Next Article in Journal
The Association between Oral Health Management and the Functional Independence Measure Scores at the Time of Admission of Inpatients to a Convalescent Hospital
Previous Article in Journal
Can Leucine Supplementation Improve Frailty Index Scores?
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Quantitative Assessment of Balance Function Characteristics in Older Patients with Orthostatic Hypotension

Geriatrics 2023, 8(5), 103; https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics8050103
by Yao Cui 1, Bo Liu 1,2,*, Jian Zhou 1, Qian Liu 1 and Hui Ye 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Geriatrics 2023, 8(5), 103; https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics8050103
Submission received: 11 September 2023 / Revised: 2 October 2023 / Accepted: 13 October 2023 / Published: 18 October 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

On behalf of my co-authors, I would like to thank you for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions. Based on your modification suggestions, we make the following response.

  1. In the abstract I would just specify the number of OH vs non-OH patients. I believe this information is more relevant than the total number of participants.

 

Answer: Thanks for the suggestion, I added the number of people in each group to the summary

 

  1. Section 2.4: the CDP should be described in more detail. In particular there are no information about how SOM, VIS and VEST are computed. This is an important information

 

Answer: I have added the calculations for SOM, VIS, and VEST to section 2.4.1

 

  1. The quality of Figure 1 needs to be improved. Please use vector format to avoid loss of quality. Also, it is not clear what FALL on the vertical axis means in this context and why there are two red bars and the other are green.

 

Answer: I have modified Figure 1 and added annotations, hoping to meet your requirements. The vertical axis represents the fall score. A score of 100 indicated a small swing in the body's center of gravity, while a score of 0 indicated a fall or approaching the limit of balance. Under 6 conditions, the computer automatically calculates SOM, VIS, and VEST scores, with green indicating normal, red abnormal and N/S undetectable.

 

4.Table I. The caption says that values are presented as median (interquartile range) but it seems rather mean ± standard deviation.

 

Answer: Yes, I made an error, it should be "mean ± standard deviation “.

 

  1. The quality of Figure 2 should be improved as well.

 

Answer: I have modified Figure 2

 

  1. Minor: the affiliation next to the authors’ name should be superscripted i.e.

Answer: Yes, I made the modifications. Thank you

Reviewer 2 Report

I would like to thank authors for clear and well presented study on computerized dynamic posturography of balance function characteristics in older patients with Orthostatic Hypotension.   

I have two comments regarding manuscript:

1) The tittle of article emphasizes the quantitative assessment of balance functions but the assessment  done by particular devices and six test conditions. Therefore I would suggest to consider to emphasize particular methodology used in assessment computerized dynamic posturography).

2) The study includes also laboratory tests which gives no statistically different results between the two study groups. Unfortunately, there was no clear explanation or reasoning described why laboratory tests were used for the study.

Author Response

On behalf of my co-authors, I would like to thank you for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions. Based on your modification suggestions, we make the following response.

1) The tittle of article emphasizes the quantitative assessment of balance functions but the assessment done by particular devices and six test conditions. Therefore,I would suggest to consider to emphasize particular methodology used in assessment computerized dynamic posturography).

 

Answer: Your comments were incredibly helpful, and as a result, I have included a description of CDP at the beginning of the third and fourth paragraphs of the discussion. It is hoped that this will highlight the significance of CDP in quantitative evaluation. The content of the conclusion has also been added accordingly. Thank you so much.

 

2) The study includes also laboratory tests which gives no statistically different results between the two study groups. Unfortunately, there was no clear explanation or reasoning described why laboratory tests were used for the study.

 

Answer: Thank you for your question. Hypertension, diabetes,and low levels of 25hydroxyvitamin D are also risk factors for OH. Therefore, in the second half of the fourth paragraph of the discussion, we analyze the laboratory indicators. As there is no statistical difference between the two groups, they are not the main factors influencing OH.

Back to TopTop