck Model for Simulation of the Whiplash Injury Mechanism. Bioengineering 2024, 11, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wang, Y.; Jiang, H.; Teo, E.C.; Gu, Y. Finite Element Analysis of Head-Neck Kinematics in Rear-End Impact Conditions with Headrest. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pan, C.C.; Lee, C.H.; Chen, K.H.; Yen, Y.C.; Su, K.C. Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Unilateral, Bilateral, and Lateral Pedicle Screw Implantation in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Study. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cassiolas, G.; Di Paolo, S.; Marchiori, G.; Grassi, A.; Della Villa, F.; Bragonzoni, L.; Visani, A.; Giavaresi, G.; Fini, M.; Zaffagnini, S.; et al. Knee Joint Contact Forces during High-Risk Dynamic Tasks: 90° Change of Direction and Deceleration Movements. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Nasseri, A.; Akhundov, R.; Bryant, A.L.; Lloyd, D.G.; Saxby, D.J. Limiting the Use of Electromyography and Ground Reaction Force Data Changes the Magnitude and Ranking of Modelled Anterior Cruciate Ligament Forces. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jayathilaka, W.; Qi, K.; Qin, Y.; Chinnappan, A.; Serrano-García, W.; Baskar, C.; Wang, H.; He, J.; Cui, S.; Thomas, S.W.; et al. Significance of Nanomaterials in Wearables: A Review on Wearable Actuators and Sensors. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1805921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pal, R.; Adhikari, D.; Heyat, M.B.B.; Guragai, B.; Lipari, V.; Brito Ballester, J.; De la Torre Díez, I.; Abbas, Z.; Lai, D. A Novel Smart Belt for Anxiety Detection, Classification, and Reduction Using IIoMT on Students’ Cardiac Signal and MSY. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gu, Y.; Fernandez, J. Advancements in Biomedical and Bioengineering Technologies in Sports Monitoring and Healthcare. Bioengineering 2024, 11, 816. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11080816

AMA Style

Gu Y, Fernandez J. Advancements in Biomedical and Bioengineering Technologies in Sports Monitoring and Healthcare. Bioengineering. 2024; 11(8):816. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11080816

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gu, Yaodong, and Justin Fernandez. 2024. "Advancements in Biomedical and Bioengineering Technologies in Sports Monitoring and Healthcare" Bioengineering 11, no. 8: 816. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11080816

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop