Next Article in Journal
Adhesion of Resin to Lithium Disilicate with Different Surface Treatments before and after Salivary Contamination—An In-Vitro Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Emerging Promise of Computational Techniques in Anti-Cancer Research: At a Glance
Previous Article in Journal
Is It Possible to Reshape the Body and Tone It at the Same Time? Schwarzy: The New Technology for Body Sculpting
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pheno-SELEX: Engineering Anti-Metastatic Aptamers through Targeting the Invasive Phenotype Using Systemic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Bioengineering
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/bioengineering9070285
bioengineering-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fusobacterium nucleatum and Malignant Tumors of the Digestive Tract: A Mechanistic Overview

by
Yue Lai
1,
Jun Mi
1,2,* and
Qiang Feng
1,*
1
Department of Human Microbiome, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration, No. 44-1 Wenhua Road West, Jinan 250012, China
2
Shenzhen Research Institute of Shandong University, Shenzhen 518057, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2022, 9(7), 285; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070285
Submission received: 23 May 2022 / Revised: 20 June 2022 / Accepted: 24 June 2022 / Published: 28 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeted Therapy for Cancer)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum) is an oral anaerobe that plays a role in several oral diseases. However, F. nucleatum is also found in other tissues of the digestive tract, and several studies have recently reported that the level of F. nucleatum is significantly elevated in malignant tumors of the digestive tract. F. nucleatum is proposed as one of the risk factors in the initiation and progression of digestive tract malignant tumors. In this review, we summarize recent reports on F. nucleatum and its role in digestive tract cancers and evaluate the mechanisms underlying the action of F. nucleatum in digestive tract cancers.

1. Introduction

Results from a number of studies have shown that there are different microbiota in the tumor environment, and intestinal flora is a major factor involved in cancer mechanisms [1,2]. Therefore, there may be specific carcinogenic bacteria that initiate or promote cancer.
F. nucleatum, a Gram-negative bacterium, is a normal component of human oral microecology. F. nucleatum exists not only in the human oral cavity, but also in other tissues of the digestive tract, such as the gastrointestinal tract. It was firstly discovered in patients with periodontal disease and was considered as a potential periodontal pathogen [3]. As a permanent member of the oral microbiota, F. nucleatum binds to abiotic surfaces, host cells, or other microorganisms, mainly through the mediating effect of the adhesion factors. Moreover, as a bonding bridge between early and late pathogens located on the surface of the teeth and epithelium [4], F. nucleatum plays an important role in the development of periodontal disease [5]. F. nucleatum is an opportunistic pathogen, not only involved in inflammatory processes, such as periodontitis [6], inflammatory bowel disease [7], pancreatic abscess [8], premature birth [9], and liver abscess [10], but also involved in the progression of cancer, which include oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), colorectal carcinoma (CRC), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), pancreatic carcinoma (PC), gastric carcinoma (GC), liver carcinoma (LC), and breast carcinoma [11]. Among them, F. nucleatum is considered to be the main cause of CRC and PC [12].
Malignant tumors of the digestive tract are present in the esophagus, stomach, liver, pancreas, colon, and rectum. Their morbidity and relative mortality rates are increasing worldwide [13]. This paper reviews recent studies on the association and possible mechanisms between F. nucleatum and digestive tract cancers, in order to understand the relationships and contribute to future related research studies.

2. Relationships between F. nucleatum and Malignant Tumors of the Digestive Tract

2.1. F. nucleatum and OSCC

OSCC is the most common malignancy in the oral cavity and is considered to be the main cause of death due to oral diseases in many countries. Currently, recognized risk factors include smoking, drinking, chewing betel nut, etc., but 15% of OSCCs cannot be explained by these factors [14]. Continuous explorations of researchers indicate that F. nucleatum may be involved in the development of OSCC.
In 1998, Nagy et al. found that the levels of F. nucleatum and Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) were significantly higher in OSCC than in normal tissue [15]. Then, some researchers sequenced DNA and found that the level of F. nucleatum in OSCC-lesion surface swabs was significantly higher than that in normal mucosa from the same patients [16]. The results of comparative analyses showed that bacterial biomarkers were associated with OSCC, and the most distinct genera were F. nucleatum (enriched in OSCC) and Streptococcus (reduced in OSCC) [17]. The results of a metagenomic analysis found that the abundances of F. nucleatum and some other bacteria were significantly increased in the patients compared with the controls [18]. Meanwhile, F. nucleatum was found to play an important role in the progression of OSCC. Kang W et al. suggested that F. nucleatum infection in the oral cavity has a potential tumor-promoting effect [19]. Moreover, some further studies showed that it could protect tumor cells from immune cell attack, stimulating the progression of OSCC through the toll-like receptor (TLR) contact with the oral epithelium [20,21]. Besides, F. nucleatum levels in OSCC were significantly negatively associated with B-lymphocyte, CD4+T-helper-lymphocyte, M2-macrophage, and fibroblast markers, indicating that F. nucleatum plays a role in the host anti-tumor immune reaction [14]. Researchers found an association between F. nucleatum and high cytokine levels in CRC and OSCC; thus, it could generate pro-inflammatory factors through the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) activation of the TLR4-mediated nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling pathway in the outer membrane to create an inflammatory microenvironment and promote tumor progression [22]. F. nucleatum could promote OSCC cell proliferation by up-regulating cyclin D1 and c-myc [23]. These studies suggest that F. nucleatum may play a vital role in the progression of OSCC through different approaches, which needs further research.

2.2. F. nucleatum and CRC

Globally, CRC is the third most prevalent malignancy and the second most frequent cause of death from malignancies. According to the GLOBOCAN project of World Health Organization (WHO) Cancer Research Center, the incidence of CRC worldwide was about 1,880,725 in 2020, and mortality was about 915,880 [24]. Studies found a close relationship between F. nucleatum and CRC. Elevated levels of F. nucleatum were detected in the colon tissues of CRC patients in comparison with healthy people [25]. The results of a meta-analysis showed that CRC patients with high tissue abundance of F. nucleatum had poor survival rates [26]. Furthermore, many studies suggested that the overabundance of F. nucleatum may be associated with CRC carcinogenesis. The results of a metagenomic analysis found that F. nucleatum proved to be an important marker of colorectal carcinogenesis and tumor aggressiveness [27]. A co-culture of F. nucleatum and CRC cells could increase formate secretion and cancer glutamine metabolism, which drove CRC tumor invasion and proliferation by triggering aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) signaling [28]. F. nucleatum was associated with the elevation of angiopoietin-like 4 protein (ANGPTL4) expression in CRC cells, thus increasing glycolytic activity, which plays an important role in F. nucleatum colonization and proliferation in CRC [29]. After investigating the clinicopathological features and prognostic impact of F. nucleatum status in patients with CRC, researchers found that a greater amount of F. nucleatum had a significant association with low-level microsatellite instability (MSI)/microsatellite stability (MSS), which indicates that F. nucleatum might be associated with poor prognostic [30]. F. nucleatum in CRC could selectively expand immunosuppressive myeloid cells to form an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, thus inhibiting T-cell proliferation and inducing T-cell apoptosis in CRC [31]. These studies suggest that F. nucleatum may play an important role in the progression of CRC through different approaches, which needs further research.

2.3. F. nucleatum and ESCC

Studies showed a potential association between F. nucleatum and ESCC. A retrospective study found that the abundance of F. nucleatum in ESCC tissues was significantly associated with the pT stage and clinical stage [32]. In ESCC tissues, the F. nucleatum DNA level was higher than that in adjacent non-tumor tissues, and the higher DNA level of F. nucleatum was significantly associated with cancer-specific survival, poor prediction of relapse-free survival, and poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy [33,34,35]. In addition, some studies suggested that the overabundance of F. nucleatum may be associated with ESCC carcinogenesis. Studies showed that F. nucleatum invaded ESCC cells and induced the NF-κB pathway through the nucleotide oligomerization domain 1 (NOD1) and receptor-interacting protein kinase 2 (RIPK2) pathways, leading to tumor progression [36]. F. nucleatum infection could induce a high expression of NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) in ESCC, thus leading to myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) enrichment and weakening the body’s antitumor immunity [37]. Additionally, F. nucleatum infection and colonization induced a high expression of KIR2DL1 on the surface of CD8+T cells, which weakened the antitumor immune response and promoted the malignant progression of ESCC [38]. Currently, there are few studies on the mechanisms of ESCC induced by F. nucleatum, which are worthy of further research.

2.4. F. nucleatum and PC

PC is the third cause of cancer death in the United States and the seventh cause of cancer death worldwide [24,39]. Recent studies showed that the development of PC may be associated with F. nucleatum. Studies found that the co-occurrence and enrichment of F. nucleatum in cyst fluid from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) with high-grade dysplasia made IPMNs progress to invasive PC and decreased PC patients’ survival [40]. A cross-sectional study found that the cancer-specific mortality rate in the positive group was significantly higher than that in the control group according to a multivariate Cox regression analysis, which suggested that F. nucleatum is independently associated with poor prognosis of PC and that it might also be a prognostic biomarker of PC [41]. Nowadays, there are few studies on the mechanisms of PC induced by F. nucleatum, which are worthy of further research.

2.5. F. nucleatum and GC

GC is the fourth leading cause of cancer death worldwide [24], and its main risk factor remains Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), which is known to be associated with 90% of GC cases [42].
A potential association between F. nucleatum and GC was found in many studies. A case-control study showed that F. nucleatum increased cancer risk factors [43]. Some researchers evaluated the possible association between the abundance of some periopathogens in the subgingival plaque and periodontal status and the characteristics of gastric cancer, and the results showed that the most abundant bacteria were F. nucleatum followed by T. forsythia in all groups [44]. Moreover, others also found that F. nucleatum-positive GC patients had significantly worse overall survival (OS) than the control group [45]. A cohort study on the relationship between F. nucleatum and H. pylori in GC showed that F. nucleatum colonization led to poor prognosis in patients with advanced H. pylori-positive GC [46]. However, there are few studies about F. nucleatum’s role in GC, which needs further research.

2.6. F. nucleatum and LC

As a malignant cancer with high morbidity and mortality [47], LC poses a great threat to the health of people all over the world. Lu H et al. identified F. nucleatum as a possible biomarker for identifying patients with LC, showing that there were significant differences in the relative abundance between healthy controls and patients with LC [48]. However, there are few studies of F. nucleatum’s role in LC, which is worthy of further research.

3. Underlying Mechanisms of Action

As noted above, several studies showed a significant relationship between the frequency of F. nucleatum and digestive tract cancers, but there are few studies available on this issue, and the responsible mechanisms have not yet been well defined. In this section, we review studies on the mechanisms underlying the action of F. nucleatum in the tumorigenesis of these tumors and the classification of factors (Figure 1).

3.1. Bacterial Adhesion and Colonization

F. nucleatum is abundant in the oral cavity and intestinal tract, and tumor cells can attract F. nucleatum adhesion and colonization through specific epigenetic modifications. It was shown that a high load of F. nucleatum was associated with specific epigenetic phenotypes of CRC. Some researchers showed that F. nucleatum was associated with some molecular changes in CRC, such as CpG island methylation phenotype (CIMP), TP53 wild type, Human Mutl Homolog 1 (hMLH1) methylation, MSI, and CHD7/8 mutation [45]. However, the mechanisms are still poorly defined. It was found that these specific molecular characteristics of CRC mainly occur in the ascending colon, which is the most common colonization site of F. nucleatum in the gastrointestinal tract [49]. This may indicate that there is a certain relationship between F. nucleatum and the colonic mucosal microenvironment. F. nucleatum can colonize digestive tract tissues and organs by direct diffusion under the attraction of tumor cells [50]. Intestinal permeability in patients with periodontitis is enhanced by the chemotactic substances produced and secreted by plaque microorganisms and host cells. F. nucleatum, an important periodontal pathogen, can enter target tissues through paracellular pathways [51]. In addition, it can enter target tissues via circulatory (and hematological or lymphatic) pathways [52,53].
After reaching the surface of the target tissue, F. nucleatum binds to the target tissue through Fusobacterium adhesin A (FadA), Fusobacterium autotransporter (Fap2), and other adhesions present on the surface (Pathway 1 in Figure 1). F. nucleatum infects digestive epithelial cells or tumor cells and binds to the 11-AA domain of the E-cadherin EC5 domain via its specific adhesive FadA, which is internalized by E-cadherin [54]. The 11-AA inhibitory peptide is known to inhibit the binding and invasion of F. nucleatum and eliminate all subsequent host responses, including tumor growth and inflammatory responses [55]. Therefore, FadA inhibits the function of the 11-AA inhibitory peptide by binding to the 11-AA inhibitory peptide and activates the β-catenin signaling pathway, resulting in an increased expression of transcription factors, oncogenes, Wnt genes, and inflammatory genes, and in the up-regulation of the NF-κB and Wnt pathways, promoting the proliferation of CRC cells. Fap2 on the surface of F. nucleatum interacts with the over-expressed D-galactose-β (1-3)-N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (Gal-GalNAc) lectin sugar portion of tumor cells to colonize, multiply, and survive in tissues, thus further promoting tumorigenesis [56]. In addition, F. nucleatum promotes the colonization of other bacteria on the surface of target tissues by participating in the formation of biofilms, which can cause the inflammation of target tissues, increasing the permeability of pancreatic epithelium and allowing bacteria and their harmful products to enter deep tissues (Pathway 1 in Figure 1).

3.2. Activation of Tumor Cell Proliferation

Altered energy metabolism, a biochemical fingerprint of cancer cells, represents one of the “hallmarks of cancer”. This metabolic phenotype is characterized by preferential dependence on glycolysis (the process of conversion of glucose into pyruvate followed by lactate production) for energy production in an oxygen-independent manner. Recently, some researchers found that F. nucleatum could activate tumor cell proliferation by the activation of glycolysis. Hong J et al. found that F. nucleatum activated glycolysis and carcinogenesis via a selective increase in long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) enolase1-intronic transcript 1 (ENO1-IT1). Moreover, through the 3′ fragment of ENO1-IT1 mediating the interaction with keratin 7 (KAT7), ENO1-IT1 coordinates the acetylation of histones genome-wide. This contributes to regulating enolase1 (ENO1) transcription in CRC via epigenetic modulation [57]. Because ENO1 is a key glycolytic enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of 2-phosphoglycerate to phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), F. nucleatum can promote CRC glycolysis via ENO1 [58]. Moreover, glycolysis serves as the main source of energy metabolism, and F. nucleatum can promote CRC glycolysis through ENO1, which contributes to tumor cell proliferation (Pathway 2 in Figure 1).
Meanwhile, some studies found that F. nucleatum infection promoted tumor cell proliferation through the Ku70/p53 pathway [59]. Under normal circumstances, DNA double-strand break (DSB) is formed through homologous recombination or is repaired by Ku70 and Ku80. Once cells are damaged, the DNA-binding domain of Ku70 is acetylated, while the Ku70-dependent suppression of p53 expression is abrogated. That is, the expression of Ku70 is reduced, while the expression of p53 is increased [60,61]. However, when F. nucleatum infection occurs, Ku70 expression is decreased, which can lead to the down-regulation or even abnormal mutation of p53 expression in association with enhanced cell proliferation abilities [59,62]. The authors hypothesize that the DNA damage caused by F. nucleatum is so serious that the intracellular Ku70 is insufficient to provide prompt repair. Furthermore, without the normal regulation of Ku70, wild p53 is aberrantly expressed from up-regulation to down-regulation along with a possible mutation that may enhance cell proliferation abilities. The Ku70/p53 pathway inhibits the p53-mediated post-injury response, which enhances the proliferation of OSCC cells [63] (Pathway 2 in Figure 1).

3.3. Fusobacterium Promoting Digestive Tract Cancers Development from Inflammation to Malignancy

The causation of cancer by F. nucleatum could occur in cases where the bacteria are involved in chronic inflammation. Inflammasome is a multi-protein complex composed of pattern recognition receptor (PRR), apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing CARD (ASC), and caspase1 [64], which mediates the host immune system to response to microbial infection and cell damage. A large number of clinical samples showed that patients with periodontal diseases had a significantly increased possibility of oral and gastrointestinal cancers [65,66]. As one of the common periodontal pathogens, F. nucleatum promotes cytokine production and adjusts the environment to a more pro-inflammatory state, stimulating chronic inflammation and possibly promoting tumor proliferation [67,68]. By driving the expression of higher levels of cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1β) in inflammatory tissues through the NF-κB pathway, F. nucleatum promotes the aggregation of tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), producing nitric oxide (NO) in inflammatory sites. Among these expression signatures, IL-8, TNF-α, and other chemokines could recruit neutrophils and macrophages, which synthesize nitric oxide (NO) and cause oxidative stress to epithelial and stromal cells. This results in DNA damage and the consequent activation of p53 transcription, which, in turn, suppresses tumorigenesis by inducing G1-S arrest, DNA repair, and cell apoptosis. Moreover, p53 overexpression also leads to TP53 mutation, which is a key event during CRC development [69]. Besides, F. nucleatum can promote the expression of absent in Melanoma (AIM2) inflammasome, which can up-regulate the expression of IL-1β and down-regulate the expression of pyrin domain (PYD)-only protein 1 (POP1), thus regulating NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation by targeting ASC [70] (Pathway 2 in Figure 1). In addition, it is evident that there may be a close relationship among periodontal bacterial infection, periodontitis, and oral squamous cell carcinoma. In other words, there may be a periodontal bacterial infection–periodontitis–OSCC association and regulatory mechanism [71]. F. nucleatum infection activates the upstream signaling molecules of ATR-CHK1 and inhibits CHK1 activation, which promotes the over-expression of NLRP3 and cell proliferation, inhibiting apoptosis, thus promoting OSCC cell survival (Pathway 3 in Figure 1).

3.4. Cell Migration and Invasion

The epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is defined as a change from the epithelial to mesenchymal phenotypes that is usually rapid and reversible, often accompanied by weakened cell–cell junctions and the remodeling of the cytoskeleton [72]. Many studies showed that partial EMT was associated with cancer progression [73]. Recently, some researchers found that F. nucleatum could promote cell migration and invasion through EMT. F. nucleatum infects normal or cancerous oral epithelial cells, inhibiting the expression of miR-296-5p and SNAIL by up-regulating lncRNA miR4435-2HG, while miR-296-5p further negatively or indirectly down-regulates SNAIL expression by Akt2. Therefore, F. nucleatum triggers EMT to promote OSCC cell migration through the lncRNA miR4435-2Hg/miR-296-5p/Akt2/SNAIL signaling pathway. However, it does not promote cell proliferation or cell cycle progression [74] (Pathway 3 in Figure 1). In addition, E-cadherin is down-regulated and trans-located to the cytoplasm after F. nucleatum infects normal or cancerous oral epithelial cells. N-cadherin, Vimentin, SNAIL, matrix metalloprotease-2 (MMP-2), and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) are up-regulated, and TLR-4 is responsible for LPS recognition. LPS may up-regulate p-EMT through the TLR signaling pathway, which changes the gene expression in OSCC and transforms epithelial cells into a p-EMT phenotype, thus promoting OSCC cell migration [75].
Matrix metalloproteinase-13 (MMP-13), also known as collagenase-3, plays a key role in normal metabolism and homeostasis. In addition, it also plays an important role in inflammatory response, tumor invasion, and metastasis [76,77]. Some studies showed that F. nucleatum could promote cell migration and invasion through the enzymatic degradation of the extracellular matrix. F. nucleatum infects oral epithelial cells and produces a large number of cytokines, such as transforming growth factor-α/β (TGF-α/β) and keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), which promote MMP-13 production by activating p38 MAP kinase [78]. MMP-13 lyses laminin-5 and transforms it into a form that promotes cell migration, thus promoting the invasion and metastasis of OSCC [54]. In addition, F. nucleatum can degrade the extracellular matrix and destroy the physical barrier by the secretion of MMP-2, MMP-9, and other MMPs stimulated by epithelial cells, facilitating the invasion and migration of OSCC [79] (Pathway 4 in Figure 1).
Some researchers also found that F. nucleatum can induct autophagy, which can promote cell migration and invasion. Yu et al. found that F. nucleatum could activate the autophagy pathway of CRC. The pathway was proved to inhibit the occurrence and development of tumors by mainly inhibiting the migration and invasion of tumor cells in vitro and by weakening metastasis in vivo [80,81]. Caspase activation and recruitment domain 3 (CARD3, RIP2) is a serine/threonine/tyrosine kinase with a carboxy-terminal caspase activation and recruitment domain (CARD). The abundance of F. nucleatum was found to be positively associated with CARD3 expression [82]. The down-regulation of CARD3 expression can reduce the migration, autophagosome formation, and expression of autophagy-associated proteins, which are induced by F. nucleatum infection. Therefore, the infection of F. nucleatum with CRC cells increases the migration of cancer cells; up-regulates the expression of CARD3, LC3-II, Beclin1 and Vimentin; and down-regulates the expression of E-cadherin and P62 in CRC cells. Through this mechanism, F. nucleatum specifically targets CARD3 to activate autophagy and promote CRC migration. In addition, F. nucleatum also stimulates the expression of pULK1 autophagy-related proteins, ULK1, and ATG7 by the loss of miR-18a/4802 and the reliance on the TLR4 and MYD88 signaling pathways, thus activating autophagy to promote CRC migration mechanism. Besides, it is also closely related to drug resistance in CRC [80] (Pathway 3 in Figure 1).
Studies showed that F. nucleatum significantly up-regulated the expression of lncRNA keratin 7-antisense (KRT7-AS) and KRT7 in CRC by activating the NF-κB pathway (Pathway 3 in Figure 1). KRT7, a type II cytokeratin, is a component of the cytoskeleton and epithelial intermediate filaments [83]. In addition to maintaining the integrity of the cell structure, it can also promote cell motility [84]. Bayrak R. et al. found that KRT7 was more common in CRC with lymph node metastasis than in CRC without lymph node metastasis [85]. Subsequently, KRT7 acts as a downstream target of KRT7-AS, which further promotes CRC cell migration through the up-regulation of KRT7 [86].
Researchers found that F. nucleatum could promote cell migration and invasion by secreting exosomes (Pathway 3 in Figure 1). For example, Guo S et al. found that F. nucleatum could promote CRC migration by stimulating the production of Mir-1246/92B-3p/27A-3p and CXCL16/RhoA/IL-8 exosomes in CRC cells [87].
There is a specific association between bacteria in dental plaques. F. nucleatum is the bonding bridge between early and late colonization bacteria, playing a leading role in the late stage of plaque biofilm formation [88]. Studies showed that F. nucleatum may also synergistically promote the cell migration and invasion of OSCC with other oral bacteria, such as P. gingivalis (Pathway 3 in Figure 1). For example, in the interaction between F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis, they infected oral epithelial cells and directly interacted with oral epithelial cells through the TLR signaling pathway to produce IL-6. The activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) activated Cyclin-D1, MMP-9, heparin, etc., which promote the proliferation and invasion of OSCC cells [22].

3.5. Producing a Tumor Immunosuppressive Microenvironment

F. nucleatum induced by Fap2 mediates T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) or promotes the apoptosis of lymphocytes and NK cells by activating carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules 1 (CEACAM1), and protects CRC cells from the cytotoxic effects of NK cells and T lymphocytes [18,89]. Meanwhile, Fap2 is a galactose-binding lectin on the surface of F. nucleatum, and its ligand, Gal-GalNAc, is on the surface of CRC tumors [56]. Thus, Fap2 can bind to Gal-GalNAc and mediate the recruitment of F. nucleatum to CRC cells, enhancing the role of F. nucleatum. In addition, researchers measured F. nucleatum DNA in the tumor tissues of 933 of 4465 CRC cases (including 128 F. nucleatum-positive cases) in two prospective cohorts by qPCR, and the results showed that F. nucleatum was negatively associated with tumor matrix CD3+T lymphocytes [90]. Kostic et al. confirmed that F. nucleatum promoted CRC by inhibiting proliferation and inducing T-cell apoptosis [91]. In addition, F. nucleatum-secreted autoinducer-2 (AI-2) acted on the tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 9 (TNFSF9) signaling pathway to reduce CD4+T cells/CD8+T cells in CRC tissues, influencing the progression of CRC [92] (Pathway 5 in Figure 1).

4. Conclusions

In summary, many studies have shown that F. nucleatum is associated with OSCC, CRC, ESCC, PC, GC, and LC. The questions of whether F. nucleatum can cause disease alone or whether there are related co-mechanisms factors and how they function need to be further explored. In addition, current studies have mostly focused on the association between F. nucleatum and malignant tumors of the digestive tract, and there are still many gaps in etiology, mechanisms, immunology, and other aspects among them. In terms of other digestive tract cancers, such as LC, only a few studies have speculated on the association between them, which has not been supported by a large number of studies.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.L., J.M., Q.F.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2019A1515110833) and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021MC098) (J.M.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wong, S.H.; Yu, J. Gut microbiota in colorectal cancer: Mechanisms of action and clinical applications. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 16, 690–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lucas, C.; Barnich, N.; Nguyen, H.T.T. Microbiota, Inflammation and Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. De Andrade, K.Q.; Almeida-da-Silva, C.L.C.; Coutinho-Silva, R. Immunological Pathways Triggered by Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum: Therapeutic Possibilities? Mediat. Inflamm. 2019, 2019, 7241312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kolenbrander, P.E. Oral microbial communities: Biofilms, interactions, and genetic systems. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2000, 54, 413–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Signat, B.; Roques, C.; Poulet, P.; Duffaut, D. Fusobacterium nucleatum in periodontal health and disease. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2011, 13, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Cai, Z.; Zhu, T.; Liu, F.; Zhuang, Z.; Zhao, L. Co-pathogens in Periodontitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 723719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qi, Y.; Wu, H.M.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, Y.F.; Jin, L.; Yang, M.F.; Wang, F.Y. New Insights into the Role of Oral Microbiota Dysbiosis in the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2022, 67, 42–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bellotti, R.; Speth, C.; Adolph, T.E.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Effenberger, M.; Öfner, D.; Maglione, M. Micro- and Mycobiota Dysbiosis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Development. Cancers 2021, 13, 3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Figuero, E.; Han, Y.W.; Furuichi, Y. Periodontal diseases and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Mechanisms. Periodontol 2000 2020, 83, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Houston, H.; Kumar, K.; Sajid, S. Asymptomatic pyogenic liver abscesses secondary to Fusobacterium nucleatum and Streptococcus vestibularis in an immunocompetent patient. BMJ Case Rep. 2017, 2017, 221476. [Google Scholar]
  11. Parhi, L.; Alon-Maimon, T.; Sol, A.; Nejman, D.; Shhadeh, A.; Fainsod-Levi, T.; Yajuk, O.; Isaacson, B.; Abed, J.; Maalouf, N.; et al. Breast cancer colonization by Fusobacterium nucleatum accelerates tumor growth and metastatic progression. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Guinney, J.; Dienstmann, R.; Wang, X.; de Reyniès, A.; Schlicker, A.; Soneson, C.; Marisa, L.; Roepman, P.; Nyamundanda, G.; Angelino, P.; et al. The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 1350–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Reitano, E.; de’Angelis, N.; Gavriilidis, P.; Gaiani, F.; Memeo, R.; Inchingolo, R.; Bianchi, G.; de’Angelis, G.L.; Carra, M.C. Oral Bacterial Microbiota in Digestive Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Neuzillet, C.; Marchais, M.; Vacher, S.; Hilmi, M.; Schnitzler, A.; Meseure, D.; Leclere, R.; Lecerf, C.; Dubot, C.; Jeannot, E.; et al. Prognostic value of intratumoral Fusobacterium nucleatum and association with immune-related gene expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nagy, K.N.; Sonkodi, I.; Szöke, I.; Nagy, E.; Newman, H.N. The microflora associated with human oral carcinomas. Oral Oncol. 1998, 34, 304–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Al-Hebshi, N.N.; Nasher, A.T.; Maryoud, M.Y.; Homeida, H.E.; Chen, T.; Idris, A.M.; Johnson, N.W. Inflammatory bacteriome featuring Fusobacterium nucleatum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa identified in association with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Su, S.C.; Chang, L.C.; Huang, H.D.; Peng, C.Y.; Chuang, C.Y.; Chen, Y.T.; Lu, M.Y.; Chiu, Y.W.; Chen, P.Y.; Yang, S.F. Oral microbial dysbiosis and its performance in predicting oral cancer. Carcinogenesis 2021, 42, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Y.; Li, Z.; Qi, Y.; Wen, X.; Zhang, L. Metagenomic Analysis Reveals a Changing Microbiome Associated With the Depth of Invasion of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 795777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kang, W.; Sun, T.; Tang, D.; Zhou, J.; Feng, Q. Time-Course Transcriptome Analysis of Gingiva-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Reveals That Fusobacterium nucleatum Triggers Oncogene Expression in the Process of Cell Differentiation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 7, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gur, C.; Ibrahim, Y.; Isaacson, B.; Yamin, R.; Abed, J.; Gamliel, M.; Enk, J.; Bar-On, Y.; Stanietsky-Kaynan, N.; Coppenhagen-Glazer, S.; et al. Binding of the Fap2 protein of Fusobacterium nucleatum to human inhibitory receptor TIGIT protects tumors from immune cell attack. Immunity 2015, 42, 344–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bhattacharyya, S.; Ghosh, S.K.; Shokeen, B.; Eapan, B.; Lux, R.; Kiselar, J.; Nithianantham, S.; Young, A.; Pandiyan, P.; McCormick, T.S.; et al. FAD-I, a Fusobacterium nucleatum Cell Wall-Associated Diacylated Lipoprotein That Mediates Human Beta Defensin 2 Induction through Toll-Like Receptor-1/2 (TLR-1/2) and TLR-2/6. Infect. Immun. 2016, 84, 1446–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Binder Gallimidi, A.; Fischman, S.; Revach, B.; Bulvik, R.; Maliutina, A.; Rubinstein, A.M.; Nussbaum, G.; Elkin, M. Periodontal pathogens Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum promote tumor progression in an oral-specific chemical carcinogenesis model. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 22613–22623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Harrandah, A.M.; Chukkapalli, S.S.; Bhattacharyya, I.; Progulske-Fox, A.; Chan, E.K.L. Fusobacteria modulate oral carcinogenesis and promote cancer progression. J. Oral Microbiol. 2020, 13, 1849493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Castellarin, M.; Warren, R.L.; Freeman, J.D.; Dreolini, L.; Krzywinski, M.; Strauss, J.; Barnes, R.; Watson, P.; Allen-Vercoe, E.; Moore, R.A.; et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum infection is prevalent in human colorectal carcinoma. Genome Res. 2012, 22, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Gethings-Behncke, C.; Coleman, H.G.; Jordao, H.W.T.; Longley, D.B.; Crawford, N.; Murray, L.J.; Kunzmann, A.T. Fusobacterium nucleatum in the Colorectum and Its Association with Cancer Risk and Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2020, 29, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Berbert, L.; Santos, A.; Magro, D.O.; Guadagnini, D.; Assalin, H.B.; Lourenço, L.H.; Martinez, C.A.R.; Saad, M.J.A.; Coy, C.S.R. Metagenomics analysis reveals universal signatures of the intestinal microbiota in colorectal cancer, regardless of regional differences. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. Rev. Bras. Pesqui. Med. Biol. 2022, 55, e11832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ternes, D.; Tsenkova, M.; Pozdeev, V.I.; Meyers, M.; Koncina, E.; Atatri, S.; Schmitz, M.; Karta, J.; Schmoetten, M.; Heinken, A.; et al. The gut microbial metabolite formate exacerbates colorectal cancer progression. Nat. Metab. 2022, 4, 458–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zheng, X.; Liu, R.; Zhou, C.; Yu, H.; Luo, W.; Zhu, J.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, N.; Peng, X.; et al. ANGPTL4-Mediated Promotion of Glycolysis Facilitates the Colonization of Fusobacterium nucleatum in Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Res. 2021, 81, 6157–6170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, Y.; Lu, Y.; Ke, Y.; Li, Y. Prognostic impact of the Fusobacterium nucleatum status in colorectal cancers. Medicine 2019, 98, e17221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fridman, W.H.; Pagès, F.; Sautès-Fridman, C.; Galon, J. The immune contexture in human tumours: Impact on clinical outcome. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, Z.; Shi, C.; Zheng, J.; Guo, Y.; Fan, T.; Zhao, H.; Jian, D.; Cheng, X.; Tang, H.; Ma, J. Fusobacterium nucleatum predicts a high risk of metastasis for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yamamura, K.; Izumi, D.; Kandimalla, R.; Sonohara, F.; Baba, Y.; Yoshida, N.; Kodera, Y.; Baba, H.; Goel, A. Intratumoral Fusobacterium Nucleatum Levels Predict Therapeutic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 6170–6179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Yamamura, K.; Baba, Y.; Nakagawa, S.; Mima, K.; Miyake, K.; Nakamura, K.; Sawayama, H.; Kinoshita, K.; Ishimoto, T.; Iwatsuki, M.; et al. Human Microbiome Fusobacterium Nucleatum in Esophageal Cancer Tissue Is Associated with Prognosis. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 5574–5581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Liu, Y.; Baba, Y.; Ishimoto, T.; Tsutsuki, H.; Zhang, T.; Nomoto, D.; Okadome, K.; Yamamura, K.; Harada, K.; Eto, K.; et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum confers chemoresistance by modulating autophagy in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2021, 124, 963–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nomoto, D.; Baba, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tsutsuki, H.; Okadome, K.; Harada, K.; Ishimoto, T.; Iwatsuki, M.; Iwagami, S.; Miyamoto, Y.; et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression via the NOD1/RIPK2/NF-κB pathway. Cancer Lett. 2022, 530, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liang, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, H.; Dai, N.; Zhang, N.; Sun, W.; Guo, Y.; Kong, J.; Wang, X.; et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum induces MDSCs enrichment via activation the NLRP3 inflammosome in ESCC cells, leading to cisplatin resistance. Ann. Med. 2022, 54, 989–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Lu, Y.; Chen, S.; Xing, Y.; Yang, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, T.; Li, J.; et al. Clinical impact of Fn-induced high expression of KIR2DL1 in CD8 T lymphocytes in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann. Med. 2022, 54, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019, 69, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gaiser, R.A.; Halimi, A.; Alkharaan, H.; Lu, L.; Davanian, H.; Healy, K.; Hugerth, L.W.; Ateeb, Z.; Valente, R.; Fernández Moro, C.; et al. Enrichment of oral microbiota in early cystic precursors to invasive pancreatic cancer. Gut 2019, 68, 2186–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mitsuhashi, K.; Nosho, K.; Sukawa, Y.; Matsunaga, Y.; Ito, M.; Kurihara, H.; Kanno, S.; Igarashi, H.; Naito, T.; Adachi, Y.; et al. Association of Fusobacterium species in pancreatic cancer tissues with molecular features and prognosis. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 7209–7220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Mukaisho, K.; Nakayama, T.; Hagiwara, T.; Hattori, T.; Sugihara, H. Two distinct etiologies of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma: Interactions among pH, Helicobacter pylori, and bile acids. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Nascimento Araujo, C.D.; Amorim, A.T.; Barbosa, M.S.; Alexandre, J.; Campos, G.B.; Macedo, C.L.; Marques, L.M.; Timenetsky, J. Evaluating the presence of Mycoplasma hyorhinis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Helicobacter pylori in biopsies of patients with gastric cancer. Infect. Agents Cancer 2021, 16, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nicolae, F.M.; Didilescu, A.C.; Șurlin, P.; Ungureanu, B.S.; Șurlin, V.M.; Pătrașcu, Ș.; Ramboiu, S.; Jelihovschi, I.; Iancu, L.S.; Ghilusi, M.; et al. Subgingival Periopathogens Assessment and Clinical Periodontal Evaluation of Gastric Cancer Patients-A Cross Sectional Pilot Study. Pathogens 2022, 11, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Boehm, E.T.; Thon, C.; Kupcinskas, J.; Steponaitiene, R.; Skieceviciene, J.; Canbay, A.; Malfertheiner, P.; Link, A. Fusobacterium nucleatum is associated with worse prognosis in Lauren’s diffuse type gastric cancer patients. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hsieh, Y.Y.; Tung, S.Y.; Pan, H.Y.; Chang, T.S.; Wei, K.L.; Chen, W.M.; Deng, Y.F.; Lu, C.K.; Lai, Y.H.; Wu, C.S.; et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum colonization is associated with decreased survival of helicobacter pylori-positive gastric cancer patients. World J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 27, 7311–7323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Llovet, J.M.; Montal, R.; Sia, D.; Finn, R.S. Molecular therapies and precision medicine for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 15, 599–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lu, H.; Ren, Z.; Li, A.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, J.; Xu, S.; Luo, Q.; Zhou, K.; Sun, X.; Zheng, S.; et al. Deep sequencing reveals microbiota dysbiosis of tongue coat in patients with liver carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Phipps, A.I.; Limburg, P.J.; Baron, J.A.; Burnett-Hartman, A.N.; Weisenberger, D.J.; Laird, P.W.; Sinicrope, F.A.; Rosty, C.; Buchanan, D.D.; Potter, J.D.; et al. Association between molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer and patient survival. Gastroenterology 2015, 148, 77–87.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Swidsinski, A.; Schlien, P.; Pernthaler, A.; Gottschalk, U.; Bärlehner, E.; Decker, G.; Swidsinski, S.; Strassburg, J.; Loening-Baucke, V.; Hoffmann, U.; et al. Bacterial biofilm within diseased pancreatic and biliary tracts. Gut 2005, 54, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Fan, X.; Alekseyenko, A.V.; Wu, J.; Peters, B.A.; Jacobs, E.J.; Gapstur, S.M.; Purdue, M.P.; Abnet, C.C.; Stolzenberg-Solomon, R.; Miller, G.; et al. Human oral microbiome and prospective risk for pancreatic cancer: A population-based nested case-control study. Gut 2018, 67, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Michaud, D.S.; Izard, J.; Wilhelm-Benartzi, C.S.; You, D.H.; Grote, V.A.; Tjønneland, A.; Dahm, C.C.; Overvad, K.; Jenab, M.; Fedirko, V.; et al. Plasma antibodies to oral bacteria and risk of pancreatic cancer in a large European prospective cohort study. Gut 2013, 62, 1764–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Brook, I.; Frazier, E.H. Microbiological analysis of pancreatic abscess. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1996, 22, 384–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Pirilä, E.; Sharabi, A.; Salo, T.; Quaranta, V.; Tu, H.; Heljasvaara, R.; Koshikawa, N.; Sorsa, T.; Maisi, P. Matrix metalloproteinases process the laminin-5 gamma 2-chain and regulate epithelial cell migration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 303, 1012–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rubinstein, M.R.; Wang, X.; Liu, W.; Hao, Y.; Cai, G.; Han, Y.W. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal carcinogenesis by modulating E-cadherin/β-catenin signaling via its FadA adhesin. Cell Host Microbe 2013, 14, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Abed, J.; Emgård, J.E.; Zamir, G.; Faroja, M.; Almogy, G.; Grenov, A.; Sol, A.; Naor, R.; Pikarsky, E.; Atlan, K.A.; et al. Fap2 Mediates Fusobacterium nucleatum Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Enrichment by Binding to Tumor-Expressed Gal-GalNAc. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 20, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hong, J.; Guo, F.; Lu, S.Y.; Shen, C.; Ma, D.; Zhang, X.; Xie, Y.; Yan, T.; Yu, T.; Sun, T.; et al. F. nucleatum targets lncRNA ENO1-IT1 to promote glycolysis and oncogenesis in colorectal cancer. Gut 2021, 70, 2123–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Didiasova, M.; Schaefer, L.; Wygrecka, M. When Place Matters: Shuttling of Enolase-1 Across Cellular Compartments. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 7, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Geng, F.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Pan, Y. Fusobacterium nucleatum Caused DNA Damage and Promoted Cell Proliferation by the Ku70/p53 Pathway in Oral Cancer Cells. DNA Cell Biol. 2020, 39, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Lamaa, A.; Le Bras, M.; Skuli, N.; Britton, S.; Frit, P.; Calsou, P.; Prats, H.; Cammas, A.; Millevoi, S. A novel cytoprotective function for the DNA repair protein Ku in regulating p53 mRNA translation and function. EMBO Rep. 2016, 17, 508–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Mari, P.O.; Florea, B.I.; Persengiev, S.P.; Verkaik, N.S.; Brüggenwirth, H.T.; Modesti, M.; Giglia-Mari, G.; Bezstarosti, K.; Demmers, J.A.; Luider, T.M.; et al. Dynamic assembly of end-joining complexes requires interaction between Ku70/80 and XRCC4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 18597–18602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Lu, Y.; Gao, J.; Lu, Y. Down-expression pattern of Ku70 and p53 coexisted in colorectal cancer. Med. Oncol. 2015, 32, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Podhorecka, M.; Skladanowski, A.; Bozko, P. H2AX Phosphorylation: Its Role in DNA Damage Response and Cancer Therapy. J. Nucleic Acids 2010, 2010, 920161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Schroder, K.; Tschopp, J. The inflammasomes. Cell 2010, 140, 821–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Fitzpatrick, S.G.; Katz, J. The association between periodontal disease and cancer: A review of the literature. J. Dent. 2010, 38, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tezal, M.; Grossi, S.G.; Genco, R.J. Is periodontitis associated with oral neoplasms? J. Periodontol. 2005, 76, 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gholizadeh, P.; Eslami, H.; Kafil, H.S. Carcinogenesis mechanisms of Fusobacterium nucleatum. Biomed. Pharmacother. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 89, 918–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, W.L.; Wang, S.S.; Wang, H.F.; Tang, Y.J.; Tang, Y.L.; Liang, X.H. Who is who in oral cancer? Exp Cell Res 2019, 384, 111634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhou, Z.; Chen, J.; Yao, H.; Hu, H. Fusobacterium and Colorectal Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Aral, K.; Milward, M.R.; Gupta, D.; Cooper, P.R. Effects of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum on inflammasomes and their regulators in H400 cells. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2020, 35, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yao, Y.; Shen, X.; Zhou, M.; Tang, B. Periodontal Pathogens Promote Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Regulating ATR and NLRP3 Inflammasome. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 722797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Dongre, A.; Weinberg, R.A. New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pastushenko, I.; Blanpain, C. EMT Transition States during Tumor Progression and Metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 2019, 29, 212–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Zhang, S.; Li, C.; Liu, J.; Geng, F.; Shi, X.; Li, Q.; Lu, Z.; Pan, Y. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transiton through regulation of the lncRNA MIR4435-2HG/miR-296-5p/Akt2/SNAI1 signaling pathway. FEBS J. 2020, 287, 4032–4047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Shao, W.; Fujiwara, N.; Mouri, Y.; Kisoda, S.; Yoshida, K.; Yoshida, K.; Yumoto, H.; Ozaki, K.; Ishimaru, N.; Kudo, Y. Conversion from epithelial to partial-EMT phenotype by Fusobacterium nucleatum infection promotes invasion of oral cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 14943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Mehana, E.E.; Khafaga, A.F.; El-Blehi, S.S. The role of matrix metalloproteinases in osteoarthritis pathogenesis: An updated review. Life Sci. 2019, 234, 116786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Viiklepp, K.; Nissinen, L.; Ojalill, M.; Riihilä, P.; Kallajoki, M.; Meri, S.; Heino, J.; Kähäri, V.M. C1r Upregulates Production of Matrix Metalloproteinase-13 and Promotes Invasion of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2022, 142, 1478–1488.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Johansson, N.; Ala-aho, R.; Uitto, V.; Grénman, R.; Fusenig, N.E.; López-Otín, C.; Kähäri, V.M. Expression of collagenase-3 (MMP-13) and collagenase-1 (MMP-1) by transformed keratinocytes is dependent on the activity of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J. Cell Sci. 2000, 113(Pt. 2), 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gursoy, U.K.; Könönen, E.; Uitto, V.J. Stimulation of epithelial cell matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-2, -9, -13) and interleukin-8 secretion by fusobacteria. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2008, 23, 432–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yu, T.; Guo, F.; Yu, Y.; Sun, T.; Ma, D.; Han, J.; Qian, Y.; Kryczek, I.; Sun, D.; Nagarsheth, N.; et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum Promotes Chemoresistance to Colorectal Cancer by Modulating Autophagy. Cell 2017, 170, 548–563.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Dower, C.M.; Bhat, N.; Gebru, M.T.; Chen, L.; Wills, C.A.; Miller, B.A.; Wang, H.G. Targeted Inhibition of ULK1 Promotes Apoptosis and Suppresses Tumor Growth and Metastasis in Neuroblastoma. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2018, 17, 2365–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Cao, P.; Chen, Y.; Guo, X.; Chen, Y.; Su, W.; Zhan, N.; Dong, W. Fusobacterium nucleatum Activates Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress to Promote Crohn’s Disease Development via the Upregulation of CARD3 Expression. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Magin, T.M.; Vijayaraj, P.; Leube, R.E. Structural and regulatory functions of keratins. Exp Cell Res 2007, 313, 2021–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Helfand, B.T.; Chang, L.; Goldman, R.D. Intermediate filaments are dynamic and motile elements of cellular architecture. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117 Pt 2, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Bayrak, R.; Yenidünya, S.; Haltas, H. Cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 20 expression in colorectal adenocarcinomas. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2011, 207, 156–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chen, S.; Su, T.; Zhang, Y.; Lee, A.; He, J.; Ge, Q.; Wang, L.; Si, J.; Zhuo, W.; Wang, L. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal cancer metastasis by modulating KRT7-AS/KRT7. Gut Microbes 2020, 11, 511–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Correction: Exosomes derived from Fusobacterium nucleatum-infected colorectal cancer cells facilitate tumour metastasis by selectively carrying miR-1246/92b-3p/27a-3p and CXCL16. Gut 2022, 71, e1–e3. [CrossRef]
  88. Fujiwara, N.; Kitamura, N.; Yoshida, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Ozaki, K.; Kudo, Y. Involvement of Fusobacterium Species in Oral Cancer Progression: A Literature Review Including Other Types of Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gur, C.; Maalouf, N.; Shhadeh, A.; Berhani, O.; Singer, B.B.; Bachrach, G.; Mandelboim, O. Fusobacterium nucleatum supresses anti-tumor immunity by activating CEACAM1. Oncoimmunology 2019, 8, e1581531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Borowsky, J.; Haruki, K.; Lau, M.C.; Dias Costa, A.; Väyrynen, J.P.; Ugai, T.; Arima, K.; da Silva, A.; Felt, K.D.; Zhao, M.; et al. Association of Fusobacterium nucleatum with Specific T-cell Subsets in the Colorectal Carcinoma Microenvironment. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2021, 27, 2816–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kostic, A.D.; Chun, E.; Robertson, L.; Glickman, J.N.; Gallini, C.A.; Michaud, M.; Clancy, T.E.; Chung, D.C.; Lochhead, P.; Hold, G.L.; et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum potentiates intestinal tumorigenesis and modulates the tumor-immune microenvironment. Cell Host Microbe 2013, 14, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Z. Immune induction identified by TMT proteomics analysis in Fusobacterium nucleatum autoinducer-2 treated macrophages. Expert Rev. Proteomics. 2020, 17, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bioengineering 09 00285 g001 550
Figure 1. Underlying mechanism of Fusobacterium nucleatum pathogenesis in digestive tract cancers. FadA, Fusobacterium adhesin A; Fap2, Fusobacterium autotransporter; ENO1-IT1, enolase1-intronic transcript 1; KAT7-AS, keratin 7-antisense; KAT7, keratin 7; ENO1, enolase1; DSB, DNA double-strand break; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; ASC, apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD; AIM2, absent in Melanoma; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; MMPs, matrix metalloproteinases; TIGIT, T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain; NK, natural killer; CEACAM1, carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules 1; AI-2, autoinducer-2; TNFSF9, tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 9.
Figure 1. Underlying mechanism of Fusobacterium nucleatum pathogenesis in digestive tract cancers. FadA, Fusobacterium adhesin A; Fap2, Fusobacterium autotransporter; ENO1-IT1, enolase1-intronic transcript 1; KAT7-AS, keratin 7-antisense; KAT7, keratin 7; ENO1, enolase1; DSB, DNA double-strand break; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; ASC, apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD; AIM2, absent in Melanoma; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; MMPs, matrix metalloproteinases; TIGIT, T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain; NK, natural killer; CEACAM1, carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules 1; AI-2, autoinducer-2; TNFSF9, tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 9.
Bioengineering 09 00285 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lai, Y.; Mi, J.; Feng, Q. Fusobacterium nucleatum and Malignant Tumors of the Digestive Tract: A Mechanistic Overview. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070285

AMA Style

Lai Y, Mi J, Feng Q. Fusobacterium nucleatum and Malignant Tumors of the Digestive Tract: A Mechanistic Overview. Bioengineering. 2022; 9(7):285. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070285

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lai, Yue, Jun Mi, and Qiang Feng. 2022. "Fusobacterium nucleatum and Malignant Tumors of the Digestive Tract: A Mechanistic Overview" Bioengineering 9, no. 7: 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070285

APA Style

Lai, Y., Mi, J., & Feng, Q. (2022). Fusobacterium nucleatum and Malignant Tumors of the Digestive Tract: A Mechanistic Overview. Bioengineering, 9(7), 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070285

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop