Alien Chromatin from Hordeeae Grasses Enhances the Compatibility of Epichloë Endophyte Symbiosis with the Hexaploid Wheat Triticum aestivum

Abstract

The inoculation of Epichloë endophytes into modern cereals, resulting in systemic infection, depends on the genetics of both the host and the endophyte strain deployed. Until very recently, the only modern cereal to have been infected with Epichloë, in which normal phenotype seed-transmitted associations were achieved, is rye (Secale cereale). Whilst minor in-roads have been achieved in infecting hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum), the phenotypes of these associations have all been extremely poor, including host death and stunting. To identify host genetic factors that may impact the compatibility of Epichloë infection in wheat, wheat–alien chromosome addition/substitution lines were inoculated with Epichloë, and the phenotypes of infected plants were assessed. Symbioses were identified whereby infected wheat plants were phenotypically like uninfected controls. These plants completed their full lifecycle, including the vertical transmission of Epichloë into the next generation of grain, and represent the first ever compatible wheat–Epichloë associations to be created.

1. Introduction

Epichloë endophytes, particularly asexual forms, have important roles in pastoral agricultural systems in the Americas, Australia and New Zealand [1]. Selected strains add value to grass-based forage systems by providing both biotic and abiotic stress resistance. The symbioses of anamorph-typified Epichloë form are mutualistic in that both the fungus and the host grass benefit from the association. The fungus benefits from a biological niche with few if any competing organisms, a source of nutrients in the host’s apoplastic fluid and a mechanism for vicarious dispersal via the host seed. The host benefits from the range of secondary metabolites the fungus produces in the form of alkaloids, many of which have individual and/or multiple activities against different classes of organism [1].

Modern Hordeeae (Triticeae) cereal grasses such as wheat (Triticum aestivum), barley (Hordeum vulgare) and rye (Secale cereale) do not host Epichloë endophytes, although grasses of some genera within the tribe, such as Elymus, Hordeum and Leymus, do [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9].

Both organism classes, Epichloë endophytes and cereal grasses, are of great importance in their own contexts, and the prospect of forming functioning symbioses offers the potential to improve cereal production systems. Previous research [10] demonstrated varying outcomes of symbiosis. Whereas symbioses established with rye (Secale cereale) showed phenotypes ranging from normal to compromised, those involving modern hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum) were always poor, exhibiting a dwarfed phenotype. This likely reflects that outcrossing species such as rye present a range of genotypes in an inoculated population, whereas inbred species such as wheat are a genetically narrow host population target.

Wild relatives of wheat are recognized as having potential as sources of genes for improving wheat performance; for example, the introduction of pathogen resistance using rye chromatin [11]. The best-known example of interspecific chromatin being transferred into a crop is the translocation of rye chromosome arm 1RS to wheat chromosome arm 1BL [12]. It is possible to add or substitute entire chromosomes, chromosome areas or chromatin segments. The rearrangement of wheat chromosomes in this way has constituted an important aspect of wheat improvement for over 50 years [13]. The transfer is effected by producing an amphidiploid, a hybrid between the two species with at least one complete diploid set of chromosomes from each species, or a partial amphidiploid, and then producing individual chromosome addition lines. Following this, the centric breakage fusion tendency can be exploited to transfer a whole alien chromosome arm. Strategies can also be deployed for transferring alien segments that are smaller than complete chromosome arms [14]. Where genetic diversity is limited, such as in highly selected and inbred wheat lines, the introduction of alien genetics from related species offers a means to broaden the genetic base of the population and increase the possibilities for the selection of desirable traits [15,16,17].

To improve the outcome of synthetic Epichloë symbioses with wheat, we utilized alien chromosome additions and substitutions from both rye and wild grass species from within the Hordeeae tribe (Supplementary Table S1).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Endophyte Strain

Epichloë bromicola AR3060 (AgResearch strain 3060) was isolated from an Elymus dahuricus subspecies excelsus plant and used in inoculation experiments in Japan following isolation from the parent plant as previously described [18]. Epichloë bromicola AR3002 was isolated from an Elymus dahuricus plant and used in inoculation experiments in New Zealand. Fungal cultures were grown on potato dextrose agar as described by Fleetwood et al., 2007 [19].

2.2. Inoculation of Wheat Alien Chromosome Substitution and Addition Lines

Experiments involving the inoculation of wheat lines sourced from the Tottori Alien Chromosome Bank Of Wheat (TACBOW) at the National BioResource Project (NBRP) Komugiwere performed as follows.

Up to five seeds from each of 155 wheat lines with various alien chromosome introductions from species of Aegilops, Agropyron, Elymus, Hordeum, Leymus, Psathyrostachys, Haynaldia and Secale, along with the wheat cultivars ‘Monad’ and ‘Chinese Spring’ as controls (Supplementary Table S1), were inoculated, as described by Latch and Christensen (1985) [20], using strain AR3060, which had previously been demonstrated to infect the wheat cultivar “Monad”, albeit with a compromised host phenotype [10]. Plants were grown for ca. 6 weeks in commercial potting mix before identifying infected individuals through tissue-print immunoblotting as previously described [18]. Plants that were demonstrated to be infected with Epichloë by immunoblot were grown for a further 3 months under glasshouse conditions to complete their full life cycle. Endophyte-free plants of the same lines were also grown under equivalent conditions to serve as direct comparisons to the infected plants.

In subsequent experiments performed in Palmerston North, New Zealand, a subset of lines (Supplementary Table S2) that supported compatible AR3060 infection were inoculated with E. bromicola strain AR3002, as, unlike AR3060, this strain does not produce the mammalian toxin ergovaline.

2.3. Phenotyping

Plants were phenotyped at the completion of their life cycle and those that were originally infected, based upon earlier immunoblotting results, were confirmed as remaining Epichloë infected by microscopy and/or fungal isolation, as described below. Infected individuals were phenotypically compared to plants of the same line that did not become infected.

2.4. Epidermal Leaf Peel

Tillers were selected from mature plants for endophyte detection. Clean, live sheath tissue was placed under a dissecting microscope at 16× magnification with the adaxial epidermis facing up. A shallow transverse cut was made with a scalpel and the epidermis was gently lifted, separated, and pulled off the sheath. Tissue was mounted in a drop of aniline blue dye (glycerol 50%; lactic acid 25%; water 24.95%; aniline blue 0.05%), heated over a naked flame and examined at 100× and 400× using a compound microscope.

2.5. Seed Squash

Grain was covered with a 5% sodium hydroxide solution and left to imbibe overnight. The following day, the solution was decanted and the samples thoroughly rinsed with tap water. Samples were covered with Garner’s solution (0.325 g aniline blue, 100 mL water and 50 mL 85% lactic acid) and heated to boiling on a hot plate. After cooling, the softened grain was mounted on a microscope slide, a cover slip was placed over the grain and gentle, even pressure was applied, squashing the preparation. The preparations were then examined under a compound light microscope at 100× and 400× magnification.

2.6. Fungal Isolation

Fungus was isolated from plants following surface sterilization of plant tissue, as described by Christensen, et al. (2002) [21]. Blade tissue was surface sterilized by quick rinse with 96% ethanol and a 1 min soak in a sodium hypochlorite solution (10% Janola: 42 g/L NaOCl domestic bleach), followed by rinsing twice in sterile water. Tissue was plated on to potato dextrose agar containing 5 µg/mL tetracycline. Plates were incubated at 22–25 °C for 3–5 days.

3. Results and Discussion

Epichloë Infection of Wheat Alien Chromosome Addition/Substitution Lines

Of the 157 lines inoculated, immunoblot results showed that 97 lines had one or more Epichloë-infected plants (

Table 1. Wheat lines, alien introgressions and Epichloë-infection phenotypes.

Line	Wheat Genetic Background	Alien Introgression	Infection Phenotype Class
Chinese Spring	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	None	dwarfed
Monad	Triticum aestivum cv. Monad	None	dwarfed
TACBOW0001	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Leymus racemosus A addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0003	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Leymus racemosus E monosomic addition	tall floral
TACBOW0005	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Leymus racemosus H addition	tall floral
TACBOW0007	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Leymus racemosus J addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0008	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Leymus racemosus K addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0009	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Leymus racemosus l addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0010	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Leymus racemosus N addition	tall floral
TACBOW0011	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Leymus racemosus H substitution	tall floral
TACBOW0012	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Leymus racemosus 2Lr#1 addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0015	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Leymus racemosus 7Lr#1 addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0016	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Leymus racemosus ?Lr#1 addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0017	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Leymus racemosus 2Lr#1 substitution	dwarfed
TACBOW0018	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Secale cereale cv. Imperial 1R addition	tall floral
TACBOW0020	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Secale cereale cv. Imperial 3R addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0024	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Secale cereale cv. Imperial 7R addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0025	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Secale cereale cv. IR130 1R addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0026	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Secale cereale cv. IR130 1R substitution	dwarfed
TACBOW0028	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Secale cereale cv. IR130 3R addition	tall floral
TACBOW0032	Triticum aestivum cv. Vilmorin 27	Thinopyrum intermedium 7Ai addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0034	Triticum aestivum cv. Vilmorin 28	Thinopyrum intermedium 1Ai addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0036	Triticum aestivum cv. Vilmorin 29	Thinopyrum intermedium 5Ai addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0038	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Thinopyrum elongatum 1E addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0040	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Thinopyrum elongatum 3E addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0041	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Thinopyrum elongatum 4E addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0043	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Thinopyrum elongatum 5E addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0045	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops umbellulata 1U addition	tall floral
TACBOW0046	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops umbellulata 2U addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0047	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops umbellulata 4U addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0048	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops umbellulata 5U addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0049	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops umbellulata 6U addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0052	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Hordeum chilense 2HchS addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0053	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Hordeum chilense 4Hch addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0054	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Hordeum chilense 5Hch addition	tall floral
TACBOW0055	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Hordeum chilense 6Hch addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0056	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Hordeum chilense 7Hch addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0057	Triticum aestivum	Dasypirum villosum 1V addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0059	Triticum aestivum	Dasypirum villosum 3V addition	tall floral
TACBOW0064	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	T. aestivum-Secale cereale cv. Imperial amphidiploid	tall floral 1
TACBOW0067	Triticum turgidum	T. turgidum-Secale cereale amphidiploid	tall floral 1
TACBOW0124	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Leymus mollis G addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0125	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Leymus mollis H addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0126	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Psathyrostachys huashanica A addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0128	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Psathyrostachys huashanica C addition	tall floral
TACBOW0138	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Thynopyrum intermedium G addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0189	Triticum aestivum cv. Alcedo	Aegilops markgrafii B addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0190	Triticum aestivum cv. Alcedo	Aegilops markgrafii C addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0193	Triticum aestivum cv. Alcedo	Aegilops markgrafii E addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0195	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops longissima 1Sl addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0196	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops longissima 2Sl addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0197	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops longissima 3Sl addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0198	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops longissima 4/7Sl addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0204	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops searsii 4Ss addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0206	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops searsii 6Ss addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0209	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops longissima ?Sl addition	tall floral
TACBOW0214	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Agropyron elongatum 3ES addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0215	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Agropyron elongatum 3EL addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0217	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Agropyron elongatum 6ES addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0219	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Agropyron elongatum 6EL addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0220	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Elymus trachycaulus T1HtS·2HtS addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0221	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Elymus trachycaulus T1HtS·3StL monosomic addition	tall floral
TACBOW0222	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Elymus trachycaulus T1HtS·6HtL addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0224	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Elymus trachycaulus T1StL·7StL addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0226	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Elymus trachycaulus T5HtL·5HtL addition	tall floral
TACBOW0230	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Elymus trachycaulus T1HtS·5HtL addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0232	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops peregrina T3Uv#1–? addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0235	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Secale cereale 2R addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0236	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Secale cereale 3R addition	tall floral
TACBOW0239	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Secale cereale 6R addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0244	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops longissima 4Sl addition	tall floral
TACBOW0245	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops longissima 5Sl addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0246	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops longissima 6Sl addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0250	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Elymus trachycaulus 1HtL addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0252	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Elymus trachycaulus 1St addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0254	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Elymus trachycaulus 6Ht addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0256	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Elymus trachycaulus 7HtS addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0259	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Elymus trachycaulus 5HtS addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0260	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Elymus trachycaulus 5Ht addition	tall floral
TACBOW0261	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Elymus trachycaulus 5St addition	tall floral
TACBOW0262	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Elymus trachycaulus 5StS addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0265	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Elymus ciliaris 1Yc addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0267	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops longissima ?Sl addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0272	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops peregrina 4Sv addition	tall floral
TACBOW0273	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops peregrina 5Sv addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0275	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops peregrina 1Uv addition	tall floral
TACBOW0278	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops peregrina 3Uv substitution	tall floral 1
TACBOW0279	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops peregrina 4Uv addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0280	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops peregrina 5Uv addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0282	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops peregrina 7Uv addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0283	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops geniculata 1Mg addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0288	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops geniculata 6Mg addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0290	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops geniculata 1Ug addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0291	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops geniculata 2Ug addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0293	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops geniculata 5Ug addition	dwarfed
TACBOW0295	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Aegilops geniculata 3Ug addition	tall floral 1
TACBOW0299	Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring	Elymus ciliaris ?Yc addition	dwarfed

¹ delayed maturation.

), with the remaining lines being uninfected. All lines were subsequently phenotyped at maturity. Uninfected lines were universally tall and floral with fully developed grain and, significantly, wheat lines with no alien chromosome introductions (Chinese Spring and Monad) were dwarfed (Figure 1) in a similar manner to that previously reported [10]. Infected plants of chromosome addition/substitution lines included tall floral individuals that were similar to uninfected plants of the same line and abnormal phenotype plants that were short in stature and often failed to produce inflorescences. Additionally, tall floral plants delayed in their maturation that were exemplified by a ‘stay green’ phenotype and a protracted elaboration and maturation of the floral spike were identified. Additional evidence for endophyte infection was obtained for a sub-set of plants from each of the three infection phenotypes using a combination of fungal isolation and microscopy of leaf and seed material. Although not all the plants that had a delayed maturation were confirmed to be infected in this way, this phenotype was indicative of endophyte infection and plants were classified as such for further analysis.

An analysis of the alien genetics associated with TACBOW lines displaying tall floral infection phenotypes (Table 1) was performed in terms of the donor species and which of the seven homoeologous groups (based upon wheat) the chromosome belonged to, aiming to reveal patterns in host genetics associated with the phenotypic outcomes. We initially looked specifically at the full wheat–rye chromosome addition lines comprising seven “Chinese Spring”-based lines with 1R-7R additions from S. cereale. Tall floral infected plants were obtained for wheat–rye 1R, 3R and 7R addition lines, with abnormal phenotypes or no infection occurring with the remaining four addition lines (2R, 4R, 5R, 6R). This result suggests that there may be genetic factors associated with alien chromosomes from homoeologous groups 1, 3 and 7 and, indeed, chromosome additions or substitutions from other grasses, distinct from rye, with these homoeologous groups were also enriched for tall floral infection phenotypes (Table 1). For example, the inoculation of the line TACBOW11, a line with alien genetics representing homoeologous group 3, produced tall floral infected plants. The underlying genetics of this line is T. aestivum cv. Chinese Spring Leymus racemosus H substitution (20″ + 1″ [H]). Line TACBOW5 was another example of tall floral infected plants involving the L. racemosus H chromosome, but as an addition rather than a substitution (21″ + 1″ [H]). Line TACBOW7 also gave rise to infected large phenotype plants but with a delayed maturation. Despite this, grain was fully filled and was confirmed to contain endophyte by microscopy (Figure 2). The underlying genetics of this line is T. aestivum cv. Chinese Spring L. racemosus J addition (20″ + 1″ [J]). Leymus J and Leymus H chromosomes have been shown, using RFLP markers, to share some syntenic regions [17,22], which also have homology with wheat chromosomes belonging to homoeologous groups 1, 3 and 7. Interestingly, chromosomes 1, 3 and 7 have been described as sharing a “close genetic relationship” [23] (pp. 29–45) and [24] (p. 73).

Several lines were identified in which, like the Leymus J addition line described above, maturation was somewhat delayed. Some of these lines were confirmed as endophytes infected by isolations, leaf sheath microscopy or seed squash (Table 1). The remainder are assumed to be infected, as uninfected lines were universally tall and floral, with fully developed grain. These delayed phenotype lines have certain genetics in common with each other and to those plants showing normal, mature seed-transmitting phenotypes. As described above, the Leymus H and J chromosomes share some synteny, and with respect to wheat, share homology with chromosomes belonging to homoeologous groups 1, 3 and 7. In addition to the Leymus H (substitution) and Leymus J (addition) lines, a Leymus N line was also confirmed to be infected (by isolation) and the Leymus N chromosome also shares homology with homoeologous groups 3 and 7. Further to this, we confirmed that many of the delayed maturation infection phenotypes also contain alien additions from homoeologous groups 1, 3 or 7 (Table 1). These include, in addition to the 1R, 3R and 7R additions from Secale described above, the 1U, 3U and 7U additions from Aegilops and 1H and 7H additions from Elymus. Whilst these lines are not exclusive and the evolution of the Hordeeae is complex, there seems to be some evidence that genes from wild species located on chromosomes belonging to homoeologous groups 1, 3 and 7 may be beneficial in terms of their compatibility with Epichloë.

The ability to infect rye with Epichloë and obtain normal phenotype plants [10], together with TACBOW lines involving rye 1R, 3R and 7R chromosome additions (this study), suggests that wheat–rye hybrids might also contain the genetics required to form floral associations with Epichloë. Whilst some limited attempts have been made to infect commercial Triticale (T. aestivum × S. cereale) lines (Simpson, unpublished), in the present study, two T. turgidum × S. cereale amphidiploid lines (TACBOW66 and TACBOW67) containing all seven rye chromosomes became infected and produced inflorescences.

In subsequent inoculations, performed in New Zealand, with the non-toxic strain AR3002 into a sub-set of TACBOW lines, we also saw a range of infection phenotypes. Examples of these are shown in (Figure 3) and plants were confirmed by seed squash to be transmitting Epichloë into the grain.

Whether the host genetics required for Epichloë compatibility will apply to all E. bromicola strains beyond those described here remains to be tested, as functional differences based upon the Epichloë genotype have been observed (unpublished data). Regardless, the genetics underlying Epichloë compatibility needs to be introgressed into modern cultivars since Chinese Spring is not agronomically useful.

4. Conclusions

The inoculation of commercial hexaploid wheat with Epichloë has, to date, been unsuccessful, with the resulting infected plants having poor phenotypes. This result was confirmed here with inoculations of the wheat cultivars Chinese Spring and Monad (no chromosome additions or substitutions). However, in this study, the inoculation of Chinese Spring-based wheat containing certain alien chromosome additions or substitutions sourced from rye and wild grass species (many of which also host Epichloë) were successful. This suggests that lines containing chromosome additions/substitutions, where infection produced tall floral plants, may have a genetic profile underlying this. Our analysis of these lines indicates that alien chromosome introgressions from homoeologous groups 1, 3 and 7 may be important for the improved compatibility between wheat and Epichloë. However, whilst infected normal phenotype lines were enriched for 1, 3 and 7 chromosome additions/substitutions, some infected plants displaying normal phenotypes consisted of lines carrying chromosome additions that did not belong to homoeologous groups 1, 3 or 7. Further work will be required to prove the role of 1, 3, 7 homoeologous group genetics and to determine if there are other commonalties present on some of the non-1, -3 or -7 chromosome groups where infection phenotypes were not compromised.

5. Patents

A patent (International application number PCT/IB2019/051395) resulted from the work reported in this manuscript.