Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Genome-Based Average Nucleotide Identity Calculation for Identification of Twelve Yeast Species
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of the Cys2His2 Zinc Finger Protein Gene Family in Flammulina filiformis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring Endophytic Fungi as Natural Antagonists against Fungal Pathogens of Food Crops
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multi-Gene Phylogenetic Analyses Reveals Heteroxylaria Gen. Nov. and New Contributions to Xylariaceae (Ascomycota) from China

1
Hainan Key Laboratory of Tropical Microbe Resources, Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
2
School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
3
Coconut Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
4
College of Plant Protection, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
5
School of Life Science, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China
6
Haikou Key Laboratory for Protection and Utilization of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Hainan Institute for Tropical Agricultural Resources, Haikou 571101, China
7
Chongzuo Key Laboratory for Protection and Utilization of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Sanya Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Chongzuo 532100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2024, 10(9), 645; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10090645
Submission received: 5 August 2024 / Revised: 5 September 2024 / Accepted: 9 September 2024 / Published: 11 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research of Ascomycota)

Abstract

:
An in-depth study of the phylogenetic relationships of Xylaria species associated with nutshells of fruits and seeds within the genus Xylaria and related genera of Xylaceaecea was conducted in China. The multi-gene phylogenetic analyses were carried out based on ITS, RPB2, and TUB sequences of 100 species of 16 known genera in Xylariaceae around the world. Based on molecular phylogenetic analyses, morphological observations, and ecological habitats, a new genus, Heteroxylaria, is established to accommodate four new species, viz. H. cordiicola, H. juglandicola, H. meliicola, and H. terminaliicola, and four new combinations, viz. H. oxyacanthae, H. palmicola, H. reevesiae, and H. rohrensis. The genus is characterized by cylindrical stromata with conspicuous to inconspicuous perithecial mounds, surface black, having brown to dark brown ascospores with a germ slit, and it grows on nutshell of fruits. The combined ITS+RPB2+TUB sequence dataset of representative taxa in the Xylariaceae demonstrate that Heteroxylaria is grouped with Hypocreodendron but forms a monophyletic lineage. All novelties described herein are morphologically illustrated and compared to similar species and phylogeny is investigated to establish new genera and species.

1. Introduction

The family Xylariaceae Tul. and Tul. was introduced and typified by Xylaria Hill ex Schrank, and widely distributed in tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Most taxa in the family are widely known as saprobes [4,7,8], while some are plant pathogens causing diseases of economic crops [9,10,11], and some are endophytes which have the potential to become pathogens when their hosts are stressed [3,12]. Many xylariaceous taxa are important producers of novel bioactive compounds and secondary metabolites [13,14,15,16]. Therefore, the xylariaceous taxa are of great interest due to their ecological and economic significance.
The number of genera accepted in Xylariaceae changed over the years. Based on morphologic characters in the 21th century, Eriksson and Hawksworth (1993) [17] accepted 35 genera but did not recognize Nemania and Obolarina, Læssøe (1994) [18] recognized 37 genera but included Daldinia and Versiomyces to Hypoxylon, Whalley (1996) [3] included 40 genera and considered Nemania and Daldinia as separate genera, respectively, while Rogers et al. revised 41 genera of the Xylariaceae (https://mycology.sinica.edu.tw/Xylariaceae/, accessed on 11 November 1997) in 1997. Kirk et al. (2008) [19] listed 85 genera and 1343 species in the Dictionary of the Fungi. Recently, based on multigene phylogeny, morphology, and chemotaxonomy analyses, Wendt et al. (2018) [20] separated Hypoxylaceae from Xylariaceae within Xylariales, and Daranagama et al. (2018) [21] accept 37 genera of Xylariaceae by observation of type specimens. Hyde et al. (2020) [22] listed 32 genera in Xylariaceae and were followed by Wijayawardene et al. (2020) [23]. Konta et al. (2020) [24] introduced a new genus, Neoxylaria, on palms (Arecaceae) from Thailand.
The genus Xylaria Hill ex Schrank, the type species X. hypoxylon (L.) Grev., is one of the most complex and difficult genera in the Xylariaceae [25,26]. Multi-gene phylogenetic analyses reveal that classification of Xylaria in Xylariaceae appeared as paraphyletic [20,21,24,27,28,29,30]. Hsieh et al. (2010) [27] found that Xylaria taxa were distributed in three main clades (TE, HY, and PO) within Xylariaceae based on stromatal morphology and multilocus phylogenetic analyses. Of the three clades, except clade TE, Xylaria taxa formed subclades with other genera of Xylariaceae, e.g., with Kretzschmaria taxa in clade HY and with Astrocystis, Discoxylaria, Stilbohypoxylon, and Amphirosellinia in clade PO, and were intermingled along the cladogram [27]. Konta et al. (2020) [24] presented that delimitation of Xylaria taxa were restricted to their morphology and habitats. We found that Xylaria species associated with fallen fruits and seeds evolved independently within Xylaria, and the phylogenetic relationships of the fructicolous Xylaria taxa may be influenced by the texture of the fruits or seeds [31]. Hence, it is necessary to carry out additional collections and studies for the primary identification and classification of xylariaceous taxa.
The type genus Xylaria is the largest genus in the family, with more than 670 morphological species (Hyde et al., 2020) [22] and 879 epithets in the Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org/names/names.asp, accessed on 30 January 2024). About 77 species were reported from China [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. This study is a continuation of the series on fructicolous fungi in China [31]. In this study, we introduce a new genus Heteroxylaria, four new species, and four new combinations for Xylariaceae occurring on nutshells of fallen fruits with morphological and phylogenetic evidence. Detailed descriptions, illustrations, and notes for each taxon are provided.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Morphological Study

The nutshells of fruits and seeds bearing xylariaceous stromata are collected in evergreen broad-leaved forests or gemperate deciduous broad-leaved forests of Nature Reserves and Forest Parks from Guizhou, Hainan, Jilin, and Yunnan provinces of China. The studied specimens are preserved at the Fungarium of Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (FCATAS, Haikou, China). The stromatal surface and perithecia were examined with a VHX-600E 3D microscope of the Keyence Corporation (Osaka, Japan). The microscopical characteristics were observed with an Olympus IX73 inverted fluorescence microscope (Tokyo, Japan) and the CellSens Dimensions Software 3.17 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The microscopic procedure followed Ma et al. (2022) [31]. Freehand sections were prepared from dried stromata and mounted in water, Melzer’s iodine reagent, 5% (w/v) potassium hydroxide (KOH), 1% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and India ink. When presenting the variation in ascus and ascospore sizes, 5% of measurements were excluded from each end of the range and given in parentheses. In the morphological description, L is for ascospore length (arithmetical average of all ascospores), W for ascospore width (arithmetical average of all ascospores), Q for variation in the L/W ratios between the measured ascospores, and (a/b) for a number of ascospores (a) measured from a number of specimens (b). Color codes and names follow Rayner (1970) [44].

2.2. DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Dried specimens were taken for total genomic DNA extraction using a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) rapid extraction kit (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the method of Song et al. (2022) [45]. Three DNA gene fragments, ITS, RPB2, and β-tubulin (TUB) regions were amplified with primer ITS5/ITS4 [46], fRPB2-5F/fRPB2-7cR [47], and T1/T22 [48], respectively. The PCR procedures for the three sequences followed Pan et al. (2022) [43]. All newly generated sequences were uploaded on GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, accessed on 13 July 2024) and listed in Table 1.

2.3. Molecular Phylogenetic Analyses

In addition to the newly generated sequences, additional sequence data were downloaded from GenBank following recent studies [20,24,27,31,51]. To infer the phylogenetic position of Heteroxylaria within Xylariaceae, a three-locus dataset of ITS, RPB2, and TUB including 100 species of 16 known genera (Amphirosellinia, Astrocystis, Brunneiperidium, Collodiscula, Entoleuca, Euepixylon, Hypocreodendron, Kretzschmaria, Nemania, Neoxylaria, Podosordaria, Poronia, Rosellinia, Sarcoxylon, Stilbohypoxylon, and Xylaria) within Xylariaceae and one Clypeosphaeria species from Clypeosphaeriaceae as ingroup taxa and two species from Hypoxylaceae (Daldinia loculatoides Wollw. and M. Stadler and Hypoxylon fragiforme (Pers.) J. Kickx f.) and Barrmaeliaceae (Barrmaelia rappazii Jaklitsch, Friebes and Voglmayr, and Entosordaria perfidiosa (De Not.) Höhn.), respectively, as outgroup taxa were used according to Hsieh et al. (2010) [27] and Konta et al. (2020) [24].
Each locus of the dataset was aligned separately using the MAFFT V.7 online server (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/, accessed on 25 May 2024) and optimized manually using BioEdit 7.0.5.3 [65] and ClustalX 1.83 [66]. Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) algorithms are performed for phylogenetic analyses based on a concatenated data set of ITS, RPB2, and TUB (ITS-RPB2-TUB). The ML analysis was conducted by raxmlGUI 2.0 [67] with GTRGAMMA+G as a substitution model. The BI analysis was conducted by MrBayes 3.2.6 [68] with jModelTest 2 conducting model discrimination. Six simultaneous Markov chains were run for one million generations and trees were sampled every 1000th generations. Of all sampled trees, the first 25% were discarded as burn-in, and the remaining trees were used to calculate the posterior probabilities (PP) of each branch. Phylogenetic trees were viewed in FigTree version 1.4.2 [69].

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analysis

The combined 3-gene (ITS-RPB2-TUB) dataset included sequences of 117 fungal samples representing 105 taxa. The dataset had an aligned length of 2921 characters, of which 1248 characters were constant, 287 were parsimony unformative, and 1386 were parsimony informative.
The topology of multi-locus phylogenetic trees retrieved from BI and ML analyses are highly similar. The ML topology is presented along with BS values from the ML method and BPPs from the BI method, if simultaneously higher than or equal to 70% and 0.95 at the nodes, respectively (Figure 1). The phylogeny indicated that the new genus Heteroxylaria formed a distinct clade in the Xylariaceae but could not be included in any existing genera (Figure 1).
In the phylogenetic tree, Poronia, Sarcoxylon, and Podosordaria formed a strongly supported clade (100/1.00) separated early from other genera. Amphirosellinia, Astrocystis, Brunneiperidium, Collodiscula, Entoleuca, Euepixylon, Hypocreodendron, Kretzschmaria, Nemania, Neoxylaria, Rosellinia, Stilbohypoxylon, and the new genus Heteroxylaria clustered in six major clades together with species of Xylaria. The six clades, TE, HY, HH, NR, PO, and IA, were supported well and all of them received 100% posterior probability values and bootstrap values 97%, 100%, 99%, 83%, 95%, and 100%, respectively. The clade TE contained termite Xylaria species. Clade HY included the wood-inhabiting, foliicolous, and fructicolous species of Xylaria, and the taxa of Brunneiperidium and Kretzschmaria. Clade HH composed of species of the new genus Heteroxylaria and Hypocreodendron (Discoxylaria). Clade NR contained species of Nemania, Rosellinia, Entoleuca, and Euepixylon. Clade PO composed primarily of species of Xylaria growing on wood, and the species of Amphirosellinia, Astrocystis, Collodiscula, and Stilbohyposylon quisquiliarum. Clade IA composed primarily of species of Xylaria growing on fruits or legume pods, and a species of Neoxylaria and Stilbohypoxylon, respectively.

