Next Article in Journal
The Purification and Characterization of a Novel Neutral Protease from Volvariella volvacea Fruiting Bodies and the Enzymatic Digestion of Soybean Isolates
Previous Article in Journal
A Twist in Yeast: New Perspectives for Studying TDP-43 Proteinopahies in S. cerevisiae
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Species Diversity of Edible Mushrooms I—Four New Laccaria Species from Yunnan Province, China

by
Song-Ming Tang
1,
Guo Zhao
1,
Kai-Yang Niu
1,
Rui-Yu Li
1,
Feng-Ming Yu
2,
Samantha C. Karunarathna
3,
Lin Li
1,
Kevin D. Hyde
4,5,
Xi-Jun Su
1,* and
Zong-Long Luo
1,6
1
College of Agriculture and Biological Science, Dali University, Dali 671003, China
2
Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity, Biogeography of East Asia, Fungal Diversity and Green Development, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
3
Center for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Biologyand Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing 655011, China
4
Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiangrai 57100, Thailand
5
Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia
6
Co-Innovation Center for Cangshan Mountain and Erhai Lake Integrated Protection and Green Development of Yunnan Province, Dali University, Dali 671003, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2025, 11(3), 189; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11030189
Submission received: 13 December 2024 / Revised: 6 February 2025 / Accepted: 25 February 2025 / Published: 28 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Fungal Evolution, Biodiversity and Systematics)

Abstract

:
As symbiotic mycorrhizal associates, species within the genus Laccaria play pivotal roles in forest ecosystems, specifically forming ectomycorrhizal relationships with the root systems of various plants. Some Laccaria species are recognized for their edibility, holding potential as a sustainable food source in the context of future food security and dietary diversification. In this study, the species diversity of Laccaria in Yunnan was investigated, and four novel species were identified. Their taxonomical positions and phylogenetic affinities were confirmed through phylogenetic analysis based on ITS, nrLSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 sequence data. Macro- and micro-morphological characteristics of the new species are also given here. Laccaria brownii sp. nov. has a dark to slightly desaturated orange pileus, stipe context broadly fistulose and soft orange, and relatively smaller cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia. Laccaria orangei sp. nov. has a hemispherical to paraboloid pileus, abundant narrowly clavate, flexuose, and branched cheilocystidia. Laccaria ruber sp. nov. pileus is red on the margin, clearly striate on the pileus surface, basidia clavate, mostly four-spored, rarely two-spored. Laccaria stipalba sp. nov. stipe surface is white, long sterigmata (4–13 μm × 2–3 μm), pleurocystidia narrowly clavate to subclavate, flexuose or mucronate, rarely branch. The descriptions, illustrations, and phylogenetic analysis results of the new taxa are provided. In addition, the new taxa are compared with closely related taxa.

1. Introduction

Laccaria belongs to the family Hydnangiaceae, order Agaricales, phylum Basidiomycota, and kingdom Fungi, and is known for its important role in forest ecosystems, where, as with all mycorrhizal fungi, species facilitate the exchange of nutrients between plants and soil [1,2,3]. Approximately 85% of the terrestrial plants form mycorrhizal associations with fungi [4], and species of Laccaria are an important member of them [5].
The genus is characterized by collybioid to omphaloid basidiomata; echinulate acyanophilous and inamyloid basidiospores; a convex, plane, or umbilicate, and hygrophanous pileus; and a clamp present in all parts of the basidiomata [6,7,8]. Laccaria species are found worldwide in association with both Angiosperms and Gymnosperms worldwide [2]; forming ectomycorrhizas with tree species, many of which are of major economic importance [9,10]. The genus includes over 100 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi, which form symbiotic relationships with more than 20 genera of plants [11,12,13].
Since the establishment of Laccaria by Berk. and Broome in 1883, the taxonomy of this genus has been a subject of significant interest and research among mycologists [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. To date, species of Laccaria have been divided into two sub-genera (L. subgen. Laccaria Berk. and Broome, L. subgen. Maritimae (Bon) Pázmány); seven sections (L. sect. Amethystinae Bon, L. sect. Bisporae Pázmány, L. sect. Laccaria Berk. and Broome, L. sect. Maritimae Bon, L. sect. Obscurae Pázmány, L. sect. Purpureobadia Pázmány, L. sect. Violacei Pázmány); and three subsections (L. subsect. Amethystinae (Bon) Contu, L. subsect. Bisporae Contu and L. subsect. Laccaria Berk. and Broome) [23,24,25,26]. However, the data lack phylogenetic support, which has made the taxonomic study of Laccaria consistently perplexing.
The species diversity of Laccaria is important; firstly, the mutualistic relationships of Laccaria with plant roots help improve nutrient uptake and support plant growth [2]. Different Laccaria species have been found to have different preferences for host plants. Therefore, a diverse community of Laccaria species can contribute to the health and diversity of plant communities in a given ecosystem [2]. Laccaria bicolor (Maire) P.D. Orton and L. japonica Popa and K. Nara have been found to have potential for use in bioremediation, as they are capable of breaking down and detoxifying a range of organic pollutants in soil [27,28]. A diverse community of Laccaria species could, therefore, provide a more comprehensive suite of tools for the remediation of contaminated soils. Furthermore, Laccaria species have been found to produce a range of bioactive compounds with potential for use in medicine, biotechnology, and agriculture. Therefore, a diverse community of Laccaria species could provide a wider range of compounds for exploration and development. The diversity of Laccaria species is important for maintaining healthy ecosystems, promoting bioremediation, and supporting biotechnological research and development [29].
With the development of molecular biology, the number of Laccaria species described from Asia has been increasing [14,15,16]. So far, 41 species of Laccaria have been described in Asia [11,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25], of which 56% (23/41) are native to China.
Yunnan’s biodiversity is reflected in its diverse ecosystems, ranging from tropical rainforests in the south to alpine meadows in the north. The province is home to many plant species, with studies indicating that it hosts one of the richest floras in the world, making Yunnan one of the richest regions in the world in terms of fungal resources [11,18,30]. In this study, four new species of Laccaria are described from Yunnan Province with morphological and molecular data. The discovery contributes to understanding the diversity of fungal species in the Lancang-Mekong River Basin.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Morphological Study

Specimens were collected from Puer City, Qujing City, and Zhaotong City, Yunnan Province, China. They were photographed in the field; important collection information was recorded [31], separately wrapped in aluminium foil, or kept in a plastic collection box and taken to the laboratory of the Fungal Diversity Conservation and Utilization Team in Northwest Yunnan (Dali University). The fresh basidiomes were macro-morphologically described on the same day of collection. Color identification was performed using the Color Hexa website (www.colorhexa.com) to assign codes. After thoroughly drying at 50 °C in a food drier [32], the specimens were stored in sealed plastic bags and deposited in the Herbarium of Cryptogams Kunming Institute of Botany, Academia Sinica (KUN-HKAS). Dried materials were sectioned under a stereo microscope, transferred onto slides, and mounted in a 5% KOH solution. The morphological structures were observed as described by reference [33,34,35]. For microscopic characters, anatomical and cytological characteristics such as basidia, basidiospores, and cystidia were observed and photographed using a Nikon ECLIPSE Ni-U microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) at magnifications of up to ×1000. For SEM studies, fragments of the lamellae of the dried material were taken, sputter coated with gold, and analyzed with a Hitachi S520 (Hitachi, Chiyoda, Japan). The notation [x/y/z] specifies that measurements were made on x basidiospores measured from y basidiomata of z collections. At least 50 basidiospores and 20 basidia were measured from one basidioma. Basidiospore dimensions are given as (a–) b–c (–d). Where “a” and “d” refer to the minimum and maximum values of all measurements, respectively, b–c presents the range of 95% of the measured values, and Q is the length/width ratio of basidiospores, Qm is the average Q of all basidiospores, and is given as Qm ± standard deviation.

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

Macro-morphological studies were conducted following the protocols provided by Genomic DNA, which was extracted from dried specimens using the Ezup Column Fungi Genomic DNA extraction kit (Sangon, Shanghai, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Primer pairs for PCR were, respectively, ITS1/ITS4 [36], LR5/LR0R [37], rpb2-5F/rpb2-7cR [38], and EF1-983F/EF1-2218R [39]. ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tef1-α were amplified in 25 μL reactions containing 12.5 μL of 2× Taq Plus Master Mix II (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China), 9.5 μL of ddH2O, 1 μL and 10 μM of forward and reverse primers, and 1 μL of DNA. The PCR amplicons were sent to Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) for Sanger sequencing. Sequence reads were assembled in SeqMan II (DNA STAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA).

2.3. Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysis

The newly generated sequences were checked using the BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor version 7.0.4 and assembled using SeqMan (DNAstar, Madison, WI, USA). The sequences were then blasted using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; 10 October 2024) against the GenBank database [40] to check the most closely related sequences. Reference sequences for 116 specimens representing 63 species were retrieved minimally adjusted by hand in BioEdit v.7.0.4 [41] first and then aligned using TrimAl (v. 1.2.59) [42].
Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was performed separately for each locus, and the concatenated dataset using RAxML-HPC2 v. 8.2.12 [43] as implemented on the CIPRES portal [44], with the GTR + G model for both genes and 1000 rapid bootstrap (BS) replicates, the GTR + G model was obtained by MrModeltest 2.2. For Bayesian inference (BI), the best substitution model for each character set was determined with MrModeltest 2.2 [45] on CIPRES, using the Akaike information criterion. Bayesian analysis was performed using MrBayes ver. 3.2.7a [46], as implemented on CIPRES.

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analyses

A total of 56 new sequences (ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tef1-α) were generated for Laccaria species and deposited in GenBank (Table 1). The ITS-LSU-rpb2-tef1-α dataset includes 116 specimens related to 63 species. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted with a 5.8S + LSU, ITS1 + ITS2, rpb2 codon, rpb2 introns + tef1-α introns, and tef1-α codon concatenated matrix [37]. The concatenated matrix contained 3533 positions (1058 for 5.8S + LSU, 450 for ITS1 + ITS2, 1026 for rpb2 exons, 163 for tef1-α introns + rpb2 introns, and 836 for tef1-α exons). Based on previous phylogenies [2,10,11,17,18,19,20,21,22], species of the Mythicomyces corneipes (Fr.) Redhead and A.H. Sm. (AFTOLID972; ES11.10.2.A) were selected as the outgroup. In the ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tef1-α datasets, the models selected by mrModelTest were GTR + I + G for 5.8S + LSU and tef1-α codon, GTR + G for ITS1 + ITS2 and rpb2 codon, and GTR + G for rpb2 introns + tef1-α introns.
In MrBayes analyses, two runs of five chains each were run for 2,000,000 generations and sampled every 200 generations. Convergence was further evaluated by checking that the potential scale reduction factor (PSRF) statistic was close to 1 for all parameters. Moreover, the effective sample size (ESS) was much higher than 200 for all parameters. A clade was considered to be supported if showing a bootstrap support value (BS) ≥ 75% and/or a posterior probability (PP) ≥ 0.90. Trees were edited in FigTree version 1.4.0 and PowerPoint.
The phylogeny from the combined datasets is presented in Figure 1. Fourteen specimens collected in southwestern China formed four monophyletic clades, described here as L. brownii, L. orangei, L. ruber, and L. stipalba, respectively. Each clade was well supported by both ML and BI analyses (Figure 1).

3.2. Taxonomy

Laccaria brownii S.M. Tang, K.D. Hyde, and Z.L. Luo, sp. nov.
Fungal Name. FN 572202
Diagnosis. Laccaria brownii is characterized by a slightly desaturated orange to brown pileus and stipe, soft orange lamellae, globose to subglobose basidiospores, pileipellis element by grayish inflate hyaline, narrowly clavate to subclavate cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia.
Etymology. The epithet “brownii” refers to the brown pileus and stipe of this fungus.
Holotype. China. Yunnan Province, Pu’er City, Ailao Mountains, 24°03′2.0″ N, 101°00′10″ E, elev. 2420 m, 3 August 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021080307 (HKAS 123286).
Description. Basidiomata medium size. Pileus 15–27 mm in diam., convex to hemispherical when young, plano-concave to concave, dark (#0a0a0a) at the center, slightly desaturated orange (#bd9b85) with a margin; a slightly depressed to depressed shape of center; margin inflexed when young, sometimes reflexed when old; context thin, 1–2 mm, soft orange (#f2d4bf), unchanging. Lamellae distant, segmentiform, subdecurrent, soft orange (#f2d4bf), 2–3 mm in height; lamella edge even or entire; lamellulae in 3–4 tiers. Stipe 20.8–39.2 × 3.0–4.3 mm, cylindrical, central, equal with an enlarged base and nearly subclavate, slightly desaturated orange (#bd9b85) to light grayish orange (#dac3b9), smooth, basal mycelium white (#ffffff); stipe context broadly fistulose, soft orange (#f2d4bf). Odor and taste not observed.
Basidia 21–40 × 8–14 μm (mean length = 29.9 ± 5.6, mean width = 11.4 ± 1.8), clavate, mostly four-spored, rarely two-spored, sterigmata 4–8 μm × 1–3 μm (mean length = 6.0 ± 1.23, mean width = 2.8 ± 0.68). Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [105/3/2] 6.5–8.4× 6.1–7.7 μm (mean length = 7.3 ± 0.58, mean width = 7.1 ± 0.49), Q = 1.04–1.25, Qm = 1.04 ± 0.09, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, spines 1–2 μm long, ca. 0.6–1.1 μm wide at the base, crowded. Cheilocystidia 13–20 × 3–7 μm (mean length = 18 ± 4.8, mean width = 5.3 ± 1.4), narrowly clavate, thin-walled, colorless, and hyaline, abundant. Pleurocystidia 12–18 × 2–6 μm (mean length = 15 ± 2.2, mean width = 4 ± 1.1), narrowly clavate to subclavate, flexuose or mucronate, thin-walled, hyaline, abundant. Lamellar trama 80–120 μm thick, regular, composed of slightly thick-walled, filamentous hyphae 3–5 μm wide. Lamellar edge more in a number of sterile basidia. Subhymenium 8–11 μm thick, tightly interwoven, cellular, ramose, or irregular cells, 4–10 × 3–5 μm (mean length = 6 ± 2.1, mean width = 3.9 ± 0.6). Pileipellis 21–50 μm thick, grayish, inflated hyaline in KOH, composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin-walled, cylindrical, filamentous hyphae 10–15 μm wide, colorless, and hyaline. Stipitipellis composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thick-walled, hyphae 3–8 μm wide; stipe trama composed of longitudinally arranged, grayish in KOH, clavate terminal cells, infrequently branching, septate, thick-walled hyphae hyaline, 3–10 μm wide. Caulocystidia not seen. Clamp connection present at some septa in pileipellis, lamellae, and stipitipellis.
Habitat and phenology. Scattered, gregarious, or caespitose on the ground in Fagus.
Additional specimens examined. China. Yunnan Province, Pu’er City, Ailao Mountains, N 24°03′2.0”, E 101°00′10”, elev. 2420 m, 3 August 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021080305 (HKAS 123243); ibid., elev. 2322 m, 3 August 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021080309 (HKAS 144550); ibid., elev. 2108 m, 6 August 2020, S.M. Tang, 2020080609 (HKAS 123243); ibid., elev. 2112 m, 6 August 2020, S.M. Tang, 2020080610 (HKAS 144549); Zhaotong City, Yiliang County, Xiaocaoba Town, elev. 1825 m, 14 July 2019, S.M. Tang, 2019071406 (HKAS 144548).
Notes. In our multi-locus phylogeny, five specimens of L. brownii were clustered together with 100/1.00. Laccaria murina S. Imai and L. anthracina K. Wang, G.J. Li, Z. Du, and T. Z. Wei are similar to L. brownii in having gray to brown pileus. However, L. murina has relatively smaller basidiomata (pileus size 10–15 mm) and relatively larger basidiomata [47]. Laccaria anthracina has a relatively smaller basidiomata (pileus size 25–65 mm), and relatively larger basidiospores (7.0–9.5 × 7–9.0 μm) [48].
Laccaria orangei S.M. Tang, K.D. Hyde, and Z.L. Luo, sp. nov.
Fungal Names. FN 572019
Diagnosis. Laccaria orangei is distinguished by its hemispherical to paraboloid pileus and soft orange basidiomata, narrowly clavate to subclavate, flexuose or mucronate of pleurocystidia, and narrowly clavate, flexuose branches of cheilocystidia.
Etymology. The epithet “orangei” refers to the orange pileus of this fungus.
Holotype. China, Yunnan Province, Zhaotong City, Yiliang County, Xiaocaoba Town, 27°75′ 81.3″ N, E 103°23′ 51.1″ E, elev. 1789 m, 24 July 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021072410 (HKAS 123244).
Description. Basidiomata medium size. Pileus 18–32 (–41) mm in diam., hemispherical to paraboloid, becoming campanulate with age, soft orange (#e7a582), unchanging, when dry moisture loss of moisture or with age becoming whitish, clearly striate on the surface; subumbonate of center; margin reflexed; context thin, 1–2 mm, slightly desaturated orange (#c59682), unchanging. Lamellae distant, arcuate, adnate with a decurrent tooth, soft orange (#f1c7b7), 3–5 mm in height; lamella edge even or entire; lamellulae in 2–3 tiers. Stipe 46.0–55.1 × 3.4–5.5 mm, cylindrical, central, equal with an enlarged base and nearly subclavate, soft orange (#e9ad88), smooth, basal mycelium white (1A1); stipe context fistulose, soft orange (#e9ad88). Odor and taste not observed.
Basidia 30–40 × 7–10 μm (mean length = 35 ± 4.1, mean width = 8 ± 1.4), clavate, mostly two-spored, rarely four-spored, sterigmata 2–5 μm × 1–3 μm (mean length = 4.4 ± 1.1, mean width = 2.2 ± 0.82). Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [109/2/2] 5.8–8.0 × 5.5– 7.3 μm (mean length = 6.9 ± 0.58, mean width = 6.5 ± 0.49), Q = 1.00–1.29, Qm = 1.05 ± 0.11, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, spines 0.7–1.8 μm long, ca. 0.5–0.8 μm wide at the base, crowded. Cheilocystidia 20–49 × 4–5 μm (mean length = 34.5 ± 4.5, mean width = 4.8 ± 0.6), narrowly clavate, flexuose, branches, thin-walled, colorless, and hyaline, abundant. Pleurocystidia 15–30 × 5–7 (–10) μm (mean length = 33.6 ± 10.7, mean width = 6.5 ± 2.1), narrowly clavate to subclavate, flexuose or mucronate, thin-walled, hyaline, abundant. Lamellar trama 90–127 μm thick, regular, composed of slightly thick-walled, filamentous hyphae 2–8 μm wide. Lamellar edge more in many sterile basidia and pleurocystidia. Subhymenium 13–20 μm thick, tightly interwoven, cellular, ramose, or irregular cells, 5–9 × 3–6 μm (mean length = 7 ± 1.9, mean width = 4.4 ± 1.4). Pileipellis 30–60 μm thick, orange hyaline in KOH, composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin-walled, cylindrical, filamentous hyphae 7–9 μm wide, colorless, and hyaline. Stipitipellis is composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thick-walled, hyphae 3–7 μm wide; stipe trama is composed of longitudinally arranged, pastel red in KOH, clavate terminal cells, infrequently branching, septate, thick-walled, hyphae hyaline 3–10 μm wide. Caulocystidia not seen. Clamp connection present at some septa in pileipellis, lamellae, and stipitipellis.
Habitat and phenology. Scattered, gregarious, or caespitose on the ground in the Dipterocarpus and Fagus.
Additional specimens examined. China, Yunnan Province, Zhaotong City, Yiliang County, Xiaocaoba Town, elev. 1689 m, 24 July 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021072410 (HKAS 123246); ibid., elev. 1521 m, 24 July 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021072405 (HKAS 123301); ibid., elev. 1782 m, 24 July 2021, C.C. Ao, A202124-1 (HKAS 123242); ibid., elev. 1643 m, 24 July 2021, L. Wang, W007 (HKAS 123248).
Notes. Phylogenetically, the species is closely related to L. fagacicola Yang-Yang Cui, Qing Cai, and Zhu L. Yang; L. rubroalba X. Luo, L. Ye, P.E. Mortimer, and K.D. Hyde; and L. aurantia Popa, Rexer, Donges, Zhu L. Yang, and G. Kost. Laccaria fagacicola differs from L. orangei by its convex to applanate, brownish orange to brownish pileus, relatively longer basidia (45–60 × 9–12 μm), and sterigmata (5–8 μm), pleurocystidia lacking and cheilocystidia filamentous to narrowly clavate [49], the ITS sequences differences between L. orangei (HKAS 123244, holotype) and L. fagacicola (HKAS 90435, holotype) were 0.78% (5/643, no gaps). Laccaria rubroalba has a reddish-white pileus, flexuous to narrowly cylindrical pleurocystidia, and cylindrical to capitate cheilocystidia [20]. Laccaria aurantia has relatively larger basidiomata (pileus size 35–40 mm in diam.), basidia (40–45 × 10–12 μm), and basidiospores (9–10 × 8–10 μm) [18].
Laccaria acanthospora A.W. Wilson and G.M. Muell. and L. ambigua K. Hosaka, A.W. Wilson, and G.M. Mueller are morphologically similar to L. orangei for having an orange pileus. Laccaria acanthospora is different by smaller basidiomata (pileus size 4–15 mm in diam.), and larger basidia (40–56 × 10–14 μm) [17]. Laccaria ambigua, originally reported from New Zealand North, has smaller basidiomata (pileus size 8–10 mm) and larger basidiospores (9–9.6 × 9.6–9.9 μm) [2].
Laccaria ruber S.M. Tang, K.D. Hyde, and Z.L. Luo, sp. nov.
Fungal Names. FN 572203
Diagnosis. Laccaria ruber is characterized by its soft orange basidiomata, which are narrowly clavate, flexuose, or mucronate, and branched cheilocystidia.
Etymology. The epithet “ruber” refers to the red margin of the pileus.
Holotype. China, Yunnan Province: Qujing City, Zhanyi County, elev. 2001 m, 30 July 2021, S.M. Tang (HKAS 123291).
Description. Basidiomata medium size. Pileus 18–24 mm in diam., convex to applanate, hemispherical, applanate to plano-concave, soft orange (#f2b790), when dry moisture loss of moisture or with age becoming whitish, clearly striate on the surface; depressed to subumbonate of center when young, becoming umbilicate with age; margin straight, clearly red (#c71e0c); and context thin, 1–2 mm, soft orange (#f2b790), unchanging. Lamellae distant, segmentiform to subventricose, adnate to narrowly adnate, soft orange (#ec9c7f), 1–3 mm in height; lamella edge even or entire, clearly red color; lamellulae in 3–4 tiers. Stipe 34.0–49.1 × 3.7–5.5 mm, cylindrical, central, equal with an enlarged base and nearly subclavate, soft orange (#f7a160), smooth, basal mycelium white (1A1); and stipe context broadly fistulose, soft orange (#f7a160). Odor and taste not observed.
Basidia 33–39 × 10–14 (–17) μm (mean length = 35.6 ± 1.7, mean width = 13 ± 1.9), clavate, mostly four-spored, rarely two-spored, sterigmata 4–8 μm × 2–3 μm (mean length = 5.7 ± 1.9, mean width = 2.9 ± 0.47). Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [120/3/2] 7.2–10.3 × 7.3–9.4 (–10.8) μm (mean length = 8.6 ± 0.74, mean width = 8.2 ± 0.80), Q = 1.00–1.21, Qm = 1.04 ± 0.09, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, spines 1–2 μm long, ca. 0.8–1.2 μm wide at the base, crowded. Cheilocystidia 14–35 × 4–7 μm (mean length = 24.1 ± 4.1, mean width = 5.5 ± 1.1), narrowly clavate, flexuose or mucronate, branches, thin-walled, colorless, and hyaline, abundant. Pleurocystidia 18–48 × 3–5 μm (mean length = 35.8 ± 11, mean width = 4.5 ± 0.7), narrowly clavate to subclavate, flexuose or mucronate, thin-walled, hyaline, abundant. Lamellar trama 130–150 μm thick, regular, composed of slightly thick-walled, filamentous hyphae 4–7 μm wide. Lamellar edge more in several sterile basidia. Subhymenium 7–10 μm thick, tightly interwoven, cellular, ramose, or irregular cells, 4–7 × 3–6 μm (mean length = 6.1 ± 0.9, mean width = 4.6 ± 1.3). Pileipellis 100–130 μm thick, orange hyaline in KOH, composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin-walled, cylindrical, filamentous hyphae 7–10 μm wide, colorless, and hyaline. Stipitipellis is composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thick-walled, hyphae 2–5 μm wide; stipe trama is composed of longitudinally arranged, pastel red in KOH, clavate terminal cells, infrequently branching, septate, thick-walled, hyphae hyaline 4–8 μm wide. Caulocystidia not seen. Clamp connection present at some septa in pileipellis, lamellae, and stipitipellis.
Habitat and phenology. Scattered or gregarious on the ground in Fagus and Pinus mixed forest.
Additional specimens examined. China. Yunnan Province, Qujing City, Zhanyi County, elev. 2005 m., 30 July 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021073021 (HKAS 123292, paratype); ibid., elev. 2018 m., 30 July 2021, C.C. Ao, A20210730-10 (HKAS 123293); ibid., elev. 2100 m., 29 July 2021, C.C. Ao, A20210729-05 (HKAS 123294); ibid., elev. 2100 m., 30 July 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021073008 (HKAS 123295).
Notes: In our phylogenetic analysis, L. ruber is sister to L. torosa. However, L. torosa differs by its orange-brown to brown pileus and lamellae, relatively larger basidia (39–47 × 12–17 μm), cheilocystidia filamentous to subclavate, no branch, and present abundant caulocystidia on the stipe surface. The ITS sequence differences between L. torosa (SFC 20150902-17, holotype) and L. ruber (HKAS 123291, holotype) were 2.95% (19/643, no gaps) [21].
Laccaria acanthospora, L. ambigua, L. aurantia, and L. indohimalayana K. Das, I. Bera, and Vizzini are similar to L. ruber in their orange basidiomata. However, Laccaria acanthospora has smaller basidiomata (pileus size 4–15 mm in diam.), relatively larger basidia (40–56 × 10–14 μm), and absent cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia [17]. Laccaria ambigua also has smaller basidiomata (pileus size 8–10 mm in diam.) and absent cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia [17]. Laccaria aurantia has larger basidiomata (35–40 mm) and basidia (40–50 × 10–12 μm), relatively longer stipe (80 mm) [18]. Laccaria indohimalayana has larger basidiomata (pileus size 40–95 mm, stipe 80–150 × 12–65 mm), smaller basidiospores (7.60–8.26 × 6.59–7.19 μm), and no cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia [50].
Laccaria stipalba S.M. Tang, K.D. Hyde, and Z.L. Luo, sp. nov.
Fungal Names. FN 572204
Diagnosis. Laccaria stipalba is distinctive because of the white stipe, relatively longer sterigmata, and narrowly clavate, flexuose, or mucronate cheilocystidia.
Etymology. The epithet “stipalba” refers to the white stipe surface of the holotype.
Holotype. China, Yunnan Province. Zhaotong City, 27°27′ 52″ N, 103° 43′ 23″ E, elev. 2200 m., 23 July 2021, L. Wang, W2021-11 (HKAS 123300).
Description. Basidiomata medium size. Pileus 18–42 mm in diam., convex to applanate at young, becoming hemispherical, applanate to plano-concave with age, desaturated dark orange (#a6795f) at the center, light grayish pink (#e6e0e4) with margin, when dry moisture loss of moisture or with age becoming whitish, clearly striate on the surface; depressed of center; margin straight; context thin, 1–2 mm, pale orange light grayish pink (#e6e0e4), unchanging. Lamellae distant, broadly ventricose, adnexed, soft orange (#e7c89c), 2–3 mm in height; lamella edge even or entire; lamellulae in 1–2 tiers. Stipe 46.0–66.1 × 2.6–5.7 mm, cylindrical, central, white (#fcfcfc) to light grayish yellow (#e5e4ce), smooth, basal mycelium white (1A1); stipe context fistulose, white (#fcfcfc). Odor and taste not observed.
Basidia 29–35 × 10–12 μm (mean length = 31.2 ± 1.6, mean width = 10.4 ± 1.2), clavate, mostly four-spored, rarely two-spored, sterigmata 6–13 μm × 2–3 μm (mean length = 9.5 ± 4.15, mean width = 3.0 ± 0.36). Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [150/3/2] 5.8–8.4 × 5.5–8.1 μm (mean length = 6.9 ± 0.68, mean width = 6.6 ± 0.67), Q = 1.00–1.29, Qm = 1.04 ± 0.13, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, spines 1–2 μm long, ca. 1–2 μm wide at the base, crowded. Cheilocystidia (10–) 20–30 × 4–7 μm (mean length = 24.0 ± 3.2, mean width = 5.1 ± 1.2), narrowly clavate, flexuose, or mucronate, thin-walled, colorless, and hyaline, abundant. Pleurocystidia 12–26 × 2–7 μm (mean length = 21 ± 5.1, mean width = 5 ± 1.5), narrowly clavate to subclavate, flexuose, or mucronate, rarely branch, thin-walled, hyaline, abundant. Lamellar trama 69–81 μm thick, regular, composed of slightly thick-walled, filamentous hyphae 2–8 μm wide. Lamellar edge more in number of sterile basidia and cheilocystidia. Subhymenium 7–10 μm thick, tightly interwoven, cellular, ramose, or irregular cells, 5–7 × 3–4 μm (mean length = 6 ± 1.2, mean width = 3.5 ± 0.5). Pileipellis (42–) 59–100 μm thick, colorless hyaline in KOH, composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin-walled, cylindrical, filamentous hyphae 4–7 μm wide, colorless, and hyaline. Stipitipellis is composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thick-walled, hyphae 3–7 μm wide; stipe trama is composed of longitudinally arranged, colorless in KOH, clavate terminal cells, infrequently branching, septate, thick-walled, hyphae hyaline 3–10 μm wide. Caulocystidia not seen. Clamp connection present at some septa in pileipellis, lamellae, and stipitipellis.
Habitat and phenology. Scattered or gregarious on the ground in Fagus and Pinus mixed forest.
Additional specimens examined. China, Yunnan Province. Qujing City, Zhanyi County, elev. 2015 m, 29 July 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021072923 (HKAS 123296); ibid., elev. 2011 m, 30 July 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021073020 (HKAS 123297); ibid., elev. 2035 m, 30 July 2021, C.C. Ao, A2021073005 (HKAS 123235); Zhaotong City, elev. 2180 m, 23 July 2021, S.M. Tang, 2021072306 (HKAS 123285).
Notes: In our phylogenetic analysis, L. stipalba is close to L. salmonicolor and L. versiformis. However, L. salmonicolor has a reddish-brown to pale brown-buff pileus, shorter spines (1–3 μm), larger basidia (39–52 × 12–14 μm), and absent pileocystidia [17]. Laccaria versiformis has a pale brown to pale orange buff pileus and stipe, relatively larger basidiospores (7.5–10 × 7.5–9.5 μm), and basidia (41–55 × 10–14 μm) [21].
In the field, L. stipalba is easily confused with L. alba Zhu L. Yang and Lan Wang and L. pseudoalba S.M Tang and S.H. Li due to their similar orange-white to whitish basidiomata. However, L. alba has a relatively thicker pileipellis (30–75 μm), shorter sterigmata (1.5–2 μm), absent pleurocystidia, narrower cheilocystidia (4–6 μm), and clavate, hyaline caulocystidia [16]. Laccaria pseudoalba, originally reported from Thailand, has a stipe surface that is pale to pastel red; the ITS sequence difference between L. pseudoalba (MFLU 22-0106, holotype) and L. stipalba (HKAS 123300, holotype) is 6.38% (41/643, no gaps) [11].
Figure 14. Characteristics of basidiospore ornamentations under scanning electron microscope (SEM). (a,b) Laccaria brownii; (c,d) Laccaria orangei; (e,f) Laccaria ruber; and (g,h) Laccaria stipalba.
Figure 14. Characteristics of basidiospore ornamentations under scanning electron microscope (SEM). (a,b) Laccaria brownii; (c,d) Laccaria orangei; (e,f) Laccaria ruber; and (g,h) Laccaria stipalba.
Jof 11 00189 g014

4. Discussion

The taxonomic knowledge of Laccaria species in China, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions, is still nascent and requires further exploration. Historically, many Chinese specimens of Laccaria were misidentified as L. amethystea (Bull.) Murrill, L. bicolor, L. laccata (Scop.) Cooke and L. vinaceoavellanea based solely on morphological characteristics [11]. However, advancements in phylogenetic studies have enhanced our understanding of certain species within China, and the discovery of new species in Laccaria is rising [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Molecular data have been instrumental in the identification of species in this genus, which has led to a better appreciation of their diversity. Despite these advancements, the distribution and accurate identification of species such as L. amethystea, L. bicolor, and L. laccata in China necessitate further investigation. We will continue to collect specimens of the Laccaria from the Asian region and add species to the phylogeny of the Laccaria; the aim is to study the species diversity of Laccaria in Asia and to establish a phylogenetic framework for the genus, laying the groundwork for subsequent species research within Laccaria.
In our study, we found that several morphological features (see Table 2) of Laccaria species are important for species identification. These features include the pileipellis, stipitipellis, basidia, number, and length of sterigmata, basidiospore size, and surface ornamentation, as well as the size and shape characteristics of the cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia.
Some previous studies have described cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia in Laccaria species as non-existent; we speculate that some of these structures in Laccaria species may have been misidentified as terminal hyphae. This issue will be a focus of our future work, as the size and shape of the cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia are important for identified species of Laccaria. Most researchers have widely accepted the description of the narrowly clavate to subclavate structures on the hymenial surface as cystidia [16,17,18,19,20,21,30,49,51,52], rather than as terminal hyphae.
Recently, with the application of molecular systematics, the species of Laccaria in Asia have been updated [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Morphological examination and phylogenetic analyses identified 45 (see Table 2) species of Laccaria in Asia (including those introduced in this paper); these species are described from China (60%, 27/45), South Korea (26.7%, 12/45), Japan (15.6%, 7/45), India (15.6%, 7/45), and Thailand (3/45). While numerous Laccaria species have been documented in China, most of these reports originate from southwestern China.
Most basidiomata of larger Laccaria species, such as L. yunnanensis, L. moshuijun, and L. fengkaiensis, are highly valued for their culinary properties in Asia. They can be mixed with chili peppers, garlic, and chives for a stir-fry, creating an exceptional and delicious edible mushroom dish (Figure 15). These mushrooms are not only appreciated for their unique flavors but also their potential health benefits. In the subtropical broad-leaved forests of southern China, where these species are commonly found, they play a significant role in local gastronomy. Collecting these mushrooms is often a seasonal activity, reflecting the biodiversity and culinary traditions of the region [11].
The relationship between fungi, plants, and insects has always attracted the attention of researchers [55]. This fungus is often found in symbiotic relationships with plants, where it can enhance plant growth and resistance to pathogens. In a unique ecological interaction, the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor has been shown to transfer nitrogen directly from soil-dwelling springtails (collembola) to white pine trees (Pinus strobus) [55,56,57]. This nitrogen transfer occurs specifically in white pine, as L. bicolor primarily associates with the roots of pine and spruce species in temperate forests. This process highlights the intricate symbiotic relationships between fungi, insects, and plants, where the fungus acts as a mediator to enhance nutrient acquisition for its host plant.
From an evolutionary perspective, Laccaria is known to form symbiotic relationships with a wide range of plant hosts. Initially, Laccaria species likely established symbiotic associations with angiosperms [2], which are characterized by their broad diversity and ecological dominance. Over time, these fungi expanded their host range to include both gymnosperms and angiosperms, reflecting an adaptive strategy to thrive in diverse environments. This evolutionary shift allowed Laccaria species to colonize a broader range of plant hosts, enhancing their ecological resilience and nutrient cycling capabilities [58]. For example, Laccaria bicolor has been shown to form ectomycorrhizal associations with various tree species, including Pinus (pine) and Fagus (beech), demonstrating the ability of these fungi to interact with both gymnosperms and angiosperms [59]. The ability to form symbiotic relationships with multiple plant species simultaneously further supports the idea that Laccaria have evolved to maximize their ecological fitness by adapting to different host environments. Further research is needed to confirm these associations and explore the specific mechanisms and benefits involved.

Author Contributions

Methodology, Z.-L.L., S.-M.T. and F.-M.Y.; formal analysis, S.-M.T. and G.Z.; investigation, K.-Y.N., R.-Y.L. and G.Z.; resources, R.-Y.L., G.Z. and K.-Y.N.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-M.T.; writing—review and editing, S.-M.T., S.C.K., L.L., K.D.H., F.-M.Y., X.-J.S. and Z.-L.L.; funding acquisition, Z.-L.L. and X.-J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the High-Level Talents Program of Yunnan Province (YNQR-QNRC 2020-113) and Yunnan Provincial Department of Education Scientific research funded project (2025J0815). S.C.K. thanks the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32260004), the Yunnan Revitalization Talents Support Plan (High-End Foreign Experts Program), and the Key Laboratory of Yunnan Provincial Department of Education of the Deep-Time Evolution on Biodiversity from the Origin of the Pearl River. K.D.H. was funded by the Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program (DSFP), King Saud University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in Species Diversity of Edible MushroomsⅠ–Four New Laccaria Species from Yunnan Province, China at 10.6084/m9.figshare.28022549.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hyde, K.D.; Noorabadi, M.T.; Thiyagaraja, V.; He, M.Q.; Johnston, P.R.; Wijesinghe, S.N.; Armand, A.; Biketova, A.Y.; Chethana, K.W.T.; Erdoğdu, M.; et al. The 2024 Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 2024, 15, 5146–6239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wilson, A.W.; Hosaka, K.; Mueller, G.M. Evolution of ectomycorrhizas as a driver of diversification and biogeographic patterns in the model mycorrhizal mushroom genus Laccaria. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 1862–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Niego, A.G.T.; Rapior, S.; Thongklang, N.; Olivier, R.; Hyde, K.D.; Peter, M. Reviewing the contributions of macrofungi to forest ecosystem processes and services. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2023, 44, 100294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Niego, A.G.T.; Lambert, C.; Mortimer, P.; Thongklang, N.; Sylvie, R.; Miriam, G.; Hedda, S.; Esteban, C.G.; Arttapon, W.; Hyde, K.D. The contribution of fungi to the global economy. Fungal Diver. 2023, 121, 95–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wu, F.; Zhou, L.W.; Yang, Z.L.; Bau, T.; Li, T.H.; Dai, Y.C. Resource diversity of Chinese macrofungi: Edible, medicinal and poisonous species. Fungal Diver. 2019, 98, 1–76. [Google Scholar]
  6. Singer, R. The Agaricales in Modern Taxonomy, 4th ed.; Koeltz Scientific Books: Koenigstein, Germany, 1986; 981p. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mueller, G.M. Systematics of Laccaria (Agaricales) in the Continental United States and Canada, with Discussions on Extralimital Taxa and Descriptions of Extant Types; Field Museum of Natural History: Chicago, IL, USA, 1992; 158p. [Google Scholar]
  8. Latha, K.D.; Raj, K.A.; Manimohan, P. Laccaria violaceotincta: A new species from tropical India based on morphology and molecular phylogeny. Phytotaxa 2019, 392, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kropp, B.R.; Mueller, G.M. Laccaria. In Ectomycorrhizal Fungi Key Genera in Profile; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999; pp. 65–88. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ramos, A.; Bandala, V.M.; Montoya, L. A new species and a new record of Laccaria (Fungi, Basidiomycota) found in a relict forest of the endangered Fagus grandifolia var. mexicana. MycoKeys 2017, 27, 77–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhang, M.; Gao, X.L.; Mu, L.Q.; Deng, W.Q. Morphology and molecular phylogeny reveal five new species of Laccaria (Hydnangiaceae, Agaricales) from Southern China. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tang, S.M.; Vadthanarat, S.; Raghoonundon, B.; Luo, Z.L.; Zhu, X.Y.; Yu, F.M.; He, J.; Li, S.H. New species and new records of Laccaria (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) from Northern Thailand. MycoKeys 2024, 107, 189–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Orton, P.D. New check list of British Agarics and Boleti, part III (keys to Crepidotus, Deconica, Flocculina, Hygrophorus, Naucoria, Plutes and Volvaria). Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1960, 43, 159–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. McNabb, R.F.R. The Tricholomataceae of New Zealand 1. Laccaria Berk. Br. N. Z. J. Bot. 1972, 10, 461–484. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mueller, G.M. New North American species of Laccaria (Agaricales). Mycotaxon 1984, 20, 101–116. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, L.; Yang, Z.L.; Liu, J.H. Two new species of Laccaria (Basidiomycetes) from China. Nova Hedwig. 2004, 79, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wilson, A.W.; Hosaka, K.; Perry, B.A.; Mueller, G.M. Laccaria (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) from Tibet (Xizang Autonomous Region, China). Mycoscience 2013, 54, 406–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Popa, F.; Rexer, K.H.; Donges, K.; Yang, Z.L.; Kost, G. Three new Laccaria species from Southwest (Yunnan). Mycol. Prog. 2014, 13, 998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Popa, F.; Jimenéz, S.Y.C.; Weisenborn, J.; Donges, K.; Rexer, K.H.; Piepenbring, M. A new Laccaria species from cloud forest of Fortuna, Panama. Mycol. Prog. 2016, 15, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Luo, X.; Ye, L.; Chen, J.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Xu, J.; Hyde, K.D.; Mortimer, P.E. Laccaria rubroalba sp. nov. (Hydnangiaceae, Agaricales) from Southwestern China. Phytotaxa 2016, 284, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cho, H.J.; Park, M.S.; Lee, H.; Oh, S.Y.; Wilson, A.W.; Mueller, G.M.; Lim, Y.W. A systematic revision of the ectomycorrhizal genus Laccaria from Korea. Mycologia 2018, 110, 948–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, F. Two new species of Laccaria from South China, with a note on Hodophilus glaberipes. Mycol. Prog. 2020, 19, 525–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cullings, K.; DeSimone, J. Rapid response by the ectomycorrhizal (ECM) community of a lodgepole Pine forest to diesel application as indicated by laccase gene fragment diversity. Biorem. Biodegrad. 2014, 5, 235. [Google Scholar]
  24. Quan, L.; Shi, L.; Zhang, S.; Yao, Q.; Yang, Q.; Zhu, Y.W.; Liu, Y.L.; Lian, C.L.; Chen, Y.H.; Shen, Z.G.; et al. Ectomycorrhizal fungi, two species of Laccaria, differentially block the migration and accumulation of cadmium and copper in Pinus densiflora. Chemosphere 2023, 334, 138857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bon, M. Tricholomataceae de France et d’Europe occidentale-6-Tribu Clitocybeae Fayod. Clé monographique des genres Clitocybe, Lepista, Ripartites, Laccaria. Doc. Mycol. 1983, 13, 1–53. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pázmány, D. Zur Systematik der Gattung Laccaria Bk. et Br. Z. Für Mykol. 1994, 60, 5–12. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mueller, G.M. Laccaria laccata complex in North America and Sweden: Intercollection pairing and morphometric analyses. Mycologia 1991, 83, 578–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Osmundson, T.W.; Cripps, C.L.; Mueller, G.M. Morphological and molecular systematics of Rocky Mountain alpine Laccaria. Mycologia 2005, 97, 949–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stadler, M.; Sterner, O. Production of bioactive secondary metabolites in the fruit bodies of macrofungi as a response to injury. Phytochemistry 1998, 49, 1013–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, K.; Chen, S.L.; Dai, Y.C.; Jia, Z.F.; Li, T.H.; Liu, T.Z.; Phurbu, D.; Mamut, R.; Sun, G.Y.; Bau, T.; et al. Overview of China’s nomenclature novelties of fungi in the new century (2000–2020). Mycosystema 2021, 40, 822–833. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hu, Y.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Li, H.; Galappaththi, M.C.; Zhao, C.L.; Kakumyan, P.; Mortimer, P.E. The impact of drying temperature on basidiospore size. Diversity 2022, 14, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rathnayaka, A.R.; Tennakoon, D.S.; Jones, G.E.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Bhat, D.J.; Priyashantha, A.H.; Stephenson, S.L.; Tibpromma, S.; Karunarathna, S.C. Significance of precise documentation of hosts and geospatial data of fungal collections, with an emphasis on plant-associated fungi. N. Z. J. Bot. 2024, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tang, S.M.; He, M.Q.; Raspe, O.; Luo, X.; Zhang, X.L.; Li, Y.J.; Li, S.H.; Hyde, K.D. Two new species of Termitomyces (Agaricales, Lyophyllaceae) from China and Thailand. Phytotaxa 2020, 439, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tang, S.M.; Lv, T.; He, J.; Yu, F.M.; Luo, H.M.; Li, S.H. Hodophilus pseudoglabripes (Clavariaceae, Agaricales), a new species from Thailand. Phytotaxa 2023, 597, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tang, S.M.; Wisitrassameewong, K.; Yu, F.M.; Ye, L.; Gao, L.; Xia, L. Lactarius pseudoaurantiozonatus (Russulales), A new Species of Lactarius subgenus Lactarius from China. Chiang Mai J. Sci. 2022, 49, 1307–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. White, T.J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990; Volume 18, pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  37. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, Y.J.; Whelen, S.; Hall, B.D. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: Evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16, 1799–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rehner, S.A.; Buckley, E. A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-α sequences: Evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 2005, 97, 84–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nilsson, R.H.; Ryberg, M.; Kristiansson, E.; Abarenkov, K.; Larsson, K.H.; Kõljalg, U. Taxonomic reliability of DNA sequences in public sequence databases: A fungal perspective. PLoS ONE 2006, 1, e59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Hall, T. BioEdit v7. 2007. Available online: http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/BioEdit.html (accessed on 10 October 2020).
  42. Salvador, C.G.; José, M.S.M.; Toni, G. trimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1972–1973. [Google Scholar]
  43. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Miller, M.A.; Pfeiffer, W.; Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, LA, USA, 14 November 2010. [Google Scholar]
  45. Nylander, J.A.A. MrModeltest, Version 2.2; Department of Systematic Zoology, Uppsala University: Uppsala, Sweden, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J.; Teslenko, M. MrBayes Version 3.2 Manual: Tutorials and Model Summaries. 2011. Available online: http://brahms.biology.rochester.edu/software.html (accessed on 10 October 2020).
  47. Imai, S. Studies on the Agaricaceae of Hokkaido. J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Imp. Univ. 1938, 43, 1–378. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang, K.; Liu, D.M.; Li, G.J.; Liu, T.Z.; Xie, M.L.; Du, Z.; Wei, T.Z. Taxonomy of Laccaria in China based on the specimens collected in the HMAS. J. Fungal Res. 2023, 20, 271–284. [Google Scholar]
  49. Cui, Y.Y.; Cai, Q.; Li, J.; Yang, Z.L. Two new Laccaria species from China based on molecular and morphological evidence. Mycol. Prog. 2021, 20, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, X.H.; Kanad, D.; Ishika, B.; Chen, Y.H.; Bhatt, R.P.; Ghosh, A.; Hembrom, M.E.; Hofstetter, V.; Parihar, A.; Vizzini, A.; et al. Fungal biodiversity profiles 81–90. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2019, 40, 57–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, J.; Che, N.J.; Cui, Y.Y. Three new species of Laccaria (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) from Southwest China (Yunnan) based on morphological and multi-gene sequence data. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1411488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cho, H.J.; Lee, H.; Park, M.S.; Park, K.H.; Park, J.H.; Cho, Y.; Kim, C.; Lim, Y.W. Two new species of Laccaria (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) from Korea. Mycobiology 2020, 48, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, S.F.; Gui, Y.; Zhu, G.S.; Shang, N.J.; Li, B.; Yang, T.J.; Gong, G.L.; Huang, W.B.; Liu, Z.B. Laccaria guizhouensis sp. nov. (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) from Southwest China. N. Z. J. Bot. 2024, 62, 138–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mueller, G.M.; Vellinga, E.C. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on Laccaria, B. & Br. Laccaria amethystea, L. fraterna, L. laccata, L. pumila, and their synonyms. Pers. Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 1986, 13, 27–43. [Google Scholar]
  55. Behie, S.W.; Zelisko, P.M.; Bidochka, M.J. Endophytic insect-parasitic fungi translocate nitrogen directly from insects to plants. Science 2012, 336, 1576–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Klironomos, J.N.; Hart, M.M. Animal nitrogen swap for plant carbon. Nature 2001, 410, 651–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Richter, D.L.; Bruhn, J.N. Mycorrhizal fungus colonization of Pinus resinosa Ait. transplanted on northern hardwood clearcuts. Soil Bio. Biochem. 1993, 25, 355–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ángeles-Argáiz, R.E.; Cruz-Gutiérrez, R.; Medel-Ortiz, R.; Pérez-Moreno, J.; Velázquez-López, O.E.; Mata, G. Recognizing symbiotic compatibility between Laccaria trichodermophora and Pinus teocote. Symbiosis 2024, 94, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, K.; Chen, X.; Shi, X.; Yang, Z.; Yang, L.; Liu, D.; Yu, F. Endophytic bacterial community, core taxa, and functional variations within the fruiting bodies of Laccaria. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood phylogeny of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2, LSU, rpb2, and tef1-α sequence data of Laccaria. ML bootstrap (≥70%) and posterior probabilities (≥0.90) are indicated above branches or in front of the branch leading to each node. The new species are highlighted in red; the holotype of each species is in bold.
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood phylogeny of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2, LSU, rpb2, and tef1-α sequence data of Laccaria. ML bootstrap (≥70%) and posterior probabilities (≥0.90) are indicated above branches or in front of the branch leading to each node. The new species are highlighted in red; the holotype of each species is in bold.
Jof 11 00189 g001aJof 11 00189 g001b
Figure 2. Fresh basidiomata of Laccaria brownii ((a,b) holotype, HKAS 123286, (ce) HKAS 1234243, and (f,g) HKAS 144548). Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 2. Fresh basidiomata of Laccaria brownii ((a,b) holotype, HKAS 123286, (ce) HKAS 1234243, and (f,g) HKAS 144548). Scale bars = 1 cm.
Jof 11 00189 g002
Figure 3. Laccaria brownii (holotype, HKAS 123286). (a) basidia; (b) basidiospores; (c) cheilocystidia; and (d) pleurocystidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 3. Laccaria brownii (holotype, HKAS 123286). (a) basidia; (b) basidiospores; (c) cheilocystidia; and (d) pleurocystidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Jof 11 00189 g003
Figure 4. Laccaria brownii (holotype, HKAS 12328). (a) pileipellis; (b) stipitipellis. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 4. Laccaria brownii (holotype, HKAS 12328). (a) pileipellis; (b) stipitipellis. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Jof 11 00189 g004
Figure 5. Fresh basidiomata of Laccaria orangei ((a,b) holotype, HKAS 123244), ((cf) HKAS 123246). Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 5. Fresh basidiomata of Laccaria orangei ((a,b) holotype, HKAS 123244), ((cf) HKAS 123246). Scale bars = 1 cm.
Jof 11 00189 g005
Figure 6. Laccaria orangei (holotype, HKAS 123244). (a) basidiospores; (b) basidia; (c) pleurocystidia; and (d,e) cheilocystidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 6. Laccaria orangei (holotype, HKAS 123244). (a) basidiospores; (b) basidia; (c) pleurocystidia; and (d,e) cheilocystidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Jof 11 00189 g006
Figure 7. Laccaria orangei (holotype, HKAS 123244). (a) pileipellis; (b) stipitipellis. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 7. Laccaria orangei (holotype, HKAS 123244). (a) pileipellis; (b) stipitipellis. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Jof 11 00189 g007
Figure 8. Fresh basidiomata of Laccaria ruber ((a,b) holotype, HKAS 123291, (c,d) HKAS 123292, (e,f) HKAS 123294). Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 8. Fresh basidiomata of Laccaria ruber ((a,b) holotype, HKAS 123291, (c,d) HKAS 123292, (e,f) HKAS 123294). Scale bars = 1 cm.
Jof 11 00189 g008
Figure 9. Laccaria ruber (holotype, HKAS 123291). (a) basidia; (b) basidiospores; (c) pleurocystidia; and (d) cheilocystidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 9. Laccaria ruber (holotype, HKAS 123291). (a) basidia; (b) basidiospores; (c) pleurocystidia; and (d) cheilocystidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Jof 11 00189 g009
Figure 10. Laccaria ruber (holotype, HKAS 123291). (a) pileipellis; (b) stipitipellis. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 10. Laccaria ruber (holotype, HKAS 123291). (a) pileipellis; (b) stipitipellis. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Jof 11 00189 g010
Figure 11. Fresh basidiomata of Laccaria stipalba ((a,b) holotype, HKAS 123300, (c,d) HKAS 123285, and (e,f) HKAS 123296). Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 11. Fresh basidiomata of Laccaria stipalba ((a,b) holotype, HKAS 123300, (c,d) HKAS 123285, and (e,f) HKAS 123296). Scale bars = 1 cm.
Jof 11 00189 g011
Figure 12. Laccaria stipalba (HKAS 123300, holotype). (a) basidia; (b) hymenium; (c) basidiospores; (d) pleurocystidia; and (e) cheilocystidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 12. Laccaria stipalba (HKAS 123300, holotype). (a) basidia; (b) hymenium; (c) basidiospores; (d) pleurocystidia; and (e) cheilocystidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Jof 11 00189 g012
Figure 13. Laccaria stipalba (HKAS 123300, holotype). (a) pileipellis; (b) stipitipellis. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 13. Laccaria stipalba (HKAS 123300, holotype). (a) pileipellis; (b) stipitipellis. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Jof 11 00189 g013
Figure 15. Laccaria fengkaiensis ((a) Growing in the wild; (b) as food after cooking).
Figure 15. Laccaria fengkaiensis ((a) Growing in the wild; (b) as food after cooking).
Jof 11 00189 g015
Table 1. Names, sample numbers, and corresponding GenBank accession numbers of ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tef1-α sequences of the Laccaria taxa were newly generated in this study. “*” following a species name indicates that the specimen is the holotype. All specimen locations are in the Lancang-Mekong River Basin (Yunnan).
Table 1. Names, sample numbers, and corresponding GenBank accession numbers of ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tef1-α sequences of the Laccaria taxa were newly generated in this study. “*” following a species name indicates that the specimen is the holotype. All specimen locations are in the Lancang-Mekong River Basin (Yunnan).
Species NameSample No.GenBank Accession
ITSLSUrpb2tef1-α
Laccaria browniiHKAS 123286 *PQ651574PQ721003PQ753337PQ753351
L. browniiHKAS 123243PQ651575PQ721004PQ753338PQ753352
L. browniiHKAS 144548PQ651576PQ721005PQ753339PQ753353
L. browniiHKAS 144549PQ651577PQ721006PQ753340PQ753354
L. browniiHKAS 144550PQ651578PQ721007PQ753341PQ753355
L. orangeiHKAS 123244 *PQ651572PQ720997PQ753335PQ753349
L. orangeiHKAS 123246PQ651573PQ720998PQ753336PQ753350
L. ruberHKAS 123291 *PQ651570PQ776317PQ753333PQ753347
L. ruberHKAS 123292PQ651571PQ776318PQ753334PQ753348
L. stipalbaHKAS 123300 *PQ651565PQ753313PQ753328PQ753342
L. stipalbaHKAS 123285PQ651566PQ753314PQ753329PQ753343
L. stipalbaHKAS 123297PQ651567PQ753315PQ753330PQ753344
L. stipalbaHKAS 123296PQ651568PQ753316PQ753331PQ753345
L. stipalbaHKAS 123235PQ651569PQ753317PQ753332PQ753346
Table 2. The main morphological features and geographical distribution of known Asian Laccaria species. The newly added species in this study are in bold.
Table 2. The main morphological features and geographical distribution of known Asian Laccaria species. The newly added species in this study are in bold.
SpeciesCap SizeCap ColorBasidiospores SizeCheilocystidia SizePleurocystidia SizeDistributionReferences
Laccaria acanthospora4–15 mmOrange7.0–10.0 × 7.0–10.0 μmN/AN/AChina[17]
L. angustilamella20–30 mm Pinkish flesh-colored to buff8.5–11.5 × 8.0–11.0 μm11–66 × 3–7 μmAbsentChina [16]
L. alba10–35 mm Pinkish to pale flesh7.0–9.5 × 7.0–9.0 μm20–48 × 4–6 μmAbsentChina; South Korea; Japan[16,21]
L. araneosa10–18 mmOrange brown or light brown8.0–9.0 × 7.4–9.0 μmAbsentAbsentJapan; South Korea[21]
L. aurantia35–40 mmOrange9.0–10.0 × 8.0–10.0 μm25–40 × 5–10 μm25–40 × 5–10 μmChina; Japan[18]
L. bicolor15–60 mmPinkish flesh to reddish brown6.5–8.0 × 6.0–7.5 μm24–54 × 2–8 μmN/AChina; South Korea[17,21]
L. bullipellis22 mmBrown to orange brown6.0–9.0 × 6.0–10.0 μmN/A50–62 × 6–29 μmChina[17]
L. brownii15–27 mmDark at center, slightly desaturated orange6.5–8.4× 6.1–7.7 μm13–20 × 3–7 μm12–18 × 2–6 μmChinaThis study
L. cinnabarina10–90 mmDark brown to orange red7.0–9.5 × 7.0–9.0 μmAbsentAbsentChina[51]
L. fagacicola20–45 mmOrange brown or brown7.0–9.0 × 6.5–8.0 μm15–50 × 3–8 μmAbsentChina[49]
L. fengkaiensis50–90 mmOrange white, pale white when young; light orange, pale red to pastel red with age5.2–6.3 × 5.1–6.3 μmAbsentAbsentChina[22]
L. fulvogrisea<30 mmGrey to reddish brown8.0–10.0 × 8.0–11.0 μm30–50 × 3–7 μm30–50 × 3–7 μmChina[18]
L. griseolilacina20–35 mmLight grayish to orange brown8.0–10.8 × 8.2–10.9 μmAbsent20–31 × 4–8 μmSouth Korea[52]
L. guizhouensis15–63 mmFlesh-colored to brownish white to brown7–8 × 6–8 μm20–35 × 3–6 μm27–46 × 3–7 μmChina[53]
L. himalayensis6–34 mmBrown to orange pink6.5–10.0 × 6.5–10.0 μmN/AN/AChina[17]
L. indohimalayana40–95 mmBrownish orange to light orange 6.9–8.3 × 6.6–8.1 μm19–29 × 4–6 μm15–39 × 3–5 μmIndia[50]
L. japonica10–30 mmBright violet to purple, pale tan to flesh color9.0–10.0 × 7.0–9.0 μm30–50 × 3–7 μm30–50 × 3–7 μmJapan; South Korea; China[21]
L. longistriata5–45 mmBrownish to brown at the center, cream, flesh-colored to brownish toward the margin6.5–8.0 × 6.0–8.0 μmAbsent30–60 × 4–8 μmChina[51]
L. laccata10–52 mmGrayish purple to buff7.5–9.5 × 7.5–9.5 μm34–86 × 2–12 μmAbsentIndia[54]
L. macrobasidia15–45 mmOrange brown to light brown8.7–11.4 × 7.9–10.3 μmAbsent19–27 × 4–7 μmSouth Korea[52]
L. moshuijun30 mmViolet to bluish8.0–9.0 × 9.0–10.0 μm30–50 × 5–8 μm30–50 × 3–6 μmChina[44]
L. montana7–35 mmReddish orange to brown8.5–13.0 × 8.0–10.5 μmN/AN/AIndia[45]
L. murina45 mmDark reddish brown to reddish orange brown13.5–17.0 × 7.5–9.5 μmN/AN/AJapan; South Korea; India[21,45]
L. nanlingensis30–55 mmBrownish orange to brownish red6.5–7.5 × 6–7 µm40–60 × 4–6 µmAbsentChina[10]
L. negrimarginata5–15 mmOrange brown to buff, blackish brown to dark brown7.0–10.0 × 6.0–10.0 μmN/AN/AChina[17]
L. neovinaceoavellanea15–40 mmPurplish pink to pale violet7.0–8.0 × 7.0–8.0 μm25–50 × 4–8 μmAbsentChina[10]
L. nobilis20–50 mmPale pinkish orange to dark orange5.4–9.5 × 5.0–7.8 μm29–44 × 1–4 μmN/AChina[46]
L. olivaceogrisea9–32 mmGrey 7.5–9.0 × 8.0–9.0 μmAbsentAbsentIndia[18]
L. orangei18–32 mmSoft orange5.8–8.0 × 5.5–7.3 μm20–49 × 4–5 μm15–30 × 5–7 μmChinaThis study
L. pallidorosea10–25 mmBrown to pink at center, becoming cream to white7.0–9.0 × 6.5–8.5 μm25–40 × 3–8 μmAbsentChina[49]
L. parva5–25 mmBright brown8.0–10.0 × 8.5–10.0 μm19–40 × 4–6 μm25–33 × 4–6 μmJapan; South Korea; China[21]
L. prava35–75 mmPastel red, pale red to reddish white6.5–7.5 × 7.0–8.0 μmAbsentAbsentChina[22]
L. pseudoalba9–15 mmPale orange to orange white6.9–11.3 × 6–10.4 μm20–31 × 6–9 μm15–31 × 6–8 μmThailand[11]
L. pumila10–35 mm Orange brown to fading lighter11.5–13.0 × 10–11.5 μmN/AN/AIndia[43]
L. rubroalba22–40 mmReddish white6.0–9.0 × 5.0–7.0 μm12–26 × 5–9 μm25–40 × 4–6 μmChina[20]
L. ruber18–24 mmSoft orange7.2–10.3 × 7.3–9.4 μm14–35 × 4–7 μm18–48 × 3–5 μmChinaThis study
L. rufobrunnea12–35 mmBrownish orange to brownish red8–9 × 7–8 µm35–50 × 3–7 μmAbsentChina[10]
L. salmonicolor10–35 mm Reddish brown7.5–10.0 × 7.5–10.0 μmN/AN/AChina[17]
L. spinulosa8–25 mmBrownish orange to brown9–11.0 × 9–10.5 μmAbsentAbsentChina[51]
L. stipalba18–42 mmLight grayish pink5.8–8.4 × 5.5–8.1 μm20–30 × 4–7 μm12–26 × 2–7 μmChinaThis study
L. subroseoalbescens2–8 mmPale yellow to light yellow7.0–8.9 × 6.8–9.0 μm23–37 × 4–8 μm36–59 × 5–8 μmThailand[11]
L. torosa10–70 mmOrange brown or brown8.0–9.0 × 8.0–9.5 μm54–94 × 5–9 μm55–75 × 7–13 μmSouth Korea[21]
L. tortilis<30 mmOrange brown to pinkish fleshN/AN/AN/ASouth Korea[21]
L. umbilicata10–28 mmPale yellow, pale orange to light orange8–10 × 8–10 µm30–47 × 3–8 µmAbsentChina[10]
L. versiformis10–35 mm Pale brown to brown7.5–8.2 × 7.5–9.5 μm42–54 × 6–8 μm42–65 × 7–9 μmSouth Korea[21]
L. vinaceoavellaneaN/ABrownish vinaceous7.4–9.2 × 7.4–9.2 μmAbsentN/AJapan; South Korea[11,21]
L. violaceotincta4–38 mmDark brown at the center, reddish brown towards the margin when young7.0–8.0 × 7.0–8.0 μm19–104 × 4–10 μmAbsentIndia[8]
L. yunnanensis60–100 mmBrown to flesh-colored8.0–9.0 × 8.0–10.0 μm30–50 × 4–6 μm55–65 × 15–25 μmChina; Thailand[11,18]
Annotation: “N/A” refers to not mentioned in the original description.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, S.-M.; Zhao, G.; Niu, K.-Y.; Li, R.-Y.; Yu, F.-M.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Li, L.; Hyde, K.D.; Su, X.-J.; Luo, Z.-L. Species Diversity of Edible Mushrooms I—Four New Laccaria Species from Yunnan Province, China. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11030189

AMA Style

Tang S-M, Zhao G, Niu K-Y, Li R-Y, Yu F-M, Karunarathna SC, Li L, Hyde KD, Su X-J, Luo Z-L. Species Diversity of Edible Mushrooms I—Four New Laccaria Species from Yunnan Province, China. Journal of Fungi. 2025; 11(3):189. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11030189

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Song-Ming, Guo Zhao, Kai-Yang Niu, Rui-Yu Li, Feng-Ming Yu, Samantha C. Karunarathna, Lin Li, Kevin D. Hyde, Xi-Jun Su, and Zong-Long Luo. 2025. "Species Diversity of Edible Mushrooms I—Four New Laccaria Species from Yunnan Province, China" Journal of Fungi 11, no. 3: 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11030189

APA Style

Tang, S.-M., Zhao, G., Niu, K.-Y., Li, R.-Y., Yu, F.-M., Karunarathna, S. C., Li, L., Hyde, K. D., Su, X.-J., & Luo, Z.-L. (2025). Species Diversity of Edible Mushrooms I—Four New Laccaria Species from Yunnan Province, China. Journal of Fungi, 11(3), 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11030189

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop