Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of the Cys2His2 Zinc Finger Protein Gene Family in Flammulina filiformis
Previous Article in Journal
Septin Organization and Dynamics for Budding Yeast Cytokinesis
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Genomic Sequence Resource of Diaporthe mahothocarpus GZU-Y2 Causing Leaf Spot Blight in Camellia oleifera
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Kelch Repeat Protein VdKeR1 Is Essential for Development, Ergosterol Metabolism, and Virulence in Verticillium dahliae

J. Fungi 2024, 10(9), 643; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10090643
by Wen-Li Xia, Zhe Zheng and Feng-Mao Chen *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
J. Fungi 2024, 10(9), 643; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10090643
Submission received: 17 May 2024 / Revised: 25 August 2024 / Accepted: 6 September 2024 / Published: 9 September 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This work expands our knowledge of the role of Kelch proteins in fungi, in general, and in pathogenic fungi, in particular.  It provides information about the potential role that VdKeR1 plays in ergosterol metabolism.   The work also supports a role for this protein in pathogenicity, a role shared with homologues in other fungi.  Another important finding is its role in melanin production and microsclerotia formation, roles which to my knowledge, had not been described for other fungal Kelch homologues.

 

 

See attachment

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The subject of your manuscript is interesting and addition in scientific field. 

 

1. Keywords:

Change all keywords to suitable words

 

2.  Line 82-85:”This study” to end:

Rewrite as what are you aimed of this study

 

3. Line102: “[Add the Ref].”

Check it

 

4.Why did not the authors write conclusion?

Write the conclusions in separation section

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Relevance is as stated in my previous review of this manuscript.  It has not changed.

See attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The subject of your manuscript is interesting and addition in scientific field. 

1. Keywords:

Change all keywords to suitable words

 

2.  Line 99:”This study investigated the biological function of”:

Rewrite as what are you aimed of this study

 

3.Why did not the authors write conclusion?

Write the conclusions in separation section, without repeating the results

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 3

Reviewer 2 Report

NA

1. Change two Keywords:

Fungal development and pathogenicity

Back to TopTop