3.2. Taxonomy

  • Heteroxylaria Hai X. Ma, A.H. Zhu and Y. Li, gen. nov.
MycoBank: MB854829
Etymology: Heteros = έτερος in Greek, other; similar in morphology but different from Xylaria in phylogeny.
Type species: Heteroxylaria oxyacanthae (Tul. and C. Tul.) Hai X. Ma, A.H. Zhu and Y. Li.
Description: Sexual morph: Stromata upright or prostrate, cylindrical, unbranched or branched; fertile parts cylindrical, with conspicuous to inconspicuous perithecial mounds; stipe definite to obscure, glabrous or tomentose, with longitudinally wrinkles, arising from a slightly enlarged base. Perithecia subglobose to obovoid, embedded in fertile parts. Ostioles papillate. Asci eight-spored, stipitate, with apical ring bluing in Melzer’s reagent. Ascospores brown, dark brown, unicellular, ellipsoid-inequilateral, with germ slit. Asexual morph: for a detailed description of H. oxyacanthae, see Stowell et al. (1983) [70].
Notes: Phylogenetically, specimens of Heteroxylaria formed a well-supported clade that is related to Hypocreodendron. Morphologically, Hypocreodendron differs by having upright stromata with an apical discoid to shallow cup bearing conidia and mature perithecia, fleshy to cartilaginous texture, brown ascospores ellipsoid with germ slit, and was found on ant nests [71]. In this study, Heteroxylaria is described as a new genus based on phylogenetic analyses, morphological characters, and ecological hatitats. Eight species are accepted in this genus including four new species, i.e., H. cordiicola, H. juglandicola, H. meliicola, and H. terminaliicola, and four new combinations, H. oxyacanthae, H. palmicola, H. reevesiae, and H. rohrensis. The genus is characterized by cylindrical stromata with conspicuous to inconspicuous perithecial mounds, surface black, brown to dark brown ascospores with germ slit, and it grows on nutshell of fruits.
  • Heteroxylaria cordiicola Hai X. Ma, A.H. Zhu and Y. Li, sp. Nov. Figure 2 and Figure 7d,e
MycoBank: MB854834
Etymology: cordiicola (Lat.): referring to the host genus Cordia which the fungus inhabits.
Holotype: CHINA: Guizhou Province, Libo County, Maolan Nature Reserve, on nutshells of fallen seeds of Cordia dichotoma G. Forst. (Boraginaceae), 16 July 2014, Ma Haixia, FCATAS907 (Col.135), GenBank numbers: ist: MZ648852, RPBS: MZ707116, TUB: MZ695791, LSU: MZ703211.
Figure 2. Heteroxylaria cordiicola (FCATAS 907, holotype). (a,b) Stroma on fallen fruit (c) Stromatal surface. (d,e) Section through stroma, showing perithecia. (f,p) Asci with ascal apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (g) Asci in 1% SDS. (h) Ascal apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (i) Ascospore with germ slit in Melzer’s reagent. (j,l) Ascospore in Melzer’s reagent. (k) Ascospore in 1% SDS. (m) Ascospore in India ink. (n) Ascospore in water. (o) Asci in water. Scale bars: (a,b) = 0.5 cm; (ce) = 100 µm; (fn) = 10 µm; and (o,p) = 20 µm.
Figure 2. Heteroxylaria cordiicola (FCATAS 907, holotype). (a,b) Stroma on fallen fruit (c) Stromatal surface. (d,e) Section through stroma, showing perithecia. (f,p) Asci with ascal apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (g) Asci in 1% SDS. (h) Ascal apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (i) Ascospore with germ slit in Melzer’s reagent. (j,l) Ascospore in Melzer’s reagent. (k) Ascospore in 1% SDS. (m) Ascospore in India ink. (n) Ascospore in water. (o) Asci in water. Scale bars: (a,b) = 0.5 cm; (ce) = 100 µm; (fn) = 10 µm; and (o,p) = 20 µm.
Jof 10 00645 g002
Description: Sexual morph: Stromata upright, simple, unbranched or occasionally branching, 3.0–7.5 cm total height, long stipitate; fertile parts 0.5–20 mm high × 0.8–2.0 mm broad, narrowly fusiform to cylindrical with acute sterile apices up to 2 mm long, at times furrowed, strongly nodulose with deep wrinkles isolating small groups of perithecia; stipes 2–50 mm high × 0.3–1.2 mm broad, glabrous to tomentose, somewhat flattened, with longitudinally wrinkles, arising from a slighly enlarged base. Surface black, with gray peeling outer layer and conspicuous perithecial mounds, continuous, glabrous; interior white to pale yellow, solid, and woody. Texture hard. Perithecia subglobose to obovoid, 280–450 × 300–500 µm. Ostioles conic-papillate. Asci eight-spored arranged in uniseriate manner, cylindrical, long-stipitate, (100–)115–135(–145) µm total length, the spore-bearing parts (65–)70–78(–84) µm long × (6.7–)7.0–8.0(–8.2) µm broad, the stipes 30–65 µm long, with apical ring bluing in Melzer’s reagent, urn-shaped to more or less rectangular, 1.5–2.0 µm high × 2.0–2.5 µm diam. Ascospores brown to dark brown, unicellular, ellipsoid-inequilateral with broadly rounded ends, sometimes with pinched on one end, smooth, (9–)10–11.7(–13) × (4.4–)5.0–6.0(–6.5) µm (M = 10.8 × 5.3 µm, Q = 2.0, n = 60/2), with a conspicuous straight germ slit full-length or nearly so, lacking a hyaline sheath or appendages visible in India ink or 1% SDS. Asexual morph: not observed.
Additional specimens examined: CHINA: Guizhou Province, Maolan Nature Reserve, on nutshells of fallen seeds of C. dichotoma (Boraginaceae), 16 July 2014, Ma Haixia, FCATAS908 (Col.138), GenBank numbers: ITS: MZ648853, RPBS: MZ707117, TUB: MZ695792, LSU: MZ703212.
Notes: Heteroxylaria cordiicola resembles Xylaria psidii J.D. Rogers and Hemmes in stromatal morphology, but the latter species has cylindrical stromata with inconspicuous perithecia mounds and long acute sterile apex, smaller perithecia 200–300 μm, slightly smaller ascospores (7.5–)8–11(–12) × 4.5–5 μm, with a straight to slightly sigmoid germ slit [56,72], and grows on seeds of Psidium guajava L. (Myrtaceae). Heteroxylaria cordiiacola is somewhat similar to H. oxyacanthae in stromatal morphology, but the latter species has a paler peeling stromatal layer, long tomentose stipes, longer spore-bearing portion 65–100 μm, larger inverted hat-shaped apical ring 2.0–2.5 × 3.0 μm, and grows on mummified seeds of C. monogyna (Rosaceae) [70,73]. Moreover, H. cordiiacola formed its lineage and was not closely related to H. oxyacanthae in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1). Although the phylogenetic analyses (Figure 1) show that H. cordiiacola has a close relationship with H. palmicola (X. palmicola Winter) and Heteroxylaria sp. (X. putaminum Maire and Durieu), H. palmicola is distinct morphologically for its longer stromata, larger ascospores (13.5–)14.5–16.5(–18.5) × (6–)6.5–7.5(–8.5) µm (M = 15.7 × 7.2 µm), and grows on Euterpe (Arecaceae) [56,74]. While X. putaminum (HAST145770) on buried stones of Olea europea var. sylvestris from Spain has a closer relationship with H. palmicola than H. cordiiacola in the phylogenetic tree, and sequence similarity of the species is higher with H. palmicola (ITS sequences 99.3%, RPB2 99.6%, and TUB 98.6%) than H. cordiiacola (ITS 98.37%, RPB2 99.32%, and TUB 97.44%). Morphologically, Heteroxylaria sp. (X. putaminum) differs from H. cordiiacola in having smaller stromata, larger ascospores 11.5–13.5 × 5–6(–6.5) µm [75].
  • Heteroxylaria juglandicola Hai X. Ma, A.H. Zhu and Y. Li, sp. Nov. Figure 3 and Figure 7a–c
MycoBank: MB854835
Etymology: juglandicola (Lat.): referring to the host genus Juglans which the fungus inhabits.
Figure 3. Heteroxylaria juglandicola (FCATAS 3667, holotype). (a,b) Stromata on fallen fruit. (c) Stromatal surface. (df) Section through stroma, showing perithecia. (g) Ascospore with germ slit in water. (h) Ascospore in India ink. (i) Ascospore in Melzer’s reagent. (j) Ascospore in 1% SDS. (k,l) Ascal apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (m,n) Asci in water. Scale bars: (a,b) = 10 mm; (cf) = 200 µm; (gl) = 10 µm; and (m,n) = 20 µm.
Figure 3. Heteroxylaria juglandicola (FCATAS 3667, holotype). (a,b) Stromata on fallen fruit. (c) Stromatal surface. (df) Section through stroma, showing perithecia. (g) Ascospore with germ slit in water. (h) Ascospore in India ink. (i) Ascospore in Melzer’s reagent. (j) Ascospore in 1% SDS. (k,l) Ascal apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (m,n) Asci in water. Scale bars: (a,b) = 10 mm; (cf) = 200 µm; (gl) = 10 µm; and (m,n) = 20 µm.
Jof 10 00645 g003
Holotype: CHINA: Yunnan Province, Yuxi City, Xinping County, Mopan mountain National Forest Park, on nutshells of fallen fruits of Juglans regia L. (Juglandaceae), 10 November 2019, Ma Haixia, FCATAS3667 (Col.M35), GenBank numbers: ITS: PQ009296, RPBS: PQ010279, TUB: PQ010278, LSU: PQ288591.
Description: Sexual morph: Stromata upright or prostrate, cylindrical, unbranched, with acute acute sterile apices, on long stipes originating from pannose bases, 2.0–6.5 cm total length; fertile parts cylindrical, 5.0–13 × 1.0–2.0 mm diam., slightly nodulose with wrinkles and finely longitudinally striate; stipes 0.5–6.0 cm length × 0.8–2 mm diam., well-defined, glabrous to tomentose, with a longitudinally furrowed, arising from a pannose, slightly enlarged base; surface black, with dark brown peeling outer layer and conspicuous perithecial mounds, glabrous; interior white to pale brown, solid, woody. Perithecia subglobose, 300–400 µm. Ostioles papillate. Asci eight-spored usually arranged in uniseriate manner, ascospores often overlapping, cylindrical, long-stipitate, (85–)90–115(–122) µm total length, the spore-bearing parts (45–)50–61(–66) µm long × (6.5–)7.0–8.3(–9.5) µm broad, the stipes 22–61 µm long, with apical ring bluing in Melzer’s reagent, wedge-shaped, 1.3–2.0 µm high × 2.0–2.8 µm diam. Ascospores brown, unicellular, ellipsoid-inequilateral with broadly rounded ends, occasionally with pinched on one end, smooth, (9.7–)10.5–11.7(–12.2) × (5.9–)6.0–7.0(–7.5) µm (M = 11.0 × 6.6 µm, Q = 1.8, n = 90/3), with a conspicuous straight germ slit less than a spore length, lacking a hyaline sheath or appendages visible in India ink or 1% SDS.
Additional specimens examined: CHINA: Yunnan Province, Yuxi City, Xinping County, Mopan mountain National Forest Park, on nutshells of fallen fruits of J. regia (Juglandaceae), 10 November 2019, Ma Haixia, FCATAS3668 (Col.N10), GenBank numbers: ITS: PQ009297, LSU: PQ288593; FCATAS3669 (Col.N31), GenBank numbers: LSU: PQ288592.
Notes: Heteroxylaria juglandicola is ascospores size similar to and phylogenetically closely related to H. rohrensis Friebes, A. Gallé, H.-M. Hsieh and Y.-M. Ju also growing on nutshells of J. regia (Figure 1) from Austria, but the latter species has stronger stromata, inverted hat-shaped and larger apical ring 2.5–2.8 µm high × 2.5–2.6 µm broad, the spore-bearing part longer 65–75 µm, brown to dark brown ascospores and a European distribution [57]. In addition, there is and eight-base-pair difference between the sequences of H. juglandicola and H. rohrensis, which accounts for 4.17% and 2.28% of the nucleotides in the ITS1 and ITS regions, respectively. Phylogenetic analyses show that H. juglandicola has a close relationship with H. terminalliicola and H. reevesiae (Figure 1). Morphologically, H. terminalliicola differs by having more or less cylindrical stromata with a mucronate or blunt sterile apex, an ill-defined stipe, tubular and larger an apical ring (2.2–3.8 µm high × 2.4–3.2 µm diam), a larger ascospores size range (10.0–)11–13.0(–13.8) × (5.2–)6.0–7.0(–7.8) µm (M = 12.0 × 6.7 µm), and it grows on nutshells of Terminalia catappa (Combretaceae). Heteroxylaria reevesiae is distinguished by cylindrical stromata with conspicuous perithecial mounds, brown and smaller ascospores (8.5–)9–10.5(–11) × (4–)4.5–5.5(–6) µm (M = 9.7± 0.6 × 5.0 ± 0.3 µm), and it grows on fallen fruits of Reevesia formosana (Sterculiaceae) [56].
  • Heteroxylaria meliicola Hai X. Ma, A.H. Zhu andY. Li, sp. nov. Figure 4 and Figure 7f,g
MycoBank: MB854836
Figure 4. Heteroxylaria meliicola (FCATAS 869, holotype). (a) Stromata on fallen fruits. (b) Stromatal surface. (c,d) Section through stroma, showing perithecia. (e,f) Asci with ascal apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (g) Ascospore in water. (h) Ascospore with beaked ends in water. (i) Ascal apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (j) Ascospore in Melzer’s reagent. (k,l) Ascospore in India ink. (m) Ascospore in 1% SDS. (n) Ascospore with germ slit in 1% SDS. (o) Asci in 1% SDS. Scale bars: (a) = 2 cm; (b) = 100 µm; (c,d) = 200 µm; (e) = 20 µm; and (fo) = 10 µm.
Figure 4. Heteroxylaria meliicola (FCATAS 869, holotype). (a) Stromata on fallen fruits. (b) Stromatal surface. (c,d) Section through stroma, showing perithecia. (e,f) Asci with ascal apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (g) Ascospore in water. (h) Ascospore with beaked ends in water. (i) Ascal apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (j) Ascospore in Melzer’s reagent. (k,l) Ascospore in India ink. (m) Ascospore in 1% SDS. (n) Ascospore with germ slit in 1% SDS. (o) Asci in 1% SDS. Scale bars: (a) = 2 cm; (b) = 100 µm; (c,d) = 200 µm; (e) = 20 µm; and (fo) = 10 µm.
Jof 10 00645 g004
Etymology: meliicola (Lat.): referring to the host genus Melia which the fungus inhabits.
Holotype: CHINA: Yunnan Province, Mengla County, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, on buried nuts of Melia toosendan Sieb. et Zucc. (Meliaceae), 20 October 2013, Ma Haixia, FCATAS869 (Col.9), GenBank numbers: ITS: MZ648845, RPBS: MZ707104, TUB: MZ695773.
Description: Sexual morph: Stromata upright or prostrate, cylindrical, terete to somewhat flattened, unbranched or occasionally branched, with acute sterile apices up to 5.5 mm, on long stipes originating from pannose bases, 4.5–8 cm total length; fertile parts cylindrical, 20–35 × 1.5–5 mm diam., with conspicuous perithecial mounds, overlain with wrinkles and finely longitudinally striate; stipes 20–45 mm length × 1–2.5 mm diam., well-defined, glabrous, with a longitudinally furrowed, arising from a pannose, slightly enlarged base; surface blackish with dark brown peeling outer layer, with immersed perithecia, interior white, often brown at center, solid, and woody. Texture hard. Perithecia subglobose, 300–500 µm. Ostioles faintly to papillate. Asci eight-spored usually arranged in uniseriate manner or occasionally in a partially biseriate manner, cylindrical, long-stipitate, (96–)110–125(–140) µm total length, the spore-bearing parts (60–)63–82(–88) µm long × (6.5–)7.0–8.0(–8.6) µm broad, the stipes 30–76 µm long, with apical ring bluing in Melzer’s reagent, urn-shaped to tubular, and 1.6–2.2 µm high × 1.5–2.0 µm broad. Ascospores brown to dark brown, unicellular, ellipsoid or pyriform, inequilateral, with narrowly to broadly rounded ends, smooth, aberrant ascospores with strongly pinched or beaked ends can be often encountered, (8.3–)9.5–12.0(–12.7) × (4.2–) 4.6–5.6(–6.2) µm (M = 10.4 × 5.1 µm, Q = 2.1, n = 90/3), with a conspicuous straight germ slit almost spore-length or less than spore-length, lacking a sheath or appendages visible in India ink or 1% SDS.
Additional specimens examined: CHINA: Yunnan Province, Mengla County, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, on buried nuts of M. toosendan (Meliaceae), 5 August 2010, Ma Haixia, FCATAS870 (Col.66), GenBank numbers: ITS: MZ648846.
Notes: Heteroxylaria meliicola is characterized by long cylindrical to irregular stromata with inconspicuous perithecial mounds and longitudinally striate, ellipsoid or pyriform ascospores with a straight germ slit, and grows on nuts of M. toosendan in Meliaceae. Læssøe and Lodge (1994) [76] described two Xylaria species on the Meliaceaea, X. meliacearum Læssøe and X. guareae Læssøe et Lodge. Xylaria meliacearum was found on leaf petioles and midveins of Trichila and Guarea, and X. guareae on the branches of G. guidonia. However, H. meliicola is distinctly different from the two species. X. meliacearum has strap-like stromata, stipitate unclear, separated from fertile part and larger ascospores (18.5–)19.1–30.0(–33.0) × (4.0–)4.6–6.6(–7.9) µm, whereas X. guareae has smaller stromata [2–6(–8) × 1.5–3(–6) mm], compressed obpyriform or pulvinate, and larger ascospores 39–50 × 13.6–17.0 µm [76].
Two species, H. oxyacanthae and H. palmicola, are somewhat similar to the Chinese collections in stromatal morphology, but H. oxyacanthae has a paler peeling stromatal layer, long tomentose stipes, larger inverted hat-shaped apical ring 2.0–2.5 × 3.0 μm, and grows on mummified seeds of Crataegus monogyna (Rosaceae) [56,70,73]. While H. palmicola differs in having larger ascospores (13.5–)14.5–16.5(–18.5) × (6–)6.5–7.5(–8.5) µm (M = 15.7 × 7.2 µm), and grows on fruits of Euterpe (Arecaceae) [56,74]. Moreover, H. cordiiacola formed its lineage and was not closely related to X. meliacearum, H. oxyacanthae, and H. palmicola in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1).
Phylogenetically, Heteroxylaria meliicola grouped with H. terminaliicola, H. reevesiae, H. juglandicola, and H. rohrensis with no significant support (−% ML, − BPP). Morphologically, H. meliicola resembles H. reevesiae YM Ju, JD Rogers and HM Hsieh in stromatal morphology, but the latter species has cylindrical stromata with conspicuous perithecial mounds, slightly smaller ascospores (8.5–)9–10.5(–11) × (4–)4.5–5.5(–6) µm (M = 9.7 × 5.0 µm), and grows on fallen fruits of Reevesia formosana (Sterculiaceae) [56]. Heteroxylaria terminaliicola differs from H. meliicola in having stronger stromata with a mucronate or blunt sterile apex, larger apical ring 2.2–3.8 µm high × 2.4–3.2 µm diam, larger ascospores (10.0–)11–13.0(–13.8) × (5.2–)6.0–7.0(–7.8) µm (M = 12.0 × 6.7 µm), and grows on nutshells of Terminalia catappa. Heteroxylaria juglandicola differs by having smaller stromata, shorter in the spore-bearing part, and slightly larger ascospores, while H. rohrensis is distinguished by having smaller stromata, larger apical ring 2.5–2.8 µm high × 2.5–2.6 µm broad, inverted hat-shaped, and the two species grow on nutshells of J. regia (Juglandaceae) [57].
  • Heteroxylaria terminaliicola Hai X. Ma, A.H. Zhu and Y. Li, sp. nov. Figure 5 and Figure 7j,k.
Figure 5. Heteroxylaria terminaliicola (FCATAS 921, holotype). (a,b) Stromata on fallen fruit. (c) Stromatal surface. (d,e) Section through stroma, showing perithecia. (f) Ascal apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (g) Ascospore with germ slit in KOH. (h) Asci with ascal apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (i) Ascospore with beaked ends in 5% KOH. (j) Ascospore in 5% KOH. (k) Ascospore in India ink. (l) Ascospore with germ slit in Melzer’s reagent. (m) Ascospore in 1% SDS. (n) Ascospores with germ slit in 1% SDS. Scale bars: (a,b) = 1 cm; (c,e) = 200 µm; (d) = 500 µm; and (fn) = 10 µm.
Figure 5. Heteroxylaria terminaliicola (FCATAS 921, holotype). (a,b) Stromata on fallen fruit. (c) Stromatal surface. (d,e) Section through stroma, showing perithecia. (f) Ascal apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (g) Ascospore with germ slit in KOH. (h) Asci with ascal apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (i) Ascospore with beaked ends in 5% KOH. (j) Ascospore in 5% KOH. (k) Ascospore in India ink. (l) Ascospore with germ slit in Melzer’s reagent. (m) Ascospore in 1% SDS. (n) Ascospores with germ slit in 1% SDS. Scale bars: (a,b) = 1 cm; (c,e) = 200 µm; (d) = 500 µm; and (fn) = 10 µm.
Jof 10 00645 g005
MycoBank: MB854837
Etymology: terminaliicola (Lat.): referring to the host genus Terminalia which the fungus inhabits.
Holotype: CHINA: Hainan Province, Haikou City, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, on nutshells of Terminalia catappa L. (Combretaceae), 20 November 2020, Ma Haixia, FCATAS921 (Col.26), GenBank numbers: ITS: MZ648854, RPBS: MZ707125, TUB: MZ695802, LSU: MZ703410.
Description: Sexual morph: Stromata upright, solitary or sometimes clustered, straight to curved, unbranched or branched at apices or fertile parts, apically attenuated into a mucronate or blunt sterile apex, 2.5–7 cm total height; fertile parts 10–20 mm high × 1.5–3.5 mm broad, cylindrical, surface dark brown to blackish, with inconspicuous perithecial mounds, occasionally with dark brown tomentum in part, eventually black outer layer splitting longitudinally into stripes; the stipes 13–50 mm high × 1.0–6.0 mm broad, terete to rarely flattened, often contorted, ill-defined, glabrous, the pannose base swollen and slightly tomentose; surface black, roughened with perithecia and tomentose; interior white, solid, and woody. Perithecia subglobose, 350–600 µm. Ostioles papillate. Asci eight-spored arranged in uniseriate manner, cylindrical, long-stipitate, (95–)105–155(–170) µm total length, the spore-bearing parts (55–)65–75(–100) µm long × (6.4–)7.0–8.0(–9.0) µm broad, the stipes 35–70 µm long, with apical ring bluing in Melzer’s reagent, tubular to short tubular, 2.2–3.8 µm high × 2.4–3.2 µm diam. Ascospores brown, unicellular, fusiform or navicular, inequilateral, with broadly rounded ends, one end slightly pinched sometimes, or beaked occasionally, smooth, (10.0–)11–13.0(–13.8) × (5.2–)6.0–7.0(–7.8) µm (M = 12.0 × 6.7 µm, Q = 1.8, n = 60/2), with a conspicuous straight germ slit slightly less than spore-length, lacking a sheath or appendages visible in India ink or 1% SDS.
Additional specimens examined: CHINA: Hainan Province, Haikou City, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, on nutshells of T. catappa, 20 November 2020, Ma HaiXia, FCATAS922 (Col.27), GenBank numbers: ITS: MZ648855, RPBS: MZ707126, TUB: MZ695803, LSU: MZ703411.
Notes: Heteroxylaria terminaliicola is distinguished by its strong stromata with inconspicuous perithecial mounds, large tubular apical ring, brown ascospores with a conspicuous straight germ slit, and grows on nutshells of T. catappa. Pande and Waingankar (2004) [77] described two Xylaria species on fallen fruits of Terminalia from Western India. Xylaria terminaliae-bellericae Pande and Waingankar was found on fallen fruits of T. bellerica, and X. terminaliae-crenulatae Pande and Waingankar on fallen fruits of T. crenulata [77]. However, H. terminaliicola is distinctly different from the two species. Xylaria terminaliae-bellericae has hairy stipe, more acute sterile apex, and slightly smaller ascospores 8–11 × 3–5.4 µm, whereas X. terminaliae-crenulatae has thinner, filiform, unbranched stromata, and larger ascospores 10.5–15.8 × 5.3–10.5 µm [77].
Heteroxylaria terminaliicola somewhat resembles H. oxyacanthae by sharing stromatal morphology, but differs from the latter in having stromata with apices often shriveled or broken, salmon buff to dark brown, slightly smaller ascospores (9.5–)10–11.5(–12) × (4–)4.5–5.5(–6) µm (M = 10.8 × 5.0 µm), and grows on seeds of C. oxyacantha (Rosaceae) [56,70,73]. Xylaria rhizocola (Mont.) Fr. is also similar to H. terminaliicola in ascospores dimensions, but differs in having rounded stromatal tip, surface non-tomentum, inverted hat-shaped and slightly smaller apical ring 1.5–2 µm high × 2 µm broad, and grows on the buried seed of an unknown host [56]. The phylogenetic trees show that H. terminaliicola and H. reevesiae Y.M. Ju, J.D. Rogers and H.M. Hsieh are closely related, but the latter differs in having conspicuous perithecial mounds, a smaller and inverted hat-shaped apical ring 1.5–2 µm high × 2–2.5 µm broad, smaller ascospores (8.5–)9–10.5(–11) × (4–)4.5–5.5(–6) µm (M = 9.7 × 5.0 µm), and grows on fruits of R. formosana (Sterculiaceae) [56].
  • Heteroxylaria oxyacanthae (Tul. and C. Tul.) Hai X. Ma, A.H. Zhu and Y. Li, comb. nov. Figure 6 and Figure 7h,i
MycoBank: MB854838
Figure 6. Heteroxylaria oxyacanthae (FCATAS 906). (a,b) Stroma on fallen fruit. (c) Stromatal surface. (d,e) Section through stroma, showing perithecia. (f) Young asci in water. (g) Asci in India ink. (h,i) Ascal apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (j) Ascospore in water. (k) Ascospore in Melzer’s reagent. (l) Ascospore with beaked ends in India ink. (m) Ascospore with germ slit in 1% SDS. Scale bars: (a,b) = 1 cm; (c) = 500 µm; (d,e) = 100 µm; and (fm) = 10 µm.
Figure 6. Heteroxylaria oxyacanthae (FCATAS 906). (a,b) Stroma on fallen fruit. (c) Stromatal surface. (d,e) Section through stroma, showing perithecia. (f) Young asci in water. (g) Asci in India ink. (h,i) Ascal apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (j) Ascospore in water. (k) Ascospore in Melzer’s reagent. (l) Ascospore with beaked ends in India ink. (m) Ascospore with germ slit in 1% SDS. Scale bars: (a,b) = 1 cm; (c) = 500 µm; (d,e) = 100 µm; and (fm) = 10 µm.
Jof 10 00645 g006
Basionym: Xylaria oxyacanthae Tul. and C. Tul., Selecta Carpologia Fungorum 2, p.15.1863.
Holotype: FRANCE: Bethisy, on seeds of Crataegus oxyacantha (Rosaceae), Jun 1860, Tulasne, R. (holotype PC 0096746!).
Description: Sexual morph: Stromata upright or prostrate, unbranched or branched from the fertile parts, 3–13 cm total height, long-stipitate; fertile parts 6–40 mm high × 1.5–8.0 mm broad, fusiform to cylindrical or forked, sometimes flattened, with acute grey-white sterile apices up to 2 mm long, exterior smooth at young stromata, white to cream-coloured, mature stromata black, strongly nodulose, with gray-white peeling outer layer, interior yellow to light brown, solid, and woody; stipes 27–90 mm high × 0.5–3.5 mm broad, smooth to downy, terete, sometimes flattened, usually contorted, with longitudinally wrinkles, arising from a pannose, slightly enlarged base. Surface roughened with wrinkles and perithecial contours. Perithecia subglobose, 300–400 µm. Ostioles papillate. Asci eight-spored arranged in uniseriate manner, cylindrical, long-stipitate, 110–185 µm total length, the spore-bearing part (60–)65–75(–80) µm long × 6–7 µm broad, with apical ring bluing in Melzer’s iodine reagent, more or less rectangular or discoid, 1.8–2.5 µm high × 2–2.5 µm broad. Ascospores brown to dark brown, unicellular, ellipsoid-inequilateral, with narrowly to broadly rounded ends, smooth, (10–)11–12(–12.5) × (4.5–)5.0–5.5(–6) µm (M = 11.0 × 5.1 µm, Q = 2.2, n = 60/2), with straight germ slit full-length or nearly so, lacking a sheath or appendages in India ink or 1% SDS.
Specimens examined: CHINA: Jilin Province, Changchun City, Jingyuetan Forest Park, on seeds of Crataegus maximowiczii Schneid (Rosaceae), 1 September 2014, Ma Haixia FCATAS905 (Col.130), GenBank numbers: ITS: MZ620654, RPBS: MZ678635, TUB: MZ695789, LSU: MZ703199; FCATAS906 (Col.132), GenBank numbers: ITS: MZ620655, RPBS: MZ678636, TUB: MZ695790, LSU: MZ703200.
Notes: Xylaria oxyacanthae was originally described on seeds of C. oxyacantha L. (Rosaceae) from France. The species is characterized by cylindrical to irregular stromata with short acute sterile apices on tomentose stipes, surface blackish with a gray to brown peeling outer layer, and brown to dark brown ascospores with straight germ slit [56,70,73]. We collected the two present materials which both were found on nuts of C. maximowiczii from Jilin province of northeastern China. We follow Ju et al. (2018) [56] who determined the type specimen of X. oxyacanthae on seeds of C. oxyacantha (Rosaceae) from France. Based on morphological studies and phylogenetic analyses, we determined that the Chinese collections are conspecific with X. oxyacanthae and transfer it to Heteroxylaria.
  • Heteroxylaria palmicola (G. Winter) Hai X. Ma, A.H. Zhu and Y. Li, comb. nov.
MycoBank: MB854839
Basionym: Xylaria palmicola G. Winter, Grevillea 15:89. 1887.
Holotype: BRAZIL: Pr. St. Catharina, São Francisco, on seeds of Euterpe sp. (Arecaceae), May 1885, Ule, E. 353 (holotype HBG!)
For a detailed description of Xylaria palmicola, see Dennis (1956) [74].
Notes: Xylaria palmicola was introduced by G. Winter (1887) from seeds of Euterpe sp. (Arecaceae) in Brazil. This species is characterized by slender, cylindrical, and long stroma, simple, with pointed apex, perithecia rather prominent, brown surface with longitudinally along numerous and closely spaced parallel cracks, stipes defined well, very long, becoming longitudinally wrinkled and some twisted when dried, and ascospores with pointed ends [74]. There is no sequence data of the type of X. palmicola, but a putatively named collection (PDD604) from New Zealand [27]. In the phylogenetic tree, the strain from New Zealand distributed in the genus Heteroxylaria (Figure 1). Based on morphological studies and phylogenetic analyses, we propose the transfer of X. palmicola into Heteroxylaria.
  • Heteroxylaria reevesiae (Y.M. Ju, J.D. Rogers and H.M. Hsieh) Hai X. Ma, A.H. Zhu and Y. Li, comb. nov.
MycoBank: MB854840
Basionym: Xylaria reevesiae Y.M. Ju, J.D. Rogers and H.M. Hsieh, Mycologia 110(4): 742. 2018.
Holotype: CHINA: Pingtung Co., Hengchun, Kenting, on fallen fruits of Reevesia formosana (Sterculiaceae), 16 July 2001, Ju YM and Hsieh HM, 90,071,609 (holotype HAST).
For a detailed description of Xylaria reevesiae, see Ju et al. (2018) [56].
Notes: Xylaria reevesiae was introduced by Y.M. Ju, J.D. Rogers, and H.M. Hsieh (2018) [56] from fallen fruits of Reevesia formosana (Sterculiaceae) in Taiwan of China. This species is characterized by cylindrical stroma with apiculate to acicular apices on glabrous or tomentose stipe, dark brown to blackish surface with conspicuous perithecial mounds, an overlain narrowly striped outermost layer, ascospores brown, smooth, with a straight germ slit. In the phylogenetic tree, the strain from the type specimen distributed in the genus Heteroxylaria (Figure 1). Based on morphological studies and phylogenetic analyses, we propose the transfer of X. reevesiae into Heteroxylaria.
Figure 7. (ac) Heteroxylaria juglandicola (FCATAS 3667, holotype); (d,e) Heteroxylaria cordiicola (FCATAS 907, holotype); (f,g) Heteroxylaria meliicola (FCATAS 869, holotype); (h,i) Heteroxylaria oxyacanthae (FCATAS 906); and (j,k) Heteroxylaria terminaliicola (FCATAS 921, holotype). Scale bars: 2 µm.
Figure 7. (ac) Heteroxylaria juglandicola (FCATAS 3667, holotype); (d,e) Heteroxylaria cordiicola (FCATAS 907, holotype); (f,g) Heteroxylaria meliicola (FCATAS 869, holotype); (h,i) Heteroxylaria oxyacanthae (FCATAS 906); and (j,k) Heteroxylaria terminaliicola (FCATAS 921, holotype). Scale bars: 2 µm.
Jof 10 00645 g007
  • Heteroxylaria rohrensis (Friebes, A. Gallé, H.M. Hsieh and Y.M. Ju) Hai X. Ma, A.H. Zhu and Y. Li, comb. nov.
MycoBank: MB854841
Basionym: Xylaria rohrensis Friebes, A. Gallé, H.M. Hsieh and Y.M. Ju, Nova Hedwigia 115(1-2): 137. 2022.
Holotype: AUSTRIA: Styria, Rohr an der Raab, Südoststeiermark, on nutshells of Juglans regia, 3 August 2020, Gallé, A. (holotype HAST 145766).
For a detailed description of Xylaria rohrensis, see Friebes et al. (2022) [57].
Notes: Xylaria rohrensis was introduced by Friebes, A. Gallé, H.M. Hsieh and Y.M. Ju (2022) [57] from nutshells of Juglans regia (Juglandaceae) in Austria. The species is characterized by cylindrical stromata unbranched or branched once or twice at clavae, asci with an apical ring inverted hat-shaped, and brown to dark brown ascospores ellipsoid-inequilateral, with a straight germ slit [57]. Based on morphological studies and phylogenetic analyses, we propose the transfer of X. rohrensis into Heteroxylaria.
Notes on doubtful species:
Xylaria putaminum Maire and Durieu
This fungus is a invalid species for lacking the Latin description and the type specimens [57,75]. Based on morphological studies and sequence analyses in the study, it may be conspecific with H. palmicola, further identification should be made. Therefore, the species was as an uncertain species in Heteroxylaria.

4. Discussion

In the present study, the genus Heteroxylaria represented by H. oxyacanthae, H. cordiicola, H. juglandicola, H. meliicola, H. palmicola, H. reevesiae, H. rohrensis, and an uncertained species (X. putaminum), is separated from Xylaria within Xylariaceae from a phylogenetic perspective and ecological characters in the present study. The new genus Heteroxylaria is mainly characterized by cylindrical stromata, brown ascospores, and grows on the nutshell of fruits, closely related to Hypocreodendron. However, the genus Hypocreodendron has obvious differences in stromatal and ascospore morphology, and grows on ant nests [71].
Xylaira is the largest genus in Xylariaceae including 879 taxa recorded in Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org/, accessed on 30 January 2024). The genus Xylaria in the current taxonomic concept clearly indicated to be not monophyletic [24,27,57,78], which was once more confirmed in this paper. The phylogenies generated in different studies suggested that a polyphasic taxonomic approach for reconstructing classification system of Xylaria was needed. Therefore, we carried out morphological, ecological, and sequence data to erect a polyphasic characterization of a separate clade (HD clade) phylogenetically resolved inside Xylaria, including taxa closely related to X. oxyacanthae, for which we present the new genus Heteroxylaria, sharing many morphological features with Xylaria in the traditional discriminative criteria. This is not unique for the genus Xylaria, but also similar for some other genera of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota; for example, several genera were separated from Hypoxylon within Hypoxylaceae [20,79] and the phylogenetic updates in Agaricales with an emphasis on Tricholomopsis [80]. Currently, the placement of other clades (TE, HY, PO, and IA) in Xylaria remain unresolved, and therefore, the polyphasic taxonomic approaches based on morphological, chemotaxonomic, and phylogenetic data including more gene sequences or genome sequencing for resolving the confusion of Xylaria species associated with other fruits or substances are needed in the further studies.
Xylaria are an extremely diverse genus of fungi, many taxa have the ability to decompose cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and carbohydrates in the substrate [81,82,83]. Some studies suggested that Xylaria species may have a preference for certain types of lignin over others for some degradative enzymes [84,85,86,87,88]. Heteroxylaria taxa grow on the nutshells of fruits or seeds, and whether the degrading enzymes can be the key evidence for resolving the taxonomic confusion of Xylaira remains to be explored in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and supervision, H.-X.M.; resources, H.-X.M., Z.-K.S. and A.-H.Z.; investigation, methodology and data curation, A.-H.Z., Z.-K.S. and Z.Q.; software, J.-F.W. and H.-W.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.-H.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.-X.M.; project administration, H.-X.M.; funding acquisition, H.-X.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund for Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (1630052022003), Hainan Province Science and technology Special Fund (ZDYF2023RDYL01), Hainan Institute of National Park, HINP, KY-24ZK02, and Yazhou Bay Scientific and Technological Project for Trained Talents of Sanya City (SCKJ-JYRC-2023-74).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. All newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/; accessed on 13 July 2024; Table 1). All new taxa were deposited in MycoBank (https:www.mycobank.org/; accessed on 18 July 2024; MycoBank identifiers follow new taxa and new combinations).

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Xiao-Peng Wu (Analysis and Testing Center, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences) for assistance in micrographs produced by SEM.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dennis, R.W.G. Further notes on tropical American Xylariaceae. Kew Bull. 1957, 12, 297–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Whalley, A.J.S. The Xylariaceae: Some ecological considerations. Sydowia Ann. Mycol. Ser. II 1985, 38, 369–382. [Google Scholar]
  3. Whalley, A.J.S. The xylariaceous way of life. Mycol. Res. 1996, 100, 897–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rogers, J.D. Thoughts and musings on tropical Xylariaceae. Mycol. Res. 2000, 104, 1412–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Suwannasai, N.; Phosri, C.; Sangvichien, E.; Sihanonth, P.; Ruchikachorn, N.; Whalley, M.A.; Yao, Y.J.; Whalley, A.J.S. Biogeography of selected Xylariaceae. Mycosystema 2013, 32, 469–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Koyani, R.D.; Patel, H.R.; Vasava, A.M.; Rajput, K.S. Xylariaceae: Overview and addition to fungal diversity of Gujarat state. Stud. Fungi 2016, 1, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rogers, J.D. The Xylariaceae: Systematic, biological and evolutionary aspects. Mycologia 1979, 71, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pažoutová, S.; Šrůtka, P.; Holuša, J.; Chudíčková, M.; Kolařík, M. Diversity of xylariaceous symbionts in Xiphydria woodwasps: Role of vector and a host tree. Fungal Ecol. 2010, 3, 392–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Edwards, R.L.; Jonglaekha, N.; Kshirsagar, A.; Maitland, D.J.; Mekkamol, S.; Nugent, L.K.; Phosri, C.; Rodtong, S.; Ruchichachorn, N.; Sangvichien, E.; et al. The Xylariaceae as phytopathogens. Recent Res. Dev. Plant Sci. 2003, 1, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  10. Husbands, D.; Aime, M. Emerging forest diseases: A case study of greenheart (Chlorocardium spp., Lauraceae) and the newly described fungus, Xylaria karyophthora. Forests 2018, 9, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Garcia-Aroca, T.; Price, P.P.; Tomaso-Peterson, M.; Allen, T.W.; Wilkerson, T.H.; Spurlock, T.; Faske, T.; Bluhm, B.; Conner, K.; Sikora, E.; et al. Xylaria necrophora, sp. nov. is an emerging root-associated pathogen responsible for taproot decline of soybean in the southern United States. Mycologia 2021, 113, 326–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Okane, I.; Srikitikulchai, P.; Toyama, K.; Læssøe, T.; Sivichai, S.; Hyweljones, N.; Nakagiri, A.; Potacharoen, W.; Suzuki, K. Study of endophytic Xylariaceae in Thailand: Diversity and taxonomy inferred from rDNA sequence analyses with saprobes forming fruit bodies in the field. Mycoscience 2008, 49, 359–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stadler, M.; Laessoe, T.; Vasilyeva, L. The genus Pyrenomyxa and its affinities to other cleistocarpous Hypoxyloideae as inferred from morphological and chemical traits. Mycologia 2005, 97, 1129–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bitzer, J.; Læssøe, T.; Fournier, J.; Kummer, V.; Decock, C.; Tichy, H.V.; Piepenbring, M.; Peršoh, D.; Stadler, M. Affinities of Phylacia and the daldinoid Xylariaceae, inferred from chemotypes of cultures and ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycol. Res. 2008, 112, 251–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Song, F.; Wu, S.H.; Zhai, Y.Z.; Xuan, Q.C.; Wang, T. Secondary metabolites from the genus Xylaria and their bioactivities. Chem. Biodivers. 2014, 11, 673–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Helaly, S.E.; Thongbai, B.; Stadler, M. Diversity of biologically active secondary metabolites from endophytic and saprotrophic fungi of the ascomycete order Xylariales. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2018, 35, 992–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Eriksson, O.E.; Hawksworth, D.L. Outline of the ascomycetes-1993. Syst. Ascomycetum 1993, 12, 51–257. [Google Scholar]
  18. Læssøe, T. Index Ascomycetum. I. Xylariaceae. Syst. Ascomycetum 1994, 1, 43–112. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kirk, P.M.; Cannon, P.F.; Minter, D.W.; Stalpers, J.A. Dictionary of the Fungi, 10th ed.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2008; p. 771. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wendt, L.; Sir, E.B.; Kuhnert, E.; Heitkämper, S.; Lambert, C.; Hladki, A.I.; Romero, A.I.; Luangsa-ard, J.J.; Srikitikulchai, P.; Peršoh, D.; et al. Resurrection and emendation of the Hypoxylaceae, recognised from a multigene phylogeny of the Xylariales. Mycol. Prog. 2018, 17, 115–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Daranagama, D.A.; Hyde, K.D.; Sir, E.B.; Thambugala, K.M.; Tian, Q.; Samarakoon, M.C.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Jayasiri, S.C.; Tibpromma, S.; Bhat, J.D.; et al. Towards a natural classification and backbone tree for Graphostromataceae, Hypoxylaceae, Lopadostomataceae and Xylariaceae. Fungal Divers. 2018, 88, 1–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hyde, K.D.; Norphanphoun, C.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Bhat, D.J.; Jones, E.B.G.; Bundhun, D.; Chen, Y.J.; Bao, D.F.; Boonmee, S.; Calabon, M.S.; et al. Refined families of Sodariomycetes. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 305–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wijayawardene, N.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Al-Ani, L.K.T.; Tedersoo, L.; Haelewaters, D.; Rajeshkumar, K.C.; Zhao, R.L.; Aptroot, A.; Leontyev, D.V.; Saxena, R.K.; et al. Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 1060–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Konta, S.; Hyde, K.D.; Phookamsak, R.; Xu, J.C.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Daranagama, D.A.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Boonmee, S.; Tibpromma, S.; Eungwanichayapant, P.D.; et al. Polyphyletic genera in Xylariaceae (Xylariales): Neoxylaria gen. nov. and Stilbohypoxylon. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 2629–2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Greville, R.K. Flora Edinensis: Or a Description of Plants Growing near Edinburgh, Arranged According to the Linnean System, with a Concise Introduction to the Natural Orders of the Class Cryptogamia, and Illustrative Plate; Blackwood: Edinburgh, UK, 1824. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rogers, J.D. Anamorphs of Xylaria: Taxonomic considerations. Sydowia 1985, 38, 255–262. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hsieh, H.M.; Lin, C.R.; Fang, M.J.; Rogers, J.D.; Fournier, J.; Lechat, C.; Ju, Y.M. Phylogenetic status of Xylaria subgenus Pseudoxylaria among taxa of the subfamily Xylarioideae (Xylariaceae) and phylogeny of the taxa involved in the subfamily. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 54, 957–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Senanayake, I.C.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Bhat, D.J.; Jones, E.B.G.; Mckenzie, E.H.C.; Dai, D.Q.; Daranagama, D.A.; Dayarathne, M.C.; Goonasekara, I.D.; et al. Towards unraveling relationships in Xylariomycetidae (Sordariomycetes). Fungal Divers. 2015, 73, 73–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Jones, E.B.G.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Bhat, J.D.; Dayarathne, M.C.; Huang, S.K.; Norphanphoun, C.; Senanayake, I.C.; Perera, R.H.; et al. Families of Sordariomycetes. Fungal Divers. 2016, 79, 1–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hongsanan, S.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Samarakoon, M.C.; Jeewon, R.; Zhao, Q.; Ai-Sadi, A.M.; Bahkali, A.H. An updated phylogeny of Sordariomycetes based on phylogenetic and molecular clock evidence. Fungal Divers. 2017, 84, 25–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ma, H.X.; Song, Z.K.; Pan, X.Y.; Qu, Z.; Yang, Z.E.; Li, Y.; Zhu, A.H. Four new pale-spored species of Xylaria (Xylariaceae, Xylariales) with a key to worldwide species on fallen fruits and seeds. Biology 2022, 11, 885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Teng, S.Q. Fungi of China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1963; p. 808. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tai, F.L. Sylloge Fungorum Sinicorum; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1979; p. 1527. [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, Y.L.; Li, H.J. A novel species of Xylaria. J. Nanjing Agric. Univ. 1994, 17, 145–147. [Google Scholar]
  35. Abe, Y.; Liu, Z. An annotated list of xylariaceous and diatrypaceous fungi collected from Mt. Fengyangshan and Mt. Baishanzu, Zhejiang Prov. in East China. Bul. Natl. Sci. Mus. Ser. B Bot. 1995, 21, 75–86. [Google Scholar]
  36. Xu, A.S. A new species of Xylaria. Mycosystema 1999, 18, 137–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhu, Y.F.; Guo, L. Xylaria hainanensis sp. nov. (Xylariaceae) from China. Mycosystema 2011, 30, 526–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ma, H.X.; Vasilyeva, L.; Li, Y. A new species of Xylaria from China. Mycotaxon 2011, 116, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ma, H.X.; Vasilyeva, L.; Li, Y. The genus Xylaria (Xylariaceae) in the south of China—6. A new Xylaria species based on morphological and molecular characters. Phytotaxa 2013, 147, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ma, H.X.; Li, Y. Xylaria curta and X. partita (Xylariales) from Yunnan province. Austrian J. Mycol. 2017, 26, 99–105. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ma, H.X.; Li, Y. Xylaria crinalis and X. betulicola from China—Two new species with thread-like stromata. Sydowia 2018, 70, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ma, H.X.; Qu, Z.; Peng, M.K.; Li, Y. Two penzigioid Xylaria species described from China based on morphological and molecular characters. Phytotaxa 2020, 436, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pan, X.Y.; Song, Z.K.; Qu, Z.; Liu, T.D.; Ma, H.X. Three new Xylaria species (Xylariaceae, Xylariales) on fallen leaves from Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park. MycoKeys 2022, 86, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rayner, R.W. A Mycological Color Chart; Cmi. & British Mycological Society Kew: London, UK, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  45. Song, Z.K.; Zhu, A.H.; Liu, Z.D.; Qu, Z.; Li, Y.; Ma, H.X. Three New species of Hypoxylon (Xylariales, Ascomycota) on a multigene phylogeny from Medog in Southwest China. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. White, T.J.; Burns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols, a Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, Y.J.; Whelen, S.; Hall, B.D. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: Evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16, 1799–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. O’ Donnell, K.; Cigelnik, E. Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the Fungus. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1997, 7, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ju, Y.M.; Rogers, J.D.; Hsieh, H.M. Amphirosellinia gen. nov. and a new species of Entoleuca. Mycologia 2004, 96, 1393–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Voglmayr, H.; Friebes, G.; Gardiennet, A.; Jaklitsch, W.M. Barrmaelia and Entosordaria in Barrmaeliaceae (fam. nov., Xylariales) and critical notes on Anthostomella-like genera based on multigene phylogenies. Mycol. Prog. 2018, 17, 155–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Daranagama, D.A.; Camporesi, E.; Tian, Q.; Liu, X.Z.; Chamyuang, S.; Stadler, M.; Hyde, K.D. Anthostomella is polyphyletic comprising several genera in Xylariaceae. Fungal Divers. 2015, 73, 203–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jaklitsch, W.M.; Gardiennet, A.; Voglmayr, H. Resolution of morphology-based taxonomic delusions: Acrocordiella, Basiseptospora, Blogiascospora, Clypeosphaeria, Hymenopleella, Lepteutypa, Pseudapiospora, Requienella, Seiridium and Strickeria. Persoonia 2016, 37, 82–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, Q.R.; Wen, T.C.; Kang, J.C.; Hyde, K.D. A new species of Collodiscula (Xylariaceae) from China. Phytotaxa 2015, 205, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, Q.R.; Kang, J.C.; Hyde, K.D. Two new species of the genus Collodiscula (Xylariaceae) from China. Mycol. Prog. 2015, 14, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vu, D.; Groenewald, M.; Vries, M.; Gehrmann, T.; Stielow, B.; Eberhardt, U.; Al-Hatmi, A.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Cardinali, G.; Houbraken, J.; et al. Large-Scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Stud. Mycol. 2019, 92, 135–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ju, Y.M.; Rogers, J.D.; Hsieh, H.M. Xylaria species associated with fallen fruits and seeds. Mycologia 2018, 110, 726–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Friebes, G.; Gallé, A.; Hsieh, H.M.; Ju, Y.M. Xylaria rohrensis, a new species inhabiting nutshells of Juglans regia in Austria. Nova Hedwig. 2022, 115, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Stadler, M.; Kuhnert, E.; Peršoh, D.; Fournier, J. The Xylariaceae as model example for a unified nomenclature following the “One Fungus-One Name” (1F1N) concept. Mycology 2013, 4, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ju, Y.M.; Hsieh, H.M.; Ho, M.C.; Szu, D.H.; Fang, M.J. Theissenia rogersii sp. nov. and phylogenetic position of Theissenia. Mycologia 2007, 99, 612–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Fournier, J.; Ju, Y.M.; Hsieh, H.M.; Lindermann, U. Xylaria aethiopica sp. nov.—A new pod-inhabiting species of Xylaria (Xylariaceae) from Ethiopia. Ascomycete.Org 2018, 10, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ju, Y.M.; Hsieh, H.M. Xylaria species associated with nests of Odontotermes formosanus in Taiwan. Mycologia 2007, 99, 936–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Perera, R.H.; Hyde, K.D.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Jones, E.B.G.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Stadler, M.; Lee, H.B.; Samarakoon, M.C.; Ekanayaka, A.H.; Camporesi, E.; et al. Fungi on wild seeds and fruits. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 2108–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Dillon, R.H.; Hector, U.; Susy, M.L.; Catherine Aime, M. Xylaria karyophthora: A new seed-inhabiting fungus of Greenheart from Guyana. Mycologia 2018, 110, 434–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhu, A.H.; Song, Z.K.; Wang, J.F.; Guan, H.W.; Qu, Z.; Ma, H.X. Multi-Gene phylogenetic and taxonomic contributions to Xylaria (Ascomycota) associated with fallen fruits from China. MycoKeys 2024, 106, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hall, T.A. Bioedit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Thompson, J.D.; Gibson, T.J.; Plewniak, F.; Franois, J.; Higgins, D.G. The CLUSTAL X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 4876–4882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Stamatakis, A. RAxML Version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; van der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Hõhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Rambaut, A. FigTree, a Graphical Viewer of Phylogenetic Trees. 2014. Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/fgtree/ (accessed on 20 July 2024).
  70. Stowell, E.A.; Rogers, J.D. Studies on Xylaria oxyacanthae. Mycotaxon 1983, 17, 433–444. [Google Scholar]
  71. Rogers, J.D.; Ju, Y.M.; San Martín, F. Discoxylaria myrmecophila and its Hypocreodendron anamorph. Mycologia 1995, 87, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rogers, J.D.; Ju, Y.M.; Hemmes, D.E. Hypoxylon rectangulosporum sp. nov., Xylaria psidii sp. nov., and comments on taxa of Podosordaria and Stromatoneurospora. Mycologia 1992, 84, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. San Martín, F.; Rogers, J.D. A preliminary account of Xylaria of Mexico. Mycotaxon 1989, 34, 283–373. [Google Scholar]
  74. Dennis, R.W.G. Some Xylarias of tropical America. Kew Bull. 1956, 11, 401–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bertault, R. Xylaires d’Europe et d’Afrique du Nord. Bull. Trimest. Soc. Mycol. Fr. 1984, 100, 139–175. [Google Scholar]
  76. Læssøe, T.; Lodge, D.J. Three host-specific Xylaria species. Mycologia 1994, 86, 436–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pande, A.; Waingankar, V. Four new taxa in Xylaria from Western India. J. Econ. Taxon. Bot. 2004, 28, 610–613. [Google Scholar]
  78. U’Ren, J.M.; Miadlikowska, J.; Zimmerman, N.; Lutzoni, F.; Stajich, J.E.; Arnoid, A.E. Contributions of North American endophytes to the phylogeny, ecology, and taxonomy of Xylariaceae (Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2016, 98, 210–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Lambert, C.; Wendt, L.; Hladki, A.I.; Stadler, M.; Sir, E.B. Hypomontagnella (Hypoxylaceae): A new genus segregated from Hypoxylon by a polyphasic taxonomic approach. Mycol. Prog. 2019, 18, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, G.S.; Cai, Q.; Hao, Y.J.; Bau, T.; Chen, Z.H.; Li, M.X.; David, N.; Kraisitudomsook, N.; Yang, Z.L. Phylogenetic and taxonomic updates of Agaricales, with an emphasis on Tricholomopsis. Mycology 2023, 14, 180–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Nilsson, T.; Daniel, G.; Kirk, T.; Obst, J.R. Chemistry and microscopy of wood decay by some higher ascomycetes. Holzforschung 1989, 43, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Thomas, D.C.; Vandegrift, R.; Ludden, A.; Carroll, G.C.; Roy, B.A. Spatial ecology of the fungal genus Xylaria in a Tropical Cloud Forest. Biotropica 2016, 48, 381–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Osono, T. Decomposition of organic chemical components in wood by tropical Xylaria species. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sorvari, J.; Sjostrom, E.; Klemola, A.; Laine, J.E. Chemical characterization of wood constituents, especially lignin, in fractions separated from middle lamella and secondary wall of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Wood Sci. Technol. 1986, 20, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Blanchette, R.A.; Obst, J.R.; Hedges, J.I.; Weliky, K. Resistance of hardwood vessels to degradation by white rot Basidiomycetes. Can. J. Bot. 1988, 66, 1841–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Eriksson, K.E.L.; Blanchette, R.A.; Ander, P. Morphological aspects of wood degradation by fungi and bacteria. In Microbial and Enzymatic Degradation of Wood and Wood Components; Timell, T.E., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1990; pp. 1–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Nghi, D.H.; Bittner, B.; Kellner, H.; Jehmlich, N.; Ullrich, R.; Pecyna, M.J.; Nousiainen, P.; Sipila, J.; Huong, L.M.; Hofrichter, M.; et al. The wood rot ascomycete Xylaria polymorpha produces a novel GH78 glycoside hydrolase that exhibits α-l-rhamnosidase and feruloyl esterase activities and releases hydroxycinnamic acids from lignocelluloses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 4893–4901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Rajtar, N.N.; Kielsmeier-Cook, J.C.; Held, B.W.; Toapanta-Alban, C.E.; Ordonez, M.E.; Barnes, C.W.; Blanchette, R.A. Diverse Xylaria in the Ecuadorian Amazon and their mode of wood degradation. Bot. Stud. 2023, 64, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. RAxML phylogenetic tree inferred based on the combined ITS-RPB2-TUB gene regions of selected species from Xylariaceae. ML bootstrap support (BS) ≥ 70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.95 are given at the nodes in this order. New species in this study are indicated in blue.
Figure 1. RAxML phylogenetic tree inferred based on the combined ITS-RPB2-TUB gene regions of selected species from Xylariaceae. ML bootstrap support (BS) ≥ 70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.95 are given at the nodes in this order. New species in this study are indicated in blue.
Jof 10 00645 g001
Table 1. List of taxa used for the phylogenetic reconstruction. GenBank accession numbers, specimen numbers, origin, and reference studies are given. Holotype specimens are labelled with HT. Species highlighted in bold were derived from this study. N/A: not available.
Table 1. List of taxa used for the phylogenetic reconstruction. GenBank accession numbers, specimen numbers, origin, and reference studies are given. Holotype specimens are labelled with HT. Species highlighted in bold were derived from this study. N/A: not available.
SpeicesSpecimen No.OriginHostGenBank Accession NumberReferences
ITSRPB2ß-Tubulin
Amphirosellinia fushanensisHAST91111209(HT)Chinadead twigsGU339496GQ848339GQ495950[27,49]
A. nigrosporaHAST91092308(HT)Chinadead twigsGU322457GQ848340GQ49595[27,49]
Astrocystis bambusaeHAST89021904Chinabamboo culmsGU322449GQ844836GQ495942[27]
As. mirabilisHAST94070803Chinabamboo culmsGU322448GQ844835GQ49594[27]
Barrmaelia rappaziiCBS142771(HT)Norwaytwigs and branches of Populus tremulaMF488989MF488998MF489017[50]
Brunneiperidium gracilentumMFLUCC14-0011(ET)Italytwigs of Tamarix gallicaKP297400 KP340528 KP406611 [51]
B. involucratumMFLUCC14-0009(ET)Italycone of Pinus sylvestrisKP297399 KP340527 KP406610 [51]
Clypeosphaeria mamillanaCBS140735(ET)Francebranches of Cornus albaKT949897 MF489001 MH704637 [50,52]
Collodiscula bambusaeGZUH0102(HT)Chinastalk of bambooKP054279 KP276675 KP276674 [53]
C. fangjingshanensisGZUH0109(HT)Chinaculm of bambooKR002590 KR002592 KR002589 [54]
Daldinia loculatoidesCBS113279(PT)UKFagus sp.MH862918 KY624247 KX271246 [20,55]
Entoleuca mammataJDR100FranceFagus sp.GU300072 GQ844782 GQ470230[27]
Entosordaria perfidiosaCBS142773(HT)Austriabark of old trunks of living Acer pseudoplatanusMF488993 MF489003 MF489021 [50]
EuepixylonsphaeriostomaJDR261USAFraxinus woodGU292821GQ844774GQ470224[27]
Heteroxylaria cordiicolaFCATAS907(HT)Chinanutshells of Cordia dichotomaMZ648852MZ707116MZ695791This study
H. cordiicolaFCATAS908Chinanutshells of Cordia dichotomaMZ648853MZ707117MZ695792This study
H. juglandicolaFCATAS3667(HT)Chinanutshells of Juglans regiaPQ009296PQ010279PQ010278This study
H. juglandicolaFCATAS3668Chinanutshells of Juglans regiaPQ009297N/AN/AThis study
H. meliicolaFCATAS869(HT)Chinanutshells of Melia toosendanMZ648845MZ707104MZ695773This study
H. meliicolaFCATAS870Chinanutshells of Melia toosendanMZ648846N/AN/AThis study
H. oxyacanthaeFCATAS905Chinanuts of Crataegus maximowicziiMZ620654MZ678635MZ695789This study
H. oxyacanthaeFCATAS906Chinanuts of Crataegus maximowicziiMZ620655MZ678636MZ695790This study
H. oxyacanthaeJDR859USAseeds of Crataegus monogynaGU322434GQ844820GQ495927[27]
H. oxyacanthaeYMJ1184Germanyseeds of Carpinus betulusMF773430MF773434MF773438[27,56]
H. oxyacanthaeYMJ1320GermanyFruits of Cornus sanguineaMF773431MF773435MF773439[27,56]
H. oxyacanthaeYMJ1660Franceplum seeds of Prunus sp.MF773429MF773433MF773437[27,56]
H. palmicolaPDD604New Zealandfruits of palmGU322436 GQ844822 GQ495929 [27]
H. reevesiaeHAST90071609(HT)Chinafruits of Reevesia formosanaGU322435GQ844821GQ495928[27]
H. rohrensisHAST145766(HT)Austrianutshells of Juglans regiaON261187ON262774ON262768[57]
H. rohrensisHAST145767Austrianutshells of Juglans regiaON261188ON262775ON262769[57]
Heteroxylaria sp.HAST145770Spainburied stones of Olea europea var. sylvestrisON248209ON262776ON262770[57]
H. terminaliicolaFCATAS921(HT)Chinanutshells of Terminalia catappaMZ648854MZ707125MZ695802This study
H. terminaliicolaFCATAS922Chinanutshells of Terminalia catappaMZ648855MZ707126MZ695803This study
Hypocreodendron sanguineum (Dixcoxylaria myrmecophila)JDR169Mexiconests of Atta mexicanaGU322433 GQ844819 GQ487710 [27]
Hypoxylon fragiformeMUCL51264(ET) Germanydead stump of Fagus sylvaticaKC477229 KM186296 KX271282 [20,51,58]
Kretzschmaria deustaCBS163.93GermanywoodKC477237 KY624227 KX271251 [58]
K. guyanensisHAST89062903ChinabarkGU300079GQ844792GQ478214[27]
K. neocaledonicaHAST94031003ChinabarkGU300078GQ844788GQ478213[27]
Nemania abortivaBiSH467(HT)USAdecayed angiosperm woodGU292816GQ844768GQ470219[27]
N. diffusaHAST91020401ChinabarkGU292817GQ844769GQ470220[27]
Neoxylaria arengaeMFLUCC15-0292 Thailanddead petiole of Arenga pinnataMT496747 MT502418 N/A[24]
Podosordaria mexicanaWSP176Mexicohorse dungGU324762GQ853039GQ844840[27]
P. muliWSP167(HT)Mexicomule dungGU324761 GQ853038GQ844839[27]
Poronia pileiformisWSP88113001(ET)Chinacow dungGU324760GQ853037GQ502720[27]
Rosellinia buxiJDR99FranceBuxus sempervivensGU300070GQ844780GQ470228[27]
R. merrilliiHAST89112601ChinabarkGU300071GQ844781GQ470229[27]
R. sanctacrucianaHAST90072903Chinafronds of Arenga engleriGU292824GQ844777GQ470227[27]
Sarcoxylon compunctumCBS359.61South AfricaN/AKT281903 KY624230 KX271255 [28]
Stilbohypoxylon elaeidisMFLUCC15-0295aThailanddead petiole of Elaeis guineensisMT496745 MT502416 MT502420 [24]
S. elaeidicolaYMJ173French GuianapalmEF026148 GQ844826 EF025616 [27,59]
S. quisquiliarumYMJ172French GuianawoodEF026119GQ853020EF025605[27,59]
Xylaria adscendensHAST570GuadeloupewoodGU300101 GQ844817 GQ487708 [27]
X. aethiopicaYMJ1136Ethiopiapods of Millettia ferrugineaMH790445MH785222MH785221[60]
X. allantoideaHAST94042903ChinatrunkGU324743 GQ848356GQ502692 [27]
X. amphitheleHAST529Guadeloupedead leavesGU300083GQ844796GQ478218[27]
X. apodaHAST90080804ChinabarkGU322437GQ844823GQ495930[27]
X. arbusculaHAST89041211ChinabarkGU300090GQ844805GQ478226[27]
X. atrosphaericaHAST91111214ChinabarkGU322459GQ848342GQ495953[27]
X. berteriHAST90112623ChinawoodGU324749GQ848362AY951763[27]
X. brunneovinosaHAST720(HT)Chinaground of bamboo plantationEU179862GQ853023GQ502706[27,61]
X. cirrataHAST664(ET)Chinaground of vegetable farmEU179863GQ853024GQ502707[27,61]
X. cranioidesHAST226ChinawoodGU300075GQ844785GQ478210[27]
X. cubensisJDR860USAwoodGU991523GQ848365GQ502700[27]
X. culleniaeJDR189ThailandpodGU322442GQ844829GQ495935[27]
X. curtaHAST92092022ChinabarkGU322443GQ844830GQ495936[27]
X. digitataHAST919UkrainewoodGU322456GQ848338GQ495949[27]
X. enterogenaHAST785French GuianawoodGU324736GQ848349GQ502685[27]
X. escharoideaHAST658(ET)Chinaground of mango orchardEU179864GQ853026GQ502709[27]
X. fabacearumMFLU16-1061(HT)Thailandseed pods of FabaceaeNR171104MT212202MT212220[62]
X. fabaceicolaMFLU16-1072(HT)Thailandseed pods of FabaceaeNR171103MT212201MT212219[62]
X. feejeensisHAST92092013 ChinabarkGU322454GQ848336GQ495947[27]
X. fimbriataHAST491Martiniquetermite nestGU324753GQ853022GQ502705[27]
X. fissilisHAST367MartiniquebarkGU300073GQ844783GQ470231[27]
X. frustulosaHAST92092010ChinabarkGU322451GQ844838GQ495944[27]
X. cf. glebulosaHAST431MartiniqueFruits of Swietenia macrophyllaGU322462GQ848345GQ495956[27]
X. globosaHAST775GuadeloupebarkGU324735GQ848348GQ502684[27]
X. grammicaHAST479ChinawoodGU300097 GQ844813 GQ487704 [27]
X. griseosepiaceaHAST641(HT)Chinaground of mango orchardEU179865 GQ853031 GQ502714 [27,61]
X. haemorrhoidalisHAST89041207ChinabarkGU322464GQ848347GQ502683[27]
X. hypoxylonHAST95082001ChinawoodGU300095GQ844811GQ487703[27]
X. ianthinovelutinaHAST553Martiniquefruit of Swietenia macrophyllaGU322441GQ844828GQ495934[27]
X. intracolorataHAST90080402ChinabarkGU324741GQ848354GQ502690[27]
X. intraflavaHAST725(HT)Chinaground of bamboo plantationEU179866 GQ853035 GQ502718 [27]
X. juruensisHAST92042501ChinaArenga engleriGU322439 GQ844825 GQ495932 [27]
X. karyophthoraDRH059Guyanaseeds of Chlorocardium sp.KY564220KY564216N/A[63]
X. laevisHAST95072910ChinabarkGU324747GQ848360GQ502696[27]
X. lindericolaFCATAS852Chinaleaves of Lindera robustaMZ005635MZ031982MZ031978[43]
X. liquidambarisHAST93090701Chinafruits of Liquidambar formosanaGU300094GQ844810GQ487702[27]
X. liquidambarisFCATAS874Chinafruits of Liquidambar formosanaMZ620275MZ707107MZ695775[64]
X. meliacearumJDR148Puerto Ricopetioles and infructescence of Guarea guidoniaGU300084GQ844797GQ478219[27]
X. microcerasHAST414GuadeloupewoodGU300086GQ844799GQ478221[27]
X. montagneiHAST495MartiniquewoodGU322455GQ848337GQ495948[27]
X. multiplexJDR259USAwoodGU300099GQ844815GQ487706[27]
X. musculaHAST520Guadeloupedead branchGU300087 GQ844800 GQ478222 [27]
X. nigripesHAST653Chinaground of mango orchardGU324755 GQ853027 GQ502710 [27]
X. ochraceostromaHAST401(HT)Chinaground of mango orchardEU179869GQ853034GQ502717[27,61]
X. oligotomaHAST784French GuianawoodGU300092GQ844808GQ487700[27]
X. ophiopodaHAST93082805ChinabarkGU322461GQ848344GQ495955[27]
X. papulisHAST89021903ChinawoodGU300100GQ844816GQ487707[27]
X. phyllocharisHAST528Guadeloupedead leavesGU322445GQ844832GQ495938[27]
X. plebejaHAST91122401Chinatrunk of Machilus zuihoensisGU324740GQ848353GQ502689[27]
X. polymorphaJDR1012USAwoodGU322460GQ848343GQ495954[27]
X. polysporicolaFCATAS848(HT)Chinaleaves of Polyspora hainanensisMZ005592MZ031980MZ031976[43]
X. regalisHAST920Indialog of Ficus racemosaGU324745 GQ848358 GQ502694 [27]
X. rogersiiFCATAS915(HT)Chinafruits of Magnolia sp.MZ648827MZ707121MZ695800[31]
X. schimicolaFCATAS896(HT)Chinafruits of Schima noronhaeMZ648850MZ707114MZ695787[31]
X. schweinitziiHAST92092023ChinabarkGU322463 GQ848346 GQ495957 [27]
X. scruposaHAST497MartiniquewoodGU322458GQ848341GQ495952[27]
X. siculaHAST90071613Chinafallen leavesGU300081GQ844794GQ478216[27]
Xylaria sp. 6JDR258USAleaves of Tibouchina semidecandraGU300082GQ844795GQ478217[27]
X. striataHAST304Chinabranch of Punica granatumGU300089GQ844803GQ478224[27]
X. telfairiiHAST90081901ChinabarkGU324738GQ848351GQ502687[27]
X. theaceicolaFCATAS903(HT)Chinafruits of Schima villosaMZ648848MZ707115MZ695788[31]
X. tuberoidesHAST475MartiniquewoodGU300074GQ844784GQ478209[27]
X. venustulaHAST 88113002ChinabarkGU300091 GQ844807 GQ487699 [27]
X. vivantiiHAST519(HT)Martiniquefruits of Magnolia sp.GU322438GQ844824GQ495931[27]
X. wallichiiFCATAS923(HT)Chinafruits of Schima wallichiiMZ648861MZ707118MZ695793[31]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, A.-H.; Song, Z.-K.; Wang, J.-F.; Guan, H.-W.; Qu, Z.; Ma, H.-X. Multi-Gene Phylogenetic Analyses Reveals Heteroxylaria Gen. Nov. and New Contributions to Xylariaceae (Ascomycota) from China. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10090645

AMA Style

Zhu A-H, Song Z-K, Wang J-F, Guan H-W, Qu Z, Ma H-X. Multi-Gene Phylogenetic Analyses Reveals Heteroxylaria Gen. Nov. and New Contributions to Xylariaceae (Ascomycota) from China. Journal of Fungi. 2024; 10(9):645. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10090645

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, An-Hong, Zi-Kun Song, Jun-Fang Wang, Hao-Wen Guan, Zhi Qu, and Hai-Xia Ma. 2024. "Multi-Gene Phylogenetic Analyses Reveals Heteroxylaria Gen. Nov. and New Contributions to Xylariaceae (Ascomycota) from China" Journal of Fungi 10, no. 9: 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10090645

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop