Next Article in Journal
Efficacy of Essential Oil Vapours in Reducing Postharvest Rots and Effect on the Fruit Mycobiome of Nectarines
Previous Article in Journal
Inhibition of Microbicidal Activity of Canine Macrophages DH82 Cell Line by Capsular Polysaccharides from Cryptococcus neoformans
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 10
Issue 5
10.3390/jof10050338
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of MrwetA on Sexual Reproduction and Secondary Metabolism of Monascus ruber M7 Based on Transcriptome Analysis

by
Yuyun Huang
1,2,3,†,
Lili Jia
1,2,3,† and
Fusheng Chen
1,2,3,*
1
National Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Hubei International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Traditional Fermented Foods, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
3
College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Fungi 2024, 10(5), 338; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10050338
Submission received: 16 April 2024 / Revised: 3 May 2024 / Accepted: 6 May 2024 / Published: 8 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Fungal Cell Biology, Metabolism and Physiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
wetA, one of the conidiation center regulatory genes in many filamentous fungi, plays an important role in promoting asexual spores (conidia) maturation. Our recent research has found that knocking out or overexpressing MrwetA (a homolog of wetA) in Monascus ruber M7 does not affect the development of its asexual spores like other fungi, but both repress the development of its sexual spores (ascospores). However, the mechanism remains unclear. In this study, the function of MrwetA on sexual reproduction and secondary metabolism in M. ruber M7 was confirmed by a complementary experiment. Moreover, the regulatory roles of MrwetA in modulating the expression of genes involved in sexual reproduction, meiosis, and biosynthesis of Monascus pigment and citrinin were analyzed based on the transcriptional data. These results not only contribute to clarifying the regulation of the reproduction and secondary metabolism of Monascus spp., but also to enriching the regulation molecular mechanism of reproduction in filamentous fungi.

1. Introduction

Monascus spp., a sort of filamentous fungi used to produce fermented foods and medicines, possess a history of application for nearly 2000 years in China and other Asian countries [1,2]. Monascus spp. are highly valued due to their ability to produce a diverse range of beneficial secondary metabolites, such as Monascus pigments (MPs) used as food colorants [3,4], and monacolin K (MK), a functional ingredient for lowering blood pressure [5]. Although some Monascus strains may also produce citrinin (CIT) [6], the CIT issue in Monascus-relative products has been well controlled through the unremitting efforts of scientists [7,8,9,10]. Over the past decades, numerous studies have investigated the biosynthesis of MPs, CIT, and MK in Monascus spp. And their gene clusters and biosynthesis pathways have been well-established [1,11,12,13]. However, due to the long fermentation time of Monascus-relative products, their production cost is often high and they are prone to contamination by miscellaneous microorganisms, resulting in food safety issues. Therefore, how to promote the growth of Monascus strains, and shorten their fermentation time is a major challenge at present [14].
Monascus spp. can produce asexual (conidia) and sexual (ascospores) spores, and both spores are very important for Monascus reproduction and growth [15]. The mechanisms by which the Monascus genus produces asexual and sexual spores were previously believed to be similar to the Aspergillus genus due to their close phylogenesis [16,17,18]. However, our recent research has found that in the Monascus genomes, there is no homologous of abaA, one of the core asexual development regulatory genes [19]. Additionally, our findings indicate that MrwetA, homologous of another central asexual development regulatory gene wetA, is not involved in regulating asexual spore production but rather plays a role in sexual reproduction in M. ruber M7 [20]. Former research revealed that wetA played a conserved role in conidial maturation and cell wall synthesis in Aspergillus spp., including A. nidulans, A. fumigatus, A. oryzae, and A. flavus [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Furthermore, wetA has been widely reported to function in forming asexual spores not only restricted to Aspergillus spp. [27,28], but also in a wide range of Ascomycota strains, including Penicillium chrysogenum, P. digitatum, Metarhizium robertsii, and Beauveria bassiana [29,30,31,32,33]. Although a recent study revealed that deletion of wetA caused 52%, 57%, and 43% of all genes differentially expressed in A. nidulans, A. fumigatus, and A. flavus [34], there is no direct evidence that wetA may participate in the sexual cycle. Our recent research first reported that MrwetA could regulate its sexual development, with both the deletant and overexpression mutants [20]. However, the mechanism remains unclear.
In this study, at first, MrwetA was complemented to MrwetA knockout mutant and its phenotypes were compared with those of M. ruber M7 and MrwetA knockout mutant. Furthermore, the differentially expressed genes between MrwetA knockout and M. ruber M7 were systematically analyzed to reveal the underlying mechanism. The results revealed that MrwetA did affect the sexual development and secondary metabolites by regulating the expression levels of genes involved in sexual reproduction, meiosis, and the biosynthesis of MPs and CIT in M. ruber M7. These findings will help to clarify the regulatory mechanisms of the reproduction and secondary metabolism of Monascus spp.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains and Culture Conditions

M. ruber M7 (CCAM 070120, Culture Collection of State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Wuhan, China), which is used as the wild strain (WT) and can produce MPs and CIT [35]. ΔMrwetA, is a knockout strain with hph as resistance marker [20], Both strains are described in Table 1.
Potato dextrose agar (PDA), malt extract agar (MA), Czapek yeast extract agar (CYA), and 25% glycerol nitrate agar (G25N) were utilized for morphological characteristics. PDA medium was used for the analyses of MPs and CIT production. Inducing medium (IM) was used to activate Agrobacterium tumefaciens before co-culture, and coculture-inducing medium (Co-IM) was used to generate mutants for the co-culture process. To select mutants, PDA supplied with 15 μg/mL G418 sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai, China) was used to isolate neomycin-resistant transformants. All strains were maintained on PDA slants at 28 °C.

2.2. Construction of the MrwetA Complemented Strain

In our recent research, the mutants of knocking out and overexpressing MrwetA were prepared [20]. In this study, the MrwetA complementation strain was constructed, according to the strategy of homologous recombination [36,37]. The genomic DNA of M7 was used to amplify the complete MrwetA gene sequence (1659 bp), 5′ flanking region (1052 bp), and 3′ flanking region (915 bp). neo (neomycin phosphotransferase resistance gene, 1221 bp) as the selected maker was amplified from plasmid pKNI. hph (hygromycin-B resistance marker gene, 2137 bp) as a maker for screening ΔMrwetA. The relevant primer pairs are shown in Table S1.
The construction steps of the complementation strain are as follows. Firstly, these cloned DNA fragments were ligated to plasmid pCAMBIA3300 (digested with Sal I and Hind III) by using pEASY®-Basic Seamless Cloning and Assembly Kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) to form plasmid pCCMrwetA. The construction procedure is shown in Figure S1. Secondly, the plasmid pCCMrwetA was transformed into A. tumefaciens EHA105 using a freeze-thaw method. Finally, the A. tumefaciens EHA105 clones containing pCCMrwetA were incubated for transformation with the ∆MrwetA strain to generate the MrwetA complementation strains (∆MrwetA::MrwetA).

2.3. Observations of Sexual Reproduction

Referred to Jia et al. [20], WT, ΔMrwetA, and ΔMrwetA::MrwetA strains were cultured for 9 d at 28 °C to observe microscopic morphologies on PDA, CYA, G25N, and MA. To measure the number of cleistothecia and ascospores, freshly harvested spores (1 × 105/mL) from each strain were inoculated in a PDA plate covered with sterile cellophane and incubated at 28 °C. Samples collected at every 4 d from the 3rd to the 11th d were scraped. The cleistothecia were counted using a five-point sampling method. Colonies with an area of 1 per cm2 were collected from each point, washed with 1 mL of sterile water, and counted under a microscope. And the number of ascospores was counted after breaking the cleistothecia.

2.4. Detection of Monascus Pigments and Citrinin

To detect the yield of MPs and CIT, 200 μL freshly harvested spores (1 × 105/mL) from each strain were inoculated onto Pa DA plate covered with sterile cellophane and incubated at 28 °C for 11 d. Hyphae and media were respectively collected at every 2 d from the 3rd to the 11th d, and freeze-dried. Then, the freeze-dried hyphae (20 mg) and media (20 mg) were separately ground into powder. Then, 1.5 mL of 80% (v/v) methanol (chromatographic grade) was added and mixed to extract under ultrasonic (KQ-250B, Kunshan, China) for 30 min at 30 °C. After centrifugation at 12,000× g for 10 min, the supernatants were used for measuring MPs and CIT.
The supernatant solution was diluted to an appropriate concentration with 80% methanol, and 80% (v/v) methanol was used as the control (CK). The yellow MPs, orange MPs, and red MPs were detected at 380 nm, 470 nm, and 520 nm using a UV-visible spectro-photometer (UV-1700, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). Then, absorption values were multiplied by the dilution factor to obtain the yields of yellow, orange, and red MPs. In addition, the CIT content was determined by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with the fluorescence detector (UPLC-FLR) following our previous paper [38].

2.5. RNA Extraction and RNA Sequencing

WT and ΔMrwetA were incubated at 28 °C on a cellophane-covered PDA plate. Two replicates were conducted for each strain. The fresh hyphae were obtained on the 3rd, 5th, and 7th d, respectively. The total RNA was extracted by using TransZol Up Plus RNA Kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China). RNA sequencing was performed on DNBSEQ high-throughput sequencing platform (BGI, Wuhan, China, http://en.genomics.cn/ (accessed on 8 January 2022)). The isolation of RNA, construction of libraries, sequencing, data filtering, and quality control were performed according to the platform’s operation guides. The reference genome is the genome of M. ruber M7 sequenced by our lab [1].
Gene expression levels were calculated as RNA-Seq by Expectation-Maximization (RSEM) [39]. The normalized value of fragments per kilobase transcript fragment per million map readings (FPKM) was used as a parameter to compare expression levels between WT and ΔMrwetA. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected by DEseq software package (DEseq 2) [40]. DEGs were selected based on the standard of gene fold change (FC) ≥1.5 (|log2 FC| ≥ 0.5849) and Q value (adjusted p-value) ≤ 0.05. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG, https://www.kegg.jp/ (accessed on 23 April 2022)) pathway is a database resource for understanding the high-level function and utility of biological systems, allowing analysis of the function of DEGs and the metabolic pathways involved. In addition, genes involved in fungal sexual reproduction and secondary metabolism were further analyzed to elucidate the role of MrwetA in sexual reproduction and secondary metabolism in M. ruber M7.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

p values were determined by using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. A significance level of p < 0.05 was labeled with *, while p < 0.01 was denoted with **. Origin 2022 was utilized for graph plotting and statistical analysis. Error bars given in the figures represent the standard error.

3. Results

3.1. Construction of the MrwetA Complemented Strain

Following the successful transformation of the constructed and verified recombinant vector (Figure S2) into ΔMrwetA, colonies with resistance to G418 sulfate were selected and subsequent PCR was conducted (primers in Table S2) to screen the complemented strains. MrwetA knockout strains were constructed in the previous study, and hph was used as the resistance screening marker [20]. Putative target transformants were discerned by the amplification of MrwetA, neo, and hph fragments with lengths consistent with the expected sizes (Figure S3). In addition, PCR analysis confirmed the presence of MrwetA ORF and neo sequences as well as the absence of the hygromycin B sequence.

3.2. Reproduction Observations of M. ruber M 7 and Its MrwetA Modified Strains

Compared to M. ruber M7 (WT), ΔMrwetA, and ΔMrwetA::MrwetA exhibited no significant difference in conidial microscope morphologies across the four media (PDA, MA, CYA, and G25N), which are commonly used for morphological observation of Monascus spp. and cleistothecia could only be observed when cultivated on PDA and MA. As shown in Figure 1, the cleistothecia were similar in the WT and ΔMrwetA::MrwetA, whereas the sizes of cleistothecia were smaller in ΔMrwetA compared to them.
The morphologies and yields of cleistothecia were analyzed from the 3rd d to the 11th d, to determine whether MrwetA delays or inhibits sexual development. The cleistothecia size in both WT and ΔMrwetA::MrwetA steadily increased from the 3rd to the 11th d. However, in ΔMrwetA, there was no significant change observed in cleistothecia size as time progressed, which remained smaller compared to that in the WT (Figure 2A). As shown in Figure 2B,C, the number of cleistothecia and ascospores was significantly reduced in ΔMrwetA compared to those in WT, whereas this defect could be restored in ΔMrwetA::MrwetA. Specifically, the number of cleistothecia in WT reached 36.93 ± 1.54/cm2, 104.67 ± 18.05/cm2, and 177.67 ± 2.38/cm2 on the 3rd, 7th, and 11th d, respectively, which was 1.33, 1.58, and 2.43 times higher than its yield in ΔMrwetA. Correspondingly, the WT ascospore numbers reached (2.21 ± 0.57) × 105 (per cm2) and (4.14 ± 0.58) × 105 (per cm2) on the 7th and 11th d, respectively, which were 96.22 and 129.50 times of that in ΔMrwetA.

3.3. MPs and CIT Analysis of WT and Its MrwetA Modified Strains

The effects of MrwetA deletion on secondary metabolites were investigated by assessing the production of MPs and CIT, as illustrated in Figure 3. Compared to the WT, ΔMrwetA exhibited no significant difference in yellow, orange, and red MP yields during the early stage (3 d–5 d), but showed an increase on the 7th and 11th d, while the MPs content of ΔMrwetA::MrwetA closely resembled that of WT across different time points (Figure 3A–C). In addition, the yield of CIT in ΔMrwetA was significantly increased at all time points compared to those in the WT, with no significant difference observed in ΔMrwetA::MrwetA (Figure 3D). The yield of total MPs and citrinin in the MrwetA overexpressed strain was higher on the 7th d compared to WT, similar to the ΔMrwetA [20]. In summary, the deletion of MrwetA resulted in enhanced MP production in the later period and CIT production in all observed time points.

3.4. The Transcriptomic Analysis of WT and ΔMrwetA

High-throughput sequencing technology was used to elucidate the mechanism of MrwetA in M7 on the transcription level. Based on the previous findings [20] and the results in this study, the deletion of MrwetA disturbed the sexual development and secondary metabolites, while complementation of MrwetA restored these disturbances, verifying the important role of MrwetA in the strain. As described by Yang et al. [41], when cultivated on PDA, M7 was at a logarithmic phase on the 3rd d, followed by stable growth from the 4th to the 7th d, and subsequently entering the decline phase after the 7th d. Consequently, samples were collected and analyzed on the 3rd, 5th, and 7th d in this study.

3.4.1. Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes

The screened differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed as shown in Figure 4, compared to WT, the number of up-regulated and down-regulated DEGs in ΔMrwetA were 285 and 386 on the 3rd d (Figure 4A), 616 and 844 on the 5th d (Figure 4B), 690 and 1013 on the 7th d (Figure 4C), respectively. In addition, the number of common DEGs was 163 at all time points (Figure 4D). In summary, the number of DEGs increased along with cultivation, and the number of down-regulated DEGs was more than that of up-regulated DEGs at all time points. This trend indicates a potential stronger involvement of MrwetA in the up-regulation of gene expression.

3.4.2. KEGG Pathway Enrichment Analysis of DEGs

The functions of DEGs at three time points (3rd, 5th, and 7th d) were investigated from five categories by KEGG pathway, including cellular processes, environmental information processing, genetic information processing, metabolism, and organismal systems. Transport and catabolism, signal transduction, folding, sorting and degradation, carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid metabolism, lipid metabolism, and global and overview maps were the main KEGG subcategories in which DEGs were involved (Figure S4). On the 3rd d, key pathways enriched with DEGs included glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, riboflavin metabolism, and thiamine metabolism (Figure 5A). Subsequently, on the 5th and 7th d, major pathways enriched with DEGs were similar, including biosynthesis of antibiotics, biosynthesis of amino acids, amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, and glycine, serine and threonine metabolism (Figure 5B,C).

3.4.3. Effects of MrwetA on Sexual Reproduction

As evidenced in Figure 2, the deletion of MrwetA inhibited the development of sexual structure cleistothecia. Both M7 and the model fungus A. nidulans belong to Aspergillaceae family and share a similar sexual reproductive process. Sexual reproduction is a complex biological process that requires the participation of many genes. To elucidate the molecular groundwork, BLASTP was used to identify homologues of sexual development-related genes, verified in A. nidulans, in the M7 genome (Table S3). Furthermore, the DEGs involved in M7 sexual reproduction were analyzed in six subgroups (Mating processes, signal transduction, perception of environmental signals, transcription factors, regulatory proteins, and fruiting body maturation) as shown in Figure 6.
Mating-type (MAT) genes and genes related to signal transduction pathways play a crucial role in regulating fungal sexual reproduction. In comparison with the M7, MAT1-2 expression levels were down-regulated on the 5th and 7th d, and pheromone receptor preA (regulated by MAT1-2) expression levels were down-regulated on the 3rd and 5th d in the deletant (Figure 6A). G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), possessing seven transmembrane structures, are activated upon binding to pheromones and then bind to heterotrimeric G proteins. In G protein signaling pathway, the expression levels of gprD-1 (encoding GPCR) were elevated on the 3rd and 5th d. In addition, the expression levels of flbA (regulator of G protein signaling) and gprD-2 (encoding GPCR) were also elevated in ΔMrwetA on the 5th d, while the opposite was observed for rasA (GTPase) (Figure 6B). Moreover, in the MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) cascade signaling pathway, the expression levels of rsp5 (E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase) and ste11 (mitogen-activated protein kinase) were down-regulated at different time points, while the other genes were up-regulated on the 5th and 7th d (Figure 6C). Among DEGs related to fruiting body maturation as shown in Figure 6D, only the expression level of vosA (trehalose production) decreased on the 5th and 7th d.
Light and nutrient factors in the environment serve as important signals for the fungal sexual reproduction process. As shown in Figure 6E, the expression levels of veA and velB related to light response increased on the 5th and 7th d, while the opposite was observed for silG. Changes in the expression levels of lsdA, phoA, An-pho80, and fhbA related to nutrient perception varied across time points. In addition, the expression levels of esdC, which regulates early sexual development, increased on the 5th and 7th d. On the other hand, DEGs related to various physiological processes (Figure 6F) demonstrated decreased expression levels of noxA (NADPH oxidase), mutA (α-1,3 glucanase/mutanase), and hxtA (high-affinity hexose transporter) on the 3rd d compared with WT. Moreover, the expression of noxA was increased on the 5th and 7th d.
Transcription factors and genes related to fruiting body maturation are indispensable from the mating process to the maturation of cleistothecia. In transcription factors, compared with WT, the expression levels of nsdD and fhpA decreased on the 3rd d; On the 5th d, the expression levels of nsdC, nosA, and flbC increased, while medA decreased; on the 7th d, both nosA expression levels increased, in contrast to fhpA (Figure 6G).
In summary, MrwetA regulated various genes associated with the sexual reproduction of M7, consistent with the findings presented in Figure 2.

3.4.4. Effects of MrwetA on Meiosis

During sexual reproduction in fungi, the formation of haploid spores requires meiosis. As depicted in Figure 7, five DEGs (cdc28, snf1, ume6, dbf4, and sok2) were detected during the Premeiotic S phase and prophase, three DEGs (hop1, cdc28, and ndt80) during meiosis I, and three DEGs (cdc20, ama1, and cdc15) during meiosis II. Additionally, five DEGs (clb3/4, slk19, rad24, rad9, and cdc14) were detected between meiosis I and meiosis II. Compared with WT, the expression levels of cdc28, ndt80, and cdc15 were decreased on the 3rd d. Furthermore, the number of DEGs on the 5th and 7th d significantly exceeded that of the 3rd d, with a consistent expression trend observed at both time points, predominantly characterized by decreased expression levels among the majority of DEGs. These changes in DEGs involved in meiosis align with the morphology and yield changes in cleistothecia and ascospores.

3.4.5. Effects of MrwetA on Secondary Metabolites

MPs and CIT are the main secondary metabolites in M7 and deletion of MrwetA disturbed the yield of these products. To elucidate the underlying mechanism, the genes involved in the biosynthesis of MPs and CIT [11,12,13] were analyzed (Figure 8). Compared with WT, there was no significant difference in the expression level of genes related to MPs biosynthesis on the 3rd d in ΔMrwetA (Figure 8A). However, the expression levels of MrPigA-G and MrPigJ-P were significantly higher on the 5th and 7th d, while the expression level of MrPigI decreased only on the 7th d.
According to He and Cox. [11], key genes in the CIT major biosynthetic pathway include pksCT, mrl1, mrl2, mrl4, mrl6, and mrl7. As depicted in Figure 8B, the expression levels of mrl1, mrl2, mrl5, and mrl7 increased on the 3rd d, mrl3 and mrl5-7 on the 5th d, pksCT, mrl1-3, and mrl7 on the 7th d in ΔMrwetA compared with WT. These changes in MPs and CIT biosynthesis-related genes were consistent with the increased yield of MPs and CIT, indicating that MrwetA regulated the production of MPs and CIT through the biosynthesis pathway.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

Based on the previous findings [20], deletion of MrwetA hindered sexual development and affected the yield of secondary metabolites, while complementation of MrwetA totally restored these observed disorders, verifying its role in sexual development and biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. On the other hand, MrwetA deletants and overexpressed mutants both exhibited defects in asexual development [20]. This pattern of consistent phenotypes resulting from both deletion and overexpression is also observed in genes in other fungi, where the strict expression levels of these genes are crucial either for their own functionality [43,44] or for their involvement in the formation of protein complexes [45] essential for an organism to form protein complexes for organisms. Although this study confirmed the important role of M7, especially for the cleistothecia, further investigation is needed to determine whether it works through complex or solely. Furthermore, in this study, 1703 DEGs (|log2 FC| ≥ 0.5849, Q value ≤ 0.05) were detected on the 7th d, accounting for 22.2% of all genes (9% up-regulated and 13.2% down-regulated) of all genes. However, the RNA-seq data showed that after wetA deletion, DEGs (|log2 FC| ≥ 1, Q value ≤ 0.05) accounted for 52% (28% up-regulated and 24% down-regulated), 57% (30% up-regulated and 27% down-regulated), 43% (21.6% up-regulated and 21.4% down-regulated) of all genes in A. nidulans, A. fumigatus, and A. flavus, respectively [34]. The percentage of wetA-regulated genes in M7 was significantly lower than those in the aforementioned species. Additionally, a larger proportion of down-regulated genes was observed, suggesting a unique regulatory network of wetA in M7.
wetA has been reported to regulate asexual reproduction in various filamentous fungi such as A. nidulans, A. fumigatus, F. graminearum, and B. bassiana [25,30,46,47]. However, disruption of it in M7 hindered sexual reproduction and showed no effect on asexual reproduction [20]. The underlying mechanism remains elusive, because of the complexity of sexual reproduction involving numerous genes. Referred to Dyer and O’Gorman [17], the genes related to sexual reproduction in M7 also can be categorized into six groups (Mating processes, signal transduction, perception of environmental signals, transcription factors, regulatory proteins, and fruiting body maturation).
MAT genes play a pivotal role in fungal sexual reproduction, orchestrating the expression of pheromone-related genes and GPCRs, which are pivotal for downstream signaling cascades, including the MAPK pathway, essential for sexual development [48,49,50]. In this study, there have been alterations in the expression levels of MAT1-2, gprD, rasA, and ste11, which are involved in MAT processes, GPCRs, and the MAPK pathway, respectively. Furthermore, environmental signal reception, transcription factors, endogenous physiological processes and genes related to fruiting body maturation also participate in the process of sexual reproduction. In our study, expression changes in genes related to these processes were identified, suggesting their involvement in sexual reproduction regulation. For instance, changes in the expression of vosA and noxA genes imply alterations in trehalose production and redox reactions, respectively, influencing cleistothecia development.
Meiosis is another necessary process for the sexual reproduction of haploid spores in filamentous fungi. In budding yeast, specific transcription factors such as ime1 initiate the meiosis process, subsequently regulating the expression of genes including ime2 and cdc28 to promote meiosis [51,52]. Based on RNA-Seq data, the expression levels of cdc28, ndt80, and cdc15 were significantly decreased on the 3rd d, while the number of down-regulated genes increased on the 5th and 7th d. This suggests a delayed onset of meiosis-related gene expression in ΔMrwetA, potentially contributing to the observed reduction in cleistothecia and ascospores.
In addition to interfering with sexual reproduction, MrwetA also affects the biosynthesis of MPs and CIT. The biosynthesis of MPs and CIT is regulated by various genes including MrpigA-P and pksCT, mrl1-7 [12,13,53,54,55,56,57]. In this study, the yield of MPs in ΔMrwetA was elevated compared to WT on the 7th d, accompanied by increased expression of MrpigA (polyketide synthase pksPT), MrpigB (transcription factor), MrpigC (C-11-ketoreductase), MrpigD (4-O-acyltransferase), MrpigE (NAD(P)H-dependent oxidoreductase), MrpigF (FAD-dependent oxidoreductase), MrpigG (serine hydrolase), MrpigJ (FAS alpha subunit), MrpigK (FAS beta subunit), MrpigL (ankyrin repeat protein), MrpigM (O-acetyltransferase), MrpigN (FAD-dependent monooxygenase), MrpigO (deacetylase), and MrpigP (MFS multidrug transporter) on the 5th and 7th d (Figure 8A). According to Li et al. [13] and Chen et al. [12], MrpigA, MrpigC-G, MrpigJ-K, MrpigM, and MrpigO have been confirmed to be directly involved in the biosynthetic pathway of MPs. Similarly, CIT production increased in ΔMrwetA, correlating with the upregulated genes including pksCT (polyketide synthase), mrl1 (serine hydrolase), mrl2 (oxoglutarate/iron-dependent dioxygenase), mrl4 (aldehyde dehydrogenase), mrl6 (short-chain dehydrogenase), and mrl7 (glucose-methanol-choline oxidoreductase). The above results indicate that MrwetA can change MPs and CIT yield by regulating the expression of the biosynthesis gene.
In summary, our findings underscore the role of MrwetA in the sexual development and secondary metabolism of M7. By affecting the expression of genes involved in sexual reproduction, meiosis, and secondary metabolite biosynthesis, MrwetA contributes to the regulatory network governing these processes. These insights advanced our understanding of reproduction and metabolism in M7, while also broadening our knowledge of wetA function and sexual reproduction regulation in filamentous fungi.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof10050338/s1, Figure S1. Schematic diagram of constructing transformation plasmid pCCMrwetA. Figure S2. Verification of PCR products and vector on MrwetA complementation cassette. Figure S3. PCR verification of MrwetA complementation strain. Figure S4. KEGG Pathway classification of DGEs. Table S1. Primers used in the construction of MrwetA complementation strain. Table S2. Primer combinations and expected sizes for validation of ΔMrwetA::MrwetA strains. Table S3. Homologues of sexual reproduction related genes of Aspergillus nidulans in Monascus ruber M7.

Author Contributions

Y.H.: formal analysis, writing—original draft. L.J.: methodology, writing—draft and editing. F.C.: project administration, supervision, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31730068 and 31330059).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, W.; He, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Shao, Y.; Feng, Y.; Li, M.; Chen, F. Edible filamentous fungi from the species Monascus: Early traditional fermentations, modern molecular biology, and future genomics. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2015, 14, 555–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, M.; Li, L.; Feng, Y.; Chen, W.; He, Y.; Liu, J.; Lei, M.; Liu, Q.; Shao, Y.; Chen, F. Historic and charming Monascus spp. Chin. Sci.Bull. 2023, 68, 479–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Patakova, P. Monascus secondary metabolites: Production and biological activity. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 40, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chen, W.; Feng, Y.; Molnar, I.; Chen, F. Nature and nurture: Confluence of pathway determinism with metabolic and chemical serendipity diversifies Monascus azaphilone pigments. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2019, 36, 561–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Endo, A. Compactin (ML-236B) and related compounds as potential cholesterol-lowering agents that inhibit HMG-CoA reductase. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 8, 401–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Blanc, P.; Laussac, J.P.; Le Bars, J.; Le Bars, P.; Loret, M.O.; Pareilleux, A.; Prome, D.; Prome, J.C.; Santerre, A.L.; Goma, G. Characterization of monascidin A from Monascus as citrinin. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1995, 27, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Feng, Y.; Shao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, F. Production and optimization of monacolin K by citrinin-free Monascus pilosus MS-1 in solid-state fermentation using non-glutinous rice and soybean flours as substrate. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2014, 239, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kang, B.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Park, S. Production of citrinin-free Monascus pigments by submerged culture at low pH. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2014, 55, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Shi, J.; Qin, X.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, X.; Yu, X.; Feng, Y. Strategies to enhance the production efficiency of Monascus pigments and control citrinin contamination. Process Biochem. 2022, 117, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. He, Y.; Zhu, L.; Dong, X.; Li, A.; Xu, S.; Wang, L.; Shao, Y. Metabolic regulation of two pksCT gene transcripts in Monascus ruber impacts citrinin biosynthesis. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. He, Y.; Cox, R.J. The molecular steps of citrinin biosynthesis in fungi. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 2119–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chen, W.; Chen, R.; Liu, Q.; He, Y.; He, K.; Ding, X.; Kang, L.; Guo, X.; Xie, N.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Orange, red, yellow: Biosynthesis of azaphilone pigments in Monascus fungi. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 4917–4925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, M.; Kang, L.; Ding, X.; Liu, J.; Liu, Q.; Shao, Y.; Molnár, I.; Chen, F. Monasone naphthoquinone biosynthesis and resistance in Monascus fungi. mBio 2020, 11, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Srianta, I.; Ristiarini, S.; Nugerahani, I.; Sen, S.K.; Zhang, B.B.; Xu, G.R.; Blanc, P.J. Recent research and development of Monascus fermentation products. Int. Food Res. J. 2014, 21, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lin, Q.; Yang, J.G.; Ma, Y.Y.; Lin, Y.; Wu, H.C. Research article optimization of process conditions of Monascus seed Koji by orthogonal test design. Adv. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 7, 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wong, H.C.; Chien, C.Y. Ultrastructure of sexual reproduction of Monascus Purpureos. Mycologia 1986, 78, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dyer, P.S.; O’Gorman, C.M. Sexual development and cryptic sexuality in fungi: Insights from Aspergillus species. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 165–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Barbosa, R.N.; Leong, S.L.; Vinnere-Pettersson, O.; Chen, A.J.; Souza-Motta, C.M.; Frisvad, J.C.; Samson, R.A.; Oliveira, N.T.; Houbraken, J. Phylogenetic analysis of Monascus and new species from honey, pollen and nests of stingless bees. Stud. Mycol. 2017, 86, 29–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Vries, R.P.; Riley, R.; Wiebenga, A.; Aguilar-Osorio, G.; Amillis, S.; Uchima, C.A.; Anderluh, G.; Asadollahi, M.; Askin, M.; Barry, K.; et al. Comparative genomics reveals high biological diversity and specific adaptations in the industrially and medically important fungal genus Aspergillus. Genome Biol. 2017, 18, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jia, L.; Yu, J.H.; Chen, F.; Chen, W. Characterization of the asexual developmental genes brlA and wetA in Monascus ruber M7. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2021, 151, 103564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mirabito, P.M.; Adams, T.H.; Timberlake, W.E. Interactions of three sequentially expressed genes control temporal and spatial specificity in Aspergillus development. Cell 1989, 57, 859–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sewall, T.C.; Mims, C.W.; Timberlake, W.E. abaA controls phialide differentiation in Aspergillus nidulans. Plant Cell 1990, 2, 731–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Marshall, M.A.; Timberlake, W.E. Aspergillus nidulans wetA activates spore-specific gene expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1991, 11, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ogawa, M.; Tokuoka, M.; Jin, F.J.; Takahashi, T.; Koyama, Y. Genetic analysis of conidiation regulatory pathways in koji-mold Aspergillus oryzae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010, 47, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tao, L.; Yu, J.H. AbaA and WetA govern distinct stages of Aspergillus fumigatus development. Microbiology 2011, 157, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shin, K.S.; Kim, Y.H.; Yu, J.H. Proteomic analyses reveal the key roles of BrlA and AbaA in biogenesis of gliotoxin in Aspergillus fumigatus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 463, 428–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Park, H.S.; Yu, J.H. Genetic control of asexual sporulation in filamentous fungi. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2012, 15, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ojeda-López, M.; Chen, W.; Eagle, C.E.; Gutiérrez, G.; Jia, W.L.; Swilaiman, S.S.; Huang, Z.; Park, H.S.; Yu, J.H.; Cánovas, D.; et al. Evolution of asexual and sexual reproduction in the Aspergilli. Stud. Mycol. 2018, 91, 37–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sigl, C.; Haas, H.; Specht, T.; Pfaller, K.; Kürnsteiner, H.; Zadra, I. Among developmental regulators, StuA but not BrlA is essential for penicillin V production in Penicillium chrysogenum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 972–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, F.; Shi, H.Q.; Ying, S.H.; Feng, M.G. WetA and VosA are distinct regulators of conidiation capacity, conidial quality, and biological control potential of a fungal insect pathogen. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 10069–10081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, M.; Sun, X.; Zhu, C.; Xu, Q.; Ruan, R.; Yu, D.; Li, H. PdbrlA, PdabaA and PdwetA control distinct stages of conidiogenesis in Penicillium digitatum. Res. Microbiol. 2015, 166, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zeng, G.; Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, C.; Mi, W.; Guo, N.; Zhao, H.; You, Y.; Dryburgh, F.J.; et al. Genome-wide identification of pathogenicity, conidiation and colony sectorization genes in Metarhizium robertsii. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 3896–3908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, A.X.; Mouhoumed, A.Z.; Tong, S.M.; Ying, S.H.; Feng, M.G. BrlA and AbaA govern virulence-required dimorphic switch, conidiation, and pathogenicity in a fungal insect pathogen. mSystems 2019, 4, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wu, M.Y.; Mead, M.E.; Lee, M.K.; Ostrem Loss, E.M.; Kim, S.C.; Rokas, A.; Yu, J.H. Systematic dissection of the evolutionarily conserved WetA developmental regulator across a genus of filamentous fungi. mBio 2018, 9, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, F.; Hu, X. Study on red fermented rice with high concentration of monacolin K and low concentration of citrinin. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 103, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shao, Y.; Ding, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, S.; Xie, B.; Chen, F. Characteristic analysis of transformants in T-DNA mutation library of Monascus ruber. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 25, 989–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, L.; He, L.; Lai, Y.; Shao, Y.; Chen, F. Cloning and functional analysis of the Gβ gene Mgb1 and the Gγ gene Mgg1 in Monascus ruber. J. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Liu, J.; Chen, F. A comprehensive analysis of the small GTPases Ypt7 involved in the regulation of fungal development and secondary metabolism in Monascus ruber M7. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 436891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, B.; Dewey, C.N. RSEM: Accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, L.; Shao, Y.; Xiong, H. The preliminary study on autolytic process of Monaascus ruber M805. China Food Addit. 2009, 82–87. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kolotila, M.P.; Hollingsworth, P.J.; Volz, P.A. Suface features of Monascus ruber van Tieghem cleistothecia. Bot. Gaz. 1978, 139, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kwon, N.J.; Shin, K.S.; Yu, J.H. Characterization of the developmental regulator FlbE in Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010, 47, 981–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yao, G.; Li, Z.; Wu, R.; Qin, Y.; Liu, G.; Qu, Y. Penicillium oxalicum PoFlbC regulates fungal asexual development and is important for cellulase gene expression. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2016, 86, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sopko, R.; Huang, D.; Preston, N.; Chua, G.; Papp, B.; Kafadar, K.; Snyder, M.; Oliver, S.G.; Cyert, M.; Hughes, T.R.; et al. Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol. Cell 2006, 21, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sewall, T.C.; Mims, C.W.; Timberlake, W.E. Conidium differentiation in Aspergillus nidulans wild-type and wet-white (wetA) mutant strains. Dev. Biol. 1990, 138, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Son, H.; Kim, M.G.; Min, K.; Lim, J.Y.; Choi, G.J.; Kim, J.C.; Chae, S.K.; Lee, Y.W. WetA is required for conidiogenesis and conidium maturation in the ascomycete fungus Fusarium graminearum. Eukaryot. Cell 2014, 13, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bardwell, A.J.; Abdollahi, M.; Bardwell, L. Anthrax lethal factor-cleavage products of MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) kinases exhibit reduced binding to their cognate MAPKs. Biochem. J. 2004, 378, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lee, S.C.; Ni, M.; Li, W.; Shertz, C.; Heitman, J. The evolution of sex: A perspective from the fungal kingdom. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2010, 74, 298–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Krijgsheld, P.; Bleichrodt, R.V.; Van Veluw, G.J.; Wang, F.; Müller, W.H.; Dijksterhuis, J.; Wösten, H.A.B. Development in Aspergillus. Stud. Mycol. 2013, 74, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chu, S.; DeRisi, J.; Eisen, M.; Mulholland, J.; Botstein, D.; Brown, P.O.; Herskowitz, I. The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science 1998, 282, 699–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Benjamin, K.R.; Zhang, C.; Shokat, K.M.; Herskowitz, I. Control of landmark events in meiosis by the CDK Cdc28 and the meiosis-specific kinase Ime2. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 1524–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Xie, N.; Liu, Q.; Chen, F. Deletion of pigR gene in Monascus ruber leads to loss of pigment production. Biotechnol. Lett. 2013, 35, 1425–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Balakrishnan, B.; Chen, C.C.; Pan, T.M.; Kwon, H.J. Mpp7 controls regioselective Knoevenagel condensation during the biosynthesis of Monascus azaphilone pigments. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 1640–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bijinu, B.; Suh, J.W.; Park, S.H.; Kwon, H.J. Delineating Monascus azaphilone pigment biosynthesis: Oxidoreductive modifications determine the ring cyclization pattern in azaphilone biosynthesis. Rsc Adv. 2014, 4, 59405–59408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, Q.; Xie, N.; He, Y.; Wang, L.; Shao, Y.; Zhao, H.; Chen, F. MpigE, a gene involved in pigment biosynthesis in Monascus ruber M7. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Yi, T.; Zhao, M.; Xie, N.; Lei, M.; Liu, J.; Shao, Y.; Chen, F. Identification and role analysis of an intermediate produced by a polygenic mutant of Monascus pigments cluster in Monascus ruber M7. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 7037–7049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jof 10 00338 g001
Figure 1. Microscopic morphology of WT, ΔMrwetA, and ΔMrwetA::MrwetA on PDA, MA, CYA, and G25N media (Size bar = 100 µm, 28 °C, 9 d). The red circle represents the magnified part.
Figure 1. Microscopic morphology of WT, ΔMrwetA, and ΔMrwetA::MrwetA on PDA, MA, CYA, and G25N media (Size bar = 100 µm, 28 °C, 9 d). The red circle represents the magnified part.
Jof 10 00338 g001
Jof 10 00338 g002
Figure 2. The cleistothecia and ascospores of WT, ΔMrwetA, and ΔMrwetA::MrwetA. (A) Microscopic morphological observation of the cleistothecia (Size bar = 100 µm, 28 °C, PDA). Columns indicate different strains, and rows indicate different time points. (B) Variation in the number of cleistothecia (28 °C, PDA). (C) Variation in the number of ascospores (28 °C, PDA). The red circle represents the magnified part. The symbol ‘**’ indicated an extremely significant difference (p < 0.01) compared with the WT.
Figure 2. The cleistothecia and ascospores of WT, ΔMrwetA, and ΔMrwetA::MrwetA. (A) Microscopic morphological observation of the cleistothecia (Size bar = 100 µm, 28 °C, PDA). Columns indicate different strains, and rows indicate different time points. (B) Variation in the number of cleistothecia (28 °C, PDA). (C) Variation in the number of ascospores (28 °C, PDA). The red circle represents the magnified part. The symbol ‘**’ indicated an extremely significant difference (p < 0.01) compared with the WT.
Jof 10 00338 g002
Jof 10 00338 g003
Figure 3. The production of Monascus pigments and citrinin in WT, ΔMrwetA, and ΔMrwetA::MrwetA. (A) The yield of yellow pigment (380 nm). (B) The yield of orange pigment (470 nm). (C) The yield of red pigment (520 nm). (D) The yield of citrinin. The symbol ‘*’ indicated a significant difference (p < 0.05) compared with the WT, while ‘**’ indicated an extremely significant difference (p < 0.01).
Figure 3. The production of Monascus pigments and citrinin in WT, ΔMrwetA, and ΔMrwetA::MrwetA. (A) The yield of yellow pigment (380 nm). (B) The yield of orange pigment (470 nm). (C) The yield of red pigment (520 nm). (D) The yield of citrinin. The symbol ‘*’ indicated a significant difference (p < 0.05) compared with the WT, while ‘**’ indicated an extremely significant difference (p < 0.01).
Jof 10 00338 g003
Jof 10 00338 g004
Figure 4. The number of DEGs. (A) Number of DEGs on the 3rd d (B) Number of DEGs on the 5th d (C) Number of DEGs on the 7th d (D) Venn diagram of DEGs. DEGs: |log2 FC| ≥ 0.5849, Q value ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4. The number of DEGs. (A) Number of DEGs on the 3rd d (B) Number of DEGs on the 5th d (C) Number of DEGs on the 7th d (D) Venn diagram of DEGs. DEGs: |log2 FC| ≥ 0.5849, Q value ≤ 0.05.
Jof 10 00338 g004
Jof 10 00338 g005
Figure 5. KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs in WT vs. ΔMrwetA. The top 20 KEGG pathways enriched by DEGs on the 3rd d (A), 5th d (B), and 7th d (C). The size of the dot indicates the number of DEGs, and a smaller p-value indicates a more significant enrichment.
Figure 5. KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs in WT vs. ΔMrwetA. The top 20 KEGG pathways enriched by DEGs on the 3rd d (A), 5th d (B), and 7th d (C). The size of the dot indicates the number of DEGs, and a smaller p-value indicates a more significant enrichment.
Jof 10 00338 g005
Jof 10 00338 g006
Figure 6. Differential expression of sexual reproduction-related genes in ΔMrwetA strain. (A) Mating-related genes; (B) G protein signaling pathway-related genes; (C) MAPK signaling pathway-related genes; (D) Fruiting body maturation-related genes; (E) Environmental signal reception-related genes; (F) Endogenous physiological processes-related genes; (G) Transcription factors and regulatory proteins-related genes. DEGs: |log2 FC| ≥ 0.5849, Q value ≤ 0.05; Positive number: upregulated; Negative number: downregulated; Blank: not DEGs. The microstructure of the cleistothecia development process was cited from Kolotila et al. [42].
Figure 6. Differential expression of sexual reproduction-related genes in ΔMrwetA strain. (A) Mating-related genes; (B) G protein signaling pathway-related genes; (C) MAPK signaling pathway-related genes; (D) Fruiting body maturation-related genes; (E) Environmental signal reception-related genes; (F) Endogenous physiological processes-related genes; (G) Transcription factors and regulatory proteins-related genes. DEGs: |log2 FC| ≥ 0.5849, Q value ≤ 0.05; Positive number: upregulated; Negative number: downregulated; Blank: not DEGs. The microstructure of the cleistothecia development process was cited from Kolotila et al. [42].
Jof 10 00338 g006
Jof 10 00338 g007
Figure 7. Differential expression of meiosis-related genes in ΔMrwetA strain. DEGs: |log2 FC| ≥ 0.5849, Q value ≤ 0.05; Positive number: upregulated; Negative number: downregulated; Blank: not DEGs.
Figure 7. Differential expression of meiosis-related genes in ΔMrwetA strain. DEGs: |log2 FC| ≥ 0.5849, Q value ≤ 0.05; Positive number: upregulated; Negative number: downregulated; Blank: not DEGs.
Jof 10 00338 g007
Jof 10 00338 g008
Figure 8. Differential expression of the biosynthesis of MPs (A) and CIT (B) related genes in ΔMrwetA strain. DEGs: |log2 FC| ≥ 0.5849, Q value ≤ 0.05; Positive number: upregulated; Negative number: downregulated; Blank: not DEGs.
Figure 8. Differential expression of the biosynthesis of MPs (A) and CIT (B) related genes in ΔMrwetA strain. DEGs: |log2 FC| ≥ 0.5849, Q value ≤ 0.05; Positive number: upregulated; Negative number: downregulated; Blank: not DEGs.
Jof 10 00338 g008
Table 1. Strains used in this study.
Table 1. Strains used in this study.
StrainParentGenotypeSource
M7M7Wild-type[35]
ΔMrwetAM7ΔMrwetA::hph[20]
ΔMrwetA::MrwetAΔMrwetAΔMrwetA::MrwetA-neoThis study
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, Y.; Jia, L.; Chen, F. Effects of MrwetA on Sexual Reproduction and Secondary Metabolism of Monascus ruber M7 Based on Transcriptome Analysis. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10050338

AMA Style

Huang Y, Jia L, Chen F. Effects of MrwetA on Sexual Reproduction and Secondary Metabolism of Monascus ruber M7 Based on Transcriptome Analysis. Journal of Fungi. 2024; 10(5):338. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10050338

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Yuyun, Lili Jia, and Fusheng Chen. 2024. "Effects of MrwetA on Sexual Reproduction and Secondary Metabolism of Monascus ruber M7 Based on Transcriptome Analysis" Journal of Fungi 10, no. 5: 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10050338

APA Style

Huang, Y., Jia, L., & Chen, F. (2024). Effects of MrwetA on Sexual Reproduction and Secondary Metabolism of Monascus ruber M7 Based on Transcriptome Analysis. Journal of Fungi, 10(5), 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10050338

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop