Next Article in Journal
Autotransplantation of the Third Molar: A Therapeutic Alternative to the Rehabilitation of a Missing Tooth: A Scoping Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Engineering Biology of Yeast for Advanced Biomanufacturing
Previous Article in Journal
Improved Repopulation Efficacy of Decellularized Small Diameter Vascular Grafts Utilizing the Cord Blood Platelet Lysate
Previous Article in Special Issue
SCRaMbLE: A Study of Its Robustness and Challenges through Enhancement of Hygromycin B Resistance in a Semi-Synthetic Yeast
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Pichia pastoris (Komagataella phaffii) as a Cost-Effective Tool for Vaccine Production for Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs)

by
Salomé de Sá Magalhães
and
Eli Keshavarz-Moore
*
Department of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2021, 8(9), 119; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8090119
Submission received: 6 February 2021 / Revised: 5 August 2021 / Accepted: 24 August 2021 / Published: 31 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Yeast to Biotechnology)

Abstract

:
Vaccination is of paramount importance to global health. With the advent of the more recent pandemics, the urgency to expand the range has become even more evident. However, the potential limited availability and affordability of vaccines to resource low- and middle-income countries has created a need for solutions that will ensure cost-effective vaccine production methods for these countries. Pichia pastoris (P. pastoris) (also known as Komagataella phaffii) is one of the most promising candidates for expression of heterologous proteins in vaccines development. It combines the speed and ease of highly efficient prokaryotic platforms with some key capabilities of mammalian systems, potentially reducing manufacturing costs. This review will examine the latest developments in P. pastoris from cell engineering and design to industrial production systems with focus on vaccine development and with reference to specific key case studies.

1. Introduction

Infectious diseases have a significant global economic and societal impact. As a result, during the last two centuries, we have witnessed the remarkable success of vaccination reducing the burden of infectious diseases [1]. Although vaccination continues to be the most successful and effective mechanism against infectious pathogens, a plenitude of factors, such as global population growth, age distribution, traveling habits, as well as climate changes and antibiotic resistant bacteria, are causing the emergence of old and new pathogens with the risk of becoming pandemic threats [2,3]. Therefore, the global demand for vaccines is growing. Regardless of the approach that is taken, the development of an effective vaccination strategy that induces long-term immunity is a common aspect and pivotal for the success of a vaccine. However, making effective vaccines against our most challenging diseases such as AIDS, malaria, Ebola, and dengue, has proved to be very difficult to achieve, mainly due to the complexity of target pathogens. Recent efforts have been made to produce a vaccine against these, and efficacy rates of nearly 50% have been reported [4]. For example, there are several vaccine candidates in clinical trials against malaria RTS/S [5], HIV (RV144, [6]), and the Ebola virus (VSV-EBOV, [7]).
Despite huge impact on human health, the vaccine industry is relatively small if compared with the pharmaceutical industry. In 2017, the vaccine sector represented 3.5% ($28 billion) of the worldwide prescription drug sales, and it is expected to reach $81.27 billion by 2027, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.7% [8]. To date, 90% of the world market share is divided by only four companies: GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co, Sanofi-Pasteur, and Pfizer (Figure 1). The vaccine industry scenario is changing, not only with the growth of new markets in emerging economies, and the need for new vaccines for the developing world, but also given the imperative for speed to tackle the emergency situation we are living due to the COVID-19 pandemic [9].
Traditional vaccines are based on formulations comprising either live, attenuated or killed, or inactivated bacteria or viruses. Although its success, there are still many issues associated with these types of formulations. Namely, their ineffectiveness in the case of the live attenuated ones, the possibility to lead to severe disease in immunocompromised people, and the production costs and administration makes these vaccines difficult to use for mass immunization. Furthermore, with the increased demand of regulatory authorities, such as the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the World Health Organization (WHO), requiring precisely specified compositions and working with whole-cell vaccines becomes particularly challenging due to their undefined molecules. Over the last three decades, there has been a trend towards new vaccine formulations that comprise defined antigenic components, such as polysaccharides, nucleic acids, or proteins. An example that is of growing importance is that recombinant proteins are gaining, due not only to their wide application as biopharmaceutical products, but also to their proven safety record (non-infectious) and highly immunogenicity.
Such vaccine manufacturing processes rely on the use of recombinant proteins. Among many conventional and emerging cell-based systems for protein production, expression of recombinant protein-based biopharmaceuticals has been achieved using bacteria, mammalian cells, yeast, insect cells, transgenic plants, and transgenic animals, and, more recently, cell-free systems. The choice of the most appropriate expression system to gain scalability and high yield, as well as to reduce cost and time, should be previously identified, and normally requires optimization at the genetic and cultivation level which is product-dependent. A comparison of the expression systems as well as examples of recombinant protein-based biopharmaceuticals is presented in the Table 1.
In this review, we will focus on the use of yeasts as recombinant protein expression systems, more specifically on the application of P. pastoris as one of the most promising candidates for expression of heterologous proteins. This methylotrophic yeast is also considered a unique host for the expression of subunit vaccines which could significantly affect the growing market of medical biotechnology. A SWOT analysis to use P. pichia as platform technology is shown at Table 2.

2. Versatility of Yeasts as an Expression System Platform

The use of yeasts is widespread across all different areas of biotechnology, from white (industrial) to red (medical) biotechnology. Their unique characteristics, such as being generally regarded as safe (GRAS), having a relative fast growth, being simple to manipulate genetically (similar to prokaryotes), having scalable fermentation with short generation time, and eukaryotic type post-translational modifications (PTMs) [14,15], make them ideal for the production of biopharmaceuticals. Yeast have been used for the production of recombinant therapeutic proteins (e.g., insulin, human hemoglobin, and parathyroid hormone); immunomodulation and anticancer agents (e.g., cell wall glucan, 𝛽-glucan, and peptide-modified glucan particles (PcGPs)); amine-modified glucan particles (amGPs); and human glycoproteins (e.g., N-glycosylation modification: Man5GlcNac2, O-glycosylation modification, i.e., gps without high mannose, and N-glycosylation modification, i.e., GlcNAcMan5GlcNac2) [14,16]. In addition to the examples above, yeasts have also found a special place within vaccine production (Table 3). In particular for vaccine manufacturing, yeasts are versatile platforms, expressing different forms of antigens. This expression, more importantly, can be performed in high quantities and at low costs. Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) and P. pastoris are strong model systems for vaccine development for both humans and animals. This is due to the availability of a complete genome sequence; well-established genetic, inherent natural adjuvant; and their non-pathogenic nature. However, due to its shorter and less immunogenic glycosylation pattern together with higher cell density growth and higher secreted protein yield, P. pastoris, has emerged as the most popular alternative host in comparison with S. cerevisiae.

3. P. pastoris as a Powerful Protein Production Host System

Pichia as a host system has many advantages but also challenges as shown in Table 4.
From a manufacturing point of view, by using P. pastoris, a high cell density can be reached, allowing controllable processes. The cell lines are genetically highly stable (proteins are correctly folded in the endoplasmic reticulum) and present high resilience to contamination. It is well known that secreting low levels of endogenous proteins allows for the implementation of a simple recovery stage, saving time and cost associated with purification steps. Over 500 heterologous proteins have been successfully expressed using this host, with several being approved for human and commercialized use (e.g., Kalbitor® (Burlington, MA, USA), from Dyax for the hereditary angioedema treatment, the Insugen® (Bangalore, India), from Biocon for diabetes therapy, the Shanferon™ (Bengaluru, India), from Shantha/Sanofi for hepatitis C and cancer treatment, the Nanobody® ALX00171 (Ghent, Belgium), from Ablynx for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection treatment) [27,28].
Nonetheless, despite the impressive advantages of using this methylotrophic yeast, not every protein of interest is produced or secreted by P. pastoris in high titres that can meet commercialization demands. This is particularly relevant if the target-expressed proteins are hetero-oligomers, membrane-attached, or prone to proteolytic degradation [27]. To address this, over the years, we have been witnessing numerous activities related to the improvement of the expression of such complex proteins. The strategies to improve the efficiency of recombinant protein expression are variable, and mostly present an interplay between strain engineering (e.g., gene optimisation/synthesis; plasmid construction; host strain) and process engineering (e.g., different fermentation mode; cultivation parameters) (Table 5).
With the increase in product titre achieved during fermentation high cell density operation, the focus turns to the development of a rapid and efficient primary recovery and purification operations.
During this stage, efficient primary recovery of secreted products from the cell culture is crucial for minimizing manufacturing costs as product loss, which has a significant effect on the overall product yield. Recovery processes that consist of a low number of purification steps generally have lower capital and operating costs, and the overall yield is also expected to increase with a decreasing number of downstream processing steps.
Complementary methodologies, such as high-throughput processing, single-use systems modelling, continuous downstream processing, and the integration of upstream processing (USP) and downstream processing (DSP), have enhanced the efficiency of this expression system and accelerated process development. In Table 6, examples of different strategies to improve the efficacy of downstream processing are compiled. Hence, reaching ideal conditions is nonetheless straining and protein-specific, with the necessity of adjustment of the optimal conditions case-by-case [27,28]. Finding the quickest and cost-effective process is detrimental for the expression of heterologous proteins for clinical applications. Thus, the rationale behind such goals means considering the endpoint application before deciding on the strategy for the expression of heterologous proteins and, accordingly, selecting the expression system characteristics.
Legend: chromatography microplates (Chromafil® Multi96), single-use centrifugation systems (Ksep®), single-use tangential flow filtration systems (ARTeSYN’s®), statistical software (Jmp, Design-Expert, Modde), integrated scalable cyto-technology (InSCyT).

3.1. Generalised Research Application Examples of the Overall Improved Features of P. pastoris

P.pastoris-based expression systems to offer a broad range of possibilities for the expression of secreted, endogenous, or membrane-bound proteins thanks to a combination of various plasmid backbones, selection markers, promoters, and fusion sequences that are introduced into dedicated host strains. Some examples of heterologous proteins, with biopharmaceutical importance produced in P. pastoris, and taking into consideration the features of different hosts, are lipase (X-33, WT/Mut+) [44], anti-CTL4 scFv Ab (GS115, His4/Mut+) [45], human insulin (SuperMan5) [46], recombinant hepatitis C (HCV), and glycoproteins E1E2 (SMD, His+/Mut+) [47]. Nonetheless, to achieve an optimal level of expression from host strain engineering, vector design, cultivation process, as well as post-translational modification, has been carried out as follows [48].

3.1.1. Strain Engineering

Genetic engineering offers a powerful tool to increase productivity and improve product characteristics. Tools and methods for targeted genome modifications are of great interest. An example is the CRISPR–Cas9 method, which has been widely used for gene editing with the aim of gene mutation, insertion, and deletion in various species. This approach is beneficial to overcome limitations related to the reduced availability of selective markers and low efficiency of homologous recombination in P. pastoris [49,50,51]. As an example, Weninger and co-workers [52] described a CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing method where an effective gene mutation, deletion, and replacement was achieved by placing the human codon-optimized cas gene and the ribozyme-mediated guide RNA (gRNA) cassettes on the same plasmid containing the autonomously replicating sequence (ARS). In a different study, a CRISPR–Cas9-mediated multi-loci gene integration method was developed with efficient gRNA targets in P. pastoris [53]. Using this method, the authors showed that multiple gene cassettes can be simultaneously integrated into the genome without employing selective markers. This will benefit the pathway assembly of complicated pharmaceuticals and chemicals expressed in P. pastoris. With the aim of obtaining high editing efficiency and shortening the experimentation period, Yang et al. [54] have developed a CRISPR–Cas9 system with episomal sgRNA plasmid, showing that high multicopy gene editing and stable multigene editing were obtained without a sharp decline caused by multi-sgRNA.
One of the several advantages of using P. pastoris as an expression system is its ability to secrete a protein, which, for large-scale industrial production, offers the advantage of simple and efficient downstream purification, thus avoiding costly cell rupture, denaturation, and refolding. However, it is very challenging to optimize protein secretion due to the multiple steps involved during secretion and a lack of genetic tools to fine tune this process. Toolkits have been developed to standardized regulatory elements specific for P. pastoris, which allows for the tuning of gene expression as well as the choice of protein secretion tag [55]. After assessing the expression and secretion efficiency of 124 constructs that combined different regulatory elements with two fluorescent reporter proteins (RFP, yEGFP), the authors demonstrated that this approach is valuable for generating diverse secretion libraries when searching for optimal expression conditions, and ultimately for the creation of efficient microbial cell factories.
The improvement of secretion signals is also critical for the secretion of certain proteins from P. pastoris. One of the most commonly employed secretion signals is the N-terminal portion of pre-pro-α-factor from S. cerevisiae α-MF. A study by Barrero et al. [39] addresses both limitations of the pre-pro-α-factor secretion signal. To poorly overcome translocation of proteins that fold in the cytosol, i.e., poorly secreted, as well as the possibility of proteins self-association, where the α-factor pro region can potentially cause aggregation hampering export from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the authors have engineered a hybrid secretion signal consisting of the S. cerevisiae Ost1 signal sequence, which promotes co-translational translocation into the ER followed by the α-factor pro region. Another approach being used to improve the α-MF is site-directed mutagenesis of the pre-pro region [56], where the effect of various deletions and substitutions on expression was performed to evaluate the stretches of amino acids that can be removed to improve secretion and, consequently, to generate a model to elucidate the structure–function relationship it has for secretion in P. pastoris. Improving protein secretion can be accomplished by optimizing the Kex2 P1′ site, enzyme that is responsible for removing the signal peptides from pre-proteins and releasing the mature form of secreted proteins. Recombinant proteins were greatly influenced by Kex2 P1′ site residues and the optimized P1′s amino acid residue could largely determine the final amount of secretory proteins synthesized and secreted. This could also be achieved by the introduction of additional Kex2 copies into yeast genome [57].
P. pastoris harbors several strong or weaker promoters that can be exploited to drive heterologous expression of recombinant genes, both in an inducible or constitutive fashion. On the one hand, the most used is the promoter PAOX1. This inducible promoter is tightly repressed by glucose and strongly induced by methanol [58], allowing the cells to use methanol as the sole carbon source. The differences in methanol utilization by this promoter are dependent on the strain phenotype, e.g., Mut+ (methanol utilization plus), MutS (methanol utilization slow), and Mut (methanol utilization minus), and have an impact on the enhancement of recombinant protein expression [59]. On the other hand, for a constitutive expression performance, the PGAP promoter is used. This promoter does not require methanol for induction. This feature makes strain growth more straightforward since no switch of carbon source is required, eliminating the hazards and costs related to the storage and delivery of large volumes of methanol [60]. However, the challenge associated with this promoter is the toxic effect that the recombinant protein expression can have on the host strain. In both cases, promoter libraries have been designed, constituting a valuable addition to the genetic toolbox for fine-tuned gene expression in P. pastoris [60,61].
Besides the genetic modifications, other approaches have been sought to improve the best features of the promoters. Várnai et al. [62] evaluated the expression of endoglucanases in P. pastoris under control of the GAP promoter. The particularity of this study was the use of PichiaPink™ expression system, normally applied to allow rapid clone selection and deliberately used to generate multi-copy clones, employing the methanol inducible AOX1 promoter to ensure high protein expression levels, being switched by the GAP promoter, pPink-GAP. The purpose of this new construct was to simplify enzyme production compared to methanol inducible expression systems. Reasonable protein levels after optimizing cultivation conditions were achieved. In the work performed by Chang et al. [63], a platform was developed as an alternative approach to express target genes driven by PAOX1 under glycerol starvation, thereby eliminating the potential risks of methanol without losing the advantages of PAOX1 promoter. The authors have applied a strategy to reprogram regulatory networks in P. pastoris, by inserting a synthetic positive feedback circuit of Mxr1 driven by a weak AOX2 promoter PAOX2. Mombeni et al. [64] has developed a new powerful promoter, pMOX, for recombinant protein production, where the promoter region of MOX, isolated from Hansenula polymorpha, was replaced with the pAOX1 in the pPINK-HC plasmid in protease-deficient and wild-type P. pastoris strains. In this study, the authors investigated the effect of protease deficiency trait on expression levels as well as the gene dosage. The obtained results suggested that pMOX is a satisfactory alternative for pAOX1. One of the main disadvantages of both promoters, PAOX1 and PGAP, is their lack of tunability. Taking that into consideration, a novel bi-directional promoter system, allowing tunable recombinant protein production in P. pastoris, was developed by Rajamanickam et al. [65]. The system was created by combining a modified catalase promoter system (PDC; derepressible and inducible) and the traditional PAOX1. In response to the available C-sources, this bi-directional promoter system offers a high degree of freedom for bioprocess design and development, making bi-directional promoters in P. pastoris highly attractive for recombinant protein production.
Additionally, Vogl and Glieder have provided a review of biotechnology-relevant aspects of Pichia pastoris promoters, including PAOX1, and alternative promoters such as PTEF1, PPHO89, PTHI11, or PAOD [66]. The group have also created the first synthetic yeast core promoter for Pichia, based on natural yeast core promoters. Short core promoters can directly be added on a PCR primer, facilitating library generation to obtained variable expression yields [34,61,67].

3.1.2. Process Engineering

Another feature to consider for heterologous protein expression is the host strain itself. Recently, Brady et al. [68] have shown that the transfer of two beneficial mutations identified in X-33 into Y-11430 resulted in an optimized base strain that provided up to four-fold higher transformation efficiency and three-fold higher protein titers while retaining robust growth. The authors have proved that comparative genome-scale analysis of P. pastoris variants enables the selection of an optimal base strain as well as the prediction of performance that can guide selection of an optimal host. The main differences between Pichia strains, relies on their auxotrophic behavior, deficiencies in endogenous proteases, and, more recently, their capacity in performing “human-like” N-glycosylations. Engineering P. pastoris, i.e., making this host capable to produce human-like glycoproteins with high homogeneity, increases the importance of this yeast as a workhorse for recombinant protein production. Moreover, the N-glycosylation pattern is extremely relevant in the field of therapeutic proteins, due to molecular stability, solubility, in vivo activity, serum half-life, and immunogenicity. Therefore, over the years, several attempts have been made to humanize the yeast cell through glycoengineering [27,69,70,71].
Recently, Wang and co-workers [72] published a study about the homogeneous production and characterization of recombinant N-GlcNAc-protein. Their work consisted on the construction of a P. pastoris system expressing truncated N-GlcNAc-modified recombinant proteins through introducing an ENGase isoform (Endo-T), which possesses powerful hydrolytic activities towards high-mannose-type N-glycan in an intracellular environment, into different subcellular fractions. The achieved results demonstrated that the location of Endo-T in different subcellular fractions affected their hydrolytic efficiencies, corroborating the findings previously achieved by Claes et al. [73]. Therefore, the developed system provides a prospective platform for mass production of increasing novel glycoprotein drugs. Liu et al. [74] developed a methodology for the expression of antibodies from yeast to enable the large-scale synthesis of antibodies for further manipulation of the glycan moiety. Moreover, they have demonstrated the use of endoglycosidases for remodeling glycans on Herceptin, a monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of breast cancer to optimize its effector functions, especially the antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC).
As mentioned previously, besides the strain engineering, process engineering is also a critical step to enhance the efficiency of recombinant protein expression. Process development strategies, along with genome-wide sequencing, leads to a rapid improvement of fermentation processes. Additionally, reaching the optimal expression conditions is strain- and target-protein-dependent, in particularly, for the secreted proteins, as the media composition may affect their genetic stability. Therefore, high throughput screening (HTS) of expression conditions is often required to identify the most optimal conditions. As an example, Kaushik et al. [75] described the possibility of using a microscale cultivation strategy for rapid high-throughput screening of P. pastoris clones, media optimization, and high-throughput recombinant protein production; a strategy that can be applied to other suspension cultures, with some modifications.
A different approach is the design of experiments (DoE) and artificial intelligence-based technique to maximize the production of huIFNα2b in recombinant glycoengineered P. pastoris [76]. The culture medium optimization, using this technique, resulted in enhanced production of huIFNα2b in glycoengineered P. pastoris at both the shake flask and bioreactor level. Moreover, the purified huIFNα2b was found to be N-glycosylated and biologically active, which is of high interest for the application in cancer therapy. Matthews and co-workers [77] designed a rich defined medium (RDM) for P. pastoris by systematically evaluating nutrients of increasing complexity and identifying those that are most critical for its growth. The evaluation was complemented by employing transcriptomics to gain deeper insights into the underlying metabolic processes. The authors have shown that the developed medium lead to yields titres comparable to, or higher than, those in standard complex medium, and that the usefulness of transcriptomics to accelerate process development for new molecules.
Continued progress in this area could lead to a new model for low-cost production of high-quality biologic drugs [78]. Proteolysis of a subunit rotavirus vaccine candidate using fed-batch fermentation, was evaluated. In this study, the authors developed a novel acidic pH pulse strategy to minimize proteolysis, thus improving the fermentation process conditions, and, in combination with an early harvest time, were able to obtain most of the material as full-length. Product quality was improved and maintained throughout the purification process. A huge amount of biopharmaceutical drugs and industrial enzymes have been successfully produced by fed-batch high-cell-density fermentation (HCDF) using P. pastoris. However, selecting a suitable HCDF strategy is not a straightforward process. One major bottleneck is the manipulation of the dissolved oxygen (DO), which, on a small scale, can be accomplished through the increment of agitation rates with a concomitant increase in the oxygen transfer rate (OTR). On a large scale, e.g., production-scale reactors, it is difficult to the increase in power consumption. The addition of pure oxygen at these scales is expensive and special precautions are required as compressed oxygen is accompanied by safety issues. The ability to demonstrate the possibility to scale up such a process is of great importance and is detrimental to commercial production [35,79].
Kastilan et al. [79] have optimized a fermentation process for the production of two PfAMA1-DiCo-based malaria vaccine candidates, which comprises only two phases: a batch phase and an induction phase. The authors have demonstrated that, even though the induction phase is initiated at a much lower cell density, the process is not only more convenient for the operator and easier to scale up, but it also generates higher product yields with a simultaneously lower level of process-related impurities. Through the use of a new methanol-feeding strategy and increased air pressure instead of pure oxygen supplement, Liu et al. [35] were able to scale up a HCDF, with the production of glycoside hydrolase LXYL-P1-2. This has been accomplished by setting up conditions of the increased air pressure (Ip-Air), developing a new biomass-stat methanol-feeding strategy. With this strategy, it was able to reduce the induction DO value to 1% with an initial induction biomass of 100 g L−1 (DCW). Their study comprises a solid basis for the commercial preparation of enzymes with the possibility of being applied to the production of other heterologous proteins from the HCDF of P. pastoris.
There is a growing interest in the biopharmaceutical industry to enhance production efficiency via shifting batch to continuous manufacturing and this is also valid for processes using P. pastoris strains. The expectation is that this will reduce process costs, increasing productivity and product quality. Nonetheless, continuous operation also has its limitations. It requires long-term stability and sterility in the cultures, and a shortening of average long development times. Genetic instability is still a challenge to be addressed when using P. pastoris strains in this operation mode. Nevertheless, the cultivation process is product-specific and must be identified on a case-by-case basis with provision for economic constraints [80]. Rahimi et al. [81] has addressed these by optimizing the dilution rates and determining strain-specific parameters, being able to produce a hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in a continuous fermentation of recombinant P. pastoris Mut+. They have compared titres, yield, productivity, and specific rates between different dilution rates. Despite the obtained results being in bench-scale fermentation, there is strong insights that the studied recombinant strain could be a suitable candidate for the transition from the fed-batch fermentation process to continuous operation in the production of the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in the biopharmaceutical industry.

3.2. P. pastoris as an Expression System for the Production of Human Subunit Vaccines

Taking into consideration the advantages of this host system along with its genetic manipulation for expression purposes, P. pastoris have an important recombinant expression platform of commercial importance. In the last few decades, a broad range of recombinant protein antigens synthesized in P. pastoris have been used to develop human sub-unit vaccines against a wide range of diseases, including the ones caused by bacteria and viruses. This type of vaccine is not only considered to be significantly safer than live attenuated and inactivated/killed vaccines, but also likely lends itself to be scaled up in a more cost-effective manner compared with other types of vaccines. In the figure below, an overview of vaccines using P. pastoris in clinical trials is shown (Figure 2).
Some other examples of research, i.e., pre-clinical and clinical studies that produced and evaluated vaccines using P. pastoris, are discussed in the following sub-sections.

3.2.1. Examples of General Diseases

The most common cause of dementia, accounting for 60–80% of dementia cases, is Alzheimer’s. This disease at a first stage leads to the loss of memory and later progresses to other cognitive abilities (i.e., speech, ability to reason, and movement), which seriously interferes with daily life. There are still no effective treatment options for the great majority of patients, therefore there is a need to continuously fight this hurdle. An example of that is the study performed by Tan and co-workers [82], a recombinant peptide vaccine (r4 × Aβ15) designed to elicit a specific Aβ immune response in the absence of a T cell response with the aim to successfully reduce Alzheimer’s disease (AD), was produced using P. pastoris. The authors findings suggested that r4 × Aβ15 was an effective immunogen in C57BL/6 mice, without an autoreactive T cell response, indicating that r4 × Aβ15 may have potential as a safe and effective AD vaccine and can be produced at a low cost.
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) disease, despite being ubiquitous in the human population worldwide, is a disease against which there is no specific treatment or vaccine. Even though most infections with EBV go unnoticed, in some cases, it can be linked to the development of serious conditions (i.e., cancer). Research is underway to further understand EBV-associated medical conditions and to develop an effective treatment. Wang and co-workers [83] showed the suitability of P. pastoris for high-level expression of the C-terminal of Epstein-Barr virus recombinant EBNA1 protein (E1ΔGA). The results have shown that the recombinant E1ΔGA elicited strong humoral and cellular immune responses, suggesting that the yeast-expressed E1ΔGA retained good immunogenicity. These achievements were possible through codon optimization, a prerequisite for large-scale industrial production of a subunit vaccine candidate. Another example is the study of the Epstein-Barr virus envelope glycoprotein gp350 as an attractive candidate for a prophylactic vaccine. The results showed that the yeast-expressed gp350 retained strong immunogenicity, providing a useful source for developing an EBV subunit vaccine candidate [84]. A recombinant VP1 protein expressed in P. pastoris have shown to induce protective immune responses against human enterovirus 71 (EV71) in mice. The results demonstrated that the yeast-expressed VP1 protein retained good immunogenicity and was a potent EV71 vaccine candidate [85]. EV71 is one of the major agents causing hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). This disease is also associated with serious neurological diseases in children and is highly prevalent in the Asia Pacific regions. Another example of such pivotal findings is the work of Zhang et al. [86, where the authors successfully demonstrated a simple, high-yield production of EV71 VLPs in transgenic P. pastoris, lifting a major limitation in commercial development of VLP-based EV71 vaccines.
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is associated with various gastric diseases, and it is known to be a risk factor for gastric cancer (GC). Due to the reduced efficacy of current standard therapies, exploring new strategies for the development of more efficient treatment is vital. The efficacy of alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (AhpC) and mannosylated AhpC (mAhpC) as candidate’s vaccine for Helicobacter pylori infection was evaluated by O’Riordan et al. [87]. The authors have cloned, over-expressed, and purified recombinant AhpC and glycoengineered mAhpC using P. pastoris as a host system. Their results showed that AhpC confers protection against H. pylori infection, which is enhanced when using glycoengineering form mAhpC. The latter represents a promising candidate vaccine against H. pylori infection.
Globally, approximately half a million people are chronically infected with hepatitis virus. Viral hepatitis is now one of the leading causes of death worldwide and represents a growing burden for health systems in lower- and middle-income countries. In order to overcome this concern, new treatment approaches in the vaccination field are underway, with the aim of developing an effective and cost-effective vaccine. Gurramkonda et al. [88] presented a detailed and enhanced method for the purification of high-level intracellular production of recombinant surface antigen of the hepatitis B virus (HBsAg) virus-like particles (VLPs) in P. pastoris. These results showed that P. pastoris-derived HBsAg VLPs exhibited a high potential as a superior biosimilar vaccine against hepatitis B in comparison with the results of mice vaccinated with a gold standard vaccine (Engerix™, GlaxoSmithKline UK Limited, Brentford, UK). Cai and co-workers [47] used P. pastoris yeast to express a high-level of truncated hepatitis C virus (HCV) E1E2 protein. Their results have shown that the expressed protein can efficiently induce anti-E1E2 antibodies in rabbits, with the ability to neutralize pseudo-type particles and virions derived from HCV genotype 1a/1b and 2a, respectively. These findings indicate that the recombinant E1E2 glycoprotein is effective in inducing broadly neutralizing antibodies and is a potent HCV vaccine candidate.
Infection by human hookworm, Necator americanus, affects hundreds of millions of people living in the poorest regions in the world. Therefore, an effective vaccine for preventing hookworm infection would constitute an important public health breakthrough. Based on these facts, Curti et al. [89], have optimized and revised the production process of the Necator americanus glutathione s-transferase 1 (Na-GST-1), the lead hookworm vaccine recombinant protein candidate. Their findings showed that, by adding a sorbitol pulse and co-feed during methanol induction, adjusting the downstream process by tuning the capacity of an ion-exchange chromatography, and altering the hydrophobic interaction chromatography conditions, it is possible to scale up the production for initial phase 1 clinical testing. Furthermore, from the same author is the expression at a 20 L scale and purification of the extracellular domain of the Schistosoma mansoni TSP-2 recombinant protein, a vaccine candidate for human intestinal schistosomiasis, an infectious disease that affects more than 230 million people worldwide [90]. In this study, the authors, described the cloning and the expression of the external loop of Sm-TSP-2 recombinant protein secreted by Pichia Pink using a 20 L scale fermentation, and the two-steps purification, which resulted in a protein recovery yield of 31% and a protein purity of 97%. Like in the previous study, the possibility to scale up the production for initial phase 1 clinical testing was demonstrated.
Cervical cancer caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) is the fourth most common cancer in women, with a large majority occurring in less developed regions. Despite the existence of treatments for the health problems that HPV can cause, there is no treatment for the virus itself. Ways of overcoming this limitation have been explored; an example of that is the work of Coimbra et al. [91]. In their study, the authors demonstrated the production of L1 protein from different types of HPV in P. pastoris using an integrative vector. The use of such a vector led to improvements on clone stability, making this heterologous expression system a potential tool, subjected to optimization, to produce a VLP-based vaccine. Another example is the study performed by Sanchooli et al. [92], where the authors have developed virus-like particles (VLPs) comprising the HPV-16 L1 capsid protein as a possible tool for prophylactic vaccination. From the results, high expression of HPV-16 L1 gene leading to pure HPV-16 L1 VLP recombinant protein was successfully generated using P. pastoris cells, reaching a yield of 11 mg/L. The fact that P. pastoris was used as an expression system makes this platform cost-effective for LMICs, contrary to the existent licensed VLPs-based vaccines known as gardasil (Merck and Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA) and cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK), which, despite being highly efficient, have high-cost production.
Poliomyelitis, a devastating paralytic and sometimes fatal infection, was responsible for global epidemics in the last century. Despite there being no cure for Polio, the disease is preventable with vaccination, namely, by using live-attenuated oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) and the inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). There are significant safety concerns for the continued use of these vaccines, making it imperative to develop alternative ones. Virus-like particles (VLP) formed by empty capsids produced in P. pastoris are presented as a model system for enterovirus VLP vaccine production [93].

3.2.2. Examples of Tropical Diseases

Dengue disease is an emerging mosquito-borne viral infection with increasing reports of outbreaks, and with 2.5 billion people potentially at risk. The global impact of infectious diseases like this is obvious, therefore the vital role of a vaccine in such situations. For the first time, Brata et al. [94] presented the feasibility of secreting dengue virus (DENV) type 2 envelope domain III using P. pastoris, demonstrating the relevance of sub-unit approaches to dengue vaccine development. This was possible after exploring various induction parameters for the fed-batch cultivation, including media composition, temperature, pH, and methanol concentration. Moreover, it was shown that this host was also able to produce DENV VLPs with the promise of efficacy and safety, offering key advantages from the perspective of inexpensive vaccine production in developing countries where dengue is endemic [95]. An example of that is the work performed by Rajpoot et al. [96], where the authors described the co-expression and co-purification strategy adopted to obtain tetravalent mosaic VLPs (T-mVLPs) and presented data on the comparison of their immunogenicity with other tetravalent E-based VLP formulations. The obtained results were a proof-of-concept that incorporation of all four E proteins into T-mVLPs does not compromise the immunogenic potential of the individual monomers. Furthermore, it can contribute to further cost reduction as it entails a single expression and purification, making this vaccine prototype an alternative to the next generation dengue vaccine candidates.
Over the last decade, chikungunya virus (CHIKV) has emerged in most parts of the world. Despite its global presence, no licensed vaccine or antivirals are currently available, which creates one of the important public health challenges. For the first time, Saraswat et al. [97] presented the potential of P. pastoris to express chikungunya virus-like particles (CHIK-VLPs). CHIK-VLPs were found to be immunogenic in mice and efficient in inducing virus neutralizing antibodies and balance Th1/Th2 response. These findings showed the protective efficacy of CHIK-VLPs against the emerging chikungunya virus. Another example of emergent illnesses is Chagas disease, a parasitic disease caused by a protozoan parasite (Trypanosoma cruzi). It is estimated that 56,000 new infection cases and 12,000 deaths are registered annually, leading to an urgent need for prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines development. Having these facts in mind, Matos and co-workers [98] developed a prime-boost immunization strategy with Tc52 N-terminal domain DNA and the recombinant protein expressed in P. pastoris, showing the protective effect against Trypanosoma cruzi infection. This strategy, combining DNA and protein vaccine, induced strong cellular and humoral responses as well as specific mucosal IgA, thus conferring better protection in the acute and chronic stages of infection and showing improvements on vaccine efficacy.
Malaria disease is a serious tropical disease that, if not diagnosed and treated promptly, can be fatal. Currently, no vaccine available offers protection against malaria; the treatment relies on antimalarial medication which is strain-dependent. Moreover, resistance to antimalarial medicines has been a recurring problem. Thus, there is an urgent need to find new and affordable approaches to tackle the disease. Taking this into consideration, Jacob and co-workers [99] developed a platform where whole P. pastoris yeast-expressing measles virus nucleoproteins were used as a production and delivery system to multimerize Plasmodium antigens, which is a major issue in the success of vaccines. In this study, circumsporozoite protein (CS) multimerization is obtained by fusing the CS from Plasmodium berghei (Pb) ANKA strain to the nucleoprotein (N) protein from measles virus (MV), generating recombinant P. pastoris yeast-expressing N or PbCS alone, or N-PbCS ribonucleoprotein rods (RNPs), and characterized the size, shape, and cellular localization of these RNP structures. With the aim of providing a means of delivering multi-antigen cocktails in a vaccine formulation, whole recombinant yeast clones, each expressing relevant Plasmodium antigens for the asexual and sexual stages, were mixed. With this strategy, the authors demonstrated a low-cost production process, independent from cold chain constraints for vaccine delivery in developing countries. Another interesting approach is the study presented by Spiegel et al. [100]. In this study, the authors optimized a multi-stage, multi-subunit malaria vaccine candidate for the production in P. pastoris by the identification and removal of protease cleavage sites. They clearly demonstrated that the proteolytic degradation of recombinant proteins by endogenous P. pastoris proteases can be prevented by the identification and removal of such cleavage sites (i.e., KEX2-protease consensus motif EKRE), which is of high importance for product yield and stability and vital for most therapeutic molecules.

3.2.3. Disease Outbreaks and Pandemics

The constant adaptation of microbes and their ability to evolve and become resistant to antibacterial and antiviral agents ensures that infectious diseases will continue to be an ever-present and ever-changing threat. Moreover, changes in human behavior, population growth, easiness to travel, and the emergence of new and resurgent pathogens contributes to the increment of infectious disease rates. Furthermore, it can lead to disease outbreaks that can easily cross borders and threaten economic and regional stability. We have been witnessing the latter historically through HIV, influenza H1N1 and H5N1, SARS, and, more recently, Ebola and COVID-19 epidemics and pandemic, respectively [101,102]. More than ever, there is an urgent need and commitment to work together to accelerate the development and production of new vaccines, and hence to assure equitable access worldwide. Examples of studies to tackle limited treatment options and lack of rapid and cost-effective response strategies for the pathogen outbreaks listed previously are described next.
It is not a surprise that it is hard to generate effective antibody responses to HIV. Nonetheless, recent studies have shown that some vaccines can indeed induce anti-HIV antibody responses. An example is the study presented by Aw et al. [103], whereby the authors demonstrated a systematic analysis of the expression of the anti-HIV VRC01 antibody in P. pastoris through signal peptide optimization. Broadly neutralizing antibody (bNAb) VRC01 is currently undergoing Phase II clinical trials to determine its effectiveness in preventing HIV infection. In this study, the authors set out a strategy to increase the production of the bNAb VRC01 by exploring a combinatorial library of signal peptides and evaluating the impact of using a 2A signal peptide to produce both chains of the antibody from a single bicistronic vector.
The spread of influenza A virus results in seasonal pandemics of human respiratory disease, which causes serious public health issues and economic burdens, as mentioned previously. The creation of an efficient vaccine is highly important to be used in an outbreak to support the eradication of the virus, due to the availability to boost immunity and decrease virus shedding into the environment. Having this in mind, Wang and co-workers [104], developed a universal influenza vaccine, by exploiting P. pastoris expression system to produce the A/Brisbane/59/2007 HA stem as the antigen. The authors have compared the yield and immunogenicity of the HA stem protein produced in yeast and mammalian (HEK 293T) cells, and the results showed that immunization of mice with the mono-glycosylated form of the H1 stem protein expressed in yeast can elicit greater antibody responses associated with strong neutralization activity. Pietrzak et al. [105] demonstrated that an avian influenza H5N1 virus vaccine candidate based on the extracellular domain produced in P. pastoris system as subviral particles protects chickens from lethal challenge. In this current study, it was shown that deletion of multi-basic cleavage site (MBCS) in the extracellular region of the H5 antigen improves protein oligomerization. Further, it was demonstrated that such a modified antigen is more immunogenic than HA with MBCS and protects from a lethal challenge with the H5 subtype of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI).
From 2002 to 2003, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), a respiratory disease caused by SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV), has spread fast from continent to continent, resulting in 8000 infections, with approximately 10% mortality, and a devastating effect on the economies of the affected areas. In order to ameliorate the effects of future outbreaks, Chen and co-workers [106] have optimized the production process and characterization of the yeast-expressed SARS-CoV recombinant receptor-binding domain (RBD219-N1) as a platform for a SARS vaccine candidate. The authors were able to increase the fermentation (10 L scale production) yield 6- to 7-fold to a 400-mg/L fermentation supernatant (FS). Additionally, their results indicated that the process is reproducible and that the purified, tag-free RBD219-N1 protein has high purity and a well-defined structure, thus making it a suitable candidate for production under current good manufacturing practice and future phase-1 clinical trials.
Ebola virus disease (EVD) is a severe, often fatal illness affecting humans. In the period between 2013–2016, the world has witnessed one of the most widespread outbreaks with a case fatality rate of 40% and a disrupting economy effect. With the aim of overcoming the limited treatment options and to accelerate the production of therapeutics against future pathogen outbreaks, Purcell et al. [107] proposed an efficient development cycle using glycoengineered P. pastoris to produce functional anti-Ebola antibodies. In this study, the authors, have engineered a landing pad system into Pichia GlycoSwitch and used the resulting strain to produce the constituent antibodies of the anti-Ebola ZMapp cocktail. This cocktail has shown to be a promising treatment, as it has demonstrated efficacy in nonhuman primates, and is currently in human clinical trials.
Pandemics have always shaped human history, and the COVID-19 pandemic that we are living in nowadays is not an exception. With nearly 200 million confirmed cases of people infected globally and almost 4.3 million deaths, this disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus has altered daily life for a sustained period of time. In such a global emergency scenario, the unification of scientific efforts is pivotal to ensure access to a safe and affordable COVID-19 vaccine worldwide. This endeavor to speed up the pandemic response is being achieved through the access to COVID-19 tools (ACT) accelerator. The latter is a tool that brings together governments, scientists, businesses, civil society, philanthropists, and global health organizations (e.g., the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, CEPI, Gavi, the WHO). Furthermore, COVAX, co-led by Gavi, CEPI, and WHO, the vaccines’ pillar to access ACT, will facilitate the equitable access and distribution to whichever vaccines prove to be effective globally, prioritizing the people most at risk (i.e., LMICs) [108,109,110,111]. An example of a scientific effort is the work performed by Chen and co-workers [112] who developed a severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) subunit recombinant protein vaccine candidate based on a high-yielding, pichia-engineered, receptor-binding domain (RBD219-N1) of the SARS beta-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) spike (S) protein, which was formulated with aluminum hydroxide. Their findings have shown that this formulation induced high-level neutralizing antibodies against both pseudotyped virus and a clinical (mouse-adapted) isolate of SARS-CoV, conferring fully protection from lethal SARS-CoV challenge in mice. Therefore, this vaccine formulation is under consideration for further development against SARS-CoV and potentially other emerging and re-emerging beta-CoVs, such as SARS-CoV-2. The same authors have also presented the potential for developing a SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) recombinant protein as a heterologous human vaccine against coronavirus infectious disease (COVID)-19 [106]. They have accelerated the evaluation of this vaccine into safety pre-clinical testing.

4. Some Economic Considerations

The potential cost advantage of using Pichia reported in the literature was demonstrated by Coleman 2020, comparing the costs of manufacturing a hypothetical monoclonal antibody mAb produced in a well0understood generalized CHO cell line with that of the same mAb produced in Pichia. In the absence of data published in the open literature, the approximations in the study could be extended to vaccine manufacture.
In terms of process comparability, the main adjustments were the removal of protein A, viral filtration, and deactivation steps. Manufacturing cost of goods (COGs) consisted of raw materials, consumables, labor, and facilities costs. An estimate for upstream costs reductions to 60% of that of CHO cells was given based on shorter culture times and higher cell densities. These differences amounted to ~42% reduction in raw material costs per lot. However, as the authors rightly point out, this only constitutes one part of the overall analysis. The speed of production (including downstream processing) as well as the productivity of the operation and product demand are key factors to consider. Different scenarios were considered. A key finding was the sensitivity of Pichia processing costs to productivity levels, which may need to be improved. There are many ways to improve productivity from cell engineering to continuous processing. These avenues are being pursued and are establishing Pichia as a firm contender for therapeutics and vaccines production (Table 2). A typical Pichia process is illustrated in Figure 3.
Lowering the overall manufacturing costs is an essential requitement to help LMICs to become more independent. However, it is worth noting that this is only one parameter in defining the needs in such countries. Other political, economic, and social factors are also involved. These are illustrated in Hayman et al., Kraigsley et al., and Phillips et al. [113,114,115].

5. Conclusions

The potential of P. pastoris in the production of recombinant proteins of commercial interest, as well as subunit vaccines, is immense. The popularity of this host system is due to the various advantages that it can offer, such as stable expression, high-level production, low cost, ease of genetic manipulation, as well as its capability to secrete a heterologous protein in its native conformational structure and strong immunogenicity. Nonetheless, further improvements either related with strain engineering (e.g., engineering of glycosylation) or process engineering (e.g., continuous processing alternative induction systems) will not only strongly increase the productivity of P. pastoris system, but also it will expand the range of target proteins including those that are currently only achieved by other expression systems. The rationale behind these strategies for improvement implies considering the endpoint application before deciding the strategy for expression of heterologous proteins and, accordingly, selecting the expression system characteristics. Hence, with the enhancement of the biopharmaceutical application of P. pastoris system, we can assume that this host in the coming years will be of prime choice along with, for example CHO cells.

Author Contributions

S.d.S.M., E.K.-M., conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Future Vaccine Research Manufacturing Hub (Vax-Hub, EP/R013756/1) for funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Amanna, I.J.; Slifka, M.K. Successful Vaccines. Curr. Top Microbiol. Immunol. 2020, 428, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rauch, S.; Jasny, E.; Schmidt, K.E.; Petsch, B. New Vaccine Technologies to Combat Outbreak Situations. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Rappuoli, R.; Hanon, E. Sustainable Vaccine Development: A Vaccine Manufacturer’s Perspective. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2018, 53, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kaslow, D.C.; Biernaux, S. RTS, S: Toward a First Landmark on the Malaria Vaccine Technology Roadmap. Vaccine 2015, 33, 7425–7432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. WHO. Malaria Vaccine Rainbow Tables. Available online: http://www.who.int/vaccine_research/links/Rainbow/en/index.html (accessed on 19 September 2020).
  6. McGuire, E.P.; Fong, Y.; Toote, C.; Cunningham, C.K.; McFarland, E.J.; Borkowsky, W.; Barnett, S.; Itell, H.L.; Kumar, A.; Gray, G.; et al. HIV-exposed infants vaccinated with an MF59/recombinant gp120 vaccine have higher-magnitude anti-V1V2 IgG responses than adults immunized with the same vaccine. J. Virol. 2018, 92, e01070-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Marzi, A.; Reynolds, P.; Mercado-Hernandez, R.; Callison, J.; Feldmann, F.; Rosenke, R.; Thomas, T.; Scott, D.P.; Hanley, P.W.; Haddock, E.; et al. Single Low-Dose VSV-EBOV Vaccination Protects Cynomolgus Macaques from Lethal Ebola Challenge. EBioMedicine 2019, 49, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Shen, A.K.; Cooke, M.T. Infectious Disease Vaccines. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2019, 18, 169–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Le, T.T.; Andreadakis, Z.; Kumar, A.; Gómez Román, R.; Tollefsen, S.; Saville, M.; Mayhew, S. The COVID-19 Vaccine Development Landscape. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020, 19, 305–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Huang, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Xia, N.; Zhao, Q. Escherichia Coli-Derived Virus-like Particles in Vaccine Development. npj Vaccines 2017, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Owczarek, B.; Gerszberg, A.; Hnatuszko-Konka, K. A Brief Reminder of Systems of Production and Chromatography-Based Recovery of Recombinant Protein Biopharmaceuticals. Biomed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 4216060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tripathi, N.K.; Shrivastava, A. Recent Developments in Bioprocessing of Recombinant Proteins: Expression Hosts and Process Development. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Kumar, R.; Kumar, P. Yeast-Based Vaccines: New Perspective in Vaccine Development and Application. FEMS Yeast Res. 2019, 19, foz007. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Roohvand, F.; Shokri, M.; Abdollahpour-Alitappeh, M.; Ehsani, P. Biomedical Applications of Yeast-a Patent View, Part One: Yeasts as Workhorses for the Production of Therapeutics and Vaccines. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2017, 27, 929–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Baghban, R.; Farajnia, S.; Rajabibazl, M.; Ghasemi, Y.; Mafi, A.A.; Hoseinpoor, R.; Rahbarnia, L.; Aria, M. Yeast Expression Systems: Overview and Recent Advances. Mol. Biotechnol. 2019, 61, 365–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Roohvand, F.; Ehsani, P.; Abdollahpour-Alitappeh, M.; Shokri, M.; Kossari, N. Biomedical Applications of Yeasts—A Patent View, Part Two: Era of Humanized Yeasts and Expanded Applications. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2020, 30, 609–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Haller, A.A.; Lauer, G.M.; King, T.H.; Kemmler, C.; Fiolkoski, V.; Lu, Y.; Bellgrau, D.; Rodell, T.C.; Apelian, D.; Franzusoff, A.; et al. Whole Recombinant Yeast-Based Immunotherapy Induces Potent T Cell Responses Targeting HCV NS3 and Core Proteins. Vaccine 2007, 25, 1452–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zeng, Y.; Cai, D.; Peng, M.; Ren, H. The primary study on the anti-HBV effect of whole recombinant yeast. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi Zhonghua Ganzangbing Zazhi Chin. J. Hepatol. 2003, 11, 728–730. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hadiji-Abbes, N.; Martin, M.; Benzina, W.; Karray-Hakim, H.; Gergely, C.; Gargouri, A.; Mokdad-Gargouri, R. Extraction and Purification of Hepatitis B Virus-like M Particles from a Recombinant Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Strain Using Alumina Powder. J. Virol. Methods 2013, 187, 132–137. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ramasamy, V.; Arora, U.; Shukla, R.; Poddar, A.; Shanmugam, R.K.; White, L.J.; Mattocks, M.M.; Raut, R.; Perween, A.; Tyagi, P.; et al. A Tetravalent Virus-like Particle Vaccine Designed to Display Domain III of Dengue Envelope Proteins Induces Multi-Serotype Neutralizing Antibodies in Mice and Macaques Which Confer Protection against Antibody Dependent Enhancement in AG129 Mice. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Liu, C.; Yao, Y.; Yang, X.; Bai, H.; Huang, W.; Xia, Y.; Ma, Y. Production of Recombinant Human Papillomavirus Type 52 L1 Protein in Hansenula Polymorpha Formed Virus-like Particles. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 25, 936–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, H.; Chen, X.; Wang, D.; Yao, C.; Wang, Q.; Xie, J.; Shi, X.; Xiang, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhang, L. Epitope-Focused Immunogens against the CD4-Binding Site of HIV-1 Envelope Protein Induce Neutralizing Antibodies against Auto- and Heterologous Viruses. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 830–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Wasilenko, J.L.; Sarmento, L.; Spatz, S.; Pantin-Jackwood, M. Cell Surface Display of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin on the Surface of Pichia Pastoris Cells Using α-Agglutinin for Production of Oral Vaccines. Biotechnol. Prog. 2010, 26, 542–547. [Google Scholar]
  24. Khulape, S.A.; Maity, H.K.; Pathak, D.C.; Mohan, C.M.; Dey, S. Antigenic Validation of Recombinant Hemagglutinin-Neuraminidase Protein of Newcastle Disease Virus Expressed in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Acta Virol. 2015, 59, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Fazlalipour, M.; Keyvani, H.; Reza Monavari, S.H.; Mollaie, H.R. Expression, Purification and Immunogenic Description of a Hepatitis c Virus Recombinant CoreE1E2 Protein Expressed by Yeast Pichia Pastoris. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2015, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lorent, E.; Bierau, H.; Engelborghs, Y.; Verheyden, G.; Bosman, F. Structural Characterisation of the Hepatitis C Envelope Glycoprotein E1 Ectodomain Derived from a Mammalian and a Yeast Expression System. Vaccine 2008, 26, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ahmad, M.; Hirz, M.; Pichler, H.; Schwab, H. Protein Expression in Pichia Pastoris: Recent Achievements and Perspectives for Heterologous Protein Production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 5301–5317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Karbalaei, M.; Rezaee, S.A.; Farsiani, H. Pichia Pastoris: A Highly Successful Expression System for Optimal Synthesis of Heterologous Proteins. J. Cell. Physiol. 2020, 235, 5867–5881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Balamurugan, V.; Reddy, G.R.; Suryanarayana, V.V.S. Pichia Pastoris: A Notable Heterologous Expression System for the Production of Foreign Proteins—Vaccines. Indian J. Biotechnol. 2007, 6, 175–186. [Google Scholar]
  30. Charoenrat, T.; Khumruaengsri, N.; Promdonkoy, P.; Rattanaphan, N.; Eurwilaichitr, L.; Tanapongpipat, S.; Roongsawang, N. Improvement of Recombinant Endoglucanase Produced in Pichia Pastoris KM71 through the Use of Synthetic Medium for Inoculum and PH Control of Proteolysis. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2013, 116, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Velez-Suberbie, M.L.; Betts, J.P.J.; Walker, K.L.; Robinson, C.; Zoro, B.; Keshavarz-Moore, E. High Throughput Automated Microbial Bioreactor System Used for Clone Selection and Rapid Scale-down Process Optimization. Biotechnol. Prog. 2018, 34, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Werten, M.W.T.; Eggink, G.; Cohen Stuart, M.A.; de Wolf, F.A. Production of Protein-Based Polymers in Pichia Pastoris. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 642–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vogl, T.; Sturmberger, L.; Fauland, P.C.; Hyden, P.; Fischer, J.E.; Schmid, C.; Thallinger, G.G.; Geier, M.; Glieder, A. Methanol Independent Induction in Pichia Pastoris by Simple Derepressed Overexpression of Single Transcription Factors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2018, 115, 1037–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fischer, J.E.; Glieder, A. Current Advances in Engineering Tools for Pichia Pastoris. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 59, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, W.C.; Gong, T.; Wang, Q.H.; Liang, X.; Chen, J.J.; Zhu, P. Scaling-up Fermentation of Pichia Pastoris to Demonstration-Scale Using New Methanol-Feeding Strategy and Increased Air Pressure Instead of Pure Oxygen Supplement. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jacobs, P.P.; Geysens, S.; Vervecken, W.; Contreras, R.; Callewaert, N. Engineering Complex-Type N-Glycosylation in Pichia Pastoris Using GlycoSwitch Technology. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, S.; Sun, P.; Gong, X.; Chang, S.; Li, E.; Xu, Y.; Wu, J.; Liu, B. Engineering O-Glycosylation in Modified N-Linked Oligosaccharide (Man12GlcNAc2∼Man16GlcNAc2) Pichia Pastoris Strains. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 8246–8252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Cregg, J.M.; Cereghino, J.L.; Shi, J.; Higgins, D.R. Recombinant Protein Expression in Pichia Pastoris. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. Part B Mol. Biotechnol. 2000, 16, 23–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Barrero, J.J.; Casler, J.C.; Valero, F.; Ferrer, P.; Glick, B.S. An Improved Secretion Signal Enhances the Secretion of Model Proteins from Pichia Pastoris. Microb. Cell Fact. 2018, 17, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Looser, V.; Bruhlmann, B.; Bumbak, F.; Stenger, C.; Costa, M.; Camattari, A.; Fotiadis, D.; Kovar, K. Cultivation Strategies to Enhance Productivity of Pichia Pastoris: A Review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 33, 1177–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yang, Z.; Zhang, Z. Engineering Strategies for Enhanced Production of Protein and Bio-Products in Pichia Pastoris: A Review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 182–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Baumann, P.; Hubbuch, J. Downstream Process Development Strategies for Effective Bioprocesses: Trends, Progress, and Combinatorial Approaches. Eng. Life Sci. 2017, 17, 1142–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Crowell, L.E.; Lu, A.E.; Love, K.R.; Stockdale, A.; Timmick, S.M.; Wu, D.; Wang, Y.A.; Doherty, W.; Bonnyman, A.; Vecchiarello, N.; et al. On-Demand Manufacturing of Clinical-Quality Biopharmaceuticals. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhou, W.J.; Yang, J.K.; Mao, L.; Miao, L.H. Codon Optimization, Promoter and Expression System Selection That Achieved High-Level Production of Yarrowia Lipolytica Lipase in Pichia Pastoris. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2015, 71, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cai, H.; Chen, L.; Wan, L.; Zeng, L.; Yang, H.; Li, S.; Li, Y.; Cheng, J.; Lu, X. High-Level Expression of a Functional Humanized Anti-CTLA4 Single-Chain Variable Fragment Antibody in Pichia Pastoris. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Baeshen, M.N.; Bouback, T.A.F.; Alzubaidi, M.A.; Bora, R.S.; Alotaibi, M.A.T.; Alabbas, O.T.O.; Alshahrani, S.M.; Aljohani, A.A.M.; Munshi, R.A.A.; Al-Hejin, A.; et al. Expression and Purification of C-Peptide Containing Insulin Using Pichia Pastoris Expression System. Biomed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 3423685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Cai, W.; Su, L.; Liao, Q.; Ye, L.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Z.; She, Y. Expression, Purification and Immunogenic Characterization of Hepatitis C Virus Recombinant E1E2 Protein Expressed by Pichia Pastoris Yeast. Antivir. Res. 2010, 88, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zahrl, R.J.; Peña, D.A.; Mattanovich, D.; Gasser, B. Systems Biotechnology for Protein Production in Pichia Pastoris. FEMS Yeast Res. 2017, 17, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Hsu, P.D.; Lander, E.S.; Zhang, F. Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering. Cell 2014, 157, 1262–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Komor, A.C.; Badran, A.H.; Liu, D.R. CRISPR-Based Technologies for the Manipulation of Eukaryotic Genomes. Cell 2017, 168, 20–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Gassler, T.; Heistinger, L.; Mattanovich, D.; Gasser, B.; Prielhofer, R. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Homology-Directed Genome Editing in Pichia Pastoris. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1923, 211–225. [Google Scholar]
  52. Weninger, A.; Fischer, J.E.; Raschmanová, H.; Kniely, C.; Vogl, T.; Glieder, A. Expanding the CRISPR/Cas9 Toolkit for Pichia Pastoris with Efficient Donor Integration and Alternative Resistance Markers. J. Cell Biochem. 2018, 119, 3183–3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Liu, Q.; Shi, X.; Song, L.; Liu, H.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, M. CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genomic Multiloci Integration in Pichia Pastoris. Microb. Cell Fact. 2019, 18, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Yang, Y.; Liu, G.; Chen, X.; Liu, M.; Zhan, C.; Liu, X.; Bai, Z. High Efficiency CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing System with an Eliminable Episomal SgRNA Plasmid in Pichia Pastoris. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2020, 138, 109556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Obst, U.; Lu, T.K.; Sieber, V. A Modular Toolkit for Generating Pichia Pastoris Secretion Libraries. ACS Synth. Biol. 2017, 6, 1016–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lin-Cereghino, G.P.; Stark, C.M.; Kim, D.; Chang, J.; Shaheen, N.; Poerwanto, H.; Agari, K.; Moua, P.; Low, L.K.; Tran, N.; et al. The Effect of α-Mating Factor Secretion Signal Mutations on Recombinant Protein Expression in Pichia Pastoris. Gene 2013, 519, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Yang, S.; Kuang, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, Y.; Hui, X.; Li, P.; Jiang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, A.; et al. Enhanced Production of Recombinant Secretory Proteins in Pichia Pastoris by Optimizing Kex2 P1′ Site. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Hartner, F.S.; Glieder, A. Regulation of Methanol Utilisation Pathway Genes in Yeasts. Microb. Cell Fact. 2006, 5, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Krainer, F.W.; Dietzsch, C.; Hajek, T.; Herwig, C.; Spadiut, O.; Glieder, A. Krainer 2012 Recombinant Protein. Microb. Cell Fact. 2012, 22, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  60. Qin, X.; Qian, J.; Yao, G.; Zhuang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Chu, J. GAP Promoter Library for Fine-Tuning of Gene Expression in Pichia Pastoris. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 3600–3608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hartner, F.S.; Ruth, C.; Langenegger, D.; Johnson, S.N.; Hyka, P.; Lin-Cereghino, G.P.; Lin-Cereghino, J.; Kovar, K.; Cregg, J.M.; Glieder, A. Promoter Library Designed for Fine-Tuned Gene Expression in Pichia Pastoris. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Várnai, A.; Tang, C.; Bengtsson, O.; Atterton, A.; Mathiesen, G.; Eijsink, V.G.H. Expression of Endoglucanases in Pichia Pastoris under Control of the GAP Promoter. Microb. Cell Fact. 2014, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Chang, C.H.; Hsiung, H.A.; Hong, K.L.; Huang, C.T. Enhancing the Efficiency of the Pichia Pastoris AOX1 Promoter via the Synthetic Positive Feedback Circuit of Transcription Factor Mxr1. BMC Biotechnol. 2018, 18, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Mombeni, M.; Arjmand, S.; Siadat, S.O.R.; Alizadeh, H.; Abbasi, A. PMOX: A New Powerful Promoter for Recombinant Protein Production in Yeast Pichia Pastoris. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2020, 139, 109582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Rajamanickam, V.; Metzger, K.; Schmid, C.; Spadiut, O. A Novel Bi-Directional Promoter System Allows Tunable Recombinant Protein Production in Pichia Pastoris. Microb. Cell Fact. 2017, 16, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Vogl, T.; Glieder, A. Regulation of Pichia Pastoris Promoters and Its Consequences for Protein Production. N. Biotechnol. 2013, 30, 385–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Vogl, T.; Ruth, C.; Pitzer, J.; Kickenweiz, T.; Glieder, A. Synthetic Core Promoters for Pichia Pastoris. ACS Synth. Biol. 2014, 3, 188–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Brady, J.R.; Whittaker, C.A.; Tan, M.C.; Kristensen, D.L.; Ma, D.; Dalvie, N.C.; Love, K.R.; Love, J.C. Comparative Genome-Scale Analysis of Pichia Pastoris Variants Informs Selection of an Optimal Base Strain. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2020, 117, 543–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Hamilton, S.R.; Gerngross, T.U. Glycosylation Engineering in Yeast: The Advent of Fully Humanized Yeast. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2007, 18, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Bollok, M.; Resina, D.; Valero, F.; Ferrer, P. Recent Patents on the Pichia Pastoris Expression System: Expanding the Toolbox for Recombinant Protein Production. Recent Pat. Biotechnol. 2009, 3, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Peña, D.A.; Gasser, B.; Zanghellini, J.; Steiger, M.G.; Mattanovich, D. Metabolic Engineering of Pichia Pastoris. Metab. Eng. 2018, 50, 2–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, S.; Rong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Kong, D.; Wang, P.G.; Chen, M.; Kong, Y. Homogeneous Production and Characterization of Recombinant N-GlcNAc-Protein in Pichia Pastoris. Microb. Cell Fact. 2020, 19, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Claes, K.; Vandewalle, K.; Laukens, B.; Laeremans, T.; Vosters, O.; Langer, I.; Parmentier, M.; Steyaert, J.; Callewaert, N. Modular Integrated Secretory System Engineering in Pichia Pastoris to Enhance G-Protein Coupled Receptor Expression. ACS Synth. Biol. 2016, 5, 1070–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liu, C.P.; Tsai, T.I.; Cheng, T.; Shivatare, V.S.; Wu, C.Y.; Wu, C.Y.; Wong, C.H. Glycoengineering of Antibody (Herceptin) through Yeast Expression and in Vitro Enzymatic Glycosylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 720–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Kaushik, N.; Lamminmäki, U.; Khanna, N.; Batra, G. Enhanced Cell Density Cultivation and Rapid Expression-Screening of Recombinant Pichia Pastoris Clones in Microscale. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Katla, S.; Karmakar, B.; Tadi, S.R.R.; Mohan, N.; Anand, B.; Pal, U.; Sivaprakasam, S. High Level Extracellular Production of Recombinant Human Interferon Alpha 2b in Glycoengineered Pichia Pastoris: Culture Medium Optimization, High Cell Density Cultivation and Biological Characterization. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 126, 1438–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Matthews, C.B.; Kuo, A.; Love, K.R.; Love, J.C. Development of a General Defined Medium for Pichia Pastoris. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2018, 115, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Velez-Suberbie, M.L.; Morris, S.A.; Kaur, K.; Hickey, J.M.; Joshi, S.B.; Volkin, D.B.; Bracewell, D.G.; Mukhopadhyay, T.K. Holistic Process Development to Mitigate Proteolysis of a Subunit Rotavirus Vaccine Candidate Produced in Pichia Pastoris by Means of an Acid PH Pulse during Fed-Batch Fermentation. Biotechnol. Prog. 2020, 36, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Kastilan, R.; Boes, A.; Spiegel, H.; Voepel, N.; Chudobová, I.; Hellwig, S.; Buyel, J.F.; Reimann, A.; Fischer, R. Improvement of a Fermentation Process for the Production of Two PfAMA1-DiCo-Based Malaria Vaccine Candidates in Pichia Pastoris. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Nieto-Taype, M.A.; Garcia-Ortega, X.; Albiol, J.; Montesinos-Seguí, J.L.; Valero, F. Continuous Cultivation as a Tool Toward the Rational Bioprocess Development with Pichia Pastoris Cell Factory. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rahimi, A.; Hosseini, S.N.; Javidanbardan, A.; Khatami, M. Continuous Fermentation of Recombinant Pichia Pastoris Mut+ Producing HBsAg: Optimizing Dilution Rate and Determining Strain-Specific Parameters. Food Bioprod. Process. 2019, 118, 248–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tan, L.; Wang, H.; Tan, X.; Zou, J.; Yao, Z. Yeast Expressed Foldable Quadrivalent Aβ15 Elicited Strong Immune Response against Aβ without Aβ-Specific T Cell Response in Wild C57BL/6 Mice. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2012, 8, 1090–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Wang, M.; Jiang, S.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y. Expression, Purification, and Immunogenic Characterization of Epstein-Barr Virus Recombinant EBNA1 Protein in Pichia Pastoris. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 6251–6262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wang, M.; Jiang, S.; Han, Z.; Zhao, B.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, Y. Expression and Immunogenic Characterization of Recombinant Gp350 for Developing a Subunit Vaccine against Epstein-Barr Virus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 1221–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wang, M.; Jiang, S.; Wang, Y. Recombinant VP1 Protein Expressed in Pichia Pastoris Induces Protective Immune Responses against EV71 in Mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 430, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Zhang, C.; Ku, Z.; Liu, Q.; Wang, X.; Chen, T.; Ye, X.; Li, D.; Jin, X.; Huang, Z. High-Yield Production of Recombinant Virus-like Particles of Enterovirus 71 in Pichia Pastoris and Their Protective Efficacy against Oral Viral Challenge in Mice. Vaccine 2015, 33, 2335–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. O’Riordan, A.A.; Morales, V.A.; Mulligan, L.; Faheem, N.; Windle, H.J.; Kelleher, D.P. Alkyl Hydroperoxide Reductase: A Candidate Helicobacter Pylori Vaccine. Vaccine 2012, 30, 3876–3884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gurramkonda, C.; Zahid, M.; Nemani, S.K.; Adnan, A.; Gudi, S.K.; Khanna, N.; Ebensen, T.; Lünsdorf, H.; Guzmán, C.A.; Rinas, U. Purification of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Virus-like Particles from Recombinant Pichia Pastoris and in Vivo Analysis of Their Immunogenic Properties. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2013, 940, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Curti, E.; Seid, C.A.; Hudspeth, E.; Center, L.; Rezende, W.; Pollet, J.; Kwityn, C.; Hammond, M.; Matsunami, R.K.; Engler, D.A.; et al. Optimization and Revision of the Production Process of the Necator Americanus Glutathione S-Transferase 1 (Na-GST-1), the Lead Hookworm Vaccine Recombinant Protein Candidate. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2014, 10, 1914–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Curti, E.; Kwityn, C.; Zhan, B.; Gillespie, P.; Brelsford, J.; Deumic, V.; Plieskatt, J.; Rezende, W.C.; Tsao, E.; Kalampanayil, B.; et al. Expression at a 20L Scale and Purification of the Extracellular Domain of the Schistosoma Mansoni TSP-2 Recombinant Protein: A Vaccine Candidate for Human Intestinal Schistosomiasis. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2013, 9, 2342–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Coimbra, E.C.; Gomes, F.B.; Campos, J.F.; D’arc, M.; Carvalho, J.C.; Mariz, F.C.; Jesus, A.L.S.; Stocco, R.C.; Beçak, W.; Freitas, A.C. Production of L1 Protein from Different Types of HPV in Pichia Pastoris Using an Integrative Vector. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2011, 44, 1209–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Sanchooli, A.; Aghayipour, K.; Naghlani, S.K.; Samiee, Z.; Kiasari, B.A.; Makvandi, M. Production of Human Papillomavirus Type-16 L1 VLP in Pichia Pastoris. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2020, 56, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sherry, L.; Grehan, K.; Snowden, J.S.; Rowlands, D.J.; Stonehouse, J. Comparative Molecular Biology Approaches for the Production of Poliovirus Virus-Like Particles Using Pichia Pastoris. Msphere 2020, 5, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Batra, G.; Gurramkonda, C.; Nemani, S.K.; Jain, S.K.; Swaminathan, S.; Khanna, N. Optimization of Conditions for Secretion of Dengue Virus Type 2 Envelope Domain III Using Pichia Pastoris. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2010, 110, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Tripathi, L.; Mani, S.; Raut, R.; Poddar, A.; Tyagi, P.; Arora, U.; de Silva, A.; Swaminathan, S.; Khanna, N. Pichia Pastoris-Expressed Dengue 3 Envelope-Based Virus-like Particles Elicit Predominantly Domain III-Focused High Titer Neutralizing Antibodies. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Rajpoot, R.K.; Shukla, R.; Arora, U.; Swaminathan, S.; Khanna, N. Dengue Envelope-Based “four-in-One” Virus-like Particles Produced Using Pichia Pastoris Induce Enhancement-Lacking, Domain III-Directed Tetravalent Neutralising Antibodies in Mice. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Saraswat, S.; Athmaram, T.N.; Parida, M.; Agarwal, A.; Saha, A.; Dash, P.K. Expression and Characterization of Yeast Derived Chikungunya Virus Like Particles (CHIK-VLPs) and Its Evaluation as a Potential Vaccine Candidate. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Matos, M.N.; Sánchez Alberti, A.; Morales, C.; Cazorla, S.I.; Malchiodi, E.L. A Prime-Boost Immunization with Tc52 N-Terminal Domain DNA and the Recombinant Protein Expressed in Pichia Pastoris Protects against Trypanosoma Cruzi Infection. Vaccine 2016, 34, 3243–3251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Jacob, D.; Ruffie, C.; Dubois, M.; Combredet, C.; Amino, R.; Formaglio, P.; Gorgette, O.; Pehau-Arnaudet, G.; Guery, C.; Puijalon, O.; et al. Whole Pichia Pastoris Yeast Expressing Measles Virus Nucleoprotein as a Production and Delivery System to Multimerize Plasmodium Antigens. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Spiegel, H.; Schinkel, H.; Kastilan, R.; Dahm, P.; Boes, A.; Scheuermayer, M.; Chudobová, I.; Maskus, D.; Fendel, R.; Schillberg, S.; et al. Optimization of a Multi-Stage, Multi-Subunit Malaria Vaccine Candidate for the Production in Pichia Pastoris by the Identification and Removal of Protease Cleavage Sites. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015, 112, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, X.; Li, Y.; O’Brien, K.L.; Madhi, S.A.; Widdowson, M.A.; Byass, P.; Omer, S.B.; Abbas, Q.; Ali, A.; Amu, A.; et al. Global Burden of Respiratory Infections Associated with Seasonal Influenza in Children under 5 Years in 2018: A Systematic Review and Modelling Study. Lancet Glob. Heal. 2020, 8, e497–e510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Ameli, J. Communicable Diseases and Outbreak Control. Turk. J. Emerg. Med. 2015, 15, 20–26. [Google Scholar]
  103. Aw, R.; McKay, P.F.; Shattock, R.J.; Polizzi, K.M. A Systematic Analysis of the Expression of the Anti-HIV VRC01 Antibody in Pichia Pastoris through Signal Peptide Optimization. Protein Expr. Purif. 2018, 149, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Wang, S.C.; Liao, H.Y.; Zhang, J.Y.; Cheng, T.J.R.; Wong, C.H. Development of a Universal Influenza Vaccine Using Hemagglutinin Stem Protein Produced from Pichia Pastoris. Virology 2019, 526, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Pietrzak, M.; Macioła, A.; Zdanowski, K.; Protas-Klukowska, A.M.; Olszewska, M.; Śmietanka, K.; Minta, Z.; Szewczyk, B.; Kopera, E. An Avian Influenza H5N1 Virus Vaccine Candidate Based on the Extracellular Domain Produced in Yeast System as Subviral Particles Protects Chickens from Lethal Challenge. Antivir. Res. 2016, 133, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Chen, W.H.; Hotez, P.J.; Bottazzi, M.E. Potential for Developing a SARS-CoV Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD) Recombinant Protein as a Heterologous Human Vaccine against Coronavirus Infectious Disease (COVID)-19. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2020, 16, 1239–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Purcell, O.; Opdensteinen, P.; Chen, W.; Lowenhaupt, K.; Brown, A.; Hermann, M.; Cao, J.; Tenhaef, N.; Kallweit, E.; Kastilan, R.; et al. Production of Functional Anti-Ebola Antibodies in Pichia Pastoris. ACS Synth. Biol. 2017, 6, 2183–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Osman, E.E.A.; Toogood, P.L.; Neamati, N. COVID-19: Living through Another Pandemic. ACS Infect. Dis. 2020, 6, 1548–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Hotez, P.J.; Bottazzi, M.E. Developing a Low-Cost and Accessible Covid-19 Vaccine for Global Health. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Nkengasong, J.N.; Ndembi, N.; Tshangela, A.; Raji, T. COVID-19 Vaccines: How to Ensure Africa Has Access. Nature 2020, 586, 197–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. WHO. COVID-19 Vaccines. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/covid-19-vaccines (accessed on 5 February 2021).
  112. Chen, W.-H.; Tao, X.; Agrawal, A.; Algaissi, A.; Peng, B.-H.; Pollet, J.; Strych, U.; Bottazzi, M.E.; Hotez, P.; Lustigman, S.; et al. Yeast-Expressed SARS-CoV Recombinant Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD219-N1) Formulated with Aluminum Hydroxide Induces Protective Immunity and Reduces Immune Enhancement. bioRxiv Prepr. Serv. Biol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hayman, B.; Bowles, A.; Evans, B.; Eyermann, E.; Nepomnyashchiy, L.; Pagliusi, S. Advancing Innovation for Vaccine Manufacturers from Developing Countries: Prioritization, Barriers, Opportunities. Vaccine 2021, 39, 1190–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Kraigsley, A.M.; Moore, K.A.; Bolster, A.; Peters, M.; Richardson, D.; Arpey, M.; Sonnenberger, M.; McCarron, M.; Lambach, P.; Maltezou, H.C.; et al. Barriers and Activities to Implementing or Expanding Influenza Vaccination Programs in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Global Survey. Vaccine 2021, 39, 3419–3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Phillips, D.E.; Dieleman, J.L.; Lim, S.S.; Shearer, J. Determinants of Effective Vaccine Coverage in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Interpretive Synthesis. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2017, 17, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Global vaccine leaders market shares. Adapted by permission of Springer Nature Customer Service Centre GmbH: Nature [Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.] [8], (Shen, A.K. and Cooke, M.T. Infectious Disease Vaccines, 2019), [copyright] [10].
Figure 1. Global vaccine leaders market shares. Adapted by permission of Springer Nature Customer Service Centre GmbH: Nature [Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.] [8], (Shen, A.K. and Cooke, M.T. Infectious Disease Vaccines, 2019), [copyright] [10].
Bioengineering 08 00119 g001
Figure 2. Clinical trials overview using P. pastoris as a production platform (clinicaltrials.gov, assessed on 5 August 2021).
Figure 2. Clinical trials overview using P. pastoris as a production platform (clinicaltrials.gov, assessed on 5 August 2021).
Bioengineering 08 00119 g002
Figure 3. Schematic Overview of a potential process for secreted product.
Figure 3. Schematic Overview of a potential process for secreted product.
Bioengineering 08 00119 g003
Table 1. Comparison of different expression systems for recombinant protein-based biopharmaceuticals production. Adapted from [10,11,12,13].
Table 1. Comparison of different expression systems for recombinant protein-based biopharmaceuticals production. Adapted from [10,11,12,13].
Host/PlatformCharacteristicsExamples of Expressed Products
Overall costProduction timeScale-up capacityPropagationProduct yieldContamination riskVaccine Candidates
Bacterialowlowhigheasyhighmedium (e.g., endotoxins)Hepatitis E virus (HEV) capsid polypeptide
Mammalian cellshighhighlowhardmediumvery high (e.g., virus, DNA)Recombinant varicella-zoster virus (rVZV)
YeastmediummediumhigheasyhighlowHepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)
Insect cellsmediummediumhighfeasiblehighlowTruncated dengue envelope proteins (DEN-80E)
Transgenic PlantsmediummediumhigheasyhighlowPapillomavirus major capsidProtein L1
Transgenic Animalshighhighlowfeasiblehighvery high (e.g., virus, DNA)Malaria major surface protein (MSP-1) antigen
Table 2. SWOT analysis of P. pastoris platform technology.
Table 2. SWOT analysis of P. pastoris platform technology.
StrengthsWeaknesses and ThreatsOpportunities
  • Generally recognized as safe (GRAS ∗ status), robust organism
  • Innate ability to secrete heterologous proteins
  • A highly inducible promoter (alcohol oxidase) that can be easily exploited for recombinant protein production
  • No Crabtree effects
  • Ability to perform certain post-translational modifications
  • Suitable for platform manufacture
  • Very high cell density achievable
  • Low Cost of Goods compared to e.g., mammalian systems
  • Relatively low secreted host cell protein (HCP)
  • Absence of endotoxins/bacterio-phage contamination
  • Low cellular productivity if not optimised
  • Protease release during fermentation
  • Scale up requires large volume methanol handling and high oxygen input together with substantial heat generation
  • Harvesting/dewatering of very high cell density results in instability in centrifugation
  • Improved cellular productivity
  • Continuous culture with lower cell concentration and higher productivity, smaller footprint
  • Methanol-free systems
Table 3. Examples of expressed antigens against diverse clinical conditions using different yeast species and strategies in which they can be used on vaccine development.
Table 3. Examples of expressed antigens against diverse clinical conditions using different yeast species and strategies in which they can be used on vaccine development.
StrategyYeast SpeciesAntigen
Immunogen
DiseaseRef
Whole Recombinant Yeast (WRY)S. cerevisiaeHCV NS3-core fusionHepatitis C[17]
P. pastorisHBsAg, HSP70Hepatitis B[18]
Virus Like Particles (VLPs)S. cerevisiaeHBsAgHepatitis B[19]
P. pastorisDENV envelope protein domain III (EDIII)Dengue [20]
H. polymorphaHPV52L1Human papillomavirus[21]
Yeast Display (YD)S. cerevisiaeHIV-1 envelope (Env) glycoproteinAIDS[22]
P. pastorisα-aggulutininAvian Influenza virus[23]
Purified ProteinS. cerevisiaeHemagglutinin-neuramidaseNewcastle disease[24]
P. pastorisHCV core E1E2Hepatitis C[25]
H. polymorphaEnvelope glycoprotein-E1 ectodomainHepatitis C[26]
Legend: hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), 70-kDa heat shock proteins (HSP70), dengue virus (DENV), human anti-human papilloma virus 52 late protein L1 (HPV52L1), human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), envelope glycoprotein (Env), hepatitis C virus (HCV).
Table 4. Pros and Cons of using P. pastoris as an expression system.
Table 4. Pros and Cons of using P. pastoris as an expression system.
ProsConsReferences
High ExpressionInefficient secretion of larger proteins (>30kDa)[27,28,29]
Cost-effectiveProteolysis of secreted proteins[29,30,31]
Relatively rapid growthMethanol safety requirements (Methanol is highly flammable chemical))[28,32,33,34]
ScalabilitySome glycosylation patterns different from mammalian[27,28,35,36,37]
Efficient Secretion & Simple purification [28,38]
Choice of secreted/intracellular expression [27,28,39]
Efficient protein folding [27,32]
N-glycosylation close to higher eukaryotes (e.g., glycoengineered, GlycoSwitch® (Carlsbad, CA, USA)) [36,37]
Table 5. Overall considerations for heterologous protein expression in P. pastoris manufacturing optimization [28,40,41].
Table 5. Overall considerations for heterologous protein expression in P. pastoris manufacturing optimization [28,40,41].
Strain EngineeringProcess Engineering
Gene Optimisation & SynthesisPlasmid ConstructionHost StrainFermentation Mode
Codon
Optimisation
Signal
Sequence
PromoterSelectable MarkerGenomic
Integration
TypeMut FormSelectionBatchFed-BatchContinuous
Codon usage databaseS.c. α-MFConstitutiveDrug
resistance
Single multicopyWild+Microscale cultivationCarbon sourceInduction temperatureDilution rate (D)
Bioinformatic toolsP.p. PHO1InducibleAuxotrophyHomologous recombinationProtease-deficient-EasySelect™Medium compositionSubstrate feed rate
Kex2p Ectopic integrationAuxotrophics pHSpecific growth rate (µ)
Ste13p Glyco-engineered DOMixed
substrate
Legend: Saccharomyces cerevisiae α-mating factor secretion leader sequence (S.c. α-MF), P. pastoris acid phosphatase (P.p. PHO1), kexin proprotein convertase (KEX2p), dipeptidyl aminopeptidase A (Ste13p).
Table 6. Methodologies to enhance downstream processing [12,42,43].
Table 6. Methodologies to enhance downstream processing [12,42,43].
Process Development MethodologiesApplicationExamples
High throughput (HT) approachesCell lysis24-well-HT sonication, high pressure homogenisation
RefoldingCircular dichroism, refolding kits
PurificationAqueous two-phase systems, pre-packed Predictor filter plates
SolubilityMultiscreen assay system, Chromafil® (Loughborough, UK) Multi96 filter plates
Single-use systemsHarvestingKsep® (centrifugation) (Surrey, UK), ARTeSYN’s® (TFF) (Kilbarry, Ireland)
Design of Experiments (DoE)Screen critical process parameters (CPPs) based on critical quality attributes (CQAs)Jmp, Design-Expert, Modde software’s
Process Analytical Technology (PAT)Analysis of protein concentration, purity, host cell protein (HCP), host cell DNA (HCD), etc.Spectroscopy, HPLC, circular dichroism
Continuous DSP processingPurificationchromatography
FormulationFreeze-drying
Integrative systemUpstream and Downstream couplingInSCyT
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Sá Magalhães, S.; Keshavarz-Moore, E. Pichia pastoris (Komagataella phaffii) as a Cost-Effective Tool for Vaccine Production for Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). Bioengineering 2021, 8, 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8090119

AMA Style

de Sá Magalhães S, Keshavarz-Moore E. Pichia pastoris (Komagataella phaffii) as a Cost-Effective Tool for Vaccine Production for Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). Bioengineering. 2021; 8(9):119. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8090119

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Sá Magalhães, Salomé, and Eli Keshavarz-Moore. 2021. "Pichia pastoris (Komagataella phaffii) as a Cost-Effective Tool for Vaccine Production for Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs)" Bioengineering 8, no. 9: 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8090119

APA Style

de Sá Magalhães, S., & Keshavarz-Moore, E. (2021). Pichia pastoris (Komagataella phaffii) as a Cost-Effective Tool for Vaccine Production for Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). Bioengineering, 8(9), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8090119

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop