Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Impact of Closure Type on Wine Ratings and Mood
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of the Different Variables for the Development of a Cucumber-Based Blended Herbal Beverage
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biochemical and Microbiological Changes during the Ivorian Sorghum Beer Deterioration at Different Storage Temperatures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Acid and Volatiles of Commercially-Available Lambic Beers

by
Katherine Thompson Witrick
,
Susan E. Duncan
,
Ken E. Hurley
and
Sean F. O’Keefe
*
Department of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Beverages 2017, 3(4), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages3040051
Submission received: 10 January 2017 / Revised: 3 October 2017 / Accepted: 6 October 2017 / Published: 26 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Beer)

Abstract

Lambic beer is the oldest style of beer still being produced in the Western world using spontaneous fermentation. Gueuze is a style of lambic beer prepared by mixing young (one year) and older (two to three years) beers. Little is known about the volatiles and semi-volatiles found in commercial samples of gueuze lambic beers. SPME was used to extract the volatiles from nine different brands of lambic beer. GC-MS was used for the separation and identification of the compounds extracted with SPME. The pH and color were measured using standard procedures. A total of 50 compounds were identified in the nine brands. Seventeen of the 50 compounds identified have been previously identified. The compounds identified included a number of different chemical groups such as acids, alcohols, phenols, ketones, aldehydes, and esters. Ethyl acetate, 4-ethylphenol, and 4-ethylguaiacol are known by-products of the yeast, Brettanomyces, which is normally a spoilage microorganism in beer and wine, but important for the flavor characteristics of lambic beer. There were no differences in pH, but there were differences in color between the beer samples.
Keywords: lambic beer; solid-phase microextraction; gas chromatography lambic beer; solid-phase microextraction; gas chromatography

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Thompson Witrick, K.; Duncan, S.E.; Hurley, K.E.; O’Keefe, S.F. Acid and Volatiles of Commercially-Available Lambic Beers. Beverages 2017, 3, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages3040051

AMA Style

Thompson Witrick K, Duncan SE, Hurley KE, O’Keefe SF. Acid and Volatiles of Commercially-Available Lambic Beers. Beverages. 2017; 3(4):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages3040051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thompson Witrick, Katherine, Susan E. Duncan, Ken E. Hurley, and Sean F. O’Keefe. 2017. "Acid and Volatiles of Commercially-Available Lambic Beers" Beverages 3, no. 4: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages3040051

APA Style

Thompson Witrick, K., Duncan, S. E., Hurley, K. E., & O’Keefe, S. F. (2017). Acid and Volatiles of Commercially-Available Lambic Beers. Beverages, 3(4), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages3040051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop